FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] Water-soluble unit dose article comprising a concentrated detergent composition.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Water-soluble unit dose detergent articles are liked by consumers as they are convenient
and efficient to use. Such water-soluble unit dose articles comprise detergent compositions
enveloped by a water-soluble film. When the water-soluble unit dose detergent article
is added to water, the film dissolves/disintegrates releasing the detergent into the
surrounding water to create a cleaning liquor.
[0003] There are a lot of constrains when formulating detergent compositions to be housed
within the water-soluble unit dose article, in particular when the composition is
in liquid form. The detergent composition should be stable, have the right viscosity
to allow for easy manufacture and easy dissolution in use and the composition should
be compatible with the water-soluble film. Usually, the detergent composition comprises
aqueous and/or non-aqueous solvents to help with the above requirements. These solvents
can help to prevent physical phase instability, to control viscosity to enable dosebility
during manufacture as well as good dissolution profile upon use, as well as to secure
proper water-soluble film plasticization to prevent premature rupture. A water-soluble
film of too low level of plasticisation becomes brittle upon ageing and as such becomes
susceptible to premature rupture. Solvents might not contribute much to the product
performance upon use, such as cleaning, whiteness, freshness or fabric or hard surface
care, and therefore there is a desire to reduce the amount of solvent in the detergent
composition. However, just reducing the level of solvent will bring physical and chemical
instabilities to the composition and incompatibility with the water-soluble film.
[0004] Therefore, there is a need to provide detergent compositions more highly concentrated
in active ingredients and comprising lower amounts of solvents. Such compositions
have benefits including reduced costs and reducing overall carbon footprint of the
detergent compositions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] A water-soluble unit dose article comprising a concentrated detergent composition,
wherein the detergent composition comprises from 45% to 65% by weight of the composition
of a non-soap surfactant system comprising anionic non-soap surfactant and nonionic
surfactant wherein the composition comprises more than 25% by weight of the composition
of non-soap anionic surfactant;; wherein the nonionic surfactant comprises alcohol
ethoxylate surfactant and the weight ratio of non-soap anionic surfactant to non-ionic
surfactant is less than or equal to 1.5:1; from 5% to 20% by weight of the composition
of organic solvent; and from 5% to 25% by weight of the composition of water.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0006] FIG.1 is a water-soluble unit dose article according to the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Water-soluble unit dose article
[0007] The present invention discloses a water-soluble unit dose article comprising a water-soluble
film and a detergent composition, preferably a laundry detergent composition. The
water-soluble film and the laundry detergent composition are described in more detail
below. The laundry detergent composition preferably is a liquid laundry detergent
composition.
[0008] The water-soluble unit dose detergent article comprises the water-soluble film shaped
such that the unit-dose article comprises at least one internal compartment surrounded
by the water-soluble film. The unit dose article may comprise a first water-soluble
film and a second water-soluble film sealed to one another such to define the internal
compartment. The water-soluble unit dose article is constructed such that the detergent
composition does not leak out of the compartment during storage. However, upon addition
of the water-soluble unit dose article to water, the water-soluble film dissolves
and releases the contents of the internal compartment into the wash liquor.
[0009] The compartment should be understood as meaning a closed internal space within the
unit dose article, which holds the detergent composition. During manufacture, a first
water-soluble film may be shaped to comprise an open compartment into which the detergent
composition is added. A second water-soluble film is then laid over the first film
in such an orientation as to close the opening of the compartment. The first and second
films are then sealed together along a seal region.
[0010] The unit dose article may comprise more than one compartment, even at least two compartments,
or even at least three compartments, or even at least four compartments. The compartments
may be arranged in superposed orientation, i.e. one positioned on top of the other.
In such an orientation the unit dose article will comprise at least three films, top,
one or more middle, and bottom. Alternatively, the compartments may be positioned
in a side-by-side orientation, i.e. one orientated next to the other. The compartments
may even be orientated in a `tyre and rim' arrangement, i.e. a first compartment is
positioned next to a second compartment, but the first compartment at least partially
surrounds the second compartment but does not completely enclose the second compartment.
Alternatively, one compartment may be completely enclosed within another compartment.
[0011] Wherein the unit dose article comprises at least two compartments, one of the compartments
may be smaller than the other compartment. Wherein the unit dose article comprises
at least three compartments, two of the compartments may be smaller than the third
compartment, and preferably the smaller compartments are superposed on the larger
compartment. The superposed compartments preferably are orientated side-by-side. The
unit dose article may comprise at least four compartments, three of the compartments
may be smaller than the fourth compartment, and preferably the smaller compartments
are superposed on the larger compartment. The superposed compartments preferably are
orientated side-by-side.
[0012] In a multi-compartment orientation, the detergent composition according to the present
invention may be comprised in at least one of the compartments. It may for example
be comprised in just one compartment, or may be comprised in two compartments, or
even in three compartments, or even in four compartments.
