[0001] Low friction between train wheels and the tracks over which they run is beneficial
for the transport efficiency of trains when up to speed. However, low friction also
means that trains can take considerable distances to stop. Furthermore, a train cannot
take evasive action to avoid incidents as its course is fixed and determined by the
tracks and a train driver can typically only see as far ahead as the view from their
cab will allow. Therefore wherever possible, persons are normally prevented from being
on tracks where trains are running. If things do go wrong and a train is approaching
a person on the track, the driver has little they can do except apply the emergency
brakes and use the horn on the train. Both of these measures rely on the train driver's
reaction times. The train continues on until the end of its, potentially large, braking
distance, meanwhile persons on the track have hopefully taken up positions of safety.
[0002] However, any persons on the track may not be paying attention or may not be able
to see or hear a train approaching and then may not be able to take appropriate action
to move out of the way of the train in time to avoid a collision. Workers in particular,
may be surprised by an unexpected train or may be pre-occupied and not notice it approaching.
[0003] Advances in train technology have made them quieter, and so an approaching train
may not be heard as readily as in the past by persons on or near the track. Improvements
in rail technology, such as continuously welded rail, also contribute to this by minimising
vibrations and noise that might otherwise be felt or heard by persons near, or in
contact with the rails.
[0004] Such difficulties are most prevalent when workers are using machinery or are in the
presence of suddenly-moving or slow-moving vehicles, such as during engineering works
or during shunting manoeuvres. In all cases, it is imperative to alert and provide
any persons in danger with as much warning as possible so that they may take up a
position of safety. The proposed invention thus provides for a solution to mitigate
the dangers faced by persons who are trackside.
[0005] Due to quieter-running trains, it may be insufficient to rely on the inherent noise
made by an approaching train, and reliance on a driver's reaction time reduces reliability
of a warning, and reduces the useful warning time to a person in danger on or near
the tracks.
[0006] Several conventional "safe systems of work" exist to enable work to be carried out
on the railway, and to ensure that moving rolling stock is kept away from track workers,
or at least to ensure that track workers are given a useful degree of warning of approaching
rolling stock.
[0007] In the UK, such "safe systems of work" include:
- 1. Safeguarded - all lines are blocked
- 2. Fenced - a fence is put up between the site of work and nearest open line
- 3. Equipment warning:
- a. Automatic Track Warning System (ATWS): using lights and sirens and/or a personal
warning device
- b. Train Operated Warning System (TOWS): using sirens
- c. Lookout Operated Warning System (LOWS): using lights and sirens and/or a personal
warning device
- 4. Lookout warning - a nominated person warns of oncoming rail vehicles using a horn,
whistle or touch.
- 5. Site Warden warning - a space is provided between the site of work and nearest
open line and a 'Site Warden' watches everyone working to ensure they remain within
the safe area
[0008] Safeguarded ("1") and fenced ("2") arrangements rely on the signaller, and interlocking
arrangements for preventing trains from entering certain lines.
[0009] Fenced ("2") and equipment warning ("3") require the correct setup of equipment and
all require the workers to work on the correct area of track and that said works have
been planned with sufficient access and working limits to the work site. Such methods
rely on human interaction to be correctly enforced.
[0010] Furthermore, all such conventional track warning systems rely on being correctly
set up and are even then only protective of specific sections of track.
[0011] None of the "safe systems of work" described above will provide any protection to
trespassers on the railway track, or persons legitimately using level crossings.
[0012] Conventional train horns, operated by a driver, can warn persons in danger, but have
limitations, in particular that they need to be operated by a driver, and are typically
activated either at fixed locations, or in response to the driver visually identifying
a hazard on the track. Furthermore, conventional train horns may not be rated to output
sound at a high enough volume for workers to be able to distinguish the sound above
the noise levels of running machinery
(https://www.gov.uk/raib-reports/report-1-2020-track-workers-struck-by-a-train-at-margam).
[0013] The present invention accordingly seeks to alleviate some of the limitations of conventional
warning systems.
[0014] The present invention accordingly seeks to provide an arrangement that would be mounted
to a vehicle, such as a rail vehicle, and may therefore provide a moving area of protection
ahead of the vehicle. In the following description, this area of protection will be
referred to as an Extended Protection Region (EPR).
[0015] Such arrangement would allow protection of the tracks ahead of a moving rail vehicle,
wherever the rail vehicle can travel. Protection may thereby be accorded to trespassers,
workers in places where they should not be, workers where a rail vehicle has entered
section of track incorrectly and workers wherever engineering vehicles are in use.
[0016] The present invention therefore provides methods and apparatus as defined in the
appended claims.
