[Technical Field]
[0001] The disclosure relates to a wire rod for cold forging and steel part and method of
manufacturing them, and more particularly, to a wire rod for cold forging and steel
part and method of manufacturing them, which improves delayed fracture resistance
by controlling the microstructure.
[Background Art]
[0002] Wire rods used for fastening bolts for vehicles and structures are required to have
high strength of the steel material to lighten the vehicles and miniaturize the structures.
To increase the strength of the steel material, metal strengthening mechanisms such
as cold working, grain refinement, martensite strengthening, precipitation hardening,
etc., are used. However, dislocations, grain boundaries, martensitic lath boundaries,
fine precipitate boundaries, etc., used for the strengthening mechanisms act as hydrogen
trap sites in the steel material and as causes for deterioration of delayed fracture.
Hence, delayed fracture in high-strength bolts with a tensile strength of at least
1 GPa deteriorates.
[0003] To solve this problem, the steel material for bolts of at least 1 GPa having the
traditional tempered martensitic structure has used Mo-added Cr-Mo alloy steel. However,
in order to respond to the need for cost reduction along with the development of bolt
manufacturing process technology, there have been efforts to replace the high-strength
steel of at least 1 GPa with boron-added steel. As a result, the boron-added steel
is used to realize cost reduction, and after the safety is confirmed, the boron-added
steel is being applied to some fastening bolts for vehicles.
[0004] However, when the boron-added steel is used at 1.1 GPa or higher, hydrogen delayed
cracking occurs (Ref.
N.Uno et al., Nippon Steel Technical Report No.97 (2008)). Accordingly, for high-strength steel of at least 1.1 GPa, MO-added standard steel
is applied, or MO- or V-added steel types that are proprietary to the respective steel
companies have been used. However, for cost competitiveness, there is a need to develop
a high-strength steel that omits expensive carbide elements such as Mo and V.
[Disclosure]
[Technical Problem]
[0005] To solve the aforementioned problem, the disclosure aims to provide a wire rod for
cold forging and steel part and method for manufacturing them, which enables cost
reduction and improves delayed fracture resistance by controlling the microstructure
through an alloy composition and manufacturing method.
[Solution to Problem]
[0006] According to an embodiment of the disclosure, a steel part with improved delayed
fracture resistance includes, in percent by weight (wt%), 0.18 to 0.25% of C, 0.30
to 0.50% of Si, 0.35 to 0.50% of Mn, more than 0 to 0.03% of P, more than 0 to 0.03%
of S, 0.45 to 0.60% of Cr, 0.015 to 0.03% of Ti, 0.001 to 0.004% of B, the remainder
having Fe and other unavoidable impurities, wherein autotempered martensite is at
least 90% in volume fraction.
[0007] In an embodiment of the disclosure, the steel part with improved delayed fracture
resistance may have carbides in prior austenite grains having an average thickness
of 15 nm or less.
[0008] In an embodiment of the disclosure, the steel part with improved delayed fracture
resistance may have at least 1200 MPa of tensile strength.
[0009] According to an embodiment of the disclosure, a method of manufacturing a steel part
with improved delayed fracture resistance includes preparing a steel material including,
in percent by weight (wt%), 0.18 to 0.25% of C, 0.30 to 0.50% of Si, 0.35 to 0.50%
of Mn, more than 0 to 0.03% of P, more than 0 to 0.03% of S, 0.45 to 0.60% of Cr,
0.015 to 0.03% of Ti, 0.001 to 0.004% of B, the remainder having Fe and other unavoidable
impurities; preparing a wire rod by finish-rolling the steel material; winding the
wire rod; drawing and then performing spheroidizing heat treatment on the wound wire
rod; shaping the spheroidized heat-treated wire rod into a part; and austenizing and
then quenching the part.
[0010] In an embodiment of the disclosure, in the method of manufacturing a steel part with
improved delayed fracture resistance, the finish-rolling may be performed at 880 to
980 °C and the winding may be performed at 830 to 930 °C.
