Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a quenching apparatus for a metal sheet with which
it is possible to inhibit shape defects from occurring in the metal sheet when quenching
is performed by using continuous annealing equipment, in which annealing is performed
while the metal sheet is continuously passed, and to continuous annealing equipment,
a method for quenching a metal sheet, a method for manufacturing a cold rolled steel
sheet, and a method for manufacturing a coated steel sheet.
Background Art
[0002] When a metal sheet such as a steel sheet is manufactured, material properties are
imparted by, for example, allowing phase transformation to occur by cooling the metal
sheet after having heated the metal sheet in continuous annealing equipment. Nowadays,
there is a growing demand in the automobile industry for a high strength steel sheet
(high tensile strength steel sheet) having reduced thickness to simultaneously achieve
weight reduction and satisfactory crash safety in automobile bodies. Therefore, increased
importance is placed on a rapid cooling technique, which is advantageous in manufacturing
the high tensile strength steel sheet. Among various kinds of cooling methods, cooling
methods utilizing water are widely used because such methods provide a high cooling
rate at low cost. However, since such cooling methods have a potential to cause a
temperature variation in the steel sheet due to such a high cooling rate, there is
a problem in that shape defects such as warpage, wavy deformation, and the like may
occur in the steel sheet due to out-of-plane deformation. To date, various methods
have been proposed to prevent such shape defects from occurring when water quenching
is performed on a steel sheet.
[0003] Patent Literature 1 proposes a method in which, to inhibit wavelike deformation from
occurring in a metal sheet when rapid-cooling quenching is performed in a continuous
annealing furnace, bridle rolls are installed upstream and downstream of a rapid-cooling
quenching region to change tension applied to a steel sheet which is subjected to
a rapid-cooling quenching process.
[0004] Patent Literature 2 proposes a method in which, by focusing on the fact that a shape
defect occurs due to buckling occurring in a metal sheet because of thermal compressive
stress in the width direction of the metal sheet generated at a quenching start point
(cooling start point), out-of-plane deformation is inhibited by restraining the metal
sheet from both surface sides of the metal sheet in the region in which the compressive
stress in the width direction of the metal sheet is generated by cooling or in the
vicinity of such a region.
[0005] In addition, Patent Literature 3 proposes a method in which, when the Ms temperature,
at which the martensite transformation of a metal sheet starts, is defined as TMs
(°C) and the Mf temperature, at which the martensite transformation of the metal sheet
finishes, is defined as TMf (°C), the metal sheet that is being subjected to rapid-cooling
quenching is restrained by using a restraining roll pair placed in a coolant while
the temperature of the metal sheet is in the temperature range of (TMs + 150°C) to
(TMf - 150°C).
[0006] Moreover, Patent Literature 4 proposes an apparatus having a water tank containing
a liquid in which a metal sheet is immersed, an injection device having plural injection
nozzles through which a liquid is injected onto the front and back surfaces of the
metal sheet, and one or plural restraining roll pairs with which the metal sheet is
restrained and a method in which the liquid is injected through all of the injection
nozzles of the injection device in the direction toward the restraining rolls.
Citation List
Patent Literature
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0008] However, in the case of any one of the methods disclosed in Patent Literature 1 to
Patent Literature 4, since the sheet thickness of the metal sheet or the sheet passing
speed of the metal sheet in the water tank is not taken into consideration when the
metal sheet is restrained by using the restraining rolls, there is a problem in that
it is not possible to restrain the metal sheet by using the restraining rolls while
the temperature of the metal sheet is in the temperature range of (TMs + 150°C) to
(TMf - 150°C). As a result, there is a problem in that shape defects occur after the
metal sheet has been subjected to quenching.
[0009] The present invention has been completed in view of the situation described above,
and an object of the present invention is to provide a quenching apparatus for a metal
sheet with which it is possible to inhibit shape defects from occurring in the metal
sheet when quenching is performed regardless of the sheet passing speed or the sheet
thickness of the metal sheet, continuous annealing equipment, a method for quenching
a metal sheet, a method for manufacturing a cold rolled steel sheet, and a method
for manufacturing a coated steel sheet.
Solution to Problem
[0010] The subject matter of the present invention to solve the problems described above
is as follows.
- [1] A quenching apparatus for a metal sheet, the quenching apparatus having a water
tank in which the metal sheet is passed and immersed in a liquid to cool the metal
sheet, a water injection apparatus placed in the water tank, and plural restraining
roll pairs with which the metal sheet that is passed in the water tank is restrained,
in which the water injection apparatus has plural water injection nozzles arranged
in a sheet passing direction of the metal sheet on front and back surface sides of
the metal sheet so that cooling water is injected in facing directions from the front
and back surface sides, and in which a position of each of the plural restraining
roll pairs is separately adjusted with respect to the metal sheet in accordance with
operation conditions.
- [2] The quenching apparatus for a metal sheet according to item [1], in which both
largest and smallest values of a maximum height roughness Rz of surfaces of the plural
restraining roll pairs are 5 um or more and 50 um or less.
- [3] The quenching apparatus for a metal sheet according to item [1], in which a roll
diameter of restraining rolls constituting the plural restraining roll pairs is 50
mm or more and 250 mm or less.
- [4] The quenching apparatus for a metal sheet according to item [1], in which the
plural restraining roll pairs are arranged such that, when a roll diameter of restraining
rolls constituting a pair is defined as D (mm), a distance between central axes of
the restraining rolls facing each other across the metal sheet is set to be (D × 1/4)
(mm) or more and D (mm) or less.
- [5] Continuous annealing equipment having the quenching apparatus for a metal sheet
according to any one of items [1] to [4], the quenching apparatus being placed on
an exit side of a soaking zone of the continuous annealing equipment.
- [6] A method for quenching a metal sheet, in which the metal sheet is continuously
passed and immersed in a liquid so as to be cooled, and in which the metal sheet is
restrained by using plural restraining roll pairs whose positions with respect to
the metal sheet are adjusted while a temperature of the metal sheet is equal to or
lower than (a martensite start temperature of the metal sheet + 150°C) and equal to
or higher than (a martensite finish temperature of the metal sheet - 150°C).