[0013] Each compartment may comprise the same or different compositions. The different compositions
could all be in the same form, or they may be in different forms.
[0014] The water-soluble unit dose article may comprise at least two internal compartments,
wherein the laundry detergent composition is comprised in at least one of the compartments,
preferably wherein the unit dose article comprises at least three compartments, wherein
the detergent composition is comprised in at least one of the compartments.
[0015] The water-soluble unit dose article may comprise from 1 gram up to 60 gram, preferably
from 5 gram up to 50 gram, more preferably from 10 gram up to 40 gram, most preferably
from 12 gram up to 25 gram alternatively from 30 gram to 40 gram of the laundry detergent
composition. The water-soluble unit dose article may comprise from 1 ml up to 60 ml,
preferably from 5 ml up to 50 ml, more preferably from 10 ml up to 40 ml, most preferably
from 12 ml up to 25 ml, alternatively from 30 ml to 40ml of the liquid laundry detergent
composition.
[0016] FIG.1 discloses a water-soluble unit dose article (1) according to the present invention.
The water-soluble unit dose article (1) comprises a first water-soluble film (2) and
a second water-soluble film (3) which are sealed together at a seal region (4). The
laundry detergent composition (5) is comprised within the water-soluble soluble unit
dose article (1).
Water-soluble film
[0017] The film of the present invention is soluble or dispersible in water. The water-soluble
film preferably has a thickness of from 20 to 150 micron, preferably 35 to 125 micron,
even more preferably 50 to 110 micron, most preferably about 76 micron.
[0018] Preferably, the film has a water-solubility of at least 50%, preferably at least
75% or even at least 95%, as measured by the method set out here after using a glass-filter
with a maximum pore size of 20 microns:
5 grams ± 0.1 gram of film material is added in a pre-weighed 3L beaker and 2L ± 5ml
of distilled water is added. This is stirred vigorously on a magnetic stirrer, Labline
model No. 1250 or equivalent and 5 cm magnetic stirrer, set at 600 rpm, for 30 minutes
at 30°C. Then, the mixture is filtered through a folded qualitative sintered-glass
filter with a pore size as defined above (max. 20 micron). The water is dried off
from the collected filtrate by any conventional method, and the weight of the remaining
material is determined (which is the dissolved or dispersed fraction). Then, the percentage
solubility or dispersability can be calculated.
[0019] Preferred film materials are preferably polymeric materials. The film material can,
for example, be obtained by casting, blow-moulding, extrusion or blown extrusion of
the polymeric material, as known in the art.
[0020] Preferred polymers, copolymers or derivatives thereof suitable for use as pouch material
are selected from polyvinyl alcohols, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyalkylene oxides,
acrylamide, acrylic acid, cellulose, cellulose ethers, cellulose esters, cellulose
amides, polyvinyl acetates, polycarboxylic acids and salts, polyaminoacids or peptides,
polyamides, polyacrylamide, copolymers of maleic/acrylic acids, polysaccharides including
starch and gelatine, natural gums such as xanthum and carragum. More preferred polymers
are selected from polyacrylates and water-soluble acrylate copolymers, methylcellulose,
carboxymethylcellulose sodium, dextrin, ethylcellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl
methylcellulose, maltodextrin, polymethacrylates, and most preferably selected from
polyvinyl alcohols, polyvinyl alcohol copolymers and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose
(HPMC), and combinations thereof. Preferably, the level of polymer in the pouch material,
for example a PVA polymer, is at least 60%. The polymer can have any weight average
molecular weight, preferably from about 1000 to 1,000,000, more preferably from about
10,000 to 300,000 yet more preferably from about 20,000 to 150,000.
[0021] Preferably, the water-soluble film comprises polyvinylalcohol polymer, preferably
wherein the polyvinylalcohol polymer comprises polyvinyl alcohol homopolymer or polyvinyl
alcohol copolymer, or a mixture thereof, preferably a blend of polyvinylalcohol homopolymers
and/or polyvinylalcohol copolymers, preferably wherein the polyvinylalcohol copolymers
are selected from sulphonated and carboxylated anionic polyvinylalcohol copolymers
especially carboxylated anionic polyvinylalcohol copolymers, most preferably wherein
the polyvinylalcohol polymer comprises a blend of a polyvinylalcohol homopolymer and
a carboxylated anionic polyvinylalcohol copolymer or a blend of polyvinylalcohol homopolymers.
Alternatively the water-soluble film may comprise a single polyvinylacohol polymer,
preferably a carboxylated anionic polyvinylalcohol copolymer.
[0022] Preferred films exhibit good dissolution in cold water, meaning unheated distilled
water. Preferably such films exhibit good dissolution at temperatures of 24°C, even
more preferably at 10°C. By good dissolution it is meant that the film exhibits water-solubility
of at least 50%, preferably at least 75% or even at least 95%, as measured by the
method set out here after using a glass-filter with a maximum pore size of 20 microns,
described above.
