Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a method of manufacturing a steel pipe and a press
die for use in the method of manufacturing a steel pipe.
Background
[0002] UOE forming techniques are widely used to form steel pipes. In the UOE forming techniques,
a steel plate is first press-bent into a U shape and then pressed into an O shape
to form an open pipe, which is a tubular body having a seam gap portion between plate
width ends opposed to each other in a circumferential direction. The seam gap portion
of the open pipe is butted and joined by welding to form a steel pipe, which is then
expanded such that the diameter of the steel pipe is increased. The UOE forming technique,
however, requires a high press force in the process of pressing a steel plate into
a U shape or an O shape to form an open pipe and inevitably requires the use of a
large-scale press machine.
[0003] Then, in manufacturing a steel pipe, there is a technique for forming an open pipe
with a reduced press force. For example, a press-bending process is in practical use,
in which the edge portions in the width direction of a steel plate are bent to produce
edge bent portions, and thereafter three-point press bending is performed multiple
times with a punch supported on a punch support and a die to shape the steel plate
into an approximately circular shape. The open amount of the seam gap portion of the
open pipe formed by the press bending process is larger than the width of the punch
support. If the open amount is too large, the force required for butting the plate
width ends opposed to each other and closing the seam gap portion is increased in
order to weld the seam gap portion. A larger facility is then required for closing
the seam gap portion. In addition, after the seam gap portion with an excessively
large open amount is welded, the welded portion receives a force caused by springback
to open the seam gap portion and tends to suffer a weld defect. If the force is too
large, the welded portion is broken.
[0004] Techniques for reducing the open amount of the seam gap portion of an open pipe after
press bending are disclosed in Patent Literatures 1 to 4. Patent Literature 1 discloses
a technique for reducing the open amount of the seam gap portion of an open pipe by
providing a pivotable coupling portion between the punch front end and the punch support
to reduce the width of the punch support. Patent Literature 2 discloses a technique
for reducing the open amount of the seam gap portion of an open pipe by providing
gap holding means for restricting movement of a plate material in a direction orthogonal
to the punch moving direction, and applying a large press in the final bending without
the plate width end portions coming into contact with the punch support. Patent Literature
3 discloses a technique for reducing the open amount of the seam gap portion of an
open pipe by measuring the gap between the plate width end portion and the punch support
after the final pressing-down process and minimizing the gap. Patent Literature 4
discloses a technique for reducing the open amount of the seam gap portion of an open
pipe irrespective of variation in shape produced in the press bending process, in
which the amount of pressing-down by the punch in a final step is determined based
on the point of time when the distance between the plate width ends becomes a predetermined
value at the time of pressing-down in the final bending process.
[0005] Unfortunately, the techniques disclosed in Patent Literatures 1 to 4 fail to reduce
the open amount of the seam gap portion of an open pipe to a width smaller than the
width of the punch support. Then, the techniques for reducing the open amount of the
seam gap portion by additionally processing the open pipe after press bending are
disclosed in Patent Literatures 5 to 9. Patent Literature 5 discloses a technique
of forming a pipe with a smaller load by hot-pressing a steel pipe after press bending.
Patent Literature 6 discloses a technique of pressing, in which a distortion detector
is disposed to detect a tilt or distortion of a pressing member attached to a slide,
the pressing member is disposed so as to be able to tilt or translate in response
to detection of a tilt or distortion by the distortion detector, and when the blank
material is pressed into a pipe shape, the pressing member is tilted or translated
for the amount of tilt or inclination of the pressing member so as to reduce the amount
of distortion. Patent Literature 7 discloses a technique in which a slit tube having
a non-circular preform is formed by shaping slightly, compared to other bending steps,
in at least one bending step acting on the inner face of a plate material on the right
and left sides with respect to the center defined by the longitudinal axis line of
an upper-side tool going into the plate material progressively shaped, and the slit
tube is then completed by properly in each case adding a pressing force acting on
the areas previously shaped slightly at both sides of the center to the noncircular
preform from outside. Patent Literature 8 discloses a technique in which, in a blank
having a flat portion between portions bent into at least two pipe curvatures, plastic
deformation is applied to at least one flat portion into a predetermined curvature
to form a pipe with a closed slit portion. Patent Literature 9 discloses a method
of forming a pipe with a closed slit portion. The method includes providing a lightly
bent portion with a curvature slighter than other regions or providing a non-bent
portion in which bending is omitted, to form a preformed body, and applying a bending
force without constraining the lightly bent portion or the non-bent portion, in pressing
the preformed body into an open pipe. In applying the bending force, it is recommended
that the preformed body is held in a die in a U-shaped posture with its opening portion
facing upward, and is supported at its lowermost end.
[0006] Patent Literatures 10 and 11 disclose a method of manufacturing a UOE pipe having
a product diameter in which the outer diameter of the product pipe is different from
the diameter of an inner surface of an O-press die. The die disclosed in Patent Literature
10 is shaped such that only a part of the ellipse shape of the inner surface of the
upper/lower die is notched. In FIG. 3(a) and FIG. 4(a) of Patent Literature 10 illustrating
the effect of the die, an O pipe is in contact with the entire inner surface of the
O-press die. Patent Literature 11 discloses a method using a die that has an inner
surface having an arc with a radius larger than a product outer diameter and has an
end surface ground in advance to provide a sufficiently large gap. After a material
is fitted in the die and then subjected to predetermined compressing, the formed pipe
is rotated by about 90 [°] and O-pressing is performed again to form a circular shape.
In the first O-pressing step, the steel pipe is in intimate contact with the entire
surface of the die.
Citation List
Patent Literature
Summary
Technical Problem
[0008] Unfortunately, the technique disclosed in Patent Literature 5 incurs a significant
cost increase if thermal energy consumption involved in heating is included. Moreover,
in this technique, if a plate material produced through a thermomechanical processing
step is used for achieving strength, toughness, and weldability, the characteristics
of the material may be impaired. In the techniques disclosed in Patent Literatures
6 to 8, the blank material or the noncircular preform is formed separately on the
right side and the left side. If the amount of deformation is different between the
right and the left, a level difference (misalignment) may be produced at the seam
gap portion or the slit portion serving as a welded portion. In these techniques,
deformation into a desired shape in a single step causes local concentration of deformation,
which may deteriorate the roundness of the steel pipe. For this reason, deformation
in multiple steps is inevitable and poses a limit on efficient forming. In the technique
disclosed in Patent Literature 9, since the radius of the lower die is larger than
the pipe outer diameter, the lowermost portion of the preformed body in a U-shaped
posture is bent back, causing a deformation that opens the gap portion. This may prevent
reduction of the gap of the slit portion. The techniques disclosed in Patent Literatures
10 and 11 involve pressing in a state in which the O pipe is in intimate contact with
the entire surface of the die, and require a high press force as described above and
still inevitably require a large-scale press machine.
[0009] The present invention is made in view of the problems above. An object of the present
invention is to provide a method of manufacturing a steel pipe for efficiently forming
a steel pipe with high roundness and a press die.
Solution to Problem
[0010] To solve the problem and achieve the object, a method of manufacturing a steel pipe
according to the present invention includes: performing bending three or more times
on a plate material along a width direction, the plate material being subjected to
edge bending at both ends in the width direction, to form a preform having a U-shaped
cross section; pressing the preform to form an open pipe, the open pipe being a tubular
body having a seam gap portion in a longitudinal direction; and joining the seam gap
portion to form a steel pipe, wherein when a width of the plate material before the
edge bending is a plate width W, the preform has a lightly bent portion or an unbent
portion of which center is positioned at a point away from a plate width end by W/4,
the lightly bent portion having a small curvature compared with other regions, the
unbent portion being not subjected to bending, and the pressing is performed to form
the open pipe into a shape such that a range of 20 [%] or more of the plate width
W of which center is positioned at a lowermost portion of the U-shaped cross section
and a range of 10 [%] or more of the plate width W from the plate width end are inscribed
in an arc with a diameter equal or substantially equal to an outer diameter of the
steel pipe.
[0011] Moreover, in the method of manufacturing a steel pipe according to the present invention,
where A denotes the range of 20 [%] or more of the plate width W of which center is
positioned at the lowermost portion of the U-shaped cross section inscribed in an
arc with a diameter equal or substantially equal to an outer diameter of the steep
pipe, and B denotes a total range of 10 [%] or more of the plate width W from both
plate width ends inscribed in an arc with a diameter equal or substantially equal
to an outer diameter of the steel pipe, Expression (1) is satisfied,

where |A—B| is an absolute value of A-B.
