Technical Field
[0001] The present disclosure relates to a high-strength ultra-thick steel material having
excellent cryogenic strain aging impact toughness in a center zone thereof, and a
method for manufacturing the same.
Background Art
[0002] Recently, the development of an ultra-thick high-strength steel material has been
necessary in the design of structures such as domestic and foreign ships, and when
high-strength steel material is used in designing structures, economic benefits due
to reductions of weight of the form of the structure may be obtained, and also a thickness
of a plate may be reduced, such that ease of processing and welding work may be secured
simultaneously. Also, to improve a transport efficiency of ships, there have been
attempts to operate a polar route, and in this case, it is expected that demand for
a cryogenic toughness guaranteeing high-strength and ultra-thick material which may
guarantee impact toughness at -60°C instead of general steel material guaranteeing
impact toughness at -40°C could increase.
[0003] However, generally, in the case of high-strength steel material, since sufficient
deformation may not occur in an overall structure due to a decrease in the total reduction
ratio during the manufacture of a ultra-thick material, a structure may become coarse,
and particularly, in the case of a center zone, a coarse austenite structure may be
formed, such that hardenability may increase and it may be difficult to guarantee
impact toughness of the center zone.
[0004] Also, when a ship is manufactured, as for a steel material, an original plate material
form may not be used as is and the steel material may be processed in the form of
a hull through deformation. When such deformation is applied to the steel material,
impact toughness due to the deformation may degrade. Also, elements such as carbon
and nitrogen may enter a dislocation created by the transformation over time after
the transformation, and impact toughness may be further deteriorated due to the increase
in strength. To guarantee this phenomenon, a strain aging impact test to measure impact
toughness after heat treatment at 250°C for 1 hour after strain of 5% may be included
in test items for a base material when after a steel material is developed and certified
by each classification society. Therefore, in the case of ultra-thick and high-strength
steel material for ships which may guarantee cryogenic toughness, basic impact toughness
and also deformation aging impact properties may need to be guaranteed, but to guarantee
deformation aging impact for even a center zone of an ultra-thick material, it may
be necessary to remarkably improve a microstructure of the center zone, which may
be problematic.
[0005] Accordingly, in a high-strength steel material of 500 MPa or more, it may be necessary
to improve deformation aging impact toughness of a center zone by controlling impact
toughness of 1/4t and 1/2t zone base material and also a microstructure of the center
zone.
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0006] An aspect of the present disclosure is to provide a high-strength ultra-thick steel
material with excellent cryogenic strain aging impact toughness in a center zone thereof,
and a method for manufacturing the same.
Solution to Problem
[0007] An embodiment of the present disclosure provides a high-strength ultra-thick steel
material having excellent cryogenic strain aging impact toughness in a center zone
thereof including, by wt%, 0.02-0.06% of C, 1.8-2.2% of Mn, 0.7-1.1% of Ni, 0.2-0.5%
of Mo, 0.005-0.03% of Nb, 0.005-0.018% of Ti, 80 ppm or less of P, 20 ppm or less
of S, and a balance of Fe and inevitable impurities, wherein an average grain size
of grains having a high boundary angle of 15 degrees or greater, measured by EBSD,
is 15 µm or less in a 3/8t-5/8t zone in a thickness (t) direction.
[0008] Another embodiment of the present disclosure provides a method for manufacturing
a high-strength ultra-thick steel material having excellent cryogenic strain aging
impact toughness in a center zone thereof including reheating a steel slab including,
by wt%, 0.02-0.06% of C, 1.8-2.2% of Mn, 0.7-1.1% of Ni, 0.2-0.5% of Mo, 0.005-0.03%
of Nb, 0.005-0.018% of Ti, 80 ppm or less of P, 20 ppm or less of S, and a balance
of Fe and inevitable impurities to a temperature of 1000-1080°C; obtaining a bar by
rough-rolling the reheated steel slab at a temperature of 850-1050°C; obtaining a
hot-rolled steel material by finish-rolling the bar at a temperature of 700-800°C
at a total reduction ratio of more than 60%; and cooling the hot-rolled steel material
to a temperature of 500°C or less at a cooling rate of 3°C/s or more.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0009] According to an aspect of the present disclosure, high-strength ultra-thick steel
material with excellent cryogenic strain aging impact toughness in a center zone thereof
which may have yield strength of 500 MPa or more and a transition temperature of -60°C
or less during a strain aging impact test for a center zone of a thickness, and a
method for manufacturing the same.
