TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to an oriented silicon steel and manufacturing method
thereof, in particular to an oriented silicon steel having low magnetostriction and
manufacturing method thereof.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Oriented silicon steel is a soft magnetic material characterized by sharp {110}<001>
orientation (i.e., Gaussian grains). Oriented silicon steel, which is an important
functional material, is commonly used in the manufacture of transformer cores.
[0003] In the prior art, according to the different magnetic properties and Gaussian grain
orientation degree, oriented silicon steel can be divided into common oriented silicon
steel (abbreviated as CGO) and high magnetic oriented silicon steel (abbreviated as
Hi-B); compared with CGO silicon steel, Hi-B silicon steel has lower iron loss, higher
magnetic induction intensity, and smaller magnetostriction. In recent years, with
the increasing attention to transformer noise performance, transformer noise performance
has become a key indicator for manufacturers. Since the magnetostriction of oriented
silicon steel has a decisive influence on the noise performance of transformers, oriented
silicon steel with low magnetostriction has become a research hotspot.
[0004] In the production process of the oriented silicon steel, the prior art mainly reduces
the magnetostriction of the oriented silicon steel by the following three technical
routes: 1) increasing the Gaussian grain orientation degree of the oriented silicon
steel product; 2) decreasing the thickness of the oriented silicon steel product;
and 3) applying a high tensile coating. All these three technical routes can reduce
the magnetostriction of oriented silicon steel.
[0005] CN111748731A (disclosed on Oct. 9, 2020, "Oriented silicon steel with low magnetostriction and manufacturing method thereof")
produces preferred grain orientation (magnetic domain structure rearrangement) triggered
by a portion of magnetic inhomogeneity due to partly sequential structural arrangement
by hot stretching and magnetic annealing of a silicon steel substrate under specific
conditions, so that the unidirectional magnetic anisotropy along the rolling direction
is increased (i.e., the volume of the 180° magnetic domain wall is increased, and
the volume of the 90° magnetic domain wall is decreased), which reduces the volume
of the 90° magnetic domains of the oriented silicon steel product, and thus reduces
the magnetostriction of the oriented silicon steel, which in turn reduces the overall
noise level of the transformer. The application performed magnetic annealing under
the following conditions: a magnetic annealing temperature of 750-200°C, a magnetic
field oriented in the direction of rolling or transverse, and a pulsed field (50ms,
1-10 Hz) with a magnitude of 2500 A/m DC magnetic field + 50,000 A/m short-time pulsed
magnetic field. The resulting oriented silicon steel product has an L
vA(17/50)<55 dB(A).
[0006] CN105220071A (disclosed on Jan. 6, 2016, "Oriented silicon steel with low noise characteristic and manufacturing method thereof")
discloses an oriented silicon steel having 0.1%≤Cu≤0.5% and 0.01%≤S≤0.05% in the oriented
silicon steel substrate, and the atomic ratio Cu/S satisfies: 5≤Cu/S≤10. During the
manufacturing process of the oriented silicon steel, the coating tension on the steel
surface, and the grain size of the product are strictly controlled. The L
vA(17) of the resulting oriented silicon steel product is less than 55 dB(A), and the
vibration generated by the core of the transformer made of this oriented silicon steel
is small, so that the overall noise level of the transformer is reduced.
[0007] CN107881411A (disclosed on April 6, 2018, "Silicon steel product with low iron loss for low-noise transformer, and manufacturing
method thereof") discloses a low-iron-loss and low-noise oriented silicon steel. The
application reduces iron loss and reduces magnetostriction/reduces noise by strictly
controlling the vertical reflectivity R of the magnesium silicate bottom layer of
the oriented silicon steel substrate to visible light to 40-60%, while ensuring that
the magnesium silicate bottom layer has a uniform brightness. The vibration noise
of magnetostriction of the final product is less than 60 dB(A), which is particularly
suitable for transformers.
[0008] It can be seen that the magnetostriction can be reduced to some extent by controlling
both the 90° magnetic domain distribution and the coating tension level. However,
both of these methods require the use of additional external equipment or conditions
to reduce the magnetostriction, and the reduction magnitude in magnetostriction is
not significant. For example, although in
CN111748731A, affecting the 90° magnetic domains by adding a magnetic field can increase the volume
of the 180° magnetic domain wall, the reduction magnitude of the magnetostriction
by the externally applied conditions at a later stage is relatively limited if the
Gaussian texture of the oriented silicon steel substrate itself is not sharp enough.
In addition, the method of refining the magnetic domains by increasing the coating
tension has the same problem, and the method also has very high requirements on the
coating properties. In addition, in some prior art, the magnetostriction can be reduced
to some extent by reducing the thickness of the silicon steel sheet. However, due
to the high silicon content of silicon steel, rolling the silicon steel to a thinner
thickness would be more difficult and also result in increased costs.
[0009] Accordingly, the prior art for reducing magnetostriction by increasing the coating
tension and reducing the thickness of the silicon steel have significant limitations.
In contrast, by improving the Gaussian grain orientation degree of the oriented silicon
steel itself (e.g., by optimizing the chemical composition and adjusting the production
process to improve the Gaussian grain orientation degree of the oriented silicon steel
product), i.e., by lowering the deviation angle of the Gaussian grains, thereby increasing
the magnetic induction intensity, it is possible to fundamentally reduce the magnetostriction
of the oriented silicon steel. In addition, in the context of the "carbon peaking
and carbon neutrality" strategic objective, energy saving and environmental protection
is also one of the focuses of the current production process. How to ensure the high
quality and stable production of oriented silicon steel under the premise of reducing
energy consumption will become one of the important R&D direction of oriented silicon
steel.
