Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet suitable
as a material for automotive parts and a method for manufacturing the high-strength
hot-rolled steel sheet.
Background Art
[0002] From the viewpoint of improving crash safety and fuel economy of automobiles, there
is a need to increase the strength of steel sheets used for automotive parts. On the
other hand, in steel sheets having increased strength, cracking due to the lack of
workability occurs significantly during pressing, and thus the pressing process and
workability of the steel sheets need to be improved. Hot-rolled steel sheets having
a TS of more than 980 MPa are required to have particularly high ductility in order
to apply such steel sheets to parts with complicated shapes, such as a lower arm.
In addition, such steel sheets are often formed into parts with complicated shapes
through a plurality of steps and required to have formability for nonuniform deformation
history. Bending and unbending are a working method that is particularly often used,
and excellent bending-unbending workability is desired.
[0003] To address the needs, various hot-rolled steel sheets have been developed as described
in, for example, Patent Literature 1 to Patent Literature 3.
[0004] Patent Literature 1 discloses a technique related to a Zn-Al-based plating-coated
steel sheet having improve unbending resistance. The coated steel sheet has, on a
surface of the steel sheet, a coated layer containing Al: 50 to 60 mass% with the
balance being substantially Zn, and a coating film disposed as an upper layer of the
coated layer, in which a cross-sectional hardness HM (HV) of the base metal and a
cross-sectional hardness HP (HV) of the coated layer satisfy HM > HP and HP ≥ 90.
[0005] Patent Literature 2 describes a hot-rolled steel sheet having a microstructure that
includes ferrite as a main phase and retained austenite as a second phase, in which
retained austenite is contained in an amount of 5% by volume or more on average, a
difference (Vmax - Vmin) between the maximum content Vmax and the minimum content
Vmin of retained austenite at positions in the thickness direction in a region between
a position 0.1 mm from a front surface of the steel sheet and a position 0.1 mm from
a back surface of the steel sheet is 3.0% by volume or less, and a total elongation
equivalent to a thickness of 2 mm is 34% or more. Patent Literature 2 discloses a
technique related to a hot-rolled steel sheet having a high total elongation and improved
bending-unbending workability, the hot-rolled steel sheet having a microstructure
that includes ferrite as a main phase and includes retained austenite.
[0006] Patent Literature 3 describes a hot-rolled steel sheet having a specific chemical
composition and containing, in an amount of 50% or more in terms of area fraction.
Crystal grains have orientation differences of 15° or more in grain boundaries between
adjacent crystal grains, and an average orientation difference of 0° to 0.5° within
the crystal grains. A total of martensite, tempered martensite, and retained austenite
is 2% or more and 10% or less in terms of area fraction. Furthermore, Ti is present
as titanium carbide in mass% of 40% or more of Tief represented by a specific formula,
and the mass of the titanium carbide having an equivalent circular grain diameter
of 7 nm or more and 20 nm or less is 50% or more of the mass of all titanium carbides.
Patent Literature 3 discloses a technique related to a hot-rolled steel sheet whose
ductility is improved by controlling the orientation difference within crystal grains.
Citation List
Patent Literature
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0008] However, the technique of Patent Literature 1 studies only unbending cracking originated
from coating, and does not study unbending cracking formed in a hot-rolled steel sheet
having no coated layer. Patent Literature 2 discloses only findings in a strength
of 900 MPa or less and includes no findings or suggestions related to ductility and
an improvement in bending-unbending workability in the over 980 MPa-grade, which needs
stricter requirements. While the technique of Patent Literature 3 can improve ductility,
no study on bending-unbending workability is performed, and there is room for improvement.
[0009] The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and an object of
the present invention is to provide a high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet that is
suitable as a material for automotive parts and that has excellent ductility and excellent
bending-unbending workability and a method for manufacturing the high-strength hot-rolled
steel sheet.
[0010] The term "high strength" as used herein means that TS (tensile strength) is 980 MPa
or more. The term "excellent ductility" as used herein means that a uniform elongation
of a tensile test is 5.0% or more. The term "excellent bending-unbending workability"
as used herein means that, in a bending-unbending test described below, when 90° V-bending
is performed with a punch with a bending radius of 5 mm, and unbending is then performed
with a flat-bottomed punch to a bending angle of 10° or less, no cracks are formed
on a ridge line of a test specimen.
In the present invention, the tensile test for measuring the TS and the uniform elongation,
and the bending-unbending test can be performed by methods described in Examples below.
Solution to Problem
[0011] To solve the above problems, the inventors of the present invention focused on a
hard phase and conceived that work hardening is promoted by controlling the fraction
of the hard phase to increase the uniform elongation.
[0012] Furthermore, the inventors conceived that bending-unbending workability is improved
by controlling the crystal orientation of the hard phase, and, when regions surrounded
by boundaries between adjacent crystals having an orientation difference of 15° or
more are defined as crystal grains, by controlling an aspect ratio of the crystal
grains of a surface layer of a steel sheet.
[0013] As a result, the chemical composition of the hot-rolled steel sheet is adjusted to
a specific range, martensite and bainite are present as main phases, martensite is
dispersed in the bainite, and furthermore, while an aspect ratio of crystal grains
of a surface layer of the steel sheet is lowered, a crystal orientation of each of
the martensite in the bainite and crystal orientations of bainite surrounding the
martensite (bainite adjacent to the martensite) are controlled to be different from
each other. The inventors have found that this enables both ductility and bending-unbending
workability to be improved even in an over 980 MPa-grade hot-rolled steel sheet, and
completed the present invention.
[0014] The present invention is summarized as follows.
- [1] A high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet having:
a chemical composition containing, by mass%,
C: 0.04% to 0.18%,
Si: 0.1% to 3.0%,
Mn: 0.5% to 3.5%,
P: more than 0% and 0.100% or less,
S: more than 0% and 0.020% or less, and
Al: more than 0% and 1.5% or less, and
further containing one or two or more selected from Cr: 0.005% to 2.0%, Ti: 0.005%
to 0.20%, Nb: 0.005% to 0.20%, Mo: 0.005% to 2.0%, and V: 0.005% to 1.0%,
with the balance being Fe and incidental impurities; and
a steel microstructure including, as main phases, 80% to 100% of martensite and bainite
in terms of total area fraction,
wherein an entire area fraction of the martensite in the bainite is 2% to 20%,
among the martensite in the bainite, an area fraction of martensite each having an
orientation difference of 15° or more between a crystal orientation of the martensite
and a crystal orientation of at least one of bainite adjacent to the martensite is
more than 50% relative to the whole martensite, and
when regions surrounded by boundaries between adjacent crystals having an orientation
difference of 15° or more are defined as crystal grains, an average aspect ratio of
the crystal grains present in a region extending from a surface of a steel sheet to
a depth of 5 um is 2.0 or less.
