[0002] This invention relates to processes for producing electro-optic displays and. More
specifically, this invention relates to processes for the production of electro-optic
displays without the use of front plane laminates, inverted front plane laminates
and double release films as described in the aforementioned
U.S. Patents Nos. 6,982,178;
7,561,324; and
7,839,564, and to processes for depositing encapsulated electrophoretic media by spraying.
[0003] The term "electro-optic", as applied to a material or a display, is used herein in
its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to a material having first and
second display states differing in at least one optical property, the material being
changed from its first to its second display state by application of an electric field
to the material. Although the optical property is typically color perceptible to the
human eye, it may be another optical property, such as optical transmission, reflectance,
luminescence or, in the case of displays intended for machine reading, pseudo-color
in the sense of a change in reflectance of electromagnetic wavelengths outside the
visible range.
[0004] The term "gray state" is used herein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art
to refer to a state intermediate two extreme optical states of a pixel, and does not
necessarily imply a black-white transition between these two extreme states. The term
"monochrome" may be used hereinafter to denote a drive scheme which only drives pixels
to their two extreme optical states with no intervening gray states.
[0005] Some electro-optic materials are solid in the sense that the materials have solid
external surfaces, although the materials may, and often do, have internal liquid-
or gas-filled spaces. Such displays using solid electro-optic materials may hereinafter
for convenience be referred to as "solid electro-optic displays". Thus, the term "solid
electro-optic displays" includes rotating bichromal member displays, encapsulated
electrophoretic displays, microcell electrophoretic displays and encapsulated liquid
crystal displays.
[0006] The terms "bistable" and "bistability" are used herein in their conventional meaning
in the art to refer to displays comprising display elements having first and second
display states differing in at least one optical property, and such that after any
given element has been driven, by means of an addressing pulse of finite duration,
to assume either its first or second display state, after the addressing pulse has
terminated, that state will persist for at least several times, for example at least
four times, the minimum duration of the addressing pulse required to change the state
of the display element. It is shown in
U.S. Patent No. 7,170,670 that some particle-based electrophoretic displays capable of gray scale are stable
not only in their extreme black and white states but also in their intermediate gray
states, and the same is true of some other types of electro-optic displays. This type
of display is properly called "multi-stable" rather than bistable, although for convenience
the term "bistable" may be used herein to cover both bistable and multi-stable displays.
[0007] Several types of electro-optic displays are known, for example
- (a) a rotating bichromal member type as described, for example, in U.S. Patents Nos. 5,808,783; 5,777,782; 5,760,761; 6,054,071 6,055,091; 6,097,531; 6,128,124; 6,137,467; and 6,147,791;
- (b) an electrochromic medium, for example an electrochromic medium in the form of
a nanochromic film comprising an electrode formed at least in part from a semiconducting
metal oxide and a plurality of dye molecules capable of reversible color change attached
to the electrode; see, for example U.S. Patents Nos. 6,301,038; 6,870,657; and 6,950,220; and
- (c) an electro-wetting display as described in Hayes, R.A., et al., "Video-Speed Electronic Paper Based on Electrowetting", Nature,
425, 383-385 (2003) and U.S. Patent No. 7,420,549.
[0008] One type of electro-optic display, which has been the subject of intense research
and development for a number of years, is the particle-based electrophoretic display,
in which a plurality of charged particles move through a fluid under the influence
of an electric field. Electrophoretic displays can have attributes of good brightness
and contrast, wide viewing angles, state bistability, and low power consumption when
compared with liquid crystal displays. Nevertheless, problems with the long-term image
quality of these displays have prevented their widespread usage. For example, particles
that make up electrophoretic displays tend to settle, resulting in inadequate service-life
for these displays.
[0009] As noted above, electrophoretic media require the presence of a fluid. In most prior
art electrophoretic media, this fluid is a liquid, but electrophoretic media can be
produced using gaseous fluids; see, for example,
Kitamura, T., et al., "Electrical toner movement for electronic paper-like display",
IDW Japan, 2001, Paper HCS1-1, and
Yamaguchi, Y., et al., "Toner display using insulative particles charged triboelectrically",
IDW Japan, 2001, Paper AMD4-4). See also
U.S. Patents Nos. 7,321,459 and
7,236,291. Such gas-based electrophoretic media appear to be susceptible to the same types
of problems due to particle settling as liquid-based electrophoretic media, when the
media are used in an orientation which permits such settling, for example in a sign
where the medium is disposed in a vertical plane. Indeed, particle settling appears
to be a more serious problem in gas-based electrophoretic media than in liquid-based
ones, since the lower viscosity of gaseous suspending fluids as compared with liquid
ones allows more rapid settling of the electrophoretic particles.
[0010] Numerous patents and applications assigned to or in the names of the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT) and E Ink Corporation describe various technologies
used in encapsulated electrophoretic and other electro-optic media. Such encapsulated
media comprise numerous small capsules, each of which itself comprises an internal
phase containing electrophoretically-mobile particles in a fluid medium, and a capsule
wall surrounding the internal phase. Typically, the capsules are themselves held within
a polymeric binder to form a coherent layer positioned between two electrodes. The
technologies described in these patents and applications include:
- (a) Electrophoretic particles, fluids and fluid additives; see for example U.S. Patents Nos. 7,002,728; and 7,679,814;
- (b) Capsules, binders and encapsulation processes; see for example U.S. Patents Nos. 6,922,276; and 7,411,719;
- (c) Films and sub-assemblies containing electro-optic materials; see for example U.S. Patents Nos. 6,825,829; 6,982,178; 7,236,292; 7,443,571; 7,513,813; 7,561,324; 7,636,191; 7,649,666; 7,728,811; 7,729,039; 7,791,782; 7,839,564; 7,843,621; 7,843,624; 8,034,209; 8,068,272; 8,077,381; 8,177,942; 8,390,301; 8,482,852; 8,786,929; 8,830,553; 8,854,721; and 9,075,280; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2009/0109519; 2009/0168067; 2011/0164301; 2014/0027044; 2014/0115884; and 2014/0340738;
- (d) Backplanes, adhesive layers and other auxiliary layers and methods used in displays;
see for example U.S. Patents Nos. D485,294; 6,124,851; 6,130,773; 6,177,921; 6,232,950; 6,252,564; 6,312,304; 6,312,971; 6,376,828; 6,392,786; 6,413,790; 6,422,687; 6,445,374; 6,480,182; 6,498,114; 6,506,438; 6,518,949; 6,521,489; 6,535,197; 6,545,291; 6,639,578; 6,657,772; 6,664,944; 6,680,725; 6,683,333; 6,724,519; 6,750,473; 6,816,147; 6,819,471; 6,825,068; 6,831,769; 6,842,167; 6,842,279; 6,842,657; 6,865,010; 6,967,640; 6,980,196; 7,012,735; 7,030,412; 7,075,703; 7,106,296; 7,110,163; 7,116,318; 7,148,128; 7,167,155; 7,173,752; 7,176,880; 7,190,008; 7,206,119; 7,223,672; 7,230,751; 7,256,766; 7,259,744; 7,280,094; 7,327,511; 7,349,148; 7,352,353; 7,365,394; 7,365,733; 7,382,363; 7,388,572; 7,442,587; 7,492,497; 7,535,624; 7,551,346; 7,554,712; 7,583,427; 7,598,173; 7,605,799; 7,636,191; 7,649,674; 7,667,886; 7,672,040; 7,688,497; 7,733,335; 7,785,988; 7,843,626; 7,859,637; 7,893,435; 7,898,717; 7,957,053; 7,986,450; 8,009,344; 8,027,081; 8,049,947; 8,077,141; 8,089,453; 8,208,193; 8,373,211; 8,389,381; 8,498,042; 8,610,988; 8,728,266; 8,754,859; 8,830,560; 8,891,155; 8,989,886; 9,152,003; and 9,152,004; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2002/0060321; 2004/0105036; 2005/0122306; 2005/0122563; 2007/0052757; 2007/0097489; 2007/0109219; 2009/0122389; 2009/0315044; 2011/0026101; 2011/0140744; 2011/0187683; 2011/0187689; 2011/0292319; 2013/0278900; 2014/0078024; 2014/0139501; 2014/0300837; 2015/0171112; 2015/0205178; 2015/0226986; 2015/0227018; 2015/0228666; and 2015/0261057; and International Application Publication No. WO 00/38000; European Patents Nos. 1,099,207 B1 and 1,145,072 B1;
- (e) Color formation and color adjustment; see for example U.S. Patents Nos. 7,075,502; and 7,839,564;
- (f) Methods for driving displays; see for example U.S. Patents Nos. 7,012,600; and 7,453,445;
- (g) Applications of displays; see for example U.S. Patents Nos. 7,312,784; and 8,009,348; and
- (h) Non-electrophoretic displays, as described in U.S. Patents Nos. 6,241,921; 6,950,220; 7,420,549; 8,319,759; and 8,994,705; and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0293858.
