[Technical Field]
[0001] The present disclosure relates to a graphite steel having excellent machinability
and a manufacturing method therefor, and more particularly, to a calcium-containing
graphite steel having machinability superior to that of normal free-cutting steel
and a manufacturing method therefor.
[Background Art]
[0002] In general, free-cutting steels to which machinability-imparting elements such as
Pb and Bi are added have been used as a material for mechanical parts that require
machinability. In order to improve machinability of steel materials, liquid metal
embrittlement may be used by adding low-melting point machinability-imparting elements
such as Pb and Bi to steel, or a large amount of MnS may be formed in steel. Such
free-cutting steels have excellent machinability of steels such as surface roughness,
chip controllability, and tool life during cutting.
[0003] However, Pb-added free-cutting steel, which is generally known to have excellent
machinability, is very harmful to the human body because harmful substances such as
toxic fume are emitted during a cutting process and causes a problem in recycling
of steel materials. Therefore, addition of S, Bi, Te, Sn, and the like is suggested
for replacement thereof. However, it has been known that many problems may be caused
thereby, for example, cracks easily occur while manufacturing steel materials causing
considerable difficulties in production or cracks may occur during hot rolling.
[0004] Free-cutting steel developed to solve the above-described problems is graphite steel.
Graphite steel, as a steel containing fine graphite grains inside a ferrite matrix
or a pearlite matrix, has excellent machinability because fine graphite grains contained
therein serve as a crack source during cutting, acting as a chip breaker.
[0005] However, despite these advantages of graphite steel, graphite steel has not been
commercialized currently. When carbon is added to steel, graphite, even a stable phase,
precipitates as cementite that is a metastable phase, so that it is difficult to precipitate
graphite without a separate long-term heat treatment. During such a long-term heat
treatment process, decarburization occurs, causing adverse effects on performance
of final products.
[0006] In addition, although graphite grains are precipitated by graphitization heat treatment,
in the case where the graphite grains are non-uniformly distributed in irregular shapes,
physical properties are non-uniformly distributed during cutting to considerably deteriorate
chip controllability or surface roughness and shorten tool life, making it difficult
to obtain advantages of graphite steel. Therefore, there is a need to provide a method
for manufacturing a graphite free-cutting steel having excellent machinability by
using MnS inclusions together with graphite grains.
[Disclosure]
[Technical Problem]
[0008] Provided are a calcium-containing graphite steel having excellent machinability and
a manufacturing method therefor.
[0009] However, the technical problems to be solved by the present disclosure are not limited
to the aforementioned problems, and any other technical problems not mentioned herein
will be clearly understood from the following description by those skilled in the
art to which the present disclosure pertains.
[Technical Solution]
[0010] In accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure to achieve the above-described
objects, a graphite steel includes, in percent by weight (wt%), 0.60 to 0.90% of carbon
(C), 2.0 to 2.5% of silicon (Si), 0.7 to 1.3% of manganese (Mn), 0.2 to 0.5% of sulfur
(S), 0.01 to 0.05% of aluminum (Al), 0.005 to 0.020% of titanium (Ti), 0.003 to 0.015%
of nitrogen (N), 0.0001 to 0.050% of calcium (Ca), and the balance of iron (Fe) and
inevitable impurities, wherein the graphite steel includes a microstructure in which
graphite grains are distributed in a ferrite matrix, has a graphitization rate of
95% or more, and includes a total of 5 wt% or less of MnS inclusions and pearlite.
[0011] In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure, a method for manufacturing
a graphite steel includes: preparing a billet including, in percent by weight (wt%),
0.60 to 0.90% of carbon (C), 2.0 to 2.5% of silicon (Si), 0.7 to 1.3% of manganese
(Mn), 0.2 to 0.5% of sulfur (S), 0.01 to 0.05% of aluminum (Al), 0.005 to 0.020% of
titanium (Ti), 0.003 to 0.015% of nitrogen (N), 0.0001 to 0.050% of calcium (Ca),
and the balance of iron (Fe) and inevitable impurities; hot rolling the billet to
prepare a wire rod; and performing graphitizing heat treatment on the prepared wire
rod.