[0012] Moreover, in the method of manufacturing a steel pipe according to the present invention,
when the preform is placed on a second die of a pair of dies such that a first die
of the pair of dies is opposed to a U-shaped open side of the preform, and the preform
is pressed while the preform is held between the pair of dies, the second die includes
a pressing surface in such a manner that: in a state in which the preform is placed
on the second die, the pressing surface is not in contact with the preform, excluding
a range formed into a shape inscribed in an arc with a diameter equal or substantially
equal to an outer diameter of the steel plate, with respect to the lowermost portion
of the U-shaped cross section; and in a state in which pressing is completed, a part
of the second die is not in contact with the open pipe, and the first die includes
a pressing surface in such a manner that: in a state in which the preform is placed
on the second die, the pressing surface is not in contact with the preform; and in
a state in which pressing is completed, a part of the first die is not in contact
with the open pipe.
[0013] Moreover, in the method of manufacturing a steel pipe according to the present invention,
pressing is performed using a die having a radius of an arc portion within a range
of ±3.5 [%] with respect to a radius corresponding to an outer radius of the steel
plate.
[0014] Moreover, in the method of manufacturing a steel pipe according to the present invention,
in pressing of the preform, a center of a press die for use in pressing of the preform
matches a center in a width direction of the preform.
[0015] Moreover, in the method of manufacturing a steel pipe according to the present invention,
the preform is held in a U-shaped posture with a U-shaped open side facing upward.
[0016] Moreover, a press die for use in the method of manufacturing a steel pipe according
to the present invention, includes: a pair of dies which are a pair of pressing bodies
for holding the preform; and an arc portion formed in a surface of each die in contact
with the preform such that an arc center is located at a position coincident with
a bending center of the die, the arc portion having a radius within a range of ±3.5
[%] with respect to a radius corresponding to an outer radius of the steel pipe, wherein
the arc portion in each die has a central angle of 70 degrees or larger, and a total
angle of the central angles of the arc portions of both dies is smaller than 360 degrees.
[0017] Moreover, in the press die according to the present invention, the central angles
of the arc portions of both dies are equal to each other.
[0018] Moreover, in the press die according to the present invention, each die includes
linear portions or small-curvature arc portions having a curvature smaller than the
arc portion, the linear portions or the small-curvature arc portions being connected
to both ends of the arc portion in an arc direction.
[0019] Moreover, in the method of manufacturing a steel pipe according to the present invention,
the press die according to the present invention is used.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0020] The method of manufacturing a steel pipe and press die according to the present invention
achieve the effect of efficiently forming a steel pipe with high roundness.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0021]
FIG. 1 is an external perspective view of a die and a punch for use in forming a preform
having a U-shaped cross section through a press bending process according to an embodiment;
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating the procedure for forming a preform having a U-shaped
cross section through a press bending process;
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the preform having a U-shaped cross section;
FIGS. 4(a) to 4(c) are diagrams schematically illustrating the process of forming
an open pipe by performing O-pressing on the preform;
FIG. 5 is an illustration of arc portions, linear portions, and central angles of
an upper die and a lower die;
FIG. 6 is graph illustrating the relation between the open amount of the seam gap
portion of the open pipe and the constraining range, in conjunction with a press load;
FIGS. 7(a) to 7(c) are diagrams schematically illustrating a deformation state when
the open pipe is formed using the upper die and the lower die with a constraining
range of 0 degrees;
FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating the relation between the constraining range and the
roundness of a steel pipe before pipe expanding when the seam gap portion of the open
pipe is closed by welding;
FIG. 9 is a graph illustrating the relation between the constraining range and the
press load;
FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating the result of the open amount of the seam gap portion
of the open pipe when the individual constraining ranges of the upper die and the
lower die are changed;
FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating the result of the roundness of a steel pipe before
pipe expanding that is formed by closing the seam gap portion of the open pipe by
welding when the individual constraining ranges of the upper die and the lower die
are changed;
FIG. 12 is a graph illustrating the result of the press load when the individual constraining
ranges of the upper die and the lower die are changed;
FIG. 13 is a graph illustrating the result of the open amount of the seam gap portion
when the constraining range of the upper die and the constraining range of the lower
die are the same and the length of a lightly bent portion or an unbent portion of
the preform after press bending is changed;
FIG. 14 is a graph illustrating the result of the roundness of a steel pipe before
pipe expanding when the constraining range of the upper die and the constraining range
of the lower die are the same and the length of the lightly bent portion or the unbent
portion of the preform after press bending is changed;
FIG. 15 is a graph illustrating the result of the press load when the constraining
range of the upper die and the constraining range of the lower die are the same and
the length of the lightly bent portion or the unbent portion of the preform after
press bending is changed;
FIG. 16 is a graph illustrating the result of the open amount of the seam gap portion
of the open pipe when the arc portion radiuses of the upper die and the lower die
are changed; and
FIG. 17 is a graph illustrating the result of the press load when the arc portion
radiuses of the upper die and the lower die are changed.
Description of Embodiments
[0022] An embodiment of a method of manufacturing a steel pipe and a press die for use in
the method of manufacturing a steel pipe according to the present invention will be
described below. FIG. 1 is an external perspective view of a die 1 and a punch 2 for
use in forming a preform having a U-shaped cross section through a press bending process
according to the present embodiment. The die 1 is disposed in a conveyance path including
a plurality of conveyance rollers 3 for a plate material S and includes a pair of
left and right rod-shaped members 1a and 1b for supporting the plate material S at
two points along the plate material conveyance direction. A distance e between the
rod-shaped members 1a and 1b in the plate material conveyance direction can be changed
according to the size of a finished steel pipe.
[0023] The punch 2 is movable in a direction closer to or away from the die 1 and includes
a downwardly projecting punch front end 2a for pressing a plate material S and a punch
support 2b continuous to the back surface (upper end surface) of the punch front end
2a with the same width for supporting the punch front end 2a. The punch support 2b
has an upper end coupled to not-illustrated driving means. The driving means applies
a pressing force to the punch front end 2a.
[0024] FIG. 2 illustrates the procedure for forming a preform S
1 having a U-shaped cross section through a press bending process. This procedure specifically
illustrates an example in which a plate material S subjected to edge bending in advance
is bent and the plate material S is fed in order from the top to the bottom in the
left column in FIG. 2, then from the top to the bottom in the middle column in FIG.
2, and finally to the right column in FIG. 2. The arrows given to the punch 2 and
the plate material S in FIG. 2 indicate the direction in which the punch 2 or the
plate material S moves in each stage.
[0025] To form a plate material S into a tubular shape using the plate material S as a starting
material, first, edge bending is performed on the plate material S in advance. This
edge bending is performed for a plate width end portion, which is relatively difficult
to bend, compared with the bending performed on the plate material S using the die
1 and the punch 2. When edge bent portions are provided at the plate width end portions
of the plate material S by the edge bending, a steel plate with high roundness can
be easily obtained, compared with when no edge bent portion is provided. The roundness
of a steel pipe is an index representing how close to a circle the cross-sectional
shape of the steel pipe is, and is a value indicated by a ratio obtained by dividing
the difference between the maximum and the minimum of the amount of variation from
an approximate arc on the entire circumference of a steel pipe by the steel pipe diameter.
For example, a steel pipe having an outside diameter D is divided into 8 equal parts,
12 equal parts, 16 equal parts, or 24 equal parts in the circumferential direction
of the pipe at any given pipe length, and the outside diameters at opposed positions
are measured. When the maximum diameter and the minimum diameter of the measured outside
diameters are D
max and D
min, respectively, the roundness [%] is defined by {(D
max-D
min)/D}×100. As the roundness is closer to zero, the cross-sectional shape of the steel
pipe is closer to a perfect circle.
[0026] The plate material S provided with the edge bent portions is placed on the die 1
illustrated in FIG. 1. While the plate material S is intermittently conveyed at a
predetermined feeding amount, bending is performed three or more times along the width
direction of the plate material S through the procedure illustrated in FIG. 2 to form
a preform S
1 having a U-shaped cross section as a whole.
[0027] FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the preform S
1 having a U-shaped cross section. As illustrated in FIG. 3, when the width of the
plate material S before edge bending is a plate width W, an unbent portion P not subjected
to bending is provided at a part of the preform S
1, in particular, such that a center of the unbent portion P is positioned at a W/4
portion that is a section W/4 away from each of the plate width ends. This unbent
portion P can be provided by increasing the feeding amount of the plate material S
and omitting the pressing by the punch 2. At a part of the preform S
1, in particular, such that a center is positioned at the W/4 portion from each of
the plate width ends, a lightly bent portion having a curvature smaller than other
portions (with a slight curvature compared with other portions) may be provided instead
of the unbent portion P. In this case, in the following description "unbent portion
P" may read "lightly bent portion", if necessary. The lightly bent portion can be
provided by applying a smaller amount of pressing by the punch 2 than on other portions.
