TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The invention relates to an optimally coated twin-wire fence panel. In a second aspect,
the invention relates to a method for optimally coating a twin-wire fence panel.
PRIOR ART
[0002] An alternative to hot-dip galvanizing twin-wire fencing panels is to use a two-layer
powder coating. The advantages of this alternative are the avoidance of skin formation,
irregularities and sharp protruding parts.
[0003] A problem with this two-layer powder coating system is that the application of the
first coating causes poor contact with the metal surface of the twin-wire fence panel,
so that grounding is no longer possible. However, this grounding is necessary to be
able to deposit a second coating on the first coating. As a result, the second coating
does not adhere or adheres poorly to the twin-wire fence panel, resulting in an insufficient
and/or non-uniform coating. This in turn leads to various weak points on the twin-wire
fence panel, where corrosion thus has free rein. This problem mainly occurs with epoxy
coatings, as epoxy has a strong insulating effect, which adversely affects the conductive
contact.
[0004] In addition, poor grounding causes sparks to form during the coating process, which
in turn results in a poor, i.e. too thin or irregular, coating at the place where
sparks originated during the process.
[0005] The present invention aims to find a solution for at least some of the above problems.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] The invention relates to a coated twin-wire fence panel according to claim 1. Preferred
embodiments are presented in the dependent claims.
[0007] The twin-wire fence panel according to the invention is advantageous because it concerns
an ungalvanized (not hot-dip galvanized) twin-wire fence panel to which a double coating
has been applied in an efficient manner. Each point on the twin-wire fence panel is
provided with at least one coating and there are no so-called support points or bearing
points that do not contain a coating. The inventors have unexpectedly found that adding
zinc to the epoxy provides an improved twin-wire fence panel in terms of coating uniformity.
A twin-wire fence panel according to the invention is thus provided with two coatings,
each with an improved uniformity in coating thickness, resulting in an improved uniformity
in the coating thickness of the total coating.
[0008] The inventors also found that adding zinc to the epoxy had a strengthening effect
on the corrosion resistance of the ungalvanized twin-wire fence panel. The inventors
found that within the range of the zinc content as described in claim 1, a powder
coating is obtained that can be processed as a powder coating, but also gives the
coating a sufficiently high conductivity so that grounding of the twin-wire fence
panel is possible for applying a subsequent coating. Moreover, it appears that within
this range an improved corrosion resistance is still imparted to the ungalvanized
twin-wire fence panel.
[0009] It was an object of the invention to provide an ungalvanized, twin-wire fence panel
in which both the uniformity of the coating and the corrosion resistance of the twin-wire
fence panel are optimized.
[0010] In a second aspect, the invention relates to a method for coating one or more twin-wire
fence panels according to claim 7. Preferred embodiments are presented in the dependent
claims.
[0011] The method allows, on the one hand, to provide two coatings on an ungalvanized twin-wire
fence panel by using a zinc-containing epoxy, so that grounding of the twin-wire fence
panel remains possible for applying the second coating. Moreover, the method is advantageous
because the method ensures a uniform coating thickness in the obtained twin-wire fence
panel.
[0012] The inventors unexpectedly found that applying a zinc epoxy as first coating resulted
in a significantly better conductivity on the surface of the twin-wire fence panel,
as a result of which the second coating showed a significantly better and more uniform
adhesion, resulting in an improved twin-wire fence panel.
[0013] It is, among other things, an object of the invention to provide a method that avoids
the occurrence of sparks in the event of poor grounding, and in which a twin-wire
fence panel can simultaneously be obtained with a double coating that is as uniform
as possible, so that both the protection of the metal and the aesthetic appearance
is optimized.
[0014] It is also among other things an object of the invention to provide a method for
coating in which refinishing, whether or not manually, of the ungalvanized twin-wire
fence panels is superfluous. In such a way that the efficiency of the coating process
increases.
[0015] It is a specific object of the invention to provide a method for coating horizontally
positioned twin-wire fence panels. Since a horizontally positioned twin-wire fence
panel has a high number of support points or bearing points, the method according
to the present invention is particularly advantageous for this application, because
refinishing, whether or not manually, of all support points of the twin-wire fence
panel is superfluous.
[0016] It was an object of the invention to provide a method for producing an ungalvanized
(not hot-dip galvanized) twin-wire fence panel, wherein both the uniformity of the
coating and the corrosion resistance of the twin-wire fence panel are optimized.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0017] The invention relates to an optimally coated twin-wire fence panel.
[0018] Unless otherwise defined, all terms used in the description of the invention, including
technical and scientific terms, have the meaning generally understood by those skilled
in the technical field of the invention. For a better understanding of the description
of the invention, the following terms are explained explicitly.
[0019] The term "ungalvanized twin-wire fence panel" refers to a twin-wire fence panel that
has not been subjected to a hot-dip galvanizing step during its production process.
[0020] The terms "epoxy" and "polyepoxide" as used herein are synonyms and refer to a class
of epoxy polymers with application in coatings, such as epoxy resins. Epoxy resins
can react with themselves (become crosslinked) through catalytic homopolymerization,
or with a wide variety of co-reactants, including polyfunctional amines, acids (and
acid anhydrides), phenols, alcohols, and thiols (commonly referred to as mercaptans).
These co-reactants are often referred to as hardeners or curatives, and the cross-linking
reaction is commonly referred to as curing. It should be clear that if a twin-wire
fence panel has a coating comprising epoxy, this is a cured epoxy coating.
[0021] The epoxy is advantageous as a first coating because it already has inherent corrosion
resistance.
[0022] The term "zinc epoxy," as used in the text, refers to an epoxy containing zinc, for
example in a minimum amount of 0.1 m%.
[0023] The term "powder coating," as used in the text, refers to the electrostatic process
whereby powder is applied to metal with a spraying means.
[0024] The terms "polyester" and "polyester resin" as used herein are synonyms and refer
to a class of polymers containing an ester functional group in each repeating unit
of their main chain. Possible polyesters are: polyether polyesters, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate),
poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid), poly(ethylene succinate), polybutylene adipate
terephthalate, polybutylene succinate, polybutylene terephthalate, polycaprolactone,
polycyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate, polydioxanone, polyethylene naphthalate,
polyethylene terephthalate, polyglycolide, polyhydroxyalkanoates, polyhydroxybutyrate,
polylactic acid, polytrimethylene terephthalate.
