Technical Field
[0001] The present disclosure relates to a steel sheet for a part material used in an environment
in which a constant load is repeated at regular intervals, and a method for manufacturing
the same.
Background Art
[0002] For a part used in an environment in which a load is repeatedly applied at regular
intervals, it is required to have an excellent fatigue lifespan in terms of securing
durability of the part. The seat belt of a vehicle has a structure in which a belt
and a leaf spring are connected to each other to assist a user in easy attachment
and detachment, and the fatigue lifespan of the leaf spring is an important factor
influencing the durability of the seat belt. In particular, since the seat belt is
a part directly related to the safety of passengers, the leaf spring provided for
the seat belt should have excellent durability so as not to reach a fatigue limit
during a life cycle of the vehicle, but development of a material thereof has not
been undertaken.
[0003] Patent Document 1 proposes a steel sheet for a spring with improved strength using
upper bainite. However, there is an issue in that the physical properties of the steel
sheet are varied by the introduction of upper bainite, and thus the durability of
the spring is rather reduced.
(Prior Art Document)
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0005] An aspect of the present disclosure is to provide a turbine. According to an aspect
of the present disclosure, a steel material having excellent workability and a method
for manufacturing the same may be provided.
[0006] The object of the present disclosure is not limited to the above description. A person
skilled in the art would have no difficulty in understanding additional objects of
the present disclosure from overall aspects of the present specification.
Solution to Problem
[0007] According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a steel sheet for a leaf spring
may include, by wt%, 0.7-1.0% of carbon (C), 0.1 - 0.4% of silicon (Si), 0.2 - 1.0%
of manganese (Mn), 0.05 - 2.0% of chromium (Cr), 0.07 - 0.2% of vanadium (V), 0.03%
or less of phosphorus (P), 0.03% or less of sulfur (S), a balance of Fe, and inevitable
impurities. The steel sheet may include, as a microstructure, 99 area% or more of
pearlite and 1 area% or less (excluding 0%) of vanadium carbide (VC), and an average
prior austenite grain size may be 28 µm or less.
[0008] A content (Vs) of vanadium (V) of the steel sheet and a content (Vp) of vanadium
(V) of the pearlite may satisfy Formular 1 below.

[0009] In Formula 1 above, Vs denotes a content (wt%) of vanadium (V) of a steel sheet,
and Vp denotes a content (wt%) of vanadium (V) of a pearlite.
[0010] A fraction of the vanadium carbide (VC) may be 0.002 area% or more.
[0011] An average interlamellar spacing of the pearlite may be 0.09 - 0.12 µm.
[0012] The average prior austenite grain size may be 2 µm or more.
[0013] A surface hardness of the steel sheet may be 410 (HB) or more based on Brinell hardness.
[0014] A thickness of the steel sheet is 3 mm or less (excluding 0 mm).
[0015] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a method for manufacturing
a steel sheet for a leaf spring, the method may include providing a hot-rolled material
including, by wt%, 0.7 - 1.0% of carbon (C), 0.1 - 0.4% of silicon (Si), 0.2 - 1.0%
of manganese (Mn), 0.05 - 2.0% of chromium (Cr), 0.07 - 0.2% of vanadium (V), 0.03%
or less of phosphorus (P), 0.03% or less of sulfur (S), a balance of Fe, and inevitable
impurities, isothermally holding the hot-rolled material by charging the hot-rolled
material in a salt bath of 400 - 600°C after reheating the hot-rolled material, and
providing a cold-rolled material by cold rolling the isothermally held hot-rolled
material at a cumulative reduction ratio of 50% or more. The hot-rolled material may
be reheated in a temperature range of 900°C or higher and less than 1000°C when a
content of vanadium (V) of the hot-rolled material is less than 0.15%, and the hot-rolled
material may be reheated in a temperature range of 900 - 1050°C when the content of
vanadium (V) of the hot-rolled material is 0.15% or more.