[0010] Based on the above reasons, the present inventor expects to develop a new type of
oriented silicon steel with low magnetostriction and a manufacturing method thereof,
which can essentially improve the magnetic induction intensity of the oriented silicon
steel and reduce the magnetostriction of the oriented silicon steel (by lowering the
deviation angle of the Gaussian grains) on the basis of a green and consumption-reducing
production process through the high-level design of the chemical composition of the
oriented silicon steel and the rational optimization of the production process. This
enables a high level of matching between high magnetic induction intensity and low
magnetostriction of the oriented silicon steel.
SUMMARY
[0011] An objective of the present invention is to provide an oriented silicon steel and
a manufacturing method thereof. The oriented silicon steel has an excellent matching
of magnetic properties (especially in terms of high magnetic induction intensity and
low magnetostriction), while at the same time the consumption of energy media in the
production process is substantially reduced.
[0012] The first aspect of the present invention provides an oriented silicon steel, comprising,
in addition to 90% or more of Fe and inevitable impurities, the following components
in percentage by mass:
C: 0.020-0.080%, Si: 2.00-4.50%, Mn: 0.01-0.10%, S≤0.005%, acid soluble aluminum Als:
0.010-0.040%, N: 0.002-0.015%, Nb: 0.006-0.120%, and at least one selected from P:
0.01-0.10%, Sn: 0.01-0.30%, and Cu: 0.01-0.50%.
[0013] Preferably, the oriented silicon steel comprises the following components in percentage
by mass:
C: 0.020-0.080%, Si: 2.00-4.50%, Mn: 0.01-0.10%, S≤0.005%, acid soluble aluminum Als:
0.010-0.040%, N: 0.002-0.015%, Nb: 0.006-0.120%, and at least one selected from P:
0.01-0.10%, Sn: 0.01-0.30%, and Cu: 0.01-0.50%; the balance of Fe and inevitable impurities.
[0014] Preferably, the oriented silicon steel has a thickness of 0.15-0.30 mm
[0015] Preferably, the oriented silicon steel has a magnetic induction intensity of B8>1.95
T and a magnetostrictive vibration velocity sound pressure level of L
vA <50 dB(A).
[0016] Another aspect of the present invention provides a manufacturing method for the above
oriented silicon steel, comprising the following steps:
- 1) Smelting and casting a molten steel to produce a slab;
- 2) Heating the slab;
- 3) Hot rolling, including roughing rolling, coiling and holding and finishing rolling;
- 4) Cold rolling;
- 5) Decarburizing annealing;
- 6) Nitriding;
- 7) Applying an annealing separator;
- 8) High-temperature annealing;
- 9) Applying an insulation coating and performing scoring to produce an oriented silicon
steel.
[0017] Preferably, in step 1), a thickness of the slab is 180-250 mm.
[0018] Preferably, in step 2), a heating temperature of the slab is 900-1150°C.
[0019] The present application uses an post-inhibitor process that performs nitriding treatment,
so that the content of inhibitor elements in the slab is relatively low. The heating
temperature in step 2) is conducive to energy consumption reduction and obtaining
sufficient inhibitor at the same time. When the heating temperature of the slab is
lower than 900°C, the inhibitor elements cannot be effectively solid-solutionized;
when the heating temperature of the slab is higher than 1150°C, it will increase the
energy consumption and the heat load of the heating furnace. Therefore, the heating
temperature of the slab in step 2) is preferably controlled to be 900-1150°C.
[0020] Preferably, a thickness of the intermediate slab at the end of rough rolling is 35-50
mm
[0021] Preferably, in step 3), an end temperature of rough rolling is higher than 950°C,
a coiling temperature is 800-1050°C, a coiling time is 30-200s, and an initial temperature
of finishing rolling is lower than 1050°C.
[0022] The present application sets an end temperature of rough rolling to be higher than
950°C, which can ensure that a coiling temperature is 800-1050°C, a coiling time is
30-200s, and an initial temperature of subsequent finishing rolling is lower than
1050°C. At this coiling temperature, the layers of the hot-rolled plate themselves
heat each other during the post-coiling and holding process, so there is no need for
additional heating; in addition, the coiling between rough rolling and finishing rolling
enable a more thorough recrystallization of the hot-rolled plate structure, and at
the same time can precipitate part of the inhibitors dispersively. When the coiling
temperature is lower than 800 °C or the coiling time is less than 30s, the desired
recrystallization effect of the structure of the hot-rolled plate cannot be achieved;
when the coiling temperature is higher than 1050°C or the coiling time is more than
200s, the grain organization of the intermediate slab and the precipitated inhibitors
will be coarsened, which adversely affects the development of the subsequent structure
and Gaussian texture. Therefore, it is preferred to set the temperature and/or time
of the hot rolling process within the above range.
[0023] Preferably, after step 3) and before step 4), a normalizing annealing treatment is
carried out, and the normalizing annealing temperature does not exceed 1000°C, preferably
800-1000°C, more preferably 800-980°C, and a normalizing annealing time is 20-200s.
[0024] By conducting extensive research, the present inventors have surprisingly found that
normalizing annealing of hot-rolled plates at an annealing temperature of about 1100-1200°C,
as routinely performed according to the present prior art, not only results in an
oversized grain structure of the normalized plates, but also leads to coarsening of
the inhibitors and ultimately deteriorates the magnetic properties.
[0025] By coiling and holding the rough-rolled plate at a temperature of 800-1050°C, it
is possible to achieve a proportion of more than 10% for Gaussian grains with a deviation
angle less than 3° in the steel plate after decarburizing annealing while no subsequent
normalizing annealing treatment is performed or the normalizing annealing is performed
at a normalizing annealing temperature of no more than 1000°C, thereby obtaining an
oriented silicon steel product with desired Gaussian grain orientation degree and
magnetic induction intensity. In contrast, the proportion of Gaussian grains with
a deviation angle less than 3° in the steel plate after decarburizing annealing is
significantly lower (i.e., significantly less than 10%) if the rough-rolled plate
is not coiled and held, or if the normalizing annealing temperature after coiling
and holding is higher than 1000°C.
