Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to an austenitic stainless steel and a method for producing
the austenitic stainless steel.
Background Art
[0002] A metastable austenitic stainless steel typified by SUS301 is known as an austenitic
stainless steel which is put to uses where corrosion resistance and strength are required.
Such an austenitic stainless steel is used as a material for a spring product such
as a cylinder head gasket of an engine in an automobile or for a structural member
such as an in-vehicle battery frame member.
[0003] In general, high strength is imparted to such a stainless steel by increasing a rolling
reduction ratio in cold rolling or the like, and the load of working such as rolling
in the production process therefore tends to be increased. In order to reduce the
load, for example, Patent Literature 1 proposes, as a method for producing a spring
member having a martensite phase in which a precipitate consisting of a Cu-rich phase
is dispersed, a method of subjecting a steel sheet for a spring to an aging treatment
which steel sheet exhibits a multiphasic system with no Cu-rich phase precipitated
therein.
Citation List
[Patent Literature]
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0005] Precipitation of a Cu-rich phase is effective for increasing the strength of a stainless
steel. As such, according to the method disclosed in Patent Literature 1, by subjecting
the steel sheet for a spring to the aging treatment to thereby cause a Cu-rich phase
to be precipitated, it is possible to increase the strength of a spring member, which
is an end product, while reducing the load of working in the production process of
the steel sheet for a spring. However, due to the need of the aging treatment step,
the method has room for improvement in productivity of the spring member.
[0006] An object of an aspect of the present invention is to provide an austenitic stainless
steel which enables both a reduction in load of working during production and an increase
in strength of an end product and which can be produced with high productivity.
[0007] Further, the inventor of the present invention paid attention to the fact that, since
a temperature at which a Cu-rich phase is precipitated and a temperature at which
a Cr carbide is precipitated are relatively close to each other, it is preferable
to utilize N without excessively increasing the amount of C, in order to suppress
a reduction in corrosion resistance which is caused by precipitation of a Cr carbide.
Keeping the amount of C in the austenitic stainless steel to be relatively low is
preferable also in terms of achieving the object of reducing the load of working.
Solution to Problem
[0008] In order to attain the object, an austenitic stainless steel in accordance with an
aspect of the present invention is an austenitic stainless steel, containing not less
than 0.005% and not more than 0.03% of C, not less than 0.1% and not more than 2.0%
of Si, not less than 0.3% and not more than 2.5% of Mn, not more than 0.04% of P,
not more than 0.015% of S, not less than 3.0% and less than 6.0% of Ni, not less than
16.0% and not more than 18.5% of Cr, not less than 1.5% and not more than 4.0% of
Cu, and not less than 0.08% and not more than 0.25% of N, in percent by mass, and
the other part composed of Fe and an inevitable impurity, the austenitic stainless
steel including (i) not less than 20% by volume of an austenite phase, (ii) a Cu-rich
phase having a number density of not less than 1.0×10
3 µm
-3 and a long diameter of not more than 30 nm, and (iii) a remaining part composed of
a deformation-induced martensite phase and an inevitably formed phase, the austenitic
stainless steel having an Md
30 value of not less than 0.0 and not more than 80.0 as represented by expression (1)
below,
Md30 = 551 - 462(C + N) - 9.2Si - 8.1Mn - 29Ni - 10.6Cu - 13.7C r- 18.5Mo
wherein in expression (1) above, a content, in percent by mass, of each element contained
in the austenitic stainless steel is substituted into a corresponding element symbol,
and 0 is substituted into an element symbol of an element not added to the austenitic
stainless steel.
[0009] In order to attain the object, a method in accordance with an aspect of the present
invention for producing an austenitic stainless steel is a method for producing an
austenitic stainless steel, the austenitic stainless steel containing not less than
0.005% and not more than 0.03% of C, not less than 0.1% and not more than 2.0% of
Si, not less than 0.3% and not more than 2.5% of Mn, not more than 0.04% of P, not
more than 0.015% of S, not less than 3.0% and less than 6.0% of Ni, not less than
16.0% and not more than 18.5% of Cr, not less than 1.5% and not more than 4.0% of
Cu, and not less than 0.08% and not more than 0.25% of N, in percent by mass, and
the other part composed of Fe and an inevitable impurity, the austenitic stainless
steel having an Md
30 value of not less than 0.0 and not more than 80.0 as represented by expression (1)
below, the method including a finishing annealing step of carrying out finishing annealing
at a temperature of not lower than 750°C and not higher than 980°C, wherein in a case
where a peak temperature in the finishing annealing step is not lower than 850°C,
time during which heating is carried out at not lower than 850°C is not more than
30 seconds, and in the finishing annealing step, an average rate of cooling from 700°C
to 500°C after the finishing annealing is not less than 1°C/s,
Md30 = 551 - 462(C + N) - 9.2Si - 8.1Mn - 29Ni - 10.6Cu - 13.7Cr - 18.5Mo
wherein in expression (1) above, a content, in percent by mass, of each element contained
in the austenitic stainless steel is substituted into a corresponding element symbol,
and 0 is substituted into an element symbol of an element not added to the austenitic
stainless steel.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0010] According to an aspect of the present invention, it is possible to provide an austenitic
stainless steel which enables both a reduction in load of working during production
and an increase in strength of an end product and which can be produced with high
productivity.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0011]
Fig. 1 is a diagram illustrating an EBSD grain boundary map and a TEM-captured image
of an austenitic stainless steel in accordance with an embodiment.
Fig. 2 is a diagram illustrating a relationship between 0.2% proof stress (YS 18%)
and reference strength (HV 60%) of austenitic stainless steels in accordance with
examples and comparative examples.
Description of Embodiments
[0012] The following description will discuss in detail an austenitic stainless steel in
accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Note that the following description
is intended to make the gist of the present invention understood better, and does
not limit the present invention unless otherwise specified.
[Configuration of system]
[0013] The austenitic stainless steel in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
is a stainless steel including not less than 20% by volume of an austenite phase.
In the present specification, "austenitic stainless steel" hereinafter means the austenitic
stainless steel in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, unless
otherwise specified. The austenitic stainless steel can be, for example, a steel sheet
or a steel strip.
[0014] The austenitic stainless steel includes a deformation-induced martensite phase into
which a part of the austenite phase has been transformed due to a transformation induced
plasticity (TRIP) phenomenon. From the viewpoint of increasing strength, a proportion
of the deformation-induced martensite phase in the austenitic stainless steel is preferably
not less than 5% by volume, more preferably not less than 10% by volume, even more
preferably not less than 15% by volume, and most preferably not less than 20% by volume.
Further, the proportion of the deformation-induced martensite phase in the austenitic
stainless steel is preferably less than 80% by volume and more preferably not more
than 75% by volume. A proportion of the austenite phase included in the austenitic
stainless steel can be decreased in accordance with an increase in proportion of the
deformation-induced martensite phase, provided that the proportion of the austenite
phase is not less than 20% by volume.
[0015] The austenitic stainless steel further includes a Cu-rich phase. The "Cu-rich phase"
means a phase containing not less than 60 atomic percent of Cu (copper) and is, for
example, an ε-Cu phase. The austenitic stainless steel includes at least a Cu-rich
phase having a number density of not less than 1.0×10
3 µm
-3 and a long diameter of not more than 30 nm. The "long diameter" means a maximum diameter
among diameters of each of the particles of the Cu-rich phase which is precipitated
in particulate form. Note that the austenitic stainless steel can also include a Cu-rich
phase having a long diameter of more than 30 nm. The Cu-rich phase can be dispersed
in the austenite phase, can be dispersed in the deformation-induced martensite phase,
or can be dispersed in an inevitably formed phase (described later).