- [2] The high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet according to [1], containing:
in addition to the chemical composition, by mass%,
one or two or more selected from:
Cu: 0.05% to 4.0%,
Ni: 0.005% to 2.0%,
B: 0.0002% to 0.0050%,
Ca: 0.0001% to 0.0050%,
REM: 0.0001% to 0.0050%,
Sb: 0.0010% to 0.10%, and
Sn: 0.0010% to 0.50%.
- [3] A method for manufacturing a high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet, the method
being a method for manufacturing the high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet according
to [1] or [2], the method including:
heating a slab having the chemical composition; and
subsequently subjecting the slab to hot rolling,
wherein the hot rolling includes performing rough rolling, performing finish rolling
under conditions in which a total number of passes at 1,000°C or higher is 3 times
or more, a total rolling reduction at 1,000°C or lower is less than 50%, and a total
rolling reduction from a final pass rolling temperature to the final pass rolling
temperature + 50°C is 35% or less, subsequently starting cooling in less than 1.0
s, performing cooling under a condition in which an average cooling rate from a cooling
start temperature to 550°C is 50°C/s or more, and subsequently performing coiling
at a coiling temperature of (Ms temperature - 50)°C to 550°C.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0015] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a high-strength hot-rolled
steel sheet that is suitable as a material for automotive parts and that has excellent
ductility and excellent bending-unbending workability and a method for manufacturing
the high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet. The use of the high-strength hot-rolled
steel sheet according to the present invention as a material for automotive parts
enables production of, for example, high-strength automotive parts with complicated
shapes.
Brief Description of Drawing
[0016] [Fig. 1] Fig. 1 is a schematic view illustrating an aspect ratio of a crystal grain
in the present invention. Description of Embodiments
[0017] A high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet and a method for manufacturing the high-strength
hot-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention will be described in detail
below. The present invention is not limited to the following embodiments.
<High-Strength Hot-Rolled Steel Sheet>
[0018] The high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention is a
so-called black surface hot-rolled steel sheet, which is as hot-rolled, or a so-called
white surface hot-rolled steel sheet, which is further pickled after hot rolling.
The high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet intended in the present invention preferably
has a thickness of 0.6 mm or more and 10.0 mm or less. When the high-strength hot-rolled
steel sheet is used as a material for automotive parts, the thickness is more preferably
1.0 mm or more and 6.0 mm or less. The high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet preferably
has a width of 500 mm or more and 1,800 mm or less, more preferably 700 mm or more
and 1,400 mm or less.
[0019] The high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention has a
specific chemical composition and a specific steel microstructure. Here, the chemical
composition and the steel microstructure will be described in this order.
[0020] First, the chemical composition of the high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet according
to the present invention will be described. Note that the symbol "%" representing
a content in the chemical composition means "mass%".
[0021] The chemical composition of the high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet according to
the present invention contains, by mass%, C: 0.04% to 0.18%, Si: 0.1% to 3.0%, Mn:
0.5% to 3.5%, P: more than 0% and 0.100% or less, S: more than 0% and 0.020% or less,
and Al: more than 0% and 1.5% or less and further contains one or two or more selected
from Cr: 0.005% to 2.0%, Ti: 0.005% to 0.20%, Nb: 0.005% to 0.20%, Mo: 0.005% to 2.0%,
and V: 0.005% to 1.0%, with the balance being Fe and incidental impurities.
C: 0.04% to 0.18%
[0022] C is an element effective in forming and strengthening bainite and martensite to
increase TS. A C content of less than 0.04% does not sufficiently provide this effect
and does not achieve a TS of 980 MPa or more. On the other hand, a C content of more
than 0.18% results in a marked hardening of martensite, thus failing to achieve bending-unbending
workability of the present invention. Accordingly, the C content is 0.04% to 0.18%.
The C content is preferably 0.05% or more from the viewpoint of more stably achieving
a TS of 980 MPa or more. The C content is preferably 0.16% or less, more preferably
0.10% or less from the viewpoint of improving bending-unbending workability.
Si: 0.1% to 3.0%
[0023] Si is an element effective in increasing TS through solid solution strengthening
of steel and suppression of temper softening of martensite. Si is an element effective
in suppressing the formation of cementite to obtain a microstructure in which martensite
is dispersed in bainite. To provide this effect, the Si content needs to be 0.1% or
more. On the other hand, a Si content of more than 3.0% results in excessive formation
of polygonal ferrite, thus failing to obtain the steel microstructure of the present
invention. Accordingly, the Si content is 0.1% to 3.0%. The Si content is preferably
0.2% or more. The Si content is preferably 2.0% or less, more preferably 1.5% or less.
Mn: 0.5% to 3.5%
[0024] Mn is an element effective in forming martensite and bainite to increase TS. A Mn
content of less than 0.5% does not sufficiently provide this effect, results in the
formation of polygonal ferrite, etc., thus failing to obtain the steel microstructure
of the present invention. On the other hand, a Mn content of more than 3.5% suppresses
the formation of bainite, thus failing to obtain the steel microstructure of the present
invention. Accordingly, the Mn content is 0.5% to 3.5%. The Mn content is preferably
1.0% or more from the viewpoint of more stably achieving a TS of 980 MPa or more.
The Mn content is preferably 3.0% or less, more preferably 2.3% or less from the viewpoint
of stably obtaining bainite.
P: More Than 0% and 0.100% or Less
[0025] P deteriorates bending-unbending workability, and thus the amount thereof is desirably
reduced as much as possible. In the present invention, a P content of up to 0.100%
is allowable. Accordingly, the P content is 0.100% or less and is preferably 0.030%
or less. The P content is more than 0% and is preferably 0.001% or more because a
P content of less than 0.001% causes a decrease in production efficiency.