- [7] A method for manufacturing a cold rolled steel sheet, in which a cold rolled steel
sheet is quenched by using the method for quenching a metal sheet according to item
[6].
- [8] A method for manufacturing a coated steel sheet, in which the cold rolled steel
sheet that has been manufactured by using the method for manufacturing a cold rolled
steel sheet according to item [7] is subjected to a coating treatment.
- [9] The method for manufacturing a coated steel sheet according to item [8], in which
the coating treatment is performed by using a method of one of an electro-galvanizing
treatment, a hot-dip galvanizing treatment, and a hot-dip galvannealing treatment.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0011] According to the quenching apparatus for a metal sheet, the method for quenching
a metal sheet, and the method for manufacturing a steel sheet according to the present
invention, it is possible to inhibit shape defects from occurring in the metal sheet
when quenching is performed regardless of the sheet passing speed or the sheet thickness
of the metal sheet.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0012]
[Fig. 1] Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the constitution of a quenching
apparatus according to the present invention.
[Fig. 2] Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating the constitution of restraining
roll pairs in the quenching apparatus according to the present invention.
[Fig. 3] Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating the arrangement constitution of
restraining rolls according to the present invention.
[Fig. 4] Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating warpage of a metal sheet.
[Fig. 5] Fig. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating the constitution of a conventional
quenching apparatus. Description of Embodiments
[0013] Hereafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference
to the figures. Although cases where water, which is inexpensive and industrially
useful, is used as a coolant will be described below, there is no particular limitation
on the coolant as long as it is a liquid which can be used for cooling.
[0014] Fig. 1 is a diagram illustrating a quenching apparatus 1 for a metal sheet S according
to an embodiment of the present invention. The quenching apparatus 1 is used for a
cooling apparatus which is placed on the exit side of the soaking zone of a continuous
annealing furnace (continuous annealing equipment). In the quenching apparatus 1,
a water injection apparatus 3 is installed in a water tank 2 which contains water
used for cooling in a manner such that some water injection nozzles 3a are exposed
above the water surface (denoted by W in the figure). In the water injection apparatus
3, plural water injection nozzles 3a are arranged in the sheet passing direction (denoted
by an arrow P in the figure) of the metal sheet S, which is continuously passed in
the water tank 2, on the front and back surface sides of the metal sheet S with a
predetermined gap being provided between the nozzles and the metal sheet, and plural
restraining roll pairs 4 are arranged in the sheet passing direction with the water
injection nozzles being interposed between the pairs. Here, although four restraining
roll pairs 4 are illustrated in Fig. 1, there is no particular limitation as long
as the number of pairs is two or more. Such plural restraining roll pairs 4 may have
controlling systems for adjusting the positions of the pairs with respect to the metal
sheet S in accordance with operation conditions.
[0015] There may be a case where the metal sheet S is to be quenched on the exit side of
a continuous annealing furnace to achieve desired material properties. However, it
is known that shape defects occur in the metal sheet S due to thermal shrinkage caused
by rapid cooling for a quenching treatment. In particular, in the case where martensite
transformation occurs in the metal sheet S, since rapid thermal shrinkage and transformation
expansion occur simultaneously in the temperature range of the martensite start temperature
(TMs (°C)) to the martensite finish temperature (TMf (°C)), stress generated in the
metal sheet S peaks, which results in a deterioration in the shape of the metal sheet
S. Here, it is possible to calculate TMs (°C) and TMf (°C) from the chemical composition
of the metal sheet S.
[0016] In particular, in the case where it is possible to physically restrain the metal
sheet S while the temperature of the metal sheet S which is being subjected to rapid
cooling for quenching is equal to or lower than (TMs + 150°C) and equal to or higher
than (TMf - 150°C), it is possible to stabilize the shape. In addition, it is more
preferable that the temperature be equal to or lower than (TMs + 100°C) and equal
to or higher than (TMf - 100°C).
[0017] In response to such a requirement, a technique utilizing restraining roll pairs 4
which are arranged so that the rolls constituting each roll pair face each other across
the surfaces of the metal sheet S immersed in cooling water in a temperature range
in which martensite transformation occurs is proposed. However, in the case of a simple
constitution, that is, in the case where only one restraining roll pair 4 is used,
it is necessary to place limitations on the sheet passing speed and sheet thickness
of the metal sheet S to restrain the metal sheet S in the appropriate temperature
range of the metal sheet S. Therefore, the present invention was focused on placing
plural restraining roll pairs 4 in the cooling water.
[0018] Next, in the case of the present invention, by placing plural restraining roll pairs
4 as illustrated in Fig. 1, since there is an increase in the distance in which it
is possible to restrain the metal sheet S, it is possible to restrain the metal sheet
S with certainty while the temperature of the metal sheet S is equal to or lower than
(TMs + 150°C) and equal to or higher than (TMf - 150°C), even if there is a change
in the sheet passing speed or sheet thickness. In the case where restraining is performed
outside of such a temperature range, since it is not possible to inhibit expansion
due to transformation, there is a deterioration in the shape of the metal sheet S.
In addition, since the sheet thickness and sheet passing speed of the metal sheet
S vary in accordance with the specifications of the product and the heating and soaking
abilities of the continuous annealing furnace, the number of the restraining roll
pairs 4 to be placed should be determined so that it is possible to restrain the metal
sheet S by using at least two or more restraining roll pairs 4 in the temperature
ranges of (TMs + 150°C) to (TMf - 150°C) when the sheet passing speed and sheet thickness
of the metal sheet S vary.