[0016] The Cu-rich phase can be identified by observing a system with use of a transmission
electron microscope (TEM). For example, a TEM sample including a given cross section
of the austenitic stainless steel is prepared, and a predetermined portion of the
cross section is observed with use of the TEM. This allows counting, in the predetermined
portion, the number of Cu-rich phase particles each having a cross section of not
more than 30 nm in long diameter. Further, by calculating a volume on the basis of
a thickness of the TEM sample used in the number counting and an area of the portion
in which the number was counted, it is possible to calculate a number density per
volume. The thickness of the TEM sample, for example, can be an actually measured
value of thickness of the TEM sample, or can be an estimation value of thickness estimated
on the basis of the method by which the TEM sample has been prepared. Examples of
the method of preparing the TEM sample include, but are not limited to, electrolytic
polishing.
[0017] The finer the precipitated Cu-rich phase and the greater the amount of the precipitated
Cu-rich phase, the higher the strength of the austenitic stainless steel. The Cu-rich
phase in the above-described size and amount is effective for increasing the strength
of the austenitic stainless steel. During the production of the austenitic stainless
steel, such as when cold rolling is carried out prior to finishing annealing, precipitation
of a Cu-rich phase is not caused. This keeps the strength low and thus reduces the
load of working. Then, precipitation of a Cu-rich phase is caused in the finishing
annealing step, so that the austenitic stainless steel which has been produced possesses
high strength. Production steps such as the finishing annealing step will be described
later.
[0018] The austenitic stainless steel can include an inevitably formed phase other than
the austenite phase, the deformation-induced martensite phase, and the Cu-rich phase.
The inevitably formed phase is not particularly limited, but examples of the inevitably
formed phase include a δ ferrite phase and a phase containing a carbide, a nitride,
and/or an oxide. Examples of the phase containing a carbide, a nitride, and/or an
oxide include a phase containing a carbide or nitride of Cr, Ti, and/or Nb and a phase
containing an oxide of Si, Ti, Al, Mg, and/or Ca.
[0019] The austenitic stainless steel has an average crystal grain size of preferably not
more than 10.0 pm. The finer the crystal grains of the austenitic stainless steel,
the higher the strength of the austenitic stainless steel. In general, increasing
the strength of an austenitic stainless steel causes a deterioration in ductility.
However, by causing the crystal grains to be finer, it is possible to achieve both
an increase in strength and an improvement in ductility of the austenitic stainless
steel.
[0020] The average crystal grain size can be measured by an electron back scattering diffraction
(EBSD) method. For example, with respect to a given cross section of the austenitic
stainless steel, a crystal grain size in each of a plurality of fields of view can
be calculated by the EBSD method, and an average value of the crystal grain sizes
thus calculated in the plurality of fields of view can be regarded as the average
crystal grain size. Further, the average crystal grain size can be measured by a method
other than the EBSD method. The method other than the EBSD method can be, for example,
a method as indicated in JIS G0551 in which grain boundaries are caused to appear
by nitric acid electrolysis and the average crystal grain size is measured using microtomy
or the like.
[Composition]
[0021] The austenitic stainless steel contains not less than 0.005% and not more than 0.03%
of C, not less than 0.1% and not more than 2.0% of Si, not less than 0.3% and less
than 2.5% of Mn, not more than 0.04% of P, not more than 0.015% of S, not less than
3.0% and less than 6.0% of Ni, not less than 16.0% and not more than 18.5% of Cr,
not less than 1.5% and not more than 3.8% of Cu, and not less than 0.08% and not more
than 0.25% of N, in percent by mass. The other part of the austenitic stainless steel
can be composed of Fe (iron) and an inevitable impurity. The following description
will discuss the significance of the amount of each element contained in the austenitic
stainless steel.
(C)
[0022] C (carbon) is an austenite former which facilitates formation of an austenite phase,
and is an element which has a high solid-solution strengthening effect and is also
effective for obtaining strength. The austenitic stainless steel contains not less
than 0.005% by mass and not more than 0.03% by mass of C. In a case where a C content
is not less than 0.005% by mass, not only a sufficient solid-solution strengthening
effect is exhibited but also an austenitic stainless steel having good strength can
be obtained.
[0023] Excessively adding C causes precipitation of a Cr carbide by annealing at a relatively
low temperature, and leads to deterioration in corrosion resistance of the austenitic
stainless steel, particularly at a welded part. For this reason, the C content is
not more than 0.03% by mass. In a case where the C content is not more than 0.03%
by mass, it is possible to obtain an austenitic stainless steel that has a good corrosion
resistance also at a welded part.
(Si)
[0024] Si (silicon) is an element which is effective as a deoxidizer and has a solid-solution
strengthening effect. The austenitic stainless steel contains not less than 0.1% by
mass and not more than 2.0% by mass of Si, and preferably contains not less than 0.2%
by mass and not more than 1.0% by mass of Si. In a case where a Si content is not
less than 0.1% by mass, the austenitic stainless steel effectively exhibits a deoxidation
effect and a solid-solution strengthening effect. It is more preferable that the Si
content be not less than 0.2% by mass.
[0025] Further, Si is a ferrite former which facilitates formation of a ferrite phase. A
δ ferrite phase can be a cause for occurrence of edge cracking or alligatoring in
hot rolling. From the viewpoint of reducing formation of a δ ferrite phase, a Si content
is not more than 2.0% by mass, and preferably not more than 1.0% by mass.
(Mn)
[0026] Mn (manganese) is an austenite former, and is also an element effective for maintaining
an austenite phase. Further, Mn is an element having an effect of promoting precipitation
of a Cu-rich phase. The austenitic stainless steel contains not less than 0.3% by
mass and not more than 2.5% by mass of Mn, and preferably contains not less than 0.5%
by mass and not more than 2.0% by mass of Mn. In a case where a Mn content is not
less than 0.3% by mass, it is easy to ensure the amount of a Cu-rich phase precipitated.
It is more preferable that the Mn content be not less than 0.5% by mass. Further,
excessively adding Mn causes deterioration in hot workability of the austenitic stainless
steel. As such, the Mn content is not more than 2.5% by mass, and preferably not more
than 2.0% by mass.
(P)
[0027] P (phosphorus) is an element which is mixed in as an inevitable impurity. The lower
a P content, the better. From the viewpoint of producibility, the austenitic stainless
steel can contain not more than 0.04% by mass of P. In a case where the P content
is not more than 0.04% by mass, it is possible to reduce an adverse effect of P on
material characteristics of the austenitic stainless steel such as ductility.
(S)
[0028] S (sulfur) is an element which is mixed in as an inevitable impurity. The lower a
S content, the better. From the viewpoint of producibility, the austenitic stainless
steel can contain not more than 0.015% by mass of S. In a case where the S content
is not more than 0.015% by mass, it is possible to reduce an adverse effect of S on
material characteristics of the austenitic stainless steel such as ductility.
