TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to a copper alloy material and a method for manufacturing
the copper alloy material, and for example, relates to a copper alloy material and
a method for manufacturing the copper alloy material used as a material for electric
and electronic components such as a lead frame, a connector, and a terminal.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] Conventionally, copper alloys have been commonly used as materials for lead frames
and other electrical and electronic components because they have good strength and
conductivity. Among copper alloys, for example, Cu-Fe-Zn-P copper alloys are considered
to have a good balance of mechanical strength, electrical conductivity, and thermal
conductivity. One of typical Cu-Fe-Zn-P copper alloys is, for example, C1940 specified
in JIS-H3100:2018. C1940 is a precipitation-hardening copper alloy containing, by
mass percent, about 2.2% of Fe, about 0.03% of P, and about 0.12% of Zn. C1940 has
a conductivity of about 60% IACS and a tensile strength of about 400MPa to 550MPa,
is internationally recognized as a standard copper alloy, and is used in many applications.
[0003] In recent years, as electric/electronic components have become highly functional
and highly integrated, for example, in the field of lead frames, the thickness of
the lead frame itself has reduced. The lead frame having a reduced thickness is easily
deformed, and the mechanical strength of the C1940 is insufficient. In such a case,
for example, Cu-Ni-Si copper alloys are often used. Cu-Ni-Si copper alloys are precipitation-hardening
copper alloys in which high strength is obtained by precipitating particles of a compound
containing Ni and Si in a matrix phase containing Cu of copper alloys as a main component.
One of typical Cu-Ni-Si copper alloys is, for example, C7025 called Corson alloy,
which is out of the specification of JIS but contains, by mass percent, about 3.0%
of Ni, about 0.65% of Si, and about 0.15% of Mg. C7025 has a tensile strength of about
600MPa to 700MPa and a conductivity of about 45.0% IACS, and is inferior to C1940
in bending workability, but is also used for the above-described lead frame.
CITATION LIST
Patent Literature
SUMMARY
TECHNICAL PROBLEM
[0005] In electric and electronic components such as lead frames, solder plating layers
and silver plating layers are generally provided on surfaces of copper-alloy materials
made of copper alloys for the purpose of facilitating attachment of silicon chips
and mounting on circuit boards. When a plating layer is provided on the surface of
a copper alloy material, chemical polishing is generally performed as a pretreatment
to chemically dissolve an oxidized layer or a damaged layer on the surface using an
acidic solution. For example, in the case of a copper-alloy material made of a Cu-Fe-Zn-P
copper-alloy such as C1940, chemical polishing using an acidic liquid (chemical polishing
liquid) containing sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide is generally performed as a
pre-treatment. A copper alloy material made of a Cu-Fe-Zn-P copper alloy such as C1940
does not have the problem of smut remaining on the surface of the copper alloy material
(hereinafter referred to as residual smut), which will be described later.
[0006] However, in the case of a copper-alloy material made of a higher-strength copper-alloy,
for example, a copper-alloy material made of a Cu-Ni-Si copper-alloy such as C7025,
when a chemical polishing liquid of the same quality as C1940 is used, particles of
a compound containing Ni and Si are not dissolved, and therefore, a large amount of
particles of the compound containing Ni and Si remain as a residue (smut) on the surface
of the copper-alloy material. Residual smut on the surface of copper alloy materials
is not easily removed by general surface cleaning after chemical polishing. Therefore,
smut may be present in the subsequent plating layer, which may have a significant
effect on the appearance and properties of the copper alloy material.
[0007] In order to solve the problem of the residual smut on the surfaces of high-strength
copper alloys such as C7025, for example, PTL 1 proposes a method of controlling the
particle size and shape of a compound containing Ni and Si so that the residual area
ratio of the residual smut on the surfaces of the copper alloys is less than 3%, and
discloses a copper alloy material containing, by mass percent, Ni: 2.0 to 6.0%, Si:
0.3 to 2.0%, Cr: 0 to 1.0%, Mg: 0 to 1.0%, Sn: 0 to 0.8%, and Zn: 0 to 0.8%, with
the balance being Cu and impurities. Furthermore, PTL 2 proposes a method for improving
adhesion with resin by leaving unevenness on the surface of a copper alloy material
by controlling the amount of residual smut on the surface of the copper alloy material,
and discloses a Cu-Ni-Si copper alloy strip containing, by mass percent, Ni: 1.5 to
4.5%, Si: 0.4 to 1.1%, with the balance being Cu and impurities, and has a tensile
strength of 800 MPa or more and an electrical conductivity of 30% IACS or more. However,
both proposals in PTLs 1 and 2 allow residual smut on the surface of the copper alloy
material, and do not fundamentally solve the problem of residual smut occurring on
the surface of the copper alloy material.
[0008] Therefore, the present invention provides a copper-alloy material and a method for
manufacturing a copper-alloy material, which are free from the above-described problem
of residual smut similarly to copper-alloy materials made of Cu-Fe-Zn-P copper alloys
such as C1940, have tensile strength and conductivity substantially equal to those
of copper-alloy materials made of higher-strength Cu-Ni-Si copper alloys such as C7025,
and preferably have good bendability. Copper alloy materials containing a large amount
of the above-mentioned additive elements (for example, Ni, Si, Cr, Mg, Sn, Zn, etc.)
generally have poor rolling workability, and is particularly prone to cracking during
hot rolling. Therefore, the present invention desirably provides a copper alloy material
and a method for producing a copper alloy material that has good rolling workability
and is particularly resistant to cracking during hot rolling.
SOLUTION TO PROBLEM
[0009] The inventors of the present invention have conducted extensive studies on a copper
alloy material made of a Cu-Fe-Zn-P copper alloy free from the problem of residual
smut and a copper alloy material made of a Cu-Ni-Si copper alloy having the problem
of residual smut in terms of the form and properties of the structure, the mechanical
and electrical properties, the production conditions, and the like, and as a result,
have found that the above problems can be solved by further devising the alloy composition
of the Cu-Fe-Zn-P copper alloy and further devising the production conditions of a
copper alloy material made of the copper alloy, and have conceived the present invention.
[0010] That is, a copper-alloy material according to the present invention contains, as
essential elements, 1.6% or more and 2.6% or less of Fe, 0.01% or more and 0.3% or
less of P, 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less of Zn, and 0.3% or more and 0.8% or less
of Sn, with the balance being Cu and impurity elements, and has a tensile strength
of 620MPa or more and a conductivity of 40.0% IACS or more in a temperature environment
of 20 °C.
[0011] The copper alloy material according to the present invention is preferably a copper
alloy material containing, by mass%, 0.01% or more and 0.20% or less of P.
[0012] The copper alloy material according to the present invention preferably contains,
by mass%, Fe, P, Zn, and Sn, 0.002% or more and 0.025% or less of Mn as essential
elements, and the balance being Cu and impurity elements, and has an elongation at
break of more than 20% in a temperature environment of 950 °C.
[0013] The copper alloy material according to the present invention is preferably a copper
alloy material in which a value obtained by (Mn content + total content of impurity
elements) / (Fe content + P content + Sn content) × 100 is 1.1 or less in terms of
content expressed in mass%.
[0014] Moreover, the method according to the present invention having the following processes:
melting and casting process for producing copper alloy casting material containing,
by mass%, 1.6% or more and 2.6% or less of Fe, 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less of P,
0.01% or more and 0.3% or less of Zn, and 0.3% or more % and 0.8% or less of Sn as
essential elements, with the balance consisting of Cu and impurity elements; a hot
rolling process in which hot rolling is performed using the copper alloy casting material
to produce a hot-rolled material; a first cold rolling process of performing cold
rolling using the hot-rolled material to produce a first cold-rolled material; a first
heat treatment process of producing a first heat-treated material by heat-retaining
of the first cold-rolled material at a temperature of 500 °C or more and 600 °C or
less for 4 hours or less; a second cold rolling process of producing a second cold-rolled
material by cold rolling the first heat treated material at a rolling degree of 20%
or more and 90% or less; a second heat treatment process of producing a second heat-treated
material by heat-retaining of the second cold-rolled material at a temperature of
380 °C or more and 480 °C or less for 1 hour or more and 12 hours or less; a third
cold rolling process of producing a third cold-rolled material by performing cold
rolling using the second heat treated material at a rolling degree of 60% or more
and 80% or less; and a third heat treatment process of producing a copper alloy material
by heat-retaining of the third cold-rolled material at a temperature of 250 °C or
more and 380 °C or more for 4 hours or less, in which the melting and casting process,
the hot rolling process, the first cold rolling process, the first heat treatment
process, the second cold rolling process, the second heat treatment process, the third
cold rolling process, and the third heat treatment process are performed in this order
in order to manufacture a copper alloy material that has a tensile strength of 620
MPa or more and a conductivity of 40.0% IACS or more in a temperature environment
of 20°C.
[0015] The method for manufacturing a copper alloy material according to the present invention
is preferably a method for manufacturing a copper alloy material containing 0.01%
or more and 0.20% or less of P by mass%.
[0016] The method for manufacturing a copper alloy material according to the present invention
is preferably a method for manufacturing a copper alloy material having a breaking
elongation of more than 20% in a temperature environment of 950 °C, by
performing a melting and casting process of manufacturing copper alloy casting material
containing, by mass%, Fe, P, Zn, Sn, and 0.002% or more and 0.025% or less of Mn as
essential elements, with the balance being Cu and impurities, and after the melting
process, and
performing the hot rolling process, the first cold rolling process, the first heat
treatment process, the second cold rolling process, the second heat treatment process,
the third cold rolling process, and the third heat treatment process in this order
after the melting and casting process.
[0017] The method for manufacturing a copper alloy material according to the present invention
is preferably a method for manufacturing a copper alloy material comprising a melting
and casting process of manufacturing a copper alloy cast material in which a value
obtained by (Mn content + total content of impurity elements) / (Fe content + P content
+ Sn content) × 100 is 1.1 or less in terms of content expressed in mass%.
ADVANTAGEOUS EFFECTS OF INVENTION
[0018] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a copper-alloy material
and a method for manufacturing a copper-alloy material, which are free from the above-described
problem of residual smut similarly to copper-alloy materials made of Cu-Fe-Zn-P copper
alloys such as C1940, and have tensile strength and conductivity substantially equivalent
to those of copper-alloy materials made of higher-strength Cu-Ni-Si copper alloys
such as C7025. Further, according to the present invention, by appropriately selecting
the structure, a copper alloy material and a method for producing copper alloy material
with good bending workability, and a copper alloy material and a method for producing
copper alloy material with good rolling workability and particularly resistant to
cracking during hot rolling, can be provided.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0019] FIG. 1 is a view showing a flow of main processes in a method for manufacturing a
copper alloy material according to the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[0020] Hereinafter, a configuration of the copper alloy material according to the present
invention and a method for manufacturing the copper alloy material will be described
along the flow of the main processes shown in FIG. 1. It should be understood that
the copper alloy material and the method for manufacturing the copper alloy material
according to the present invention are defined by the claims and include all modifications
within the meaning and scope equivalent to the scope of the claims. The content (numerical
value) of an element and the chemical composition (numerical value) of a material
are expressed by mass% unless otherwise specified.
[0021] The copper-alloy material according to the present invention contains 1.6% or more
and 2.6% or less of Fe (iron), 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less of P (phosphorus), 0.01%
or more and 0.3% or less of Zn (zinc), and 0.3% or more and 0.8% or less of Sn (tin)
(preferably more than 0.3% and 0.8% or less of Sn) as essential elements, with the
balance being Cu (copper) and impurity elements, and has a tensile strength of 620MPa
or more (preferably 625MPa or more, more preferably 630MPa or more) and a conductivity
of 40.0% IACS or more (preferably 45.0% IACS or more) in a temperature environment
of 20 °C. The copper alloy constituting the copper-alloy material according to the
present invention is a Cu-Fe-P-Zn-Sn-based copper-alloy in terms of alloy composition.
[0022] The copper alloy material according to the present invention preferably contains
0.01% or more and 0.20% or less of P.
[0023] The copper alloy material according to the present invention preferably contains
Fe (1.6% or more and 2.6% or less), P (0.01% or more and 0.3% or less, preferably
0.01% or more and 0.20% or less), Zn (0.01% or more and 0.3% or less), Sn (0.3% or
more and 0.8% or less, preferably more than 0.3% and 0.8% or less), and 0.002% or
more and 0.025% or less of Mn, as essential elements, with the balance being Cu and
impurity elements, and has an elongation at break of more than 20% in a temperature
environment of 950 °C.
[0024] In the copper alloy material according to the present invention, a value obtained
by (Mn content + total content of impurity elements) / (Fe content + P content + Sn
content) × 100 (hereinafter referred to as "MI value") is preferably 1.1 or less.
[0025] The reasons for limiting the elements contained in the copper alloy constituting
the copper alloy material according to the present invention are as follows.
<Fe (Iron)>
[0026] The copper alloy material according to the present invention contains, as an essential
element, 1.6% or more and 2.6% or less of Fe. In the copper alloy material, Fe forms
a solid solution in a matrix phase mainly containing Cu of the copper alloy, and a
part of Fe is dispersed and precipitated in the matrix phase as Fe or a compound containing
Fe and P. These effects of Fe contribute to improving the mechanical strength and
heat resistance of the copper alloy material. Therefore, the copper alloy material
containing an appropriate amount of Fe can have higher mechanical strength and heat
resistance while maintaining appropriate electrical conductivity.
