Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a technique for causing an additive containing non-conductive
fine particles used in a composite plating solution to become a liquid.
Background Art
[0002] Plating that has a non-shiny uniform semi-bright or almost matte appearance is called
satin nickel. A method for obtaining a satin-like appearance includes composite plating
in which non-conductive fine particles are suspended in a liquid and codeposited with
nickel (NPL 1).
[0003] In addition, plating utilizing similar non-conductive fine particles includes microporous
plating used for a base for chrome plating used as decorative plating for an automobile
part, a faucet fitting, or the like. With this microporous plating film, a large number
of invisible tiny pores can be formed in the surface layer of chrome plating, and
corrosion resistance can be improved by dispersing a corrosion current (PTL 1). This
microporous plating is also a type of composite plating.
[0004] The fine particles used to form a satin-like appearance or micropores have a very
small particle diameter, and therefore scatter into the atmosphere when added to the
plating solution, are exposed to a worker or adhere to the surroundings in working,
and a liquid additive form has long been desired.
[0005] However, as for an additive in which water is used as a solvent, when non-conductive
fine particles such as silica particles were added thereto, a phenomenon in which
the non-conductive fine particles sediment, precipitate, and then solidify after several
hours was observed, and it was unsuitable as a stable fine particle liquid additive.
[0006] Incidentally, as a technique for forming micropores during plating, it is known to
perform electroplating using a plating solution containing non-conductive particles
such as silica particles that are positively charged using aluminum hydroxide (PTL
2) .
[0007] However, if positively charged non-conductive fine particles are prepared in advance
as an additive by such a conventional technique, the particles will solidify, so that
it is necessary to add the particles separately each time when used, which made it
unsuitable as a stable fine particle liquid additive.
Citation List
Patent Literature
Non Patent Literature
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0010] Therefore, an object of the invention is to provide an additive for a composite plating
solution, which is a liquid containing non-conductive fine particles, does not require
preparation of special fine particles, and has high stability.
Solution to Problem
[0011] The present inventors conducted intensive studies to solve the above problems, and
as a result, they found that the above problems can be solved by incorporating nickel
ions for dispersing non-conductive fine particles in a liquid, and thus completed
the invention.
[0012] That is, the invention is directed to an additive for a composite plating solution
characterized by containing non-conductive fine particles, nickel ions, and water.
[0013] In addition, the invention is directed to a method for preventing solidification
of a precipitate of non-conductive fine particles in an additive for a composite plating
solution, characterized by incorporating nickel ions in an additive for a composite
plating solution containing non-conductive fine particles and water.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0014] The additive for a composite plating solution of the invention can prevent sedimentation
of non-conductive fine particles (separation between a suspension layer of non-conductive
fine particles and a supernatant is delayed: a time until formation of a precipitate
is slow), and prevent solidification of a precipitate (non-conductive fine particles
do not re-disperse even if shaking is performed), and can maintain a stable state
as a liquid additive.
[0015] Therefore, the additive for a composite plating solution of the invention can be
used stably without scattering into the atmosphere when added to the plating solution,
or exposure to a worker or adhesion to the surroundings in working.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0016]
[FIG. 1] FIG. 1 is a view showing a state of an additive of Comparative Example 1
after being left for 168 hours in Test Example 2 (the left and right views are the
same, and the right view has an explanation added to the left view).
[FIG. 2] FIG. 2 is a view showing a state of an additive of Example 1 after being
left for 168 hours in Test Example 2 (the left and right views are the same, and the
right view has an explanation added to the left view).
[FIG. 3] FIG. 3 is a view showing a state of an additive of Example 2 after being
left for 168 hours in Test Example 2 (the left and right views are the same, and the
right view has an explanation added to the left view).
[FIG. 4] FIG. 4 is a view showing a state of an additive of Comparative Example 1
after being left for 168 hours and then being shaken in Test Example 2 (the left and
right views are the same, and the right view has an explanation added to the left
view).
