[Technical Field of the Invention]
[0001] The present invention relates to a steel sheet.
[Related Art]
[0003] Today, as industrial technology fields are highly divided, materials used in each
technology field require special and advanced performance. In particular, with regard
to steel sheets for a vehicle, in order to reduce the weight of a vehicle body and
improve fuel efficiency in consideration of the global environment, there is a significantly
increasing demand for high-strength steel sheets. However, most metal materials deteriorate
in various properties with high strengthening and particularly, the hydrogen embrittlement
susceptibility increases. It is known that the hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility
particularly increases when the tensile strength of a steel member is 1,200 MPa or
more, and there is a case of hydrogen embrittlement cracking in bolt steel for which
high strengthening has progressed ahead of the vehicle field. Therefore, for high-strength
steel sheets having a tensile strength of 1,500 MPa or more, there is a strong demand
for a radical solution to hydrogen embrittlement.
[0004] In many cases, the microstructure of a high strength steel sheet having a tensile
strength of 1,500 MPa or more mainly includes martensite or tempered martensite. In
such a high strength steel sheet, hydrogen entering into the steel segregates to grain
boundaries of martensite and causes grain boundary embrittlement (decreases the grain
boundary strength), whereby cracking occurs (hydrogen embrittlement occurs). Since
the intrusion of hydrogen also occurs at room temperature, there is no method for
completely suppressing the intrusion of hydrogen, and it is necessary to modify the
internal structure of steel in order to obtain a radical solution.
[0005] So far, many proposals have been made for technologies for improving the hydrogen
embrittlement resistance (may be referred to as hydrogen embrittlement resistance
properties) of high-strength steel sheets (for example, see Patent Documents 1 to
6).
[0006] Patent Document 1 discloses, as an ultra-high strength thin steel sheet having excellent
hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties and workability, an ultra-high strength
thin steel sheet containing, by mass%, C: more than 0.25% to 0.60%, Si: 1.0% to 3.0%,
Mn: 1.0% to 3.5%, P: 0.15% or less, S: 0.02% or less, Al: 1.5% or less (not including
0%), Mo: 1.0% or less (not including 0%), Nb: 0.1% or less (not including 0%), and
a remainder consisting of iron and unavoidable impurities, in which a metallographic
structure after stretch working at a working ratio of 3% includes residual austenite
structure: 1% or more, bainitic ferrite and martensite: 80% or more in total, and
ferrite and pearlite: 9% or less (including 0%) in total by area ratio with respect
to the whole structure, crystal grains of the residual austenite have an average axial
ratio (major axis/minor axis) of 5 or higher, and the tensile strength is 1,180 MPa
or more.
[0007] Patent Document 2 discloses, as a high strength steel sheet having a tensile strength
of 1,500 MPa or more, a high strength steel sheet excellent in delayed fracture resistance
properties and bendability in a rolling direction, that contains Si + Mn as steel
components: 1.0% or more, and in which in a primary phase structure, ferrite and carbides
form layers, a carbide has an aspect ratio of 10 or more, a layered structure in which
an interval between the layers is 50 nm or less occupies 65% or more of the whole
structure by volume percentage, and among the carbides that form layers with ferrite,
the fraction of carbides having an aspect ratio of 10 or more and an angle of 25°
or less with respect to the rolling direction is 75% or more by area ratio.
[0008] Patent Document 3 discloses, as a thin ultra-high strength cold-rolled steel sheet
having excellent bendability and delayed fracture resistance properties, an ultra-high
strength cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent bendability, that contains, by mass%,
C: 0.15% to 0.30%, Si: 0.01% to 1.8%, Mn: 1.5% to 3.0%, P: 0.05% or less, S: 0.005%
or less, Al: 0.005% to 0.05%, N: 0.005% or less, and a remainder consisting of Fe
and unavoidable impurities, and in which a soft steel sheet surface layer portion
meeting the relationship represented by "hardness of soft steel sheet surface layer
portion/hardness of center portion of steel sheet ≤ 0.8" is provided, a ratio of the
soft steel sheet surface layer portion to the sheet thickness is 0.10 or more and
0.30 or less, the volume percentage of tempered martensite is 90% or more in the soft
steel sheet surface layer portion, the structure of the center portion of the steel
sheet includes tempered martensite, and the tensile strength is 1,270 MPa or more.
[0009] Patent Document 4 discloses, as a cold-rolled steel sheet having a tensile strength
of 1,470 MPa or more and excellent bending workability and delayed fracture resistance
properties, a cold-rolled steel sheet that contains, by mass%, C: 0.15% to 0.20%,
Si: 1.0% to 2.0%, Mn: 1.5% to 2.5%, P: 0.020% or less, S: 0.005% or less, Al: 0.01%
to 0.05%, N: 0.005% or less, Ti: 0.1% or less, Nb: 0.1% or less, B: 5 to 30 ppm, and
a remainder consisting of Fe and unavoidable impurities, in which in a metallographic
structure, the volume percentage of a tempered martensite is 97% or more and the volume
percentage of a residual austenite is less than 3%.
[0010] Patent Document 5 discloses, as an ultra-high strength steel sheet capable of exhibiting
excellent delayed fracture resistance properties even at a cut end portion, an ultra-high
strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 1,470 MPa or more containing, as
a composition, by mass%, C: 0.15% to 0.4%, Mn: 0.5% to 3.0%, Al: 0.001% to 0.10%,
and a remainder consisting of iron and unavoidable impurities of which P, S, and N
are limited so that P: 0.1% or less, S: 0.01% or less, and N: 0.01% or less are satisfied,
in which a structure including martensite: 90% or more and residual austenite: 0.5%
or more by area ratio with respect to the whole structure is provided, a region where
a local Mn concentration is 1.1 times or more the Mn content of the entire steel sheet
exists in an area ratio of 2% or more, and the tensile strength is 1,470 MPa or more.
[0011] Patent Document 6 discloses, as an ultra-high strength cold-rolled steel sheet having
excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties and the tensile strength of
1,300 MPa or more, an ultra-high strength cold-rolled steel sheet having a steel structure
containing C: 0.150% to 0.300%, Si: 0.001% to 2.0%, Mn: 2.10% to 4.0%, P: 0.05% or
less, S: 0.01% or less, N: 0.01% or less, Al: 0.001% to 1.0%, Ti: 0.001% to 0.10%,
and B: 0.0001% to 0.010%, in which values of a solid solution B amount solB [mass%]
and a prior austenite grain size Dγ [µm] satisfy the relationship represented by solB·Dγ
≥ 0.0010, polygonal ferrite is 10% or less, bainite is 30% or less, residual austenite
is 6% or less, tempered martensite is 60% or more, the number density of Fe carbides
in the tempered martensite is 1 × 10
6/mm
2 or more, the average dislocation density of the entire steel is 1.0 × 10
15 to 2.0 × 10
16/m
2, and a crystal grain size is 7.0 µm or less.
[Prior Art Document]
[Patent Document]
[Disclosure of the Invention]
[Problems to be Solved by the Invention]
[0013] As described above, several technologies for improving the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance properties (hydrogen embrittlement resistance) of a high strength steel
sheet have been proposed. However, in Patent Document 1, only the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance properties when a stress of 1,000 MPa is applied are disclosed, and no
technical solution guidelines are provided for the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
properties when a higher stress is applied.
[0014] In addition, as described above, hydrogen embrittlement occurs when hydrogen accumulates
at grain boundaries and decreases the binding strength of the grain boundaries. Therefore,
it is considered that cracking due to hydrogen embrittlement can be suppressed in
a case where the binding strength of grain boundaries can be increased. However, Patent
Documents 1 to 6 do not consider a method of improving the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance properties based on such a viewpoint. In recent years, it has been stringently
required to obtain hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties, and Patent Documents
1 to 6 may not be able to meet such stringent requirements.
[0015] That is, in the related art, in high-strength steel sheets having a microstructure
mainly including martensite and tempered martensite, there is room for improvement
in hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties.
[0016] Furthermore, in Patent Document 2, the steel sheet has a structure including a pearlite
structure as a primary phase, in which the volume percentage of ferrite in the remainder
in microstructure is 20% or less with respect to the whole structure and the lamellar
pitch in the pearlite structure is 500 nm or less, and is obtained by cold-rolling
a steel sheet having a Vickers hardness of HV200 or more with a rolling reduction
of 60% or more (preferably 75% or more). Therefore, it is possible to easily estimate
that the anisotropy is strong and the formability of the member by a cold press is
low.
[0017] In addition, in Patent Document 3, in order to improve delayed fracture properties,
holding for 20 minutes or longer is required at 650°C or 700°C in an atmosphere having
a dew point of 15°C or higher, which also creates a problem of low productivity.
[0018] The present invention has been contrived in view of the above problems. An object
of the present invention is to provide a steel sheet having excellent hydrogen embrittlement
resistance properties on the premise of being a high strength steel sheet having a
microstructure mainly including martensite and tempered martensite.
[Means for Solving the Problem]
[0019] As described above, the hydrogen embrittlement is considered to be cracking occurring
from grain boundaries due to the segregation of hydrogen in steel to the grain boundaries
and the resulting decrease in binding strength of the grain boundaries. Therefore,
the present inventors have paid attention to the binding strength of the grain boundaries
and conducted various studies on a method of improving the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance properties.
[0020] As a result, the present inventors have found that by segregating a predetermined
alloying element to grain boundaries, the binding strength of the grain boundaries
is improved, entering hydrogen is less likely to segregate to the grain boundaries,
and thus it is possible to suppress a decrease in binding strength of the grain boundaries
due to the hydrogen even the hydrogen enters.
[0021] The present invention has been made in view of the above-described findings. The
gist of the present invention is as follows.
- [1] A steel sheet according to one aspect of the present invention containing, as
a chemical composition, by mass%: C: 0.150% to 0.400%; Si: 0.01% to 2.00%; Mn: 0.80%
to 2.00%; P: 0.0001% to 0.0200%; S: 0.0001% to 0.0200%; Al: 0.001% to 1.000%; N: 0.0001%
to 0.0200%; O: 0.0001% to 0.0200%; Co: 0% to 0.500%; Ni: 0% to 1.000%; Mo: 0% to 1.000%;
Cr: 0% to 2.000%; Ti: 0% to 0.500%; B: 0% to 0.0100%; Nb: 0% to 0.500%; V: 0% to 0.500%;
Cu: 0% to 0.500%; W: 0% to 0.100%; Ta: 0% to 0.100%; Mg: 0% to 0.050%; Ca: 0% to 0.050%;
Y: 0% to 0.050%; Zr: 0% to 0.050%; La: 0% to 0.050%; Ce: 0% to 0.050%; Sn: 0% to 0.050%;
Sb: 0% to 0.050%; As: 0% to 0.050%; and a remainder: Fe and impurities, in which a
microstructure includes, by area ratio, ferrite: 5.0% or less, martensite and tempered
martensite: more than 90.0% in total, and a remainder: one or two or more of bainite,
pearlite, and residual austenite, when an interface where an orientation difference
between adjacent martensite and tempered martensite is 15 degrees or more is defined
as a prior austenite grain boundary, grain boundary binding energy EGB determined by a concentration of each alloying element on the prior austenite grain
boundary satisfies Expression (1), and a tensile strength is 1,500 MPa or more.
EGB = 1 + (3 x [Co] + 0.7 x [Ni] + 5.5 x [Mo] + 0.7 x [Cr] + 2.9 x [Ti] + 47 x [B] +
4.3 x [Nb] + 4.5 x [V] + 5.2 x [W] + 3.1 x [Ta] + 4.3 x [Zr] - 0.25 x [Mn] - 0.1 x
[P] - [Cu] - 1.1 x [Sn] - 0.6 x [Sb] - 0.9 x [As]) ≥ 0.50
Here, [chemical symbol] in the expression represents the concentration of each alloying
element by mass% on the prior austenite grain boundary.
- [2] In the steel sheet according to [1], the chemical composition may contain one
or two or more selected from the group consisting of Co: 0.01% to 0.500%, Ni: 0.01%
to 1.000%, Mo: 0.01% to 1.000%, Cr: 0.001% to 2.000%, Ti: 0.001% to 0.500%, B: 0.0001%
to 0.0100%, Nb: 0.001% to 0.500%, V: 0.001% to 0.500%, Cu: 0.001% to 0.500%, W: 0.001%
to 0.100%, Ta: 0.001% to 0.100%, Mg: 0.001% to 0.050%, Ca: 0.001% to 0.050%, Y: 0.001%
to 0.050%, Zr: 0.001% to 0.050%, La: 0.001% to 0.050%, Ce: 0.001% to 0.050%, Sn: 0.001%
to 0.050%, Sb: 0.001% to 0.050%, and As: 0.001% to 0.050%.
- [3] In the steel sheet according to [1] or [2], a coating layer containing zinc, aluminum,
magnesium, or an alloy of these metals may be provided on a surface.
[Effects of the Invention]
[0022] According to the aspect of the present invention, it is possible to provide a steel
sheet having excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties.
[Brief Description of the Drawings]
[0023] FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the relationship between: hydrogen embrittlement resistance;
and E
GB and the tensile strength of steel sheets in examples of the present invention.
[Embodiments of the Invention]
[0024] Hereinafter, a steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention (the
steel sheet according to the present embodiment) will be described.
[0025] The steel sheet according to the present embodiment has a predetermined chemical
composition, in which
a microstructure includes, by area ratio, ferrite: 5.0% or less, martensite and tempered
martensite: more than 90.0% in total, and a remainder: one or two or more of bainite,
pearlite, and residual austenite,
when an interface where an orientation difference between adjacent martensite and
tempered martensite is 15 degrees or more is defined as a prior austenite grain boundary
(prior γ grain boundary), grain boundary binding energy EGB determined by the concentration of each alloying element on the prior austenite grain
boundary is 0.50 or more, and
the tensile strength is 1,500 MPa or more.
<Chemical Composition>
[0026] First, the amount of each of the elements constituting the chemical composition of
the steel sheet according to the present embodiment will be described. Hereinafter,
"%" regarding the amount of each element means "mass%". In addition, ranges shown
using "to" include values at both ends thereof as a lower limit and an upper limit.
C: 0.150% to 0.400%
[0027] C is an effective element for increasing the tensile strength at a low cost. In a
case where the C content is less than 0.150%, a target tensile strength cannot be
obtained, and the fatigue properties of a weld deteriorate. Therefore, the C content
is set to 0.150% or more. The C content may be 0.160% or more, 0.180% or more, or
0.200% or more.
[0028] Meanwhile, in a case where the C content is more than 0.400%, the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance properties and the weldability decrease. Therefore, the C content is set
to 0.400% or less. The C content may be 0.350% or less, 0.300% or less, or 0.250%
or less.
Si: 0.01% to 2.00%
[0029] Si is an element that acts as a deoxidizing agent and affects the morphology of carbide
and residual austenite after a heat treatment. In a case where the Si content is less
than 0.01%, it is difficult to suppress the formation of coarse oxides. The coarse
oxides serve as crack initiation points, and the cracking propagates in the steel,
leading to a deterioration in hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties. Therefore,
the Si content is set to 0.01% or more. The Si content may be 0.05% or more, 0.10%
or more, or 0.30% or more.
[0030] Meanwhile, in a case where the Si content is more than 2.00%, the precipitation of
alloy carbides is delayed in the hot-rolled structure. Therefore, the Si content is
set to 2.00% or less. The Si content may be 1.80% or less, 1.60% or less, or 1.40%
or less.
Mn: 0.80% to 2.00%
[0031] Mn is an effective element for increasing the strength of the steel sheet. In a case
where the Mn content is less than 0.80%, the effect cannot be sufficiently obtained.
Therefore, the Mn content is set to 0.80% or more. The Mn content may be 1.00% or
more or 1.20% or more.
[0032] Meanwhile, in a case where the Mn content is more than 2.00%, Mn may not only promote
co-segregation with P and S, but also deteriorate the corrosion resistance and the
hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties. Therefore, the Mn content is set to
2.00% or less. The Mn content may be 1.90% or less, 1.85% or less, or 1.80% or less.