[0011] In an embodiment of the disclosure, in the method of manufacturing a steel part with
improved delayed fracture resistance, the spheroidizing heat treatment may be performed
at a range of 745 to 765 °C of maximum temperature.
[0012] In an embodiment of the disclosure, in the method of manufacturing a steel part with
improved delayed fracture resistance, the austenizing may be performed at 870 to 940
°C.
[0013] In an embodiment of the disclosure, in the method of manufacturing a steel part with
improved delayed fracture resistance, the quenching may be performed with a refrigerant
of 10 to 80 °C.
[0014] According to an embodiment of the disclosure, a wire rod for cold forging includes,
in percent by weight (wt%), 0.18 to 0.25% of C, 0.30 to 0.50% of Si, 0.35 to 0.50%
of Mn, more than 0 to 0.03% of P, more than 0 to 0.03% of S, 0.45 to 0.60% of Cr,
0.015 to 0.03% of Ti, 0.001 to 0.004% of B, the remainder having Fe and other unavoidable
impurities, wherein a diameter of the wire rod is 5.5 to 20 mm.
[Advantageous Effects]
[0015] According to an embodiment of the disclosure, a wire rod for cold forging and steel
part and method for manufacturing them, which enables cost reduction and improves
delayed fracture resistance by controlling the microstructure through an alloy composition
and manufacturing method may be provided.
[Best Mode]
[0016] According to an embodiment of the disclosure, a steel part with improved delayed
fracture resistance includes, in percent by weight (wt%), 0.18 to 0.25% of C, 0.30
to 0.50% of Si, 0.35 to 0.50% of Mn, more than 0 to 0.03% of P, more than 0 to 0.03%
of S, 0.45 to 0.60% of Cr, 0.015 to 0.03% of Ti, 0.001 to 0.004% of B, the remainder
having Fe and other unavoidable impurities, wherein autotempered martensite is at
least 90% in volume fraction.
[Modes]
[0017] The following embodiments are provided as examples to convey the full spirit of the
disclosure to those of ordinary skill in the art to which the embodiments of the disclosure
belong. The disclosure is not limited to the embodiments but may be specified in any
other forms. In the drawings, unrelated part of the description is not shown to clarify
the disclosure, and the size of an element may be a little exaggerated to help understanding.
[0018] Throughout the specification, the term "include (or including)" or "comprise (or
comprising)" is inclusive or open-ended and does not exclude additional, unrecited
components, elements or method steps, unless otherwise stated.
[0019] It is to be understood that the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" include plural
references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
[0020] A reason for numerical limitation of the content of an alloy composition in an embodiment
of the disclosure will now be described. A unit of weight(wt)% will now be used unless
otherwise mentioned.
[0021] According to an embodiment of the disclosure, a steel part with improved delayed
fracture resistance includes, in percent by weight (wt%), 0.18 to 0.25% of C, 0.30
to 0.50% of Si, 0.35 to 0.50% of Mn, more than 0 to 0.03% of P, more than 0 to 0.03%
of S, 0.45 to 0.60% of Cr, 0.015 to 0.03% of Ti, 0.001 to 0.004% of B, the remainder
having Fe and other unavoidable impurities.
[0022] The content of C (carbon) may be 0.18 to 0.25%.
[0023] C is an element added to secure strength of the product. Considering this, at least
0.18% of C may be added. However, when the content of C is excessive, it may cause
delayed fracture due to the rise in strength. Considering this, the upper limit of
the content of C is limited to 0.25%.
[0024] The content of Si (silicon) may be 0.30 to 0.50%.
[0025] Si may be added for deoxidation of steel. Furthermore, Si is an element that is effective
in securing strength through solid solution strengthening. Considering this, Si may
be added in at least 0.30%. However, when the content of Si is excessive, impact characteristics
and formability may deteriorate. Considering this, the upper limit of the content
of Si may be limited to 0.50%. Preferably, the content of Si may be 0.31 to 0.48%.