[0025] The expression "percent by weight," "wt%," "m%" or "% by weight" in this document
refers to the relative weight of a component based on the total weight of the entire
referenced product.
[0026] The terms "double wire fence panel" and "twin-wire fence panel", as used in the text,
refers to a fence panel, wherein parallel vertical bars (wires) are welded to horizontal
bars (wires), and wherein the vertical bars are welded at the same height between
two horizontal bars (a pair).
[0027] The term "coating" in the current context refers to a substance or a mixture of substances
for covering a substrate, such as a metal surface or other coating, with the aim of
protecting the surface, making it more beautiful or making it safer. Several coatings
can be applied or present on the same metal surface, in which case we can speak of
a first and a second coating. Each coating can be applied in one or more layers, herein
referred to as "coating sublayers." A single coating step thus covers the application
of a single coating, wherein one or more coating sublayers are deposited on the surface.
[0028] It will be apparent to a person skilled in the art that the names of the wires in
the twin-wire fence panel, namely "horizontal wires" and "vertical wires," are relative
terms. The terms "horizontal wires," "horizontal bars," and "cross wires" refer to
the wires or bars that, in a working form (installed condition) of the twin-wire fence
panel, are positioned substantially horizontally with respect to the surface on which
the fencing is positioned upright. The horizontal wires therefore correspond to the
length of the twin-wire fence panel. The terms "vertical wires," "vertical bars,"
and "longitudinal wires" refer to the wires or bars that, in a working form (installed
condition) of the twin-wire fence panel, are positioned substantially vertically relative
to the surface on which the fencing is positioned upright. The vertical wires therefore
correspond to the height of the twin-wire fence panel. The horizontal wires and vertical
wires are thus positioned perpendicular to each other.
[0029] When the twin-wire fence panel is supplied in a substantially horizontal position
during coating, both the horizontal wires and the vertical wires lie substantially
in a plane parallel to the ground surface, still positioned perpendicular to each
other.
[0030] The unit "mu" is synonymous with "µm" and "micron" and refers to the unit of length
micrometer from the SI system.
[0031] In this document, "a", "an" and "the" refer to both the singular and the plural,
unless the context presupposes otherwise. For example, "a segment" means one or more
than one segment.
[0032] The terms "comprise," "comprising," "consist of," "consisting of," "provided with,"
"have," "having," "include," "including," "contain," "containing" are synonyms and
are inclusive or open terms that indicate the presence of what follows, and which
do not exclude or prevent the presence of other components, characteristics, elements,
members, steps, as known from or disclosed in the prior art.
[0033] When the term 'around' or 'about' is used in this document with a measurable quantity,
a parameter, a duration or moment, and the like, then variations are meant of approx.
20% or less, preferably approx. 10% or less, more preferably approx. 5% or less, even
more preferably approx. 1% or less, and even more preferably approx. 0.1% or less
than and of the quoted value, insofar as such variations are applicable in the described
invention. However, it must be understood that the value of a quantity used where
the term "about" or "around" is used, is itself specifically disclosed.
[0034] Quoting numerical ranges by endpoints includes all integers, fractions and/or real
numbers between the endpoints, these endpoints included.
[0035] In a first aspect, the invention relates to a coated twin-wire fence panel.
[0036] A twin-wire fence panel according to the invention preferably has between 50 and
55, preferably 51, vertical wires and between 1 and 20 pairs of horizontal wires.
[0037] In one embodiment, the vertical wires have a length between 500 and 2500 mm, preferably
the vertical wires have a length selected from the list: 630, 830, 1030, 1230, 1430,
1630, 1830, 2030, 2230, 2430 mm. It will be apparent to a person skilled in the art
that the length of the vertical wires corresponds to the height of a twin-wire fence
panel. In one embodiment, the horizontal wires have a length between 2000 and 3000
mm; preferably between 2400 and 2600, even more preferably between 2500 and 2550 mm,
most preferably 2508 or 2510 mm. It will be apparent to a person skilled in the art
that the length of the horizontal wires corresponds to the length of a twin-wire fence
panel.
[0038] In a preferred embodiment, the distance between two adjacent vertical wires is 40-60
mm c.t.c., more preferably between 45 and 55 mm, even more preferably between 49 and
51, most preferably about 50 mm.
[0039] In another embodiment, the distance between the adjacent horizontal wires is 100-300
mm c.t.c., preferably 150-250 mm, more preferably 180-220 mm, most preferably about
200 mm.
[0040] The term "c.t.c." (center to center) refers to a distance between the center (the
heart) of a circular cross-section of one wire and the center (the heart) of a circular
cross-section of another wire.
[0041] In one embodiment, the twin-wire fence panel is manufactured from unalloyed steel,
low-alloy steel or high-alloy steel. The twin-wire fence panel can be made from high
or low carbon steel.
[0042] Unalloyed steel contains a maximum of 1.5% of alloying elements (excluding carbon
(C)). Unalloyed steel has a carbon percentage of 0.5% to 2%. Low-alloy steel contains
between 1.5 and 5% alloying elements (excluding carbon). High-alloy steel contains
more than 5% of alloying elements. The twin-wire fence panel is preferably manufactured
from unalloyed steel. The term "alloying elements" refers to the elements that are
present in the alloy in addition to iron and carbon. In a preferred embodiment, the
twin-wire fence panel is manufactured from an alloy comprising iron (Fe), carbon (C)
and alloying elements. Preferably, the alloy comprises a maximum of 1.5% alloying
elements, more preferably a maximum of 1.4%, even more preferably a maximum of 1.3%,
even more preferably a maximum of 1.2%, most preferably a maximum of 1.1%. Preferably
the alloy comprises at least 0.5% alloying elements, more preferably at least 0.6%,
even more preferably at least 0.7%, even more preferably at least 0.8%, even more
preferably at least 0.9%, most preferably at least 1%. In another preferred embodiment,
the alloy comprises between 0.5 and 1.5% alloying elements, preferably between 0.6
and 1.5%, more preferably between 0.7 and 1.4%, even more preferably between 0.8 and
1.3%, even more preferably between 0.9 and 1.2%, most preferably between 1 and 1.1%.
