[Technical Field]
[0001] The present invention relates to a smoking article filter in which a phenol functional
additive, which includes a phenol reducing material and a hydrophobic emulsion, is
added to lyocell tow to improve a remaining amount of the phenol reducing material,
a method of manufacturing the smoking article filter, and a smoking article including
the smoking article filter.
[Background Art]
[0002] Typical cigarette filters include cellulose acetate tow formed by extracting cellulose
from wood pulp and acetylating the extracted cellulose. Also, cigarette filters are
assembled into cigarette products, distributed to consumers, provided for smoking,
and then finally discarded after smoking is completed. Also, some cigarette filters
are directly discarded as manufacturing residue from a cigarette filter manufacturing
plant. This cigarette filter waste is collected as refuse and landfilled for disposal.
In addition, in some cases, smoked cigarettes are left in the natural environment
without being collected as refuse.
[0003] Accordingly, in recent years, research for replacing cellulose acetate tow with an
eco-friendly material to protect the natural environment and reduce costs has been
carried out. For example, the development of tow using lyocell fibers in which the
cellulose itself is fiberized, unlike cellulose acetate, is in progress.
[0004] In manufacturing a smoking article filter, a phenol reducing material that can specifically
reduce phenols generated during smoking is added to reduce phenols in mainstream smoke.
Conventionally, it is known that polyethylene glycol (PEG), triethyl citrate (TEC),
triacetin (TA), and the like are added as a phenol reducing material to cellulose
acetate tow. In a case where a phenol reducing material composed of PEG and TEC is
added to cellulose acetate which is hydrophobic, there is a problem in that the phenol
reducing material also serves as a plasticizer for cellulose acetate fibers and causes
the cellulose acetate fibers, which are hydrophobic, to bond to each other, thus reducing
biodegradability.
[0005] Meanwhile, since lyocell fibers are hydrophilic, even in a case where the phenol
reducing material is added to the lyocell fibers, the hydrophilic lyocell fibers are
not plasticized. Accordingly, in the case where the phenol reducing material, which
also conventionally serves as a plasticizer for cellulose acetate fibers, is applied
to the lyocell fibers, the phenol reducing material is unable to serve as a plasticizer
for the lyocell fibers and is not chemically bonded to the lyocell fibers. Accordingly,
there is an advantage in that biodegradability of the lyocell fibers is not reduced,
but since it is difficult for the added phenol reducing material to stably settle
on (bond to) the lyocell fibers, there is a problem in that the amount of the phenol
reducing material remaining in a cigarette filter to which lyocell tow made of lyocell
fibers is applied is not sufficient.
[0006] Accordingly, there is a need for a method of allowing a phenol reducing material
added to hydrophilic lyocell tow to stably settle on the lyocell tow to increase the
amount of the phenol reducing material remaining in a cigarette filter to which the
lyocell tow is applied.
[Disclosure]
[Technical Problem]
[0007] One object of the present invention is to provide a smoking article filter including
lyocell tow in which a phenol reducing material mixed with a hydrophobic emulsion
is added to the lyocell tow so that the phenol reducing material uniformly and stably
settles on the lyocell tow, thereby minimizing the loss of the phenol reducing material,
improving a remaining amount of the phenol reducing material, and having an excellent
phenol reducing effect.
[0008] Another object of the present invention is to provide a method of manufacturing a
smoking article filter including lyocell tow in which a process of adding a phenol
functional additive, which includes a phenol reducing material and a hydrophobic emulsion,
to lyocell fibers included in the lyocell tow is performed so that the phenol reducing
material can uniformly and stably settle on the lyocell tow.
[0009] Also, the another object of the present invention is to provide a method of manufacturing
a smoking article filter including lyocell tow in which, in a process of treating
lyocell fibers with an emulsion during a process of manufacturing the lyocell tow,
the emulsion is added using a mixed solution of a hydrophobic emulsion and a phenol
reducing material, thereby not requiring an additional process and improving the efficiency
of the manufacturing process.
[0010] Still another object of the present invention is to provide a smoking article including
a smoking article filter to which lyocell tow, to which a phenol functional additive
obtained by mixing a phenol reducing material and a hydrophobic emulsion is added,
is applied, thereby minimizing the loss of the phenol reducing material, improving
a remaining amount of the phenol reducing material, and having an excellent phenol
reducing effect.
[0011] The objects of the present invention are not limited to those mentioned above, and
other unmentioned objects can be clearly understood by those of ordinary skill in
the art to which the present invention pertains from the description below.