[0028] The punch 2 illustrated in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 has an I shape in which the width of
the punch front end 2a in the plate material conveyance direction is equal to the
width of the punch support 2b in the plate material conveyance direction. However,
the shape of the punch 2 is not limited to this. For example, a punch 2 having an
approximately inverse T shape may be used, in which the width of the punch front end
2a in the plate material conveyance direction is larger than the width of the punch
support 2b in the plate material conveyance direction. If the width of the punch support
2b in the plate material conveyance direction is the same, the punch 2 having an approximately
inverse T shape can press a larger area of the plate material S in a single press,
compared with the punch 2 having an I shape, thereby reducing the number of times
of pressing.
[0029] Once the plate material S is bent by press bending to form the preform S
1 having a U-shaped cross section, O-pressing is performed to press-bend the preform
S
1 into an O shape using a press die that is a pair of dies including an upper die 4
and a lower die 5 as illustrated in FIG. 4, thereby forming an open pipe S
2, which is a tubular body having a seam gap portion G between the plate width end
portions opposed to each other in the circumferential direction.
[0030] The procedure for performing O-pressing on the preform S
1 to form the open pipe S
2 will now be described with reference to FIG. 4. First of all, as illustrated in FIG.
4(a), the preform S
1 is installed in the lower die 5 such that the upper die 4 and the U-shaped open side
of the preform S
1 are opposed to each other (such that the U-shaped open side of the preform S
1 faces upward), and the preform S
1 is held between the upper die 4 and the lower die 5. In pressing of the preform S
1, the bending center of the press die is aligned with the center in the width direction
of the preform S
1. The plate width end portions thus can be pressed evenly on the right and the left
at the U-shaped open side of the preform S1.
[0031] As illustrated in FIG. 5, the surfaces of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 that
may be in contact with the preform S
1 have arc portions 4a and 5a, respectively, with a diameter equal or substantially
equal to the outer diameter of the steel pipe to be formed and with a central angle
θ. This range is pressed into a shape inscribed in the arc with a diameter equal or
substantially equal to the outer diameter of the steel pipe. For example, the central
angle θ of 360 degrees corresponds to a plate width of 100 [%] to be pressed into
the inscribed shape. Hereinafter, the central angle θ of the arc portion 4a, 5a is
referred to as a constraining range, and the value obtained by dividing this angle
by 360 degrees is the range pressed into the shape inscribed in the arc with a diameter
equal or substantially equal to the outer diameter of the steel pipe. The arc portion
4a has an arc center at a position coincident with the bending center O
p4 of the upper die 4. The arc portion 5a has an arc center at a position coincident
with the bending center O
p5 of the lower die 5. The upper die 4 has linear portions 4b
1 and 4b
2 connected to respective both ends in the arc direction of the arc portion 4a. The
lower die 5 has linear portions 5b
1 and 5b
2 connected to respective both ends in the arc direction of the arc portion 5a. In
place of the linear portions 4b
1, 4b
2, 5b
1, and 5b
2, the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 may have small-curvature arc portions having
a curvature smaller than that of the arc portions 4a and 5a. In the present invention,
in view of enhancing the symmetry of the resultant steel pipe, it is preferable that
the linear portions 4b
1, 4b
2, 5b
1, and 5b
2 or the small-curvature arc portions connected to the arc portions 4a and 5a are symmetric
with respect to the bending centers O
p4 and O
p5, that is, the centers of the arc portions 4a and 5a. It is preferable that pressing
is performed using a die having a radius of an arc portion within a range of ±3.5
[%] relative to a radius corresponding to the outer radius of the steel pipe. The
reason for this will be described later.
[0032] Subsequently, the preform S
1 held between the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 is pressed down by the upper die
4 and subjected to O-pressing as illustrated in FIG. 4(b). Here, the portions of the
preform S
1 that are opposed to the arc portions 4a and 5a of the upper die 4 and the lower die
5 are constrained by the upper die 4 and the lower die 5, whereas the unbent portions
P of the preform S
1 are not constrained by the upper die 4 and the lower die 5. Thus, the open pipe S
2 as illustrated in FIG. 4(c) can be formed with a pressing force smaller than the
pressing force required when the entire circumference of the preform S
1 is constrained by the upper die 4 and the lower die 5.
[0033] In the method of manufacturing a steel pipe according to the present embodiment,
using the press die including the upper die 4 and the lower die 5, the preform S
1 is pressed to form the open pipe S
2 into a shape such that a range of 20 [%] or more of the plate width W (equivalent
to the central angle θ of 70 degrees or larger) of which center is positioned at the
lowermost portion of the U-shaped cross section and a range of 10 [%] or more (equivalent
to the central angle θ of 35 degrees or larger) of the plate width W from the plate
width end are inscribed in the arc with a diameter equal or substantially equal to
the outer diameter of the steel pipe.
[0034] In the present embodiment, in view of improving the resultant steel pipe shape, it
is preferable that the range in which the open pipe S
2 is inscribed in the die is substantially the same on the upper die 4 side and the
lower die 5 side. That is, when the range of 20 [%] or more of the plate width W of
which center is positioned at the lowermost portion of the U-shaped cross section
inscribed in the arc with a diameter equal or substantially equal to the outer diameter
of the steep pipe is denoted by A, and the total range of 10 [%] or more of the plate
width W from both plate width ends inscribed in the arc with a diameter equal or substantially
equal to the outer diameter of the steel pipe is denoted by B, it is preferable that
Expression (1) is satisfied:

where |A—B| is the absolute value of A-B.
[0035] The meaning of Expression (1) will be described in detail later.
[0036] In the method of manufacturing a steel pipe according to the present embodiment,
in order to ensure that the open pipe S
2 is inscribed in the die in a predetermined range and to obtain a satisfactory shape,
as illustrated in FIG. 5, it is preferable that, in the U-shaped cross section of
the preform S
1 before pressing, the angles θ
11 and θ
12 between a tangent TL
1 at a W/2 portion that is a plate width center portion and tangents TL
21 and TL
22 at the W/4 portions is 35 degrees or larger and smaller than 90 degrees. Furthermore,
it is preferable that, in the preform S
1 before pressing, the angles θ
21 and θ
22 between tangents TL
31 and TL
32 at the plate width end portions and tangents TL
21 and TL
22 at the W/4 portions is 35 degrees or larger and smaller than 90 degrees. In order
to set the same inscribed range on the upper die 4 side and the lower die 5 side,
it is preferable that the sum of the angles θ
11 and θ
12 between the tangent TL
1 and the tangents TL
21 and TL
22 is substantially equal to the sum of the angles θ
21 and θ
22 between the tangents TL
31 and TL
32 and the tangents TL
21 and TL
22.
[0037] These angles need to be defined in consideration of a facility for bending into the
U-shaped preform S
1 and the shape of a die for bending the U-shaped preform S
1 into the open pipe S
2, for the following reasons. If these angles are too large, the distance between the
plate width ends is small. If the distance is smaller than the width of the punch
support 2b for bending into the U-shaped preform S
1, it is impossible to obtain the U-shaped preform S
1. On the other hand, if these angles are too small, the distance between the plate
width ends of the U-shaped preform S
1 is large, so that when the U-shaped preform S
1 is placed on the die, the plate width ends are greater than the opening of the upper
die 4 and the bending force is unable to be applied. In addition, the distance between
the unbent portions P on the right and the left is excessively large to prevent proper
placement in the lower die 5.
[0038] When the preform S
1 is placed on the lower die 5 that is the second die of a pair of dies such that the
upper die 4 that is the first die of the pair is opposed to the U-shaped open side
of the preform S
1, and the preform S
1 is pressed while the preform S
1 is held between the upper die 4 and the lower die 5, the upper die 4 and the lower
die 5 have the following pressing surfaces. That is, the lower die 5 has a pressing
surface in such a manner that the pressing surface is not in contact with the preform
S
1, excluding the range of 20 [%] or more (equivalent to the central angle θ of 70 degrees
or larger) of the plate width W of which center is positioned at the lowermost portion
of the U-shaped cross section, in a state in which the preform S
1 is placed on the lower die 5, and that a part of the lower die 5 is not in contact
with the open pipe S
2 in a state in which pressing is completed. The upper die 4 has a pressing surface
in such a manner that the pressing surface is not in contact with the preform S
1 in a state in which the preform S
1 is placed on the lower die 5, and that a part of the upper die 4 is not in contact
with the open pipe S
2 in a state in which pressing is completed.