[0043] In one embodiment, the alloy comprises a maximum of 0.1% C, more preferably a maximum
of 0.09%, even more preferably a maximum of 0.085%, even more preferably a maximum
of 0.08%, most preferably a maximum of 0.075%. Preferably, the alloy comprises at
least 0.025% C, more preferably at least 0.03%, even more preferably at least 0.035%,
even more preferably at least 0.04%, most preferably at least 0.045%. In another preferred
embodiment, the alloy comprises between 0.02 and 0.1% C, preferably between 0.025
and 0.09%, more preferably between 0.035 and 0.085%, even more preferably between
0.04 and 0.08%, most preferably between 0.045 and 0.075%.
[0044] In a preferred embodiment, the alloy comprises alloying elements selected from the
list of: manganese (Mn), silicon (Si), sulfur (S), phosphorus (P), nitrogen (N), copper
(Cu), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), niobium (Nb), tin (Sn), aluminum (Al) or any combination
thereof. Preferably the alloy comprises manganese (Mn), silicon (Si), sulfur (S),
phosphorus (P), nitrogen (N), copper (Cu), and optionally chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni),
niobium (Nb), tin (Sn), aluminum (Al).
[0045] Preferably, the alloy comprises Mn in an amount between 0.3 and 0.5%, more preferably
between 0.35 and 0.45%, Si in an amount between 0.05 and 0.25%, more preferably between
0.1 and 0.2%, S in an amount between 0.01 and 0.045%, more preferably between 0.015
and 0.04%, P in an amount between 0.005 and 0.03%, more preferably between 0.005 and
0.025%, Cu in an amount between 0.2 and 0.4%, more preferably between 0.25 and 0.35%,
N in an amount between 0.005 and 0.02%, more preferably between 0.005 and 0.015%,
and Cr in an amount of up to 0.15%, more preferably up to 0.1%, Ni in an amount up
to 0.15%, more preferably up to 0.1%, and Nb in an amount up to 0.005%, more preferably
up to 0.002%, Sn in an amount up to 0.05%, more preferably up to 0.03%, and/or Al
in an amount up to 0.005%, more preferably up to 0.003%. The percentages as stated
above all refer to m%.
[0046] In a preferred embodiment, the twin-wire fence panel is provided with one or more
coatings, preferably the twin-wire fence panel is provided with two coatings.
[0047] In a further preferred embodiment, at least one coating comprises an epoxy, preferably
one coating comprises an epoxy.
[0048] Epoxy has a number of advantages over polyester, such as creating a liquid-tight
protective layer. The adhesion and mechanical strength of epoxy is also many times
greater than that of a polyester. In addition, epoxy is also resistant to a large
number of chemicals.
[0049] In a preferred embodiment, at least one coating comprises a polymer selected from
the list of: a polyamide, a polyolefin, a polyester, or a combination thereof, preferably
a polyester, preferably one coating comprises a polymer selected from the list of:
a polyamide, a polyolefin, a polyester, or a combination thereof, preferably a polyester.
[0050] Polyamides are condensation products of one or more amino acids, such as aminocaproic
acid, amino-7-heptanoic acid, amino-11-undecanoic acid and amino-12-dodecanoic acid,
or of one or more lactams, such as caprolactam, oenantholactam and lauryllactam, or
of one or more salts or mixtures of diamines such as hexamethylenediamine, dodecamethylenediamine,
metaxylenediamine, bis-p aminocyclohexylmethane and trimethylhexamethylenediamine
with diacids such as isophthalic acid, terephthalic acid, adipic acid, azelaic acid,
suberic acid, sebacic acid and dodecanedioic acid or mixtures of all these monomers,
which lead to copolyamides.
[0051] Polyolefins are understood to mean polymers containing olefin units, such as, for
example, ethylene, propylene, butene-1 units. Examples of polyolefins are:
- polyethylene, polypropylene, copolymers of ethylene with alpha-olefins. These products
can be grafted with anhydrides of unsaturated carboxylic acids such as maleic anhydride
or unsaturated epoxides such as glycidyl methacrylate, and
- copolymers of ethylene with at least one product selected from i) unsaturated carboxylic
acids, their salts and esters, ii) vinyl esters of saturated carboxylic acids, iii)
unsaturated dicarboxylic acids, their salts, esters, hemiesters and anhydrides, and
iv) the unsaturated epoxides. These ethylene copolymers can be grafted with anhydrides
of unsaturated dicarboxylic acids or unsaturated epoxides.
[0052] Polyesters can be chosen from the list of: poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate),
poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid), poly(ethylene succinate), polybutylene adipate
terephthalate, polybutylene succinate, polybutylene terephthalate, polycaprolactone,
polycyclohexylenedimethylene terephthalate, polydioxanone, polyethylene naphthalate,
polyethylene terephthalate, polyglycolide, polyhydroxyalkanoates, polyhydroxybutyrate,
polylactic acid, polytrimethylene terephthalate.
[0053] In a preferred embodiment at least one coating comprises a polyester, preferably
at least one coating comprises a polyester selected from the list of: polybutylene
succinate, polybutylene terephthalic acid, polycaprolactone, polyethylene naphthalate,
polyethylene terephthalate, polyglycolide, polyhydroxyalkanoates, polyhydroxybutyrate,
polylactic acid. In a particular preferred embodiment, the polyester is a polyether
polyester.
[0054] In a particular preferred embodiment, the twin-wire fence panel is provided with
two or more coatings, preferably two coatings, wherein the two or more coatings comprise:
- at least one coating comprising an epoxy, preferably one coating comprising an epoxy,
and;
- at least one coating comprising a polyester, preferably one coating comprising a polyester.
[0055] In a particular preferred embodiment, the epoxy is a zinc epoxy. The inventors have
unexpectedly found that adding zinc to the epoxy provides better grounding and consequently
an improved twin-wire fence panel in terms of coating uniformity. A twin-wire fence
panel according to the invention is thus provided with two coatings, each with an
improved uniformity in coating thickness, resulting in an improved uniformity in the
coating thickness of the total coating. The addition of zinc to the epoxy also has
an improved effect on corrosion resistance.
