FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to a hot stamped body.
BACKGROUND
[0002] In recent years, in the automobile industry, lighter weight of car bodies has been
sought from the viewpoint of improvement of fuel economy. To achieve both lighter
weight of car bodies and collision safety, one effective method is to increase the
strength of the steel sheet used. A high strength steel sheet is being developed due
to such a background. On the other hand, if making a steel sheet higher in strength,
the formability falls, and therefore achieving both strength and formability in the
steel sheet is generally difficult.
[0003] In relation to this, PTL 1 describes a steel material having a predetermined chemical
composition, wherein a Ceq defined by C+1/24Si+1/6Mn+1/40Ni+1/SCr+1/4Mo+1/14V is 0.10
to 1.00, and a metallographic structure comprising, by vol%, 95.0% or more of martensite,
wherein a former austenite grain size is 5.0 µm or less, and a number of packets in
the former austenite grain is 3.0 or less. Further, PTL 1 teaches that it is possible
to obtain a steel material having an ultrafine structure with an average grain size
of 5.0 µm or less and excellent in strength, ductility, and toughness.
[0004] Hot stamping (hot pressing) is known as a technique for press-forming a steel material
such as described in PTL 1 which is high in strength and therefore difficult to form.
Hot stamping is a technique of hot forming which heats then forms a material to be
formed. This technique heats then forms the material, and therefore at the time of
forming, the steel material is soft and has good formability. Therefore, even a high
strength steel material can be formed into a complex shape with a good precision.
Further, it is hardened at the same time as being formed by the press dies, and therefore
the formed steel material is known to have sufficient strength.
[0005] In relation to this, PTL 2 describes a hot stamped body having a predetermined chemical
composition and a microstructure comprising former austenite with an average grain
size of 3 µm or less and, further, containing at least one of lower bainite, martensite,
and tempered martensite in an area ratio of 90% or more, wherein a grain boundary
solid solution ratio Z, defined by Z=(mass% of one or both of Nb and Mo at the grain
boundaries)/(mass% of one or both of Nb and Mo at time of melting), is 0.3 or more.
Further, PTL 2 teaches that by making the grain size of the former austenite 3 µm
or less and, further, making one or both of Nb and Mo dissolve at the former austenite
grain boundaries to raise the brittle strength of the grain boundaries, a shock absorption
ability better than the past is obtained, more specifically, discloses that a hot
stamped body having the above constitution has a tensile strength of 2000 MPa or more
and is suppressed in early fracture.
[0006] PTL 3 describes a steel sheet for hot stamping having a predetermined chemical composition
and a microstructure comprising at least one of lower bainite, martensite, and tempered
martensite in an area ratio of 90% or more, wherein a grain boundary solid solution
ratio Z, defined by Z=(mass% of one or both of Nb and Mo at the grain boundaries)/(mass%
of one or both of Nb and Mo at time of melting), is 0.4 or more, an X-ray random intensity
ratio of {112}<111> of the crystal grains forming the lower bainite, martensite, or
tempered martensite is 2.8 or more, and a number density of cementite and epsilon
carbide with a grain size of 50 nm or less is a total of 1×10
16 /cm
3 or more. Further, PTL 3 teaches that by controlling the X-ray random intensity ratio
of {1 12}<1 1 1> of the crystal grain orientation of the crystal grains of the lower
bainite, martensite, or tempered martensite in a steel sheet for hot stamping, due
to the texture memory effect of austenite and martensite, crystal orientations with
high crack propagation inhibiting effect in the hot stamped body are formed and excellent
bending deformation ability is obtained in the hot stamped body, more specifically
discloses that a hot stamped body having the above constitution has a tensile strength
of 2000 MPa or more and has a maximum bending angle of 50° or more.
[CITATIONS LIST]
[PATENT LITERATURE]
SUMMARY
[TECHNICAL PROBLEM]
[0008] If receiving an impact exceeding the yield strength, plastic deformation occurs,
and therefore from the viewpoint of securing the collision safety of automobiles,
improvement of not only the tensile strength, but also the yield strength is sought
in a hot stamped body. However, in a hot stamped body having such a high strength,
sometimes hydrogen embrittlement cracking (also referred to as "delayed fracture",
etc.) becomes a problem. "Hydrogen embrittlement cracking" is the phenomenon where
a steel member which is acted on by a high stress under conditions of use suddenly
fractures due to hydrogen penetrating the steel from the environment. In general,
it is known that hydrogen embrittlement cracking occurs more easily the higher the
strength of the steel material. On the other hand, in the automobile industry, etc.,
further reduction of weight of the steel material is sought. To achieve such lighter
weight, a need arises to raise the strength more than the past. Therefore, there is
a great need for a steel material, more specifically a hot stamped body, able to solve
the problem of hydrogen embrittlement even if raising the strength equal to the past
or more than the same.
[0009] Therefore, the present invention has as its object to provide a hot stamped body
which is high in strength and able to suppress hydrogen embrittlement by a novel constitution.
[SOLUTION TO PROBLEM]
[0010] The inventors conducted studies so as to achieve the above object, in particular
focusing on the metallographic structure of the hot stamped body. As a result, the
inventors discovered that by increasing the fineness and the uniformity of the former
austenite grains in a hot stamped body and in relation to this reducing the variation
in hardness in the metallographic structure of the hot stamped body, it is possible
to suppress or reduce microstress concentration and that, further, it is possible
to reduce the amount of hydrogen trapped per unit grain boundary area by the increase
in grain boundary area accompanying increasing the fineness and the uniformity of
the former austenite grains, discovered that, due to the combination of suppression
or reduction of such microstress concentration and reduction of the amount of hydrogen
trapped per unit grain boundary area, it is possible to remarkably improve the hydrogen
embrittlement resistance despite the hot stamped body having a high tensile strength
and yield strength, and thereby completed the present invention.
[0011] The present invention able to achieve this object is as follows:
- (1) A hot stamped body having a chemical composition comprising, by mass%,
C: 0.40 to 0.70%,
Si: 0.01 to 1.30%,
Mn: 0.05 to 3.00%,
P: 0.100% or less,
S: 0.0100% or less,
N: 0.0200% or less,
O: 0.0200% or less,
Al: 0.001 to 1.000%,
Cr: 0.01 to 1.00%,
Nb: 0 to 0.200%,
Ti: 0 to 0.200%,
Mo: 0 to 1.00%,
B: 0 to 0.1000%,
Co: 0 to 4.00%,
Ni: 0 to 3.00%,
Cu: 0 to 3.00%,
V: 0 to 3.00%,
W: 0 to 1.00%,
Ca: 0 to 1.000%,
Mg: 0 to 1.000%,
REM: 0 to 1.000%,
Sb: 0 to 1.000%,
Zr: 0 to 1.000%,
Sn: 0 to 1.000%,
As: 0 to 0.100%, and
balance: Fe and impurities, and
a metallographic structure comprising, by volume ratio, martensite in 90% or more,
wherein
an average grain size of former austenite grains is 3.0 µm or less,
a standard deviation in grain size distribution of former austenite grains is 1.5
µm or less, and
a difference of a maximum value and a minimum value in a Vickers hardness distribution
in a sheet thickness direction is 35% or less of an average value of I Vickers hardness
distribution.
- (2) The hot stamped body according to (1), wherein the chemical composition contains,
by mass%, one or more selected from the group consisting of,
Nb: 0.001 to 0.200%,
Ti: 0.001 to 0.200%,
Mo: 0.001 to 1.00%,
B: 0.0001 to 0.1000%,
Co: 0.001 to 4.00%,
Ni: 0.001 to 3.00%,
Cu: 0.001 to 3.00%,
V: 0.001 to 3.00%,
W: 0.001 to 1.00%,
Ca: 0.0001 to 1.000%,
Mg: 0.0001 to 1.000%,
REM: 0.0001 to 1.000%,
Sb: 0.001 to 1.000%,
Zr: 0.001 to 1.000%,
Sn: 0.001 to 1.000%, and
As: 0.001 to 0.100%.
[ADVANTAGEOUS EFFECTS OF INVENTION]
[0012] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a hot stamped body
which is high in strength and able to suppress hydrogen embrittlement.
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
<Hot Stamped Body>
[0013] The hot stamped body according to an embodiment of the present invention has a chemical
composition comprising, by mass%,
C: 0.40 to 0.70%,
Si: 0.01 to 1.30%,
Mn: 0.05 to 3.00%,
P: 0.100% or less,
S: 0.0100% or less,
N: 0.0200% or less,
O: 0.0200% or less,
Al: 0.001 to 1.000%,
Cr: 0.01 to 1.00%,
Nb: 0 to 0.200%,
Ti: 0 to 0.200%,
Mo: 0 to 1.00%,
B: 0 to 0.1000%,
Co: 0 to 4.00%,
Ni: 0 to 3.00%,
Cu: 0 to 3.00%,
V: 0 to 3.00%,
W: 0 to 1.00%,
Ca: 0 to 1.000%,
Mg: 0 to 1.000%,
REM: 0 to 1.000%,
Sb: 0 to 1.000%,
Zr: 0 to 1.000%,
Sn: 0 to 1.000%,
As: 0 to 0.100%, and
balance: Fe and impurities, and
a metallographic structure comprising, by volume ratio, martensite in 90% or more,
wherein an average grain size of former austenite grains is 3.0 µm or less,
a standard deviation in grain size distribution of former austenite grains is 1.5
µm or less, and
a difference of a maximum value and a minimum value in a Vickers hardness distribution
in a sheet thickness direction is 35% or less of an average value the Vickers hardness
distribution.
[0014] As explained above, it is known that hydrogen embrittlement cracking becomes easier
to occur the higher the strength of the steel material. For example, in a high strength
steel material, to secure high strength, the metallographic structure generally contains
martensite. In particular, in a hot stamped body having a tensile strength of 2000
MPa or more, the body is often controlled to a metallographic structure mainly comprised
of martensite. Such a mainly martensite structure is high in dislocation density.
On the other hand, dislocations can become trap sites for hydrogen. Therefore, in
a high strength hot stamped body mainly comprised of martensite, there is an ongoing
need for solving the problem of hydrogen embrittlement. Therefore, the inventors conducted
studies from the viewpoint of reducing or suppressing regions able to become starting
points for hydrogen embrittlement cracking in such a high strength hot stamped body
mainly comprised of martensite, in particular focusing on the metallographic structure
of the hot stamped body. More specifically, the inventors first discovered that if
there is a large variation in former austenite grain size in the metallographic structure
of a hot stamped body, the hardness becomes higher in a region with a smaller former
austenite grain size and that such a local high hardness region can become a starting
point of hydrogen embrittlement cracking. As opposed to this, the inventors discovered
that by increasing the fineness of the former austenite grains and reducing the average
grain size to 3.0 µm or less and by controlling the standard deviation in the grain
size distribution to 1.5 µm or less to increase the uniformity and in relation to
this controlling the difference of a maximum value and minimum value in a Vickers
hardness distribution in a sheet thickness direction to 35% or less of the average
value of the Vickers hardness distribution, it is possible to suppress a rise in such
a local hardness to reliably suppress or reduce microstress concentration.