[0026] The content of Mn (manganese) may be 0.35 to 0.50%.
[0027] Mn is an element that is very effective in enhancing hardenability and producing
a solid solution strengthening effect by forming a substitutional solid solution within
the matrix structure. When the content of Mn is low, it may not sufficiently combine
with S (sulfur) brought as an impurity in the steel, thereby causing casting cracks.
Considering this, at least 0.35% of Mn may be added. However, when the content of
Mn is excessive, it may form MnS, which may deteriorate delayed fracture resistance.
Considering this, the upper limit of the content of Mn may be limited to 0.50%. Preferably,
the content of Mn may be 0.36 to 0.49%.
[0028] The content of P (phosphorus) may be more than 0 to 0.03%.
[0029] P is segregated on the grain boundaries, reducing toughness, and acts as a cause
to reduce delayed fracture resistance. Hence, it may be managed as an impurity in
the disclosure. Considering this, the upper limit of the P content may be limited
to 0.03%, and is desirable to be as close as 0%.
[0030] The content of S (sulfur) may be more than 0 to 0.03%.
[0031] Like P, S is segregated on the grain boundaries, reducing toughness, and acts as
a cause to hinder hot rolling by forming low melding point sulfides. Hence, it may
be managed as an impurity in the disclosure. Considering this, the upper limit of
the S content may be limited to 0.03%, and is desirable to be as close as 0%.
[0032] The content of Cr (chrome) may be 0.45 to 0.60%.
[0033] Cr is an element that is very effective in enhancing hardenability and producing
a solid solution strengthening effect by forming a substitutional solid solution within
the matrix structure. Considering this, Cr may be added in at least 0.45%. However,
when the Cr content is excessive, the c/a ratio of corrosion pits increases due to
formation of a chromium oxide layer on the surface, so the delayed fracture resistance
may deteriorate due to the notch effect. Considering this, the upper limit of the
content of Cr may be limited to 0.60%. Preferably, the content of Cr may be 0.46 to
0.59%.
[0034] The content of Ti (titanium) may be 0.015 to 0.03%.
[0035] Ti is an effective element in preventing B (boron) from combining with N (nitrogen)
by combining with N brought into the steel into a titanium nitride. Considering this,
Ti may be added in at least 0.015%. However, when the content of Ti is excessive,
it may form coarse carbonitrides, which may deteriorate delayed fracture resistance.
Considering this, the upper limit of the content of Ti may be limited to 0.03%. Preferably,
the content of Ti may be 0.023 to 0.026%.
[0036] The content of B (boron) may be 0.001 to 0.004%.
[0037] B is an effective element in improving hardenability. Considering this, B may be
added in at least 0.001%. However, when the content of B is excessive, it may form
Fe
23(CB)
6 carbides, which may cause brittleness of the austenite grain boundaries and thus,
deteriorate delayed fracture resistance. Considering this, the upper limit of the
content of B may be limited to 0.004%. Preferably, the content of B may be 0.0018%
to 0.0023%.
[0038] The remaining ingredient is iron (Fe) in the disclosure. However, unintended impurities
may be inevitably mixed in from raw materials or surroundings in the normal manufacturing
process, so they may not be excluded. These impurities may be known to anyone skilled
in the ordinary manufacturing process, so not all of them are specifically mentioned
in this specification.
[0039] In an embodiment of the disclosure, a steel part with improved delayed fracture resistance
may have at least 90% of autotempered martensite in volume fraction.
[0040] When the autotempered martensite is less than 90%, it is difficult to secure sufficient
toughness, which may deteriorate delayed fracture resistance. Hence, in the disclosure,
the autotempered martensite may be controlled to be at least 90% through an alloy
composition and manufacturing process. Especially, the autotempered martensite structure
is characterized by being automatically tempered during quenching without an extra
tempering heat treatment process.
[0041] Furthermore, a steel part with improved delayed fracture resistance according to
an embodiment of the disclosure may be automatically tempered during quenching without
an extra tempering heat treatment process, so that the average thickness of carbides
in prior austenitic grains may be controlled to be 15 nm or less.
