[0001] The given invention relates to chemical, petrochemical, coke-gas, energy and other
related industries, and can be used primarily for processing carbonaceous feedstock
to produce energy and process gases, particularly for gasification of carbonaceous
feedstock, synthesis gas production by means of partial oxidation of a flow containing
carbon.
[0002] Methods of producing synthesis gas by partial oxidation are well known in the technologies
currently used. Usually a flow containing carbon (hydrocarbon) such as coal, brown
coal, peat, wood, coke, soot or other types of gaseous, liquid or solid fuels, or
mixtures thereof, is partially burned in a gasification reactor, i.e. partially oxidized
using an oxygen-containing gas, such as pure oxygen or air, optionally enriched with
oxygen, etc., thus obtaining a product stream containing, among other things, synthesis
gas (i.e. CO and H2) and CO2.
[0003] Coal gasification technologies are mainly divided into three types: gas producers
with a fixed-bed, such as gas producers manufactured by Lurgi AG (Germany, Frankfurt
am Main) [1, pp.161-167], fluidized or fluidized bed gas producers implemented using
the U-GAS, Winkler technologies (USA, Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago) [1, pp.
167-173], and parallel flow gas producers, according to the Shell process (jointly
Shell and Uhde companies, Buggenum installation, Netherlands) [1, pp.189-191] and
Texaco (USA, Texaco GP, Cool Water and Polk installations) [1, pp.176-180].
[0004] Fixed-bed gas producers have drawbacks due to the low throughput capacity of a single
device and the need for expensive synthesis gas and water treatment systems. They
also have problems with operational safety.
[0005] Fluidized bed gas producers have low efficiency due to low carbon conversion, difficulties
with unloading dry bottom ash and high-volatile ash.
[0006] These disadvantages are dealt with when using the gasification process in a parallel
flow. Partial oxidation of almost all types of carbonaceous feedstock accompanied
by extraction of technical gases with specified properties can be carried out in gasification
devices in a parallel flow. In addition, such gas producers are small in size, and
can provide high efficiency in terms of the gasified feedstock.
[0007] The disadvantages of gasification process in a parallel flow include the following:
- 1. Gasification of any types of solid and liquid fuels in the parallel flow can be
effectively carried out only when they are finely dispersed, usually with a particle
size of less than 75 microns. At the same time, large fractions of feedstock particles
can significantly reduce efficiency of the process and quality of the produced gases.
- 2. In order to obtain technical gases with the highest possible hydrogen yield (water
gas, synthesis gas and their mixtures) during gasification of solid and liquid fuels,
it is necessary to use water vapour or oxygen vapour mixture for oxidation of feedstock,
which creates difficulties for ignition of the mixture while maintaining the required
optimal temperature of the process between 900-1100° C [2, p. 26-27, p.31].
[0008] There is another type of a gas producer operating according to the Koppers-Totzek
method [1, pp.174-176]. This method involves utilization of atmospheric pressure.
According to the Koppers-Totzek technology specially prepared crushed and dried fuel
enters the fuel storage bin, from where it is fed by dosing screws into mixing nozzles
and then into an ellipsoid reaction chamber which hosts from two to four burner mixing
nozzles located opposite each other. In the burner nozzles the pulverized fuel is
mixed with oxygen and water vapour in such a way that water vapour creates a steam
jacket on the outside of the carbon dioxide torch, thereby protecting the refractory
lining of the reaction chamber from slagging, erosion and exposure to high temperatures
inside the torch. Combustion temperature inside the torch is 1500-1700° C and its
level is maintained depending on the melting temperature of the ash. The ash in liquid
form is removed from the bottom of the reaction chamber into a special device where
it is cooled and granulated. The disadvantages of the given gasifier include:
- 1. Increased oxygen consumption compared to the other types of oxygen-vapour gas producers;
- 2. Small hydrogen yield due to high temperatures;
- 3. Decreased safety due to the fact that even minor deviations from the nominal mode
can lead to formation of an explosive concentration of gaseous products inside the
reaction chamber.
- 4. Strict requirements for structural materials used in construction of the gas producer
due to high process temperatures.
[0009] There is also the Destec method of coal gasification to enlarge the feedstock types
by switching from natural gas to coal, which was originally developed by Dow Chemical
[1, pp.180-183]. A two-stage in-line gas producer with liquid slag removal was developed
for coal gasification. Fuel is fed to the reactor in the form of a coal-water suspension
(coal / water = 60 / 40%) under high pressure generated by the pump. High-purity oxygen
(95%) produced by a special installation is used as a gasifying agent. The gas producer
operates at a pressure of 2.75 MPa and temperature of 1371°C. However, process temperature
depends on the type of utilized fuel and in case of presence of a more refractory
ash, process temperature increases due to liquid slag removal. The coal-water suspension
is fed into the lower part of the gas producer simultaneously mixing with oxygen.
Partial oxidation of coal occurs, thus providing endothermic reactions in thermal
energy gasification zone. The slag formed at the first stage is removed into a water
bath and then used in construction. The crude producer gas enters the upper lined
part of the reactor, where a coal-water suspension is additionally added. In this
part, the reaction of fresh fuel with the producer gas obtained at the first stage
of the process takes place. At the second stage, the combustion temperature of the
producer gas increases, and the ongoing endothermic reactions contribute to its cooling
to a temperature of about 1038°C.
