The present invention relates to methods for controlling a cooking hob by means of a portable device.
Methods for controlling a cooking hob by means of a portable device in which, with the portable device, there are programmed instructions which are transmitted to the hob for commanding it are known.
The object of the invention is to provide a method for controlling a cooking hob by means of a portable device, as defined in the claims.
The invention relates to a method for controlling a cooking hob by means of a portable device in which instructions for the cooking hob are programmed, said instructions being transmitted to said cooking hob and being a single order or a sequence of orders for being executed successively or in parallel in the cooking hob for controlling at least one functional element of said cooking hob. The method comprises the steps of:
Steps S1 and S2 are implemented in the portable device and can be executed before, during, or after step S3.
In this manner, with the proposed method a more accessible and safe cooking is offered for some groups with an impairment. This is done as a result of the two confirmations by the user, one in each apparatus involved (a first confirmation in the portable device, the validation, step S2, and a second confirmation in the cooking hob, instruction request, step S5), whereby the instructions to be executed in the cooking hob are not sent to said cooking hob unless these two confirmations associated with said instructions have previously been performed, thereby largely ensuring that they cannot mistakenly or accidentally be executed, given that they are not in said cooking hob before having the two confirmations.
Having to provide a confirmation in the portable device before providing one in the cooking hob considerably reduces the risk of unwanted instructions being mistakenly sent to the cooking hob, because even though they have been validated in the portable device itself, if the user is aware that he or she has mistakenly validated it, these instructions will not reach the cooking hob given that they require additional confirmation in the cooking hob, and, furthermore, starting a new programming again is easy and quick. The second confirmation will only be performed in cases where it is considered that the validated instructions are the correct or desired instructions, proposing a method for controlling cooking hobs from portable devices that is safer than those that are known.
The programmed and validated instructions are transmitted only if, in addition, the time elapsed between the validation of the instructions programmed in the portable device and the reception of the instruction request in said portable device is less than a predetermined transmission time. The method further comprises a cancellation step for cancelling the instructions validated in the portable device if the transmission time has elapsed.
These and other advantages and features of the invention will become apparent in view of the figures and the detailed description of the invention.
The invention relates to a method which is suitable for controlling a cooking hob 1 by means of a portable device 2 (see
The method comprises the steps of:
The programmed instructions are a single order or a sequence of orders for being executed successively or in parallel in the cooking hob 1 for controlling the at least one functional element. For example, it can be a given value of a given parameter for controlling the functional element such as a power level, a cooking time, or a standby time. It can also be a series of orders for being executed in parallel for controlling the functional element such as a power level and a cooking time. It can even be a sequence of orders for being executed successively for controlling the functional element such as a pre-established operating mode of the functional element associated with a type of dish or with a digital recipe.
Steps S1 and S2 are implemented in the portable device 2. Obviously, to be able to validate the programmed instructions, the validation step S2 must come after the programming step S1. However, the programming step S1 and validation step S2 can be executed before, during, or after the pairing establishment step S3, given that they do not require interaction with the cooking hob 1, although they are preferably executed after, as depicted in the embodiment shown in
In the programming step S1, the instructions to be transmitted to the cooking hob 1 are programmed in the portable device 2 by the user. Said instructions can be programmed by entering the instructions in parts from the start, or by modifying and/or selecting pre-established instructions or pre-established operating modes in the portable device 2. Modifying and/or selecting pre-established instructions in the portable device 2 instead of having to enter them from the start simplify the programming step S1 by the user.
The portable device 2 may comprise a communication interface for communicating with the cooking hob 1, control means, and a user interface by means of which the user can interact with the mobile device 2. Preferably, an application installed in the control means of the portable device 2 allows the instructions to be programmed in the portable device 2 and the user interface allows the user to interact with the mobile device 2 for programming and validating said instructions. The user interface can be a touch screen or voice recognition means, for example.
The pairing established notification (in step S4) notifies the user that the cooking hob 1 and the portable device 2 are prepared for communicating with one another.