[0039] In the present embodiment, it is preferable that, in pressing of the preform S
1, the center of the press die for use in pressing of the preform S
1 matches the center in the width direction of the preform S
1. This is because application of a symmetric force to the center in the width direction
of the preform S
1 contributes to improvement in shape accuracy of the resultant steel pipe.
[0040] In the present embodiment, it is preferable that the preform S
1 is held in a U-shaped posture with the U-shaped open side facing upward. This is
because pressing in this posture facilitates the operation. Another reason is that
if the U-shaped open side faces downward, the weight of the preform S
1 is exerted on the plate width end portions of the preform S
1 and may cause scratching at the plate width end portions or the die, and this should
be avoided.
[0041] Here, in the present embodiment, when the open pipe S
2 is formed by performing O-pressing on the preform S
1 using the upper die 4 and the lower die 5, the pressing force is applied to a part
W/4 away from the center of the unbent portion P toward the width end portion in the
preform S
1. The reason for this is as follows. When the entire preform S
1 is shaped into a circle, the bending moment is M = F-r-cosϕ (F: pressing force, r:
radius of circle) at a position where the central angle is away from the pressed portion
by an angle ϕ, and is largest at a position away from the pressed portion by 90 degrees,
where the deformation is also largest. The pressing force is then applied to a position
away from the center of the unbent portion P by 90 degrees, that is, by 1/4 of the
entire circumference, whereby the unbent portion P is effectively deformed. Here,
the bending moment is largest at a position away from the position receiving the pressing
force by 90 degrees and decreases as the distance from this position increases. Based
on this, it is preferable to apply a pressing force to a section away from the center
of the unbent portion P toward the plate width end portion by W/4±0.07W in order to
produce sufficient plastic deformation in the unbent portion P.
[0042] In the present embodiment, the center of the unbent portion P is provided at a section
including the position away from the plate width end by W/4. The reason for this is
as follows. Although it is preferable to apply a pressing force to a section away
from the center of the unbent portion P toward the plate width end portion by W/4
as described above, the contact position between the upper die 4 and the preform S
1 changes, and the position receiving the pressing force also changes, because the
shape of the preform S
1 changes in a stage of forming the preform S
1 into the open pipe S
2. When the unbent portion P is provided at a section including the position away from
the plate width end by W/4 in the preform S
1, the portion receiving the pressing force is always the plate width end portion of
the preform S
1, so that the unbent portion P is most deformed. By doing so, it is possible to apply
deformation to the unbent portion P in a single press, without changing the pressed
position. Furthermore, it is preferable to provide the unbent portion P in a range
of W/4±0.07W from the position receiving the pressing force, that is, the plate width
end of the preform S
1.
[0043] Since the plate width end portions are in contact with the upper die 4 in the initial
state of pressing as illustrated in FIG. 4(a) and FIG. 4(b), it is preferable that
the unbent portion P is provided at a section including a section away from the plate
width end of the preform S
1 by W/4.
[0044] FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the relation between the open amount of the seam gap
portion G of the open pipe S
2 and the constraining range, in conjunction with a press load. The relation between
the open amount and the constraining range illustrated in FIG. 6 and the press load
are those obtained when a steel pipe with a tensile strength of 630 [MPa], an outer
diameter of 660.4 [mm], and a pipe thickness of 40.0 [mm] is formed by welding both
edges of the open pipe S
2 and thereafter performing shape correction by pipe expanding at a pipe expanding
ratio of 1 [%].
[0045] The preform S
1 after press bending is provided with an unbent portion P having a length of W/12
at a portion W/4 from each of the plate width ends on both sides. The angle θ
11, θ
12 between the tangent at the plate width center portion and the W/4 portion that is
a section away from the plate width end by W/4 is 75 degrees, and the angle θ
21, θ
22 between the tangent at the plate width end portion and the tangent at the W/4 portion
is 75 degrees. This preform S
1 is held between the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 having the same constraining
range. The pressing amount is set such that the distance between the portions at W/2
of the open pipe S
2 is equal to the diameter before pipe expanding (the amount of pressing-down in O-pressing
is set such that the longitudinal diameter agrees with the diameter before pipe expanding).
As can be seen from FIG. 6, the larger the constraining range is, the smaller the
open amount of the seam gap portion G of the open pipe S
2 is.
[0046] FIGS. 7(a) to 7(c) are diagrams schematically illustrating a deformation state when
the open pipe S
2 is formed using the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 with a constraining range of
0 degrees. When the constraining range of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 is 0
degrees, the arc portions 4a and 5a are arcs having a diameter 1.16 times as large
as the steel pipe outer diameter such that the upper die 4 is in contact only with
both edges of the preform S
1 and the lower die 5 is in contact only with the plate width center portion of the
preform S
1. As illustrated in FIG. 7(a), the diameter of the arc portion 5a of the lower die
5 is larger than the steel pipe diameter such that when the cross section of the preform
S
1 is compared to a clock, the 6 o'clock portion alone is in contact with the lower
die 5. Because of this, as illustrated in FIG. 7(b), the 6 o'clock portion of the
preform S
1 and the vicinity thereof are bent back to conform to the arc portion 5a of the lower
die 5 during O-pressing, and the radius of curvature becomes larger than the steel
pipe diameter. As a result, after O-pressing, as illustrated in FIG. 7(c), the open
amount of the seam gap portion G of the open pipe S
2 is large, in combination with the springback at the 3 o'clock portion and the 9 o'clock
portion of the preform S
1.
[0047] FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating the relation between the constraining range and the
roundness of a steel pipe before pipe expanding when the seam gap portion G of the
open pipe S
2 is closed by welding. As can be understood from FIG. 8, when the constraining range
is 60 degrees, the roundness is worse than when the constraining range is 0 degrees.
However, as the constraining range is increased, the roundness improves. When the
constraining range is 70 degrees or larger, the roundness is better than when the
constraining range is 0 degrees. It also can be understood that the roundness is most
improved when the constraining range is 100 degrees to 110 degrees.
[0048] FIG. 9 is a graph illustrating the relation between the constraining range and the
press load. As can be understood from FIG. 9, as the constraining range increases,
the press load increases. Increasing the constraining range reduces the open amount
of the seam gap portion G of the open pipe S
2, but the increased press load requires a larger size of press facility. It is therefore
preferable to reduce the constraining range in a range in which a desired open amount
is obtained. For example, the constraining range is set to 150 degrees or smaller
in order to set the press load to 90 [%] or smaller of the press load required when
the individual constraining ranges of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 for constraining
the entire circumference of the preform S
1 with the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 are 180 degrees.
[0049] FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating the result of the open amount of the seam gap portion
G of the open pipe S
2 when the individual constraining ranges of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 are
changed. FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating the result of the roundness of the steel
pipe before pipe expanding that is formed by closing the seam gap portion G of the
open pipe S
2 by welding when the individual constraining ranges of the upper die 4 and the lower
die 5 are changed. FIG. 12 is a graph illustrating the result of the press load when
the individual constraining ranges of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 are changed.
In FIG. 10 to FIG. 12, the target steel pipe has a tensile strength of 630 [MPa],
an outer diameter of 660.4 [mm], and a pipe thickness of 40.0 [mm], which are the
same as those in FIG. 6, FIG. 8, and FIG. 9. The horizontal axis represents the average
value of constraining ranges of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5, and different
constraining ranges in the lower die 5 are represented by different symbols. In the
figure, for example, "lower 60 degrees" means that the constraining range in the lower
die 5 is 60 degrees.
[0050] As can be understood from FIG. 10, irrespective of the individual constraining ranges
of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5, as the average value of constraining ranges
of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 increases, the open amount of the seam gap
portion G of the open pipe S
2 decreases. As can be understood from FIG. 11, when the constraining range of one
of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 is smaller than 60 degrees, the roundness of
the steel pipe is worse. Accordingly, although the individual constraining ranges
of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 may not necessarily be equal between the upper
die 4 and the lower die 5, it is desirable that the constraining ranges of the upper
die 4 and the lower die 5 both exceed 60 degrees in order to obtain a shape with satisfactory
roundness of a steel pipe. It can also be understood from FIG. 12 that the larger
the average value of constraining ranges of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 is,
the larger the press load is. Therefore, when the upper limit of permissible press
load is set, the range of average value of applicable constraining ranges of the upper
die 4 and the lower die 5 can be determined according to the upper limit value of
press load.
