[0001] The invention relates to a soundproofing wall for isolating a first room on one side
of the soundproofing wall from a sound source on the other side of the soundproofing
wall. Such soundproofing walls find application in various fields, for example to
isolate an interior of a vehicle, a vessel or an aircraft from an external sound source,
to encapsulate a noise generating machine from its surroundings, within buildings,
etc.
[0002] The efficiency of a soundproofing wall can be characterised in terms of the sound
transmission loss (STL) which describes the loss of intensity of an incident acoustic
wave having passed the soundproofing wall. For homogeneous walls, the sound transmission
loss is determined by the mass-law for frequencies below the coincidence frequency,
leading to the well-known problem that efficient soundproofing of low frequencies
requires walls having a large mass.
[0003] In 2008, the so-called membrane-type acoustic metamaterials (MAM) were introduced
as a new class of acoustic metamaterials with lightweight properties and, at the same
time, frequency bands in the low-frequency range with remarkably large sound transmission
loss, considerable larger than in accordance with the corresponding mass-law. However,
one major challenge for the application of MAM in practical noise problems is the
pretension of the membrane. The pretension generates the spring stiffness of the unit
cell and is therefore critical in determining the vibroacoustic properties of the
metamaterial. In practice, the pretension of a membrane can be difficult to control
as it can be subject to relaxation effects in the membrane material or thermal variations.
Also, MAM require a relatively heavy frame in order to sustain the pretension and
this frame can significantly impair the lightweight properties of MAM
[0004] A solution to this problem is to use a plate instead of a membrane as the base material
to which the masses are attached. In the case of such plate-type acoustic metamaterials
(PAM), the spring stiffness is generated by the bending stiffness of a baseplate and
a pretension is not required. Several different designs of PAM have been investigated,
for example PAM with a frame and no masses in the unit cells, PAM with added masses
or double-layer PAM with air cavities and orifices. One particular PAM design, which
has particularly promising properties for applications with strong weight limitations,
consists of a baseplate with a periodic array of rigid masses attached to the baseplate
and no frame structure at all.
[0005] Although these PAM exhibit the same low-frequency sound reduction properties as MAM
and do not require a pretensioned membrane and frame structure, the large number of
masses (typically hundreds or thousands of masses per square meter) lead to a level
of complexity which drives the manufacturing cost of such metamaterials to prohibitively
high levels, in particular when large surfaces need to be lined with PAM for low-frequency
sound insulation.
[0006] Departing therefrom, it is an object of the invention to provide an improved soundproofing
wall based on a plate-type acoustic metamaterial enabling industrial manufacturing
at reasonable costs.
[0007] This object is solved by the soundproofing wall with the features of claim 1. The
soundproofing wall is for isolating a first room on one side of the soundproofing
wall from a sound source on the other side of the soundproofing wall and comprises
a plate-type acoustic metamaterial with a baseplate and a plurality of masses arranged
on the baseplate, wherein at least one of the masses is strip-shaped.
[0008] The term plate-type acoustic metamaterial means that, in contrast to a membrane-type
acoustic metamaterial, the vibroacoustic properties of the metamaterial (of the combination
of the baseplate and the masses) do not rely on a membrane that must be held under
tension, but rather on the elastic properties of the "unsupported" baseplate itself.
No tensioning of the baseplate is required. The soundproofing wall therefore does
not require a frame or any other support structure that provides a pretension of the
baseplate. However, the soundproofing wall may nevertheless comprise a frame or support
structure to which the baseplate is fastened, in order to maintain the plate-type
acoustic metamaterial in place.
[0009] In addition to the plate-type acoustic metamaterial, the soundproofing wall may comprise
any number of further structural or acoustic elements in layered or any other suitable
form, such as one or more layers of a sound absorbing material, acoustic metamaterials,
structural wall elements such as bricks, structural steel work, concrete wall elements,
wood, sheet metal, fibre-reinforced plastics, and so on. In any event, the soundproofing
wall by means of the plate-type acoustic metamaterial provides improved sound insulation.