[0016] The providing of the hot-rolled material may include an operation of reheating a
slab to a temperature range of 1000 - 1300°C, a rough rolling operation of providing
an intermediate material by rough rolling the reheated slab at a cumulative reduction
ratio of 60% or more, a finishing rolling operation of rolling the intermediate material
at a cumulative reduction ratio of 60% or more, and providing a hot-rolled material
by rolling the intermediate material at an exit temperature of 700 - 1000°C, a first
cooling operation of performing cooling to a first cooling end temperature of 500
- 700°C by applying a slow cooling condition, a first holding operation of isothermally
holding the hot-rolled material at the first cooling end temperature, and a second
cooling operation of cooling the isothermally held hot-rolled material to room temperature
by furnace cooling.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0017] According to a preferred aspect of the present disclosure, it is possible to provide
a steel sheet for a leaf spring having excellent durability by effectively improving
a fatigue lifespan thereof.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0018]
FIGS. 1 to 3 are photographic images illustrating prior austenite grains of specimens
4, 5, and 6 observed using an optical microscope, respectively.
FIGS. 4 to 6 are photographic images illustrating pearlite structures of specimens
4, 5, and 6 observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
Best Mode for Invention
[0019] The present disclosure relates to a steel plate for a leaf spring having an excellent
fatigue lifespan, and a method for manufacturing the same. Hereinafter, preferred
embodiments of the present disclosure will be described. The embodiments of the present
disclosure can be modified to have various other forms, and the scope of the present
disclosure should not be limited to the embodiments described below. In addition,
the embodiments of the present disclosure are provided to more fully explain the present
disclosure to those skilled in the art.
[0020] The present inventors conducted an in-depth study on a method for improving a fatigue
lifespan of a steel part used in an environment in which a constant load is repeatedly
applied at regular intervals, and recognized that a fatigue lifespan of a steel material
can be improved by suppressing generation and propagation of fatigue cracks when physical
properties of the steel material itself are strengthened, and thus the present disclosure
was derived.
[0021] As a method of increasing strength and hardness of a steel material, mechanisms such
as solid solution strengthening, work hardening, structure refinement, and precipitation
hardening are representatively known. The present inventors studied a method for improving
strength and hardness of a steel material by adding a large amount of carbon (C),
which is a solid solution strengthening element, and confirmed that, when an amount
of carbon (C) added exceeds a predetermined level, a large amount of hard, coarse
carbide is formed along a grain boundary, which rather promotes generation and propagation
of fatigue cracks. That is, it was found that a desired level of fatigue lifespan
improvement effect cannot be expected only with the solid solution strengthening.
In addition, the present inventors studied a method for improving strength and hardness
of a steel material using work hardening. However, it was confirmed that, as an amount
of processing increases, strength and hardness of the steel material increase to create
an environment favorable for suppression of generation and propagation of fatigue
cracks, whereas a fatigue lifespan is rather lowered by inducing generation of defects
inside the steel material when the amount of processing exceeds a predetermined level.
[0022] Therefore, the present inventors conducted an in-depth study of a method for effectively
securing strength and hardness of a steel material through precipitation hardening
and grain refinement while securing an effect of solid solution strengthening by including
a predetermined level of carbon (C) or more, and confirmed that, when an appropriate
level of carbon (C) is added to the steel material while vanadium carbide (VC) is
used, the hardness and strength of the steel material may be effectively improved
by maximizing effects of precipitation hardening and grain refinement, and thus the
present disclosure was derived.
[0023] Hereinafter, a steel material for a leaf spring according to an aspect of the present
disclosure will be described in more detail.
[0024] A steel sheet for a leaf spring according to an aspect of the present disclosure
may include, by wt%, 0.7-1.0% of carbon (C), 0.1 - 0.4% of silicon (Si), 0.2 - 1.0%
of manganese (Mn), 0.05 - 2.0% of chromium (Cr), 0.07 - 0.2% of vanadium (V), 0.03%
or less of phosphorus (P), 0.03% or less of sulfur (S), a balance of Fe, and inevitable
impurities. The steel sheet may include, as a microstructure, 99 area% or more of
pearlite and 1 area% or less (excluding 0%) of vanadium carbide (VC), and an average
prior austenite grain size may be 28 µm or less.
[0025] Hereinafter, an alloy composition of the present disclosure will be described in
more detail. Hereinafter, unless otherwise specified, % and ppm related to a content
of the alloy composition are based on weight.
[0026] The steel material for a leaf spring according to an aspect of the present disclosure
may include, by wt%, 0.7 - 1.0% of carbon (C), 0.1 - 0.4% of silicon (Si), 0.2 - 1.0%,
of manganese (Mn), 0.05 - 2.0% of chromium (Cr), 0.07 - 0.2% of vanadium (V), 0.03%
or less of phosphorus (P), 0.03% or less of sulfur (S), a balance of Fe, and inevitable
impurities.