[0017] The above, and further, objects, characteristics and advantages of the present invention
will become more apparent from the following description of certain embodiments, by
way of examples only, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figs. 1 and 2 illustrate highly directional speakers generating an alarm signal, according
to operation of an embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 3 illustrates potential alarm signal focus directions, defined using railway
parameters and UK average heights for persons;
Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of a train-mounted alarm system in accordance with an
embodiment of the present invention The present invention provides methods and apparatus
for providing warning to persons in the path of a moving vehicle;
Fig. 5 is a chart illustrating the requirements of the sound pressure used in embodiments
in accordance with the present invention in more detail; and
Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating the collimated beam generated by embodiments
of the present invention in more detail.
[0018] The present description may use a number of acronyms or terms as follows:
Rail vehicle - any vehicle which may use railway networks including, but not limited
to, passenger trains, freight trains and road-rail vehicles;
EPR - Extended Protection Region - the region protected by a system of the present
invention within which any persons would be alerted to a vehicle's presence and outside
of which the alarm will be minimised;
NOM - Normal Operation Mode - When a rail vehicle is moving, or able to move, according
to the particular embodiment, the alarm system of the present invention is active
and focussed on the EPR with minimal effect outside the EPR;
EOM - Emergency Operation Mode - Enhanced operation (increased intensity and EPR area
size at the cost of alarming rail users not in danger), as may be triggered in an
emergency situation;
AOM - Active Operation Mode - NOM plus added adjustment of alarm parameters depending
on the situation;
Alarm signature - an underlying pattern or feature that is part of the alarm, for
example a pattern of flashing lights or a recognisable sound such as fire alarms or
sirens;
Phased array - an arrangement comprising an array of transducers which may be triggered
in sequence such that the resulting combined focus of the array as a whole is shifted;
x-y plane - defined as a plane through which the cab of a rail vehicle would travel,
perpendicular to the ground and to the rails;
Persons not in danger - anyone that would not be involved in an accident or near miss
if the rail vehicle being considered continues normally. This includes people outside
of the railway boundaries;
Position of safety - a position where a person is not in danger.
[0019] The methods and apparatus of the present invention provide a moving vehicle warning
which is not reliant on human reaction times to be operated.
[0020] The warning is continuously active after being automatically triggered, whenever
the vehicle is in motion; or is capable of being in motion, according to the particular
embodiment.
[0021] The warning should be sufficiently perceptible to effectively warn those with ear
defenders, such as track workers, and should be effective even in the presence of
large amounts of ambient noise.
[0022] The warning should be effective over a long distance, yet should provide minimal
disruption to persons outside of an area of danger, in that only a much reduced level
of sound or other alarm characteristic is perceptible outside of the area of danger.
[0023] Preferably, an easily recognisable alarm signature is employed, that should only
be audible to persons in danger. Rail workers, and the wider general public, may be
trained to recognise the alarm signature, allowing workers and the general public
to be trained to have a clear procedure to follow upon hearing the alarm.
[0024] Alarm sounds should be directional, such that persons in danger hearing the alarm
sounds may be made aware of the direction and severity of a situation more immediately
than compared to omnidirectional alarms. This may allow increased chances for the
person in danger to reach a position of safety.
[0025] According to the present invention, a warning device is introduced, which is, or
may be, attached to a vehicle, and is directional and continuously active while the
vehicle is in motion. Optionally, the warning device may also be continuously active
whenever the vehicle is capable of motion. Such arrangements provide a protection
region extending in front of a moving vehicle, defining an area of protection, which
may be known herein as an Extended Protection Region (EPR).
[0026] An EPR is defined as the region around a rail vehicle which is protected by the system
of the present invention. Inside the EPR, persons would be alerted to the train's
presence and approach, while outside of the EPR the sound of the alarm is minimised.
[0027] By providing a continuously-active, directional alarm, the arrangements of the present
invention serve to both maximise the warning provided to persons in danger and to
minimise the unnecessary alarming of persons not in danger, such as passengers at
a station; persons waiting at a level crossing (rail/road crossing); persons inside
a rail vehicle running on another line; or residents living near to the railway.
[0028] A first embodiment of the invention comprises highly directional speakers retrofitted
to the front of a train and arranged to focus emitted sound on an area ahead of the
train, the area covering the tracks on which the train may run, and a protection region
either side of such tracks. Those areas cover the locations where persons would be
in danger from the approach of the train.
[0029] A further embodiment of the invention includes the relevant hardware designed and
built into vehicles at manufacture.
[0030] Another embodiment provides a removable version that could be retrofitted temporarily
to a vehicle. For example, a temporary version could be affixed to road-rail vehicles
not otherwise provided with protection systems, which would then increase protection
of persons working around them.
[0031] Figs. 1-3 illustrate the desired effects of the alarm according to the present invention.
Preferably, the present invention provides an alarm sound to persons within the EPR,
but generates a minimal level of sound outside of the EPR.
[0032] As illustrated in Fig. 1, an approaching train 10 carries an alarm system 12 according
to an embodiment of the present invention. Highly directional speakers may be employed
as the sound source. The alarm system is shown generating an alarm signal in directions
14, defined as a radiating beam, into an EPR 16 at the level of the tracks 18, for
perception by any persons on the tracks 18, but minimally perceptible by people 20
waiting on an adjacent platform 22 at a station.
