BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention:
[0001] The present invention relates to beam structures, and more particularly, to a metal
beam with asymmetrical section and damage warning function.
2. Description of the Related Art:
[0002] Current practice of selecting metal beams and columns in the industry has at least
the following disadvantages:
- 1. Regarding the reinforced concrete deck (RC DECK), it has a considerable influence
on the section modulus of the steel body. In terms of a symmetrical section, when
the pressure zone and tension zone are subjected to the bending moment and axial pressure
to reach the critical load, the pressure zone is the first to yield. However, the
industry usually ignores the influence of reinforced concrete decks on the section
modulus of the steel body. As a result, the section modulus of the tension zone at
the end of the beam column is greater than that of the pressure zone and/or the pressure
zone suffers a critical damage unexpectedly.
- 2. In addition, the industry also currently ignores the beam axial force (the pressure
generated by the beam structure under a load). As for a steel beam with two fixed
ends, a so-called axial pressure will be generated when it is loaded. As a result,
the pressure zone would reach the elastic limit first unexpectedly.
- 3. Furthermore, regarding a cantilever steel beam with reinforced concrete deck, due
to the combination of the deck and the beam, the section modulus of the tension zone
would be greater than the section modulus of the pressure zone.
[0003] However, the current practice of selecting metal beams and columns in the industry,
including ignoring the influence of reinforced concrete floor deck on the section
modulus of the steel body, ignoring the beam axial force, and the situation of the
section modulus of the tension zone being greater than the section modulus of the
pressure zone due to the combination of the deck and the beam, possibly make the pressure
zone of the beam reach the elastic limit and yield before the tension zone, causing
a compressive shear damage to instantaneously occur, leading to serious consequences.
[0004] Therefore, the improvement by the present invention aims at solving and correcting
the above-mentioned problems and disadvantages of conventional beam structure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] To improve the issues above, the present invention provides a metal beam with asymmetrical
section and damage warning function. With an asymmetrical section arrangement for
the section of the main body, the tension zone reaches the elastic limit and yield
to enter a plastic deformation before the pressure zone, whereby the plastic deformation
of the tension zone provides a warning about possibly occurring compressive shear
damage of the pressure zone.
[0006] An embodiment of the present invention provides a metal beam with asymmetrical section
and damage warning function, whose main body comprises a main body section. The cross-sectional
shape of the main body section defines a neutral axis. The main body section defines
a pressure zone and a tension zone when subjected to a pure bending moment load. Each
point of the main body is arranged in a linear relationship with respect to the neutral
axis within the elastic range, and the cross-sectional shape of the main body section
is on both sides of the neutral axis in an asymmetrical arrangement. The pressure
zone of the main body section at the maximum bending moment of the main body has a
section modulus greater than the section modulus of the tension zone. Before the pressure
zone bears a stress reaching the elastic limit to yield, the tension zone has a stress
exceeding the elastic limit first and yield first, so that the plastic deformation
of the yielding tension zone serves as a warning about the possibly occurring compressive
shear damage of the pressure zone.
[0007] Therefore, because the shape of the main body section of the present invention is
designed to be asymmetrically arrangement on both sides of the defined neutral axis,
the section modulus of the pressure zone of the main body section at the maximum bending
moment of the main body is greater than the section modulus of the tension zone. Thus,
when the main body bears a load, the tension zone has reached the elastic limit to
yield and begins to enter the plastic deformation, whereby the tension zone entering
the plastic deformation stage provides a warning before the pressure zone undergoes
a compressive shear damage, earning time for emergency treatments such as evacuation
of personnel or structural reinforcement.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0008]
Fig. 1 is a schematic view illustrating the support and uniformly distributed load of a
metal beam in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2a is a schematic view of the H-shaped metal beam with asymmetric main body section
in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, wherein the main body section
has identical widths and different thicknesses on two sides of the neutral axis.
Fig. 2b is a schematic view of the quadrangularly-shaped metal beam with asymmetric main
body section in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, wherein the
main body section has identical widths and different thicknesses on two sides of the
neutral axis.