P: 0.0001% to 0.0200%
[0033] P is an element that strongly segregates to ferrite grain boundaries and promotes
grain boundary embrittlement. In a case where the P content is more than 0.0200%,
the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties significantly decrease due to the
grain boundary embrittlement. Therefore, the P content is set to 0.0200% or less.
The P content may be 0.0180% or less, 0.0150% or less, or 0.0120% or less.
[0034] The P content is preferably as small as possible. However, in a case where the P
content is less than 0.0001%, the time required for refining increases and this leads
to a significant increase in cost. Therefore, the P content is set to 0.0001% or more.
The P content may be 0.0005% or more, 0.0010% or more, or 0.0020% or more.
S: 0.0001 % to 0.0200%
[0035] S is an element that forms non-metallic inclusions such as MnS in the steel. In a
case where the S content is more than 0.0200%, non-metallic inclusions which serve
as crack initiation points in cold working are noticeably formed. In this case, even
in a case where grain boundaries are strengthened, cracking occurs from the non-metallic
inclusions, and the cracking propagates in the steel, leading to a deterioration in
hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties. Therefore, the S content is set to 0.0200%
or less. The S content may be 0.0180% or less, 0.0150% or less, or 0.0120% or less.
[0036] The S content is preferably as small as possible. However, in a case where the S
content is less than 0.0001%, the time required for refining increases and this leads
to a significant increase in cost. Therefore, the S content is set to 0.0001% or more.
The S content may be 0.0005% or more, 0.0010% or more, or 0.0020% or more.
Al: 0.001% to 1.000%
[0037] Al is an element that acts as a deoxidizing agent for steel and stabilizes ferrite.
In a case where the Al content is less than 0.001%, the effect cannot be sufficiently
obtained. Therefore, the Al content is set to 0.001% or more. The Al content may be
0.005% or more, 0.010% or more, or 0.020% or more.
[0038] Meanwhile, in a case where the Al content is more than 1.000%, coarse Al oxides are
formed. The coarse oxides serve as crack initiation points. Therefore, in a case where
coarse Al oxides are formed, cracking occurs in the coarse oxides even in a case where
grain boundaries are strengthened, and the cracking propagates in the steel, leading
to a deterioration in hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties. Therefore, the
Al content is set to 1.000% or less. The Al content may be 0.950% or less, 0.900%
or less, or 0.800% or less.
N: 0.0001% to 0.0200%
[0039] N is an element that forms coarse nitrides in the steel sheet and decreases the hydrogen
embrittlement resistance properties of the steel sheet. In addition, N is an element
that causes the generation of blowholes during welding.
[0040] In a case where the N content is more than 0.0200%, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
properties deteriorate, and the generation of blowholes is noticeable. Therefore,
the N content is set to 0.0200% or less. The N content may be 0.0180% or less, 0.0160%
or less, or 0.0120% or less.
[0041] Meanwhile, in a case where the N content is set to less than 0.0001%, the manufacturing
cost increases significantly. Therefore, the N content is set to 0.0001% or more.
The N content may be 0.0005% or more, 0.0010% or more, or 0.0020% or more.
O: 0.0001% to 0.0200%
[0042] O is an element that forms oxides and deteriorates the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
properties. In particular, the oxides are present as inclusions in many cases. In
a case where the oxides are present in a punched end surface or a cut surface, notch-like
scratches or coarse dimples are formed on the end surface, which cause stress concentration
during severe deformation. These serve as crack initiation points and significantly
deteriorate the workability. In a case where the O content is more than 0.0200%, the
above-described tendency of deterioration in workability is noticeable. Therefore,
the O content is set to 0.0200% or less. The O content may be 0.0180% or less, 0.0150%
or less, or 0.0100% or less.
[0043] The O content is preferably low. However, from the economic perspective, it is not
preferable the O content be less than 0.0001% due to an excessive increase in cost.
Therefore, the O content is set to 0.0001% or more. The O content may be 0.0005% or
more, 0.0010% or more, or 0.0015% or more.
[0044] The base elements of the chemical composition of the steel sheet according to the
embodiment of the present invention are as described above. That is, the chemical
composition of the steel sheet according to the present embodiment may contain the
above elements and a remainder comprising Fe and impurities. Meanwhile, the chemical
composition of the steel sheet according to the present embodiment may contain, instead
of a part of Fe in the remainder, Co, Ni, Mo, Cr, Ti, B, Nb, V, Cu, W, Ta, Mg, Ca,
Y, Zr, La, Ce, Sn, Sb, and As as an optional component in order to improve various
properties.
[0045] Since these elements do not necessarily need to be contained, the lower limits thereof
in content are 0%. In addition, even in a case where the following elements are contained
as impurities, the effects of the steel sheet according to the present embodiment
are not impaired.
Co: 0% to 0.500%
[0046] Co is an effective element for controlling the morphology of carbide and increasing
the strength of the steel sheet. In addition, Co is an element that also contributes
to an improvement in binding strength of the grain boundaries. Therefore, Co may be
contained. To sufficiently obtain the effect, the Co content is preferably set to
0.010% or more. The Co content may be 0.020% or more, 0.050% or more, or 0.100% or
more.
[0047] Meanwhile, in a case where the Co content is more than 0.500%, coarse Co carbides
are precipitated. In this case, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties may
deteriorate. Therefore, the Co content is set to 0.500% or less. The Co content may
be 0.450% or less, 0.400% or less, or 0.300% or less.
Ni: 0% to 1.000%
[0048] Ni is an effective element for increasing the strength of the steel sheet. In addition,
Ni is an element that also contributes to an improvement in binding strength of the
grain boundaries. In addition, Ni is also an effective element for improving the wettability
and promoting an alloying reaction. Therefore, Ni may be contained. In order to obtain
the above effect, the Ni content is preferably set to 0.010% or more. The Ni content
may be 0.020% or more, 0.050% or more, or 0.100% or more.
[0049] Meanwhile, in a case where the Ni content is more than 1.000%, the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance properties may decrease. Therefore, the Ni content is set to 1.000% or
less. The Ni content may be 0.900% or less, 0.800% or less, or 0.600% or less.
Mo: 0% to 1.000%
[0050] Mo is an effective element for increasing the strength of the steel sheet. In addition,
Mo is an element having an effect of suppressing ferritic transformation that occurs
during a heat treatment in continuous annealing equipment or continuous hot-dip galvanizing
equipment. In addition, Mo is an element that also contributes to an improvement in
binding strength of the grain boundaries. Therefore, Mo may be contained. In order
to obtain the above effect, the Mo content is preferably set to 0.010% or more. The
Mo content may be 0.020% or more, 0.050% or more, or 0.080% or more.
[0051] Meanwhile, in a case where the Mo content is more than 1.000%, the effect of suppressing
ferritic transformation is saturated. Therefore, the Mo content is set to 1.000% or
less. The Mo content may be 0.900% or less, 0.800% or less, or 0.600% or less.
Cr: 0% to 2.000%
[0052] Cr is an effective element for suppressing pearlitic transformation, thereby increasing
the strength of steel, similar to Mn. In addition, Cr is an element that also contributes
to an improvement in binding strength of the grain boundaries. Therefore, Cr may be
contained. In order to obtain the above effect, the Cr content is preferably set to
0.001% or more. The Cr content may be 0.005% or more, 0.010% or more, or 0.050% or
more.
[0053] Meanwhile, in a case where the Cr content is more than 2.000%, coarse Cr carbides
may be formed in a center segregation area and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
properties may decrease. Therefore, the Cr content is set to 2.000% or less. The Cr
content may be 1.800% or less, 1.500% or less, or 1.000% or less.
Ti: 0% to 0.500%
[0054] Ti is an element that contributes to an increase in strength of the steel sheet by
precipitation strengthening, grain refinement strengthening by suppressing the growth
of ferrite crystal grains, and dislocation strengthening by suppressing recrystallization.
In addition, Ti is an element that also contributes to an improvement in binding strength
of the grain boundaries. Therefore, Ti may be contained. In order to obtain the above
effect, the Ti content is preferably set to 0.001 % or more. The Ti content may be
0.003% or more, 0.010% or more, or 0.050% or more.
[0055] Meanwhile, in a case where the Ti content is more than 0.500%, the precipitation
of carbonitrides may increase and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties
may deteriorate. Therefore, the Ti content is set to 0.500% or less. The Ti content
may be 0.450% or less, 0.400% or less, or 0.300% or less.
B: 0% to 0.0100%
[0056] B is an element that suppresses the formation of ferrite and pearlite in the course
of cooling from an austenite temperature range and promotes the formation of a low
temperature transformation structure such as bainite or martensite. In addition, B
is an element useful for high strengthening of steel. In addition, B is an element
that also contributes to an improvement in binding strength of the grain boundaries.
Therefore, B may be contained. In order to obtain the above effect, the B content
is preferably set to 0.0001% or more. The B content may be 0.0003% or more, 0.0005%
or more, or 0.0010% or more.
[0057] Meanwhile, in a case where the B content is more than 0.0100%, coarse B oxides are
formed in the steel. Since the oxides serve as initiation points where voids are generated
in cold working, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties may deteriorate
due to the formation of coarse B oxides. Therefore, the B content is set to 0.0100%
or less. The B content may be 0.0080% or less, 0.0060% or less, or 0.0050% or less.
Nb: 0% to 0.500%
[0058] Similar to Ti, Nb is an effective element for controlling the morphology of carbide
and is also an effective element for improving the toughness by refining the structure.
In addition, Nb is an element that also contributes to an improvement in binding strength
of the grain boundaries. Therefore, Nb may be contained. In order to obtain the above
effect, the Nb content is preferably set to 0.001% or more. The Nb content may be
0.002% or more, 0.010% or more, or 0.020% or more.
[0059] Meanwhile, in a case where the Nb content is more than 0.500%, coarse Nb carbides
are noticeably formed. Since cracking is likely to occur in the coarse Nb carbides,
the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties may deteriorate due to the formation
of the coarse Nb carbides. Therefore, the Nb content is set to 0.500% or less. The
Nb content may be 0.450% or less, 0.400% or less, or 0.300% or less.
V: 0% to 0.500%
[0060] V is an element that contributes to an increase in strength of the steel sheet by
precipitation strengthening, grain refinement strengthening by suppressing the growth
of ferrite crystal grains, and dislocation strengthening by suppressing recrystallization.
In addition, V is an element that also contributes to an improvement in binding strength
of the grain boundaries. Therefore, V may be contained. In order to obtain the above
effect, the V content is preferably set to 0.001% or more. The V content may be 0.002%
or more, 0.010% or more, or 0.020% or more.
[0061] Meanwhile, in a case where the V content is more than 0.500%, the precipitation of
carbonitrides may increase and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties may
deteriorate. Therefore, the V content is set to 0.500% or less. The V content may
be 0.450% or less, 0.400% or less, or 0.300% or less.
Cu: 0% to 0.500%
[0062] Cu is an effective element for increasing the strength of the steel sheet. In a case
where the Cu content is less than 0.001%, it is not possible to sufficiently obtain
the effect. Therefore, in order to obtain the above effect, the Cu content is preferably
set to 0.001% or more. The Cu content may be 0.002% or more, 0.010% or more, or 0.030%
or more.
[0063] Meanwhile, in a case where the Cu content is more than 0.500%, the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance properties may deteriorate. In addition, in a case where the Cu content
is large, the steel may embrittle during hot rolling and it may not be possible to
perform the hot rolling. Therefore, the Cu content is set to 0.500% or less. The Cu
content may be 0.450% or less, 0.400% or less, or 0.300% or less.
W: 0% to 0.100%
[0064] W is an effective element for increasing the strength of the steel sheet. In addition,
W forms precipitates or crystallized substances. Since the precipitates and crystallized
substances containing W act as hydrogen trap sites, W is an effective element for
improving the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties. In addition, W is an element
that also contributes to an improvement in binding strength of the grain boundaries.
Therefore, W may be contained. In order to obtain the above effect, the W content
is preferably set to 0.001% or more. The W content may be 0.002% or more, 0.005% or
more, or 0.010% or more.
[0065] Meanwhile, in a case where the W content is more than 0.100%, coarse W precipitates
or crystallized substances are noticeably formed. Cracking is likely to occur in the
coarse W precipitates or crystallized substances, and the cracking propagates in the
steel with a low load stress. Therefore, in a case where coarse W precipitates or
crystallized substances are formed, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties
may deteriorate. Therefore, the W content is set to 0.100% or less. The W content
may be 0.080% or less, 0.060% or less, or 0.050% or less.
Ta: 0% to 0.100%
[0066] Similar to Nb, V, and W, Ta is an effective element for controlling the morphology
of carbide and increasing the strength of the steel sheet. In addition, Ta is an element
that also contributes to an improvement in binding strength of the grain boundaries.
Therefore, Ta may be contained. In order to obtain the above effect, the Ta content
is preferably set to 0.001% or more. The Ta content may be 0.002% or more, 0.005%
or more, or 0.010% or more.
[0067] Meanwhile, in a case where the Ta content is more than 0.100%, a large number of
fine Ta carbides may be precipitated and the strength of the steel sheet may increase.
With this, the ductility may decrease or the bending resistance and the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance properties may decrease. Therefore, the Ta content is set to 0.100% or
less. The Ta content may be 0.080% or less, 0.060% or less, or 0.050% or less.
Mg: 0% to 0.050%
[0068] Mg is an element capable of controlling the morphology of sulfide when contained
in a small amount. Therefore, Mg may be contained. In order to obtain the above effect,
the Mg content is preferably set to 0.001% or more. The Mg content may be 0.005% or
more, 0.010% or more, or 0.020% or more.
[0069] Meanwhile, in a case where the Mg content is more than 0.050%, coarse inclusions
may be formed and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties may decrease. Therefore,
the Mg content is set to 0.050% or less. The Mg content may be 0.040% or less, 0.030%
or less, or 0.020% or less.
Ca: 0% to 0.050%
[0070] Ca is an element that is useful as a deoxidizing element and is also effective in
controlling the morphology of sulfide. Therefore, Ca may be contained. In order to
obtain the above effect, the Ca content is preferably set to 0.001% or more. The Ca
content may be 0.002% or more, 0.004% or more, or 0.006% or more.
[0071] Meanwhile, in a case where the Ca content is more than 0.050%, coarse inclusions
may be formed and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties may decrease. Therefore,
the Ca content is set to 0.050% or less. The Ca content may be 0.040% or less, 0.030%
or less, or 0.020% or less.
Y: 0% to 0.050%
[0072] Similar to Mg and Ca, Y is an element capable of controlling the morphology of sulfide
when contained in a small amount. Therefore, Y may be contained. In order to obtain
the above effect, the Y content is preferably set to 0.001% or more. The Y content
may be 0.002% or more, 0.004% or more, or 0.006% or more.
[0073] Meanwhile, in a case where the Y content is more than 0.050%, coarse Y oxides may
be formed and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties may decrease. Therefore,
the Y content is set to 0.050% or less. The Y content may be 0.040% or less, 0.030%
or less, or 0.020% or less.
Zr: 0% to 0.050%
[0074] Similar to Mg, Ca, and Y, Zr is an element capable of controlling the morphology
of sulfide when contained in a small amount. In addition, Zr is an element that also
contributes to an improvement in binding strength of the grain boundaries. Therefore,
Zr may be contained. In order to obtain the above effect, the Zr content is preferably
set to 0.001% or more. The Zr content may be 0.002% or more, 0.004% or more, or 0.006%
or more.
[0075] Meanwhile, in a case where the Zr content is more than 0.050%, coarse Zr oxides may
be formed and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties may decrease. Therefore,
the Zr content is set to 0.050% or less. The Zr content may be 0.040% or less, 0.030%
or less, or 0.020% or less.
La: 0% to 0.050%
[0076] Similar to Mg, Ca, Y, and Zr, La is an element capable of controlling the morphology
of sulfide when contained in a small amount. Therefore, La may be contained. In order
to obtain the above effect, the La content is preferably set to 0.001% or more. The
La content may be 0.002% or more, 0.004% or more, or 0.006% or more.