(Ni)
[0029] Ni (nickel) is an austenite former, and is also an element effective for maintaining
an austenite phase. The austenitic stainless steel contains not less than 3.0% by
mass and less than 6.0% by mass of Ni, preferably contains not less than 3.5% by mass
and not more than 5.5% by mass of Ni, and more preferably contains not less than 4.0%
by mass and less than 5.0% by mass of Ni. In a case where a Ni content is not less
than 3.0% by mass, an austenite phase can be formed and maintained well. It is more
preferable that the Ni content be not less than 4.5% by mass.
[0030] However, Ni is an expensive element and, when added excessively, causes a reduction
in amount of a deformation-induced martensite phase formed, due to stabilization of
an austenite phase. As such, the Ni content is less than 6.0% by mass, preferably
not more than 5.5% by mass, and more preferably less than 5.0% by mass.
(Cr)
[0031] Cr (chromium) is an element effective for ensuring corrosion resistance of the austenitic
stainless steel. The austenitic stainless steel contains not less than 16.0% by mass
and not more than 18.5% by mass of Cr, and more preferably contains not less than
16.5% by mass and not more than 18.0% by mass of Cr. In a case where a Cr content
is not less than 16.0% by mass, the corrosion resistance of the austenitic stainless
steel can be ensured well. It is more preferable that the Cr content be not less than
16.5% by mass.
[0032] However, Cr is also a ferrite former as with Si. As such, excessively adding Cr causes
excessive formation of a δ ferrite phase. As such, the Cr content is not more than
18.5% by mass, and preferably not more than 18.0% by mass.
(Cu)
[0033] Cu is an austenite former, and is also an element effective for maintaining an austenite
phase. Further, Cu is effective for increasing the strength of an austenitic stainless
steel by precipitation of a Cu-rich phase. Cu is an element which also acts effectively
for causing crystal grains to be finer. This is considered to be because a Cu-rich
phase exhibits an effect of inhibiting growth of crystal grains. Further, Cu reduces
work hardening of an austenite phase in a solid solution state and therefore can reduce
the load of rolling in the production process of the austenitic stainless steel.
[0034] The austenitic stainless steel contains not less than 1.5% by mass and not more than
4.0% by mass of Cu, preferably contains not less than 2.0% by mass and not more than
3.5% by mass of Cu, and more preferably contains not less than 2.0% by mass and not
more than 3.5% by mass of Cu. In a case where a Cu content is not less than 1.5% by
mass, an austenite phase can be formed and maintained well and also a Cu-rich phase
can be precipitated well. The Cu content is more preferably not less than 2.0% by
mass, and even more preferably more than 2.0% by mass.
[0035] However, excessively adding Cu causes undesirable formation of a CuMn phase at the
center of slab during solidification of the slab. This deteriorates hot workability
of the slab. As such, the Cu content is not more than 4.0% by mass, and preferably
not more than 3.5% by mass.
(N)
[0036] N (nitrogen) is an austenite former and is also an element which has a solid-solution
strengthening effect and a corrosion resistance improving effect. Since the austenitic
stainless steel has a C content of not more than 0.03% by mass in order to ensure
the corrosion resistance at a welded part, the austenitic stainless steel has a N
content of not less than 0.08% by mass, preferably not less than 0.10% by mass, more
preferably not less than 0.11% by mass, and even more preferably not less than 0.12%
by mass. A N content within any of the above ranges is effective for ensuring the
strength and the corrosion resistance which the austenitic stainless steel is required
to have.
[0037] In a case where N is excessively added, the load of rolling of the austenitic stainless
steel is increased. As such, the N content is not more than 0.25% by mass, and is
preferably not more than 0.20% by mass.
(Other elements)
[0038] The austenitic stainless steel can further contain, in addition to the elements described
above, at least one selected from the group consisting of: not more than 1.0% of Mo;
not more than 1.0% of W; not more than 0.5% of V; not less than 0.0001% and not more
than 0.01% of B; not more than 0.8% of Co; not more than 0.1% of Sn; not more than
0.03% of Ca; not more than 0.03% of Mg; not more than 0.5% of Ti; not more than 0.5%
of Nb; not more than 0.3% of Al; not more than 0.5% of Sb; not more than 0.5% of Zr;
not more than 0.03% of Ta; not more than 0.03% of Hf; and not more than 0.2% of a
rare earth metal (REM), in percent by mass.
(Mo, W, and V)
[0039] Mo (molybdenum), W (tungsten), and V (vanadium) are elements effective for improving
corrosion resistance. However, Mo, W, and V are ferrite formers and also expensive
elements. As such, it is not preferable to add Mo, W, and V excessively. As such,
the austenitic stainless steel preferably contains at least one selected from the
group consisting of: not more than 1.0% by mass of Mo; not more than 1.0% by mass
of W; and not more than 0.5% by mass of V.
(B)
[0040] B (boron) is an element which improves hot workability and is effective for reducing
occurrence of edge cracking and alligatoring in hot rolling. The austenitic stainless
steel preferably contains not less than 0.0001% by mass and not more than 0.01% by
mass of B. A B content of not less than 0.0001% by mass is effective for improving
hot workability and reducing occurrence of edge cracking and alligatoring in hot rolling.
However, excessively adding B to the austenitic stainless steel containing Cr causes
deterioration in corrosion resistance due to precipitation of CraB. As such, the B
content is preferably not more than 0.01% by mass.
(Co)
[0041] Co (cobalt) is an element effective for ensuring corrosion resistance of the austenitic
stainless steel. Co also contributes to reducing coarsening of the Cu-rich phase to
thereby maintain the fineness of the Cu-rich phase. In order to obtain these effects,
it is preferable that Co be contained in an amount of preferably not less than 0.10%
by mass. However, Co is an expensive element. From the viewpoint of reducing costs,
a Co content is preferably not more than 0.8% by mass.
(Sn)
[0042] Sn (tin) is an element effective for ensuring corrosion resistance of the austenitic
stainless steel. Further, excessively adding Sn causes deterioration in hot workability
of the austenitic stainless steel. As such, a Sn content is preferably not more than
0.1% by mass.
(Al, Ca, Mg, and Ti)
[0043] Al (aluminum), Ca (calcium), Mg (magnesium), and Ti (titanium) are elements each
having a deoxidation effect. The austenitic stainless steel preferably contains, as
a deoxidizer, at least one selected from the group consisting of: not more than 0.3%
by mass of Al; not more than 0.03% by mass of Ca; not more than 0.03% by mass of Mg;
and not more than 0.5% by mass of Ti.
(Nb)
[0044] Nb (niobium) is an element effective for reducing sensitization of the austenitic
stainless steel. Nb is also effective for making the system finer and more uniform.
The austenitic stainless steel preferably contains not more than 0.5% by mass of Nb.
(Sb, Zr, Ta, Hf, and REM)
[0045] Sb (antimony), Zr (zirconium), Ta (tantalum), Hf (hafnium), and REM (rare earth metal)
are each an element which improves hot workability and is also effective for oxidation
resistance. The austenitic stainless steel preferably contains at least one selected
from the group consisting of: not more than 0.5% by mass of Sb; not more than 0.5%
by mass of Zr; not more than 0.03% by mass of Ta; not more than 0.03% by mass of Hf;
and not more than 0.2% by mass of REM.
[Md30 value]
[0046] The austenitic stainless steel has an Md
30 value, as represented by expression (1) below, of not less than 0.0 and not more
than 80.0, and preferably not less than 20.0 and not more than 70.0.