[0019] In the present invention, cooling is promoted by using a water injection apparatus
3 having plural water injection nozzles 3a. As illustrated in Fig. 1, the water injection
apparatus 3, which is composed of plural water injection nozzles 3a, is arranged so
as to cover a region from a position immediately above the water surface W to a position
below the water surface. The water injection nozzles 3a are arranged at positions
farther from the metal sheet S than those of the restraining roll pairs 4. Although
there is no particular limitation on the distance between the water injection nozzles
3a and the metal sheet S, there is a risk that the water injection nozzles 3a come
into contact with the metal sheet S due to warpage or vibration of the steel sheet
(metal sheet S) in the case where the distance is small and, conversely, that cooling
ability decreases due to a decrease in jet flow speed when the coolant reaches the
steel sheet (metal sheet S) in the case where the distance is large. Therefore, the
distance is to be taken into consideration. A position at which the coolant (denoted
by 3b in the figure) injected through the water injection nozzle 3a located at the
uppermost position of the water injection apparatus 3 impinges on the metal sheet
S, that is, a jet flow impinging position, is at a distance A above the water surface
W (as illustrated in Fig. 1), and it is preferable that the height be 10 mm.
[0020] Incidentally, it is not appropriate that the jet flow impinging position be excessively
near to the water surface W because, since the jet flow impinging position is influenced
by a variation in the position of the water surface W, a position at which a vapor
film is removed is unstable, which results in the cooling capacity being largely influenced.
On the other hand, it is not appropriate that the jet flow impinging position be excessively
far from the water surface W because, since there is an increase in the temperature
of the injected water while flowing down, there is a decrease in the cooling capacity
in the region in which the water flows down, which results in the occurrence of transition
boiling. Therefore, it is preferable that the distance between the water surface W
and the jet flow impinging position, which is denoted by A, be about 5 mm to 50 mm
(or 10 mm).
[0021] To date, it has been recommended that the water injection nozzles 3a be arranged
so as to tilt at the positions nearest the restraining roll pair 4 (refer to Fig.
5) to inject water toward positions at which the restraining roll pair 4 and the metal
sheet S come into contact with each other (hereinafter, referred to as "roll side")
for the purpose of inhibiting a decrease in the cooling rate of the metal sheet S.
[0022] However, in the case where the water injection nozzles are arranged so as to tilt
as illustrated in Fig. 5, the apparatus (water tank 2) increases in length and size.
Therefore, experiments and the like were conducted to investigate necessary conditions.
As a result, it was found that there is a decrease in cooling rate at the roll side
only in the case where a vapor film is retained and that there is almost no decrease
in cooling rate in the case where a vapor film does not exist. In particular, in the
case where the metal sheet S made of high tensile strength steel, for which the present
invention is intended, is quenched, the martensite start temperature (TMs (°C)) is
about 400°C, and the martensite finish temperature (TMf (°C)) is about 300°C. Therefore,
it is assumed that a temperature range in which restraining is performed by using
the restraining roll pairs 4 in a quenching process is about 150°C to 550°C. In such
a temperature range, which corresponds to a range from a nucleate boiling range to
a transition boiling range, a vapor film does not exist (nucleate boiling), or a vapor
film is considerably unstable (transition boiling). Therefore, since it is possible
to break the vapor film by using a small amount of water injection, it is not necessary
to arrange the nozzles so as to tilt toward the restraining roll pair, and water injected
onto the metal sheet S at a right angle does not pose a problem.
[0023] In addition, such conditions are satisfied in the case where the quenched material
is a metal sheet S having a martensite start temperature (TMs (°C)) of 450°C or lower
or preferably 400°C or lower.
[0024] As pointed out conventionally, there is a significant decrease in cooling rate at
the roll side in the case where a vapor film is not removed when restraining is performed
by using rolls at a high temperature. However, since it is preferable that restraining
not be performed in such a temperature range for the first time, such a phenomenon
poses no problem.
[0025] Therefore, in the present invention, by providing a moving system with which the
restraining roll pairs 4 move independently from each other in a direction for the
restraining rolls 4a to push the metal sheet S or to draw away from the metal sheet
S, it is possible to achieve a stable cooling state, even in the case where the water
injection nozzles 3a are arranged in a manner such that cooling water is injected
in facing directions from the front and back surface sides of the metal sheet S. To
inject the cooling water through the water injection nozzles 3a in facing directions
across the metal sheet S, it is necessary to arrange the water injection nozzles 3a
almost perpendicularly to the sheet passing direction of the metal sheet S. Specifically,
when the inclination angle of the water injection nozzle 3a with respect to the metal
sheet S is defined as θ, the expression "almost perpendicularly" denotes a case where
θ is 80° or more and 100° or less, preferably 82° or more and 98° or less, or more
preferably 87° or more and 93° or less.
[0026] Specifically, restraining roll pairs 4 which are located at positions where the temperature
of the metal sheet S is in a temperature range in which transition boiling may occur
are withdrawn, and the metal sheet S is restrained by using the other restraining
roll pairs 4. Here, each of the restraining roll pairs 4 may have a system with which
the pair moves independently from other pairs, and instead each of the rolls (restraining
roll 4a) constituting the pair may have a system with which the roll moves independently
from the other roll.
[0027] Incidentally, restraining roll pairs to be withdrawn or used should be determined
in accordance with operation conditions. The expression "operation conditions" denotes
heat treatment conditions and cooling conditions; and, in particular, the sheet passing
speed, the sheet thickness, the quenching start temperature, and the warpage of the
metal sheet are items having large influences. In the case of an identical steel grade,
and in the case where the heat treatment conditions before quenching is performed
and a distance between a position at which the heat treatment is finished and a position
at which cooling is started are identical, it is preferable that such a determination
be made in accordance with the sheet passing speed and the sheet thickness. Examples
of a method for determining restraining roll pairs to be used include the method described
above (the restraining roll pairs to be used are determined in accordance with positions
corresponding to the preferable temperature range described in paragraph 0018 which
are derived in accordance with the sheet passing speed and the sheet thickness) and
a method in which preferable restraining roll pairs are selected to be used on the
basis of accumulated data regarding the relationship between the combination of operation
conditions and restraining roll pairs used and shape stability.