[0056] Alternatively, the epoxy can be any metal epoxy such as iron epoxy for example. The
inventors found that adding zinc to the epoxy had a strengthening effect on the corrosion
resistance of the ungalvanized twin-wire fence panel. However, other metals can actually
promote corrosion.
[0057] In a preferred embodiment, the zinc epoxy has a zinc content of at least 0.01 m%,
preferably at least 0.05 m%, more preferably at least 0.1 m%, even more preferably
at least 0.5 m%, and even more preferably at least 1 m%.
[0058] A minimum zinc content is necessary to achieve sufficient conductivity, and thus
to optimally apply a second coating and to obtain an optimally coated twin-wire fence
panel.
[0059] In another or further preferred embodiment, the zinc epoxy has a zinc content of
at most 50 m%, preferably at most 45 m%, more preferably at most 40 m%, even more
preferably at most 35 m%, and even more at preferably at most 30 m%.
[0060] The inventors found that higher zinc content causes the powder coating to become
unworkable and consequently cannot be used anymore for powder coating. The specific
weight of the zinc epoxy increases with the amount of zinc present in the epoxy. The
inventors have discovered experimentally that with a zinc content of 50 m% (1.41 g/cm
3) the powder is already "too heavy". This has not only proven to adversely affect
the processing of the powder (obtaining the powder cloud), but also the durability
of the pumps, pipes and spray agents of the spray booth, as they become clogged.
[0061] The inventors found that the powder is processable with a zinc content of maximum
30 m%, and is even more processable with a zinc content of maximum 25 m% or even 20
m%.
[0062] In a further or other preferred embodiment, the zinc epoxy comprises a zinc content
of between 0.01 and 50 m%, preferably between 0.05 and 45 m%, more preferably between
0.1 and 40 m%, even more preferably between 0.5 and 35 m%, and even more preferably
between 1.0 and 30 m%, , even more preferably between 1.0 and 25 m%, and most preferably
between 1.0 and 20 m%.
[0063] The inventors found that within this range a powder coating is obtained that can
be processed as a powder coating and provides sufficient conductivity to the coating
so that grounding of the twin-wire fence panel is possible for applying a subsequent
coating. Moreover, it appears that within this range a certain corrosion resistance
is still imparted to the ungalvanized twin-wire fence panel.
[0064] In a preferred embodiment, the coating comprising an epoxy has a coating thickness
of at least 40 mu, preferably at least 45 mu, more preferably at least 50 mu.
[0065] This coating thickness is the minimum required to obtain sufficient coverage of the
twin-wire fence panel, so that a second coating layer can be applied.
[0066] In another or further preferred embodiment, the coating comprising an epoxy has a
coating thickness of at most 180 mu, preferably at most 170 mu, more preferably at
most 160 mu, even more preferably at most 150 mu, even more preferably at most 140
mu, even more preferably at most 130 mu, even more preferably at most 120 mu, even
more preferably at most 110 mu, and most preferably at most 100 mu.
[0067] The inventors found that a larger coating thickness is unnecessary because otherwise
the coating would lead to higher coating losses.
[0068] In another or further preferred embodiment, the coating comprising an epoxy has a
coating thickness of between 40 and 180 mu, preferably between 45 and 170 mu, more
preferably between 50 and 160 mu, even more preferably between 50 and 150 mu, even
more preferably between 50 and 140 mu, even more preferably between 50 and 130 mu,
even more preferably between 50 and 120 mu, even more preferably between 50 and 110
mu, even more preferably between 50 and 100 mu.
[0069] It has been found that this range allows a minimum conductivity that is required,
moreover, this range limits the necessary coating quantity and therefore also the
losses.
[0070] Moreover, it appears that within this range a certain corrosion resistance is still
imparted to the ungalvanized twin-wire fence panel.
[0071] In a preferred embodiment, the coating comprising a polymer selected from the list
of: a polyamide, a polyolefin, a polyester, or a combination thereof, preferably a
polyester, has a coating thickness of at least 30 mu, preferably at least 35 mu, more
preferably at least 40 mu.
[0072] This coating thickness is the minimum required to obtain sufficient coverage of the
twin-wire fence panel, so that an aesthetic advantage is obtained.
[0073] In another or further preferred embodiment, the coating comprising a polymer selected
from the list of: a polyamide, a polyolefin, a polyester, or a combination thereof,
preferably a polyester, has a coating thickness of at most 120 mu, preferably at most
100 mu, and most preferably at most 90 mu.
[0074] The inventors found that a larger coating thickness is unnecessary because otherwise
the coating would lead to higher coating losses.
[0075] In another or further preferred embodiment, the coating comprising a polymer selected
from the list of: a polyamide, a polyolefin, a polyester, or a combination thereof,
preferably a polyester, has a coating thickness of between 30 and 120 mu, preferably
between 35 and 120 mu, more preferably between 40 and 120 mu, even more preferably
between 40 and 100 mu, even more preferably between 40 and 90 mu.
[0076] In a preferred embodiment, the coating thickness of the coating comprising an epoxy
and the coating thickness of the coating comprising a polymer selected from the list
of: a polyamide, a polyolefin, a polyester, or a combination thereof, preferably a
polyester, are in proportion according to a ratio between 0.3 and 6, preferably between
0.35 and 5, more preferably between 0.4 and 4, even more preferably between 0.45 and
3, most preferably between 0.5 and 2.5.
[0077] The inventors unexpectedly found that the combination of the coatings in this thickness
ratio results in an optimally coated twin-wire fence panel that can function as an
alternative to hot-dip galvanized twin-wire fence panels.
[0078] The inventors unexpectedly found that the combination of a zinc epoxy and a polyester
coating leads to improved corrosion resistance compared to other two-layer coating
systems for ungalvanized fence panels.
[0079] In a preferred embodiment, the hardness of the coating comprising epoxy is at least
75 Buchholz resistance units (BH), preferably at least 80 BH, more preferably at least
85 BH, even more preferably at least 90 BH, even more preferably at least 95 BH, and
most preferably a minimum of 100 BH.
[0080] "Buchholz resistance" or "Buchholz Hardness" is a recognized test described in standard
ISO 2815: 1973. A standard metal plate is coated with the "coating to be tested".
The width of the impression is then measured with the microscope. This value (in mm)
is converted into the Buchholz (BH) value via an official table.