[FIG. 5] FIG. 5 is a view showing a state of an additive of Example 1 after being
left for 168 hours and then being shaken in Test Example 2 (the left and right views
are the same, and the right view has an explanation added to the left view).
[FIG. 6] FIG. 6 is a view showing a state of an additive of Example 2 after being
left for 168 hours and then being shaken in Test Example 2 (the left and right views
are the same, and the right view has an explanation added to the left view).
[FIG. 7] FIG. 7 is a view showing an appearance of a test piece used in Test Example
3.
Description of Embodiments
[0017] The additive for a composite plating solution of the invention (hereinafter referred
to as "the additive of the invention") contains non-conductive fine particles, nickel
ions, and water.
[0018] The non-conductive fine particles used in the additive of the invention are not particularly
limited, and examples thereof include oxides, nitrides, sulfides, and inorganic salts
of metals such as silicon, barium, zirconium, aluminum and titanium. Among these,
oxides, nitrides, sulfides, and inorganic salts of silicon, barium, zirconium, and
aluminum are preferred in terms of effect, and oxides such as silica (silicon dioxide)
and zirconia (zirconium dioxide), and inorganic salts such as barium sulfate are particularly
preferred. Among these non-conductive fine particles, one type or two or more types
can be used.
[0019] In addition, as the non-conductive fine particles, for example, commercially available
products such as MP POWDER 308 and MP POWDER 309A of JCU CORPORATION can also be used.
[0020] The average particle diameter of these non-conductive fine particles is not particularly
limited, but is, for example, 0.1 to 10 um, and preferably 1.0 to 3.0 um. The average
particle diameter is a value measured by a zeta potential/particle diameter/molecular
weight measurement system ELSZ-2000 manufactured by Otsuka Electronics Co., Ltd.
[0021] The content of the non-conductive fine particles in the additive of the invention
is not particularly limited, but is, for example, 0.01 to 20 wt% (hereinafter simply
referred to as "%"), and preferably 0.05 to 10%. In addition, the content of the non-conductive
fine particles in the additive of the invention can also be set to a concentration
higher than when the non-conductive fine particles are used in an ordinary composite
plating solution. In this case, the content is, for example, 5 to 50%, and preferably
10 to 40%.
[0022] The content of nickel ions in the additive of the invention is not particularly limited,
but is, for example, 0.01 to 12%, and preferably 0.05 to 10%.
[0023] The nickel ion supply source of the nickel ions is not particularly limited as long
as nickel ions are generated when it is dissolved in water. Examples thereof include
nickel sulfate, nickel chloride, nickel sulfamate, and nickel acetate. These can be
used in the form of a hydrate or an anhydride. Among these, nickel sulfate hexahydrate
is preferred in terms of cost and containing no halogens. Among these nickel ion supply
sources, one type or two or more types can be used.
[0024] The mass ratio of the non-conductive fine particles and the nickel ions in the additive
of the invention may be appropriately set according to the type of non-conductive
fine particles, but for example, when silicon dioxide is used as the non-conductive
fine particles, the mass ratio is 1:0.001 to 1:3, and preferably 1:0.003 to 1:2.
[0025] The water used in the additive of the invention is not particularly limited, and
for example, distilled water, ion-exchanged water, ultrapure water, city water, or
the like may be used.
[0026] The pH of the additive of the invention is not particularly limited, but is preferably
neutral or acidic, and in particular, since a hydroxide of nickel is generated at
pH 6 or higher, it is more preferably pH 6 or lower. In order to adjust the pH, for
example, an inorganic acid such as sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, or nitric acid,
an organic acid such as acetic acid, sulfamic acid, or the like may be used.
[0027] The additive of the invention can prevent sedimentation of the non-conductive fine
particles and solidification of a precipitate thereof in the additive for composite
plating solution containing water and the non-conductive fine particles by the action
of nickel ions described above, and can maintain a stable state as a liquid additive,
but may further contain one type or two or more types selected from a charge imparting
agent, a surfactant, and a brightener.