Carbon (C): 0.7 - 1.0%
[0027] Carbon (C) is not only a representative hardenability improving element, but also
an element effectively contributing to improvement of strength and hardness of steel
by solid solution strengthening. Accordingly, the present disclosure may include 0.7%
or more of carbon (C) for such an effect. A preferable content of carbon (C) may be
0.75% or more, and a more preferable content of carbon (C) may be 0.8% or more. Conversely,
carbon (C) may have a low solid solution limit in ferrite, and thus may react with
a carbideforming element to form a precipitate or may combine with Fe to form cementite
(Fe
3C). When an amount of carbon (C) added is excessive, a large amount of hard carbide
is formed, which may adversely affect a fatigue lifespan. Accordingly, the present
disclosure may limit an upper limit of a content of carbon (C) to 1.0%. A preferable
content of carbon (C) may be 0.95% or less, and a more preferable content of carbon
(C) may be 0.9% or less.
Silicon (Si): 0.1 - 0.4%
[0028] Silicon (Si) is not only a ferrite stabilizing element, but also an element effectively
contributing to improvement of strength and hardness of steel by refining an interlamellar
spacing of pearlite by delaying a transformation rate of the pearlite. Accordingly,
the present disclosure may include 0.1% or more of silicon (Si) for such an effect.
A preferable content of silicon (Si) may be 0.15% or more, and a more preferable content
of silicon (Si) may be 0.2% or more. However, when silicon (Si) is excessively added,
hot workability and toughness may be lowered as well as surface quality may be lowered,
so the present disclosure may limit an upper limit of the content of silicon (Si)
to 0.4%. The preferable content of silicon (Si) may be 0.35% or less, and the more
preferable content of silicon (Si) may be 0.3% or less.
Manganese (Mn): 0.2 - 1.0%
[0029] Manganese (Mn) is an element not only contributing to improvement of hardenability
of steel, but also an element effectively contributing to securing cleanliness of
steel by deoxidation and desulfurization. Accordingly, the present disclosure may
include 0.2% or more of manganese (Mn). A preferable content of manganese (Mn) may
be 0.3% or more, and a more preferable content of manganese (Mn) may be 0.4% or more.
However, when manganese (Mn) is excessively added, a segregation layer may be formed
in a central portion of a steel sheet to lower workability, so that the present disclosure
may limit an upper limit of the content of manganese (Mn) to 1.0%. The preferable
content of manganese (Mn) may be 0.8% or less, and the more preferable content of
manganese (Mn) may be 0.6% or less.
Chromium (Cr): 0.05 - 2.0%
[0030] Chromium (Cr) is an element contributing to improvement of hardenability of steel.
In addition, chromium (Cr) is an element not only forming fine carbide, but also an
element effectively contributing to improvement of strength and hardness of steel
by refining the interlamellar spacing of the pearlite. Accordingly, the present disclosure
may include 0.05% or more of chromium (Cr). A preferred content of chromium (Cr) may
be 0.07% or more. However, when chromium (Cr) is added excessively, there is a concern
that toughness may be lowered due to excessive hardenability or heat treatment properties
may be lowered due to stabilization of carbide. The present disclosure may limit an
upper limit of the content of chromium (Cr) to 2.0%. The preferred content of chromium
(Cr) may be 1.5% or less, and a more preferred content of chromium (Cr) may be 1.0%
or less.
Vanadium (V): 0.07 - 0.2%
[0031] In the present disclosure, vanadium (V) is an element essentially added to improve
strength and hardness of steel. Vanadium (V) is not only an element having easy heat
treatment properties and having low reactivity with oxygen, but also an element reacting
with carbon (C) in steel to precipitate fine vanadium carbide (VC) and effectively
contribute to grain refinement of austenite. Accordingly, the present disclosure may
include 0.07% or more of vanadium (V). A more preferable content of vanadium (V) may
be 0.1% or more. However, when a content of vanadium (V) exceeds a predetermined level,
an effect of adding vanadium (V) may be saturated, whereas vanadium (V), a relatively
expensive element, may not be preferred in terms of economic feasibility. The present
disclosure may limit an upper limit of the content of vanadium (V) to 0.2%. The more
preferable content of vanadium (V) may be 0.18% or less.