S: More Than 0% and 0.020% or Less
[0026] S deteriorates bending-unbending workability, and thus the amount thereof is desirably
reduced as much as possible. However, a S content of up to 0.020% is allowable in
the present invention. Accordingly, the S content is 0.020% or less, preferably 0.0050%
or less, more preferably 0.0020% or less. The S content is more than 0% and is preferably
0.0002% or more because a S content of less than 0.0002% causes a decrease in production
efficiency.
Al: More Than 0% and 1.5% or Less
[0027] Al acts as a deoxidizing agent and is preferably added in a deoxidization step. The
lower limit of the Al content is more than 0%. From the viewpoint of using Al as a
deoxidizing agent, the Al content is preferably 0.01% or more. If Al is contained
in a large amount, a large amount of polygonal ferrite may be formed, thus failing
to obtain the steel microstructure of the present invention. In the present invention,
an Al content of up to 1.5% is allowable. Accordingly, the Al content is 1.5% or less.
The Al content is preferably 0.50% or less.
[0028] One or Two or More Selected from Cr: 0.005% to 2.0%, Ti: 0.005% to 0.20%, Nb: 0.005%
to 0.20%, Mo: 0.005% to 2.0%, and V: 0.005% to 1.0%
[0029] Cr, Ti, Nb, Mo, and V are elements effective in obtaining a microstructure in which
martensite is dispersed in bainite. To provide this effect, the content or contents
of one or two or more elements selected from the above elements need to be equal to
or higher than their respective lower limits mentioned above. On the other hand, if
the content or contents of one or two or more elements selected from the above elements
exceed their respective upper limits mentioned above, the effect is not provided,
thus failing to obtain the steel microstructure of the present invention. Accordingly,
one or two or more selected from Cr: 0.005% to 2.0%, Ti: 0.005% to 0.20%, Nb: 0.005%
to 0.20%, Mo: 0.005% to 2.0%, and V: 0.005% to 1.0% are contained. When the above
elements are contained, the contents are preferably Cr: 0.1% or more, Ti: 0.010% or
more, Nb: 0.010% or more, Mo: 0.10% or more, and V: 0.10% or more. When the above
elements are contained, the upper limits of the contents are preferably Cr: 1.0% or
less, Ti: 0.15% or less, Nb: 0.10% or less, Mo: 1.0% or less, and V: 0.5% or less.
[0030] The balance is Fe and incidental impurities. An example of incidental impurity elements
is N, and the acceptable upper limit of this element is preferably 0.010%.
[0031] The above components are the basic chemical composition of the high-strength hot-rolled
steel sheet according to the present invention. In the present invention, the following
elements may be further contained as needed.
[0032] One or Two or More Selected from Cu: 0.05% to 4.0%, Ni: 0.005% to 2.0%, B: 0.0002%
to 0.0050%, Ca: 0.0001% to 0.0050%, REM: 0.0001% to 0.0050%, Sb: 0.0010% to 0.10%,
and Sn: 0.0010% to 0.50%
[0033] Cu and Ni are elements effective in forming martensite to contribute to an increase
in the strength. To provide this effect, when Cu and Ni are contained, the contents
thereof are preferably equal to or higher than their respective lower limits mentioned
above. If the contents of Cu and Ni each exceed the respective upper limits mentioned
above, the formation of bainite may be suppressed, which may fail to obtain the steel
microstructure of the present invention. The Cu content is more preferably 0.10% or
more and more preferably 0.6% or less. The Ni content is more preferably 0.1% or more
and more preferably 0.6% or less.
[0034] B is an element effective in improving the hardenability of a steel sheet and forming
martensite to contribute to an increase in the strength. To provide this effect, when
B is contained, the B content is preferably 0.0002% or more. On the other and, a B
content of more than 0.0050% may increase the amounts of B-containing compounds and
deteriorate the hardenability, which may fail to obtain the steel microstructure of
the present invention. Accordingly, when B is contained, the content is preferably
0.0002% to 0.0050%. The B content is more preferably 0.0005% or more and more preferably
0.0040% or less.
[0035] Ca and REM (rare-earth metal) are elements effective in improving workability due
to the morphological control of inclusions. To provide this effect, when Ca and REM
are contained, the contents thereof are preferably Ca: 0.0001% to 0.0050% and REM:
0.0001% to 0.0050%. If the Ca content and the REM content exceed the respective upper
limits mentioned above, the amount of inclusions may increase, which may result in
the deterioration of workability. The Ca content is more preferably 0.0005% or more
and more preferably 0.0030% or less. The REM content is more preferably 0.0005% or
more and more preferably 0.0030% or less.
[0036] Sb is an element effective in suppressing denitrification, deboronization, and the
like to suppress a decrease in the strength of steel. To provide this effect, when
Sb is contained, the Sb content is preferably 0.0010% to 0.10%. An Sb content of more
than the upper limit mentioned above may cause embrittlement of the steel sheet. The
Sb content is more preferably 0.0050% or more and more preferably 0.050% or less.
[0037] Sn is an element effective in suppressing the formation of pearlite to suppress a
decrease in the strength of steel. To provide this effect, when Sn is contained, the
Sn content is preferably 0.0010% to 0.50%. A Sn content of more than the upper limit
mentioned above may cause embrittlement of the steel sheet. The Sn content is more
preferably 0.0050% or more and more preferably 0.050% or less.
[0038] Even if the contents of Cu, Ni, B, Ca, REM, Sb, and Sn are less than the respective
lower limits mentioned above, the effects of the present invention are not impaired.
Accordingly, when the contents of these components are less than their respective
lower limits mentioned above, these elements are treated as being contained as incidental
impurities.
[0039] Next, the steel microstructure of the high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet according
to the present invention will be described below.
The steel microstructure of the high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet according to
the present invention includes, as main phases, 80% to 100% of martensite and bainite
in terms of total area fraction. An entire area fraction of the martensite in the
bainite is 2% to 20%. Among the martensite in the bainite, an area fraction of a martensite
each having an orientation difference of 15° or more between a crystal orientation
of the martensite and a crystal orientation of at least one of bainite adjacent to
the martensite is more than 50% relative to the whole martensite. When regions surrounded
by boundaries between adjacent crystals having an orientation difference of 15° or
more are defined as crystal grains, an average aspect ratio of the crystal grains
present in a region extending from a surface of the steel sheet to a depth of 5 um
is 2.0 or less.