Fig. 3a is another schematic view of the H-shaped metal beam with asymmetric main body section
in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, wherein the main body section
has identical thicknesses and different widths on two sides of the neutral axis.
Fig. 3b is another schematic view of the quadrangularly-shaped metal beam with asymmetric
main body section in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, wherein
the main body section has identical thicknesses and different widths on two sides
of the neutral axis.
Fig. 4a is a sectional view of a conventional H-shaped metal beam with a symmetrical main
body section, wherein the scale is not according to the actual specifications, but
only for illustration.
Fig. 4b is a sectional view of an H-shaped metal beam with an asymmetrical main body section
in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, wherein the scale is not
according to the actual specifications, but only for illustration.
Fig. 4c is another sectional view of an H-shaped metal beam with an asymmetrical main body
section in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, wherein the scale
is not according to the actual specifications, but only for illustration.
Fig. 5 is a schematic view of a conventional H-shaped metal beam with a symmetrical section
combined with a floor deck.
Fig. 6a is a schematic view illustrating the support and uniformly distributed load of another
metal beam in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 6b is a bending moment diagram of the metal beam of Fig. 6a bearing uniformly distributed load.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0009] The aforementioned and further advantages and features of the present invention will
be understood by reference to the description of the preferred embodiment in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings where the components are illustrated based on a proportion
for explanation but not subject to the actual component proportion.
[0010] Referring to
Fig. 1 to
Fig. 6b, the present invention provides a metal beam with asymmetrical section and damage
warning function, as shown by
Fig. 1, comprising a main body
10. The main body
10 in the embodiment is a transverse beam, which has a plurality of supports
20 for bearing a load and generates a plurality of regions with positive and negative
bending moments.
[0011] The main body
10 described in the present invention comprises a main body section, whose cross-sectional
shape is asymmetrically arranged on two sides of a defined neutral axis
NA, so as to for an asymmetrical section. This main body section defines a pressure zone
and a tension zone when subjected to a pure bending moment load. Each point of the
main body is arranged in a linear relationship with respect to the neutral axis
NA within the elastic range. The pressure zone of the main body section at the maximum
bending moment of the main body
10 has a section modulus greater than the section modulus of the tension zone. Before
the pressure zone bears a stress reaching the elastic limit to yield, the tension
zone has a stress exceeding the elastic limit first and yield first, so that the tension
zone entering the plastic deformation stage provides a warning about a possible compressive
shear damage of the pressure zone after the tension reaches the elastic limit and
deforms. The elastic limit refers to the critical limit of the bearable stress (both
tension and pressure) of the metal beams and columns before yielding. In other words,
when the stress exceeds the elastic limit, the metal beams and columns begin to yield
and enter a plastic deformation.
[0012] The main body
10 is preferably an H-shaped steel beam or a quadrangularly-shaped steel beam (as shown
in
Fig. 2a to
Fig. 3b), and the cross-sectional shape of the main body section is asymmetrical one two sides
of the neutral axis
NA. In an embodiment, the widths of the main body section one the two sides are the same,
but the thicknesses thereof are thicker on one side and thinner on the other side
(as shown in
Fig. 2a to
Fig. 2b), wherein the thicker side is the pressure zone at the place of the maximum bending
moment and has a larger section modulus; and the thinner side is the tension zone
at the place of the maximum bending moment and has a smaller section modulus. The
main body
10 of the present invention is not limited to having the aforementioned differences
in thickness. For example, in another embodiment, the main body section thicknesses
of the main body on two sides are same, but the widths thereof are wider on one side
and narrower on the other side (as shown in
Fig. 3a to
Fig. 3b). In such case, the wider side is the pressure zone with a larger section modulus,
and the narrower side is the tension zone with a smaller section modulus.