[0023] Preferred films are those supplied by Monosol under the trade references M8630, M8900,
M8779, M8310.
[0024] The film may be opaque, transparent or translucent. The film may comprise a printed
area. The area of print may be achieved using standard techniques, such as flexographic
printing or inkjet printing.
[0025] The film may comprise an aversive agent, for example a bittering agent. Suitable
bittering agents include, but are not limited to, naringin, sucrose octaacetate, quinine
hydrochloride, denatonium benzoate, or mixtures thereof. Any suitable level of aversive
agent may be used in the film. Suitable levels include, but are not limited to, 1
to 5000ppm, or even 100 to 2500ppm, or even 250 to 2000ppm.
[0026] Preferably, the water-soluble film or water-soluble unit dose article or both are
coated in a lubricating agent, preferably, wherein the lubricating agent is selected
from talc, zinc oxide, silicas, siloxanes, zeolites, silicic acid, alumina, sodium
sulphate, potassium sulphate, calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, sodium citrate,
sodium tripolyphosphate, potassium citrate, potassium tripolyphosphate, calcium stearate,
zinc stearate, magnesium stearate, starch, modified starches, clay, kaolin, gypsum,
cyclodextrins or mixtures thereof.
[0027] Preferably, the water-soluble film, and each individual component thereof, independently
comprises between Oppm and 20ppm, preferably between Oppm and 15ppm, more preferably
between Oppm and 10ppm, even more preferably between Oppm and 5ppm, even more preferably
between Oppm and 1ppm, even more preferably between 0ppb and 100ppb, most preferably
0ppb dioxane. Those skilled in the art will be aware of known methods and techniques
to determine the dioxane level within water-soluble films and ingredients thereof.
Detergent composition
[0028] The water-soluble unit dose article comprises a detergent composition, the composition
can be any cleaning or treatment composition such as a hard surface cleaning composition,
an automatic dishwashing cleaning composition, a laundry composition, etc. Preferably
the composition is a laundry detergent composition, more preferably the detergent
composition is a liquid laundry detergent composition. The term `liquid laundry detergent
composition' refers to any laundry detergent composition comprising a liquid capable
of wetting and treating a fabric, and includes, but is not limited to, liquids, gels,
pastes, dispersions and the like. The liquid composition can include solids or gases
in suitably subdivided form, but the liquid composition excludes forms which are non-fluid
overall, such as tablets or granules.
[0029] The laundry detergent composition can be used in a fabric hand wash operation or
may be used in an automatic machine fabric wash operation.
[0030] The laundry detergent composition comprises a non-soap surfactant system and an organic
solvent system. The non-soap surfactant system and the organic solvent system are
described in more detail below.
[0031] The laundry detergent composition comprises from 45% to 65%, preferably from 45%
to 60%, more preferably from 45% to 55% by weight of the composition of a non-soap
surfactant system. The non-soap surfactant system comprises a non-soap anionic surfactant
and a nonionic surfactant system, wherein the nonionic surfactant comprises, preferably
consists of, alcohol ethoxylate surfactant. The composition comprises more than 25%
by weight of the composition of non-soap anionic surfactant. The weight ratio of non-soap
anionic surfactant to non-ionic surfactant is less than or equal to 1.5:1 preferably
from 1.5:1 to 1:2, more preferably from 1.5:1 to 1:1. The non-soap anionic surfactant
is preferably selected from neutralised linear alkylbenzene sulphonate, neutralised
alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant selected from neutralised alkoxylated alkyl sulphate,
neutralised non-alkoxylated alkyl sulphate, and mixtures thereof, or a mixture thereof.
The non-soap anionic surfactant may comprise a mixture of neutralised linear alkylbenzene
sulphonate and neutralised alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant. The weight ratio of
neutralised linear alkylbenzene sulphonate to neutralised alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant
may be from 1:2 to 9:1, or from 1:1 to 7:1, or from 1.5:1 to 6:1, or from 1.5:1 to
5:1. Alternatively the non-soap anionic surfactant system may be free of neutralised
alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant. Alternatively the non-soap anionic surfactant system
may consist of neutralized linear alkylbenzene sulphonate. For surfactant weight %
or weight ratio calculation the weight of the neutralizing counterion in the case
of anionic surfactants is not taken into account, e.g. for soap or non-soap anionic
surfactants solely the weight of the surfactant anion is considered when calculating
the soap or non-soap anionic surfactant weight % or soap or non-soap anionic surfactant
to nonionic surfactant weight ratio.
[0032] Preferably, the non-soap anionic surfactant comprises linear alkylbenzene sulphonate.