[Advantageous Effects]
[0012] Since the graphite steel according to the present disclosure includes calcium (Ca),
a Ca-Al-based oxide acting as a nucleus of graphitization is formed to promote graphitization
and a Ca-based emulsion is formed to improve machinability. The present disclosure
may provide a graphite steel having excellent machinability and capable of replacing
conventional free-cutting steels and a manufacturing method therefor.
[0013] The graphite steel according to the present disclosure having excellent machinability
may replace conventional free-cutting steel materials, and thus eco-friendly graphite
free-cutting steel from which harmful elements such as Pb and Bi are replaced may
be provided.
[Best Mode]
[0014] A graphite steel according to an embodiment of the present disclosure includes, in
percent by weight (wt%), 0.60 to 0.90% of carbon (C), 2.0 to 2.5% of silicon (Si),
0.7 to 1.3% of manganese (Mn), 0.2 to 0.5% of sulfur (S), 0.01 to 0.05% of aluminum
(Al), 0.005 to 0.020% of titanium (Ti), 0.0030 to 0.0150% of nitrogen (N), 0.0001
to 0.050% of calcium (Ca), and the balance of iron (Fe) and inevitable impurities,
wherein the graphite steel includes a microstructure in which graphite grains are
distributed in a ferrite matrix, has a graphitization rate of 95% or more, and includes
a total of 5 wt% or less of MnS inclusions and pearlite.
[Modes of the Invention]
[0015] Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described.
However, the present disclosure may be embodied in many different forms and should
not be construed as being limited to the embodiments set forth herein. In addition,
these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete,
and will fully convey the scope of the disclosure to those skilled in the art.
[0016] The terms used herein are merely used to describe particular embodiments. Thus, an
expression used in the singular encompasses the expression of the plural, unless it
has a clearly different meaning in the context.
[0017] Hereinafter, the unit is wt% unless otherwise stated. In addition, it is to be understood
that the terms such as "including" or "having" are intended to indicate the existence
of components disclosed in the specification, and are not intended to preclude the
possibility that one or more other components may exist or may be added.
[0018] Meanwhile, unless otherwise defined, all terms used herein have the same meaning
as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure
belongs. Thus, these terms should not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal
sense unless expressly so defined herein. As used herein, the singular forms are intended
to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
[0019] In addition, the terms "about", "substantially", etc. used throughout the specification
mean that when a natural manufacturing and substance allowable error are suggested,
such an allowable error corresponds a value or is similar to the value, and such values
are intended for the sake of clear understanding of the present invention or to prevent
an unconscious infringer from illegally using the disclosure of the present invention.
[0020] Hereinafter, a graphite steel having excellent machinability and a manufacturing
method therefor according to the present disclosure will be described in detail.
[Graphite Steel]
[0021] A graphite steel according to an embodiment of the present disclosure may include,
in percent by weight (wt%), 0.60 to 0.90% of carbon (C), 2.0 to 2.5% of silicon (Si),
0.7 to 1.3% of manganese (Mn), 0.2 to 0.5% of sulfur (S), 0.01 to 0.05% of aluminum
(Al), 0.005 to 0.020% of titanium (Ti), 0.003 to 0.015% of nitrogen (N), 0.0001 to
0.050% of calcium (Ca), and the balance of iron (Fe) and inevitable impurities.
[Composition]
Carbon (C): 0.60 to 0.90 wt%
[0022] Carbon is an essential element to form graphite grains. If the C content is less
than 0.60 wt%, the effect of improving machinability is insufficient and distribution
of graphite is non-uniform even after graphitization is completed. On the contrary,
if the C content is excessive exceeding 0.90 wt%, coarse graphite grains are formed
and the aspect ratio increases, so that machinability, particularly, surface roughness,
may deteriorate. Therefore, an upper limit of the C content may be controlled to 0.90
wt%.
Silicon (Si): 2.0 to 2.5 wt%
[0023] Silicon is an essential component, as a deoxidizer, to prepare molten steel and is
a graphitization-promoting element allowing carbon to precipitate into graphite by
destabilizing cementite contained in steel, and thus it is preferable to necessarily
include silicon. In order to achieve these effects in the present disclosure, the
Si content may be 2.0 wt%.
[0024] However, if the Si content is excessive, the effects may be saturated, and hardness
also increases due to sold solution strengthening effect to accelerate tool wear during
cutting, embrittlement is caused by an increase in non-metallic inclusions, and excessive
decarburization may occur during hot rolling. Therefore, an upper limit of the Si
content may be controlled to 2.5 wt%.
