Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a gas-blowing upper nozzle that is provided at the
bottom of a tundish and used in hot working, and to a continuous casting method using
this nozzle.
Background Art
[0002] In conventional continuous casting of molten steel, clogging of a gas-blowing upper
nozzle being used often occurs as inclusions, such as alumina (Al
2O
3), in molten steel adhere to and accumulate on the inner wall of the nozzle. When
nozzle clogging occurs, the clogging substance comes off while the molten steel is
being poured and gets mixed into the cast slab, or a non-uniform flow of the molten
steel inside the nozzle occurs due to the clogging, thus leading to troubles related
to the quality of the cast slab.
[0003] One measure to prevent nozzle clogging is to blow in an inert gas through the nozzle
and make the inclusions float and separate so as to prevent the inclusions from adhering
to and clogging the nozzle. Gas blowing in continuous casting nozzles is usually performed
in an upper nozzle installed in a tundish, a sliding plate, and an immersion nozzle
connected under the sliding plate, or the like.
[0004] For gas blowing in a gas-blowing upper nozzle, a porous gas-permeable material or
a ventilation hole penetrating a refractory is sometimes used. In the case where a
porous gas-permeable material is used, the nozzle is often composed of a refractory
1 combining a non-gas-permeable material 1A and a gas-permeable material 1B as shown
in Fig. 4 (a). An outer circumference of a gas-blowing upper nozzle 100 is kept gastight
by a metal case 2. The inert gas is introduced through an inert-gas introduction pipe
6 installed at a lateral lower part of the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100. Part of this
inert gas is introduced to the part of an upper gas-permeable material 1B through
a gas flow passage, i.e., a gas pool 5 provided between a refractory outer circumference
of the non-gas-permeable material 1A and the metal case 2. Then, this inert gas is
blown into a flow of molten steel flowing down a through-hole 11 of the gas-blowing
upper nozzle 100. The rest of the inert gas is blown into the flow of molten steel
flowing down the through-hole 11 of the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100 through a lower
gas-permeable material 1B. Here, it is feared that a predetermined amount of inert
gas may fail to be blown into the flow of molten steel flowing down the inside of
the gas-blowing upper nozzle as the gas leaks through the gap between the outer circumference
of the refractory 1 and the metal case 2 of the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100. Therefore,
the refractory outer circumference of the non-gas-permeable material 1A and the metal
case 2 are bonded together by a sealing mortar part 4 or the like to prevent a gas
leak.
[0005] On the other hand, sealability between the refractory 1 and the metal case 2 provided
on the outer circumference has been a conventional problem. For example, if sealing
between the refractory 1 and the metal case 2 is interrupted, the inert gas leaks
through the outer circumference of the refractory 1 and leaks out into the molten
steel from a bed part of the tundish. As a result, a sufficient amount of inert gas
to be blown into the molten steel passing through the through-hole 11 of the gas-blowing
upper nozzle 100 cannot be secured. A cast slab that has been cast in such a state
falls outside the specifications.
[0006] Fig. 4 (b) is an enlarged schematic view of part B indicated by the dash-double-dot
line in Fig. 4 (a), i.e., the periphery of an upper end part of the gas-blowing upper
nozzle 100. Fig. 4 (b) shows a state where the upper end of the metal case 2 has opened
due to thermal deformation (indicated by the arrow). As continuous casting is repeated,
the metal case 2 of the upper nozzle reaches a high temperature and thermally expands
due to heat transfer from the molten steel. In the process, the upper end of the metal
case 2 opens away from the refractory 1 as indicated by the arrow by pushing an upper-nozzle
setting mortar 10. When the metal case 2 deforms in this way, a gap is left between
the sealing mortar part 4 and the metal case 2. A gas leak is likely to occur through
this gap. The cause of the phenomenon of an inert gas leak is that, as a gap is left
between the metal case 2 and the refractory 1 as described above, the sealability
of the sealing mortar part 4 decreases and a leak path is formed. Whether a gas leak
has occurred can be grasped by detecting a change in the pressure (back pressure)
of gas blowing. The back pressure decreases when a gas leak occurs. Therefore, in
the case where gas blowing is performed during continuous casting, a system is established
that monitors the back pressure of the gas being blown in and determines that there
is an abnormality when the back pressure has decreased.