[0027] When the amount of Fe contained in the copper-alloy material is excessively small
(less than 1.6%), the above-described action and effect of Fe are not sufficiently
exhibited, and when the amount of Fe contained in the copper-alloy material is excessively
large (more than 2.6%), an excessively large crystallized product of Fe is formed
in a copper-alloy cast material to be described later, which may cause deterioration
in surface cleanliness or processing cracking. From this viewpoint, the copper-alloy
material according to the present invention contains 1.6% or more and 2.6% or less
of Fe, and preferably contains 2.1% or more and 2.4% or less of Fe in order to obtain
more well-balanced characteristics. In addition, the copper-alloy material according
to the present invention contains 1.6% or more and 2.6% or less (preferably 2.1% or
more and 2.4% or less) of Fe, and has a preferable balance between tensile strength
and conductivity in consideration of the Sn content as described later. In this case,
for example, the copper-alloy material has a tensile strength of 630MPa or more and
a conductivity of 45.0% IACS or more.
<P (Phosphorus)>
[0028] The copper alloy material according to the present invention contains 0.01% or more
and 0.3% or less of P as an essential element. In the copper alloy material, P acts
as a deoxidizer for removing excess oxygen present in a molten metal in a melting
and casting process to be described later, and a part of P forms a compound containing
Fe and P and is dispersed and precipitated in a matrix phase mainly containing Cu
of the copper alloy. Such action of P contributes to improving the mechanical strength
and heat resistance of the copper alloy material. Therefore, a copper alloy material
containing an appropriate amount of P can have higher mechanical strength and heat
resistance while maintaining appropriate electrical conductivity.
[0029] When the amount of P contained in the copper alloy material is excessively small
(less than 0.01%), the above-described action and effect of P are not sufficiently
exhibited, and when the amount of P contained in the copper alloy material is excessively
large (more than 0.3%), a decrease in hot workability in a hot rolling process to
be described later or a decrease in electrical conductivity of the copper alloy material
may be caused. From this viewpoint, in the copper alloy material according to the
present invention, the amount of P is set to 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less, and more
preferably 0.01% or more and 0.20% or less in order to improve bending workability.
<Zn (Zinc)>
[0030] The copper-alloy material according to the present invention contains, as an essential
element, 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less of Zn. In the copper-alloy material, Zn improves
the wettability of the surfaces of the copper-alloy material with respect to solder,
and also improves the weather resistance of the solder plating layers provided on
the surfaces of the copper-alloy material. Such an effect of Zn is particularly required
when a solder plating layer is provided on the surface of a copper alloy material,
such as in the above-mentioned lead frame. Therefore, the copper-alloy material containing
an appropriate amount of Zn is practically high in availability.
[0031] In the case where the amount of Zn contained in the copper alloy material is excessively
small (less than 0.01%), the above-described action and effect of Zn are not sufficiently
exhibited, and in the case where the amount of Zn contained in the copper alloy material
is excessively large (more than 0.3%), the above-described action and effect of Zn
are saturated, which may cause a decrease in the electrical conductivity of the copper
alloy material. From this point of view, the copper alloy material according to the
present invention has a Zn content of 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less, preferably 0.05%
or more and 0.2% or less in order to obtain better balanced properties.
<Sn (Tin)>
[0032] The copper-alloy material according to the present invention contains, as an essential
element, 0.3% or more and 0.8% or less (preferably, more than 0.3% and 0.8% or less)
of Sn. In the copper alloy material, Sn is dissolved in the matrix phase of the copper
alloy, which is mainly composed of Cu, and contributes to further improving the mechanical
strength and heat resistance of the copper alloy material. Therefore, a copper-alloy
material containing an appropriate amount of Sn can have higher mechanical strength
and heat resistance while maintaining appropriate electrical conductivity, as compared
with a copper-alloy material not containing the appropriate amount of Sn. Note that
this Sn is not added to the above-described Cu-Fe-Zn-P copper alloys and Cu-Ni-Si
copper alloys. By utilizing this effect of Sn, the mechanical strength of copper alloy
material made of Cu-Fe-Zn-P copper alloy can be pulled up to almost the same level
as that of copper alloy material made of Cu-Ni-Si copper alloy. Note that Sn is not
added to the above-described C1940 and C7025. Further, even if a copper alloy material
made of Cu-Fe-Zn-P copper alloy further contains an appropriate amount of Sn, the
above-mentioned problem of residual smut does not occur. In this regard, please refer
to Table 1 and the like described later.
[0033] If the Sn contained in the copper alloy material is excessively small (less than
0.3%), the effect of the action of Sn is not sufficiently exhibited. Also, if the
Sn contained in the copper alloy material is excessively large (more than 0.8%), although
the mechanical strength of the copper alloy material is further improved, it may cause
a large decrease in the conductivity of the copper alloy material. From this viewpoint,
the copper alloy material according to this invention contains Sn in the range of
0.3% or more and 0.8% or less, and preferably in the range of more than 0.3% and 0.8%
or less in order to stably obtain a tensile strength of 625 MPa or more. This point
should also be referred to the section on the influence of Sn described later. Also,
the copper alloy material according to this invention contains Sn in the range of
0.5% or more and 0.7% or less, and the balance of tensile strength and conductivity
is preferable considering the Fe content as described above. In this case, for example,
a copper alloy material having a tensile strength of 630 MPa or more and a conductivity
of 45.0% IACS or more is obtained.
<Mn (Manganese)>
[0034] The copper alloy material according to this invention contains, as essential elements,
Fe, P, Zn, and Sn in the above-mentioned range, and preferably, further contains 0.002%
or more and 0.025% or less of Mn. The copper alloy material according to this invention
is a copper alloy material made of a Cu-Fe-P-Zn-Sn based copper alloy as described
above. Fe and P contained in this copper alloy material are essential elements, but
as described above, they are elements related to cracking during processing and decrease
in hot workability. Also, this copper alloy material may contain S (sulfur) as an
impurity element derived from the manufacturing raw material (copper material) generally
used. This copper alloy material decreases reliability due to the solid solution of
S, and is particularly prone to cracking at the stage of hot rolling. Therefore, this
copper alloy material preferably contains Mn as an essential element, which reduces
S in the solid solution state by actively generating MnS.
[0035] The S contained in the general manufacturing raw material of this copper alloy material
can be considered to be about 0.001% to 0.005% in practical use. The composition ratio
(Mn: S) of MnS is 1:1 in atomic ratio and 63:37 in mass ratio. Therefore, assuming
that all S reacts with Mn, Mn is required to be about 1.7 times the mass of S in mass
ratio. For example, a copper alloy material containing 0.001% or more and 0.005% or
less of S by mass needs to contain 0.0017% or more and 0.0085% or less of Mn in calculation.
However, in reality, not all Mn reacts with S to form MnS. Therefore, it is practical
to contain Mn in an amount that has sufficient margin for the amount of S, and to
contain Mn in an amount of 2 to 5 times (mass ratio) of S. From this viewpoint, in
the copper alloy material according to this invention, when the content of S is predicted
to be 0.001% or more and 0.005% or less, it is preferable to set Mn in the range of
0.002% or more and 0.025% or less in accordance with the amount of S. Also, if S is
0.002% or less, it is preferable to set Mn in the range of 0.010% or less in accordance
with the amount of S. This makes it possible to produce a copper alloy material that
has good reliability and is particularly resistant to cracking at the stage of hot
rolling.
<Cu (Copper)>
[0036] The copper alloy material according to this invention, excluding the above-mentioned
essential elements Fe, P, Zn, and Sn, consists of the remainder being Cu and impurity
elements. When the copper alloy material according to this invention further contains
Mn, the remainder consists of Cu and impurity elements, the remainder excluding the
above-mentioned essential elements Fe, P, Zn, Sn, and Mn. In this copper alloy material,
Cu is contained in a range of generally 96% or more and 98% or less depending on the
content rate of the above-mentioned essential elements. In this copper alloy material,
the remainder excluding Cu and the above-mentioned essential elements is impurity
elements. In the copper alloy material, Cu (copper) is the main element constituting
the mother phase of the copper alloy and is contained the most. Copper materials made
of copper and copper alloy materials made of copper alloys have excellent conductivity
and are widely used as materials for electrical and electronic components. For example,
copper materials made of oxygen-free copper such as C1020 and C1100 standardized by
JIS have a conductivity of about 100% IACS and a tensile strength of about 195 MPa
(Temper designation O) to 315 MPa (Temper designation H). Also, a copper alloy material
made of C1940 has a conductivity of 60% IACS or more and less than 100% IACS and a
tensile strength of about 275 MPa (Temper designation O3) to 590 MPa (Temper designation
ESH). Also, a copper alloy material made of C7025 has a conductivity of about 45.0%
IACS and a tensile strength of about 650 MPa (Temper designation 1/2H).
<Impurity Element>
[0037] The copper alloy material according to the present invention contains impurity elements.
The impurity elements are inevitably mixed in the production process of the copper
alloy material and are not intentionally added. Examples of the impurity element include
elements such as Ag (silver), Pb (lead), Ni (nickel), and S (sulfur), depending on
the production raw materials and production facilities to be used. If these impurity
elements are mixed in too much, there is a risk that various properties (tensile strength,
electrical conductivity, bending workability, etc.) of the copper alloy material will
be deteriorated. In addition, S in a solid solution state in this copper alloy material
causes deterioration in rolling workability, particularly cracking during hot rolling
as described above. From this viewpoint, the content of impurity elements in the copper
alloy material is suppressed to be as small as possible, for example, to 0.05% or
less, preferably 0.03% or less, and more preferably 0.01% or less in total.
[0038] In addition, in the copper alloy material according to the present invention, Fe
and P are related to work cracking and a decrease in hot workability as described
above; Sn is related to mechanical strength and heat resistance; and impurity elements
such as Ag, Pb, Ni, and S are related to deterioration in tensile strength and bending
workability. In addition, when Mn is further contained, the relationship between Mn
and S relates to a decrease in rolling workability and cracking at the stage of hot
rolling. Considering the influences of impurity elements such as Fe, P, Sn, Mn, and
S described above, it is preferable that the copper alloy material according to the
present invention contains Mn. In this case, preferably, a value obtained by (Mn content
+ total content of impurity elements) / (Fe content + P content + Sn content) × 100
(hereinafter, referred to as "MI value") is considered, and the MI value is set to,
for example, 1.1 or less (> 0), and preferably 1.0 or less (> 0), whereby the rolling
workability (particularly, hot workability) and the like of the copper alloy material
according to the present invention can be sufficiently enhanced.
[0039] The copper-alloy material according to the present invention contains Fe, P, Zn,
and Sn as essential elements in the above-described ranges, with the balance being
Cu and impurity elements, so that the copper-alloy material has a tensile strength
of 620MPa or more (preferably 625MPa or more, more preferably 630MPa or more) and
a conductivity of 40.0% IACS or more (preferably 45.0% IACS or more) in a temperature
environment of 20 ° C, and the generation of residual smut is suppressed as will be
described later. This copper-alloy material has the above-described tensile strength
and conductivity and suppresses the occurrence of residual smut, and thus is considered
to be sufficiently usable as a substitute material for copper-alloy materials made
of Cu-Fe-Zn-P copper alloys such as C1940 and copper-alloy materials made of higher-strength
C7025.
[0040] Furthermore, the copper alloy material according to this invention contains Fe, P,
Zn, Sn, and Mn as essential elements within the aforementioned range, with the remainder
consisting of Cu and impurity elements. As a result, this copper alloy material exhibits
an elongation at break exceeding 20% under a temperature environment of 950°C, improving
its reliability and particularly reducing its susceptibility to cracking during hot
rolling. This copper alloy material, possessing the aforementioned tensile strength,
electrical conductivity, and elongation at break, and with the generation of residual
smut suppressed, is considered to be sufficiently usable as a substitute for copper
alloy materials made from copper alloys such as C1940 of the Cu-Fe-Zn-P system, or
the higher-strength C7025.
[0041] The tensile strength of the copper alloy material according to this invention primarily
depends on precipitation strengthening due to the dispersion precipitation of particles
of a compound containing Fe or Fe and P, and work hardening due to cold rolling. The
strengthening mechanism of the copper alloy structure due to this precipitation strengthening
and work hardening can be controlled by specifying the manufacturing conditions. The
effect of precipitation strengthening can be obtained by controlling the heat treatment
holding conditions within a specific range and uniformly dispersing precipitated particles
of an appropriate size that can act as obstacles to the deformation of the copper
alloy structure. The effect of work hardening can be obtained by controlling the cold
rolling processing conditions within a specific range and accumulating an appropriate
amount of crystals containing dislocations that can act as obstacles to the deformation
of the copper alloy structure. Furthermore, the electrical conductivity of the copper
alloy material according to this invention essentially depends on Cu, but also utilizes
the effect of increasing the purity of the parent phase Cu due to the aforementioned
particle precipitation.
[0042] For a copper alloy material made from a Cu-Fe-P-Zn-Sn system copper alloy to have
a tensile strength of 620 MPa or more (preferably 625 MPa or more, more preferably
630 MPa or more) and an electrical conductivity of 40.0% IACS or more (preferably
45.0% IACS or more) under a temperature environment of 20°C, its manufacturing method
is important. That is, the manufacturing method of the copper alloy material according
to this invention includes the following steps (1) to (8), and is a manufacturing
method that implements these steps in this order.