[0040] Total Area Fraction of Martensite and Bainite: 80% to 100%
[0041] In the present invention, in order to provide high TS and excellent bending-unbending
workability, the steel microstructure mainly has martensite and bainite (includes
martensite and bainite as main phases).
If the total area fraction of martensite and bainite is less than 80% relative to
the whole steel sheet microstructure, either high TS or bending-unbending workability
is not achieve. Accordingly, the total area fraction of martensite and bainite is
80% to 100%. The total area fraction is preferably 90% to 100%, more preferably 94%
to 100%.
Entire Area Fraction of Martensite in Bainite: 2% to 20%
[0042] Martensite is a steel microstructure effective in increasing TS and, furthermore,
is a steel microstructure effective in increasing the uniform elongation when being
dispersed in bainite. To provide this effect, an entire area fraction of martensite
in bainite needs to be 2% or more. On the other hand, an entire area fraction of the
above-mentioned martensite of more than 20% results in deterioration of the uniform
elongation and bending-unbending workability. Accordingly, an entire area fraction
of the above-mentioned martensite is 2% to 20%. The entire area fraction of the above-mentioned
martensite is preferably 3% or more, more preferably 4% or more. The entire area fraction
of the above-mentioned martensite is preferably 15% or less, more preferably 12% or
less.
[0043] Among Martensite in Bainite, Area Fraction of Martensite Each Having Orientation
Difference of 15° or More between Crystal Orientation of the Martensite and Crystal
Orientation of at Least One of Bainite Adjacent to the Martensite: More Than 50% Relative
to Whole Martensite
[0044] Among martensite in bainite, when an area fraction of martensite each having an orientation
difference of 15° or more between a crystal orientation of the martensite and a crystal
orientation in at least one of bainite adjacent to the martensite (hereinafter, may
also be referred to as a "dispersed martensite phase") is more than 50% relative to
the area of the whole martensite, bending-unbending workability of the present invention
is achieved. Herein, the above-mentioned "martensite having an orientation difference
of 15° or more between a crystal orientation of the martensite and a crystal orientation
of at least one of bainite adjacent to the martensite portion" means that, for example,
when a martensite surrounded by bainite having multiple of crystal orientations is
present, it is sufficient that the orientation difference between one or more of the
bainite having the multiple of crystal orientations and the crystal orientation of
the martensite is 15° or more.
[0045] Although a detailed reason for this is not clear, it is presumably because a large
difference in crystal orientations between a martensite in bainite and bainite surrounding
the martensite (bainite adjacent to the martensite) is likely to serve as an obstacle
for crack extension in bending and unbending.
[0046] For this reason, in the present invention, the area fraction of the above-mentioned
dispersed martensite phase is more than 50%. As the amount of martensite serving as
the obstacle for crack extension increases, crack extension in bending and unbending
is further suppressed. Bending-unbending workability of the present invention can
be achieved by setting the area fraction to more than 50%.
[0047] Accordingly, among martensite in bainite, the area fraction of the above-mentioned
dispersed martensite phase is more than 50% relative to the whole martensite. The
area fraction is preferably 60% or more, more preferably 70% or more. The upper limit
of the area fraction of the above-mentioned dispersed martensite phase is not particularly
specified. Since it is difficult to control the area fraction to substantially 100%,
the area fraction is preferably less than 100%.
[0048] Herein, the above-mentioned "dispersed martensite phase" can be measured by a method
described in Examples below. Specifically, crystal orientations of bainite and martensite
are determined by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), and boundaries having orientation
differences of 15° or more are displayed. Subsequently, among martensite dispersed
in bainite, an area fraction of martensite each having an orientation difference of
15° or more between a crystal orientation of the martensite and a crystal orientation
of at least one of bainite adjacent to the martensite (adjacent bainite) is determined.
[0049] The steel microstructure of the present invention may have ferrite, pearlite, and
retained austenite as microstructures other than the martensite and bainite described
above. Total area fraction of the microstructures other than martensite and bainite
is less than 20% (including 0%). When the total area fraction is less than 20%, the
characteristics of the present invention can be achieved.
[0050] Average Aspect Ratio in Crystal Grains Present in Region Extending from Surface of
Steel Sheet to Depth of 5 um: 2.0 or Less
[0051] A crystal grain of a surface layer of a steel sheet serves as an origin of a crack
in bending and unbending, and a crystal grain having a larger aspect ratio is more
likely to cause cracking. In order to provide bending-unbending workability intended
in the present invention, an average aspect ratio of crystal grains present in a region
extending from a surface of the steel sheet to a depth of 5 um needs to be 2.0 or
less. The average aspect ratio of crystal grains is preferably 1.7 or less, more preferably
1.5 or less.
[0052] Here, as illustrated in Fig. 1, the "crystal grain" indicates a region surrounded
by boundaries between adjacent crystals having an orientation difference of 15° or
more. When a maximum length of the crystal grain in a rolling direction is represented
by RL, and a maximum length of the crystal grain in a thickness direction is represented
by TL, the "aspect ratio" is determined as a ratio of the maximum length RL in the
rolling direction to the maximum length TL in the thickness direction (maximum length
RL in rolling direction/maximum length TL in thickness direction). The "average aspect
ratio of crystal grains" refers to an average of aspect ratios of the crystal grains
present in a region extending from the surface of the steel sheet to a depth of 5
µm.
[0053] In the present invention, the area fractions and the crystal orientations of the
microstructures and the aspect ratio can be measured by methods described in Examples
below.
<Method for Manufacturing High-Strength Hot-Rolled Steel Sheet>
[0054] The high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention is manufactured
by heating a slab having the chemical composition described above, and subsequently
subjecting the slab to hot rolling. In the hot rolling, the heated slab is subjected
to rough rolling, and subjected to finish rolling under conditions in which a total
number of passes at 1,000°C or higher is 3 times or more, a total rolling reduction
at 1,000°C or lower is less than 50%, and a total rolling reduction from a final pass
rolling temperature to the final pass rolling temperature + 50°C is 35% or less, cooling
is then started in less than 1.0 s, cooling is performed under a condition in which
an average cooling rate from a cooling start temperature to 550°C is 50°C/s or more,
coiling is then performed at a coiling temperature of (Ms temperature - 50)°C to 550°C,
and cooling is performed to room temperature.