[0028] That is, when the metal sheet S is quenched, by adjusting the positions of the plural
restraining roll pairs 4 with respect to the metal sheet S in accordance with operation
conditions, that is, in accordance with the sheet passing speed and the sheet thickness,
it is possible to restrain the metal sheet S with certainty while the temperature
of the metal sheet S is equal to or lower than (TMs + 150°C) and equal to or higher
than (TMf - 150°C), that is, in the preferable temperature range. Although the sheet
passing speed and the sheet thickness may be used as the operation conditions, the
product of the sheet passing speed and the sheet thickness (hereinafter, referred
to as "LSD") may also be used. In this case, when any one of the sheet passing speed
and the sheet thickness varies (increases or decreases), LSD also varies. When the
positions of the plural restraining roll pairs 4 are adjusted, for example, the restraining
roll pairs to be used, the distance between the restraining roll pairs, the intermesh
value, the offset value described below, and the like are adjusted.
[0029] In the case of a method for improving shape by using restraining rolls, there may
be a case where scrape occurs due to roll slip. It is considered to be because there
may be a case where the metal sheet S is severely vibrated due to the water jet flow
impinging on the metal sheet S in a turbulent flow state and because, since a water
film tends to enter a gap between the restraining roll 4a and the metal sheet S, slip
may occur due to a so-called hydroplaning phenomenon. As a countermeasure for the
former case, it is preferable that the metal sheet S be restrained by using plural
restraining roll pairs 4 because this results in a significant improvement in vibration
level. Moreover, as a countermeasure for the latter case, by increasing the maximum
height roughness Rz of the surface of the restraining rolls 4a to 5 um or more, it
is possible to prevent slip from occurring due to an improvement in water-dissipation
capability.
[0030] However, in the case where Rz is larger than a certain value, the effect of preventing
slip becomes saturated, and flaws tend to occur due to roughness. Therefore, the upper
limit of Rz is set to be 50 um or less. Here, the maximum height roughness Rz is prescribed
in Japanese Industrial Standards "JIS B 0601 Surface Roughness (2001)" and derived
in accordance with "JIS B 0633" from a profile in the width direction of the metal
sheet S, that is, the longitudinal direction of the restraining rolls 4a, obtained
by using a two-dimensional roughness meter. In addition, the measurement method adopted
by a measurement device may be of a contact type or a non-contact type as long as
the obtained measurement results satisfy the prescription in "JIS B 0601 surface roughness".
[0031] There is also a preferable range for the diameter (D (mm)) of the restraining rolls
4a for the reasons described below. In the case where the diameter of the restraining
rolls 4a is large, since the water flow becomes unstable due to an increase in the
degree of interference with the water flow, the state of the removal of a vapor film
becomes unstable, which results in the shape of the metal sheet S becoming unstable.
In addition, it is not preferable that there be an increase in roll diameter because
this results in an increase in the length of the coolant jet flow which is disturbed
by the rolls, which makes it difficult to achieve a sufficient cooling length. Therefore,
it is preferable that the roll diameter be 250 mm or less. On the other hand, in the
case where the roll diameter is excessively small, since deflection occurs in the
rolls when restraining the metal sheet S, there is a decrease in force for restraining
the metal sheet S, which results in the effect of correcting shape not being realized.
Therefore, it is preferable that the roll diameter be 50 mm or more.
[0032] Incidentally, Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 illustrate an example of the arrangement constitution
of the restraining roll pairs 4. In the restraining roll pair 4, which is composed
of two restraining rolls 4a that are arranged respectively on the front and back surface
sides of the metal sheet S so as to face each other across the metal sheet S, it is
preferable that a distance in the sheet passing direction P of the metal sheet S be
provided between the central axes of the restraining rolls 4a (offset) constituting
the pair. At this time, it is not necessary that the directions of the movement of
the central axes be the same in all the restraining roll pairs 4; that is, the movement
direction of the restraining roll 4a on one side may be upward in one pair while the
movement direction of the restraining roll 4a on the same side is downward in another
pair. It is not possible to push the metal sheet S in the case where such a distance
is not provided, and, in the case where such a distance is provided, since the pushing-in
distances are variable, there is an increase in restraining force. However, in the
case where the distance in the sheet passing direction of the metal sheet provided
between the central axes of the restraining rolls 4a constituting each pair, that
is, an offset value (denoted by B in the figure), is excessively large, since it is
not possible to restrain the metal sheet S at the target positions simultaneously
on the front and back surface sides of the metal sheet S, it is not possible to realize
the restraining effect. For these reasons, it is preferable that the distance in the
sheet passing direction of the metal sheet provided between the central axes of the
restraining rolls 4a on the front and back surface sides constituting the pair (offset
value) be (D × 1/4) (mm) or more and D (mm) or less. Here, "D" denotes the diameter
(mm) of the restraining roll 4a as described above. In the case where the offset value
is more than D (mm), it is possible to increase the pushing-in distance of rolls,
but it is not possible to realize the effect of roll restraining. That is, the effect
of correcting shape by applying bending and unbending forces to the sheet almost simultaneously
is not realized. On the other hand, in the case where the offset value is less than
(D × 1/4) (mm), while the effect of roll restraining is large, there is an insufficient
effect of correcting shape due to a sufficient push-in distance in the metal sheet
pushing-in direction not being achieved, and it is not possible for a thick metal
sheet to pass through a gap between the rolls.
[0033] In addition, there is no particular limitation on the movement I (I.M: intermesh
value) of the restraining roll pair 4 in the metal sheet S pushing-in direction, and
such an optimum movement should be separately set for each of the restraining roll
pairs 4 in accordance with the strength and arrangement of the metal sheet S to be
restrained and the number of the restraining roll pairs 4. However, in the case where
the movement in the pushing-in direction is small, since slip tends to occur, there
is an increased risk of scrape occurring. On the other hand, in the case where the
movement is large, the occurrence of shape defects may be promoted. Therefore, there
is an appropriate value. In the case where a steel sheet is used as the metal sheet
S, when the sheet thickness is defined as t (mm), it is preferable that the movement
of the restraining roll pair 4 in the metal sheet S-pushing-in direction be -t (mm)
to (+10 × t) (mm). Here, as specifically described with reference to Fig. 3, in the
case where the movement I of the restraining rolls 4a in the metal sheet S pushing-in
direction is less than -t (mm) (refer to Fig. 3(a)), it is not possible to realize
the effect of restraining the metal sheet S. In addition, in the case where the movement
of the restraining rolls 4a in the metal sheet S pushing-in direction is more than
(+10 × t) (mm) (refer to Fig. 3(b)), there is a risk that it is not possible for the
metal sheet S to pass through the gap between the rolls due to an excessively strong
biting force.
