TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present disclosure relates to the field of computer technologies, and in particular
to a method and apparatus for determining a traffic checkpoint, an electronic device,
and a medium.
BACKGROUND
[0002] With the continuous development of the social economy and the transportation industry,
a growing number of vehicles travel across regions and even borders. During global
route planning, a cross-border request needs to be made to a customs port between
two countries. However, opening time of the customs port may change over time, and
untimely or false update will cause problems such as improper route planning, detours,
or failure to get through the port that severely affect user experience.
[0003] Data of the customs port is often updated manually at regular intervals, for example,
once a year. However, manually updating data may cause untimely or false update of
the data of the customs port, and then cause poorly planned routes, detours, infeasible
planning schemes, or other problems.
SUMMARY
[0004] According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a computer-implemented method for
determining a traffic checkpoint is provided, the method comprising: acquiring data
of vehicle trajectories within a predetermined area, the predetermined area being
determined by a boundary between two adjacent areas; matching the data of the vehicle
trajectories with map data within the predetermined area to obtain a matching road
network; determining a plurality of intersection points between the road network and
the boundary, and dividing the plurality of intersection points into at least one
group, a distance between any two intersection points in a first group of the at least
one group being less than a preset value; and determining a specific position of a
first traffic checkpoint in the first group based on a number of the vehicle trajectories
passing each of the intersection points in the first group of the at least one group.
[0005] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, an apparatus for determining
a traffic checkpoint is provided, the apparatus comprising: an acquisition module
configured to acquire data of vehicle trajectories within a predetermined area, the
predetermined area being determined by a boundary between two adjacent areas; a matching
module configured to match the data of the vehicle trajectories with map data within
the predetermined area to obtain a matching road network; a determination module configured
to determine a plurality of intersection points between the road network and the boundary,
and divide the plurality of intersection points into at least one group, a distance
between any two intersection points in a first group of the at least one group being
less than a preset value; and a planning module configured to determine a specific
position of a traffic checkpoint in the first group based on the number of vehicle
trajectories passing each of the intersection point in the first group of the at least
one group.
[0006] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a computer program product
is provided, comprising program code portions for performing the method described
in the present disclosure when the computer program product is executed on one or
more computing devices.
[0007] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a computer-readable storage
medium is provided which has computer program instructions stored thereon, wherein
the computer program instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor
to perform the method described in the present disclosure.
[0008] According to the method and the apparatus for determining a traffic checkpoint, the
electronic device, and the medium provided in the present disclosure, data of the
customs port can be automatically updated and user navigation experience can be enhanced.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009] The drawings exemplarily show embodiments and form a part of the specification, and
are used to explain exemplary implementations of the embodiments together with a written
description of the specification. The embodiments shown are merely for illustrative
purposes and do not limit the scope of the claims. Throughout the drawings, like reference
signs denote like but not necessarily identical elements.
FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing a method for determining a traffic checkpoint according
to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a relationship among vehicle trajectories, road
networks, and administrative areas according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a relationship between a boundary and a predetermined
area according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a method for matching data of vehicle trajectories with
map data according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 5 is a schematic structural diagram showing an apparatus for determining a traffic
checkpoint according to an embodiment of the present disclosure; and
FIG. 6 is a structural block diagram showing an example electronic device that can
be applied to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0010] Embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in more detail below with
reference to the accompanying drawings. Although some embodiments of the present disclosure
are shown in the accompanying drawings, it should be understood that the present disclosure
can be implemented in various forms and should not be construed as being limited to
the embodiments set forth herein. On the contrary, these embodiments are provided
for a more thorough and complete understanding of the present disclosure. It should
be understood that the accompanying drawings and the embodiments of the present disclosure
are merely for illustrative purposes, and are not intended to limit the scope of protection
of the present disclosure.
[0011] It should be understood that the steps recorded in the method implementations of
the present disclosure may be performed in different orders and/or in parallel. Furthermore,
additional steps may be comprised and/or the execution of the illustrated steps may
be omitted in the method implementations. The scope of the present disclosure is not
limited in this respect.