[Technical Solution]
[0012] One embodiment for achieving the one object provides a smoking article filter including:
lyocell tow including a plurality of lyocell fibers; and a phenol functional additive
dispersed in the lyocell tow and including a phenol reducing material and a hydrophobic
emulsion.
[0013] Also, the phenol reducing material may include one or more of triethyl citrate (TEC)
and polyethylene glycol (PEG).
[0014] Also, the phenol reducing material may include one of triethyl citrate (TEC) and
polyethylene glycol (PEG), and the content of the phenol reducing material relative
to the weight of the lyocell tow may range from 0.5 wt% to 15 wt%.
[0015] Also, the content of the phenol reducing material relative to the weight of the lyocell
tow may range from 1 wt% to 6 wt%.
[0016] Also, the phenol reducing material may include triethyl citrate (TEC) and polyethylene
glycol (PEG), and the content of the phenol reducing material relative to the weight
of the lyocell tow may range from 10 wt% to 30 wt%.
[0017] Also, the content of the phenol reducing material relative to the weight of the lyocell
tow may range from 15 wt% to 25 wt%.
[0018] Also, the phenol functional additive may be dispersed in the lyocell tow using a
brush type method or a spray type method.
[0019] Also, the lyocell tow in which the phenol functional additive is dispersed may be
manufactured by injecting a mixed solution of the phenol reducing material and the
hydrophobic emulsion onto the lyocell fibers using the spray type method and drying
the mixed solution.
[0020] The smoking article filter may be manufactured by injecting a mixed solution of the
phenol reducing material and the hydrophobic emulsion onto the lyocell tow, which
is manufactured using the lyocell fibers, using the brush type method and drying the
mixed solution.
[0021] One embodiment for achieving the another object provides a method of manufacturing
a smoking article filter, the method including: preparing a plurality of lyocell fibers;
preparing a mixed solution by mixing a phenol reducing material and a hydrophobic
emulsion; manufacturing lyocell tow in which a phenol functional additive including
the phenol reducing material and the hydrophobic emulsion is dispersed by injecting
the mixed solution onto the plurality of lyocell fibers and drying the mixed solution;
and wrapping the lyocell tow in which the phenol functional additive is dispersed
with wrapping paper, wherein the phenol reducing material includes one or more of
triethyl citrate (TEC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG).
[0022] Another embodiment for achieving the another object provides a method of manufacturing
a smoking article filter, the method including: preparing lyocell tow including a
plurality of lyocell fibers; preparing a mixed solution by mixing a phenol reducing
material and a hydrophobic emulsion; dispersing a phenol functional additive including
the phenol reducing material and the hydrophobic emulsion in the lyocell tow by injecting
the mixed solution onto the lyocell tow and drying the mixed solution; and wrapping
the lyocell tow in which the phenol functional additive is dispersed with wrapping
paper, wherein the phenol reducing material includes one or more of triethyl citrate
(TEC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG).
[0023] One embodiment for achieving the still another object provides a smoking article
including a smoking material portion, a filter portion, and a wrapper, wherein the
filter portion includes lyocell tow including a plurality of lyocell fibers and a
phenol functional additive dispersed in the lyocell tow and including a phenol reducing
material and a hydrophobic emulsion, and the phenol reducing material includes one
or more of triethyl citrate (TEC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG).
[Advantageous Effects]
[0024] According to a smoking article filter according to one embodiment, by adding a phenol
reducing material mixed with a hydrophobic emulsion to lyocell tow, the phenol reducing
material uniformly and stably settles on the lyocell tow, and thus the loss of the
phenol reducing material can be minimized, a remaining amount of the phenol reducing
material can be improved, and the phenol reducing performance of the smoking article
filter to which the lyocell fibers are applied can be improved.
[0025] According to a smoking article filter according to some embodiments, by adding a
phenol reducing material mixed with a hydrophobic emulsion to lyocell tow, the hydrophobic
emulsion settles on lyocell fibers constituting the lyocell tow, and thus surfaces
of the lyocell fibers become hydrophobic, and it is possible to prevent moisture from
penetrating into the lyocell tow during storage of the lyocell tow.
[0026] Advantageous effects according to the technical spirit of the present disclosure
are not limited to those mentioned above, and other unmentioned advantageous effects
can be clearly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art from the description
above.
[Description of Drawings]
[0027] FIG. 1 is a view illustrating a schematic configuration of a smoking article according
to one embodiment of the present invention.