[0010] In accordance with the invention, at least one of the masses of the plate-type acoustic
metamaterial is strip-shaped. In particular, a plurality of the masses, a majority
of the masses or all of the masses may be strip-shaped. The inventors realised that
the manufacturing costs of a plate-type acoustic metamaterial can be greatly reduced
when a strip-shaped mass is used instead of a plurality of point-like masses. Although
the at least one strip-shaped mass covers an elongated section of the baseplate and
imparts additional stiffness to the metamaterial, and thereby alters the possible
vibrational motion of the metamaterial, it was found that a comparable frequency response
can be achieved, in particular including resonances and anti-resonances similar to
a plate-type acoustic metamaterial with point-like masses. For this reason, using
at least one strip-shaped mass is an economically viable alternative to a larger number
of point-shaped masses.
[0011] In an aspect of the invention, the baseplate has a stiffness. It is this stiffness
that leads to the vibroacoustic properties of the metamaterial. The stiffness can
be selected and adapted in relation to the at least one strip-shaped mass such that
a desired frequency response of the plate-type acoustic metamaterial is achieved.
It is noted that for an efficient sound transmission loss in a low-frequency range,
such as for example 20 Hz to 100 Hz, the stiffness of the baseplate may be relatively
low. This is true in particular when a lightweight overall structure is desired, including
relatively lightweight masses. The stiffness of the baseplate may be tailored by selecting
a material for the baseplate (or a combination of materials) having a certain Young's
modulus, and/or by selecting a suitable thickness of the baseplate. In practice, for
example various polymeric materials may be used, ranging from thin foils to thicker,
solid or foamed layers. These or any other suitable materials may be combined with
an adjacent layer of another material, thereby forming a sandwich-like baseplate having
the desired stiffness. For example, the baseplate may comprise a thin layer of an
impermeable material, e.g. a polymeric foil, and an adjacent, preferably thicker layer
of another material, for example an absorber material such as a glass or mineral wool,
the adjacent layer imparting stiffness and/or elasticity to the thin layer.
[0012] In an aspect of the invention, the at least one strip-shaped mass has a length and
a width, wherein the length is at least three times the width. Of course, the length
to width-ratio of the at least one strip-shaped mass may be larger, such as at least
5, at least 10, or at least 20. Another parameter to quantify the length of the at
least one strip-shaped mass is the ratio of the length to a distance between the strip-shaped
mass and an adjacent mass. This ratio may be at least 5, at least 10 or at least 20.
[0013] In an aspect of the invention, the at least one strip-shaped mass has a length extending
in a length-direction, wherein the length of the at least one strip-shaped mass extends
over at least 50% of a dimension of the baseplate measured in the length-direction.
In particular the length of the at least one strip-shaped mass may extend over at
least 80% of said dimension, or over the entirety of said dimension. This may be an
advantage when manufacturing the soundproofing wall, in particular because an endless
plate-type acoustic metamaterial may be produced and stored as a roll, for example.
[0014] In an aspect of the invention, the ratio
µ between a surface mass density of the at least one strip-shaped mass to a surface
mass density of the baseplate is 3.5 or more. The ratio µ may also be 5.0 or more,
or 10 or more. The ratio
µ can be calculated from the specific density
ρM and the height
hM of the at least one strip-shaped mass and the specific density
ρb and the height
hb of the baseplate as follows:

[0015] It was found that a ratio µ of 3.5 or more leads to a favourable sound transmission
loss in a relatively broad frequency range. As an upper limit, one may consider a
value of about µ = 40,000. For practical/structural reasons, however, the inventors
found a suitable upper limit to be around µ = 500.