Phosphorus (P): 0.03% or less (including 0%) and Sulfur (S): 0.03% or less (including
0%)
[0032] Phosphorus (P) and sulfur (S) are representative impurity elements, and the present
disclosure seeks to minimize contents of the elements in terms of securing cleanliness
of steel. However, in consideration of economic feasibility in a conventional steelmaking
process, the present disclosure may limit upper limits of contents of phosphorus (P)
and sulfur (S) to 0.03%, respectively.
[0033] The steel sheet for a leaf spring according to an aspect of the present disclosure
may include a balance of Fe and other inevitable impurities in addition to the above-described
elements. However, unintended impurities from a raw material or a surrounding environment
may be inevitably mixed therewith in a general manufacturing process, so that the
unintended impurities may not be entirely excluded. The impurities are known to those
skilled in the art, and thus all contents thereof are not specifically mentioned in
the present specification. In addition, the addition of effective elements other than
the above-described composition is not excluded.
[0034] The steel sheet for a leaf spring according to an aspect of the present disclosure
may include, as a microstructure, 99 area% or more of pearlite and 1 area% or less
(excluding 0%) of vanadium carbide (VC). A lower limit of a preferable fraction of
vanadium carbide (VC) may be 0.002 area% or more. That is, the steel sheet for a leaf
spring according to an aspect of the present disclosure may have a microstructure
including a predetermined level of vanadium carbide (VC) in a pearlite single-phase
structure.
[0035] In addition, in the steel sheet for a leaf spring according to an aspect of the present
disclosure, a content (Vs, wt%) of vanadium (V) included in the steel sheet and a
content (Vp, wt%) of vanadium (V) included in the pearlite may satisfy Formula 1 below.

[0036] In Formula 1 above, Vs denotes a content (wt%) of vanadium (V) included in the steel
sheet, and Vp denotes a content (wt%) of vanadium (V) included in the pearlite. A
person skilled in the art may determine Vp and Vs without a particular technical difficulty
through an analysis method generally performed in the art.
[0037] That is, the steel sheet for a leaf spring according to an aspect of the present
disclosure does not aim for complete solid solution of vanadium (V) in the pearlite
structure, and thus may mean that some vanadium (V) is precipitated as vanadium carbide
(VC). Accordingly, in the steel sheet for a leaf spring according to an aspect of
the present disclosure, an effect of improving strength and hardness of the steel
sheet by precipitation of vanadium carbide (VC) may be expected.
[0038] In the steel sheet for a leaf spring according to an aspect of the present disclosure,
an average prior austenite grain size (average grain size at an austenitization temperature)
may be 28 µm or less, and a preferred average prior austenite grain size may be 2
µm or more. In addition, a preferred average interlamellar spacing of the pearlite
may be 0.09 - 0.12 µm. That is, the steel sheet for a leaf spring according to an
aspect of the present disclosure may be manufactured by heat-treating a hot-rolled
material with added vanadium (V), and thus it can be seen that a structure is refined
by vanadium carbide (VC) present in a state of the hot-rolled material. Accordingly,
in the steel sheet for a leaf spring according to an aspect of the present disclosure,
an effect of improving strength and hardness of the steel sheet by refining the structure
may be expected.
[0039] A thickness of the steel sheet for a leaf spring according to an aspect of the present
disclosure is not particularly limited, but may preferably have a thickness of 3 mm
or less (excluding 0 mm).
[0040] A surface hardness of the steel sheet for a leaf spring according to an aspect of
the present disclosure may be greater than or equal to 410 (HB) based on Brinell hardness.
In the case of a leaf spring manufactured using the steel sheet of the present disclosure,
an expected fatigue lifespan calculated through Formula 2 below may be 15*10
4 times or more.

[0041] In Formula 2 above, HB denotes a Brinell hardness of a steel sheet surface, and 2Nf
denotes a fatigue lifespan. In addition, E in Formula 2 above denotes an elastic modulus,
and a fixed value of 210 GPa is applied in the present disclosure.
[0042] Accordingly, according to an aspect of the present disclosure, it is possible to
provide a steel sheet for a leaf spring having an excellent fatigue lifespan even
in an environment in which a constant load is continuously repeated at regular intervals.