[0011] Many of the aforementioned patents and applications recognize that the walls surrounding
the discrete microcapsules in an encapsulated electrophoretic medium could be replaced
by a continuous phase, thus producing a so-called polymer-dispersed electrophoretic
display, in which the electrophoretic medium comprises a plurality of discrete droplets
of an electrophoretic fluid and a continuous phase of a polymeric material, and that
the discrete droplets of electrophoretic fluid within such a polymer-dispersed electrophoretic
display may be regarded as capsules or microcapsules even though no discrete capsule
membrane is associated with each individual droplet; see for example, the aforementioned
U.S. Patent No. 6,866,760. Accordingly, for purposes of the present application, such polymer-dispersed electrophoretic
media are regarded as sub-species of encapsulated electrophoretic media.
[0012] Although electrophoretic media are often opaque (since, for example, in many electrophoretic
media, the particles substantially block transmission of visible light through the
display) and operate in a reflective mode, many electrophoretic displays can be made
to operate in a so-called "shutter mode" in which one display state is substantially
opaque and one is light-transmissive. See, for example,
U.S. Patents Nos. 5,872,552;
6,130,774;
6,144,361;
6,172,798;
6,271,823;
6,225,971; and
6,184,856. Dielectrophoretic displays, which are similar to electrophoretic displays but rely
upon variations in electric field strength, can operate in a similar mode; see
U.S. Patent No. 4,418,346. Other types of electro-optic displays may also be capable of operating in shutter
mode. Electro-optic media operating in shutter mode may be useful in multi-layer structures
for full color displays; in such structures, at least one layer adjacent the viewing
surface of the display operates in shutter mode to expose or conceal a second layer
more distant from the viewing surface.
[0013] An encapsulated electrophoretic display typically does not suffer from the clustering
and settling failure mode of traditional electrophoretic devices and provides further
advantages, such as the ability to print or coat the display on a wide variety of
flexible and rigid substrates. (Use of the word "printing" is intended to include
all forms of printing and coating, including, but without limitation: pre-metered
coatings such as patch die coating, slot or extrusion coating, slide or cascade coating,
curtain coating; roll coating such as knife over roll coating, forward and reverse
roll coating; gravure coating; dip coating; spray coating; meniscus coating; spin
coating; brush coating; air knife coating; silk screen printing processes; electrostatic
printing processes; thermal printing processes; ink jet printing processes; electrophoretic
deposition (See
U.S. Patent No. 7,339,715); and other similar techniques.) Thus, the resulting display can be flexible. Further,
because the display medium can be printed (using a variety of methods), the display
itself can be made inexpensively.
[0014] Other types of electro-optic materials may also be used in the present invention.
[0015] The aforementioned
U.S. Patent No. 6,982,178 describes a method of assembling a solid electro-optic display (including an encapsulated
electrophoretic display) which is well adapted for mass production. Essentially, this
patent describes a so-called "front plane laminate" ("FPL") which comprises, in order,
a light-transmissive electrically-conductive layer; a layer of a solid electro-optic
medium in electrical contact with the electrically-conductive layer; an adhesive layer;
and a release sheet. Typically, the light-transmissive electrically-conductive layer
will be carried on a light-transmissive substrate, which is preferably flexible, in
the sense that the substrate can be manually wrapped around a drum (say) 10 inches
(254 mm) in diameter without permanent deformation. The term "light-transmissive"
is used in this patent and herein to mean that the layer thus designated transmits
sufficient light to enable an observer, looking through that layer, to observe the
change in display states of the electro-optic medium, which will normally be viewed
through the electrically-conductive layer and adjacent substrate (if present); in
cases where the electro-optic medium displays a change in reflectivity at non-visible
wavelengths, the term "light-transmissive" should of course be interpreted to refer
to transmission of the relevant non-visible wavelengths. The substrate will typically
be a polymeric film, and will normally have a thickness in the range of about 1 to
about 25 mil (25 to 634 µm), preferably about 2 to about 10 mil (51 to 254 µm). The
electrically-conductive layer is conveniently a thin metal or metal oxide layer of,
for example, aluminum or ITO, or may be a conductive polymer. Poly(ethylene terephthalate)
(PET) films coated with aluminum or ITO are available commercially, for example as
"aluminized Mylar" ("Mylar" is a Registered Trade Mark) from E.I. du Pont de Nemours
& Company, Wilmington DE, and such commercial materials may be used with good results
in the front plane laminate.
[0016] Assembly of an electro-optic display using such a front plane laminate may be effected
by removing the release sheet from the front plane laminate and contacting the adhesive
layer with the backplane under conditions effective to cause the adhesive layer to
adhere to the backplane, thereby securing the adhesive layer, layer of electro-optic
medium and electrically-conductive layer to the backplane. This process is well-adapted
to mass production since the front plane laminate may be mass produced, typically
using roll-to-roll coating techniques, and then cut into pieces of any size needed
for use with specific backplanes.
[0017] The aforementioned
U.S. Patent No. 7,561,324 describes a so-called "double release sheet" which is essentially a simplified version
of the front plane laminate of the aforementioned
U.S. Patent No. 6,982,178. One form of the double release sheet comprises a layer of a solid electro-optic
medium sandwiched between two adhesive layers, one or both of the adhesive layers
being covered by a release sheet. Another form of the double release sheet comprises
a layer of a solid electro-optic medium sandwiched between two release sheets. Both
forms of the double release film are intended for use in a process generally similar
to the process for assembling an electro-optic display from a front plane laminate
already described, but involving two separate laminations; typically, in a first lamination
the double release sheet is laminated to a front electrode to form a front sub-assembly,
and then in a second lamination the front sub-assembly is laminated to a backplane
to form the final display, although the order of these two laminations could be reversed
if desired.
[0018] The aforementioned
U. S. Patent No. 7,839,564 describes a so-called "inverted front plane laminate", which is a variant of the
front plane laminate described in the aforementioned
U.S. Patent No. 6,982,178. This inverted front plane laminate comprises, in order, at least one of a light-transmissive
protective layer and a light-transmissive electrically-conductive layer; an adhesive
layer; a layer of a solid electro-optic medium; and a release sheet. This inverted
front plane laminate is used to form an electro-optic display having a layer of lamination
adhesive between the electro-optic layer and the front electrode or front substrate;
a second, typically thin layer of adhesive may or may not be present between the electro-optic
layer and a backplane. Such electro-optic displays can combine good resolution with
good low temperature performance.
[0019] As already indicated, the aforementioned front plane laminates, inverted front plane
laminates and double release films are well adapted for production by roll-to-roll
processes, thus producing the front plane laminate, inverted front plane laminate
or double release film in the form of a roll of material which can be severed into
pieces of the size needed for individual displays and laminated to appropriate backplanes.
However, also as already indicated, to effect the necessary lamination, and layer
of lamination adhesive normally needs to be present between the electro-optic layer
itself and the backplane, and this layer of lamination adhesive remains in the final
display between the two electrodes. The presence of this lamination adhesive layer
has significant effects on the electro-optic properties of the display. Inevitably,
some of the voltage drop between the electrodes occurs within the lamination adhesive
layer, thus reducing the voltage available for driving the electro-optic layer. The
effect of the lamination adhesive tends to become greater at lower temperatures, and
this variation in the effect of lamination adhesive with temperature complicates the
driving of the display. The voltage drop within the lamination adhesive can be reduced,
and the low temperature operation of the display improved, by increasing the conductivity
of the lamination adhesive layer, for example by doping the layer with tetrabutylammonium
hexafluorophosphate or other materials as described in
U.S. Patents Nos. 7,012,735 and
7,173,752. However, increasing the conductivity of the lamination adhesive layer in this manner
tends to increase pixel blooming (a phenomenon whereby the area of the electro-optic
layer which changes optical state in response to change of voltage at a pixel electrode
is larger than the pixel electrode itself), and this blooming tends to reduce the
resolution of the display. Hence, this type of display apparently intrinsically requires
a compromise between low temperature performance and display resolution.
[0020] One aspect of the present invention relates to processes for the production of electro-optic
displays which do not require the presence of a lamination adhesive layer between
the electro-optic layer and the backplane; these processes involve coating the electro-optic
material on to the backplane.
[0021] A second aspect of the present invention relates to novel processes for application
of encapsulated electrophoretic media to substrates. These processes may be used to
aid in the first aspect of the invention but may also be used in other types of coating
processes.
[0022] The electrophoretic media described in the aforementioned E Ink patents and applications,
and similar prior art electrophoretic media typically comprise electrophoretic particles,
charge control agents, image stability agents and flocculants in a non-polar liquid,
typically encapsulated in a flexible organic matrix such as a gelatin/acacia coacervate.