Manganese (Mn): 0.7 to 1.3 wt%
[0025] Manganese improves strength and impact properties of steel materials and combines
with sulfur contained in steel to form MnS inclusions contributing to improvement
of machinability. In order to achieve these effects in the present disclosure, the
Mn content may be 0.7 wt% or more.
[0026] On the contrary, an excessive Mn content may inhibit graphitization to delay graphitization
completion time and may increase strength and hardness to deteriorate machinability.
Therefore, an upper limit of the Mn content may be 1.3 wt%.
Sulfur (S): 0.2 to 0.5 wt%
[0027] Sulfur combines with manganese to form MnS inclusions and machinability may be improved
as the MnS inclusions are formed. However, if the S content is excessive, graphitization
of carbon in steel may be inhibited, S may be segregated into crystal grains to deteriorate
toughness, a low-melting point emulsion may be formed to impair hot rollability, and
mechanical anisotropy may be observed due to MnS stretched by rolling. Therefore,
in the present disclosure, formation of MnS inclusions may be induced by adjusting
the S content within a range capable of contributing to improvement of machinability
without causing mechanical anisotropy.
[0028] Therefore, if the S content is controlled to less than 0.2 wt%, MnS inclusions cannot
be formed in a fraction sufficient to improve machinability. In addition, if the S
content exceeds 0.5 wt%, anisotropy of a material increases to cause breakage during
cutting so that risks may occur during processing.
Aluminum (Al): 0.01 to 0.05 wt%
[0029] Aluminum is the second most important material to promote graphitization after silicon.
This is because aluminum, when existing as a solid solution of Al, destabilizes cementite,
and thus Al needs to exist as a solid solution. In the present disclosure, Al may
be contained in an amount of 0.01 wt% or more to obtain such effects.
[0030] However, if the Al content is excessive, not only the effects may be saturated but
also nozzle clogging may be induced during continuous casting and AlN may be formed
in austenite grain boundaries causing non-uniform distribution of graphite including
AlN as nuclei in the grain boundaries. Therefore, an upper limit of the Al content
may be controlled to 0.05 wt%.
Titanium (Ti): 0.005 to 0.020 wt%
[0031] Titanium, like aluminum, combines with nitrogen to form nitrides such as TiN and
AlN, and these nitrides act as nuclei for graphite formation during constant-temperature
heat treatment.
[0032] While AlN that is formed at a low temperature non-uniformly precipitates after austenite
is formed, TiN that is formed at a temperature higher than that of AlN is crystallized
before formation of austenite is completed and thus uniformly distributed in the austenite
grain boundaries and in the grains. Therefore, graphite grains formed of TiN as nuclei
are also distributed finely and uniformly.
[0033] Although the Ti content may be 0.005 wt% or more to obtain these effects, addition
of Ti in an amount greater than 0.02 wt% may cause consumption of carbon required
for forming graphite by forming coarse carbonitrides, thereby deteriorating graphitization.
Therefore, an upper limit of the Ti content may be controlled to 0.020 wt%.
Nitrogen (N): 0.003 to 0.015 wt%
[0034] Nitrogen combines with titanium and aluminum to form TiN, AlN, and the like, and
nitrides such as AlN are mainly formed in austenite grain boundaries. Because graphite
is formed using such nitrides as nuclei during graphitizing heat treatment, non-uniform
distribution of graphite may be caused thereby, and therefore it is necessary to add
an appropriate amount thereof.
[0035] If the amount of nitrogen added is excessive, nitrogen fails to bind to a nitride-forming
element and remains as a solid solution to increase strength and stabilize cementite,
thereby adversely affecting to delay graphitization.
[0036] Therefore, a lower limit of the N content may be controlled to 0.003 wt% and an upper
limit thereof may be controlled to 0.015 wt% in the present disclosure such that nitrogen
is consumed to form nitrides acting as nuclei for forming graphite and does not remain
as a solid solution.
Calcium (Ca): 0.0001 to 0.050 wt%
[0037] Calcium forms a Ca-Al-based oxide in steel having the composition of the present
disclosure, and the Ca-Al-based oxide may act as a nucleus of graphitization to promote
graphitization and may also form a Ca-based emulsion to improve machinability. Stress
is concentrated during a cutting process at the interface between the Ca-based emulsion
and the matrix structure to form voids which grow and spread to form cracks, exhibiting
the effects of being cut and separated as chips in steel.