- (1) A melting casting step to produce a copper alloy casting material consisting of
1.6% or more and 2.6% or less of Fe, 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less (preferably 0.01%
or more and 0.20% or less) of P, 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less of Zn, 0.3% or more
and 0.8% or less of Sn as essential elements, with the remainder consisting of Cu
and impurity elements.
- (2) A hot rolling step to produce a hot-rolled material using the copper alloy casting
material.
- (3) A first cold rolling step to produce a first cold-rolled material using the hot-rolled
material.
- (4) A first heat treatment step to produce a first heat-treated material by heat-retaining
of the first cold-rolled material at a temperature of 500°C or more and 600°C or less
for 4 hours or less.
- (5) A second cold rolling step to produce a second cold-rolled material by cold rolling
the first heat-treated material with a rolling degree of 20% or more and 90% or less.
- (6) A second heat treatment step to produce a second heat-treated material by heat-retaining
of the second cold-rolled material at a temperature of 380°C or more and 480°C or
less for 1 hour or more and 12 hours or less.
- (7) A third cold rolling step to produce a third cold-rolled material by cold rolling
the second heat-treated material with a rolling degree of 60% or more and 80% or less.
- (8) A third heat treatment step to produce a copper alloy material by heat-retaining
of the third cold-rolled material at a temperature of 250°C or more and 380°C or more
for 4 hours or less.
[0043] According to the manufacturing method having the flow of the main steps (1) to (8)
as described above, it is possible to produce a copper alloy material that contains
1.6% or more and 2.6% or less of Fe, 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less (preferably 0.01%
or more and 0.20% or less) of P, 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less of Zn, 0.3% or more
and 0.8% or less of Sn as essential elements, with the remainder consisting of Cu
and impurity elements, and that has a tensile strength of 620 MPa or more and an electrical
conductivity of 40.0% IACS or more under a temperature environment of 20°C.
[0044] In the step (1) described above, preferably, a copper alloy casting material is produced
that contains Fe, P, Zn, Sn, and further, 0.002% or more and 0.025% or less of Mn
as essential elements, with the remainder consisting of Cu and impurity elements.
In that case, in the step (1) described above, a copper alloy casting material is
produced with the MI value, for example, 1.1 or less (>0), preferably 1.0 or less
(>0). Then, the steps (2) to (8) described above are implemented in this order. According
to this manufacturing method, it is possible to produce a preferred copper alloy material
that contains Fe, P, Zn, Sn within the aforementioned range, further, 0.002% or more
and 0.025% or less of Mn, with the remainder consisting of Cu and impurity elements.
This preferred copper alloy material can have a tensile strength of 620 MPa or more
and an electrical conductivity of 40.0% IACS or more under a temperature environment
of 20°C, and further, an elongation at break exceeding 20% under a temperature environment
of 950°C.
[0045] Hereinafter, the manufacturing method of the copper alloy material according to this
invention will be explained along the flow of the main steps shown in Figure 1. In
the manufacturing method of the copper alloy material according to this invention,
in the flow of the main steps shown in Figure 1, it is also possible to make a step
that repeats the combination of the first cold rolling step and the first heat treatment
step as necessary, and it is also possible to make a step that repeats the combination
of the first heat treatment step and the second cold rolling step.
(1) Melting Casting Process
[0046] In the melting casting process, a copper alloy casting material with added Fe, P,
Zn, and Sn is produced. Specifically, the copper alloy material obtained through the
third heat treatment process is prepared to contain 1.6% or more and 2.6% or less
of Fe, 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less of P, 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less of Zn,
and 0.3% or more and 0.8% or less (preferably, exceeding 0.3% and 0.8% or less) of
Sn in mass%, with the remainder consisting of Cu and impurity elements, to produce
a copper alloy casting material. The general S content of the raw materials for this
copper alloy material is, for example, about 0.001% to 0.005%. Therefore, to suppress
or mitigate the influence of S, it is preferable that this copper alloy material further
contains Mn. In that case, the Mn content is adjusted to be 0.002% or more and 0.025%
or less, and preferably, the MI value is also adjusted. The MI value is adjusted to
be, for example, 1.1 or less (>0), preferably 1.0 or less (>0).
(2) Hot Rolling Process
[0047] In the hot rolling process, a hot-rolled material is produced by performing hot rolling
using the copper alloy casting material produced in the above melting casting process.
The hot rolling conditions such as the heat-retaining temperature and the rolling
degree can be selected arbitrarily from general conditions. Generally, in the case
of copper materials and copper alloy materials, hot rolling is performed under a wide
temperature range of 700°C to 1000°C depending on their composition. And, in the case
of copper alloy materials with a relatively large total content of added elements,
hot rolling is performed under a temperature of 900°C to 1000°C. From this viewpoint,
in the copper alloy material according to this invention, the evaluation of its high-temperature
characteristics is performed under a temperature (about 950°C) near the center of
900°C to 1000°C.
(3) First Cold Rolling Process
[0048] In the first cold rolling process, a first cold-rolled material is produced by performing
cold rolling using the hot-rolled material produced in the above hot rolling process.
The cold rolling conditions such as the rolling degree can be arbitrary.
(4) First Heat Treatment Process
[0049] In the first heat treatment process, a first heat-treated material is produced by
performing heat-retaining of the first cold-rolled material at a temperature of 500°C
or more and 600°C or less for 4 hours or less. This first heat treatment process is
a heat treatment performed after the first cold rolling, which is the first rolling,
to sufficiently release the strain accumulated in the copper alloy structure. In the
conventional general manufacturing method of copper alloy materials, the heat treatment
at this stage is performed by heat-retaining at a relatively high temperature (for
example, 700°C or more and 900°C or less). In contrast, in the first heat treatment
process of this invention, heat-retaining is performed at a relatively low temperature
of 500°C or more and 600°C or less for 4 hours or less. By this relatively low-temperature
heat-retaining, not only the effect of appropriately releasing the strain of the copper
alloy structure but also the effect of precipitating particles of a compound containing
Fe or Fe and P in an appropriate amount can be obtained. The particles appropriately
dispersed and precipitated in the copper alloy structure at this stage act to further
improve the tensile strength of the copper alloy material finally obtained.
[0050] If the heat-retaining temperature in the first heat treatment process is excessively
low (less than 500°C), not only the release of the strain of the copper alloy structure
is insufficient, but also the precipitation of the above-mentioned particles into
the copper alloy structure is insufficient. Also, if the heat-retaining temperature
in the first heat treatment process is excessively high (more than 600°C) or the heat-retaining
time is excessively long (more than 4 hours), the strain of the copper alloy structure
is sufficiently released, but the above-mentioned particles precipitated in the copper
alloy structure become excessively coarse, which may hinder the improvement of the
tensile strength of the copper alloy material. Also, if the heat-retaining temperature
in the first heat treatment process is at the relatively high temperature mentioned
above (for example, 700°C or more and 900°C or less), there is a risk that the precipitation
of the above-mentioned particles itself does not occur. From this viewpoint, in the
first heat treatment process, heat-retaining is performed on the first cold-rolled
material at a temperature of 500°C or more and 600°C or less for 4 hours or less,
and preferably, heat-retaining is performed at a temperature of 550°C or more and
600°C or less for 4 hours or less (preferably 2 hours or less) to obtain a copper
alloy structure with a good balance of strain release and precipitation of the above-mentioned
particle.
(5) Second Cold Rolling Process
[0051] In the second cold rolling process, a second cold-rolled material is produced by
performing cold rolling on the first heat-treated material produced in the above first
heat treatment process with a rolling degree of 20% or more and 90% or less. This
second cold rolling process is a process for introducing and sufficiently accumulating
dislocations into the copper alloy structure of the first heat-treated material produced
in the first heat treatment process and further work-hardening the copper alloy structure.
The dislocations introduced into the crystals constituting the copper alloy structure
act as the starting point for precipitating particles responsible for precipitation
strengthening of the copper alloy structure. Therefore, by uniformly introducing and
sufficiently accumulating dislocations into the copper alloy structure at this stage,
it is possible to uniformly precipitate particles responsible for precipitation strengthening
in the copper alloy structure in the next second heat treatment process. As a result,
it is possible to further improve the tensile strength of the copper alloy material
finally obtained.
[0052] If the rolling degree in the second cold rolling process is excessively small (less
than 20%), the introduction and accumulation of dislocations into the copper alloy
structure are insufficient, and the number of particles precipitated in the copper
alloy structure in the next second heat treatment process tends to be insufficient.
Also, if the rolling degree in the second cold rolling process is excessively large
(more than 90%), the particles precipitated in the copper alloy structure in the next
second heat treatment process grow excessively large, and the effect of precipitation
strengthening may not be obtained. From this viewpoint, in the second cold rolling
process, cold rolling is performed on the first heat-treated material produced in
the above first heat treatment process with a rolling degree of 20% or more and 90%
or less, and preferably cold rolling is performed with a rolling degree of 40% or
more and 75% or less to obtain a good balance of the synergistic effect of precipitation
strengthening and work hardening finally.
(6) Second Heat Treatment Process
[0053] In the second heat treatment process, a second heat-treated material is produced
by performing heat-retaining of the second cold-rolled material produced in the above
second cold rolling process at a temperature of 380°C or more and 480°C or less for
1 hour or more and 12 hours or less. This second heat treatment process is a heat
treatment process performed after the above-mentioned second cold rolling and is an
aging treatment process for sufficiently dispersing and precipitating particles responsible
for precipitation strengthening in the copper alloy structure of the second cold-rolled
material using dislocations introduced and accumulated during cold rolling. In the
case of a conventional general manufacturing method of copper alloy materials made
from a Cu-Fe-P system, the heat-retaining of the aging treatment is performed at a
temperature of, for example, 400°C or more and 600°C or less. In contrast, in the
second heat treatment process of this invention, heat-retaining is performed at a
relatively lower temperature of 380°C or more and 480°C or less for 1 hour or more
and 12 hours or less. By this relatively lower temperature heat-retaining, the particles
of a compound containing Fe or Fe and P precipitated in the copper alloy structure
can be further refined and more uniformly dispersed. As a result, the effect of precipitation
strengthening on the copper alloy structure can be sufficiently obtained. Also, by
this relatively lower temperature heat-retaining, the strain in the copper alloy structure
is intentionally insufficiently released, and the synergistic effect of precipitation
strengthening and work hardening obtained up to the second cold rolling process can
be sufficiently obtained.
[0054] In the second heat treatment process, if the heat-retaining temperature is excessively
low (less than 380°C) or the heat-retaining time is excessively short (less than 1
hour), the precipitation of the aforementioned particles into the copper alloy structure
may be insufficient, and the tensile strength and electrical conductivity of the copper
alloy material finally obtained may be insufficient. Also, if the heat-retaining temperature
in the second heat treatment process is excessively high (more than 480°C) or the
heat-retaining time is excessively long (more than 12 hours), the aforementioned particles
precipitated in the copper alloy structure grow excessively, the effect of precipitation
strengthening decreases, and the strain in the copper alloy structure is excessively
released beyond the intended level, and the synergistic effect of precipitation strengthening
and work hardening obtained up to the second cold rolling process is lost. As a result,
the tensile strength of the copper alloy material finally obtained may be insufficient.
From this viewpoint, in the second heat treatment process, heat-retaining is performed
on the second cold-rolled material at a temperature of 380°C or more and 480°C or
less for 1 hour or more and 12 hours or less, and preferably, heat-retaining is performed
at a temperature of 400°C or more and 460°C or less for 1 hour or more and 12 hours
or less (preferably 2 hours or more and 8 hours or less) to obtain a copper alloy
structure with a good balance of strain release and the aforementioned particle precipitation.
(7) Third Cold Rolling Process
[0055] In the third cold rolling process, a third cold-rolled material is produced by performing
cold rolling on the second heat-treated material produced in the above second heat
treatment process with a rolling degree of 60% or more and 80% or less. Also, in this
process, the thickness (product thickness) of the copper alloy material finally desired
can be adjusted. This third cold rolling process is a process for further introducing
and sufficiently accumulating dislocations into the copper alloy structure of the
second heat-treated material produced in the second heat treatment process, in which
the aforementioned particles are dispersed and precipitated, and further work-hardening
the copper alloy structure. As a result, the synergistic effect of precipitation strengthening
and work hardening obtained up to the second heat treatment process is sufficiently
enhanced, and the tensile strength of the copper alloy material finally obtained can
be sufficiently improved.
[0056] If the rolling degree in the third cold rolling process is excessively small (less
than 60%), the copper alloy structure is not sufficiently work-hardened, and the synergistic
effect of precipitation strengthening and work hardening may not be sufficiently enhanced.
Also, if the rolling degree in the third cold rolling process is excessively large
(more than 80%), the strain in the copper alloy structure is excessively accumulated,
and the excessively accumulated strain is excessively released beyond the intended
level in the next third heat treatment process, and the tensile strength of the copper
alloy material finally obtained may not be sufficiently improved. From this viewpoint,
in the third cold rolling process, cold rolling is performed on the second heat-treated
material produced in the above second heat treatment process with a rolling degree
of 60% or more and 80% or less, and preferably, cold rolling is performed with a rolling
degree of 65% or more and 75% or less to obtain a good balance of the synergistic
effect of precipitation strengthening and work hardening finally.