[0026] Preferably, in step 4), a cold rolling reduction ratio is >80%.
[0027] Preferably, in step 5), a decarburizing annealing temperature is 800-900°C. When
the decarburizing annealing temperature is lower than 800°C, the decarburization effect
is not obvious; when the decarburizing annealing temperature is higher than 900°C,
the primarily recrystallized grain is too coarse, affecting the secondary recrystallization.
[0028] Preferably, in step 5), a proportion of Gaussian grains with a deviation angle less
than 3° in the steel plate after decarburizing annealing is more than 10%. The "proportion
of Gaussian grains with a deviation angle less than 3° in the steel plate after decarburizing
annealing" herein refers to the ratio (in %) of the number of Gaussian grains with
a deviation angle less than 3° to the total number of Gaussian grains.
[0029] The "deviation angle" herein refers to the deviation angle of the Gaussian grain
orientation. The deviation angle and ratio of Gaussian grains are observed and counted
by a scanning electron microscope with an electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD)
system.
[0030] Preferably, in step 6), an amount of nitriding is 50-280 ppm.
[0031] The present application uses a post-inhibitor process that performs nitriding treatment.
In other words, a nitriding treatment must be performed prior to high-temperature
annealing in order to form inhibitors that sufficient to inhibit growth of the primary
recrystallized grain. When the amount of nitriding is lower than 50 ppm, the amount
of inhibitor formation is insufficient; when the amount of nitriding is higher than
280 ppm, it will adversely affect the formation of the magnesium silicate bottom layer
during the high-temperature annealing process. Based on these considerations, the
amount of nitriding in step 6) of the present invention is strictly controlled to
50-280 ppm.
[0032] In step 7), the annealing separator may be an annealing separator commonly used in
the art, preferably MgO.
[0033] Preferably, in step 8), an annealing temperature is 1100-1250°C and an annealing
time is greater than 25 hours.
[0034] In step 9), the insulation coating may be formed using a coating fluid commonly used
in the art, such as forming the insulation coating by applying a coating fluid comprising
phosphate, colloidal silicon dioxide, and chromic anhydride; the scoring may be performed
using a scoring method commonly used in the art, such as laser scoring, electrochemical
scoring, tooth roller scoring, high-pressure water beam scoring, or the like.
[0035] Compared with the prior art, the oriented silicon steel and the manufacturing method
thereof according to the present invention realize the following beneficial effects:
The present inventor found that the orientation degree of the Gaussian grain nuclei
in the primary recrystallization has a decisive influence on the orientation degree
of the Gaussian grain and magnetic induction intensity of the product through a large
number of experiments. Therefore, the present inventor optimizes the design of the
relevant process parameters, so that the proportion of Gaussian grains with a deviation
angle less than3° in the steel plate after decarburizing annealing is more than 10%,
thereby obtaining an oriented silicon steel product with desired Gaussian grain orientation
degree and magnetic induction intensity.
[0036] The present invention obtains an oriented silicon steel with a matched high magnetic
induction intensity and low magnetostriction under the premise of an environmental-friendly
and consumption-reducing production process. The oriented silicon steel in the present
invention has excellent magnetic properties (magnetic induction intensity of B8>1.95
T, magnetostrictive vibration velocity sound pressure level of L
vA<50 dB(A)), which has good economic benefits and application prospects.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0037] By conducting extensive research, the present inventors surprisingly discovered that
by designing the chemical composition of the oriented silicon steel above, an oriented
silicon steel with excellent overall performance (especially high magnetic induction
intensity and low magnetostriction) can be obtained. Specifically, the design principle
of each aforementioned chemical elements is as follows. In the present application,
the element contents are expressed in percentage by mass unless explicitly stated
otherwise.
[0038] C: The addition of an appropriate amount of C ensures that an appropriate proportion
of the γ phase is obtained in the hot rolling or normalizing process, which is conducive
to the precipitation of fine dispersed inhibitors. When the C content in the steel
is lower than 0.020%, the proportion of γ phase is low, which is unfavorable to the
precipitation of the inhibitor; when the C content in the steel is higher than 0.080%,
the decarburization cost is increased. Based on these considerations, the C content
in the oriented silicon steel of the present invention is controlled to 0.020-0.080%,
preferably 0.022-0.073%.
[0039] Si: Si is the main element to reduce iron loss. In order to ensure the quality of
silicon steel product, the Si content in steel should not be too low or too high.
When the Si content in the silicon steel is lower than 2.00%, it is difficult to obtain
the desired low iron loss in the oriented silicon steel product; when the Si content
in the steel is higher than 4.50%, it leads to difficulties in cold rolling and a
reduction in the product yield. Based on these considerations, the Si content in the
oriented silicon steel of the present invention is controlled to 2.00-4.50%, preferably
2.19-4.29%.
[0040] Mn: The addition of an appropriate amount of Mn can form a small amount of MnS auxiliary
inhibitor in the continuous casting and hot rolling process, which can effectively
improve the microstructure and rollability of the oriented silicon steel. In order
to ensure the performance of the oriented silicon steel, the Mn content in steel must
be strictly controlled. When the Mn content is less than 0.01%, it is detrimental
to obtaining the desired microstructure and rollability of the silicon steel; when
the Mn content is higher than 0.10%, the slab heating temperature will be significantly
increased, and it is easy to form coarse MnS inhibitors. Based on these considerations,
the Mn content in the oriented silicon steel of the present invention is controlled
to 0.01-0.10%, preferably 0.01-0.09%.