Preferably, the linear alkylbenzene sulphonate comprises C
10-C
16 alkyl benzene sulfonate, C
11-C
14 alkyl benzene sulphonate or a mixture thereof. Preferably, the alkylbenzene sulphonate
is an amine neutralized alkylbenzene sulphonate, an alkali metal neutralized alkylbenzene
sulphonate or a mixture thereof. The amine is preferably selected from monoethanolamine,
triethanolamine, monoisopropanolamine or mixtures thereof. The alkali metal is preferably
selected from sodium, potassium, magnesium or a mixture thereof. Preferably, the laundry
detergent composition comprises between 5% and 45%, preferably between 7.5% and 40%,
more preferably between 10% and 35% by weight of the laundry detergent composition
of the linear alkylbenzene sulphonate.
[0033] The non-soap anionic surfactant may comprise an alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant
wherein the alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant is selected from alkyl sulphate, an
alkoxylated alkyl sulphate, or a mixture thereof. The alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant
may be a primary or a secondary alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant, or a mixture thereof,
preferably a primary alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant. Preferably, the alkoxylated
alkyl sulphate comprises ethoxylated alkyl sulphate, propoxylated alkyl sulphate,
a mixed ethoxylated/propoxylated alkyl sulphate, or a mixture thereof, more preferably
an ethoxylated alkyl sulphate. Preferably, the ethoxylated alkyl sulphate has an average
degree of ethoxylation of between 0.1 to 5, preferably between 0.5 and 3. Alternatively
the alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant is free of alkoxylation. Preferably, the alkyl
sulphate anionic surfactant has an average alkyl chain length of between 8 and 18,
more preferably between 10 and 16, most preferably between 12 and 15. Preferably,
the alkyl chain of the alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant is linear, branched or a
mixture thereof. Preferably, the branched alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant is a branched
primary alkyl sulphate, a branched secondary alkyl sulphate, or a mixture thereof,
preferably a branched primary alkyl sulphate, wherein the branching preferably is
in the 2-position, or alternatively might be present further down the alkyl chain,
or could be multi-branched with branches spread over the alkyl chain. The weight average
degree of branching of alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant may be from 0% to 100% preferably
from 0% to 95%, more preferably from 0% to 60%, most preferably from 0% to 20%. Alternatively,
the weight average degree of branching of alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant may be
from 70% to 100%, preferably from 80% to 90%. Preferably, the alkyl chain is selected
from naturally derived material, synthetically derived material or mixtures thereof.
Preferably, the synthetically derived material comprises oxo-synthesized material,
Ziegler-synthesized material, Guerbet-synthesized material, aldol condensation-synthesized
material, Fischer-Tropsch - synthesized material, iso-alkyl synthesized material,
or mixtures thereof, preferably oxo-synthesized material. Preferably, the laundry
detergent composition comprises between 1% and 20%, preferably between 2% and 15%,
more preferably between 4% and 10% by weight of the laundry detergent composition
of the alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant. Alternatively, the composition is free of
alkyl sulphate anionic surfactant. When alkyl ethoxy sulphate is present in the laundry
detergent composition, the alkyl ethoxy sulphate starting material may have been treated
to reduce the 1,4-dioxane content down to a level as low as less than 1 ppm per surfactant
active. The skilled person will be aware of technical means to reduce the dioxane
content in surfactant starting materials, including (multi-step) steam stripping,
nano-filtration, or a combination thereof.
[0034] The laundry detergent composition comprises a non-ionic surfactant. The non-ionic
surfactant comprises, preferably consists of, an ethoxylated alcohol non-ionic surfactant.
Preferably, the laundry detergent composition comprises between 5% and 45%, or between
10% and 40%, or between 15% and 35% by weight of the laundry detergent composition
of the ethoxylated alcohol non-ionic surfactant. The ethoxylated alcohol non-ionic
surfactant may be a primary nonionic surfactant, a secondary nonionic surfactant,
or a mixture thereof. Preferably the nonionic surfactant comprises a mixture of primary
and secondary ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactant, more preferably wherein the
primary and the secondary ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactant are present in a
weight ratio of from 2:1 to 1:10, preferably from 1.5:1 to 1:7, more preferably from
1:1 to 1:5. The ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactant may be linear or may be branched.
When branched, the branching may be at the 1-position, the 2-position or even further
down the alkyl chain, wherein the carbon counting starts as of the carbon linked to
the oxygen linker between the alkyl chain and the ethoxylation chain, The branching
may be a single branching or a multi-branching. Most preferably the branching is a
single branching at the 2-position. The branching preferably is an alkyl branching,
more preferably a methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl or pentyl branching, most preferably
mixtures thereof. When linear the alkyl chain of the alcohol may have a natural distribution
of C6 to C20 alkyl chains pending the source of the material. Alternatively, the linear
alkyl alcohol may have been fractionated to magnify the C12 to C14 alkyl chain content.
