Technical Field
[0001] The present disclosure relates to an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet
having excellent yield strength and bending properties, and a method for manufacturing
the same, and more particularly, to an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet
having excellent yield strength and bending properties, which can be used as a structural
member for automobiles such as a member, a seat rail, a pillar, and the like, and
a method for manufacturing the same.
Background Art
[0002] Recently, as safety regulations for passengers and pedestrians have been strengthened,
as provision of safety devices is mandatory, and there is a problem in that a weight
of a vehicle body increases, as opposed to weight reductions improving fuel efficiency
of the vehicle. Consumers are increasingly interested in hybrid and electric vehicles
that are eco-friendly and have high fuel efficiency. In order to produce such eco-friendly
and safe vehicles, it is necessary to reduce the weight of structures of the vehicle
body and to secure stability of a material of the vehicle body. However, a hybrid
vehicle has been provided with various devices such as an electric engine, an electric
battery, and a secondary fuel storage tank as well as a conventional gasoline engine.
In addition, as driver convenience facilities are continuously added, the weight of
the vehicle body is increasing. Accordingly, in order to realize weight reduction
of the vehicle body, it is essential to develop a material which is thin yet has excellent
strength, ductility, and bending properties. Therefore, in order to solve these problems,
it is necessary to develop a giga-grade steel sheet capable of securing high strength
having a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more and high ductility.
[0003] Meanwhile, as regulations for impact stability of automobiles have expanded, a high-strength
steel having excellent yield strength is being employed as a material of structural
members such as a member, a seat rail, a pillar, and the like, for improving impact
resistance of a vehicle body. The structural member has a characteristic that is advantageous
in absorbing impact energy as a yield strength compared to a tensile strength, that
is, a yield ratio (yield strength/tensile strength) becomes higher. However, in general,
as the strength of the steel sheet increases, an elongation decreases, resulting in
a problem of deterioration in molding processability. Therefore, there is a demand
for the development of materials with improved high yield ratio, formability, and
bending properties, which are major physical properties during part processing.
[0004] A representative manufacturing method for increasing the yield strength is to use
water cooling during continuous annealing. That is, after being soaked in an annealing
process, immersion in water and tempering, so that it is possible to manufacture a
steel sheet obtained by transforming a microstructure thereof from martensite into
tempered martensite. As representative prior art of such a method, there is provided
Patent Document 1. Patent Document 1 discloses a technology of manufacturing a steel
material, and in Patent Document 1, a steel material having 0.18 to 0.3 of carbon
is continuously annealed and then water cooled to room temperature, followed by an
overaging treatment at a temperature of 120 to 300°C for 1 to 15 minutes, and the
steel material has a martensite volume fraction of 80 to 97% and a balance of ferrite.
As described above, when an ultra-strength steel is manufactured by a tempering method
after water cooling, there is a problem in that a yield ratio is very high but shape
quality of a coil deteriorates due to a deviation in temperature in a width direction
and a length direction. Therefore, problems such as material defects depending on
parts to be processed during roll forming, workability deterioration, and the like.
[0005] Provided is Patent Document 2 as a prior art for improving the processibility of
the high tensile strength steel sheet. Patent Document 2 discloses a steel sheet formed
of a composite structure mainly composed of tempered martensite, and in Patent Document
2, in order to improve processability, fine precipitated Cu particles having a particle
size of 1 to 100 mm are dispersed in the structure. However, in Patent Document 1,
in order to precipitate good fine Cu particles, red heat brittleness due to Cu may
occur due to excessive addition of Cu content of 2 to 5%, and there is also a problem
in that manufacturing costs are excessively increased.
[0006] Meanwhile, Patent Document 3 mainly discloses a steel sheet having ferrite as a base
structure and 2 to 10% by area of pearlite as a microstructure, and having improved
strength through precipitation strengthening and crystal grain refinement through
the addition of carbon nitride forming elements such as Ti, or the like. Patent Document
3 has an advantage of easily obtaining high strength compared to low manufacturing
costs, but has a disadvantage in that high-temperature annealing should be performed
in order to secure ductility by causing sufficient recrystallization by rapidly increasing
a recrystallization temperature due to fine precipitates. In addition, an existing
precipitation strengthening steel, which is strengthened by precipitating carbonitrides
on a ferrite base, has a problem in that it is difficult to obtain a high-strength
steel of 600 MPa grade or higher.
[0007] Therefore, by solving the above-described problems, there is a demand for the development
of a steel material having ultra-high strength capable of cold forming while exhibiting
high yield strength and bending properties.
[Prior art Document]
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0009] An aspect of the present disclosure is to provide an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled
steel sheet having excellent yield strength and bending properties and a method for
manufacturing the same.
Solution to Problem
[0010] According to an aspect of the present disclosure, provided is an ultra-high-strength
cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent yield strength and bending properties, the
ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet including, by weight: C: 0.03 to 0.12%,
Si: 0.03 to 0.30%, Mn: 2.1 to 2.9%, Al: 0.005 to 0.07%, Nb: 0.01 to 0.08%, Ti: 0.005
to 0.08%, B: 0.0005 to 0.005%, Cr: 0.7 to 1.4%, Mo: 0.005 to 0.10%, N: 0.008% or less
(excluding 0%), with a balance of Fe and inevitable impurities, satisfying the following
Relational Expressions 1 to 3, wherein a microstructure thereof includes by area,
fresh martensite: 4 to 19%, a sum of tempered martensite and bainite: 78 to 95%, and
retained austenite: 0.2 to 2.0%, wherein an average grain size of the microstructure
is 0.5 to 6 um,

where, a content of alloy components described in the Relational Expressions 1 to
3 refers to weight %.
[0011] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, provided is a method for manufacturing
an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent yield strength and
bending properties, the method including operations of: heating a slab including,
by weight: C: 0.03 to 0.12%, Si: 0.03 to 0.30%, Mn: 2.1 to 2.9%, Al: 0.005 to 0.07%,
Nb: 0.01 to 0.08%, Ti: 0.005 to 0.08%, B: 0.0005 to 0.005%, Cr: 0.7 to1.4%, Mo: 0.005-0.10%,
N: 0.008% or less (excluding 0%), with a balance of Fe and inevitable impurities,
satisfying the following Relational Expressions 1 to 3; finish hot rolling the heated
slab so that a finish rolling exit temperature is Ar3+50°C to Ar3+150°C; cooling the
hot-rolled steel sheet to a temperature within a range of Ms+50°C to Ms+300°C and
winding the same; cold rolling the wound hot-rolled steel sheet to obtain a cold-rolled
steel sheet; continuously annealing the cold-rolled steel sheet at a temperature within
a range of Ar3+10°C to Ar3+70°C; soaking the continuously annealed cold-rolled steel
sheet for 50 to 200 seconds; primarily cooling the soaked cold-rolled steel sheet
to a temperature of 620 to 700°C at a cooling rate of 1 to 10°C/s; secondarily cooling
the primarily-cooled cold-rolled steel sheet to a temperature of 360 to 420°C at a
cooling rate of 5 to 50°C/sec; overaging the secondarily-cooled cold-rolled steel
sheet for 250 to 650 seconds, and then terminating the same at a temperature of 320
to 400°C, wherein the following Relational Expressions 4 to 6 are satisfied during
the secondary cooling and the overaging treatment,

where, in the above Relational Expressions 1 to 3, a content of alloy components
described is weight %, and in the above Relational Expressions 4 to 6, A is a Ms-secondary
cooling end temperature (°C), and B is an overaging end temperature (°C).
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0012] As set forth, according to an aspect of the present disclosure, an ultra-high-cold-rolled
steel sheet having excellent yield strength and bending properties, and a method for
manufacturing the same may be provided.
Brief description of drawings
[0013] FIG. 1 is a photograph of a microstructure of Inventive Example 6 observed by SEM
according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Best Mode for Invention
[0014] Hereinafter, an ultra-high strength cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent yield
strength and bending properties according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
will be described. First, the alloy composition of the present disclosure will be
described. A content of the alloy composition described below refers to by weight
unless otherwise stated.
Carbon (C): 0.03 to 0.12%
[0015] Carbon (C) is a very important element added for solid solution strengthening. In
addition, C is bonded to a precipitation element to form fine precipitates, thereby
contributing strength improvement. When the content of C is less than 0.03%, it is
very difficult to secure a desired strength. On the other hand, when the content of
C exceeds 0.12%, as martensite is excessively formed during cooling an increase in
hardenability, the strength may rapidly increase, and bending properties may deteriorate,
so that it may be difficult to obtain an HER, R/t, and a 3-point bending maximum angle,
which are intended to be obtained in the present disclosure. In addition, weldability
is deteriorated, thereby increasing a possibility of occurrence of welding defects
during parts processing by customers. Therefore, the content of C is preferably in
a range of 0.03 to 0.12%. A lower limit of the content of C is more preferably 0.04%,
and even more preferably 0.05%. An upper limit of the content of C is more preferably
0.10%, and even more preferably 0.09%.