[0015] While not intending to be bound to any specific theory, it is believed that at the
time of hot stamping, the starting temperature of martensite transformation changes
in accordance with the size of the austenite grains. If explained in more detail,
it is believed that austenite grains having larger size are higher in starting temperature
of martensite transformation compared with austenite grains having smaller size and
austempering proceeds in the period from the completion of transformation to cooling
to room temperature, and therefore the hardness becomes lower. Austenite grains having
smaller size rise in hardness since martensite transformation occurs at a lower temperature
than large grains. Therefore, to suppress or reduce the rise in such local hardness,
it is important to reduce the variation in the austenite grain size before martensite
transformation. In other words, it is believed that by reducing the variation in the
austenite grain size before martensite transformation, it is possible to reduce the
variation in the former austenite grain size after martensite transformation and as
a result it is possible to reduce the variation in hardness in the metallographic
structure of the hot stamped body. Due to such a reason, it is believed that by controlling
the difference between the maximum value and minimum value of the Vickers hardness
distribution in the metallographic structure of the hot stamped body to 35% or less
of the average value of the Vickers hardness distribution to reduce the variation
in hardness, it would be possible to remarkably suppress the rise in local hardness
due to differences in timing of martensite transformation. If there is locally a region
of a high hardness, it is believed that there will be a high possibility of stress
concentrating in particular at the interfaces of former austenite grains with differences
in hardness and causing hydrogen embrittlement cracking, and therefore reducing the
variation in hardness in the metallographic structure of a hot stamped body would
be extremely effective in suppressing or reducing microstress concentration and improving
the hydrogen embrittlement resistance.
[0016] Furthermore, in the hot stamped body according to an embodiment of the present invention,
the former austenite grains have an average grain size of 3.0 µm or less, and therefore
are extremely fine. Further, the standard deviation in the grain size distribution
of former austenite grains is controlled to 1.5 µm or less, i.e., the former austenite
grains are increased in uniformity to a high degree. The fine former austenite grains
are believed to transform to martensite at a lower temperature as described above.
Further, these are increased in uniformity to a high degree, and therefore it is believed
that a metallographic structure including former austenite grains increased in fineness
and uniformity in this way transforms to martensite at a lower temperature in the
metallographic structure as a whole. For this reason, a hot stamped body including
such a metallographic structure can enable overall hardness to be remarkably improved,
and therefore an extremely high strength, specifically an extremely high tensile strength
and yield strength, can be achieved. In addition, in a metallographic structure including
such former austenite grains increased in fineness and uniformity, the grain boundary
area greatly increases, and therefore it is possible to remarkably reduce the amount
of hydrogen trapped per unit grain boundary area. Hydrogen embrittlement cracking,
for example, is caused by hydrogen penetrating the steel from the environment being
trapped at the grain boundaries in the state where a high stress is acting. For this
reason, by reducing the amount of hydrogen trapped per unit grain boundary area, it
is possible to greatly reduce the risk of hydrogen embrittlement cracking. Therefore,
according to the hot stamped body according to an embodiment of the present invention,
in addition to the effect of improvement of the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
due to the reduction in variation in hardness explained previously, it is also possible
to improve the hydrogen embrittlement resistance of a hot stamped body from the viewpoint
of increase of the grain boundary area due to increased fineness and increased uniformity
of the former austenite grains.
[0017] Below, the hot stamped body according to the embodiment of the present invention
will be explained in more detail. In the following explanation, the "%" of the units
of content of the elements, unless otherwise indicated, means "mass%". Further, in
this Description, "to" showing a numerical range, unless otherwise indicated, is used
in the sense including the numerical values described before and after it as the upper
limit value and lower limit value.
[C: 0.40 to 0.70%]
[0018] C is an element improving the strength of a hot stamped body. If the C content is
less than 0.40%, it is not possible to obtain the desired strength at the hot stamped
body. For this reason, the C content is 0.40% or more. The C content is preferably
more than 0.40%, 0.42% or more, 0.44% or more, or 0.45% or more.
[0019] On the other hand, if the C content is more than 0.70%, the strength becomes too
high and sometimes excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance cannot be obtained.
For this reason, the C content is 0.70% or less. Preferably, the C content is 0.68%
or less, 0.67% or less, 0.65% or less, or 0.60% or less.
[Si: 0.01 to 1.30%]
[0020] Si is an element improving the strength of a hot stamped body by solution strengthening.
If the Si content is less than 0.01%, the desired strength cannot be obtained. For
this reason, the Si content is 0.01% or more. The Si content is preferably 0.05% or
more, 0.10% or more, 0.20% or more, more than 0.25%, 0.26% or more, 0.27% or more,
0.30% or more, or 0.40% or more.
[0021] On the other hand, if the Si content is more than 1.30%, the amount of ferrite increases
and sometimes the desired metallographic structure cannot be obtained. For this reason,
the Si content is 1.30% or less. The Si content is preferably 1.20% or less, 1.00%
or less, 0.80% or less, 0.60% or less, or 0.50% or less.
[Mn: 0.05 to 3.00%]
[0022] Mn is an element raising the hardenability of steel and contributing to improvement
of the strength. If the Mn content is less than 0.05%, such an effect cannot be sufficiently
obtained. For this reason, the Mn content is 0.05% or more. The Mn content is preferably
0.10% or more, 0.50% or more, 1.00% or more, 1.30% or more, or 1.50% or more.
[0023] On the other hand, if the Mn content is more than 3.00%, Mn segregation becomes remarkable.
Due to this, sometimes variation in grain size of former austenite grains cannot be
sufficiently suppressed. For this reason, the Mn content is 3.00% or less. The Mn
content is preferably 2.80% or less, 2.50% or less, 2.30% or less, or 2.00% or less.
[P: 0.100% or Less]
[0024] P is an impurity element and segregates at the grain boundaries to cause the hydrogen
embrittlement resistance to deteriorate. For this reason, the P content is 0.100%
or less. The P content is preferably 0.070% or less, 0.050% or less, or 0.010% or
less.
[0025] The lower limit of the P content is not particularly prescribed, but if less than
0.0001%, the dephosphorization cost greatly rises making this not preferable economically.
For this reason, the P content may also be 0.0001% or more.
[S: 0.0100% or Less]
[0026] S is an impurity element and forms inclusions in the steel. The inclusions cause
the hydrogen embrittlement resistance to deteriorate, and therefore the S content
is 0.0100% or less. The S content is preferably 0.0080% or less, 0.0050% or less,
0.0030% or less, or 0.0020% or less.
[0027] The lower limit of the S content is not particularly prescribed, but if less than
0.0001%, the desulfurization cost greatly rises making this not preferable economically.
For this reason, the S content may also be 0.0001% or more.
[N: 0.0200% or Less]
[0028] N is an impurity element and forms nitrides in the steel. The nitrides cause the
hydrogen embrittlement resistance to deteriorate, and therefore the N content is 0.0200%
or less. The N content is preferably 0.0180% or less, 0.0150% or less, 0.0100% or
less, 0.0060% or less, or 0.0040% or less.
[0029] The lower limit of the N content is not particularly prescribed, but if reducing
this to less than 0.0001%, the denitridation cost greatly rises making this not preferable
economically. For this reason, the N content may also be 0.0001% or more.
[O: 0.0200% or Less]
[0030] O, if contained in a large amount in the steel, forms coarse oxides and causes the
hydrogen embrittlement resistance to deteriorate. For this reason, the O content is
0.0200% or less. The O content is preferably 0.0150% or less, 0.0100% or less, 0.0070%
or less, or 0.0040% or less.
[0031] From the viewpoint of reducing the refining costs, the O content may also be 0.0001%
or more. To make a large number of fine oxides disperse at the time of deoxidation
of the molten steel, the O content may be 0.0005% or more.
[Al: 0.001 to 1.000%]
[0032] Al is an element having the action of deoxidizing the molten steel and making the
steel sounder. If the Al content is less than 0.001%, the deoxidation will not sufficiently
proceed and coarse oxides will be formed causing the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
to deteriorate. For this reason, the Al content is 0.001% or more. The Al content
is preferably 0.003% or more, 0.005% or more, 0.010% or more, or 0.030% or more.
[0033] On the other hand, if the Al content is more than 1.000%, coarse oxides will form
in the steel causing the hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the hot stamped body
to fall. For this reason, the Al content is 1.000% or less. The Al content is preferably
0.800% or less, 0.600% or less, 0.400% or less, 0.200% or less, or 0.100% or less.
[Cr: 0.01 to 1.00%]
[0034] Cr is an element dissolving in the former austenite grains before hot stamping and
thereby raising the strength of the hot stamped body. If the Cr content is less than
0.01%, the desired strength cannot be obtained. For this reason, the Cr content is
0.01% or more. The Cr content is preferably 0.05% or more, 0.10% or more, 0.15% or
more, or 0.20% or more.
[0035] On the other hand, if the Cr content is more than 1.00%, coarse intermetallic compounds
are formed at the hot stamped body and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the
hot stamped body deteriorates. For this reason, the Cr content is 1.00% or less. The
Cr content is preferably 0.80% or less, 0.60% or less, 0.50% or less, or 0.40% or
less.
[0036] The basic chemical composition of the hot stamped body according to an embodiment
of the present invention is as explained above. Furthermore, the hot stamped body
may, if necessary, contain at least one of the following optional elements in place
of part of the balance of Fe. For example, the hot stamped body may contain at least
one element selected from the group comprising Nb: 0 to 0.200%, Ti: 0 to 0.200%, Mo:
0 to 1.00%, B: 0 to 0.1000%, Co: 0 to 4.00%, Ni: 0 to 3.00%, Cu: 0 to 3.00%, V: 0
to 3.00%, and W: 0 to 1.00%. Further, the hot stamped body may contain at least one
element selected from the group comprising Ca: 0 to 1.000%, Mg: 0 to 1.000%, and REM:
0 to 1.000%. Further, the hot stamped body may contain at least one element selected
from the group comprising Sb: 0 to 1.000%, Zr: 0 to 1.000%, and Sn: 0 to 1.000%. Further,
the hot stamped body may contain As: 0 to 0.100%. Below, these optional elements will
be explained in detail.