[0055] The manufacturing method will be described in detail below. The temperature described
above is the temperature (surface temperature) at a central portion of the width of
the slab or steel sheet, and the average cooling rate described above is the average
cooling rate at a central portion of the width of the steel sheet. These temperatures
can be measured with, for example, a radiation thermometer.
Total Number of Passes at 1,000°C or Higher: 3 Times or More
[0056] In the finish rolling of the hot rolling, when a reduction at 1,000°C or higher is
performed three times or more, recrystallization of austenite can be promoted to form
grains having a small aspect ratio in the surface layer of the steel sheet. Accordingly,
the total number of passes at 1,000°C or higher is three times or more, preferably
four times or more. The upper limit of the total number of passes at 1,000°C or higher
is not particularly specified. The total number of passes at 1,000°C or higher is
preferably 20 times or less in view of, for example, production efficiency.
Total Rolling Reduction at 1,000°C or Lower: Less Than 50%
[0057] If the total rolling reduction at 1,000°C or lower in the finish rolling of the hot
rolling is 50% or more, grains having a large aspect ratio are formed in the surface
layer of the steel sheet, martensite having crystal orientations close to adjacent
bainite is likely to be formed, and the steel microstructure of the present invention
is not obtained. Accordingly, the total rolling reduction at 1,000°C or lower is less
than 50%. The total rolling reduction at 1,000°C or lower is preferably less than
40%, more preferably less than 30%. The lower limit of the total rolling reduction
at 1,000°C or lower is not particularly specified. The total rolling reduction at
1,000°C or lower is preferably 10% or more because abnormal grains may be formed in
a case of a soft reduction.
Herein, the total rolling reduction is a percentage of a value determined by dividing
the difference between a sheet thickness at the entry before the first pass in the
above temperature region and a sheet thickness at the exit after the last pass in
the temperature region by the sheet thickness at the entry before the first pass.
Specifically, the total rolling reduction is determined by (sheet thickness at entry
before first pass in the temperature region - sheet thickness at exit after last pass
in the temperature region)/(sheet thickness at entry before first pass in the temperature
region) × 100 (%).
[0058] Total Rolling Reduction from Final Pass Rolling Temperature to Final Pass Rolling
Temperature + 50°C: 35% or Less
[0059] If the rolling reduction exceeds 35% near the final pass temperature (hereinafter
also referred to as FT), elongated grains are formed in the vicinity of the surface
layer, thus failing to obtain the average aspect ratio of crystal grains present in
a region extending from a surface of the steel sheet to a depth of 5 um of the present
invention. In addition, the amount of strain introduced in austenite becomes excessive,
and martensite having the crystal orientation relationship of the present invention
is not obtained. Accordingly, the total rolling reduction from the final pass rolling
temperature to the final pass rolling temperature + 50°C is 35% or less, preferably
30% or less. The lower limit is not particularly specified; however, if the rolling
reduction is excessively low, for example, surface defects may be caused. Thus, the
above total rolling reduction is preferably 5% or more, more preferably 10% or more.
Natural Cooling Time after Finish Rolling: Less Than 1.0 s
[0060] After the finish rolling, cooling is started in less than 1.0 s (second). A natural
cooling time after the finish rolling of 1.0 s or more fails to obtain the dispersed
martensite phase having the crystal orientation of the present invention. Although
the reason for this is not clear, presumably, the decrease in the natural cooling
time suppresses the recovery of dislocations introduced by the finish rolling, which
may affect orientation selections during the subsequent bainite transformation and
martensite transformation. Accordingly, the natural cooling time after the finish
rolling is less than 1.0 s. The natural cooling time is preferably 0.7 s or less.
The lower limit of the natural cooling time is not particularly specified. The natural
cooling time is preferably 0.01 s or more because it is difficult to start cooling
immediately after rolling due to, for example, restrictions of the equipment structure.
Average Cooling Rate from Cooling Start Temperature to 550°C: 50°C/s or More
[0061] An average cooling rate from the cooling start temperature to 550°C of less than
50°C/s results in the formation of ferrite and pearlite, thus failing to obtain the
steel microstructure of the present invention. Accordingly, the average cooling rate
from the cooling start temperature to 550°C is 50°C/s or more. The average cooling
rate is preferably 80°C/s or more. The upper limit of the average cooling rate is
not particularly specified; however, the average cooling rate is preferably 1,000°C/s
or less from the viewpoint of, for example, the shape stability of the steel sheet.
Coiling Temperature: (Ms Temperature - 50)°C to 550°C
[0062] A coiling temperature of lower than (Ms Temperature - 50)°C results in an increase
in martensite, thus failing to obtain the steel microstructure of the present invention.
On the other hand, a coiling temperature of higher than 550°C results in the formation
of ferrite and pearlite, thus failing to obtain the steel microstructure of the present
invention. Accordingly, the coiling temperature is (Ms temperature - 50)°C to 550°C.
The coiling temperature is preferably (Ms temperature - 30)°C or higher and preferably
520°C or lower.
[0063] Herein, the Ms temperature is the martensite transformation start temperature and
can be determined by performing actual measurement, such as electric resistance measurement
or thermal expansion measurement during cooling by a formaster test or the like.
[0064] Conditions other than those of the manufacturing method described above are not particularly
limited; however, the manufacturing is preferably performed while the conditions are
appropriately adjusted as described below.
[0065] For example, the heating temperature of the slab is preferably 1,100°C or higher
from the viewpoints of, for example, removing segregation and dissolving precipitates,
and is preferably 1,300°C or lower from the viewpoint of, for example, energy efficiency.
The finish rolling is preferably performed in 4 or more passes from the viewpoint
of, for example, decreasing coarse grains, which may cause deterioration of workability.
Note that this number of passes of the finish rolling refers to a total number of
passes in the finish rolling and includes the above-mentioned "total number of passes
at 1,000°C or lower" described above.
EXAMPLES
[0066] The present invention will be further described with reference to Examples below.
The present invention is not limited to the following Examples.
[0067] Steels having respective chemical compositions shown in Table 1 were obtained by
steelmaking in a vacuum melting furnace to manufacture slabs. Subsequently, the slabs
were heated to 1,200°C and subjected to hot rolling under the conditions shown in
Table 2 to produce hot-rolled steel sheets. In the hot rolling, the total number of
passes of finish rolling was 7 passes. A blank in Table 1 means that the element is
not intentionally added and refers to not only the case where the element is not contained
(0%) but also the case where the element is incidentally contained. N is an incidental
impurity.