Silicon (Si): 0.03 to 0.30%
[0016] Silicon (Si) is one of the five major elements of steel, and a small amount of Si
is naturally added during a manufacturing process of steel. Si contributes to an increase
in strength, and suppresses formation of carbides, so that carbon is not formed as
carbides during an annealing soaking heat treatment and cooling. In addition, this
carbon is distributed and accumulated in retained austenite, so that an austenite
phase remains at room temperature and is advantageous in securing elongation. When
the Si content is less than 0.03%, it may be difficult to sufficiently secure the
above-mentioned effects. On the other hand, when the content of Si exceeds 0.30%,
a solid solution strengthening effect may be increased and elongation may be reduced,
and surface scale defects may be caused to deteriorate plating surface quality and
formation treatment properties. Therefore, the content of Si is preferably in a range
of 0.03 to 0.30%. A lower limit of the content of Si is more preferably 0.04%, and
even more preferably 0.05%. An upper limit of the content of Si is more preferably
0.25%, and even more preferably 0.20%.
Manganese (Mn): 2.1 to 2.9%
[0017] Manganese (Mn) is an element which completely precipitates sulfur in steel as MnS
to prevent hot brittleness due to formation of FeS and solid solution strengthening
of steel. When the content of Mn is less than 2.1%, it is difficult to secure a target
level of strength in the present disclosure. On the other hand, when the content of
Mn exceeds 2.9%, problems such as weldability, hot rolling, and the like, are likely
to occur, and at the same time, hardenability may be increased to excessively form
martensite, which may result in a decrease in elongation. In addition, there is a
problem in that a Mn-Band (band of Mn oxide) are formed in the microstructure, which
increases a risk of processing cracks and sheet breakage, and there is a problem in
that the Mn oxide is eluted on the surface during annealing, thereby greatly impairing
plating properties. Therefore, the content of Mn is preferably in a range of 2.1 to
2.9%. A lower limit of the content of Mn is more preferably 2.2%, and even more preferably
2.3%. An upper limit of the content of Mn is more preferably 2.8%, and even more preferably
2.7%.
Aluminum (Al): 0.005 to 0.07%
[0018] Aluminum (Al) is an element added for deoxidation during steelmaking. When the content
of Al is less than 0.005%, it is difficult to obtain a sufficient deoxidation effect,
and when the content of Al exceeds 0.07%, Al reacts with oxygen (O) in molten steel
to form oxides (inclusions) having a high melting point, which may cause nozzle clogging.
In addition, a shape of the inclusion formed in this manner is sharp, so that bending
properties may be inferior. Therefore, the content of Al is preferably 0.005 to 0.07%.
A lower limit of the content of Al is more preferably 0.010%, and even more preferably
0.020%. An upper limit of the content of Al is more preferably 0.06%, and even more
preferably 0.05%.
Niobium (Nb): 0.01 to 0.08%
[0019] Niobium (Nb) is an element which is segregated at austenite grain boundaries to suppress
coarsening of austenite crystal grains during an annealing heat treatment, and to
contribute to increase strength by forming fine carbides. When the content of Nb is
less than 0.01%, the above-described effect is insufficient. On the other hand, when
the content of Nb exceeds 0.08%, coarse carbides are precipitated, strength and elongation
may be reduced by reducing an amount of carbon dissolved in steel, and manufacturing
costs may increase. Therefore, the content of Nb is preferably in a range of 0.01
to 0.08%. A lower limit of the content of Nb is more preferably 0.02%, and even more
preferably 0.03%. An upper limit of the content of Nb is more preferably 0.07%, and
even more preferably 0.06%.
Titanium (Ti): 0.005 to 0.08%
[0020] Titanium (Ti) is an element for forming fine carbides, thereby contributing to securing
yield strength and tensile strength. In addition, Ti is an element for forming nitrides,
and having an effect of suppressing AlN precipitation by precipitating N in steel
as TiN, thereby reducing a risk of occurrence of cracks during continuous casting.
When the content of Ti is less than 0.005%, it may be difficult to obtain the above-described
effect. On the other hand, when the content of Ti exceeds 0.08%, coarse carbides are
precipitated, strength and elongation may be reduced by reducing an amount of dissolved
carbon in steel, and nozzle clogging may be caused during casting. Therefore, the
content of Ti is preferably in a range of 0.005 to 0.08%. A lower limit of the content
of Ti is more preferably 0.007%, and even more preferably 0.01%. An upper limit of
the content of Ti is more preferably 0.07%, and even more preferably 0.06%.
Boron (B): 0.0005 to 0.005%
[0021] Boron (B) is an element greatly contributing to securing hardenability of a steel
material, and is preferably added in an amount of 0.0005% or more to obtain such an
effect. However, when the content of B exceeds 0.005%, boron carbides are formed at
a grain boundary to provide ferrite nucleation sites, which may rather deteriorate
the hardenability. Therefore, the content of B is preferably in a range of 0.0005
to 0.005%. A lower limit of the B content is more preferably 0.0010%, and even more
preferably 0.0015%. An upper limit of the B content is more preferably 0.0045%, and
even more preferably 0.004%.
Chromium (Cr): 0.7 to 1.4%
[0022] Chromium (Cr) is an element improving hardenability and increasing strength of steel.
When the content of Cr is less than 0.7%, it may be difficult to secure a target level
of strength. On the other hand, when the content of Cr exceeds 1.4%, ductility of
a steel sheet may decrease. Therefore, the content of Cr is preferably in a range
of 0.7 to 1.4%. A lower limit of the content of Cr is more preferably 0.75%, and even
more preferably 0.8%. An upper limit of the content of Cr is more preferably 1.3%,
and even more preferably 1.2%.
Molybdenum (Mo): 0.005 to 0.10%
[0023] Molybdenum (Mo) is an element forming carbides, and perform a role of improving yield
strength and tensile strength by finely maintaining a size of precipitates when combined
with carbon nitride forming elements such as Ti, Nb, V, and the like. In addition,
Mo has an advantage of capable of controlling a yield ratio by forming the hardenability
of steel to finely form martensite at a grain boundary. In order to obtain the above-described
effect, Mo is preferably added in an amount of 0.0005% or more. However, molybdenum
(Mo) is an expensive element, and as the content of Mo increases, there is a disadvantage
in manufacturing, so that it is preferable to properly control the content of Mo.
When the content of Mo exceeds 0.10%, there is a problem in that ductility of the
steel is rather deteriorated due to an excessive crystal grain refinement effect and
a solid solution strengthening effect, as well as economic feasibility is deteriorated
due to a rapid increase in manufacturing costs. Therefore, the content of Mo is preferably
in a range of 0.005 to 0.10%. A lower limit of the content of Mo is more preferably
0.007%, and even more preferably 0.01%. An upper limit of the content of Mo is more
preferably 0.08%, and even more preferably 0.06%.
Nitrogen (N): 0.008% or less (excluding 0%)
[0024] Nitrogen (N)is an element that is inevitably contained in the manufacturing process,
but is an element that contributes to improving the strength of steel through the
formation of carbon nitrides. However, when the content of N exceeds 0.008%, a risk
of occurrence of brittleness is greatly increased, and an excess amount of N remaining
after forming TiN can consume B, which should contribute to hardenability, in a form
of BN. Therefore, the content of N is preferably 0.008% or less. The content of N
is more preferably 0.007% or less, and even more preferably 0.006% or less.
[0025] Meanwhile, the cold-rolled steel sheet of the present disclosure preferably satisfies
the above-described alloy components and the following Relational Expressions 1 to
3. Thereby, it is possible to manufacture an ultra-high-strength steel sheet having
a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more, which has very excellent bending processability,
targeted by the present disclosure.

[0026] The Relational Expression 1 is a component Relational Expression for securing strength
and weldability. When a value of Relational Expression 1 is less than 0.18, it is
difficult to a strength targeted by the present disclosure, and when a value of Relational
Expression 1 exceeds 0.30, weldability may inferior. Therefore, the value of Relational
Expression 1 preferably has a range of 0.18 to 0.30. A lower limit of the value of
the Relational Expression 1 is more preferably 0.19, and even more preferably 0.20.
An upper limit of the value of Relational Expression 1 is more preferably 0.28, and
even more preferably 0.26.

[0027] The Relational Expression 2 is a Relational Expression related to a hardenability
index for securing hardenability. When a value of the Relational Expression 2 is less
than 180, it is difficult to secure a strength targeted by the present disclosure
due to insufficient hardenability, and when a value of the Relational Expression 2
exceeds 270, the hardenability may be excessively increased, resulting in poor bending
properties and formability. Therefore, the value of the Relational Expression 2 is
preferably in a range of 180 to 270. A lower limit of the value of the Relational
Expression 2 is more preferably 190, and even more preferably 200. An upper limit
of the value of the Relational Expression 2 is more preferably 260, and even more
preferably 250.