[0012] FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing a method 100 for determining a traffic checkpoint according
to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
[0013] In step 101, acquiring data of vehicle trajectories within a predetermined area,
the predetermined area being determined by a boundary between two adjacent areas.
[0014] In step 102, matching the data of the vehicle trajectories with map data within the
predetermined area to obtain a matching road network.
[0015] In step 103, determining a plurality of intersection points between the road network
and the boundary, and dividing the plurality of intersection points into at least
one group, a distance between any two intersection points in a first group of the
at least one group being less than a preset value.
[0016] In step 104, determining a specific position of a first traffic checkpoint in the
first group based on a number of the vehicle trajectories passing each of the intersection
points in the first group of the at least one group.
[0017] The method 100 for determining a traffic checkpoint according to the embodiment shown
in FIG. 1 makes it possible that a specific position of an opening traffic checkpoint
can be determined by using the collected data of the vehicle trajectories that is
more up-to-date, thereby avoiding untimely or false update of customs port (that is,
traffic checkpoint) data that may be caused by manually updating data in the related
technologies. Specifically, by matching the data of vehicle trajectories with the
real map data, the method 100 according to this embodiment makes it possible to obtain
corresponding possible positions of a current traffic checkpoint without a need to
manually update data, and select the most possible position therefrom as a position
of the current traffic checkpoint. Accurate and timely update of the data of the traffic
checkpoint can improve the accuracy of a navigation route, thereby enhancing user
navigation experience. FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a relationship among
vehicle trajectories, road networks, and administrative areas according to an embodiment
of the present disclosure.
[0018] As shown in FIG. 2, two adjacent areas: an area 1 and an area 2 are different areas,
the area 1 and the area 2 have a boundary 270, and the boundary 270 has an endpoint
A and an endpoint B.
[0019] Four vehicle trajectories are shown therein, comprising: a vehicle trajectory 210,
a vehicle trajectory 220, a vehicle trajectory 240, and a vehicle trajectory 250.
[0020] A road network 230 and a road network 260 are preset road networks on a map. There
is an intersection point 280 between the road network 230 and the boundary 270, and
there is an intersection point 290 between the road network 260 and the boundary 270.
[0021] In some aspects, the predetermined area is determined by performing operations comprising:
acquiring coordinates of a plurality of points on the boundary in a first direction
and coordinates of the plurality of points in a second direction, the plurality of
points being obtained from the boundary with predetermined precision; comparing the
coordinates of the plurality of points in the first direction to obtain X
max and X
min, wherein X
max is a maximum value among the coordinates of the plurality of points in the first
direction, and X
min is a minimum value among the coordinates of the plurality of points in the first
direction; comparing the coordinates of the plurality of points in the second direction
to obtain Y
max and Y
min, wherein Y
max is a maximum value among the coordinates of the plurality of points in the second
direction, and Y
min is a minimum value among the coordinates of the plurality of points in the second
direction, and determining coordinates of four vertices of the predetermined area
as (X
min, Y
max), (X
max, Y
max), (X
max, Y
min), and (X
min, Y
min).
[0022] Still referring to FIG. 2, acquiring X coordinates and Y coordinates of the plurality
of points on the boundary 270. The plurality of points is obtained with predetermined
precision, for example, the X coordinates and Y coordinates of the plurality of points
on the boundary 270 are acquired with precision of 1 meter. The X coordinates of the
plurality of points on the boundary 270 are compared to find that an X coordinate
of a point B is the smallest and an X coordinate of a point A is the largest, and
therefore, X
max = X
A, and X
min = X
B. The Y coordinates of the plurality of points on the boundary 270 are compared to
find that a Y coordinate of the point B is the smallest and a Y coordinate of the
point A is the largest, and therefore, Y
max = Y
A, and Y
min = Y
B. Therefore, the coordinates of four vertices of the predetermined area are (X
B, Y
A), (X
A, Y
A), (X
A, Y
B), and (X
B, Y
B). Correspondingly, the four vertices are D, A, C, and B. Therefore, the predetermined
area is determined by an area defined by the four vertices D, A, C, and B.