[0041] S: S can form auxiliary inhibitors such as MnS and Cu
2S. However, it should be noted that the S content in steel should not be too high.
When the S content in the steel is too high, it will significantly increase the slab
heating temperature, which is not favorable to production. Based on these considerations,
the S content in the oriented silicon steel of the present invention is controlled
to S ≤ 0.005%, preferably ≤ 0.004%.
[0042] Acid soluble aluminum Als: Acid soluble aluminum Als is an important component in
the formation of the main inhibitor AlN. When the acid soluble aluminum Als content
in steel is lower than 0.010%, it will lead to insufficient inhibitor; when the acid
soluble aluminum Als content in steel is higher than 0.040%, it will lead to coarse
inhibitor AlN. Therefore, the acid soluble aluminum Als content in the silicon steel
needs to be strictly controlled. Based on these considerations, the acid soluble aluminum
Als content in the oriented silicon steel of the present invention is controlled to
0.010-0.040%, preferably 0.012-0.039%.
[0043] N: The addition of an appropriate amount of N can properly inhibit grain growth.
The addition of N in silicon steel can cooperate with acid soluble aluminum Als to
form AlN before nitriding, thereby effectively inhibiting the growth of the primary
recrystallized grains. When the N content in the steel is lower than 0.002%, the growth
of the primary recrystallized grains cannot be effectively inhibited; when the N content
in the steel is higher than 0.015%, the difficulty of steelmaking will be significantly
increased. Based on these considerations, the N content in the oriented silicon steel
of the present invention is controlled to 0.002-0.015%, preferably 0.003-0.014%.
[0044] Nb: In order to reduce the slab heating temperature, the Mn and Cu contents are relatively
low, but this leads to insufficient precipitation of MnS and Cu
2S. Therefore, in order to compensate for the lack of inhibition ability of the inhibitor,
an appropriate amount of Nb is added into the silicon steel. Nb can form auxiliary
inhibitor Nb (C, N), and play the role of auxiliary inhibitor. In addition, due to
the relatively low solid solution temperature of Nb (C, N), it can also reduce the
heating temperature of the slab. When the Nb content in the steel is lower than 0.006%,
the inhibitor Nb (C, N) formed cannot fully realize the inhibitory effect; when the
Nb content in the steel is higher than 0.120%, the occurrence of secondary recrystallization
is hindered as the inhibitory effect is too strong. Based on these considerations,
the Nb content in the oriented silicon steel of the present invention is controlled
to 0.006-0.120%, preferably 0.006-0.118%.
[0045] P and Sn: P and Sn are both grain boundary segregation elements. The addition of
an appropriate amount of P and Sn in silicon steel can act as auxiliary inhibitor.
When the P and Sn contents in the steel are each lower than 0.01%, the auxiliary inhibitor
effect cannot be fully realized; when the P and Sn contents in the steel are higher
than 0.10% and 0.30%, respectively, the decarburization and nitriding will be adversely
affected. Based on these considerations, the P content in the oriented silicon steel
of the present invention is controlled to 0.01-0.10%, preferably 0.02-0.08%, and the
Sn content is controlled to 0.01-0.30%, preferably 0.02-0.25%.
[0046] Cu: The addition of an appropriate amount of Cu in silicon steel can not only form
auxiliary inhibitors such as Cu
2S, but also effectively expand the γ-phase region, thus facilitating the precipitation
of other inhibitors. However, it should be noted that the Cu content in steel should
not be too low or too high. When the Cu content in the silicon steel is lower than
0.01%, the above effect cannot be fully realized; when the Cu content in the silicon
steel is higher than 0.50%, the production cost will be increased. Based on these
considerations, the Cu content in the oriented silicon steel of the present invention
is controlled to 0.01-0.50%, preferably 0.02-0.48%, for example 0.02-0.39%.
[0047] The oriented silicon steel and the manufacturing method thereof of the present invention
will be further explained and illustrated below in connection with specific Examples.
However, the following description is an illustrative description for explaining the
present invention and is not intended to limit the technical scope of the present
invention to the description.
Examples 1-12
[0048] The oriented silicon steel of Examples 1-12 of the present invention is manufactured
by the following steps:
- 1) Smelting and casting a molten steel according to the composition shown in Table
1 below, producing a slab with a thickness of 180-250 mm.
- 2) Heating the slab at a temperature of 900-1150°C.
- 3) Rough rolling, coiling and holding and finishing rolling of the slab: an end temperature
of rough rolling was higher than 950°C, a coiling temperature was 800-1050°C, a coiling
time was 30-200s, and an initial temperature of finishing rolling was lower than 1050°C.
- 4) Cold rolling to a finished plate thickness of 0.15-0.30 mm, wherein a cold rolling
reduction ratio was >80%.
- 5) Decarburizing annealing at a temperature of 800-900°C.
- 6) Nitriding, wherein the amount of nitriding was 50-280 ppm.
- 7) Applying an annealing separator.
- 8) High-temperature annealing, wherein an annealing temperature was 1100-1250°C and
an annealing time was greater than 25 hours.
- 9) Applying an insulation coating and performing scoring to produce an oriented silicon
steel with a thickness of 0.15-0.30 mm.
[0049] It should be noted that Examples other than Example 10 and Example 11 were also subjected
to a normalizing annealing treatment (normalizing annealing temperature was not more
than 1000°C, normalizing annealing time was 20-200s) between steps 3) and 4).
Comparative Examples 1-20
[0050] Comparative Examples 1-20 used similar process steps to manufacture the oriented
silicon steel, wherein the Comparative Examples other than Comparative Example 16
were also subjected to a normalizing annealing treatment between steps 3) and 4).