[0028] The Relational Expression 3 is a component Relational Expression for simultaneously
securing strength, hardenability and weldability, which are the targets of the present
disclosure. When a value of the Relational Expression 3 is less than 700, not only
weldability may be inferior, but also it is difficult to secure a strength targeted
by the present disclosure due to insufficient hardenability, and when a value of the
Relational Expression 3 exceeds 1200, hardenability may be excessively increased,
resulting in inferior bending properties and formability. Therefore, the value of
the Relational Expression 3 is preferably in a range of 700 to 1200. A lower limit
of the value of the Relational Expression 3 is more preferably 700, and even more
preferably 800. An upper limit of the value of the Relational Expression 3 is more
preferably 1150, and even more preferably 1100.
[0029] The remaining component of the present disclosure is iron (Fe). However, since in
the common manufacturing process, unintended impurities may be inevitably incorporated
from raw materials or the surrounding environment, the component may not be excluded.
Since these impurities are known to any person skilled in the common manufacturing
process, the entire contents thereof are not particularly mentioned in the present
specification.
[0030] However, thereamong, since phosphorus and sulfur are impurities, commonly mentioned,
a brief description thereof is as follows.
Phosphorus (P): 0.04% or less (excluding 0%)
[0031] Phosphorus (P) is an element which may be segregated at a grain boundary and/or an
interphase grain boundary to cause brittleness. Therefore, the content of P should
be controlled to be as low as possible, and it is preferable to limit the content
of P to be 0.04% or less. The content of P is more preferably limited to be 0.03%
or less, and more preferably limited to be 0.02% or less.
Sulfur (S): 0.005% or less (excluding 0%)
[0032] Sulfur (S), as an impurity, may be segregated during MnS non-metallic inclusions
in steel and casting solidification and can cause high-temperature cracking. Therefore,
the content of S should be controlled to be as low as possible, and it is preferable
to limit the content of S to be 0.005% or less. The content of S is more preferably
limited to be 0.004% or less, and more preferably limited to be 0.003% or less.
[0033] In addition, the impurities may include at least one of Sb, Mg, Sn, Sb, Zn, and Pb
as tramp elements, and a total amount thereof may be 0.1% or less by weight. The tramp
element is an impurity element derived from scrap, or the like used as a raw material
in a steelmaking process, and when the total amount thereof exceeds 0.1%, it may cause
surface cracks of the slab, and deteriorate surface quality of the steel sheet.
[0034] Hereinafter, a microstructure of an ultra-high strength cold-rolled steel sheet having
excellent yield strength and bending properties according to an embodiment of the
present disclosure will be described.
[0035] The microstructure of the cold-rolled steel sheet according to the present disclosure
preferably includes, by area, fresh martensite: 4 to 19%, a sum of tempered martensite
and bainite: 78 to 95%, and retained austenite: 0.2 to 2.0%. The microstructure of
the cold-rolled steel sheet of the present disclosure includes tempered martensite
(hereinafter, also referred to as 'TM') and bainite (hereinafter, referred to as 'B')
as a main structure. Since the tempered martensite and bainite are not easy to be
distinguished in terms of a microstructure, in the present disclosure, a fraction
of the sum of the tempered martensite and bainite is controlled. When the fraction
of the sum of the tempered martensite and bainite is less than 78%, it is difficult
to secure the target strength, and when the fraction of the sum of the tempered martensite
and bainite exceeds 95%, bending properties and elongation may be inferior. The fresh
martensite (hereinafter, also referred to as 'FM') is a structure, advantageous for
securing strength. When a fraction of the fresh martensite is less than 4%, it is
difficult to secure the target strength, and when the fraction of the fresh martensite
exceeds 19%, bending properties and elongation may be inferior. The retained austenite
(hereinafter, also referred to as 'RA') is a structure, advantageous for securing
elongation. When a fraction of the retained austenite is less than 0.2%, it may be
difficult to sufficiently obtain the above effect, and when the fraction of the retained
austenite exceeds 2.0%, it may be transformed into martensite during processing, resulting
in inferior HER or bending properties.
[0036] Meanwhile, the microstructure may further include 10% or less of ferrite. The ferrite
structure is a structure that can be formed inevitably in the manufacturing process,
but also has a positive function. For example, the ferrite may contribute to securing
elongation. However, when a fraction of the ferrite exceeds 10%, it may be difficult
to secure the strength desired by the present disclosure. The fraction of the ferrite
is more preferably 7% or less, and even more preferably 5% or less. Meanwhile, it
is preferable that the microstructure has an average grain size of 0.5 to 6 um. The
finer the average grain size is, the more favorable it is to secure physical properties
such as strength, HER, and the like. However, in order to control the average grain
size to be less than 0.5 um, an input amount of Nb, Ti, Mo, V, and the like, which
are effective in grain refinement, may be excessively increased, resulting in an increase
in manufacturing costs. When the average grain size exceeds 6 um, it is difficult
to secure the strength targeted by the present disclosure, and HER and bending properties
may be significantly inferior. Therefore, the average grain size preferably has a
range of 0.5 to 6.0 µm. A lower limit of the the average grain size is more preferably
1.0 um, and even more preferably 1.5 um. An upper limit of the average grain size
is more preferably 5.5 µm, and even more preferably 5.0 µm.
[0037] The cold-rolled steel sheet of the present disclosure provided as described above
may have a yield strength (YS): 800 to 980 MPa, a tensile strength (TS): 980 to 1180
MPa, an elongation (EL): 4 to 12%, a yield ratio (YS / TS): 0.70 to 0.95, a hole expansion
ratio (HER): 35 to 80%, a R/t: 0.8 or less, and a 3-point bending maximum angle: 90
to 140°. The yield strength is more preferably 820 to 960MPa, more preferably 850
to 950MPa. The tensile strength is more preferably 1000 to 1170MPa, more preferably
1020 to 1160MPa. The elongation is more preferably 5 to 11%, and even more preferably
6 to 10%. The yield ratio is more preferably 0.72 to 0.92, and even more preferably
0.75 to 0.90. The hole expansion ratio is more preferably 40 to 75%, and even more
preferably 45 to 70%. The R/t is more preferably 0.15 to 0.70, and even more preferably
0.20 to 0.60. The 3-point bending maximum angle is more preferably 95 to 135 °, and
more preferably 100 to 130 °.
[0038] In addition, the cold-rolled steel sheet of the present disclosure may have a hardness
(HvBM) of 300 to 400 Hv. The hardness of the base material is more preferably 310
to 390 Hv, and even more preferably 320 to 380 Hv. In addition, hardness of a fusion
zone (HvFZ) of a weld zone formed after welding may be 350 to 450 Hv. When the hardness
of the fusion zone (HvFZ) of the weld zone is less than 350 Hv, sufficient hardness
of the fusion zone may not be secured, and thus a strength of the weld zone may be
low. On the other hand, when the hardness of the fusion zone (HvFZ) of the weld zone
exceeds 450 Hv, the hardness of the fusion zone is too high, and crack generation
susceptibility is increased, so the strength of the weld zone and impact absorption
energy may be lowered. The hardness of the cold-rolled steel sheet, that is, the hardness
corresponding to the base material after welding (HvBM) is better as it is similar
to the hardness of the fusion zone (HvFZ), and therefore, the ratio thereof (HvFZ/HvBM)
is preferably 1.30 or less.
[0039] Hereinafter, an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent yield
strength and bending properties according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
will be described.
[0040] First, a slab satisfying the above-described alloy composition is heated. In the
present disclosure, the slab heating temperature is not particularly limited, but
for example, the slab may be heated at a temperature within a range of 1100 to 1300°C.
When the slab heating temperature is lower than 1100°C, the slab temperature is low,
which may cause a rolling load during rough rolling, and when the slab heating temperature
is higher than 1300°C, the structure may be coarsened, and there may be a disadvantage
such as increased power costs. A lower limit of the slab heating temperature is more
preferably 1125°C, and even more preferably 1150°C. An upper limit of the slab heating
temperature is more preferably 1275°C, and even more preferably 1250°C. Meanwhile,
the slab may have a thickness of 230 to 270 mm.
[0041] Thereafter, the heated slab is finish-rolled so that a finish-rolling exit temperature
is Ar3+50°C to Ar3+150°C to obtain a hot-rolled steel sheet. When the finish-rolling
exit temperature is lower than Ar3+50°C, there is a high possibility in that hot deformation
resistance is rapidly increased. When the finish-rolling exit temperature is higher
than Ar3+150°C, there is a high possibility in that too thick oxide scales may be
generated and the microstructure of the steel sheet may be coarsened. Therefore, the
finish-rolling exit temperature preferably has a range of Ar3+50°C to Ar3+150°C. A
lower limit of the finish-rolling exit temperature is more preferably Ar3+60°C, and
even more preferably Ar3+70°C. An upper limit of the finish-rolling exit temperature
is more preferably Ar3+140°C, and even more preferably Ar3+140°C. Meanwhile, the Ar3
means a temperature at which austenite is transformed into austenite during heating,
and a value thereof can be obtained by, for example, a formula such as 910-203C
1/2+44.7Si+31.5Mo-30Mn-11Cr+700P+400Al+400Ti.