To produce commercial displays, it is necessary to coat a thin layer (preferably a
monolayer - see
U.S. Patent No. 6,839,158) of capsules on a substrate, which may be a front substrate bearing an electrode
(see the aforementioned
U.S. Patent No. 6,982,178), a backplane or a release sheet. Hitherto, coating of encapsulated electrophoretic
media on substrates has typically been effected by slot coating, in which a slurry
of capsules in a carrier medium is forced through a slot on to a substrate which is
moving relative to the slot. Slot coating imposes limitations upon the viscosity and
other physical properties of the material being coated and typically requires the
addition of slot coating additives to control the rheology of the coated material
to ensure that the coating does not flow and develop non-uniformities in thickness
prior to drying. Thus, in slot coating electrophoretic capsules are typically supplied
in the form of aqueous slurries containing optional latex binder, rheology modification
agents, ionic dopants, and surfactants. These additives remain in the final dried
electrophoretic medium and may affect its properties, including its electro-optic
properties.
[0023] Furthermore, although slot coating is well adapted for applying electrophoretic media
to continuous webs, it is not well adapted for "patch" coating of discrete areas of
a web or discrete parts (for example, individual backplanes) lying on a moving belt,
since settling and self-segregation of capsule slurry within the slot die manifold
become problematic during such "interrupted" capsule deposition processes. Slot coating
is generally not useful for non-planar substrates, which is unfortunate since encapsulated
electrophoretic media are well adapted for coating three-dimensional objects, including
architectural features. Other problems with slot coating include chatter-like streaks
parallel to the coating slot die (these streaks are believed to result from periodic
bunching or jamming of capsules), and streaking in the direction of coating (believed
to be due to capsule jamming or non-uniform flows in delivery of capsules to the slot
coating slot die).
[0024] The aforementioned problems with slot coating have resulted in a search for an alternative
coating technology able to cope with patch coating and coating of non-planar substrates,
as well as planar objects and webs. One well established coating technology which
has been considered for this purpose is spray coating, i.e., the pneumatic atomization
and deposition of capsule dispersions. Spray coating is a mature technology, but prior
art attempts to apply the technology to capsule deposition have been subject to various
defects and modes of failure. Because they typically have flexible capsule walls,
capsules deform and sometime rupture during spraying, either during the atomization
step or upon impact on the target. The consequences of significant capsule rupture,
including the release of electrophoretic particles, fluid etc., are so severe that,
so far as the present inventors are aware, unacceptable levels of ruptured capsules
have by themselves been sufficient to doom all previous attempts to spray coat encapsulated
electrophoretic media. The second aspect of the present invention provides a spray
coating process which reduces or eliminates these problems.
[0025] A third aspect of the present invention relates to processes for reducing the adhesion
of capsules to a substrate during coating in order to facilitate close packing of
capsules on the substrate. This adhesion reduction process is primarily intended for
use with spray coating of capsules but may also be useful with other capsule deposition
techniques.
[0026] As previously mentioned, in the production of electrophoretic displays it is generally
preferred to form a monolayer of capsules on a substrate. However, a common problem
encountered when coating electrophoretic capsules on to a substrate (typically a ITO/PET
film, a PET/release film, or any type of silicone release film) is that the capsules
adhere strongly to the substrate and are unable to rearrange themselves into an optimally
packed monolayer upon drying. Various coating materials have been found to significantly
reduce capsule-substrate adhesion, thus allowing the capsules to rearrange themselves
by means of capillary forces during drying. Unfortunately, if such coating materials
are used in slot coating processes employing a doctor blade, as is common during slot
coating, the reduced capsule-substrate adhesion causes the capsules to not pass properly
past the doctor blade; instead, the vast majority of the capsules are simply pushed
in front of the doctor blade, leaving only a very sparse capsule coating on the substrate.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved process for the formation of closely
packed monolayers of capsules on substrates, and the third aspect of the present invention
seeks to provide such a process.
[0027] A fourth aspect of the present invention relates to processes for overcoating electro-optic
materials to planarize an electro-optic layer and/or adhere the electro-optic layer
to a transparent front electrode that may be attached to a color filter.
[0028] It is known (see especially
United States Patent No. 7,839,564) that a color display may be formed by overlaying a color filter array (CFA) over
an monochromatic black/white electro-optic display, with the CFA elements aligned
with the pixel electrodes of the backplane. Such a CFA may for example have repeating
red, green and blue stripes, or a repeating 2 × 2 red/green/blue/white (clear) pixel
pattern. The brightest state of such a display is achieved when all pixels of the
electro-optic layer are white, and it is therefore preferred that the absorption of
the CFA elements, taken as a whole, be constant across the visible range, so that
the brightest state will have no color tint.
[0029] Overlaying a CFA over an electro-optic layer in this manner leads to a trade-off
between brightness and color saturation, and the colors that are most difficult to
render are the brightest colors, such as white and yellow. Moreover, such a display
suffers from several sources of light loss or contamination that limit still further
the quality of color attainable. These include:
- (a) absorption of light by the white state of the electro-optic layer that limits
the brightness of all colors; this may be as much as 50% of light incident on a white
region of the electro-optic layer;
- (b) reflection of light by the dark state of the electro-optic layer, causing pollution
of a desired color by unwanted light of other colors;
- (c) contrast at the pixel level ("local contrast") may be lower than the contrast
measured if the entire display is switched from the white state to the dark state,
due to electrical effects at the edges of pixels (i.e., image "blooming") or to optical
effects related to the scattering length within the electro-optic layer (i.e., "optical
dot gain");
- (d) loss of light due to total internal reflection within the display; since electrophoretic
and most other reflective electro-optic layer are Lambertian reflectors, a significant
proportion of light may be reflected at angles to the normal greater than the critical
angle for total internal reflection at at least one surface between adjacent layers
of the display and be lost;
- (e) illumination parallax: if the CFA elements are significantly separated from the
electro-optic layer by intervening layers, light incident on the display at sufficiently
large angles to the normal may pass through a color filter element of one color and
exit the display through an element of a different color, leading to pollution of
the colored image and a color shift; and
- (f) viewing parallax: for the same reasons as in (e), if a viewer observes the display
at a sufficiently large angle to the normal, and the CFA elements are significantly
separated from the electro-optic layer, the viewer may see modulation of reflectivity
through an unintended color filter element.
[0030] When an electro-optic display is formed using a front plane laminate, as described
above with reference to
U.S. Patent No. 6,982,178, a single adhesive layer is present between the electro-optic layer and the backplane.
Although this adhesive layer is not disposed between the electro-optic layer and the
CFA (and thus does not contribute to most of the problems discussed above), it is
present between the electrodes of the display, and thus contributes to image blooming.
The presence of this adhesive layer also diminishes the voltage drop actually occurring
across the electro-optic layer, which tends to limit the reflectivity of the white
state of the electro-optic layer and its contrast ratio. When an electro-optic display
is formed using either a double release film, as described above with reference to
U.S. Patent No. 7,561,324, or an inverted front plane laminate, as described above with reference to
U.S. Patent No. 7,839,564, typically two adhesive layers will be present, the first between the CFA and the
electro-optic layer, and the second between the electro-optic layer and the backplane.
The second adhesive layer contributes to the same problems as the adhesive layer derived
from an FPL, as already discussed; the first adhesive layer at least contributes to
the illumination and viewing parallax problems, and may also contribute to the total
internal reflection problem.
[0031] There is thus a need for a process for producing electro-optic displays which reduces
or eliminates the problems caused by the presence of adhesive layers between the electrodes.
However, since as discussed above, manufacture of electro-optic displays necessitates
at least one lamination operation, the best process will involve the provision of
only one thin adhesive layer, and the present invention seeks to provide such a process.
[0032] Accordingly, in one aspect this invention provides a process for producing a sub-assembly
for use in an electro-optic display, the process comprising:
providing a backplane comprising at least one electrode located in a first area of
the backplane;
covering a second area of the backplane spaced from the electrode with a masking layer;
coating the backplane having the masking layer thereon with a layer of an electro-optic
material; and
removing the masking layer, and the portion of the layer of electro-optic medium thereon,
from the backplane, thereby producing a sub-assembly comprising the backplane having
its first area covered by the layer of electro-optic material but its second area
free from the layer of electro-optic material.
[0033] This process may hereinafter for convenience be referred to as the "masked backplane"
process of the invention. In one form of this process, the second area of the backplane
comprises a contact pad intended, in the final display, to make electrical contact
with the front electrode of the display. In this form of the invention, a light-transmissive
conductive layer may be partially covered with a lamination adhesive, and laminated
to the backplane/electro-optic material sub-assembly with the lamination adhesive
contacting the electro-optic material and the light-transmissive conductive layer
in electrical contact with the contact on the backplane. This electrical contact may
be direct, or may be made via an electrically conductive ink or similar deformable
conductive material.