[0007] To prevent such a gas leak as described above, various improvements have been hitherto
made. For example, the technologies disclosed in Patent Literatures 1 and 2 use a
thermally expandable mortar that fills the gap left between the metal case and the
gas-permeable material due to thermal expansion of the metal case. According to these
Patent Literatures, the coefficient of thermal expansion is generally high in the
metal case and low in the refractory. Due to heating during the use of the nozzle,
expansion of the metal case becomes large compared with the outer circumference of
the nozzle refractory, thus leaving a gap between the outer circumference of the nozzle
refractory and the metal case, through which the gas leaks. As a countermeasure for
this, these technologies use the expandable mortar to prevent a gas leak.
[0008] Further, the technologies disclosed in Patent Literatures 3 and 4 inhibit thermal
expansion of the metal case by increasing a restraining force. According to Patent
Literature 3, a flexible refractory sealing material is disposed on an outer circumferential
part of the metal case to restrain the metal case from deforming due to thermal expansion
by the refractory sealing material and thereby inhibit thermal deformation. In Patent
Literature 4, spiral fins are attached to an outer circumferential part of the metal
case to thereby enhance the restraining force on the metal case.
Citation List
Patent Literature
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0010] However, the above-described conventional technologies have the following problems.
[0011] In the technologies disclosed in Patent Literatures 1 and 2, even when the thermal
expansion rate of the mortar between the metal case and the gas-permeable material
is increased, the mortar is limited in its amount of thermal expansion. There is a
problem that if the metal case expands beyond the amount of expansion of the mortar,
a gas leak through the gap between the metal case and the refractory cannot be completely
prevented. Another problem is that when a foamable material is used to increase the
thermal expansion rate of the mortar as in Patent Literature 2, the density of the
mortar itself decreases and its sealability decreases.
[0012] The method of physically inhibiting the thermal expansion of the metal case by increasing
the restraining force on the metal case as in the technologies disclosed in Patent
Literatures 3 and 4 also have the following problems. The method of wrapping a flexible
refractory seal around the outer circumference of the metal case as in Patent Literature
3 is expected to have a reducing effect on thermal deformation of the metal case for
the part where the refractory sealing material is wrapped, but cannot restrict the
thermal expansion at the other portions. Further, if the refractory seal is wrapped
around the entire metal case, the adhesion between the upper nozzle and the surrounding
square brick decreases, so that the upper nozzle shifts up and down, which may increase
the risk of a steel leak. Thus, this method cannot be called adequate as a gas leak
inhibiting method. The method of installing fins on the outer circumference of the
metal case as in Patent Literature 4 can be expected to have a reducing effect on
thermal deformation of the entire metal case. However, if the fins have such dimensions
as to come into contact with the square brick during the work of setting the upper
nozzle inside the surrounding square brick, the fins may cause damage to the square
brick itself. Thus, there is a problem that the work of inserting the upper nozzle
becomes difficult. On the other hand, if the outside diameter of the fins is designed
to be smaller than the inside diameter of the square brick, this raises a problem
that the strength increasing effect is so small that thermal expansion of the metal
case cannot be completely inhibited.
[0013] The present invention aims to solve the above-described conventional problems and
provide a technology that can prevent the occurrence of a gas leak when blowing in
an inert gas through a gas-blowing upper nozzle during continuous casting of molten
steel. Here, a gas leak refers to an outflow of an inert gas to a part other than
the gas-permeable material through the gap between the refractory and the metal case
provided on the outer circumference of the gas-blowing upper nozzle.
Solution to Problem
[0014] A gas-blowing upper nozzle according to the present invention that advantageously
solves the above-described problems includes a refractory (1) including a gas-permeable
material (1B), and a metal case (2) surrounding an outer circumference of the refractory
(1). This gas-blowing upper nozzle is characterized in that it has an upper-end metal
case (3) that extends inward from an upper end part of the metal case (2), and that
an upper end of a sealing mortar part (4) between the refractory (1) and the metal
case (2) is covered by the upper-end metal case (3).