[0028] Examples of the charge imparting agent include aluminum ions. The supply source of
the aluminum ions is not particularly limited, but when it is added to a composite
plating solution containing a Watts bath in which nickel sulfate or nickel chloride
is used as a base, use of polyaluminum chloride or aluminum sulfate has little effect
on sulfate ions or chlorine ions.
[0029] When polyaluminum chloride is incorporated in the additive of the invention, polyaluminum
chloride in the form of a powder may be added, or for example, a commercially available
product in the form of an aqueous solution of about 10% in terms of aluminum oxide
such as PAC of Nankai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. or TAIPAC series of Taimei Chemicals
Co., Ltd. may be added. Such polyaluminum chloride may be added as it is or after
being appropriately diluted or the like.
[0030] The content of polyaluminum chloride in the additive of the invention is not particularly
limited, but is, for example, 0.01 to 50.0%, and preferably 0.1 to 30% in terms of
aluminum oxide (for example, 0.002 to 15%, and preferably 0.02 to 7% in terms of aluminum).
[0031] Further, when aluminum sulfate is incorporated in the additive of the invention,
aluminum sulfate in the form of a powder may be added, or aluminum sulfate in the
form of a liquid may be added. To aluminum sulfate in the form of a liquid, a commercially
available product such as an aluminum sulfate solution for tap water or an aluminum
sulfate solution for general use of Taimei Chemical Co., Ltd. may be added.
[0032] The surfactant is not particularly limited, but examples thereof include nonionic
surfactants such as polyethylene glycol, anionic surfactants such as sodium polyoxyethylene
alkyl ether sulfates, cationic surfactants such as benzethonium chloride, stearylamine
acetate, and dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride, and amphoteric surfactants such as
lauryl betaine, lauryl dimethylamino acetate betaine, amidopropyl dimethylamino acetate
betaine laurate, and lauryl dimethylamine oxide. Among these surfactants, one type
or two or more types can be used. Among these surfactants, a cationic surfactant that
is positively charged or an amphoteric surfactant that exhibits cationic in a pH range
where it is used is preferred. With the use of such a surfactant, the dispersibility
is further maintained.
[0033] The content of the surfactant in the additive of the invention is not particularly
limited, but is, for example, 0.001 to 5%, and preferably 0.001 to 2%.
[0034] The brightener is not particularly limited, and examples thereof include a primary
brightener and a secondary brightener that are used in an ordinary composite plating
solution. Examples of the primary brightener include sulfonamides, sulfonimides, benzenesulfonic
acid, and alkylsulfonic acids. As the primary brightener, for example, MP333 (manufactured
by JCU CORPORATION) or the like is commercially available and therefore may be used.
Examples of the secondary brightener include 1,4-butynediol and coumarin. The secondary
brightener is an organic compound having a functional group as follows (C=O, C=C,
C=C, C=N, C=N, N-C=S, N=N, -CH
2-CH-O). As the secondary brightener, for example, #810 (manufactured by JCU CORPORATION)
is commercially available and therefore may be used. These primary brighteners and
secondary brighteners may be used alone or a plurality thereof may be used in combination.
[0035] The content of the brightener in the additive of the invention is not particularly
limited, but for example, the primary brightener is preferably added in an amount
of 0.1 to 900 mL/L, and the secondary brightener is preferably added in an amount
of about 0.1 to 900 mL/L.
[0036] It is only necessary that the additive of the invention contains non-conductive fine
particles, nickel ions, and water, and therefore, an electrolytic nickel solution
that is used for a composite plating solution such as a Watts bath or a sulfamate
bath may be utilized as one containing nickel ions and water.
[0037] The composition of the Watts bath includes the following composition. This Watts
bath may be diluted as appropriate.
Nickel sulfate (NiSO4·6H2O): 1 to 450 g/L
Nickel chloride (NiCl2·6H2O): 0.1 to 45 g/L
Boric acid (H3BO3) : 0.1 to 45 g/L
Water: balance
[0038] When the Watts bath is utilized in this manner, the additive of the invention becomes
one containing non-conductive fine particles and the Watts bath.