[0077] Meanwhile, in a case where the La content is more than 0.050%, La oxides may be formed
and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties may decrease. Therefore, the
La content is set to 0.050% or less. The La content may be 0.040% or less, 0.030%
or less, or 0.020% or less.
Ce: 0% to 0.050%
[0078] Similar to La, Ce is an element capable of controlling the morphology of sulfide
when contained in a small amount. Therefore, Ce may be contained. In order to obtain
the above effect, the Ce content is preferably set to 0.001% or more. The Ce content
may be 0.002% or more, 0.004% or more, or 0.006% or more.
[0079] Meanwhile, in a case where the Ce content is more than 0.050%, Ce oxides may be formed
and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties may decrease. Therefore, the
Ce content is set to 0.050% or less. The Ce content may be 0.040% or less, 0.030%
or less, or 0.020% or less.
Sn: 0% to 0.050%
[0080] Sn is an element that is contained in the steel in a case where a scrap is used as
a raw material. In a case where the Sn content is large, the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance properties may decrease due to grain boundary embrittlement. In a case
where the Sn content is more than 0.050%, the adverse effect is particularly noticeable.
Therefore, the Sn content is set to 0.050% or less. The Sn content may be 0.040% or
less, 0.030% or less, or 0.020% or less.
[0081] The Sn content is preferably as small as possible and may be 0%. However, in a case
where the Sn content is less than 0.001%, the refining cost increases. Therefore,
the Sn content may be set to 0.001% or more. The Sn content may be 0.002% or more,
0.005% or more, or 0.010% or more.
Sb: 0% to 0.050%
[0082] Similar to Sn, Sb is an element that is contained in a case where a scrap is used
as a raw material. Sb is an element that strongly segregates to grain boundaries and
causes the grain boundary embrittlement and a decrease in ductility. In a case where
the Sb content is more than 0.050%, the adverse effect is particularly noticeable.
Therefore, the Sb content is set to 0.050% or less. The Sb content may be 0.040% or
less, 0.030% or less, or 0.020% or less.
[0083] The Sb content is preferably as small as possible and may be 0%. However, in a case
where the Sb content is less than 0.001%, the refining cost increases. Therefore,
the Sb content may be set to 0.001% or more. The Sb content may be 0.002% or more,
0.005% or more, or 0.008% or more.
As: 0% to 0.050%
[0084] Similar to Sn and Sb, As is an element that is contained in a case where a scrap
is used as a raw material, strongly segregates to grain boundaries, and causes the
grain boundary embrittlement and a decrease in ductility. In a case where the As content
is large, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties may decrease. In a case
where the As content is more than 0.050%, the adverse effect is particularly noticeable.
Therefore, the As content is set to 0.050% or less. The As content may be 0.040% or
less, 0.030% or less, or 0.020% or less.
[0085] The As content is preferably as small as possible and may be 0%. However, in a case
where the As content is less than 0.001 %, the refining cost increases. Therefore,
the As content may be set to 0.001% or more. The As content may be 0.002% or more,
0.003% or more, or 0.005% or more.
[0086] As described above, the chemical composition of the steel sheet according to the
present embodiment may contain base elements and a remainder consisting of Fe and
impurities, or may contain base elements, one or more optional elements, and a remainder
consisting of Fe and impurities.
[0087] The chemical composition of the steel sheet according to the present embodiment may
be measured by a general method. For example, the measurement may be performed on
chips using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) according
to JISG1201: 2014. In this case, the chemical composition is an average content throughout
the whole sheet thickness. C and S, that cannot be measured by ICP-AES, may be measured
using a combustion-infrared absorption method, N may be measured using an inert gas
fusion-thermal conductivity method, and O may be measured using an inert gas fusion-nondispersive
infrared absorption method.
[0088] In a case where the steel sheet is provided with a coating layer on the surface,
the chemical composition may be analyzed after removing the coating layer by mechanical
grinding or the like. In a case where the coating layer is a plating layer, the coating
layer may be removed by dissolving the plating layer in an acid solution to which
an inhibitor suppressing the corrosion of the steel sheet is added.
<Microstructure (Metallographic Structure)>
[0089] Next, the microstructure of the steel sheet according to the present embodiment will
be described. In the present embodiment, the microstructure is a microstructure at
a position ranging from 118 to 3/8 (t/4 portion) of the sheet thickness in the sheet
thickness direction from the surface of the steel sheet. The reason why the microstructure
is regulated in the t/4 portion is that it is a representative microstructure of the
steel sheet and has a high correlation with the properties of the steel sheet.
[0090] In addition, the fraction (%) of each of the following phases is an area ratio unless
otherwise specified.
Ferrite: 5.0% or less
[0091] Ferrite has an influence on the deformability of steel including martensite as a
main structure. As the area ratio of ferrite increases, the local deformability and
hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties decrease. In particular, in a case where
the area ratio of ferrite is more than 5.0%, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
properties may decrease due to fractures in elastic deformation under stress loading.
Therefore, the area ratio of ferrite is set to 5.0% or less. The area ratio of ferrite
may be 4.0% or less, 3.0% or less, or 2.0% or less.
[0092] The area ratio of ferrite may be 0%. However, in order to control the area ratio
to less than 1.0%, a high degree of control is required in the manufacturing, and
this leads to a decrease in yield. Therefore, the area ratio of ferrite may be set
to 1.0% or more.
Martensite and Tempered Martensite: more than 90.0% in total
[0093] The total area ratio of martensite and tempered martensite has an influence on the
strength of steel. As the area ratio increases, the tensile strength increases. In
a case where the total area ratio of martensite and tempered martensite is 90.0% or
less, a target tensile strength cannot be achieved. Moreover, fractures may be caused
during elastic deformation under stress loading, or the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
properties may decrease due to an increase in non-uniformity of the microstructure
caused by the formation of a structure other than the martensite and tempered martensite.
Therefore, the total area ratio of martensite and tempered martensite is set to more
than 90.0%. The total area ratio of martensite and tempered martensite may be 95.0%
or more, 97.0% or more, 99.0% or more, or 100.0%.
Remainder: one or two or more of bainite, pearlite, and residual austenite
[0094] The area ratio of the structure (the remainder in microstructure) other than the
above-described structure may be 0%, but in a case where the remainder in microstructure
is present, the remainder in microstructure includes one or two or more of bainite,
pearlite, and residual austenite.
[0095] In a case where the area ratio of the remainder in microstructure is more than 8.0%,
the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties may decrease due to fractures in
elastic deformation under stress loading. Therefore, the area ratio of the remainder
in microstructure is preferably 8.0% or less, and more preferably 7.0% or less. Of
these, particularly, pearlite and residual austenite are structures that deteriorate
the local ductility of the steel, and are preferably as small as possible.
[0096] Meanwhile, a high degree of control is required in the manufacturing in order to
control the area ratio of the remainder in microstructure to 0%, and this may lead
to a decrease in yield. Therefore, the area ratio of the remainder in microstructure
may be 1.0% or more.
[0097] The area ratio of each phase in the microstructure of the steel sheet according to
the present embodiment can be obtained by the following method.
(Method of Evaluating Area Ratio of Ferrite)
[0098] The area ratio of ferrite is obtained by observing a t/4 portion (ranging from 1/8
to 3/8 of the sheet thickness, in which a 1/4 position of the sheet thickness is centered
in the sheet thickness direction from the surface) of an electron channeling contrast
image for which a field emission-scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) is used. The
electron channeling contrast image relates to a method of detecting a crystal orientation
difference in crystal grains as a difference in contrast in an image, and in the image,
a part that appears with uniform contrast in a structure determined to be ferrite
rather than pearlite, bainite, martensite, or residual austenite is polygonal ferrite.
The area ratio of polygonal ferrite is calculated in each of 8 visual fields in a
35 µm × 25 µm electron channeling contrast image by an image analysis method, and
an average value thereof is defined as the area ratio of ferrite.
(Method of Evaluating Total Area Ratio of Martensite and Tempered Martensite)
[0099] The total area ratio of martensite and tempered martensite is also obtained from
an image taken with the above-described electron channeling contrast. These structures
are more difficult to etch than ferrite and are thus present as protrusions on the
structure observation section. Tempered martensite is an aggregate of lath-shaped
crystal grains and contains iron-based carbides having a major axis of 20 nm or more
therein, and the carbides belong to a plurality of variants, that is, a plurality
of iron-based carbide groups elongated in different directions. In addition, residual
austenite is also present as protrusions on the structure observation section. Therefore,
by subtracting, from the area ratio of the protrusions obtained by the above procedure,
the area ratio of residual austenite measured by a procedure to be described later,
the total area ratio of martensite and tempered martensite can be accurately measured.
(Method of Evaluating Total Area Ratio of Bainite, Pearlite, and Residual Austenite)
[0100] The area ratio of residual austenite can be calculated by measurement using X-rays.
That is, a portion from the sheet surface of a sample to a 1/4 position of the sheet
thickness in the sheet thickness direction is removed by mechanical polishing and
chemical polishing. The microstructural fraction of residual austenite is calculated
from the integrated intensity ratio of the diffraction peaks of (200) and (211) of
a bcc phase and (200), (220), and (311) of an fcc. phase obtained from the polished
sample using MoKα rays as characteristic X rays, and this is defined as the area ratio
of residual austenite.
[0101] In addition, the area ratio of pearlite is obtained from an image taken with the
above-described electron channeling contrast. Pearlite is a structure in which platelike
carbides and ferrite are arranged.
[0102] In addition, bainite is an aggregate of lath-shaped crystal grains, contains no iron-based
carbide having a major axis of 20 nm or more therein or contains iron-based carbides
having a major axis of 20 nm or more therein. The carbides belong to a single variant,
that is, an iron-based carbide group elongated in the same direction. Here, the iron-based
carbide group elongated in the same direction means a group in which a difference
in elongation direction of the iron-based carbide group is within 5°.
<Grain Boundary Binding Energy>
[0103] Regarding cracking occurring by hydrogen embrittlement, the binding strength of grain
boundaries is decreased by segregation of hydrogen in the steel to the grain boundaries,
and cracking is generated from the grain boundaries of which the binding strength
has been decreased. Regarding this, the binding strength of the grain boundaries is
improved by segregating a predetermined alloying element to the grain boundaries.
In addition, in a case where an alloying element is already segregated, it becomes
difficult for the entering hydrogen to segregate to the grain boundaries, and thus
it is possible to suppress a decrease in binding strength of the grain boundaries
due to the hydrogen even in a case where the hydrogen enters.
[0104] The present inventors have investigated the contribution of each alloying element
to improvement of the grain boundary strength, based on the consideration that in
a microstructure mainly including martensite and tempered martensite, a prior austenite
grain boundary that is an interface (interface between martensite and tempered martensite;
martensite and martensite; or tempered martensite and tempered martensite) where an
orientation difference between adjacent martensite and tempered martensite is 15 degrees
or more is a main grain boundary. As a result, they have found that grain boundary
binding energy E
GB can be expressed as Expression (1) by using the concentration of each alloying element
on the grain boundary, and that the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties are
distinctly improved in a case where E
GB is 0.50 or more.
[0105] Therefore, in the steel sheet according to the present embodiment, when an interface
where an orientation difference between adjacent martensite and tempered martensite
is 15 degrees or more is defined as a prior austenite grain boundary, the grain boundary
binding energy E
GB determined by the concentration of each alloying element on the prior austenite grain
boundary satisfies Expression (1):
EGB = 1 + (3 × [Co] + 0.7 × [Ni] + 5.5 × [Mo] + 0.7 × [Cr] + 2.9 × [Ti] + 47 × [B] +
4.3 × [Nb] + 4.5 × [V] + 5.2 × [W] + 3.1 × [Ta] + 4.3 × [Zr] - 0.25 × [Mn] - 0.1 ×
[P] - [Cu] - 1.1 × [Sn] - 0.6 × [Sb] - 0.9 × [As]) ≥ 0.50
[0106] Here, [chemical symbol] in the expression represents the concentration of each alloying
element by mass% on the prior austenite grain boundary.
[0107] The reason why the interface where the orientation difference is 15 degrees or more
is targeted is that hydrogen tends to preferentially accumulate at the prior austenite
grain boundary where the orientation difference is 15 degrees or more.
[0108] As can be seen from Expression (1), not all the alloying elements segregated to the
grain boundary increase the grain boundary binding energy, and the grain boundary
binding energy is increased by segregating a large amount of the alloying elements
that increase the grain boundary binding energy.
[0109] Here, the interface where an orientation difference between adjacent martensite and
tempered martensite is 15 degrees or more includes an interface between martensite
and martensite where an orientation difference is 15 degrees or more, an interface
between martensite and tempered martensite where an orientation difference is 15 degrees
or more, and an interface between tempered martensite and tempered martensite where
an orientation difference is 15 degrees or more.
[0110] The concentration of each alloying element on the prior austenite grain boundary
is obtained by observing a t/4 portion (ranging from 118 to 3/8 of the sheet thickness,
in which a 1/4 position of the sheet thickness is centered in the sheet thickness
direction from the surface) in the same manner as in the above-described SEM observation
using an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) of a transmission electron microscope
(TEM). More specifically, as the transmission electron microscope (TEM), a spherical
aberration corrected transmission electron microscope (Cs-corrected TEM) is used.
[0111] A flaky sample used for the TEM observation is obtained by the following method.
A sample for measuring the amount of an alloying element is collected from a position
ranging from 1/8 to 3/8 of the sheet thickness in a steel sheet sample, and polished
up to a thickness of about 100 µm by wet polishing using emery paper.
[0112] After that, twin jet electrolytic polishing is conducted to perform electrolytic
polishing up to a thickness in which the TEM observation is possible. The electrolytic
polishing method is performed using a twin jet electrolytic polishing device. Since
appropriate conditions for the twin jet electrolytic polishing vary depending on the
base metal components of the sample, it is necessary to perform extraction for each
sample. After the twin jet, the flaky sample is uniformly milled using Ar ion milling,
whereby the accuracy of quantification of the element on the prior austenite grain
boundary is improved.
[0113] The flaky sample obtained as described above is observed by a Cs-corrected TEM. The
observation position is on the prior austenite grain boundary, and the prior austenite
grain boundary is found as follows. In a bright-field image in the TEM observation,
the prior austenite grain boundary, the packet boundary, and the block boundary appear
as black lines when observed at a magnification of 30,000 times. The sample is inclined
and rotated so that, among the black lines, a black line indicating any prior austenite
grain boundary is horizontal to the incident direction of TEM electron beams. In that
state, elemental analysis is performed immediately above the prior austenite grain
boundary using an EDS at a magnification of 100,000 times. The elemental analysis
using the integration times of EDS analysis is performed by the following method.
Point analysis is performed three times immediately above the prior austenite grain
boundary to quantify the alloying element concentration on the prior austenite grain
boundaries. This analysis is performed on five prior austenite grain boundaries, and
an average alloying element concentration is calculated. The average alloying element
concentration is defined as an alloying element concentration on the prior austenite
grain boundary.
(Mechanical Properties)
[0114] In the steel sheet according to the present embodiment, as a strength that contributes
to the weight reduction of vehicle bodies of vehicles, the tensile strength (TS) is
set to 1,500 MPa or more.
[0115] There is no need to limit the upper limit. However, an increase in tensile strength
may cause a decrease in formability. Therefore, the tensile strength may be set to
2,000 MPa or less.
(Sheet Thickness)
[0116] The sheet thickness of the steel sheet according to the present embodiment is not
limited, but is preferably 1.0 to 2.2 mm. The sheet thickness is more preferably 1.05
mm or more, and even more preferably 1.1 mm or more. In addition, the sheet thickness
is more preferably 2.1 mm or less, and even more preferably 2.0 mm or less.
(Coating Layer)
[0117] The steel sheet according to the present embodiment may have a coating layer containing
zinc, aluminum, magnesium, or an alloy of these metals on its one or both surfaces.
The coating layer may consist of zinc, aluminum, magnesium or an alloy of these metals
and impurities.