Md30 = 551 - 462(C + N) - 9.2Si - 8.1Mn - 29Ni - 10.6Cu - 13.7Cr - 18.5Mo
wherein in expression (1), a content (percent by mass) of each element contained
in the austenitic stainless steel is substituted into a corresponding element symbol,
and 0 is substituted into an element symbol of an element not added to the austenitic
stainless steel.
[0047] An Md
30 value of an austenitic stainless steel represents a temperature (°C) at which 50%
of a system of a monophasic austenitic stainless steel having only an austenite phase
is transformed into a martensite phase when a 30% tensile strain is given to the austenitic
stainless steel. As such, an Md
30 value can be used as an index of stability of an austenite phase. Further, an Md
30 value can be used also as an index that affects a likelihood of occurrence of a TRIP
phenomenon in the austenitic stainless steel.
[0048] The austenitic stainless steel in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
has an Md
30 value of preferably not less than 0.0 and not more than 80.0. The higher the Md
30 value, the more likely for an austenite phase to be transformed into a deformation-induced
martensite phase, so that giving a light degree of cold rolling strain enables obtaining
high strength and excellent ductility is ensured. Further, also in a case where the
austenitic stainless steel is subjected to molding, a portion to which processing
strain is given, such as a bent part, tends to have an even higher strength due to
a TRIP phenomenon.
[0049] Further, in a production process of the austenitic stainless steel, in order to obtain
fine crystal grains by finishing annealing, the presence of a deformation-induced
martensite phase in a rolled material before the finishing annealing acts effectively.
Such an effect is prominently exhibited in a case where the Md
30 value is not less than 0.0. Further, in a case where the Md
30 value is more than 80.0, a TRIP phenomenon tends to occur excessively, and the characteristics
of the austenitic stainless steel tends not to be stable.
[0050] As such, in a case where the Md
30 value, which serves as an index of stability of an austenite phase, is not less than
0.0 and not more than 80.0, it is possible to stably produce the austenitic stainless
steel having a high strength and a good ductility.
[0051] Note that, in conventionally known component regression expressions of Md
30, it is common that the same value is used as a coefficient of Ni and a coefficient
of Cu. In contrast, in an embodiment of the present invention, a coefficient of Cu
is set lower than a coefficient of Ni in a component regression expression of Md
30. Many of the component regression expressions of Md
30 according to the conventional knowledge are based on results obtained from an austenitic
stainless steel that is not an austenitic stainless steel with reduced amount of Ni.
In contrast, in a component in which the amount of Ni is not reduced as in the present
invention, the effect of Cu on stabilization of the austenite phase is clearly less
prominent in comparison with the conventional knowledge. This is a novel finding obtained
as a result of diligent study by the inventors of the present invention, and the coefficient
of Cu in the component regression expression of Md
30 has been set on the basis of the finding. This makes it easy to adjust the content
of Cu and to increase a degree of freedom in production of the austenitic stainless
steel.
[Production method]
[0052] A method for producing an austenitic stainless steel in accordance with an embodiment
of the present invention is a method in which the austenitic stainless steel contains
not less than 0.005% and not more than 0.03% of C, not less than 0.1% and not more
than 2.0% of Si, not less than 0.3% and not more than 2.5% of Mn, not more than 0.04%
of P, not more than 0.015% of S, not less than 3.0% and less than 6.0% of Ni, not
less than 16.0% and not more than 18.5% of Cr, not less than 1.5% and not more than
4.0% of Cu, and not less than 0.08% and not more than 0.25% of N, in percent by mass,
and the other part composed of Fe and an inevitable impurity, the austenitic stainless
steel having an Md
30 value of not less than 0.0 and not more than 80.0 as represented by expression (1)
above. Further, the method for producing an austenitic stainless steel includes a
finishing annealing step.
[0053] The method for producing an austenitic stainless steel can include processes for
producing a general austenitic stainless steel, except in the finishing annealing
step. The following description will discuss an example of the method for producing
an austenitic stainless steel in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention,
but the present invention is not limited to such an example.
[0054] In the method for producing an austenitic stainless steel in accordance with an embodiment
of the present invention, for example, slab is produced by carrying out continuous
casting of molten steel containing adjusted components. Then, the slab produced by
the continuous casting is heated to a temperature of not lower than 1100°C and not
higher than 1300°C, and then is subjected to hot rolling to produce a hot-rolled steel
strip. The speed of precipitation of a Cu-rich phase from an austenite phase having
little strain after the hot rolling is slow. As such, conditions of a finishing temperature
and a winding temperature of the hot-rolled steel strip after the hot rolling can
be similar to those of general methods for producing au austenitic stainless steel.
From the viewpoint of minimizing precipitation of a Cu-rich phase until finishing
annealing, the winding temperature at which the hot-rolled steel strip is wound up
after the hot rolling is preferably not higher than 850°C, more preferably not higher
than 650°C.
[0055] The hot-rolled steel strip which has been subjected to the hot rolling can be subjected
to pickling. Note that annealing can be carried out before the pickling of the hot-rolled
steel strip, or the pickling can be carried out without annealing. In a case where
the hot-rolled steel strip is subjected to annealing before pickling, an annealing
temperature is preferably within a range of not lower than 900°C and not higher than
1150°C. In order to bring Cu completely into a solid solution state, the annealing
temperature is more preferably in a range of not lower than 980°C and not higher than
1150°C. The annealing temperature, however, is not limited to these ranges. The hot-rolled
steel strip after the pickling is subjected to cold rolling until the hot-rolled steel
strip has a predetermined thickness. Thus obtained is a cold-rolled steel strip.
[0056] In the method for producing an austenitic stainless steel, recrystallization and
precipitation of a Cu-rich phase progress simultaneously in the finishing annealing
step after the cold rolling step. A Cu-rich phase is precipitated particularly easily
from a deformation-induced martensite phase. As such, the cold rolling step is carried
out preferably at a rolling reduction ratio and a rolling temperature at which a proportion
of a deformation-induced martensite phase in the cold-rolled steel strip is not less
than 20% by volume of the entire volume of the cold-rolled steel strip. Carrying out
the cold rolling step in this manner enables a Cu-rich phase to be effectively precipitated
in the steel strip in the subsequent finishing annealing step.
[0057] Note that the austenitic stainless steel has an Md
30 value adjusted to not less than 0.0 and not more than 80.0. In the austenitic stainless
steel having such an Md
30 value, a Cu-rich phase in an amount specified in an embodiment of the present invention
is precipitated regardless of an amount of a deformation-induced martensite phase
in the cold-rolled steel strip. However, it is even more effective for precipitation
of a Cu-rich phase to, as necessary, for example, increase the rolling reduction ratio
in the cold rolling step or control the temperature in the cold rolling step to be
low.
[0058] From the viewpoint of causing the cold-rolled steel strip to include a deformation-induced
martensite phase in a proportion of not less than 20% by volume, for example, the
rolling reduction ratio in the cold rolling step is preferably not less than 40%,
more preferably not less than 50%, and even more preferably not less than 60%. Further,
the temperature in the cold rolling step is preferably not higher than 90°C and more
preferably not higher than 60°C.
