[0001] The present invention concerns a foundation for a structure and a method for installing
the same. In particular, the present invention concerns structural foundations, such
as piles, tubular piles, monopiles, jacket piles, suction bucket/caisson foundations
and suction anchors, skirted foundations, sheet walls, berthing dolphins, and other
types of temporary and permanent shallow or deep water foundations, that may be inserted
into a soil for supporting structures such as buildings, walls, offshore structures,
and wind turbines. The present invention is particularly suited to offshore foundations,
and more particularly to open ended tubular foundation types, such as monopiles, jacket
piles and suction buckets, and most particularly to offshore wind turbine foundations.
[0002] Structural foundations are typically installed by forcing the foundation into the
ground using a piling or hydraulic impact hammer to apply a series of axial impacts
for driving the foundation down into the soil in an insertion direction. Once installed,
the foundation is axially supported by the friction applied to the lateral surfaces
of the foundation's body and, to a lesser extent, the resistance to further penetration
at the foundation's toe.
[0003] With conventional installation techniques, the toe at the distal end of the foundation
displaces soil as it is driven down. This compresses the soil in the surrounding region.
However, as the foundation is driven deeper, and pressure increases, the forces required
to continue displacing soil at the foundation's toe also increase. At the same time,
the lateral surface area of the foundation in contact with the soil increases, leading
to an increase in the shear forces required to overcome the frictional resistance
to driving. As a result, the bearing resistance increases as the foundation is installed
deeper into the soil.
[0004] In recent years, there has been a trend towards having larger monopile and other
foundations, and this has exacerbated the above challenges of their installation.
For example, higher impact forces and/or a higher number of hammer strikes are required
for pile driving larger foundations. This in turn imposes significant failure resistance
requirements on the foundation. At the same time, the noise generated by the larger
impacts is also increased, which presents significant environmental and safety hazards.
[0005] In view of the above, various methods and systems have been proposed for making the
installation of foundations easier. For example, electro-osmosis has been proposed
as a mechanism to lower shaft resistance during pile installation by attracting pore
water to the foundation body. This thereby lubricates the interface between the soil
and the foundation surface. However, whilst research in this area continues, electro-osmosis
may not be suitable in all circumstances. As such, there remains a need for other
methods and systems for reducing installation resistance during installation of a
foundation.
[0006] The present invention therefore seeks to address the above issues.
[0007] According to a first aspect, there is provided a foundation for a structure comprising:
a body for insertion into a soil in an insertion direction during installation, the
body having a toe at its distal end; and an array of nozzles provided at the distal
end for jetting a fluid, wherein the nozzles in the array are configured such that
their fluid jets are complementarily directed for generating a fluid stream ahead
of the toe which flows in a direction substantially perpendicular to the insertion
direction.
[0008] In this way, the present invention provides a foundation that may be installed more
easily. In particular, the generation of the fluid stream driven by high-pressure
jetting from the nozzles provides a high velocity flow which erodes soil as it moves
around a fluid channel formed in a plane ahead of the toe. As soil is eroded, coarse
grains are accumulated in the suspension, increasing its abrasiveness, and further
enhancing erosion. The toe may therefore progressively advance into the cavity formed
by the flowing fluid. At the same time, the excess soil suspension caused by the persistent
fluid influx is pushed upwards through the gap between the foundation wall and the
soil that is created by the abrasive suspension flow. As such, soil particles are
continually transported away from the installation front. Importantly, as the fluid
flow is perpendicular to the installation direction, and the complementary configuration
of the nozzles acts to enhance the speed of the fluid flow, the erosion of the fluid
cavity walls is controlled and rapid. This contrasts with conventional jetting techniques
which rely on high-power vertical jets to mechanically cut into and breakup the soil.
Embodiments of the invention therefore allow for both improved installation speed
and retention of the surrounding soil structure for providing a more stable support
for the foundation once installed.
[0009] In embodiments, the fluid stream forms a fluid channel ahead of the toe in a plane
perpendicular to the insertion direction by eroding soil as the fluid flows through
the fluid channel in the direction perpendicular to the insertion direction.
[0010] In embodiments, soil is progressively eroded from the wall of the fluid channel as
the toe advances in the insertion direction during installation.
[0011] In embodiments, the nozzles in the array are configured for generating the fluid
stream flowing in a cyclic path in a soil region ahead of the toe. In this way, the
fluid stream may form a continuous loop, allowing the fluid flow to be driven around
by the nozzles in the respective array at a high velocity, with each nozzle feeding
into the stream produced by the preceding nozzles.