[0013] For example, an H-shaped metal steel beam is provided in a symmetrical arranged on
two sides of the central axis NA, with the specification of the main body section
being H400L
∗200W
∗7t
∗ 11T (as shown by
Fig. 4a, wherein
L is height;
W is width; t is web thickness;
T is upper and lower flange thickness). Also, an H-shaped metal steel beam is provided
in an asymmetrical arranged on two sides of the central axis
NA (as shown by
Fig. 4b), with the specification of the main body section being H400L
∗200W
∗7t
∗12T1/10T2 (
T1 is the pressure zone at the place of the maximum bending moment;
T2 is the tension zone at the place of the maximum bending moment). Also, still another
H-shaped metal steel beam is provided in an asymmetrical arranged on two sides of
the central axis
NA (as shown by
Fig. 4c), with the specification of the main body section being H400L
∗200W
∗7t
∗15T1/7T2. Regarding these three H-shaped metal steel beams, the sectional area, unit
weight, moment of inertia Ix, section modulus Sx, and the ratio of section modulus
Sx thereof are shown in Table 1 below:
Table 1
| Model |
Section steel type (mm) |
Sectional Area(cm2) |
Unit Weight kgf/m |
Moment of Inertia Ix(cm4) |
Section Modulus Sx(cm3) |
Sx Ratio |
| 1 |
H400 L ∗200 W ∗7 t ∗11 T |
70.46 |
56.1 |
19800 |
990 |
100% |
| 2 |
H400 L ∗200 W ∗7 t ∗12T1/10T2 |
19710 |
1039/937 |
105%/95% |
| 3 |
H400 L ∗200 W ∗7 t ∗15T1/7T2 |
18361 |
1158/761 |
117%/77% |
[0014] As shown in Table 1, regarding models 1, 2, and 3, the cross-sectional area thereof
are all 70.46 cm
2, and the unit weight are all 56.1 kgf/m. The section modulus (Sx) of model 1 is 990
cm
3, and the ratio is set as 100%. Comparing model 2, under the condition that the sectional
area and unit weight remain unchanged, only the thickness of the upper and lower flanges
11 are modified according to the specifications of the main body section, so as to
be asymmetrical on two sides of the neutral axis NA, wherein the upper and lower flanges
thicknesses are modified into 10 mm and 12 mm, respectively. In the case, the section
modulus of model 2 on the flange 11 side (pressure zone) having the thickness of 12
mm is increased to 1039 cm
3, which is 5% higher than that of model 1. Meanwhile, the section modulus on the flange
11 side (tension zone) having thickness of 10 mm is reduced to 937 cm
3, which is 5% less than that of the model 1. Comparing the model 3, the thicknesses
of the upper and lower flanges 11 are modified according to the specifications of
the main body, so as to be asymmetrical on two sides of the neutral axis NA. That
is, the thicknesses of the upper and lower flanges 11 are changed to 7 mm and 15 mm,
respectively. In such case, the section modulus of model 3 on the flange 11 side (pressure
zone) having the thickness of 15 mm is increased to 1158 cm
3, which is 17% higher than that of model 1. Meanwhile, the section modulus on the
flange 11 side (tension zone) having thickness of 7 mm is reduced to 761 cm
3, which is 23% less than that of the model 1. It can be seen that when such main body
section is used for structures with fixed loading direction at critical points (such
as construction beams and side columns), the load-bearing capacity on the side with
a relatively large section modulus can be improved. Meanwhile, the other side with
a relatively smaller section modulus, if in a tension status, will yield and undergoes
deformation damage after exceeding the elastic limit, thereby providing a warning
of compressive shear damage.
[0015] Regarding the main body
10 shown in
Fig. 1, when a floor deck
D is laid on the upper flange
11 and fixed with shear stud
30, if the shear stud
30 has sufficient density and strength, the floor deck
D is combined with the main body
10 through the shear stud
30 to form a T-shaped integral beam (as shown by
Fig. 5). At this time, the span section between the main body
10 and the support
40 is presented as a positive bending moment, with the pressure zone on the upper side
and the tension zone on the lower side. Because the upper flange
11 is constrained by the floor deck
D, the section modulus of the pressure zone increases, thereby improving the carrying
capacity thereof. According to the structural mode, the bending moment relationship
can be expressed in accordance with mechanics of material (as shown in formula 1),
and as shown in
Fig. 6a, the supports
40 (also presented by end points A and B) on two sides and the middle point of the span
are critical points (end points A and B are characteristic critical points). Also,
as shown in
Fig. 6b, both
MA and
MB are presented as negative bending moments, and
Mmax is presented as positive bending moment.