[Modes of the Invention]
[0028] Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in
detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Advantages and features of the
present disclosure and methods of achieving the same should become clear with embodiments
described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, the
technical spirit of the present disclosure is not limited to the following embodiments
and may be implemented in various different forms. The following embodiments are only
provided to make the technical spirit of the present disclosure complete and completely
inform those of ordinary skill in the art to which the present disclosure pertains
of the scope of the present disclosure. The technical spirit of the present disclosure
is defined only by the scope of the claims.
[0029] In assigning reference numerals to components of each drawing, it should be noted
that the same reference numerals are assigned to the same components wherever possible
even when the components are illustrated in different drawings. Also, in describing
the present disclosure, when it is determined that the detailed description of a known
related configuration or function may obscure the gist of the present disclosure,
the detailed description thereof will be omitted.
[0030] Unless otherwise defined, all terms including technical or scientific terms used
herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in
the art to which the present disclosure pertains. Terms defined in commonly used dictionaries
should not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly
so defined herein. Terms used herein are for describing the embodiments and are not
intended to limit the present disclosure. In the specification, a singular expression
includes a plural expression unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
[0031] Also, in describing components of the present disclosure, terms such as first, second,
A, B, (a), and (b) may be used. Such terms are only used for distinguishing one component
from another component, and the essence, order, sequence, or the like of the corresponding
component is not limited by the terms. In a case in which a certain component is described
as being "connected," "coupled," or "linked" to another component, it should be understood
that, although the component may be directly connected or linked to the other component,
still another component may also be "connected," "coupled," or "linked" between the
two components.
[0032] The terms "comprises" and/or "comprising" used herein do not preclude the presence
or addition of one or more components, steps, operations, and/or devices other than
those mentioned.
[0033] First, some terms used herein will be clarified.
[0034] In the present specification, "smoking article" may refer to any product that can
be smoked or any product that can provide a smoking experience, regardless of whether
the product is based on tobacco, tobacco derivatives, expanded tobacco, reconstituted
tobacco, or tobacco substitutes. For example, smoking articles may include products
that can be smoked, such as cigarettes, cigars, and cigarillos.
[0035] In the present specification, "smoking material" may refer to any type of material
that may be used in a smoking article.
[0036] In the present specification, "upstream" or "upstream direction" may refer to a direction
moving away from an oral region of a smoker, and "downstream" or "downstream direction"
may refer to a direction approaching the oral region of the smoker.
[0037] In the present specification, "longitudinal direction" may refer to a direction corresponding
to a longitudinal axis of a smoking article.
[0038] Hereinafter, various embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in detail
with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[0039] FIG. 1 is a view illustrating a schematic configuration of a smoking article according
to one embodiment of the present invention.
[0040] Throughout the specification, "smoking article" may refer to anything capable of
generating an aerosol, such as tobacco (cigarettes) and cigars. The smoking article
may include an aerosol-generating material or an aerosol-forming substrate. Also,
the smoking article may include a solid material based on tobacco raw materials, such
as reconstituted tobacco leaves, shredded tobacco, and reconstituted tobacco. A smoking
material may include volatile compounds.
[0041] Also, throughout the specification, "upstream" or "upstream direction" refers to
a direction moving away from an oral region of a user smoking a smoking article 100,
and "downstream" or "downstream direction" refers to a direction approaching the oral
region of the user smoking the smoking article 100. For example, in the smoking article
100 illustrated in FIG. 1, a smoking material portion 10 is disposed upstream or in
an upstream direction of a smoking article filter portion 20 (a smoking article filter
20 or a filter portion 20).
[0042] Further, in the specification, a case where the smoking article 100 is a combustion-type
cigarette is described as an example. However, the present invention is not limited
thereto, and the smoking article 100 may also be a heating-type cigarette or the like
that is used together with an aerosol generation device (not illustrated) such as
an electronic cigarette device.
[0043] The present invention relates to the smoking article filter 20 (or the smoking article
filter portion 20) included in the smoking article 100, and the smoking article filter
20 according to one embodiment of the present invention includes lyocell tow including
a plurality of lyocell fibers and a phenol functional additive dispersed in the lyocell
tow and including a phenol reducing material and a hydrophobic emulsion. The lyocell
fibers are eco-friendly fibers made of cellulose extracted from wood pulp. The lyocell
tow refers to a bundle formed by cross-connecting adjacent lyocell fibers.