[0118] Corrosion resistance is improved by providing a coating layer on the surface. In
a case where there is a concern about holes due to corrosion in a steel sheet for
a vehicle, the steel sheet cannot be thinned to a certain sheet thickness or less
in some cases even in a case where the high strengthening is achieved. One purpose
of high strengthening of the steel sheet is to reduce the weight by making the steel
sheet thinner. Accordingly, even in a case where a high strength steel sheet is developed,
the site where the steel sheet is to be applied is limited in a case where the steel
sheet has low corrosion resistance. As a method for solving these problems, it is
considered to form a coating layer on the front and back surfaces in order to improve
the corrosion resistance.
[0119] Even in a case where a coating layer is formed, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
properties of the steel sheet according to the present embodiment are not impaired.
[0120] The coating layer is, for example, a hot-dip galvanized layer, a hot-dip galvannealed
layer, an electrogalvanized layer, an aluminum plating layer, a Zn-Al alloy plating
layer, an Al-Mg alloy plating layer, or a Zn-Al-Mg alloy plating layer.
[0121] In a case where the surface has a coating layer, the surface serving as a reference
for the above-described t/4 portion is a surface of the base metal excluding the coating
layer.
<Manufacturing Method>
[0122] The steel sheet according to the present embodiment achieves its effects regardless
of the manufacturing method as long as the steel sheet has the above features, and
can be manufactured by a manufacturing method including the following steps (I) to
(VII):
- (I) a heating step of heating a steel piece having a predetermined chemical composition;
- (II) a hot rolling step of hot-rolling the heated steel piece to obtain a hot-rolled
steel sheet;
- (III) a cooling step in which cooling of the hot-rolled steel sheet is started within
3.0 seconds from the completion of the hot rolling step, and the steel sheet is cooled
to a coiling temperature of 550°C to 700°C at an average cooling rate of 20 °C/sec
or higher and 50 °C/sec or lower;
- (IV) a coiling step of coiling the hot-rolled steel sheet after the cooling step at
the coiling temperature;
- (V) a retaining step of retaining the hot-rolled steel sheet after the coiling step
in a temperature range of 400°C to 550°C for 600 seconds or longer;
- (VI) a cold rolling step of pickling and cold-rolling the hot-rolled steel sheet after
the retaining step to obtain a cold-rolled steel sheet;
- (VII) an annealing step of holding and annealing the cold-rolled steel sheet after
the cold rolling step at an annealing temperature of 800°C or higher and lower than
900°C.
[0123] Hereinafter, preferable conditions in each step will be described.
(Heating Step)
[0124] In the heating step, a steel piece such as a slab having the same chemical composition
as the steel sheet according to the present embodiment is heated prior to hot rolling.
[0125] The heating temperature is not limited as long as the rolling temperature for the
next step can be secured. For example, the heating temperature is 1,000°C to 1,300°C.
[0126] The steel piece to be used is preferably cast by a continuous casting method from
the viewpoint of productivity, but may be manufactured by an ingot-making method or
a thin slab casting method.
[0127] In a case where a steel piece obtained by continuous casting can be subjected to
the hot rolling step while it maintains a sufficiently high temperature, the heating
step may be omitted.
(Hot Rolling Step)
[0128] In the hot rolling step, the heated steel piece is hot-rolled to obtain a hot-rolled
steel sheet.
[0129] The hot rolling step includes rough rolling and finish rolling. In the finish rolling,
a plurality of passes of reduction is performed, and among the plurality of passes,
4 or more passes are large reduction passes with a rolling reduction of 20% or higher.
The interpass time between the large reduction passes is set to 5.0 seconds or shorter.
Further, the rolling start temperature is set to 950°C to 1,100°C, and the rolling
finishing temperature is set to 800°C to 950°C.
[Large Reduction Passes with Rolling Reduction of 20% or Higher in Finish Rolling:
4 or More Passes]
[Interpass Time: within 5.0 seconds]
[0130] The morphology of austenite grains can be controlled equiaxially and finely by controlling
the rolling reduction, the number of times of rolling, and the interpass time, in
finish rolling. In a case where the austenite grains become equiaxed and fine, grain
boundary diffusion of the alloying elements is promoted and precipitation of alloy
carbides or nitrides at the grain boundaries is promoted. In a case where the number
of passes (large reduction passes) with a rolling reduction of 20% or higher is less
than 4, unrecrystallized austenite remains, and it is not possible to sufficiently
obtain the effect. Therefore, the rolling reduction is set to 20% or higher in 4 or
more passes (4 or more passes of reduction are performed with a rolling reduction
of 20% or higher). Preferably, the rolling reduction is set to 20% or higher in 5
or more passes. Meanwhile, the upper limit of the number of passes with a rolling
reduction of 20% or higher is not particularly limited. However, in order to conduct
more than 10 passes, it is necessary to install a large number of rolling stands,
and the size of equipment and the manufacturing cost may be increased. Therefore,
the number of passes (pass number) with a rolling reduction of 20% or higher may be
10 or less, 9 or less, or 7 or less.
[0131] In addition, the interpass time in finish rolling has a great influence on the recrystallization
and grain growth of the austenite grains after rolling. Even in a case where the number
of large reduction passes is 4 or more, the grains are likely to grow in a case where
the interpass time between the large reduction passes is longer than 5.0 seconds,
so the austenite grains become coarse.
[0132] Meanwhile, it is not necessary to limit the lower limit of the interpass time. However,
in a case where the interpass time between the large reduction passes is shorter than
0.2 seconds, the recrystallization of the austenite is not completed and the ratio
of unrecrystallized austenite increases. In this case, it is not possible to sufficiently
obtain the effect in some cases. Therefore, the interpass time between the large reduction
passes is preferably set to 0.2 seconds or longer. The interpass time may be 0.3 seconds
or longer or 0.5 seconds or longer.
(Cooling Step)
[0133] In the cooling step, cooling of the hot-rolled steel sheet after the hot rolling
step is started within 3.0 seconds from the completion of the hot rolling step (the
completion of the final pass in finish rolling), and the steel sheet is cooled to
a coiling temperature of 550°C to 700°C at an average cooling rate of 20 °C/sec or
higher and 50 °C/sec or lower.
[0134] In a case where the time from the completion of hot rolling to the start of cooling
is longer than 3.0 seconds or the average cooling rate up to the coiling temperature
is lower than 20 °C/sec, ferritic transformation from austenite occurs until coiling.
In this case, the driving force of precipitates is reduced, and thus in the subsequent
step, it becomes difficult for the precipitates to be uniformly and finely precipitated.
[0135] Meanwhile, in a case where the average cooling rate up to the coiling temperature
is too high, a hard phase is likely to be formed. In this case, after that, the manufacturability
significantly deteriorates and the productivity decreases.
[0136] In addition, in a case where the cooling stop temperature is lower than 550°C, the
precipitation of precipitates is delayed, resulting in a deterioration in manufacturability
and a decrease in productivity. In addition, it is not preferable that the cooling
stop temperature be higher than 700°C, since ferritic transformation from austenite
occurs, the driving force for the precipitation of carbides is reduced, and it becomes
difficult for the precipitates to be uniformly and finely precipitated in the subsequent
step. In addition, it is not preferable that the cooling stop temperature be higher
than 700°C, since an internal oxide layer is likely to be formed on the surface of
the steel sheet, and the surface is likely to be cracked or the productivity significantly
deteriorates in pickling in the subsequent step.
[0137] It is not necessary to limit the lower limit of the time from the completion of hot
rolling to the start of rolling, and the time may be as short as possible within the
range of the equipment limitation.
(Coiling Step)
(Retaining Step)
[0138] In the coiling step, the hot-rolled steel sheet after the cooling step is coiled
at the coiling temperature (cooling stop temperature). In addition, in the subsequent
retaining step, the coiled hot-rolled steel sheet is held (retained) in a temperature
range of 400°C to 550°C for 600 seconds or longer. Alloy carbides or nitrides are
precipitated in the steel sheet by controlling the coiling and retaining conditions.
[0139] The precipitates precipitated here can be unevenly distributed at the prior austenite
grain boundaries by controlling the subsequent step.
[0140] In a case where the holding temperature is too high, the precipitates coarsen and
are not uniformly dispersed. In addition, in a case where the holding temperature
is too low, the precipitates are refined, but it takes a lot of time until the completion
of precipitation, whereby the manufacturability and the productivity decrease. In
addition, in a case where the holding time is short, the alloy carbides are not sufficiently
precipitated.
[0141] In order to retain the steel sheet under the above-described conditions, for example,
a method such as covering or heating box covering may be performed.
(Cold Rolling Step)
[0142] In the cold rolling step, the hot-rolled steel sheet after the retaining step is
recoiled, pickled, and cold-rolled to obtain a cold-rolled steel sheet.
[0143] By performing the pickling, oxide scale on the surface of the hot-rolled steel sheet
is removed, and the chemical convertibility and plating properties of the cold-rolled
steel sheet can be improved. The pickling may be performed under known conditions,
and may be performed once or separately performed a plurality of times. The rolling
reduction (rolling reduction) of cold rolling is not particularly limited. For example,
the rolling reduction is 20% to 80%.
(Annealing Step)
[0144] In the annealing step, the cold-rolled steel sheet after the cold rolling step is
held and annealed at an annealing temperature of 800°C or higher and lower than 900°C.
[0145] In the annealing step, in the course of heating to the annealing temperature that
is an austenite single phase region, the precipitates act to pin the prior austenite
grain boundaries in a relatively low temperature range. As a result, the precipitates
are unevenly distributed on the prior austenite grain boundaries. In a case where
a relatively high temperature range is reached by further heating, the precipitates
become thermally unstable and dissolved. As a result, a state can be made in which
the alloying elements are segregated onto the prior austenite grain boundaries.
[0146] In this state, in a case where rapid cooling is performed as in a post-annealing
cooling step to be described later, it is possible to obtain a high strength steel
sheet in which the austenite is transformed into martensite and the alloying elements
are unevenly distributed on the prior austenite grain boundaries.
[0147] In a case where the annealing temperature is lower than 800°C, the amount of austenite
formed is small and the carbides do not sufficiently dissolved. Therefore, the annealing
temperature is set to 800°C or higher. The annealing temperature is preferably 830°C
or higher.
[0148] Meanwhile, in a case where the annealing temperature is 900°C or higher, the grains
grow and the prior austenite grain size coarsens. Therefore, the segregation of a
predetermined alloying element to the grain boundaries may be suppressed and the hydrogen
embrittlement resistance properties may deteriorate.
[0149] The holding time at the annealing temperature does not need to be limited. However,
in a case where the holding time is shorter than 10 seconds, there is a concern that
the fraction of austenite at the annealing temperature may be insufficient or the
dissolving of carbides may be insufficient. Therefore, the holding time is preferably
10 seconds or longer. Meanwhile, even in a case where the holding time is long, no
problems occur in the properties. However, in a case where continuous annealing is
assumed, the line length of the equipment is increased. Therefore, the substantial
upper limit of the holding time may be set to about 600 seconds.
[0150] The average rate of temperature increases up to the annealing temperature is preferably
2 to 35 °C/sec.
(Post-Annealing Cooling Step)
(Tempering Step)
[0151] In the post-annealing cooling step, after the annealing step, the cold-rolled steel
sheet may be cooled from the annealing temperature to 25°C to 300°C at an average
cooling rate of 20 to 100 °C/sec.
[0152] Due to the cooling, the steel sheet is rapidly cooled in a state in which the alloying
elements segregate to the austenite grain boundaries, and the austenite is transformed
into martensite. As a result, it is possible to obtain a steel sheet having a structure
mainly including martensite, in which the alloy element is segregated to the prior
austenite grain boundaries.
[0153] In a case where the average cooling rate is lower than 20 °C/sec, a sufficient amount
of martensite is not generated. Meanwhile, in a case where the average cooling rate
is higher than 100 °C/sec, equipment capacity may be insufficient and reinforcement
of the equipment may be required in a case where continuous annealing is assumed.
Thus, the substantial upper limit of the average cooling rate is set to 100 °C/sec.
[0154] In addition, in a case where the cooling stop temperature is higher than 300°C, untransformed
austenite that has not undergone martensitic transformation is likely to undergo bainitic
transformation, and the strength may decrease. Meanwhile, with a cooling stop temperature
lower than 25°C, not only the effects are saturated, but also a special cooling medium
or the like is required, which reduces the manufacturability or increases the cost.
[0155] The cold-rolled steel sheet after the post-annealing cooling step may be further
subjected to a tempering step of heating the cold-rolled steel sheet to 50°C to 550°C
and holding the steel sheet for 10 to 1,000 seconds. By performing the tempering,
the alloying elements that are not segregated to the grain boundaries and are present
in the grains can be segregated onto the prior austenite grain boundaries. In addition,
the martensite is turned into tempered martensite, and thus the formability can be
improved.
[0156] In a case where the tempering temperature (holding temperature) is lower than 50°C
or the holding time is shorter than 10 seconds, the above effect cannot be obtained.
Meanwhile, in a case where the tempering temperature is higher than 550°C, the strength
may decrease due to a decrease in dislocation density in the tempered martensite and
the tensile strength may thus be decreased. In addition, coarse carbides may be precipitated
on the prior austenite grain boundaries and deteriorate the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance properties. In addition, in a case where the holding time is 1,000 seconds
or longer, the strength decreases and the productivity decreases. The tempering may
be performed in the continuous annealing equipment or performed offline in separate
equipment after continuous annealing.
[0157] In the above-described post-annealing cooling step, the steel sheet may be held in
a temperature range of 350°C to 650°C (a second temperature range: a temperature range
considered to be higher than the Ms point) for 10 to 200 seconds in the middle of
cooling. In this case, the cooling rate up to the second temperature range excluding
the holding and the average cooling rate from the holding temperature to 25°C to 300°C
(cooling stop temperature) are each set to 20 to 100 °C/sec.
[0158] That is, in this case, after the annealing step, cooling may be performed from the
annealing temperature to the second temperature range of 350°C to 650°C at the average
cooling rate of 20 to 100 °C/sec, holding may be performed in the second temperature
range for 10 to 200 seconds, and cooling may be performed from the second temperature
range to 25°C to 300°C at the average cooling rate of 20 to 100 °C/sec.
[0159] By holding at 350°C to 650°C, the alloying elements that are not segregated to the
grain boundaries and are present in the grains can be segregated onto the prior austenite
grain boundaries, and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties can thus be
improved. However, in a case where the holding temperature is lower than 350°C, bainitic
transformation is likely to occur, and there is a concern that the strength may decrease.
In a case where the holding time is shorter than 20 seconds, the effect of segregating
the element present in the grains onto the prior austenite grain boundaries cannot
be obtained. Meanwhile, in a case where the holding temperature is higher than 650°C,
ferritic transformation from austenite is likely to occur, leading to a decrease in
tensile strength.
[0160] In addition, in a case where the holding time is longer than 200 seconds, bainitic
transformation or ferritic transformation from austenite is likely to occur. The range
of the holding temperature is preferably 370°C or higher and 630°C or lower, and more
preferably 390°C or higher and 610°C or lower. In addition, the range of the holding
time is preferably 30 seconds or longer and 180 seconds or shorter, and more preferably
50 seconds or longer and 160 seconds or shorter.
[0161] Both the holding in the middle of the post-annealing cooling step and the tempering
step further promote the segregation of the alloying elements onto the prior austenite
grain boundaries. Therefore, any one step may be performed or both steps may be performed.
Neither of them may be performed.
[0162] The steel sheet manufacturing method according to the present embodiment may include
a coating layer forming step of forming a coating layer on the surface (one or both)
of the steel sheet.
[0163] The coating layer is preferably a coating layer containing zinc, aluminum, magnesium,
or an alloy of these metals. The coating layer is, for example, a plating layer.
[0164] The coating method is not limited. However, for example, in a case where a coating
layer mainly containing zinc is formed by hot-dip plating, conditions therefor are
as follows: the steel sheet temperature of the cold-rolled steel sheet is adjusted
to be (plating bath temperature - 40)°C to (plating bath temperature + 50)°C (heating
or cooling is performed); and then the steel sheet is immersed in the plating bath
at 450°C to 490°C to form a plating layer.