[0043] Hereinafter, a method for manufacturing a steel sheet for a spring according to an
aspect of the present disclosure will be described in more detail.
[0044] According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a method for manufacturing a steel
sheet for a spring, the method may include providing a hot-rolled material including,
by wt%, 0.7 - 1.0% of carbon (C), 0.1 - 0.4% of silicon (Si), 0.2 - 1.0% of manganese
(Mn), 0.05 - 2.0% of chromium (Cr), 0.07 - 0.2% of vanadium (V), 0.03% or less of
phosphorus (P), 0.03% or less of sulfur (S), a balance of Fe, and inevitable impurities,
isothermally holding the hot-rolled material by charging the hot-rolled material in
a salt bath of 400 - 600°C after reheating the hot-rolled material, and providing
a cold-rolled material by cold rolling the isothermally held hot-rolled material at
a cumulative reduction ratio of 50% or more. The hot-rolled material may be reheated
in a temperature range of 900°C or higher and less than 1000°C when a content of vanadium
(V) of the hot-rolled material is less than 0.15%, and the hot-rolled material may
be reheated in a temperature range of 900 - 1050°C when the content of vanadium (V)
of the hot-rolled material is 0.15% or more.
[0045] The providing of the hot-rolled material may include an operation of reheating a
slab to a temperature range of 1000 - 1300°C, a rough rolling operation of providing
an intermediate material by rough rolling the reheated slab at a cumulative reduction
ratio of 60% or more, a finishing rolling operation of rolling the intermediate material
at a cumulative reduction ratio of 60% or more, and providing a hot-rolled material
by rolling the intermediate material at an exit temperature of 700 - 1000°C, a first
cooling operation of performing cooling to a first cooling end temperature of 500
- 700°C by applying a slow cooling condition, a first holding operation of isothermally
holding the hot-rolled material at the first cooling end temperature, and a second
cooling operation of cooling the isothermally held hot-rolled material to room temperature
by furnace cooling.
Provision of Hot-Rolled Material
[0046] After a slab having a predetermined alloy composition is prepared, reheating and
hot rolling of the slab may be performed. The slab of the present disclosure may have
an alloy composition corresponding to the alloy composition of the steel sheet described
above, and thus descriptions of the alloy composition of the slab of the present disclosure
are replaced with descriptions of the alloy composition of the steel sheet described
above.
[0047] A slab reheating temperature of the present disclosure is not particularly limited,
but reheating of the slab may be performed at 1000 - 1300°C in consideration of uniformity
of a material and a rolling load of a subsequent hot-rolling process. An intermediate
material may be provided by rough rolling the reheated slab at a cumulative reduction
ratio of 60% or more, and then finishing rolling may be performed to provide a hot-rolled
material by rolling the intermediate material at a cumulative reduction ratio of 60%
or more. In terms of suppressing formation of a coarse structure, an upper limit of
an exit temperature of finishing rolling may be limited to 1000°C, and a lower limit
of the exit temperature may be limited to 700°C in consideration of the rolling load.
An upper limit of a preferable exit temperature may be 920°C, and a lower limit of
the preferable exit temperature may be 830°C.
[0048] After the hot-rolled material is wound, two-stagecondition cooling may be performed.
That is, after first cooling is performed to a first cooling end temperature of 500
- 700°C by applying a slow cooling condition, isothermal holding may be performed
at the first cooling end temperature, and then secondary cooling of the hot-rolled
material held isothermally by furnace cooling may be performed to room temperature.
A cooling rate of the first cooling may be 20 - 100°C/s. The isothermal holding may
be performed in a state of a hot-rolled coil, and isothermal holding time may be 30
- 90 minutes. In addition, a cooling rate of the secondary cooling may be 5°C/ s or
less.
Reheating and Isothermally Holding Hot-Rolled Material
[0049] After the hot-rolled material is reheated in a predetermined temperature range for
microstructure control, a process of isothermal holding may be performed by charging
the hot-rolled material in a salt bath set to a pearlitization temperature. A hot-rolled
material reheating temperature may be selectively applied according to a content of
vanadium (V) included in the hot-rolled material. Here, the content of vanadium (V)
included in the hot-rolled material may be interpreted as meaning corresponding to
that of a content of vanadium (V) included in the slab.