[0023] FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a relationship between a boundary and a predetermined
area according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
[0024] According to some implementations of the present disclosure, the relationship between
the shape of a boundary and a predetermined area is complex. As shown in FIG. 3, acquiring
X coordinates and Y coordinates of a plurality of points on a boundary 370. The plurality
of points is obtained with predetermined precision, for example, the X coordinates
and Y coordinates of the plurality of points on the boundary 370 are acquired with
precision of 1 meter. The X coordinates of the plurality of points on the boundary
370 are compared to find that an X coordinate of a point E is the smallest and an
X coordinate of a point A is the largest, and therefore, X
max = X
A, and X
min = X
E. The Y coordinates of the plurality of points on the boundary 370 are compared to
find that a Y coordinate of a point B is the smallest and a Y coordinate of the point
A is the largest, and therefore, Y
max = Y
A, and Y
min = Y
B. Therefore, the coordinates of four vertices of the predetermined area are (X
E, Y
A), (X
A, Y
A), (X
A, Y
B), and (X
E, Y
B). Correspondingly, the four vertices are D, A, C, and B'. Therefore, the predetermined
area is determined by an area defined by the four vertices D, A, C, and B .
[0025] In step 101, acquiring data of vehicle trajectories within a predetermined area,
the predetermined area being determined by a boundary between two adjacent areas.
It can be learned in conjunction with Figs 2 and 3 that, the predetermined area is
determined by the boundary 270 or the boundary 370 between the two adjacent areas.
[0026] Because the predetermined area is determined by the boundary, acquiring the data
of the vehicle trajectories within the predetermined area can ensure that the data
of the obtained vehicle trajectories are located near the boundary, the obtained data
is more effective and accurate, and data of irrelevant vehicle trajectories around
is filtered out, thereby reducing the computation amount and improving the computation
efficiency.
[0027] The data of the vehicle trajectories falling within the predetermined area is collected
through collision check.
[0028] The boundary is an administrative area boundary between the adjacent areas. The administrative
area boundary between the adjacent areas may be a boundary between adjacent provinces
or cities. The two adjacent areas may belong to the same country or region. For example,
the boundary is a part of the boundary between Shandong Province and Shanxi Province,
or a part of a boundary between adjacent cities or counties within the same province.
Alternatively, the two adjacent areas may belong to different countries or regions.
For example, the boundary is a part of the boundary between Shenzhen and Hong Kong.
[0029] In some aspects , the traffic checkpoint may be a customs port.
[0030] Step 102 is continued. Step 102 of matching the data of the vehicle trajectories
with map data within the predetermined area to obtain a matching road network comprises:
determining whether a matching degree between the data of the vehicle trajectories
and existing road network data in the map data within the predetermined area exceeds
a preset matching degree threshold; and determining, in response to determining that
the matching degree exceeds the threshold, a current route in the existing road network
as a route in the matching road network route.
[0031] The road network is a preset road network on a map.
[0032] FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a method for matching data of vehicle trajectories
with map data according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
[0033] As shown in FIG. 4, determining whether a matching degree between the data of the
vehicle trajectories and data of an existing road network in the map data within the
predetermined area exceeds a preset matching degree threshold; and determining, in
response to determining that the matching degree exceeds the threshold, a current
route in the existing road network as a route in the matching road network . If the
matching degree does not exceed the threshold, determining that the current route
in the existing road network does not match the vehicle trajectories to be determined.
[0034] Since the data of the vehicle trajectories may have errors, the vehicle trajectories
may not necessarily coincide with the road network, and the data of the vehicle trajectories
needs to be matched with the map data to obtain the matching road network, to determine
a road network which a vehicle travels on. The data of the road network has been preset
in the map data and has high accuracy, thereby providing an accurate data basis for
subsequent computation of the traffic checkpoint.
[0035] Each of the vehicle trajectories corresponds to a respective route in the matching
road network. As there is definitely a corresponding road for a traveling vehicle,
any vehicle trajectory corresponds to a route in a road network.