[0038] The effects are insufficient in the case where the Ca content is less than 0.0001
wt%, and coarse oxide-based non-metal inclusions are produced in a large quantity
in the case where the Ca content is greater than 0.050 wt%, thereby deteriorating
fatigue strength of mechanical parts. Therefore, the Ca content may be controlled
to a range of 0.0001 to 0.050 wt%.
Other components
[0039] The remaining component of the composition of the present disclosure is iron (Fe).
However, the composition may include unintended impurities inevitably incorporated
from raw materials or surrounding environments in normal manufacturing processes.
However, the graphite steel according to the present disclosure may not include phosphorus
(P) or oxygen (O). These impurities are not specifically mentioned in the present
disclosure, as they are known to any person skilled in the art.
[Microstructure]
[0040] The graphite steel according to the present disclosure has a microstructure in which
graphite grains are distributed in a ferrite matrix, has a graphitization rate of
95% or more, and includes a total of 5 wt% or less of MnS inclusions and pearlite.
[0041] The graphite steel according to an embodiment of the present disclosure may have
a graphitization rate of 98% or more, more preferably 99% or more, and most preferably
99.5% or more.
[0042] Meanwhile, the graphitization rate refers to a ratio of an amount of carbon existing
as a graphite state to an amount of carbon added to steel and is defined by Equation
1 below. A graphitization rate of 95% or more indicates that most carbon added to
the steel is consumed to form graphite (in which amounts of carbon as solid solutions
contained in ferrite and in fine carbides are extremely small and thus not considered)
and the graphite steel has a microstructure in which graphite grains are distributed
in a ferrite matrix in which undegraded pearlite does not exist.
Graphitization rate (%) = (1-amount of C in undergraded pearlite/amount of C in steel)
× 100
(Here, the graphitization rate is 100% in the case where there is no undegraded pearlite)
[0043] All of the descriptions given above with reference to the graphite steel may be applied
to a method for manufacturing a graphite steel to be described below. Although duplicate
descriptions may be omitted, the omitted descriptions may also be applied thereto
in the same manner.
[Method for Manufacturing Graphite Steel]
[0044] A method for manufacturing a graphite steel according to another embodiment of the
present disclosure includes: preparing a billet including, in percent by weight (wt%),
0.60 to 0.90% of carbon (C), 2.0 to 2.5% of silicon (Si), 0.7 to 1.3% of manganese
(Mn), 0.2 to 0.5% of sulfur (S), 0.01 to 0.05% of aluminum (Al), 0.005 to 0.02% of
titanium (Ti), 0.0030 to 0.0150% of nitrogen (N), 0.0001 to 0.05% of calcium (Ca),
and the balance of iron (Fe) and inevitable impurities; hot rolling the billet to
prepare a wire rod; and performing graphitizing heat treatment on the prepared wire
rod.
Rolling Process
[0045] In addition, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the hot rolling
may include hot rolling in a temperature range of 900 to 1150°C. Specifically, the
hot rolling may be performed by hot rolling after conducting heat treatment in a temperature
range of 900 to 1150°C for a certain period of time.
[0046] The rolling temperature of the wire rod may be controlled in the range of 900 to
1150°C because surface defects easily occur or a rolling load increases during hot
rolling at a temperature lower than 900°C making a rolling process difficult, and
austenite grain size (AGS) increases at a temperature higher than 1150°C so that graphitizing
heat treatment time increases after hot rolling the wire rod.
Graphitizing Heat Treatment Process
[0047] In addition, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the graphitizing
heat treatment may include heat treatment in a temperature range of 700 to 800°C for
5 hours or more, preferably, for 5 hours to 20 hours.
[0048] If the wire rod is heat-treated in a temperature range of 700 to 800°C for 5 hours
or more, the graphitization rate may be 95% or more. However, at a temperature lower
than 700°C, graphitizing heat treatment time increases to exceed 20 hours. At a temperature
higher than 800°C, not only graphitizing heat treatment time increases, but also austenite
is formed by reverse-transformation of pearlite and pearlite may be formed during
cooling. Thus, they are not desirable.
[0049] Hereinafter, the present disclosure will be described in more detail with reference
to the following examples.