[0012] In embodiments, the cyclic path is a circumferential path coaxial with the body.
In this way, the fluid channel cavity formed by the fluid stream is aligned with the
foundation's body for creating the space between the soil and the body as the foundation
advances in the installation direction.
[0013] Preferably, the foundation is provided as a hollow foundation. More preferably, the
foundation is a hollow pile foundation. Even more preferably, the foundation is a
monopile. For example, the monopile may comprise a hollow tubular body.
[0014] In embodiments, the foundation further comprises a second array of nozzles provided
at the distal end, wherein the nozzles in the second array are configured such that
their fluid jets are complementarily directed for generating a second fluid stream
ahead of the toe which flows in a direction perpendicular to the insertion direction
and opposite to the first fluid stream. In this way, a second array of nozzles may
be provided with their jetting thrust being applied in an opposite direction to the
thrust applied by the first nozzle array. This thereby counteracts the torsional moment
that would otherwise be applied by jetting in an uniform direction. At the same time,
the generation of a second stream allows a wider cavity area to be formed for creating
space between the soil and the foundation body.
[0015] In embodiments, the first array of nozzles is provided on an interior side of the
body for generating the first fluid stream in a path in line with an interior lateral
surface of the body, and the second array of nozzles is provided on an exterior side
of the body for generating the second fluid stream in a path in line with an exterior
lateral surface of the body. In this way, the angle of the nozzles in each of the
first and second arrays may be respectively directed for creating space between the
soil and the interior and exterior lateral surfaces of the foundation body.
[0016] In embodiments, a fin provided at the distal end for separating the first fluid stream
from the second fluid stream. In this way, efficiency may be improved as less jetting
energy is dissipated by the turbulent interface between the opposing streams. At the
same time, the respective nozzles of each of the arrays may be angled more closely
together, thereby providing a narrower combined fluid channel cavity, and in turn
allowing the soil structure surrounding the foundation body to be better preserved.
[0017] In embodiments, the foundation further comprises a manifold at the distal end of
the foundation and wherein the nozzles are mounted to the manifold for being fed fluid
thereby. In this way, pressurised fluid may be fed to the nozzles at the distal end
of the foundation, with the shape of the manifold defining the shape of the path of
the fluid channel cavities formed during jetting. That is, the shape of the manifold
in a horizontal plane determines the shape of the fluid channel in a horizontal plane.
At the same time, the pressurised fluid applied acts to maintain the shape of the
interior bore within the manifold itself.
[0018] In embodiments, the nozzles are directed downward in the range of 1-40 degrees about
the radial axis from the tangential direction. Preferably, the nozzles are directed
in the range of 10-30 degrees from the tangential direction. In this way, rather than
being directed into the soil ahead of the toe, the jetted fluid from nozzles in each
array is directed diagonally down for driving the fluid suspension flow in a lateral
plane. For example, for round foundations, the fluid suspension flow is driven circumferentially.
In embodiments, the nozzles are directed in the range of -10 to +10 degrees about
an axial axis from the tangential direction.
[0019] In embodiments, the nozzles are distributed around the perimeter of the toe. In this
way, the velocity of the fluid stream formed by the fluid jetting may be maintained
throughout the fluid circuit for providing uniform soil erosion.
[0020] In embodiments, the foundation further comprises a pressurised fluid supply for supplying
pressurised fluid to the nozzles. Preferably, this pressurised fluid supply is in
excess of 10 bar relative to the ambient fluid pressures, and more preferably above
100 bar relative to the ambient fluid pressures, and even more preferably above 200
bar relative to the ambient fluid pressures.
[0021] In embodiments the nozzles have a diameter of 1.5-5mm. It will be understood that,
the larger the nozzle diameter, the greater the influx. In a preferred embodiment,
the nozzles have a diameter of 2.8mm. In such embodiments, the fluid may be supplied
at a pressure of around 250bar. Such embodiments may be implemented with a 9m diameter
monopile having two rows of nozzles pointing in the different directions and each
nozzle being spaced 15cm apart.
[0022] In embodiments, the foundation further comprises a controller for controlling one
or more of: an installation speed, a ballast weight, and a fluid pressure of fluid
supplied to the nozzles.
[0023] Preferably, the fluid comprises water. The fluid may be, for example, seawater, or
an aqueous solution or suspension. In this respect, a controller may be provided for
controlling the pressure, flow rate and/or composition of the fluid delivered through
the nozzles.