[0051] In FIG. 11, when the difference between upper and lower constraining ranges is 30
degrees and the difference is 29 [%] of the average value of the upper and lower constraining
ranges, namely, upper 90 degrees/lower 90 degrees, upper 90 degrees/lower 120 degrees,
upper 120 degrees/lower 90 degrees, the roundness before pipe expanding after welding
is as excellent as 1.5 [%] or less. On the other hand, when the difference between
upper and lower constraining ranges is 30 degrees but the difference is as large as
40 [%] of the average value of the upper and lower constraining ranges, namely, upper
90 degrees/lower 60 degrees, the roundness before pipe expanding after welding is
slightly poor, 2.0 [%]. In this way, reducing the difference between upper and lower
constraining ranges can provide a satisfactory shape. That is, in the present invention,
it is further preferable that the difference between upper and lower constraining
ranges is set to less than 40 [%] of the average value of upper and lower constraining
ranges, further preferably 30 [%] or less. It is preferable that the difference between
upper and lower constraining ranges is less than 30 degrees. The relation of the difference
between upper and lower constraining ranges and the average value of upper and lower
constraining ranges can be said as follows. When the range of 20 [%] or more of the
plate width W of which center is positioned at the lowermost portion of the U-shaped
cross section inscribed in the arc with a diameter equal or substantially equal to
the outer diameter of the steep pipe is denoted by A, and the total range of 10 [%]
or more of the plate width W from both plate width ends inscribed in the arc with
a diameter equal or substantially equal to the outer diameter of the steel pipe is
denoted by B, it is preferable that Expression (1) is satisfied:

where |A—B| is the absolute value of A-B.
[0052] FIG. 13 is a graph illustrating the result of the open amount of the seam gap portion
G when the constraining range of the upper die 4 and the constraining range of the
lower die 5 are the same and the length L of the unbent portion P of the preform S
1 after press bending is changed. FIG. 14 is a graph illustrating the result of the
roundness of the steel pipe before pipe expanding when the constraining range of the
upper die 4 and the constraining range of the lower die 5 are the same and the length
L of the unbent portion P of the preform S
1 after press bending is changed. FIG. 15 is a graph illustrating the result of the
press load when the constraining range of the upper die 4 and the constraining range
of the lower die 5 are the same and the length L of the unbent portion P of the preform
S
1 after press bending is changed. In FIG. 13 to FIG. 15, when the angle between the
tangent at the plate width center portion and the tangent at the W/4 portion that
is a section away from the plate width end by W/4 is θ
11, θ
12, and the angle between the tangent at the plate width end portion and the tangent
at the W/4 portion is θ
21, θ
22, all of these angles are set to an equal value and changed in accordance with the
width of the unbent portion P. The horizontal axis represents the average value of
the constraining range of the upper die 4 and the constraining range of the lower
die 5.
[0053] As can be understood from FIG. 13, irrespective of the length L of the unbent portion
P of the preform S
1 and the angles of θ
11' θ
12, θ
21, and θ
22 of the tangents, as the average value of the constraining range of the upper die
4 and the constraining range of the lower die 5 increases, the open amount of the
seam gap portion G decreases. It is also understood that when the average value of
the constraining range of the upper die 4 and the constraining range of the lower
die 5 is the same, the longer the length L is and the smaller the angles θ
11, θ
12, θ
21, and θ
22 of the tangents are, the smaller the open amount is. As can be understood from FIG.
14 and FIG. 15, when the average value of the constraining range of the upper die
4 and the constraining range of the lower die 5 is the same, there is no significant
difference in roundness and press load of the steel pipe due to the length L of the
unbent portion P of the preform S
1 and the angles θ
11' θ
12, θ
21, and θ
22 of the tangents. In this way, when the average value of the constraining range of
the upper die 4 and the constraining range of the lower die 5 is the same, the open
amount of the seam gap portion G of the open pipe S
2 can be reduced by increasing the length L of the unbent portion P of the preform
S
1 and reducing the angles θ
11, 6
12, θ
21, and θ
22 of the tangents, without causing a difference in roundness or press load of the steel
pipe due to the length L.
[0054] FIG. 16 is a graph illustrating the result of the open amount of the seam gap portion
G of the open pipe S
2 when the arc portion radiuses of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 are changed.
FIG. 17 is a graph illustrating the result of the press load when the arc portion
radiuses of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 are changed. In FIG. 16 and FIG. 17,
the central angles of the arc portions 4a and 5a of the upper die 4 and the lower
die 5 are 45 degrees, and while the arc portion radiuses, which are the radiuses of
the arc portions 4a and 5a, are changed, a steel pipe having a tensile strength of
630 MPa, an outer diameter of 660.4 [mm], and a pipe thickness of 40.0 [mm] is pressed
down by O-pressing such that the longitudinal diameter agrees with the diameter before
pipe expanding. In FIG. 16 and FIG. 17, the horizontal axis represents the ratio between
the arc portion radius and the steel pipe outer radius (radius corresponding to the
steel pipe outer diameter). When the arc portion radius is larger than the steel pipe
outer radius, the ratio is greater than 1.0, and when the arc portion radius is smaller
than the steel pipe outer radius, the ratio is smaller than 1.0.
[0055] As illustrated in FIG. 16, when the arc portion radius of the upper die 4 and the
lower die 5 is equal to the steel pipe outer radius (the horizontal axis is 1.0 in
FIG. 16), the open amount of the seam gap portion G is smallest. On the other hand,
when the arc portion radius of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 is larger than
the steel pipe outer radius, bending-back deformation occurs at the 6 o'clock portion
of the preform S
1 and the vicinity thereof as illustrated in FIG. 7, so that the open amount of the
seam gap portion G increases as the arc portion radius of the upper die 4 and the
lower die 5 increases. When the arc portion radius of the upper die 4 and the lower
die 5 is smaller than the steel pipe outer radius, bending-back deformation occurs
at portions where the arc portions 4a and 5a of the upper die 4 and the lower die
5 terminate, so that the open amount of the seam gap portion G increases as the arc
portion radius decreases. In this way, although it is most preferable that the arc
portion radius of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 is equal to the steel pipe outer
radius, the open amount of the seam gap portion G is kept to 40 [mm] or smaller when
the arc portion radius of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 is a radius equivalent
to the steel pipe outer radius ±3.5 [%].
[0056] However, as can be understood from FIG. 17, the press load increases as the arc portion
radius decreases. In particular, when the arc portion radius is small, it is necessary
to determine the radius considering the load of the press machine.
[Example 1]
[0057] A steel plate provided with a groove using an edge mirror and formed to have a plate
width W of 1928 [mm] with a length of 1000 [mm], a plate thickness of 40 [mm], and
a tensile strength of 635 [MPa] was subjected to edge bending, followed by press bending,
to prepare a preform S
1. Subsequently, O-pressing was performed on this preform S
1 with a press machine of 30 [MN] using the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 with various
constraining ranges to form preforms A and B. Table 1 and Table 2 show the shapes
of the preforms A and B. In Table 1 and Table 2, the initial alphabets A and B in
the "No." column indicate the shapes of preforms (preforms A and B), and the numerals
following the alphabets A, B, and C indicate a combination of the constraining ranges
of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5.
[0058] Table 1 shows a preform A under Condition A in which an unbent portion was provided
with a width of 160 [mm] (W/12) of which center is positioned at the W/4 portion from
the plate width end, the angle θ
21, θ
22 between the tangent at the plate width end portion and the tangent at the W/4 portion
was 65 degrees, and the angle θ
11, θ
12 between the tangent at the plate width center portion and the tangent at the W/4
portion was 73 degrees. Table 2 shows a preform B under Condition B in which an unbent
portion was provided with a width of 321 [mm] (W/6) (the width twice that in Condition
A) of which center is positioned at the W/4 portion from the plate width end, the
angle θ
21, θ
22 between the tangent at the plate width end portion and the tangent at the W/4 portion
was 59 degrees, and the angle θ
11, θ
12 between the tangent at the plate width center portion and the tangent at the W/4
portion was 61 degrees. The preforms A and B are each symmetric with respect to a
straight line connecting the center of the plate width end portion and the plate width
1/2, and Table 1 and Table 2 show the value of the portion at the plate width 1/2.
The amount of pressing-down in O-pressing was set such that the distance between the
outer surface side of the W/2 portion and the outer surface side of the plate width
end portion was 654 [mm].