[0042] It is known that the surface direction of the carbides precipitated in a plate type
during autotempering has high coherency and is thus ineffective as a hydrogen trap
site, and that the plate type side surface has low coherency, acting as a non-diffusive
hydrogen trap site and thus improves hydrogen delayed fracture resistance.
[0043] Hence, when the average thickness of carbides in the prior austenite grains is thin,
the coherency of the carbide interface increases, making it difficult to improve hydrogen
delayed fracture resistance. On the other hand, when the average thickness of carbides
in the prior austenite grains is thick, the number of carbides decreases, making it
difficult to improve delayed fracture resistance. Hence, in the disclosure, the average
thickness of the carbides in prior austenite grains is controlled to be 15 nm or less
to improve the delayed fracture resistance.
[0044] In an embodiment of the disclosure, the steel part with improved delayed fracture
resistance may have a tensile strength of at least 1200 MPa by controlling an alloy
composition and manufacturing process.
[0045] Next, a method of manufacturing a steel part with improved delayed fracture resistance
according to another aspect of the disclosure will now be described.
[0046] In an embodiment of the disclosure, a method of manufacturing a steel part with improved
delayed fracture resistance includes preparing a steel material including, in percent
by weight (wt%), 0.18 to 0.25% of C, 0.30 to 0.50% of Si, 0.35 to 0.50% of Mn, more
than 0 to 0.03% of P, more than 0 to 0.03% of S, 0.45 to 0.60% of Cr, 0.005 to 0.03%
of Ti, 0.001 to 0.004% of B, the remainder having Fe and other unavoidable impurities;
preparing a wire rod by finish-rolling the steel material; winding the wire rod; drawing
and then performing spheroidizing heat treatment on the wound wire rod; shaping the
spheroidized heat-treated wire rod into a part; austenizing and then quenching the
part.
[0047] The reason of numerical limitations of ranges of ingredients of each alloy composition
is the same as described above, and each manufacturing step will now be described
in more detail.
[0048] After the steel material that satisfies the alloy composition is prepared first,
it may go through a series of finish-rolling, winding, spheroidizing heat treatment,
shaping, austenizing and quenching processes.
[0049] First, a wire rod may be prepared by finish-rolling the steel material at 880 to
980 °C, and the wire rod may be wound at 830 to 930 °C.
[0050] When the finish-rolling temperature or the winding temperature is low, the surface
layer is a quasi-two-phase station, so a surface ferrite decarburization layer may
be formed by phase transformation. Accordingly, when the finish-rolling temperature
or the winding temperature is low, the ferrite decarburization layer is formed on
the surface even during heat treatment of the steel part, deteriorating the delayed
fracture resistance. With consideration for this, the finish-rolling temperature may
be at least 880 °C or the winding temperature may be at least 830 °C.
[0051] On the other hand, when the finish-rolling temperature or the winding temperature
is high, the ferrite decarburization layer is formed on the surface as diffusion accelerates
the decarburization, thereby deteriorating the delayed fracture resistance. With consideration
for this, the finish-rolling temperature may be 980 °C or less, or the winding temperature
may be 930 °C or less.
[0052] Subsequently, the wound wire rod may be drawn to be fit for the purpose, and subjected
to spheroidizing heat treatment at a range of 745 to 765 °C of maximum temperature.
[0053] When the maximum temperature for the spheroidizing heat treatment is too low or too
high, the hardness of a material to be subject to the spheroidizing heat treatment
increases, which may cause cracks due to deterioration of formability when the steel
part is processed. Considering this, the maximum temperature at which to perform the
spheroidizing heat treatment may be 745 to 765 °C.
[0054] The spheroidized heat treated wire rod is shaped to be fit for the purpose into a
steel part, and the steel part may be austenized at 870 to 940 °C.