[0024] In embodiments, the foundation may further comprise an additive delivery system for
delivering additives to the fluid stream. For example, abrasion increasing additives
may be introduced into the fluid flow for enhancing soil erosion. Such additives may
be introduced into the fluid supply or using a separately delivery path. For example,
it is envisaged that abrasion increasing additives, such as coarser grains, fine gravel,
or steel shot, could be deposited on the seabed near the pile wall before or during
installation. Such additives may then trickle down the annulus to the erosion front
as it progresses downwards for enhancing soil erosion.
[0025] According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method
of installing the above foundation, where the method comprises: inserting the toe
into the soil; supplying the fluid to the array of nozzles to jet fluid for generating
the fluid stream ahead of the toe which flows in a direction perpendicular to the
insertion direction; and controlling movement of the body in the insertion direction
to maintain the formation of a fluid channel by the fluid stream as the toe advances
in the insertion direction.
[0026] In embodiments, the method further comprises the step of supplying the fluid to the
second array of nozzles for generating the second fluid stream ahead of the toe which
flows in a direction perpendicular to the insertion direction and opposite to the
first fluid stream.
[0027] Illustrative embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference
to the accompanying drawings in which:
Figure 1 shows a cross-sectional view of a distal end of a foundation according to
a first embodiment of the invention;
Figure 2 shows an enlarged isometric view of a section of the fluid manifold shown
in Figure 1 during fluid jetting;
Figure 3 shows a cross-sectional plan view of a section of one array of nozzles and
the associated fluid flows in the embodiment shown in Figure 1;
Figure 4 shows a schematic illustration for explaining the jetting angles of the nozzles;
Figure 5 shows a sequence of the foundation of the foundation shown in Figure 1 being
installed; and
Figure 6 shows a cross-sectional view of a distal end of a foundation according to
a second embodiment of the invention.
[0028] Figure 1 shows a cross-sectional view of the distal end region of a foundation according
to a first embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment, the foundation 10 is a
monopile.
[0029] The foundation 10 comprises a hollow tubular body 1 having an exterior lateral surface,
and an interior lateral surface that defines an interior cavity in the form of a bore.
The distal end of the body 1 forms a toe, which comprises a manifold 3 for feeding
jetting fluid to a plurality of nozzles 6. The manifold 3 is fed by a pressurised
fluid supply (not shown) which delivers pressurised fluid to the distal end of the
foundation 10, for example, from a pump provided on a nearby installation vessel.
Typically, the fluid supplied through the manifold 3 is seawater.
[0030] The nozzles 6 are each supported on a lateral extension 5 which extends out from
the manifold 3 and includes an internal fluid pathway 4 connecting between the interior
of the manifold 3 and the outlet of each nozzle 6. As such, pressurised fluid from
the manifold 3 is jetted out through the nozzles 6.
[0031] In this embodiment, the nozzles 6 are arranged in two arrays, with an interior set
of nozzles 6a provided on the interior lateral surface side of the body 1 and an exterior
set of nozzles 6b provided on the exterior lateral surface side. Each array of nozzles
6 are circumferentially distributed around the manifold 3 so that they are spaced
evenly around the distal end of the body 1. In this respect, Figure 2 shows an enlarged
isometric view of a section of the fluid manifold shown in Figure 1 during fluid jetting.
In this figure, two of the set of exterior nozzles 6b are most visible, with backs
of the lateral extensions 5 for the set of interior nozzles 6a being visible on the
opposing side. As shown, the nozzles 6 within each array are angled to direct their
fluid jets 7 diagonally downward and in the direction of the stream of the adjacent
fluid jet. As such, all the nozzles 6 within each of the interior and exterior arrays
are uniformly angled in a complementary configuration.