[0050] When the content of vanadium (V) of the hot-rolled material is less than 0.15%, reheating
of the hot-rolled material may be performed in a temperature range of 900°C or higher
and less than 1000°C. In addition, when the content of vanadium (V) of the hot-rolled
material is 0.15% or more, reheating of the hot-rolled material may be performed in
a temperature range of 900 - 1050°C. That is, in order to allow a predetermined level
of vanadium carbide (VC) to remain in a final steel sheet, the present disclosure
may selectively apply a reheating temperature range according to the content of vanadium
(V).
[0051] The present disclosure does not particularly limit hot-rolled material reheating
time, but the hot-rolled material reheating time may be 1 minute to 10 minutes in
consideration of effects of preventing coarsening of a microstructure and preventing
complete solid solution of a carbide. A lower limit of preferred hot-rolled material
reheating time may be 3 minutes, and an upper limit of the preferred hot-rolled material
reheating time may be 5 minutes.
[0052] After the reheated hot-rolled material is charged into a salt bath of 400 - 600°C,
the reheated hot-rolled material may be isothermally held to provide a microstructure
of the final steel sheet as a single-phase pearlite structure. The present disclosure
does not particularly limit isothermal holding time, but in order to prevent a fatigue
lifespan from being lowered due to local formation of a lowtemperature structure,
isothermal holding may be performed for 30 seconds or more. In addition, preferred
isothermal holding time may be 60 to 150 seconds in consideration of implementation
and economic feasibility of a desired final structure.
[0053] Cold rolling may be performed on the isothermally held hot-rolled material under
a condition of a cumulative reduction ratio of 50% or more, and a steel sheet having
a final thickness of 3 mm or less may be provided.
[0054] The steel sheet for a leaf spring manufactured by the above-described manufacturing
method may include, as a microstructure, 99 area% or more of pearlite and 1 area%
or less (excluding 0%) of vanadium carbide (VC), and a content (Vs, wt%) of vanadium
(V) of the steel sheet and a content (Vp, wt%) of vanadium (V) of the pearlite may
satisfy Formula 1 below.

[0055] In Formula 1 above, Vs denotes a content (wt%) of vanadium (V) included in a steel
sheet, and Vp denotes a content (wt%) of vanadium (V) included in pearlite.
[0056] In addition, in the steel sheet for a leaf spring manufactured by the above-described
manufacturing method, an average prior austenite grain size (average grain size at
an austenitization temperature) may be 28 µm or less, and an average interlamellar
spacing of the pearlite may be 0.09 - 0.12 µm or more.
[0057] In addition, the steel sheet for a leaf spring manufactured by the above-described
manufacturing method may have a hardness of 410 (HB) or more based on Brinell hardness.
In the case of a leaf spring manufactured using the steel sheet, an expected fatigue
lifespan calculated through Formula 2 below may satisfy 15*10
4 times or more.

[0058] In Formula 2 above, HB denotes a Brinell hardness of a steel sheet surface, and 2Nf
denotes a fatigue lifespan. In addition, E in Formula 2 above denotes an elastic modulus,
and a fixed value of 210 GPa is applied in the present disclosure.
Mode for Invention
[0059] Hereinafter, the present disclosure will be described in more detail through examples.
However, it should be noted that the examples described below are for illustrative
purposes only and not for limiting the scope of the present disclosure.
(Example)
[0060] After a slab having an alloy composition of Table 1 was reheated in a temperature
range of 1200°C, rough rolling was performed at a cumulative reduction ratio of 60%,
and finish rolling was performed at a cumulative reduction ratio of 80% to prepare
a hot-rolled material specimen. In this case, an exit temperature of the finishing
rolling was applied with a condition of 850°C. Each hot-rolled material specimen was
reheated under conditions shown in Table 2, and then was charged into a salt bath
at 600°C or lower to perform isothermal holding, and a cold-rolled reduction ratio
of 80% was applied to prepare a final cold-rolled material specimen. A microstructure
and carbide of each cold-rolled material specimen were observed, and results thereof
are shown in Table 2. In addition, a surface hardness of each of the hot-rolled material
specimen and the final cold-rolled material specimen before and after isothermal heat
treatment was measured, and results thereof are shown in Table 3.
[0061] At the time of observing the microstructure, 2% nital etching was performed on a
polished specimen surface, and then a prior austenite grain size was observed by performing
200 times magnification with an optical microscope, and a structure composition and
a pearlite lamellar spacing were observed by performing 500 - 50,000 times magnification
with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). A hardness of each specimen was measured
using a Vickers hardness tester, and a hardness value was measured for 10 points per
specimen by applying a 10 kg load, and then an average value was calculated.