(Finishing annealing step)
[0059] The cold-rolled steel strip is subjected to finishing annealing. The finishing annealing
step is carried out under conditions that cause precipitation of a Cu-rich phase to
proceed. A Cu-rich phase is effective for increasing the strength of the austenitic
stainless steel. As such, the hot-rolled steel strip and the cold-rolled steel strip
before precipitation of a Cu-rich phase are each relatively low in strength, and the
load of rolling in the cold rolling step can therefore be reduced. Then, a Cu-rich
phase is precipitated in the finishing annealing step, so that the austenitic stainless
steel after the finishing annealing step is able to have high strength.
[0060] Further, the precipitation of a Cu-rich phase is effective for causing recrystallized
grains of an austenite phase to be finer. As such, utilizing the precipitation of
a Cu-rich phase makes it possible to control an average crystal grain size to be not
more than 10.0 pm.
[0061] Thus, according to the method in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
for producing an austenitic stainless steel, both a reduction in load of working during
production and an increase in strength of an end product can be achieved to significant
degrees. Further, since an additional step conventionally required, i.e., an aging
treatment step, is not required in the precipitation of a Cu-rich phase, the austenitic
stainless steel can be produced with good productivity.
[0062] The temperature of finishing annealing in the finishing annealing step is not lower
than 750°C and not higher than 980°C, and preferably not lower than 800°C and not
higher than 925°C, in order for a Cu-rich phase to be effectively precipitated in
the austenitic stainless steel. In a case where the temperature of the finishing annealing
is lower than 750°C, the system is insufficiently recrystallized. In a case where
the temperature of the finishing annealing is higher than 980°C, the Cu-rich phase
is dissolved, so that the amount of a Cu-rich phase remaining after the finishing
annealing is insufficient.
[0063] Further, a Cu-rich phase precipitated from a deformation-induced martensite phase
is dissolved particularly easily in an austenite phase when the Cu-rich phase is maintained
at a temperature not lower than 850°C for a long time in the finishing annealing.
As such, in a case where a peak temperature in the finishing annealing step is not
lower than 850°C, it is preferable that time during which heating is carried out at
not lower than 850°C be short. Specifically, in a case where a peak temperature in
the finishing annealing step is not lower than 850°C, time during which heating is
carried out at not lower than 850°C is not more than 30 seconds, and preferably not
more than 15 seconds. In a case where there are a plurality of times during each of
which the temperature in the finishing annealing step is not lower than 850°C, the
"time during which heating is carried out at not lower than 850°C" means a total of
the respective lengths of those times.
[0064] Since the austenitic stainless steel has a C content of not more than 0.03% by mass,
precipitation of a Cr carbide during cooling is less likely to occur. As such, a rate
of cooling after the finishing annealing can be similar to those of general methods
for producing a stainless steel. From the viewpoint of productivity, the rate of cooling
is preferably high. However, for example, an average rate of cooling from 700°C to
500°C can be a relatively low rate of not less than 1°C/s, and preferably not less
than 5°C/s in consideration of productivity. Further, in consideration of flatness
of the steel sheet, the rate of cooling is preferably less than 75°C/s, more preferably
not more than 50°C/s.
[0065] Note that, as necessary, process annealing and intermediate rolling can be carried
out in the cold rolling step. The steel strip after the finishing annealing can be
subjected to temper rolling, as necessary, in order to further increase the strength.
The temperature of the process annealing is preferably not lower than 980°C and not
higher than 1150°C in order to avoid precipitation of a Cu-rich phase, in a case where
a reduction in load of rolling has priority. In terms of obtaining high strength by
repeating a precipitation process, the conditions of the temperature of the process
annealing are preferably the same as those of the finishing annealing. Note that the
temperature of the process annealing is not limited to the above-described ranges.
[Evaluation of strength]
[0066] The austenitic stainless steel in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
is an austenitic stainless steel whose strength is kept relatively low in the production
process to achieve a reduction in load of rolling and which possesses high strength
after being produced. This characteristic of the austenitic stainless steel can be
represented, for example, by a relationship between 0.2% proof stress (YS 18%, MPa)
and reference strength (HV 60%).
[0067] 0.2% proof stress (YS 18%) is an index of strength of the austenitic stainless steel.
0.2% proof stress (YS 18%) indicates 0.2% proof stress exhibited by the austenitic
stainless steel in a case where the austenitic stainless steel has been subjected
to finishing annealing and then to temper rolling causing an elongation of 18%. 0.2%
proof stress can be evaluated using a method in conformity with JIS Z2241.
[0068] Reference strength (HV 60%) is an index hypothetically indicating strength of the
austenitic stainless steel before precipitation of a Cu-rich phase is caused in the
finishing annealing step. Reference strength (HV 60%) indicates Vickers hardness exhibited
by an austenitic stainless steel which has the same composition but has been produced
by a method partially changed from the production method in accordance with an embodiment
of the present invention such that: annealing is carried out at 1050°C after the hot
rolling; and cold rolling is carried out at a rolling reduction ratio of 60%. That
is, reference strength (HV 60%) does not have to indicate strength of the austenitic
stainless steel in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, but can
be, for example, strength of a steel strip prepared for evaluation. Vickers hardness
can be measured by a Vickers hardness test method in conformity with JIS Z2244.
[0069] The inventors of the present invention have found that an austenitic stainless steel
which enables both a reduction in load of working during production and an increase
in strength of an end product exhibits 0.2% proof stress (YS 18%) and reference strength
(HV 60%) which are in a relationship satisfying expression (2) below.

[0070] According to the method in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention,
it is possible to produce an austenitic stainless steel that satisfies expression
(2) above and enables both a reduction in load of working during production and an
increase in strength of an end product.
[Uses for which austenitic stainless steel is suitable]
[0071] The austenitic stainless steel has extremely high strength and corrosion resistance.
As such, the austenitic stainless steel is suitable for use as a material for a spring
product that is required to have high strength and corrosion resistance, such as a
cylinder head gasket, a flat spiral spring, a spring for an electronic device component,
a member for a train carriage, an in-vehicle battery frame member, a structural member,
and a metal gasket. In particular, also in a case where the austenitic stainless steel
is welded, the austenitic stainless steel is excellent in corrosion resistance at
a welded part (weldability). As such, the austenitic stainless steel in accordance
with an embodiment of the present invention is suitably applicable even to uses in
which the number of welded structures is relatively large, such as a member for a
train carriage or an in-vehicle battery frame member produced to be used by being
welded.
[0072] Aspects of the present invention can also be expressed as follows:
An austenitic stainless steel in accordance with Aspect 1 of the present invention
is an austenitic stainless steel, containing not less than 0.005% and not more than
0.03% of C, not less than 0.1% and not more than 2.0% of Si, not less than 0.3% and
not more than 2.5% of Mn, not more than 0.04% of P, not more than 0.015% of S, not
less than 3.0% and less than 6.0% of Ni, not less than 16.0% and not more than 18.5%
of Cr, not less than 1.5% and not more than 4.0% of Cu, and not less than 0.08% and
not more than 0.25% of N, in percent by mass, and the other part composed of Fe and
an inevitable impurity, the austenitic stainless steel including (i) not less than
20% by volume of an austenite phase, (ii) a Cu-rich phase having a number density
of not less than 1.0×10
3 µm
-3 and a long diameter of not more than 30 nm, and (iii) a remaining part composed of
a deformation-induced martensite phase and an inevitably formed phase, the austenitic
stainless steel having an Md
30 value of not less than 0.0 and not more than 80.0 as represented by expression (1)
below,
Md30 = 551 - 462(C + N) - 9.2Si - 8.1Mn - 29Ni - 10.6Cu - 13.7Cr - 18.5Mo
wherein in expression (1) above, a content, in percent by mass, of each element contained
in the austenitic stainless steel is substituted into a corresponding element symbol,
and 0 is substituted into an element symbol of an element not added to the austenitic
stainless steel.