[0016] However, the main body
10 is presented as a negative bending moment at the support
40, with the tension zone on the upper side and the pressure zone on the lower side.
The upper flange
11 is also constrained by the floor deck
D, which in turn causes the section modulus of the tension zone to increase, thereby
improving the bearing capacity thereof. As a result, the pressure zone at the support
40 first exceeds the elastic limit instead and breaks. Accordingly, it is known that
when the main body
10 is combined with the floor deck
D, the section modulus of the tension zone of the main body
10 is increased, thus improving the load bearing capacity thereof, causing the pressure
zone to exceed the elastic limit first and may instantaneously undergo a compressive
shear damage. This can greatly affect the design safety of the floor structure. However,
according to the structural analysis and design method commonly used in the current
construction industry, the combination of the floor with the main body
10 is regarded as non-contributing and therefore ignored. So, when used over limit,
it may cause the risk of instantaneous damage of the pressure zone.
[0017] For example, a main body
10 has the aforementioned supports
40 at only two ends thereof, with the span between the two supports
40 being a span section, and the support
40 section being a support section. The main body section of the body
10 has the aforementioned specifications of H400L
∗200W
∗7t
∗ 11T, and the uniformly distributed load of the main body
10 is 3000 kgf/m. Also, the upper flange
11 of the main body
10 is laid with a floor deck
D which is fixed by shear stud
30. In such case, if the uniformly distributed load is increased to 3300 kgf/m in an
application over limit, as shown in Table 2, the section modulus of the tension zone
of the support section increases, so that the load bearing capacity is improved, which
results in that the stress ratio is prevented from exceeding the elastic limit. Instead,
the stress ratio of the pressure zone of the support section exceeds the elastic limit
to be broken. (In Table 2, σ represents the maximum stress of the section; fy represents
the yield stress of the metal material, which is hypothetically 2500 kgf/cm
2; S
pressure and S
tension represent the section moduli of the pressure zone and tension zone, which are same
in Tables 3, 4, and 5 below.)
Table 2
| Section modulus and stress ratio σ/fy |
Combination of main body and floor deck having original section |
| Support section |
Span section |
| Section modulus Spressure |
1063 |
3222 |
| Section modulus Stension |
1197 |
1533 |
| Stress ratio of pressure zone |
-1.034 |
0.171 |
| Stress ratio of tension zone |
-0.919 |
0.359 |
[0018] Still in an application over limit with the uniformly distributed load increased
to 3300 kgf/m, the main body section of the main body
10 is replaced by the specifications of H400L
∗200W
∗7t
∗ 14T1/8T2 in an asymmetrical section arrangement. In such case, as shown in
Fig. 3, although the load bearing capacity of the tension zone of the support section is
improved due to the increased section modulus, the cross-sectional shape of the main
body section of the main body
10 is asymmetrical arranged on two sides of the neutral axis
NA. Therefore, for the main body
10 combined with the floor deck
D, the section modulus of the pressure zone is still greater than the section modulus
of the tension zone, so that the stress ratio of the pressure zone of the support
section is prevented from exceeding the elastic limit in an over limit application;
instead, the stress ratio of the tension zone of the support section exceeds the elastic
limit first and yields to under a plastic deformation damage, thereby still providing
a warning about a possibly occurring unexpected instantaneous compressive shear damage
of the pressure zone.