[0059] After the open amount of the open pipe S
2 after O-pressing of the preforms A and B was measured, the seam gap portion G of
the open pipe S
2 was welded to form a steel pipe having an outer diameter of 654 [mm]. Thereafter,
the diameter of the steel pipe was measured at eight points at a pitch of 22.5 degrees
in the circumferential direction, and the difference between the maximum diameter
and the minimum diameter was obtained. Table 1 and Table 2 also show die shape (constraining
range), press load, open amount, and roundness. Here, the roundness is a numeral obtained
by dividing the difference between the maximum and the minimum by the steel pipe outer
diameter (the average value of all the measured values of the diameter).
[0060] The welding machine used in this example failed to close the opening of the pipe
having an open amount exceeding 40 [mm] after O-pressing. In this case, both ends
and the center in the pipe axial direction were temporarily welded with the opening
closed using another press machine, and thereafter the entire length of the seam gap
portion G was normally welded. A roundness of 2.5 [%] before pipe expanding was considered
acceptable. This is because if the roundness is equal to or lower than 2.5 [%] before
pipe expanding, the roundness after pipe expanding is as satisfactory as 1.0 [%] or
lower.
Table 1
| No. |
Shape of preform after press bending |
Die shape |
Result |
Note |
| Plate width [mm] |
Angle of tangent [deg] |
Constraining range [deg] |
Press load [MN/m] |
Open amount [mm] |
Roundness [%] |
| Plate edge-side bent portion |
Unbent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Plate edge-side bent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Upper die |
Lower die |
Upper and lower average |
| A1 |
402 |
160 |
402 |
65 |
73 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
28 |
5 |
1.5 |
Example |
| A2 |
120 |
120 |
120 |
26 |
8 |
1.3 |
Example |
| A3 |
110 |
110 |
110 |
24 |
15 |
0.9 |
Example |
| A4 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
19 |
20 |
0.9 |
Example |
| A5 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
15 |
28 |
1.0 |
Example |
| A6 |
80 |
90 |
85 |
14 |
31 |
1.2 |
Example |
| A7 |
70 |
90 |
80 |
12 |
34 |
1.6 |
Example |
| A8 |
60 |
90 |
75 |
10 |
37 |
3.1 |
Comparative example |
| A9 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
12 |
35 |
1.5 |
Example |
| A10 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
9 |
38 |
2.4 |
Example |
| A11 |
90 |
60 |
75 |
10 |
36 |
3.0 |
Comparative example |
| A12 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
6 |
40 |
3.5 |
Comparative example |
| A13 |
0 |
90 |
45 |
6 |
45 |
3.3 |
Comparative example |
| A14 |
90 |
0 |
45 |
6 |
50 |
2.4 |
Comparative example |
| A15 |
60 |
0 |
30 |
5 |
52 |
* |
Comparative example |
| A16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
60 |
* |
Comparative example |
Table 2
| No. |
Shape of preform after press bending |
Die shape |
Result |
Note |
| Plate width [mm] |
Angle of tangent [deg] |
Constraining range [deg] |
Press load [MN/m] |
Open amount [mm] |
Roundness [%] |
| Plate edge-side bent portion |
Unbent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Plate edge-side bent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Upper die |
Lower die |
Upper and lower average |
| B1 |
321 |
321 |
321 |
59 |
61 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
28 |
1 |
1.5 |
Example |
| B2 |
120 |
120 |
120 |
26 |
4 |
1.4 |
Example |
| B3 |
110 |
110 |
110 |
24 |
11 |
1.0 |
Example |
| B4 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
19 |
16 |
0.9 |
Example |
| B5 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
15 |
24 |
0.9 |
Example |
| B6 |
80 |
90 |
85 |
14 |
27 |
1.1 |
Example |
| B7 |
70 |
90 |
80 |
12 |
30 |
1.6 |
Example |
| B8 |
60 |
90 |
75 |
10 |
33 |
3.0 |
Comparative example |
| B9 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
12 |
31 |
1.5 |
Example |
| B10 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
9 |
34 |
2.4 |
Example |
| B11 |
90 |
60 |
75 |
10 |
32 |
3.0 |
Comparative example |
| B12 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
6 |
36 |
3.5 |
Comparative example |
| B13 |
0 |
90 |
45 |
6 |
41 |
3.3 |
Comparative example |
| B14 |
90 |
0 |
45 |
6 |
46 |
2.4 |
Comparative example |
| B15 |
60 |
0 |
30 |
5 |
48 |
2.5 |
Comparative example |
| B16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
56 |
* |
Comparative example |
[0061] In Nos. A1 to A7, A9, and A10 in Table 1 and Nos. B1 to B7, B9, and B10 in Table
2, which are in a range of examples of the present invention, the open amount is small,
and the roundness is also satisfactory. In particular, the products with a constraining
range of 90 degrees to 110 degrees have a roundness of 1.0 [%] or lower even without
pipe expanding. The smaller the average value of constraining range is, the smaller
the press load is.
[0062] By contrast, in Nos. A8 and A11 in Table 1 and Nos. B8 and B11 in Table 2, in which
the constraining ranges of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 are a combination of
60 degrees and 90 degrees, the open amount is small, but the roundness is bad. In
Nos. A12 to A16 in Table 1 and Nos. B12 to B16 in Table 2, in which the average value
of constraining ranges is 60 degrees or smaller, the open amount is large. In particular,
in Nos. A15 and A16 in Table 1 and No. B16 in Table 2, it was impossible to measure
the roundness, because the welded portion was broken after the seam gap portion G
was welded.
[0063] In a product formed using the preform B having an unbent portion wider than that
of the preform A, compared with a product formed using the preform A, the press load
and the roundness are almost the same, but the open amount is small.
[0064] Although embodiments to which the present invention is applied have been described
above, the present invention is not intended to be limited by the description and
the drawings that are a part of the disclosure of the present invention according
to the embodiments. In other words, all of other embodiments, examples, operating
techniques, and the like carried out by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments
are embraced in the scope of the present invention.
[Example 2]
[0065] A steel plate provided with a groove using an edge mirror and formed to have a width
of 1639 [mm] with a length of 1000 [mm], a plate thickness of 31.8 [mm], and a tensile
strength of 779 [MPa] was subjected to edge bending, followed by press bending, to
prepare a preform S
1. Subsequently, O-pressing was performed on this preform S
1, using the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 with various constraining ranges with
a press machine of 30 [MN] to form preforms A and B. Table 3 and Table 4 show the
shapes of the preforms A and B. In Table 3 and Table 4, the initial alphabets A and
B in the "No." column indicate the shapes of preforms (preforms A and B) and the numerals
following the alphabets A and B each indicate a combination of the constraining ranges
of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5.
[0066] Table 3 shows a preform A under Condition A in which an unbent portion was provided
with a width of 137 [mm] (W/12) of which center is positioned at the W/4 portion from
the plate width end, the angle θ
21, θ
22 between the tangent at the plate width end portion and the tangent at the W/4 portion
was 65 degrees, and the angle θ
11, θ
12 between the tangent at the plate width center portion and the tangent at the W/4
portion was 72 degrees. Table 4 shows a preform B under Condition B in which an unbent
portion was provided with a width of 273 [mm] (W/6) (the width twice that in Condition
A) of which center is positioned at W/4 from the plate width end, the angle θ
21, θ
22 between the tangent at the plate width end portion and the tangent at the W/4 portion
was 59 degrees, and the angle θ
11, θ
12 between the tangent at the plate width center and the tangent at the W/4 portion
was 61 degrees. The preforms A and B are each symmetric with respect to a straight
line connecting the center of the plate width end portion and the plate width 1/2.
Table 3 and Table 4 show the values of the portion at the plate width 1/2. The amount
of pressing-down in O-pressing was set such that the distance between the outer surface
side of the W/2 portion and the outer surface side of the plate width end portion
was 553 [mm].
[0067] Then, after the open amount of the open pipe S
2 after O-pressing of the preforms A and B was measured, the seam gap portion G of
the open pipe S
2 was welded to form a steel pipe having an outer diameter of 553 [mm]. Thereafter,
the diameter of the steel pipe was measured at eight points at a pitch of 22.5 degrees
in the circumferential direction, and the difference between the maximum diameter
and the minimum diameter was obtained. Table 3 and Table 4 also show die shape (constraining
range), press load, open amount, and roundness. Here, the roundness is a numeral obtained
by dividing the difference between the maximum and the minimum by the steel pipe outer
diameter.
[0068] The welding machine used in this example failed to close the opening of the pipe
having an open amount exceeding 40 [mm] after O-pressing. In this case, both ends
and the center in the pipe axial direction were temporarily welded with the opening
closed using another press machine, and thereafter the entire length of the seam gap
portion G was normally welded. The roundness of 2.5 [%] before pipe expanding, which
becomes 1.0 [%] or lower through pipe expanding, was considered acceptable.