[0073] In Aspect 2 of the present invention, the austenitic stainless steel in accordance
with Aspect 1 can be configured such that the austenitic stainless steel further contains
at least one selected from the group consisting of: not more than 1.0% of Mo; not
more than 1.0% of W; not more than 0.5% of V; not less than 0.0001% and not more than
0.01% of B; not more than 0.8% of Co; not more than 0.1% of Sn; not more than 0.03%
of Ca; not more than 0.03% of Mg; not more than 0.5% of Ti; not more than 0.5% of
Nb; not more than 0.3% of Al; not more than 0.5% of Sb; not more than 0.5% of Zr;
not more than 0.03% of Ta; not more than 0.03% of Hf; and not more than 0.2% of a
rare earth metal, REM, in percent by mass.
[0074] In Aspect 3 of the present invention, the austenitic stainless steel in accordance
with Aspect 1 or 2 can be configured such that the austenitic stainless steel has
an average crystal grain size of not more than 10.0 pm.
[0075] A method in accordance with Aspect 4 of the present invention for producing an austenitic
stainless steel is a method for producing an austenitic stainless steel, the austenitic
stainless steel containing not less than 0.005% and not more than 0.03% of C, not
less than 0.1% and not more than 2.0% of Si, not less than 0.3% and not more than
2.5% of Mn, not more than 0.04% of P, not more than 0.015% of S, not less than 3.0%
and less than 6.0% of Ni, not less than 16.0% and not more than 18.5% of Cr, not less
than 1.5% and not more than 4.0% of Cu, and not less than 0.08% and not more than
0.25% of N, in percent by mass, and the other part composed of Fe and an inevitable
impurity, the austenitic stainless steel having an Md
30 value of not less than 0.0 and not more than 80.0 as represented by expression (1)
below, the method including a finishing annealing step of carrying out finishing annealing
at a temperature of not lower than 750°C and not higher than 980°C, wherein in a case
where a peak temperature in the finishing annealing step is not lower than 850°C,
time during which heating is carried out at not lower than 850°C is not more than
30 seconds, and in the finishing annealing step, an average rate of cooling from 700°C
to 500°C after the finishing annealing is not less than 1°C/s,
Md30 = 551 - 462(C + N) - 9.2Si - 8.1Mn - 29Ni - 10.6Cu - 13.7Cr - 18.5Mo
wherein in expression (1) above, a content, in percent by mass, of each element contained
in the austenitic stainless steel is substituted into a corresponding element symbol,
and 0 is substituted into an element symbol of an element not added to the austenitic
stainless steel.
[0076] The present invention is not limited to the embodiments, but can be altered by a
skilled person in the art within the scope of the claims. The present invention also
encompasses, in its technical scope, any embodiment derived by combining technical
means disclosed in differing embodiments.
Examples
[0077] The following description will discuss results of evaluation of austenitic stainless
steels in accordance with inventive examples of the present invention and austenitic
stainless steels in accordance with comparative examples.
[Evaluation conditions]
<Composition>
[0078] Table 1 below shows compositions (in percent by mass) and Md
30 values of austenitic stainless steels in accordance with examples of the present
invention (Inventive Steels A1 to A15) and austenitic stainless steels in accordance
with comparative examples (Comparative Steels B1 to B5). The Md
30 values were calculated by expression (1) above. Note that underlined values in Table
1 below are each a value that falls outside a range specified in the present invention.
The same is true of Table 2 below.

<Production method>
[0079] The austenitic stainless steels in accordance with the examples of the present invention
and the austenitic stainless steels in accordance with the comparative examples were
produced by methods described below. Each of the austenitic stainless steels having
the compositions indicated in Table 1 was dissolved and was subjected to processes
from hot rolling to finishing annealing in accordance with a production method in
accordance with an embodiment of the present invention (Inventive Examples C1 to C8)
or a production method in accordance with a comparative example (Comparative Examples
D1 and D2) to obtain a cold-rolled annealed material. Conditions of each production
method are indicated in Table 2.
[Table 2]
|
|
Thickness after hot rolling (mm) |
Annealing after hot rolling |
Thickness after cold rolling (mm) |
Temperature of finishing anne aling |
Time during which temperature is not lower than 850°C |
Inventive Example |
C1 |
5 |
NA |
1.5 |
890°C |
5s |
Inventive Example |
C2 |
5 |
1050°C |
1.5 |
870°C |
3s |
Inventive Example |
C3 |
4 |
1100°C |
1.2 |
850°C |
1 s |
Inventive Example |
C4 |
3.5 |
NA |
1 |
830°C |
- |
Inventive Example |
C5 |
3.5 |
1050°C |
1.5 |
870°C |
3s |
Inventive Example |
C6 |
3 |
1000°C |
1 |
860°C |
3s |
Inventive Example |
C7 |
4 |
NA |
1.2 |
910°C |
10 s |
Inventive Example |
C8 |
3.5 |
1120°C |
1 |
930°C |
20 s |
Comparative Example |
D1 |
3 |
1050°C |
1 |
990°C |
40 s |
Comparative Example |
D2 |
4 |
1080°C |
1.2 |
900°C |
65 s |
[0080] In the finishing annealing step, in a case where the finishing annealing temperature
was not lower than 850°C, time during which the finishing annealing temperature was
not lower than 850°C was adjusted as indicated in Table 2. Note that in Inventive
Example C3, heating was adjusted such that the temperature of the finishing annealing
would start to decrease at a point in time when the temperature reached 850°C, but
in Table 2, time during which the temperature was not lower than 850°C is indicated
as "1 s" for convenience.
<Evaluation method>
[0081] The austenitic stainless steels in accordance with the examples of the present invention
and the austenitic stainless steels in accordance with the comparative examples were
evaluated as follows with respect to various indices.
(Number density of Cu-rich phase)
[0082] From a cold-rolled annealed material produced under each set of conditions, a TEM
sample was prepared by electrolytic polishing. On a surface of the TEM sample which
surface was parallel to a rolling direction of the cold-rolled annealed material,
three fields of view each in a size of 400 nm×400 nm were observed. On the basis of
contrasts in a TEM image, a Cu-rich phase was identified and the number of Cu-rich
phase particles were counted. Assuming that the TEM sample had a thickness of 150
nm, a number density per unit volume was determined. When a Cu-rich phase was coarse,
the Cu-rich phase was observed in clear shapes instead of contrasts. Cu-rich phase
particles each having a long diameter of more than 30 nm were excluded from the counting.
(Crystal grain size)
[0083] An average crystal grain size was evaluated by the EBSD method. A cross section of
the cold-rolled annealed material produced under each set of conditions which cross
section was parallel to the rolling direction and perpendicular to the rolled surface
was subjected to mechanical polishing and then to electrolytic polishing. Then, in
a field of view with a magnification of 2000 times, a 40 µm×40 pm portion in the cross
section was subjected to EBSD analysis at step intervals of 0.2 pm. With respect to
an orientation difference in a crystallographic orientation relationship that satisfies
a coincidence grain boundary of Σ3, an annealing twin with an orientation difference
of not more than 1° was excluded, and a boundary with an orientation difference of
not less than 2° was regarded as a grain boundary. A crystal grain size was calculated
by expression (3) below where S (µm
2) was an area of each crystal grain and D (pm) was a diameter of a circle having the
same area as the crystal grain. This operation was carried out with respect to five
fields of view, and an average of crystal grain sizes obtained in the respective five
fields of view was calculated as an average crystal grain size.