[0010] The disadvantages of this gas producer include:
- 1. Technological problems stemming from utilization of coal-water suspension;
- 2. Small hydrogen yield due to high temperatures and high pressures;
- 3. Large yield of carbon dioxide CO2 compared to other direct-flow gasifiers (i.e. it yields less caloric gas than its
analogues);
- 4. Strict requirements for structural materials used in construction of the gas producer
stemming from high process temperatures.
- 5. Utilization of highly purified oxygen as a gasifying agent.
[0011] The "PRENFLO" (PRessurized Entrained-FLOw) process with vapour production (PSG) by
Thyssenkrupp AG [1, pp.183-186] is used under increased pressure with any type of
solid fuel (coal, petroleum coke, biomass). The process is based on the Koppers-Totzek
technology. The prepared fuel is gasified at a pressure of about 4 MPa in the gas
producer.
[0012] The gasification temperature is higher than the melting point of the ash (1400-1600°
C) which allows for liquid slag removal. The advantage of this process is the dry
supply of fuel which is the feedstock of gasification. Finely dispersed coal (80%
of volume smaller than 0.1 mm) is fed together with oxygen and vapour through four
burners installed in the same horizontal plane at the bottom of the gas producer.
The disadvantages of this gas producer include:
- 1. Small hydrogen yield due to high temperatures and pressure (in the chemical industry,
it is used only when elevated hydrogen concentration in the process gas is not required);
- 2. High temperature and pressure cause strict requirements for the materials used
in the construction of the gas producer and significant financial costs for its production.
[0013] There is also a carbon-containing feedstock gasifier (RU No. 2237079, IPC C10J3/20,
issued in 27.09.2004) which is another type of carbonaceous feedstock gas producer
and can be used in chemical, petrochemical, coke-gas, energy and other related industries
for processing carbonaceous feedstock to produce energy and process gases. The gasifier
contains a vertical gasification chamber, a burner with nozzles for supplying carbonaceous
feedstock and oxygen-containing gas, a manifold for supplying water vapour, nozzles
for supplying pulverized carbonaceous feedstock, a pipe for removing gasification
products (in the lower part of the gasification chamber), a slag removal chamber.
It is also equipped with a special unit consisting of a burner placed in the center
of the block above the gasification chamber, and injectors located around the burner
on the periphery of the block above the gasification chamber to create a steam curtain
to protect the coating of gasification chamber from overheating. The gasification
chamber is a cylindrical pipe ending with a conical slag removal chamber while the
gasification chamber is conditionally divided into oxidizing and reduction parts.
The process in the oxidation zone is carried out at a temperature of 1500-3000°C,
and in the reduction zone by vapour supply, the temperature drops to 1000-1600°C.
[0014] The disadvantages of this gas producer include:
- 1. Small hydrogen yield due to high temperatures;
- 2. Reduced thermal efficiency of the device when using a gasifier as a source of thermal
energy, since the presence of free hydrogen and a large amount of carbon monoxide
indicate incomplete combustion.
- 3. Placement of the gas outlet pipe in the lower part of the gasification chamber
leads to the insertion of significant amounts of slag and ash into the flues gas ducts
and gas distribution system, which can lead to a short life span of the gasifier.
[0015] There is also a gasification method performed by the PRENFLO PDQ gas producer by
Thyssenkrupp AG [1, pp.186-189] which is considered to be the closest analogue of
its predecessor PRENFLO PSG functioning according to the Koppers-Totzek process. In
this gas producer, fine coal dust is gasified in a mixture of oxygen and water vapour
in a vertical oxidation chamber at a temperature of 1400-1600°C. Oxidation of coal
actually occurs under adiabatic conditions, as the oxidation chamber is made in a
form of a channel mounted coaxially to the outer wall of the gas producer separated
from the outer wall by an annular space washed by coal oxidation products, which maintains
the temperature in the oxidation chamber close to 1400-1600°C. The supply of coal
dust and a mixture of oxygen and water vapour is carried out through 4 horizontal
burners in the upper part of the oxidation chamber. The oxidation chamber merges into
rapid water cooling chamber into which water is injected through vants located along
the ring in the cooling chamber, cooling the oxidation products to a temperature of
200 - 250°C.
[0016] The closest to the proposed device is the gas producer [1, pp.186-189] employing
the specified method-prototype containing a manifold for feeding water vapour and
oxygen to the burners, a manifold for feeding a gas-coal mixture to the burners, an
oxidation chamber that passes into a rapid water cooling chamber which is a cylindrical
pipe coaxially arranged inside the gas producer housing ending with a conical slag
removal chamber. There is an annular gap between the slag removal chamber and the
central pipe of the rapid cooling chamber through which the raw oxidation generator
gas and water vapour exit the cooling chamber then rise along the inter-wall gap between
the cooling chamber pipe and the gas producer housing and exit the gas producer into
the pipe for removal of gasification products for further processing.