[0033] As illustrated in Fig. 2, the alarm system 12 is shown generating an alarm signal
into the EPR 16 at the level of the tracks 18, for perception by any persons on the
tracks 18, but minimally perceptible by people 23 on a passing train 24.
[0034] Fig. 3 illustrates an example of alarm signal focus directions, defined using railway
parameters and UK average heights for persons. In the illustrated example, the alarm
sound is transmitted as a beam in directions 14 of rectangular cross-section, as may
be expected if produced by a rectangular phased array of emitters. As illustrated
in Fig. 3, the dimensions of the beam directions 14 are preferably determined to cover
core directions 26, which would include the position of the head of the vast majority
of the relevant population, in sitting or standing positions. The upper extent of
the core directions 26 corresponds to the standing height of males at 95th percentile,
while the lower extent of the core directions 26 corresponds to the seated height
of females at 5th percentile. Width-wise, the width of the core directions 26 corresponds
to the separation of the rails. Thus, the core directions 26 include the likely position
of the head of a person in danger. The core directions 26 are expanded to radiating
beam directions 14 to include a safety factor. Persons whose heads are slightly outside
the core directions 26 may still be in danger from the approaching vehicle, and must
be alerted to the approach of the vehicle by perception of the alarm signal generated
by the alarm system 12. Therefore, the radiating beam directions 14 are extended beyond
the core directions 26 to provide alarm signals to the EPR 16, while minimising the
amplitude of alarm signal which enters regions outside of the radiating beam directions
14, for example, onto the platform at the likely head height of waiting passengers,
as illustrated in Fig. 1; or at the likely head height of passengers on a passing
train, as illustrated in Fig. 2.
[0035] In Fig. 3 are listed various heights which may be used to determine the radiating
beam directions 14.
[0036] A more complex embodiment of the invention may have different modes of operation.
A Normal Operation Mode (NOM) may be defined as a mode of operation in which the alarm
is focused on the EPR 16 and such that the alarm sounds extend minimally outside of
the EPR 16. This represents a normal default mode of operation which would be continuously
active whenever a rail vehicle was moving, or capable of moving. This NOM mode would
minimise annoyance to other users of the railway, such as passengers at stations etc.
and crucially would allow for the system to be continuously active, without the need
for driver input. Such an embodiment would ensure that persons entering the EPR would
always be warned instantly. Human reaction time in triggering a warning signal is
therefore not a factor as the EPR is always active.
[0037] Although an advantage of the present invention is that it does not rely on human
interaction, it may be advantageous in some embodiments to provide for a manual override
by a driver: for example, where a driver may observe people in locations outside of
the EPR, but where the driver considers that those persons may enter a dangerous location.
A manual override may be applied to shift the alarm focus or activate EOM in some
cases to expand the protection region such that the people observed by the driver
can perceive an alarm sound generated by the system of the present invention.
[0038] Alternatively, or additionally, an Emergency Operation Mode (EOM) may be available,
which would be automatically activated or manually by human intervention, either locally,
such as by the driver, or remotely, such as by the signaller, in cases of emergency
such as where persons are detected just outside of the EPR 16 but are in danger of
entering it; or where persons are observed to be unresponsive to a normal mode alarm
configuration.
[0039] Automatic operation may be activated in response to a detected object on the line,
for example by computer vision, such as may be captured by an infra-red camera. Suitable
arrangements for such embodiments may be found described in a co-pending UK patent
application
GB 2103661.1, filed of even date herewith.
[0040] In an example embodiment, when triggered, EOM would increase the size of the EPR
16 and the intensity of the alarm. EOM would improve the chance of persons on or near
the line being warned, at the cost of potentially disrupting people in safe positions
such as those outside the railway boundaries or passengers on platforms. For that
reason, EOM is not intended to be used continuously.
[0041] Furthermore, or alternatively, an Active Operation Mode (AOM) may be provided, the
AOM could allow for certain alarm parameters to be adjusted in real time. Such alarm
parameters may include sound intensity, EPR size, alarm focus.
[0042] In a particular embodiment, operation of AOM adjusts the power or range of the alarm
depending on the vehicle's speed. In this case the size of the EPR 16 could be reduced
at low speeds and increased at high speeds, by adjusting the directions 14 and/or
adjusting the intensity of the generated sound. This may be beneficial when slowing
down to take a corner, as reducing the range of the alarm sound would mean that the
alarm sound extends less onto other lines or away from the railway. It may also be
beneficial when shunting at low speeds. Similarly, reduction in alarm range commensurate
with reduction in speed of the train may also be beneficial when using engineering
vehicles during a possession of the railway as it would allow workers to work safely
on the line when a vehicle is static or slowly moving but would warn workers with
sufficient warning if the vehicle started to approach where they are working. By reducing
the range of the alarm by reducing the EPR, alarms are not generated over an excessive
distance with regard to the danger posed by a slowly-moving train.
