TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to a copper alloy used in a sliding member, and containing
no lead as its main component.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] Conventionally used copper alloys contain a predetermined amount of lead to improve
the sliding and cutting properties, and CAC603 or the like has been used as sliding
members. However, in recent years, since it is required to take account of the RoHS
Directive or other environmental concerns, copper alloys in which no lead is used
or the amount of lead used is reduced have been developed.
[0003] For example, the below-identified Patent Document 1 discloses, in its Example, a
copper alloy for a sliding member consisting of not less than 5.14% by mass and not
more than 15.54% by mass of tin; not less than 0.42% by mass and not more than 1.04%
by mass of sulfur; not less than 0.31% by mass and not more than 3.43% by mass of
iron; not less than 0.012% by mass and not more than 0.033% by mass of phosphorus;
and a balance consisting of copper and unavoidable impurities.
[0004] Also, the below-identified Patent Document 2 discloses, as a copper alloy having
improved machinability, a copper alloy wrought material consisting of tin, phosphorus,
sulfur, and a balance consisting of copper and unavoidable impurities, the copper
alloy wrought material containing a dispersed sulfide whose average diameter is 0.1
to 10 µm and whose area ratio is 0.1 to 10% in a cross section perpendicular to the
longitudinal direction of the wrought material.
PRIOR ART DOCUMENT(S)
PATENT DOCUMENT(S)
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED BY THE INVENTION
[0006] However, the copper alloy of Patent Document 1 has a problem in that if the iron
content is smaller than a predetermined amount, the sliding properties are insufficient.
[0007] Also, Patent Document 2 discloses the effect of machinability of a copper alloy containing
tin, sulfur and phosphorus other than iron, but Patent document 2 is silent about
the sliding properties. Generally, copper alloys having good machinability and suitable
for cutting are not suitable for sliding applications.
[0008] Also, a copper alloy in which the iron content is large has a problem in that cast
defects tend to occur, thus causing many defective products when producing the copper
alloy by casting.
[0009] In view of the above, it is an object of the present invention to provide (i) a copper
alloy for a sliding member which contains tin, sulfur, iron and phosphorus as its
main components, but in which even if no iron is contained or the iron content is
reduced, sliding properties are obtained which are equal or superior to the sliding
properties of a conventional copper alloy; and (ii) a copper alloy for a sliding member
that has sliding properties and good castability.
MEANS FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
[0010] In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a copper alloy
for a sliding member according to a first embodiment, the copper alloy consisting
of: not less than 3.0% by mass and not more than 16.0% by mass of tin; not less than
0.3% by mass and not more than 1.0% by mass of sulfur; less than 0.3% by mass of iron;
not less than 0.04% by mass and not more than 0.5% by mass of phosphorus; and a balance
consisting of copper and unavoidable impurities.
[0011] For the copper alloy of the present invention, it is possible to select a second
embodiment in which some of the contents in the first embodiment are limited, i.e.,
the tin content is not less than 6.0% by mass and not more than 15.0% by mass, and
the iron content is not less than 0.005% by mass and less than 0.3% by mass.
[0012] For the copper alloy of the present invention, it is possible to select a third embodiment
in which some of the contents in the first embodiment are limited, i.e., the tin content
is not less than 9.0% by mass and not more than 11.0% by mass, the sulfur content
is not less than 0.5% by mass and not more than 1.0% by mass, and the iron content
is not less than 0.005% by mass and less than 0.05% by mass.
[0013] For the present invention, it is possible to select a cast member formed of the copper
alloy according to any one of the first to third embodiments.
[0014] For the present invention, it is possible to select a sliding member comprising the
cast member, which is formed of the copper alloy according to any one of the first
to third embodiments.
[0015] The present invention also provides a production method for producing a sliding member,
the production method comprising: melting a material such that copper alloy components
thereof comprise not less than 3.0% by mass and not more than 16.0% by mass of tin,
not less than 0.3% by mass and not more than 1.0% by mass of sulfur, less than 0.07%
by mass of iron, and not less than 0.04% by mass and not more than 0.5% by mass of
phosphorus; and casting the melted material.
[0016] For the production method of the present invention, it is possible to select an embodiment
in which the tin content is not less than 6.0% by mass and not more than 15.0% by
mass, and the iron content is not less than 0.005% by mass and less than 0.05% by
mass.
EFFECTS OF THE INVENTION
[0017] With respect to the copper alloy of the present invention, even if the iron content
is reduced, by appropriately adjusting the phosphorus content, sliding properties
are obtainable which are equal or superior to the sliding properties of a conventional
copper alloy for a sliding member. Good castability is obtainable in a similar metal
composition.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0018]
Fig. 1A is an evaluation cross-sectional photograph of a fracture portion of Example
9 in a castability test.