[0034] In another form of the process, after the layer of electro-optic material has been
coated on the backplane, but before the masking layer is removed, a layer of lamination
adhesive (preferably a 100 per cent solids radiation-curable adhesive) is coated over
the electro-optic material, and then the masking layer is removed, together with both
the portions of the layers of electro-optic material and the lamination adhesive thereon.
A light-transmissive electrically-conductive layer can then be laminated to the lamination
adhesive in the first area of the backplane; the light-transmissive electrically-conductive
layer preferably extends into the second area of the backplane so as to make electrical
contact with the contact pad in this second area.
[0035] In a further form of the process, the backplane has a third area which is covered
by a second masking layer which can be removed separately from the (first) masking
layer covering the second area. In this form of the process, after the layer of electro-optic
material has been coated, the second masking layer is removed, thus exposing the third
area of the backplane. Alight-transmissive electrically-conductive layer is now coated
over the backplane.
[0036] In a second aspect, this invention provides a process for spraying capsules of an
electrophoretic medium on to a substrate, the process comprising:
forming a dispersion of the capsules in a liquid;
feeding the dispersion through a first orifice; and
feeding a continuous stream of gas through a second, annular orifice surrounding the
first orifice, thereby forming a spray of the capsules.
[0037] This process may hereinafter for convenience be referred to as the "spray coating
process" of the present invention. The process may include shaping the spray by feeding
a continuous stream of gas through a plurality of shaping orifices disposed adjacent
the spray. The spray may be directed on to any type of substrate, including a web,
a plurality of discrete objects disposed on a support or one or more three-dimensional
(i.e., non-planar) objects. If, as is typically the case, the capsule walls are formed
from a hydrophilic material (such as the aforementioned gelatin/acacia coacervate),
the liquid used to disperse the capsules is desirably aqueous; depending upon the
specific capsules and liquid used, the liquid may optionally comprise any one or more
of pH modifiers, surfactants and ionic dopants. The gas passed through both the second
orifice and the shaping orifices is typically air, but it some cases it may be useful
to use an inert gas, for example nitrogen.
[0038] The spray coating process of the present invention may include the use of a masking
material covering part of the substrate so that, after removal of the masking material,
capsules remain only on those portions of the substrate where the masking material
was not present. Such a "masked spray coating process" of the invention may comprise
multiple steps with each step involving the use of a different mask and a different
capsule dispersion so that the different capsule dispersions are disposed in different
areas of the final display.
[0039] In a third aspect, this invention provides a process for forming a monolayer of capsules
on a substrate, the process comprising:
depositing a solution of a water-swellable polymer on the substrate; and
thereafter depositing a quantity of the capsules sufficient to form a monolayer of
capsules on to the substrate, and allowing the capsules to arrange themselves into
a monolayer on the substrate.
[0040] This process may hereinafter for convenience be referred to as the "swellable polymer
coating process" of the present invention. The polymer used may be, for example, a
polysaccharide, such as a pectin, or a protein, especially an albumin. The albumin
used may be, for example, egg albumin or bovine serum albumin; other types of albumin
may also be suitable. At least when the capsules are formed of a hydrophilic material
(such as the gelatin/acacia coacervate mentioned in many of the E Ink patents and
applications mentioned above), the polymer solution is preferably an aqueous solution.
The deposition of the capsules is desirably effected by a process such as spray coating
which does not require contact of a coating head or coating bar with the capsule layer.
[0041] In a fourth aspect, this invention provides a process for forming an electro-optic
display, the process comprising:
providing a backplane comprising at least one electrode;
coating the backplane with a layer of an electro-optic material;
depositing a layer of a substantially solvent-free polymerizable liquid material over
the layer of electro-optic material;
contacting the polymerizable liquid material with at least one light-transmissive
electrically-conductive layer; and
exposing the polymerizable liquid material to conditions effective to cause polymerization
of the material, thereby adhering the at least one light-transmissive electrically-conductive
layer to the layer of electro-optic material.
[0042] This process may hereinafter for convenience be referred to as the "overcoat layer
process" of the present invention. In this process, the coating of the backplane with
the electro-optic material may be conducted by the masked backplane process of the
present invention (to permit masking of any areas, for example row and column electrodes,
which should not be covered by electro-optic material) and/or by the spray coating
process of the present invention.
[0043] In one form of the overcoat layer process of the present invention, both a light-transmissive
electrically-conductive layer and a color filter array are adhered to the electro-optic
layer. Typically, the light-transmissive electrically-conductive layer is mounted
on a front substrate, which is provided with a color filter array (which may be printed
directly on to the front substrate). The front substrate may serve to provide mechanical
support to the electrically-conductive layer; many conductive layers, for example
indium-tin-oxide (ITO) layers are too fragile to be self-supporting.
[0044] In a second form of the overcoat layer process of the present invention, the electro-optic
layer is a color electro-optic layer capable of displaying a variety of colors (a
so-called "inherent color" layer), and only a front plane electrode (and any supporting
substrate required) are adhered to the electro-optic layer by means of the polymerizable
liquid material.
Figure 1 of the accompanying drawings is a schematic top plan view of a backplane
undergoing a first masked backplane process of the present invention.
Figure 2A is a schematic section along line 2A-2A in Figure 1 but showing the backplane
after deposition of electro-optic material thereon.
Figure 2B is a schematic section similar to that of Figure 2A but showing the backplane
after the masking layer has been removed.
Figure 2C is a schematic section through a sub-assembly comprising a light-transmissive,
electrically-conductive layer and a layer of lamination adhesive.
Figure 2D is a schematic section similar to those of Figures 2A and 2B but showing
the backplane after lamination of a front electrode and front substrate to the electro-optic
material via a layer of lamination adhesive.
Figure 3A is a schematic section similar to that of Figure 2A but showing the same
stage in a second masked backplane process of the present invention.
Figure 3B is a schematic section similar to those of Figures 2B and 3A but showing
the backplane after formation of a layer of lamination adhesive overlying the electro-optic
material but before removal of the masking layer.
Figure 3C is a schematic section similar to that of Figure 3B but showing the backplane
after removal of the masking layer.
Figure 3D is a schematic section similar to that of Figures 2D and 3C but showing
the backplane after lamination of a front electrode and front substrate to the electro-optic
material via the layer of lamination adhesive.
Figure 4A is a schematic section similar to those of Figures 2A and 3A but showing
the same stage in a third masked backplane process of the present invention which
uses two separate masking layers.
Figure 4B is a schematic section similar to that of Figure 4A but showing the backplane
after removal of the second masking layer.
Figure 4C is a schematic section similar to those of Figures 4A and 4B but showing
the backplane after formation of a light-transmissive front electrode layer overlying
the electro-optic material.
Figure 4D is a schematic section similar to those of Figures 4A-4C but showing the
backplane after removal of the first masking layer.
Figure 5 is a schematic top plan view, similar to that of Figure 1, of the backplane
used in the third masked backplane process after application of the two masking layers
but before deposition of the electro-optic layer.
Figure 6 is a schematic cross-section through a simple spray coating nozzle used in
the spray coating process of the present invention.
Figure 7 is a cross-section through a more complex spray coating nozzle used in the
spray coating process of the present invention.
Figure 8 is an enlarged view of the portion of the nozzle lying within the dotted
box in Figure 7.
Figure 9 is a graph illustrating preferred parameters used in the spray coating process
of the present invention.
Figure 10 is a top plan view of a first electrophoretic display produced by a masked
spray coating process of the present invention.
Figure 11 is a top plan view of a second electrophoretic display produced by a masked
spray coating process of the present invention.
Figures 12A-12H are time lapse micrographs showing an experimental demonstration of
the swellable polymer coating process of the present invention using capsules deposited
from a pipette on to a microscope slide.
Figure 13 is a schematic cross-section through a prior art color display using a color
filter array and produced using a double release film as previously described.
Figure 14 is a schematic cross-section similar to that of Figure 13 but taken through
a color display produced by the overcoat layer process of the present invention.
Figure 15 is a schematic cross-section similar to those of Figures 13 and 14 through
a prior art inherent color display.
Figure 16 is a schematic cross-section similar to those of Figures 13 to 15 but taken
through an inherent color display produced by the overcoat layer process of the present
invention.
[0045] As already indicated, this invention has several different aspects, which will primarily
be described separately below. However, it should be appreciated that a single physical
process may make use of more than one aspect of the invention. Thus, for example,
a masked backplane process of the invention might make use of the air spray coating
process of the invention to deposit electro-optic material on a backplane treated
by the swellable coating process of the invention, and the layer of electro-optic
material might thereafter be treated by the overcoat layer process of the invention.