However, the chemical composition and the process parameters of the oriented silicon
steel of Examples 1-12 satisfy the claimed scope of the present invention, whereas
at least one of the chemical composition and/or the process parameters of Comparative
Examples 1-20 does not satisfy the claimed scope of the present invention.
[0051] The chemical compositions of the oriented silicon steels of Examples 1-12 and Comparative
Examples 1-20 are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 (wt%, the balance is Fe and inevitable impurities)
Number |
C |
Si |
Mn |
S |
Als |
N |
Nb |
P |
Sn |
Cu |
Example 1 |
0.031 |
3.25 |
0.02 |
0.004 |
0.029 |
0.003 |
0.009 |
0.04 |
0.08 |
0.02 |
Example 2 |
0.052 |
3.51 |
0.04 |
0.004 |
0.027 |
0.006 |
0.011 |
0.08 |
0.15 |
- |
Example 3 |
0.073 |
3.81 |
0.06 |
0.004 |
0.021 |
0.008 |
0.033 |
- |
- |
0.15 |
Example 4 |
0.066 |
3.03 |
0.08 |
0.004 |
0.018 |
0.011 |
0.062 |
0.06 |
- |
- |
Example 5 |
0.048 |
2.84 |
0.09 |
0.004 |
0.033 |
0.013 |
0.097 |
- |
0.20 |
- |
Example 6 |
0.022 |
2.19 |
0.01 |
0.004 |
0.036 |
0.014 |
0.118 |
- |
0.25 |
0.18 |
Example 7 |
0.045 |
4.29 |
0.05 |
0.004 |
0.012 |
0.009 |
0.006 |
0.02 |
- |
0.29 |
Example 8 |
0.037 |
3.28 |
0.08 |
0.004 |
0.039 |
0.007 |
0.088 |
- |
0.02 |
0.39 |
Example 9 |
0.041 |
2.99 |
0.09 |
0.004 |
0.028 |
0.009 |
0.028 |
0.05 |
- |
|
Example 10 |
0.033 |
3.27 |
0.08 |
0.004 |
0.033 |
0.006 |
0.055 |
- |
0.17 |
- |
Example 11 |
0.052 |
3.18 |
0.06 |
0.004 |
0.030 |
0.011 |
0.072 |
- |
- |
0.32 |
Example 12 |
0.051 |
3.16 |
0.05 |
0.004 |
0.029 |
0.010 |
0.061 |
0.03 |
0.012 |
0.48 |
Comparative Example 1 |
0.015 |
3.25 |
0.06 |
0.004 |
0.028 |
0.011 |
0.029 |
0.05 |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 2 |
0.038 |
1.5 |
0.02 |
0.004 |
0.029 |
0.011 |
0.033 |
0.05 |
0.15 |
- |
Comparative Example 3 |
0.036 |
3.35 |
0.06 |
0.004 |
0.027 |
0.011 |
0.032 |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 4 |
0.033 |
3.45 |
0.06 |
0.004 |
0.006 |
0.010 |
0.045 |
- |
0.26 |
0.18 |
Comparative Example 5 |
0.027 |
3.44 |
0.05 |
0.004 |
0.027 |
0.001 |
0.033 |
- |
0.26 |
0.28 |
Comparative Example 6 |
0.038 |
3.65 |
0.04 |
0.004 |
0.033 |
0.012 |
0.004 |
0.07 |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 7 |
0.037 |
3.62 |
0.04 |
0.004 |
0.032 |
0.011 |
0.160 |
0.06 |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 8 |
0.032 |
3.6 |
0.18 |
0.004 |
0.036 |
0.011 |
0.028 |
- |
0.21 |
- |
Comparative Example 9 |
0.09 |
4.62 |
0.06 |
0.004 |
0.038 |
0.011 |
0.022 |
- |
0.25 |
- |
Comparative Example 10 |
0.033 |
3.4 |
0.06 |
0.004 |
0.045 |
0.019 |
0.031 |
0.09 |
- |
0.28 |
Comparative Example 11 |
0.029 |
3.32 |
0.07 |
0.006 |
0.030 |
0.012 |
0.058 |
0.04 |
0.20 |
- |
Comparative Example 12 |
0.036 |
3.13 |
0.08 |
0.004 |
0.026 |
0.011 |
0.062 |
0.06 |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 13 |
0.032 |
3.18 |
0.08 |
0.004 |
0.028 |
0.011 |
0.090 |
0.06 |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 14 |
0.04 |
3.14 |
0.07 |
0.004 |
0.029 |
0.010 |
0.082 |
- |
0.09 |
- |
Comparative Example 15 |
0.037 |
3.17 |
0.06 |
0.004 |
0.033 |
0.008 |
0.067 |
- |
0.22 |
0.09 |
Comparative Example 16 |
0.032 |
3.28 |
0.08 |
0.004 |
0.035 |
0.006 |
0.089 |
- |
0.14 |
- |
Comparative Example 17 |
0.035 |
3.33 |
0.06 |
0.004 |
0.027 |
0.007 |
0.054 |
0.04 |
0.18 |
- |
Comparative Example 18 |
0.037 |
3.45 |
0.07 |
0.004 |
0.032 |
0.012 |
0.048 |
0.05 |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 19 |
0.032 |
3.31 |
0.07 |
0.004 |
0.029 |
0.011 |
0.059 |
0.06 |
- |
- |
Comparative Example 20 |
0.033 |
3.30 |
0.07 |
0.004 |
0.031 |
0.011 |
0.049 |
0.06 |
|
|
[0052] Specific process parameters for Examples 1-12 and Comparative Examples 1-20 in the
above process steps are shown in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.