Fig. 1B is an evaluation cross-sectional photograph of a fracture portion of Example
10 in a castability test.
Fig. 1C is an evaluation cross-sectional photograph of a fracture portion of Comparative
Example 6 in a castability test.
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0019] A copper alloy for a sliding member according to the present invention is described
below. The copper alloy for a sliding member consists of predetermined amounts of
tin, sulfur, iron and phosphorus; and a balance consisting of copper and unavoidable
impurities.
[0020] The copper alloy needs to contain not less than 3.0% by mass of tin. Tin improves
the matrix strength of the copper alloy, improves the wear resistance, and keeps the
sliding properties good, but if the tin content is less than 3.0% by mass, these effects
will be insufficient. On the other hand, the tin content needs to be not more than
16.0% by mass. If the tin content is more than 16.0% by mass, the counterpart component
may be significantly worn, and good sliding properties may not be obtained. Also,
in order to obtain a copper alloy balanced with respect to properties required for
a sliding member such as strength, elongation, and hardness and wear amount relating
to wear resistance, the tin content is preferably not less than 6.0% by mass and not
more than 15.0% by mass, and more preferably not less than 9.0% by mass and not more
than 11.0% by mass.
[0021] The copper alloy needs to contain not less than 0.3% by mass of sulfur. Sulfur reacts
with one or both of copper and iron, thereby forming a sulfide. The sulfide has solid
lubricity, reduces the friction coefficient, improves compatibility, and provides
good sliding properties in a sliding state. If the sulfur content is less than 0.3%
by mass, these effects will not be obtained or will be insufficient. The sulfur content
is preferably not less than 0.5% by mass. On the other hand, the sulfur content needs
to be not more than 3.0% by mass, because if the sulfur content is more than 3.0%
by mass, sulfur is likely to reduce the strength. Also, in order to obtain sufficient
sliding properties, the sulfur content is preferably not more than 1.0% by mass, and
more preferably not more than 0.7% by mass.
[0022] The copper alloy needs to contain less than 0.3% by mass of iron. If the iron content
is not less than 0.3% by mass, the hardness of the copper alloy will increase significantly,
and thus when the copper alloy is used as a sliding member, the sliding member is
likely to attack and wear the counterpart component, or the elongation will decrease,
thereby reducing the performance of the product. On the other hand, the wear resistance
tends to worsen as the iron component decreases. This is because, in view of the fact
that iron together with sulfur forms a Fe-S compound that improves the sliding properties
of the copper alloy, iron is desirably contained to form the amount of Fe-S compound
required to ensure necessary sliding properties. Therefore, in order to obtain a copper
alloy having hardness and sliding properties in a balanced manner, the iron content
is preferably not less than 0.005% by mass and less than 0.3% by mass, and more preferably
not less than 0.005% by mass and not more than 0.05% by mass.
[0023] Also, the copper alloy needs to contain less than 0.3% by mass of iron in view of
castability. This is because if the iron content is not less than 0.3% by mass, casting
defects are likely to exist in the product after casting. Also, in order to ensure
sufficient castability, the iron content is preferably not more than 0.07% by mass.
[0024] The copper alloy needs to contain not less than 0.04% by mass of phosphorus. Phosphorus
has the effect of forming a Cu-P compound together with copper, thereby increasing
the hardness of the entire copper alloy. In the copper alloy of the present invention,
even if the iron component is reduced, it is possible to ensure sliding properties
by including phosphorus in the above range. On the other hand, the phosphorus content
needs to be not more than 0.5% by mass, because if more than 0.5% by mass of phosphorus
is present, the hardness of the entire copper alloy will increase significantly, so
that the seizure resistance will decrease.
[0025] The copper alloy preferably contains copper and unavoidable impurities as the elements
other than the above-mentioned elements. The amount of elements contained as unavoidable
impurities is preferably as small as possible, and more preferably is equal to or
below the detection limit. Such elements are, e.g., molybdenum and nickel.
[0026] Examples of the sliding member in which the copper alloy of the present invention
is used include, e.g., a linear bushing and a cylinder liner that include a rolling
bearing or a sliding bearing. By using the copper alloy of the present invention at
a portion of such a sliding member that requires sliding properties, it is possible
to obtain balanced sliding properties. As a suitable production method for producing
the sliding member according to the present invention, it is possible to use, for
example, a casting method such as gravity casting, centrifugal casting or die casting.
In a cast member obtained by such a casting method, the occurrence of casting defects
is reduced as described above. Also, the cast member exhibits a good balance with
respect to strength, elongation, and hardness and wear amount relating to wear resistance,
and can be suitably used as the sliding member.