Masked backplane process
[0046] As indicated above, the masked backplane process of the present invention provides
a process for producing a sub-assembly for use in an electro-optic display. This process
comprises providing a backplane comprising at least one electrode located in a first
area of the backplane; covering a second area of the backplane spaced from the electrode
with a masking layer; coating the backplane having the masking layer thereon with
a layer of an electro-optic material; and removing the masking layer, and the portion
of the layer of electro-optic medium thereon, from the backplane, thereby producing
a sub-assembly comprising the backplane having its first area covered by the layer
of electro-optic material but its second area free from the layer of electro-optic
material. Thus, the masked backplane process allows for formation of a sub-assembly,
and ultimately an electro-optic display, without the use of a pre-formed front plane
laminate and without the presence of a lamination adhesive layer between the electro-optic
layer and the backplane, thus reducing or eliminating the problems associated with
this lamination adhesive layer, as discussed above.
[0047] The masked backplane process of the present invention builds the sub-assembly or
display starting from the backplane. The process may be carried out on individual
backplanes but for mass production purposes it is more conveniently effected on backplanes
arranged in a multi-up configuration. Conceptually, when used to produce a complete
display, the masked backplane process may be regarded as involving (a) the backplane
itself, which may be a segmented, passive matrix or active matrix backplane; (b) a
masking layer for protecting areas of the backplane which are not be covered by the
electro-optic material (the protected areas will typically be those required for making
a "top plane connection" to the front electrode of the final display, and may also
include areas used for conductors leading to the pixel electrodes and electronic components
such as row and column drivers); (c) a solid electro-optic medium, typically an encapsulated
electrophoretic medium; (d) a light-transmissive, electrically-conductive layer which
forms the front electrode of the display; and (e) a means, typically a lamination
adhesive, for securing the light-transmissive, electrically-conductive layer to the
solid electro-optic medium.
[0048] As already indicated, the backplane used in the masked backplane process may be of
any known type, although care should be taken to ensure that the backplane used does
not damage the electro-optic layer. For example if the electro-optic layer is to be
formed from an encapsulated electrophoretic medium, the backplane should not have
such sharp changes in level as to risk puncturing some of the capsules. The masking
layer may be formed from a simple polymeric film which adheres to the backplane either
because of its own physical properties or with the aid of an adhesive coating, but
should desirably not be more than about 75 µm in thickness; polymeric films which
have been found useful as masking layers include Kapton tape (a polyimide tape available
from du Pont de Nemours & Company, Wilmington, DE) and RP301 film (an acrylic film
available form Nitto America, Inc., Fremont CA). The solid electro-optic layer is
typically an encapsulated electrophoretic layer but may also be a polymer-dispersed
electrophoretic layer or a rotating bichromal member or electrochromic layer. Care
should be taken to ensure that the physical properties of the electro-optic layer
are such that the portions of the layer overlying the masking layer are removed when
the masking layer itself is removed, without tearing the masking layer so that portions
of the masking layer are left on the backplane and/or without portions of the electro-optic
layer in the unmasked portion of the backplane being inadvertently removed. The material
used to form the front electrode and the adhesive can be any of the materials used
in the prior art for this purpose.
[0049] Specific masked backplane processes of the invention will now be described in more
detail with reference to Figures 1 to 4 of the accompanying drawings. Figure 1 is
a top plan view of an active matrix backplane (generally designated 100) having a
first, central area 102 provided with a two dimensional array of pixel electrodes
(not shown), and a second, peripheral area 104 covered by a masking film 106. (It
will be appreciated that the relative sizes and dispositions of the first and second
areas 102 and 104 can vary widely and it is not necessary that the second area 104
surround the first area 102.) The second area 104 will normally include a contact
pad for making electrical contact with a front electrode (described below) and may
include row and column electrodes connected to the pixel electrodes in the first area
102 and sockets for row and column drivers.
[0050] After provision of the masking layer on the backplane, the next step of the masked
backplane process is coating the backplane with a layer of electro-optic material
108, as illustrated in Figure 2A. Any technique capable of depositing the layer of
electro-optic material on the backplane may be used to form layer 108; with an encapsulated
electrophoretic electro-optic material, slot die coating, bar coating and spray coating
methods have all been successfully used to apply the electrophoretic material directly
to a masked backplane. Depending upon the deposition method used, the layer of electro-optic
material may or may not cover completely both the first and second areas of the backplane;
for example, some spray coating methods may only coat part of the masked area.
[0051] The next step of the process is removal of the masking layer 106 to expose the second
area 104 of the backplane 100, and the electrical connectors and/or sockets thereon,
as illustrated in Figure 2B. As already noted, it is important to choose the masking
layer and the electro-optic material such that the masking film and overlying layer
of electro-optic material are removed completely from the second area 104 but that
no portion of the electro-optic material overlying the first area 102 is removed.
[0052] To complete the assembly of an electro-optic display, it is necessary to secure a
light-transmissive, electrically conductive layer over the layer of electro-optic
material 108. As shown in Figure 2C, this is most conveniently effected by providing
a front substrate 110 carrying the light-transmissive, electrically conductive layer
or front electrode layer 112. As discussed for example in the aforementioned
U.S. Patent No. 6,982,178, polymeric films coated with indium tin oxide (ITO) are available commercially and
are very suitable for providing the front substrate 110 and front electrode layer
112. A layer of lamination adhesive 114 is then formed on the front electrode layer
112, leaving exposed a portion of the front electrode layer 112 needed to provide
an electrical connection to the backplane 100. In practice, it is generally most convenient
to coat the whole of the front electrode layer 112 with the lamination adhesive layer
114 using a roll-to-roll process, cut the resultant roll into portions of the size
needed for individual displays, and then to remove or "clean" the lamination adhesive
from the portion of the front electrode layer 112 required to provide the electrical
connection. A variety of methods for cleaning the lamination adhesive from the requisite
portion of the front electrode layer 112 are known in the art; see, for example,
U.S. Patent No. 7,733,554.
[0053] The sub-assembly shown in Figure 2C is then laminated to the sub-assembly shown in
Figure 2C with the lamination adhesive layer 114 in contact with the electro-optic
layer 108 to form the final display shown in Figure 2D. Typically, a conductive ink
or similar material 116 is placed on the backplane 100 adjacent the portion of the
front electrode layer 112 not covered by the adhesive layer 114, as described in the
aforementioned
U.S. Patent No. 6,982,178. This final display has the advantage that the electro-optic layer 108 is in direct
contact with the backplane 100 (without any intervening adhesive layer), thereby maximizing
the resolution of the display. In addition, the positioning of the adhesive layer
114 adjacent the front electrode layer 112 allows the adhesive layer 114 to be made
highly conductive without detriment to the resolution of the display.
[0054] Figures 3A-3D illustrate a second masked backplane process of the invention in which
an adhesive layer is formed overlying the electro-optic layer before the masking layer
is removed. The first stages of this second process, namely the provision of a masking
layer 106 on a backplane 100 and the deposition of an electro-optic layer 108 over
the backplane, are identical to the first process described above, and result in the
sub-assembly shown in Figure 3A, which is essentially identical to that shown in Figure
2A. However, the next step in the second process is the coating of a 100 per cent
solids radiation-curable adhesive layer 214 over the electro-optic layer 108, to produce
the structure shown in Figure 3B. The adhesive layer 214 is left uncured at this step
of the process. The masking layer 106 is next removed, as shown in Figure 3C, thereby
removing the portions of both the electro-optic layer 108 and the adhesive layer 214
previously overlying the masking layer 106. Again, it is important to choose the masking
layer, the electro-optic material and the adhesive such that the masking film and
overlying layers of electro-optic material and adhesive are removed completely from
the second area 104 but that no portion of the electro-optic material overlying the
first area 102 is removed.
[0055] The final step in the second process is the lamination of a film comprising a front
substrate 110 and front electrode layer 112 to the sub-assembly shown in Figure 3C
to produce the final display shown in Figure 3D, with the provision of conductive
ink 116 or similar conductive material as described above with reference to Figure
2D. Since the radiation-curable adhesive layer 214 is already present in the sub-assembly
of Figure 3C, no further adhesive is needed and the front substrate 110 and front
electrode layer 112 can be laminated at substantially room temperature and without
the use of high pressure. The use of the 100% solids adhesive layer 214 allows the
front electrode layer 112 and front substrate 110 to take a variety of forms including
flexible substrates and also rigid substrates like glass. Once the front electrode
layer 112 and front substrate 110 have been applied, the adhesive layer 214 can be
radiation cured with ultraviolet radiation to produce the final display shown in Figure
3D. This display, like that shown in Figure 2D, has the advantage that the electro-optic
layer 108 is in direct contact with the backplane 100 to maximize the resolution of
the display. In addition, the positioning of the adhesive layer 214 adjacent the front
electrode layer 112 allows the adhesive layer 214 to be made highly conductive without
detriment to the resolution of the display. The process of Figures 3A-3D eliminates
the top plane cleaning used in the process of Figures 2A-2D, allows for a thinner
adhesive layer because this layer is applied as a liquid, allows for flexible or rigid
front electrode layers and eliminates the need for a high temperature lamination step.