[0015] In the gas-blowing upper nozzle according to the present invention, the following
could be more preferable solutions:
- (a) that an extension length of the upper-end metal case (3) is not smaller than a
thickness of a joint between the metal case (2) and a square brick (8); and
- (b) that a leading end of the extending upper-end metal case (3) is within such a
range as to be concealed by being held between a flat top end of the refractory (1)
and an upper-nozzle-top refractory (9).
[0016] A continuous casting method according to the present invention that advantageously
solves the above-described problems is characterized in that any one of the above-described
gas-blowing upper nozzles is installed at the bottom of a tundish, and that molten
steel is poured from the tundish into a casting mold through the gas-blowing upper
nozzle while an inert gas is blown into the gas-permeable material.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0017] Configured as has been described above, the gas-blowing upper nozzle according to
the present invention can offer the following advantages: The gas-blowing upper nozzle
is formed by the refractory including the gas-permeable material and the metal case
having the upper-end metal case. Even when a gap occurs at the joint between the refractory
and the metal case due to thermal deformation of the metal case, the upper-end metal
case that is disposed so as to conceal the joint at the top end of the upper nozzle
serves to physically interrupt a gas leak path. Thus, a gas leak can be prevented.
In the continuous casting method according to the present invention, molten steel
is poured from the tundish into the mold through this gas-blowing upper nozzle, so
that continuous casting can be performed without a gas leak and a favorable quality
of a cast slab can be maintained.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0018]
[Fig. 1] Fig. 1 is a vertical sectional view of a gas-blowing upper nozzle according
to one embodiment of the present invention.
[Fig. 2] Fig. 2 (a) is a schematic sectional view of the gas-blowing upper nozzle
of the embodiment as installed in a tundish, and Fig. 2 (b) is a partially enlarged
sectional view of part A of Fig. 2 (a).
[Fig. 3] Fig. 3 is a conceptual sectional view showing a state where a metal case
of the gas-blowing upper nozzle of the embodiment has thermally expanded.
[Fig. 4] Fig. 4 (a) is a schematic sectional view of a conventional gas-blowing upper
nozzle as installed in a tundish, and Fig. 4 (b) is a partially enlarged sectional
view of part B of Fig. 4 (a) and is a conceptual sectional view showing a state where
a metal case has thermally expanded.
[Fig. 5] Fig. 5 is a graph evaluating a status of a gas leak when continuous casting
is performed using the gas-blowing upper nozzle of the embodiment, as compared with
a conventional example.
Description of Embodiments
[0019] An embodiment of the present invention will be specifically described below. Each
drawing is schematic and may differ from the reality. The following embodiment presents
examples of a device and a method for embodying the technical idea of the present
invention, and is not intended to restrict the configuration to the one to be described
below. Thus, various changes can be made to the technical idea of the present invention
within the technical scope described in the claims.
[0020] Fig. 1 is a view showing a vertical section of a gas-blowing upper nozzle according
to one embodiment of the present invention. A refractory 1 inside a gas-blowing upper
nozzle 100 has a through-hole 11 through which molten steel flows along a rotational
axis (symmetrical axis) CL, and has a shape of a hollow, thick-walled rotating body.
The through-hole 11 flares out toward an upper part. The refractory 1 has a flat part
at its top end (upper end). In the example of Fig. 1, the refractory 1 is composed
of a combination of a non-gas-permeable material 1A and a gas-permeable material 1B.
The gas-permeable material 1B can be disposed at an arbitrary position. From the position
where the gas-permeable material 1B is disposed, a gas can be blown into molten steel
passing through the through-hole 11. The non-gas-permeable material 1A can also be
disposed at an arbitrary position. In the case where gas blowing is to be performed
separately from two upper and lower positions as in Fig. 1, separate blowing can be
performed by disposing the non-gas-permeable material 1A at a boundary portion of
the gas-permeable material 1B. When there is no particular need for performing separate
gas blowing, a structure in which the refractory 1 is entirely composed of the gas-permeable
material 1B can be adopted without any problem.
[0021] A supply path of an inert gas to the gas-permeable material 1B is configured as follows.
First, the inert gas is introduced into the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100 through an
inert-gas introduction pipe 6. Then, the inert gas reaches the gas-permeable material
1B by passing through a gas pool 5 provided between the refractory 1 and a substantially
cylindrical metal case 2 covering an outer circumference of the refractory 1. While
the gas pool 5 is provided between the refractory 1 and the metal case 2 in the example
of Fig. 1, it is also possible to form the gas pool 5 by providing a slit in the refractory
1. In this embodiment, however, the structure in which the gas pool 5 is provided
between the refractory 1 and the metal case 2 as in Fig. 1 can reap the advantages
of the embodiment more remarkably.