[0044] In an exemplary embodiment, the lyocell fibers may have a shaped cross-section. The
shaped cross-section is defined as a cross-section having a shape including a plurality
of protrusions instead of having a circular shape. For example, a cross-section having
a shape in which a plurality of protrusions extend from the center may be referred
to as "shaped cross-section."
[0045] In an exemplary embodiment, the lyocell fibers may have a Y-shaped cross-section
with three protrusions branching from the center, a cross-shaped cross-section with
four protrusions, a star-shaped cross-section with five protrusions, or an O-shaped
cross-section, but the present invention is not limited thereto.
[0046] In one embodiment, the phenol functional additive may include a phenol reducing material
and a hydrophobic emulsion. The phenol functional additive may be formed to be dispersed
in the lyocell tow through a process of injecting a mixed solution, which is prepared
by mixing the phenol reducing material and the hydrophobic emulsion, onto the lyocell
fibers or the lyocell tow and then drying the mixed solution during the process of
manufacturing the smoking article filter.
[0047] In some embodiments, the phenol functional additive may be dispersed in the lyocell
tow by injecting a mixed solution, which is prepared by mixing the phenol reducing
material and the hydrophobic emulsion, onto the lyocell fibers or the lyocell tow
using a brush type method or a spray type method and drying the mixed solution.
[0048] As will be described below, the mixed solution prepared by mixing the phenol reducing
material and the hydrophobic emulsion may be injected onto the lyocell fibers during
the process of manufacturing the lyocell tow or may be injected onto the lyocell tow
manufactured using lyocell fibers during the process of manufacturing the smoking
article filter 20.
[0049] In one embodiment, the phenol reducing material corresponds to a substance that can
specifically reduce phenols generated during smoking, and types of the phenol reducing
material may include one or more of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and triethyl citrate
(TEC). However, the phenol reducing material is not limited thereto and may be any
other substance as long as the substance can reduce phenols generated during smoking.
[0050] The smoking article filter according to the present invention is manufactured by
mixing the phenol reducing material and the hydrophobic emulsion and injecting the
mixed solution thereof onto the lyocell tow and thus may have an excellent phenol
reducing effect. As will be described below, since the hydrophobic emulsion and the
phenol reducing material are mixed and the mixed solution thereof is added to the
lyocell tow in the smoking article filter according to the present invention, the
smoking article filter according to the present invention may have a greater effect
of reducing phenols generated during smoking than a smoking article filter to which
the phenol reducing material is not added. Specifically, the content of phenols in
smoke that has passed through the smoking article filter including the phenol reducing
material according to the present invention may be reduced by 49% or more, 50% or
more, 51% or more, or 52% or more compared to the content of phenols in smoke that
has passed through the smoking article filter not including the phenol reducing material.
[0051] In some embodiments, the phenol reducing material may include one of polyethylene
glycol (PEG) and triethyl citrate (TEC). In the case where the phenol reducing material
includes one of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and triethyl citrate (TEC), the content
of the phenol reducing material relative to the weight of the lyocell tow may range
from 0.5 wt% to 15 wt%, 0.5 wt% to 12 wt%, 0.5 wt% to 10 wt%, 0.5 wt% to 8 wt%, 1
wt% to 6 wt%, 2 wt% to 5 wt%, 2.1 wt% to 4.9 wt%, or 2.25 wt% to 4.8 wt%.
[0052] In some embodiments, the phenol reducing material may include triethyl citrate (TEC).
In the case where the phenol reducing material includes triethyl citrate (TEC), the
content of triethyl citrate (TEC) relative to the weight of the lyocell tow may range
from 0.5 wt% to 15 wt%, 0.5 wt% to 12 wt%, 0.5 wt% to 10 wt%, 0.5 wt% to 8 wt%, 1
wt% to 6 wt%, 2 wt% to 5 wt%, 2.1 wt% to 4.8 wt%, or 2.3 wt% to 4.7 wt%.
[0053] In some embodiments, the phenol reducing material may include triethyl citrate (TEC),
and the triethyl citrate (TEC) may be added by being injected together with the hydrophobic
emulsion in the process of manufacturing lyocell tow. Specifically, triethyl citrate
(TEC) may be added by being injected onto the lyocell fibers together with the hydrophobic
emulsion during the process of manufacturing the lyocell tow, and in this case, the
content of triethyl citrate (TEC) relative to the weight of the lyocell tow may range
from 2.5 wt% to 4.9 wt%, 2.6 wt% to 4.8 wt%, or 2.7 wt% to 4.75 wt%, preferably, from
2.75 wt% to 2.85 wt%, 4.65 wt%, or 4.75 wt%.
