[0001] The present invention relates to a method of producing a wheel for straddled vehicles.
[0002] In recent years, along with steels, aluminum alloys are widely used as the material
of wheels for automotive vehicles.
[0003] JP 5205655 B2 discloses a method of producing a wheel made of an aluminum alloy, where a tilting
gravity casting apparatus is used. Employing a gravity casting technique for producing
a wheel is advantageous in terms of reducing the weight of relatively large wheels
because it is easy to form a hollow structure by utilizing a core.
[0004] However, when producing a wheel made of an aluminum alloy by using a gravity casting
technique, some improvement could still be made in the material strength (mechanical
properties) of the rim, in which solidification tends to be slow and defects are likely
to remain.
[0005] The present invention has been made in view of the above problem, and an objective
thereof is to provide a method of producing a wheel for straddled vehicles that is
able to adequately improve the mechanical properties of a rim. According to the present
invention said object is solved by a method of producing a wheel for straddled vehicles
having the features of independent claim 1. Preferred embodiments are laid down in
the dependent claims.
[0006] The present specification discloses a method of producing a wheel for straddled vehicles
as recited in the following Items.
[Item 1]
[0007] A method of producing a wheel for straddled vehicles, the wheel including: a hub
having an aperture into which a wheel shaft is to be inserted; an annular rim; and
a plurality of spokes connecting the hub and the rim, the method comprising:
step (A) of forming an intermediate product from an aluminum alloy by using a gravity
casting technique, the intermediate product including a precursory hub, an annular
precursory rim, and a plurality of precursory spokes connecting the precursory hub
and the precursory rim;
step (B) of performing a flow forming process for the precursory rim of the intermediate
product by using a flow forming apparatus, wherein, while the intermediate product
is rotated, at least a portion of the precursory rim is drawn in a first direction
and a second direction, the first direction being one direction that extends from
a center of the intermediate product on an axial direction thereof, and the second
direction being an opposite direction that extends from the center of the intermediate
product on the axial direction; and
step (C) of, after step (B), performing a cutting process for the intermediate product
to at least complete the rim, wherein,
a ratio of a wall thickness of the precursory rim after step (B) and before step (C)
to a wall thickness of the rim after step (C) is not less than 132% and not more than
433%.
[0008] In the production method according to Item 1, after step (A) of forming an intermediate
product from an aluminum alloy by a gravity casting technique, step (B) of performing
a flow forming process for a precursory rim of the intermediate product is performed.
As a result of this, mechanical properties (e.g., elongation) of the rim can be adequately
improved. Moreover, a ratio of a wall thickness of the precursory rim after step (B)
and before step (C) to a wall thickness of the rim after step (C) is not less than
132% and not more than 433%. As a result, while suitably realizing a desired product
shape, the efficiency of material use can be enhanced.
[Item 2]
[0009] The production method of Item 1, wherein step (B) is performed in such a manner that,
in at least a portion of the precursory rim, a ratio of the wall thickness of the
precursory rim after step (B) and before step (C) to a wall thickness of the precursory
rim before step (B) is 50% or less.
[0010] From the standpoint of adequately improving the mechanical properties of the rim
through the flow forming process, step (B) is preferably performed in such a manner
that, in at least a portion of the precursory rim, a ratio of the wall thickness of
the precursory rim after step (B) and before step (C) to the wall thickness of the
precursory rim before step (B) is 50% or less.
[0012] The production method of Item 1 or 2, wherein
the flow forming apparatus includes:
a first mandrel having a first abutting surface that abuts with an inner peripheral
surface of the precursory rim of the intermediate product from one direction along
the axial direction;
a second mandrel having a second abutting surface that abuts with the inner peripheral
surface of the precursory rim of the intermediate product from an opposite direction
along the axial direction;
a rotating mechanism to rotate the first mandrel and the second mandrel; and
a roller to be pressed against an outer peripheral surface of the precursory rim of
the intermediate product.
[Item 4]
[0013] The production method of Item 3, wherein,
the flow forming apparatus further includes a knockout ring located near an outer
periphery of the first mandrel so as to be able to move up and down;
an upper surface of the knockout ring is offset from a reference plane along the first
direction; and
an amount of offset of an upper surface of the knockout ring from the reference plane
is set so that the amount increases as a ratio L1/L2 increases, wherein the ratio
L1/L2 is a ratio of a length L1 of the precursory rim after step (B) and before step
(C) as taken along the axial direction to a length L2 of the rim after step (C) as
taken along the axial direction.
[0014] The upper surface of the knockout ring may be offset from the reference plane along
the first direction. This will restrain the precursory rim from abutting with the
upper surface of the knockout ring during the flow forming process, thus making it
easier for the precursory rim to undergo sufficient plastic deformation. Herein, an
amount of offset of the knockout ring from the reference plane is preferably set in
accordance with a ratio L1/L2 of a length L1 of the precursory rim after step (B)
and before step (C) as taken along the axial direction to a length L2 of the rim after
step (C) as taken along the axial direction. Specifically, it is preferable that the
amount of offset increases as the ratio L1/L2 increases.
[Item 5]
[0015] The production method of Item 4, wherein the ratio L1/L2 is not less than 101% and
not more than 113%.
[0016] The ratio L1/L2 is preferably set to not less than 101% and not more than 113%.
[Item 6]
[0017] The production method of any of Items 3 to 5, wherein,
the inner peripheral surface of the precursory rim of the intermediate product formed
at step (A) includes a first region to abut with the first abutting surface of the
first mandrel and a second region to abut with the second abutting surface of the
second mandrel; and
each of the first region and the second region of the inner peripheral surface of
the precursory rim includes at least one stepped portion protruding inwardly along
a radial direction of the intermediate product.
[0018] Within the inner peripheral surface of the precursory rim of the intermediate product
(workpiece) provided, each of the region (first region) to abut with the first mandrel
and the region (second region) to abut with the second mandrel may include at least
one stepped portion protruding inwardly along the radial direction of the intermediate
product. As a result, the torque from the first mandrel and the second mandrel being
rotated by the rotating mechanism can be sufficiently transmitted to the intermediate
product. In other words, the stepped portion(s) enables clamping of the intermediate
product. Since this makes it unnecessary to rely on the precursory hub or the precursory
spoke for the clamping of the intermediate product, it becomes possible to produce
the wheel for straddled vehicles in such a manner that clamp scars will not be left
on the hub and the spoke.
[Item 7]
[0019] The production method of Item 6, wherein the at least one stepped portion is one
stepped portion formed along an entire circumference along a circumferential direction
of the intermediate product.
[0020] The at least one stepped portion may be one stepped portion that is formed along
the entire circumference along the circumferential direction of the intermediate product.