[0017] A sharp change in the movement of the gas flow in the rapid cooling chamber, leading
to the fact that the movement of gases downwards after the passage of the slit gap
between the pipe of the cooling chamber and the slag removal chamber changes into
an upward movement, allows separating a significant amount of slag and ash with their
insertion into the conical slag removal chamber. The slag removal chamber is connected
to the slag removal system.
[0018] Slag from the gasifier can be used as a building material.
[0019] The disadvantages of this gas producer include:
- 1. Small hydrogen yield due to high temperatures and pressure (in the chemical industry
these gas producers are used only when elevated hydrogen concentration in the process
gas is not required). Total hydrogen is not more than 22-32% (as for all direct-flow
gas producers based on Koppers-Totzek technology (Shell-Koppers process)), whereas
for Lurgi layered gas producers the hydrogen concentration in dry gas is 36-40%, for
Winkler fluidized bed gas producers [1, pp.169-170] the hydrogen concentration lies
within 35-45% [4, p.30].
- 2. High temperature and pressure cause strict requirements for the materials used
in the construction of the gas producer and significant financial costs for its production.
- 3. Increased specific oxygen consumption per 1 ton of gasified coal for all direct-flow
gas producers based on Koppers-Totzek technology is 540-650 m3, whereas for Lurgi layer gas producers it is 220-300 m3, and for Winkler fluidized bed gas generators it is 350 m3 [4, pp. 30-33].
- 4. To ensure stable ignition and maintain stable combustion of the mixture, in addition
to increased oxygen consumption, a horizontal arrangement of burners is used in the
oxidation chamber, which does not allow reducing the process temperature to temperatures
of 900-11000C (optimal synthesis gas production temperatures), because at such temperatures (900-1100°C)
the ash of the majority of coal types is in the solid phase, which means that it can
accumulate on the walls of the combustion chamber which leads to its slagging and
further failure of the gas producer.
- 5. Too rapid cooling of gases to a temperature of 200-250°C does not allow obtaining
additional hydrogen by the reaction:
CO + H2O = CO2 + H2 + 10300 kcal., (1)
as even at a temperature of 800°C, the degree of decomposition of water vapour decreases
by an order of magnitude compared to 1000°C, and for the same residence and contact
time in 1 sec, the degree of conversion of water vapour at 800°C will be only 0.5%
of the conversion at 1000°C [2, p.29]. This means that at lower temperatures there
will be no reaction at all, which is confirmed by an increase in the equilibrium constant
of this reaction (1) at 500°C by 100 times compared to 1000° C [3, p. 102].
[0020] The main objective of the invention is to create an effective method of gasification
in a parallel flow of carbonaceous feedstock such as coal, brown coal, peat, wood,
coke, soot or other types of gaseous, liquid or solid fuels, or mixtures thereof by
partial oxidation of carbonaceous feedstock in a mixture of oxygen-containing gas
and water vapour and a device for its implementation in order to obtain the maximum
possible hydrogen yield during gasification of carbonaceous feedstock.
[0021] The technical result of the claimed invention is the production of producer gas with
increased hydrogen concentration. What is more, the ignition stability is achieved
and the necessary partial oxidation temperature is maintained.
[0022] The proposed technical result is achieved due to the fact that in the known method
of gasification of carbonaceous feedstock, including partial oxidation of carbonaceous
feedstock in an oxidation chamber in a mixture of oxygen-containing gas and water
vapour, partial oxidation is carried out in a partial oxidation channel coaxially
mounted in the oxidation chamber, and the supply of water vapour for partial oxidation
of carbonaceous feedstock is carried out at the input and output of the partial oxidation
channel of the combustion chamber.
[0023] It is most efficient to carry out partial oxidation in the flow of a mixture of oxygen
and water vapour in the partial oxidation channel of the oxidation chamber at a temperature
of 900-1100
0C which is provided by changing the volume of vapour at the input to the partial oxidation
channel.
[0024] It is advisable to maintain a temperature within 800-1000
0C at the output of the partial oxidation channel of the oxidation chamber, which is
provided by changing the volume of vapour at the output of the partial oxidation channel.
[0025] It is advisable to ignite the mixture of carbonaceous feedstock and the vapour-oxygen
mixture and maintain their stable combustion by feeding the combustion products to
the input of the partial oxidation channel from the burner device installed along
the axis of the partial oxidation channel.
[0026] It is preferable to choose longer residence time of combustion products in the oxidation
channel than the combustion time of the biggest particle of feedstock.
[0027] The size dimensions of the partial oxidation channel are optimally chosen based on
the ratio:

where
L - the length of partial oxidation channel;
D - the diameter of the partial oxidation channel;
G - the mass entry of oxidation products into the partial oxidation channel;
Tb - the combustion temperature of the biggest particle of carbonaceous feedstock;
to - the calculated temperature of oxidation products in the partial oxidation channel;
ρ(to) - the calculated density of oxidation products in the partial oxidation channel.
[0028] Solid fuels in the form of coal, brown coal, peat, wood, coke, soot, or gaseous and
liquid fuels, or mixtures thereof can be used as carbonaceous feedstock.
