Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a motor that is suitable for cordless home appliances,
cutting tools, and drones, and is driven at high speed.
Background
[0002] Product value of apparatuses using a battery as a power supply, such as cordless
home appliances (for example, a vacuum cleaner), cutting tools, and drones, frequently
depend on their usable time and weight. It is therefore highly demanded to increase
the efficiency by reducing loss in the control system such as a motor and an inverter,
and to achieve downsizing and higher speed rotation of the motor. Motors are thus
designed to have the minimum body size and to be able to output the maximum power
at the highest efficiency depending on the usage. On the other hand, motors are required
to be driven not only at a rotational speed for the maximum output (maximum output
speed), but also under conditions of a lower output speed and a lower output. Under
such driving conditions, the iron core is excited by the magnet to a level that is
not necessarily required, which compromises the efficiency of the motor. Against this
background, to reduce the iron loss in the motor when driving under conditions other
than the maximum output, in some driving conditions, control is conducted on the motor
to intentionally weaken the excitation magnetic flux density of the iron core by current
phase advance control. This type of motor is designed to be smaller and lighter and
thus to rotate at high speed. The excitation frequency of the iron core is therefore
high such as one to several kilo-Hertz. Iron cores for specific purposes are made
of permendur and other materials. Since such materials are quite expensive, non-oriented
electrical steel sheets are widely used for iron cores.
[0003] The loss caused in the iron core is classed into the hysteresis loss and the eddy-current
loss. As is known, the eddy current loss becomes dominant with an increase in the
excitation frequency. As measures taken to reduce the eddy-current losses, for example,
the specific resistance of the steel sheet may be increased by adding a non-magnetic
element such as Si or Al, or the thickness of the sheet may be reduced. Unfortunately,
increasing the content of alloy made of non-magnetic elements reduces the value of
magnetic saturation of the steel sheet. To reduce the iron loss at high frequencies
while keeping the magnetic flux density high, Patent Literature 1 describes use of
Si gradient steel that has the concentration gradient of Si controlled in the sheet
thickness direction.
Citation List
Patent Literature
[0004] Patent Literature 1: Japanese Patent No.
4677955 Summary
Technical Problem
[0005] Use of the Si gradient steel for a material of the iron core of an electric apparatus,
having an excitation frequency of several kilo-Hertz, can reduce the eddy-current
losses; however, this method is not sufficiently effective to reduce the loss in a
motor in which the above-described current phase advance control is employed with
the intention to reduce the loss in the motor iron core. This is a critical issue
especially for a reduced-size high-speed motor that is designed to be fed with power
from the battery. For controlling the magnetic flux density of the iron core using
the current phase advance control, a large magnetizing force is necessary. In other
words, it is necessary to apply a large current to the magnet wire or to increase
the number of windings of the coil. An increase in the current increases the copper
loss, the loss in the magnet wire, which reduces the efficiency of the motor. An increase
in the number of windings of the coil increases the counter electromotive voltage
generated by a rotor magnet of the motor, which makes it more difficult to drive the
motor at high rotational speed. As described above, a motor that achieves high efficiency,
downsizing, and high speed under limited power conditions has problems to be solved,
and above all, an iron core material suitable for such a motor is yet to be found.
[0006] The present invention is made in view of the above problems. An object of the present
invention is to provide a motor capable of achieving higher efficiency, downsizing,
and higher speed by reducing the iron loss during drive at a rotational speed lower
than the maximum rotational speed.
Solution to Problem
[0007] To solve the above problems, the inventors of the present invention have conducted
earnest studies on iron core materials having electrical characteristics suitable
for high-speed motor. As a result, it has been found out that iron core materials
having not only a low iron loss but also having a sharp change in a magnetic flux
density to a change in a magnetic field is effective for achieving higher efficiency,
downsizing, and higher speed of a motor. In the present specification, "high-speed
motor" means a motor whose maximum frequency of basic component of excitation condition
of iron core, is over 1000 Hz.
[0008] To solve the problem and achieve the object, a motor according to the present invention
that is able to perform motor drive control that weakens a magnetic flux density of
an iron core during drive at a rotational speed lower than a maximum rotational speed.