In that case, an upper surface (i.e., a surface of the intermediate product outward
along the axial direction) of the stepped portion has an annular shape, this upper
surface functioning as a clamping surface. Specifically, clamping of the intermediate
product is achieved by utilizing a frictional force occurring between the upper surface
(clamping surface) of the stepped portion and the abutting surface (i.e., the first
abutting surface of the first mandrel or the second abutting surface of the second
mandrel) of each mandrel pressed against the upper surface.
[0021] In the case where such a stepped portion (a stepped portion being formed along the
entire circumference along the circumferential direction of the intermediate product)
are provided in each of the first region and the second region of the inner peripheral
surface of the precursory rim, there is an advantage in that the intermediate product
can be easily set to the flow forming apparatus.
[Item 8]
[0022] The production method of Item 6, wherein the at least one stepped portion comprises
a plurality of stepped portions that are formed discretely along a circumferential
direction of the intermediate product.
[0023] The at least one stepped portion may be a plurality of stepped portions that are
formed discretely along the circumferential direction of the intermediate product.
In that case, the torque from the mandrel (the first mandrel or the second mandrel)
can be received on a partial side surface (a side surface oriented in the circumferential
direction of the intermediate product) of each stepped portion, so that not only the
upper surface of each stepped portion but also the partial side surface functions
as a clamping surface.
[0024] In the case where such a plurality of stepped portions are provided on the inner
peripheral surface of the precursory rim, the intermediate product can be prevented
from slipping against each mandrel. Moreover, a smaller amount of metal material is
needed to form the intermediate product than in the case where one stepped portion
is formed continuously along the entire circumference.
[Item 9]
[0025] The production method of any of Items 6 to 8, wherein each of the first abutting
surface of the first mandrel and the second abutting surface of the second mandrel
includes at least one engaging portion to engage with the at least one stepped portion.
[0026] Each of the first abutting surface of the first mandrel and the second abutting surface
of the second mandrel is preferably shaped so as to correspond to at least one stepped
portion of the intermediate product. Specifically, each of the first abutting surface
of the first mandrel and the second abutting surface of the second mandrel preferably
includes at least one engaging portion to engage with at least one stepped portion.
[Item 10]
[0027] The production method of any of Items 6 to 9, wherein the at least one stepped portion
is removed in step (C).
[0028] Because the at least one stepped portion including a clamping surface is removed
at step (C), no clamp scars will be left on the final product (i.e., the wheel for
straddled vehicles).
[0029] According to an embodiment of the present teaching, there is provided a method of
producing a wheel for straddled vehicles that is able to adequately improve the mechanical
properties of a rim.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0030]
FIG. 1 is a left side view schematically showing a wheel 100 for straddled vehicles.
FIG. 2 is a right side view schematically showing the wheel 100.
FIG. 3 is a plan view showing the wheel 100 as viewed from a radial direction.
FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of a method of producing the wheel 100.
FIG. 5 is a left side view schematically showing an intermediate product (workpiece)
100'.
FIG. 6 is a right side view schematically showing the workpiece 100'.
FIG. 7 is a plan view showing the workpiece 100' as viewed from a radial direction.
FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 8A-8A' in FIG. 5.
FIG. 9 is a diagram schematically showing a flow forming apparatus 10.
FIG. 10A is a left side view schematically showing the workpiece 100' after a flow
forming process.
FIG. 10B is a right side view schematically showing the workpiece 100' after a flow
forming process.
FIG. 10C is a plan view showing the workpiece 100' after a flow forming process as
viewed from a radial direction.
FIG. 10D is a cross-sectional view taken along line 10D-10D' in FIG. 10A.
FIG. 11 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 11A-11A' in FIG. 1.
FIG. 12A is a diagram showing an example positioning of a knockout ring 24.
FIG. 12B is a diagram showing another example positioning of the knockout ring 24.
FIG. 13 is a left side view schematically showing the workpiece 100'.
FIG. 14 is a right side view schematically showing the workpiece 100'.
FIG. 15 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 15A-15A' in FIG. 13.
FIG. 16 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 16A-16A' in FIG. 13.
FIG. 17 is a side view schematically showing a lower mandrel 21 and an upper mandrel
22.
FIG. 18 is a cross-sectional view schematically showing a state where the workpiece
100' is clamped by the lower mandrel 21 and the upper mandrel 22.
FIG. 19 is a left side view schematically showing the workpiece 100' after a flow
forming process.
FIG. 20 is a right side view schematically showing the workpiece 100' after a flow
forming process.
FIG. 21 is a left side view schematically showing the workpiece 100'.
FIG. 22 is a right side view schematically showing the workpiece 100'.
FIG. 23 is a left side view schematically showing the workpiece 100'.
FIG. 24 is a right side view schematically showing the workpiece 100'.
FIG. 25 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 25A-25A' in FIG. 23.
FIG. 26 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 26A-26A' in FIG. 23.
FIG. 27 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Si and
tensile strength and proof stress for Examples 1 to 3 and Reference Example 3.
FIG. 28 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Si and
elongation for Examples 1 to 3 and Reference Example 3.
FIG. 29 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Mg and
tensile strength and proof stress for Examples 3 to 7 and Reference Examples 4 and
5.
FIG. 30 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Mg and
elongation for Examples 3 to 7 and Reference Examples 4 and 5.
FIG. 31 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Cu and
tensile strength and proof stress for Examples 3, 8 and 9.
FIG. 32 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Cu and
elongation for Examples 3, 8 and 9.
FIG. 33 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Fe and
tensile strength and proof stress for Examples 3, 10 and 11.
FIG. 34 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Fe and
elongation for Examples 3, 10 and 11.
FIG. 35 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Ti and
tensile strength and proof stress for Examples 3, 12 and 13.
FIG. 36 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Ti and
elongation for Examples 3, 12 and 13.
FIG. 37 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Na and
tensile strength and proof stress for Examples 14 to 17.
FIG. 38 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Na and
elongation for Examples 14 to 17.
FIG. 39 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Sr and
tensile strength and proof stress for Examples 3, 14, and 18 to 20.
FIG. 40 is a graph showing a relationship between the percentage content of Sr and
elongation for Examples 3, 14, and 18 to 20.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0031] Hereinafter, embodiments of the present teaching will be described with reference
to the drawings.
[vehicle wheel]
[0032] With reference to FIGS. 1 to 3, an example of a wheel for straddled vehicles (hereinafter
simply referred to as a "wheel") that is produced by a production method according
to an embodiment of the present teaching will be described. FIGS. 1 and 2 are a left
side view and a right side view, respectively, schematically showing the wheel 100.