[0068] The resulting hot-rolled steel sheets were subjected to microstructure observation
and evaluations of tensile properties and bending-unbending workability in accordance
with test methods described below.
<Microstructure Observation>
(Area Fraction of Each Microstructure)
[0069] The area fractions of martensite and bainite are the ratios of the areas of the respective
microstructures to the area of observation.
[0070] The area fraction of martensite is determined as follows.
A sample is cut out from the resulting hot-rolled steel sheet. A cross section of
the sample that is taken in the thickness direction so as to be parallel to the rolling
direction is polished and then etched in 3% nital. Images of cross sections at a position
1/4 of the thickness are captured with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at a magnification
of 1,500x in three fields of view. The area fraction of each microstructure is determined
from the image data of the obtained secondary electron images using Image-Pro available
from Media Cybernetics, Inc., and the average area fraction of the fields of view
is defined as the area fraction of each microstructure.
[0071] In the image data, upper bainite is distinguished as black or dark gray containing
carbide or martensite having linear interfaces, or retained austenite. Lower bainite
is distinguished as black, dark gray, gray, or light gray containing uniformly oriented
carbide. Martensite is distinguished as black, dark gray, gray, or light gray containing
carbides having multiple orientations, or white or light gray containing no carbide.
Retained austenite is distinguished as white or light gray containing no carbide.
[0072] In some cases, martensite and retained austenite cannot be distinguished from each
other. Accordingly, the area fraction of martensite was determined by subtracting
the area fraction of retained austenite determined by a method described below from
the total area fraction of martensite and retained austenite determined from the SEM
images.
[0073] In the present invention, the martensite may be any martensite, such as fresh martensite,
autotempered martensite, or tempered martensite. The bainite may be any bainite, such
as upper bainite, lower bainite, or tempered bainite.
[0074] A microstructure subjected to a higher degree of tempering provides a contrast image
in which the matrix appears blacker. Therefore, the colors of the above matrices serve
only as a guide. In the present invention, the microstructures were identified in
comprehensive consideration of the amount of carbide, the microstructural morphology,
and the like and classified into any of those having similar characteristics and including
microstructures described below. Carbides appear white dots or lines.
[0075] Although ferrite is not basically contained in the present invention, ferrite can
be distinguished as a black or dark gray microstructure having no or a very small
amount of carbide inside and surrounded mainly by a curvilinear boundary. Pearlite
can be distinguished as a black and white lamellar or partially interrupted and substantially
lamellar microstructure.
[0076] The area fraction of retained austenite is determined as follows. A steel sheet after
annealing was ground to a position of 1/4 of the thickness of the sheet + 0.1 mm and
then further polished by 0.1 mm by chemical polishing. For the polished surface, integrated
reflection intensities of (200), (220), and (311) planes of fcc iron (austenite) and
(200), (211), and (220) planes of bcc iron (ferrite) were measured with an X-ray diffractometer
using Mo-Kα1 radiation. The volume fraction was determined from the intensity ratios
of the integrated reflection intensities from the above planes of fcc iron to the
integrated reflection intensities from the above planes of bcc iron. This volume fraction
is used as the area fraction of retained austenite.
[0077] The total area fraction of bainite and martensite and the total area fraction of
other microstructures are determined using the obtained area fractions of the respective
microstructures, and the total area fractions are shown in Table 3. In Table 3, "V
(M)" means the area fraction (%) of martensite, "V(B + M)" means the total area fraction
(%) of bainite and martensite, and "V (O)" means the total area fraction (%) of the
other microstructures.
(Crystal Orientation)
[0078] The crystal orientations of bainite and martensite were determined by electron backscatter
diffraction (EBSD) for the same field of view of the same sample used for the microstructure
observation, and boundaries having an orientation difference of 15° or more were displayed.
Thus, among martensite dispersed in bainite, an area fraction of martensite each having
an orientation difference of 15° or more between the martensite and at least one of
bainite adjacent to the martensite (adjacent bainite) was determined. A ratio of the
area of the relevant martensite to the area of the whole martensite was then determined.
The EBSD measurement was performed at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV and a step
size of 0.05 µm in a region of 100 µm × 100 µm.
The resulting ratio is shown in Table 3. The "Ratio of M having orientation difference
of 15° or more from adjacent B (%)" in Table 3 indicates the above ratio (%).
(Aspect Ratio of Crystal Grain)
[0079] For a surface layer portion of the same sample used for the microstructure observation,
crystal orientations were determined by EBSD, boundaries between adjacent crystals
having an orientation difference of 15° or more are displayed, and regions surrounded
by the boundaries are defined as crystal grains. Among the crystal grains, for each
crystal grain present in a region extending from a surface of the steel sheet to 5
um in the depth direction (thickness direction), the maximum length RL in the rolling
direction and the maximum length TL in the thickness direction are determined (see
Fig. 1). The aspect ratio of each crystal grain is calculated from the ratio (RL/TL)
of the maximum length RL in the rolling direction to the maximum length TL in the
thickness direction in the crystal grains, and the average of the calculated values
is used as the average aspect ratio of the crystal grains. The ratio of the maximum
length RL in the rolling direction to the maximum length TL in the thickness direction
is determined such that the minimum value of the aspect ratio is 1.0.
[0080] Note that a crystal grain extending through a position 5 um from the surface of the
steel sheet in the depth direction is counted as a crystal grain in the region extending
from the surface of the steel sheet to 5 um in the depth direction.
[0081] The EBSD measurement is performed at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV and a step
size of 0.10 µm in a region of 100 µm × 100 µm. The measurement of the aspect ratio
of a crystal grain is performed for all the relevant crystal grains in the region
(the region of 100 µm × 100 µm).
<Tensile Test>
[0082] The evaluation of tensile properties was performed by a tensile test. JIS No. 5 test
pieces for a tensile test (JIS Z 2201) were collected from the resulting hot-rolled
steel sheets in a direction parallel to the rolling direction. The tensile test was
performed in accordance with JIS Z 2241 at a strain rate of 10
-3/s to determine a TS and a uniform elongation.
In the present invention, a TS of 980 MPa or more and a uniform elongation of 5.0%
or more were each evaluated as pass.