[0055] When the austenizing temperature is low, austenite reverse transformation does not
occur sufficiently, so the toughness may deteriorate because of unevenness of the
martensite structure after quenching. Considering this, the austenizing temperature
may be at least 870 °C. On the other hand, when the austenizing temperature is high,
the austenite grain size becomes coarse, which may deteriorate the delayed fracture
resistance. Considering this, the upper limit of the austenizing temperature may be
limited to 940 °C.
[0056] Subsequently, the austenized steel part may be quenched with a refrigerant of 10
to 80 °C.
[0057] When the temperature of the quenching refrigerant is low, fine quenching cracks are
formed due to heat deformation of the steel part, causing delayed destruction. Considering
this, the temperature of the quenching refrigerant may be at least 10 °C. On the other
hand, when the temperature of the quenching refrigerant is high, the autotempering
effect may increase, making it difficult to realize a targeted strength. Considering
this, the upper limit of the temperature of the quenching refrigerant may be limited
to 80 °C.
[0058] From the aforementioned process, a final microstructure of the steel part may realize
at least 90% of autotempered martensitic structure without a tempering process and
realize a structure in which carbides with an average thickness of 15 nm or less within
the prior austenite grains are precipitated. Accordingly, the delayed fracture resistance
may be improved by controlling the microstructure.
[0059] Next, a wire rod for cold forging according to another aspect of the disclosure will
now be described.
[0060] According to an embodiment of the disclosure, a wire rod for cold forging includes,
in percent by weight (wt%), 0.18 to 0.25% of C, 0.30 to 0.50% of Si, 0.35 to 0.50%
of Mn, more than 0 to 0.03% of P, more than 0 to 0.03% of S, 0.45 to 0.60% of Cr,
0.005 to 0.03% of Ti, 0.001 to 0.004% of B, the remainder having Fe and other unavoidable
impurities, wherein the wire rod has a diameter of 5.5 to 20 mm.
[0061] The reason of limiting the numerical values of each ingredient range of the alloy
composition is as described above, and the wire rod for cold forging according to
an embodiment of the disclosure may be manufactured to have a diameter of 5.5 to 20
mm. It is not, however, limited thereto, and may be manufactured to have various diameters
for the purposes.
[0062] Embodiments of the disclosure will now be described in more detail. The embodiments
may be merely for illustration, and the disclosure is not limited thereto. The scope
of the disclosure is defined by the claims and their equivalents.
[0064] With various alloy ingredient ranges shown in table 1 below, a steel material was
manufactured, a wire rod having a diameter of 15 mm is prepared by finish-rolling
the steel material at 910 °C and then wound at 880 °C into a coil form. The wound
wire rod may be subjected to spheroidizing heat treatment at a range having a maximum
temperature of 755 °C, shaped into bolts of a screw-M12 standard, austenized at 890
°C, and quenched with a refrigerant of 60 °C. The spheroidizing heat treatment temperature
refers to the highest heating temperature.