[0036] It may be learned in conjunction with FIG. 2, both the vehicle trajectory 210 and
the vehicle trajectory 220 match the road network 230 by using the matching method
102 shown in FIG. 4, and similarly, both the vehicle trajectory 240 and the vehicle
trajectory 250 match the road network 260 by using the matching method shown in FIG.
4.
[0037] In some aspects , the matching method may be the Huffman algorithm.
[0038] Step 103 is continued, in which the plurality of intersection points between the
matching road network and the boundary are searched, wherein the matching road network
comprises a plurality of routes intersecting the boundary to form the plurality of
intersection points.
[0039] There is a plurality of intersection points between the road network and the boundary.
The plurality of intersection points is grouped based on distances between the intersection
points, and a plurality of intersection points between which distances are less than
a preset value is grouped into one group. The distance between any two intersection
points in the group being less than the preset value.
[0040] Still referring to FIG. 2, the matching road network comprises the road network 230
and the road network 260. There is an intersection point 280 between the road network
230 and the boundary 270, and there is an intersection point 290 between the road
network 260 and the boundary 270.
[0041] The intersection point between a route and a boundary represents a position of a
traffic checkpoint of two adjacent administrative areas through which a vehicle passes,
and if there is a plurality of intersection points, it indicates that there is a plurality
of traffic checkpoints on the boundary between the adjacent administrative areas through
which the vehicle is allowed to pass. Finding the plurality of traffic checkpoints
can provide diversified routes for navigation.
[0042] According to some embodiments of the present disclosure, the determining a plurality
of intersection points between the road network and the boundary, and dividing the
plurality of intersection points into at least one group, a distance between any two
intersection points in a first group of the at least one group being less than a preset
value comprises: determining the at least one group by means of a depth-first algorithm
or a breadth-first algorithm.
[0043] In some aspects , all the intersection points are traversed once by means of the
depth-first algorithm or the breadth-first algorithm, to group intersection points
between which distances are less than a threshold into one group, for example, into
the first group, a distance between any two intersection points in the first group
being less than the preset value.
[0044] Still referring to FIG. 2, the intersection point 280 and the intersection point
290 are traversed by means of the depth-first algorithm or the breadth-first algorithm,
and if a distance between the intersection point 280 and the intersection point 290
is less than the threshold, the intersection point 280 and the intersection point
290 are grouped into the first group.
[0045] The two intersection points in the figure are merely exemplary descriptions, and
the present disclosure imposes no limitation on the number of intersection points.
[0046] Step 104 is continued, in which a specific position of a first traffic checkpoint
in the first group is determined based on a number of the vehicle trajectories passing
intersection points in the first group of the at least one group.
[0047] The intersection points in the first group are aggregated to determine a traffic
checkpoint through which most vehicles pass, and a specific position of the traffic
checkpoint is recommended as a navigation route.
[0048] According to some implementations of the present disclosure, a number of the vehicle
trajectories passing each of the intersection points in the first group within a predetermined
time is counted, wherein when the number of vehicle trajectories is greater than a
number threshold, traffic checkpoints corresponding to the intersection points in
the first group are candidate traffic checkpoints of the first traffic checkpoint.
[0049] Still referring to FIG. 2, the numbers of vehicle trajectories passing the intersection
point 280 and the intersection point 290 within the predetermined time are counted.
For example, the numbers of vehicle trajectories passing the intersection point 280
and the intersection point 290 within one day are counted and are 20 and 30, respectively.
When the number threshold is 10, the traffic checkpoints corresponding to the intersection
point 280 and the intersection point 290 respectively are both candidate traffic checkpoints.
[0050] According to some implementations of the present disclosure, a position of a candidate
traffic checkpoint through which most vehicle trajectories pass is selected as the
specific position of the first traffic checkpoint.
[0051] Still referring to FIG. 2, in some aspects, selecting a position of the candidate
traffic checkpoint that corresponds to the intersection point 290 and through which
most vehicle trajectories pass as the specific position of the first traffic checkpoint.