<Bending-Unbending Test>
[0083] The evaluation of bending-unbending workability was performed by a bending-unbending
test. Test specimens having a width of 30 mm and a length of 100 mm were collected
from the resulting hot-rolled steel sheets such that the longitudinal direction was
parallel to the rolling direction. A 90° V-bending is performed using the test specimens
under the conditions of a stroke rate of 10 mm/min, a bending radius of 5 mm, and
a maximum pressing load of 10 ton. Subsequently, each of the test specimens was reversed,
a flat-bottomed punch is pressed under the condition of a stroke rate of 10 mm/min
and stopped at a stroke at which the bending angle becomes 10° or less, the load is
removed, and the sample is then taken out. Subsequently, bending ridge line portions
of the samples are visually observed.
In the present invention, when no cracks were formed on a surface corresponding to
the inside of bending in the first bending (V-bending), bending-unbending workability
was evaluated as pass. The "No" in the "bending-unbending cracking" in Table 3 indicates
pass.
[0084] Table 3 shows various evaluation results.
[Table 1]
| Steel |
Chemical composition (mass%) |
Remarks |
| C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
N |
Others |
| A |
0.11 |
0.50 |
1.7 |
0.014 |
0.0018 |
0.031 |
0.003 |
Ti:0.060 |
Within scope of invention |
| B |
0.07 |
0.30 |
2.0 |
0.023 |
0.0022 |
0.033 |
0.002 |
Nb:0.060 |
Within scope of invention |
| C |
0.04 |
1.00 |
2.1 |
0.015 |
0.0029 |
0.036 |
0.004 |
Mo:0.30 |
Within scope of invention |
| D |
0.11 |
0.10 |
3.3 |
0.008 |
0.0014 |
0.038 |
0.003 |
V:0.20 |
Within scope of invention |
| E |
0.17 |
0.70 |
2.4 |
0.004 |
0.0004 |
0.027 |
0.003 |
Ti:0.03, Cu:0.2, Ca:0.0010, Sn:0.04 |
Within scope of invention |
| F |
0.05 |
0.90 |
2.5 |
0.015 |
0.0018 |
0.044 |
0.003 |
Nb:0.04, REM:0.0020, Sb:0.010 |
Within scope of invention |
| G |
0.06 |
0.40 |
0.7 |
0.010 |
0.0014 |
0.082 |
0.002 |
Cr:0.30, Ni:0.60, Ti:0.080, B:0.0020 |
Within scope of invention |
| H |
0.03 |
0.30 |
1.9 |
0.010 |
0.0021 |
0.019 |
0.006 |
Cr:0.30 |
Outside scope of invention |
| I |
0.19 |
0.50 |
2.2 |
0.009 |
0.0013 |
0.015 |
0.004 |
Ti:0.040 |
Outside scope of invention |
| J |
0.09 |
3.10 |
1.8 |
0.010 |
0.0012 |
0.028 |
0.003 |
Nb:0.020 |
Outside scope of invention |
| K |
0.10 |
0.50 |
0.4 |
0.013 |
0.0016 |
0.036 |
0.003 |
Mo:0.30 |
Outside scope of invention |
| L |
0.05 |
0.40 |
3.9 |
0.011 |
0.0010 |
0.035 |
0.004 |
V:0.10 |
Outside scope of invention |
| M |
0.13 |
0.10 |
2.2 |
0.018 |
0.0008 |
0.033 |
0.003 |
- |
Outside scope of invention |
| N |
0.15 |
1.40 |
2.4 |
0.003 |
0.0004 |
0.030 |
0.004 |
Ti:0.03 ,Mo:0.4, B:0.0020 |
Within scope of invention |
| O |
0.10 |
1.00 |
2.4 |
0.012 |
0.0005 |
0.029 |
0.004 |
Cr:0.8 |
Within scope of invention |
| P |
0.10 |
1.00 |
2.4 |
0.012 |
0.0006 |
0.029 |
0.003 |
Cr:2.3 |
Outside scope of invention |
| Q |
0.10 |
1.00 |
2.4 |
0.012 |
0.0006 |
0.030 |
0.003 |
Ti:0.23 |
Outside scope of invention |
| R |
0.10 |
1.00 |
2.4 |
0.011 |
0.0005 |
0.031 |
0.003 |
Nb:0.22 |
Outside scope of invention |
| S |
0.10 |
1.00 |
2.4 |
0.011 |
0.0007 |
0.030 |
0.003 |
Mo:2.1 |
Outside scope of invention |
| T |
0.10 |
1.00 |
2.4 |
0.012 |
0.0006 |
0.030 |
0.003 |
V:2.1 |
Outside scope of invention |
| * Underlined portions are outside the scope of the present invention. |
[Table 2]
| Steel sheet No. |
Steel |
Finish rolling conditions |
Natural cooling time after finish rolling (s) |
Average cooling rate from cooling start temperature to 550°C (°C/s) |
Coiling temperature (°C) |
Ms temperature (°C) |
Remarks |
| Total number of passes at 1,000°C or higher (times) |
Total rolling reduction at 1,000°C lower (%) |
Total rolling reduction from FT to FT + 50°C (%) |
| 1 |
A |
4 |
30 |
27 |
0.9 |
200 |
480 |
444 |
Inventive Example |
| 2 |
4 |
55 |
27 |
0.9 |
200 |
480 |
444 |
Comparative Example |
| 3 |
B |
3 |
48 |
11 |
0.6 |
60 |
450 |
447 |
Inventive Example |
| 4 |
3 |
48 |
11 |
0.6 |
60 |
560 |
447 |
Comparative Example |
| 5 |
3 |
48 |
11 |
0.6 |
60 |
380 |
447 |
Comparative Example |
| 6 |
C |
4 |
30 |
25 |
0.5 |
100 |
460 |
452 |
Inventive Example |
| 7 |
4 |
30 |
25 |
1.5 |
100 |
460 |
452 |
Comparative Example |
| 8 |
D |
4 |
30 |
32 |
0.3 |
50 |
530 |
382 |
Inventive Example |
| 9 |
E |
5 |
40 |
23 |
0.4 |
100 |
450 |
395 |
Inventive Example |
| 10 |
5 |
40 |
23 |
0.4 |
30 |
450 |
395 |
Comparative Example |
| 11 |
2 |
40 |
23 |
0.4 |
100 |
450 |
395 |
Comparative Example |
| 12 |
5 |
40 |
23 |
0.4 |
100 |
580 |
395 |
Comparative Example |
| 13 |
F |
4 |
40 |
26 |
0.6 |
100 |
420 |
434 |
Inventive Example |
| 14 |
G |
4 |
40 |
27 |
0.6 |
100 |
480 |
485 |
Inventive Example |
| 15 |
H |
4 |
40 |