EXAMPLE
(Mechanical property test)
[0027] In each of Examples 1 to 8 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5, a raw material was prepared
such that the components after casting would consist of predetermined % by mass of
components as shown in table 1; and a balance consisting of copper and unavoidable
impurities, the raw material was heated to 1200°C and melted to obtain a copper alloy,
and the copper alloy was cast by the gravity casting method using a casting mold.
(Tensile test and elongation test)
[0028] Using the cast copper alloy after the above heat treatment, a test piece of 14A was
prepared which includes a parallel portion having a diameter of 5 mm, and which is
based on JIS Z2241. Using the test piece, a tensile test was conducted (with Instron
5982, made by Instron Corporation), and the test piece was evaluated by the tensile
strength and the elongation when the test piece broke.
(Tensile test evaluation criteria)
[0029]
○○: 300 MPa or more
○: 200 MPa or more and less than 300 MPa
△: 100 MPa or more and less than 200 MPa
×: Less than 100 MPa
(Elongation test evaluation criteria)
[0030]
○○: 24% or more
O: 16% or more and less than 24%
△: 8% or more and less than 16%
×: less than 8%
(Hardness test)
[0031] A Brinell hardness test was conducted (with BO3, made by Imai Seiki Co., Ltd.) with
respect to the cast copper alloy after the above heat treatment, and the alloy was
evaluated by Brinell hardness. The test conditions are as follows: the test force
was 500 kgf, and a cemented carbide ball having a diameter of 10 mm was used as an
indenter.
(Hardness test evaluation criteria)
[0032]
○○: 80HB or more and less than 120HB
O: 60HB or more and less than 80HB
△: 40HB or more and less than 60HB
×: less than 40HB, or not less than 120HB
(Wear amount confirmation test)
[0033] By machining the cast copper alloy after the above heat treatment, a disk having
an outer diameter of 70 mm and a thickness of 6 mm was prepared. The friction surface
was finished with #80 waterproof paper.
[0034] Next, with respect to the friction surface of the prepared disk of each Example,
a friction test was conducted using a friction test machine (made by UMT-TriboLab,
Bruker). In the friction test, while bringing a ball having a diameter of 10 mm and
made of high oxygen chromium bearing steel (SUJ2) into contact with the disk; and
pressing the ball against the friction surface with a load of 10N, the ball was reciprocated
at a friction speed of 20 mm/s for 15 minutes with an amplitude of 2 mm (±1 mm). After
the friction test, using a 3D shape measuring machine (VR-5200, Keyence Corporation),
the amount of wear was calculated from the width and depth of a worn portion of the
disk friction surface.
(Wear amount confirmation test evaluation criteria)
[0035]
○○: 0.15 mm3 or less
O: 0.16 mm3 or more and 0.30 mm3 or less
△: 0.31 mm3 or more and 0.45 mm3 or less
×: 0.46 mm3 or more
(Overall evaluation criteria for mechanical property test)
[0036]
○○: All of the evaluation results are ○○
O: One or more of the evaluation results are ○, and the others are ○○
△: One or more of the evaluation results are △, and the others are ○○ or ○
×: At least one of the evaluation results is ×
[Table 1]
|
Component (mass %) |
Evaluation result |
Tin |
Sulfur |
Iron |
Phosphorus |
Copper |
Tensile strength |
Elongation |
Hardness HB |
Wear amount |
Overall result |
Example 1 |
10.4 |
0.55 |
0.003 |
0.14 |
Balance |
286 ○ |
22.7 ○ |
88.8 ○○ |
0.15 ○○ |
○ |
Example 2 |
10.4 |
0.53 |
0.009 |
0.14 |
Balance |
302 ○○ |
29.9 ○○ |
86.9 ○○ |
0.12 ○○ |
○○ |
Example 3 |
10.6 |
0.47 |
0.17 |
0.15 |
Balance |
321 ○○ |
22.0 ○ |
91.8 ○○ |
0.12 ○○ |
○ |
Example 4 |
6.3 |
0.63 |
0.02 |
0.14 |
Balance |
273 ○ |
28.5 ○○ |
68.3 ○ |
0.15 ○○ |
○ |
Example 5 |
13.1 |
0.59 |
0.03 |
0.14 |
Balance |
353 ○○ |
16.7 ○ |
102.0 ○○ |
0.13 ○○ |
○ |
Example 6 |
10.6 |
0.48 |
0.04 |
0.16 |
Balance |
327 ○○ |
21.1 ○ |
91.7 ○○ |
0.24 ○○ |
○ |
Example 7 |
10.2 |
0.56 |
0.04 |
0.06 |
Balance |
322 ○○ |
29.8 ○○ |
84.0 ○○ |
0.14 ○○ |
○○ |
Example 8 |
10.1 |
0.58 |
0.02 |
0.43 |
Balance |
321 ○○ |
25.1 ○○ |
93.2 ○○ |
0.07 ○○ |
○○ |
Comparative Example 1 |
10.4 |
0.49 |
2.03 |
0.14 |
Balance |
378 ○○ |
15.4 △ |
100.5 ○○ |
0.12 ○○ |