[0081] The hardness can be measured by means of Buchholz hardness testers as known in the
art. A Buchholz hardness tester preferably consists of a beveled disc indentation
tool mounted in a stainless steel block and exerting a constant pressure of 500g.
The meter is placed on the coating for 30 seconds and removed again after those 30
seconds. The length of the resulting indentation of the coating is measured with the
scale reading microscope. The result is expressed in Buchholz indentation resistance
units using the scale provided.
[0082] In a preferred embodiment, the hardness of the coating comprising a polymer selected
from the list of: a polyamide, a polyolefin, a polyester, or a combination thereof,
preferably a polyester, is between 60 and 120 Buchholz resistance units (BH), preferably
between 65 and 115 BH, more preferably between 70 and 110 BH, even more preferably
between 75 and 105 BH, even more preferably between 80 and 100 BH, and most preferably
between 85 and 95 BH.
[0083] The hardness is advantageous for imparting robustness to the non-hot-dip galvanized
twin-wire fence panel.
[0084] In a second aspect, the invention relates to a method for coating one or more twin-wire
fence panels.
[0085] In a specific preferred embodiment, the method comprises the steps of:
- i. applying a coating comprising epoxy, preferably a zinc epoxy, to the one or more
twin-wire fence panels; and
- ii. applying a coating comprising a polymer selected from the list of: a polyamide,
a polyolefin, a polyester, or a combination thereof, preferably a polyester, to the
one or more twin-wire fence panels.
[0086] In a preferred embodiment, the coating is applied by means of powder coating. By
applying a powder coating to an ungalvanized twin-wire fence panel, not only an aesthetically
pleasing result is achieved, the corrosion resistance of the twin-wire fence panel
is also considerably better.
[0087] The coating step is discussed below. It should be understood that the coating step
describes both the application of the coating in step i and step ii. For example,
when two coatings are applied, the coating step is performed twice.
[0088] In powder coating, a powder coating is applied to a metal surface by applying a charge
to the powder, after which the powder is preferably sprayed onto the metal surface
by means of a spraying means.
[0089] In one embodiment, the charge is applied to the powder by an electrode where a discharge
takes place (the corona principle), or by friction along a non-conductive material
(the tribo principle), preferably the charge is applied by means of the tribo principle
by a tribo-charging system. The tribo principle is advantageous because the effect
of a Faraday cage can be avoided.
[0090] In a preferred embodiment, the coatings are applied by means of powder coating, preferably
triboelectric powder coating.
[0091] Prior to powder coating, the twin-wire fence panels must be grounded, i.e. connected
to a zero potential. This grounding is important to ensure the deposition of the powder
on the metal surface, as this allows the static charge on the powder to dissipate.
[0092] Many contaminants can occur on the ungalvanized metal surface, such as corrosion
products, passivating coats, rolling oil, etc. In a further or other embodiment, the
twin-wire fence panels are therefore pre-treated prior to coating. The pre-treatment
preferably comprises one or more steps from the list of: degreasing, rinsing, demi-rinsing,
pickling, fluxing, demi-fogging, conversion coating, such as phosphating, zirconizing,
chromating, passivating, iron phosphating, zinc phosphating, manganese phosphating,
stove-enameling, or a combination of these. In a preferred embodiment, the twin-wire
fence panels are pre-treated by means of the steps of: alkaline degreasing, acid pickling,
conversion coating, stove-enameling, or a combination of these. In a further preferred
embodiment, the twin-wire fence panels are pre-treated by means of the steps of: alkaline
degreasing, acid pickling, conversion coating, and stove-enameling. The conversion
coating is preferably a combination of chromating, passivating or zirconizing, preferably
in combination with fluorides.
[0093] During the pre-treatment, the twin-wire fence panels are preferably provided with
a conversion coating or adhesion layer that has been formed on the metal surface by
the action of a chemical agent, such as a polymer.
[0094] In a preferred embodiment, the twin-wire fence panels are coated in a substantially
horizontal position. In a further preferred embodiment, the twin-wire fence panels
are positioned for this purpose on four or more support points.
[0095] "The support points" are defined as positions on the twin-wire fence panels that
make contact with a support means. The twin-wire fence panel is preferably provided
with a zero potential via these support points, i.e. the twin-wire fence panel is
grounded via these support points. A set of support points is a set of positions on
the twin-wire fence panel that contact a support means.
[0096] In one embodiment, the twin-wire fence panels are positioned in step (i) and step
(ii) on the same set of support points.
[0097] In an alternative and preferred embodiment, the twin-wire fence panels are positioned
in step (i) on a first set of support points, and in step (ii) positioned on a second
set of support points, wherein the first set of support points and the second set
of support points are different, i.e. do not have any support point in common.
[0098] This is possible by moving or shifting the twin-wire fence panels horizontally with
respect to the support means in an embodiment to form a new set of support points.
Alternatively, this is possible by turning the twin-wire fence panels over, so that
a new set of support points is formed on the opposite side face of the twin-wire fence
panel.
[0099] This prevents no coating from ending up on the contact points made by the twin-wire
fence panels on the support points during spraying, requiring manual touch-ups afterwards.
[0100] The zinc epoxy coating is advantageous here because the zinc particles ensure that
grounding on the new support points is still possible by increasing the conductivity
of the epoxy.
[0101] In one embodiment, a coating is applied to the twin-wire fence panels in one or more
spray booths comprising spraying means.
[0102] In a further embodiment, the twin-wire fence panels are supplied substantially horizontally
in a spray booth.
[0103] It has been found that spraying the coating horizontally is necessary specifically
for twin-wire fence panels to obtain sufficient coating on the pairs of horizontal
wires. Moreover, it has been found that spraying the coating horizontally ensures
that there are fewer coating losses. Since the twin-wire fence panels are positioned
horizontally, more support points are needed than, for example, when they are sprayed
in suspended condition. This makes avoiding refinishing these supporting points very
important, as it is very labor intensive to refinish every support point of every
twin-wire fence panel.