The ethoxylated alcohol non-ionic surfactant comprises an alkyl chain having an average
of from 8 to 18 carbon atoms, preferably of from 10 to 16 more preferably 12 to 15
carbon atoms. The ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactant has an average degree of
ethoxylation between 5 and 12, preferably between 6 and 10. The ethoxylated alcohol
nonionic surfactant may have a broad range (BRE) or a narrow range (NRE) ethoxylation
distribution. Narrow-range ethoxylates (NREs) are alcohol polyglycol ethers with a
narrow homolog distribution and are known nonionic surfactants. Peaked alkoxylation
and peaked ethoxylation are also often used to describe the process and materials
produced. They can be produced industrially, for example, by the addition of ethylene
oxide onto alcohols in the presence of suitable catalysts (layer compounds which have
been calcined or hydrophobized with fatty acids). Examples of narrow range alkoxylation
catalysts include many alkaline earth (Mg, Ca, Ba, Sr, etc.) derived catalysts, Lewis
acid catalysts, such as Zirconium dodecanoxide sulfate, and certain boron halide catalysts,
such as those described by Dupont and of the form MB(OR1)x(X)4-x or B(OR1)3/ MX wherein
R1 is a linear, branched, cyclic, or aromatic hydrocarbyl group, optionally substituted,
having from 1 to 30 carbon atoms, M is Na+, K+, Li+, R2R3R4R5N+, or R2R3R4R5P+, where
R2, R3, R4, and R5 independently are hydrocarbyl groups, and x is 1 to 3. This process
can also be carried out on a variety of other hydrophobes and using different alkoxylating
compounds (e.g., propylene oxide and butylene oxide) by modifying the catalyst properties.
The narrow range ethoxylated alcohol non-ionic surfactant comprises at least 85% by
weight of the total narrow range ethoxylate alcohol surfactant of alcohol ethoxylate
nonionic surfactant molecules comprising a polyethoxy group comprising between 5 and
12, preferably between 6 and 10 ethoxy groups. The broad range ethoxylated alcohol
non-ionic surfactant comprises polyethoxy groups, preferably, wherein between 15%
and 45%, preferably between 25% and 40% by weight of the total broad range ethoxylated
alcohol surfactant are ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactant molecules comprising
a polyethoxy group comprising between 6 and 10 ethoxy groups, and wherein between
30% and 70%, preferably between 40% and 65% by weight of the total broad range ethoxylated
alcohol surfactant are ethoxylated alcohol nonionic surfactant molecules comprise
a polyethoxy group comprising between 5 and 12 ethoxy groups. The ethoxylated alcohol
non-ionic surfactants may be derived from a natural alcohol source, a synthetic alcohol
source, or a mixture thereof. Most suitable natural sources include palm kernel oil,
coconut oil, or mixtures thereof, preferably palm kernel oil. When the ethoxylated
alkyl alcohol non-ionic surfactant is derived from a synthetic alcohol source, the
synthetic alcohol source preferably is made via an oxo process, a Ziegler process,
a Guerbet process, an aldol condensation process, or a mixture thereof. The resulting
alcohols can optionally but preferably be further fractionated to magnify the C12
to C15 content within the starting alcohol. Suitable examples of narrow range ethoxylated
alcohol non-ionic surfactants are commercially available from the Nouryon company
under the Berol or Ethylan tradenames, and from the Sasol company under the Novel
tradename.
[0035] The laundry detergent composition may comprise a fatty acid, preferably a neutralized
fatty acid soap. The fatty acid soap may be an amine neutralized fatty acid soap,
wherein the amine is an alkanolamine more preferably selected from monoethanolamine,
diethanolamine, triethanolamine, monoisopropanolamine or a mixture thereof, more preferably
monoethanolamine. The laundry detergent composition may comprise between 1% and 20%,
preferably between 3% and 17%, more preferably between 5% and 15% by weight of the
laundry detergent composition of fatty acid, preferably a neutralized fatty acid soap.
[0036] The laundry detergent comprises between 5% and 25%, preferably between 7% and 20%,
more preferably between 10% and 15% by weight of the detergent composition of water.
[0037] Preferably, the laundry detergent composition comprises between 5% and 20%, preferably
between 10% and 17% by weight of the laundry detergent composition of a non-aqueous
organic solvent, preferably wherein the non-aqueous organic solvent is selected from
1,2-propanediol, dipropylene glycol, tripropyleneglycol, glycerol, sorbitol, polyethylene
glycol, ethoxylated glycerin or a mixture thereof. Preferably the non-aqueous organic
solvent comprises 1,2-propanediol and glycerol, more preferably wherein the 1,2-propanediol
and glycerol are in a weight ratio of from 1:3 to 12:1, preferably of from 1:2 to
9:1, more preferably from 1:1 to 6:1. The laundry composition preferably comprises
less than 1% preferably less than 0.5% by weight of the composition of ethanol, most
preferably the laundry composition is free of ethanol.