Table 3
| No. |
Shape of preform after press bending |
Die shape |
Result |
Note |
| Plate width [mm] |
Angle of tangent [deg] |
Constraining range [deg] |
Press load [MN/m] |
Open amount [mm] |
Roundness [%] |
| Plate edge-side bent portion |
Unbent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Plate edge-side bent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Upper die |
Lower die |
Upper and lower average |
| A1 |
341 |
137 |
341 |
65 |
72 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
27 |
3 |
1.5 |
Example |
| A2 |
120 |
120 |
120 |
26 |
6 |
1.3 |
Example |
| A3 |
110 |
110 |
110 |
23 |
13 |
0.9 |
Example |
| A4 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
20 |
19 |
0.9 |
Example |
| A5 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
14 |
25 |
1.0 |
Example |
| A6 |
80 |
90 |
85 |
13 |
28 |
1.2 |
Example |
| A7 |
70 |
90 |
80 |
11 |
32 |
1.6 |
Example |
| A8 |
60 |
90 |
75 |
10 |
35 |
3.1 |
Comparative example |
| A9 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
11 |
33 |
1.5 |
Example |
| A10 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
9 |
36 |
2.4 |
Example |
| A11 |
90 |
60 |
75 |
10 |
34 |
3.0 |
Comparative example |
| A12 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
6 |
38 |
3.5 |
Comparative example |
| A13 |
0 |
90 |
45 |
5 |
43 |
3.3 |
Comparative example |
| A14 |
90 |
0 |
45 |
5 |
50 |
2.4 |
Comparative example |
| A15 |
60 |
0 |
30 |
4 |
54 |
* |
Comparative example |
| A16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
60 |
* |
Comparative example |
Table 4
| No. |
Shape of preform after press bending |
Die shape |
Result |
Note |
| Plate width [mm] |
Angle of tangent [deg] |
Constraining range [deg] |
Press load [MN/m] |
Open amount [mm] |
Roundness [%] |
| Plate edge-side bent portion |
Unbent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Plate edge-side bent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Upper die |
Lower die |
Upper and lower average |
| B1 |
273 |
273 |
273 |
59 |
61 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
27 |
0 |
1.5 |
Example |
| B2 |
120 |
120 |
120 |
26 |
3 |
1.4 |
Example |
| B3 |
110 |
110 |
110 |
23 |
9 |
1.0 |
Example |
| B4 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
20 |
13 |
0.9 |
Example |
| B5 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
14 |
22 |
0.9 |
Example |
| B6 |
80 |
90 |
85 |
13 |
25 |
1.1 |
Example |
| B7 |
70 |
90 |
80 |
11 |
28 |
1.6 |
Example |
| B8 |
60 |
90 |
75 |
10 |
30 |
3.0 |
Comparative example |
| B9 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
11 |
29 |
1.5 |
Example |
| B10 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
9 |
32 |
2.4 |
Example |
| B11 |
90 |
60 |
75 |
10 |
30 |
3.0 |
Comparative example |
| B12 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
6 |
34 |
3.5 |
Comparative example |
| B13 |
0 |
90 |
45 |
5 |
40 |
3.3 |
Comparative example |
| B14 |
90 |
0 |
45 |
5 |
44 |
2.4 |
Comparative example |
| B15 |
60 |
0 |
30 |
4 |
46 |
2.5 |
Comparative example |
| B16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
53 |
* |
Comparative example |
[0069] In Nos. A1 to A7, A9, and A10 in Table 3 and Nos. B1 to B7, B9, and B10 in Table
4, which are in a range of examples of the present invention, the open amount is small,
and the roundness is also satisfactory. In particular, the products with a constraining
range of 90 degrees to 110 degrees have a roundness of 1.0 [%] or lower even without
pipe expanding. The smaller the average value of constraining ranges is, the smaller
the press load is.
[0070] By contrast, in Nos. A8 and A11 in Table 3 and Nos. B8 and B11 in Table 4, in which
the constraining ranges of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 are a combination of
60 degrees and 90 degrees, the open amount is small, but the roundness is bad. In
Nos. A12 to A16 in Table 3 and Nos. B12 to B16 in Table 4, in which the average value
of constraining ranges is 60 degrees or smaller, the open amount is large. In particular,
in Nos. A15 and A16 in Table 3 and No. B16 in Table 4, it was impossible to measure
the roundness, because the welded portion was broken after the seam gap portion G
was welded.
[0071] In a product formed using the preform B having an unbent portion wider than that
of the preform A, compared with a product formed using the preform A, the press load
and the roundness are almost the same, but the open amount is small.
[Example 3]
[0072] A steel plate provided with a groove using an edge mirror and formed to have a plate
width of 2687 [mm] with a length of 1000 [mm], a plate thickness of 50.8 [mm], and
a tensile strength of 779 [MPa] was subjected to edge bending, followed by press bending,
to prepare a preform S
1. Subsequently, O-pressing was performed on this preform S
1 using the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 with various constraining ranges with a
press machine of 30 [MN] to form preforms A and B. Table 5 and Table 6 show the shapes
of the preforms A and B. In Table 5 and Table 6, the initial alphabets A and B in
the "No." column indicate the shapes of preforms (preforms A and B), and the numerals
following the alphabets A and B indicate a combination of the constraining ranges
of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5.
[0073] Table 5 shows a preform A under Condition A in which an unbent portion was provided
with a width of 224 [mm] (W/12) of which center is positioned at the W/4 portion from
the plate width end, the angle θ
21, θ
22 between the tangent at the plate width end portion and the tangent at the W/4 portion
was 73 degrees, and the angle θ
11, θ
12 between the tangent at the plate width center portion and the tangent at the W/4
portion was 72 degrees. Table 6 shows a preform B under Condition B in which an unbent
portion was provided with a width of 448 [mm] (W/6) (the width twice that in Condition
A) of which center is positioned at W/4 from the plate width end, the angle θ
21, θ
22 between the tangent at the plate width end portion and the W/4 portion was 58 degrees,
and the angle θ
11, θ
12 between the tangent at the plate width center portion and the tangent at the W/4
portion was 59 degrees. The preforms A and B are each symmetric with respect to a
straight line connecting the center of the plate width end portion and the plate width
1/2, and Table 5 and Table 6 show the value of the portion at the plate width 1/2.
The amount of pressing-down in O-pressing was set such that the distance between the
outer surface side of the W/2 portion and the outer surface side of the plate width
end portion was 905 [mm].
[0074] After the open amount of the open pipe S
2 after O-pressing of the preforms A and B was measured, the seam gap portion G of
the open pipe S
2 was welded to form a steel pipe having an outer diameter of 905 [mm]. Thereafter,
the diameter of the steel pipe was measured at eight points at a pitch of 22.5 degrees
in the circumferential direction, and the difference between the maximum diameter
and the minimum diameter was obtained. Table 5 and Table 6 also show die shape (constraining
range), press load, open amount, and roundness. Here, the roundness is a numeral obtained
by dividing the difference between the maximum and the minimum by the steel pipe outer
diameter.
[0075] The welding machine used in this example failed to close the opening of the pipe
having an open amount exceeding 40 [mm] after O-pressing. In this case, both ends
and the center in the pipe axial direction were temporarily welded with the opening
closed using another press machine, and thereafter the entire length of the seam gap
portion G was normally welded. The roundness of 2.5 [%] before pipe expanding, which
becomes 1.0 [%] or lower through pipe expanding, was considered acceptable.