FIG. 3 is a plan view showing the wheel 100 from a radial direction.
[0033] As shown in FIGS. 1, 2 and 3, the wheel 100 includes a hub 110, a rim 120, and a
plurality of spokes 130. The wheel 100 is made of a metal material. The hub 110, the
rim 120, and the plurality of spokes 130 are monolithically formed.
[0034] The hub 110 is located in the center of the wheel 100, and has an aperture (wheel-shaft
insertion hole) 111, into which a wheel shaft is to be inserted. A direction that
is parallel to a center axis of the wheel-shaft insertion hole 111 may be referred
to as the "axial direction" hereinbelow. Note that the specific shape of the hub 110
is not limited to what is illustrated in FIG. 1, etc.
[0035] The rim 120 has an annular shape, and extends along the circumferential direction
of the wheel 100. The rim 120 has an inner peripheral surface 120a and an outer peripheral
surface 120b. A tire is to be mounted on the outer peripheral surface 120b of the
rim 120.
[0036] The plurality of spokes 130 connect the hub 110 and the rim 120. More specifically,
the plurality of spokes 130 connect an outer periphery of the hub 110 and the inner
peripheral surface 120a of the rim 120. Although the example shown illustrates the
wheel 100 as having ten spokes 130, the number of spokes 130 is not limited to ten.
Although the example shown illustrates that two adjacent spokes 130 are united at
the hub 110 side, the configuration of the spokes 130 is not limited thereto.
[Method of producing a wheel for straddled vehicles]
[0037] With reference to FIG. 4, a method of producing the wheel 100 will be described.
FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of a method of producing the wheel 100.
[0038] First, by using a gravity casting technique, an intermediate product (hereinafter
referred to as a "workpiece") 100' is formed from an aluminum alloy (Step s1). Specific
shapes for the workpiece 100' are shown in FIG. 5 to FIG. 8. FIG. 5 and FIG. 6 are
a left side view and a right side view, respectively, schematically showing the workpiece
100'. FIG. 7 is a plan view showing the workpiece 100' as viewed from a radial direction.
FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 8A-8A' in FIG. 5.
[0039] As shown in FIG. 5 to FIG. 7, the workpiece 100' includes a precursory hub 110',
a precursory rim 120', and a plurality of precursory spokes 130' connecting the precursory
hub 110' and the precursory rim 120'. The precursory hub 110' is a portion to become
the hub 110 of the wheel 100. Similarly, the precursory rim 120' is a portion to become
the rim 120, and the precursory spokes 130' are portions to become the spokes 130.
[0040] The precursory hub 110' is located at the center of the workpiece 100'. In the example
shown, the wheel-shaft insertion hole 111 is not formed in the precursory hub 110'
yet. The precursory rim 120' has an annular shape, and extends along the circumferential
direction of the workpiece 100'. The precursory rim 120' has an inner peripheral surface
120a' and an outer peripheral surface 120b'. The plurality of precursory spokes 130'
connect the precursory hub 110' and the precursory rim 120'. More specifically, the
plurality of precursory spokes 130' connect an outer periphery of the precursory hub
110' and the inner peripheral surface 120a' of the precursory rim 120'.
[0041] Then, a flow forming process is performed for the precursory rim 120' of the workpiece
100' by using a flow forming apparatus (Step s2). In this Step s2, while the workpiece
100' is rotated, at least a portion of the precursory rim 120' is drawn in a first
direction D1, which is one direction that extends from the center of the workpiece
100' on its axial direction (see FIG. 8) and in a second direction D2, which is an
opposite direction that extends from the center of the workpiece 100' on its axial
direction (see FIG. 8).
[0042] An example of a flow forming apparatus to be used at Step s2 is shown in FIG. 9.
The flow forming apparatus 10 shown in FIG. 9 includes: a first mandrel 21 and a second
mandrel 22; a rotating mechanism 31 to rotate the first mandrel 21 and the second
mandrel 22; and a roller 41 to be pressed against the outer peripheral surface 120b'
of the precursory rim 120' of the workpiece 100'.
[0043] Hereinafter, between the first mandrel 21 and the second mandrel 22, the first mandrel
21 being located relatively low will be referred to as the "lower mandrel", whereas
the second mandrel 22 being located relatively high will be referred to as the "upper
mandrel".
[0044] The rotating mechanism 31, which includes a motor, is placed on a pedestal 11. The
lower mandrel 21 is attached to a leading end of the rotating mechanism 31. On a roof
12, a mandrel moving mechanism 32 to move the upper mandrel 22 up or down is placed.
The upper mandrel 22 is attached to a leading end of the mandrel moving mechanism
32. On a wall 13, a roller moving mechanism 33 to move the roller 41 in the up-down
direction, the right-left direction, or the front-rear direction is placed. The roller
41 is supported, in a rotatable manner, by an arm 42 that is attached to a leading
end of the roller moving mechanism 33.
[0045] With the workpiece 100' being externally fitted on the lower mandrel 21 and the upper
mandrel 22, a flow forming process is performed. At this time, the lower mandrel 21
and the upper mandrel 22 are coupled in such a manner that the upper mandrel 22 will
rotate as the lower mandrel 21 rotates. For example, the flow forming process may
be performed in a state where a portion the lower mandrel 21 is fitted in a portion
of the upper mandrel 22.
[0046] The lower mandrel 21 has a surface (hereinafter referred to as the "first abutting
surface") 21a that abuts with the inner peripheral surface 120a' of the precursory
rim 120' of the workpiece 100' from one direction (e.g., from below herein) along
the axial direction of the workpiece 100'.
[0047] The upper mandrel 22 has a surface (hereinafter referred to as the "second abutting
surface") 22a that abuts with the inner peripheral surface 120a' of the precursory
rim 120' of the workpiece 100' from the opposite direction (e.g., from above herein)
along the axial direction of the workpiece 100'.
[0048] When the lower mandrel 21 and the upper mandrel 22 are rotated by the rotating mechanism
31, the workpiece 100' rotates accordingly. As the roller 41 is pressed against the
outer peripheral surface 120b' of the precursory rim 120' of the workpiece 100' in
this state, the flow forming process is accomplished.
[0049] The workpiece 100' after the flow forming process is shown in FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C,
and 10D. FIG. 10A and FIG. 10B are a left side view and a right side view, respectively,
schematically showing the workpiece 100' after the flow forming process. FIG. 10C
is a plan view showing the workpiece 100' after the flow forming process as viewed
from a radial direction. FIG. 10D is a cross-sectional view taken along line 10D-10D'
in FIG. 10A. As shown in FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C, and 10D, the flow forming process has
caused plastic deformation of the precursory rim 120'; more specifically, the precursory
rim 120' has been stretched along the axial direction while being also thinned.