[0052] In some aspects, the step of determining the candidate traffic checkpoints may alternatively
be omitted. After the number of vehicle trajectories passing each of the intersection
points in the first group within the predetermined time is counted, a position of
a traffic checkpoint through which most vehicle trajectories pass is directly selected
as the specific position of the first traffic checkpoint.
[0053] Since there is no need to manually update data of the traffic checkpoint in the process
of determining the position of the first traffic checkpoint, a specific position of
an opening traffic checkpoint can be acquired by processing the data of the vehicle
trajectories, and the position of the traffic checkpoint through which most vehicle
trajectories pass is selected as the specific position of the first traffic checkpoint,
which indicates that most vehicles have passed through the first traffic checkpoint
on the boundary. In this case, it is most possible that the traffic checkpoint is
opening, and therefore, directing a navigation route to the first traffic checkpoint
will ensure to the greatest extent that a vehicle passes the first traffic checkpoint.
When the first traffic checkpoint is a customs port, according to the method for determining
a traffic checkpoint provided in the present disclosure, data of the customs port
can be automatically updated and user navigation experience can be enhanced.
[0054] FIG. 5 is a schematic structural diagram showing an apparatus 500 for determining
a traffic checkpoint according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
[0055] As shown in FIG. 5, the apparatus 500 for determining a traffic checkpoint is provided,
the apparatus comprising:
an acquisition module 510 configured to acquire data of vehicle trajectories within
a predetermined area, the predetermined area being determined by a boundary between
two adjacent areas;
a matching module 520 configured to match the data of the vehicle trajectories with
map data within the predetermined area to obtain a matching road network;
a determination module 530 configured to determine a plurality of intersection points
between the road network and the boundary, and divide the plurality of intersection
points into at least one group, a distance between any two intersection points in
a first group of the at least one group being less than a preset value; and
a planning module 540 configured to determine a specific position of a first traffic
checkpoint in the first group based on a number of the vehicle trajectories passing
each of the intersection points in the first group of the at least one group.
[0056] Based on the above apparatus for determining a traffic checkpoint, there is no need
to manually update data of the traffic checkpoint, data of trajectories within a specific
area is acquired, and a specific position of an opening traffic checkpoint can be
acquired by processing the data of the vehicle trajectories. There is no need to manually
update data during obtaining of the position of the traffic checkpoint, so that the
data of the traffic checkpoint can be automatically updated, and the data of the traffic
checkpoint can be quickly updated to ensure the accuracy of a navigation route, thereby
enhancing user navigation experience.
[0057] According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the present disclosure further
provides an electronic device 600 and a readable storage medium.
[0058] FIG. 6 is a structural block diagram showing an exemplary electronic device that
can be applied to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
[0059] The electronic device is intended to represent various forms of digital computers,
such as a laptop computer, a desktop computer, a workstation, a personal digital assistant,
a server, a blade server, a mainframe computer, and other suitable computers. The
electronic device may further represent various forms of mobile apparatuses, such
as personal digital assistant, a cellular phone, a smartphone, a wearable device,
and other similar computing apparatuses. The components shown herein, their connections
and relationships, and their functions are merely examples, and are not intended to
limit the implementation of the present disclosure described and/or required herein.
[0060] As shown in FIG. 6, the electronic device 600 comprises: one or more processors 601,
a memory 602, and an interface for connecting various components, comprising a high-speed
interface and a low-speed interface. The various components are connected to each
other by using different buses, and may be mounted on a common motherboard or in other
manners as required. The processor may process instructions executed in the electronic
device (for example, instructions to display graphical information of the GUI on the
display device coupled to the interface). In other implementations, if required, the
plurality of processors and/or a plurality of buses can be used together with a plurality
of memories. Similarly, a plurality of electronic devices can be connected, and each
device provides some of the necessary operations (for example, as a server array,
a group of blade servers, or a multi-processor system). In FIG. 6, one processor 601
is used as an example.