[0034] The position of the restraining roll pair 4 may be adjusted in accordance with information
about the warpage of the metal sheet S. There is no particular limitation on the information
about the warpage of the metal sheet S, and such information may be based on predicted
values or measured values. In the case where the warpage of the metal sheet S is measured,
examples of the measurement position of the warpage include three positions, that
is, a position upstream of the water tank 2, a position downstream of the water tank
2, and an offline position, and a combination thereof may be used. The measurement
of the warpage of the metal sheet S may be performed by using a laser-type distance
meter or the like. It is advantageous that the measurement is performed before the
metal sheet S is cooled because this makes it possible to determine the conditions
applied for the restraining roll pairs 4 (restraining roll pairs to be used, distances
between the restraining roll pairs, intermesh values, offset values, and the like),
without delay. In the case where the measurement is performed after the metal sheet
S has been cooled, although it is not possible to avoid a delay in determining the
conditions due to a time lag, since the determination is made on the basis of information
about the practical warpage of the metal sheet S, it is possible to appropriately
adjust the restraining roll pairs 4. In the case where the warpage of the metal sheet
S is measured offline, there is an increased delay in determining the conditions applied
for the restraining roll pairs 4, but there is an advantage in that, for example,
it is possible to perform manual measurement.
[0035] That is, when the metal sheet S is quenched, the positions of the plural restraining
roll pairs 4 with respect to the metal sheet S may be adjusted in accordance with
operation conditions including not only the sheet passing speed and the sheet thickness
but also the information about warpage of the metal sheet S. In addition, also in
this case where the positions of the plural restraining roll pairs 4 are adjusted,
the restraining roll pairs to be used, the distances between the restraining roll
pairs, the intermesh values, the offset values, and the like may be adjusted as in
the case of the restraining roll pair 4.
[0036] In addition, regarding adjacent restraining roll pairs 4, the expression "distance
between restrain roll pairs 4" (denoted by C in Fig. 2) denotes the distance between
the center of the lower restraining roll 4a of the upper restraining roll pair 4 and
the center of the upper restraining roll 4a of the lower restraining roll pair 4.
[0037] Under the assumption that the restraining rolls 4a in a restraining roll pair 4 have
a moving system with which the rolls move toward or draw away from the sheet passing
direction P of the metal strip S, in the case where one restraining roll pair is withdrawn,
technically, the distance between the restraining roll pairs 4 is doubled and the
number of the restraining roll pairs 4 is halved. However, in the case where the original
distance C between the restraining roll pairs 4 is not appropriately set in advance,
it is not possible to realize the effect of correcting shape.
[0038] The appropriate range of the distance C is set to be D (mm) or more and 10 × D (mm)
or less. It is not preferable that the distance C between the restraining roll pairs
4 be less than D (mm) because, in this case, since water which is injected through
the water injection nozzles 3a is disturbed by the restraining roll pairs 4 before
the water reaches the metal sheet S, sufficient cooling capacity is not achieved,
which results in an increase in the size of the equipment due to an increase in distance
necessary for shape correction. In addition, since there is an increase in the number
of points at which the metal sheet S and the restraining roll pairs 4 come into contact,
there is an increased risk of the occurrence of surface defects such as pressing flaws,
slip flaws, and the like. On the other hand, in the case where the distance C is more
than 10 × D (mm), since there is an increase in distance between a point at which
the metal sheet S is restrained by one restraining roll pair 4 and a point at which
the metal sheet S is restrained by the next restraining roll pair 4, it is not possible
to realize the effect due to plural restraining roll pairs 4 being placed.
[0039] The restraining rolls 4a should be made of a material having excellent thermal conductivity
and strength sufficient to endure a load placed on the rolls when the rolls compress
the metal sheet. Examples of such a material include heat-resistant steel (for example,
KHR12C), stainless steel (SUS304, SUS310), ceramics, and the like, but CFRP easily
realizes the effect of roll restraining and is advantageous especially for achieving
satisfactory cooling capacity because the deflection of a roll made of CFRP is small
even in the case where the roll diameter is small.
[0040] As described above, since the present invention is intended to reduce complex and
nonuniform, wavy shape which occurs due to microstructure volume expansion caused
by martensite transformation occurring when the metal sheet S is rapidly cooled, it
is preferable that the present invention be used in a method for manufacturing a cold
rolled steel sheet. In addition, the relevant cold rolled steel sheet may be subjected
to a coating treatment. Examples of the coating treatment which may be performed include
an electro-galvanizing treatment, a hot-dip galvanizing treatment, and a hot-dip galvannealing
treatment.
[0041] More specifically, it is preferable that the present invention be used for manufacturing
a high strength steel sheet (high tensile strength steel sheet) having a tensile strength
of 580 MPa or higher. There is no particular limitation on the upper limit of the
tensile strength as long as the roll material or the like withstands high strength,
and, in the case where stainless steel (SUS304, SUS310), ceramics, or the like is
used for the rolls, it is expected for the effects to be realized even when the tensile
strength is about 3000 MPa.
[0042] Examples of the high strength steel sheet (high tensile strength steel sheet) described
above include a high strength cold rolled steel sheet and steel sheets which are manufactured
by performing a surface treatment on the high strength cold rolled steel sheet, that
is, a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet, an electro-galvanized steel sheet, a hot-dip
galvannealed steel sheet, and the like. That is, it is preferable that a high strength
cold rolled steel sheet, a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet, an electro-galvanized steel
sheet, and a hot-dip galvannealed steel sheet be manufactured by performing continuous
annealing utilizing the quenching apparatus for the metal sheet S and the method for
quenching the metal sheet S according to the present invention.