[0050] Next, a heat treatment is performed. More specifically, a solution treatment (Step
s3), a quenching process (Step s4), and an artificial aging process (Step s5) are
performed in this order. This series of processes may sometimes be called a T6 heat
treatment. The solution treatment may be performed at 530°C for 4.5 hours, for example.
The quenching process may be performed through water-cooling at 60°C, for example.
The artificial aging process may be performed at 170°C for 3.2 hours, for example.
[0051] Thereafter, a cutting process is performed for the workpiece 100', thereby at least
completing the rim 120 (Step s6). Through the cutting process, the wheel-shaft insertion
hole 111 and the like are formed, and also their dimensions are adjusted. In this
manner, the wheel 100 is obtained. FIG. 11 shows a cross section taken along line
11A-11A' in FIG. 1. In the present embodiment, a ratio of the wall thickness t1 (see
FIG. 10D) of the precursory rim 120' after Step s2 and before Step s6 to the wall
thickness t2 (see FIG. 11) of the rim 120 after Step s6 (hereinafter denoted as the
"wall thickness ratio t1/t2") is set within a predetermined range. Note that the "wall
thickness ratio" refers to the ratio of wall thicknesses taken at the same place (or
site). Note that the wheel-shaft insertion hole 111 does not need to be formed via
a cutting process. For example, at step S1, a workpiece 100' that already has a wheel-shaft
insertion hole 111 may be provided.
[0052] As described above, in the method of producing the wheel 100 according to an embodiment
of the present teaching, after Step s1 of forming an intermediate product from an
aluminum alloy by a gravity casting technique, Step s2 of performing a flow forming
process for a precursory rim of the intermediate product is performed. As a result
of this, mechanical properties of the rim 120 can be adequately improved.
[0053] Moreover, in the method of producing the wheel 100 according to an embodiment of
the present teaching, the wall thickness ratio t1/t2 is set within a predetermined
range. Specifically, the percentage wall thickness ratio t1/t2 is not less than 132%
and not more than 433%. As a result, while suitably realizing a desired product shape,
the efficiency of material use can be enhanced. Hereinafter, this point will be described
in detail.
[0054] Assuming a cut margin a [mm] in Step s6 (cutting process), the wall thickness t1
is expressed as t1=t2+a, and therefore the wall thickness ratio t1/t2 is expressed
as t1/t2=1+a/t2. If the cut margin a is less than 3.0 mm, it may be difficult to realize
a desired product shape. On the other hand, if the cut margin exceeds 5.0 mm, the
efficiency of use of the material (which herein is an aluminum alloy) is somewhat
decreased. Therefore, when one assumes a minimum product wall thickness t2min [mm]
and a maximum product wall thickness t2max [mm], it may be said that the wall thickness
ratio t1/t2 preferably satisfies the relationship 1+3/t2max ≤ t1/t2 ≤ 1+5/t2min. Herein,
given that the minimum product wall thickness t2min is 1.5 mm and that the maximum
product wall thickness t2max is 9.5 mm, the wall thickness ratio t1/t2 is preferably
not less than 132% and not more than 433%, as is calculated from the above equation.
[0055] Thus, because of the wall thickness ratio t1/t2 being not less than 132% and not
more than 433%, while suitably realizing a desired product shape, the efficiency of
material use can be enhanced.
[0056] From the standpoint of adequately improving the mechanical properties of the rim
120 through the flow forming process, Step s2 is preferably performed in such a manner
that, in at least a portion of the precursory rim 120', a ratio of the wall thickness
t1 of the precursory rim 120' after Step s2 and before Step s6 to the wall thickness
t0 of the precursory rim before Step s2 (see FIG. 8) is 50% or less.
[0057] Moreover, as in the above-described production method, Step s3 of performing a solution
treatment after the flow forming process of Step s2, Step s4 of performing a quenching
process after Step s3, and Step s5 of performing an artificial aging process after
Step s4 may further be included. This series of heat treatment processes allows the
mechanical properties of the wheel 100 made of an aluminum alloy to be adjusted (e.g.,
so that it increases in tensile strength, proof stress, and hardness).
[0058] As shown in FIG. 12A, the flow forming apparatus 10 may further include a knockout
ring 24 located at an outer periphery of the first mandrel 21. The knockout ring 24
is able to move up and down. The knockout ring 24 allows the workpiece 100' after
the flow forming process to be released from the first mandrel 21.
[0059] Given a reference plane p, which is an imaginary plane that is defined by one end
face of the workpiece 100' after the flow forming process along the axial direction,
an end face (upper surface) of the knockout ring 24 is essentially flush with this
reference plane p in the example shown in FIG. 12A; however, the position of the end
face of the knockout ring 24 is not limited thereto. As shown in FIG. 12B, the end
face of the knockout ring 24 may be offset from the reference plane p along the first
direction D1. This will restrain the precursory rim 120' from abutting with the end
face of the knockout ring 24 during the flow forming process, thus making it easier
for the precursory rim 120' to undergo sufficient plastic deformation. Herein, an
amount of offset a of the knockout ring 24 from the reference plane p is preferably
set in accordance with a ratio L1/L2 of a length L1 of the precursory rim 120' after
Step s2 and before Step s6 as taken along the axial direction (see FIG. 10D) to a
length L2 of the rim 120 after Step s6 as taken along the axial direction (see FIG.
11). Specifically, it is preferable that the amount of offset a increases as the ratio
L1/L2 increases. Preferably, the ratio L1/L2 is set to not less than 101% and not
more than 113%.
[Another example method of producing a wheel for straddled vehicles]
[0060] Another example method of producing the wheel 100 will be described.
[0061] First, an intermediate product (workpiece) made of an aluminum alloy is provided.
The workpiece may suitably be formed by a gravity casting technique, for example.
Specific shapes for the workpiece are shown in FIG. 13 to FIG. 16. FIG. 13 and FIG.
14 are a left side view and a right side view, respectively, schematically showing
the workpiece 100'. FIG. 15 and FIG. 16 are cross-sectional views taken along line
15A-15A' and line 16A-16A', respectively, in FIG. 13.
[0062] As shown in FIG. 13 to FIG. 16, the workpiece 100' includes a precursory hub 110',
a precursory rim 120', and a plurality of precursory spokes 130' connecting the precursory
hub 110' and the precursory rim 120'. The precursory hub 110' is a portion to become
the hub 110 of the wheel 100. Similarly, the precursory rim 120' is a portion to become
the rim 120, and the precursory spokes 130' are portions to become the spokes 130.