[0039] The composition of the sulfamate bath includes the following composition. This sulfamate
bath may be diluted as appropriate.
Nickel sulfamate (Ni(SO3NH2)2·4H2O): 1 to 600 g/L
Nickel chloride (NiCl2·6H2O): 0 to 15 g/L
Boric acid (H3BO3) : 0.1 to 40 g/L
Water: balance
[0040] When the sulfamate bath is utilized in this manner, the additive of the invention
becomes one containing non-conductive fine particles and the sulfamate bath.
[0041] Examples of the additive of the invention include those containing non-conductive
fine particles, nickel ions, and water as described above, but the following ones
may also be used.
- (1) An additive for a composite plating solution characterized by containing non-conductive
fine particles, nickel ions, and water.
- (2) The additive for a composite plating solution according to (1), wherein the composite
plating solution is a satin nickel plating solution or a microporous nickel plating
solution.
- (3) The additive for a composite plating solution according to (1) or (2), wherein
the non-conductive fine particles are one or more types selected from oxides, nitrides,
sulfides, and inorganic salts of silicon, barium, zirconium, aluminum, and titanium.
- (4) The additive for a composite plating solution according to any one of (1) to (3),
wherein the supply source of nickel ions is one type or two or more types selected
from nickel sulfate hexahydrate, nickel chloride, and nickel sulfamate.
- (5) An additive for a composite plating solution characterized by containing:
non-conductive fine particles;
nickel ions; and
one or more types selected from a charge imparting agent, a surfactant, and a brightener.
- (6) An additive for a composite plating solution characterized by containing:
non-conductive fine particles; and
a Watts bath or a sulfamate bath.
- (7) An additive for a composite plating solution characterized by containing:
non-conductive fine particles;
a Watts bath or a sulfamate bath; and
one or more types selected from a charge imparting agent, a surfactant, and a brightener.
- (8) A method for preventing solidification of a precipitate of non-conductive fine
particles in an additive for a composite plating solution, characterized by incorporating
nickel ions in an additive for a composite plating solution containing non-conductive
fine particles and water.
[0042] The additive of the invention described above can be prepared by stirring and mixing
the above-mentioned components until homogeneity.
[0043] Then, it is possible to prevent sedimentation of the non-conductive fine particles
of the invention or solidification of a precipitate thereof, and maintain a stable
state as a liquid additive.
[0044] It is possible to prepare a composite plating solution such as a satin nickel plating
solution or a microporous nickel plating solution by adding the additive of the invention
to a composite plating solution base. In particular, by adding the additive of the
invention to a microporous nickel plating solution base to prepare a microporous nickel
plating solution, it is possible to perform microporous plating with a good number
of micropores as in a conventional case. The composite plating solution base refers
to a base containing some or all of the components other than the non-conductive fine
particles in the composite plating solution, and becoming the composite plating solution
by adding the additive of the invention thereto.
Examples
[0045] Hereinafter, the invention will be described in detail with reference to Examples,
but the invention is by no means limited to these Examples or the like. In the preparation
of additives in Examples and Comparative Examples, a 110 mL glass screw tube bottle
(9-852-10, manufactured by AS ONE Co., Ltd.) (hereinafter referred to as a screw tube
bottle) was used.
Example 1
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0046] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of a 500 g/L aqueous solution of nickel sulfate and
6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until
homogeneity, thereby obtaining an additive (pH 5.31).
Example 2
Preparation of Additive Using Watts Bath:
[0047] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of a Watts bath prepared with the following composition
and 6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide (average particle diameter: 1.5 um) were placed,
followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining an additive (pH
3.69).