Best Mode for Invention
[0010] Hereinafter, an embodiment of steel material of the present disclosure will be described.
First, an alloy composition of the present disclosure will be described. The unit
of alloy composition described below may be weight % unless otherwise indicated.
C: 0.02-0.06%
[0011] C may be the most important element for securing basic strength in the present disclosure,
and accordingly, C may need to be included in steel within an appropriate range. However,
when the content of C exceeds 0.06%, a large amount of C may be fixed to dislocation
during a strain aging impact test and strength may increase, such that strain aging
impact toughness may decrease, and when the content is less than 0.02%, strength may
decrease. Thus, the content of C may be preferably in the range of 0.02-0.06%. A lower
limit of C may be more preferably 0.024%, even more preferably 0.028%, and most preferably
0.3%. An upper limit of C may be more preferably 0.058%, even more preferably 0.054%,
and most preferably 0.05%.
Mn: 1.8-2.2%
[0012] Mn may be a useful element for improving strength through solid solution strengthening
and hardenability improvement, and accordingly, 1.8% or more of Mn may need to be
added to satisfy yield strength of 500 MPa or more to be obtained in the present disclosure.
However, when the content exceeds 2.2%, hardenability may excessively increase such
that the formation of coarse upper bainite and martensite may be facilitated such
that strain aging impact toughness of a center zone may greatly degrade. Thus, the
Mn content may be in the range of 1.8-2.2% preferably. A lower limit of Mn may be
more preferably 1.83%, even more preferably 1.86%, and most preferably 1.9%. An upper
limit of Mn may be more preferably 2.17%, even more preferably 2.14%, and most preferably
2.1%
Ni: 0.7-1.1%
[0013] Ni may facilitate cross slip of dislocation and may improve impact toughness and
hardenability, and accordingly, Ni may be an important element to improve strength.
To improve strain aging impact toughness of the center zone in high-strength steel
having yield strength of 500 MPa or more, Ni may be added by 0.7% or more. However,
when the content exceeds 1.1%, hardenability may excessively increase, and a large
amount of low-temperature transformation phase may be formed, such that toughness
may decrease, and manufacturing costs may increase, which may be problematic. Accordingly,
the Ni content may be preferably in the range of 0.7-1.1%. The Mn content may be preferably
in the range of 1.8-2.2%. A lower limit of Ni may be more preferably 0.73%, even more
preferably 0.76%, and most preferably 0.8%. An upper limit of Ni may be more preferably
1.07%, even more preferably 1.03%, and most preferably 1%.
Mo: 0.2-0.5%
[0014] Mo may be an important element for improving strength by improving hardenability,
and may be an alloying element having less reduction in toughness as compared to strength
improvement, preferably, 0.2% or more of Mo may be added to secure high-strength steel
having yield strength of 500 MPa or more. However, when the content exceeds 0.5%,
hardenability may excessively increase, and a large amount of low-temperature transformation
phase may be formed, such that toughness may decrease. Therefore, the Mo content may
be preferably in the range of 0.2-0.5%. A lower limit of Mo may be more preferably
0.23%, even more preferably 0.26%, and most preferably 0.3%. An upper limit of Mo
may be more preferably 0.48%, even more preferably 0.44%, and most preferably 0.4%.
Nb: 0.005-0.03%
[0015] Nb may be precipitated in the form of NbC or NbCN and may improve strength of a base
material. Also, Nb dissolved during reheating to a high temperature may be very finely
precipitated in the form of NbC during rolling, may prevent recrystallization of austenite,
and may refine the structure. To obtain the above effect, Nb may be added 0.005% or
more preferably. However, when Nb exceeds 0.03%, brittle cracks may be created in
corners of the steel material, and there may be problems of deterioration of toughness
due to formation of excessive precipitate and formation of a large amount of martensite.