[0104] In one embodiment, powder and therefore powder particles are sprayed onto the twin-wire
fence panels in each spray booth by means of spraying means. The powder hereby adheres
to the twin-wire fence panels through electrostatic forces. The powder particles are
transported by an air stream to the spraying means. They receive an electrostatic
charge and thus adhere to the grounded twin-wire fence panels through electrostatic
forces. In a preferred embodiment, the spraying means sprays the powder in an upward
vertical direction, i.e. the opposite direction of gravity, preferably perpendicular
to the horizontal plane. In this process, the powder is atomized into a powder cloud,
causing the double-wire fence panels to move.
[0105] The spraying means are preferably spray guns, more preferably the spraying means
are triboelectric powder coating guns. The tribo-gun contains a friction system through
which powder is guided and that comes out of the gun positively charged.
[0106] In a preferred embodiment, the spraying means spray the powder onto the twin-wire
fence panels at a spraying speed of 2-8 m/min, preferably 3-7 m/min, more preferably
4-6 m/min.
[0107] In a preferred embodiment, the application of the coating comprising epoxy (step
i) and the application of the coating comprising a polymer selected from the list
of: a polyamide, a polyolefin, a polyester, or a combination thereof, preferably a
polyester (step ii), is done in two layers, such that each coating comprises two coating
sublayers.
[0108] In a specific embodiment, the twin-wire fence panels are supplied substantially horizontally
into two sequential spray booths, so that a second spray booth is positioned downstream
of a first spray booth, whereby one coating sublayer is deposited on the twin-wire
fence panels in each spray booth.
[0109] Feeding preferably takes place by means of guide means which guide the twin-wire
fence panels substantially horizontally through the first and then through the second
spray booth. The guide means preferably make a minimum number of contact points, i.e.
support points, with the twin-wire fence panels or have a minimum contact surface
with the twin-wire fence panels. This is because the contact points ensure that the
twin-wire fence panels cannot be covered with powder in those areas. Therefore, the
guide means can for instance comprise two narrow guide means, such as conveyor belts,
which support two opposite sides of a twin-wire fence panel.
[0110] The use of two spray booths ensures that the layer thickness can be better controlled.
As a result, the spraying means also have to process less powder per time unit, so
that the spraying means last longer.
[0111] In one embodiment, the guide means are suitable for advancing the twin-wire fence
panels through the spray booths at a constant speed between 1 and 10 m/min, preferably
between 5 and 7.5 m/min.
[0112] In a preferred embodiment, prior to the application of the second coating sublayer,
the powder of the first coating sublayer adhered to the vertical wires is blown away
by means of air lances. In this case, the air lances are preferably only aimed at
the vertical wires. In one embodiment, the powder is blown off all vertical wires
simultaneously. In another embodiment, the powder is blown off the vertical wires
one by one.
[0113] The preferred embodiment is advantageous because the powder adhered to the vertical
wires is blown away by means of air lances after the application of the first coating
sublayer, preferably after the first spray booth, so that a more uniform and thinner
layer is obtained after spraying the second coating sublayer, preferably after spraying
the coating sublayer in the second spray booth. A substantially equal coating thickness
is hereby obtained on the vertical and horizontal wires.
[0114] In a preferred embodiment, approximately all powder on the vertical wires is blown
away, so that the thickness of the coating sublayer present on the vertical wires
after blowing is at most 5 mu, preferably at most 4 mu, more preferably at most 3
mu, even more preferably up to 2 mu, even more preferably up to 1 mu, most preferably
up to 0.1 mu, or about 0 mu.
[0115] In a further preferred embodiment, the air blown out of the air lances has a pressure
between 1 and 2 bar, preferably between 1 and 1.25 bar, more preferably about 1 bar.
[0116] In another or further preferred embodiment, the air is blown out of the air lances
at a flow rate of between 100 and 600 m
3/hour, preferably between 200 and 500 m
3/hour, more preferably between 300 and 400 m
3/hour.
[0117] In a preferred embodiment, the ratio of the coating thickness on the vertical wires
to the coating thickness on the horizontal wires is at most 2.2/1, preferably at most
2/1, more preferably at most 1.8/1, even more preferably at most 1.6/1, even more
preferably at most 1.4/1, even more preferably at most 1.2/1, most preferably at most
1.1/1. In a further or other preferred embodiment, the ratio of the coating thickness
on the vertical wires to the coating thickness on the horizontal wires is at least
1/2.2, preferably at least 1/2, more preferably at least 1/1.8, even more preferably
at least 1/1.6, even more preferably at least 1/1.4, even more preferably at least
1/1.2, most preferably at least 1/1.1. In a further preferred embodiment, the ratio
of the coating thickness on the vertical wires to the coating thickness on the horizontal
wires is between 2.2/1 and 1/2.2, preferably between 2/1 and 1/2, more preferably
between 1.8/1 and 1/1.8, even more preferably between 1.6/1 and 1/1.6, even more preferably
between 1.4/1 and 1/1.4, even more preferably between 1.2/1 and 1/1.2, most preferably
between 1.1/1 and 1/1.1.
[0118] In a preferred embodiment, the twin-wire fence panels are stove-enameled following
the application of the coating sublayers.
[0119] In a preferred embodiment, a plurality of parallel stacked horizontally positioned
twin-wire fence panels are stove-enameled simultaneously.
[0120] In a preferred embodiment, the stove-enameling of the twin-wire fence panels continues
in one or more ovens, preferably one oven.
[0121] In a preferred embodiment, the twin-wire fence panels have a residence time between
15 and 30 minutes, preferably between 20 and 28 minutes per oven.
[0122] In a preferred embodiment, the one or more ovens, preferably one oven, operate at
an air temperature between 160 and 240°C, preferably between 180 and 220°C.
[0123] In one embodiment, the twin-wire fence panels are visually checked after stove-enameling,
by one or more operators and/or checked on the basis of a layer thickness gauge or
by weighing.
[0124] In a specific preferred embodiment, a coating is applied by means of the steps of:
- a. feeding one or more twin-wire fence panels into two sequential spray booths substantially
horizontally, such that a second spray booth is positioned downstream of a first spray
booth, wherein in each spray booth a powder is sprayed onto the twin-wire fence panels
by means of spraying means, and wherein the powder adheres to the wires of the twin-wire
fence panels through electrostatic forces, so that a coating sublayer is obtained;
and
- b. stove-enameling the twin-wire fence panels in one or more ovens.