The motor includes a steel sheet used as a core material of the motor, wherein the
steel sheet includes a composition including: by mass%, 0.010% or less of C; 2.0%
to 7.0% of Si; 2.0% or less of Al; 0.05% to 1.0% of Mn; 0.005% or less of S; 0.005%
or less of N; and balance Fe and inevitable impurities; the steel sheet includes a
magnetic flux density changing area where a change ΔB in magnetic flux density to
a change ΔH = 50 A/m in a magnetic field, is equal to or higher than 0.50 T; a thickness
of the steel sheet is 0.05 mm to 0.20 mm; and an eddy-current loss of the steel sheet,
at 1000 Hz - 1.0 T, is equal to or less than 0.55 of a total iron loss.
[0009] Moreover, in the motor according to the present invention, the steel sheet further
includes: by mass%, at least one element selected from 0.01% to 0.1% of P; 0.001%
to 0.1% of Sn; 0.001% to 0.1% of Sb; and 0.001% to 0.01% of Mo.
[0010] Moreover, in the motor according to the present invention, a difference between a
concentration of Si at a surface of the steel sheet and a concentration of Si at a
center portion of the steel sheet is 0.5% to 4.0%, and a saturation magnetic flux
density Bs of the steel sheet is equal to or higher than 2.0 T.
[0011] Moreover, in the motor according to the present invention, the magnetic flux density
changing area is present in an area including a magnetic flux density equal to or
higher than 1 T.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0012] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a motor capable of
achieving higher efficiency, downsizing, and higher speed by reducing the iron loss
during drive at a rotational speed lower than the maximum rotational speed.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0013]
FIG. 1 is an example graph of the magnetic flux density versus the external magnetic
field of a steel sheet.
FIG. 2 is a schematic drawing that illustrates an example configuration of a two-pole
three-phase brushless DC motor.
Description of Embodiments
[0014] Requirements of a steel sheet, used as a material of the iron core of a motor according
to the present invention, and reasons for the limitation will now be described. There
is no limitation, other than being a magnetic motor, on the type of motor according
to the present invention. In the following description, added components simply indicated
in "percentage" are actually in "percentage by mass".
C: Equal to or smaller than 0.010%
[0015] Since excessively adding carbon (C) to a steel sheet increases the hysteresis losses
in the motor, the content of C should be equal to or less than 0.010%.
Si: from 2.0% to 7.0%
[0016] Silicon (Si) is an additive element effective for reducing the eddy-current losses
in the motor by increasing the specific resistance of the steel sheet. Too much Si
added to a steel sheet, however, makes the processing into a motor iron core more
difficult and reduces the saturation magnetic flux density of the steel sheet. The
content of Si should therefore be from 2.0% to 7.0%. Since adding Si equal to or higher
than 4.0% impairs the rollability of the steel sheet, for example, Si may be added
after cold rolling using the chemical vapor siliconizing method. More specifically,
Si may be added such that the concentration difference of Si between the center layer
and the surface layer of the steel sheet is in the range from 0.5% to 4.0% and that
the saturation magnetic flux density Bs is equal to or higher than 2.0 T. This manner
is advantageous in reducing the size of the motor while reducing the eddy-current
losses.
Al: equal to or less than 2.0%, Mn: from 0.05% to 1.0%
[0017] Aluminum (Al) and manganese (Mn) are elements effective for reducing the eddy-current
losses in a motor by increasing the specific resistance of the steel sheet. Excessive
addition of Al and Mn, however, negatively affects the grain growth and increases
the hysteresis losses in the motor. The content of Al should therefore be equal to
or less than 2.0%, and the content of Mn should be in the range from 0.05% to 1.0%.
S: equal to or less than 0.005%, N: equal to or less than 0.005%, the balance being
Fe and unavoidable impurities
[0018] Excessive addition of S and N causes generation of precipitates and inhibits the
grain growth and increases the hysteresis losses in the motor. The content of each
S and N is therefore equal to or less than 0.005%, and the balance is Fe and unavoidable
impurities.