(Amount of martensite phase)
[0084] An amount (percent by volume) of a martensite phase was measured as follows. In a
case where a material which had been subjected to cold rolling or a material which
had been subjected to temper rolling had a thickness of not less than 1.5 mm, the
material was used as it was. In a case where a material which had been subjected to
cold rolling or a material which had been subjected to temper rolling had a thickness
of less than 1.5 mm, a plurality of strips of the material were laid on top of each
other so that a total thickness was not less than 1.5 mm. These materials were subjected
to measurement with use of a ferrite scope (FMP30, manufactured by Fischer, electromagnetic
induction method), and a value thus measured was divided by 0.7475 to obtain a value
which was regarded as an amount of the martensite phase. An amount (percent by volume)
of an austenite phase was assumed to be a value obtained by subtracting the amount
of the martensite phase from 100% by volume of the entire matrix of the austenitic
stainless steel. An amount of a Cu-rich phase and an amount of an inevitably formed
phase accounted for only a small part of the austenitic stainless steel and were difficult
to accurately measure. As such, the amount of the Cu-rich phase and the amount of
the inevitably formed phase can be calculated as extra numbers.
(Tensile characteristics)
[0085] As an index of tensile characteristics, evaluation was made of 0.2% proof stress
(YS 18%) exhibited in a case where temper rolling causing an elongation of 18% was
carried out. The 0.2% proof stress (YS 18%) was measured by preparing a JIS #13 B
test piece and conducting a tensile test in conformity with JIS Z2241. The 0.2% proof
stress (YS 18%) was measured at a crosshead speed of 3 mm/min.
(Strength)
[0086] Among the conditions of examples of the present invention and the conditions of examples,
production conditions were partially changed such that annealing of a hot-rolled steel
strip was carried out at 1050°C and cold rolling was carried out at a rolling reduction
ratio of 60% to obtain a 60% rolled material. A Vickers hardness of the 60% rolled
material was measured as a reference strength (HV 60%). The Vickers hardness was measured
by a Vickers hardness test (JIS Z2244) with use of a Vickers hardness tester with
respect to a surface of the 60% rolled material. A load at the time of measurement
in the Vickers hardness test was 10 kg.
(Corrosion resistance at welded part)
[0087] A cold-rolled annealed material having a strip thickness of 1.5 mm was subjected
to melt run welding by TIG under the conditions of an electrode diameter of 1.6 mm,
a welding speed of 70 cm/min, a welding current of 90 A, and an Ar gas seal. A 10
mm×10 mm portion including a welded part was regarded as a surface to be evaluated,
and was sanded with #600 sanding paper in order to eliminate an effect of a coating
film. Then, corrosion resistance on the surface to be evaluated was evaluated with
use of an electrochemical reactivation rate as an index.
[0088] The reactivation rate was measured in conformity with JIS G0580. Specifically, in
an aqueous solution of 0.5 mol/L of sulfuric acid and 0.01 mol/L of potassium thiocyanate
at a temperature of 30°C, polarization was carried out from a natural potential to
0.3 V (vsSCE) at a sweep rate of 100 mV/min (hereinafter referred to as "forward operation").
After 0.3 V (vsSCE) was reached, the potential was swept in a direction reverse to
that of the forward operation, and after the hot-rolled material was reactivated,
the sweeping was ended at a potential at which the anode current was 0 again (hereinafter
referred to as "backward operation").
[0089] A ratio of a maximum current density ia in the forward operation to a maximum current
density ir in the backward operation (ir/ia) was calculated as a reactivation rate.
This evaluation method is strict for a method for determining sensitization, which
is a method for evaluating corrosion resistance. As such, even a reactivation rate
of, for example, approximately 1.5% is considered to cause no problem in an actual
environment. However, the cold-rolled annealed materials in accordance with the examples
of the present invention can have fine crystal grains and therefore can be difficult
to evaluate in terms of corrosion resistance. In consideration of this fact, the cold-rolled
annealed materials in accordance with the examples of the present invention can be
considered to have good corrosion resistance in a case where the reactivation rate
is not more than 1%. As such, the corrosion resistance at the welded part was evaluated
to be "good" in a case where the reactivation rate was not more than 1% and "poor"
in a case where the reactivation rate was more than 1%.
[Results]
[0090] With respect to Inventive Steel A2, an amount of a Cu-rich phase precipitated and
a crystal grain size of the cold-rolled annealed material obtained under each set
of conditions indicated in Table 2 are shown in Table 3 below. Further, 0.2% proof
stress (YS 18%), an amount of a martensite phase after temper rolling causing an elongation
of 18% was carried out after cold rolling (before finishing annealing), and an amount
of a martensite phase after temper rolling causing an elongation of 18% was carried
out after finishing annealing, under each set of conditions, are also shown in Table
3 below.
[0091] Note that, in Table 3 below, each underline indicates that the amount of a Cu-rich
phase precipitated falls outside a range specified in the present invention.
[Table 3]
|
|
Amount of martensite after cold rolling (vol%) |
Amount of Cu precipitated (µm-3) |
Crystal grain size (µm) |
YS 18% (MPa) |
Amount of martensite after temper rolling (vol%) |
Inventive Example |
C1 |
55 |
2.0×103 |
3 |
1150 |
15 |
Inventive Example |
C2 |
60 |
3.3×103 |
2.6 |
1157 |
12 |
Inventive Example |
C3 |
63 |
4.5×103 |
2.4 |
1160 |
8 |
Inventive Example |
C4 |
59 |
6.2×103 |
2 |
1172 |
10 |
Inventive Example |
C5 |
40 |
2.5×103 |
2.8 |
1142 |
15 |
Inventive Example |
C6 |
55 |
2.8×103 |
2.6 |
1153 |
14 |
Inventive Example |
C7 |
61 |
2.0×103 |
3.4 |
1138 |
18 |
Inventive Example |
C8 |
63 |
1.6×103 |
7 |
1120 |
23 |
Comparative Example |
D1 |
65 |
NA |
18 |
1030 |
31 |
Comparative Example |
D2 |
65 |
NA |
5 |
1026 |
25 |
[0092] With respect to Inventive Steel A2, cold-rolled annealed materials produced by the
respective sets of conditions of Inventive Examples C1 to C8 each had an amount of
a Cu-rich phase precipitated which fell within the range specified in the present
invention and exhibited a very small average crystal grain size of not more than 10.0
pm. In contrast, neither of the cold-rolled annealed materials produced under the
respective sets of conditions of Comparative Examples D1 and D2 exhibited precipitation
of a Cu-rich phase.