Table 2-1
Number |
Step 1 |
Step 2 |
Step 3 |
Whether performing normalizing annealing |
Product thickness [mm] |
Slab thickness [mm] |
Slab heating temperature [°C] |
Rough rolling end temperature [°C] |
Plate thickness after rough rolling [mm] |
Coiling temperature [°C] |
Coiling time [s] |
Finishing rolling initial temperat ure [°C] |
Example 1 |
190 |
1140 |
960 |
36 |
900 |
40 |
1040 |
Yes |
0.30 |
Example 2 |
220 |
1090 |
980 |
48 |
1000 |
60 |
1000 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Example 3 |
210 |
1150 |
970 |
44 |
980 |
80 |
980 |
Yes |
0.23 |
Example 4 |
200 |
1130 |
1000 |
38 |
890 |
130 |
990 |
Yes |
0.20 |
Example 5 |
240 |
1120 |
1100 |
42 |
820 |
160 |
1030 |
Yes |
0.18 |
Example 6 |
250 |
1140 |
990 |
39 |
870 |
180 |
1015 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Example 7 |
190 |
1020 |
1110 |
40 |
930 |
70 |
990 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Example 8 |
200 |
1000 |
1000 |
49 |
950 |
90 |
995 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Example 9 |
195 |
960 |
1000 |
48 |
1010 |
100 |
1000 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Example 10 |
180 |
920 |
990 |
42 |
1040 |
150 |
1000 |
No |
0.27 |
Example 11 |
235 |
940 |
980 |
45 |
1020 |
190 |
1010 |
No |
0.27 |
Example 12 |
210 |
1000 |
1000 |
48 |
1015 |
120 |
1000 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 1 |
220 |
1130 |
1000 |
40 |
1000 |
150 |
1000 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 2 |
220 |
1130 |
1000 |
40 |
1000 |
150 |
1000 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 3 |
200 |
1130 |
1020 |
45 |
1000 |
160 |
980 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 4 |
220 |
1130 |
1000 |
45 |
1000 |
80 |
900 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 5 |
220 |
1120 |
1010 |
40 |
1010 |
90 |
800 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 6 |
210 |
1130 |
1030 |
38 |
980 |
100 |
890 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 7 |
220 |
1100 |
1000 |
40 |
1000 |
120 |
1000 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 8 |
230 |
1130 |
1000 |
40 |
900 |
120 |
1000 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 9 |
230 |
1130 |
1000 |
40 |
900 |
120 |
1000 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 10 |
230 |
1130 |
1000 |
40 |
900 |
120 |
1000 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 11 |
200 |
1110 |
990 |
45 |
1000 |
110 |
1020 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 12 |
220 |
1120 |
930 |
40 |
900 |
120 |
1000 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 13 |
240 |
1110 |
1000 |
55 |
1000 |
130 |
1010 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 14 |
230 |
1050 |
1000 |
45 |
1060 |
130 |
1020 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 15 |
220 |
1090 |
1000 |
45 |
1010 |
210 |
1010 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 16 |
190 |
1120 |
990 |
45 |
1010 |
180 |
1060 |
No |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 17 |
240 |
1100 |
990 |
45 |
1020 |
160 |
1030 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 18 |
200 |
1110 |
970 |
30 |
1010 |
28 |
1000 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 19 |
220 |
1010 |
980 |
40 |
790 |
170 |
1020 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Comparative Example 20 |
210 |
890 |
980 |
40 |
1000 |
180 |
1010 |
Yes |
0.27 |
Table 2-2
Number |
Normalizing annealing temperature |
Normalizing annealing time |
Step 4 |
Step 5 |
Step 6 |
Step 7 |
Step 8 |
Cold rolling reduction ratio [%] |
Decarburizing annealing temperature [°C] |
Amount of nitriding [ppm] |
Annealing separator |
High-temperature annealing temperature [°C] |
High-temperature annealing time [h] |
Example 1 |
980 |
190 |
88 |
840 |
60 |
MgO |
1110 |
30 |
Example 2 |
950 |
100 |
89 |
860 |
100 |
MgO |
1140 |
36 |
Example 3 |
940 |
180 |
90 |
830 |
120 |
MgO |
1250 |
28 |
Example 4 |
880 |
150 |
92 |
880 |
160 |
MgO |
1220 |
29 |
Example 5 |
970 |
90 |
93 |
820 |
150 |
MgO |
1200 |
38 |
Example 6 |
960 |
140 |
89 |
810 |
180 |
MgO |
1180 |
34 |
Example 7 |
900 |
160 |
89 |
840 |
190 |
MgO |
1150 |
31 |
Example 8 |
800 |
80 |
89 |
850 |
80 |
MgO |
1100 |
26 |
Example 9 |
850 |
30 |
89 |
840 |
270 |
MgO |
1150 |
30 |
Example 10 |
- |
- |
89 |
840 |
250 |
MgO |
1150 |
30 |
Example 11 |
- |
- |
89 |
840 |
200 |
MgO |
1150 |
30 |
Example 12 |
850 |
80 |
89 |
840 |
200 |
MgO |
1150 |
30 |
Comparative Example 1 |
900 |
100 |
89 |
840 |
180 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 2 |
900 |
120 |
89 |
840 |
180 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 3 |
950 |
100 |
89 |
840 |
180 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 4 |
980 |
110 |
89 |
840 |
180 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 5 |
940 |
100 |
89 |
840 |
180 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 6 |
900 |
90 |
89 |
840 |
180 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 7 |
950 |
100 |
89 |
840 |
180 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 8 |
960 |
100 |
89 |
840 |
180 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 9 |
960 |
100 |
89 |
840 |
180 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 10 |
960 |
100 |
89 |
840 |
180 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 11 |
980 |
140 |
89 |
845 |
170 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 12 |
960 |
100 |
89 |
840 |
180 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 13 |
980 |
110 |
89 |
830 |
170 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 14 |
990 |
160 |
89 |
845 |
200 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 15 |
990 |
150 |
89 |
840 |
180 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 16 |
- |
- |
89 |
845 |
170 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 17 |
1010 |
150 |
89 |
840 |
170 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 18 |
950 |
210 |
89 |
840 |
220 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 19 |
950 |
15 |
89 |
910 |
290 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
Comparative Example 20 |
960 |
150 |
89 |
780 |
40 |
MgO |
1200 |
30 |
[0053] In step 5), the steel plates after decarburizing annealing of Examples 1-12 and Comparative
Examples 1-20 were sampled, then the proportion of Gaussian grains with a deviation
angle less than 3° of each sample was observed and analyzed by a scanning electron
microscope with an electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) system.