[0029] The technical result is also achieved by the fact that the well-known gas producer
for gasification of carbonaceous feedstock, containing a housing, a burner device,
a vertical oxidation chamber, manifolds for supply of carbonaceous feedstock, water
vapour and oxygen-containing gas, a pipe for discharging gasification products, a
slag removal chamber, additionally contains a partial oxidation channel which is coaxially
mounted in a vertical oxidation chamber and attached to the upper inner part of the
housing in which the burner device is installed.
[0030] For the best result the upper part of the housing is made in the form of a removable
lid in which a burner device is installed.
[0031] The pipe for discharging gasification products can be installed in the side of the
gas producer housing, closer to the upper part of the gas producer.
[0032] It is optimal to make gas producer for gasification of carbonaceous feedstock containing
upper and lower vapour manifolds made in the form of hollow rings connected by downpipes,
the axes of which are parallel to the axis of the outer housing, while the upper collector
is mounted on the outside of the gas producer lid, the downpipes are placed on the
outside of the partial oxidation channel, and the lower vapour manifold is located
at the output of the oxidation channel and is equipped with vents for vapour to exit
into the flow of partial oxidation products.
[0033] It is optimal to perform the burner device in the form of a diffusion burner equipped
with annular channels located coaxially around the diffusion burner and made with
the possibility of supplying oxygen-containing gas, carbonaceous feedstock and water
vapour to the annular channels.
[0034] It is reasonable to make the inner walls of the oxidation chamber in the form of
a coil the upper output of which is connected to the upper vapour manifold through
the hot vapour distribution unit, and the lower output is connected to an external
water vapour producer.
[0035] The inner walls of the oxidation chamber can be made in the form of coaxially arranged
toroid-shaped containers that provide the possibility of supplying water vapour from
below the oxidation chamber to the gas producer lid.
[0036] The partial oxidation channel can be made with external thermal insulation.
[0037] The proposed method of gasification of carbonaceous feedstock such as coal, brown
coal, peat, wood, coke, soot or other types of gaseous, liquid or solid hydrocarbon
fuels, or mixtures thereof as well as the device for its implementation are unknown
from the prior art, therefore the proposed solutions satisfy the condition of patentability
of the invention referred to as 'the novelty'.
[0038] Analysis of the state of the art for compliance of the proposed solutions with the
patentability condition of the invention referred to as 'the inventive level' showed
the following.
[0039] In the proposed method of gasification of carbonaceous feedstock such as coal, brown
coal, peat, wood, coke, soot or other types of gaseous, liquid or solid fuels, or
mixtures thereof by partial oxidation in a mixture of oxygen-containing gas and water
vapour in order to maximize the production of hydrogen, in contrast to the traditional
devices, the oxidation process is divided into 2 stages: first, partial oxidation
is carried out under adiabatic conditions in a thermally insulated oxidation channel
at optimal temperatures of 900-1100
0C in a flow of oxygen and water vapour mixture, and then the resulting gases are further
oxidized at the output of the partial oxidation channel only by water vapour with
the temperature in this zone being maintained within the optimal temperature range
of 800-1000°C. In the proposed device for implementing the proposed oxidation method,
in contrast to analogues, all processes are carried out under conditions that exclude
a sharp increase in pressure in the reaction zones. In addition, the proposed method
allows for stable ignition and combustion in the resulting two-phase flow both on
the surface of the particle and in the gas phase, due to the stable supply of additional
thermal energy from combustion products coming from the built-in burner device in
which liquid or gaseous fuel is burned. The combustion products from the burner device
enter the partial oxidation channel along the axis of the channel mixing with carbonaceous
feedstock and a vapour oxygen mixture.
[0040] At the same time, the ignition stability and maintenance of the required temperature
in the oxidation channel is supported by the supply of thermal energy from the burner
device built in the upper part of the gas producer housing when burning any fuel regardless
of the type of carbonaceous feedstock entering the gas producer for oxidation, for
example, with the help of air oxygen, unlike the prototype and other traditional methods
in which stabilization is maintained by means of high oxygen consumption for burning
part of the oxidized carbonaceous feedstock with obtaining high temperatures of 1400-1600°C
and a pressure of 27-40 atm in them, and as a result, with a small hydrogen yield.
Conducting the process under optimal conditions and temperatures for gasification
allows, in contrast to the prototype where the burners are mounted across the vertical
axis of the gas producer, which leads to high temperatures when combustion product
flows collide, using inexpensive materials with significantly lower material consumption
and heat resistance in the design of the gas producer. Consequently, the proposed
group of inventions satisfies the condition referred to as "the inventive level".
[0041] The proposed method and device for gasification of carbonaceous feedstock are illustrated
by drawings, where
Fig. 1 presents the overall scheme of the gas producer for gasification of carbonaceous
feedstock;
Fig. 2 depicts the section scheme of the gas producer;
Fig. 3 presents the scheme of the burner device of the gas producer;
Fig. 4 presents the schematic diagram of the gas producer with a coil for heating
vapour and cooling the housing wall;
Fig. 5 presents the schematic diagram of the gas producer with a set of toroid-shaped
containers for heating vapour and cooling the wall of the gas producer.