[0056] Figures 4A-4D illustrate a third masked backplane process of the invention in which
two separate masking layers are used and a front electrode layer is formed directly
on the electro-optic layer. The first stages of this third process, namely the provision
of two separate masking layers 106A and 106B on a backplane 100 and the deposition
of an electro-optic layer 108 over the backplane, are generally similar to the first
and second processes described above, and result in the sub-assembly shown in Figure
4A, which is generally similar to those shown in Figures 2A and 3A except for the
provision of the two separate masking layers 106A and 106B. Masking layer 106A covers
the bonding areas for the driver electronics and edge seal areas, while masking layer
106B covers the area for front electrode connection(s). The two masking layers do
not have to be separate films but can be in the form of a single film cut to allow
two portions thereof to be removed separately, as illustrated schematically in Figure
5. Alternatively, depending upon the geometry of the areas covered by the first and
second masking films, the first masking film may cover all areas of the backplane
which are not to have electro-optic material deposited thereon, and the second masking
film may be a separate film applied over the first masking film. The masking films
previously described can be used. The masked backplane shown in Figure 5 then has
electro-optic material deposited thereon by any of the methods previously described
to produce the structure shown in Figure 4A.
[0057] The next step in the second process is removal of the second masking layer 106B without
removing the first masking layer 106A, thus exposing the areas of the backplane needed
for front electrode contacts, and producing the structure shown in Figure 4B. Next,
a light-transmissive, electrically-conductive front electrode layer 312 is deposited
(normally by a wet coating process) over the backplane to produce the structure shown
in Figure 4C. The front electrode layer 312 not only forms a front electrode over
the electro-optic layer 108 but also forms a front electrode connection with the exposed
areas of the backplane, as illustrated at the right hand side of Figure 4C. The front
electrode layer 312 may be formed from a conductive polymer, for example poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)
("PEDOT"), normally used in the form of its poly(styrenesulfonate) salt ("PEDOT:PSS")
or a polyaniline, or may be formed from network of conductors, for example carbon
nanotubes or nanowires. The present inventors have successfully coated both PEDOT
and carbon nanotube front electrodes directly on an encapsulated electrophoretic layer.
[0058] The final step of the process is removal of the first masking layer 106A, together
with the overlying portions of the electro-optic layer 108 and the front conductor
layer 312 to produce the display illustrated in Figure 4D. If desired driver electronics
and/or edge seals may now be placed in the exposed areas of the backplane.
[0059] The display shown in Figure 4D, like those shown in Figures 2D and 3D, has the advantage
that the electro-optic layer is in direct contact with the backplane, thus maximizing
the resolution of the display. However, in contrast to the displays described above,
the display shown in Figure 4D has no lamination adhesive between its electrodes,
thus completely eliminating the electrical effect of such adhesive. Thus, the display
structure shown in Figure 4D enables the highest resolution and temperature performance
for a given electro-optic layer. One potential practical problem with the display
structure shown in Figure 4D is that any pore or pinhole in the electro-optic layer
would allow the coated front electrode to come into electrical contact with the pixel
electrodes on the backplane, thus shorting the display.
[0060] From the foregoing, it will be seen that the masked backplane process of the present
invention can provide high resolution addressing without compromising temperature
performance, thus removing the limitations imposed by prior art display construction
methods which require a thin adhesive between the electro-optic layer and the backplane.
Additionally the masked backplane process opens up the possibility of conducting the
entire manufacturing process in a single fab.
Spray coating process
[0061] As already mentioned, this invention also provides a process for spraying capsules
of an electrophoretic medium on to a substrate. This process comprises forming a dispersion
of the capsules in a liquid; feeding the dispersion through a first orifice; and feeding
a continuous stream of gas through a second, annular orifice surrounding the first
orifice, thereby forming a spray of the capsules. This spray coating process has the
advantage over slot coating that spray coating normally does not require the use of
rheology modifiers in the liquid being sprayed, so that the final coating is free
from such rheology modifiers and hence free from the effects such rheology modifiers
may have upon the properties of slot coated electrophoretic media. Typically, in spray
coating, only the additives actually needed in the final product need be added to
the liquid being sprayed.
[0062] Figure 6 is a schematic cross-section through a simple spray coating nozzle (generally
designated 600) which may be used in the spray coating process of the present invention.
The nozzle 600 comprises a substantially cylindrical body 602 having a central, axial
bore 604 through which is pumped electrophoretic capsules (not shown) dispersed in
a liquid (also not shown). The central bore 604 is surrounded by an annular bore 606,
through which is forced a continuous stream of air. The lower end of the central bore
604 terminates in an orifice 608, which the lower end of the annular bore 606 terminates
in an annular orifice 610, which surrounds orifice 608. A cylindrical baffle 612 surrounds
the annular orifice 610. The air flow through the annular orifice 610 constrained
by the baffle 612 causes the dispersion of capsules passing through orifice 608 to
form a spray or jet 614.
[0063] The nozzle 600 is also provided with shaping air bores 616, which may be six or eight
in number. As shown in Figure 6, the peripheral portions of the nozzle 600, through
which the bores 616 pass, extend downwardly below the orifices 608 and 610 and the
baffle 612, and the lower portions of the bores 616 are directly downwardly and inwardly.
Shaping air is forced continuously through the bores 616 so that it impinges on the
jet 614, thereby causing the jet to open out into a wide spray 618, which impinges
on a substrate 620 disposed below the nozzle 600.
[0064] Figures 7 and 8 illustrate a high-volume low-pressure atomization nozzle (generally
designated 700) suitable for use in a high volume spray coating process of the present
invention. It will be appreciated that in use the nozzle 700 would normally be inverted
relative to the position illustrated in Figures 7 and 8 so that capsules emerging
from the nozzle would be directed downwardly on to a substrate, as illustrated in
Figure 6.
[0065] As will readily be apparent to those familiar with spray nozzle technology, the nozzle
700 shown in Figures 7 and 8 operates in substantially the same manner as the nozzle
600 shown in Figure 6 but the nozzle 700 has the following structural differences:
- (a) the central axial bore 702, through which the capsule dispersion passes, tapers
adjacent its orifice 708 to increase the velocity at which the capsule dispersion
passes through this orifice;
- (b) the simple annular bore 606 in Figure 6 is replaced by a combination of air feed
passage 706A, a cylindrical air plenum 706B, a conical tapering portion 706C and an
outlet portion 706D (Figure 8) which terminates in an annular orifice 710; in addition,
auxiliary shaping air jets are provided by bores 706E which extend from the tapering
portion 706C to orifices on either side of the orifice 708; and
- (c) the shaping air bores 716 are provided with double outlet portions 716A, 716B
to provide greater control of the shape of the final capsule spray.
[0066] Figure 8 shows four dimensions which have been found important in achieving good
spray coating results from the nozzle 700 shown in Figures 7 and 8, these four dimensions
being (A) the radius of the central orifice 708; (B) the radial distance between the
outer edge of the central orifice 708 and the inner edge of the annular orifice 706D;
(C) the radial width of the annular orifice 706D; and (D) the axial distance between
the orifices 708 and 710.
[0067] The quality of capsules coatings is assessed in terms of their reproducibility granularity,
mean coating weight, uniformity and defect density; defect density is quantified by
the number of non-switching capsules per unit display area in a standard display structure,
which for present purposes is defined as a backplane bearing, in order, a 25 µm layer
of lamination adhesive, a 20 µm capsule layer and a front substrate comprising an
ITO layer on 25 µm polyethylene terephthalate film. The first factor to be considered
in achieving good spray coatings is capsule and gas flow rates and pressures. It has
been found empirically that capsule spraying is best achieved using a high-volume,
low-pressure ("HVLP") nozzle; a variety of standard nozzle designs known in the art
may be used, but the preferred design is that shown in Figures 7 and 8. Preferably,
the ratio of atomization air outlet cross-section to capsule dispersion outlet cross
section is not greater than about 8.5, and preferably between about 5.0 and about
7.0. The capsule dispersion orifice diameter (twice A in Figure 8) is preferably in
the range of about 1.0-1.40 mm. The capsule dispersion may contain capsules in a weight
fraction preferably between about 38.0 and about 40.5 weight per cent; this dispersion
may optionally contain 1-butanol at a concentration of up to about 4.0 weight per
cent and a surfactant, such as Triton X-100 at a concentration of up to about 0.04
weight per cent.