[0043] In some embodiments, the shape of the track ahead of the train may be taken into
account. In cases where the track ahead includes one or more sets of points, the setting
of the points, or the intended path of the train, may be used to calculate the appropriate
shape of track to be considered. Suitable arrangements for deriving the shape of the
track ahead of the train are discussed in co-pending UK patent application
GB 2103661.1, filed of even date herewith.
[0044] A highly directional speaker, used to deliver alarm sounds according to an embodiment
of the invention, may be adjusted so that alarm sounds are projected in the direction
of the track ahead of the train, or the intended path of the train, even if that does
not extend in a "straight ahead" orientation in front of the train.
[0045] An embodiment of the invention would alter the distance and/or focus of the alarm
sound generated by the highly directional speaker to follow the curvature of the track,
or the intended path of the train and be directed at a certain defined position on
the track ahead of the train.
[0046] For example, methods listed below could be used in combination or alone to estimate
track layout ahead of a vehicle in order to optimally focus the alarm beam to protect
persons that might be in positions of danger ahead of the vehicle.
[0047] Methods may include: Computer vision of image feed ahead of the vehicle, as described
in co-pending UK patent application
GB 2103661.1, filed of even date herewith; Route network map data may be stored aboard the vehicle
and used with information enabling the vehicle to determine its location within the
route network, and, knowing the vehicle's current position, a track layout ahead of
the vehicle may be determined from the route network map data, providing direction
on where to focus the alarm beam of the present invention at any given location along
route.
[0048] A current position of the vehicle on the route network may be obtained, for example,
from one or more of the following methods: from GPS data; from identifiers read or
received from trackside balises or nodes; commands transmitted from trackside nodes
for focussing the alarm beam of the present invention through an upcoming section
of track; a predicted itinerary of the vehicle will provide information on the vehicle's
intended route such as passing through points in either normal or reverse states,
for example; data received from or updated by communication from passing vehicles,
or from a wireless network or other data sources; sensors carried aboard the vehicle
may detect route features such as cornering radius, gradient, which may be matched
to corresponding features in the route network map data to determine a current location
of the vehicle; or manual human override and control, which may be useful in case
situations arise in which a driver or other user determines that the alarm beam of
the present invention should be directed in a certain direction, which is not the
direction determined by any of the other arrangements provided.
[0049] In the case of using stored route network map data, the map data could be updated
by vehicles that have previously passed through area part of the route network; or
may be updated by commands sent from a control centre. This could include changes
based on new temporary speed restrictions imposed or based on expert input. For example,
in the case of preparing a new route for focussing of the alarm beam of the present
invention, a person with the relevant expertise could pass through the area in a vehicle
during a calibration exercise to manually aim the focus of the alarm beam of the present
invention the vehicle passes along a route. This data could then be saved to the route
map data and communicated to a central data store, and could be copied into any other
vehicles with maps. In subsequent journeys made by this or other vehicles, the vehicles
could then look up the beam storing information initially determined by the expert
user and use it to direct the beam.
[0050] As described above, certain embodiments of the present invention provides a moving
vehicle alarm system which is connected to receive data from other systems, such data
indicating features of the track ahead of the railway vehicle. The system operates
to evaluate a condition of the track ahead, from the received data. One of the other
systems may include a network map. Another of the systems may provide an indication
of a current position of the rail vehicle.
[0051] The positions to focus may be calculated by computer simulation of the network and
this information may then be provided to the route network map data or live to the
system of the present invention.
[0052] Temporary Speed Restrictions or other alterations to the expected track layout, information
on these could be received at the train using radio communications for example by
using GSMR cab radio, and stored in the memory.
[0053] While the alarm signal of the present invention is largely described herein as an
audible signal, embodiments of the present invention could employ a number of different
alarm signal generator elements, for example elements providing highly directional
alarm signals by sound, vibration or light emission.
[0054] Recognisable signatures may be incorporated into the alarm signals, whether they
be audible, vibration or light signals. For example, a signature of timing and intensity
similar to that of a fire alarm or an emergency services siren could be used. This
may evidently be applied to audible signals, but equivalent patterns of timing and
intensity may be used for vibration or light signals or other aspects of the alarm.
The signature, that is, the pattern of timing and intensity, could aid in warning
persons in danger of the type of danger they are in and hence this would help to trigger
an appropriate response reducing the time that a person in danger needs to recognise
and understand the meaning of the alarm signal received.
[0055] This response could be learned, for example, workers would be trained to recognise
specific alarm signatures and then taught the appropriate procedures to follow in
order to maximise their chances of survival. With practice, this response could become
automatic, similar to people's reaction in response to fire alarm sounds.