<Watts Bath>
[0048]
Nickel sulfate (NiSO4·6H2O): 250 g/L
Nickel chloride (NiCl2·6H2O): 40 g/L
Boric acid (H3BO3) : 40 g/L
Example 3
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0049] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of a 500 g/L aqueous solution of nickel sulfate and
6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide, and further polyaluminum chloride (PAC, Nankai
Chemical Co., Ltd.) in an amount of 0.07 g in terms of aluminum were placed, followed
by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining an additive (pH 3.92).
Example 4
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0050] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of a 60 g/L aqueous solution of nickel sulfate and
6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide, and further polyaluminum chloride in an amount
of 0.07 g in terms of aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until
homogeneity, thereby obtaining an additive (pH 3.99).
Example 5
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0051] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of a 10 g/L aqueous solution of nickel sulfate and
6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide, and further polyaluminum chloride in an amount
of 0.07 g in terms of aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until
homogeneity, thereby obtaining an additive (pH 4.05).
Example 6
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0052] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of a 1 g/L aqueous solution of nickel sulfate and
6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide, and further polyaluminum chloride in an amount
of 0.07 g in terms of aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until
homogeneity, thereby obtaining an additive (pH 3.86).
Example 7
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0053] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of an aqueous solution adjusted to 450 g/L of nickel
sulfate, 40 g/L of nickel chloride, and 40 g/L of boric acid, and 6 g of a powder
of silicon dioxide, and further polyaluminum chloride in an amount of 0.07 g in terms
of aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby
obtaining an additive (pH 3.62).
Example 8
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0054] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of an aqueous solution adjusted to 250 g/L of nickel
sulfate, 40 g/L of nickel chloride, and 40 g/L of boric acid, and 6 g of a powder
of silicon dioxide, and further polyaluminum chloride in an amount of 0.07 g in terms
of aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby
obtaining an additive (pH 3.74).
Example 9
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0055] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of an aqueous solution adjusted to 10 g/L of nickel
sulfate, 1.6 g/L of nickel chloride, and 1.6 g/L of boric acid, and 6 g of a powder
of silicon dioxide, and further polyaluminum chloride in an amount of 0.07 g in terms
of aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby
obtaining an additive (pH 3.96).
Example 10
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0056] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of an aqueous solution adjusted to 1 g/L of nickel
sulfate, 0.16 g/L of nickel chloride, and 0.16 g/L of boric acid, and 6 g of a powder
of silicon dioxide, and further polyaluminum chloride in an amount of 0.07 g in terms
of aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby
obtaining an additive (pH 3.85) .
Example 11
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0057] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of a 500 g/L aqueous solution of nickel sulfate and
6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide, and further aluminum sulfate in an amount of 0.07
g in terms of aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity,
thereby obtaining an additive (pH 3.31).
Example 12
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0058] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of a 60 g/L aqueous solution of nickel sulfate and
6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide, and further aluminum sulfate in an amount of 0.07
g in terms of aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity,
thereby obtaining an additive (pH 3.24).
Example 13
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0059] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of a 10 g/L aqueous solution of nickel sulfate and
6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide, and further aluminum sulfate in an amount of 0.07
g in terms of aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity,
thereby obtaining an additive (pH 3.41).
Example 14
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0060] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of a 1 g/L aqueous solution of nickel sulfate and
6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide, and further aluminum sulfate in an amount of 0.07
g in terms of aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity,
thereby obtaining an additive (pH 3.31).
Example 15
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0061] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of an aqueous solution adjusted to 450 g/L of nickel
sulfate, 40 g/L of nickel chloride, and 40 g/L of boric acid, and 6 g of a powder
of silicon dioxide, and further aluminum sulfate in an amount of 0.07 g in terms of
aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining
an additive (pH 3.08).
Example 16
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0062] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of an aqueous solution adjusted to 250 g/L of nickel
sulfate, 40 g/L of nickel chloride, and 40 g/L of boric acid, and 6 g of a powder
of silicon dioxide, and further aluminum sulfate in an amount of 0.07 g in terms of
aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining
an additive (pH 3.00).