Therefore, the Nb content may be preferably in the range of 0.005-0.03%. A lower limit
of Nb may be more preferably 0.008%, even more preferably 0.011%, and most preferably
0.015%. An upper limit of Nb may be more preferably 0.028%, even more preferably 0.026%,
and most preferably 0.025%.
Ti: 0.005-0.018%
[0016] Ti may be precipitated as TiN during reheating and may prevent growth of grains in
a base material and a welding heat-affected zone such that low-temperature toughness
may greatly improve, and Ti may be added by 0.005% or more to effectively precipitate
TiN. However, when the content exceeds 0.018%, coarse TiN crystallization may occur
such that low-temperature toughness may degrade, which may be problematic. Accordingly,
the Ti content may be preferably in the range of 0.005-0.018%. A lower limit of Ti
may be more preferably 0.006%, even more preferably 0.008%, and most preferably 0.01%.
An upper limit of Ti may be more preferably 0.017%, even more preferably 0.016%, and
most preferably 0.015%.
P: 80ppm or less
[0017] P may be an element which may cause brittleness at grain boundaries or may form coarse
inclusions, which may lead to brittleness, and to improve brittle crack propagation
resistance, the content thereof may be preferably limited to 80 ppm or less.
S: 20ppm or less
[0018] S may be an element which may cause brittleness at grain boundaries or may form coarse
inclusions, which may lead to brittleness. To improve brittle crack propagation resistance,
the content thereof may be preferably limited to 20 ppm or less.
[0019] A remainder of the present disclosure may be iron (Fe) . However, in a general manufacturing
process, inevitable impurities may be inevitably added from raw materials or an ambient
environment, and thus, impurities may not be excluded. A person skilled in the art
of a general manufacturing process may be aware of the impurities, and thus, the descriptions
of the impurities may not be provided in the present disclosure.
[0020] In the steel material of the present disclosure, an average grain size of grains
having a high boundary angle of 15 degrees or more, measured by EBSD, in the 3/8t-5/8t
zone in a thickness (t) direction may be 15 µm or less, preferably. When the average
grain size of grains having a high boundary angle of 15 degrees or more, measured
by EBSD, in the 3/8t-5/8t zone in the thickness (t) direction exceeds 15 µm, an effective
grain size due to grain size coarsening may increase, such that an impact transition
temperature may increase, and deformation aging impact toughness may degrade, which
may be problematic.
[0021] Meanwhile, a microstructure of the steel material of the present disclosure may be
a mixed structure including acicular ferrite, granular bainite, upper bainite.
[0022] The steel material of the present disclosure may have a thickness of 5-90mm.
[0023] The steel material of the present disclosure provided as described above may have
yield strength of 500 MPa or more. Also, after 5% of strain and performing heat treatment
at 250°C for 1 hour, a transition temperature may be -60°C or less in the strain aging
impact test.
[0024] Hereinafter, a method for manufacturing a steel material according to an embodiment
of the present disclosure will be described.
[0025] First, a steel slab may be reheated to a temperature of 1000-1080°C. In the reheating
of the steel material of the present disclosure, the heating temperature may be preferably
1000°C or higher so as to allow carbonitride of Ti and/or Nb formed during casting
to be solid solute. Also, to sufficiently allow carbonitride of Ti and/or Nb to be
solid solute, the heating may be performed to 1030°C or higher. However, when the
reheating is performed to an excessively high temperature, austenite in the center
zone may be coarsened, and thus, the reheating temperature may be preferably 1080
°C or less, and more preferably 1070°C or less.
[0026] The reheated steel slab may be rough-rolled at a temperature of 850-1050°C, thereby
obtaining a bar. Rough-rolling may be performed to the reheated slab as above to adjust
the shape thereof. Through the rough-rolling, destruction of a cast structure such
as dendrites formed during casting and also the effect of reducing the grain size
through the recrystallization of coarse austenite may be obtained. Meanwhile, to refine
the structure by sufficient recrystallization, a total reduction ratio during rough-rolling
may be 40% or more preferably.