Once the pairing established notification is output, with the user acting on the cooking hob 1 the instructions validated in the portable device 2 are requested. As a response to this action, the cooking hob 1 sends a validated instruction request to the portable device 2 for said portable device 2 to send them to it.
Once said instruction request is received in said portable device 2, the instructions programmed and validated in the portable device 2 are automatically transmitted from said portable device 2 to said cooking hob 1 (step S6). Under normal circumstances, the cooking hob 1 receives said instructions and automatically executes them (step S7).
In the context of the invention, "automatically" must be interpreted as the associated action (transmission or execution of instructions, for example) being performed directly, without the need for further action by the user.
It is not necessary to check the order in which the confirmations (steps S2 and S5) are performed in the method of the invention. As mentioned, it must be confirmed in the portable device 2 (step S2) before it is confirmed in the cooking hob 1 (step S5), but if it is first confirmed in the cooking hob 1 said cooking hob 1 simply would not receive instructions to be executed because there would still be nothing validated in the portable device 2 when said portable device 2 receives the corresponding request.
Preferably, nor is it necessary to check if the pairing is maintained or lost once said pairing is established. In the event that the established pairing is lost, instructions for being executed would not reach the cooking hob 1. Said lack of communication may prevent, for example, the portable device 2 from receiving the instruction request output from the cooking hob 1 or it may prevent said cooking hob 1 from receiving the instructions transmitted from said portable device 2. The method for controlling a cooking hob 1 by means of a portable device 2 is thereby simplified.
The programmed and validated instructions are transmitted only if, in addition, the time elapsed between the validation of the instructions programmed in the portable device 2 and the reception of the instruction request in said portable device 2 is less than a predetermined transmission time ttrans, as depicted in
Therefore, a transmission time ttrans set to a relative short time allows assuring that the user must be in the vicinity of the cooking hob 1 when executing the validation in the portable device 2, such that the instructions cannot be sent due to involuntary actions of third parties in the vicinity of the cooking hob 1 without the user knowing that he or she is performing said validation. Preferably, the predetermined maximum time is less than 30 seconds, more preferably less than 15 seconds. The transmission time ttrans can thus be set to a time that is so short that it is ensured that the cooking hob 1 is in view of the user when said user executes the validation in the portable device 2.
The method according to the invention comprises a cancellation step S10 for cancelling the instructions validated in the portable device 2 if, once the transmission time ttrans has elapsed, an instruction request from the cooking hob 1 is not received in the portable device 2 since said validation has been performed. The validated instructions are thereby cancelled in the portable device 2 and the user of the portable device 2 is notified that the validated instructions have not been transmitted and the user may furthermore be notified of this fact, where said user must perform a new validation in the portable device 2. Preferably only the validation of the programmed instructions would be cancelled; said programmed instructions could remain in the portable device 2, such that it would be sufficient for the user to repeat only the validation of the programmed instructions in order to try to activate the method again, and said user would not have to waste time repeating the programming step. Therefore, once again having the portable device 2 ready to send instructions to the cooking hob 1 is easy and quick.
The pairing established notification (step S4) is output preferably by means of a vibration and/or light and/or acoustic and/or voice indication in the cooking hob 1. The user is thereby notified that the cooking hob 1 and the portable device 2 are prepared for communicating with one another.
Furthermore, if notification is provided in at least two different ways, it is largely assured that the notification reaches a user with an impairment, for example, a user with impaired sight. Additionally, by arranging the notification means close to the actuation element 4 the notification means 5 can guide the user as to the location of the cooking hob 1 on which he or she must act for executing the instruction request (step S5) when appropriate.
The cooking hob 1 and the portable device 2 are configured for communicating with one another in a wireless manner. Preferably said communication is performed such that the signals that are output have a maximum range equal to or less than a predetermined maximum distance. It is thereby assured that the instructions are not received in the cooking hob 1 unless a distance between the portable device 2 and the cooking hob that is less than (or equal to) said predetermined maximum distance is assured. If there is no communication between said portable device 2 and said cooking hob 1, even though the portable device 2 sends said instructions, they are not received in the cooking hob 1.