[0016] In an aspect of the invention, the ratio between a bending stiffness
DM of the at least one strip-shaped mass to a bending stiffness
Db of the baseplate is in a range of about 50 to about 500. The bending stiffness may
be increased as desired by using stiffer materials for and/or larger heights/thicknesses
of the masses/the baseplate. When the at least one strip-shaped mass has a high bending
stiffness, it will move as a rigid body, and the vibroacoustic properties of the metamaterial
will be dominated by the deformability of the baseplate. This may be assumed as long
as the bending stiffness of the at least one strip-shaped mass is about 1,000 times
larger than the bending stiffness of the baseplate. When the bending stiffness of
the at least one strip-shaped mass is reduced, the first anti-resonance of the plate-type
acoustic metamaterial shifts towards lower frequencies. When using a ratio in the
claimed range, an additional anti-resonance appears at a frequency below the first
anti-resonance, which leads to a broadening of the frequency range with high sound
transmission loss, and/or to a second peak in sound transmission loss at a lower frequency.
Both effects can be beneficial when aiming for an efficient soundproofing for a specific
noise problem.
[0017] In an aspect of the invention, the at least one strip-shaped mass consists of a material
having a higher mass density and/or a higher stiffness than a material of the baseplate.
Both measures help to obtain a desired ratio
µ of surface mass densities and/or a desired ratio
DM /
Db of bending stiffnesses in a compact/thin package.
[0018] In an aspect of the invention, a plurality of the masses are strip-shaped and arranged
in a regular pattern. The regular pattern may include a simple repetition of strip-shaped
masses arranged in parallel, but may also be more complex, as will be shown in some
of the embodiments. For example, the regular pattern may include a geometric structure
such as a square, a rectangle, or a spiral. Each geometric structure may be formed
by one or by several strip-shaped masses. Each geometric structure may comprise additional/internal
structures or patterns. When using a spiral, for example, a width of the at least
one strip-shaped mass forming the spiral may increase from a centre of the spiral
towards an outer area of the spiral. A plurality of geometric structures, each formed
by one or more strip-shaped masses, may be arranged on the baseplate in a regular
pattern. It was found that regular patterns from strip-shaped masses make it easy
to predict and tailor the vibroacoustic characteristics of the plate-type acoustic
metamaterial as desired and in a consistent manner for the entire soundproofing wall.
[0019] In an aspect of the invention, the plate-type acoustic metamaterial comprises a plurality
of unit cells each including at least one of the strip-shaped masses and an adjacent,
strip-shaped baseplate region in which none of the masses is present. Unit cells arranged
in a regular pattern also help to achieve predictable, consistent vibroacoustic characteristics.
[0020] In an aspect of the invention, the baseplate has a thickness
hb and a longitudinal wave velocity
cb and two of the strip-shaped masses are arranged in a distance /, wherein the materials
used for the strip-shaped masses and the baseplate and their dimensions are selected
such that the ratio between
hb times
cb and
l2 is 30 per second or more. Written as a formula, this reads as follows:

[0021] Based on the characteristics of the baseplate material, the longitudinal wave velocity
cb of the baseplate can be calculated as follows:

with Young's modulus
Eb, specific density
ρb and Poisson's ratio v
b of the baseplate. When operating within the region defined by the above inequation,
the lowest anti-resonance of the plate-type acoustic metamaterial is expected to fall
in a frequency range suitable for many noise problems. As an upper limit, most practical
noise problems will benefit from selecting the ratio between
hb times
cb and
l2 at or below 15,000 per second, at or below 7,500 per second or even at or below 1,500
per second.
[0022] In an aspect of the invention, each of the unit cells includes at least two of the
strip-shaped masses. This makes it possible do design the plate-type acoustic metamaterial
such it comprises one or more peaks in sound transmission loss at different, selected
frequencies.
[0023] In an aspect of the invention, the at least two strip-shaped masses have different
surface mass densities. This may be achieved by using different dimensions and/or
materials having different mass densities for the at least two strip-shaped masses.
This offers additional options for selecting suitable frequency responses of the soundproofing
wall.