[0027] The bar may be finish-rolled at a temperature of 700-800°C at a total reduction of
more than 60%, thereby obtaining a hot-rolled steel material. In the present disclosure,
finish-rolling may be performed to pancake an austenite structure of the bar and to
obtain dislocation. The finish-rolling may be preferably performed at a temperature
of 700-800°C such that the deformation applied to the center zone may be maintained
as much as possible. When the finish-rolling temperature is less than 700°C, ferrite
may be precipitated during deformation and both strength and toughness may be reduced,
which may be disadvantageous. When the temperature exceeds 800°C, the particle size
may increase, such that impact toughness may deteriorate and sufficient strength may
not be secured, which may be disadvantageous. A lower limit of the finish-rolling
temperature may be more preferably 720°C, even more preferably 740°C. An upper limit
of the finish-rolling temperature may be more preferably 780°C, even more preferably
760°C. In the present disclosure, to refine the particle size of the center zone during
the finish-rolling, a total reduction ratio of more than 60% may be applied preferably.
The total reduction ratio during the finish-rolling may be more preferably 61% or
more, and even more preferably 62%.
[0028] The hot-rolled steel material may be cooled to a temperature of 500°C or less at
a cooling rate of 3°C/s or more. When the cooling rate is lower than 3°C/s or the
cooling stop temperature is more than 500°C, fine grains may not be properly formed
in the present disclosure, such that it may be likely that yield strength may be 500
MPa or less.
Mode for Invention
[0029] Hereinafter, the present disclosure will be described in greater detail through examples.
However, it is necessary to note that the following examples are only for describing
the present disclosure by examples and not for limiting the scope of the present disclosure.
This is because the scope of the present disclosure is determined by the matters described
in the claims and matters reasonably inferred therefrom.
(Example)
[0030] A steel slab having a thickness of 400mm and an alloy composition listed in Table
1 below was prepared, was reheated to a temperature of 1040-1070°C, was rough-rolled
in a temperature range of 930-1020°C, thereby obtaining a bar. The bar was finish-rolled
under the conditions listed in Table 2 and a hot-rolled steel material was obtained,
and the steel material was cooled to a temperature of 491-342°C at a cooling rate
of 3.8-5.4°C/sec. A thickness, an average grain size of grains having a high boundary
angle of 15 degrees or more, measured by EBSD, in the 3/8t-5/8t zone in a thickness
(t) direction, yield strength, and a strain aging impact transition temperature of
the center zone (3/8t-5/8t) were measured and listed in Table 3.
[0031] In this case, the center zone strain aging impact test was carried by taking a sample
from the center zone of the steel material, performing a heat treatment at 250°C for
1 hour after 5% of deformation, performing an impact test, and measuring a transition
temperature.
[Table 1]
Steel type |
Alloy composition (weight%) |
C |
Mn |
Ni |
Mo |
Nb |
Ti |
P(ppm) |
S(ppm) |
Inventive steel 1 |
0.043 |
1.96 |
1.05 |
0.32 |
0.023 |
0.017 |
39 |
9 |
Inventive steel 2 |
0.038 |
2.06 |
0.87 |
0.31 |
0.016 |
0.009 |
44 |
8 |
Inventive steel 3 |
0.046 |
1.99 |
0.79 |
0.28 |
0.015 |
0.013 |
51 |
10 |
Inventive steel 4 |
0.031 |
2.13 |
1.07 |
0.43 |
0.011 |
0.012 |
37 |
7 |
Inventive steel 5 |