[0125] In a further embodiment, in step (a), before the one or more twin-wire fence panels
are fed into the second spray booth, the powder adhered to the vertical wires is blown
away by means of air lances.
[0126] In a specific preferred embodiment, the method comprises the steps of:
- i. applying a coating comprising epoxy to the one or more twin-wire fence panels,
wherein the application of the coating takes place through the steps of:
- a. feeding one or more twin-wire fence panels into a first pair of sequential spray
booths substantially horizontally such that a second spray booth is positioned downstream
of a first spray booth, wherein in each spray booth a powder is sprayed onto the twin-wire
fence panels by means of spraying means, and wherein the powder adheres to the wires
of the twin-wire fence panels through electrostatic forces, so that a coating sublayer
is obtained; and
- b. stove-enameling the twin-wire fence panels in one or more ovens; and
- ii. applying a coating comprising a polymer selected from the list of: a polyamide,
a polyolefin, a polyester, or a combination thereof, preferably a polyester, to the
one or more twin-wire fence panels, wherein the coating is applied by means of the
steps of:
c. feeding one or more twin-wire fence panels into a second pair of sequential spray
booths substantially horizontally such that a second spray booth is positioned downstream
of a first spray booth, wherein in each spray booth a powder is sprayed onto the twin-wire
fence panels by means of spraying means, and wherein the powder adheres to the wires
of the twin-wire fence panels through electrostatic forces, so that a coating sublayer
is obtained; and
d. stove-enameling the twin-wire fence panels in one or more ovens.
In a further embodiment, in step (a) and (c), before the one or more twin-wire fence
panels are fed into the second spray booth, the powder adhered to the vertical wires
is blown away by means of air lances.
[0127] When the coating is applied by powder coating, it is clear that the coatings according
to the present invention are applied as a powder on the metal surface. The powder
comprises one or more components that form a protective coating on the object when
heated.
[0128] In one embodiment, the D50 particle size of the coating comprising a polymer selected
from the list of: a polyamide, a polyolefin, a polyester, or a combination thereof,
preferably a polyester, is between 1 and 100 µm, preferably between 10 and 90 µm,
more preferably between 20 and 80 µm, even more preferably between 30 and 70 µm, even
more preferably between 40 and 60 µm, most preferably between 45 and 55 µm.
[0129] In one embodiment, the D50 particle size of the coating comprising an epoxy is between
1 and 70 µm, preferably between 10 and 60 µm, more preferably between 20 and 50 µm,
most preferably between 30 and 40 µm.
[0130] In a preferred embodiment, the method is suitable for producing twin-wire fence panels
according to the first aspect.
[0131] In what follows, the invention is described by way of non-limiting examples illustrating
the invention, and which are not intended to and should not be interpreted as limiting
the scope of the invention.
EXAMPLES
[0132]
Figure 1 shows a perspective view of a twin-wire fence panel.
Figure 2 shows an enlarged perspective view of a twin-wire fence panel (section A in Figure 2).
[0133] Example 1 concerns a twin-wire fence panel, as shown in
Figure 1 and
Figure 2, which can be coated according to the method of the first aspect.
[0134] A twin-wire fence panel (108) consists of parallel vertical wires (104) welded to
horizontal wires (101, 102) with the vertical wires welded at any height between two
horizontal wires (101, 102) forming a double pair (103). The distance between two
adjacent vertical wires (106) is about 50 mm c.t.c. The distance between the adjacent
horizontal wires (105) is about 200 mm c.t.c.
[0135] It will be apparent to a person skilled in the art that the names of the wires in
the twin-wire fence panel, namely "horizontal wires" and "vertical wires," are relative
terms. The terms "horizontal wires" and "cross wires" refer to the wires or bars which,
in a working form (installed condition) of the twin-wire fence panel, are positioned
substantially horizontally with respect to the surface on which the fencing is positioned
upright. The horizontal wires therefore correspond to the length of the twin-wire
fence panel. The terms "vertical wires" and "longitudinal wires" refer to the wires
or bars that, in a working form (installed condition) of the twin-wire fence panel,
are positioned substantially vertically relative to the surface on which the fencing
is positioned upright. The vertical wires therefore correspond to the height of the
twin-wire fence panel. The horizontal wires and vertical wires are thus positioned
perpendicular to each other.
[0136] When the twin-wire fence panel is positioned substantially horizontally during coating,
both the horizontal wires and the vertical wires lie substantially in a plane parallel
to the ground surface, still positioned perpendicular to each other.
[0137] Example 2 concerns an embodiment of the method according to the second aspect. For clarification,
reference is made to
Figure 3. In a first coating step (200), ungalvanized twin-wire fence panels are fed (201)
substantially horizontally to a first spray booth (202) in which powdered zinc epoxy,
with a D50 = 30-40 µm, is sprayed onto the twin-wire fence panels by means of triboelectric
powder coating guns, such that the powder is electrically charged through the triboelectric
effect. In this example, the zinc epoxy comprises an epoxy obtained after polymerization
of diglycidyl ether and bisphenol A. Before spraying the zinc epoxy powder, the twin-wire
fence panels are grounded, i.e. connected to a zero potential. The guns spray the
zinc epoxy powder at a spraying speed of 4-6 m/min onto the twin-wire fence panels.
The twin-wire fence panels remain in the first spray booth for between 20 and 28 seconds.
Subsequently, the zinc epoxy powder adhered to the vertical wires is blown away (203)
so that a maximum of 1 mu, and preferably about 0 mu, of epoxy powder is present on
the vertical wires. Subsequently, the twin-wire fence panels are passed through (204)
to a second spray booth (205). The triboelectric powder coating guns spray the powder
with a spraying speed of 4-6 m/min onto the twin-wire fence panels. The twin-wire
fence panels remain in the second spray booth (205) for between 20 and 28 seconds.
The twin-wire fence panels are then stove-enameled in an oven to harden the coating
(206). Zinc epoxy coated ungalvanized twin-wire fence panels are obtained (207) comprising
horizontal wires with a zinc epoxy coating with a thickness of approximately 70 mu
and vertical wires with a zinc epoxy coating with a thickness of approximately 70
mu.