[0038] Preferably, the laundry detergent composition comprises an adjunct ingredient selected
from the group comprising builders, perfumes, enzymes, citrate, bleach, bleach catalyst,
dye, hueing dye, brightener, cleaning polymers including alkoxylated polyamines and
polyethyleneimines, soil release polymer, fabric care polymers including cationic
hydroxyethyl celluloses, cationic guar gums and cationic polyglucans, surfactant,
solvent, dye transfer inhibitors, chelant, encapsulated perfume, polycarboxylates,
structurant, pH trimming agents, anti-oxidants including Ralox 35, anti-foam agent,
and mixtures thereof.
[0039] Preferably, the laundry detergent composition comprises a further enzyme selected
from the group comprising hemicellulases, peroxidases, proteases, cellulases, xylanases,
lipases, phospholipases, esterases, cutinases, pectinases, keratanases, reductases,
oxidases, phenoloxidases, lipoxygenases, ligninases, pullulanases, tannases, pentosanases,
malanases, β-glucanases, arabinosidases, hyaluronidase, chondroitinase, laccase, xyloglucanases,
mannanases and amylases, nuclease or mixtures thereof, preferably a further enzyme
selected from the group comprising proteases, amylase, cellulase, lipases, xyloglucanases,
mannanases, nucleases, and mixtures thereof.
[0040] Preferably, the laundry detergent composition has a pH between 6 and 10, more preferably
between 6.5 and 8.9, most preferably between 7 and 8, wherein the pH of the laundry
detergent composition is measured as a 10% product concentration in demineralized
water at 20°C.
[0041] When liquid, the liquid laundry detergent composition may be Newtonian or non-Newtonian.
Preferably, the liquid laundry detergent composition is non-Newtonian. Without wishing
to be bound by theory, a non-Newtonian liquid has properties that differ from those
of a Newtonian liquid, more specifically, the viscosity of non-Newtonian liquids is
dependent on shear rate, while a Newtonian liquid has a constant viscosity independent
of the applied shear rate. The decreased viscosity upon shear application for non-Newtonian
liquids is thought to further facilitate liquid detergent dissolution. The liquid
laundry detergent composition described herein can have any suitable viscosity depending
on factors such as formulated ingredients and purpose of the composition.
Process of making
[0042] Those skilled in the art will be aware of standard techniques to make the laundry
detergent composition and the water-soluble unit dose article according to the present
invention. Those skilled in the art will also be aware of standard techniques and
methods to make the ingredients of the laundry detergent composition of the present
invention.
Process of use
[0043] A further aspect of the present invention is a process of laundering fabrics comprising
the steps of diluting between 200 and 3000 fold, preferably between 300 and 2000 fold,
the water-soluble unit dose article according to the present invention with water
to make a wash liquor, contacting fabrics to be treated with the wash liquor.
[0044] Preferably the wash liquor comprises between 5L and 75L, preferably between 7L and
40L, more preferably between 10L and 20L of water. Alternatively, the wash liquor
may comprise between 35L and 65L of water. Preferably, the wash liquor is at a temperature
of between 5°C and 90°C, preferably between 10°C and 60°C, more preferably between
12°C and 45°C, most preferably between 15°C and 40°C. Preferably, washing the fabrics
in the wash liquor takes between 5 minutes and 60 minutes, preferably between 5 minutes
and 40 minutes, more preferably between 5 minutes and 30 minutes, even more preferably
between 5 minutes and 20 minutes, most preferably between 6 minutes and 18 minutes
to complete. Alternatively, washing the fabrics in the wash liquor may take between
30 minutes and 60 minutes. Preferably, the wash liquor comprises between 1kg and 20
kg, preferably between 3kg and 15kg, most preferably between 5 and 10 kg of fabrics.
The wash liquor may comprise water of any hardness preferably varying between 0 gpg
to 40gpg.
[0045] The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly
limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified,
each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally
equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as "40
mm" is intended to mean "about 40 mm."
EXAMPLES
[0046] Liquid laundry detergent compositions suitable for use in water-soluble unit dose
laundry detergent articles were prepared through mixing of the individual components
in a batch process. The appearance and the viscosity of the compositions and the interaction
of the compositions with the water-soluble film (as quantified by swelling of the
film), were assessed by altering the non-soap anionic surfactant to nonionic surfactant
weight ratio in the surfactant system. Comparative composition 1 represents a non-compacted
positive reference formulation outside the scope of the invention. Comparative composition
2 represents a related compacted negative reference formulation at equal non-soap
anionic surfactant to nonionic surfactant weight ratio as the non-compacted positive
reference formulation.
[0047] From the data summarized in Table 1, it can be seen that clear compacted compositions
of suitable viscosity and film swelling profile can be achieved when formulating the
non-soap anionic surfactant to nonionic surfactant ratio according to the invention,
both for AES as well as nil AES based surfactant formulations, despite the decreased
organic solvent content.