[0061] The memory 602 is a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium provided in the
present disclosure. The memory stores instructions that can be executed by at least
one processor, so that the at least one processor performs the method for determining
a traffic checkpoint provided in the present disclosure. The non-transitory computer-readable
storage medium of the present disclosure stores computer instructions for causing
a computer to perform the method for determining a traffic checkpoint provided in
the present disclosure.
[0062] As a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, the memory 602 may be configured
to store non-transitory software programs, and non-transitory computer-executable
programs and modules, such as program instructions/modules corresponding to the method
for determining a traffic checkpoint in the embodiments of the present disclosure
(for example, the acquisition module 510, the matching module 520, the determination
module 530, and the planning module 540 shown in FIG. 5). The processor 601 executes
various functional applications and data processing of the server, that is, implements
the method for determining a traffic checkpoint in the foregoing method embodiments,
by running non-transitory software programs, instructions, and modules stored in the
memory 602.
[0063] The memory 602 may comprise a program storage area and a data storage area, wherein
the program storage area may store an operating system and an application program
required by at least one function; and the storage data area can store data created
according to the use of the electronic device configured to implement the method for
determining a traffic checkpoint. Moreover, the memory 602 may comprise a high-speed
random access memory, and may further comprise a non-transitory memory, such as at
least one magnetic disk storage device, a flash memory device, or other non-transitory
solid-state storage devices. In some embodiments, the memory 602 may optionally comprise
memories disposed remotely relative to the processor 601, and these remote memories
may be connected, through a network, to the electronic device for implementing the
method for determining a traffic checkpoint. Instances of the above network include,
but are not limited to, the Internet, an enterprise intranet, a local area network,
a mobile communications network, and a combination thereof.
[0064] The electronic device 600 for implementing the method for determining a traffic checkpoint
may further comprise: an input apparatus 603 and an output apparatus 604. The processor
601, the memory 602, the input apparatus 603, and the output apparatus 604 may be
connected through a bus or in other manners. In FIG. 6, the connection using a bus
is taken as an example.
[0065] The input apparatus 603 can receive entered digit or character information, and generate
a key signal input related to user settings and function control of the electronic
device for implementing the method for determining a traffic checkpoint, and may be
input apparatuses such as a touchscreen, a keypad, a mouse, a trackpad, a touchpad,
an indicator rod, one or more mouse buttons, a trackball, and a joystick. The output
apparatus 604 may comprise a display device, an auxiliary lighting apparatus (such
as an LED), a tactile feedback apparatus (such as a vibration motor), etc. The display
device may include, but is not limited to, a liquid crystal display (LCD), a light-emitting
diode (LED) display, and a plasma display. In some implementations, the display device
may be a touchscreen.
[0066] Various implementations of the systems and technologies described herein can be implemented
in a digital electronic circuit system, an integrated circuit system, an ASIC (application-specific
integrated circuit), computer hardware, firmware, software, and/or a combination thereof.
These various implementations may comprise: the systems and technologies are implemented
in one or more computer programs, wherein the one or more computer programs may be
executed and/or interpreted on a programmable system comprising at least one programmable
processor. The programmable processor may be a dedicated or general-purpose programmable
processor that can receive data and instructions from a storage system, at least one
input apparatus, and at least one output apparatus, and transmit data and instructions
to the storage system, the at least one input apparatus, and the at least one output
apparatus.
[0067] These computing programs (also referred to as programs, software, software applications,
or code) comprise machine instructions of a programmable processor, and can be implemented
by using an advanced procedure and/or object-oriented programming languages, and/or
assembly/machine languages. As used herein, the terms "machine-readable medium" and
"computer-readable medium" refer to any computer program product, device, and/or apparatus
(for example, a magnetic disk, an optical disc, a memory, a programmable logic device
(PLD)) configured to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor,
comprising a machine-readable medium that receives machine instructions as machine-readable
signals. The term "machine-readable signal" refers to any signal used to provide machine
instructions and/or data to a programmable processor.