[0138] In a second coating step (300), the twin-wire fence panels are fed substantially
horizontally (301) to a first spray booth (302) in which polyester in powder form,
with a D50 = 50 µm, is sprayed onto the twin-wire fence panels by means of triboelectric
powder coating guns, such that the powder is electrically charged through the triboelectric
effect. In this example, the polyester is a polyether polyester, such as obtained
after polycondensation of terephthalic acid diglycidyl ester and trimellitic acid
triglycidyl ester. Before spraying the polyester powder, the twin-wire fence panels
are grounded, i.e. connected to a zero potential. The guns spray the polyester powder
at a spraying speed of 4-6 m/min onto the twin-wire fence panels. The twin-wire fence
panels remain in the first spray booth for between 20 and 28 seconds. Subsequently,
the polyester powder adhered to the vertical wires is blown away (303) so that a maximum
of 1 mu of polyester powder is present on the vertical wires. Subsequently, the twin-wire
fence panels are passed through (304) to a second spray booth (305). The triboelectric
powder coating guns spray the polyester powder with a spraying speed of 4-6 m/min
onto the twin-wire fence panels. The twin-wire fence panels remain in the second spray
booth (305) for between 20 and 28 seconds. The twin-wire fence panels are then stove-enameled
in an oven to harden the coating (306). A zinc epoxy+polyester coated ungalvanized
twin-wire fence panel is obtained (307), comprising horizontal wires with a zinc epoxy
coating with a thickness of approximately 70 mu and a polyester coating with a thickness
of approximately 50 mu and vertical wires with a zinc epoxy coating with a thickness
of about 70 mu and a polyester coating with a thickness of about 50 mu.
[0139] Example 3 concerns an embodiment of the method according to the second aspect, as described
in Example 2. In this embodiment, the position of the support points is changed between
the two coating steps.
[0140] This prevents no coating at all from ending up on the contact points made by the
twin-wire fence panels on the support points, which means that manual refinishing
has to be done afterwards.
[0141] The zinc epoxy coating is advantageous here because the zinc particles ensure that
grounding on the new support points is still possible by increasing the conductivity
of the epoxy.
[0142] The inventors found that the zinc epoxy coating results in twice as good conductivity
compared to an epoxy without zinc. The method according to the invention also avoids
the problem of "sparking" in case of poor conductivity by the use of this zinc epoxy.
[0143] The present invention should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments
described above and certain modifications or changes may be added to the examples
described without having to re-evaluate the appended claims. For example, the present
invention has been described with reference to a twin-wire fence panel with seven
pairs of horizontal wires, but it should be understood that the invention can be applied
to e.g. a twin-wire fence panel with 7 pairs of horizontal wires or 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 pairs of horizontal wires.
Example 4-11: electrical resistance measurements
[0144] Resistance measurements were performed on test plates coated with 0% zinc epoxy (Examples
4-7) and zinc epoxy with a zinc content of 5 m% (Examples 8-11).
[0145] The test plates were coated with a layer thickness of 45-50 µm, and the resistance
was measured with a test voltage of 5000 V over two measuring points on the test plate
located 15 mm apart. The results are shown in
Table 1. This shows that the electrical resistance in an epoxy coated test plate is much higher
than the electrical resistance in a zinc epoxy coated test plate. It is clear that
adding zinc to the epoxy ensures that the electrical current is less obstructed and
thus the conductivity is increased.
TABLE 1
Example |
Resistance measurement in TΩ |
4 |
15.00 (maximum value of the measuring device) |
5 |
15.00 (maximum value of the measuring device) |
6 |
11.82 |
7 |
14.41 |
8 |
5.60 |
9 |
7.36 |
10 |
3.11 |
11 |
3.70 |
Example 12-16: electrical resistance measurements
[0146] Resistance measurements were carried out in quadruplicate on test plates coated with
epoxy with 0% zinc (ex. 12) and zinc-epoxy with a zinc content of 0.5 m% (ex. 13),
1 m% (ex. 14), 5 m% (ex. 15) and 15 m% (ex. 16).
[0147] The test plates were provided with a coating with a layer thickness of 45-50 µm,
and the resistance was measured with a measuring voltage of 5000 V across two measuring
points on the test plate located 15 mm apart. The results are shown in
Table 2. This shows that the electrical resistance in an epoxy-coated test plate is much higher
than the electrical resistance in a zinc-epoxy coated test plate. The advantageous
lower limit is 1 m% because it has been shown that a resistance <10 TΩ is required
to obtain sufficient grounding of the panel.
TABLE 2
Example |
m% zinc |
Resistance measurement in TΩ |
12 |
0 |
15.00 (maximum value of the measuring device) |
|
0 |
15.00 (maximum value of the measuring device) |
|
0 |
15.00 (maximum value of the measuring device) |
|
0 |
15.00 (maximum value of the measuring device) |
13 |
0.5 |
15.00 (maximum value of the measuring device) |
|
0.5 |
13.31 |
|
0.5 |
15.00 (maximum value of the measuring device) |
|
0.5 |
11.20 |
14 |
1 |
9.51 |
|
1 |
8.14 |
|
1 |
10.20 |
|
1 |
9.45 |
15 |
5 |
5.60 |
|
5 |
7.36 |
|
5 |
3.11 |
|
5 |
3.70 |
16 |
15 |
0.15 |
|
15 |
0.14 |
|
15 |
0.18 |
|
15 |
0.13 |
Example 17-23: Sparking during the coating process
[0148] Examples 17 to 23 concern experiments regarding how many panels show "sparks" during
the coating process, performed with zinc epoxies with different percentages of zinc.
This sparking thus occurs if the grounding is not sufficient.
[0149] The percentage of panels that show sparks during the coating process is advantageously
below 5%. Experimentally, 1 m% zinc appears to be a preferable lower limit.
TABLE 3
Example |
m% zinc |
Number of panels tested |
Number of panels with sparks |
Percentage of panels with sparks |
17 |
0 |
50 |
11 |
22% |
18 |
0.5 |
75 |
7 |
9.3% |
19 |
0.75 |
50 |
4 |
8% |
20 |
1 |
100 |
2 |
2% |
21 |
1.5 |
75 |
1 |
1.3% |
22 |
2 |
100 |
1 |
1% |
23 |
5 |
50 |
0 |
0% |