(8) Third Heat Treatment Process
[0057] In the third heat treatment process, the copper alloy material intended is produced
by performing heat-retaining of the third cold-rolled material produced in the above
third cold rolling process at a temperature of 250°C or more and 380°C or more for
4 hours or less. The heat-retaining in this process may be 0 hours, that is, it may
immediately enter cooling as soon as it is heated and reaches the target retention
temperature. This third heat treatment process is a process for appropriately releasing
the strain accumulated in the copper alloy structure of the third cold-rolled material
produced in the above-mentioned third cold rolling, and improving the mechanical properties
such as elongation and bendability of the copper alloy material intended. In the case
of a conventional general manufacturing method of copper alloy materials made from
a Cu-Fe-P system, the heat-retaining of the heat treatment (annealing) intended for
strain release is performed at a temperature of, for example, 400°C or more and 500°C
or less. In contrast, in the third heat treatment process of this invention, heat-retaining
is performed at a lower temperature of 250°C or more and 380°C or less for 4 hours
or less. By this heat-retaining at a lower temperature than conventional, the strain
in the copper alloy structure due to rolling is appropriately released but not excessively
released, and by obtaining a copper alloy structure containing an appropriate amount
of strain, the decrease in tensile strength of the copper alloy material intended
can be minimized.
[0058] If the heat-retaining temperature in the third heat treatment process is excessively
low (less than 250°C), the release of the strain in the third cold-rolled material's
copper alloy structure may be insufficient, and the mechanical properties such as
elongation and bendability of the copper alloy material intended may not be improved.
Also, if the heat-retaining temperature in the third heat treatment process is excessively
high (more than 380°C) or the heat-retaining time is excessively long (more than 4
hours), the release of the strain in the third cold-rolled material's copper alloy
structure is excessive, and the tensile strength of the copper alloy material intended
may not be obtained. From this viewpoint, in the third heat treatment process, heat-retaining
is performed on the third cold-rolled material at a temperature of 250°C or more and
380°C or less for 4 hours or less, and preferably, heat-retaining is performed at
a temperature of 280°C or more and 350°C or less for 1 hour or less to obtain a copper
alloy structure with a good balance of tensile strength and elongation and bendability
of the copper alloy material intended.
[0059] As described above, according to this invention, it is possible to provide a copper
alloy material and a manufacturing method of a copper alloy material that have no
problem of the aforementioned residual smut like a copper alloy material made from
a Cu-Fe-Zn-P system such as C1940, and have almost the same electrical conductivity
(conductivity) and mechanical strength (tensile strength) as a copper alloy material
made from a Cu-Ni-Si system such as C7025, which is of higher strength.
EXAMPLES
[0060] The effectiveness of the copper alloy material and the manufacturing method of the
copper alloy material according to this invention will be explained by giving actual
evaluation results. First, Table 1 shows the composition (added elements), main manufacturing
conditions, and mechanical properties, etc., of the copper alloy materials of Samples
1 to 29 (Example, Comparative Examples). Also, as Reference Examples, the copper alloy
materials of Samples 30 and 31 are listed. In Samples 1 to 29, Mn is not intentionally
added. Also, the remainder of Samples 1 to 29 other than the added elements may be
interpreted as Cu and impurity elements, and impurity elements of less than 0.01%
(Ag, Pb, Ni, and S, etc.) are omitted from the description.
[Table 1]
Sample number |
Additive elements (mass%) |
1st Heat Treatment Process |
2nd Cold Rolling Process |
2nd Heat Treatment Process |
Fe |
P |
Zn |
Sn |
Mn |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Rolling Degree (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
1 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
2 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
420°C, 4h |
3 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
420°C, 4h |
4 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.30 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
5 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
550°C, 3 min. |
73 |
420°C, 4h |
6 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
550°C, 3 min. |
46 |
450°C, 4h |
7 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
73 |
420°C, 4h |
8 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
600°C, 3 min. |
73 |
420°C, 4h |
9 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
600°C, 3 min. |
46 |
450°C, 4h |
10 |
1.50 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
11 |
2.80 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
12 |
2.20 |
0.22 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
13 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.40 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
14 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
15 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.90 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
16 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.30 |
< 0.001 |
450°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
17 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
650°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
18 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 5h |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
19 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
17 |
450°C, 4h |
20 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
91 |
450°C, 4h |
21 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
350°C, 4h |
22 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
500°C, 4h |
23 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
420°C, 0.5h |
24 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 20h |
25 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
79 |
450°C, 4h |
26 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
28 |
450°C, 4h |
27 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
28 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
29 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
30 |
C1940 equivalent material (quality ESH) |
- |
- |
- |
31 |
C7025 equivalent material (1/2H by quality) |
- |
- |
- |
Table 1 (continued)
Sample Number |
3rd Cold Rolling Process |
3rd Heat Treatment Process |
Characteristics of copper alloy materials, etc. |
Notes |
Rolling Degree (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Electrical conductivity (% IACS) |
Bendability |
Presence or Absence of residual smut |
1 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
670 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
2 |
70 |
300°C, 1 min. |
692 |
45.8 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
3 |
70 |
280°C, 1 min. |
711 |
41.8 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
4 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
624 |
51.0 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
5 |
60 |
350°C, 1 min. |
646 |
47.7 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
6 |
80 |
350°C, 1 min. |
654 |
45.8 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
7 |
60 |
350°C, 1 min. |
645 |
47.3 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
8 |
60 |
350°C, 1 min. |
636 |
46.9 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
9 |
80 |
350°C, 1 min. |
662 |
47.4 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
10 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
575 |
56.3 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
11 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
672 |
38.8 |
Poor |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
12 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
675 |
48.8 |
Poor |
Absent |
Inventive Example |
13 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
674 |
39.2 |
Poor |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
14 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
604 |
55.0 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
15 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
696 |
39.8 |
Poor |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
16 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
610 |
50.5 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
17 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
596 |
51.8 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
18 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
612 |
51.0 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
19 |
80 |
350°C, 1 min. |
624 |
39.6 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
20 |
60 |
350°C, 1 min. |
610 |
48.8 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
21 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
606 |
38.0 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
22 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
575 |
50.5 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
23 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
598 |
39.7 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
24 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
602 |
52.0 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
25 |
50 |
350°C, 1 min. |
569 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
26 |
85 |
350°C, 1 min. |
580 |
46.0 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
27 |
70 |
200°C, 1 min. |
718 |
39.8 |
Poor |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
28 |
70 |
400°C, 1 min. |
603 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
29 |
70 |
350°C, 5h |
614 |
49.6 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
30 |
- |
- |
540 |
63.0 |
Good |
Absent |
Reference Example |
31 |
- |
- |
650 |
45.0 |
Good |
Present |
Reference Example |
[0061] The copper alloy material of Sample 1 shown in Table 1 contains 2.2 mass% of Fe,
0.03 mass% of P, 0.12 mass% of Zn, and 0.60 mass% of Sn, with the remainder being
Cu and impurity elements. This copper alloy material was produced through the following
processes (1) to (8).
- (1) In the melting and casting process, additive materials containing predetermined
additive elements were added to a molten parent material made of oxygen-free copper
using a high-frequency melting furnace, and the mixture was melted in a nitrogen atmosphere.
After adjusting the composition, the mixture was cast to produce a copper alloy casting
material with a thickness of about 25 mm, a width of about 30 mm, and a length of
about 150 mm.
- (2) In the hot rolling process, the copper alloy casting material was hot-rolled at
a temperature of about 950°C to produce a hot-rolled material with a thickness of
about 8 mm.
- (3) In the first cold rolling process, the hot-rolled material was cold-rolled to
a total rolling degree of about 83% to produce a first cold-rolled material with a
thickness of about 1.4 mm.
- (4) In the first heat treatment process, the first cold-rolled material was heated
and retained at a temperature of about 580°C for about 3 minutes to produce a first
heat-treated material.
- (5) In the second cold rolling process, the first heat-treated material was cold-rolled
to a total rolling degree of about 64% to produce a second cold-rolled material with
a thickness of about 0.5 mm. In this case, the total rolling degree of the first and
second cold rolling processes was about 94%.
- (6) In the second heat treatment process, the second cold-rolled material was heated
and retained at a temperature of about 450°C for about 4 hours to produce a second
heat-treated material.
- (7) In the third cold rolling process, the second heat-treated material was cold-rolled
to a total rolling degree of about 70% to produce a third cold-rolled material with
a thickness of about 0.15 mm. In this case, the total rolling degree of the second
and third cold rolling processes was about 89%, and the total rolling degree of the
first, second, and third cold rolling processes was about 98%.
- (8) In the third heat treatment process, the third cold-rolled material was heated
and retained at a temperature of about 350°C for about 1 minute to finally obtain
a copper alloy material of Sample 1 with a thickness of about 0.15 mm. The copper
alloy material of Sample 1 is an example of the present invention.
[0062] The copper alloy material of Sample 2 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the same
final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially the
same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the
heat retention in the second heat treatment process was set to a temperature of about
420°C. The copper alloy material of Sample 2 is an example of the present invention.
[0063] The copper alloy material of Sample 3 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the same
final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially the
same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the
heat retention in the second heat treatment process was set to a temperature of about
420°C and the heat retention in the third heat treatment process was set to a temperature
of about 280°C. The copper alloy material of Sample 3 is an example of the present
invention.
[0064] The copper alloy material of Sample 4 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the same
final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially the
same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the
Sn content in the copper alloy material finally obtained in the melting and casting
process was set to about 0.30 mass%. The copper alloy material of Sample 4 is an example
of the present invention.
[0065] The copper alloy material of Sample 5 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the same
final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially the
same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the
heat retention in the first heat treatment process was set to a temperature of about
550°C, the rolling degree in the second cold rolling process was set to about 73%,
the heat retention in the second heat treatment process was set to a temperature of
about 420°C, and the rolling degree in the third cold rolling process was set to about
60%. In this case, the total rolling degree of the second and third cold rolling processes
was about 89%. The copper alloy material of Sample 5 is an example of the present
invention.
[0066] The copper alloy material of Sample 6 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the same
final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially the
same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the
heat retention in the first heat treatment process was set to a temperature of about
550°C, the rolling degree in the second cold rolling process was set to about 46%,
and the rolling degree in the third cold rolling process was set to about 80%. In
this case, the total rolling degree of the second and third cold rolling processes
was about 89%. The copper alloy material of Sample 6 is an example of the present
invention.
[0067] The copper alloy material of Sample 7 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the same
final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially the
same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the
rolling degree in the second cold rolling process was set to about 73%, the heat retention
in the second heat treatment process was set to a temperature of about 420°C, and
the rolling degree in the third cold rolling process was set to about 60%. The copper
alloy material of Sample 7 is an example of the present invention.
[0068] The copper alloy material of Sample 8 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the same
final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially the
same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the
heat retention in the first heat treatment process was set to a temperature of about
600°C, the rolling degree in the second cold rolling process was set to about 73%,
the heat retention in the second heat treatment process was set to a temperature of
about 420°C, and the rolling degree in the third cold rolling process was set to about
60%. The copper alloy material of Sample 8 is an example of the present invention.
[0069] The copper alloy material of Sample 9 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the same
final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially the
same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the
heat retention in the first heat treatment process was set to a temperature of about
600°C, the rolling degree in the second cold rolling process was set to about 46%,
and the rolling degree in the third cold rolling process was set to about 80%. The
copper alloy material of Sample 9 is an example of the present invention.
[0070] The copper alloy material of Sample 10 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially
the same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that
the Fe content in the copper alloy material finally obtained in the melting and casting
process was set to about 1.50 mass%. The copper alloy material of Sample 10 is a comparative
example, and the Fe content is outside the range of this invention.
[0071] The copper alloy material of Sample 11 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially
the same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that
the Fe content in the copper alloy material finally obtained in the melting and casting
process was set to about 2.80 mass%. The copper alloy material of Sample 11 is a comparative
example, and the Fe content is outside the range of this invention.
[0072] The copper alloy material of Sample 12 shown in Table 1 was produced through substantially
the same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that
the P content in the copper alloy material finally obtained in the melting and casting
process was set to about 0.22 mass%. The copper alloy material of Sample 12 is an
example of the present invention.
[0073] The copper alloy material of Sample 13 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially
the same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that
the Zn content in the copper alloy material finally obtained in the melting and casting
process was set to about 0.40 mass%. The copper alloy material of Sample 13 is a comparative
example, and the Zn content is outside the range of this invention.
[0074] The copper alloy material of Sample 14 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially
the same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that
the Sn content in the copper alloy material finally obtained in the melting and casting
process was set to about 0.20 mass%. The copper alloy material of Sample 14 is a comparative
example, and the Sn content is outside the range of this invention.
[0075] The copper alloy material of Sample 15 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through substantially
the same production process as the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that
the Sn content in the copper alloy material finally obtained in the melting and casting
process was set to about 0.90 mass%. The copper alloy material of Sample 15 is a comparative
example, and the Sn content is outside the range of this invention.
[0076] The copper alloy material of Sample 16 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the Sn content
in the copper alloy material finally obtained in the component adjustment of the melting
and casting process is set to be about 0.30 mass%, and the heat-retaining of the first
heat treatment process is set to a temperature of about 450°C. The copper alloy material
of Sample 16 is a comparative example, and the first heat treatment process is outside
the scope of this invention.
[0077] The copper alloy material of Sample 17 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the heat-retaining
of the first heat treatment process is set to a temperature of about 650°C. The copper
alloy material of Sample 17 is a comparative example because the first heat treatment
process is outside the scope of this invention.
[0078] The copper alloy material of Sample 18 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the heat-retaining
of the first heat treatment process is set to a time of about 5 hours. The copper
alloy material of Sample 18 is a comparative example because the first heat treatment
process is outside the scope of this invention.