[0042] The proposed gas producer for gasification of carbonaceous feedstock contains a housing
1, an oxidation chamber 2, a housing lid 3 (Fig. 1), a burner device 4 (fig. 4) with
a diffusion burner 7, oxygen supply pipes 5 and a mixture of water vapour and carbonaceous
feedstock 6, a pipe 8 for discharging generator gases, a partial oxidation channel
9 with thermal insulation 10, with a vapour supply manifold 12 into the space at the
output of the oxidation channel 9, as well as downpipes 13, (fig. 2) supplying vapour
from the upper vapour manifold 14 to the vapour supply manifold 12. A slag removal
chamber 11 is installed in the lower part of the housing.
[0043] Fig. 2 presents the A-A section (Fig. 1) of the gas producer, which shows a variant
of arrangement of the vapour supply vants 15 in the vapour supply manifold 12. Fig.
3 shows a diagram of the burner device 4 with a built-in diffusion burner 7 with an
air supply channel 16, with a fuel supply channel 17 (for example, fuel oil or gas
fuel), with ignition electrodes 18, a mixing diffuser 19, with an oxygen supply channel
20 and a vapour supply channel 21. Fig. 4 shows a diagram of the gas producer according
to Fig. 1, supplemented by a coil 22 for heating vapour and cooling the thermal insulation
of the wall of the gas producer housing 1, a vapour input pipe 23 into the coil 22,
a vapour distribution unit 24 into the vapour mixing unit with carbonaceous feedstock
25 and into the manifold 14, a coal supply pipe 26 into the mixing unit 25. Fig. 5
shows a diagram of the gas producer according to Fig. 1, supplemented by toroid-shape
tanks 27 for heating vapour and cooling the thermal insulation of the wall of the
gas producer housing 1, a vapour input pipe 23 into the coil 22, a vapour distribution
unit 24 into the vapour mixing unit with carbonaceous feedstock 25 and into the manifold
14, a coal supply pipe 26, U-tubes 28 connecting toroid-shaped containers 27 among
themselves.
[0044] The proposed method and gas producer work as follows.
[0045] Wet vapour enters the coil 22 through the nozzle 23 (Fig. 4) where it is heated by
the outgoing producer gases through the pipe 8 discharging producer gases. Through
the coil 22, vapour enters the vapour distribution node 24, where it is divided into
2 flows. Part of the vapour enters the mixing unit 25, where the vapour picks up fine
carbonaceous feedstock for example, coal dust coming through the nozzle 26, and the
resulting coal-vapour mixture enters through the nozzle 6 (an ejection device or a
sluice (not shown in the drawing)) into the burner device. The burner device is a
combined burner 4 (Fig.3) in the center of which there is a diffusion burner 7 for
burning liquid or gaseous fuel in the air. The combustion products of the diffusion
burner with a temperature of 1500-2000°C create the centre of the gas stream whirled
by the mixing diffuser 19 of the burner 7 mixing the oxygen flows entering through
the nozzle 5 into the channel 20 and the vapour-coal mixture entering through the
nozzle 6 into the channel 21.
[0046] In order to obtain the maximum possible amount of hydrogen during gasification of
hydrocarbon particles in a parallel flow it is essential to solve several complex
tasks, production of producer gas by an endothermic chemical reaction in particular
C + H2O = CO + H2 - 31700 kcal (2)
with a significant loss of thermal energy simultaneously with burning up part of carbonaceous
particles in oxygen (in the total flow of vapour and oxygen-containing gas) and maintaining
the process temperature in the range of 900-1100
0C.
[0047] In order to obtain the required result it is necessary to perform the process at
low pressure (for instance, the pressure close to the atmospheric one), then, according
to the Le Chatelier principle, the process according to (2) will be shifted to the
right. The principle of Le Chatelier establishes that in case of an outside impact
on a system in a state of equilibrium by means of a change in one of the factors determining
the equilibrium, the direction of the process which weakens such impact in the system
increases. Since the reaction (2) produces 2 moles of gas (CO and H2 instead of one
mole of H2O) with an increase in pressure as a result of an increase in the volume
of gases, then by decreasing the pressure in the reactor, it is possible to force
the system to return to equilibrium, accelerating the reaction (2) with production
of CO and H2 gases. Conversely, when the pressure in the reactor increases the pressure
in the system decreases due to slowing down reaction (2). Technically, this means
that it is necessary to prevent an increase in pressure during oxidation process,
i.e. it is necessary to prevent an increase in gas dynamic resistances to the movement
of the gas flow. Consequently, the design of the channels through which the oxidation
products move should not have sharp constrictions and the combustion of carbonaceous
particles should preferably be carried out during movement in the flow and not in
a closed chamber.