[0042] Thereafter, the hot-rolled steel sheet is cooled to Ms+50°C to Ms+300°C and then
wound. When the winding temperature is lower than Ms+50°C, excessive martensite or
bainite may be generated, resulting in an excessive increase in strength of the hot-rolled
steel sheet, and a problem such as shape defects, or the like due to load during cold
rolling may occur. On the other hand, when the winding temperature is higher than
Ms+300°C, pickling properties may be deteriorated due to an increase in surface scales.
Therefore, the winding temperature preferably has a range of Ms+50°C to Ms+300°C.
A lower limit of the winding temperatureis more preferably Ms+60°C, and even more
preferably Ms+70°C. An upper limit of the winding temperature is more preferably Ms+290°C,
and even more preferably Ms+270°C. Meanwhile, after the winding, the wound hot-rolled
steel sheet may be cooled to room temperature at a cooling rate of 0.1°C/s or less.
The Ms means a temperature at which martensite starts to be transformed during cooling,
and a value thereof may be obtained by, for example, a formula such as 539-423C-30.4Mn-7.5Si+30Al.
[0043] Thereafter, the cold-rolled steel sheet is obtained by cold-rolling the wound and
cooled hot-rolled steel sheet. The cold rolling may be performed at a reduction ratio
of 40 to 70%. When the cold reduction ratio is less than 40%, a driving force for
recrystallization may be weakened, and problems are likely to occur in obtaining good
recrystallized grains, and there is a disadvantage in that shape correction is very
difficult. When the cold reduction ratio exceeds 70%, there is a high possibility
in that cracks may occur at an edge portion of the steel sheet, and a rolling load
may rapidly be increased. Therefore, the cold rolling is preferably performed at a
reduction ratio of 40 to 70%. Meanwhile, prior to the cold rolling, pickling may be
performed to remove scales or impurities attached to the surface thereof.
[0044] Thereafter, the cold-rolled steel sheet is continuously annealed in a temperature
range of Ar3+10°C to Ar3+70°C. When the continuous annealing temperature is lower
than Ar3+10°C, it may not be sufficiently transformed into austenite, so it is difficult
to obtain a fraction of martensite or bainite desired by the present disclosure in
a subsequent process, and it may be difficult to secure strength. On the other hand,
When the continuous annealing temperature is higher than Ar3+70°C, an austenite grain
size may be coarsened, so that it may be difficult to secure the target bending properties.
Therefore, the continuous annealing temperature preferably has a range of Ar3+10°C
to Ar3+70°C. A lower limit of the continuous annealing temperature is more preferably
Ar3+20°C, and even more preferably Ar3+30°C. An upper limit of the continuous annealing
temperature is more preferably Ar3+60°C, and even more preferably Ar3+50°C.
[0045] Thereafter, the continuously annealed cold-rolled steel sheet is subjected to a soaking
treatment for 50 to 200 seconds. This is to secure a sufficient fraction of austenite
at an annealing temperature suggested by the present disclosure along with recrystallization
and grain growth of the cold-rolled structure. When the soaking treatment time is
less than 50 seconds, reverse transformation into austenite does not sufficiently
occur, so that a fraction of ferrite in a final structure increases, making it difficult
to secure the target strength. On the other hand, when the soaking treatment time
exceeds 200 seconds, the austenite grain size may be coarsened, so that bending properties
of the final product may be inferior. A lower limit of the soaking treatment time
is more preferably 55 seconds, and even more preferably 60 seconds. An upper limit
of the soaking treatment time is more preferably 190 seconds, and even more preferably
180 seconds.
[0046] Thereafter, the soaking-treated cold-rolled steel sheet is primarily cooled to 620
to 700°C at a cooling rate of 1 to 10°C/s. The primary cooling operation is to increase
ductility and strength of the steel sheet by securing an equilibrium carbon concentration
of ferrite and austenite. When the primary cooling end temperature is lower than 630°C
or is higher than 700°C it is difficult to secure the ductility and strength targeted
by the present disclosure. When the cooling rate is less than 1°C/s, ferrite transformation
is accelerated, so that there is a disadvantage in that it is difficult to secure
a fraction of the target microstructure, and when the cooling rate is exceeds 1°C/s,
there is a disadvantage in that it is difficult to secure an elongation due to excessive
martensitic transformation.
[0047] Thereafter, the primarily-cooled cold-rolled steel sheet is secondarily cooled to
360 to 420°C at a cooling rate of 5 to 50°C/ sec. The secondary cooling is one of
control factors that are considered to be important in the present disclosure, and
the secondary cooling end temperature is a very important condition to simultaneously
secure strength, ductility and bending properties. When the secondary cooling end
temperature is lower than 360°C, it is difficult to secure ductility due to an excessive
increase in a fraction of martensite, and when the secondary cooling end temperature
is higher than 420°C, it is difficult to secure sufficient martensite, so that it
is difficult to secure the target strength. Therefore, the secondary cooling end temperature,
which is one of the important control factors for securing the target physical properties
in the present disclosure, preferably has a range of 360 to 420°C. A lower limit of
the secondary cooling end temperature is more preferably 365°C, and even more preferably
370°C. An upper limit of the secondary cooling end temperature is more preferably
410°C, and even more preferably 405°C. When the secondary cooling rate is less than
5°C/s, due to slow cooling rate, ferrite transformation occurs preferentially before
martensite and bainite transformation, so there is a disadvantage in that an appropriate
amount of fraction of the microstructure to be obtained by the present disclosure
may not be obtained, and when the secondary cooling rate exceeds 50°C/s, passing ability
may be reduced due to a problem of shape defects due to an excessive cooling rate,
and sheet breakage may occur. A lower limit of the secondary cooling rate is more
preferably 7.5°C/s, and more preferably 10°C/s. An upper limit of the secondary cooling
rate is more preferably 47.5°C/s, and more preferably 45°C/s.
[0048] Meanwhile, it is important to precisely control a difference between an Ms temperature
and a secondary cooling end temperature in order to secure fractions of tempered martensite
and bainite, which are important microstructures, to a target level. More specifically,
it is preferable to satisfy the following Relational Expression 4. When the difference
between Ms and the secondary cooling end temperature, that is, a value of A is less
than 10°C, it may be difficult to secure the target strength due to low martensite
or bainite transformation, and when the value of A exceeds 70°C, it may be difficult
to secure ductility due to an excessive increase in the fraction of the martensite
due to a long residence time in a martensite region. Therefore, the difference between
the Ms and the secondary cooling end temperature, that is, the value of A is preferably
10 to 70°C. A lower limit of the value of A is more preferably 15°C, and even more
preferably 20°C. An upper limit of the value of A is more preferably 65°C, and even
more preferably 60°C. Meanwhile, Ms means a temperature at which martensitic transformation
starts, and a value thereof can be obtained by the following Expression 1.

where, A is an Ms-secondary cooling end temperature (°C)
[0049] Thereafter, the secondarily-cooled cold-rolled steel sheet is subjected to an overaging
treatment for 250 to 650 seconds, and then ends at a temperature within a range of
320 to 400°C. Thereafter, the overaging treatment is preferably performed at a temperature,
equal to or higher than the temperature at the time of the secondary cooling. The
overaging treatment is a process for promoting transformation of fresh martensite
generated at the end of secondary cooling into tempered martensite, through which
high yield strength and bending properties can be stably secured. Therefore, the overaging
treatment is a very important factor in order to secure high bending processability
to be obtained in the present disclosure, and in the present invention, the overaging
treatment time is precisely controlled to be in a range of 250 to 650 seconds. When
the overaging treatment time is less than 250 seconds, transformation from fresh martensite
into tempered martensite may occur in a small amount, resulting in poor bending processability.
On the other hand, when the overaging treatment time exceeds 650 seconds, it may be
difficult to secure the tensile strength desired by the present disclosure due to
reduced productivity and excessive tempered martensitic transformation. A lower limit
of the overaging treatment time is more preferably 260 seconds, and even more preferably
270 seconds. An upper limit of the overaging treatment time is more preferably 600
seconds, and even more preferably 550 seconds. When the overaging treatment end temperature
is lower than 320°C, it may be difficult to secure an elongation due to excessive
fresh martensitic transformation, and bending properties may be inferior. When the
overaging treatment end temperature is higher than 400°C, transformation from fresh
martensite into tempered martensite may occur in a small amount, resulting in inferior
bending properties. A lower limit of the overaging treatment end temperature is more
preferably 325°C, and even more preferably 330°C. An upper limit of the overaging
treatment end temperature is more preferably 395°C, and even more preferably 380°C.
Meanwhile, when it is desired to further improve the HER and bending properties, an
overaging treatment may be additionally performed by reheating after cooling is performed
to the secondary cooling end temperature after the overaging treatment.