Example 17
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0063] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of an aqueous solution adjusted to 10 g/L of nickel
sulfate, 1.6 g/L of nickel chloride, and 1.6 g/L of boric acid, and 6 g of a powder
of silicon dioxide, and further aluminum sulfate in an amount of 0.07 g in terms of
aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining
an additive (pH 3.30).
Example 18
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0064] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of an aqueous solution adjusted to 1 g/L of nickel
sulfate, 0.16 g/L of nickel chloride, and 0.16 g/L of boric acid, and 6 g of a powder
of silicon dioxide, and further aluminum sulfate in an amount of 0.07 g in terms of
aluminum were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining
an additive (pH 3.30) .
Example 19
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0065] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of an aqueous solution adjusted to 100 g/L of nickel
sulfate and 6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide were placed, followed by stirring and
mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining an additive (pH 5.63).
Example 20
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0066] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of an aqueous solution adjusted to 100 g/L of nickel
sulfate and 6 g of a powder of titanium dioxide (average particle diameter: 0.01 um)
were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining
an additive (pH 4.94).
Example 21
Preparation of Additive Using Nickel Salt:
[0067] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of an aqueous solution adjusted to 100 g/L of nickel
sulfate and 6 g of a powder of zirconium silicate (average particle diameter: 1.1
um) were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining
an additive (pH 5.64).
[0068] As Comparative Examples, cases where nickel ions were not contained in the dispersion
solvent for the non-conductive fine particles, and water was substantially used as
the main solvent will be described below.
Comparative Example 1
Preparation of Additive Prepared with Only Water:
[0069] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of pure water and 6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide
were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining
an additive (pH 7.17) .
Comparative Example 2
Preparation of Additive Prepared with Only Water:
[0070] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of pure water and 6 g of a powder of titanium dioxide
were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining
an additive (pH 7.61) .
Comparative Example 3
Preparation of Additive Prepared with Only Water:
[0071] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of pure water and 6 g of a powder of zirconium silicate
were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining
an additive (pH 6.91) .
Comparative Example 4
Preparation of Additive Prepared with Only Water:
[0072] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of pure water and 6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide
were placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, and an additive adjusted
to pH 3 or lower with a small amount of sulfuric acid was obtained (pH 2.34) .
Comparative Example 5
Preparation of Additive Prepared with Only Water:
[0073] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of pure water and 6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide
were placed, and further, polyaluminum chloride in an amount of 0.07 g in terms of
aluminum was placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining
an additive (pH 3.36).
Comparative Example 6
Preparation of Additive with Only Water:
[0074] In a screw tube bottle, 100 mL of pure water and 6 g of a powder of silicon dioxide
were placed, and further, aluminum sulfate in an amount of 0.07 g in terms of aluminum
was placed, followed by stirring and mixing until homogeneity, thereby obtaining an
additive (pH 3.84).
Test Example 1
Dispersibility Test:
[0075] The screw tube bottles were sealed in a state where the additives of Examples 1 to
21 and Comparative Examples 1 to 6 were placed therein, and shaking was performed
until homogeneity, and then, the state of each additive was investigated after 24
hours passed. When precipitation occurred, shaking was performed again and redispersibility
of the non-conductive fine particles was investigated. In the shaking, the screw tube
bottle was shaken up and down 30 times. After shaking, it was visually evaluated whether
precipitation occurred in the additive after 24 hours passed, and further redispersibility
after shaking was performed again was evaluated according to the following criteria.
The results are shown in Table 1.
<Redispersibility Evaluation Criteria>
Evaluation Contents
[0076]
A: Homogeneity is achieved when shaking is performed.
B: Homogeneity is not achieved even when shaking is performed.