[0019] At least one of elements selected from P: from 0.01% to 0.1%, Sn: from 0.001% to
0.1%, Sb: from 0.001% to 0.1%, and Mo: from 0.001% to 0.01%
[0020] To the above composition, containing at least one of elements selected from P: from
0.01% to 0.1%, Sn: from 0.001% to 0.1%, Sb: from 0.001% to 0.1%, and Mo: from 0.001%
to 0.01% can improve the magnetic flux density of the steel sheet. It is therefore
preferable to add the selected element. However, excessive addition of whatever the
element impairs productivity and magnetic characteristics of the steel sheet.
[0021] Change ΔB in magnetic flux density to change ΔH = 50 A/m in magnetic field being
equal to or higher than 0.50 T
[0022] A steel sheet subjected to a sharp change ΔB in the magnetic flux density equal to
or higher than 0.50 T to a change ΔH = 50 A/m in the magnetic field enables easy control
of the magnetic flux density of the motor in the event of drive that is powered by
a battery and has limited conditions on the power supply (the voltage, the current,
or both of them).
[0023] For example, FIG. 1 is an example graph of the magnetic flux density B versus the
external magnetic field H of a steel sheet. In an example of the invention (a curve
L1), a change ΔB in the magnetic flux density B is equal to or higher than 0.50 T
to a change ΔH = 50 A/m in the external magnetic field H from a point A to a point
B. In a comparative example (a curve L2), there is no areas that includes a change
ΔB in the magnetic flux density B equal to or higher than 0.50 T to a change ΔH =
50 A/m in the external magnetic field H. In the example of the invention, for example,
if the excitation magnetic flux density in use of a magnet is designed to a value
around the point A, a magnetizing force of 50 A/m is necessary for a current control
to weaken the magnetic flux density of the iron core to the level of the point B.
In the comparative example, a magnetizing force of 140 A/m is necessary to weaken
the magnetic flux density of the iron core from the level of the point A to the level
of the point B. With power supply under limited conditions, however, such a strong
magnetizing force is actually unavailable. It is therefore difficult to weaken the
magnetic flux density, and the current control cannot effectively reduce the iron
loss in the motor.
[0024] The steel sheet used as a material of the iron core of a motor according to the present
invention therefore has an area having a sharp change in the magnetic flux density
where a change ΔB in magnetic flux density is equal to or higher than 0.50 T to a
change ΔH = 50A/m in the magnetic field. Furthermore, if this area having a sharp
change in the magnetic flux density is present in the area including the magnetic
flux density equal to or higher than 1 T, the magnetic flux density of the iron core
is maintained high with the above-described current control being effectively conducted.
Downsizing of the motor is therefore achieved.
Thickness of sheet: from 0.05 mm to 0.20 mm
[0025] Although reducing the thickness of a steel sheet is effective in reducing the eddy-current
losses in the motor, making the steel sheet thinner problematically increases the
manufacturing cost and the cost for producing the motor iron core. The thickness of
the steel sheet should therefore be in the range from 0.05 mm to 0.20 mm.
[0026] Eddy-current loss at 1000 Hz - 1.0 T being equal to or less than 0.55 of total iron
loss
[0027] The excitation frequency of a small high-speed motor is usually several hundreds
to 10 kHz. When the motor actually drives, the iron loss at high frequencies caused
with excitation from a PWM inverter is a more important issue. Since the eddy-current
loss is dominant at high frequencies, if the eddy-current loss at 1000 Hz- 1.0 T is
not smaller than the hysteresis loss, the loss generated in the iron core is large.
The loss reduces the efficiency of the motor, and moreover, an increase in the size
of the motor is inevitable to avoid heat generation. The eddy-current loss at 1000
Hz - 1.0 T should therefore be equal to or less than 0.55 of the total iron loss.
The eddy-current loss herein defined is calculated using, what is called, the dual-frequency
method, on the magnetic characteristics measured using a method in compliance with
JIS C 2550-1. If the motor iron core is magnetically closed, the magnetic characteristics
may be measured as a ring iron core with primary and secondary coils wound. In this
case, any of the magnetic characteristics may meet the above standards.