[0050] These embodiments are provided to fully convey the scope of the disclosure to those
skilled in the art. The present disclosure may, however, be embodied in many different
forms and should not be construed as limited to the exemplary embodiments set forth
herein.
[Examples]
[0051] Billets having compositions shown Table 1 below were maintained at a heating temperature
of 1050°C for 90 minutes and rolled at a high speed to prepare wire rods having a
diameter of 19 mm. In this regard, graphitizing heat treatment times and graphitization
rates are shown in Table 2. In addition, graphitizing heat treatment was performed
by constantly applying "Al temperature - 50°C" as a graphitizing heat treatment temperature.
[0052] In Tables 1 and 2 below, Examples 1 to 11 show graphite steel wire rods satisfying
the composition range of alloying elements and manufacturing conditions of the present
disclosure, and Comparative Examples 1 to 7 show wire rods not satisfying the composition
range of alloying elements and/or manufacturing conditions of the present disclosure.
[Table 1]
Category |
Composition of alloying elements (wt%) |
C |
Si |
Mn |
S |
Al |
Ti |
N |
Ca |
Example 1 |
0.67 |
2.1 |
0.85 |
0.31 |
0.015 |
0.015 |
0.005 |
0.010 |
Example 2 |
0.85 |
2.15 |
0.96 |
0.24 |
0.023 |
0.017 |
0.008 |
0.020 |
Example 3 |
0.72 |
2.35 |
1.07 |
0.35 |
0.043 |
0.007 |
0.010 |
0.015 |
Example 4 |
0.68 |
2.18 |
1.16 |
0.45 |
0.035 |
0.009 |
0.009 |
0.030 |
Example 5 |
0.82 |
2.25 |
0.95 |
0.35 |
0.040 |
0.012 |
0.014 |
0.040 |
Example 6 |
0.62 |
2.48 |
0.80 |
0.25 |
0.042 |
0.006 |
0.012 |
0.045 |
Example 7 |
0.73 |
2.42 |
1.20 |
0.30 |
0.034 |
0.011 |
0.006 |
0.035 |
Example 8 |
0.78 |
2.32 |
1.25 |
0.43 |
0.019 |
0.016 |
0.008 |
0.030 |
Example 9 |
0.85 |
2.15 |
0.95 |
0.27 |
0.027 |
0.009 |
0.013 |
0.025 |
Example 10 |
0.75 |
2.26 |
1.15 |
0.26 |
0.030 |
0.018 |
0.007 |
0.015 |
Example 11 |
0.73 |
2.46 |
1.20 |
0.42 |
0.020 |
0.008 |
0.008 |
0.035 |
Comparative |
0.63 |
2.00 |
1.35 |
0.05 |
0.005 |
0.016 |
0.001 |
0.060 |
Example 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparative Example 2 |
0.68 |
2.20 |
1.41 |
0.13 |
0.006 |
0.020 |
0.002 |
0.065 |
Comparative Example 3 |
0.73 |
2.25 |
1.50 |
0.56 |
0.075 |
0.009 |
0.018 |
0.080 |
Comparative Example 4 |
0.95 |
2.15 |
0.40 |
0.11 |
0.060 |
0.018 |
0.020 |
0.070 |
Comparative Example 5 |
0.55 |
2.60 |
0.56 |
0.60 |
0.003 |
0.025 |
0.025 |
0.100 |
Comparative Example 6 |
0.80 |
2.75 |
0.65 |
0.15 |
0.065 |
0.030 |
0.021 |
0.085 |
Comparative Example 7 |
0.75 |
2.80 |
0.60 |
0.10 |
0.060 |
0.002 |
0.022 |
0.070 |
[Table 2]
Category |
Graphitizing Heat Treatment |
Machinability (%) |
Hour (hr) |
Graphitization rate (%) |
Example 1 |
6.0 |
99 |
100 |
Example 2 |
9.5 |
99 |
100 |
Example 3 |
11.0 |
100 |
100 |
Example 4 |
6.5 |
100 |
100 |
Example 5 |
13.5 |
100 |
100 |
Example 6 |
5.5 |
99.5 |
100 |
Example 7 |
16.5 |
100 |
100 |
Example 8 |
8.2 |
98.5 |
100 |
Example 9 |
18.5 |
100 |
100 |
Example 10 |
5.7 |
98 |
100 |
Example 11 |
12.5 |
99 |
100 |
Comparative Example 1 |
3.5 |
86 |
88 |
Comparative Example 2 |
2.0 |
85 |
80 |
Comparative Example 3 |
3.0 |
86 |
89 |
Comparative Example 4 |
4.5 |
84 |
92 |
Comparative Example 5 |
2.5 |
91 |
84 |
Comparative Example 6 |
3.0 |
92 |
93 |
Comparative Example 7 |
4.5 |
90 |
90 |
[0053] In Table 2, a (100%-graphitization rate) structure consists of MnS inclusions, pearlite,
and some common inclusions, and a graphitized structure consists of ferrite and graphite
grains.