Table 5
| No. |
Shape of preform after press bending |
Die shape |
Result |
Note |
| Plate width [mm] |
Angle of tangent [deg] |
Constraining range [deg] |
Press load [MN/m] |
Open amount [mm] |
Roundness [%] |
| Plate edge-side bent portion |
Unbent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Plate edge-side bent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Upper die |
Lower die |
Upper and lower average |
| A1 |
560 |
224 |
560 |
73 |
72 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
29 |
7 |
1.4 |
Example |
| A2 |
120 |
120 |
120 |
27 |
10 |
1.3 |
Example |
| A3 |
110 |
110 |
110 |
25 |
17 |
1.0 |
Example |
| A4 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
20 |
21 |
1.0 |
Example |
| A5 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
26 |
29 |
0.9 |
Example |
| A6 |
80 |
90 |
85 |
14 |
33 |
1.0 |
Example |
| A7 |
70 |
90 |
80 |
12 |
35 |
1.4 |
Example |
| A8 |
60 |
90 |
75 |
10 |
39 |
3.2 |
Comparative example |
| A9 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
12 |
36 |
1.4 |
Example |
| A10 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
10 |
39 |
2.3 |
Example |
| A11 |
90 |
60 |
75 |
11 |
36 |
3.1 |
Comparative example |
| A12 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
6 |
40 |
3.4 |
Comparative example |
| A13 |
0 |
90 |
45 |
6 |
45 |
3.3 |
Comparative example |
| A14 |
90 |
0 |
45 |
6 |
50 |
2.4 |
Comparative example |
| A15 |
60 |
0 |
30 |
5 |
52 |
* |
Comparative example |
| A16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
60 |
* |
Comparative example |
Table 6
| No. |
Shape of preform after press bending |
Die shape |
Result |
Note |
| Plate width [mm] |
Angle of tangent [deg] |
Constraining range [deg] |
Press load [MN/m] |
Open amount [mm] |
Roundness [%] |
| Plate edge-side bent portion |
Unbent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Plate edge-side bent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Upper die |
Lower die |
Upper and lower average |
| B1 |
448 |
448 |
448 |
58 |
59 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
29 |
3 |
1.5 |
Example |
| B2 |
120 |
120 |
120 |
27 |
6 |
1.4 |
Example |
| B3 |
110 |
110 |
110 |
25 |
13 |
1.0 |
Example |
| B4 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
20 |
17 |
0.9 |
Example |
| B5 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
26 |
24 |
1.0 |
Example |
| B6 |
80 |
90 |
85 |
14 |
27 |
1.1 |
Example |
| B7 |
70 |
90 |
80 |
12 |
31 |
1.5 |
Example |
| B8 |
60 |
90 |
75 |
10 |
35 |
3.0 |
Comparative example |
| B9 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
12 |
32 |
1.4 |
Example |
| B10 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
10 |
35 |
2.4 |
Example |
| B11 |
90 |
60 |
75 |
11 |
32 |
3.0 |
Comparative example |
| B12 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
6 |
36 |
3.5 |
Comparative example |
| B13 |
0 |
90 |
45 |
6 |
41 |
3.3 |
Comparative example |
| B14 |
90 |
0 |
45 |
6 |
46 |
2.4 |
Comparative example |
| B15 |
60 |
0 |
30 |
5 |
48 |
2.5 |
Comparative example |
| B16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
56 |
* |
Comparative example |
[0076] In Nos. A1 to A7, A9, and A10 in Table 5 and Nos. B1 to B7, B9, and B10 in Table
6, which are in a range of examples of the present invention, the open amount is small,
and the roundness is also satisfactory. In particular, the products with a constraining
range of 90 degrees to 110 degrees have a roundness of 1.0 [%] or lower even without
pipe expanding. The smaller the average value of the constraining range is, the smaller
the press load is.
[0077] By contrast, in Nos. A8 and A11 in Table 5 and Nos. B8 and B11 in Table 6, in which
the constraining ranges of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 are a combination of
60 degrees and 90 degrees, the open amount is small, but the roundness is bad. In
Nos. A12 to A16 in Table 5 and Nos. B12 to B16 in Table 6, in which the average value
of constraining ranges is 60 degrees or smaller, the open amount is large. In particular,
in Nos. A15 and A16 in Table 5 and No. B16 in Table 6, it was impossible to measure
the roundness, because the welded portion was broken after the seam gap portion G
was welded.
[0078] In a product formed using the preform B having an unbent portion wider than that
of the preform A, compared with a product formed using the preform A, the press load
and the roundness are almost the same, but the open amount is small.
[Example 4]
[0079] To produce a steel pipe with a target outer diameter of 621 [mm] to 687 [mm], a steel
plate provided with a groove using an edge mirror and formed to have a plate width
of 1826 to 2032 [mm] with a length of 1000 [mm], a plate thickness of 40 [mm], and
a tensile strength of 635 [MPa] was subjected to edge bending, followed by press bending,
to prepare a preform S
1. Subsequently, O-pressing was performed on this preform S
1 using a variety of the upper dies 4 and the lower dies 5 with an arc portion radius
of 327 mm and a constraining range of 45 degrees, with a press machine of 30 [MN]
to form preforms D1 to D11. Table 7 shows the bending conditions of the preforms D1
to D11. In the preforms D1 to D11, an unbent portion was provided with a width of
W/12 of which center is positioned at the W/4 portion from the plate width end, in
accordance with the initial plate width W, the angle θ
21, θ
22 between the tangent at the plate width end portion and the tangent at the W/4 portion
was 75 degrees, and the angle θ
11, θ
12 between the tangent at the plate width center portion and the tangent at the W/4
portion was 75 degrees. In O-pressing, the pressing-down was performed such that the
distance between the outer surface side of the W/2 portion and the outer surface side
of the plate width end attained a value corresponding to the initial plate width W
as shown in Table 7. Table 7 also shows the outer diameter of the steel pipe after
pressing down with O-press.
[0080] The open amount of the open pipe S
2 after O-pressing of the preforms D1 to D11 was measured. Table 7 also shows the press
load and the open amount as the results.
[Table 7]
[0081]
Table 7
| No. |
Target outer diameter [mm] |
Plate width [mm] |
Shape of preform after press bending |
Die shape |
Outer diameter [mm] after pressing down by O-press |
Result |
| Plate width [mm] |
Angle of tangent [deg] |
Arc portion radius [mm] |
Arc portion radius/steel pipe outer radius |
Press load [MN/m] |
Open amount [mm] |
| Plate edge-side bent portion |
Unbent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
Plate edge-side bent portion |
Plate width center-side bent portion |
| D1 |
621 |
1826 |
380 |
152 |
380 |
75 |
75 |
327 |
0.95 |
621 |
17 |
51 |
| D2 |
628 |
1847 |
385 |
154 |
385 |
0.96 |
628 |
16 |
40 |
| D3 |
634 |
1867 |
389 |
156 |
389 |
0.97 |
634 |
16 |
35 |
| D4 |
641 |
1888 |
393 |
157 |
393 |
0.98 |
641 |
15 |
31 |
| D5 |
647 |
1908 |
398 |
159 |
398 |
0.99 |
647 |
15 |
28 |
| D6 |
654 |
1929 |
402 |
161 |
402 |
1.00 |
654 |
15 |
25 |
| D7 |
661 |
1949 |
406 |
162 |
406 |
1.01 |
661 |
15 |
27 |
| D8 |
667 |
1970 |
410 |
164 |
410 |
1.02 |
667 |
14 |
30 |
| D9 |
674 |
1991 |
415 |
166 |
415 |
1.03 |
674 |
14 |
35 |
| D10 |
680 |
2011 |
419 |
168 |
419 |
1.04 |
680 |
13 |
40 |
| D11 |
687 |
2032 |
423 |
169 |
423 |
1.05 |
687 |
12 |
53 |
[0082] In No. D6 in Table 7 in which the ratio between the arc portion radius and the outer
radius of the steel pipe is 1.00, the open amount is smallest, and as the steel pipe
outer radius decreases or increases, the open amount increases. The open amount of
40 [mm] or smaller, which can be closed by the welding machine used in Example 1,
was achieved in Nos. D2 to D10 in Table 7, and the ratio between the arc portion radius
and the outer radius of the steel pipe is 0.96 to 1.04. The open amount of 50 [mm],
which did not cause breakage of the welded portion in Example 1, was achieved also
in Nos. D2 to D10 in Table 7, and the ratio between the arc portion radius and the
outer radius of the steel pipe is 0.96 to 1.04.
[0083] Although the open amount that can be closed by welding the seam gap portion G and
the open amount that does not cause breakage of the welded portion vary depending
on the welding facility and the welding method, the guideline of the arc portion radiuses
of the upper die 4 and the lower die 5 is 0.96 to 1.04 of the steel pipe outer radius.
[0084] According to the present invention, a method of manufacturing a steel pipe for efficiently
forming a steel pipe with high roundness and a press die can be provided. Reference
Signs List
[0085]
- 1
- die
- 1a
- rod-shaped member
- 1b
- rod-shaped member
- 2
- punch
- 2a
- punch front end
- 2b
- punch support
- 3
- conveyance roller
- 4
- upper die
- 4a
- arc portion
- 4b1
- linear portion or small-curvature arc portion
- 4b2
- linear portion or small-curvature arc portion
- 5
- lower die
- 5a
- arc portion
- 5b1
- linear portion or small-curvature arc portion
- 5b2
- linear portion or small-curvature arc portion