The predetermined maximum distance is preferably a distance less than 1 m. It is thereby assured that the cooking hob 1 is in view of the user of the portable device 2 when the instruction request is executed.
The communication protocol can be an NFC protocol, or a Bluetooth protocol in which the strength of the signals output by the cooking hob 1 and/or the portable device 2 is limited so that the range of said signals does not exceed the predetermined maximum distance. The manner of assuring the proximity between the portable device 2 and the cooking hob 1 is thereby simplified. In the aforementioned communication protocols, the signals are output directly from the portable device 2 to the cooking hob 1 and vice versa.
However, in other embodiments the cooking hob 1 and the portable device 2 can also be communicated with one another by means of intermediate devices such as servers on the cloud. For example, the cooking hob 1 can be communicated with a server on the cloud and the portable device 2 can be communicated with another server on the cloud, both servers being communicated with one another over the Internet.
The method can output an error notification (step S8) in the cooking hob 1 preferably by means of a vibration and/or light and/or acoustic and/or voice indication if, once a predetermined reception time trec from the request of the validated instructions has elapsed, the instructions are not received in the cooking hob 1, as depicted in
The method can also output an instructions executed notification (step S9) in the cooking hob 1 by means of a vibration and/or light and/or acoustic and/or voice indication after executing the instructions (step S7), as occurs in the preferred embodiment of the method shown in
Preferably the pairing established notification, error notification, and instructions executed notification are indicated in a different manner in each case, such that the user can distinguish one notification from another.
The method is implemented in a system with a cooking hob 1 and a portable device 2. The cooking hob 1 comprises an actuation element 4 configured for being actuated by a user, notification means 5, at least one communication interface 6 suitable for communicating with the portable device 2, and control means. Said control means are configured for implementing the steps of the previously described method, in any of its embodiments, corresponding to the cooking hob 1, said control means thus being configured based on the embodiment of the method to be implemented.
In the example of
In other examples, the cooking hob 1 can be an induction hob of another type, or it may comprise another number and type of functional elements which can be operated by the portable device 2. The portable device 2 can also be of another type, for example, a tablet or even a speaker.
The actuation element 4 is configured for being actuated by a user for requesting the instructions validated in the portable device 2 and the notification means 5 are configured for outputting at least a pairing established notification.
The control means control the actuation element 4, the notification means 5, and the communication interface 6.
Preferably the notification means 5 are also configured for outputting other notifications of the method in the cooking hob 1, for example, the error notification indicated in step S8 or the instructions executed notification indicated in step S9. Sole notification means 5 in the cooking hob 1 are thereby required.
Preferably the notification means 5 will output a different indication depending on the notification they must output in each case. The user can thereby distinguish one notification from another with the same notification means 5 in the cooking hob 1.
The actuation element 4 can be, for example, a tactile sensor which the user actuates by contact and the notification means 5 can be, for example, LEDs and a buzzing generator arranged around the actuation element 4 which light up and sound in a given manner depending on the notification they must output in each case. For example, the pairing established notification mentioned in step S4 can be a constant illumination along with a buzzing of the notification means 5, whereas the error notification can be a flashing illumination along with several buzzes.
However, the actuation element 4 can also be a proximity sensor which is actuated by the user bringing the portable device 2 closer to or positioning same in a given location of the cooking hob 1.
Preferably, as depicted in
Conventional main control devices and main printed circuit boards of cooking hobs which are not commanded by portable devices can thereby be used in the cooking hob 1.
Preferably, the communication interface 6 is arranged in the auxiliary printed circuit board 82. All the components that are different from conventional cooking hobs for commanding the cooking hob 1 from a portable device 2 according to the method of the invention are thereby arranged in the auxiliary printed circuit board 82.
Preferably, the actuation element 4, the notification means 5, and the communication interface 6 are controlled by the auxiliary control device 72.
This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader's convenience only. It does not form part of the European patent document. Even though great care has been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be excluded and the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.