[0063] The precursory hub 110' is located at the center of the workpiece 100'. In the example
shown, the wheel-shaft insertion hole 111 is not formed in the precursory hub 110'
yet. The precursory rim 120' has an annular shape, and extends along the circumferential
direction of the workpiece 100'. The precursory rim 120' has an inner peripheral surface
120a' and an outer peripheral surface 120b'. The plurality of precursory spokes 130'
connect the precursory hub 110' and the precursory rim 120'. More specifically, the
plurality of precursory spokes 130' connect an outer periphery of the precursory hub
110' and the inner peripheral surface 120a' of the precursory rim 120'.
[0064] Then, a flow forming process is performed for the precursory rim 120' of the workpiece
100' by using a flow forming apparatus. At this step, the flow forming apparatus illustrated
in FIG. 9 can be used.
[0065] As shown in FIG. 15 and FIG. 16, the inner peripheral surface 120a' of the precursory
rim 120' of the workpiece 100' includes: a first region R1 to abut with a first abutting
surface 21a of the lower mandrel 21; and a second region R2 to abut with a second
abutting surface 22a of the upper mandrel 22. As shown in FIG. 13, FIG. 14 and FIG.
16, each of the first region R1 and the second region R2 includes at least one stepped
portion (protrusion) 121 protruding inwardly along the radial direction of the workpiece
100'. In the example shown, each of the first region R1 and the second region R2 includes
a plurality of (i.e., two or more) stepped portions 121 that are formed discretely
along the circumferential direction of the workpiece 100'.
[0066] In the configuration illustrated herein, the stepped portions 121 in the first region
R1 and the stepped portions 121 in the second region R2 overlap one another when viewed
along the axial direction; however, the positioning of the stepped portions 121 is
not limited thereto. Alternatively, the stepped portions 121 in the first region R1
and the stepped portions 121 in the second region R2 may be shifted from one another
when viewed along the axial direction (i.e., so that the stepped portions 121 in the
first region R1 and the stepped portions 121 in the second region R2 are staggered
along the circumferential direction). Although an example has been illustrated where
essentially the entire inner peripheral surface 120a' of the precursory rim 120' consists
of the first region R1 and the second region R2, the positioning of the first region
R1 and the second region R2 is not limited thereto. Alternatively, only a portion
of a half of the inner peripheral surface 120a' along the axial direction (i.e., a
lower half in FIG. 15 and FIG. 16) may be the first region R1, while only a portion
of another half of the inner peripheral surface 120a' along the axial direction (i.e.,
an upper half in FIG. 15 and FIG. 16) may be the second region R2.
[0067] FIG. 17 and FIG. 18 show specific examples of the lower mandrel 21 and the upper
mandrel 22. FIG. 17 is a side view schematically showing the lower mandrel 21 and
the upper mandrel 22, illustrating a state where the lower mandrel 21 and the upper
mandrel 22 are coupled (more specifically, a guide pin 25 of the lower mandrel 21
is inserted in an aperture of the upper mandrel 22). FIG. 18 is a cross-sectional
view schematically showing a state where the workpiece 100' is clamped by the lower
mandrel 21 and the upper mandrel 22.
[0068] As has already been described, the lower mandrel 21 has the first abutting surface
21a, which abuts with the inner peripheral surface 120a' of the precursory rim 120'
from below; and the upper mandrel 22 has the second abutting surface 22a, which abuts
with the inner peripheral surface 120a' of the precursory rim 120' from above. Each
of the first abutting surface 21a of the lower mandrel 21 and the second abutting
surface 22a of the upper mandrel 22 is shaped so as to correspond to the plurality
of stepped portions 121 of the workpiece 100'. Specifically, each of the first abutting
surface 21a of the lower mandrel 21 and the second abutting surface 22a of the upper
mandrel 22 includes a plurality of engaging portions (recesses) 23 to engage with
the plurality of stepped portions 121.
[0069] When the lower mandrel 21 and the upper mandrel 22 are rotated by the rotating mechanism
31, the workpiece 100' rotates accordingly. As the roller 41 is pressed against the
outer peripheral surface 120b' of the precursory rim 120' of the workpiece 100' in
this state, the flow forming process is accomplished.
[0070] The workpiece 100' after the flow forming process are shown in FIG. 19 and FIG. 20.
FIG. 19 and FIG. 20 are a left side view and a right side view, respectively, schematically
showing the workpiece 100' after the flow forming process. The flow forming process
has caused plastic deformation of the precursory rim 120'; more specifically, the
precursory rim 120' has been stretched along the axial direction while being also
thinned.
[0071] Next, a heat treatment is performed. More specifically, a solution treatment, a quenching
process, and an artificial aging process are performed in this order (T6 heat treatment).
[0072] Thereafter, a cutting process is performed. Through the cutting process, the wheel-shaft
insertion hole 111 and the like are formed, and also their dimensions are adjusted.
At this point, the plurality of stepped portions 121 on the inner peripheral surface
120a' of the precursory rim 120' are removed. In this manner, the wheel 100 is obtained.
Note that the wheel-shaft insertion hole 111 does not need to be formed via a cutting
process. For example, at the step of providing the workpiece 100', a workpiece 100'
that already has a wheel-shaft insertion hole 111 may be provided.
[0073] In the example described above, within the inner peripheral surface 120a' of the
precursory rim 120' of the intermediate product (workpiece) 100' provided, each of
the region (first region) R1 to abut with the lower mandrel (first mandrel) 21 and
the region (second region) R2 to abut with the upper mandrel (second mandrel) 22 includes
at least one stepped portion 121 protruding inwardly along the radial direction of
the workpiece 100'. Because of such a stepped portion(s) 121 being provided on the
inner peripheral surface 120a' of the precursory rim 120', the torque from the lower
mandrel 21 and the upper mandrel 22 being rotated by the rotating mechanism 31 can
be sufficiently transmitted to the workpiece 100'. In other words, the stepped portion(s)
121 enables clamping of the workpiece 100'. Since this makes it unnecessary to rely
on the precursory hub 110' or the precursory spoke 130' for the clamping of the workpiece
100', it becomes possible to produce the wheel 100 in such a manner that clamp scars
will not be left on the hub 110 and the spoke 130. For example, since the at least
one stepped portion 121 including a clamping surface is removed at the step of performing
a cutting process, no clamp scars will be left on the final product (i.e., the wheel
100 for straddled vehicles).
[0074] Note that the number of stepped portions 121 in each of the first region R1 and the
second region R2 is not limited to what is illustrated in FIG. 13 and FIG. 14. It
suffices if at least one stepped portion 121 is provided in each of the first region
R1 and the second region R2.