[Table 1]
|
Precipitation |
Redispersibility |
|
Precipitation |
Redispersibility |
Example 1 |
slightly occurred |
A |
Example 15 |
slightly occurred |
A |
Example 2 |
occurred |
A |
Example 16 |
occurred |
A |
Example 3 |
occurred |
A |
Example 17 |
occurred |
A |
Example 4 |
occurred |
A |
Example 18 |
occurred |
A |
Example 5 |
occurred |
A |
Example 19 |
occurred |
A |
Example 6 |
occurred |
A |
Example 20 |
occurred |
A |
Example 7 |
slightly occurred |
A |
Example 21 |
occurred |
A |
Example 8 |
slightly occurred |
A |
|
|
|
Example 9 |
slightly occurred |
A |
Comparative Example 1 |
occurred |
B |
Example 10 |
slightly occurred |
A |
Comparative Example 2 |
occurred |
A |
Example 11 |
slightly occurred |
A |
Comparative Example 3 |
occurred |
B |
Example 12 |
occurred |
A |
Comparative Example 4 |
occurred |
B |
Example 13 |
occurred |
A |
Comparative Example 5 |
occurred |
A |
Example 14 |
occurred |
A |
Comparative Example 6 |
occurred |
A |
[0077] With respect to Examples 1 to 21, although precipitation occurred, when shaking was
performed again, the precipitate easily redispersed, and homogeneous dispersibility
could be verified.
[0078] On the other hand, with respect to Comparative Examples 1, 3, and 4, precipitation
occurred, and even after shaking was performed again, the precipitate solidified and
did not redisperse. Further, with respect to Comparative Examples 2, 5, and 6, although
precipitation occurred, when shaking was performed again, the precipitate easily redispersed,
and homogeneous dispersibility could be verified.
Test example 2
Dispersibility Test After Long-Term Storage:
[0079] The screw tube bottles were sealed in a state where the additives of Examples 1 to
21 and Comparative Examples 1 to 6 were placed therein, and shaking was performed
until homogeneity, and then, the state of each additive was investigated after 168
hours passed. When precipitation occurred, shaking was performed again and redispersibility
of the non-conductive fine particles was investigated. In the shaking, the screw tube
bottle was shaken up and down 30 times. After shaking, it was visually evaluated whether
precipitation occurred in the additive after 168 hours passed, and redispersibility
after shaking was performed again was evaluated according to the same criteria as
in Test Example 1. The results are shown in Table 2.
[0080] Further, the results of the additive of Comparative Example 1 are shown in FIGS.
1 and 4, the results of the additive of Example 1 are shown in FIGS. 2 and 5, and
the results of the additive of Example 2 are shown in FIGS. 3 and 6.
[Table 2]
|
Precipitation |
Redispersibility |
|
Precipitation |
Redispersibility |
Example 1 |
occurred |
A |
Example 15 |
occurred |
A |
Example 2 |
occurred |
A |
Example 16 |
occurred |
A |
Example 3 |
occurred |
A |
Example 17 |
occurred |
A |
Example 4 |
occurred |
A |
Example 18 |
occurred |
A |
Example 5 |
occurred |
A |
Example 19 |
occurred |
A |
Example 6 |
occurred |
A |
Example 20 |
occurred |
A |
Example 7 |
occurred |
A |
Example 21 |
occurred |
A |
Example 8 |
occurred |
A |
|
|
|
Example 9 |
occurred |
A |
Comparative Example 1 |
occurred |
B |
Example 10 |
occurred |
A |
Comparative Example 2 |
occurred |
A |
Example 11 |
occurred |
A |
Comparative Example 3 |
occurred |
B |
Example 12 |
occurred |
A |
Comparative Example 4 |
occurred |
B |
Example 13 |
occurred |
A |
Comparative Example 5 |
occurred |
A |
Example 14 |
occurred |
A |
Comparative Example 6 |
occurred |
B |
[0081] With respect to Examples 1 to 21, although precipitation occurred, when shaking was
performed again, the precipitate easily redispersed, and homogeneous dispersibility
could be verified.
[0082] On the other hand, with respect to Comparative Examples 1, 3, 4, and 5, precipitation
occurred, and even after shaking was performed again, the precipitate solidified and
did not redisperse. Further, with respect to Comparative Examples 2 and 5, although
precipitation occurred, when shaking was performed again, the precipitate easily redispersed,
and homogeneous dispersibility could be verified.