[0079] The copper alloy material of Sample 19 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the rolling
degree of the second cold rolling process is set to about 17%, and the rolling degree
of the third cold rolling process is set to about 80%. In this case, the total rolling
degree by the second and third cold rolling processes is about 83%. The copper alloy
material of Sample 19 is a comparative example, and the second cold rolling process
is outside the scope of this invention.
[0080] The copper alloy material of Sample 20 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the rolling
degree of the second cold rolling process is set to about 91%, and the rolling degree
of the third cold rolling process is set to about 60%. In this case, the total rolling
degree by the second and third cold rolling processes is about 96%. The copper alloy
material of Sample 20 is a comparative example, and the second cold rolling process
is outside the scope of this invention.
[0081] The copper alloy material of Sample 21 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the heat-retaining
of the second heat treatment process is set to a temperature of about 350°C. The copper
alloy material of Sample 21 is a comparative example, and the second heat treatment
process is outside the scope of this invention.
[0082] The copper alloy material of Sample 22 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the heat-retaining
of the second heat treatment process is set to a temperature of about 500°C. The copper
alloy material of Sample 22 is a comparative example, and the second heat treatment
process is outside the scope of this invention.
[0083] The copper alloy material of Sample 23 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the heat-retaining
of the second heat treatment process is set to a temperature of about 420°C for about
0.5 hours. The copper alloy material of Sample 23 is a comparative example, and the
second heat treatment process is outside the scope of this invention.
[0084] The copper alloy material of Sample 24 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the heat-retaining
of the second heat treatment process is set to a temperature of about 450°C for about
20 hours. The copper alloy material of Sample 24 is a comparative example, and the
second heat treatment process is outside the scope of this invention.
[0085] The copper alloy material of Sample 25 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the rolling
degree of the second cold rolling process is set to about 79%, and the rolling degree
of the third cold rolling process is set to about 50%. In this case, the total rolling
degree by the second and third cold rolling processes is about 90%. The copper alloy
material of Sample 25 is a comparative example, and the third cold rolling process
is outside the scope of this invention.
[0086] The copper alloy material of Sample 26 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the rolling
degree of the second cold rolling process is set to about 28%, and the rolling degree
of the third cold rolling process is set to about 85%. In this case, the total rolling
degree by the second and third cold rolling processes is about 89%. The copper alloy
material of Sample 26 is a comparative example, and the third cold rolling process
is outside the scope of this invention.
[0087] The copper alloy material of Sample 27 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the heat-retaining
of the third heat treatment process is set to a temperature of about 200°C. The copper
alloy material of Sample 27 is a comparative example, and the third heat treatment
process is outside the scope of this invention.
[0088] The copper alloy material of Sample 28 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the heat-retaining
of the third heat treatment process is set to a temperature of about 400°C. The copper
alloy material of Sample 28 is a comparative example, and the third heat treatment
process is outside the scope of this invention.
[0089] The copper alloy material of Sample 29 shown in Table 1 was produced to have the
same final thickness as the copper alloy material of sample 1 through a process substantially
equivalent to that of the copper alloy material of Sample 1, except that the heat-retaining
of the third heat treatment process is set to a time of about 5 hours. The copper
alloy material of Sample 29 is a comparative example, and the third heat treatment
process is outside the scope of this invention.
[0090] The copper alloy material of Sample 30 shown in Table 1 is a commercially available
material having a composition equivalent to C1940 (Cu - 2.2 mass% Fe - 0.03 mass%
P - 0.12 mass% Zn), Temper designation of ESH, and a thickness equivalent to that
of the copper alloy material of Sample 1. The copper alloy material of Sample 30 is
a reference example.
[0091] The copper alloy material of Sample 31 shown in Table 1 is a commercially available
material having a composition equivalent to C7025 (Cu - 3 mass% Ni - 0.65 mass% Si
- 0.15 mass% Mg), Temper designation of 1/2-H, and a thickness equivalent to that
of the copper alloy material of Sample 1. The copper alloy material of Sample 31 is
a reference example.
[0092] The characteristics of the copper alloy materials of Samples 1 to 31 were actually
confirmed and evaluated by focusing on the tensile strength, electrical conductivity,
bendability, and the presence or absence of residual smut, as shown in Table 1. Specifically,
the tensile strength of the copper alloy material was measured in accordance with
JIS-Z2241:2011, which specifies the method for tensile testing of metallic materials,
under normal temperature conditions (about 20°C). The electrical conductivity of the
copper alloy material was measured in accordance with JIS-Z0505:1975, which specifies
the method for measuring the electrical conductivity of non-ferrous metal materials,
under normal temperature conditions (about 20°C). The bendability of the copper alloy
material was evaluated by the W bending test adopted as a bending test in JIS-H3110:2018
under normal temperature conditions (about 20°C). Specifically, when the test piece
(copper alloy material) was bent with a bending radius (inner radius) of 0.15 mm,
if no cracks were confirmed on the outer surface of the bend of the test piece, it
was judged as "Good", and even if the cracks were small, if cracks were confirmed,
it was judged as "Poor". The presence or absence of residual smut was confirmed by
observing the surface of the test piece (copper alloy material) which was pretreated,
immersed in a chemical polishing solution for about 1 minute, washed with water, and
dried. At this time, the chemical polishing solution was an acidic aqueous solution
containing about 20 mass% of sulfuric acid and about 8 mass% of hydrogen peroxide,
and was kept at about 40°C. The surface area of the test piece immersed in the chemical
polishing solution was about 2000 mm
2 (on both sides with a width of 20 mm and a length of 50 mm). The pretreatment of
the test piece was carried out in the order of ethanol degreasing, alkali electrolytic
degreasing, immersion in a 5% sulfuric acid aqueous solution (neutralization), water
washing, and drying.
[0093] Regarding the reference examples shown in Table 1, the tensile strength of the copper
alloy material of Sample 30 was 540 MPa, which was less than 620 MPa. The conductivity
was 63.0% IACS, which was more than 40.0% IACS. The bendability was rated as "Good",
and there was no residual smut. Also, the tensile strength of the copper alloy material
of Sample 31 was 650 MPa, which was more than 620 MPa. The conductivity was 45.0%
IACS, which was more than 40.0% IACS. The bendability was rated as "Good", and residual
smut was present.
<Influence of Fe>
[0094] The copper alloy materials of Samples 1, 10, and 11 shown in Table 2 (extracted from
Table 1) were produced to have substantially equivalent thicknesses through substantially
equivalent production processes except that Fe contents were different in the final
copper alloy material obtained by adjusting the composition in the melting and casting
process. Specifically, the Fe content of Sample 1 was 2.20%, which is within the range
of 1.6% to 2.6% defined in this invention. In contrast, Sample 10 had a smaller Fe
content of 1.50 mass%, and Sample 11 had a larger Fe content of 2.80%, both of which
were outside the above range.
[Table 2]
Sample number |
Added elements (mass%) |
Characteristics of copper alloy materials |
Notes |
Fe |
P |
Zn |
Sn |
Mn |
Tensile Strength (MPa) |
Conductivity (% IACS) |
Bendability |
Presense or Absence of Residual Smut |
1 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
670 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
10 |
1.50 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
575 |
56.3 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
11 |
2.80 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
672 |
38.8 |
Poor |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
[0095] As shown in Table 2, the tensile strength of Samples 1 and 11 was 670 MPa and 672
MPa, respectively, both of which were more than 620 MPa. In contrast, the tensile
strength of Sample 10 was 575 MPa, which was less than 620 MPa. Also, the conductivity
of Samples 1 and 10 was 48.2% IACS and 56.3% IACS, respectively, both of which were
more than 40.0% IACS. In contrast, the conductivity of Sample 11 was 38.8% IACS, which
was less than 40.0% IACS. Also, the bendability of Samples 1 and 10 was rated as "Good",
while that of Sample 11 was rated as "Poor". Also, residual smut was absent in any
of Samples 1, 10, and 11.
[0096] By comparing the evaluation of the copper alloy materials of Samples 1, 10, and 11
with different Fe contents, it was found that when the Fe content decreases and is
outside the above range, the tensile strength of the copper alloy material decreases
and does not reach 620 MPa. Also, when the Fe content increases and is outside the
above range, the conductivity of the copper alloy material decreases and does not
reach 40.0% IACS. Also, it was found that the Fe content has little influence on the
bendability and residual smut of the copper alloy material. Therefore, from the viewpoint
of having no residual smut, a tensile strength of more than 620 MPa, a conductivity
of more than 40.0% IACS, and good bendability, it is effective in practical use to
have a copper alloy material containing Fe of 1.6% to 2.6%.
<Influence of P>
[0097] The copper alloy materials of Samples 1 and 12 shown in Table 3 (extracted from Table
1) were produced to have substantially equivalent thicknesses through substantially
equivalent production processes except that P contents were different in the final
copper alloy material obtained by adjusting the composition in the melting and casting
process, and were produced through substantially equivalent production processes to
have substantially equivalent thicknesses. Specifically, the P content of Sample 1
was 0.03%, which is within the range of 0.01% to 0.3% defined in this invention. Also,
Sample 12 had a larger P content of 0.22 mass%, which is within the above range, but
is outside the range of 0.01% to 0.20% which the inventors consider more preferable.
[Table 3]
Sample Number |
Added elements (mass%) |
Characteristics of copper alloy materials etc. |
Notes |
Fe |
P |
Zn |
Sn |
Mn |
Tensile Strength (MPa) |
Conductivity (% IACS) |
Bendability |
Presence or Absence of Residual Smut |
1 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
670 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
12 |
2.20 |
0.22 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
675 |
48.8 |
Poor |
Absent |
Example |
[0098] As shown in Table 3, the tensile strength of Samples 1 and 12 was more than 620 MPa,
and the tensile strength of Sample 12 was 675 MPa which was larger than that of Sample
1 (670 MPa). Also, the conductivity of Samples 1 and 12 was more than 40.0% IACS,
and the conductivity of Sample 12 was larger than that of Sample 1 (48.2% IACS), being
48.8% IACS. Also, the bendability of Sample 1 was rated as "Good", while that of Sample
12 was rated as "Poor". Also, residual smut was absent in both of Samples 1 and 12.
[0099] By comparing the evaluation of the copper alloy materials of Samples 1 and 12 with
different P contents, it was found that the P content has little influence on the
tensile strength and conductivity of the copper alloy material. Also, it was found
that when the P content increases, the bendability of the copper alloy material tends
to deteriorate. Also, it was found that the P content has little influence on the
residual smut of the copper alloy material. Therefore, from the viewpoint of having
no residual smut, a tensile strength of more than 620 MPa, a conductivity of more
than 40.0% IACS, and good bendability, it is effective in practical use to have a
copper alloy material containing P of 0.01% to 0.3% defined in this invention. Also,
from the viewpoint of having good bendability, it is effective in practical use to
have a copper alloy material containing P of 0.01% to 0.20%.
<Influence of Zn>
[0100] The copper alloy materials of Samples 1 and 13 shown in Table 4 (extracted from Table
1) were produced to have substantially equivalent thicknesses through substantially
equivalent production processes except that Zn contents were different in the final
copper alloy material obtained by adjusting the composition in the melting and casting
process. Specifically, the Zn content of Sample 1 was 0.12%, which is within the range
of 0.01% to 0.3% defined in this invention. In contrast, Sample 13 had a larger Zn
content of 0.40%, which was outside the above range.
[Table 4]
Sample number |
Additive elements (mass%) |
Characteristics of copper alloy materials, etc. |
Note |
Fe |
P |
Zn |
Sn |
Mn |
Tensile Strength (MPa) |
Conductivity (% IACS) |
Bendability |
Presence or Absence of Residual Smut |
1 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
670 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
13 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.40 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
674 |
39.2 |
Poor |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
[0101] As shown in Table 4, the tensile strength of Samples 1 and 12 was more than 620 MPa,
and the tensile strength of Sample 13 was 674 MPa, which was larger than that of Sample
1 (670 MPa). Also, the conductivity of Sample 1 (48.2% IACS) was more than 40.0% IACS,
while the conductivity of Sample 13 was 39.2% IACS, which was less than 40.0% IACS.
Also, the bendability of Sample 1 was rated as "Good", while that of Sample 13 was
rated as "Poor". Also, residual smut was absent in both Samples 1 and 13.
[0102] By comparing the evaluation of the copper alloy materials of Samples 1 and 13 with
different Zn contents, it was found that when the Zn content increases and is outside
the above range, the conductivity of the copper alloy material decreases and does
not reach 40.0% IACS, and the bendability of the copper alloy material tends to deteriorate.
Also, it was found that the Zn content has little influence on the tensile strength
and residual smut of the copper alloy material. Therefore, from the viewpoint of having
no residual smut, a tensile strength of more than 620 MPa, a conductivity of more
than 40.0% IACS, and good bendability, it is effective in practical use to have a
copper alloy material containing Zn of 0.01% to 0.3%.
<Influence of Sn>
[0103] The copper alloy materials of Samples 1, 4, 14, and 15 shown in Table 5 (extracted
from Table 1) were produced to have substantially equivalent thicknesses through substantially
equivalent production processes except that Sn contents were different in the final
copper alloy material obtained by adjusting the composition in the melting and casting
process. Specifically, the Sn content of Sample 1 was 0.60%, and that of Sample 13
was 0.30%, both of which are within the range of 0.3% to 0.8% defined in this invention.