[0054] In Table 2, machinability is a value based on machinability of common free-cutting
steels (100% refers to an equivalent level).
[0055] It may be confirmed that graphitization fraction and machinability may be achieved
under the conditions for manufacturing graphite free-cutting steel as shown in Table
2.
[0056] Hereinafter, Examples and Comparative Examples will be evaluated with reference to
Tables 1 and 2.
[0057] In Examples 1 to 11, it was confirmed that the graphitization rates were not less
than 98.5% and machinability was 100% of that of lead free-cutting steels because
the compositions of alloying elements and manufacturing conditions of the present
disclosure were satisfied.
[0058] On the contrary, according to Comparative Examples 1 to 7 in which Ca contents exceed
0.05 wt% in the compositions of alloying elements and graphitizing heat treatment
was maintained for less than 5 hours, it was confirmed that the graphitization rates
were not more than 92% and machinability was also not more than 95%.
[0059] Specifically, in the graphite steels according to Comparative Examples 1 and 2 including
greater than 1.3 wt% of Mn, less than 0.2 wt% of S, and greater than 0.05 wt% of Ca,
machinability was only 88% and 95% of that of lead free-cutting steels due to insufficient
formation of MnS inclusions and the graphitization rates were not more than 86% because
graphitizing heat treatment was maintained for 3.5 hours or less.
[0060] In addition, in the graphite steel of Comparative Example 3 including 1.50 wt% of
Mn, 0.56 wt% of S, and 0.08 wt% of Ca, machinability was only 89% of that of lead
free-cutting steel and the graphitization rate was only 86% because graphitizing heat
treatment was maintained for 3.0 hours.
[0061] In addition, in the graphite steel of Comparative Example 4 including 0.95 wt% of
C, 0.40 wt% of Mn, 0.011 wt% of S, and 0.07 wt% of Ca, machinability was only 92%
of that of lead free-cutting steels and the graphitization rate was only 84% because
graphitizing heat treatment was maintained for 4.5 hours.
[0062] In addition, in the graphite steel of Comparative Example 5 including 0.55 wt% of
C, 2.6 wt% of Si, 0.56 wt% of Mn, 0.60 wt% of S, 0.025 wt% of TI, and 0.1 wt% of Ca,
machinability was only 91% of that of lead free-cutting steels and the graphitization
rate was only 91% because graphitizing heat treatment was maintained for 2.5 hours.
[0063] In addition, in the graphite steel of Comparative Example 6 including 2.7 wt% of
Si, 0.65 wt% of Mn, 0.15 wt% of S, 0.03 wt% of Ti, and 0.085 wt% of Ca, machinability
was only 93% of that of lead free-cutting steels and the graphitization rate was only
92% because graphitizing heat treatment was maintained for 3.0 hours.
[0064] In addition, in the graphite steel of Comparative Example 7 including 2.8 wt% of
Si, 0.60 wt% of Mn, 0.10 wt% of S, 0.002 wt% of Ti, and 0.07 wt% of Ca, machinability
was only 90% of that of lead free-cutting steels and the graphitization rate was only
90% because graphitizing heat treatment was maintained for 4.5 hours.
[0065] While the present disclosure has been particularly described with reference to exemplary
embodiments, it should be understood by those of skilled in the art that various changes
in form and details may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the
present disclosure.
[Industrial Applicability]
[0066] According to the present disclosure, the graphite free-cutting steel according to
the present disclosure having excellent machinability may replace conventional free-cutting
steels and may be eco-friendly by replacing harmful substances such as Pb and Bi,
and therefore the present disclosure has industrial applicability.