[0043] Specific examples of the high strength steel sheet include one having a chemical
composition containing, by mass%, C: 0.04% or more and 0.25% or less, Si: 0.01% or
more and 2.50% or less, Mn: 0.80% or more and 3.70% or less, P: 0.001% or more and
0.090% or less, S: 0.0001% or more and 0.0050% or less, sol.Al: 0.005% or more and
0.065% or less, optionally at least one of Cr, Mo, Nb, V, Ni, Cu, and Ti in an amount
of 0.5% or less each, optionally at least one of B and Sb in an amount of 0.01% or
less each, and a balance of Fe and incidental impurities.
[0044] Incidentally, it is possible to use the embodiment of the present invention for rapidly
cooling metal sheets in general. In addition, the present invention is not limited
to the embodiment which is described as an example and in which cooling is performed
by using a water immersion method, and it is possible to use the present invention
as a method for preventing deformation from occurring in a steel sheet due to transformation
by physically restraining the steel in processes in general regardless of whether
the relevant process is a heating process or a cooling process.
EXAMPLES
[0045] Hereafter, examples in which metal sheets were manufactured by using the quenching
apparatus for a metal sheet, the method for quenching a metal sheet, and a method
for manufacturing a steel sheet according to the present embodiment will be described.
[0046] By using the quenching apparatus 1 illustrated in Fig. 1 basically, high tensile
strength cold rolled steel sheets (metal sheets S) having a sheet thickness of 1.0
mm to 2.3 mm, a width of 1000 mm, a tensile strength of 1470 MPa class were manufactured
under the conditions of a sheet passing speed (refer to "LS" in Table 1) of 60 mpm
to 108 mpm, a quenching start temperature of 800°C, a cooling water injection flow
rate of 1000 T/hr, and a water temperature of 30°C. In addition, although the quenching
apparatus 1 illustrated in Fig. 1 has four restraining roll pairs 4 which are vertically
arranged, one to three restraining roll pairs were vertically arranged in the present
examples.
[0047] Incidentally, the representative chemical composition of the high tension cold rolled
steel sheet having a tensile strength of 1470 MPa class contained, by mass%, C: 0.20%,
Si: 1.0%, Mn: 2.3%, P: 0.005%, and S: 0.002%. Here, the Ms temperature (TMs (°C))
of such a high tension cold rolled steel sheet is 400°C, and the Mf temperature (TMf
(°C)) of the steel sheet is 300°C. In this case, the temperature range of the steel
sheet in which restraining utilizing the restraining roll pairs 4 is effective is
150°C to 550°C.
[0048] In addition, the roll diameter (D) of the restraining rolls 4a was 150 mm. The distance
in the sheet passing direction provided between the central axes of the restraining
rolls 4a in a restraining roll pair 4 was 75 mm (B in Fig. 2 = 75 mm) (refer to "Offset
Value" in Table 1), whereas the offset value was varied in some cases (Examples 7
to 10). In the case of examples 1 to 14, the restraining roll pairs 4 were placed
at a position located 0.3 m (first restraining roll pair) and a position located 0.75
m (second restraining roll pair) from the water surface W whose position was set to
be 0 m, the distance was measured in the sheet passing direction P. That is, C in
Fig. 2 was 0.45 m. Examples 15 and 16 are examples in which one more restraining roll
pair was added at a position located 1.05 m (third restraining roll pair) from the
water surface. Each of the restraining roll pairs 4 was designed so as to be withdrawn
(corresponding to the case of I.M =-50 mm in Table 1, where the sign "-" denotes the
withdrawing direction (direction of drawing away from the metal sheet S) so that it
was possible to select each pair to be used or not to be used (by moving the rolls)
in accordance with conditions. That is, "-50.0 mm" in the column "I.M" denotes a case
where the relevant restraining roll pair 4 is completely separated from the metal
sheet S so as to exert no restraining force on the metal sheet S. Here, "I.M" in Table
1 denotes "I" in Fig. 3.
[0049] Incidentally, in the case where the restraining roll pairs 4 were used to push the
metal sheet S without withdrawing the restraining roll pairs 4, the base condition
was set to be a case where movement of restraining rolls in metal sheet S pushing-in
direction was 0 mm. That is, in the case where "0.0 mm" in the column "I.M" in Table
1 denotes a state in which the restraining roll pair 4 pushed the metal sheet S. In
more detail, in the case where I.M is "0.0 mm", the surfaces of the restraining rolls
4a in the restraining roll pair 4 reach the central position of the metal sheet S.
In other words, in the case where I.M is "0.0 mm", the surfaces of the restraining
rolls 4a in the restraining roll pair 4 are moved in the metal sheet pushing-in direction
by a distance of half the sheet thickness of the metal sheet S. On the other hand,
in the case of example 7 and example 9, the movement in the metal sheet pushing-in
direction was changed. This was because, under the conditions of the two cases, since
the heights of the restraining rolls 4a on the front and back surface sides of the
metal sheet S were the same (offset value was 0), it was not possible physically for
the restraining rolls to push the metal sheet. Although, it was possible theoretically
to move the metal sheet from the pass line by a distance of half the sheet thickness,
since there was a risk of an excessive increase in load, allowance was taken into
consideration in setting.
[0050] The evaluations of the examples were conducted from the viewpoint of the warpage
quantity (mm) and surface quality of the metal sheet S which had been cooled. As illustrated
in Fig. 4, the warpage quantity (denoted by K in Fig. 4) of the metal sheet S was
measured in the width direction of the metal sheet S. In addition, the surface quality
of the metal sheet S was evaluated by performing surface-appearance observation on
three samples in total having the same width as that of the metal sheet S and a length
of 1 m which were taken from the front end, central position, and tail end in the
sheet passing direction of the metal sheet S. On the basis of the results of the observation
performed on the front and back surfaces of the three samples, a case where the number
of defects including surface flaws and the like was two or less in total was judged
as good (denoted by "o" in Table 1), and a case where the number of the defects was
three or more in total was judged as a case with flaws occurring (denoted by "×" in
Table 1).