[0075] Another exemplary configuration of the stepped portion 121 is shown in FIG. 21 and
FIG. 22. In the example shown in FIG. 21 and FIG. 22, only one stepped portion 121
is provided in each of the first region R1 and the second region R2. Such a configuration
also allows the wheel 100 to be produced without leaving clamp scars on the hub 110
and the spoke 130.
[0076] Still another exemplary configuration of the stepped portion 121 is shown in FIG.
23, FIG. 24, FIG. 25 and FIG. 26. In the example shown in FIG. 23 to FIG. 26, in each
of the first region R1 and the second region R2, one stepped portion 121 is formed
along the entire circumference along the circumferential direction of the workpiece
100'. In this case, an upper surface (i.e., a surface of the workpiece 100' facing
outward along the axial direction) 121u of the stepped portion 121 has an annular
shape, this upper surface 121u functioning as a clamping surface. Specifically, clamping
of the workpiece 100' is achieved by utilizing a frictional force occurring between
the upper surface (clamping surface) 121u of the stepped portion 121 and the abutting
surface (i.e., the first abutting surface 21a of the lower mandrel 21 or the second
abutting surface 22a of the upper mandrel 22) of each mandrel pressed against the
upper surface 121u.
[0077] In the case where such a stepped portion 121 (a stepped portion 121 being formed
along the entire circumference along the circumferential direction of the workpiece
100') are provided in each of the first region R1 and the second region R2 of the
inner peripheral surface 120a' of the precursory rim 120', there is an advantage in
that the workpiece 100' can be easily set to the flow forming apparatus 10.
[0078] On the other hand, as was illustrated in FIG. 13 and FIG. 14, etc., when a plurality
of stepped portions 121 are formed discretely along the circumferential direction
of the workpiece 100', the torque from the mandrel (the lower mandrel 21 or the upper
mandrel 22) can be received on a partial side surface (a side surface oriented in
the circumferential direction of the workpiece 100') of each stepped portion 121,
so that not only the upper surface 121u of each stepped portion 121 but also the partial
side surface functions as a clamping surface.
[0079] In the case where a plurality of stepped portions 121 are provided on the inner peripheral
surface 120a' of the precursory rim 120', the workpiece 100' can be prevented from
slipping against each mandrel. Moreover, a smaller amount of metal material is needed
to form the workpiece 100' than in the case where one stepped portion 121 is formed
continuously along the entire circumference.
[0080] Each of the first abutting surface 21a of the lower mandrel 21 and the second abutting
surface 22a of the upper mandrel 22 is preferably shaped so as to correspond to at
least one stepped portion 121 of the workpiece 100'. Specifically, as is illustrated,
each of the first abutting surface 21a of the lower mandrel 21 and the second abutting
surface 22a of the upper mandrel 22 preferably includes at least one engaging portion
23 to engage with at least one stepped portion 121.
[0081] In the step of providing the workpiece 100', the workpiece 100' can be formed from
a metal material by a gravity casting technique. Employing a gravity casting technique
provides an advantage of reducing the weight of relatively large wheels because it
is easy to form a hollow structure by utilizing a core.
[aluminum alloy]
[0082] Preferable compositions for the aluminum alloy to be used as the material of the
wheel 100 will be described.
[0083] Preferably, the aluminum alloy contains silicon (Si) in an amount of not less than
5.0 mass% and not more than 7.5 mass%, magnesium (Mg) in an amount of not less than
0.40 mass% and not more than 0.90 mass%, and aluminum (Al) and inevitable impurities
as a balance.
[0084] When the percentage content of Si is 5.0 mass% or more, castability (e.g., melt fluidity)
can be adequately improved. The influence of the percentage content of Si on the melt
fluidity is disclosed in
Kitaoka and 2 others, "Al-Si type alloys", Light Metals, 1988, pp.426-446 (hereinafter "Non-Patent Document 1"), for example. Non-Patent Document 1 states
that, for example, given a constant pour point, lowest fluidity results when the percentage
content of Si is 2 to 3 mass%. On the other hand, if the percentage content of Si
is too high, toughness may lower. When the percentage content of Si is 7.5 mass% or
less, a decrease in toughness can be suppressed.
[0085] Moreover, since Mg yields a deposition (Mg2Si) with Si, when the percentage content
of Mg is 0.40 mass% or more, tensile strength and proof stress can be improved. However,
if the percentage content of Mg is too high, elongation may lower. When the percentage
content of Mg is 0.90 mass% or less, a decrease in elongation due to Mg can be kept
at an insignificant level.
[0086] Thus, an aluminum alloy having the aforementioned composition has good castability,
as well as good tensile strength and proof stress. Good castability makes it easier
to realize a complicated shape (e.g., the shape of a vehicle wheel) or a thin-walled
shape, even by using a gravity casting technique. Goode tensile strength and proof
stress make it possible to provide a sufficient strength even in the case of a complicated
shape or a thin-walled shape.
[0087] As has already been described, as the amount of Mg added to the aluminum alloy is
increased, tensile strength and proof stress may improve, but elongation (toughness)
tends to lower. When a flow forming process is performed for the product (intermediate
product) after casting (e.g., gravity casting), the metallographic structure changes
through plastic deformation (or more specifically, the metallographic structure becomes
stretched out to create a metal flow) at the site(s) which have been subjected to
the flow forming process; as a result, elongation improves, thus to compensate for
a decrease in elongation that is ascribable to the increased amount of Mg added. Therefore,
an aluminum alloy having the aforementioned composition can be suitably used for vehicle
wheels that are produced through a combination of a gravity casting technique and
a flow forming process.
[0088] If the percentage content of Cu is too high, elongation may lower. Therefore, the
percentage content of Cu is preferably 0.20 mass% or less.
[0089] The percentage content of Fe is preferably 0.20 mass% or less. If the percentage
content of Fe is too high, toughness may lower. When the percentage content of Fe
is 0.20 mass% or less, a decrease in toughness that is ascribable to Fe can be suppressed.
From the standpoint of suppressing a decrease in toughness, it is more preferable
that the percentage content of Fe is 0.15 mass% or less.
[0090] The percentage content of Ti is preferably 0.20 mass% or less. If the percentage
content of Ti is too high, a decrease in toughness may be caused. When the percentage
content of Ti is 0.20 mass% or less, a decrease in toughness that is ascribable to
Ti can be suppressed.
[0091] When the aluminum alloy further contains Na in an amount of not less than 0.002 mass%
and not more than 0.01 mass%, or Sr in an amount of not less than 0.005 mass% and
not more than 0.03 mass%, modification (microstructuring of the eutectic Si phase)
can be suitably achieved.