[0028] A steel sheet used as a material of the iron core of the motor according to the present
invention may be any desired steel sheet satisfying the above requirements. Such a
steel sheet is preferably manufactured in the following conditions.
[0029] There is no limitation on the conditions of hot rolling applied to steel slabs, and
any desired known conditions may be used. It is preferable that the temperature to
heat the slabs be under 1250°C for energy efficiency and that the thickness of a finished
hot-rolled steel sheet be equal to or smaller than 2.0 mm. If the sheet finally has
a thickness of 0.05 mm to 0.20 mm after undergoing a high rate of reduction in cold
rolling, crystal planes, which inhibit magnetization (111), are increased in the crystal
texture after recrystallization. The thickness is, however, not necessarily in the
range if the cold rolling is performed twice with intermediate annealing put therebetween.
After hot rolling, and annealing treatment if necessary, the steel sheet undergoes
cold rolling to have a thickness of 0.05 mm to 0.20 mm. The sheet then undergoes finishing
annealing that heats and retains the sheet at temperatures in the range from 900°C
to 1250°C in an oxidation atmosphere equal to or less than 0.010, given by P(H
2O) / P(H
2). The heating rate is set equal to or higher than 25°C/s in the temperature range
from 600°C to 900°C, which is beneficial in improving the crystal texture and obtaining
excellent magnetic characteristics. The heating rate is preferably equal to or higher
than 100°C/s, and is more preferably, equal to or higher than 200°C/s. Furthermore,
in the finishing annealing process, the Si concentration distribution of the steel
is controlled at temperatures higher than 1200°C using the chemical vapor siliconizing
method. With this control, more excellent magnetic characteristics are obtained. The
steel sheet used for the iron core of the motor according to the present invention
is manufactured in the above manufacturing conditions to be adjusted as appropriate.
The motor iron core is made by punching, wire cutting, and other methods. The advantageous
effects of the present invention are exerted by any method satisfying the requirements.
As is known, introducing strain into the core material by punching affects the magnetic
characteristics of the core material. It is therefore preferable to perform stress
relieving annealing if punching is employed.
Example
[0030] The steel slabs (steel marks A to F) containing the components of Table 1 were heated
to 1200°C and then formed into hot-rolled steel sheets having a thickness of 1.8 mm
through the hot rolling process. The sheet underwent annealing treatment at 1000°C
× 30 s and was finished as a sheet having a thickness of 0.05 mm to 0.20 mm through
the cold-rolling process. Finishing annealing was performed under the conditions (test
numbers 1 to 13) of Table 2. Magnetic characteristics (the maximum change ΔB(T) in
the magnetic flux density to ΔH = 50 A/m, and the rate of eddy-current loss at W
10/100) indicated in Table 2 were obtained. The magnetic characteristics were measured using
a method in accordance with JIS C 2550-1. Some cold-rolled steel sheets having passed
the cold-rolling process were subjected to siliconizing treatment in the finishing
annealing process, at 1200°C under the atmosphere of silicon tetrachloride using the
chemical vapor siliconizing method. The time period of treatment and the magnetic
characteristics are indicated in Table 3. With regards to the sheets subjected to
the siliconizing treatment, since the siliconizing treatment changes the concentration
of Si and C, values of these components after the treatment were added to the data.
Components of the steel slab and components of the steel sheet used for the iron core
were the same in other conditions.