[0068] A wide range of capsule dispersion feed rates and atomization air feed rates can
be used in the spray coating process of the present invention. Typically, the capsule
dispersion feed rate, M
F, is not less than about 30 g/min and not greater than about 70 g/min, the optimum
being determined mainly on the basis of an appropriate residence time in the atomization
zone, that is to say the region in which the capsule dispersion column emerging from
the first orifice breaks into sheets of fluid, which subsequently break into ligaments
and finally droplets. Desirably, the droplet size distribution is such that the mean
capsule count per droplet is less than about 5.0, and the standard deviation is less
than about 3.0, capsules per droplet. The atomization air feed rate is set on the
basis of a critical air velocity, v
∗, measured at the second orifice, and is typically of the order of about 100 m/sec.
In the preferred process, a total air feed rate, M
A, (including atomization air and shaping air) of approximately 150 to 200 g/min is
employed in the absence of shaping air, and up to 300 g/min with shaping air.
[0069] Empirically, it has been found that the operating window for HVLP atomization in
terms of M
A/M
F versus M
F, has the form shown in Figure 9, although the numerical values involved will vary
with the particular nozzle design used. The unshaded region of the graph of Figure
9 represents the desirable operating window. The shaded regions represent defect regions
which result in undesirable spray patterns such as excessive fluid velocity ("jetting"),
highly irregular and transient spray structure, and coarse droplet distribution.
[0070] In the spray coating process of the present invention, the air feed rate and nozzle-to-substrate
distance should be carefully controlled to avoid capsule damage. In general, a nozzle-to-substrate
distance of 200 to 320 mm is optimal, and this distance should be adjusted approximately
inversely to atomization air velocity squared.
[0071] It has also been found that the quality and uniformity of the sprayed capsule coating
can be strongly influenced by pretreatment of the substrate and by additives added
to the capsule dispersion. Useful pretreatments and additives include but are not
limited to:
- 1) Capsule dispersions that incorporate surfactants such as Triton X -100, butanol
etc. to improve wetting of the substrate surface;
- 2) Pre-coating of the substrate surface with sub-layers incorporating surfactants
such as Triton X-100, 1-butanol, and others possessing a detergent structure, and
optionally a polyurethane latex;
- 3) Pre-treating the substrate with an atmospheric plasma or corona discharge treatment;
and
- 4) The capsule dispersion may contain polymeric binders, for example a polyurethane
latex
Example 1
[0072] A capsule dispersion was sprayed with an HVLP nozzle using inlet atomization air
at a pressure of 20 psig (about 330 MNw m
-2) measured at the nozzle inlet, with a gravity feed of the capsule dispersion. Depending
on the dispersion viscosity, the mass flow rate of the dispersion was approximately
25 to 35 g/min. The spray was directed vertically downward and deposition took place
at near normal incidence on to a horizontal substrate so as to avoid inclined plane
flow after deposition. The nozzle-to-substrate distance was 240 to 280 mm, but may
be lower or higher. Capsule spraying took plane across a thin film transistor backplane
in one or more passes to achieve a target mean coating weight given by the following
relationship:

where Θ is the mean coating weight (in g/m
2), M
F is the dispersion mass feed rate (in g/min), N is the number of passes over the substrate,
η is the spray transfer efficiency at each pass (which should be at least 50%), W
is the substrate width (in meters), v is the actuation velocity (in m/min). In one
process of the invention, the target mean coat weight Θ = 20 -d, M
F = 35 g/min, η ~ 60 - 70%, and W = 0.107 m. In this process, multiple coating passes
could be used so long as the total residence time of a given substrate underneath
the nozzle did not exceed about 3 or 4 seconds; longer coating times left the thin
sub-layers ineffective by evaporation.
[0073] As already mentioned, the spray coating process of the invention may include the use
of a masking material covering part of the substrate so that, after removal of the
masking material, capsules remain only on those portions of the substrate where the
masking material was not present. The masking material used to cover part of the substrate
should not be porous, or at least should have low enough porosity to ensure that capsule
deposition on to the masked areas of the substrate does not occur. The masking material
should not significantly absorb the liquid (usually aqueous) in which the capsules
are dispersed, and should be placed close enough to the surface of the substrate that
lateral draft of capsules beneath the masking material from the unmasked regions of
the substrate into the masked areas does not occur. After the capsules have been deposited
on the substrate, the capsules may be dried (or otherwise treated to form a coherent
layer, for example by exposure to radiation) with the masking material still in position,
or the masking material may first be removed and then the capsules dried or otherwise
treated. In either case, the physical properties of the masking material and the capsule
dispersion should be chosen so that, during the removal of the masking material, capsules
are not dragged into previously masked areas of the substrate, nor are capsules removed
from unmasked areas (for example, by irregular tearing of a coherent dried layer of
capsules.
[0074] The masking film may comprise an adhesive pre-laminated on to the surface on to which
the capsules are to be deposited, and a release film exposed to the spray. After capsule
deposition, the release film is removed, followed by additional processing. The resultant
spray-printed film may then be laminated to a backplane, which may be either transparent
or opaque.
[0075] Figure 10 is a top plan view of a first electrophoretic produced by a masked spray
coating process of the invention. The backplane is made transparent to allow visibility
through the display outside of the areas (circles in Figure 10) on which the capsules
have been deposited. Such a backplane can generate a patterned image with as many
individual optical states as the electrophoretic medium is capable of generating.
In the display shown in Figure 10, the capsules contain a white and a magenta pigment,
so that all possible states of the display are a combination of magenta and/or white,
including the extreme magenta and white optical states.
[0076] As already mentioned, the masked spray coating process of the invention may comprise
more than one coating step and thus allow deposition of two or more different electrophoretic
media on a single substrate. Figure 11 is a top plan view of a display produced in
this manner. The display shown in Figure 11 is produced by applying a first masking
material to a front plane electrode, and then spray coating electrophoretic capsules
containing blue and white pigments over the first masking material. After drying the
capsules and removing the first masking material, a second masking material is applied
to the front electrode, and electrophoretic capsules containing yellow and white pigments
are spray coated on to the electrode. The second masking material is then removed
and the front electrode and overlying electrophoretic layer laminated to a backplane.
The display shown in Figure 11 has two primary optical states, namely a uniform color
determined by the common pigment (in this case, white) and a second patterned (blue/yellow)
state as illustrated in Figure 11.
[0077] The spray coating process of the present invention overcomes the limitation of prior
art coating processes such as slot coating and thus provides the ability to do patch
coating and coating of three dimensional objects. The spray coating process is also
less susceptible to streaking due to clogging of the die in slot coating processes,
and thus can offer enhanced yields. The spray coating process also avoids the need
for lamination adhesive layers between the electrodes of a display, thus permitting
a higher electric field across the electrophoretic layer for a given operating voltage
and thus enabling higher white state brightness and higher contrast ratio, as well
as the potential for reduced blooming and enhanced microcontrast as a result of the
electrophoretic capsules being in direct contact with the backplane.
[0078] Printed encapsulated electrophoretic displays are desirable in applications such
as window screens, wall panels, or other architectural elements in which either a
low information density display or artistic relief is desired with minimal or no active
matrix driving. Instead, the interfaces between switching and non-switching, or between
two regions of differing electrophoretic medium which switch in a qualitatively different
manner, may be pre-patterned into the display. The masked spray coating process of
the present invention provides a way of achieving these aims without compromising
the mechanical integrity of the deposited capsules.
Swellable polymer coating process
[0079] As already mentioned, this invention provides a process for forming a monolayer of
capsules on a substrate, the process comprising depositing a solution of a water swellable
polymer on the substrate; and thereafter depositing a quantity of the capsules sufficient
to form a monolayer of capsules on to the substrate, and allowing the capsules to
arrange themselves into a monolayer on the substrate.
[0080] In this process, it is important to control the quantity of capsules deposited on
each unit area of the substrate; this quantity should be controlled so that the capsules
can rearrange on the substrate into a tightly packed monolayer. The rearrangement
of capsules may take place immediately after the deposition of the capsules on the
substrate but, perhaps more commonly, may take place after the capsule layer is dried
or otherwise treated to form a coherent layer of capsules on the substrate. As previously
noted, it is desirable that the deposition of the capsules be effected by a process
such as spray coating (or alternatively curtain coating or deposition of capsules
from nozzles or similar processes) which do not require contact of a coating head
or bar with the capsule layer. With the swellable polymer reducing adhesion of the
capsules to the substrate, a coating head or bar will tend to drag the capsules along
with it, thus resulting in a very sparse capsule coating on the substrate, too sparse
to enable a well packed monolayer of capsules to be formed. If coating is attempted
without the swellable polymer pre-treatment, the capsules stick to the substrate as
they are deposited by a coating head or bar, but the adhesion of the capsules to the
substrate is so great that capillary forces are insufficient to allow for capsule
rearrangement and the formation of a well packed monolayer of capsules.