0.052 |
1.86 |
0.94 |
0.39 |
0.021 |
0.011 |
62 |
13 |
Comparative steel 1 |
0.083 |
2.07 |
0.86 |
0.35 |
0.018 |
0.013 |
57 |
15 |
Comparative steel 2 |
0.044 |
2.49 |
1.06 |
0.41 |
0.019 |
0.011 |
48 |
9 |
Comparative steel 3 |
0.016 |
1.67 |
0.93 |
0.39 |
0.015 |
0.012 |
46 |
13 |
Comparative steel 4 |
0.042 |
1.97 |
0.59 |
0.36 |
0.023 |
0.017 |
51 |
11 |
Comparative steel 5 |
0.051 |
2.03 |
0.94 |
0.67 |
0.019 |
0.013 |
38 |
14 |
Comparative steel 6 |
0.039 |
1.96 |
0.89 |
0.33 |
0.046 |
0.032 |
38 |
14 |
[Table 2]
Classification |
Steel type |
Reheating temperature (°C) |
Rough-Rolling |
Finish-Rolling |
Cooling |
Finish temperature (°C) |
Finish temperature (°C) |
Total reduction ratio (%) |
Rate (°C/s) |
Stop temperature (°C) |
Inventive example 1 |
Inventive steel 1 |
1065 |
953 |
735 |
62 |
3.7 |
435 |
Inventive example 2 |
Inventive steel 2 |
1072 |
975 |
725 |
61 |
4.6 |
488 |
Inventive example 3 |
Inventive steel 3 |
1054 |
892 |
713 |
63 |
5.7 |
307 |
Inventive example 4 |
Inventive steel 4 |
1049 |
888 |
749 |
61 |
7.9 |
205 |
Inventive example 5 |
Inventive steel 5 |
1079 |
915 |
755 |
62 |
4.4 |
416 |
Comparative example 1 |
Inventive steel 2 |
1026 |
865 |
769 |
38 |
5.1 |
395 |
Comparative example 2 |
Inventive steel 3 |
1043 |
903 |
711 |
49 |
4.7 |
407 |
Comparative example 3 |
Comparative steel 1 |
1055 |
930 |
736 |
61 |
5.3 |
453 |
Comparative example 4 |
Comparative steel 2 |
1067 |
972 |
744 |
61 |
7.1 |
356 |
Comparative example 5 |
Comparative steel 3 |
1037 |
901 |
784 |
63 |
12.3 |
415 |
Comparative example 6 |
Comparative steel 4 |
1012 |
859 |
723 |
62 |
3.8 |
467 |
Comparative example 7 |
Comparative steel 5 |
1059 |
938 |
733 |
61 |
6.5 |
459 |
Comparative example 8 |
Comparative steel 6 |
1038 |
896 |
741 |
62 |
5.0 |
437 |
[0032]
[Table 3]
Classification |
Thickness (mm) |
Average grain size (µm) in 3/8t-5/8t zone |
Yield strength (MPa) |
Deformation aging impact transition temperature of center zone (°C) |
Inventive example 1 |
85 |
13.3 |
529 |
-71 |
Inventive example 2 |
80 |
14.3 |
564 |
-65 |
Inventive example 3 |
90 |
12.1 |
542 |
-7 |
Inventive example 4 |
85 |
12.8 |
572 |
-73 |
Inventive example 5 |
80 |
14.5 |
523 |
-64 |
Comparative example 1 |
80 |
21.2 |
559 |
-49 |
Comparative example 2 |
85 |
18.9 |
556 |
-51 |
Comparative example 3 |
85 |
13.9 |
635 |
-36 |
Comparative example 4 |
90 |
18.2 |
693 |
-31 |
Comparative example 5 |
80 |
13.5 |
449 |
-62 |
Comparative example 6 |
80 |
14.3 |
508 |
-44 |
Comparative example 7 |
85 |
18.7 |
669 |
-38 |
Comparative example 8 |
80 |
13.8 |
609 |
-37 |
[0033] In the case of Inventive Examples 1 to 5 satisfying the alloy composition and manufacturing
conditions suggested in the present disclosure, the average grain size of grains of
the 3/8t-5/8t zone was 15 µm or less, and accordingly, yield strength was 500 MPa
or more, and the strain aging impact transition temperature was -60°C or less.
[0034] In the case of Comparative Examples 1 and 2, the alloy composition suggested in the
present disclosure was satisfied, but the total reduction ratio during finish-rolling
was low, such that sufficient deformation was not applied to the center zone, and
acicular ferrite which may greatly affect grain size refinement was not sufficiently
formed, and a large amount of coarse bainite was formed. Accordingly, it is indicated
that the grain size as coarsened, the average grain size of grains of the 3/8t-5/8t
zone exceeded 15 µm, and the strain aging impact transition temperature of the center
zone exceeded -60°C.