[0050] Meanwhile, it is important to precisely control a difference between the Ms temperature
and the overaging treatment end temperature in order to secure a fraction of the tempered
martensite, which is an important microstructure in the present invention, to a target
level. More specifically, it is preferable to satisfy the following Relational Expression
5. When the difference between the Ms temperature and the overaging treatment end
temperature, that is, a value of B is lower than 30°C, it may be difficult to secure
the target strength due to insufficient martensitic transformation. When the value
of B is higher than 100°C, it may be difficult to secure target elongation and bending
properties due to excessive fresh martensitic transformation. Therefore, it is preferable
that the difference between the Ms temperature and the overaging treatment end temperature,
that is, the value of B is in a 30 to 100°C. A lower limit of the value of B is more
preferably 35°C, and even more preferably 40°C. An upper limit of the value of B is
more preferably 95°C, and even more preferably 90°C. An upper limit of the value of
B is more preferably 95°C, and even more preferably 90°C.

where, B is an Ms-overaging treatment end temperature (°C)
[0051] In addition, in the present invention, for the target fraction of microstructure
and mechanical properties, it is preferable to satisfy the following Relational Expression
6 during the secondary cooling and overaging treatment.

[0052] The relational expression 6 is to precisely control the microstructure targeted by
the present disclosure to secure the target physical properties. When a value of Relational
Expression 6 is less than 2.5, an overaging holding time may be short or an overaging
treatment end temperature may be low, so that it may be difficult to secure the target
elongation or bending properties due to excessive fresh martensitic transformation.
On the other hand, when the value of the Relational Expression exceeds 14, it may
be difficult to secure the target physical properties due to the long overaging holding
time or the high overaging treatment end temperature, making it difficult to secure
the target fraction of microstructure. Therefore, the value of Relational Expression
6 is preferably in a range of 2.5 to 14. A lower limit of the value of the Relational
Expression 6 is more preferably 3.0, and even more preferably 3.5. An upper limit
of the value of the Relational Expression 6 is more preferably 12, and even more preferably
10.
[0053] Meanwhile, in the present disclosure, after the overaging treatment, an operation
of temper rolling the overaged cold-rolled steel sheet at an elongation of 0.1 to
2.0°, may be further included. In general, in the case of temper rolling, an increase
in yield strength of at least 50 MPa or more occurs with little increase in tensile
strength. When the elongation is less than 0.1%, it may be difficult to control the
shape, and when the elongation exceeds 2.0%, workability may be greatly unstable due
to a high elongation work.
Mode for Invention
[0054] Hereinafter, the present disclosure will be specifically described through the following
Examples. However, it should be noted that the following examples are only for describing
the present disclosure by illustration, and not intended to limit the right scope
of the present disclosure. The reason is that the right scope of the present disclosure
is determined by the matters described in the claims and reasonably inferred therefrom.
(Example 1)
[0055] After preparing molten steel having the alloy composition illustrated in Table 1
below, the molten steel was prepared into a slab having a thickness of 250 mm, heated
at a temperature of 1200°C for 12 hours and then was subjected to finish hot rolling
under the conditions illustrated in Table 2 below, and then wound to prepare a hot-rolled
steel sheet. After pickling was performed on the hot-rolled steel sheet prepared as
described above, cold rolling was performed at a cold rolling reduction ratio of 50%
to manufacture a cold-rolled steel sheet. The cold-rolled steel sheet was subjected
to continuous annealing, soaking treatment, primary and secondary cooling, and overaging
treatment under the conditions illustrated in Table 3 below to manufacture a final
cold-rolled steel sheet.
[0056] After measuring a microstructure, average grain size, and mechanical properties of
the final cold-rolled steel sheet manufactured as described above, the results thereof
are illustrated in Table 4 below.
[0057] The microstructure and average grain size were measured using an Electron BackScatter
Diffraction (EBSD) instrument.
[0058] Among the mechanical properties, a tensile strength (TS), yield strength (YS), and
elongation (EL) were obtained by taking tensile specimens in a rolling horizontal
direction, which were measured by a tensile test. In this case, a gauge length was
80 mm, and a width of the tensile specimen was 20mm.
[0059] Hardness in a fusion zone (HvFZ) and hardness of a base material (HvBS) were measured
by performing Bead On Plate (BOP) welding on the cold-rolled steel sheet using a CO
2 welder under the conditions of 6kW-3min, and then measured 5 times at a 1/4t (t=thickness
point) under a load of 500 gf using a Vickers harness tester and then averaged.
[Table 1]
STEEL TYPE No. |
ALLOY COMPOSITION (WEIGHT %) |
C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
Nb |
Ti |
B |
Cr |
Mo |
N |
EXP RES SIO N 1 |
EXP RES SIO N2 |
EXP RES SIO N 3 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 1 |
0.08 |
0.15 |
2.35 |
0.010 |
0.0020 |
0.030 |
0.040 |
0.03 |
0.0020 |
0.85 |
0.05 |
0.004 |
0.231 |
205 |
888 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 2 |
0.07 |
0.15 |
2.45 |
0.015 |
0.002 2 |
0.035 |
0.05 4 |
0.02 |
0.0025 |
0.95 |
0.03 |
0.00 4 |
0.23 6 |
229 |
971 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 3 |
0.09 |
0.12 |
2.35 |
0.011 |
0.0021 |
0.039 |
0.04 5 |
0.02 |
0.0023 |
1.01 |
0.02 |
0.00 4 |
0.24 2 |
222 |
918 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 4 |
0.07 |
0.11 |
2.40 |
0.015 |
0.0015 |
0.041 |
0.051 |
0.03 |
0.0025 |
0.98 |
0.05 |
0.00 3 |
0.23 0 |
227 |
989 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 5 |
0.10 |
0.15 |
2.30 |
0.012 |
0.0021 |
0.035 |
0.04 5 |
0.02 |
0.0020 |
0.85 |
0.03 |
0.00 4 |
0.25 2 |
212 |
841 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 1 |
0.02 |
0.35 |
2.41 |
0.010 |
0.0021 |
0.032 |
0.03 0 |
0.02 |
0.0025 |
0.91 |
0.03 |
0.00 4 |
0.181 |
172 |
951 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 2 |
0.06 |
0.15 |
1.56 |
0.011 |
0.002 5 |
0.042 |
0.05 0 |
0.02 |
0.0020 |
0.72 |
0.05 |
0.00 3 |
0.175 |
174 |
995 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 3 |
0.07 |
0.25 |
2.10 |
0.012 |
0.0021 |
0.037 |
0.03 0 |
0.01 |
0.0020 |
0.45 |
0.01 |
0.00 4 |
0.216 |
148 |
684 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 4 |
0.07 |
0.11 |
2.45 |
0.015 |
0.0018 |
0.035 |
0.00 5 |
0.01 |
0.0025 |
0.85 |
0.03 |
0.00 4 |
0.23 3 |
156 |
668 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 5 |
0.05 |
0.12 |
2.01 |
0.012 |
0.002 4 |
0.041 |
0.04 5 |
0.02 |
0.0005 |
0.55 |
0.01 |
0.00 4 |
0.188 |
161 |
858 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 6 |
0.14 |
0.12 |
2.60 |
0.015 |
0.002 0 |
0.035 |
0.015 |
0.02 |
0.0018 |
0.85 |
0.01 |
0.00 4 |
0.312 |
187 |
600 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 7 |
0.15 |
0.25 |
3.50 |
0.02 |
0.002 5 |
0.040 |
0.00 5 |
0.03 |
0.0030 |
1.50 |
0.20 |
0.00 4 |
0.38 3 |
280 |
731 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 8 |
0.06 |
0.15 |
1.80 |
0.02 |
0.002 4 |
0.042 |
0.041 |
0.02 |
0.0025 |
1.50 |
0.30 |
0.00 4 |
0.20 5 |
257 |
1255 |
[EXPRESSION 1] C+Si/30+Mn/20+2P+4S |
[EXPRESSION 2] 48.8+49logC+35.1Mn+25.9Si+76.5Cr+105.9Mo+1325Nb |
[EXPRESSION 3] 48.8+49logC+35.1Mn+25.9Si+76.5Cr+105.9Mo+1325Nb/C+Si/30+Mn/20+2P+4S |
[Table 2]
DIVISION |
STEEL TYPE No. |
Ar3 (°C) |
Ms (°C) |
FINISH ROLLING TEMPERATURE (°C) |
WINDING TEMPERATURE (°C) |
THICKNESS OF HOT-ROLLED MATERIAL (mm) |
THICKNESS OF COLD-ROLLED MATERIAL (mm) |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 1 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 1 |
812 |
433 |
921 |
667 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 2 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 2 |
812 |
435 |
915 |
687 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 3 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 3 |
805 |
430 |
916 |
680 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 4 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 4 |
819 |
437 |
901 |
678 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 5 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 5 |
806 |
427 |
925 |
681 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 1 |
843 |
456 |
905 |
669 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 2 |
846 |
466 |
931 |
675 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 3 |
827 |
445 |
925 |
685 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 4 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 4 |