[0048] To maintain the necessary temperature, it is rational to burn a part of carbon in
oxygen according to the reaction
C + O2 = CO2 + 94300 kcal (3)
which happens almost instantly at 1000°C, but when the temperature decreases its speed
decreases too [1, p.24]. However, to maintain the reaction (2) a significant amount
of water vapour is used and it takes away thermal power and the heat input from the
reaction (3) occurs gradually while the particles burn up. Therefore, it is rational
to divide the water vapour into 2 parts where the first part of the vapour enters
through the burner device, and the second part used for partial oxidation of feedstock
enters the flow of partial oxidation products at the output of the oxidation channel
after burning up of carbonaceous feedstock into the space between the vertical wall
of the gas producer housing and the wall of the oxidation channel. In addition, the
division of water vapour supply makes it possible to conduct a controlled reaction
at the output of the oxidation channel
CO + H2O = CO2 + H2 + 10300 kcal according to formula (1)
with an increase in hydrogen in producer gas. As the reaction (1) is exothermic, the
temperature increase will lead to the shift of equilibrium to the left (i.e. towards
the feedstock) according to the Le Chatelier principle. However, for this reaction
the limit is the temperature of 1000°C (it is proved by the equilibrium constant dynamics
[3, p.102] and experimental data [2, p.30]). It means that the supply of water vapour
at the output of the oxidation channel will allow the reaction (1) to develop and
reduce the gases temperature to 700-800°C preventing it from rising above 900-1000°C.
Therefore, it is optimal to maintain the temperature at the output of the oxidation
channel in the range of 800-1000
0C.
[0049] To complete the oxidation-reduction reactions (2) in the partial oxidation channel,
its size dimensions (diameter and length) must ensure that the burning particle stays
in the channel at least for as long as its burnup time (significantly increasing thermal
efficiency of the process) which critically depends on the size of the burned particle.
For example, an anthracite particle with a diameter of 100 microns burns up in oxygen
for 7.1 seconds, but a particle with a diameter of 50 microns burns up for 0.413 seconds
[3, p.210]. Knowing the particle size of the gasified feedstock and its hourly consumption,
it is easy to calculate the size dimensions of the oxidation channel.
[0050] The most important condition for the stable operation of a gas producer with particle
in flow gasification is stable ignition and combustion in the resulting two-phase
flow, where combustion occurs both on the surface of the particle and in the gas phase.
For the stability of the process it is important for the flame propagation velocity
to be higher than the two-phase flow velocity, otherwise the flame will fail and the
oxidation process will stop. In well-known gas producers of flow-line gasification
including the closest analogue of the "PRENFLO" PDQ this problem is solved in the
following way. They increase the combustion rate of coal particles increasing the
pressure and temperature of the process by means of increasing the oxygen supply and
burning more coal according to reaction (3). In addition, they increase the residence
time of particles in the reactor by arranging the burners perpendicular to the flow.
What is essential in the design of the prototype is that the increase in pressure
in the oxidation chamber is achieved by narrowing at the output of the oxidation chamber
in the form of a rocket nozzle which innately requires liquid slag removal and high
temperatures because otherwise the narrowing channel will be quickly slagged.
[0051] In the proposed device, this problem is solved differently. In order to obtain a
permanent ignition source and stabilize the partial oxidation process the burner device,
preferably embedded in the lid of the gas producer, is a combined diffusion burner
in the center of which along the axis the actual diffusion burner for burning gaseous
or liquid fuel is embedded. It is equipped with annular channels arranged coaxially
around the built-in diffusion burner designed with the possibility of supplying oxygen-containing
gas, carbonaceous feedstock and water vapour to these annular channels. It means the
source of additional heat for igniting the mixture and maintaining a stable oxidation
process in the proposed method is the heat of the combustion products of liquid or
gaseous fuel fed along the flow of the reacting oxygen vapour mixture and carbonaceous
feedstock. Such a scheme of combustion process allows obtaining a stable ignition
of the two-phase flow and maintaining its combustion until there is stable heat generation
according to reaction (3) and compensating for heat losses in the reaction of carbon
and carbon monoxide with water vapour. Thermodynamic calculations of variants of such
process show that the power of such a built-in burner comprises 10-25% of the power
of the carbon burned by the reaction (3) and it is sufficient for organizing a stable
process with an inflow temperature not exceeding 1100
0C.
[0052] Thus, the proposed method allows for stable ignition and combustion in the resulting
two-phase flow both on the surface of the particle and in the gas phase due to the
stable supply of additional thermal energy from combustion products coming from an
integrated burner device in which liquid or gaseous fuel is burned. The combustion
products from the burner device enter the partial oxidation channel along the axis
of the channel, mixing with carbonaceous feedstock and oxygen vapour mixture.
[0053] Adjustment of flow rates of vapour, coal and oxygen in the oxidation channel 9 (Fig.
4) helps to set the temperature of 900-1100° C monitored by thermal sensors (not shown
in the drawings). The second part of the vapour from the distribution unit 25 through
the pipes 13 enters the vapour supply manifold 12 and through the vents 15 is fed
into the space at the output of the oxidation channel 9, where carbon monoxide is
oxidized to carbon dioxide to produce hydrogen. The calculated amount of vapour should
in total provide cooling to a temperature not higher than 900-1000°C to prevent reverse
reactions according to formula (1). The resulting producer gases are fed through the
producer gas output pipe 8 for cooling and purification and further processing (for
example, for organic synthesis or to a membrane separator with further supply of the
resulting hydrogen for coal hydrogenation). The bulk of the slag and ash formed as
a result of coal combustion enters the slag removal chamber 11. They are disposed
of by the system afterwards.