[0165] The reasons why the above conditions are preferable are that in a case where the
steel sheet temperature in the immersion in the plating bath is lower than hot-dip
galvanizing bath temperature - 40°C, the heat removed during the immersion in the
plating bath may be large and a part of the molten zinc may solidify, deteriorating
the appearance of the plating, and in a case where the steel sheet temperature in
the immersion in the plating bath is higher than hot-dip galvanizing bath temperature
+ 50°C, operational problems are generated due to an increase in temperature of the
plating bath.
[0166] In the formation of a plating layer mainly containing zinc, the effective Al content
(the value obtained by subtracting the total Fe content from the total Al content
in the plating bath) in the composition of the plating bath is preferably 0.050 to
0.250 mass%. In addition, Mg is preferably contained as necessary and the remainder
preferably consists of Zn and impurities. In a case where the effective Al content
in the plating bath is less than 0.050 mass%, the intrusion of Fe into the plating
layer may proceed excessively, leading to a decrease in plating adhesion. Meanwhile,
in a case where the effective Al content in the plating bath is more than 0.250 mass%,
Al-based oxides inhibiting the movement of Fe atoms and Zn atoms may be formed at
the boundary between the steel sheet and the plating layer, leading to a decrease
in plating adhesion.
[0167] The coating layer may be formed after the post-annealing cooling step described above,
during the post-annealing cooling step, or during the tempering step. That is, the
formation of the coating layer may be performed as a part of the holding at 350°C
to 650°C during the post-annealing cooling step or as a part of the holding at 50°C
to 550°C in the tempering step.
[0168] In the formation of a plating layer mainly containing zinc as the coating layer,
an alloying treatment may be further performed. Conditions for this case include,
for example, holding the steel sheet with a plating layer formed thereon at 480°C
to 550°C for 1 to 30 seconds.
[0169] The alloying step may also be performed during the post-annealing cooling step described
above or the tempering step. That is, the formation of the coating layer may be performed
as a part of the holding at 350°C to 650°C during the post-annealing cooling step
or as a part of the holding at 50°C to 550°C in the tempering step.
[0170] For the purpose of improving coatability and weldability, the surface of the coating
layer may be subjected to upper layer plating or various treatments such as a chromate
treatment, a phosphate treatment, a lubricity improvement treatment, and a weldability
improvement treatment.
[Examples]
[0171] Examples of the present invention will be shown below. The examples to be shown below
are merely examples of the present invention, and the present invention is not limited
thereto.
<Example 1>
[0172] Steels having chemical compositions shown in Tables 1-1 to 1-4 were melted and cast
into steel pieces.
[0173] The steel piece was inserted into a furnace heated to 1,220°C, held for 60 minutes,
taken out into the air, and hot-rolled to obtain a steel sheet (hot-rolled steel sheet)
having a sheet thickness of 2.8 mm. In the hot rolling, finish rolling was continuously
performed a total of 7 times using a rolling mill having 7 stands (so that a constant
interpass time was provided), and among the passes, 4 rolling passes were performed
with a rolling reduction higher than 20%. In addition, the interpass time between
each rolling pass for which a rolling reduction of 20% or higher was applied in the
finish rolling and a rolling pass immediately before each rolling pass was set to
0.6 seconds. The finish rolling start temperature was 1,060°C, and the finish rolling
finishing temperature was 870°C.
[0174] Cooling of the hot-rolled steel sheet by water was started 2.2 seconds after completion
of the hot rolling, and the steel sheet was cooled to 580°C at an average cooling
rate of 38.0 °C/sec and coiled. Then, the steel sheet was put in a furnace at 530°C
and held for 1,800 seconds.
[0175] Subsequently, oxide scale on the hot-rolled steel sheet was removed by pickling,
and the steel sheet was cold-rolled with a rolling reduction of 50.0% to obtain a
cold-rolled steel sheet having a sheet thickness of 1.4 mm.
[0176] The cold-rolled steel sheet was heated to 880°C at an average rate of temperature
increase of 12.0 °C/sec, held at 880°C for 120 seconds, and then cooled to 150°C at
an average cooling rate of 42.0 °C/sec.
[0177] After that, the cold-rolled steel sheet was reheated to 230°C and held for 180 seconds
for tempering. No plating was performed.
[0178] The chemical composition was analyzed using a sample collected from the obtained
steel sheet. As a result, it was equivalent to the chemical compositions of the steels
shown in Tables 1-1 to 1-4.
[0179] In addition, in the obtained cold-rolled steel sheet, area ratios of ferrite, martensite
and tempered martensite, and a remainder (one or two or more of bainite, pearlite,
and residual austenite) in the microstructure of a t/4 portion were obtained by the
above-described methods.
[0180] The results are shown in Table 2.
[0181] In addition, the concentration of each alloying element on austenite grain boundaries
was measured by the above-described method, and E
GB was obtained.
[0182] In addition, the tensile strength, total elongation, and hydrogen embrittlement resistance
(hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties) of the obtained cold-rolled steel sheet
was evaluated by the following methods.
(Method of Evaluating Tensile Properties)
[0183] AJIS No. 5 test piece was collected from a direction in which the longitudinal direction
of the test piece was parallel to the orthogonal-to-rolling direction of the steel
strip, and a tensile test was performed according to JIS Z 2241 (2011) to measure
the tensile strength (TS) and the total elongation (El).
(Method of Evaluating Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance)
[0184] The hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the steel sheet manufactured using the steel
sheet manufacturing method according to the embodiment of the present invention was
evaluated by the following method. Specifically, the steel sheet was sheared with
a clearance of 15%, and then a U-bending test was performed at 8R. A strain gauge
was attached to the center of the obtained test piece, and a stress was applied by
tightening both ends of the test piece with bolts. The applied stress was calculated
from the monitored strain in the strain gauge. As a load stress, a stress corresponding
to 80% of the tensile strength (TS) was applied (for example, in a case of A in Table
2, applied stress = 1,515 MPa × 0.8 = 1,212 MPa). This is because the residual stress
that is introduced during forming is considered to correspond to the tensile strength
of the steel sheet.
[0185] The obtained U-bending test piece was immersed in an HCl aqueous solution having
a pH of 2 at a liquid temperature of 25°C and held for 96 hours, and the presence
or absence of cracking was investigated. The lower the pH of the HCl aqueous solution
and the longer the immersion time, the larger the amount of hydrogen entering into
the steel sheet, and the hydrogen embrittlement environment becomes severe. After
the immersion, a case where a crack having a length longer than 1.00 mm was recognized
in the U-bending test piece was evaluated NG, and a case where no crack having a length
longer than 1.00 mm was recognized was evaluated OK. A case where the evaluation was
OK was considered a pass, and a case where the evaluation was NG was considered to
be a failure.
[0186] A steel sheet having a tensile strength of 1,500 MPa or more and evaluated OK in
terms of hydrogen embrittlement resistance was evaluated to have high strength and
excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance.
[Table 1-1]
| Steel No. |
Chemical Composition (mass%) Remainder: Fe and Impurities |
| C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
N |
O |
Co |
Ni |
Mo |
Cr |
Ti |
B |
| A |
0.213 |
1.17 |
1.80 |
0.0189 |
0.0036 |
0.294 |
0.0059 |
0.0191 |
0.019 |
0.365 |
0.177 |
1.517 |
0.281 |
0.0080 |
| B |
0.241 |
0.80 |
1.20 |
0.0060 |
0.0004 |
0.086 |
0.0113 |
0.0021 |
0.200 |
0.493 |
0.869 |
1.873 |
0.060 |
0.0031 |
| C |
0.342 |
1.94 |
1.10 |
0.0156 |
0.0130 |
0.831 |
0.0131 |
0.0040 |
|
|
|
1.548 |
0.430 |
0.0058 |
| D |
0.387 |
0.62 |
1.40 |
0.0087 |
0.0103 |
0.961 |
0.0087 |
0.0110 |
0.348 |
0.623 |
0.833 |
1.155 |
0.118 |
0.0079 |
| E |
0.197 |
1.75 |
0.80 |
0.0054 |
0.0076 |
0.155 |
0.0099 |
0.0155 |
0.254 |
0.759 |
0.124 |
0.266 |
0.445 |
0.0038 |
| F |
0.282 |
1.21 |
1.50 |
0.0102 |
0.0161 |
0.692 |
0.0043 |
0.0012 |
0.053 |
0.574 |
0.053 |
1.688 |
0.197 |
0.0006 |
| G |
0.354 |
1.38 |
1.70 |
0.0030 |
0.0018 |
0.429 |
0.0037 |
0.0121 |
0.414 |
0.987 |
0.764 |
0.827 |
0.309 |
0.0023 |
| H |
0.328 |
1.58 |
1.50 |
0.0021 |
0.0139 |
0.395 |
0.0006 |
0.0066 |
0.472 |
0.198 |
0.647 |
0.507 |
0.088 |
0.0046 |
| I |
0.173 |
0.96 |
1.00 |
0.0074 |
0.0086 |
0.579 |
0.0161 |
0.0170 |
0.296 |
0.417 |
0.485 |
1.225 |
0.257 |
0.0094 |
| J |
0.376 |
0.28 |
2.00 |
0.0169 |
0.0149 |
0.744 |
0.0143 |
0.0085 |
0.311 |
0.905 |
0.458 |
0.952 |
0.379 |
0.0049 |
| K |
0.295 |
0.82 |
1.69 |
0.0138 |
0.0175 |
0.058 |
0.0178 |
0.0079 |
|
0.689 |
0.540 |
0.129 |
0.408 |
0.0013 |
| L |
0.229 |
0.54 |
1.30 |
0.0009 |
0.0049 |
0.520 |
0.0072 |
0.0047 |
0.379 |
0.825 |
0.937 |
0.592 |
0.205 |
0.0065 |
| M |
0.263 |
0.13 |
1.20 |
0.0109 |
0.0056 |
0.048 |
0.0025 |
0.0178 |
0.133 |
0.075 |
0.280 |
0.337 |
0.160 |
0.0058 |
| N |
0.285 |
0.32 |
1.70 |
0.0183 |
0.0187 |
0.216 |
0.0151 |
0.0144 |
0.231 |
0.230 |
0.222 |
1.827 |
0.469 |
0.0089 |
| O |
0.306 |
1.65 |
1.90 |
0.0128 |
0.0114 |
0.622 |
0.0187 |
0.0098 |
0.105 |
0.135 |
0.377 |
1.391 |
0.358 |
0.0017 |
| P |
0.141 |
0.13 |
1.80 |
0.0166 |
0.0155 |
0.165 |
0.0043 |
0.0079 |
0.211 |
0.868 |
0.441 |
0.262 |
0.070 |
0.0080 |
| Q |
0.408 |
1.19 |
1.40 |
0.0087 |
0.0114 |
0.080 |
0.0100 |
0.0151 |
0.435 |
0.614 |
0.251 |
1.006 |
0.322 |
0.0095 |
| R |
0.322 |
2.06 |
1.30 |
0.0083 |
0.0157 |
0.074 |
0.0124 |
0.0153 |
0.082 |
0.571 |
0.844 |
0.130 |
0.313 |
0.0060 |
| S |
0.347 |
1.73 |
0.65 |
0.0067 |
0.0050 |
0.483 |
0.0037 |
0.0075 |
0.288 |
0.334 |
0.508 |
0.266 |
0.200 |
0.0040 |
| T |
0.325 |
1.68 |
2.12 |
0.0079 |
0.0021 |
0.585 |
0.0089 |
0.0061 |
0.395 |
0.275 |
0.950 |
0.765 |
0.068 |
0.0049 |
| U |
0.300 |
1.37 |
1.70 |
0.0206 |
0.0085 |
0.100 |
0.0095 |
0.0083 |
0.466 |
0.324 |
0.337 |
1.262 |
0.142 |
0.0010 |
| V |
0.251 |
0.38 |
1.10 |
0.0036 |
0.0208 |
0.930 |
0.0087 |
0.0171 |
0.343 |
0.708 |
0.831 |
1.857 |
0.417 |
0.0019 |
| W |
0.338 |
1.29 |
1.30 |
0.0104 |
0.0129 |
0.289 |
0.0207 |
0.0151 |
0.403 |
0.637 |
0.108 |
0.365 |
0.087 |
0.0086 |
| * The underlined value is out of the range of the present invention. |
[Table 1-2]
| Steel No. |
Chemical Composition (mass%) Remainder: Fe and Impurities |
| C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
N |
O |
Co |
Ni |
Mo |
Cr |
Ti |
B |
| X |
0.316 |
1.80 |
1.50 |
0.0163 |
0.0055 |
1.034 |
0.0182 |
0.0180 |
0.484 |
0.456 |
0.544 |
0.127 |
0.208 |
0.0015 |
| Y |
0.383 |
0.48 |
0.80 |
0.0123 |
0.0114 |
0.552 |
0.0173 |
0.0069 |
0.254 |
0.588 |
0.353 |
1.912 |
0.470 |
0.0104 |
| Z. |
0.209 |
1.53 |
1.90 |
0.0011 |
0.0174 |
0.322 |
0.0100 |
0.0047 |
0.425 |
0.342 |
0.639 |
0.763 |
0.511 |
0.0085 |
| AA |
0.242 |
0.97 |
0.90 |
0.0027 |
0.0164 |
0.398 |
0.0140 |
0.0181 |
0.229 |
0.241 |
0.820 |
1.745 |
0.409 |
0.0035 |
| AB |
0.293 |
1.75 |
1.90 |
0.0148 |
0.0141 |
0.748 |
0.0097 |
0.0117 |
0.346 |
0.628 |
0.198 |
1.866 |
0.385 |
0.0008 |
| AC |
0.386 |
0.21 |
1.30 |
0.0016 |
0.0096 |
0.266 |
0.0155 |
0.0206 |
0.111 |
0.392 |
0.485 |
1.634 |
0.446 |
0.0065 |
| AD |
0.242 |
0.98 |
1.00 |
0.0077 |
0.0165 |
0.513 |
0.0057 |
0.0077 |
0.124 |
0.509 |
1.030 |
1.110 |
0.242 |
0.0095 |
| AE |
0.279 |
0.15 |
1.00 |
0.0162 |
0.0124 |
0.529 |
0.0148 |
0.0180 |
0.473 |
0.594 |
0.663 |
2.074 |
0.112 |
0.0081 |
| AF |
0.199 |
1.02 |
1.10 |
0.0185 |
0.0031 |
0.068 |
0.0051 |
0.0164 |
0.511 |
0.611 |
0.080 |
1.334 |
0.143 |
0.0073 |
| AG |
0.174 |
0.60 |
1.70 |
0.0147 |
0.0075 |
0.731 |
0.0055 |
0.0112 |
0.314 |
1.025 |
0.430 |
0.022 |
0.047 |
0.0036 |
| AH |
0.225 |
1.27 |
1.20 |
0.0162 |
0.0053 |
0.171 |
0.0119 |
0.0058 |
0.035 |
0.419 |
0.741 |
1.839 |
0.265 |
0.0079 |
| AI |
0.199 |
0.58 |
0.90 |
0.0131 |
0.0082 |
0.316 |
0.0024 |
0.0116 |
0.367 |
0.054 |
0.769 |
1.601 |
0.393 |
0.0065 |
| AJ |
0.290 |
1.43 |
1.50 |
0.0152 |
0.0030 |
0.733 |
0.0100 |
0.0041 |
0.065 |
0.756 |
0.764 |
1.439 |
0.103 |