[0093] With respect to Inventive Steel A2, an EBSD grain boundary map and a TEM-captured
image are shown on a left side and a right side, respectively, of Fig. 1 with respect
to the cold-rolled annealed material produced under the conditions of Inventive Example
C2. As indicated in the TEM-captured image on the right side of Fig. 1, precipitation
of a Cu-rich phase (illustrated as "Cu" in Fig. 1) was observed in the austenitic
stainless steel in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
[0094] Further, since the reference strength (HV 60%) of Inventive Steel A2 was 445, the
0.2% proof stress (YS 18%) is preferably not less than 1094 MPa according to expression
(2) above. The cold-rolled annealed materials of Inventive Steel A2 produced under
the respective sets of conditions of Inventive Examples C1 to C8 each exhibited a
0.2% proof stress (YS 18%) of not less than 1094 MPa. In contrast, the cold-rolled
annealed materials produced under the respective sets of conditions of Comparative
Examples D1 and D2 each exhibited a 0.2% proof stress (YS 18%) of less than 1094 MPa.
The above indicates that under the sets of conditions of Comparative Examples D1 and
D2, precipitation of a Cu-rich phase does not occur, and it is therefore difficult
to obtain an austenitic stainless steel having a good balance between workability
before finishing annealing and high strength after the finishing annealing.
[0095] Next, Table 4 below indicates (i) an amount of a Cu-rich phase precipitated in a
cold-rolled annealed material produced from Inventive Steels A1 to A15 or Comparative
Steels B1 to B5 under the set of production conditions indicated in Inventive Example
C2 and (ii) a crystal grain size of the cold-rolled annealed material, the amount
of a Cu-rich phase precipitated and the crystal grain size being exhibited by after
finishing annealing. Further, Table 4 below also indicates 0.2% proof stress (YS 18%),
reference strength (HV 60%), and corrosion resistance at the welded part under these
conditions.
[0096] Note that, in Table 4 below, each underlined portion indicates that (i) the amount
of a Cu-rich phase precipitated fell outside the range specified in the present invention,
(ii) the value of 0.2% proof stress (YS 18%) did not satisfy expression (2) above,
or (iii) the corrosion resistance at the welded part was poor.
[Table 4]
|
|
Amount of Cu precipitated (µm-3) |
Crystal grain size (µm) |
YS 18% (MPa) |
HV 60% |
Corrosion resistance at welded part |
Inventive Steel |
A1 |
3.5×103 |
3.0 |
1080 |
430 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A2 |
3.3×103 |
2.6 |
1150 |
445 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A3 |
3.8×103 |
3.5 |
1130 |
450 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A4 |
2.3×103 |
3.0 |
1050 |
425 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A5 |
3.3×103 |
3.4 |
1090 |
440 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A6 |
5.0×103 |
2.5 |
1100 |
435 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A7 |
3.8×103 |
2.1 |
1060 |
430 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A8 |
4.2×103 |
2.2 |
1100 |
445 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A9 |
1.5×103 |
2.9 |
1100 |
452 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A10 |
3.0×103 |
3.4 |
1140 |
450 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A11 |
3.4×103 |
4.2 |
1160 |
455 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A12 |
3.6×103 |
4.0 |
1150 |
455 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A13 |
3.2×103 |
1.9 |
1150 |
450 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A14 |
2.4×103 |
3.2 |
1060 |
435 |
Good |
Inventive Steel |
A15 |
3.1×103 |
3.5 |
1100 |
440 |
Good |
Comparative Steel |
B1 |
3.1×103 |
3.2 |
1240 |
480 |
Poor |
Comparative Steel |
B2 |
3.3×103 |
2.9 |
920 |
420 |
Good |
Comparative Steel |
B3 |
0.3×103 |
6.2 |
980 |
425 |
Good |
Comparative Steel |
B4 |
5.3×103 |
3.2 |
940 |
480 |
Good |
Comparative Steel |
B5 |
Not precipitated |
7.8 |
940 |
460 |
Good |
[0097] The cold-rolled annealed materials of Inventive Steels A1 to A15 each had an amount
of a Cu-rich phase precipitated falling within the range specified in the present
invention and exhibited a very small average crystal grain size of not more than 10.0
pm. Further, the cold-rolled annealed materials each exhibited 0.2% proof stress (YS
18%) with a good value satisfying expression (2) above.
[0098] In contrast, the cold-rolled annealed material of Comparative Steel B1 had a poor
corrosion resistance at the welded part. The cold-rolled annealed materials of Comparative
Steels B2 to B5 exhibited a 0.2% proof stress (YS 18%) that did not satisfy expression
(2) above, and it was thus not possible to obtain an austenitic stainless steel having
a good balance between workability before finishing annealing and high strength after
the finishing annealing.
[0099] Fig. 2 shows a diagram plotting a relationship between 0.2% proof stress (YS 18%)
and reference strength (HV 60%) under each set of conditions in Table 4. In Fig. 2,
an example of the present invention is represented by a white circle, and a comparative
example is represented by a black arrowhead. In the graph shown in Fig. 2, the closer
a plotted relationship is to the upper left side, the better balance between workability
before finishing annealing and high strength after the finishing annealing is indicated
by the plotted relationship.
[0100] Note that the above-described results each pertain to a cold-rolled annealed material
obtained under the condition of a cooling rate after finishing annealing of 25°C/s.
Now, with use of Inventive Steels A1, A2, and A5, respective cold-rolled annealed
materials were produced under the conditions of Inventive Example C2 indicated in
Table 2 except that the cooling rate from 700°C to 500°C after the finishing annealing
was changed within a range of 0.3°C/s to 100°C/s. An amount of a Cu-rich phase precipitated
in each of the resultant cold-rolled annealed materials is shown in Table 5 below.
[Table 5]
Cooling rate |
Amount of Cu precipitated (µm-3) |
°C/s |
A1 |
A2 |
A5 |
0.3 |
0.7×103 |
0.8×103 |
0.6×103 |
0.6 |
0.9×103 |
0.9×103 |
0.9×103 |
1.2 |
1.2×103 |
1.2×103 |
1.3×103 |
2 |
2.4×103 |
2.8×103 |
2.1×103 |
5 |
3.5×103 |
3.3×103 |
3.3×103 |
25 |
3.5×103 |
3.3×103 |
3.3×103 |
60 |
3.5×103 |
3.3×103 |
3.3×103 |
100 |
3.5×103 |
3.3×103 |
3.3×103 |
[0101] At a cooling rate of not less than 5°C/s, no change was observed in the amount of
Cu precipitated in the cold-rolled annealed material. It can be said that in a case
where the cooling rate is sufficiently high, coarsening of a Cu-rich phase during
the cooling and resultant loss of the Cu-rich phase do not occur. When the cooling
rate was 2°C/s, a slight decrease in amount of Cu precipitated was observed. This
is considered to be because coarsening of a Cu-rich phase during the cooling and resultant
loss of the Cu-rich phase occurred. This is a phenomenon generally referred to as
Ostwald ripening. In a case where the cooling rate was less than 1°C/s, coarsening
of a Cu-rich phase during the cooling and resultant loss of the Cu-rich phase were
further promoted, so that the amount of precipitation was less than 1.0×10
3 µm
-3.
[0102] As shown in Table 4 and Fig. 2, it is indicated that a cold-rolled annealed material
produced in accordance with a production method in accordance with an embodiment of
the present invention with use of an austenitic stainless steel having a composition
in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention enables both a reduction
in load of working during production and an increase in strength of an end product.
It is also indicated that such a cold-rolled annealed material is excellent in corrosion
resistance at a welded part and is suitable also for uses where a great amount of
welding is carried out.