808 |
435 |
915 |
675 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 5 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 5 |
837 |
457 |
921 |
681 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 6 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 6 |
785 |
401 |
928 |
692 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 7 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 7 |
769 |
368 |
917 |
662 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 8 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL β |
845 |
459 |
909 |
681 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
Ar3 = 910-203C1/2+44.7 7Si +31.5 5Mo-30Mn -11Cr+700P+400Al +400Ti |
Ms = 539-423C-30.4M n-7.5Si + 30AI |
[Table 3]
DIVISION |
STEEL TYPE No. |
ANNEAL -ING TEMPERATURE (°C) |
SOAKING TIME (SEC) |
PRIMARY COOLING RATE (°C/SEC) |
PRIMARY COOLING END TEMPERATURE (°C) |
SECONDARY COOLING RATE (°C/ SEC) |
SECONDARY COOLING END TEMPERA -TURE (°C) |
OVERAGING TREATMENT |
EXPRESSION 4 |
EXPRESSION 5 |
EXPRESSION 6 |
TIME (SEC. ) |
END TEMPERA -TURE (°C) |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 1 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 1 |
845 |
80 |
3.2 |
651 |
11.2 |
395 |
400 |
362 |
38 |
71 |
5.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 2 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 2 |
851 |
79 |
3.5 |
654 |
12.1 |
397 |
400 |
371 |
38 |
64 |
6.3 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 3 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 3 |
835 |
78 |
3.1 |
662 |
11.6 |
399 |
400 |
360 |
31 |
70 |
5.7 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 4 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 4 |
839 |
82 |
3.0 |
671 |
11.4 |
402 |
400 |
381 |
35 |
56 |
7.2 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 5 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 5 |
847 |
81 |
3.0 |
654 |
10.5 |
385 |
400 |
361 |
42 |
66 |
6.1 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 1 |
867 |
83 |
3.1 |
645 |
12.1 |
385 |
400 |
368 |
71 |
88 |
4.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 2 |
857 |
84 |
3.6 |
655 |
11.2 |
415 |
400 |
391 |
51 |
75 |
5.3 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 3 |
841 |
87 |
3.2 |
661 |
11.7 |
415 |
400 |
385 |
30 |
60 |
6.7 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 4 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 4 |
834 |
85 |
3.3 |
657 |
11.8 |
405 |
400 |
374 |
30 |
61 |
6.5 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 5 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 5 |
857 |
79 |
3.0 |
651 |
11.2 |
417 |
400 |
401 |
40 |
56 |
7.1 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 6 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 6 |
821 |
76 |
3.1 |
653 |
11.4 |
387 |
400 |
359 |
14 |
42 |
9.5 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 7 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 7 |
818 |
81 |
3.8 |
652 |
11.2 |
392 |
400 |
367 |
-24 |
1 |
400 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 8 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 8 |
861 |
82 |
3.6 |
657 |
11.7 |
391 |
400 |
367 |
68 |
92 |
4.3 |
[EXPRESSION 4] A = Ms- SECONDARY COOLING END TEMPERATURE |
[EXPRESSION 5] B = Ms- OVERAGING TREATMENT END TEMPERATURE |
[EXPRESSION 6]OVERAGING TREATMENT END TEMPERATURE / B |
[Table 4]
DIVISION |
STEEL TYPE No. |
FRACTION OF MICROSTRUCTURE (AREA %) |
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE (µm) |
YS (MPa) |
TS (MPa) |
YR |
EL (%) |
HvBM (Hv) |
HVFZ (Hv) |
HvFZ/HvB M |
FM |
TM + B |
F |
RA |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 1 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 1 |
9.3 |
90.4 |
0 |
0.3 |
2.1 |
891 |
1092 |
0.82 |
8.5 |
335 |
415 |
1.24 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 2 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 2 |
9.2 |
90.6 |
0 |
0.2 |
2.3 |
892 |
1105 |
0.81 |
8.3 |
336 |
425 |
1.26 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 3 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 3 |
9.3 |
90.1 |
0 |
0.6 |
2.2 |
904 |
1116 |
0.81 |
7.0 |
337 |
414 |
1.23 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 4 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 4 |
9.4 |
90.1 |
0 |
0.5 |
2.5 |
928 |
1126 |
0.82 |
7.1 |
338 |
414 |
1.22 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 5 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 5 |
9.1 |
90.2 |
0 |
0.7 |
2.3 |
913 |
1123 |
0.81 |
7.3 |
329 |
415 |
1.26 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 1 |
7.2 |
74.5 |
18 |
0.3 |
3.2 |
762 |
971 |
0.78 |
10.8 |
285 |
330 |
1.16 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 2 |
6.9 |
73.6 |
19 |
0.5 |
2.9 |
650 |
956 |
0.68 |
13.2 |
271 |
320 |
1.18 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 3 |
5.3 |
73.4 |
21 |
0.3 |
2.3 |
561 |
902 |
0.62 |
15.2 |
264 |
390 |
1.48 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 5 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 4 |
7.2 |
80.6 |
12 |
0.2 |
5.2 |
778 |
1099 |
0.71 |
8.70 |
254 |
395 |
1.56 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 5 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 5 |
6.2 |
80.3 |
13 |
0.5 |
2.5 |
648 |
1042 |
0.62 |
10.9 |
269 |
343 |
1.28 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 6 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 6 |
23.1 |
76.7 |
0 |
0.2 |
2.1 |
923 |
1253 |
0.74 |
5.9 |
356 |
553 |
1.55 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 7 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL 7 |
24.2 |
75.1 |
0 |
0.7 |
2.3 |
890 |
1320 |
0.67 |
6.2 |
389 |
582 |
1.50 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 8 |
COMPARATIVE STEEL B |
22.9 |
76.5 |
0 |
0.6 |
2.2 |
1123 |
1236 |
0.91 |
4.5 |
352 |
401 |
1.14 |
FM: FRESH MARTENSITE |
TM: TEMPERED MARTENSITE |
B: BAINITE |
RA: RETAINED AUSTENITE |
F: FERRITE |
[0060] As can be seen from Tables 1 to 4, in the case of Inventive Examples 1 to 5 satisfying
the alloy composition and manufacturing conditions proposed by the present disclosure,
it can be confirmed that the present disclosure may secure the microstructure to be
obtained by the present disclosure may be secured and have excellent mechanical properties.
[0061] On the other hand, in the case of Comparative Examples 1 to 8, not satisfying the
alloy composition propose by the present disclosure and not satisfying some manufacturing
conditions, it can be seen that the mechanical properties are poor since the microstructure
to be obtained by the present disclosure is not secured.
(Example 2)
[0062] After preparing molten steel having the alloy composition of Inventive Steel 1 described
in Example 1, the molten steel was prepared into a slab having a thickness of 250
mm, heated at a temperature of 1200°C for 12 hours and then was subjected to finish
hot rolling under the conditions illustrated in Table 5 below, and then wound to prepare
a hot-rolled steel sheet. After pickling was performed on the hot-rolled steel sheet
prepared as described above, cold rolling was performed at a cold rolling reduction
ratio of 50% to manufacture a cold-rolled steel sheet. Such a cold-rolled steel sheet
was subjected to continuous annealing, soaking treatment, primary and secondary cooling,
and overaging treatment under the conditions illustrated in Table 6 below to manufacture
a final cold-rolled steel sheet.
[0063] After measuring a microstructure, average grain size, and mechanical properties of
a final cold-rolled steel sheet manufactured as described above, the results thereof
were illustrated in Table 7 below.
[0064] The microstructure and average grain size were measured using an Electron BackScatter
Diffraction (EBSD) instrument.
[0065] Among the mechanical properties, a tensile strength (TS), yield strength (YS), and
elongation (EL) were obtained by taking tensile specimens in a rolling horizontal
direction, which were measured by a tensile test. In this case, a gauge length was
80 mm, and a width of the tensile specimen was 20 mm.
[0066] Among the mechanical properties, HER was measured according to the ISO 16330 standard,
and holes were sheared with a clearance of 12% using a punch having a diameter of
10 mm.
[0067] Among the mechanical properties, R/t is a value obtained by dividing R (a limit bending
radius)by a thickness of the steel sheet. In this case, the R was obtained by taking
a test piece having a width of 30 mm × length of 35 mm in a horizontal direction (long
axis) to a rolling direction, grinding one surface thereof by 0.2 mm, performing a
bending test by a V block method in accordance with JIS Z 2248 so that the ground
surface is not in contact with a punch, and variously changing a bending radius at
that time from 0 to 5 mm, and obtaining a minimum bending radius at which bending
may be performed without breaking the material.
[0068] Among the mechanical properties, three-point bending maximum angle was measured three
times for each specimen in accordance with the Verband Der Automobilindustrie (VDA)
standard, and then an average value thereof was measured.