[0032] The above described configuration is shown more clearly in Figure 3 which shows a
cross-sectional plan view of a section of one array of nozzles 6 and the associated
fluid flows generated thereby. It will be understood that there is also a flow going
the opposite direction generated by the other array of nozzles. As shown, when pressurised
fluid is supplied via the manifold, each nozzle 6 produces a fluid jet 7. As the jetted
fluid travels diagonally down and further away from each nozzle 6, it spreads and
dissipates into the fluid suspension below the toe of the foundation. The diagonal
angling of the fluid jets 7 by the nozzles 6 means that each jet, rather than cutting
into the soil below the foundation, feeds diagonally into the fluid suspension beneath
the adjacent nozzle 6. As such, in use, this drives the fluid suspension in a plane
substantially perpendicular to the insertion direction and thereby generates a high
velocity circulating fluid stream 8 below the respective array of nozzles. This stream
8 flows in the jetting direction in a path defined by the manifold 3. In embodiments,
flow velocities of 30m/s may be generated. Accordingly, a high-speed circulating fluid
annulus is created by each array of nozzles 6, with the fluid annuluses being coaxial
with the foundation body 1. As shown in Figure 2, the interior and exterior nozzle
arrays 6a,6b have nozzles angled in different directions, and therefore their respective
fluid streams 8a,8b will also flow in opposite directions. This configuration in which
opposing flows are generated acts to counteract the torsional moment forces that would
otherwise be applied to the distal end of the foundation body 1 if the jetting thrusts
from all the nozzles were directed in the same rotational direction.
[0033] As shown in Figure 1, in this embodiment, the interior and exterior nozzles 6a,6b
are also angled slightly outward, away from each other, so that the fluid streams
8a,8b generated thereby are separated. That is, the nozzles are angled so that a nib
21 of the soil 2 below the manifold 3 remains between the two streams 8a,8b, which
thereby avoids interference between them.
[0034] Figure 4 shows a schematic illustration for explaining the jetting angles of the
nozzles in further detail. As shown, the foundation body 1 defines an axial axis 21
which is coincident with the insertion direction of the foundation. Perpendicular
to this is the radial axis 22 of the body 1, and the tangential direction 23 is also
shown. In this embodiment, the nozzles are angled in a jetting direction 24 by a jetting
angle 25 that is 20 degrees below the tangential direction rotated about the radial
axis 22. In other embodiments, the jetting angle 25 may be 0 to 40 degrees and preferably
10 to 30 degrees. As mentioned above, the nozzles may also be angled slightly outward
or inwardly, for example by an angle of -10 to +10 degrees about the axial axis 21.
[0035] In use, as shown in Figure 1, particles 9 from the soil will become suspended in
the fluid streams 8a,8b as the foundation body 1 is driven into the soil. Accordingly,
the fluid streams 8a,8b contain a suspension of abrasive soil grains, which flow at
high speed in two concentric rings with opposing flows formed by the interior and
exterior nozzle arrays 6a,6b. As such, the fluid streams 8a,8b, accelerated by the
fluid jets 7, have an abrasive effect on the soil 2 below, causing further soil particles
to be broken away from the walls of the fluid channel. This has the effect of maintaining
the space for the fluid streams 8a,8b as the toe of the foundation 10 advances deeper
into the soil 2. As a result, the soil 2 is rapidly eroded away ahead of the foundation
10, allowing the foundation 10 to move downward more easily through the soil.
[0036] In this connection, figure 5 shows a sequence of the foundation 10 being installed
in an offshore location. As shown in Figure 5(a), the foundation 10 is lowered through
the water 10 so that its distal end inserts into the soil 2. Prior to engaging with
the seabed, the fluid jets 7 are started, albeit at a relatively lower pressure, such
as 50 bar. This initial jetting flow prevents soil from entering the jetting system.
After the foundation's toe engages with the seabed, it penetrates down to an initial
depth under its own weight. This depth may be, for instance, around 2 meters.
[0037] Once the initial depth is reached, the fluid jetting pressure is increased up to
300 bar. As shown in Figures 5(b) and 5(c), with the high-pressure jetting established,
the toe of the foundation 10 penetrates axially downward in an insertion direction
through the soil 2. As discussed above, the water jets act to accelerate the flow
of the soil suspension located below and around the toe of the body 1 forming at least
one fluid channel cavity with high velocity circulating flow streams. These streams
8 around the circumference of the toe region are loaded with abrasive soil grains
in suspension and act to erode the walls of the fluid channels. This thereby forms
annuluses either side of the body 1, which separates the soil from the foundation's
interior and exterior surfaces. The excess soil suspension caused by the persistent
fluid influx through the jetting nozzles 6 also generates upward fluid flows through
the gaps formed between the body's wall and the soil. Soil is thereby transported
up the body of the foundation. These combined effects result in much lower frictional
resistance during foundation installation.
[0038] The speed of insertion may be controlled by, for example, controlling the rate that
the foundation 10 is lowered by a crane 12. For example, an installation rate of 2m/min
may be maintained through this phase of installation. Typically, the foundation's
own weight will be sufficient to drive the toe downward. However, in some scenarios,
a ballast (not shown) may be connected the proximal end of the foundation 10 to help
drive installation.