[Nb: 0 to 0.200%]
[0037] Nb is an element forming carbonitrides in steel and and improving the strength of
the hot stamped body by precipitation strengthening. The Nb content may be 0.001%
or more, but to reliably obtain this effect, the Nb content is preferably 0.010% or
more or 0.020% or more.
[0038] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the Nb content is preferably 0.200% or less. The Nb content
may also be 0.180% or less, 0.150% or less, 0.100% or less, 0.080% or less, or 0.060%
or less.
[Ti: 0 to 0.200%]
[0039] Ti is an element forming carbonitrides in steel and and improving the strength of
the hot stamped body by precipitation strengthening. The Ti content may be 0.001%
or more, but to reliably obtain this effect, the Ti content is preferably 0.010% or
more or 0.020% or more.
[0040] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the Ti content is preferably 0.200% or less. The Ti content
may also be 0.180% or less, 0.150% or less, 0.100% or less, 0.080% or less, or 0.060%
or less.
[Mo: 0 to 1.00%]
[0041] Mo is an element improving the hardenability of steel. The Mo content may be 0.001%
or more, but to reliably obtain this effect, the Mo content is preferably 0.005% or
more or 0.01% or more.
[0042] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the Mo content is preferably 1.00% or less. The Mo content
may also be 0.80% or less, 0.60% or less, 0.50% or less, 0.30% or less, or 0.10% or
less.
[B: 0 to 0.1000%]
[0043] B is an element improving the hardenability of steel. The B content may be 0.0001%
or more, but to reliably obtain this effect, the B content is preferably 0.0005% or
more or 0.0010% or more.
[0044] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the B content is preferably 0.1000% or less. The B content
may also be 0.0500% or less, 0.0100% or less, 0.0050% or less, 0.0030% or less, or
0.0015% or less.
[Co: 0 to 4.00%]
[0045] Co is an element improving the strength of the hot stamped body by solution strengthening.
The Co content may be 0.001% or more, but to reliably obtain this effect, the Co content
is preferably 0.01% or more or 0.05% or more.
[0046] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the Co content is preferably 4.00% or less. The Co content
may also be 3.00% or less, 2.00% or less, 1.00% or less, 0.80% or less, or 0.60% or
less.
[Ni: 0 to 3.00%]
[0047] Ni has the action of dissolving in the austenite grains at the time of heating in
the hot stamping step and thereby raising the strength of the hot stamped body. The
Ni content may be 0.001% or more, but to reliably obtain this effect, the Ni content
is preferably 0.01% or more.
[0048] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the Ni content is preferably 3.00% or less. The Ni content
may also be 2.80% or less, 2.50% or less, 2.00% or less, 1.50% or less, 1.00% or less,
or 0.80% or less.
[Cu: 0 to 3.00%]
[0049] Cu has the action of dissolving in the austenite grains at the time of heating in
the hot stamping step and thereby raising the strength of the hot stamped body. The
Cu content may be 0.001% or more, but to reliably obtain this effect, the Cu content
is preferably 0.01% or more or 0.05% or more.
[0050] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the Cu content is preferably 3.00% or less. The Cu content
may also be 2.00% or less, 1.00% or less, 0.50% or less, 0.30% or less, or 0.10% or
less.
[V: 0 to 3.00%]
[0051] V has the effect of forming carbonitrides in the steel to thereby improve the strength
of the hot stamped body by precipitation strengthening. The V content may be 0.001%
or more, but to reliably obtain this effect, the V content is preferably 0.01% or
more or 0.05% or more.
[0052] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the V content is preferably 3.00% or less. The V content
may also be 2.00% or less, 1.00% or less, 0.50% or less, 0.30% or less, or 0.10% or
less.
[W: 0 to 1.00%]
[0053] W is an element improving the hardenability of steel. The W content may be 0.001%
or more, but to reliably obtain this effect, the W content is preferably 0.005% or
more or 0.01% or more.
[0054] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the W content is preferably 1.00% or less. The W content
may also be 0.80% or less, 0.60% or less, 0.50% or less, 0.30% or less, or 0.10% or
less.
[Ca: 0 to 1.000%]
[0055] Ca is an element able to control the form of sulfides. The Ca content may be 0.0001%
or more, but to reliably obtain this effect, the Ca content is preferably 0.0005%
or more or 0.001% or more.
[0056] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the Ca content is preferably 1.000% or less. The Ca content
may also be 0.500% or less, 0.100% or less, 0.050% or less, 0.010% or less, 0.005%
or less, or 0.002% or less.
[Mg: 0 to 1.000%]
[0057] Mg is an element able to control the form of sulfides. The Mg content may be 0.0001%
or more, but to reliably obtain this effect, the Mg content is preferably 0.0005%
or more or 0.001% or more.
[0058] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the Mg content is preferably 1.000% or less. The Mg content
may also be 0.500% or less, 0.100% or less, 0.050% or less, 0.010% or less, 0.005%
or less, or 0.002% or less.
[REM: 0 to 1.000%]
[0059] REM is an element able to control the form of sulfides. The REM content may be 0.0001%
or more, but to reliably obtain this effect, the REM content is preferably 0.0005%
or more or 0.001% or more.
[0060] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the REM content is preferably 1.000% or less. The REM content
may be 0.500% or less, 0.100% or less, 0.050% or less, 0.010% or less, 0.005% or less,
or 0.002% or less.
[0061] In the present embodiment, "REM" is the general term for the 17 elements of atomic
number 21 scandium (Sc), atomic number 39 yttrium (Y), and the lanthanoids of atomic
number 57 lanthanum (La) to atomic number 71 lutetium (Lu). The REM content is the
total content of these elements.
[Sb: 0 to 1.000%]
[0062] Sb is an element inhibiting the formation of oxides. To reliably obtain this effect,
the Sb content is preferably 0.001% or more.
[0063] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the Sb content is preferably 1.000% or less. The Sb content
may also be 0.800% or less, 0.500% or less, 0.200% or less, 0.100% or less, or 0.050%
or less.
[Zr: 0 to 1.000%]
[0064] Zr is an element inhibiting the formation of oxides. To reliably obtain this effect,
the Zn content is preferably 0.001% or more.
[0065] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the Zr content is preferably 1.000% or less. The Zr content
may also be 0.800% or less, 0.500% or less, 0.200% or less, 0.100% or less, or 0.050%
or less.
[Sn: 0 to 1.000%]
[0066] Sn is an element inhibiting the formation of oxides. To reliably obtain this effect,
the Sn content is preferably 0.001% or more.
[0067] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the Sn content is preferably 1.000% or less. The Sn content
may also be 0.800% or less, 0.500% or less, 0.200% or less, 0.100% or less, or 0.050%
or less.
[As: 0 to 0.100%]
[0068] As makes the single austenite phase forming temperature fall, and therefore contributes
to increased fineness of the former austenite grains. To reliably obtain this effect,
the As content is preferably 0.001% or more.
[0069] On the other hand, even if made to be contained in a large amount, the effect becomes
saturated, and therefore the As content is preferably 0.100% or less. The As content
may also be 0.080% or less, 0.050% or less, 0.020% or less, 0.010% or less, or 0.005%
or less.
[0070] In the hot stamped body according to an embodiment of the present invention, the
balance besides the above elements is comprised of Fe and impurities. The "impurities"
are constituents, etc., entering due to various factors in the production process
starting from materials such as ore and scrap, etc., when industrially producing hot
stamped bodies.
[0071] The chemical composition of the above hot stamped body may be measured by a general
analysis method. For example, it may be measured using ICP-AES (Inductively Coupled
Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry). C and S may be measured using the combustioninfrared
absorption method, N may be measured using the inert gas melting-thermal conductivity
method, and O may be measured by the inert gas melting-nondispersion type infrared
absorption method.
[0072] If the surface of the hot stamped body is provided with a plating layer, mechanical
polishing may be used to remove the plating layer, then the chemical composition analyzed.
[Martensite: 90% or More]
[0073] The metallographic structure of the hot stamped body according to an embodiment of
the present invention contains, by volume ratio, martensite in 90% or more. The balance
of the structure is not particularly limited, but may be comprised of 10% or less
of at least one of bainite, ferrite, retained austenite, and pearlite. Martensite
is an extremely hard structure. Therefore, by including martensite in the hot stamped
body in a volume ratio of 90% or more, a high tensile strength and yield strength,
specifically a tensile strength of 2200 MPa or more and a yield strength of 1800 MPa
or more, become able to be achieved. On the other hand, if the volume ratio of the
martensite is low and the ratio of ferrite or other soft structures becomes high,
the variation in hardness in the sheet thickness direction will become remarkable
and the ratio of the difference of the maximum value and minimum value in the Vickers
hardness distribution in the sheet thickness direction with respect to the average
value will become larger. Therefore, the larger the volume ratio of the martensite
the more preferable. For example, it may be 92% or more, 94% or more, 96% or more,
or 98% or more. The upper limit of the volume ratio of martensite is not particularly
prescribed, but may be 100%.
[Identification of Metallographic Structure and Calculation of Volume Ratio]
[0074] The metallographic structure of the hot stamped body is identified and the volume
ratio is calculated as follows: First, a sample is taken so that a cross-section parallel
to the sheet thickness direction of the hot stamped body becomes the examined surface.
Next, the examined surface is polished to a mirror finish and corroded by a Nital
corrosion solution, then the structure is examined using a scan type electron microscope
(SEM). A 300 µm×300 µm range is captured at 1000X centered about the sheet thickness
1/4 depth position of the examined surface. The obtained microstructure photo is digitalized
to white and black, then is analyzed to identify the pearlite, bainite, and ferrite.
The total of the area ratios of these is found using a method based on "Steels-micrographic
determination of the apparent grain size" prescribed in JIS G 0551: 2020. Furthermore,
the area ratio of the above structures is converted to volume ratio by the line segment
method. The line segment method is based on the technique described in, for example,
Robert T. DeHoff, Frederik N. Rhines coedit (Quantitative Microscopy, 1968). Retained
austenite is difficult to differentiate from martensite by an SEM, and therefore X-ray
diffraction is used to measure the volume ratio of the retained austenite. Finally,
the total volume ratio of the pearlite, bainite, ferrite, and retained austenite obtained
by the above method is subtracted from 100% to determine the volume ratio of martensite.
[Average Grain Size of Former Austenite Grains: 3.0 µm or Less]
[0075] In an embodiment of the present invention, the average grain size of the former austenite
grains is 3.0 µm or less. Such an increased fineness of the former austenite grains
contributes to making the hot stamped body higher in strength by combination with
the increase uniformity of the former austenite grains explained later. By making
the grain boundary area increase to reduce the amount of hydrogen trapped per unit
grain boundary area, it is possible to improve the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
of the hot stamped body. From the viewpoint of increasing the strength of the hot
stamped body and improving the hydrogen embrittlement resistance, the smaller the
average grain size of the former austenite grains, the better. For example, it may
be 2.8 µm or less, 2.5 µm or less, 2.3 µm or less, or 2.0 µm or less. The lower limit
is not particularly prescribed, but the average grain size of the former austenite
grains may also be, for example, 1.0 µm or more, 1.2 µm or more, or 1.5 µm or more.