[0024] In an aspect, the plate-type acoustic metamaterial has a surface mass density of
5 kg/m
2 or less. While a common, solid soundproofing wall with this surface mass density
will have relatively low performance in the low frequency range, as predicted by the
mass-law, the inventive soundproofing wall can perform much better. At the same time,
the inventive soundproofing wall has an overall weight low enough to be suitable for
weight-sensitive applications, such as, for example, for soundproofing of an aircraft
passenger cabin. In particular, the inventive soundproofing wall may be integrated
in a cabin wall of an aircraft.
[0025] In an aspect of the invention, the at least one strip-shaped mass is attached to
the baseplate. In particular, the at least one strip-shaped mass may be adhered or
welded to the baseplate. Manufacturing the plate-type acoustic metamaterial in this
way can be done with proven techniques and offers great flexibility with regard to
the selection of materials. No matter how the at least one strip-shaped mass is connected
to the baseplate, it may consist of a single layer or of more than one layer, such
as, for example two, three or more layers. These layers may consist of different materials
and/or may have different structures so that they have different viscosities, stiffnesses,
densities and/or thicknesses. In particular the at least one strip-shaped mass may
comprise a bottom layer of an adhesive, arranged between the baseplate and at least
one upper layer.
[0026] In an aspect of the invention, the at least one strip-shaped mass comprises a first
mass layer, a second mass layer and an elastic layer arranged between the first mass
layer and the second mass layer. By means of this layered construction, the at least
one strip-shaped mass itself forms a system of two elastically coupled masses that
can vibrate on its own. This allows for additional anti-resonances of the plate-type
acoustic metamaterial, which may be helpful for obtaining a broad frequency range
of high transmission loss. The elastic layer may extend over the entire length and/or
over the entire width of the first and second mass layers, or it may cover selected
connection regions or connection points thereof only, for example arranged in a certain
pattern, such as in strips running in the crosswise or lengthwise direction of the
first and second mass layers. This can help achieving a lower effective spring constant
with a given elastic material, and thereby a lower anti-resonance frequency. In particular,
the connection regions or points may be distributed over a length direction of the
mass layers such that longitudinal sections of the mass layers arranged between neighbouring
connection regions remain unconnected. This allows for additional bending vibration
modes of the first mass layer and/or the second mass layer and related, additional
anti-resonances. The first mass layer may be connected to the baseplate by any suitable
means, such as an adhesive layer. However, the first mass layer can also be formed
integrally with the baseplate and from the same material as the baseplate, for example
when a thickened strip of the baseplate forms the first mass layer. It is understood
that the concept may be extended by adding one, two or more additional pairs of an
elastic layer and a mass layer.
[0027] In an aspect of the invention, the elastic layer comprises a pressurised gas. In
this aspect, variations of the distance between the two mass layers translate into
pressure changes within the elastic layer. Suitable examples of such elastic layers
include various foamed materials as well as larger gas volumes encapsulated in a container,
such as a hose or closed profile. Elastic layers comprising a pressurised gas are
relatively lightweight, cost efficient and can provide a desired degree of elasticity
with low damping.
[0028] In an aspect of the invention, a material of the first mass layer and a material
of the second mass layer are selected such that these layers are pulled towards one
another by a magnetic force. For example, one of these layers may comprise a ferromagnetic
material and the other one may comprise a permanent magnet. The pulling force may
be helpful for holding the two mass layers and the elastic layer together. However,
the various layers may be interconnected by any other means as well, such as by additional
adhesive layers. Moreover, the magnetic force leads to a desired level of compression
of the elastic layer. When combined with an elastic layer comprising a pressurised
gas, in particular, vibroacoustic properties largely independent of temperature changes
can be obtained.
[0029] In an aspect of the invention, the baseplate and the at least one strip-shaped mass
are integrally formed from the same material. In particular, this can be done by machining
a plate to remove material to form grooves in the area where no masses shall be present
or by recasting the material of a plate. These manufacturing techniques are well-suited
for mass production, in particular in endless lengths. Various polymeric materials,
in particular, have favourable characteristics as to stiffness and weight, well suited
for achieving surface mass density and bending stiffness ratios in accordance with
the above mentioned, preferred ranges.