Table 1: Liquid detergent compositions comprising LAS, AES and NI surfactant system
As 100% active |
Comp. Example 1 |
Comp. Example 2 |
Comp. Example 3 |
Inventive Example 1 |
Inventive Example 2 |
Inventive Example 3 |
Total surfactant |
41.6 |
50.0 |
50.2 |
50.6 |
50.4 |
50.7 |
Non-soap anionic : nonionic surfactant ratio |
9:1 |
9.2:1 |
4:1 |
1:1 |
1:2 |
1:1 |
Total organic solvent |
22.6 |
10.6 |
15.3 |
13.5 |
13.8 |
13.5 |
Water |
10.7 |
11.0 |
10.9 |
10.9 |
10.8 |
11.1 |
Nonionic surfactant 1 1 |
3.4 |
4.1 |
9.3 |
24.4 |
33.0 |
25.1 |
Nonionic surfactant 2 2 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
HLAS |
24.0 |
28.8 |
24.0 |
16.8 |
10.5 |
24.8 |
H-C1215-AE2.5S |
13.4 |
16.3 |
16.0 |
8.7 |
6.2 |
0.0 |
Topped Coconut Fatty acid |
5.7 |
5.5 |
5.2 |
7.1 |
8.0 |
7.6 |
Citric acid |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1,2-Propanediol |
16.4 |
7.7 |
10.4 |
9.9 |
10.5 |
9.9 |
Glycerol |
6.2 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
3.6 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
Monoethanolamin e |
8.8 |
10.7 |
8.3 |
6.1 |
5.4 |
5.5 |
Amphiphilic graft polymer3 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
ethoxylated polyethyleneimin e4 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
GLDA chelant |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
Sodium Bisulfite |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
Hydrogenated Castor Oil |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
Enzyme (Protease, amylase, mananase) |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
Sodium Formate |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Brightener 49 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Perfume, dyes and minors |
Balance to 100% |
Balance to 100% |
Balance to 100% |
Balance to 100% |
Balance to 100% |
Balance to 100% |
Appearance |
Isotropic liquid |
Opaque viscous liquid |
Hazy liquid |
Isotropic liquid |
Isotropic liquid |
Isotropic liquid |
Viscosity (mPa.s) (20/s, 20° C) |
751 |
3440 |
810 |
602 |
496 |
352 |
% swelling |
9 |
-5 |
-1 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
1 Neodol C14-15 EO7, available from the Shell Company
2 Natural derived C12-14 EO9
3 polyethylene glycol graft polymer comprising a polyethylene glycol backbone (Pluriol
E6000) and hydrophobic vinyl acetate side chains, comprising 40% by weight of the
polymer system of a polyethylene glycol backbone polymer and 60% by weight of the
polymer system of the grafted vinyl acetate side chains
4 ethoxylated polyethyleneimine having an average degree of ethoxylation of 20 per
EO chain and a polyethyleneimine backbone with MW of about 600 |
Test methods
Detergent composition appearance
[0048] The appearance of a detergent composition is visually assessed after storing the
composition in a 30 ml glass vial overnight at 20°C. The visual assessment is conducted
on a nil hydrogenated castor oil nil enzyme sample, considering hydrogenated castor
oil and potentially enzyme samples render the finished product slightly translucent
and as such may mask eventual product haziness appearances.
Detergent composition viscosity
[0049] The viscosity measurements are carried out using a rotational rheometer e.g. TA instruments
HR10. The instrument includes a 40mm 2° cone fixture with a 52µ

η gap. The measurement is carried out using a flow procedure that contains a conditioning
step, a peak hold and a continuous ramp step. The conditioning step involves the setting
of the measurement temperature at 20°C, a pre-shear of 10 seconds at a shear rate
of 10s
-1, and an equilibration of 60 seconds at the selected temperature. The peak hold involves
applying a shear rate of 0.05s
- 1 at 20°C for 3min with sampling every 10s. The continuous ramp step is performed at
a shear rate from 0.1 to 1200s
-1 for 3min at 20°C to obtain the full flow profile. The viscosity value at a shear
rate of 20s
-1 is extracted and reported. The detergent composition of the invention should have
a viscosity between 250 and 1000 mPa.s., preferably between 300 and 800 mPa.s. Too
low viscosity (below 250 mPa.s) can give rise to splashing during the dosing in the
manufacturing process. Too high viscosity (above 1000 mPa.s) can give rise to stringing
during the dosing in the manufacturing process, both splashing and stringing can have
a negative impact on the seal strength.
% film swelling
[0050] Water-soluble PVOH film samples measuring 11 cm by 12 cm are prepared and exposed
to detergent compositions according to the invention and comparative compositions.