[0056] In more specific embodiments, arrangements may be made to convey direction and urgency
of danger to a person in danger. For example, a person in danger may have their back
to an approaching rail vehicle. If the rail vehicle is fitted with an alarm device
according to the present invention, emitting an appropriate alarm signature, the person
in danger may be able to rapidly ascertain that the alarm indicates the approach of
a rail vehicle; and the person in danger may be able to ascertain the direction that
the rail vehicle is approaching from, reducing the time to assess danger and allowing
the person in danger to move to a position of safety earlier. As the vehicle approaches,
the alarm signature as perceived by the person in danger may also change, for example
increasing in intensity, assisting the person in danger in evaluating the type and
urgency of the danger.
[0057] In certain embodiments, signatures could be overlaid, for example, there could be
a high pitch component to the alarm sound and a low pitch component. The different
components could serve different purposes, for example the high pitch could be designed
to be most effective at transmitting a sound similar to a fire alarm through the air
as discussed. However, the low pitch component could be designed to maximise distance
travelled and could travel best through the rails, potentially being registered as
vibrations and through touch. For a person on the track some distance away, they may
first notice a vibration in the rails, which may attract their attention and may be
sufficient warning that a rail vehicle is approaching. If the person in danger fails
to react to the vibration in the rails, for any reason, the rail vehicle will approach
closer to the person in danger. The person in danger may then hear the low pitch component
audibly. That component, like the rail vibrations, may carry an alarm signature such
as variations in timing or intensity. The person in danger may recognise the alarm
signature and may respond by moving out of danger. On the other hand, if the person
in danger fails to react to the low pitch audible alarm, for any reason, the rail
vehicle will approach closer to the person in danger. The person in danger may then
hear the high pitch component audibly. The high pitch component will preferably carry
an alarm signature, for example as variations in timing and intensity. The high pitch
component is preferably an intense sound, and will be accompanied by the low pitch
sound and the rail vibrations, respectively described above, meaning that the person
in danger should be able to perceive the alarm and remove themselves from their position
of danger before the arrival of the rail vehicle.
[0058] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide a vibratory aspect directly
through the ground or rails. Such vibratory aspect may be particularly useful to alert
those that cannot hear an audible alarm, for example those working with ear defenders
or in an area of excessive ambient noise. This vibratory alarm component would be
identifiable through touch or through vibrations passing through solid infrastructure.
Furthermore, the vibratory alarm component could be used to warn workers in areas
further ahead due to lower attenuation and higher speed of vibration in the rails
than sound in the air. Providing a vibratory warning through the rails could also
allow for warnings to extend beyond corners, which is difficult for sound alarms,
and impossible for visual alarms, so providing early warning for areas separated from
an approaching vehicle with blind bends. A worker working on the tracks and touching
them, or in a rail vehicle touching the tracks, would be particularly protected by
this embodiment.
[0059] In order to prevent damage to rails, as discussed previously, a vibratory signature
could be chosen that is identifiable so that the intensity can be reduced while maintaining
an acceptable chance of detection by a person in danger. This would keep vibrations
small, to minimise the risk of damage to the rail tracks. It may also be possible
to emit a sound directly through the rails, such as the low pitch component discussed
above, as an alternative to larger-amplitude mechanical vibrations and hence mitigating
the railway damage risk. However, in the case of emergency EOM operation, larger vibrations
through the rails could also be applied, to improve the chance that a person in danger
will perceive the alarm and react in good time to move from the position of danger
into a position of safety.
[0060] A component of the alarm could be visible, based on appropriate lighting, for example
a flashing light to illuminate far ahead. Any light source used in such a role preferably
has a highly directional light output, to avoid unnecessarily illuminating nearby
areas and alerting persons who are not in danger. The light source could, for example,
be activated only in Emergency EOM running and would not be active normally. The signature
of the alarm output components could also match - for example the light source may
be arranged to flash in accordance with an alarm signature of an audible alarm, if
desired.
[0061] The present invention preferably utilises a highly directional speaker system, which
enables a specific area to be targeted where persons in danger would most likely be
located. Use of a highly directional speaker system would minimise noise generated
by the alarm of the present invention outside the EPR. Highly directional speakers
would also allow for greater sound intensity in the specific area, for a given power
input, than would be provided with an omnidirectional speaker provided with the same
amount of input power. Accordingly, the highly directional aspect to the alarm would
allow for an area far ahead of a train to be protected and included within the EPR,
as well as limiting disruption to the surrounding areas. This would allow the previously
discussed NOM to be achieved, where the alarm is continuously active when the train
is moving, and workers far ahead can be automatically warned without relying on the
reaction time of the driver. This is beneficial to persons in danger, as it would
allow them the greatest amount of warning and would increase their chance of reaching
a position of safety. Highly directional speakers would allow for further range, no
dependency on driver reaction time and minimal disruption to persons not in danger,
and hence are improvements over traditional rail vehicle mounted horns, at least in
these respects.
[0062] In a simple embodiment, a highly directional speaker is directed by passive focusing.