[0083] From the results of Test Examples 1 and 2, it was found that in order to form a
liquid state with good dispersibility without causing precipitation of the non-conductive
fine particles and solidification of the precipitate thereof, incorporation of nickel
ions together with the non-conductive fine particles has an effect on redispersibility.
Test Example 3
Plating Test:
[0084] The additive prepared in Example 1 was added in an amount of 0.5 mL/L to a plating
bath having the following composition, thereby preparing a microporous plating solution.
<Plating Bath>
[0085]
Nickel sulfate (NiSO4·6H2O): 260 g/L
Nickel chloride (NiCl2·6H2O): 45 g/L
Boric acid (H3BO3) : 45 g/L
Brightener #810*: 3 mL/L
Brightener MP333*: 10 mL/L
Polyaluminum chloride: 0.3 mg/L (in terms of aluminum)
Bath temperature: 55°C
Specific gravity: 1.205
*: manufactured by JCU CORPORATION
[0086] Subsequently, a microporous plated product was produced as a test piece according
to the following steps using a bent cathode test piece (brass: manufactured by Yamamoto-MS
Co., Ltd.) having a shape shown in FIG. 7.
(Degreasing/Acid Activation)
[0087] The test piece was treated with SK-144 (manufactured by JCU CORPORATION) for 5 minutes
for degreasing, and then treated with V-345 (manufactured by JCU CORPORATION) for
30 seconds for acid activation.
(Bright Nickel Plating)
[0088] The test piece subjected to the degreasing and acid activation treatments above were
plated in the following nickel plating solution at 4 A/dm
2 for 3 minutes.
<Bright Nickel Plating Bath>
[0089]
Nickel sulfate (NiSO4·6H2O): 260 g/L
Nickel chloride (NiCl2·6H2O): 45 g/L
Boric acid (H3BO3) : 45 g/L
Brightener #810*: 3 mL/L
Brightener #83*: 10 mL/L
*: manufactured by JCU CORPORATION
(Microporous Plating)
[0090] The test piece subjected to bright plating was plated in the microporous plating
solution prepared above at 3 A/dm
2 for 3 minutes.
(Chrome Plating)
[0091] The test piece subjected to microporous nickel plating above was plated in a hexavalent
chromium plating solution having the following composition at 10 A/dm
2 for 3 minutes.
<Hexavalent Chromium Plating Bath>
[0092]
Chromic anhydride (CrO3): 250 g/L
Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) : 1 g/L
Additive ECR 300LN*: 10 mL/L
MISTSHUT NP*: 0.1 mL/L
*: manufactured by JCU CORPORATION
(Procedure 1 for Measuring Number of Micropores)
[0093] The test piece after chrome plating was immersed in a copper sulfate plating solution
having the following composition for 3 minutes, and then plated in the copper sulfate
plating solution at 0.5 A/dm
2 for 3 minutes.
<Copper Sulfate Plating Bath>
[0094]
Copper sulfate (CuSO4·5H2O): 220 g /L
Sulfuric acid (H2SO4): 50 g/L
Hydrochloric acid (HCl): 0.15 mL/L
(Procedure 2 for Measuring Number of Micropores)
[0095] After copper sulfate plating, the test piece was gently washed with water, air-dried,
and then, the number of micropores in the plating film was measured. The measurement
of the number of micropores was performed for the evaluation surface of the test piece
using a microscope VHX-200 manufactured by KEYENCE CORPORATION. The measurement result
of the number of micropores is shown in Table 3.
[Table 3]
|
|
Number of micropores in evaluation surface (micropores/cm2) |
30440 |
[0096] With the use of the additive of the invention, the expected number of micropores
could be obtained even when a microporous nickel plating solution was prepared by
adding non-conductive fine particles in a liquid state.
Industrial Applicability
[0097] The additive of the invention can be utilized for preparing a composite plating solution.