In contrast, Sample 4 had a smaller Sn content of 0.20 mass%, and Sample 14 had a
larger Sn content of 0.90%, both of which were outside the above range.
[Table 5]
Sample number |
Additive elements (mass%) |
Characteristics of copper alloy materials |
Notes |
Fe |
P |
Zn |
Sn |
Mn |
Tensile Strength (MPa) |
Conductivity (% IACS) |
Bendability |
Presence or Absence of Residual Smut |
1 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
670 |
48.2 |
Excellent |
Absent |
Example |
4 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.30 |
< 0.001 |
624 |
51.0 |
Excellent |
Absent |
Example |
14 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
< 0.001 |
604 |
55.0 |
Excellent |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
15 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.90 |
< 0.001 |
696 |
39.8 |
Poor |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
[0104] As shown in Table 5, the tensile strength was 620 MPa or more for samples 1, 4, and
15, and less than 620 MPa for sample 14. Specifically, the tensile strength of sample
1 (670 MPa) was smaller for sample 4 at 624 MPa, even smaller for sample 14 at 604
MPa, but larger for sample 15 at 690 MPa. Also, the conductivity was 40.0% IACS or
more for samples 1, 4, and 14, and less than 40.0% IACS for sample 15. Specifically,
compared to the conductivity of sample 1 (48.2% IACS), sample 4 was larger at 51.0%
IACS, sample 14 was even larger at 55.0% IACS, but sample 15 was smaller at 39.8%
IACS. Furthermore, the bendability was "Good" for samples 1, 4, and 14, but "inferior"
for sample 15. Also, the residual smut was "Absent" for all samples 1, 4, 14, and
15.
[0105] By comparing the evaluation of the copper alloy materials of samples 1, 4, 14, and
15 with different Sn content, it was found that as the Sn content decreases, the tensile
strength of the copper alloy material tends to decrease. Also, it was found that when
the Sn content decreases further and falls outside the above range, the tensile strength
of the copper alloy material does not reach 620 MPa. Furthermore, by comparing the
evaluation of the copper alloy materials of samples 1 and 4, it was found that when
the copper alloy material contains more than 0.3% Sn, a tensile strength of 625 MPa
or more can be obtained. Also, it was found that as the Sn content decreases, the
conductivity of the copper alloy material tends to increase. Furthermore, it was found
that when the Sn content increases and falls outside the above range, the conductivity
of the copper alloy material further decreases and does not reach 40.0% IACS. Also,
it was found that as the Sn content increases, the bendability of the copper alloy
material tends to deteriorate. Furthermore, it was found that the Sn content has little
influence on the residual smut. Therefore, from the viewpoint of having no residual
smut, having a tensile strength of 620 MPa or more, having a conductivity of 40.0%
IACS or more, and having good bendability, in practical use, copper alloy materials
containing 0.3% to 0.8% Sn are effective.
<Influence of First Heat Treatment Process>
[0106] Focusing on the copper alloy materials of samples 1, 4, 16, 17, and 18 shown in Table
6 (extracted from Table 1), the influence of the first heat treatment process will
be explained. The copper alloy materials of samples 1, 16, 17, and 18 were produced
to have substantially equivalent thicknesses through substantially equivalent production
processes except that the heat-retaining conditions of the first heat treatment process
were varied. Also, the copper alloy materials of samples 1, 17, and 18 were adjusted
to have a Sn content of 0.60%, and the copper alloy materials of samples 4 and 16
were adjusted to have a Sn content of 0.30%. Specifically, the heat-retaining conditions
of the first heat treatment process are about 3 minutes at 580°C for samples 1 and
4, which are within the range of 500°C to 600°C for 4 hours or less, which is defined
in this invention. On the other hand, sample 16 is at a lower temperature of 450°C,
and sample 17 is at a higher temperature of 650°C, which was outside the above range
although the retention time was the same as samples 1 and 4. Also, sample 18 is for
a longer time of about 5 hours, which was outside the above range although the retention
temperature was the same as samples 1 and 4.
[Table 6]
Sample Number |
Additive Elements (mass%) |
1st Heat Treatment Process |
2nd Cold Rolling Process |
2nd Heat Treatment Process |
Fe |
P |
Zn |
Sn |
Mn |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Rolling Degree (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
1 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
4 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.30 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
16 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.30 |
< 0.001 |
450°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
17 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
650°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
18 |
2.20 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C,5h |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
Table 6 (continued)
Sample Number |
3rd Cold Rolling Process |
3rd Heat Treatment Process |
Characteristics of copper alloy materials, etc. |
Notes |
Rolling Degree (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Electrical conductivity (% IACS) |
Bendability |
Presence or Absence of residual smut |
1 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
670 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
4 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
624 |
51.0 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
16 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
610 |
50.5 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
17 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
596 |
51.8 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
18 |
70 |
350°C, 1 min |
612 |
51.0 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
[0107] As shown in Table 6, the tensile strength was 620 MPa or more for sample 1 (670 MPa),
and although sample 4 was smaller at 624 MPa due to the smaller Sn content than sample
1, it was still 620 MPa or more. On the other hand, sample 16, which was set outside
the above range as a low-temperature retention, was 610 MPa, sample 17, which was
set outside the above range as a high-temperature hold, was 596 MPa, and sample 18,
which was set outside the above range as a long-time hold, was 612 MPa, all of which
were less than 620 MPa. Also, the conductivity was 48.2% IACS) for sample 1, which
was 40.0% IACS or more, 51.0% IACS for samples 4 and 18, 50.5% IACS for sample 16,
and 51.8% IACS for sample 17. Also, the bendability was "Good" for samples 1, 16,
17, and 18. Also, the residual smut was "absent" for samples 1, 16, 17, and 18.
[0108] By comparing the evaluation of the copper alloy materials of sample 1 with sample
17 and by comparing the evaluation of the copper alloy materials of sample 4 with
sample 16 with different heat-retaining temperatures of the first heat treatment process,
it was found that when the heat-retaining temperature of the first heat treatment
process was high or low and falls outside the above range, the tensile strength of
the copper alloy material tends to decrease and does not reach 620 MPa. Also, by comparing
the evaluation of the copper alloy materials of samples 1 and 18, it was found that
when the heat-retaining time of the first heat treatment process was long and falls
outside the above range, the tensile strength of the copper alloy material tends to
decrease and does not reach 620 MPa. Also, by comparing the evaluation of the copper
alloy materials of samples 1, 4, 16, 17, and 18, it was found that the heat-retaining
conditions of the first heat treatment process have little influence on the conductivity,
bendability, and residual smut of the copper alloy material. Therefore, from the viewpoint
of having no residual smut, having a tensile strength of 620 MPa or more, having a
conductivity of 40.0% IACS or more, and having good bendability, in practical use,
the first heat treatment process of producing the first heat-treated material by heat-retaining
of the first cold-rolled material at a temperature of 500°C to 600°C for 4 hours or
less is effective.
<Influence of Second Cold Rolling Process>
[0109] Focusing on the copper alloy materials of samples 1, 6, 19, and 20 shown in Table
7 (extracted from Table 1), the influence of the second cold rolling process will
be explained. The copper alloy materials of samples 1, 6, 19, and 30 were produced
to have substantially equivalent thicknesses through substantially equivalent production
processes except that the rolling degree in the second cold rolling process was varied.
Specifically, the rolling degree in the second cold rolling process was 64% for sample
1 and 46% for sample 6, which were within the range of 20% to 90% defined in this
invention. On the other hand, sample 19 is 17% and sample 20 is 91%, which were outside
the above range.
[Table 7]
Sample number |
1st Heat Treatment Process |
2nd Cold Rolling Process |
2nd Heat Treatment Process |
3rd Cold Rolling Process |
3rd Heat Treatment Process |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Rolling Degree (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Rolling Degree (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
1 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
6 |
550°C, 3 min. |
46 |
450°C, 4h |
80 |
350°C, 1 min. |
19 |
580°C, 3 min. |
17 |
450°C, 4h |
80 |
350°C, 1 min. |
20 |
580°C, 3 min. |
91 |
450°C, 4h |
60 |
350°C, 1 min |
Table 7 (continued)
Sample Number |
Characteristics of copper alloy materials, etc. |
Notes |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Electrical conductivity (% IACS) |
Bendability |
Presence or Absence of residual smut |
1 |
670 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
6 |
654 |
45.8 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
19 |
624 |
39.6 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
20 |
610 |
48.8 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
[0110] As shown in Table 7, the tensile strength was 620 MPa or more for sample 1 (670 MPa),
and was smaller at 654 MPa for sample 6 which had a smaller rolling degree, all of
them were 620 MPa or more. On the other hand, sample 20, which had a larger rolling
degree and was set outside the above range, was even smaller at 610 MPa and was less
than 620 MPa. Also, the conductivity was 40.0% IACS or more for sample 1 (48.2% IACS),
and about the same, 48.8% IACS for sample 20 which had a larger rolling degree set
outside the above range. On the other hand, sample 6, which had a smaller rolling
degree, was smaller at 45.8% IACS. Also, sample 19, which had a smaller rolling degree
set outside the above range, was even smaller at 39.6% IACS and was less than 40.0%
IACS. Also, the bendability was "Good" for samples 1, 6, 19, and 20. Also, the residual
smut was "absent" for samples 1, 6, 19, and 20.
[0111] By comparing the evaluation of the copper alloy materials of samples 1, 6 and 19,
with different rolling degree in the second cold rolling process, it was found that
the tensile strength of the copper alloy material tends to decrease as the rolling
degree of the second cold rolling process decreases. Also, by comparing the evaluation
of the copper alloy materials of samples 1, 6, 19, and 20, it was found that when
the rolling degree of the second cold rolling process was excessive and exceeds the
above range, the tensile strength of the copper alloy material decreases and does
not reach 620 MPa. Furthermore, by comparing the evaluation of samples 1, 6, 19, and
20 of copper alloy materials, it was found that the rolling degree of the second cold
rolling process does not easily affect the conductivity of the copper alloy material
even if it is excessive and exceeds the above range, and if it is too small and exceeds
the above range, the conductivity of the copper alloy material decreases and does
not reach 40.0% IACS. Also, by comparing the evaluation of samples 1, 6, 19, and 20
of copper alloy materials, it was found that the rolling degree of the second cold
rolling process does not easily affect the bending workability and residual smut of
the copper alloy material. Therefore, from the viewpoint of having no residual smut,
having a tensile strength of 620 MPa or more, having a conductivity of 40.0% IACS
or more, and having good bending workability, the second cold rolling process of producing
the second cold-rolled material by cold rolling the first heat treated material at
a rolling degree of 20% or more and 90% or less is effective in practical use.
<Influence of Heat-Retaining Condition of Second Heat Treatment Process>
[0112] Focusing on samples 1, 21, 22, 23, and 24 of copper alloy materials shown in Table
8 (extracted from Table 1), the influence of the second heat treatment process will
be explained. Samples 1, 21, 22, 23, and 24 of copper alloy materials were made to
have substantially equivalent thicknesses through substantially equivalent production
processes except that the heat-retaining conditions of the second heat treatment process
were different. Specifically, the heat-retaining conditions of the second heat treatment
process were about 4 hours at 450°C for sample 1, which were within the range of 380°C
or higher and 480°C or lower for 1 hour or longer and 12 hours or shorter as defined
in this invention. On the other hand, retention temperature of sample 21 was at a
lower temperature of 350°C, and that of sample 22 was at a higher temperature of 500°C,
which were outside the above range although the retention time was the same as sample
1. Also, the retention time of sample 23 was a shorter time of about 0.5 hours, and
that of sample 24 was a longer time of about 20 hours, so the retention temperature
is within the above range, but the retention time is outside the above range.
[Table 8]
Sample number |
1st Heat Treatment Process |
2nd Cold Rolling Process |
2nd Heat Treatment Process |
3rd Cold Rolling Process |
3rd Heat Treatment Process |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Rolling Degree (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Rolling Degree (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
1 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
21 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
350°C, 4h |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
22 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
500°C, 4h |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
23 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
420°C, 0.5h |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
24 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 20h |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
Table 8 (continued)
Sample Number |
Characteristics of copper alloy materials, etc. |
Notes |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Electrical conductivity (% IACS) |
Bendability |
Presence or Absence of residual smut |
1 |
670 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
21 |
606 |
38.0 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
22 |
575 |
50.5 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
23 |
598 |
39.7 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
24 |
602 |
52.0 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
[0113] As shown in Table 8, the tensile strength of samples 21 (606 MPa) and 22 (575 MPa),
which were made outside the above range as low temperature or high temperature retention,
and samples 23 (598 MPa) and 24 (602 MPa), which were made outside the above range
as short time or long time retention, all decreased to less than 620 MPa compared
to sample 1 (670 MPa) with a tensile strength of 620 MPa or more. Also, the conductivity
of sample 21 (38.0% IACS) which was made outside the above range as low temperature
retention and sample 23 (39.7% IACS) which was made outside the above range as short
time retention, both decreased to less than 40.0% IACS compared to sample 1 (48.2%
IACS) with a conductivity of 40.0% IACS or more. Also, both of the conductivity of
sample 22 (50.5% IACS) which was made outside the above range as high temperature
retention and sample 24 (52.0% IACS) which were made outside the above range as long
time retention increased. Also, the bending workability of samples 1, 21, 22, 23,
and 24 were all "Good". Also, the residual smut of samples 1, 21, 22, 23, and 24 were
all "absent".