[0068] In order to provide interaction with a user, the systems and technologies described
herein can be implemented on a computer which has: a display apparatus (for example,
a CRT (cathode-ray tube) or an LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor) configured to
display information to the user; and a keyboard and pointing apparatus (for example,
a mouse or a trackball) through which the user can provide an input to the computer.
Other types of apparatuses can also be used to provide interaction with the user;
for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback (for
example, visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback), and an input from
the user can be received in any form (including an acoustic input, voice input, or
tactile input).
[0069] The systems and technologies described herein can be implemented in a computing system
(for example, as a data server) comprising a backend component, or a computing system
(for example, an application server) comprising a middleware component, or a computing
system (for example, a user computer with a graphical user interface or a web browser
through which the user can interact with the implementation of the systems and technologies
described herein) comprising a frontend component, or a computing system comprising
any combination of the backend component, the middleware component, or the frontend
component. The components of the system can be connected to each other through digital
data communication (for example, a communications network) in any form or medium.
Examples of the communications network comprise: a local area network (LAN), a wide
area network (WAN), and the Internet.
[0070] A computer system may comprise a client and a server. The client and the server are
generally far away from each other and usually interact through a communications network.
A relationship between the client and the server is generated by computer programs
running on respective computers and having a client-server relationship with each
other. The server may be a server in a distributed system, or a server combined with
a blockchain. The server may alternatively be a cloud server, or an intelligent cloud
computing server or intelligent cloud host with artificial intelligence technologies.
[0071] It should be understood that steps may be reordered, added, or deleted based on the
various forms of procedures shown above. For example, the steps recorded in the present
application can be performed in parallel, in order, or in a different order, provided
that the desired result of the technical solutions disclosed in the present disclosure
can be achieved, which is not limited herein.
[0072] The specific implementations above do not constitute a limitation on the protection
scope of the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art should understand that various
modifications, combinations, sub-combinations, and replacements can be made according
to design requirements and other factors. Any modifications, equivalent replacements,
improvements, etc. within the spirit and principle of the present disclosure shall
fall within the protection scope of the present disclosure.
1. A computer-implemented method for determining a traffic checkpoint, the method comprising:
acquiring (101) data of vehicle trajectories within a predetermined area, the predetermined
area being determined by a boundary between two adjacent areas;
matching (102) the data of the vehicle trajectories with map data within the predetermined
area to obtain a matching road network;
determining (103) a plurality of intersection points between the road network and
the boundary, and dividing the plurality of intersection points into at least one
group, a distance between any two intersection points in a first group of the at least
one group being less than a preset value; and
determining (104) a specific position of a first traffic checkpoint in the first group
based on a number of the vehicle trajectories passing each of the intersection points
in the first group of the at least one group.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the predetermined area is determined by performing
operations comprising:
acquiring coordinates of a plurality of points on the boundary in a first direction
and coordinates of the plurality of points in a second direction, the plurality of
points being obtained from the boundary with predetermined precision;
comparing the coordinates of the plurality of points in the first direction to obtain
Xmax and Xmin, wherein Xmax is a maximum value among the coordinates of the plurality of points in the first
direction, and Xmin is a minimum value among the coordinates of the plurality of points in the first
direction;
comparing the coordinates of the plurality of points in the second direction to obtain
Ymax and Ymin, wherein Ymax is a maximum value among the coordinates of the plurality of points in the second
direction and Ymin is a minimum value among the coordinates of the plurality of points in the second
direction; and
determining coordinates of four vertices of the predetermined area as (Xmin, Ymax), (Xmax, Ymax), (Xmax, Ymin), and (Xmin, Ymin).
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the matching the data of the vehicle trajectories
with map data within the predetermined area to obtain a matching road network comprises:
determining whether a matching degree between the data of the vehicle trajectories
and data of an existing road network in the map data within the predetermined area
exceeds a preset matching degree threshold; and
determining, in response to determining that the matching degree exceeds the threshold,
a current route in the existing road network as a route in the matching road network.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein each of the vehicle trajectories corresponds
to a respective route in the matching road network.