[0054] The proportion of Gaussian grains with a deviation angle less than 3° in the steel
plates after decarburizing annealing of Examples 1-12 and Comparative Examples 1-20
are shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Number |
Proportion of Gaussian grains with deviation angle less than 3° in steel plates after
decarburizing annealing (%) |
Example 1 |
12 |
Example 2 |
18 |
Example 3 |
21 |
Example 4 |
19 |
Example 5 |
17 |
Example 6 |
13 |
Example 7 |
14 |
Example 8 |
11 |
Example 9 |
22 |
Example 10 |
19 |
Example 11 |
20 |
Example 12 |
18 |
Comparative Example 1 |
8.2 |
Comparative Example 2 |
8.3 |
Comparative Example 3 |
8.4 |
Comparative Example 4 |
7.7 |
Comparative Example 5 |
6.1 |
Comparative Example 6 |
7.8 |
Comparative Example 7 |
6.4 |
Comparative Example 8 |
7.6 |
Comparative Example 9 |
6.8 |
Comparative Example 10 |
6.9 |
Comparative Example 11 |
8.9 |
Comparative Example 12 |
7.1 |
Comparative Example 13 |
7.9 |
Comparative Example 14 |
8.8 |
Comparative Example 15 |
9.2 |
Comparative Example 16 |
9.4 |
Comparative Example 17 |
3.6 |
Comparative Example 18 |
4.5 |
Comparative Example 19 |
4.8 |
Comparative Example 20 |
5.8 |
[0055] As shown in Table 3, the proportion of Gaussian grains with a deviation angle less
than 3° in the steel plate after decarburizing annealing of Examples 1-12 is 11%-22%.
In contrast, the proportion of Gaussian grains with a deviation angle less than 3°
in the steel plate after decarburizing and annealing of Comparative Examples 1-20
is 3.6%-9.4%, which is significantly lower than those of Examples 1-12.
[0056] The oriented silicon steel products manufactured in Examples 1-12 and Comparative
Examples 1-20 were sampled, and the magnetic properties of each sample were measured
and analyzed to obtain the magnetic induction intensity B8 and the magnetostrictive
vibration velocity sound pressure level L
vA of each oriented silicon steel sample.
[0057] In the present application, the related test methods for the magnetic properties
of the oriented silicon steel are described below:
Magnetic property test: the magnetic induction intensity of the oriented silicon steel
of Examples 1-12 and Comparative Examples 1-20 is determined in accordance with the
national standard GB/T 13789-2008 "Method for Measuring the Magnetic Properties of
Electrical Steel Sheets (Strips) with a Monolithic Tester".
[0058] Magnetostriction test: In accordance with IEC Technical Report IEC/TP 62581, the
magnetostrictive vibration velocity sound pressure level L
vA of Examples 1-12 and Comparative Examples 1-20 is determined by a non-contact laser
Doppler vibrometer at B=1.7 T and f=2 MPa (in the actual working conditions of the
transformer, the compressive stress applied to the oriented silicon steel is 2-3 MPa).
Herein, L
vA is the magnetostrictive vibration velocity sound pressure level of oriented silicon
steel under the test conditions described above. The unit is dB(A)
[0059] The magnetic induction intensity B8 and the magnetostrictive vibration velocity sound
pressure level L
vA of the oriented silicon steels of Examples 1-12 and Comparative Examples 1-20 are
shown in Table 4.
Table 4
Number |
B8 [T] |
LvA [dB(A)] |
Example 1 |
1.956 |
48 |
Example 2 |
1.962 |
46 |
Example 3 |
1.969 |
44 |
Example 4 |
1.958 |
45 |
Example 5 |
1.959 |
46 |
Example 6 |
1.956 |
47 |
Example 7 |
1.957 |
46 |
Example 8 |
1.954 |
48 |
Example 9 |
1.970 |
43 |
Example 10 |
1.967 |
45 |
Example 11 |
1.972 |
44 |
Example 12 |
1.965 |
45 |
Comparative Example 1 |
1.933 |
53 |
Comparative Example 2 |
1.912 |
58 |
Comparative Example 3 |
1.914 |
58 |
Comparative Example 4 |
1.891 |
60 |
Comparative Example 5 |
1.860 |
61 |
Comparative Example 6 |
1.908 |
58 |
Comparative Example 7 |
1.805 |
62 |
Comparative Example 8 |
1.899 |
58 |
Comparative Example 9 |
1.811 |
63 |
Comparative Example 10 |
1.899 |
60 |
Comparative Example 11 |
1.934 |
53 |
Comparative Example 12 |
1.913 |
55 |
Comparative Example 13 |
1.927 |
55 |
Comparative Example 14 |
1.932 |
55 |
Comparative Example 15 |
1.936 |
52 |
Comparative Example 16 |
1.939 |
51 |
Comparative Example 17 |
1.825 |
63 |
Comparative Example 18 |
1.804 |
64 |
Comparative Example 19 |
1.807 |
64 |
Comparative Example 20 |
1.819 |
63 |
[0060] As shown in Table 4, the magnetic induction intensity B8 of Examples 1-12 is 1.954-1.972
T, and the magnetostrictive vibration velocity sound pressure level L
vA is 43-48 dB(A). In contrast, the magnetic induction intensity B8 of Comparative
Examples 1-20 is 1.805-1.939 T (apparently lower than Examples 1-12), and the magnetostrictive
vibration velocity sound pressure level L
vA is 51-64 dB(A) (apparently higher than Examples 1-12).