[0030] In the following, the invention is explained in greater detail based on embodiments
shown in drawings. The figures show:
- Fig. 1
- a soundproofing wall in a schematic, perspective view;
- Fig. 2
- the soundproofing wall of Fig. 1 in cross section;
- Fig. 3
- a diagram illustrating the frequency response of a soundproofing wall;
- Fig. 4
- a diagram illustrating the influence of bending stiffness on the frequency response
of a soundproofing wall;
- Fig. 5
- a schematic view of four different arrangements of strip-shaped masses having varying
lengths;
- Fig. 6
- a schematic view of three different arrangements of strip-shaped masses having varying
shapes;
- Fig. 7
- a schematic view of strip-shaped masses arranged in a pattern of squares;
- Fig. 8
- a schematic view of strip-shaped masses arranged in spirals;
- Fig. 9
- a schematic view of four different patterns of strip-shaped masses;
- Fig. 10
- a schematic view of strip-shaped masses arranged in a complex pattern;
- Fig. 11
- a schematic view of a soundproofing wall in cross-section having a first unit cell
with two strip-shaped masses;
- Fig. 12
- a schematic view of a soundproofing wall in cross-section having a second unit cell
with two strip-shaped masses;
- Fig. 13
- a schematic view of a soundproofing wall in cross-section having a third unit cell
with two strip-shaped masses;
- Fig. 14
- a schematic, perspective view of a strip-shaped mass having a layered construction
on a baseplate;
- Fig. 15
- an illustration of the physical principles underlying the arrangement of Fig. 14.
[0031] Figure 1 shows a soundproofing wall consisting of a baseplate 10 and a plurality
of strip-shaped masses 12, together forming a plate-type acoustic metamaterial. The
baseplate 10 has a height
hb, a mass density
ρb, a Young's modulus
Eb, and a Poisson's ratio
vb. These quantities essentially determine the bending stiffness
Db of the baseplate 10.
[0032] The strip-shaped masses 12 have a length extending along a y-axis, and a width
b along an x-axis. The strip-shaped masses have a height
hM and a mass density
ρM. They are arranged in parallel. Between each two strip-shaped masses 12, there is
a spacing
l. A unit cell of the plate-type acoustic metamaterial therefore has a width
a =
l +
b. For some of the calculations carried out by the inventors, it is assumed that the
soundproofing wall extends endlessly in the x- and y-directions, as illustrated by
the series of points.
[0033] In all cases, the soundproofing wall is designed for isolating a first room on one
side of the soundproofing wall from a sound source on the other side of the soundproofing
wall. In Fig. 2, the soundproofing wall of Fig. 1 is shown in cross-section. An incident
acoustic wave 14 is illustrated coming from the bottom of the figure, i.e. from a
sound source on that side of the soundproofing wall. The figure illustrates a transversal
displacement
w(
x,
y) along the z-direction of the masses 12 and the baseplate 10 due to the incident
acoustic wave 14. It can be seen that a deformation of the baseplate 10 is larger
than a deformation of the strip-shaped masses, which have a larger bending stiffness
than the baseplate 10.
[0034] Figure 3 shows a diagram illustrating the sound transmission loss TL measured in
dB for a frequency range from 100 Hz to 1,000 Hz for a soundproofing wall as shown
in Figs. 1 and 2 as compared to a mass-equivalent homogeneous plate. The sound transmission
loss of the inventive soundproofing wall calculated in a mathematical model is depicted
as a solid line. It shows a broad peak at about 250 Hz. The calculation is compared
to a measurement with a sample having an overall size of 1 m x 1.2 m, depicted by
the small circles. Both the calculations as well as the experiment were based on a
baseplate of PET having a thickness
hb of 0.1 mm, a mass density
ρb of 1,400 kg/m
3, a Young's modulus
Eb of 3500 MPa, and a Poisson's ratio
vb of 0.4. The strip-shaped masses 12 were made from strips of polyvinyl-chloride foam