Description of a real case
[0054]
- 1. To produce hydrogen for the coal hydrogenation plant, a prototype gas producer
was built according to the scheme of Fig. 5 for partial oxidation of coal. The characteristics
of raw coal type were determined: average ash content - 12%; moister content - 8%;
carbon content in the organic matter of coal (COM) - 77%; hydrogen content in COM
- 5%. The raw coal was crushed, dried in a drum dryer and finely ground on a crusher
with a particle size of less than 100 microns (80% of particles with a size of less
than 50 microns). The consumption of dry coal was 1 ton per hour.
- 2. An oxygen extraction unit with a capacity of 300 m3 per hour or 390 kg per hour was chosen as an oxygen source.
- 3. The volume of the amount of water for the oxidation of coal and the proportions
of the distribution of vapour volumes through the burner and manifold at the output
of the oxidation channel were selected from thermodynamic calculations of thermal
balances of chemical oxidation and reduction reactions. As a diffusion burner built
into the burner device a fuel oil burner with a thermal capacity of 200 kW was used.
The burner can burn 20 kg of fuel oil in 20x10.8 = 216 m3/hour of air or 276.5 kg/hour of air during a 60-minute period.
- 4. Up to 150 kg of vapour per hour were supplied to the input of the partial oxidation
channel through the burner device. The calculated temperature of the combustion products
at the output of the partial oxidation channel was 952°C which fits into the optimal
temperature limit of 900-1100°C.
- 5. Vapour supply from the manifold (pos.12, Fig.5) was carried out through 3 rows
of vents with a spray angle between the rows of vents equal to 120°. The volume of
vapour coming through the manifold (pos.12 Fig.5) was 250-300 kg per hour.
[0055] The regulation of vapour volumes entering through the burner device and through the
manifold was carried out according to the data of the three temperature sensors built
in at the output of the oxidation channel and data from temperature sensors built
into the annular gap between the oxidation channel and the gas producer housing 20
cm above the output of the oxidation channel (3 pcs).
[0056] The selection of size dimensions of the partial oxidation channel (pos.9, Fig.6)
was determined by the residence time of combustion products in the oxidation channel.
This value should preferably be longer than the combustion time of the biggest particle
of the feedstock. Coal dust with particle size of up to 50 microns (80%) and up to
80-90 microns (20%) was fed to the gas producer. The combustion time of a particle
with the size of 50 microns was 0.41 seconds, and with the size of 100 microns - 7
seconds. Under the condition of the complete reaction of coal in the oxygen vapour
flow about 826 liters of gases were obtained at a temperature of 1000
0C per second. When selecting the diameter for the partial oxidation channel of 0.85
meters and the length of the oxidation chamber of 6 meters, the residence time of
the particles in the oxidation chamber was 7.9 seconds, which exceeded the theoretical
combustion time of a coal particle of the biggest size.
[0057] The composition of gases (dry) under the mode with maximum hydrogen yield averaged
in volume %:
H2 - 52.3%,
N2 - 10.0%,
CO - 12.4%,
CO2 - 25.3%.
[0058] Oxygen consumption per 1 ton of dry coal was 300 m
3 per hour, vapour consumption per 1 ton of dry coal was 370 - 430 kg.
[0059] From the information source [4, p.31] describing the prototype installation according
to the Shell-Coppers technology, the following average indicators are revealed:
H2 - 25.6%
CO - 65.6%
CO2 - 0.8%
CH4 - 8.0%
[0060] The oxygen consumption was 644 m
3 per ton of dry coal, and the vapour consumption was only about 100 kg per ton of
dry coal. It is obvious that the hydrogen yield according to the proposed method and
device is 2 times higher than that of the prototype, oxygen consumption is 2 times
lower. The process temperature is lower (1100° C) too, compared to the prototype in
which the process takes place at a temperature of 1400-1600°C. In the proposed device
the water vapour consumption is almost 4 times higher, but the elevated hydrogen yield
is precisely determined by decomposition of water.
[0061] The given example of a specific implementation of the claimed method and device for
its implementation shows that in the installation of the proposed gas producer, the
results obtained on the hydrogen yield significantly exceed the hydrogen yield indicators
compared to the prototype. At the same time, the total consumption of water vapour
for partial oxidation of coal was 370-430 kg per 1 ton of coal. Oxygen consumption
was 300 m
3 per ton of coal. The total yield of hydrogen was about 65 kg per hour, while in the
prototype it is about 32 kg per hour.
[0062] The proposed invention can find wide application in gasification of carbonaceous
feedstock, due to ensuring efficient gasification in a parallel flow of carbonaceous
feedstock, such as coal, brown coal, peat, wood, coke, soot or other types of gaseous,
liquid or solid fuels, or mixtures thereof in order to obtain producer gas with the
highest possible hydrogen concentration. At the same time, the required parameters
of the produced gas are easily regulated by changing the flow rates of oxygen, vapour,
gasified feedstock and the power of the built-in burner.
[0063] The gas producer can be used in the chemical, carbon and petrochemical industries
(ammonia, methanol, synthetic fuels, etc.), coke and gas, energy and other related
industries for processing carbonaceous feedstock to produce energy and gases. Elevated
concentration of hydrogen in the technical gases produced in the proposed device will
allow efficiently disposing of heavy oil residues at oil refineries together with
producing high-quality motor fuels. For the coal chemical industry the proposed device
can become the main basic device for chemical processing of coal. Such device is equally
essential both for processing coal by hydrogenation and for obtaining synthesis gas
from coal.