[Standard Deviation in Grain Size Distribution of Former Austenite Grains: 1.5 µm
or Less]
[0076] In an embodiment of the present invention, the standard deviation in the grain size
distribution of the former austenite grains is 1.5 µm or less. Increasing the uniformity
of the former austenite grain in this way to keep down variation in the former austenite
grain size, as already explained in relation to the average grain size of the former
austenite grains, can make the hot stamped body higher in strength and further improve
the hydrogen embrittlement resistance by increasing the grain boundary area. In addition,
according to an embodiment of the present invention, by controlling the standard deviation
in the grain size distribution of former austenite grains to 1.5 µm or less to reduce
the variation in former austenite grain size, it is possible to reduce the variation
in hardness and in turn remarkably suppress a rise in local hardness in the hot stamped
body. By suppressing a rise in local hardness at the hot stamped body, it is possible
to reliably suppress or reduce the microstress concentration, and therefore it is
possible to further improve the hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the hot stamped
body. From the viewpoint of improving these effects, the smaller the standard deviation
in the grain size distribution of former austenite grains, the better. For example,
it may be 1.4 µm or less, 1.2 µm or less, 1.0 µm or less, or 0.8 µm or less. The lower
limit is not particularly prescribed, but the standard deviation, for example, may
be 0.1 µm or more, 0.2 µm or more, or 0.4 µm or more.
[Method of Determination of Average Grain Size and Standard Deviation in Grain Size
Distribution of Former Austenite Grains]
[0077] The average grain size and the standard deviation in the grain size distribution
of former austenite grains are determined in the following way. First, a sample is
cut out from any position 50 mm or more from an end face of the hot stamped body (if
a sample cannot be taken from this position, a position away from the end parts) so
as to enable a sheet thickness cross-section vertical to the surface to be examined.
The size of the sample, while depending also on the measuring device, is made a size
enabling 10 mm or so to be examined in a direction vertical to the sheet thickness
direction. The cross-section of the sample is polished using #600 to #1500 silicon
carbide paper, then a liquid comprised of particle size 1 to 6 µm diamond powder dispersed
in alcohol or other diluent or pure water is used to polish the surface to a mirror
finish. Next, the examined surface is finished by electrolytic polishing. An area
of a length 50 µm and 50 µm in the sheet thickness direction centered at a 1/4 depth
position of the sheet thickness at any position in the long direction of the sample
cross-section is measured at 0.1 µm measurement intervals by electron backscatter
diffraction to obtain crystal orientation information. For the measurement, an EBSD
analysis apparatus comprised of a thermal field emission type scan electron microscope
and EBSD detector may be used. For example, an EBSD analysis apparatus comprised of
a JSM-7001F made by JEOL and a DVC5 model detector made by TSL may be used. At that
time, the vacuum degree inside the EBSD analysis apparatus may be 9.6×10
- 5 Pa or less, the acceleration voltage may be 15 kV, and the beam current level may
be made 13. The obtained crystal orientation information is used to calculate the
crystal orientation of the former austenite grains from the crystallographic orientation
relationship of general former austenite grains and crystal grains having body-centered
cubic structures after transformation. For the method of calculating the crystal orientations
of the former austenite grains, the following method is used. First, a crystal orientation
map of the former austenite grains is prepared by the method described in
Acta Materialia, 58(2010), 6393-6403. The average value between the shortest diameter and the longest diameter of one
former austenite grain included in the examined field is calculated. That average
value is made the size of the former austenite grain. The above operation is performed
for all of the former austenite grains except for the former austenite grains where
the crystal grains as a whole are not included in the captured field, such as at the
end parts of the captured field, to find the sizes of all of the former austenite
grains in the captured field. From the obtained sizes of all former austenite grains,
the average grain size and standard deviation are calculated whereupon the average
grain size and the standard deviation in the grain size distribution of former austenite
grains are determined.
[Difference of Maximum Value and Minimum Value in Vickers Hardness Distribution in
Sheet Thickness Direction: 35% or Less of Average Value of Vickers Hardness Distribution]
[0078] In an embodiment of the present invention, the difference of the maximum value and
minimum value in the Vickers hardness distribution in the sheet thickness direction
is 35% or less of the average value of the Vickers hardness distribution. By keeping
the variation in Vickers hardness distribution within such a range, it is possible
to remarkably suppress in rise of local hardness at the hot stamped body. As a result,
it is possible to reliably suppress or reduce microstress concentration, and therefore
it is possible to improve the hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the hot stamped
body. From the viewpoint of improving the hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the
hot stamped body, the smaller the difference of the maximum value and minimum value
of the Vickers hardness distribution, the better. For example, it may be 30% or less,
25% or less, 20% or less, or 15% or less of the average value of the Vickers hardness
distribution. The lower limit is not particularly prescribed, but the difference of
the maximum value and minimum value of the Vickers hardness distribution may, for
example, be 1% or more, 3% or more, or 5% or more of the average value of the Vickers
hardness distribution.
[0079] As explained above, by reducing the variation in austenite grain size, it is possible
to reduce the variation in hardness. However, in an embodiment of the present invention,
the standard deviation in the grain size distribution of former austenite grains is
measured and determined at a region centered about the same sheet thickness 1/4 depth
position, while the difference of the maximum value and minimum value of the Vickers
hardness distribution is determined based on the values of Vickers hardness measured
at various depth positions in the sheet thickness direction. Therefore, it is not
possible to say that by the standard deviation in the grain size distribution of former
austenite grains being 3.0 µm or less, naturally the difference of the maximum value
and minimum value in the Vickers hardness distribution in the sheet thickness direction
would become 35% or less of the average value of the Vickers hardness distribution.
In addition, the effect obtained by reducing the variation in former austenite grain
size and the effect obtained by reducing the variation in hardness also do not completely
match. For example, as explained above, reduction of variation in former austenite
grain size (increased uniformity), by combination with the former austenite grain
size, contributes to increasingly higher strength of the hot stamped body and improvement
of the hydrogen embrittlement resistance by increase of the grain boundary area, while
reduction of variation of hardness suppresses the rise of local hardness in the hot
stamped body to suppress or reduce microstress concentration and thereby improve the
hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the hot stamped body. The object of "provision
of a hot stamped body which is high in strength and able to inhibit hydrogen embrittlement"
according to the present invention is achieved by satisfaction of all requirements
of the chemical composition of the hot stamped body plus the average grain size and
standard deviation in the grain size distribution of the former austenite grains and
the difference of the maximum value and minimum value of the Vickers hardness distribution.
It is not, for example, achieved by only the provisions of the chemical composition
of the hot stamped body and the average grain size and standard deviation in the grain
size distribution of the former austenite grains.
[Method of Determination of Difference of Maximum Value and Minimum Value in Vickers
Hardness Distribution in Sheet Thickness Direction]
[0080] The difference of the maximum value and minimum value in the Vickers hardness distribution
in the sheet thickness direction is determined in the following way: First, a sample
is cut out from any position of the hot stamped body 50 mm or more separated from
an end face so that a cross-section vertical to the surface (sheet thickness cross-section)
can be examined. The sample, while depending also on the measuring device, is made
a size enabling 10 mm to be examined in a direction vertical to the sheet thickness
direction. The cross-section of the sample is polished using #600 to #1500 silicon
carbide paper, then a liquid comprised of particle size 1 to 6 µm diamond powder dispersed
in alcohol or other diluent or pure water is used to polish the surface to a mirror
finish. The cross-section polished to a mirror finish is measured for Vickers hardness
using a micro Vickers hardness tester by a load of 25 gf at 25 to 30 µm intervals
in the sheet thickness direction from a position of 100 µm depth from the surface
of the hot stamped body (if there is a plating layer present at the surface, the surface
of the hot stamped body after removing the plating layer) to obtain the measured values
of Vickers hardness for a distance of half or more of the sheet thickness minus 100
µm from the front and back surfaces of the hot stamped body. The intervals between
measurement points in the sheet thickness direction (intervals between centers of
indentations) have to be 3 times or more the distance of an indentation. "3 times
or more the distance of an indentation" means a distance of 3 times or more of the
length of the diagonal at the rectangular shaped opening of an indentation formed
by the diamond indenter at the time of measurement of the Vickers hardness. If the
hot stamped body to be measured is thin and it is difficult to make the intervals
between measurement points 3 times or more the distance of an indentation and strike
the sheet linearly in the sheet thickness direction, the intervals between measurement
points can be made 3 times or more the distance of an indentation while striking the
sheet zigzag in the sheet thickness direction. Finally, the maximum value and minimum
value are selected from all of the measured values of the Vickers hardness and the
difference of the same is calculated. Using the calculated difference of the maximum
value and minimum value and the average value obtained by arithmetically averaging
all of the measured values of the Vickers hardness, the ratio of the difference of
the maximum value and minimum value in the Vickers hardness distribution in the sheet
thickness direction with respect to the average value is determined.
[Plating]
[0081] The hot stamped body according to the present embodiment may having a plating layer
at its surface. By having a plating layer at the surface, the corrosion resistance
can be improved. As the plating layer, an aluminum plating layer, aluminum-zinc plating
layer, aluminum-silicon plating layer, hot dip galvanized layer, electrogalvanized
layer, hot dip galvannealed layer, zinc-nickel plating layer, aluminum-magnesium-zinc
based plating layer, etc., may be illustrated.
[Mechanical Properties]
[0082] According to the hot stamped body of an embodiment of the present invention, excellent
mechanical properties, for example, a tensile strength of 2000 MPa or more, can be
achieved. The tensile strength is preferably 2300 MPa or more, more preferably 2400
MPa or more, most preferably2500 MPa or more. The upper limit is not particularly
prescribed, but, for example, the tensile strength may be 3500 MPa or less, 3300 MPa
or less, or 3000 MPa or less. Similarly, according to the hot stamped body of an embodiment
of the present invention, a 1800 MPa or more yield strength can be achieved. The yield
strength is preferably 1900 MPa or more, more preferably 2000 MPa or more, most preferably
2100 MPa or more. The upper limit is not particularly prescribed, but, for example,
the yield strength may also be 3000 MPa or less, 2800 MPa or less, or 2500 MPa or
less. The tensile strength and the yield strength of the hot stamped body are measured
by preparing a No. 5 test piece and conducting a tensile test based on JIS Z 2241:
2011.