0.0075 |
| AK |
0.233 |
1.66 |
1.90 |
0.0051 |
0.0043 |
0.921 |
0.0160 |
0.0127 |
0.193 |
0.907 |
0.469 |
0.839 |
0.470 |
0.0059 |
| AL |
0.187 |
0.71 |
1.80 |
0.0196 |
0.0025 |
0.609 |
0.0071 |
0.0137 |
0.208 |
0.817 |
0.269 |
0.109 |
0.128 |
0.0052 |
| AM |
0.298 |
1.83 |
1.40 |
0.0113 |
0.0066 |
0.168 |
0.0121 |
0.0017 |
0.146 |
0.451 |
0.872 |
0.597 |
0.462 |
0.0037 |
| AN |
0.255 |
1.60 |
1.60 |
0.0045 |
0.0191 |
0.708 |
0.0119 |
0.0169 |
0.280 |
0.802 |
0.416 |
0.763 |
0.120 |
0.0040 |
| AO |
0.234 |
1.13 |
1.30 |
0.0031 |
0.0061 |
0.887 |
0.0109 |
0.0139 |
0.178 |
0.091 |
0.613 |
0.418 |
0.194 |
0.0057 |
| AP |
0.223 |
1.06 |
1.50 |
0.0019 |
0.0083 |
0.773 |
0.0175 |
0.0099 |
0.239 |
0.662 |
0.314 |
0.952 |
0.271 |
0.0042 |
| AQ |
0.344 |
0.61 |
1.60 |
0.0167 |
0.0129 |
0.575 |
0.0081 |
0.0011 |
0.393 |
0.189 |
0.597 |
0.892 |
0.295 |
0.0059 |
| AR |
0.306 |
0.76 |
1.50 |
0.0135 |
0.0185 |
0.866 |
0.0173 |
0.0107 |
0.175 |
0.192 |
0.800 |
1.701 |
0.007 |
0.0061 |
| AS |
0.362 |
1.23 |
1.40 |
0.0011 |
0.0114 |
0.146 |
0.0140 |
0.0041 |
0.143 |
0.944 |
0.870 |
0.496 |
0.451 |
0.0048 |
| * The underlined value is out of the range of the present invention. |
[Table 1-3]
| Steel No. |
Chemical Composition (mass%) Remainder: Fe and Impurities |
Remarks |
| Nb |
V |
Cu |
W |
Ta |
Mg |
Ca |
Y |
Zr |
La |
Ce |
Sn |
Sb |
As |
| A |
0.085 |
0.375 |
0.212 |
0.029 |
0.060 |
0.048 |
0.019 |
0.002 |
0.036 |
0.023 |
0.038 |
0.034 |
0.042 |
0.015 |
Development Steel |
| B |
0.044 |
0.231 |
0.383 |
0.050 |
0.074 |
0.022 |
0.017 |
0.027 |
0.026 |
0.029 |
0.026 |
0.030 |
0.048 |
0.031 |
Development Steel |
| C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Steel |
| D |
0.475 |
0.269 |
0.316 |
0.095 |
0.032 |
0.033 |
0.039 |
0.015 |
0.023 |
0.042 |
0.007 |
0.002 |
0.029 |
0.046 |
Development Steel |
| E |
0.211 |
0.438 |
0.181 |
0.023 |
0.013 |
0.041 |
0.009 |
0.023 |
0.030 |
0.035 |
0.046 |
0.006 |
0.012 |
0.007 |
Development Steel |
| F |
0.166 |
0.346 |
0.402 |
0.038 |
0.090 |
0.037 |
0.035 |
0.047 |
0.033 |
0.020 |
0.031 |
0.017 |
0.010 |
0.010 |
Development Steel |
| G |
0.437 |
0.061 |
0.453 |
0.046 |
0.082 |
0.026 |
0.030 |
0.039 |
0.013 |
0.033 |
0.015 |
0.014 |
0.035 |
0.035 |
Development Steel |
| H |
0.240 |
0.425 |
0.477 |
0.083 |
0.072 |
0.035 |
0.042 |
0.012 |
0.016 |
0.038 |
0.035 |
0.046 |
0.039 |
0.012 |
Development Steel |
| I |
0.297 |
0.164 |
0.286 |
0.012 |
0.041 |
0.013 |
0.044 |
0.043 |
0.004 |
0.008 |
0.023 |
0.020 |
0.016 |
0.037 |
Development Steel |
| J |
0.328 |
0.007 |
0.021 |
0.069 |
0.053 |
0.005 |
0.012 |
0.035 |
0.048 |
0.016 |
0.047 |
0.021 |
0.023 |
0.022 |
Development Steel |
| K |
0.016 |
|
0.164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Steel |
| L |
0.347 |
0.081 |
0.085 |
0.016 |
0.008 |
0.020 |
0.047 |
0.026 |
0.045 |
0.048 |
0.030 |
0.010 |
0.004 |
0.003 |
Development Steel |
| M |
0.369 |
0.182 |
0.360 |
0.088 |
0.015 |
0.016 |
0.023 |
0.009 |
0.008 |
0.007 |
0.009 |
0.024 |
0.005 |
0.028 |
Development Steel |
| N |
0.420 |
0.476 |
0.113 |
0.078 |
0.024 |
0.003 |
0.025 |
0.042 |
0.038 |
0.026 |
0.018 |
0.031 |
0.044 |
0.025 |
Development Steel |
| O |
0.121 |
0.128 |
0.258 |
0.008 |
0.040 |
0.009 |
0.032 |
0.006 |
0.043 |
0.044 |
0.004 |
0.038 |
0.033 |
0.018 |
Development Steel |
| P |
0.419 |
0.142 |
0.270 |
0.060 |
0.036 |
0.009 |
0.007 |
0.006 |
0.016 |
0.023 |
0.021 |
0.022 |
0.027 |
0.034 |
Comparative Steel |
| Q |
0.456 |
0.321 |
0.303 |
0.096 |
0.094 |
0.027 |
0.016 |
0.036 |
0.009 |
0.041 |
0.005 |
0.008 |
0.020 |
0.022 |
Comparative Steel |
| R |
0.303 |
0.205 |
0.415 |
0.072 |
0.034 |
0.023 |
0.010 |
0.023 |
0.006 |
0.017 |
0.016 |
0.042 |
0.017 |
0.002 |
Comparative Steel |
| S |
0.101 |
0.392 |
0.094 |
0.021 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.048 |
0.013 |
0.023 |
0.015 |
0.021 |
0.033 |
0.017 |
0.030 |
Comparative Steel |
| T |
0.218 |
0.463 |
0.093 |
0.063 |
0.093 |
0.043 |
0.030 |
0.004 |
0.037 |
0.022 |
0.026 |
0.004 |
0.011 |
0.040 |
Comparative Steel |
| U |
0.447 |
0.114 |
0.265 |
0.073 |
0.061 |
0.030 |
0.043 |
0.026 |
0.003 |
0.035 |
0.013 |
0.025 |
0.038 |
0.032 |
Comparative Steel |
| V |
0.156 |
0.410 |
0.141 |
0.067 |
0.063 |
0.003 |
0.032 |
0.038 |
0.014 |
0.004 |
0.007 |
0.028 |
0.019 |
0.046 |
Comparative Steel |
| W |
0.347 |
0.028 |
0.044 |
0.097 |
0.014 |
0.020 |
0.016 |
0.032 |
0.033 |
0.012 |
0.033 |
0.015 |
0.037 |
0.006 |
Comparative Steel |
[Table 1-4]
| Steel No. |
Chemical Composition (mass%) Remainder: Fe and Imparities |
Remarks |
| Nb |
V |
Cu |
W |
Ta |
Mg |
Ca |
Y |
Zr |
La |
Co |
Sn |
Sb |
As |
| X |
0.104 |
0.284 |
0.142 |
0.067 |
0.086 |
0.003 |
0.039 |
0.047 |
0.024 |
0.019 |
0.025 |
0.030 |
0.028 |
0.042 |
Comparative Steel |
| Y |
0.041 |
0.138 |
0.382 |
0.080 |
0.079 |
0.031 |
0.033 |
0.004 |
0.022 |
0.049 |
0.027 |
0.017 |
0.015 |
0.044 |
Comparative Steel |
| Z |
0.065 |
0.257 |
0.058 |
0.044 |
0.086 |
0.044 |
0.019 |
0.012 |
0.044 |
0.042 |
0.030 |
0.037 |
0.012 |
0.034 |
Comparative Steel |
| AA |
0.511 |
0.476 |
0.206 |
0.025 |
0.085 |
0.017 |
0.012 |
0.006 |
0.043 |
0.045 |
0.036 |
0.033 |
0.004 |
0.014 |
Comparative Steel |
| AB |
0.473 |
0.512 |
0.125 |
0.049 |
0.022 |
0.038 |
0.036 |
0.004 |
0.021 |
0.009 |
0.019 |
0.010 |
0.034 |
0.048 |
Comparative Steel |
| AC |
0.159 |
0.363 |
0.134 |
0.057 |
0.071 |
0.048 |
0.040 |
0.030 |
0.046 |
0.003 |
0.022 |
0.046 |
0.025 |
0.044 |
Comparative Steel |
| AD |
0.127 |
0.281 |
0.035 |
0.074 |
0.074 |
0.047 |
0.005 |
0.036 |
0.008 |
0.010 |
0.017 |
0.025 |
0.037 |
0.021 |
Comparative Steel |
| AE |
0.076 |
0.247 |
0.243 |
0.025 |
0.073 |
0.035 |
0.021 |
0.035 |
0.040 |
0.042 |
0.011 |
0.017 |
0.045 |
0.022 |
Comparative Steel |
| AF |
0.251 |
0.199 |
0.424 |
0.011 |
0.043 |
0.025 |
0.005 |
0.022 |
0.026 |
0.032 |
0.047 |
0.032 |
0.025 |
0.042 |
Comparative Steel |
| AG |
0.185 |
0.278 |
0.200 |
0.041 |
0.041 |
0.039 |
0.005 |
0.040 |
0.026 |
0.007 |
0.042 |
0.027 |
0.043 |
0.019 |
Comparative Steel |
| AH |
0.142 |
0.126 |
0.518 |
0.039 |
0.031 |
0.011 |
0.014 |
0.035 |
0.040 |
0.008 |
0.047 |
0.006 |
0.045 |
0.010 |
Comparative Steel |
| AI |
0.246 |
0.026 |
0.221 |
0.104 |
0.019 |
0.047 |
0.044 |
0.025 |
0.039 |
0.011 |
0.004 |
0.011 |
0.030 |
0.021 |
Comparative Steel |
| AJ |
0.231 |
0.168 |
0.361 |
0.006 |
0.103 |
0.026 |
0.045 |
0.045 |
0.018 |
0.037 |
0.036 |
0.041 |
0.016 |
0.024 |
Comparative Steel |
| AK |
0.293 |
0.388 |
0.423 |
0.068 |
0.069 |
0.039 |
0.027 |
0.043 |
0.036 |
0.045 |
0.043 |
0.052 |
0.027 |
0.038 |
Comparative Steel |
| AL |
0.042 |
0.048 |
0.020 |
0.058 |
0.044 |
0.009 |
0.028 |
0.014 |
0.048 |
0.037 |
0.022 |
0.010 |
0.051 |
0.006 |
Comparative Steel |
| AM |
0.295 |
0.215 |
0.292 |
0.055 |
0.028 |
0.015 |
0.039 |
0.049 |
0.011 |
0.035 |
0.016 |
0.027 |
0.013 |
0.051 |
Comparative Steel |
| AN |
0.315 |
0.350 |
0.394 |
0.090 |
0.057 |
0.052 |
0.045 |
0.027 |
0.014 |
0.033 |
0.038 |
0.043 |
0.041 |
0.029 |
Comparative Steel |
| AC |
0.437 |
0.117 |
0.438 |
0.059 |
0.065 |
0.027 |
0.051 |
0.018 |
0.030 |
0.029 |
0.009 |
0.007 |
0.021 |
0.005 |
Comparative Steel |
| AP |
0.072 |
0.045 |
0.059 |
0.026 |
0.025 |
0.027 |
0.025 |
0.051 |
0.031 |
0.046 |
0.036 |
0.002 |
0.005 |
0.012 |
Comparative Steel |
| AQ |
0.382 |
0.160 |
0.361 |
0.028 |
0.081 |
0.045 |
0.033 |
0.043 |
0.052 |
0.017 |
0.006 |
0.025 |
0.006 |
0.011 |
Comparative Steel |
| AR |
0.041 |
0.185 |
0.323 |
0.017 |
0.068 |
0.041 |
0.038 |
0.017 |
0.047 |
0.052 |
0.018 |
0.046 |
0.039 |
0.037 |
Comparative Steel |
| AS |
0.402 |
0.427 |
0.098 |
0.050 |
0.058 |
0.007 |
0.043 |
0.033 |
0.048 |
0.025 |
0.052 |
0.014 |
0.010 |
0.016 |
Comparative Steel |
| * The underlined value is out of the range of the present invention. |
[Table 2]
| Manufacturing No. |
Steel No. |
Ferrite (%) |
Sum of Martensite and Tempered Martensite (%) |
Remainder in Microstructure |
EGB |
Tensile Strength (MPa) |
Total Elongation (%) |
Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance |
Remarks |
| A |
A |
1.4 |
96.9 |
1.7 |
1.48 |
1515 |
9.4 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| B |
B |
0.0 |
95.1 |
4.9 |
1.65 |
1598 |
7.2 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| C |
C |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.68 |
1898 |
8.4 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| D |
D |
1.0 |
97.7 |
1.3 |
1.45 |
2032 |
8.9 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| E |
E |
0.0 |
92.2 |
7.8 |
1.23 |
1569 |
8.0 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| F |
F |
0.0 |
95.0 |
5.0 |
0.96 |
1720 |
7.7 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| G |
G |
0.0 |
96.5 |
3.5 |
0.92 |
1934 |
7.2 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| H |
H |
0.0 |
91.1 |
8.9 |
0.87 |
1856 |
8.5 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| I |
I |
0.0 |
96.7 |
3.3 |
0.86 |
1509 |
9.4 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| J |
J |
0.0 |
93.4 |
5.6 |
1.54 |
1999 |
6.9 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| K |
K |
0.0 |
99.0 |
1.0 |
1.59 |
1768 |
8.2 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| L |
L |
0.0 |
97.9 |
2.1 |
1.44 |
1563 |
8.6 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| M |
M |
0.0 |
94.6 |
5.4 |
0.59 |
1664 |
8.4 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| N |
N |
1.5 |
91.3 |
7.2 |
0.69 |
1729 |
9.3 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| O |
O |
2.9 |
95.6 |
1.5 |
0.96 |
1791 |
7.7 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| P |
P |
23.0 |
75.0 |
2.0 |
1.95 |
1301 |
7.0 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| Q |
Q |
0.0 |
98.0 |
2.0 |
0.85 |
2105 |
8.2 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| R |
R |
2.3 |
94.0 |
3.7 |
0.11 |
1839 |
7.2 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| S |
S |
11.5 |
83.0 |
5.5 |
0.69 |
1366 |
8.1 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| T |
T |
43.0 |
54.0 |
3.0 |
0.46 |
1848 |
7.0 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| U |
U |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.03 |
1773 |
7.3 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| V |
V |
1.8 |
97.5 |
0.7 |
0.95 |
1628 |
8.2 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| W |
W |
0.0 |
93.8 |
6.2 |
0.68 |
1886 |
7.6 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| X |
X |
1.4 |
95.0 |
3.6 |
0.86 |
1821 |
7.4 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| Y |
Y |
0.0 |
96.4 |
3.6 |
0.58 |
2020 |
6.8 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| Z |
Z |
13.0 |
85.1 |
1.9 |
0.32 |
1395 |
6.2 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AA |
AA |
1.0 |
97.8 |
1.2 |
1.28 |
1601 |
8.3 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AB |
AB |
2.3 |
94.8 |
2.9 |
1.59 |
1753 |
8.7 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AC |
AC |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.94 |
2029 |
9.2 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AD |
AD |
1.8 |
97.0 |
1.2 |
0.47 |
1601 |
8.8 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AE |
AE |
3.3 |
93.8 |
2.9 |
0.23 |
1711 |
8.2 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AF |
AF |
1.5 |
95.2 |
3.3 |
0.39 |
1568 |
8.6 |
NG |
Comparative Steel |
| AG |
AG |
0.0 |
99.0 |
1.0 |
0.56 |
1502 |
8.7 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AH |
AH |
3.6 |
92.1 |
4.3 |
0.33 |
1551 |
8.3 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AI |
AI |
2.3 |
96.8 |
0.9 |
0.43 |
1465 |
9.9 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AJ |
AJ |
1.5 |
97.4 |
1.1 |
0.55 |
1744 |
8.3 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AK |
AK |
3.5 |
95.8 |
0.7 |
-0.95 |
1575 |
8.1 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AL |
AL |
3.9 |
93.6 |
2.5 |
-0.75 |
1598 |
9.0 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AM |
AM |
0.0 |
99.0 |
1.0 |
0.95 |
1767 |
7.9 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AN |
AN |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.57 |
1640 |
8.6 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AO |
AO |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.68 |
1577 |
9.0 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AP |
AP |
1.0 |
98.3 |
0.7 |
0.79 |
1545 |
8.2 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AQ |
AQ |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.59 |
1904 |
7.3 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AR |
AR |
2.0 |
98.0 |
0.0 |
0.75 |
1791 |
8.1 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| AS |
AS |
4.3 |
92.3 |
3.4 |
0.94 |
1957 |
6.5 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
[0187] Referring to Tables 1-1 to 2, in Manufacturing No. P, since the C content was low,
the tensile strength was less than 1,500 MPa.