A total of 750 ml of these liquid detergent compositions, is required for each test
film. The bottom of a clean inert glass recipient is covered with a thin layer of
liquid and a first film to be tested iss spread on the liquid; air bubbles trapped
under the film are gently pushed towards the sides. A thin layer of liquid is spread
on top of the first film sample followed by addition of a second film sample. This
process is repeated till 5 film samples have been piled up with in-between thin film
layers accordingly. The remaining liquid is then gently poured on top of the fifth
film, in such a way that the films are fully immersed into the liquid. The film should
remain free of wrinkles and no air bubbles should be in contact with the film. The
film in contact with the liquid is stored under closed vessel conditions for 5 days
at 50°C and 1 night at 21°C. A separate glass recipient is used for each different
liquid tested. The film is then removed from the storage vessel, and the excess liquid
is removed from the film. A piece of paper is put on the film which is laid on top
of a bench paper, and then the film is wiped dry thoroughly with dry paper, e.g. a
tissue dry and free of fibers that could stick to a polyvinyl alcohol based film surface.
The weight of the film is measured pre and post immersion testing, and the relative
gain weight/loss is calculated and expressed as a % change according to below formula
:

The average value of the 5 film samples per test solution is calculated and reported.
[0051] A negative film swelling value may result in a brittle film upon product ageing,
while a film swelling value of more than 15% may render the overall unit dose article
become floppy upon ageing and as such aesthetically unappealing. Preferably the film
swelling value is between 3% and 15%, more preferably between 5% and 15%.
1. A water-soluble unit-dose detergent article comprising a water-soluble film and a
detergent composition,
wherein the detergent composition comprises:
from 45% to 65% by weight of the composition of a non-soap surfactant system comprising
anionic non-soap surfactant and nonionic surfactant, wherein the composition comprises
more than 25% by weight of the composition of non-soap anionic surfactant;
from 5% to 20% by weight of the composition of organic solvent; and
from 5% to 25% by weight of the composition of water,
wherein the nonionic surfactant comprises alcohol ethoxylate surfactant and wherein
the weight ratio of non-soap anionic surfactant to non-ionic surfactant is less than
or equal to 1.5:1.
2. The detergent article according to claim 1, wherein the anionic non-soap surfactant
is selected from the group consisting of: linear alkyl benzene sulphonate, alkyl ether
sulphate, alkyl sulphate and mixtures thereof.
3. The detergent article according to any of claims 1 or 2, wherein the nonionic surfactant
is selected from the group consisting of: primary alcohol ethoxylate, secondary alcohol
ethoxylate, and mixtures thereof.
4. The detergent article according to any of the preceding claims wherein the detergent
is a laundry detergent.
5. The detergent article according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the organic
solvent is selected from the group consisting of: 1,2-propanediol, dipropylene glycol,
tripropyleneglycol, glycerol, sorbitol, polyethylene glycol, ethoxylated glycerin
or a mixture thereof.
6. The detergent article according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the weight
ratio of non-soap anionic surfactant to non-ionic surfactant is between 1:2 to 1.5:1.
7. The detergent article according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the detergent
composition further comprises a fatty acid.
8. The detergent article according to the preceding claim, wherein the detergent composition
comprises between 1.5% and 20% by weight of the composition of the fatty acid.
9. The detergent article according to any of the preceding claims further comprising
an enzyme, preferably an enzyme selected from the group consisting of proteases, amylase,
cellulase, lipases, xyloglucanases, mannanases, nucleases, and a mixture thereof.
10. The detergent article according to any of the preceding claims further comprising
a thickener, preferably hydrogenated castor oil.
11. The detergent article according to any of the preceding claims further comprising
a performance polymer, preferably a soil release polymer.
12. The detergent article according to any of the preceding claims further comprising
a chelant, preferably an aminocarboxylated chelant.
13. The detergent article according to any of the preceding claims wherein the detergent
composition has a pH of from 6 to 10 as measured in 10% by weight water solution at
25°C.
14. The detergent article according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the water-soluble
film comprises a polyvinyl alcohol polymer, preferably wherein the water-soluble film
comprises a polyvinyl alcohol homopolymer, a polyvinyl alcohol copolymer, or mixtures
thereof.
15. The detergent article according to the preceding claim wherein the water-soluble film
comprises a blend of polyvinylalcohol homopolymers or a blend of polyvinylalcohol
copolymers or a blend of a polyvinylalcohol homopolymer and a polyvinylalcohol copolymer,preferably
wherein the polyvinylalcohol copolymer is selected from sulphonated and carboxylated
anionic polyvinylalcohol copolymers especially carboxylated anionic polyvinylalcohol
copolymers, most preferably the polyvinyl alcohol polymer comprises a blend of a polyvinylalcohol
homopolymer and a carboxylated anionic polyvinylalcohol copolymer, or a blend of polyvinyl
alcohol homopolymers.