Table 3
| Section modulus and stress ratio σ/fy |
Combination of main body and floor deck having asymmetric section |
| Support section |
Span section |
| Section modulus Spressure |
1224 |
2640 |
| Section modulus Stension |
1021 |
1625 |
| Stress ratio of pressure zone |
-0.899 |
0.208 |
| Stress ratio of tension zone |
-1.078 |
0.338 |
[0019] Alternatively, in an application without going over limit with the uniformly distributed
load being 2750 kgf/m, while the upper flange
11 of the main body
10 is also laid with a floor deck
D which is fixed by the shear stud
30, according to commonly applied structural analysis in the current industry (contribution
of floor deck D ignored), the specifications above RH400L
∗200W
∗7t
∗ 11T would be used, with the stress ratio shown in Table 4:
Table 4
| Section modulus and stress ratio σ/fy |
Main body having original section with floor deck contribution ignored |
| |
Support section |
Span section |
| Stress ratio of pressure zone |
-0.921 |
0.460 |
| Stress ratio of tension zone |
-0.921 |
0.460 |
[0020] Accordingly, under the same conditions, if the metal beam with asymmetrical section
of the present invention is selected instead, plus the contribution of floor deck
D in accordance with the actual situation, the specifications of the main body section
of the main body
10 can be reduced to the specifications of H380L
∗190W
∗7t
∗14T1/8T2 asymmetrical section arrangement. As shown in Table 5, the stress ratio of
the pressure zone and the tension zone are both within the elastic range (stress ratio
≤ 1). Also, when there is a floor deck
D, the section modulus of the pressure zone is greater than that of the tension zone,
which still provides a higher load bearing capacity. Even in the case of application
over limit, the stress ratio of the tension zone of the support section would exceed
the elastic limit first and yield to undergo a plastic deformation damage. It can
not only provide a warning about possibly occurring instantaneous compressive damage,
but also reduce the unit weight due to the reduction of specifications (the unit weight
being reduced by 6.4% compared to the specifications of H400L
∗200W
∗7t
∗ 11T). Also, as long as the structural safety prerequisite is met, the material cost
of the main body
10 can be reduced.
Table
5
| Section modulus and stress ratio σ/fy |
Combination of main body and floor deck having asymmetric section |
| Support section |
Span section |
| Section modulus Spressure |
1109 |
2567 |
| Section modulus Stension |
935 |
1507 |
| Stress ratio of pressure zone |
-0.830 |
0.179 |
| Stress ratio of tension zone |
-0.984 |
0.305 |
[0021] From the above description, the characteristics of the present invention are clear
as follows:
- 1. When the main body 10 of the present invention bears a critical loading, because the shape of the main
body section of the present invention is designed to be asymmetrically arrangement
on both sides of the defined neutral axis, the section modulus of the pressure zone
of the main body section at the maximum bending moment of the main body 10 is greater than the section modulus of the tension zone. Thus, when the main body
10 bears a load, the tension zone has reached the elastic limit to yield and begins
to enter the plastic deformation, thereby providing a warning before the pressure
zone undergoes a compressive shear damage, thus beneficial for earning time for emergency
treatments such as evacuation of personnel or structural reinforcement.
- 2. The current industry usually neglects the effects of reinforced concrete floor
deck on the modules of the steel body or ignores the beam axial force (the pressure
generated by the beam structure under a load), which causes the issues of the section
modulus of the tension zone of the main beam column end being greater than that of
the pressure zone and/or the pressure zone undergoing critical damage first unexpectedly,
or the issue of a cantilever steel beam of a floor deck D, due to the combination
of the deck and the beam, having a section modulus of the tension zone greater than
the section modulus of the pressure zone. Such issues can be resolved by use of the
main body section of the main body 10 of the present invention, which is designed in an asymmetrical arrangement, so as
to correct abovementioned improper construction practice.
- 3.The main body section of the main body 10 of the present invention has an asymmetrical section design, wherein the tension
zone, after reaching the elastic limit, yields and begins to enter the plastic deformation,
thereby not only providing a warning before the pressure zone undergoes a compressive
shear damage, but also lowering the unit weight with the reduction of main body section
specifications. Thus, as long as the structural safety prerequisite is met, the material
cost of the main body 10 can be reduced.