[Table 1]
section |
alloy ingredients |
C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Cr |
Ti |
B |
Embodiment 1 |
0.18 |
0.40 |
0.46 |
0.011 |
0.005 |
0.53 |
0.024 |
0.001 8 |
Embodiment 2 |
0.25 |
0.41 |
0.45 |
0.010 |
0.005 |
0.54 |
0.024 |
0.002 1 |
Embodiment 3 |
0.20 |
0.40 |
0.36 |
0.009 |
0.005 |
0.52 |
0.026 |
0.002 3 |
Embodiment 4 |
0.21 |
0.44 |
0.49 |
0.011 |
0.005 |
0.52 |
0.023 |
0.002 1 |
Embodiment 5 |
0.19 |
0.41 |
0.44 |
0.011 |
0.005 |
0.46 |
0.024 |
0.002 0 |
Embodiment 6 |
0.22 |
0.41 |
0.43 |
0.010 |
0.005 |
0.59 |
0.025 |
0.002 1 |
Embodiment 7 |
0.23 |
0.31 |
0.42 |
0.009 |
0.005 |
0.52 |
0.024 |
0.002 2 |
Embodiment 8 |
0.21 |
0.48 |
0.44 |
0.010 |
0.005 |
0.53 |
0.024 |
0.001 8 |
Comparative example 1 |
0.17 |
0.41 |
0.46 |
0.011 |
0.005 |
0.52 |
0.024 |
0.002 1 |
Comparative example 2 |
0.26 |
0.42 |
0.47 |
0.010 |
0.005 |
0.52 |
0.023 |
0.002 3 |
Comparative example 3 |
0.18 |
0.25 |
0.45 |
0.011 |
0.005 |
0.50 |
0.024 |
0.002 2 |
Comparative example 4 |
0.24 |
0.40 |
0.53 |
0.011 |
0.005 |
0.51 |
0.024 |
0.002 0 |
Comparative example 5 |
0.23 |
0.37 |
0.49 |
0.009 |
0.005 |
0.42 |
0.023 |
0.001 9 |
Comparative example 6 |
0.22 |
0.42 |
0.47 |
0.009 |
0.005 |
0.64 |
0.022 |
0.002 1 |
[0065] Table 2 below shows tensile strength, carbide thickness and crack presence from delayed
fracture performance evaluation of the manufactured bolt. The tensile strength was
measured by ZWICK Z250 tensile tester from Zwick/Roell. The tensile strength measurement
test was performed with a tensile specimen having a diameter of 10 mm and a gauge
diameter of 6.25 mm.
[0066] The carbide thickness measurement was performed with the FEI Tecnai OSIRIS transmission
electron microscopy (TEM). In this case, the carbide thickness was measured at 5 random
points on a replica specimen and expressed as the average thickness, and the minor
axis of the carbide formed in a plate type was defined and measured as the thickness.
[0067] The delayed fracture performance evaluation test was performed in a delayed fracture
simulation method by which the bolt is fastened to a structure with a clamping force
of yield strength and presence or absence of a crack on the screw thread, which is
a stress-concentrated area, is observed before/after the bolt fastened to the structure
is immersed in a 5% hydrochloric acid + 95% distilled solution for 10 minutes.
[0068] As a result of the delayed fracture performance evaluation, when there is a crack,
it is marked by 'O', or when there is no crack, it is marked by 'X'.
[Table 2]
section |
tensile strength (MPa) |
carbide thickness (mn) |
presence of crack |
Embodiment 1 |
|
1213 |
|
12 |
|
X |
Embodiment 2 |
|
1680 |
|
13 |
|
X |
Embodiment 3 |
|
1365 |
|
11 |
|
X |
Embodiment 4 |
|
1391 |
|
11 |
|
X |
Embodiment 5 |
|
1265 |
|
12 |
|
X |
Embodiment 6 |
|
1354 |
|
13 |
|
X |
Embodiment 7 |
|
1566 |
|
14 |
|
X |
Embodiment 8 |
|
1421 |
|
10 |
|
X |
Comparative example 1 |
|
1185 |
|
13 |
|
X |
Comparative example 2 |
|
1693 |
|
16 |
|
O |
Comparative example 3 |
|
1193 |
|
16 |
|
O |
Comparative example 4 |
|
1655 |
|
14 |
|
O |
Comparative example 5 |
|
1586 |
|
13 |
|
O |
Comparative example 6 |
|
1543 |
|
15 |
|
O |
[0069] Referring to table 2, embodiments 1 to 8 satisfied the alloy composition, ingredient
ranges and manufacturing processes proposed in the disclosure. Accordingly, embodiments
1 to 8 satisfied a tensile strength of at least 1200 MPa and a carbide thickness of
15 nm or less, and resulted in no cracks as a result of the delayed fracture performance
evaluation. On the other hand, comparative example 1 failed to satisfy the tensile
strength of 1200 MPa because the C content was low.
[0070] In comparative example 2, the carbide thickness exceeded 15 nm because of the high
C content, and cracks occurred as a result of the delayed fracture performance evaluation.