[0083] The hot stamped body according to an embodiment of the present invention, despite
as explained above having a for example 2200 MPa or more high tensile strength and
1800 MPa or more high yield strength, is excellent in hydrogen embrittlement resistance,
and therefore is extremely useful for use as, for example, a frame member or bumper
of an automobile or other structural member and reinforcing member where strength
is required.
<Method of Production of Hot Stamped Body>
[0084] Next, a preferable method of production of the hot stamped body according to an embodiment
of the present invention will be explained. The following explanation is intended
to illustrate the characteristic method for producing the hot stamped body according
to the embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the hot stamped
body to one produced by the method of production such as explained below.
[0085] In order to increase the fineness and the uniformity of the former austenite grains
to reduce the variation in hardness in relation to the same, in particular, the method
of production of the hot stamped body according to an embodiment of the present invention
is characterized by cold working hot rolled steel sheet having a metallographic structure
mainly comprised of tempered martensite and, further, rapidly heating the same at
the time of hot stamping. More specifically, the method of production of the hot stamped
body according to the embodiment of the present invention comprises:
hot rolling a slab having a chemical composition explained above in relation to the
hot stamped body, then cooling it by an average cooling speed of 50°C/s or more and
coiling it at a temperature of Ms point or lower (hot rolling step),
tempering the obtained hot rolled steel sheet in a temperature region of 400 to 600°C
(tempering step),
cold rolling the tempered hot rolled steel sheet by a rolling reduction of 30% or
more (cold rolling step), and
heating the obtained cold rolled steel sheet by an average heating speed of more than
100°C/s from 600°C to the heat treatment temperature: A3+50 to A3+150°C and holding
it there for 30 seconds or less, then starting hot stamping in the period up to when
the temperature becomes 550°C and cooling it by an average cooling speed of 10°C/s
or more (hot stamping step).
[0086] To obtain fine former austenite grains in the metallographic structure of the finally
obtained hot stamped body, it is important to form a large number of austenite nucleation
sites at the time of heating in the hot stamping step. In relation to this, in martensite
structures, the former austenite grain boundaries can become austenite nucleation
sites, but it is known that martensite structures further have packets, blocks, laths,
and other substructures in the former austenite grains and that the boundaries (interfaces)
of these, etc., also can become austenite nucleation sites. For this reason, martensite
structures have very many more austenite nucleation sites compared with for example
ferrite, pearlite, and other structures. Therefore, in the present method of production,
first, in the hot rolling step, the hot rolled slab is cooled by a cooling speed of
the critical cooling speed or more, more specifically by an average cooling speed
of 50°C/s or more, and coiled at a temperature of Ms point or lower to thereby form
a hot rolled steel sheet having a structure mainly comprised of martensite. Next,
the obtained hot rolled steel sheet is heat treated at a suitable temperature region
in the tempering step to thereby form (precipitate) a large number of carbides at
the former austenite grain boundaries, packet-block interfaces, and between laths,
etc., in the martensite structure. The interfaces of the precipitated large number
of carbides and their substructures also become major austenite nucleation sites at
the time of heating in the hot stamping step. For this reason, by performing the hot
stamping step after going through the tempering step, compared with when performing
the hot stamping step without going through the tempering step, it is possible to
form austenite from a greater number of austenite nucleation sites.
[0087] Next, by cold working (cold rolling) the tempered hot rolled steel sheet by a predetermined
rolling reduction, it is possible to increase the fineness of the metallographic structure
to increase the interfaces of the substructures and as a result possible to further
increase the austenite nucleation sites. For example, in the tempering step, carbides
precipitating at the interfaces of the packets, blocks, laths, and other substructures
in the same grains are close in relative orientations, and therefore if heating at
the hot stamping step as is, the relative orientations of the austenite formed using
the interfaces of these carbides and the substructures as nucleation sites can also
become close. In such a case, the austenite grains formed easily become connected
and it is difficult to maintain the final metallographic structure fine. As opposed
to this, by cold rolling in a predetermined rolling reduction, it is possible to change
the relative orientations among such carbides to make the relative orientations of
the austenite formed using the interfaces of these carbides and the substructures
as nucleation sites random. For this reason, the austenite formed is harder to be
connected and therefore the finally obtained metallographic structure in the subsequent
hot stamping step can be not only kept fine, but also kept in a uniform state. Finally,
the cold rolled steel sheet having the cold worked metallographic structure mainly
comprised of tempered martensite is rapidly heated at the time of heating for hot
stamping through the temperature range, in which recrystallization occurs, by a predetermined
average heating speed. If recrystallization proceeds at the time of heating in hot
stamping, the austenite nucleation sites formed in the steps up to then are reduced
or eliminated, and therefore it is impossible to achieve the desired increased fineness
and uniformity in the final metallographic structure. Therefore, in the present method
of production, such a recrystallization promoting temperature range is passed by predetermined
rapid heating in a short time to thereby suppress recrystallization and in turn suppress
the reduction or elimination of the austenite nucleation sites due to the progression
of this recrystallization to enable increased fineness and uniformity in the finally
obtained metallographic structure. According to the present method of production,
the austenite grains made finer in the process of production will not be connected
or will be difficult to be connected, and therefore not only it is possible to make
the former austenite grains obtained after the heating and cooling in the hot stamping
step finer, but also it is possible to increase the uniformity. As a result, it is
possible to reduce the variation in size of former austenite grains and reliably reduce
the variation in hardness. Below, the steps will be explained in more detail.
[Hot Rolling Step]
[0088] In the hot rolling step, first, a slab having the chemical composition explained
above in relation to the hot stamped body is heated. The method of casting the molten
steel is not particularly limited. The slab may be produced by continuous casting,
ingot forming, or thin slab casting. The heating before the hot rolling is not particularly
limited, but the slab used contains a relatively large amount of alloying elements
for obtaining a high strength steel sheet. For this reason, the slab may also be heated
before being sent on for hot rolling. For the purpose of making the alloying elements
dissolve in the slab, the heating temperature may be 1100°C or more. Further, the
heated slab may optionally be rough rolled before the finish rolling so as to adjust
the sheet thickness, etc. The rough rolling need only be able to secure the desired
sheet bar dimensions. The conditions are not particularly limited. The heated slab
or the slab additionally rough rolled as needed is next finish rolled. The finish
rolling is not particularly limited, but in general is performed under conditions
giving an end temperature of the finish rolling of 650°C or more. If the end temperature
of the finish rolling is too low, the rolling reaction force becomes higher and the
desired sheet thickness becomes difficult to stably obtain. The upper limit is not
particularly prescribed, but in general the end temperature of finish rolling is 950°C
or less.
[Coiling]
[0089] Next, the finish rolled hot rolled steel sheet is cooled by an average cooling speed
of 50°C/s or more and coiled at a temperature of Ms point or lower. By making the
average cooling speed 50°C/s or more, preferably 100°C/s or more, and making the coiling
temperature the Ms point or lower, it is possible to form a metallographic structure
mainly comprised of martensite at the coiled hot rolled steel sheet and becomes possible
to reliably form cold rolled steel sheet having a metallographic structure mainly
comprised of tempered martensite at the subsequent tempering step. If the average
cooling speed is less than 50°C/s and/or the coiling temperature is higher than the
Ms point, it is not possible to form a metallographic structure mainly comprised of
martensite at the coiled hot rolled steel sheet and even if suitably performing the
subsequent steps, in the finally obtained hot stamped body, the desired hard structures
cannot be obtained and/or increased fineness and increased uniformity of the former
austenite grains can no longer be realized and reduction of the variation of hardness
can no longer be achieved. From the viewpoint of increasing the fineness of the metallographic
structure, preferably the average cooling speed is 100°C/s or more and the coiling
temperature is the Mf point or less. By making the average cooling speed 100°C/s or
more and making the coiling temperature the Mf point or less, the percentage of the
martensite structures obtained can be made higher. Martensite structures, as explained
above, have pluralities of substructures. Using these substructures and the carbides,
etc., precipitating at the tempering step, a large number of austenite nucleation
sites can be created. For this reason, martensite structures can be said to be extremely
effective structures in promoting the increased fineness of the metallographic structure.
However, on the other hand, if raising the percentage of martensite structures as
hard structures in the hot rolled steel sheet, the rolling load of the rolling mill
becomes remarkably higher in the subsequent cold rolling step. Therefore, the technical
idea of trying to realize both increased fineness and increased uniformity by the
combination of coiling at a low temperature of Ms point or lower, the subsequent tempering
and cold rolling, and further the rapid heating at the hot stamping step had not existed
up to now. It was first devised by the present inventors. Here, the Ms point (°C)
and Mf point (°C) can be calculated by approximation based on the following formulas
1 and 2:
Ms=550-361x[C]-39x[Mn]-35x[V]-20x[Cr]-17x[Ni]-10x[Cu]-5x([Mo]+[W])+15x[Co]+ formula
1

where, [C], [Mn], [V], [Cr], [Ni], [Cu], [Mo], [W], [Co], [Al], and [Si] are the
contents (mass%) of the elements in the hot stamped body.
[Tempering Step]
[0090] Next, the obtained hot rolled steel sheet is tempered at the tempering step in a
temperature region of 400 to 600°C. By tempering the hot rolled steel sheet in the
temperature region, it is possible to make a large number of carbides precipitate
at the former austenite grain boundaries, packet and block boundaries, between the
laths, etc., in the martensite structures and as a result becomes possible to form
many austenite nucleation sites at the interfaces of the resultant precipitated large
number of carbides and the substructures of the same. If not performing the tempering
step or the tempering temperature is lower than 400°C, it is not possible to make
sufficient carbides precipitate. Therefore, even if suitably performing the subsequent
steps, it becomes impossible to achieve the desired increased fineness and/or increased
uniformity in the metallographic structure. Preferably, the tempering temperature
is 450°C or more. On the other hand, if the tempering temperature is higher than 600°C,
the precipitated carbides become coarser and similarly it becomes impossible to achieve
the desired increased fineness and/or increased uniformity in the metallographic structure.
Preferably, the tempering temperature is 550°C or less. From the viewpoint of making
carbides sufficiently precipitate, the tempering time is preferably 1200 seconds or
more. The upper limit is not particularly prescribed, but, for example, the tempering
time may be 7200 seconds or less.
[Pickling Step]
[0091] Before the cold rolling step, optionally, pickling may be performed for removing
the oxide scale formed on the surface of the hot rolled steel sheet. The pickling
may be formed under conditions suitable for removing oxide scale. It may be performed
at one time or may be performed divided into several times so as to reliably remove
the oxide scale. Such a pickling step is not necessarily limited to being performed
before the cold rolling step. For example, it may also be performed after the cold
rolling step.