[Table 5]
DIVISION |
STEEL TYPE No. |
Ar3 (°C) |
Ms (°C) |
FINISH ROLLING TEMPERATURE (°C) |
WINDINGTEM PERATURE (°C) |
THICKNESS OF HOT-ROLLED MATERIAL (mm) |
THICKNESS OF COLD-ROLLED MATERIAL (mm) |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 6 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 1 |
812 |
433 |
915 |
651 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 7 |
|
|
|
921 |
667 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 8 |
|
|
|
917 |
655 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 9 |
|
|
|
920 |
680 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 10 |
|
|
|
917 |
674 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 9 |
|
|
|
820 |
- |
- |
- |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 10 |
|
|
|
918 |
430 |
3.2 |
- |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 11 |
|
|
|
925 |
651 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 12 |
|
|
|
917 |
687 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 13 |
|
|
|
918 |
687 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 14 |
|
|
|
921 |
679 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 15 |
|
|
|
916 |
680 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 16 |
|
|
|
921 |
689 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
Ar3 = 910-203C1/2+44.7Si+31.5Mo-30Mn-11Cr+700P+400Al+400Ti |
Ms = 539-423C-30.4Mn-7.5Si+30Al |
[Table 6]
DIVISION |
STEEL TYPE No. |
ANNEALING TEMPERA -TURE (°C) |
SOAKING TIME (SEC. ) |
PRIMARY COOLING RATE (°C/ SEC) |
PRIMARY COOLING END TEMPERA-TURE (°C) |
SECONDARY COOLING RATE (°C/SEC) |
SECONDARY COOLING END TEMPERA-TURE (°C) |
OVERAGING TREATMENT |
EXPRESSION 4 |
EXPRESSION 5 |
EXPRESSION 6 |
TIME (SEC. ) |
END TEMPERATURE (°C) |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 6 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 1 |
838 |
85 |
4.2 |
650 |
11.6 |
410 |
400 |
375 |
23 |
58 |
6.9 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 7 |
|
847 |
86 |
3.6 |
651 |
12.1 |
395 |
400 |
365 |
38 |
68 |
5.9 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 8 |
|
851 |
84 |
3.2 |
657 |
11.6 |
390 |
400 |
362 |
43 |
71 |
5.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 9 |
|
861 |
85 |
3.4 |
659 |
12.5 |
415 |
400 |
382 |
18 |
51 |
7.8 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 10 |
|
855 |
81 |
3.2 |
651 |
10.9 |
405 |
400 |
371 |
28 |
62 |
6.5 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 9 |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 10 |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 11 |
|
800 |
84 |
3.2 |
651 |
11.5 |
403 |
400 |
370 |
30 |
63 |
6.3 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 12 |
|
899 |
81 |
3.5 |
650 |
12.1 |
415 |
400 |
382 |
18 |
51 |
7.8 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 13 |
|
845 |
82 |
0.3 |
650 |
12.1 |
405 |
400 |
379 |
28 |
54 |
7.4 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 14 |
|
854 |
80 |
3.4 |
654 |
2.5 |
421 |
400 |
392 |
12 |
41 |
9.8 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 15 |
|
847 |
79 |
3.9 |
651 |
11.8 |
520 |
400 |
492 |
-87 |
-59 |
-6.8 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 16 |
|
852 |
78 |
3.2 |
657 |
11.5 |
320 |
400 |
285 |
113 |
148 |
2.7 |
[EXPRESSION 4] A = Ms- SECONDARY COOLING END TEMPERATURE |
[EXPRESSION 5] B = Ms- OVERAGING TREATMENT END TEMPERATURE |
[EXPRESSION 6]OVERAGING TREATMENT END TEMPERATURE / B |
[Table 7]
DIVISION |
STEEL TYPE No. |
FRACTION OF MICROSTRUCTURE (AREA %) |
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE (µm) |
YS (MPa) |
TS (MPa) |
YR |
EL (%) |
HER (%) |
R/t |
3-POINT BENDING (°) |
FM |
TM + B |
F |
RA |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 6 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 1 |
8.9 |
90.4 |
0 |
0.7 |
2.6 |
899 |
1097 |
0.82 |
8.3 |
54 |
0.31 |
107 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 7 |
|
9.5 |
90.0 |
0 |
0.5 |
2.4 |
905 |
1105 |
0.82 |
8.9 |
57 |
0.31 |
109 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 8 |
|
11.0 |
88.2 |
0 |
0.8 |
2.3 |
921 |
1125 |
0.82 |
8.1 |
61 |
0.31 |
112 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 9 |
|
7.5 |
91.8 |
0 |
0.7 |
2.6 |
889 |
1079 |
0.82 |
9.7 |
54 |
0.31 |
108 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 10 |
|
10.1 |
89.3 |
0 |
0.6 |
2.5 |
900 |
1101 |
0.82 |
8.6 |
55 |
0.31 |
109 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 9 |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 10 |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 11 |
|
7.6 |
70.9 |
21 |
0.5 |
3.6 |
760 |
1025 |
0.74 |
11.2 |
31 |
0.94 |
87 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 12 |
|
15.1 |
84.0 |
0 |
0.9 |
6.7 |
951 |
1135 |
0.84 |
5.20 |
42 |
0.94 |
80 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 13 |
|
6.8 |
74.7 |
18 |
0.5 |
4.5 |
771 |
1051 |
0.73 |
10.9 |
35 |
0.63 |
88 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 14 |
|
2.5 |
96.9 |
0 |
0.6 |
3.1 |
923 |
975 |
0.95 |
11.9 |
61 |
0.31 |
121 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 15 |
|
21.0 |
78.3 |
0 |
0.7 |
2.1 |
780 |
1250 |
0.62 |
5.6 |
38 |
0.94 |
86 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 16 |
|
3.0 |
96.7 |
0 |
0.3 |
2.4 |
997 |
1135 |
0.88 |
4.8 |
67 |
0.94 |
88 |
FM: FRESH MARTENSITE |
TM: TEMPERED MARTENSITE |
B: BAINITE |
RA: RETAINED AUSTENITE |
|
[0069] As can be seen from Tables 5 to 7, in the case of Inventive Examples 6 to 10 satisfying
the alloy composition and manufacturing conditions proposed by the present disclosure,
by securing a type and fraction of the microstructure and an average grain size, it
can be seen that mechanical properties (tensile property, HER, bending properties),
to be obtained by the present disclosure.
[0070] On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 9 to 16 satisfying the alloy composition
proposed by the present disclosure, but not satisfying the manufacturing conditions,
it can be seen that the microstructure or average grain size targeted by the present
disclosure may not be secured, so that mechanical properties are inferior. In particular,
in the case of Comparative Examples 9 and 10, a finish rolling temperature and winding
temperature did not satisfy the conditions of the present disclosure, respectively,
and thus sheet breakage occurred.
[0071] FIG. 1 is a photograph of a microstructure of Inventive Example 6 observed by SEM.
As can be seen from FIG. 1, it can be confirmed that the microstructure targeted by
the present disclosure is properly formed in Inventive Example 6.
(Example 3)
[0072] After preparing molten steel having the alloy composition of Inventive Steel 2 described
in Example 1, the molten steel was prepared into a slab having a thickness of 250
mm, heated at a temperature of 1200°C for 12 hours and then was subjected to finish
hot rolling under the conditions illustrated in Table 8 below, and then wound to prepare
a hot-rolled steel sheet. After pickling was performed on the hot-rolled steel sheet
prepared as described above, cold rolling was performed at a cold rolling reduction
ratio of 50% to manufacture a cold-rolled steel sheet. Such a cold-rolled steel sheet
was subjected to continuous annealing, soaking treatment, primary and secondary cooling,
and overaging treatment under the conditions illustrated in Table 9 below to manufacture
a final cold-rolled steel sheet.
[0073] After measuring a microstructure, average grain size, and mechanical properties of
a final cold-rolled steel sheet manufactured as described above, the results thereof
were illustrated in Table 10 below.
[0074] The microstructure and average grain size were measured using an Electron BackScatter
Diffraction (EBSD) instrument.
[0075] Among the mechanical properties, the 3-point bending maximum angle was measured three
times for each specimen in accordance with the Verband Der Automobilindustrie(VDA)
standard, and then the average value thereof was measured.