△ |
Comparative Example 2 |
1.8 |
0.68 |
0.03 |
0.12 |
Balance |
254 ○ |
23.2 ○ |
55.1 △ |
0.11 ○○ |
△ |
Comparative Example 3 |
18.6 |
0.38 |
0.04 |
0.14 |
Balance |
382 ○○ |
0.3 × |
163.2 × |
0.13 ○○ |
× |
Comparative Example 4 |
10.5 |
0.22 |
0.03 |
0.14 |
Balance |
406 ○○ |
36.5 ○○ |
86.2 ○○ |
0.31 △ |
△ |
Comparative Example 5 |
11.0 |
1.42 |
0.05 |
0.13 |
Balance |
109 △ |
3.6 × |
94.1 ○○ |
0.16 ○ |
× |
Note: The iron content in Example 1 is due to unavoidable impurities (not intentionally
added) |
[0037] Table 1 shows that, in each of Examples 1 to 8, the content of each component is
within the range of the present invention, and thus the copper alloy has good properties
with respect to tensile strength, elongation, hardness, and wear resistance, which
are necessary for use as a sliding member. Especially Examples 2, 7, and 8 show that
if the phosphorus content is not less than 0.04% by mass, which is larger than the
amounts described in Examples of Patent Document 1, even if the iron content is less
than 0.05% by mass, the copper alloy has very good properties.
[0038] Since, in Comparative Example 1, the iron content is larger than the range of the
present invention, the copper alloy has low elongation properties. Also, since, in
Comparative Example 2, the tin content is smaller than the range of the present invention,
and, in Comparative Example 3, the tin content is conversely larger than the range
of the present invention, the copper alloy of Comparative Example 2 has low hardness
properties, and the copper alloy of Comparative Example 3 has low hardness and elongation
properties. Also, since, in Comparative Example 4, the sulfur content is smaller than
the range of the present invention, and, in Comparative Example 5, the sulfur content
is conversely larger than the range of the present invention, the copper alloy of
Comparative Example 4 has low wear resistance, and the copper alloy of Comparative
Example 5 has low tensile strength and elongation properties.
(Castability test)
[0039] In each of Examples 9 and 10 and Comparative Example 6, a raw material was prepared
such that the components after casting would consist of predetermined % by mass of
components as shown in table 2; and a balance consisting of copper and unavoidable
impurities. Using the raw material, a tensile test piece was prepared by the same
melting, casting, and machining steps as in the above tensile test. Then, a tensile
test was conducted with respect to the test piece under the same conditions, and the
test piece was evaluated by observing the fracture surface after the tensile test.
(Castability test evaluation criteria)
[0040]
O: No casting defects are present on the fracture surface
×: Casting defects are present on the fracture surface
[Table 2]
|
Component (mass %) |
Castability evaluation result |
Tin |
Sulfur |
Iron |
Phosphorus |
Copper |
Example 9 |
9.8 |
0.49 |
0.002 |
0.06 |
Balance |
○ |
Example 10 |
9.9 |
0.49 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
Balance |
○ |
Comparative Example 6 |
10.5 |
0.49 |
0.46 |
0.07 |
Balance |
× |
Note: The iron content in Example 9 is due to unavoidable impurities (not intentionally
added) |
[0041] As shown in table 2, the iron contents in Examples 9 and 10 are within the range
of the present invention, whereas the iron content in Comparative Example 6 is larger
than the range of the present invention. As a result, in Examples 9 and 10, no casting
defects are present as shown in Figs. 1A and 1B, and the copper alloys have good castability,
whereas, in Comparative Example 6, casting defects are present as shown in Fig. 1C,
and the copper alloy has inferior castability.
[0042] Thus, with respect to a copper alloy for a sliding member containing tin, sulfur,
iron and phosphorus as its main components, by adjusting the iron and phosphorus contents,
i.e., by containing no iron or reducing the iron content compared to a conventional
copper alloy; and increasing the phosphorus content, it is possible to make the copper
alloy have sliding properties equal or superior to the sliding properties of a conventional
copper alloy. Also, by reducing the iron content, it is possible to make the copper
alloy have good castability.