Table 1
| |
Components (mass%) |
| Steel Mark |
C |
Si |
Al |
Mn |
S |
N |
Others |
| A |
0.002 |
2.5 |
0.002 |
0.1 |
0.002 |
0.001 |
Sn: 0.04 |
| B |
0.003 |
3.6 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
0.003 |
0.002 |
- |
| C |
0.0015 |
3.1 |
1 |
0.2 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
P: 0.07 |
| D |
0.002 |
4 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
Mo: 0.05 |
| E |
0.01 |
3.3 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
Sb: 0.005 Sn: 0.007 |
| F |
0.0025 |
2.7 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.002 |
0.001 |
- |
Table 2
| Test No. |
Steel Mark |
Thickness (mm) |
Retention Temperature (°C) at Finishing Annealing |
Maximum Change ΔB(T) in Magnetic Flux Density to ΔH = 50 (A/m) |
Rate of Eddy-current Loss at W10/1000 |
Remarks |
| 1 |
A |
0.10 |
950 |
0.53 |
0.60 |
Comparative Example |
| 2 |
A |
0.05 |
1050 |
0.61 |
0.47 |
Example |
| 3 |
B |
0.10 |
1000 |
0.63 |
0.58 |
Comparative Example |
| 4 |
B |
0.07 |
1050 |
0.64 |
0.53 |
Example |
| 5 |
C |
0.20 |
950 |
0.65 |
0.79 |
Comparative Example |
| 6 |
C |
0.10 |
1000 |
0.66 |
0.60 |
Comparative Example |
| 7 |
C |
0.05 |
1100 |
0.69 |
0.50 |
Example |
| 8 |
D |
0.15 |
1000 |
0.56 |
0.62 |
Comparative Example |
| 9 |
D |
0.10 |
1050 |
0.59 |
0.55 |
Example |
| 10 |
D |
0.05 |
1100 |
0.60 |
0.43 |
Example |
| 11 |
E |
0.10 |
1050 |
0.49 |
0.63 |
Comparative Example |
| 12 |
E |
0.05 |
1000 |
0.51 |
0.52 |
Example |
| 13 |
F |
0.10 |
1100 |
0.65 |
0.59 |
Comparative Example |
Table 3
| Test No. |
Steel Mark |
Thickness (mm) |
Time period of Siliconizing (min) |
Components after Annealing (mass %) |
Maximum Change ΔB(T) in Magnetic Flux Density to ΔH = 50 (A/m) |
Rate of Eddy-current Loss at W10/1000 |
Remarks |
| Surface Si |
Average Si |
C |
| 14 |
A |
0.20 |
16 |
6.5 |
5.2 |
0.002 |
0.31 |
0.47 |
Comparative Example |
| 15 |
A |
0.20 |
12 |
5.2 |
4.3 |
0.002 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
Example |
| 16 |
A |
0.10 |
19 |
6.5 |
5.2 |
0.001 |
0.30 |
0.41 |
Comparative Example |
| 17 |
A |
0.10 |
13 |
4.6 |
3.9 |
0.001 |
0.52 |
0.46 |
Example |
| 18 |
A |
0.10 |
11 |
4.1 |
3.6 |
0.001 |
0.59 |
0.52 |
Example |
| 19 |
B |
0.20 |
14 |
6.5 |
5.5 |
0.001 |
0.38 |
0.44 |
Comparative Example |
| 20 |
B |
0.20 |
11 |
4.5 |
4.2 |
0.002 |
0.54 |
0.52 |
Example |
| 21 |
B |
0.10 |
10 |
4.4 |
4.1 |
0.002 |
0.52 |
0.46 |
Example |
| 22 |
C |
0.10 |
15 |
5.5 |
4.7 |
0.001 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
Comparative Example |
| 23 |
C |
0.10 |
10 |
4.1 |
3.8 |
0.001 |
0.52 |
0.49 |
Example |
| 24 |
D |
0.10 |
10 |
5.2 |
4.8 |
0.001 |
0.47 |
0.43 |
Comparative Example |
| 25 |
D |
0.10 |
5 |
4.5 |
4.3 |
0.001 |
0.54 |
0.50 |
Example |
| 26 |
E |
0.15 |
12 |
5.2 |
4.6 |
0.003 |
0.48 |
0.48 |
Comparative Example |
| 27 |
E |
0.15 |
8 |
4.5 |
4.1 |
0.005 |
0.50 |
0.51 |
Example |
| 28 |
F |
0.10 |
8 |
4.1 |
3.6 |
0.001 |
0.51 |
0.48 |
Example |
| 29 |
F |
0.05 |
5 |
3.7 |
3.4 |
0.001 |
0.56 |
0.44 |
Example |
[0031] Iron cores were fabricated using the steel sheets indicated in Tables 2 and 3 to