[0188] In Manufacturing No. Q, since the C content was high, the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance decreased.
[0189] In Manufacturing No. R, since the Si content was high, the precipitation of alloy
carbides was suppressed in the hot rolling step, the segregation of the grain boundary
strengthening elements to the prior austenite grain boundaries was suppressed in the
annealing step, and thus the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0190] In Manufacturing No. S, since the Mn content was low, the tensile strength was less
than 1,500 MPa.
[0191] In Manufacturing No. T, since the Mn content was large and E
GB decreased, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0192] In Manufacturing No. U, since the P content was high, E
GB decreased and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0193] In Manufacturing No. V, since the S content was high, the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance decreased.
[0194] In Manufacturing No. W, since the N content was high, coarse nitrides were formed
and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0195] In Manufacturing No. X, since the Al content was high, coarse Al oxides were formed
and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0196] In Manufacturing No. Y, since the B content was high, coarse B oxides were formed
and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0197] In Manufacturing No. Z, since the Ti content was high, coarse carbonitrides were
formed and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased. In addition, due to the
formation of coarse carbonitrides, the amount of Ti segregated to the grain boundaries
decreased and E
GB decreased. In addition, since the amount of C effective for increasing the strength
was decreased, the tensile strength was 1,500 MPa or less.
[0198] In Manufacturing No. AA, since the Nb content was high, coarse Nb carbides were formed
and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0199] In Manufacturing No. AB, since the V content was high, coarse V carbides were formed
and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0200] In Manufacturing No. AC, since the O content was high, oxides were formed and the
hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0201] In Manufacturing No. AD, since the Mo content was high, the amount of carbonitrides
precipitated increased and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased. In addition,
due to the formation of coarse carbonitrides, the amount of Mo segregated to the grain
boundaries decreased and E
GB decreased.
[0202] In Manufacturing No. AE, since the Cr content was high, coarse Cr carbides were formed
at the center segregation area in the steel and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
decreased. In addition, due to the formation of coarse carbonitrides, the amount of
Cr segregated to the grain boundaries decreased and E
GB decreased.
[0203] In Manufacturing No. AF, since the Co content was high, coarse Co carbides were formed
and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased. In addition, due to the formation
of coarse carbonitrides, the amount of Co segregated to the grain boundaries decreased
and E
GB decreased.
[0204] In Manufacturing No. AG, since the Ni content was high, the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance decreased.
[0205] In Manufacturing No. AH, since the Cu content was high, E
GB decreased to less than 0.50, and thus the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0206] In Manufacturing No. AI, since the W content was high, coarse W precipitates were
formed and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased. In addition, the amount
of W effective for grain boundary strengthening was decreased, E
GB became less than 0.50, and thus the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0207] In Manufacturing No. AJ, since the Ta content was high, a large number of fine Ta
carbides were precipitated and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0208] In Manufacturing No. AK, since the Sn content was high, E
GB was less than 0.50 due to grain boundary embrittlement, and thus the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance decreased.
[0209] In Manufacturing Nos. AL and AM, since the Sb content and the As content were high,
respectively, E
GB was less than 0.50 due to boundary segregation and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
decreased.
[0210] In Manufacturing Nos. AN and AO, since the Mg content and the Ca content were high,
respectively, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased due to the formation
of coarse inclusions.
[0211] In Manufacturing Nos. AP to AS, since the Y content, the Zr content, the La content,
and the Ce content were high, respectively, coarse oxides were formed and the hydrogen
embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0212] In contrast, in Manufacturing Nos. A to Q, by appropriately controlling the chemical
compositions and structures of the steel sheets and the grain boundary strength E
GB at the prior austenite grain boundaries, it was possible to obtain steel sheets having
a high strength and excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance.
<Example 2>
[0213] Furthermore, in order to investigate the influences of manufacturing conditions,
the steel types (Steel Nos. A to O) recognized to have excellent properties in Example
1 were targeted, and in the same equipment as in Example 1, steel pieces were inserted
into a furnace heated to 1,250°C to 1,100°C, held for 60 minutes, taken out into the
air, and produced into hot-rolled steel sheets having a sheet thickness of 2.3 mm
under manufacturing conditions shown in Tables 3-1 and 3-2. Furthermore, cold-rolled
steel sheets were obtained under conditions shown in Tables 3-1 to 3-4 following coiling.
A part of the cold-rolled steel sheet was a steel sheet with a plating layer formed
thereon. Here, the plating symbols GI and GA represent galvanizing methods. GI indicates
a steel sheet in which a galvanized layer is formed on a surface of a steel sheet
by immersing the steel sheet in a hot-dip galvanizing bath at 460°C, and GA indicates
a steel sheet in which an iron-zinc alloy layer is formed on a surface of a steel
sheet by immersing the steel sheet in a hot-dip galvanizing bath and by then raising
the temperature of the steel sheet to 485°C. In a case where intermediate holding
was performed in the second temperature range, the plating was performed as it was
(without cooling to room temperature) after the intermediate holding. In a case where
intermediate holding was not performed in the second temperature range, the plating
was performed in the middle of cooling to 25°C to 300°C. In Tables 3-3 and 3-4, the
examples in which "-" is recorded for tempering are examples not subjected to tempering.
In addition, the interpass time in the tables is an interpass time between passes
with a rolling reduction of 20% or higher (the interpass times were the same since
the rolling was performed by a tandem rolling mill). In addition, in Tables 3-3 and
3-4, in a case where cooling to the second temperature range is performed, the holding
time in the post-annealing cooling step is a holding time in the second temperature
range, and in a case where the cooling stop temperature is out of the second temperature
range, the holding time in the post-annealing cooling step is a holding time at a
temperature near the cooling stop temperature.
[0214] In the obtained cold-rolled steel sheet (including the plated steel sheet), area
ratios of ferrite, martensite and tempered martensite, and a remainder (one or two
or more of bainite, pearlite, and residual austenite) in the microstructure were obtained
in the same manner as in Example 1. In addition, the concentration of each alloying
element on the austenite grain boundaries was measured, and E
GB was obtained.
[0215] In addition, the tensile strength and total elongation of the obtained cold-rolled
steel sheet were evaluated by the same methods as in Example 1.
[0216] In addition, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance was evaluated by the following
method.
(Method of Evaluating Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance)
[0217] The hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the hot-dip galvanized steel sheet manufactured
using the steel sheet manufacturing method according to the embodiment of the present
invention was evaluated by the following method. Specifically, the steel sheet was
sheared with a clearance of 15%, and then a U-bending test was performed at 8R. A
strain gauge was attached to the center of the obtained test piece, and a stress was
applied by tightening both ends of the test piece with bolts. The applied stress was
calculated from the monitored strain in the strain gauge. As a load stress, a stress
corresponding to 80% of the tensile strength (TS) was applied (for example, in a case
of A-1 in Table 4, applied stress = 1,540 MPa × 0.8 = 1,232 MPa). This is because
the residual stress that is introduced during forming is considered to correspond
to the tensile strength of the steel sheet.
[0218] The obtained U-bending test piece was immersed in an HCl aqueous solution having
a pH of 2 at a liquid temperature of 25°C and held for 96 hours, and the presence
or absence of cracking was investigated. The lower the pH of the HCl aqueous solution
and the longer the immersion time, the larger the amount of hydrogen entering into
the steel sheet. Therefore, the hydrogen embrittlement environment becomes severe.
After the immersion, a total length of a crack (in a case where a plurality of cracks
were recognized, the sum of the individually measured values was defined as the total
length) in the U-bending test piece was measured.
[0219] It is shown that the smaller the total length of the crack, the more excellent the
hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties. In particular, a case where a crack
having a crack length longer than 1.00 mm was recognized was evaluated NG, and a case
where no crack was recognized and a case where a slight crack having a crack length
of 1.00 mm or shorter was recognized were evaluated OK. Among cases where the evaluation
was OK, a case where no crack was recognized and a case where a crack having a crack
length of 0.70 mm or shorter was formed were evaluated Ex. A case where the evaluation
was OK or Ex was considered a pass, and a case where the evaluation was NG was considered
a fail.
[0220] The results are shown in Table 4.
[Table 3-1]
| Manufacturing No. |
Steel No. |
Hot Rolling Step |
| Rolling Start Temperature in Hot Rolling |
Number of Passes with Rolling Reduction of 20% or Higher |
Interpass Time |
Rolling Finishing Temperature |
Time from After Hot Rolling Step to Start of Cooling |
Average Cooling Rate up to Coiling Temperature |
Coiling Temperature |
Retention Time at 400°C to 550°C After Hot Rolling |
| °C |
Number of Passes |
See |
°C |
Sec |
°C/Sec |
°C |
Sec |
| A-1 |
A |
1081 |
4 |
4.5 |
884 |
1.9 |
45 |
635 |
636 |
| B-1 |
B |
999 |
4 |
3.4 |
933 |
2.5 |
47 |
566 |
831 |
| C-1 |
C |
1096 |
4 |
3.7 |
905 |
2.4 |
48 |
596 |
758 |
| D-1 |
D |
1004 |
4 |
1.5 |
842 |
1.2 |
36 |
698 |
902 |
| E-1 |
E |
986 |
4 |
4.2 |
858 |
1.1 |
37 |
675 |
974 |
| F-1 |
F |
1035 |
4 |
3.2 |
915 |
1.8 |
33 |
612 |
850 |
| G-1 |
G |
958 |
4 |
1.2 |
927 |
2.5 |
44 |
655 |
1182 |
| H-1 |
H |
965 |
4 |
3.2 |
942 |
2.3 |
31 |
574 |
1079 |
| I-1 |
I |
972 |
5 |
2.2 |
872 |
2.3 |
41 |
645 |
777 |
| J-1 |
J |
1028 |
6 |
2.7 |
808 |
1.1 |
25 |
585 |
694 |
| K-1 |
K |
1076 |
5 |
2.8 |
835 |
1.9 |
28 |
560 |
941 |
| L-1 |
L |
1046 |
4 |
4.6 |
823 |
1.0 |
39 |
607 |
1149 |
| M-1 |
M |
1054 |
5 |
3.1 |
862 |
2.3 |
21 |
667 |
1023 |
| N-1 |
N |
1066 |
6 |
4.1 |
815 |
1.8 |
26 |
621 |
668 |
| O-1 |
O |
1052 |
4 |
4.1 |
820 |
2.5 |
33 |
611 |
788 |
| A-2 |
A |
1016 |
6 |
4.0 |
899 |
3.6 |
23 |
680 |
1054 |
| B-2 |
B |
944 |
4 |
3.5 |
829 |
2.6 |
42 |
622 |
943 |
| C-2 |
C |
1106 |
5 |
4.1 |
869 |
2.2 |
44 |
611 |
1053 |
| D-2 |
D |
964 |
5 |
2.6 |
794 |
2.3 |
27 |
570 |
973 |
| E-2 |
E |
1017 |
4 |
3.2 |
954 |
2.9 |
36 |
680 |
868 |
| F-2 |
F |
1082 |
4 |
4.5 |
808 |
2.5 |
33 |
545 |
1091 |
| G-2 |
G |
991 |
4 |
4.5 |
828 |
1.2 |
28 |
705 |
1136 |
[Table 3-2]
| Manufacturing No. |
Steel No. |
Hot Rolling Step |
| Rolling Start Temperature in Hot Rolling |
Number of Passes with Rolling Reduction of 20% or Higher |
Interpass Time |
Rolling Finishing Temperature |
Time from After Hot Rolling Step to Start of Cooling |
Average Cooling Rate up to Coiling Temperature |
Coiling Temperature |
Retention Time at400°C to 550°C After Hot Rolling |
| °C |
Number of Passes |
Sec |
°C |
Sec |
°C/Sec |
°C |
Sec |
| H-2 |
H |
968 |
6 |
3.5 |
848 |
1.1 |
19 |
577 |
1151 |
| I-2 |
I |
1039 |
6 |
3.7 |
922 |
1.8 |
44 |
681 |
803 |
| J-2 |
J |
1066 |
6 |
3.5 |
885 |
1.4 |
31 |
614 |
1166 |
| K-2 |
K |
1035 |
3 |
5.6 |
905 |
2.2 |
47 |
691 |
882 |
| L-2 |
L |
1070 |
4 |
4.1 |
819 |
2.4 |
38 |
664 |
453 |
| M-2 |
M |
987 |
4 |
3.2 |
938 |
2.5 |
34 |
585 |
513 |
| N-2 |
N |
1047 |
5 |
2.3 |
947 |
2.9 |
38 |
552 |
1220 |
| O-2 |
O |
999 |
4 |
2.1 |
851 |
1.5 |
40 |
661 |
856 |
| A-3 |
A |
1020 |
5 |
2.7 |
922 |
1.7 |
26 |
581 |
697 |
| B-3 |
B |
1055 |
5 |
4.6 |
886 |
1.9 |
33 |
589 |
906 |
| C-3 |
C |
1016 |
5 |
4.1 |
861 |
2.5 |
40 |
659 |
846 |
| F-3 |
F |
1092 |
4 |
3.4 |
867 |
2.7 |
30 |
608 |
754 |
| G-3 |
G |
994 |
5 |
3.3 |
916 |
2.1 |
21 |
644 |
999 |
| H-3 |
H |
1010 |
6 |
2.7 |
812 |
1.5 |
40 |
671 |
824 |
| I-3 |
I |
1058 |
5 |
2.9 |
914 |
1.9 |
23 |
600 |
1002 |
| J-3 |
J |
1074 |
4 |
4.1 |
847 |
1.1 |
47 |
602 |
1093 |
| K-3 |
K |
967 |
5 |
4.1 |
877 |
1.6 |
49 |
673 |
639 |
| L-3 |
L |
1001 |
4 |
3.6 |
901 |
1.4 |
37 |
630 |
628 |
| M-3 |
M |
1060 |
5 |
2.7 |
813 |
2.2 |
24 |
694 |
686 |
| N-3 |
N |
1083 |
5 |
2.4 |
835 |
2.5 |
45 |
573 |
759 |
| O-3 |
O |
1088 |
5 |
2.2 |
892 |
1.5 |
30 |
638 |
769 |
[Table 3-3]
| Manufacturing No. |
Steel No. |
Cold Rolling Step |
Annealing Step |
Post-Annealing Cooling Step |
Plating |
Tempering Step |
| Rolling Reduction |
Annealing Temperature |
Average Cooling Rate After Annealing*1 |
Cooling Stop Temperature |
Holding Time |
Average Cooling Rate After Holding |
Cooling Stop Temperature |
Tempering Temperature |
Tempering Time |
| % |
°C |
°C/Sec |
°C |
Sec |
°C/Sec |
°C |
°C |
Sec |
| A-1 |
A |
61 |
844 |
52 |
513 |
128 |
81 |
203 |
GA |
151 |
379 |
| B-1 |
B |
40 |
839 |
93 |
395 |
69 |
50 |
152 |
GA |
122 |
990 |
| C-1 |
C |
52 |
859 |
85 |
- |
- |
- |
157 |
None |
143 |
159 |
| D-1 |
D |
57 |
895 |
79 |
368 |
51 |
93 |
217 |
GI |
220 |
754 |
| E-1 |
E |
63 |
864 |
66 |
387 |
60 |
52 |
52 |
None |
67 |
289 |
| F-1 |
F |
46 |
868 |
72 |
471 |
40 |
95 |
125 |
None |
- |
- |
| G-1 |
G |
66 |
890 |
78 |
540 |
151 |
59 |
286 |
None |
134 |
88 |
| H-1 |
H |
50 |
847 |
38 |
561 |
197 |
74 |
97 |
GA |
177 |
42 |
| I-1 |
I |
55 |