[0114] By comparing the evaluation of samples 1, 21, 22, 23, and 24 of copper alloy materials
with different heat-retaining temperatures of the second heat treatment process, it
was found that when the heat-retaining of the second heat treatment process was performed
at high temperature or low temperature exceeding the above range, the tensile strength
of the copper alloy material tends to decrease and does not reach 620 MPa. Also, by
comparing the evaluation of samples 1, 21, and 23 of copper alloy materials, it was
found that when the heat-retaining of the second heat treatment process was performed
at low temperature or short time exceeding the above range, the conductivity of the
copper alloy material tends to decrease and does not reach 40.0% IACS. Also, by comparing
the evaluation of samples 1, 22, and 24 of copper alloy materials, it was found that
when the heat-retaining of the second heat treatment process was performed at high
temperature or long time, the conductivity of the copper alloy material tends to increase.
Also, by comparing the evaluation of samples 1, 21, 22, 23, and 24 of copper alloy
materials, it was found that the heat-retaining conditions of the second heat treatment
process do not easily affect the bending workability and residual smut of the copper
alloy material. Therefore, from the viewpoint of having no residual smut, having a
tensile strength of 620 MPa or more, having a conductivity of 40.0% IACS or more,
and having good bending workability, the second heat treatment process of producing
the second heat treated material by heat-retaining at a temperature of 380°C or higher
and 480°C or lower for 1 hour or longer and 12 hours or shorter for the second cold-rolled
material is effective in practical use.
<Influence of Rolling Degree of Third Cold Rolling Process>
[0115] Focusing on samples 1, 25, and 26 of copper alloy materials shown in Table 9 (extracted
from Table 1), the influence of the third cold rolling process will be explained.
Samples 1, 25, and 26 of copper alloy materials were made to have substantially equivalent
thicknesses through substantially equivalent production processes except that the
rolling degree of the third cold rolling process was different. Specifically, the
rolling degree of the third cold rolling process was 70% for sample 1, which was within
the range of 60% or more and 80% or less as defined in this invention. On the other
hand, sample 25 was 50%, and sample 26 was 85%, which were outside the above range.
[Table 9]
Sample number |
1st Heat Treatment Process |
2nd Cold Rolling Process |
2nd Heat Treatment Process |
3rd Cold Rolling Process |
3rd Heat Treatment Process |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Rolling Degree (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Rolling Degree (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
1 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
25 |
580°C, 3 min. |
79 |
450°C, 4h |
50 |
350°C, 1 min. |
26 |
580°C, 3 min. |
28 |
450°C, 4h |
85 |
350°C, 1 min. |
Table 9 (continued)
Sample Number |
Characteristics of copper alloy materials, etc. |
Notes |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Electrical conductivity (% IACS) |
Bendability |
Presence or Absence of residual smut |
1 |
670 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
25 |
569 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
26 |
580 |
46.0 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
[0116] As shown in Table 9, the tensile strength of both of sample 25 (569 MPa) which was
made outside the above range by reducing the rolling degree and sample 26 (580 MPa)
which was made outside the above range by increasing the rolling degree decreased
to less than 620 MPa compared to sample 1 (670 MPa) with a tensile strength of 620
MPa or more. Also, the conductivity of sample 25 (48.2% IACS) which was made outside
the above range by reducing the rolling degree, was the same as that of sample 1 (48.2%
IACS) with a conductivity of 40.0% IACS or more, and sample 26 (46.0% IACS) which
was made outside the above range by increasing the rolling degree was smaller than
that of sample 1, although it did not become less than 40.0% IACS. Also, the bending
workability of samples 1, 25, and 26 were all "Good". Also, the residual smut of samples
1, 25, and 26 all were "absent".
[0117] By comparing the evaluation of samples 1, 25, and 26 of copper alloy materials with
different rolling degrees in the third cold rolling process, it was found that when
the rolling degree of the third cold rolling process exceeds the above range, the
tensile strength of the copper alloy material tends to decrease and does not reach
620 MPa. Also, it was found that even if the rolling degree of the third cold rolling
process was too small exceeding the above range, it tends not to affect the conductivity
of the copper alloy material. Also, it was found that when the rolling degree of the
third cold rolling process was too large exceeding the above range, the conductivity
of the copper alloy material tends to decrease. Also, it was found that the rolling
degree of the third cold rolling process does not easily affect the bending workability
and residual smut of the copper alloy material. Therefore, from the viewpoint of having
no residual smut, having a tensile strength of 620 MPa or more, having a conductivity
of 40.0% IACS or more, and having good bending workability, the third cold rolling
process of producing the third cold-rolled material by cold rolling the second heat
treated material at a rolling degree of 60% or more and 80% or less is effective in
practical use.
<Influence of Heat-Retaining Condition of Third Heat Treatment Process>
[0118] Focusing on samples 1, 27, 28, and 29 of copper alloy materials shown in Table 10
(extracted from Table 1), the influence of the third heat treatment process will be
explained. Samples 1, 27, 28, and 29 of copper alloy materials were made to have substantially
equivalent thicknesses through substantially equivalent production processes except
that the heat-retaining conditions of the third heat treatment process were different.
Specifically, the heat-retaining conditions of the third heat treatment process were
about 1 minute at 430°C for sample 1, which were within the range of 250°C or higher
and 380°C or higher for 4 hours or less as defined in this invention. On the other
hand, sample 27 is at a lower temperature of 200°C, and sample 28 is at a higher temperature
of 400°C, so the retention time was the same as sample 1, but it was outside the above
range. Also, sample 29 was for a longer time of about 5 hours, although the retention
temperature was the same as sample 1, but the retention time was outside the above
range.
[Table 10]
Sample number |
1st Heat Treatment Process |
2nd Cold Rolling Process |
2nd Heat Treatment Process |
3rd Cold Rolling Process |
3rd Heat Treatment Process |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Rolling Degree (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Rolling Degree (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
1 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
70 |
350°C, 1 min. |
27 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
70 |
200°C, 1 min. |
28 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
70 |
400°C, 1 min. |
29 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
70 |
350°C, 5h |
Table 10 continued
Sample Number |
Characteristics of copper alloy materials etc. |
Notes |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Electrical conductivity (% IACS) |
Bendability |
Presence or Absence of residual smut |
1 |
670 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Example |
27 |
718 |
39.8 |
Poor |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
28 |
603 |
48.2 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
29 |
614 |
49.6 |
Good |
Absent |
Comparative Example |
[0119] As shown in Table 10, the tensile strength of sample 27 (718 MPa) which was outside
the above range as low temperature retention increased, but sample 28 (603 MPa) which
was outside the above range as high temperature retention decreased to less than 620
MPa compared to sample 1 (670 MPa) with a tensile strength of 620 MPa or more. Also,
the conductivity of sample 28 (48.2% IACS) which was outside the above range as high
temperature retention was the same as that of sample 1 (48.2% IACS) with a conductivity
of 40.0% IACS or more, but sample 27 (39.8% IACS) which was made outside the above
range as low temperature retention decreased to less than 40.0% IACS. Also, the bending
workability of samples 1, 28, and 29 were "Good", while that of sample 27 was "Poor".
Also, the residual smut of samples 1, 27, 28, and 29 were all "absent".
[0120] By comparing the evaluation of samples 1, 28 of copper alloy materials with different
heat-retaining temperatures of the third heat treatment process and samples 1, 29
of copper alloy materials, it was found that when the heat-retaining of the third
heat treatment process is performed at high temperature or long time exceeding the
above range, the tensile strength of the copper alloy material tends to decrease and
does not reach 620 MPa. Also, by comparing the evaluation of samples 1, 27 of copper
alloy materials, it was found that when the heat-retaining of the third heat treatment
process is performed at low temperature, the tensile strength of the copper alloy
material tends to increase. Also, by comparing the evaluation of samples 1, 27 of
copper alloy materials with different heat-retaining temperatures of the third heat
treatment process, it was found that when the heat-retaining of the third heat treatment
process is performed at low temperature exceeding the above range, the conductivity
of the copper alloy material tends to decrease and does not reach 40.0% IACS. Also,
by comparing the evaluation of samples 1, 28 of copper alloy materials, it was found
that when the heat-retaining of the third heat treatment process was performed at
high temperature, the conductivity of the copper alloy material tends to increase.
Also, by comparing the evaluation of samples 1, 27 of copper alloy materials, it was
found that when the heat-retaining of the third heat treatment process is performed
at low temperature exceeding the above range, the bending workability of the copper
alloy material tends to deteriorate. Also, by comparing the evaluation of samples
1, 27, 28, and 29 of copper alloy materials, it was found that the heat-retaining
conditions of the third heat treatment process do not easily affect the residual smut
of the copper alloy material. Therefore, from the viewpoint of having no residual
smut, having a tensile strength of 620 MPa or more, having a conductivity of 40.0%
IACS or more, and having good bending workability, the third heat treatment process
of producing the copper alloy material by heat-retaining at a temperature of 250°C
or higher and 380°C or higher for 4 hours or less for the third cold-rolled material
is effective in practical use.
<Influence of Mn>
[0121] In order to evaluate the influence of Mn, a copper alloy material (sample 1A) that
does not intentionally contain Mn and a copper alloy material (samples 1B to 1F) that
intentionally contains Mn were produced. Samples 1A to 1F of copper alloy materials
were made to have substantially equivalent thicknesses through substantially equivalent
production processes except that the Mn content of the finally obtained copper alloy
material was different in the melting casting process. Then, for samples 1A to 1F
of copper alloy materials, the tensile strength, conductivity, and bending workability
at room temperature (about 20°C) were measured and confirmed, and the presence or
absence of residual smut was confirmed in the same way as for sample 1 shown in Table
1. Also, as mentioned above, the elongation at break was measured in accordance with
JIS-G0567:2020, which defines the high temperature tensile test method, under a high
temperature environment of about 950°C.
[0122] Table 11 shows the composition (added elements), main manufacturing conditions, and
mechanical properties of samples 1A to 1F (examples of the present invention) of copper
alloy materials. Note that the remainder of samples 1A to 1F shown in Table 11, other
than the added elements, may be interpreted as Cu and impurity elements, and impurity
elements (Ag, Pb, Ni, and S, etc.) of less than 0.01% are omitted from the description.
[Table 11]
Sample number |
Additive elements (mass%) |
1st Heat Treatment Process |
2nd Cold Rolling Process |
2nd Heat Treatment Process |
3rd Cold Rolling Process |
Fe |
P |
Zn |
Sn |
Mn |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Degree of rolling (%) |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Degree of rolling (%) |
1A |
2.20 |
0.02 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
< 0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
70 |
1B |
2.20 |
0.02 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
0.001 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
420°C, 4h |
70 |
1C |
2.20 |
0.02 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
0.002 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
420°C, 4h |
70 |
1D |
2.20 |
0.02 |
0.12 |
0.30 |
0.006 |
580°C, 3 min. |
64 |
450°C, 4h |
70 |
1E |
2.20 |
0.02 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
0.010 |
550°C, 3 min. |
73 |
420°C, 4h |
60 |
1F |
2.20 |
0.02 |
0.12 |
0.60 |
0.020 |
550°C, 3 min. |
46 |
450°C, 4h |
80 |
Table 11 (continued)
Sample number |
3rd heat treatment Process |
Characteristics of copper alloy materials, etc. |
Notes |
Heat-Retaining Condition |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Electrical conductivity (% IACS) |
Bendability |
Presence or Absence of residual smut |
Elongation at break (%) |
1A |
350°C, 1 min. |
658 |
47.2 |
Good |
Absent |
20.0 |
Example |
1B |
300°C, 1 min. |
657 |
47.2 |
Good |
Absent |
19.8 |
Example |
1C |
280°C, 1 min. |
658 |
46.8 |
Good |
Absent |
29.0 |
Example |
1D |
350°C, 1 min. |
660 |
47.0 |
Good |
Absent |
31.4 |
Example |
1E |
350°C, 1 min. |
663 |
46.7 |
Good |
Absent |
37.0 |
Example |
1F |
350°C, 1 min. |
666 |
46.0 |
Good |
Absent |
32.0 |
Example |
[0123] As shown in Table 11, the Mn content of sample 1A, which does not intentionally contain
Mn, is less than 0.001%. Also, the Mn content of the copper alloy material that intentionally
contains Mn is about 0.001% for sample 1B, about 0.002% for sample 1C, about 0.006%
for sample 1D, about 0.010% for sample 1E, and about 0.020% for sample 1F. Therefore,
the Mn content of samples 1C to 1F is within the range of Mn content (0.002% or more
and 0.025% or less) mentioned above as a preferable copper alloy material in this
invention.
[0124] Under normal temperature conditions (approximately 20°C), the tensile strength, conductivity,
and bendability of samples 1A to 1F were evaluated, and the presence or absence of
residual smut was assessed. As shown in Table 11, the tensile strength of all samples
was above 620 MPa, within the range of 650 to 670 MPa. When the Mn content was 0.002%
or less (samples 1A to 1C), the tensile strength was less than 660 MPa, and when the
Mn content exceeded 0.002% (samples 1D to 1F), the tensile strength was 660 MPa or
more. Therefore, the tensile strength is not significantly affected by the presence
of Mn, and even with a Mn content of 0.002% to 0.025%, the tensile strength is likely
to be above 620 MPa. The conductivity of samples 1A to 1F was also above 40% IACS,
within the range of 46.0 to 47.2% IACS. Therefore, the conductivity is not significantly
affected by the presence of Mn, and even with a Mn content of 0.002% to 0.025%, the
conductivity is likely to be above 40% IACS. The bendability of samples 1A to 1F was
rated as "Good". Therefore, the bendability is not significantly affected by the presence
of Mn, and even with a Mn content of 0.002% to 0.025%, the bendability is likely to
be "Good". The residual smut of samples 1A to 1F was rated as "absent". Therefore,
the residual smut is not significantly affected by the presence of Mn, and even with
a Mn content of 0.002% to 0.025%, the residual smut is likely to be "absent".