(PVC-F) with a height
hM of 5 mm and a width
b of 50 mm, arranged in distances
l of 20 mm, leading to a unit cell width
a of 70 mm. PVC-F had a mass density
ρM of 460 kg/m
3. The total surface mass density of the plate-type acoustic metamaterial is 1.8 kg/m
2. One can see that the calculations and the measurement are in good agreement.
[0035] As compared to the results for the mass-equivalent homogeneous plate, depicted as
a dashed line (calculated) and as little squares (measured), the sound transmission
loss of the soundproofing wall is much larger (about 20 dB) in the relevant frequency
range.
[0036] Fig. 4 illustrates the influence of the ratio
DM/
Db of the bending stiffnesses of the strip-shaped masses to the bending stiffness of
the baseplate on the frequency response. For large ratios, such as 43,000 and 500,
the sound transmission loss shows only one prominent peak shifting to lower frequencies
with decreasing ratio. For smaller ratios, such as 100 and 50, the curve shows an
additional second peak at a lower frequency.
[0037] Figures 5 to 10 show various examples of how the strip-shaped masses may be arranged.
Only the masses 12 themselves are shown in a schematic top view. In the four examples
of Fig. 5, the strip-shaped masses are arranged in parallel rows, but have different
lengths.
[0038] Figure 6 illustrates that the strip-shaped masses 12 may have widths and spacings
that vary over their length.
[0039] Figure 7 includes a regular pattern of nested squares, each formed by one strip-shaped
mass 12. In the middle of each set of nested squares, the arrangement includes one
smaller square-mass 16, i.e. an additional mass that is not strip-shaped.
[0040] In the example of Fig. 8, a regular pattern of spirals is shown, each spiral formed
by a strip-shaped mass 12.
[0041] Fig. 9 shows four examples of arrangements of strip-shaped masses 12. In the first
example to the left of the figure, a single strip-shaped mass 12 forms a spiral, wherein
a width of the strip-shaped mass 12 is increasing from the centre towards an outer
region of the spiral. The second example shows a spiral formed by a plurality of strip-shaped
masses 12. The third example shows a spiral formed by a plurality of strip-shaped
masses 12 as well, wherein these are interconnected to each other by narrower sections
18. The fourth example, to the right of the figure, shows a plurality of straight,
strip-shaped masses 12 arranged in a rectangular pattern.
[0042] Figure 10 shows another regular pattern of strip-shaped masses 12 of a more complex
arrangement, including a plurality of straight strip-shaped masses 12 of different
lengths as well as a plurality of strip-shaped masses 12 forming spirals and nested
squares.
[0043] Figure 11 shows another soundproofing wall in cross section, with unit cells of a
width
a including two strip-shaped masses 12 each. The dimensions of the strip-shaped masses
12 are identical, but their spacing varies.
[0044] Figure 12 shows yet another soundproofing wall in cross section, with unit cells
of a width
a including two strip-shaped masses 12 each. The dimensions of the strip-shaped masses
12 vary, wherein one of the two strip-shaped masses 12 has a larger width than the
other one, while both have the same height.
[0045] Figure 13 shows yet another soundproofing wall in cross section, with unit cells
of a width
a including two strip-shaped masses 12 each. The dimensions of the strip-shaped masses
12 vary, wherein one of the two strip-shaped masses 12 has a larger height than the
other one, while both have the same width.
[0046] Figure 14 shows a unit cell of yet another soundproofing wall, partly in cross section.
The unit cell includes only one strip-shaped masse 12, which consists of four layers.