For example, a highly directional speaker system may simply be fixed to the front
of the rail vehicle. This would mean the focus of the highly directional speaker would
line up with the "straight ahead" direction of the rail vehicle, but there would be
inaccuracies when cornering. In an improved version of such an embodiment, focussing
of the alarm beam of the present invention may be adjusted manually by the driver
or other user. Such embodiments are simpler, and so may be expected to be relatively
low-cost. Such embodiments may be of particular use for low-speed applications. Such
low-speed applications may include possessions, where works are being carried out
on the track, and depots, where rail vehicles typically move slowly over limited distances.
Such embodiments may also be found appropriate in areas with "permeable" rail boundaries,
such as in some developing countries, where animals and trespassers are commonly found
on the track.
[0063] In more advanced embodiments provided with a type of automatic focussing, as described
elsewhere herein, the option to have manual override of the system and manual focus
of the alarm beam could be added, and may allow savings to be made in other components,
thereby to maintain lower costs.
[0064] In a preferred embodiment, active x-y focus of the highly directional speaker could
be achieved. Arrangements providing for this are known in themselves. For example,
a phased array of transducers may be pulsed in the correct time intervals to provide
the required beam steering, or mechanical means may be used to physically rotate the
highly directional speaker about appropriate axes, relative to the front of the rail
vehicle.
[0065] Optionally, the braking distance of the vehicle may be taken into account when calculating
the dimensions of the EPR. A factor of safety should be added to the braking distance.
The dimensions of the EPR may be adaptive, increasing in size with increasing speed
of the approaching vehicle. The apparent intensity of the vehicle's alarm could be
arranged to increase if the vehicle approaches a person in danger. If the vehicle
were to brake and the EPR, reducing in size due to the reduced speed of the vehicle,
and so the reduced braking distance, no longer reached the position where a person
was standing, then the pedestrian would hear the intensity of the alarm decrease,
indicating that the vehicle is slowing and might come to a stop before reaching them.
[0066] The present invention therefore provides a safety system whereby vehicles are fitted
with warning systems to protect the area ahead of the vehicle in its direction of
travel. The system provides alarm signals into an Extended Protection Region (EPR)
to minimise disruption to persons not in danger from the approach of the vehicle.
By using a highly directional speaker, specific regions may be targeted with the alarm.
[0067] The present invention may be found useful in providing a protection region in the
path ahead of vehicles which may move unexpectedly, for example when shunting or conducting
engineering works at low speeds, where the alarm of the present invention may be active
whenever the vehicle is capable of moving. On the other hand, the alarm as proposed
by the present invention is very useful in situations where vehicles may move at high
speed. In such cases, the time available to alert a person in danger, for example
a worker with their back to an oncoming train, is very limited and such person's chance
of escaping from the danger of the approaching vehicle is significantly increased
through use of an alarm which is continuously active whenever the vehicle is moving,
or is capable of moving. Directionality of the alarm signals, particularly in the
case of use of a highly directional speaker, allows for higher power signals within
a protection region which can potentially travel further, hence providing earlier
warning to a person in danger. Vibrational and "fire alarm" signature aspects of the
alarm of embodiments of the invention can improve the chance of alerting persons in
danger and getting them to follow the correct procedure, potentially improving their
chances of survival.
[0068] In certain preferred embodiments, alarm parameters such as intensity can be modified
in real time to convey urgency, alter alarm range, so as to best protect regions ahead
of the vehicle, while minimising disruption to persons not in danger.
[0069] While the present invention has been particularly described with reference to the
use of a highly directional speaker (for example, "Long Range Acoustic Devices" as
described at https://www.genasys.com/ahd-products/), the present invention may be
implemented with any suitable directional sound generator.
[0070] Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described generally above,
the operation of the train-mounted alarm system and the system itself will now be
described in further detail. A main advantage of the embodiments of the present invention
are their applicability to situations such as track worker safety. Furthermore, the
system may be adapted to aid in preventing trespass on to a rail track, and also persons
at level crossings.
[0071] Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of a train-mounted alarm system in accordance with
an embodiment of the present invention. A train 40 is shown on a railway track 41
comprising a first rail 42a and a second rail 42b fixed to a plurality of sleepers
43a...n laid on ballast 44. The train-mounted alarm system 45 comprises a highly directional
sound generator 46 mounted at the end of the train 40 corresponding to the front of
the train 40 based on the direction of travel. The highly directional sound generator
46 is adapted to produce a collimated beam 47 of sound parallel to the direction of
travel of the train 40, and extends from the train 40 to form the extended protection
region, EPR,. The highly directional sound generator 46 is further adapted to deliver
a minimum sound pressure corresponding to a pre-determined threshold within the collimated
beam 47 only. This results in the sound pressure being detectable within the extended
protection region EPR only. The highly directional sound generator 46 is mounted on
a moveable support 48 that enables the highly directional sound generator 46 to be
rotated about an axis perpendicular to the train 40 in use. The highly directional
sound generator 46 is mounted on the train 40 at a height corresponding to the head
height of an average-sized person standing on the railway track 41, ensuring that
the collimated beam 47 is directed firstly to a region where the sound pressure will
have most impact, and secondly at a level below the head height of passengers standing
on a platform at a railway station. In practice, the maximum height of the collimated
beam 47 from the railway track is in the range 1.25m to 2.0m.