[0071] Comparative example 3 failed to satisfy the tensile strength of 1200 MPa because
the Si content was low.
[0072] Comparative example 4 had the high Mn content and formed coarse MnS, which caused
occurrence of cracks as a result of the delayed fracture performance evaluation.
[0073] In comparative example 5, the Cr content was low and a bainite mixed structure was
formed in the microstructure, resulting in occurrence of cracks as a result of the
delayed fracture performance evaluation.
[0074] Comparative example 6 had a high Cr content, forming sharp corrosion pits when corroded
by hydrochloric acid, and thus causing occurrence of cracks as a result of the delayed
fracture performance evaluation.
[0075] Next, a steel material was manufactured with the alloy ingredients of embodiment
5 in table 1, and manufactured into a bolt at finish-rolling temperature, winding
temperature, maximum temperature of spheroidizing heat treatment and austenizing temperature
as shown in table 3 below, and then presence or absence of cracks is marked in table
3 as a result of delayed fracture performance evaluation.
[Table 3]
section |
temperature (°C) |
presence of crack |
finish-rolling |
winding |
spheroidizing heat treatment |
austenizing |
Embodiment 5 |
910 |
880 |
755 |
890 |
X |
Comparative example 7 |
985 |
935 |
755 |
890 |
O |
Comparative example 8 |
865 |
825 |
755 |
890 |
O |
Comparative example 9 |
910 |
880 |
755 |
950 |
O |
Comparative example 10 |
910 |
880 |
755 |
860 |
O |
Comparative example 11 |
910 |
880 |
740 |
890 |
O |
Comparative example 12 |
910 |
880 |
770 |
890 |
O |
[0076] Comparative example 7 had high finish-rolling temperature and winding temperature,
which caused the prior austenite grain size to grow, resulting in occurrence of cracks
as a result of delayed fracture performance evaluation. Comparative example 8 had
low finish-rolling temperature and winding temperature, which caused formation of
ferrite decarburization layer on the wire rod, resulting in occurrence of cracks as
a result of delayed fracture performance evaluation.
[0077] Comparative example 9 had high austenizing temperature, which caused the prior austenite
grain size to grow, resulting in occurrence of cracks as a result of delayed fracture
performance evaluation.
[0078] Comparative example 10 had low austenizing temperature, making it enter into the
quasi-two-phase station, forming a ferrite decarburization layer during heating, and
resulting in occurrence of cracks as a result of delayed fracture performance evaluation.
[0079] Comparative examples 11 and 12 had low and high maximum temperatures for spheroidizing
heat treatment, respectively, so the spheroidizing heat treatment was not sufficiently
done, leading to deterioration of formability. Accordingly, comparative examples 11
and 12 had cracks formed during screw part shaping, resulting in occurrence of cracks
as a result of delayed fracture performance evaluation.
[Table 4]
|
austenizi ng temperat ure (°C) |
quenching oil temperature (°C) |
automartens ite fraction (%) |
carbide thickness (nm) |
delayed fracture crack presence |
Embodiment 5 |
910 |
60 |
95% |
12 |
X |
Comparative example 13 |
910 |
85 |
89% |
16 |
O |
Comparative example 14 |
910 |
95 |
86% |
18 |
O |
Comparative example 15 |
910 |
105 |
85% |
21 |
O |
Comparative example 16 |
910 |
115 |
85% |
22 |
O |
[0080] Comparative examples 13 to 16 used a steel material having the same alloy ingredients
and composition ranges as in embodiment 5, but as compared to embodiment 5, they had
an automartensite fraction and carbide thickness that did not satisfy the ranges of
the disclosure, which caused occurrence of cracks as a result of delayed fracture
performance evaluation.
[Industrial Applicability]
[0081] According to the disclosure, a wire rod for cold forging and steel part and method
for manufacturing them, which enables cost reduction and improves delayed fracture
resistance by controlling the microstructure through an alloy composition and manufacturing
method may be provided, so the industrial applicability is acknowledged.