5. The method according to any one of the foregoing claims, wherein the determining a
plurality of intersection points between the road network and the boundary comprises:
searching for the plurality of intersection points between the matching road network
and the boundary, wherein the matching road network comprises a plurality of routes
intersecting the boundary to form the plurality of intersection points.
6. The method according to any one of the foregoing claims, wherein the plurality of
intersection points is divided into the at least one group by means of a depth-first
algorithm or a breadth-first algorithm.
7. The method according to any one of the foregoing claims, wherein the determining a
specific position of a traffic checkpoint in the first group based on a number of
the vehicle trajectories passing each of the intersection points in the first group
of the at least one group comprises:
counting the number of the vehicle trajectories passing each of the intersection points
in the first group within a predetermined time;
in accordance with a determination that the number of the vehicle trajectories passing
each of the intersection points in the first group is greater than a number threshold,
determining traffic checkpoints corresponding to the intersection points in the first
group are candidate traffic checkpoints of the first traffic checkpoint; and
selecting a position of one of the candidate traffic checkpoints through which most
vehicle trajectories pass as the specific position of the first traffic checkpoint.
8. The method according to any one of the foregoing claims, wherein the first traffic
checkpoint is a customs port, and the two adjacent areas belong to different countries
or regions.
9. An apparatus for determining a traffic checkpoint, the apparatus comprising:
an acquisition module (510) configured to acquire data of vehicle trajectories within
a predetermined area, the predetermined area being determined by a boundary between
two adjacent areas;
a matching module (520) configured to match the data of the vehicle trajectories with
map data within the predetermined area to obtain a matching road network;
a determination module (530) configured to determine a plurality of intersection points
between the road network and the boundary, and divide the plurality of intersection
points into at least one group, a distance between any two intersection points in
a first group of the at least one group being less than a preset value; and
a planning module (540) configured to determine a specific position of a first traffic
checkpoint in the first group based on a number of the vehicle trajectories passing
each of the intersection points in the first group of the at least one group.
10. The apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the predetermined area is determined by
the determination module, and the determination module is configured to:
acquire coordinates of a plurality of points on the boundary in a first direction
and coordinates of the plurality of points in a second direction, the plurality of
points being obtained from the boundary with predetermined precision;
compare the coordinates of the plurality of points in the first direction to obtain
Xmax and Xmin, wherein Xmax is a maximum value among the coordinates of the plurality of points in the first
direction and Xmin is a minimum value among the coordinates of the plurality of points in the first
direction;
compare the coordinates of the plurality of points in the second direction to acquire
Ymax and Ymin, wherein Ymax is a maximum value among the coordinates of the plurality of points in the second
direction and Ymin is a minimum value among the coordinates of the plurality of points in the second
direction; and
determine coordinates of four vertices of the predetermined area as (Xmin, Ymax), (Xmax, Ymax), (Xmax, Ymin), and (Xmin, Ymin).
11. The apparatus according to claim 9 or 10, wherein the vehicle trajectories and the
matching road network have a one-to-one correspondence.
12. The apparatus according to any one of the claims 9 to 11, wherein
the planning module is configured to:
count a number of the vehicle trajectories passing each of the intersection points
in the first group within a predetermined time;
in accordance with a determination that the number of the vehicle trajectories is
greater than a number threshold, determine traffic checkpoints corresponding to the
intersection points in the first group are candidate traffic checkpoints of the first
traffic checkpoint; and
select a position of one of the candidate traffic checkpoints through which most vehicle
trajectories pass as the specific position of the first traffic checkpoint.
13. The apparatus according to any one of claims 9 to 12, wherein the first traffic checkpoint
is a customs port, and the two adjacent areas belong to different countries or regions.
14. A computer program product comprising program code portions for performing the method
of any one of claims 1 to 8 when the computer program product is executed on one or
more computing devices.
15. A computer-readable storage medium having computer program instructions stored thereon,
wherein the computer program instructions, when executed by a processor, cause the
processor to perform the method according to any one of claims 1 to 8.