[Table 1]
| Example |
LS [mpm] |
Sheet Thickness [mm] |
LSD [mpm·mm] |
Maximum Height Roughness [µm] |
Offset Value in Restraining Roll Pair (8) [mm] |
Injection Direction of Water Injection Nozzle (with Respect to Metal Sheet) |
First Restraining Roll Pair |
Second Restraining Roll Pair |
Third Restraining Roll Pair |
Warpage Quantity [mm] |
Surface Quality |
| Distance [m] |
I.M (I) [mm] |
Distance [m] |
I.M (I) [mm] |
Distance [m] |
I.M (I) [mm] |
| Rz min |
Rz max |
| Comparative Example 1 |
60 |
1.0 |
60 |
- |
- |
- |
90° |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
34.5 |
○ |
| Comparative Example 2 |
60 |
1.0 |
60 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
75 |
90° |
- |
- |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
15.2 |
○ |
| Comparative Example 3 |
60 |
1.8 |
108 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
75 |
90° |
- |
- |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
2.1 |
○ |
| Comparative Example 4 |
100 |
1.8 |
180 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
75 |
90° |
- |
- |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
4.3 |
○ |
| Comparative Example 5 |
100 |
1.8 |
180 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
75 |
60° |
- |
- |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
16.3 |
○ |
| Example 1 |
60 |
1.0 |
60 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
75 |
90° |
0.30 |
0.0 |
0.75 |
-50.0 |
- |
- |
2.9 |
○ |
| Example 2 |
60 |
1.8 |
108 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
75 |
90° |
0.30 |
-50.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
2.2 |
○ |
| Example 3 |
100 |
1.8 |
180 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
75 |
90° |
0.30 |
-50.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
4.6 |
○ |
| Example 4 |
60 |
1.0 |
60 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
75 |
90° |
0.30 |
0.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
3.4 |
○ |
| Example 5 |
50 |
1.6 |
80 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
75 |
90° |
0.30 |
0.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
3.7 |
○ |
| Example 6 |
60 |
1.8 |
108 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
75 |
90° |
0.30 |
0.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
15.5 |
○ |
| Example 7 |
60 |
1.8 |
108 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
0 |
90° |
0.30 |
-50.0 |
0.75 |
-3.0 |
- |
- |
11.0 |
○ |
| Example 8 |
60 |
1.8 |
108 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
200 |
90° |
0.30 |
-50.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
4.2 |
○ |
| Example 9 |
108 |
1.0 |
108 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
0 |
90° |
0.30 |
-50.0 |
0.75 |
-1.0 |
- |
- |
3.7 |
○ |
| Example 10 |
108 |
1.0 |
108 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
200 |
90° |
0.30 |
-50.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
10.5 |
○ |
| Example 11 |
60 |
1.8 |
108 |
5.6 |
13.3 |
75 |
90° |
0.30 |
-50.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
2.5 |
○ |
| Example 12 |
60 |
1.8 |
108 |
4.8 |
12.3 |
75 |
90° |
0.30 |
-50.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
2.3 |
× Slip Flaw |
| Example 13 |
60 |
1.8 |
108 |
42.7 |
48.5 |
75 |
90° |
0.30 |
-50.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
1.9 |
○ |
| Example 14 |
60 |
1.8 |
108 |
45.1 |
51.2 |
75 |
90° |
0.30 |
-50.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
1.8 |
× Rough Surface |
| Example 15 |
90 |
2.3 |
207 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
75 |
90° |
0.30 |
0.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
1.05 |
-50.0 |
11.5 |
○ |
| Example 16 |
90 |
2.3 |
207 |
25.3 |
29.6 |
75 |
90° |
0.30 |
-50.0 |
0.75 |
0.0 |
1.05 |
0.0 |
3.1 |
○ |
[0051] Hereafter, comparative examples 1 to 5 and examples 1 to 16 given in Table 1 will
be described.
[0052] In the case of comparative example 1, the restraining roll pair 4 was not placed,
and the metal sheet S was cooled by injecting water through the water injection nozzles
3a in the direction perpendicular to the sheet passing direction P of the metal sheet
S. The warpage quantity of the metal sheet S was 34.5 mm, which means a shape defect
occurred.
[0053] In the case of comparative examples 2 to 5, the number of restraining roll pairs
4 was one, and, in the case of comparative example 5, the water injection direction
was 60° with respect to the steel sheet. In the case of comparative examples 3 and
4, since the restraining roll pair 4 was placed within the preferable temperature
range for restraining derived from the transformation temperature of the metal sheet,
there was an improvement in warpage quantity. In the case of comparative examples
2 and 5, there was no improvement in warpage. From these results, it was clarified
that, in the case of one restraining roll pair 4, it was not possible to respond to
a change in the product of the sheet passing speed and sheet thickness of the metal
sheet S (LSD). In addition, there was a deterioration in shape in the case of an oblique
water injection direction. The reason for this is because, since there was a substantial
decrease in cooling capacity, there was an increase in the temperature of the metal
sheet S which passed through the restraining roll pair 4.
[0054] On the other hand, examples 1 to 6 show the results of the cases where two restraining
roll pairs 4 were placed. In addition, in the case of examples 1 to 3, the restraining
roll pair 4 to be used was selected (the movement conditions of the restraining roll
pairs 4 were selected) in accordance with LSD, and, as a result, it was clarified
that it is possible to respond a wide range of a change in LSD. Here, a metal sheet
for which the present invention is mainly intended is a steel sheet, and it is possible
to organize the sheet cooling state in accordance with LSD. Therefore, the larger
the LSD, the more difficult it is to cool the metal sheet, and the larger the distances
from the cooling start position to the martensite start position and the martensite
finish position. Therefore, it is preferable to select the restraining roll pairs
4 placed at lower positions in Fig. 1. To the contrary, the smaller the LSD, the easier
it is to cool the metal sheet, and the smaller the distance from the cooling start
position to the martensite start position and the martensite finish position. Therefore,
it is preferable to select the restraining roll pairs 4 placed at upper positions
in Fig. 1.