[0035] In the case of Comparative Example 3, by having a value higher than an upper limit
of C suggested in the present disclosure, a large amount of coarse bainite phase was
formed due to high hardenability, such that very high yield strength was exhibited,
and although the average grain size of grains of the 3/8t-5/8t zone was 15 µm or less,
a large amount of C was fixed to the dislocation during the strain aging impact test,
such that the strain aging impact transition temperature exceeded -60°C.
[0036] In the case of Comparative Example 4, by having a value higher than an upper limit
of Mn suggested in the present disclosure, a large amount of coarse bainite phase
was formed due to high hardenability, such that very high yield strength was exhibited,
but the average grain size of grains of the 3/8t-5/8t zone exceeded 15 µm, and the
strain aging impact transition temperature exceeded -60°C.
[0037] In the case of Comparative Example 5, by having a value lower than A lower limit
of C and Mn suggested in the present disclosure, a large amount of soft phase such
as polygonal ferrite was formed in the center zone, and accordingly, yield strength
was lower than 500Mpa.
[0038] In the case of Comparative Example 6, by having a value lower than an upper limit
of Ni suggested in the present disclosure, although the average grain size of grains
of the 3/8t-5/8t zone was 15 µm or less, strain aging impact transition temperature
exceeded -60°C due to a decrease in toughness due to the low Ni content.
[0039] In the case of Comparative Example 7, by having a higher value than an upper limit
of Mo suggested in the present disclosure, a large amount of coarse bainite phase
was formed due to high hardenability, such that very high yield strength was exhibited,
but the average grain size of grains of the 3/8t-5/8t exceeded 15 µm, and the strain
aging impact transition temperature exceeded -60°C.
[0040] In the case of Comparative Example 8, by having a value higher than an upper limit
of Ti and Nb suggested in the present disclosure, strength increased due to excessive
hardenability and the formation of precipitate, and the strain aging impact transition
temperature exceeded -60°C due to the decrease in toughness caused by precipitation
strengthening.
1. A high-strength ultra-thick steel material having excellent cryogenic strain aging
impact toughness in a center zone thereof, the steel material comprising:
by wt%, 0.02-0.06% of C, 1.8-2.2% of Mn, 0.7-1.1% of Ni, 0.2-0.5% of Mo, 0.005-0.03%
of Nb, 0.005-0.018% of Ti, 80 ppm or less of P, 20 ppm or less of S, and a balance
of Fe and inevitable impurities,
wherein an average grain size of grains having a high boundary angle of 15 degrees
or greater, measured by EBSD, is 15 µm or less in a 3/8t-5/8t zone in a thickness
(t) direction.
2. The steel material of claim 1, wherein the steel material has a microstructure including
acicular ferrite, granular bainite, and upper bainite.
3. The steel material of claim 1, wherein the steel material has a thickness of 5-90mm.
4. The steel material of claim 1, wherein the steel material has yield strength of 500
MPa or more.
5. The steel material of claim 1, wherein, after a heat treatment is performed on the
steel material at 250°C for 1 hour after deformation of 5%, a transition temperature
is -60°C or less in a strain aging impact test.
6. A method for manufacturing a high-strength ultra-thick steel material having excellent
cryogenic strain aging impact toughness in a center zone thereof, the method comprising:
reheating a steel slab including, by wt%, 0.02-0.06% of C, 1.8-2.2% of Mn, 0.7-1.1%
of Ni, 0.2-0.5% of Mo, 0.005-0.03% of Nb, 0.005-0.018% of Ti, 80 ppm or less of P,
20 ppm or less of S, and a balance of Fe and inevitable impurities to a temperature
of 1000-1080°C;
obtaining a bar by rough-rolling the reheated steel slab at a temperature of 850-1050°C;
obtaining a hot-rolled steel material by finish-rolling the bar at a temperature of
700-800°C at a total reduction ratio of more than 60%; and
cooling the hot-rolled steel material to a temperature of 500°C or less at a cooling
rate of 3°C/s or more.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein a total reduction ratio during the rough-rolling is
40% or more.