[Table 1]
| Type of steel |
Alloy composition (wt%) |
| C |
Si |
Mn |
Cr |
V |
N |
P |
S |
| A |
0.83 |
0.2 |
0.41 |
0.098 |
0 |
0.004 |
0.013 |
0.003 |
| B |
0.81 |
0.21 |
0.405 |
0.1 |
0.07 |
0.0043 |
0.011 |
0.003 |
| C |
0.81 |
0.22 |
0.41 |
0.101 |
0.151 |
0.0038 |
0.012 |
0.003 |
[Table 2]
| Spe cim en No. |
Typ e of Ste el |
Hot-Rolled Materi al Reheat ing Temper ature (°C) |
AGS* Averag e Size (um) |
Pearlit e Lamella r Spacing (um) |
Pearli te Fracti on (area% ) |
Pearlite Elements |
Precipi tate fractio n (area%) |
Precipit ate Elements |
| Fe (wt% ) |
V (wt% ) |
V (wt% ) |
C (wt %) |
| 1 |
A |
1000 |
37.2 |
0.110 |
100 |
98.4 37 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| 2 |
A |
950 |
28.2 |
0.086 |
99.993 |
98.4 4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| 3 |
A |
900 |
20.6 |
0.114 |
99.986 |
98.4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
B |
1000 |
31.0 |
0.100 |
99.996 |
98.3 79 |
0.07 |
- |
- |
- |
| 5 |
B |
950 |
26.0 |
0.097 |
99.985 |
98.3 85 |
0.06 9 |
0.002 |
76.3 29 |
8.3 14 |
| 6 |
B |
900 |
20.0 |
0.103 |
99.958 |
98.4 03 |
0.05 4 |
0.029 |
74.4 68 |
11. 55 |
| 7 |
C |
1000 |
27.8 |
0.095 |
99.971 |
98.3 03 |
0.13 3 |
0.029 |
76.4 78 |
10. 077 |
| 8 |
C |
950 |
21.9 |
0.105 |
99.916 |
98.3 39 |
0.10 4 |
0.084 |
74.8 18 |
13. 132 |
| 9 |
C |
900 |
5.4 |
0.119 |
99.843 |
98.3 85 |
0.06 7 |
0.157 |
72.4 16 |
14. 608 |
| [0085] *AGS average size denotes an average prior austenite grain size. |
[Table 3]
| Specime n No. |
Type of Steel |
Hot-Rolled Material |
Isotherma lly Heat-Treated Material |
Cold-Rolled Material |
[Formula 2] Expected Fatigue Lifespan of Cold-Rolled Material (Times) |
| Vickers Hardness (Hv) |
Vickers Hardness (Hv) |
Vickers Hardness (Hv) |
Brinell hardness (HB) |
| 1 |
A |
216.7 |
334.6 |
408.2 |
386.4 |
110,000 |
| 2 |
A |
216.7 |
353.5 |
415 |
392.5 |
120,000 |
| 3 |
A |
216.7 |
347.1 |
431.5 |
406.5 |
140,000 |
| 4 |
B |
226.0 |
368.9 |
421.3 |
398.0 |
130,000 |
| 5 |
B |
226.0 |
369.8 |
440 |
415.0 |
150,000 |
| 6 |
B |
226.0 |
361.7 |
442.5 |
417.5 |
160,000 |
| 7 |
C |
244.1 |
372.4 |
455.6 |
429.4 |
190,000 |
| 8 |
C |
244.1 |
370.4 |
448.6 |
423.6 |
180,000 |
| 9 |
C |
244.1 |
351.0 |
445.4 |
420.4 |
170,000 |
[0062] As shown in Tables 1 to 3, it can be confirmed that specimens 5 to 9 satisfying an
alloy composition and a process condition of the present disclosure satisfied a desired
microstructure and physical properties, whereas specimens 1 to 4 that do not satisfy
one or more among the alloy composition and the process condition of the present disclosure
did not satisfy the desired microstructure and physical properties.