[0055] In contrast, in the case of examples 4 to 6 where the two restraining roll pairs
4 were both used, there was a deterioration in the warpage of the metal sheet S under
some conditions. Therefore, the withdrawal function of the restraining rolls 4a (moving
function of the restraining roll pairs 4) is necessary to respond to changes in sheet
passing speed and sheet thickness.
[0056] In the case of examples 7 to 14, on the basis of the conditions of example 2, the
offset value (distance in the sheet passing direction P of the metal strip S between
the restraining rolls 4a in a restraining roll pair 4) and the maximum height roughness
Rz of the restraining rolls 4a are changed. In the case of an offset value of 0 (example
7 and example 9), as described above, due to the limitations on the movement in the
sheet pushing-in direction of the restraining rolls 4a, there was a deterioration
in warpage quantity compared with the results of example 2. On the other hand, in
the case of example 8 and example 10 where the offset value was 200 mm, there was
a deterioration in the warpage quantity of the metal sheet S under the condition of
a sheet thickness of 1 mm. From these results, it was clarified that it is necessary
to appropriately set the offset value.
[0057] Moreover, from the results of examples 11 to 14, it was clarified that there may
be a deterioration in the external appearance of the metal sheet S depending on the
maximum height roughness Rz of the restraining rolls 4a. It was clarified that, to
maintain the external appearance of the surface of the metal sheet S, both the largest
and smallest values of the maximum height roughness Rz should be set to be 5 um to
50 µm.
[0058] Example 15 is an example in which quenching was performed with reference to examples
4 to 6. By using the plural restraining roll pairs 4, it was possible to realize the
effect of correcting shape of the metal sheet S to some extent. In the case of example
16, by selecting roll pairs to be used from the plural restraining roll pairs 4 in
accordance with the product of the sheet passing speed and sheet thickness of the
metal sheet S (LSD) and the measurement results of the warpage of the metal sheet
S to thereby adjust the positions at which the metal sheet S was restrained and the
distance between the restraining roll pairs, it is possible to suppress the warpage
quantity of the metal sheet S to be 3.1 mm. Here, although, in this example (example
16), restraining roll pairs to be used were selected to thereby adjust the distance
between the restraining roll pairs, the items to be adjusted may be the intermesh
values and offset values. Regarding the measurement of the warpage of the metal sheet
S, by placing a laser displacement meter at any position in the sheet passing direction
P of the metal sheet S, and by using the measurement results of the warpage derived
from such a laser displacement meter, various kinds of conditions applied for the
plural restraining roll pairs 4 may be determined.
[0059] The present inventors diligently conducted investigations to solve the problems described
above and to thereby complete the quenching apparatus for a metal sheet, a method
for quenching a metal sheet, and a method for manufacturing a steel sheet according
to the present invention and, as a result, the following knowledge was obtained.
[0060] Although, to achieve a good shape of the metal sheet S, restraining the metal sheet
S by using restraining rolls 4a to inhibit out-of-plane deformation occurring in the
metal sheet S in the temperature range of (T
Ms + 150) (°C) to (T
Mf - 150) (°C) is effective, it is necessary to place significant limitations on the
sheet passing speed and sheet thickness of the metal sheet S to satisfy such conditions
by using only one restraining roll pair 4. In response to such a problem, the idea
that, by using plural restraining roll pairs 4, it is possible to relax significantly
the limitations on the conditions under which the metal sheet S passes through the
restraining roll pairs 4 in the good temperature range was conceived.
[0061] Although, to respond to changes in the LS, sheet thickness, and the like of the metal
sheet S, plural restraining roll pairs 4 should be placed as described above, there
may be a case where the shape of the metal sheet S is not stabilized or scrape or
the like occurs due to the restraining roll pairs 4, unless the restraining roll pairs
4 are placed under appropriate conditions.
[0062] The destabilization of the shape of the metal sheet S is caused by the unstableness
of the cooling capacity, and this was presumed to be because of the destabilization
of the vapor film-removing capability due to a water flow. Generally, it is known
that, when cooling is performed for water quenching, the contact state between the
metal sheet S and water (boiling state) varies in accordance with the temperature
range of the metal sheet S in the cooling process; that is, film boiling, transition
boiling, and nucleate boiling occur in this order as the temperature decreases, which
results in a variation in cooling rate and cooling uniformity. In addition, it was
considered that, to realize rapid cooling while maintaining temperature uniformity,
performing cooling only in the nucleate boiling range is important and, for such a
purpose, removing a vapor film uniformly is important. To realize this, a method in
which slit nozzles are placed on the front and back surface sides of the metal sheet
S to spray a water flow onto the surfaces has been put into practice.
[0063] In addition, from the results of the investigation conducted by the present inventors,
it was found that multiple parallel jet flows provided by using water injection nozzles
3a for injecting a coolant which are arranged in plural parallel lines are significantly
unstable due to peripheral flows. In the case where the jet flows are unstable, since
the positions at which the jet flows impinge on the metal sheet S also are unstable,
the removal of the vapor film becomes unstable. Therefore, it was found that, in the
case where the restraining rolls 4a are simply added, since the state of the removal
of the vapor film becomes unstable, there may be a deterioration in the shape of the
metal sheet S on the contrary. On the other hand, it was considered that scratch occurring
in the surface of the metal sheet S is a defect caused by the slip of the restraining
rolls 4a and that such a defect is caused by a hydroplaning phenomenon occurring in
the case where a water film is formed between the restraining rolls 4a and the metal
sheet S.
Reference Signs List
[0064]
- 1
- quenching apparatus
- 2
- water tank
- 3
- water injection apparatus
- 3a
- water injection nozzle
- 3b
- coolant injected through water injection nozzle
- 4
- restraining roll pair
- 4a
- restraining roll
- D
- roll diameter
- P
- sheet passing direction
- Rz
- maximum height roughness
- S
- metal sheet
- K
- warpage quantity
- W
- water surface
- A
- distance from water surface to cooling start point
- B
- distance between central axes of one pair of restraining rolls facing each other (offset
value)
- C
- distance between restraining roll pairs
- I
- movement of restraining rolls in metal sheet pushing-in direction (I.M)