[0072] The highly directional sound generator 46 comprises a phased array 49 of acoustic
emitters 50a...n. This may be in the form of the long range acoustic device described
above, or a combination of a phased array of ultrasonic acoustic emitters having an
audio-frequency within the range of human hearing modulated on top of the acoustic
signal. This forms a collimated beam of sound parallel to the direction of travel
of the train 40. In this latter case, an audio-frequency generator 51 is provided,
along with the circuitry 52 required to generate the modulated signal. The overall
result is a collimated beam of sound pressure that is audible by humans. Such a beam
comprises a central lobe with lobes at harmonics minimised. The width
W and height
H of the extended protection region EPR is determined by the dimensions of the phased
array 49 and the signals used to drive the individual ultrasonic acoustic emitters
50a...
n. For example, the width
W may be adjusted by varying which of the individual ultrasonic acoustic emitters 50a...
n are turned on across a single row in the phased array 49 at any one time.
[0073] Fig. 5 is a chart illustrating the requirements of the sound pressure used in embodiments
in accordance with the present invention in more detail. The
x-axis represents distance from a trackside worker in metres and the
y-axis is the sound pressure level at that distance in dB. As stated in the RAIB report
referenced above, at a level crossing where work is being carried out, the background
or ambient noise will be around 50dB to 55dB, and at a distance of 25m from the worker,
the horn on a train will sound approximately 88 dB to persons at the crossing. However,
if any of the trackside workers is using heavy machinery, such as an impact wrench,
the sound pressure level increases to around 105dB to 113dB, which also requires persons
to wear hearing protection. It is clear therefore that a train horn sounding at 88dB
will not warn persons of the approach of the train. Preferably, the pre-determined
threshold for sound pressure in this situation is at least 20dB above any ambient
noise. Therefore, a minimum sound pressure threshold for persons working with heavy
machinery would be at least 120dB. For persons who are not using heavy machinery,
whilst they are likely to hear the train horn above the ambient noise depending on
the layout of the track this may not always be enough to alert such persons to the
imminent danger of the train approach, for example, if the track curves away from
the location of such persons. This may give a false impression of how far away the
train actually is. However, by having the sound pressure within the collimated beam
47 of the train mounted alarm system 45 set to a pre-determined threshold that corresponds
to the threshold at which the human ear detects pain, and that this occurs only within
the collimated beam, persons are alerted to move out of the range of the sound pressure,
and thence to safety. This is at around 112dB to 120dB.
[0074] Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating the collimated beam generated by embodiments
of the present invention in more detail. The train 40 travels at a speed 5 along the
railway track 41. The train mounted alarm system 45 generates an extended protection
region EPR that has a length
L that is a function of the speed 5 of the train. This is the case whether the train
mounted alarm system 45 is adapted to be used continuously whilst the train 40 is
travelling at a speed 5 or intermittently whilst the train 40 is travelling at a speed
S. The length of the extended protection region EPR is preferably a linear function
of the speed 5 of the train. For situations where this would lead to an impractical
length of collimated beam 47, the length of the extended protection region EPR may
be a function of the logarithm of the speed 5 of the train (such as base 10 or a natural
logarithm). It may be desirable to have the length of the extended protection region
EPR as a linear function of the speed 5 of the train at lower speeds and as a logarithm
function of the speed
5 of the train at higher speeds, with the switch between the two occurring at speeds
that are typical outside of built up areas. In addition, it may be preferable for
the train mounted alarm system to be turned on when the train 40 begins to move from
a stationary position. At very low speeds it may be desirable for the length of the
extended protection region to be a quadratic function of the speed 5 of the train
to ensure that the alarm function is successful.
[0075] As described above the highly directional sound generator 46 is mounted on a movable
support 48. This is to enable the collimated beam 47 to be moved whilst the train
is in motion, for example, to sweep across the width of the railway track 41 or to
anticipate rail track curvature. This allows the collimated beam 47 to effectively
push persons or animals across a railway track and out of danger to avoid the sound
pressure within the collimated beam. The sound pressure within the collimated beam
47 may vary over time, for example, having a lower dB level in regions where there
are no crossings or ingress onto the railway track is unlikely or there is no night-time
working planned, and a dB level above the pre-determined threshold only where required.