These include a first mass layer 22 fastened on the baseplate 10 by means of an adhesive
layer 20, a second mass layer 26 and an elastic layer 24 arranged between the first
mass layer 22 and the second mass layer 26. The first mass layer 22 comprises a ferromagnetic
material, the second mass layer 26 is a permanent magnet. The elastic layer 24 comprises
a pressurised gas, in particular a foamed material. It may be attached to both mass
layers 22, 26 by additional adhesive layers (not shown). The magnetic force between
the mass layers 22, 26 leads to a certain level of compression of the elastic layer
24.
[0047] Figure 15 illustrates the "working principle" of the layered strip-shaped mass 12
of Fig. 14. The elastic layer 24 acts like a spring connecting the mass layers 22,
26. The adhesive layer 20 has elastic properties as well, leading to an elastic coupling
between the baseplate 10 and the system of the two elastically coupled mass layers
22, 26.
List of reference numerals
[0048]
- 10
- baseplate
- 12
- strip-shaped mass
- 14
- incident acoustic wave
- 16
- square mass
- 18
- narrower section
- 20
- adhesive layer
- 22
- first mass layer
- 24
- elastic layer
- 26
- second mass layer
1. A soundproofing wall for isolating a first room on one side of the soundproofing wall
from a sound source on the other side of the soundproofing wall, the soundproofing
wall comprising a plate-type acoustic metamaterial with a baseplate (10) and a plurality
of masses (12, 16) arranged on the baseplate (10), characterised in that at least one of the masses (12) is strip-shaped.
2. The soundproofing wall of claim 1, characterised in that the baseplate (10) has a stiffness.
3. The soundproofing wall of any of claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the ratio (µ) between a surface mass density of the at least one strip-shaped mass
(12) to a surface mass density of the baseplate (10) is 3.5 or more.
4. The soundproofing wall of any of the claims 1 to 3, characterised in that the ratio between a bending stiffness DM of the at least one strip-shaped mass (12) to a bending stiffness Db of the baseplate (10) is in a range of about 50 to about 500.
5. The soundproofing wall of any of the claims 1 to 4, characterised in that the at least one strip-shaped mass (12) consists of a material having a higher mass
density and/or a higher stiffness than a material of the baseplate (10).
6. The soundproofing wall of any of the claims 1 to 5, characterised in that a plurality of the masses (12) are strip-shaped and arranged in a regular pattern.
7. The soundproofing wall of any of claim 6, characterised in that the regular pattern comprises a plurality of unit cells each including at least one
of the strip-shaped masses (12) and an adjacent, strip-shaped baseplate region in
which none of the masses (12) is present.
8. The soundproofing wall of any of the claims 1 to 7, characterised in that the baseplate (10) has a thickness hb and a longitudinal wave velocity cb and two of the strip-shaped masses (12) are arranged in a distance l, wherein the materials used for the strip-shaped masses (12) and the baseplate (10)
and their dimensions are selected such that the ratio between hb times cb and l2 is 30 per second or more.
9. The soundproofing wall of any of the claims 7 to 9, characterised in that each of the unit cells includes at least two of the strip-shaped masses (12), the
at least two strip-shaped masses (12) in particular having different surface mass
densities.
10. The soundproofing wall of any of the claims 1 to 9, characterised in that the plate-type acoustic metamaterial has a surface mass density of 5 kg/m2 or less.
11. The soundproofing wall of any of the claims 1 to 10, characterised in that the at least one strip-shaped mass (12) is attached to the baseplate (10).
12. The soundproofing wall of any of the claims 1 to 11, characterised in that the at least one strip-shaped mass (12) comprises a first mass layer (22), a second
mass layer (26) and an elastic layer (24) arranged between the first mass layer (22)
and the second mass layer (26).
13. The soundproofing wall of claim 12, characterised in that the elastic layer (24) comprises a pressurised gas.
14. The soundproofing wall of claim 12 or 13, characterised in that a material of the first mass layer (22) and a material of the second mass layer (26)
are selected such that these layers are pulled towards one another by a magnetic force.
15. The soundproofing wall of any of the claims 1 to 11, characterised in that the baseplate (10) and the at least one strip-shaped mass (12) are integrally formed
from the same material.