[Cold Rolling Step]
[0092] The tempered hot rolled steel sheet is cold rolled by a rolling reduction of 30%
or more. By cold rolling by a rolling reduction of 30% or more, as explained above,
it is possible to increase the fineness of the metallographic structure to increase
the interfaces with the substructures of martensite and change the relative orientations
of the carbides precipitated at the tempering step so as to reliably randomize the
relative orientations of the austenite formed using the interfaces of these carbides
and the substructures as nucleation sites. If the rolling reduction of the cold rolling
is low, such an effect cannot be sufficiently obtained. Preferably, the rolling reduction
of the cold rolling is 40% or more. The upper limit is not particularly prescribed,
but from the viewpoint of reducing the rolling load of the rolling mills, the rolling
reduction of the cold rolling may be, for example, 80% or less or 70% or less.
[Annealing Step]
[0093] For example, after the cold rolling step, annealing may optionally be performed so
as to adjust the metallographic structure and/or properties. While not particularly
limited, from the viewpoint of avoiding the elimination of the metallographic structures
built in at the steps up to there, for example, the elimination of austenite nucleation
sites due to progression of recrystallization, etc., the heating temperature of the
annealing step is preferably, for example, 600°C or less.
[Plating Step]
[0094] For the purpose of improving the corrosion resistance, etc., the surface of the cold
rolled steel sheet may also be plated. The plating may be hot dip coating, alloyed
hot dip coating, electroplating, or other treatment. For example, as the plating,
the steel sheet may be hot dip galvanized. After hot dip galvanization, alloying treatment
may be performed. As the plating layer, an aluminum plating layer, aluminum-zinc plating
layer, aluminum-silicon plating layer, hot dip galvanized layer, electrogalvanized
layer, hot dip galvannealed layer, zinc-nickel plating layer, aluminum-magnesium-zinc
based plating layer, etc., may be illustrated. The specific conditions of the plating
and alloying treatment are not particularly limited and may be any suitable conditions
known to persons skilled in the art. However, in the same way as the case of the annealing
step, from the viewpoint of avoiding the elimination of austenite nucleation sites
due to the progression of recrystallization, etc., the plating treatment and alloying
treatment are preferably performed at as low a temperature and as short a time as
possible.
[Temper Rolling Step]
[0095] To correct the shape of the steel sheet or adjust the surface roughness, etc., it
is possible, for example, to temper roll the steel sheet after the cold rolling step,
after the annealing step, or after the plating step. The rolling reduction of the
temper rolling is preferably, for example, 1.0% or less.
[Hot Stamping Step]
[0096] Finally, the obtained cold rolled steel sheet is, at the hot stamping step, heated
by an average heating speed of more than 100°C/s from 600°C to the heat treatment
temperature: A3+50 to A3+150°C and held at the heat treatment temperature for 30 seconds
or less, then started to be hot stamped in the period until the temperature became
550°C and is cooled by an average cooling speed of 10°C/s or more. By rapidly heating
by an average heating speed of more than 100°C/s from 600°C to the above heat treatment
temperature, it is possible to avoid a temperature region in which recrystallization
proceeds, and therefore it is possible to keep the austenite nucleation sites formed
in the steps up to then from being reduced or eliminated due to progression of recrystallization.
Therefore, due to the martensite transformation in the subsequent cooling process,
in the finally obtained hot stamped body, it is possible to obtain a metallographic
structure containing former austenite grains increased in fineness and uniformity
and remarkably reduced in variation of hardness in the sheet thickness direction.
Along with the increasing higher strength of steel materials, sometimes a relatively
large amount of Mn is added so as to improve the hardenability of the steel material.
In such a case, sometimes the Mn segregation becomes remarkable and it is impossible
to suitably suppress variation in former austenite grains. However, according to the
present method of production, by rapid heating by a more than 100°C/s high average
heating speed, even if the Mn content is relatively high, it is possible to reduce
the variation in grain size and hardness of the austenite grains and obtain the desired
metallographic structure. On the other hand, if the average heating speed is 100°C/s
or less or the heating start temperature by an average heating speed of more than
100°C/s is higher than 600°C, recrystallization proceeds and the austenite nucleation
sites are reduced or eliminated and it becomes impossible to achieve the desired increased
fineness and increased uniformity at the metallographic structure. From the viewpoint
of achieving the desired increased fineness and increased uniformity, the average
heating speed is preferably 120°C/s or more. Further, if rapidly heating by a high
average heating speed such as more than 100°C/s, in general, there is a tendency for
the A3 point to rise. Therefore, to sufficiently austenize the metallographic structure
to obtain the desired hard structures and to achieve the desired increased fineness
and increased uniformity, the rapid heating has to be heating up to a temperature
50 to 150°C higher than the A3 point (°C) of the following formula 3 found by approximation
from the chemical composition of the hot stamped body:

where, [C], [N], [Mn], [Nb], [Ti], [B], [Cr], and [Mo] are contents (mass%) of elements
in hot stamped body.
[0097] If the above heat treatment temperature is lower than A3+50°C, the austenization
will become insufficient and the desired hard structures will not be obtained and/or
the desired increased fineness and increased uniformity will become impossible to
achieve. On the other hand, if the above heat treatment temperature is more than A3+150°C,
the austenite will excessively grow in size and similarly the desired increased fineness
and increased uniformity will become impossible to achieve and, as a result, the desired
Vickers hardness distribution in the sheet thickness direction will become impossible
to obtain. Further, even if the holding time at the above heat treatment temperature
is more than 30 seconds, the austenite will excessively grow in size and the desired
increased fineness and increased uniformity will become impossible to achieve. Therefore,
the holding time at the above heat treatment temperature is preferably 10 seconds
or less, more preferably 3 seconds or less. The lower limit is not particularly prescribed,
but the holding time may also be 1 second or more.
[0098] The heating atmosphere is not particularly limited. Usual conditions are enough.
For example, it may be an air atmosphere, a gas combustion atmosphere controlled in
ratio of air and fuel, and a nitrogen atmosphere. The dew points may also be controlled
in these gases. Further, as the heating method, for example, furnace heating by an
electric furnace, gas furnace, etc., flame heating, ohmic heating, high frequency
heating, induction heating, etc. The steel sheet is held at that heat treatment temperature,
then starts to be hot stamped in the period until the temperature becomes 550°C. If
starting the hot stamping at a temperature lower than 550°C, bainite transformation,
etc., will proceed. In such a case, it will become impossible to obtain the martensite
90 vol% or more desired hard structures. After hot stamping, to obtain the desired
hard structures of martensite 90 vol% or more, the steel sheet may be cooled down
to a temperature region of 250°C or less by an average cooling speed of 10°C/s or
more. Further, it is also possible to perform bake hardening treatment (BH treatment)
after hot stamping and after painting, for example, perform BH treatment at 170 to
200°C for 20 to 30 minutes.
[0099] Below, examples will be used to explain the present invention in more detail, but
the present invention is not limited to these examples in any way.
EXAMPLES
[0100] In the following examples, hot stamped bodies according to an embodiment of the present
invention were produced under various conditions and the obtained tensile strength,
yield strength, and hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the hot stamped bodies were
investigated.
[0101] First, molten steels having the chemical compositions shown in Table 1 were cast
by continuous casting to produce slabs. The balances besides the constituents shown
in Table 1 were Fe and impurities. These slabs were heated to a 1100°C or more temperature
and rough rolled under predetermined conditions, then were finish rolled, cooled,
coiled, tempered, and cold rolled under the conditions shown in Table 2. Next, the
obtained cold rolled steel sheets were heated by the average heating speeds shown
in Table 3 from 600°C to the heat treatment temperatures shown in Table 3 and held
there, then started to be hot stamped in the period up to the temperature becoming
550°C and cooled by the average cooling speed shown in Table 3 down to a temperature
region of 250°C or less. In Comparative Examples 42, 44, and 46 and Invention Examples
43 and 45, the cold rolled steel sheets obtained by cold rolling were heated by the
average heating speeds shown in Table 4 from the temperature T1 similarly shown in
Table 4 to the heat treatment temperatures and held there, then started to be hot
stamped in the period until the temperature became 550°C, and were cooled by the average
cooling speeds shown in Table 4 down to a temperature region of 250°C or less. The
heating atmosphere and heating method in the hot stamping step were a gas combustion
atmosphere (air-fuel ratio 0.85) and ohmic heating. Further, from the viewpoint of
evaluating the performances under conditions closer to actual products, the obtained
hot stamped bodies were heat treated at 170°C for 20 minutes (no painting) as post-painting
bake hardening treatment (BH treatment).