884 |
30 |
- |
- |
- |
113 |
None |
102 |
636 |
| J-1 |
J |
50 |
875 |
98 |
493 |
45 |
43 |
267 |
GA |
207 |
721 |
| K-1 |
K |
54 |
867 |
59 |
641 |
30 |
40 |
242 |
GA |
- |
- |
| L-1 |
L |
61 |
856 |
52 |
459 |
56 |
66 |
28 |
GA |
111 |
830 |
| M-1 |
M |
60 |
832 |
25 |
- |
- |
- |
64 |
None |
335 |
868 |
| N-1 |
N |
43 |
821 |
36 |
422 |
93 |
22 |
258 |
GA |
310 |
543 |
| O-1 |
O |
55 |
887 |
45 |
- |
- |
- |
203 |
None |
223 |
303 |
| A-2 |
A |
54 |
822 |
46 |
623 |
23 |
26 |
180 |
None |
155 |
267 |
| B-2 |
B |
54 |
819 |
65 |
573 |
89 |
41 |
141 |
None |
257 |
983 |
| C-2 |
C |
43 |
881 |
84 |
396 |
22 |
30 |
171 |
None |
106 |
147 |
| D-2 |
D |
41 |
845 |
79 |
- |
- |
- |
221 |
None |
243 |
470 |
| E-2 |
E |
45 |
859 |
38 |
496 |
29 |
43 |
133 |
None |
91 |
259 |
| F-2 |
F |
65 |
832 |
97 |
459 |
51 |
44 |
36 |
None |
255 |
644 |
| G-2 |
G |
55 |
995 |
47 |
640 |
36 |
39 |
182 |
GI |
137 |
442 |
*1 An average cooling rate up to the holding temperature range, in a case where intermediate
holding is performed, and
an average cooling rate up to the temperature range of 25°C to 300°C, in a case where
intermediate holding is not performed |
[Table 3-4]
| Manufacturing No. |
Steel No. |
Cold Rolling Step |
Annealing Step |
Post-Annealing Cooling Step |
Plating |
Tempering Step |
| Rolling Reduction |
Annealing Temperature |
Average Cooling Rate After Annealing*1 |
Cooling Stop Temperature |
Holding Time |
Average Cooling Rate After Holding |
Cooling Stop Temperature |
Tempering Temperature |
Tempering Time |
| % |
°C |
°C/Sec |
°C |
Sec |
°C/Sec |
°C |
°C |
Sec |
| H-2 |
H |
67 |
896 |
80 |
549 |
82 |
26 |
173 |
GA |
295 |
445 |
| I-2 |
I |
60 |
867 |
96 |
369 |
59 |
56 |
145 |
GA |
- |
- |
| J-2 |
J |
57 |
840 |
41 |
- |
- |
- |
277 |
None |
296 |
313 |
| K-2 |
K |
43 |
862 |
29 |
491 |
39 |
80 |
256 |
None |
54 |
651 |
| L-2 |
L |
39 |
854 |
70 |
592 |
42 |
25 |
155 |
None |
219 |
764 |
| M-2 |
M |
64 |
848 |
87 |
353 |
46 |
32 |
239 |
GA |
284 |
174 |
| N-2 |
N |
46 |
833 |
66 |
520 |
55 |
36 |
211 |
GA |
- |
- |
| O-2 |
O |
61 |
837 |
56 |
458 |
45 |
48 |
241 |
GA |
- |
- |
| A-3 |
A |
56 |
796 |
42 |
444 |
68 |
64 |
290 |
GI |
467 |
874 |
| B-3 |
B |
48 |
902 |
21 |
382 |
48 |
83 |
104 |
GA |
440 |
345 |
| C-3 |
c |
46 |
827 |
17 |
631 |
75 |
76 |
86 |
GI |
323 |
179 |
| F-3 |
F |
57 |
876 |
36 |
499 |
54 |
77 |
309 |
GI |
210 |
703 |
| G-3 |
G |
42 |
869 |
52 |
378 |
21 |
57 |
247 |
GA |
150 |
23 |
| H-3 |
H |
48 |
858 |
60 |
355 |
81 |
87 |
75 |
None |
569 |
555 |
| I-3 |
I |
55 |
882 |
28 |
- |
- |
- |
117 |
None |
52 |
88 |
| J-3 |
J |
55 |
876 |
30 |
- |
- |
- |
192 |
None |
366 |
1029 |
| K-3 |
K |
63 |
891 |
76 |
346 |
33 |
96 |
113 |
GA |
328 |
591 |
| L-3 |
L |
47 |
841 |
57 |
658 |
38 |
71 |
67 |
GA |
- |
- |
| M-3 |
M |
69 |
851 |
90 |
455 |
202 |
47 |
201 |
GA |
401 |
757 |
| N-3 |
N |
56 |
844 |
47 |
602 |
31 |
17 |
281 |
GA |
- |
- |
| O-3 |
O |
54 |
885 |
52 |
621 |
146 |
94 |
34 |
GI |
245 |
82 |
*1 An average cooling rate up to the holding temperature range, in a case where intermediate
holding is performed, and
an average cooling rate up to the temperature range of 25°C to 300°C, in a case where
intermediate holding is not performed |
[Table 4]
| No. |
Ferrite (%) |
Sum of Martensite and Tempered Martensite (%) |
Remainder in Microstructure (%) |
EGB |
Tensile Strength (MPa) |
Total Elongation (%) |
Crack Length (mm) |
Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance |
Remarks |
| A-1 |
1.4 |
96.9 |
1.7 |
0.93 |
1540 |
7.6 |
0.00 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| B-1 |
0.0 |
95.1 |
4.9 |
0.76 |
1622 |
8.4 |
0.12 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| C-1 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.69 |
1923 |
6.9 |
0.92 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| D-1 |
1.0 |
97.7 |
1.3 |
1.23 |
1999 |
7.8 |
0.59 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| E-1 |
0.0 |
92.2 |
7.8 |
1.33 |
1572 |
7.3 |
0.67 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| F-1 |
0.0 |
95.0 |
5.0 |
0.96 |
1764 |
8.7 |
0.35 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| G-1 |
0.0 |
96.5 |
3.5 |
0.76 |
1965 |
8.7 |
0.11 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| H-1 |
0.0 |
91.1 |
8.9 |
0.89 |
1977 |
9.4 |
0.59 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| I-1 |
0.0 |
96.7 |
3.3 |
1.08 |
1543 |
8.5 |
0.91 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| J-1 |
0.0 |
93.4 |
6.6 |
1.44 |
1922 |
7.6 |
0.35 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| K-1 |
0.0 |
95.7 |
4.3 |
1.34 |
1505 |
7.2 |
0.51 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| L-1 |
0.0 |
97.9 |
2.1 |
0.78 |
1566 |
6.2 |
0.00 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| M-1 |
0.0 |
94.6 |
5.4 |
0.86 |
1520 |
6.5 |
0.80 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| N-1 |
1.5 |
91.3 |
7.2 |
0.56 |
1576 |
7.5 |
0.00 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| O-1 |
2.9 |
95.6 |
1.5 |
0.76 |
1749 |
8.9 |
0.95 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| A-2 |
1.0 |
97.5 |
1.5 |
0.34 |
1535 |
8.5 |
1.59 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| B-2 |
1.0 |
99.0 |
0.0 |
0.41 |
1619 |
6.2 |
1.53 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| C-2 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.23 |
1576 |
7.5 |
1.25 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| D-2 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.41 |
1801 |
6.7 |
1.52 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| E-2 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.22 |
1531 |
6.9 |
1.32 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| F-2 |
1.9 |
98.1 |
0.0 |
0.34 |
1741 |
8.7 |
1.11 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| G-2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative Example |
| H-2 |
3.0 |
95.5 |
1.5 |
0.41 |
1645 |
8.2 |
1.09 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| I-2 |
2.3 |
96.6 |
1.1 |
0.69 |
1533 |
6.3 |
0.32 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| J-2 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.68 |
1712 |
7.4 |
0.93 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| K-2 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.11 |
1502 |
7.6 |
1.64 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| L-2 |
4.0 |
96.0 |
0.0 |
0.45 |
1544 |
7.5 |
1.23 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| M-2 |
0.0 |
96.6 |
3.4 |
0.32 |
1629 |
8.4 |
1.15 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| N-2 |
2.0 |
98.0 |
0.0 |
0.89 |
1965 |
8.4 |
0.00 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| O-2 |
0.0 |
98.6 |
1.4 |
0.81 |
2001 |
8.6 |
0.24 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| A-3 |
16.0 |
76.0 |
8.0 |
0.87 |
1345 |
8.1 |
1.25 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| B-3 |
1.5 |
97.4 |
1.1 |
0.44 |
1769 |
8.4 |
1.24 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| C-3 |
14.5 |
77.4 |
8.1 |
0.51 |
1323 |
8.6 |
1.34 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| F-3 |
1.4 |
82.1 |
16.5 |
0.53 |
1463 |
8.6 |
1.47 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| G-3 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.91 |
1945 |
7.1 |
0.55 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
| H-3 |
2.0 |
98.0 |
0.0 |
0.79 |
1245 |
9.8 |
0.35 |
Ex |
Comparative Example |
| I-3 |
2.3 |
95.6 |
2.1 |
1.43 |
1511 |
7.4 |
0.92 |
OK |
Invention Example |
| J-3 |
0.0 |
97.7 |
2.3 |
0.81 |
1459 |
9.7 |
0.85 |
OK |
Comparative Example |
| K-3 |
5.9 |
84.2 |
9.9 |
0.76 |
1134 |
13.5 |
1.25 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| L-3 |
3.2 |
85.4 |
11.4 |
0.89 |
1395 |
11.5 |
1.23 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| M-3 |
9.4 |
65.3 |
25.3 |
0.59 |
1232 |
12.7 |
1.11 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| N-3 |
2.5 |
78.5 |
19.0 |
0.66 |
1367 |
14.2 |
1.08 |
NG |
Comparative Example |
| O-3 |
1.0 |
99.0 |
0.0 |
0.68 |
1769 |
8.8 |
0.67 |
Ex |
Invention Example |
[0221] Referring to Table 4, in Manufacturing No. A-2, the time from the completion of
finish rolling to the start of cooling was long. Therefore, ferritic transformation
was suppressed in the course of cooling after the finish rolling, the pearlite structure
was coarsened, and thus the precipitation of alloy carbides was delayed. As a result,
the alloying elements that contribute to the improvement of grain boundary strength
were not segregated to the grain boundaries, and E
GB was less than 0.50. As a result, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0222] In Manufacturing No. B-2, since the rolling start temperature was low in the hot
rolling, unrecrystallized austenite remained, the precipitation of alloy carbides
was delayed, and E
GB was less than 0.50. As a result, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0223] In Manufacturing No. C-2, since the rolling start temperature was high in the hot
rolling, crystal grains of recrystallized austenite coarsened, the precipitation of
alloy carbides was delayed, and E
GB was less than 0.50. As a result, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0224] In Manufacturing No. D-2, since the rolling finishing temperature was low, unrecrystallized
austenite remained, the precipitation of alloy carbides was delayed, and E
GB was less than 0.50. As a result, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0225] In Manufacturing No. E-2, since the rolling finishing temperature was high, crystal
grains of recrystallized austenite coarsened, the precipitation of alloy carbides
was delayed, and E
GB was less than 0.50. As a result, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0226] In Manufacturing No. F-2, since the coiling temperature was low, the diffusion of
the alloying elements was delayed, the precipitation of alloy carbides was suppressed,
and E
GB was less than 0.50. As a result, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0227] In Manufacturing No. G-2, since the coiling temperature was high, an internal oxide
layer was formed on the surface layer of the hot-rolled steel sheet, and the surface
of the steel sheet was cracked in the subsequent treatment. Therefore, structure analysis
and evaluation of mechanical properties were not performed.
[0228] In Manufacturing No. H-2, since the average cooling rate up to the coiling temperature
was low, ferritic and pearlitic transformation occurred, the precipitation of alloy
carbides was suppressed, and E
GB was less than 0.50. As a result, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0229] In Manufacturing No. K-2, since the interpass time between passes with a rolling
reduction of 20% or higher in the finish rolling was long, the precipitation of alloy
carbides was delayed in the hot rolling step. As a result, E
GB was less than 0.50 and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0230] In Manufacturing No. L-2, the holding temperature after the hot rolling step was
low, the retention time at 400°C to 550°C was shorter than 600 seconds, and thus the
precipitation of alloy carbides was not sufficient. Therefore, E
GB was less than 0.50. As a result, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance deteriorated.
[0231] In Manufacturing No. M-2, the holding temperature after the hot rolling step was
high and the retention time at 400°C to 550°C was shorter than 600 seconds. Therefore,
the precipitation of alloy carbides was not sufficient, and thus E
GB was less than 0.50. As a result, the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0232] In Manufacturing No. A-3, since the annealing temperature was low, ferritic transformation
proceeded during holding and the tensile strength was less than 1,500 MPa.
[0233] In Manufacturing No. B-3, since the annealing temperature was high, the concentration
of the alloying element segregated to the grain boundaries decreased. As a result,
E
GB was less than 0.50 and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance decreased.
[0234] In Manufacturing No. C-3, since the average cooling rate from the annealing temperature
was low, ferritic transformation occurred in the course of cooling and the tensile
strength did not reach 1,500 MPa.
[0235] In Manufacturing No. F-3, since the cooling stop temperature was high, bainitic transformation
occurred and the tensile strength did not reach 1,500 MPa.
[0236] In Manufacturing No. H-3, since the tempering temperature was high, martensite was
softened and the tensile strength did not reach 1,500 MPa.
[0237] In Manufacturing No. J-3, since the tempering time was long, martensite was excessively
softened and the tensile strength did not reach 1,500 MPa.
[0238] In Manufacturing No. K-3, since the cooling stop temperature and the intermediate
holding temperature in the post-annealing cooling step were low (out of the second
temperature range), bainitic transformation occurred and the tensile strength did
not reach 1,500 MPa.
[0239] In Manufacturing No. L-3, since the cooling stop temperature and the intermediate
holding temperature in the post-annealing cooling step were high (out of the second
temperature range), ferritic transformation and pearlitic transformation occurred,
and the tensile strength did not reach 1,500 MPa.
[0240] In Manufacturing No. M-3, since the holding time at the second cooling stop temperature
was long, bainitic transformation occurred during holding and the tensile strength
did not reach 1,500 MPa.
[0241] In Manufacturing No. N-3, since the cooling rate from the second cooling stop temperature
was slow, ferritic transformation and bainitic transformation occurred in the course
of cooling, and the tensile strength did not reach 1,500 MPa.
[0242] In contrast, in all of the examples according to the present invention, by appropriately
controlling the hot rolling, coiling, annealing, and the like, it was possible to
obtain steel sheets having a high strength and excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance.
[0243] FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the relationship of hydrogen embrittlement resistance
with E
GB and the tensile strength of the steel sheets in Examples 1 and 2. In FIG. 1, the
symbol ▲ indicates an example in which the target hydrogen embrittlement resistance
was not achieved, and the symbol ○ indicates an example in which the target hydrogen
embrittlement resistance was achieved. As shown in FIG. 1, in a case where E
GB is 0.50 or more, it is possible to obtain excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance
even for a high strength material of 1,500 MPa or more.
[Industrial Applicability]
[0244] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a high strength steel
sheet having excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance properties. When applied
as a steel sheet for a vehicle, the steel sheet contributes to the weight reduction
of a vehicle body, thereby improving fuel efficiency.