[0039] In this connection, depending on the erodibility of the soil and the foundation installation
velocity, the size of the fluid channel cavities formed by the fluid jets 7 can be
varied. If the installation velocity is too fast, the cavity can become too small
such that the suspension flow will eventually stall, and the erosion rate drops. In
this case, the installation velocity can be reduced or stopped to allow for a new
cavity to form and the suspension stream to develop. For instance, in use, if a rapid
increase in installation resistance is detected during the driving phase, the crane
12 may be used to stop installation and lift the foundation, for example by 10cm,
before restarting the lowering process of the pile. This thereby lifts the foundation
to create space to reestablish the fluid streams 8, and thereby allow their abrasive
effect to restart. This scenario may arise, for example, when conditions change from
granular to a more cohesive soil during installation. As the toe passes through the
cohesive soil layer, the erodibility will be reduced, which could otherwise trigger
a runaway effect. By swiftly reducing the installation rate, stalling of the circumferential
flow may be avoided and, once the more cohesive layer is passed, the installation
rate can be gradually increased to return back to an optimal rate. It will be understood
that if the installation rate is too fast for the crane 12or the associated mechanisms,
the jetting pressure may be reduced.
[0040] As shown in Figure 5(d), once the foundation 10 reaches a predetermined depth threshold
slightly ahead of its target depth, the fluid jets 7 may be turned off. For example,
the predetermined depth threshold may be 30cm above the target depth. This thereby
minimises the disturbance of the soil at the target depth, allowing the foundation
10 to sink down to its final target depth without overly weakening the soil structure
in this region. The foundation 10 will resist further installation once the target
depth has been reached. Once the insertion phase is completed, the soil 2 will relax
to refill the space formed by the fluid streams. As shown in Figure 5(e), a test load
13 may then be applied to verify the initial axial load bearing capacity of the foundation
10. Over time, the axial load bearing capacity of the foundation will progressively
increase as the load cycles from wave loading act to re-compact the soil in the annulus
formed by the fluid streams.
[0041] Figure 6 shows a cross-sectional view of a distal end of a foundation according to
a second embodiment of the invention. This second embodiment is substantially the
same as the first embodiment, but the toe of the foundation 10 is further provided
with a fin 31 for dividing the interior and exterior fluid streams 8a,8b. The fin
31 is used to separate the opposing suspension fluid streams for avoiding interference
between them. This may thereby allow the respective nozzles of each of the arrays
to be angled more closely together, thereby providing a narrower combined fluid channel
cavity. This may allow the soil structure surrounding the foundation body to be better
preserved. At the same time, it also provides for increased efficiency since less
jetting energy is dissipated by the turbulent interface between the opposing streams.
[0042] It will be understood from the above that the inventive arrangements disclosed herein
allow a foundation to be installed into the soil more easily. This reduces cost and
allows installation noise to be minimised.
[0043] In this connection, with embodiments of the present invention, the soil failure mechanism
at the foundation toe can continue throughout the pile installation process as the
foundation penetrates deeper. As such, the need for pile driving or large ballasts
to reach target installation depths are avoided. After the foundation has been installed
to the required depth, the fluid jetting system may be turned off to allow water to
drain from the soil around the foundation body. The suspended soil particles will
then settle to form a sediment which may compact over time through cyclic shake down
effects, thereby restabilising the soil strength.
[0044] Importantly, as the fluid jets are used to form fluid streams which erode the soil,
rather than directly cutting into the soil themselves, the structure of the soil outside
the formed fluid channels is largely undisturbed, with the suspension pressure acting
to stabilize the adjacent soil. This soil is therefore able to maintain its structure
for supporting the foundation. This contrasts with conventional liquid excavation
techniques where a body of soil is cut into using pressurised liquid to excavate space
for a foundation. With this type of conventional methodology, soil is removed in an
uncontrolled manner, and the excavated site is effectively refilled with reclaimed
soil once the foundation is in place. However, as the soil re-filling the space is
newly located, it has little developed structure and will therefore be inherently
weaker as a result.
[0045] It will be understood that the embodiments illustrated above show applications of
the invention only for the purposes of illustration. In practice the invention may
be applied to many different configurations, the detailed embodiments being straightforward
for those skilled in the art to implement.