[0125] Also, under high temperature conditions (approximately 950°C), the elongation at
break of samples 1A to 1F was evaluated. As shown in Table 11, the elongation at break
of samples 1A to 1F was generally above 20%. Specifically, the elongation at break
may be less than 20% when the Mn content is 0.001% or less (samples 1A, 1B), and it
is definitely above 20% when the Mn content is 0.002% or more (samples 1C to 1F),
and it was found to be 30% or more when the Mn content is 0.006% or more (samples
1D to 1F). Also, the elongation at break was found to be a maximum of 37.0% when the
Mn content is 0.010% (sample 1E), and it decreased to 32.0% when the Mn content is
0.020% (sample 1F). Therefore, the elongation at break is easily affected by the content
of Mn, and it is definitely more than 20% with a Mn content of 0.002% to 0.025%, and
it is likely to be more than 30% with a Mn content of 0.005% to 0.020%.
[0126] As stated above, a copper alloy material containing Fe, P, Zn, and Sn within the
above range is effective in practical use from the viewpoint of having no residual
smut, having a tensile strength of 620 MPa or more and a conductivity of 40.0% IACS
or more under normal temperature conditions (approximately 20°C), having good bendability,
and having an elongation at break of more than 20% under high temperature conditions
(approximately 950°C).
[0127] Next, based on the measured Mn, Fe, P, Sn content shown in Table 11, an attempt was
made to calculate the MI value. The MI value, as stated above, is a value obtained
by (Mn content + total impurity element content) / (Fe content + P content + Sn content)
x 100. The total content of Fe, P, and Sn is 2.82%. For example, when the total content
of impurity elements is 0.001%, based on the measured values shown in Table 11, it
can be confirmed that the MI value increases from 0.04 (sample 1A) to 0.74 (sample
1F) in proportion to the increase in Mn content from 0% (sample 1A) to 0.020% (sample
1F). However, in samples 1A to 1F, the content of some impurity elements is less than
0.01%, but it is not realistic to measure all impurity elements, and the exact value
of the total content of impurity elements is unknown. Therefore, assuming the total
content of impurity elements, an attempt was made to predict the relationship between
Mn content, MI value, and elongation at break based on the measured values shown in
Table 11.
[0128] Specifically, the total content of impurity elements was set to three conditions
of 0.010% (low purity), 0.005% (normal purity), and 0.001% (high purity), which are
considered practically reasonable, and a first model showing the relationship between
Mn content (measured value) and MI value (conditional calculated value) based on the
measured values shown in Table 11 was derived, and a second model showing the relationship
between MI value (conditional calculated value) and elongation at break (measured
value) was derived. Then, using the first model, the range of MI values corresponding
to the range of Mn content was predicted, and using the second model, the range of
elongation at break corresponding to the range of MI values was predicted. Using a
general-purpose spreadsheet software (Microsoft Excel) considering practicality and
ease of use, a graph (scatter plot) of Mn content (measured value) and MI value (conditional
calculated value) is created, and a linear (first-order) approximation formula is
obtained and used as a regression model in the first model.
[0129] In the first model, the Mn content (set value) is the independent variable x, and
the MI value (predicted value) is the first dependent variable p. The prediction interval
is 0.000 ≤ x ≤ 0.030. Similarly, a graph (scatter plot) of MI value (conditional calculated
value) and elongation at break (measured value) is created, and a polynomial (second-order)
approximation formula is obtained and used as a regression model in the second model.
In the second model, the MI value (predicted value) of the first dependent variable
p of the first model is the independent variable, and the elongation at break (predicted
value) is the second dependent variable y. The reliability of the first and second
models was judged to be "reliable" unconditionally if the coefficient of determination
(R
2) was 0.7 or more (R
2 ≤ 1), referring to the concept of the field of machine learning.
[0130] Tables 12 to 13 show the predicted results of Mn content (set value), MI value (predicted
value), and elongation at break (predicted value) when the total content of impurity
elements is set to 0.010% (low purity), 0.005% (normal purity), and 0.001% (high purity)
based on the measured values shown in Table 11. In addition, when S, which has a particularly
large influence on rolling workability, is the main impurity element, it is considered
that the S content of general manufacturing raw materials is about 0.001% to 0.005%,
and from the viewpoint of easy measurement and high practicality, the total content
of impurity elements can be selectively set from 0.001% to 0.005% for prediction.
Also, when the main impurity elements are Ag, Pb, Ni, and S mentioned above, the total
content of Ag, Pb, Ni, and S can be set as the total content of impurity elements
for prediction.
[Table 12]
Elongation at break (predicted) |
Independent variables x |
First model p = Ax + B |
First dependent variable P |
Second model y = Cp2+Dp+E |
Second dependent variable y |
Modulus A |
Modulus B |
R2 |
Factor D |
Factor E |
Factor F |
R2 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
0.001 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
23.4 |
0.002 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
25.5 |
0.006 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
0.010 |
35.344 |
0.3666 |
0.9895 |
0.72 |
-74.975 |
122.91 |
-13.896 |
0.8590 |
35.7 |
0.018 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
34.0 |
0.020 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
|
31.6 |
0.025 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
22.6 |
0.030 |
|
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
x: Mn content (%), p: MI value, y: elongation at break (%), and condition of total
impurity content: 0.010% |
[0131] As shown in Table 12, when the total content of impurity elements is 0.010% (low
purity) relative to the total content of Fe, P, and Sn (2.82%), the prediction results
of the first model are, for example, p = 0.37 when x = 0.000, p = 0.44 when x = 0.002,
p = 1.00 when x = 0.018, and p = 1.25 when x = 0.025. Then, the prediction results
of the second model are, for example, y = 21.1 when p = 0.37, y = 25.5 when p = 0.44,
y = 34.0 when p = 1.00, and y = 22.6 when p = 1.25. The R
2 of the first model (0.9895) and the R
2 of the second model (0.8590) are both sufficiently larger than the reliability criterion
of 0.7. Therefore, the prediction results of the first and second models are considered
to be less likely to be significantly affected by outliers, and can be judged as "reliable".
[0132] From this, it can be understood that even when x is 0.000, y is 20 or more. Also,
it can be understood that when x increases larger than 0.018 and p increases larger
than 1.00, y decreases smaller. Also, it can be understood that when y is at its maximum
(35.7), p is 0.72 and x is 0.010. Therefore, if the Mn content is adjusted to be between
0.002% and 0.025%, the MI value is between 0.44 and 1.25, and an elongation at break
of 25.5% to 22.6% (maximum 35.7%) can be obtained. Also, if the Mn content is adjusted
to be between 0.010% and 0.018%, the MI value is between 0.72 and 1.00, and a larger
elongation at break of 34.0% to 35.7% can be obtained. Therefore, when Mn is contained
in a low-purity material, considering practicality and stability, the MI value should
be adjusted to be, for example, 0.45 or more (preferably 0.50 or more) and 1.1 or
less (preferably 1.0 or less, more preferably 0.9 or less).
[Table 13]
Elongation at break (predicted) |
Independent variable x |
First model p = Ax + B |
First dependent variable P |
Second model y = Cp2+Dp+E |
Second dependent variable y |
Modulus A |
Modulus B |
R2 |
Factor D |
Factor E |
Factor F |
R2 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
20.8 |
0.001 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
23.2 |
0.002 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
25.4 |
0.006 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
32.3 |
0.010 |
35.38 |
0.1856 |
0.9950 |
0.54 |
-78.023 |
99.704 |
4.9447 |
0.8712 |
36.0 |
0.020 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
31.8 |
0.023 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
26.6 |
0.025 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
|
22.3 |
0.030 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
x: Mn content (%), p: MI value, y: elongation at break (%), and condition of total
impurity content: 0.005% |
[0133] As shown in Table 13, when the total content of impurity elements is 0.005% (medium
purity) relative to the total content of Fe, P, and Sn (2.82%), the prediction results
of the first model are, for example, p = 0.19 when x = 0.000, p = 0.26 when x = 0.002,
p = 1.00 when x = 0.023, and p = 1.07 when x = 0.025. Then, the prediction results
of the second model are, for example, y = 20.8 when p = 0.19, y = 25.4 when p = 0.26,
y = 26.6 when p = 1.00, and y = 22.3 when p = 1.07. The R
2 of the first model (0.9950) and the R
2 of the second model (0.8712) are both sufficiently larger than the reliability criterion
of 0.7. Therefore, the prediction results of the first and second models are considered
to be less likely to be significantly affected by outliers, and can be judged as "reliable".
[0134] From this, it can be understood that even when x is 0.000, y is 20 or more. Also,
it can be understood that when x increases larger than 0.010 and p increases larger
than 0.54, y decreases smaller. Also, it can be understood that when y is at its maximum
(36.0), p is 0.54 and x is 0.010. Therefore, if the Mn content is adjusted to be between
0.002% and 0.025%, the MI value is between 0.26 and 1.07, and an elongation at break
of 25.4% to 22.3% (maximum 36.0%) can be obtained. Also, if the Mn content is adjusted
to be between 0.006% and 0.020%, the MI value is between 0.40 and 0.89, and a larger
elongation at break of 31.8% to 36.0% can be obtained. Therefore, when Mn is contained
in a medium-purity material, considering practicality and stability, the MI value
should be adjusted to be, for example, 0.30 or more (preferably 0.35 or more) and
1.1 or less (preferably 1.0 or less, more preferably 0.9 or less).
[Table 14]
Elongation at break (predicted) |
Independent variable x |
First model p = Ax + B |
First dependent variable p |
Second model y = Cp2+Dp+E |
Second dependent variable y |
Modulus A |
Modulus B |
R2 |
Factor D |
Factor E |
Factor F |
R2 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
20.5 |
(0.0003) |
|
|
|
(0.05) |
|
|
|
|
(21.2) |
0.001 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
23.0 |
0.002 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
25.3 |
0.006 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
32.4 |
0.010 |
35.41 |
0.0407 |
0.9980 |
0.39 |
-80.731 |
79.769 |
17.376 |
0.8808 |
36.3 |
0.020 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
31.8 |
0.025 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
22.0 |
0.027 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
16.4 |
0.030 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
7.1 |
x: Mn content (%), p: MI value, y: elongation at break (%), and condition of total
impurity content: 0.001% |
[0135] As shown in Table 14, when the total content of impurity elements is 0.001% relative
to the total content of Fe, P, and Sn (2.82%), the prediction results of the first
model are, for example, p = 0.04 when x = 0.000, p = 0.05 when x = 0.0003, p = 0.11
when x = 0.002, p = 0.93 when x = 0.025, and p = 1.00 when x = 0.027. Then, the prediction
results of the second model are, for example, y = 20.5 when p = 0.04, y = 21.2 when
p = 0.05, y = 25.3 when p = 0.11, y = 22.0 when p = 0.93, and y = 16.4 when p = 1.00.
The R
2 of the first model (0.9980) and the R
2 of the second model (0.8808) are both sufficiently larger than the reliability criterion
of 0.7. Therefore, the prediction results of the first and second models are considered
to be less likely to be significantly affected by outliers, and can be judged as "reliable".
[0136] From this, it can be understood that even when x is 0.000, y is 20 or more. Also,
it can be understood that when x is 0.027 or more, y is less than 20. Also, it can
be understood that when x is larger than 0.010 and p is larger than 0.39, y is smaller.
Also, it can be understood that when y is at its maximum (36.3), p is 0.39 and x is
0.010. Therefore, if the Mn content is adjusted to be between 0.002% and 0.025%, the
MI value is between 0.11 and 0.93, and an elongation at break of 25.3% to 22.0% (maximum
36.3%) can be obtained. Also, if the Mn content is adjusted to be between 0.006% and
0.020%, the MI value is between 0.25 and 0.75, and a larger elongation at break of
31.8% to 36.3% can be obtained. Therefore, when Mn is contained in a high-purity material,
considering practicality and stability, the MI value may be adjusted to be, for example,
0.15 or more (preferably 0.20 or more) and 0.9 or less (preferably 0.85 or less, more
preferably 0.80 or less).
[0137] In conclusion, by controlling the content of the additive elements (Fe, P, Zn, and
Sn) that constitute the copper alloy structure of the copper alloy material within
a specific range, and controlling the manufacturing conditions of the first heat treatment
process, the second cold rolling process, the second heat treatment process, the third
cold rolling process, and the third heat treatment process in the manufacturing process
of the copper alloy material shown in Figure 1 within a specific range, it was confirmed
that a copper alloy material can be obtained that has no problem of residual smut
like Cu-Fe-Zn-P copper alloys such as C1940, has a tensile strength and conductivity
almost equivalent to Cu-Ni-Si copper alloys such as C7025. Also, by more appropriately
controlling the content of the additive elements and the manufacturing conditions,
it was confirmed that a copper alloy material with good bendability can be obtained.
Also, by adding Mn along with the four types of additive elements and appropriately
controlling the content of the four types of additive elements and Mn, it was confirmed
that a copper alloy material with good elongation at break at high temperatures, good
reliability, and particularly less likely to crack in the hot rolling stage can be
obtained.