[0063] In particular, it can be confirmed that specimen 5 satisfied a content of vanadium
(V) limited by the present disclosure, but re-dissolution of vanadium carbide (VC)
present in a hot-rolled material specimen occurred due to a hot-rolled material reheating
temperature exceeding a range limited by the present disclosure.
[0064] Specimens 1 to 3 are photographic images illustrating prior austenite grains of specimens
4, 5, and 6 observed using an optical microscope, respectively, from which, it can
be confirmed that specimen 4 had a largest average prior austenite grain size, and
specimen 6 had a smallest average prior austenite grain size.
[0065] Specimens 4 to 6 are photographic images illustrating pearlite structures of specimens
4, 5 and 6 observed using an SEM, from which, it can be confirmed that average pearlite
interlamellar spacings of specimens 5 and 6 were formed narrower than that of specimen
4.
[0066] While example embodiments have been shown and described above, it will be apparent
to those skilled in the art that modifications and variations could be made without
departing from the scope of the present disclosure as defined by the appended claims.
1. A steel sheet for a leaf spring, the steel sheet comprising:
by wt%, 0.7 - 1.0% of carbon (C), 0.1 - 0.4% of silicon (Si), 0.2 - 1.0% of manganese
(Mn), 0.05 - 2.0% of chromium (Cr), 0.07 - 0.2% of vanadium (V), 0.03% or less of
phosphorus (P), 0.03% or less of sulfur (S), a balance of Fe, and inevitable impurities,
wherein the steel sheet comprises, as a microstructure, 99 area% or more of pearlite
and 1 area% or less (excluding 0%) of vanadium carbide (VC), and
an average prior austenite grain size is 28 µm or less.
2. The steel sheet of claim 1, wherein a content (Vs) of vanadium (V) of the steel sheet
and a content (Vp) of vanadium (V) of the pearlite satisfy Formular 1 below.

in Formula 1 above, Vs denotes a content (wt%) of vanadium (V) of a steel sheet,
and Vp denotes a content (wt%) of vanadium (V) of a pearlite.
3. The steel sheet of claim 1, wherein a fraction of the vanadium carbide (VC) is 0.002
area% or more.
4. The steel sheet of claim 1, wherein an average interlamellar spacing of the pearlite
is 0.09 - 0.12 µm.
5. The steel sheet of claim 1, wherein the average prior austenite grain size is 2 µm
or more.
6. The steel sheet of claim 1, wherein a surface hardness of the steel sheet is 410 (HB)
or more based on Brinell hardness.
7. The steel sheet of claim 1, wherein a thickness of the steel sheet is 3 mm or less
(excluding 0 mm).
8. A method for manufacturing a steel sheet for a leaf spring, the method comprising:
providing a hot-rolled material including, by wt%, 0.7 - 1.0% of carbon (C), 0.1 -
0.4% of silicon (Si), 0.2 - 1.0% of manganese (Mn), 0.05 - 2.0% of chromium (Cr),
0.07 - 0.2% of vanadium (V), 0.03% or less of phosphorus (P), 0.03% or less of sulfur
(S), a balance of Fe, and inevitable impurities;
isothermally holding the hot-rolled material by charging the hot-rolled material in
a salt bath of 400 - 600°C after reheating the hot-rolled material; and
providing a cold-rolled material by cold rolling the isothermally held hot-rolled
material at a cumulative reduction ratio of 50% or more,
wherein the hot-rolled material is reheated in a temperature range of 900°C or higher
and less than 1000°C when a content of vanadium (V) of the hot-rolled material is
less than 0.15%, and
the hot-rolled material is reheated in a temperature range of 900 - 1050°C when the
content of vanadium (V) of the hot-rolled material is 0.15% or more.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the providing of the hot-rolled material comprises:
an operation of reheating a slab to a temperature range of 1000 - 1300°C;
a rough rolling operation of providing an intermediate material by rough rolling the
reheated slab at a cumulative reduction ratio of 60% or more;
a finishing rolling operation of rolling the intermediate material at a cumulative
reduction ratio of 60% or more, and providing a hot-rolled material by rolling the
intermediate material at an exit temperature of 700 - 1000°C;
a first cooling operation of performing cooling to a first cooling end temperature
of 500 - 700°C by applying a slow cooling condition;
a first holding operation of isothermally holding the hot-rolled material at the first
cooling end temperature; and
a second cooling operation of cooling the isothermally held hot-rolled material to
room temperature by furnace cooling.