evaluate the efficiency of the motor. The evaluated motor is a two-pole 3-phase brushless
DC motor (the drive voltage 25.2 V), the size of which is illustrated in FIG. 2. The
iron core had a thickness of lamination of 15 mm, and the laminated steel sheets were
bonded using the impregnation technique. The efficiency of the motor was evaluated
based on driving conditions A (sine wave drive having current phase advance of 30
degrees at 50000 rpm - 10 mNm), as conditions of drive at a rotational speed lower
than the maximum rotational speed, and based on driving conditions B (sine wave drive
having current phase advance of 0 degree at 85000 rpm - 25 Nm), as conditions of drive
at the maximum rotational speed. Table 4 demonstrates the results of evaluation. The
example of the present invention has an area having a sharp change in the magnetic
flux density where a change ΔB in magnetic flux density is equal to or higher than
0.50 T to a change ΔH = 50 A/m in the magnetic field and an eddy-current loss at 1000
Hz - 1.0 T is equal to or less than 0.55 of the total iron loss. As demonstrated in
Table 4, the example of the present invention achieved high motor efficiency in both
the driving conditions A and B with the average motor efficiency over 85%. The comparative
example not satisfying the above requirements had low motor efficiency in comparison
with the example of the invention, in either or both of the driving conditions A or
B with the average motor efficiency under 85%.
Table 4
| Test No. |
Driving Conditions A |
Driving Conditions B |
Motor Average Efficiency (%) |
Remarks |
| Motor Efficiency (%) |
Motor Efficiency (%) |
| 1 |
80.3 |
86.7 |
83.5 |
Comparative Example |
| 2 |
86.1 |
89.0 |
87.6 |
Example |
| 3 |
82.0 |
87.5 |
84.7 |
Comparative Example |
| 4 |
85.7 |
88.3 |
87.0 |
Example |
| 5 |
80.4 |
84.4 |
82.4 |
Comparative Example |
| 6 |
82.3 |
87.3 |
84.8 |
Comparative Example |
| 7 |
86.9 |
89.0 |
87.9 |
Example |
| 8 |
80.6 |
86.5 |
83.5 |
Comparative Example |
| 9 |
84.6 |
87.7 |
86.2 |
Example |
| 10 |
86.6 |
89.6 |
88.1 |
Example |
| 11 |
74.6 |
86.0 |
80.3 |
Comparative Example |
| 12 |
83.9 |
87.8 |
85.8 |
Example |
| 13 |
82.2 |
87.4 |
84.8 |
Comparative Example |
| 14 |
77.8 |
87.5 |
82.6 |
Comparative Example |
| 15 |
84.0 |
87.5 |
85.8 |
Example |
| 16 |
78.6 |
88.4 |
83.5 |
Comparative Example |
| 17 |
84.9 |
88.7 |
86.8 |
Example |
| 18 |
85.1 |
88.2 |
86.6 |
Example |
| 19 |
78.7 |
88.3 |
83.5 |
Comparative Example |
| 20 |
84.3 |
87.9 |
86.1 |
Example |
| 21 |
84.9 |
88.7 |
86.8 |
Example |
| 22 |
79.3 |
88.5 |
83.9 |
Comparative Example |
| 23 |
84.5 |
88.3 |
86.4 |
Example |
| 24 |
79.8 |
88.9 |
84.4 |
Comparative Example |
| 25 |
84.6 |
88.2 |
86.4 |
Example |
| 26 |
79.2 |
88.2 |
83.7 |
Comparative Example |
| 27 |
83.9 |
87.9 |
85.9 |
Example |
| 28 |
84.5 |
88.4 |
86.4 |
Example |
| 29 |
85.8 |
89.2 |
87.5 |
Example |
Industrial Applicability
[0032] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a motor capable of
achieving higher efficiency, downsizing, and higher speed by reducing the iron loss
during drive at a rotational speed lower than the maximum rotational speed.