12 |
0.6 |
100 |
470 |
459 |
Comparative Example |
| 16 |
I |
4 |
40 |
28 |
0.6 |
100 |
400 |
396 |
Comparative Example |
| 17 |
J |
4 |
40 |
28 |
0.6 |
100 |
500 |
447 |
Comparative Example |
| 18 |
K |
4 |
40 |
28 |
0.6 |
100 |
500 |
497 |
Comparative Example |
| 19 |
L |
4 |
40 |
12 |
0.6 |
100 |
370 |
380 |
Comparative Example |
| 20 |
M |
4 |
40 |
12 |
0.6 |
100 |
500 |
417 |
Comparative Example |
| 21 |
N |
4 |
40 |
11 |
0.6 |
100 |
460 |
400 |
Inventive Example |
| 22 |
F |
4 |
40 |
38 |
0.6 |
100 |
420 |
434 |
Comparative Example |
| 23 |
G |
4 |
40 |
57 |
0.6 |
100 |
480 |
485 |
Comparative Example |
| 24 |
O |
4 |
40 |
27 |
0.6 |
100 |
400 |
404 |
Inventive Example |
| 25 |
P |
4 |
40 |
27 |
0.6 |
100 |
400 |
374 |
Comparative Example |
| 26 |
Q |
4 |
40 |
27 |
0.6 |
100 |
400 |
420 |
Comparative Example |
| 27 |
R |
4 |
40 |
27 |
0.6 |
100 |
400 |
420 |
Comparative Example |
| 28 |
S |
4 |
40 |
27 |
0.6 |
100 |
400 |
408 |
Comparative Example |
| 29 |
T |
4 |
40 |
27 |
0.6 |
100 |
400 |
420 |
Comparative Example |
| * Underlined portions are outside the scope of the present invention. |
[Table 3]
| Steel sheet No. |
Steel microstructure |
Mechanical properties |
Remarks |
| V(M+B) (%) |
V(M) (%) |
V(O) (%) |
Ratio of M having orientation difference of 15° or more from adjacent B (%) |
Average aspect ratio of crystal grains present in region extending from surface of
steel sheet to depth of 5 µm |
TS (MPa) |
Uniform elongation (%) |
Bending-unbending cracking |
| 1 |
100 |
4 |
0 |
72 |
1.3 |
1042 |
7.5 |
No |
Inventive Example |
| 2 |
100 |
5 |
0 |
44 |
2.3 |
1045 |
7.9 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 3 |
100 |
4 |
0 |
62 |
1.9 |
1017 |
7.1 |
No |
Inventive Example |
| 4 |
73 |
5 |
29 |
61 |
1.8 |
957 |
6.7 |
No |
Comparative Example |
| 5 |
100 |
56 |
0 |
58 |
1.9 |
1121 |
4.3 |
No |
Comparative Example |
| 6 |
97 |
8 |
3 |
82 |
1.3 |
1095 |
9.2 |
No |
Inventive Example |
| 7 |
96 |
10 |
4 |
46 |
1.2 |
1100 |
9.1 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 8 |
98 |
19 |
2 |
84 |
1.2 |
1183 |
6.8 |
No |
Inventive Example |
| 9 |
98 |
13 |
2 |
77 |
1.5 |
1189 |
8.4 |
No |
Inventive Example |
| 10 |
91 |
25 |
9 |
79 |
1.6 |
1204 |
8.7 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 11 |
98 |
15 |
2 |
74 |
2.5 |
1183 |
8.7 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 12 |
63 |
3 |
37 |
55 |
1.6 |
1099 |
7.0 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 13 |
99 |
18 |
1 |
60 |
1.6 |
1088 |
6.3 |
No |
Inventive Example |
| 14 |
98 |
3 |
2 |
69 |
1.5 |
996 |
7.6 |
No |
Inventive Example |
| 15 |
100 |
2 |
0 |
70 |
1.2 |
952 |
5.8 |
No |
Comparative Example |
| 16 |
99 |
19 |
1 |
66 |
1.4 |
1152 |
9.9 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 17 |
62 |
3 |
38 |
58 |
1.1 |
1165 |
9.5 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 18 |
93 |
0 |
7 |
- |
1.3 |
938 |
4.6 |
No |
Comparative Example |
| 19 |
96 |
82 |
4 |
89 |
1.4 |
1158 |
4.3 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 20 |
100 |
1 |
0 |
68 |
1.2 |
1135 |
4.5 |
No |
Comparative Example |
| 21 |
90 |
10 |
10 |
75 |
1.7 |
1246 |
8.8 |
No |
Inventive Example |
| 22 |
98 |
20 |
2 |
53 |
2.1 |
1096 |
5.7 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 23 |
98 |
3 |
2 |
40 |
2.5 |
1020 |
5.9 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 24 |
96 |
19 |
4 |
75 |
1.2 |
1084 |
6.5 |
No |
Inventive Example |
| 25 |
99 |
62 |
1 |
76 |
1.3 |
1195 |
5.3 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 26 |
99 |
51 |
1 |
65 |
2.0 |
1233 |
5.6 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 27 |
99 |
59 |
1 |
67 |
2.0 |
1260 |
5.2 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 28 |
98 |
85 |
2 |
64 |
1.9 |
1267 |
4.8 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| 29 |
99 |
88 |
1 |
60 |
1.8 |
1245 |
4.6 |
Yes |
Comparative Example |
| * Underlined portions are outside the scope of the present invention. |
[0085] Referring to Table 3, all Inventive Examples provide high-strength hot-rolled steel
sheets having an excellent uniform elongation and excellent bending-unbending workability.
In contrast, in Comparative Examples, which are outside the scope of the present invention,
one or more of the desired strength, uniform elongation, and bending-unbending workability
are not achieved.
Industrial Applicability
[0086] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a high-strength hot-rolled
steel sheet having a TS of 980 MPa or more, excellent ductility, and excellent bending-unbending
workability. The use of the high-strength hot-rolled steel sheet according to the
present invention for automotive parts can contribute greatly to the improvements
in crash safety and fuel economy of automobiles.