In addition, data from acoustic signals picked up from optical fibres laid alongside
the railway track 41 for signalling purposes may be used to indicate regions where
the train mounted alarm system should be turned on. The highly directional sound generator
46 may comprise more than one audio frequency generator 51 such that sound pressure
within the collimated beam 47 is provided with different frequencies. Such frequencies
may be tailed to individual issues, such as those most likely to affect humans and
those most likely to affect wildlife. It is also possible to adjust the sound pressure
output of the collimated beam 47 to create an alarm signature, for example, by using
either longer and shorter bursts of sound pressure or bursts of sound pressure at
different frequencies. The highly directional sound generator may also further comprise
a low-frequency signal generator 53 that is used to generate vibrations along the
railway track 41 as an additional alarm mechanism. These vibrations may be felt by
persons on the track before the collimated beam 47 is audible.
[0076] As mentioned above, it is possible to combine the embodiments of the present invention
with a train mounted railway track 41 detection system. Such a system comprises a
sensor unit, mounted on the train 40, and image processing equipment, preferably within
the train in this example. Housing the image processing equipment within the train
40 provides increased security and reduced likelihood of damage from everyday train
operation. However, both the sensor unit and the image processing equipment may be
fitted to the train 40 together in a single housing, if desired. The sensor unit comprises
a housing, within which is mounted a LiDAR system. The LiDAR system comprises a laser
having a wavelength in the infra-red region of the electromagnetic spectrum, a phased
array of optical antennas adapted to illuminate at least one region of interest on
the railway track 41, a moveable mount adapted to direct the laser in the direction
of the railway track 41 ahead of the rail vehicle, and a photodetector connected to
the image processing equipment. A power source may be provided, or the sensor unit
may be linked to a power source on the train. Initially, the LiDAR system is activated
to detect image data received from the railway track 41 when the train 40 is in motion.
Image data is received from at least one region of interest on the railway track 41
in order to be able to determine the direction of the railway track 41 ahead, such
as the set-direction of a set of points. During motion of the train 40, the direction
of the LiDAR system may be altered to match that of the upcoming railway track 41
by tilting the moveable base. Alternatively, the LiDAR system may have a wide enough
field of view to omit the moveable base as all reasonable railway track 41 configurations
will sit within that field of view. Whilst data is received continuously from the
LiDAR system, regions of interest are analysed specifically to reduce the on-board
computing cost required to implement the overall system. The image data is processed
to identify the set direction of a set of points in the railway track 41 ahead of
the train 40. This set direction may then be used by the train mounted alarm system
45 to alter the direction of the collimated beam 47, in order to ensure the effective
generation of the extended protection region EPR.
1. A train-mounted alarm system adapted to warn of the presence of an oncoming train
along a railway track, the system comprising:
a highly directional sound generator adapted to be mounted on an end of a train and
to produce a collimated beam of sound parallel to a direction of travel of the train
and extending from the train to form an extended protection region (EPR), the sound
generator being further adapted to deliver a minimum sound pressure corresponding
to a pre-determined threshold within the collimated beam only, such that said sound
pressure is detectable within the extended protection region only.
2. A train-mounted alarm system according to claim 1, wherein the sound pressure is not
detectable outside of the extended protection region.
3. A train-mounted alarm system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the pre-determined
threshold for the sound pressure is equal to the threshold at which the human ear
detects pain.
4. A train-mounted alarm system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the pre-determined
threshold is equal to a sound pressure of at least twenty dB above any ambient noise.
5. A train-mounted alarm system according to any preceding claim, adapted to be used
continuously when the train is travelling at a speed 5, and wherein the length of
the extended protection region is a function of the speed 5 of the train.
6. A train-mounted alarm system according to any of claims 1 to 4, adapted to be used
intermittently when the train is travelling at a speed 5, and wherein the length of
the extended protection region is a function of the speed 5 of the train.
7. A train-mounted alarm system according to any of claims 1 to 4, adapted to be turned
on when the train begins to move from a stationary position, and wherein the length
of the extended protection region is a function of the length of the train.
8. A train-mounted alarm system according to claim 5, 6 or 7, further comprising means
to adjust the direction of the collimated beam to project the extended protection
region in the direction of the railway track on which the train is travelling.
9. A train mounted alarm system according to claim 8, wherein the direction of the collimated
beam is adapted to sweep across the width of the railway track.
10. A train-mounted alarm system according to any preceding claim, wherein the highly
directional sound generator is mounted on the train such that the maximum height of
the collimated beam from the ground is in the range 1.25m to 2.0m.
11. A train-mounted alarm system according to any preceding claim, wherein the sound pressure
within the collimated beam varies over time.
12. A train-mounted alarm system according to any preceding claim, wherein the sound pressure
within the collimated beam is composed of components having different frequencies.
13. A train-mounted alarm system according to any preceding claim, wherein the sound pressure
within the collimated beam is pulsed to create an alarm signature.
14. A train-mounted alarm system according to any preceding claim, further comprising
a low-frequency sound generator adapted to create vibrations along the railway track.
15. A train-mounted alarm system according to any preceding claim, wherein the highly
direction sound generator comprises a phased array of acoustic emitters.
16. A railway track worker safety system comprising the train-mounted alarm system according
to any of claims 1 to 15.
17. A train comprising the train-mounted alarm system according to any of claims 1 to
15.