[0022] The inert gas having reached the gas pool 5 needs to entirely pass through the gas-permeable
material 1B and be blown into the molten steel. That the inert gas leaks to the outside
of the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100 through a portion other than the gas-permeable
material 1B is called a gas leak. When a gas leak occurs, a sufficient amount of inert
gas fails to be supplied to the molten steel inside the hollow part of the gas-blowing
upper nozzle 100. Therefore, a sufficient improving effect on the purity of the molten
steel cannot be achieved. This can result in quality problems with a cast slab that
has been cast. To prevent such a gas leak, a sealing mortar part 4 is disposed between
the refractory 1 and the metal case 2. The sealing mortar part 4 fills the gap between
the refractory 1 and the metal case 2 other than the gas pool 5. The sealing mortar
part 4 serves to prevent the inert gas from leaking to the outside of the gas-blowing
upper nozzle 100.
[0023] Fig. 2 (a) shows a schematic view of the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100 of the embodiment
as set inside a tundish. The circumference of the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100 is
surrounded by a tundish iron shell 7, a square brick 8, and an upper-nozzle-top refractory
9. The gas-blowing upper nozzle 100 is restrained by each of the materials surrounding
it. An upper-nozzle setting mortar 10 is disposed at a joint between the square brick
8 and the metal case 2 as a way to leave no gap. A restraining force on the gas-blowing
upper nozzle 100 is secured by a bonding force among the square brick 8, the upper-nozzle
setting mortar 10, and the metal case 2.
[0024] Fig. 2 (b) shows a close-up of an upper end part of the gas-blowing upper nozzle
100 in part A of Fig. 2 (a) circled by the dash-double-dot line. In this embodiment,
the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100 has an upper-end metal case 3 that extends inward
from an upper end part of the metal case 2. In this configuration, an upper end of
the sealing mortar part 4 (joint part) between the refractory 1 and the metal case
2 is covered by the upper-end metal case 3. An outer circumference of the upper end
of the metal case 2 and the upper-end metal case 3 may be coupled together by, for
example, welding or caulking, or the metal case 2 and the upper-end metal case 3 may
be integrally formed by draw forming etc. It is preferable that the upper-end metal
case 3 have an annular shape along a flat part at the top end of the refractory 1.
The upper-end metal case 3 is disposed at the upper end part of the gas-blowing upper
nozzle 100 so as to create a state where the upper-end metal case 3 and the metal
case 2 on the outer circumference of the upper nozzle are coupled together without
a gap. Thus, even when the metal case 2 undergoes thermal deformation, a gas leak
through the joint between the refractory 1 and the metal case 2 can be prevented.
That is, even when thermal deformation as shown in Fig. 3 (indicated by the arrow)
occurs, a gas leak path formed at the joint between the refractory 1 and the metal
case 2 is blocked by the upper-end metal case 3 and the sealing mortar part 4, and
thus the gas leak path can be physically interrupted. In this case, the limit length
to which the metal case 2 opens due to thermal deformation depends on the thickness
of the joint between the metal case 2 and the square brick 8. Therefore, to provide
a gas leak preventing effect even when the metal case 2 undergoes maximum thermal
deformation, it is preferable that the extension length of the upper-end metal case
3 be not smaller than the thickness of the joint between the metal case 2 and the
square brick 8. When coming into direct contact with the molten steel, the upper-end
metal case 3 melts and can no longer retain its shape. Therefore, it is preferable
that the extension length of the upper-end metal case 3 be at a maximum within such
a range that the upper-end metal case 3 is concealed by being held between the flat
top end of the refractory 1 of the gas-blowing upper nozzle and the upper-nozzle-top
refractory 9. Here, the extension length of the upper-end metal case 3 is the length
in a radial direction in a cylindrical coordinate system with the rotational axis
CL as a central axis.