Reference list:
List of terms
[0065]
1. Housing
2. Oxidation chamber
3. Gas producer lid
4. Burner device
5. Oxygen supply pipe
6. Pipe for supplying a mixture of water vapour and carbonaceous feedstock
7. Built-in diffusion burner
8. Pipe for the discharge of producer gases
9. Partial oxidation channel
10. Thermal insulation of the oxidation channel
11. Slag removal chamber
12. Lower vapour manifold
13. Downpipes
14. Upper vapour manifold
15. Vapour supply vents in the manifold
16 Air supply channel
17. Fuel supply channel
18. Ignition electrodes
19. Mixing diffuser
20. Oxygen supply channel
21. Vapour supply channel
22. Vapour heating coil
23. Vapour input pipe into the coil
24. Vapour supply distribution unit
25. Vapour mixing unit with carbonaceous feedstock
26. Coal supply pipe to the mixing unit
27. Toroid-shaped containers for vapour heating
28. U-tubes for connecting toroid-shaped containers
1. The method of gasification of carbonaceous feedstock, including partial oxidation
of carbonaceous feedstock in an oxidation chamber in a mixture of oxygen-containing
gas and water vapour characterized in that partial oxidation is carried out in a partial oxidation channel which is mounted
coaxially in a vertical oxidation chamber, and water vapour supply for partial oxidation
of carbonaceous feedstock is carried out at the input and output of the partial oxidation
channel of the oxidation chamber.
2. The method, as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that partial oxidation is carried out in the flow of the oxygen-containing gas and water
vapour mixture in the partial oxidation channel of the oxidation chamber at a temperature
of 900-11000C which is maintained by changing the volume of vapour at the output of the partial
oxidation channel.
3. The method as claimed in claim 1 characterized in that at the output of the partial oxidation channel of the oxidation chamber the temperature
is maintained within 800-1000°C which is provided by changing the volume of vapour
at the output of the partial oxidation channel.
4. The method as claimed in claim 1 characterized in that the ignition of the carbonaceous feedstock and vapour-oxygen mixture and maintenance
of their stable combustion is carried out by feeding the combustion products to the
input of the partial oxidation channel from the burner device mounted coaxially in
the partial oxidation channel.
5. The method as claimed in claim 1 characterized in that the residence time of combustion products in the oxidation channel is longer than
the biggest feedstock particle's combustion time.
6. The method as claimed in claim 1
characterized in that the size dimensions of the partial oxidation channel are chosen based on the ratio:

where
L - the length of the partial oxidation channel;
D - the diameter of the partial oxidation channel;
G - the mass arrival of oxidation products into the partial oxidation channel;
Tb - the combustion temperature of the biggest particle of carbonaceous feedstock;
t0 - the calculated temperature of oxidation products in the partial oxidation channel;
ρ(t0) - the calculated density of oxidation products in the partial oxidation channel.
7. The method as claimed in claim 1 characterized in that solid fuels in the form of coal, brown coal, peat, wood, coke, soot or gaseous and
liquid fuels, or mixtures thereof, are used as carbonaceous feedstock.
8. The gas producer comprising a housing, a burner device, a vertical oxidation chamber,
manifolds for supplying carbonaceous feedstock, water vapour and oxygen-containing
gas, a pipe for discharging gasification products, a slag removal chamber, is peculiar
for the fact that the partial oxidation channel is additionally introduced into it.
The channel is arranged coaxially in the vertical oxidation chamber and is attached
to the upper internal part of the housing in which the burner device is installed.
9. The gas producer as claimed in claim 1 characterized in that the upper part of the housing is made in the form of a removable lid, into which
the burner device is installed.
10. The gas producer as claimed in claim 1 characterized in that the pipe for discharge of gasification products is installed in the side piece of
the gas producer housing closer to the upper part of the gas producer.
11. The gas producer as claimed in claim 1 characterized in that it contains upper and lower vapour manifolds made in the form of hollow rings connected
by downpipes, the axes of which are parallel to the axis of the outer housing, though
the upper manifold is installed on the outer part of the gas producer lid, the downpipes
are installed on the outer side of the partial oxidation channel, and the lower vapour
manifold is located at the output of the oxidation channel and is provided with vents
to send vapour into the flow of partial oxidation products.
12. The gas producer as claimed in claim 1 characterized in that the burner device is made in the form of a diffusion burner equipped with annular
channels arranged coaxially around the diffusion burner and made with the possibility
of supplying oxygen-containing gas, carbonaceous feedstock and water vapour to the
annular channels.
13. The gas producer as claimed in claim 1 characterized in that the inner walls of the oxidation chamber are made in the form of a coil, the upper
output of which is connected to the upper vapour manifold through the hot vapour distribution
unit, and the lower output is connected to an external water vapour generator.
14. The gas producer as claimed in claim 1 characterized in that the inner walls of the oxidation chamber are made in the form of coaxially arranged
toroid-shaped containers made with the possibility of supplying water vapour from
below the oxidation chamber to the lid of the gas producer.
15. The gas producer as claimed in claim 1 characterized in that the partial oxidation channel is made with external thermal insulation.