[0061] As can be seen from Tables 1-4, the proportion of Gaussian grains with a deviation
angle less than 3° in the steel plates after decarburizing annealing of Examples 1-12
is significantly higher than that of Comparative Examples 1-20, and their magnetic
properties (in particular, the magnetic induction intensity B8 and L
vA) are significantly better than those of Comparative Examples 1-20.
[0062] After analyzing the proportion of Gaussian grains with a deviation angle less than
3° in the steel plate after decarburizing annealing, the present inventors surprisingly
found that different combinations of hot rolling and normalizing annealing process
parameters have a key influence on the deviation angle α of the Gaussian grain orientation
in the steel plate after decarburizing annealing. The proportion of Gaussian grains
with a deviation angle less than 3° in the steel plate after decarburizing annealing
can be significantly increased, especially within the range of the chemical composition
claimed in the present invention, by coiling and holding the rough-rolled plate at
a temperature of 800-1050°C while subsequent low-temperature normalizing annealing
(normalizing annealing temperatures of no more than 1000°C) is performed, or even
no normalizing annealing treatment is performed. The present inventors have found
through extensive experiments that the orientation degree of the Gaussian grain nuclei
in the primary recrystallization has a decisive influence on the Gaussian grain orientation
degree and the magnetic induction intensity of the product. As a result, the oriented
silicon steel manufactured according to the method of the present invention shows
a high level of matching between high magnetic induction intensity and low magnetostriction.
[0063] It should be noted that all the technical features recorded in this application may
be freely combined or incorporated in any manner, unless they contradict each other.
Various amendments and variations may be made to the present invention without departing
from the scope of the invention, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
For example, features shown or described as part of one embodiment may be used in
conjunction with another embodiment to produce yet another embodiment. Accordingly,
the present invention is intended to cover such amendments and variations as fall
within the scope of the attached claims and their equivalents.
1. An oriented silicon steel, comprising, in addition to 90% or more of Fe and inevitable
impurities, the following components in percentage by mass:
C: 0.020-0.080%, Si: 2.00-4.50%, Mn: 0.01-0.10%, S≤0.005%, acid soluble aluminum Als:
0.010-0.040%, N: 0.002-0.015%, Nb: 0.006-0.120%, and at least one selected from P:
0.01-0.10%, Sn: 0.01-0.30%, and Cu: 0.01-0.50%.
2. The oriented silicon steel as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that, the oriented silicon steel comprises the following components in percentage by mass:
C: 0.020-0.080%, Si: 2.00-4.50%, Mn: 0.01-0.10%, S≤0.005%, acid soluble aluminum Als:
0.010-0.040%, N: 0.002-0.015%, Nb: 0.006-0.120%, and at least one selected from P:
0.01-0.10%, Sn: 0.01-0.30%, and Cu: 0.01-0.50%; the balance of Fe and inevitable impurities.
3. The oriented silicon steel as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that, the oriented silicon steel has a thickness of 0.15-0.30 mm; preferably, the oriented
silicon steel has a magnetic induction intensity of B8>1.95 T and a magnetostrictive
vibration velocity sound pressure level of LvA <50 dB(A).
4. A method for manufacturing the oriented silicon steel as claimed in any one of claims
1-3, comprising the following steps:
1) Smelting and casting a molten steel to produce a slab;
2) Heating the slab;
3) Hot rolling, including roughing rolling, coiling and holding, and finishing rolling;
4) Cold rolling;
5) Decarburizing annealing;
6) Nitriding;
7) Applying an annealing separator;
8) High-temperature annealing;
9) Applying an insulation coating and performing scoring to produce an oriented silicon
steel.
5. The method as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that, in step 3), an end temperature of rough rolling is higher than 950°C, a coiling
temperature is 800-1050°C, a coiling time is 30-200s, and an initial temperature of
finishing rolling is lower than 1050°C.
6. The method as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that, after step 3) and before step 4), a normalizing annealing treatment is carried out,
and the normalizing annealing temperature does not exceed 1000°C, preferably 800-1000°C,
more preferably 800-980°C, and a normalizing annealing time is 20-200s.
7. The method as claimed in any one of claims 4-6, characterized in that, in step 2), a heating temperature of the slab is 900-1150°C.
8. The method as claimed in any one of claims 4-6,
characterized in that, the method satisfies one or more of the following:
in step 1), a thickness of the slab is 180-250 mm;
in step 3), a thickness of the intermediate slab at the end of rough rolling is 35-50
mm;
in step 4), a cold rolling reduction ratio is >80%; and
in step 7), the annealing separator is MgO.
9. The method as claimed in any one of claims 4-6, characterized in that, in step 5), a decarburizing annealing temperature is 800-900°C; preferably, a proportion
of Gaussian grains with a deviation angle less than 3° in the steel plate after decarburizing
annealing is more than 10%.
10. The method as claimed in any one of claims 4-6, characterized in that, in step 6), an amount of nitriding is 50-280 ppm.
11. The method as claimed in any one of claims 4-6, characterized in that, in step 8), an annealing temperature is 1100-1250°C and an annealing time is greater
than 25 hours.