[0092] Now, results of studying influences of changes in the percentage content of Si, Mg,
etc., in the aluminum alloy on tensile strength, proof stress, and elongation (toughness)
will be described. In the following, any Example in which Si is not in the range of
not less than 5.0 mass% and not more than 7.5 mass% and any Example in which Mg is
not in the range of not less than 0.40 mass% and not more than 0.90 mass% is indicated
as "Reference Example" for ease of understanding.
<Si percentage content>
[0093] Table 1 shows the compositions and measurement results of tensile strength, proof
stress, and elongation for aluminum alloys of Examples 1 to 3 and Reference Examples
1 to 3. As for elongation, the case where a flow forming process was not performed
for the sample (indicated as "w/o FF") and the case where a flow forming process was
performed for the sample (indicated as "w/ FF") are also shown. Also, for Examples
1 to 3 and Reference Example 3, their relationship between the percentage content
of Si and tensile strength and proof stress is shown in FIG. 27, and their relationship
between the percentage content of Si and elongation is shown in FIG. 28. In the following,
a preferable tensile strength of 300 MPa or more and a preferable proof stress of
250 MPa or more are assumed, and a preferable elongation (in the case of not performing
a flow forming process) of 3% or more and a preferable elongation (in the case of
performing a flow forming process) of 5% or more are assumed.
[Table 1]
| |
composition (mass%) |
measurement results |
| tensile strength (MPa) |
proof stress (MPa) |
elongation (%) |
| Cu |
Si |
Mg |
Fe |
Ti |
Na |
Sr |
Al |
w/o FF |
w/FF |
| Reference Example 1 |
0.00 |
4.5 |
0.70 |
0.12 |
0.11 |
0.000 |
0.013 |
balance |
298 |
265 |
5.8 |
8.0 |
| Reference Example 2 |
0.00 |
4.8 |
0.68 |
0.11 |
0.12 |
0.000 |
0.014 |
balance |
305 |
266 |
5.5 |
7.8 |
| Example 1 |
0.00 |
5.8 |
0.71 |
0.09 |
0.12 |
0.000 |
0.009 |
balance |
310 |
270 |
5.4 |
7.6 |
| Example 2 |
0.00 |
6.9 |
0.70 |
0.11 |
0.10 |
0.000 |
0.010 |
balance |
319 |
275 |
5.2 |
7.3 |
| Example 3 |
0.00 |
7.3 |
0.68 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.000 |
0.010 |
balance |
321 |
278 |
5.0 |
7.1 |
| Reference Example 3 |
0.00 |
8.0 |
0.72 |
0.12 |
0.10 |
0.000 |
0.013 |
balance |
322 |
282 |
2.5 |
4.3 |
[0094] As can be seen from Table 1 and FIG. 27 and FIG. 28, in Examples 1 to 3, preferable
levels are attained in all of tensile strength, proof stress, and elongation. On the
other hand, in Reference Example 3, where the percentage content of Si is 8.0 mass%
(i.e., above 7.5 mass%), elongation is insufficient and toughness is poor, as can
be seen from Table 1 and FIG. 28.
<Mg percentage content>
[0095] Table 2 shows the compositions and measurement results of tensile strength, proof
stress, and elongation for aluminum alloys of Examples 3 to 7 and Reference Examples
4 and 5. Also, for Examples 3 to 7 and Reference Examples 4 and 5, their relationship
between the percentage content of Mg and tensile strength and proof stress is shown
in FIG. 29, and their relationship between the percentage content of Mg and elongation
is shown in FIG. 30.
[Table 2]
| influences of Mg percentage content |
| |
composition (mass%) |
measurement results |
| tensile strength (MPa) |
proof stress (MPa) |
elongation (%) |
| Cu |
Si |
Mg |
Fe |
Ti |
Na |
Sr |
Al |
w/o FF |
w/ F |
| Reference Example 4 |
0.00 |
7.2 |
0.35 |
0.10 |
0.11 |
0.000 |
0.010 |
balance |
278 |
230 |
9.8 |
12.0 |
| Example 4 |
0.00 |
7.2 |
0.40 |
0.09 |
0.12 |
0.000 |
0.013 |
balance |
310 |
252 |
9.0 |
11.7 |
| Example 5 |
0.00 |
6.9 |
0.51 |
0.09 |
0.11 |
0.000 |
0.015 |
balance |
325 |
264 |
7.5 |
10.0 |
| Example 6 |
0.00 |
7.1 |
0.62 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.000 |
0.013 |
balance |
324 |
278 |
6.0 |
8.0 |
| Example 3 |
0.00 |
7.3 |
0.68 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.000 |
0.010 |
balance |
321 |
278 |
5.0 |
7.1 |
| Example 7 |
0.00 |
6.9 |
0.89 |
0.12 |
0.11 |
0.000 |
0.015 |
balance |
319 |
280 |
3.5 |
5.0 |
| Reference Example 5 |
0.00 |
7.0 |
0.95 |
0.11 |
0.10 |
0.000 |
0.015 |
balance |
321 |
283 |
2.0 |
3.5 |
[0096] As can be seen from Table 2 and FIG. 29 and FIG. 30, in Examples 3 to 7, preferable
levels are attained in all of tensile strength, proof stress, and elongation. On the
other hand, in Reference Example 4, where the percentage content of Mg is 0.35 mass%
(i.e., below 0.40 mass%), tensile strength and proof stress are insufficient, as can
be seen from Table 2 and FIG. 29. Moreover, in Reference Example 5, where the percentage
content of Mg is 0.95 mass% (i.e., above 0.90 mass%), elongation is insufficient,
as can be seen from Table 2 and FIG. 30.
<Cu percentage content>
[0097] Table 3 shows the compositions and measurement results of tensile strength, proof
stress, and elongation for aluminum alloys of Examples 3, 8 and 9. Also, for Examples
3, 8 and 9, their relationship between the percentage content of Cu and tensile strength
and proof stress is shown in FIG. 31, and their relationship between the percentage
content of Cu and elongation is shown in FIG. 32.
[Table 3]
| influences of Cu percentage content |
| |
composition (mass%) |
measurement results |
| tensile strength (MPa) |
proof stress (MPa) |
elongation (%) |
| Cu |
Si |
Mg |
Fe |
Ti |
Na |
Sr |
Al |
w/o FF |
w/FF |
| Example 3 |
0.00 |
7.3 |
0.68 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.000 |
0.010 |
balance |
321 |
278 |
5.0 |
7.1 |
| Example 8 |
0.20 |
7.0 |
0.70 |
0.11 |
0.10 |
0.000 |
0.012 |
balance |
331 |
285 |
3.2 |
5.4 |
| Example 9 |
0.25 |
7.0 |
0.71 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.000 |
0.015 |
balance |
333 |
290 |
2.5 |
3.9 |
[0098] As can be seen from Table 3 and FIG. 31 and FIG. 32, in Examples 3 and 8, preferable
levels are attained in all of tensile strength, proof stress, and elongation. On the
other hand, in Example 9, where the percentage content of Cu is 0.25 mass% (i.e.,
above 0.20 mass%), elongation is smaller than in Examples 3 and 8, as can be seen
from Table 3 and FIG. 32.