[0025] The refractory 1 is, for example, a high-alumina material. The metal case 2 and the
upper-end metal case 3 are made of metal, and, for example, carbon steel, alloy steel,
stainless steel, cast steel, cast iron, titanium, and titanium alloy are suitably
used. For the sealing mortar part 4 and the upper-nozzle setting mortar 10, for example,
a high-alumina water-kneaded mortar that has been adjusted to appropriate consistency
can be used. The thickness of the joint between the metal case (2) and the square
brick (8) is about 1 to 5 mm. The range of being held between the flat top end of
the refractory 1 of the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100 and the upper-nozzle-top refractory
9 is about 5 to 20 mm as a length in the radial direction from the rotational axis
CL.
[0026] In a continuous casting method as another embodiment of the present invention, the
gas-blowing upper nozzle 100 of the above-described embodiment is disposed at the
bottom of the tundish as shown in Fig. 2. Then, the inert gas introduced through the
inert-gas introduction pipe 6 is passed through the gas-permeable material 1B into
the molten steel flowing down the through-hole 11. The molten steel inside the tundish
is poured into a mold through a sliding nozzle and an immersion nozzle as necessary
in addition to the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100. By performing continuous casting
using the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100 of the above-described embodiment, even when
sequence casting is continuously performed, a gas leak attributable to deformation
due to thermal expansion of the metal case 2 of the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100 can
be prevented. As for the range that the upper-end metal case 3 covers the top end
of the gas-blowing upper nozzle 100, the top end need be covered such that the sealing
mortar part 4 that is the joint between the refractory 1 and the metal case 2 is not
exposed to the outside regardless of thermal deformation of the metal case 2. This
configuration can prevent a gas leak.
[0027] Fig. 5 shows a result of performing continuous casting with the gas-blowing upper
nozzle of the embodiment shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 and the conventional gas-blowing
upper nozzle shown in Fig. 4 installed at the bottom of the tundish, and conducting
an evaluation as to whether there was a gas leak based on a back pressure of the inert
gas blown into the gas-blowing upper nozzles. Whether a gas leak has occurred can
be determined by monitoring the back pressure of the inert gas being introduced into
the gas-blowing upper nozzle. Specifically, when the inert gas is normally blown into
the molten steel through the gas-permeable material 1B, the back pressure of the inert
gas is subjected to a resistant pressure that is the sum of a static pressure of the
molten steel and permeation resistance of the gas-permeable material 1B, and this
resistant pressure appears as a back pressure. However, when a gas leak occurs, at
least the permeation resistance of the gas-permeable material 1B does not occur, so
that the back pressure decreases. Therefore, whether a gas leak had occurred was determined
based on whether the back pressure had decreased, and the effects of the gas-blowing
upper nozzle of the embodiment and the conventional gas-blowing upper nozzle were
examined.
[0028] Here, a threshold value of the back pressure used for the determination depends on
the casting facility and the operation rate, and therefore need be optimized for individual
continuous casters. In the continuous caster used for the determination this time,
the determination was performed with a decrease in the back pressure of about 30%
from the back pressure at normal times being called a decrease in the back pressure.
As shown in Fig. 5, when the conventional gas-blowing upper nozzle (conventional example:
N = 1012) was used, the incidence rate of a decrease in the back pressure was 0.018.
By contrast, adopting the embodiment (example of present invention: N = 107) successfully
prevented a decrease in the back pressure, i.e., the occurrence of a gas leak.
Industrial Applicability
[0029] The gas-blowing upper nozzle and the continuous casting method of the present invention
allow continuous casting to be performed while an inert gas having been blown in is
blown into molten steel without a gas leak, so that a favorable quality of a cast
slab can be maintained, which makes the present invention industrially useful.
Reference Signs List
[0030]
- 100
- Gas-blowing upper nozzle (upper nozzle)
- 1
- Refractory
- 1A
- Non-gas-permeable material
- 1B
- Gas-permeable material
- 2
- Metal case
- 3
- Upper-end metal case
- 4
- Sealing mortar part
- 5
- Gas pool (gas flow passage)
- 6
- Inert-gas introduction pipe
- 7
- Tundish iron shell
- 8
- Square brick
- 9
- Upper-nozzle-top refractory
- 10
- Upper-nozzle setting mortar
- 11
- Through-hole
- CL
- Rotational axis (symmetrical axis)