[0046] For example, it will be understood that by adjusting the jetting direction of the
nozzles, the location and shape of the fluid channel formed beneath the toe can be
adjusted. For example, by locating the nozzles on the inside of the foundation, the
fluid cavity will be shifted more towards the inside of the foundation body. Conversely,
by locating the nozzles on both the interior and exterior sides, and pointing them
slightly away from the foundation wall, a wider cavity may be created by the suspension
flow, or two individual cavities may be formed, as shown in Figure 1.
[0047] Furthermore, in some embodiments, additives may be added to the fluid streams formed
at the toe of the foundation, for instance by introducing them to the fluid supply
or separately using an additive delivery system. For example, an abrasive additive
may be used to introduce a more coarse/angular material for improving the abrasiveness
of the fluid streams. This may be advantageous for tackling soil types which do not
easily erode, such as silt, clay, chalk, soft bedrock. Grout may also be introduced
towards the end of the installation process for improving the in-place performance
of the foundation.
[0048] It will also be understood that additional mechanisms and systems may be also used
in combination with the described fluid jetting system for further reducing driving
resistance. For instance, the foundation may further incorporate electrodes for electro-osmosis.
Furthermore, the fluid jetting system may work synergistically with the electro-osmosis
system.
[0049] Finally, although in the above illustrative embodiments, the foundation was a monopile,
it will nevertheless be understood that other foundations are also possible, such
as bucket foundations.
1. A foundation for a structure comprising:
a body for insertion into a soil in an insertion direction during installation, the
body having a toe at its distal end; and
an array of nozzles provided at the distal end for jetting a fluid, wherein the nozzles
in the array are configured such that their fluid jets are complementarily directed
for generating a fluid stream ahead of the toe which flows in a direction substantially
perpendicular to the insertion direction.
2. A foundation according to claim 1, wherein the fluid stream forms a fluid channel
ahead of the toe in a plane perpendicular to the insertion direction by eroding soil
as the fluid flows through the fluid channel in the direction perpendicular to the
insertion direction.
3. A foundation according to claim 2, wherein soil is progressively eroded from the wall
of the fluid channel as the toe advances in the insertion direction during installation.
4. A foundation according to any preceding claim, wherein the nozzles in the array are
configured for generating the fluid stream flowing in a cyclic path in a soil region
ahead of the toe.
5. A foundation according to claim 4, wherein the cyclic path is a circumferential path
coaxial with the body.
6. A foundation according to any preceding claim, further comprising a second array of
nozzles provided at the distal end, wherein the nozzles in the second array are configured
such that their fluid jets are complementarily directed for generating a second fluid
stream ahead of the toe which flows in a direction perpendicular to the insertion
direction and opposite to the first fluid stream.
7. A foundation according to claim 6, wherein the first array of nozzles is provided
on an interior side of the body for generating the first fluid stream in a path in
line with an interior lateral surface of the body, and
the second array of nozzles is provided on an exterior side of the body for generating
the second fluid stream in a path in line with an exterior lateral surface of the
body.
8. A foundation according to claim 6 or 7, further comprising a fin provided at the distal
end for separating the first fluid stream from the second fluid stream.
9. A foundation according to any preceding claim, further comprising a manifold at the
distal end of the foundation and wherein the nozzles are mounted to the manifold for
being fed fluid thereby.
10. A foundation according to any preceding claim, wherein the nozzles are directed downward
in the range of 1-40 degrees about the radial axis from the tangential direction.
11. A foundation according to any preceding claim, further comprising a pressurised fluid
supply for supplying pressurised fluid to the nozzles.
12. A foundation according to any preceding claim, further comprising a controller for
controlling one or more of: an installation speed, a ballast weight, and a fluid pressure
of fluid supplied to the nozzles.
13. A foundation according to any preceding claim, further comprising an additive delivery
system for delivering additives to the fluid stream.
14. A method of installing a foundation according to any one of claims 1-13, the method
comprising:
inserting the toe into the soil;
supplying the fluid to the array of nozzles to jet fluid for generating the fluid
stream ahead of the toe which flows in a direction perpendicular to the insertion
direction; and
controlling movement of the body in the insertion direction to maintain the formation
of a fluid channel by the fluid stream as the toe advances in the insertion direction.
15. A method according to claim 14 when depending via claim 7, further comprising the
step of supplying the fluid to the second array of nozzles for generating the second
fluid stream ahead of the toe which flows in a direction perpendicular to the insertion
direction and opposite to the first fluid stream.