[0081] Figures 12Ato 12H of the accompanying drawings illustrate successive stages of an
experimental process of the present invention in which a microscope slide was treated
with egg albumen and then had capsules deposited thereon from a pipette. It will be
seen from these Figures that the originally scattered capsules deposited from the
pipette were gradually drawn by capillary forces into a closely packed monolayer covering
about three-fourths of the area of the slide shown in the Figures. When a similar
experiment was attempted with bar coating on an albumin-treated slide, the capsules
simply clung to the coating bar and virtually no capsules were left behind on the
slide. When covering much larger areas than a microscope slide, the albumin coating
process of the present invention renders it possible to generate large area of closely
packed monolayers of capsules.
[0082] From the foregoing, it will be seen that the swellable polymer coating process of
the present invention provides a process for generating large quantities of closely
packed capsule monolayer coatings using conventional equipment and materials suitable
for mass production. The process should produce coatings essentially free from grain,
especially if the capsules are applied by spray coating, as the spray should randomize
the size distribution of capsules over the coating area. The swellable polymer coating
process may be especially useful in providing coatings for use in variable transmission
windows, where multilayers of coatings and coating defects (uncoated areas) are highly
visible and adversely affect the quality of the windows.
Overcoat layer process
[0083] As already mentioned, the overcoat layer process of this invention comprises: providing
a backplane comprising at least one electrode; coating the backplane with a layer
of an electro-optic material; depositing a layer of a substantially solvent-free polymerizable
liquid material over the layer of electro-optic material; contacting the polymerizable
liquid material with at least one light-transmissive electrically-conductive layer;
and exposing the polymerizable liquid material to conditions effective to cause polymerization
of the material, thereby adhering the at least one light-transmissive electrically-conductive
layer to the layer of electro-optic material.
[0084] The advantages of the overcoat layer process of the present invention may be seen by
comparing Figures 13 and 14. Figure 13 shows a schematic cross-section through a prior
art color display (generally designated 1300) comprising, in order, a backplane 1302,
a first (relatively thin) adhesive layer 1304, a monochrome electro-optic layer 1306,
a second adhesive layer 1308 substantially thicker than the first adhesive layer 1304,
a front electrode layer 1310, a front substrate 1312 and a color filter array 1314,
which may be printed directly on to the front substrate 1312. This structure may be
formed using a double release film in the manner described above. Note that in the
display 1300 the CFA 1314 is separated from the electro-optic layer 1306 by the thicknesses
of the front substrate 1312 and the second adhesive layer 1308, which together are
typically about 50 µm thick. (The front electrode layer 1310 is typically less than
1 µm thick and thus for practical purposes its thickness may be ignored.)
[0085] Figure 14 is a schematic cross-section, similar to that of Figure 13, but taken through
a display (generally designated 1400) produced by the overcoat layer process of the
present invention. The backplane 1302, electro-optic layer 1306, front electrode layer
1310, front substrate 1312 and CFA 1314 are all similar to the corresponding layers
in the prior art display 1300 shown in Figure 13. However, in Figure 14 the electro-optic
layer 1306 is coated directly on to the backplane 1302 so that the first adhesive
layer 1304 present in the display 1300 is eliminated. Furthermore, the second adhesive
layer 1308 in display 1300 is replaced in display 1400 by a much thinner adhesive
layer 1408 formed by polymerization of a solvent-free polymerizable liquid material.
The adhesive layer 1408 will typically have a thickness of only about 5 µm, thus reducing
the spacing between the CFA 1314 and the electro-optic layer 1306 to about 30 µm,
a 40 per cent reduction from the spacing in display 1300, with a corresponding reduction
in both illumination and viewing parallax, thus providing a wider viewing angle and
higher color saturation. In addition, the elimination from display 1400 of the first
adhesive layer 1304 in display 1300 increases the voltage drop across the electro-optic
layer and reduces blooming. The overcoat layer process of the present invention may
also be applied to black-and-white displays having a structure similar to that of
display 1400 but lacking the CFA 1314.
[0086] As already indicated, the present invention may also be applied to inherent color
displays, as illustrated in Figures 15 and 16. Figure 15 is a schematic cross-section
through a prior art display (generally designated 1500), which is generally similar
to the display 1300 shown in Figure 13 except that the electro-optic layer 1506 is
an inherent color electro-optic layer which is capable of displaying a range of colors
at every pixel of the display, as described, for example in
U.S. Patent No. 8,576,476, and the color filter array is omitted. Figure 16 shows a display 1600 produced by
the overcoat layer process of the present invention. As with the display 1400 described
above, in the display 1600 the first adhesive layer 1304 is omitted and the second
adhesive layer 1308 is replaced with a much thinner adhesive layer 1408 formed by
polymerization of a solvent-free polymerizable liquid material. As with the display
1400 described above, eliminating the first adhesive layer 1304 allows more of the
electric field applied to the display to reside within the electro-optic layer 1506,
resulting in a brighter white state and higher contrast ratio. In addition, micro
contrast will be greatly improved because blooming effects associated with the first
adhesive will be eliminated, thereby increasing color gamut and image sharpness.
[0087] The overcoat layer process of the present invention may include various optional
features. When the electro-optic layer is to be an encapsulated electrophoretic layer,
the capsule slurry used to apply the capsules to the backplane may include surfactants,
such as Triton X-100 or butanol, to improve wetting of the backplane. Prior to coating
of the electro-optic layer, the backplane may be pre-coated with surfactants, such
as Triton X-100 or butanol, or with a polyurethane latex. Alternatively or in addition,
the backplane may be pre-treated with plasma (including atmospheric plasma) or corona
discharge treatment. Such treatment may be effected at various power settings and
with various gases, including but not limited to oxygen, nitrogen etc. As previously
noted, in general it is preferred that the electro-optic layer in the overcoat layer
process be applied by spray coating, including electrostatic spray coating, but other
application techniques, such as slot die coating, blade coating and roll coating (including
flexo and gravure techniques) may also be used. When the electro-optic layer is to
be an encapsulated electrophoretic layer, the capsules are desirably in the form of
a slurry containing a polymeric binder, for example a polyurethane latex.
Example 2
[0088] An overcoat layer process of the present invention was carried out by depositing capsules
of an electrophoretic medium on to a backplane, overcoating the capsules with a solvent-free
polymerizable liquid material and adhering a front electrode layer/front substrate
(in the form of a poly(ethylene terephthalate) film coated on one surface with ITO)
to the electrophoretic medium by means of the polymerizable liquid material.
[0089] The spraying of the capsules on to an active matrix backplane was effected using the
spray coating process of the present invention and substantially as in Example 1 above
using an HVLP nozzle at a pressure of 20 psig (about 330 MNw m
-2) measured at the nozzle inlet, with a gravity feed of the capsule dispersion at a
mass flow rate of 25 to 35 g/min. The spray was directed vertically downward and deposition
took place at near normal incidence on to a horizontal substrate so as to avoid inclined
plane flow after deposition. The nozzle-to-substrate distance was 240 to 280 mm. The
target coating weight was 20 g/m
2. Multiple spray heads and higher dilution coating slurries may contribute to increased
coating uniformity.
[0090] The polymerizable liquid material used was formulated as follows (the various Sartomer
resins used are available from Sartomer Americas, Inc., Overland Park KS):
Sartomer SR 9087 |
44.55% by weight |
Sartomer SR 9038 |
14.85% by weight |
Sartomer CN 3108 |
39.6% by weight |
TPO diphenyl (2, 4, 6-trimethylbenzoyl) - phosphine oxide |
0.5% by wt. |
1-Hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone |
0.5% by weight. |
These components were combined and placed on a roll mill for at least eight hours
to ensure thorough mixing.
[0091] The displays were assembled as follows. A metal pan was covered with cardboard to
provide cushioning, and a sheet of plastic release sheet was placed on top of the
cardboard. The capsule-coated backplane was placed on this pan, and polyimide tape
was used to cover the contacts on the backplane. A PET/ITO film was cut to the size
of the backplane, placed over the capsule-coated backplane, and taped in place with
polyimide tape. A sheet of metalized release sheet was placed on top of the stack,
and the whole assembly moved to a laminator, with the roller closed just barely on
the glass of the backplane. The laminator was set to 20psi and 25ft/min (7.62 m/min)
to assure an ultraviolet-cured coating of the desired thickness. The PET/ITO was lifted
up, allowing a bead of the polymerizable liquid mixture to be placed as close as possible
to one edge of the PET/ITO film; the film was lifted for as long as possible while
the roller moves the polymerizable liquid mixture to the opposed edge of the backplane.
Finally, the metalized release film was removed and the polymerizable liquid mixture
cured. The tape used to cover the contacts on the backplane was removed, and use carbon
tape (or silver paste) applied to make electrical contact with the ITO layer. The
display thus produced was conditioned at 25°C and 50% relative humidity for 5 days,
then edge sealed with a hydrophobic UV curable polymer.
[0092] From the foregoing, it will be seen that the overcoat layer process of the present
invention enables higher white state brightness in both color and monochrome displays,
and increased color gamut in both inherent color and color filter array displays.