[Table 8]
DIVISION |
STEEL TYPE No. |
Ar3 (°C) |
Ms (°C) |
FINISH ROLLING TEMPERATURE (°C) |
WINDING TEMPERA -TURE (°C) |
THICKNESS OF HOT-ROLLED MATERIAL (mm) |
THICKNESS OF COLD-ROLLED MATERIAL (mm) |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 11 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 2 |
812 |
435 |
925 |
675 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 12 |
|
|
|
920 |
681 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 13 |
|
|
|
916 |
679 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 14 |
|
|
|
920 |
682 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 15 |
|
|
|
918 |
679 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 17 |
|
|
|
925 |
681 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 18 |
|
|
|
931 |
678 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 19 |
|
|
|
925 |
681 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 20 |
|
|
|
927 |
678 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
Ar3 = 910-203C1/2+44.7Si+31.5Mo-30Mn-11Cr+700P+400Al+400Ti |
Ms = 539-423C-30.4Mn-7.5Si+30Al |
[Table 9]
DIVISION |
STEEL TYPE No. |
ANNEALING TEMPERA -TURE (°C) |
SOAKING TIME (SEC.) |
PRIMARY COOLING RATE (°C/SEC) |
PRIMARY COOLING END TEMPERA-TURE (°C) |
SECONDARY COOLING RATE (°C/SEC) |
SECONDARY COOLING END TEMPERATURE (°C) |
OVERAGING TREATMENT |
EXPRESSION 4 |
EXPRESSION 5 |
EXPRESSION 6 |
TIME (SEC. ) |
END TEMPERATURE (°C) |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 11 |
INVENTIVE STEEL 2 |
851 |
84 |
3.2 |
649 |
11.2 |
395 |
374 |
362 |
40 |
73 |
5.1 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 12 |
|
849 |
80 |
3.2 |
651 |
11.2 |
385 |
361 |
365 |
50 |
70 |
5.2 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 13 |
|
847 |
79 |
3.2 |
661 |
11.2 |
395 |
360 |
369 |
40 |
66 |
5.5 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 14 |
|
849 |
89 |
3.2 |
658 |
11.2 |
387 |
355 |
369 |
48 |
66 |
5.4 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 15 |
|
852 |
81 |
3.2 |
649 |
11.2 |
394 |
360 |
369 |
41 |
66 |
5.5 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 17 |
|
853 |
80 |
3.2 |
647 |
11.2 |
390 |
195 |
335 |
45 |
100 |
2.0 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 18 |
|
849 |
90 |
3.2 |
649 |
11.2 |
384 |
225 |
310 |
51 |
125 |
1.8 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 19 |
|
851 |
81 |
3.2 |
651 |
11.2 |
395 |
315 |
300 |
40 |
135 |
2.3 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 20 |
|
850 |
82 |
3.2 |
652 |
11.2 |
402 |
325 |
290 |
33 |
145 |
2.2 |
[EXPRESSION 4] A = Ms- MS- SECONDARY COOLING END TEMPERATURE |
[EXPRESSION 5] B = Ms- OVERAGING TREATMENT END TEMPERATURE |
[EXPRESSION 6]OVERAGING TREATMENT END TEMPERATURE / B |
[Table 10]
DIVISION |
STEEL TYPE No. |
FRACTION OF MICROSTRUCTURE (AREA %) |
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE (µm) |
YS (MPa) |
TS (MPa) |
YR |
EL (%) |
3-POINT BENDING (°) |
FM |
TM + B |
F |
RA |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 11 |
 2 |
9.5 |
90.0 |
0 |
0.5 |
2.3 |
891 |
1092 |
0.82 |
8.0 |
109 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 12 |
|
10.1 |
89.3 |
0 |
0.6 |
2.2 |
905 |
1115 |
0.81 |
8.2 |
108 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 13 |
|
9.2 |
90.1 |
0 |
0.7 |
2.4 |
899 |
1110 |
0.81 |
8.0 |
110 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 14 |
|
10.5 |
88.7 |
0 |
0.8 |
2.6 |
914 |
1116 |
0.82 |
7.1 |
108 |
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE 15 |
|
11.0 |
88.0 |
0 |
1.0 |
2.5 |
915 |
1120 |
0.82 |
7.5 |
106 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 17 |
|
25.3 |
73.7 |
0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
965 |
1269 |
0.76 |
5.7 |
79 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 18 |
|
26.0 |
73.2 |
0 |
0.8 |
2.1 |
975 |
1275 |
0.76 |
5.6 |
75 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 19 |
|
24.1 |
75.2 |
0 |
0.7 |
2.3 |
956 |
1265 |
0.76 |
6.1 |
78 |
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 20 |
|
26.5 |
72.6 |
0 |
0.9 |
2.5 |
967 |
1287 |
0.75 |
5.4 |
74 |
FM: FRESH MARTENSITE TM: TEMPERED MARTENSITE B: BAINITE |
RA: RETAINED AUSTENITE F: FERRITE |
[0076] As can be seen from Tables 8 to 10, in Inventive Examples 11 to 15 satisfying the
alloy composition and manufacturing conditions proposed by the present disclosure,
it can be seen that the microstructure targeted by the present disclosure may be secured,
so that bending properties to be obtained by the present disclosure are secured.
[0077] On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 17 to 20 satisfying the alloy composition
proposed by the present disclosure, but not satisfying the overaging treatment condition
and Relational Expressions 5 and 6 among manufacturing conditions, it can be seen
that the microstructure targeted in the present disclosure may not be secured, so
that bending properties is inferior.
1. An ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent yield strength and
bending properties, comprising by weight:
C: 0.03 to 0.12%, Si: 0.03 to 0.30%, Mn: 2.1 to 2.9%, Al: 0.005 to 0.07%, Nb: 0.01
to 0.08%, Ti: 0.005 to 0.08%, B: 0.0005 to 0.005%, Cr: 0.7 to 1.4%, Mo: 0.005 to 0.10%,
N: 0.008% or less (excluding 0%), with a balance of Fe and inevitable impurities,
satisfying the following Relational Expressions 1 to 3,
wherein a microstructure thereof includes by area,
fresh martensite: 4 to 19%, a sum of tempered martensite and bainite: 78 to 95%, and
retained austenite: 0.2 to 2.0%,
wherein an average grain size of the microstructure is 0.5 to 6 um,



where, a content of alloy components described in the Relational Expressions 1 to
3 refers to weight %.
2. The ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent yield strength and
bending properties of claim 1, wherein the impurities further comprise: P: 0.04% or
less (excluding 0%) and S: 0.005% or less (excluding 0%).
3. The ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent yield strength and
bending properties of claim 1, wherein the impurities comprise at least one of Sb,
Mg, Sn, Sb, Zn, and Pb, and a total content thereof is 0.1% or less by weight.
4. The ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent yield strength and
bending properties of claim 1, wherein the microstructure further comprises 10% or
less of ferrite.
5. The ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent yield strength and
bending properties of claim 1, wherein the cold-rolled steel sheet has a yield strength
(YS) of 800 to 980 MPa, a tensile strength (TS) of 980 to 1180 MPa, an elongation
(EL) of 4 to 12%, a yield ratio (YS/TS) of 0.70 to 0.95, a hole expansion ratio (HER)
of 35 to 80%, R/t of 0.8% or less, and a 3-point bending maximum angle of 90 to 140°.
6. The ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent yield strength and
bending properties of claim 1, wherein the cold-rolled steel sheet has hardness (HvBM)
of 300 to 400 Hv, a hardness of a fusion zone (HvFZ) of a weld zone formed after welding
of 350 to 450 Hv, wherein HvFZ / HvBM is 1.30 or less.
7. A method for manufacturing an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent
yield strength and bending properties, comprising operations of:
heating a slab including, by weight: C: 0.03 to 0.12%, Si: 0.03 to 0.30%, Mn: 2.1
to 2.9%, Al: 0.005 to 0.07%, Nb: 0.01 to 0.08%, Ti: 0.005 to 0.08%, B: 0.0005 to 0.005%,
Cr: 0.7 to 1.4%, Mo: 0.005 to 0.10%, N: 0.008% or less (excluding 0%), with a balance
of Fe and inevitable impurities, satisfying the following Relational Expressions 1
to 3;
finish hot rolling the heated slab so that a finish rolling exit temperature is Ar3+50°C
to Ar3+150°C;
cooling the hot-rolled steel sheet to a temperature within a range ofMs+50°C to Ms+300°C
and winding the same;
cold rolling the wound hot-rolled steel sheet to obtain a cold-rolled steel sheet;
continuously annealing the cold-rolled steel sheet at a temperature within a range
of Ar3+10°C to Ar3+70°C;
soaking the continuously annealed cold-rolled steel sheet for 50 to 200 seconds;
primarily cooling the soaked cold-rolled steel sheet to a temperature of 620 to 700°C
at a cooling rate of 1 to 10°C/s;
secondarily cooling the primarily-cooled cold-rolled steel sheet to a temperature
of 360 to 420°C at a cooling rate of 5 to 50°C/sec;
overaging the secondarily-cooled cold-rolled steel sheet for 250 to 650 seconds, and
then terminating the same at 320 to 400°C,
wherein the following Relational Expressions 4 to 6 are satisfied during the secondary
cooling and the overaging treatment,






where, in the above Relational Expressions 1 to 3, a content of alloy components described
is weight %, and in the above Relational Expressions 4 to 6, A is a Ms-secondary cooling
end temperature (°C), and B is an overaging end temperature (°C).
8. The method for manufacturing an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having
excellent yield strength and bending properties of claim 7, wherein the slab is performed
at a temperature within a range of 1100 to 1300°C.
9. The method for manufacturing an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having
excellent yield strength and bending properties of claim 7, wherein the slab has a
thickness of 230 to 270 mm.
10. The method for manufacturing an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having
excellent yield strength and bending properties of claim 7, further comprising
cooling the wound hot-rolled steel sheet to room temperature at a cooling rate of
0.1°C/s or less.
11. The method for manufacturing an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having
excellent yield strength and bending properties of claim 7, wherein the cold rolling
is performed at a reduction ratio of 40 to 70%.
12. The method for manufacturing an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having
excellent yield strength and bending properties of claim 7, further comprising
temper rolling the overaged cold-rolled steel sheet at an elongation of 0.1 to 2.0%,
after the overaging treatment.