[Table 2]
[0102]
Table 2
Ex. no. |
Steel type |
Hot rolling step |
Tempering step |
Cold rolling step |
Remarks |
Heating temp. (°C) |
Finish rolling end temp. (°C) |
Average cooling speed (°C/s) |
Coiling temp. (°C) |
Tempering temp. (°C) |
Tempering time (s) |
Rolling reduction (%) |
1 |
A |
1272 |
904 |
115 |
322 |
520 |
3600 |
43 |
Inv. ex. |
2 |
A |
1272 |
912 |
112 |
322 |
520 |
3600 |
43 |
Comp. ex. |
3 |
A |
1275 |
910 |
119 |
343 |
None |
None |
42 |
Comp. ex. |
4 |
A |
1254 |
908 |
118 |
336 |
500 |
3600 |
None |
Comp. ex. |
5 |
A |
1242 |
905 |
115 |
324 |
500 |
3600 |
45 |
Inv. ex. |
6 |
A |
1272 |
899 |
115 |
322 |
520 |
3600 |
44 |
Comp. ex. |
7 |
A |
1258 |
910 |
123 |
498 |
450 |
3600 |
43 |
Comp. ex. |
8 |
B |
1263 |
896 |
123 |
326 |
450 |
3600 |
52 |
Inv. ex. |
9 |
B |
1245 |
907 |
119 |
334 |
740 |
3600 |
42 |
Comp. ex. |
10 |
B |
1223 |
907 |
115 |
334 |
250 |
3600 |
45 |
Comp. ex. |
11 |
C |
1266 |
912 |
117 |
320 |
480 |
3600 |
38 |
Comp. ex. |
12 |
D |
1255 |
915 |
125 |
322 |
500 |
3600 |
50 |
Comp. ex. |
13 |
D |
1254 |
908 |
124 |
331 |
480 |
3600 |
45 |
Inv. ex. |
14 |
D |
1249 |
906 |
120 |
336 |
480 |
3600 |
44 |
Comp. ex. |
15 |
D |
1255 |
903 |
118 |
338 |
500 |
3600 |
44 |
Comp. ex. |
16 |
E |
1246 |
899 |
116 |
341 |
500 |
3600 |
43 |
Inv. ex. |
17 |
F |
1272 |
906 |
119 |
335 |
500 |
3600 |
43 |
Inv. ex. |
18 |
G |
1248 |
926 |
122 |
399 |
450 |
1200 |
51 |
Comp. ex. |
19 |
H |
1252 |
896 |
115 |
364 |
450 |
1200 |
44 |
Comp. ex. |
20 |
I |
1244 |
908 |
119 |
335 |
500 |
1200 |
43 |
Comp. ex. |
21 |
J |
1264 |
923 |
123 |
355 |
450 |
1800 |
48 |
Inv. ex. |
22 |
J |
1255 |
933 |
121 |
620 |
450 |
1800 |
49 |
Comp. ex. |
23 |
K |
1277 |
924 |
118 |
319 |
450 |
1800 |
48 |
Inv. ex. |
24 |
K |
1272 |
909 |
120 |
313 |
450 |
1800 |
48 |
Comp. ex. |
25 |
L |
1246 |
924 |
119 |
323 |
500 |
1200 |
37 |
Inv. ex. |
26 |
M |
1273 |
930 |
126 |
331 |
500 |
1200 |
36 |
Inv. ex. |
27 |
N |
1272 |
904 |
117 |
314 |
500 |
1200 |
36 |
Inv. ex. |
28 |
O |
1249 |
905 |
123 |
322 |
450 |
1800 |
42 |
Inv. ex. |
29 |
P |
1248 |
912 |
115 |
272 |
480 |
1800 |
43 |
Inv. ex. |
30 |
Q |
1273 |
921 |
121 |
324 |
480 |
1800 |
38 |
Inv. ex. |
31 |
R |
1255 |
908 |
119 |
322 |
470 |
1800 |
41 |
Inv. ex. |
32 |
S |
1246 |
910 |
115 |
354 |
470 |
1800 |
51 |
Inv. ex. |
33 |
T |
1273 |
911 |
123 |
249 |
480 |
1800 |
42 |
Inv. ex. |
34 |
U |
1273 |
908 |
124 |
321 |
450 |
1800 |
44 |
Inv. ex. |
35 |
V |
1259 |
904 |
118 |
336 |
470 |
1800 |
38 |
Inv. ex. |
36 |
W |
1244 |
912 |
119 |
355 |
450 |
1800 |
36 |
Inv. ex. |
37 |
X |
1256 |
903 |
115 |
343 |
480 |
1800 |
41 |
Inv. ex. |
38 |
C |
1272 |
908 |
20 |
322 |
480 |
1800 |
43 |
Comp. ex. |
39 |
C |
1263 |
912 |
117 |
324 |
480 |
1800 |
43 |
Comp. ex. |
40 |
F |
1261 |
903 |
125 |
336 |
500 |
1800 |
5 |
Comp. ex. |
41 |
F |
1248 |
901 |
124 |
334 |
500 |
1800 |
42 |
Inv. ex. |
42 |
A |
1252 |
924 |
116 |
343 |
500 |
1800 |
46 |
Comp. ex. |
43 |
C |
1244 |
914 |
121 |
351 |
500 |
1800 |
43 |
Inv. ex. |
44 |
C |
1244 |
914 |
121 |
351 |
500 |
1800 |
43 |
Comp. ex. |
45 |
F |
1258 |
909 |
124 |
333 |
500 |
1800 |
48 |
Inv. ex. |
46 |
F |
1258 |
909 |
124 |
333 |
500 |
1800 |
48 |
Comp. ex. |
Underlines indicate production conditions not preferable. |
[Table 3]
[0103]
Table 3
Ex. no. |
Steel type |
Hot stamping ste |
Metallo graphic structure of hot stamped body |
Properties of hot stamped body |
Remarks |
Average heating speed (°C/s) |
Heat treatment temp. (°C) |
Holding time (s) |
Average cooling speed (°C/s) |
BH treat-ment |
Martensite vol. ratio (%) |
Former γ grain average grain size (µm) |
Grain size distribution standard deviation (µm) |
Hardness provision (%) |
YS (MPa) |
TS (MPa) |
Fracture load in hydrogen atmosphere (MPa) |
1 |
A |
150 |
947 |
1 |
140 |
Yes |
96 |
2.3 |
1.1 |
19 |
2111 |
2421 |
706 |
Inv. ex. |
2 |
A |
4 |
945 |
4 |
125 |
Yes |
98 |
5.1 |
2.3 |
53 |
1977 |
2383 |
392 |
Comp. ex. |
3 |
A |
150 |
952 |
3 |
58 |
Yes |
97 |
3.4 |
1.4 |
37 |
1946 |
2104 |
435 |
Comp. ex. |
4 |
A |
150 |
967 |
3 |
65 |
Yes |
96 |
4.1 |
2.3 |
41 |
1786 |
2320 |
672 |
Comp. ex. |
5 |
A |
150 |
951 |
2 |
62 |
Yes |
97 |
2.7 |
1.3 |
24 |
1905 |
2387 |
747 |
Inv. ex. |
6 |
A |
150 |
890 |
6 |
59 |
Yes |
86 |
2.5 |
1.2 |
77 |
1656 |
2205 |
519 |
Comp. ex. |
7 |
A |
150 |
944 |
2 |
155 |
Yes |
98 |
4.5 |
2.4 |
37 |
1667 |
2346 |
636 |
Comp. ex. |
8 |
B |
150 |
940 |
4 |
255 |
Yes |
97 |
2.2 |
1.2 |
19 |
2068 |
2403 |
669 |
Inv. ex. |
9 |
B |
150 |
972 |
6 |
300 |
Yes |
95 |
47 |
2.5 |
41 |
1701 |
2328 |
644 |
Comp. ex. |
10 |
B |
150 |
959 |
3 |
125 |
Yes |
98 |
3.4 |
1.8 |
38 |
1952 |
2323 |
538 |
Comp. ex. |
11 |
C |
150 |
948 |
60 |
130 |
Yes |
98 |
4.5 |
2.2 |
34 |
1887 |
2302 |
431 |
Comp. ex. |
12 |
D |
3 |
944 |
120 |
85 |
Yes |
98 |
6.1 |
2.8 |
47 |
1994 |
2402 |
565 |
Comp. ex. |
13 |
D |
150 |
931 |
1 |
153 |
Yes |
97 |
2.4 |
1.3 |
24 |
2099 |
2391 |
653 |
Inv. ex. |
14 |
D |
150 |
1095 |
4 |
320 |
Yes |
98 |
12.5 |
6.9 |
43 |
1927 |
2322 |
373 |
Comp. ex. |
15 |
D |
150 |
942 |
8 |
8 |
Yes |
<30 |
- |
- |
- |
669 |
892 |
865 |
Comp. ex. |
16 |
E |
150 |
945 |
4 |
173 |
Yes |
97 |
2.5 |
1.1 |
26 |
1974 |
2385 |
702 |
Inv. ex. |
17 |
F |
150 |
944 |
7 |
124 |
Yes |
98 |
2.4 |
1.2 |
22 |
2089 |
2443 |
696 |
Inv. ex. |
18 |
G |
500 |
922 |
1 |
325 |
Yes |
98 |
2.9 |
1.3 |
27 |
1557 |
1690 |
1274 |
Comp. ex. |
19 |
H |
500 |
935 |
1 |
143 |
Yes |
98 |
2.7 |
0.8 |
34 |
1752 |
2026 |
852 |
Comp. ex. |
20 |
I |
150 |
933 |
3 |
65 |
Yes |
97 |
2.9 |
1.3 |
26 |
1797 |
2104 |
665 |
Comp. ex. |
21 |
J |
500 |
951 |
1 |
295 |
Yes |
98 |
2.9 |
1.4 |
23 |
1937 |
2208 |
689 |
Inv. ex. |
22 |
J |
500 |
960 |
1 |
306 |
Yes |
72 |
2.8 |
1.0 |
21 |
1142 |
1662 |
1421 |
Comp. ex. |
23 |
K |
500 |
953 |
1 |
322 |
Yes |
98 |
2.6 |
1.2 |
27 |
1953 |
2240 |
726 |
Inv. ex. |
24 |
K |
500 |
763 |
1 |
342 |
Yes |
53 |
1.7 |
0.7 |
66 |
927 |
1119 |
1094 |
Comp. ex. |
25 |
L |
150 |
970 |
2 |
86 |
Yes |
96 |
2.8 |
1.3 |
31 |
2098 |
2415 |
692 |
Inv. ex. |
26 |
M |
150 |
945 |
2 |
77 |
Yes |
98 |
2.4 |
1.2 |
28 |
2022 |
2387 |
704 |
Inv. ex. |
27 |
N |
150 |
941 |
2 |
79 |
Yes |
98 |
2.5 |
1.2 |
25 |
2036 |
2379 |
723 |
Inv. ex. |
28 |
O |
500 |
949 |
2 |
294 |
Yes |
97 |
2.8 |
1.3 |
28 |
2028 |
2411 |
612 |
Inv. ex. |
29 |
P |
150 |
978 |
1 |
85 |
Yes |
98 |
2.3 |
1.2 |
33 |
2444 |
2648 |
605 |
Inv. ex. |
30 |
Q |
150 |
948 |
1 |
105 |
Yes |
98 |
2.5 |
1.2 |
23 |
1988 |
2339 |
664 |
Inv. ex. |
31 |
R |
150 |
953 |
1 |
234 |
Yes |
98 |
2.4 |
1.2 |
26 |
2044 |
2274 |
662 |
Inv. ex. |
32 |
S |
150 |
947 |
2 |
225 |
Yes |
97 |
2.3 |
1.2 |
24 |
2015 |
2322 |
704 |
Inv. ex. |
33 |
T |
150 |
966 |
2 |
18 |
Yes |
94 |
2.2 |
1.1 |
22 |
2033 |
2322 |
621 |
Inv. ex. |
34 |
U |
150 |
942 |
1 |
125 |
Yes |
93 |
2.6 |
1.4 |
28 |
2023 |
2293 |
613 |
Inv. ex. |
35 |
V |
150 |
972 |
2 |
133 |
Yes |
96 |
2.8 |
1.4 |
28 |
1975 |
2344 |
652 |
Inv. ex. |
36 |
W |
125 |
958 |
2 |
124 |
Yes |
96 |
2.3 |
1.2 |
25 |
1983 |
2337 |
674 |
Inv. ex. |
37 |
X |
125 |
955 |
1 |
119 |
Yes |
99 |
2.4 |
1.3 |
23 |
2042 |
2344 |
644 |
Inv. ex. |
38 |
C |
150 |
949 |
1 |
95 |
Yes |
98 |
4.6 |
2.8 |
46 |
1985 |
2393 |
438 |
Comp. ex. |
39 |
C |
85 |
950 |
2 |
115 |
Yes |
97 |
5.3 |
2.5 |
43 |
2004 |
2381 |
522 |
Comp. ex. |
40 |
F |
150 |
948 |
1 |
145 |
Yes |
98 |
4.8 |
2.5 |
41 |
1822 |
2334 |
571 |
Comp. ex. |
41 |
F |
150 |
946 |
1 |
113 |
Yes |
98 |
2.5 |
1.3 |
24 |
2071 |
2432 |
625 |
Inv. ex. |
Underlines indicate outside scope of present invention or production conditions not
preferable. |
[Table 4]
[0104]
Table 4
Ex. no. |
Steel type |
Hot stamping step |
Metallographic structure of hot stamped body |
Properties of hot stamped body |
Remarks |
Average heating speed from room temp. to T1 (°C/s) |
Speed change temp. T1 (°C) |
Average heating speed from T1 to heat treatment temp. (°C/s) |
Heat treatment temp. (°C) |
Holding time (s) |
Average cooling speed (°C/s) |
BH treatment |
Martensite vol. ratio (%) |
Former γ grain average grain size (µm) |
Grain size distribution standard deviation (µm) |
Hardness provision (%) |
YS (MPa) |
TS (MPa) |
Fracture load in hydrogen atmosphere (MPa) |
42 |
A |
15 |
800 |
150 |
964 |
2 |
92 |
Yes |
93 |
4.2 |
2.4 |
37 |
2012 |
2281 |
488 |
Comp. ex. |
43 |
C |
15 |
450 |
200 |
964 |
1 |
89 |
Yes |
97 |
2.6 |
1.3 |
24 |
2087 |
2342 |
624 |
Inv. ex. |
44 |
C |
5 |
780 |
200 |
962 |
2 |
88 |
Yes |
97 |
3.9 |
2.2 |
32 |
2091 |
2338 |
565 |
Comp. ex. |
45 |
F |
5 |
300 |
200 |
957 |
2 |
91 |
Yes |
98 |
2.4 |
1.2 |
21 |
1997 |
2322 |
641 |
Inv. ex. |
46 |
F |
10 |
720 |
150 |
977 |
2 |
93 |
Yes |
97 |
5.1 |
2.7 |
36 |
2111 |
2342 |
461 |
Comp. ex. |
Underlines indicate outside scope of present invention or production conditions not
preferable. |
[0105] The properties of the obtained hot stamped body were measured and evaluated by the
following methods:
[Tensile Strength (TS) and Yield Strength (YS)]
[0106] The tensile strength (TS) and (YS) of the hot stamped body were obtained from any
position of the hot stamped body by preparing a No. 5 test piece and conducting a
tensile test based on JIS Z 2241: 2011. The crosshead speed was 1 mm/min.
[Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance]
[0107] The hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the hot stamped body was evaluated as follows
by the slow strain rate technique (SSRT). First, a 1.0t×9.0W×140L (mm) test piece
was prepared. The test piece was made one of a parallel part length of 25 mm and a
diameter of the parallel part of 2.0 mm. At the two sides of the center of the parallel
part, U-notches each having a notch depth of 0.35 mm and a notch bottom radius of
0.1 mm were provided. This test piece was dipped in a 3% NaCl solution. Hydrogen was
charged using a galvanostat as a power source and controlling the current density
of a dipping portion of the test piece surface to become 0.1 mA/cm
2 . Next, the test piece charged with hydrogen was subjected to a slow strain rate
test by a tensile rate of 0.0060 mm/min and the load at the time of fracture was investigated.
Cases where such a fracture load in a hydrogen environment was 600 MPa or more were
evaluated as passing and cases where the fracture load was less than 600 MPa were
evaluated as failing.
[0108] Cases where the tensile strength (TS) was 2200 MPa or more, the yield strength (YS)
was 1800 MPa or more, and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance was evaluated as passing
were evaluated as a hot stamped body which is high in strength and able to suppress
hydrogen embrittlement. The results are shown in Table 3. In Table 3, the volume ratio
of martensite at a region of the hot stamped body centered about the 1/4 depth position
of the sheet thickness and the average grain size and the standard deviation in the
grain size distribution of the former austenite grains (former γ grains) are shown.
Further, in Table 3, the ratio of the difference of the maximum value and minimum
value in the Vickers hardness distribution in a sheet thickness direction with respect
to the average value (hardness provision) is shown. In the hot stamped body shown
in Table 3, the remaining structures besides the martensite were bainite, ferrite,
retained austenite, and/or pearlite.
[0109] Referring to Tables 1 to 4, in Comparative Example 2, the average heating speed in
the hot stamping step was slow, and therefore it is believed that recrystallization
proceeded and the austenite nucleation sites were reduced. As a result, the desired
increased fineness and increased uniformity could not be realized in the metallographic
structure. In relation to this, the desired average grain size and standard deviation
in the grain size distribution of the γ grains and the hardness provision could not
be obtained and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance fell. In Comparative Example
3, the tempering step was not performed, and therefore it is believed austenite nucleation
sites by precipitation of carbides could not be sufficiently formed. As a result,
it was not possible to obtain the desired average grain size of the γ grains and hardness
provision in the metallographic structure and the TS and the hydrogen embrittlement
resistance fell. In Comparative Example 4, the cold rolling step was not performed,
and therefore it was not possible to randomize the relative orientations of the austenite
formed using the interfaces of carbides and substructures of martensite as nucleation
sites and it is believed the austenite became easily connected. As a result, it was
not possible to realize the desired increased fineness and increased uniformity in
the metallographic structure and the YS fell. In Comparative Example 6, the heat treatment
temperature at the hot stamping step was low, and therefore the austenization became
insufficient, the desired hard structures and hardness provision could not be realized,
and the YS and hydrogen embrittlement resistance fell. In Comparative Example 7, the
coiling temperature was high, and therefore it is believed it was not possible to
form a metallographic structure mainly comprised of martensite at the hot rolled steel
sheet after coiling. As a result, it was not possible to achieve the desired increased
fineness and increased uniformity in the metallographic structure of the finally obtained
hot stamped body and the YS fell.
[0110] In Comparative Example 9, the tempering temperature was high, and therefore it is
believed the precipitated carbides became coarser. As a result, it was not possible
to realize the desired increased fineness and increased uniformity in the metallographic
structure and the YS fell. On the other hand, in Comparative Example 10, the tempering
temperature was low, and therefore it is believed that carbides could not be made
to sufficiently precipitate. As a result, similarly, it was not possible to realize
the desired increased fineness and increased uniformity in the metallographic structure
and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance fell. In Comparative Example 11, the holding
time at the hot stamping step was long, and therefore it is believed the austenite
excessively grew in size. As a result, it was not possible to realize the desired
increased fineness and increased uniformity in the metallographic structure and the
hydrogen embrittlement resistance fell. In Comparative Example 12, the average heating
speed at the hot stamping step was slow and the holding time was also long, and therefore
it is believed recrystallization proceeded and austenite nucleation sites were reduced
and further the austenite formed excessively grew in size. As a result, it was not
possible to realize the desired increased fineness and increased uniformity in the
metallographic structure and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance fell. In Comparative
Example 14, the heat treatment temperature at the hot stamping step was high, and
therefore it is believed that the austenite excessively grew in size. As a result,
it was not possible to realize the desired increased fineness and uniformity of grains
in the metallographic structure and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance fell. In
Comparative Example 15, the average cooling speed at the hot stamping step was slow,
and therefore the volume ratio of the martensite in the metallographic structure greatly
fell. For this reason, it was not possible to suitably measure the average grain size
of the γ grains, the standard deviation in the grain size distribution, and the hardness
provision by the methods prescribed in the Description. Further, the YS and TS also
greatly fell. In each of Comparative Examples 18 to 20, the C content was low, and
therefore the YS and TS fell. In Comparative Example 22, the coiling temperature was
high, and therefore it is believed that it was not possible to form a metallographic
structure mainly comprised of martensite in the hot rolled steel sheet after coiling.
As a result, in the finally obtained hot stamped body, it was not possible to realize
the desired hard structures and prescribed hardness in the metallographic structure
and the YS and TS fell. In Comparative Example 24, the heat treatment temperature
at the hot stamping step was low, and therefore the austenization became insufficient,
the desired hard structures and hardness provision could not be realized, and the
YS and TS fell.
[0111] In Comparative Example 38, the average cooling speed after finish rolling at the
hot rolling step was slow, and therefore it is believed it was not possible to form
a metallographic structure mainly comprised of martensite in the hot rolled steel
sheet after coiling. As a result, it was not possible to realize the desired increased
fineness and increased uniformity in the metallographic structure and the hydrogen
embrittlement resistance fell. In Comparative Example 39, the average heating speed
at the hot stamping step was low, and therefore it is believed that recrystallization
proceeded and austenite nucleation sites were reduced or eliminated. As a result,
it was not possible to realize the desired increased fineness and increased uniformity
in the metallographic structure and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance fell. In
Comparative Example 40, the rolling reduction of the cold rolling was low, and therefore
it is believed that it was not possible to randomize the relative orientations of
the austenite formed using interfaces between the carbides and substructures of martensite
as nucleation sites and it is believed the austenite became easily connected. As a
result, it was not possible to realize the desired increased fineness and increased
uniformity in the metallographic structure and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
fell. In each of Comparative Examples 42, 44, and 46, the heating start temperature
at an average heating speed of more than 100°C/s at the hot stamping step (speed change
temperature T1 in Table 4) was higher than 600°C, and therefore it is believed that
recrystallization proceeded and austenite nucleation sites were reduced or eliminated.
As a result, it was not possible to realize the desired increased fineness and increased
uniformity in the metallographic structure and the hydrogen embrittlement resistance
fell.
[0112] In contrast to this, in the hot stamped bodies according to all of the invention
examples, by having the desired chemical composition and a metallographic structure
comprised of 90 vol% or more of martensite and making the former austenite grains
finer to reduce the average grain size to 3.0 µm or less and controlling the standard
deviation in grain size distribution to 1.5 µm or less to make the grains more uniform
and, in relation to this, controlling the difference of the maximum value and minimum
value in the Vickers hardness distribution in the sheet thickness direction to 35%
or less of the average value of the Vickers hardness distribution, regardless of having
a 2200 MPa or more high tensile strength and a 1800 MPa or more high yield strength
due to the high C content and martensite volume ratio, etc., it was possible to achieve
a 600 MPa or more high fracture load and therefore possible to realize an excellent
hydrogen embrittlement resistance.