<Fe percentage content>
[0099] Table 4 shows the compositions and measurement results of tensile strength, proof
stress, and elongation for aluminum alloys of Examples 3, 10 and 11. Also, for Examples
3, 10 and 11, their relationship between the percentage content of Fe and tensile
strength and proof stress is shown in FIG. 33, and their relationship between the
percentage content of Fe and elongation is shown in FIG. 34.
[Table 4]
| influences of Fe percentage content |
| |
composition (mass%) |
measurement results |
| tensile strength (MPa) |
proof stress (MPa) |
elongation (%) |
| Cu |
Si |
Mg |
Fe |
Ti |
Na |
Sr |
Al |
w/o FF |
w/FF |
| Example 3 |
0.00 |
7.3 |
0.68 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.000 |
0.010 |
balance |
321 |
278 |
5.0 |
7.1 |
| Example 10 |
0.00 |
7.3 |
0.70 |
0.20 |
0.11 |
0.000 |
0.014 |
balance |
325 |
285 |
3.1 |
5.0 |
| Example 11 |
0.00 |
7.2 |
0.70 |
0.24 |
0.11 |
0.000 |
0.012 |
balance |
328 |
286 |
1.5 |
3.0 |
[0100] As can be seen from Table 4 and FIG. 33 and FIG. 34, in Examples 3 and 10, preferable
levels are attained in all of tensile strength, proof stress, and elongation. On the
other hand, in Example 11, where the percentage content of Fe is 0.24 mass% (i.e.,
above 0.20 mass%), elongation is smaller (i.e., toughness is lower) than in Examples
3 and 10, as can be seen from Table 4 and FIG. 34.
<Ti percentage content>
[0101] Table 5 shows the compositions and measurement results of tensile strength, proof
stress, and elongation for aluminum alloys of Examples 3, 12 and 13. Also, for Examples
3, 12 and 13, their relationship between the percentage content of Ti and tensile
strength and proof stress is shown in FIG. 35, and their relationship between the
percentage content of Ti and elongation is shown in FIG. 36.
[Table 5]
| influences of Ti percentage content |
| |
composition (mass%) |
measurement results |
| tensile strength (MPa) |
proof stress (MPa) |
elongation (%) |
| Cu |
Si |
Mg |
Fe |
Ti |
Na |
Sr |
Al |
w/o FF |
w/FF |
| Example 3 |
0.00 |
7.3 |
0.68 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.000 |
0.010 |
balance |
321 |
278 |
5.0 |
7.1 |
| Example 12 |
0.00 |
7.4 |
0.72 |
0.11 |
0.19 |
0.000 |
0.009 |
balance |
324 |
286 |
4.0 |
5.3 |
| Example 13 |
0.00 |
7.5 |
0.71 |
0.12 |
0.24 |
0.000 |
0.011 |
balance |
330 |
290 |
2.8 |
4.0 |
[0102] As can be seen from Table 5 and FIG. 35 and FIG. 36, in Examples 3 and 12, preferable
levels are attained in all of tensile strength, proof stress, and elongation. On the
other hand, in Example 13, where the percentage content of Ti is 0.24 mass% (i.e.,
above 0.20 mass%), elongation is smaller (i.e., toughness is lower) than in Examples
3 and 10, as can be seen from Table 5 and FIG. 36.
<Na and Sr percentage contents>
[0103] Table 6 shows the compositions and measurement results of tensile strength, proof
stress, and elongation for aluminum alloys of Examples 3, and 14 to 20. Also, for
Examples 14 to 17, their relationship between the percentage content of Na and tensile
strength and proof stress is shown in FIG. 37, and their relationship between the
percentage content of Na and elongation is shown in FIG. 38. Also, for Examples 3,
14, and 18 to 20, their relationship between the percentage content of Sr and tensile
strength and proof stress is shown in FIG. 39, and their relationship between the
percentage content of Sr and elongation is shown in FIG. 40.
[Table 6]
| influences of Na and Sr percentage contents |
| |
composition (mass%) |
measurement results |
| tensile strength (MPa) |
proof stress (MPa) |
elongation (%) |
| Cu |
Si |
Mg |
Fe |
Ti |
Na |
Sr |
Al |
w/o FF |
w/FF |
| Example 14 |
0.00 |
7.2 |
0.73 |
0.10 |
0.11 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
balance |
322 |
280 |
2.5 |
3.7 |
| Example 15 |
0.00 |
7.0 |
0.70 |
0.10 |
0.12 |
0.002 |
0.000 |
balance |
320 |
280 |
3.0 |
5.2 |
| Example 16 |
0.00 |
7.3 |
0.69 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.012 |
0.000 |
balance |
319 |
275 |
5.5 |
8.0 |
| Example 17 |
0.00 |
7.1 |
0.71 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.019 |
0.000 |
balance |
325 |
277 |
5.7 |
7.9 |
| Example 18 |
0.00 |
7.1 |
0.70 |
0.09 |
0.12 |
0.000 |
0.005 |
balance |
318 |
275 |
4.1 |
6.2 |
| Example 3 |
0.00 |
7.3 |
0.68 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.000 |
0.010 |
balance |
321 |
278 |
5.0 |
7.1 |
| Example 19 |
0.00 |
7.2 |
0.70 |
0.12 |
0.10 |
0.000 |
0.028 |
balance |
326 |
280 |
6.9 |
9.3 |
| Example 20 |
0.00 |
6.9 |
0.72 |
0.10 |
0.11 |
0.000 |
0.040 |
balance |
325 |
282 |
7.0 |
9.5 |
[0104] As can be seen from Table 6 and FIG. 37 to FIG. 40, in Examples 3, and 15 to 20,
preferable levels are attained in all of tensile strength, proof stress, and elongation.
On the other hand, in Example 14, where neither Na nor Sr is substantially contained,
elongation is smaller than in Examples 3, and 15 to 20, as can be seen from Table
6 and FIG. 38 and FIG. 40. This is presumably because modification (microstructuring
of the eutectic Si phase) is not suitably achieved.
[0105] According to an embodiment of the present teaching, there is provided a method of
producing a wheel for straddled vehicles that is able to adequately improve the mechanical
properties of a rim. A production method according to an embodiment of the present
teaching can be suitably used for the production of a wheel for various straddled
vehicles, such as motorcycles.