[0054] In some other embodiments, the phenol reducing material may include triethyl citrate
(TEC), and the triethyl citrate (TEC) may be added by being injected together with
the hydrophobic emulsion in the process of manufacturing the smoking article filter
using lyocell tow. Specifically, triethyl citrate (TEC) may be added by being injected
together with the hydrophobic emulsion onto the lyocell tow manufactured using lyocell
fibers during the process of manufacturing the smoking article filter, and in this
case, the content of triethyl citrate (TEC) relative to the weight of the lyocell
tow may range from 2 wt% to 4.5 wt%, 2.1 wt% to 4.4 wt%, or 2.2 wt% to 4.3 wt%, preferably,
from 2.25 wt% to 2.35 wt%, 4.15 wt%, or 4.25 wt%.
[0055] In some embodiments, the phenol reducing material may include polyethylene glycol
(PEG).
[0056] In some embodiments, polyethylene glycol (PEG) included in the phenol reducing material
has a weight average molecular weight (MW) in a range of 100 to 10,000, preferably
in a range of 100 to 8,000, more preferably in a range of 100 to 2,000, and most preferably
in a range of 500 to 700. In a case where the phenol functional additive dispersed
in the lyocell tow includes polyethylene glycol (PEG) having a weight average molecular
weight (MW) in the above range as the phenol reducing material, the phenol reducing
performance of the smoking article filter manufactured using the lyocell tow may be
excellent.
[0057] In a case where the phenol reducing material includes polyethylene glycol (PEG),
the content of polyethylene glycol (PEG) relative to the weight of the lyocell tow
may range from 0.5 wt% to 15 wt%, 0.5 wt% to 12 wt%, 0.5 wt% to 10 wt%, 0.5 wt% to
8 wt%, 1 wt% to 6 wt%, 2 wt% to 5 wt%, 2.2 wt% to 4.95 wt%, 2.35 wt% to 4.9 wt%, or
2.4 wt% to 4.85 wt%.
[0058] In some embodiments, the phenol reducing material may include polyethylene glycol
(PEG), and the polyethylene glycol (PEG) may be added by being injected together with
the hydrophobic emulsion in the process of manufacturing lyocell tow. Specifically,
polyethylene glycol (PEG) may be added by being injected together with the hydrophobic
emulsion onto the lyocell fibers during the process of manufacturing the lyocell tow,
and in this case, the content of polyethylene glycol (PEG) relative to the weight
of the lyocell tow may range from 2.6 wt% to 4.95 wt%, 2.7 wt% to 4.9 wt%, or 2.75
wt% to 4.85 wt%, preferably, from 2.8 wt% to 2.85 wt%, 4.8 wt%, or 4.85 wt%.
[0059] In some other embodiments, the phenol reducing material may include polyethylene
glycol (PEG), and the polyethylene glycol (PEG) may be added by being injected together
with the hydrophobic emulsion in the process of manufacturing the smoking article
filter using lyocell tow. Specifically, polyethylene glycol (PEG) may be added by
being injected together with the hydrophobic emulsion onto the lyocell tow manufactured
using lyocell fibers during the process of manufacturing the smoking article filter,
and in this case, the content of polyethylene glycol (PEG) relative to the weight
of the lyocell tow may range from 2.1 wt% to 4.6 wt%, 2.2 wt% to 4.5 wt%, 2.3 wt%
to 4.4 wt%, or 2.4 wt% to 4.35 wt%, preferably, from 2.4 wt% to 2.5 wt%, 4.25 wt%,
or 4.35 wt%.
[0060] In some embodiments, the phenol reducing material may include both polyethylene glycol
(PEG) and triethyl citrate (TEC). In the case where the phenol reducing material includes
polyethylene glycol (PEG) and triethyl citrate (TEC), the content of the phenol functional
additive relative to the weight of the lyocell tow may range from 5 wt% to 30 wt%,
7 wt% to 28 wt%, 10 wt% to 25 wt%, 12 wt% to 23 wt%, 15 wt% to 20 wt%, 16 wt% to 19.5
wt%, or 16.5 wt% to 19 wt%.
[0061] In some embodiments, the phenol reducing material may include polyethylene glycol
(PEG) and triethyl citrate (TEC), and the phenol reducing material including the polyethylene
glycol (PEG) and triethyl citrate (TEC) may be added by being injected together with
the hydrophobic emulsion in the process of manufacturing lyocell tow. Specifically,
polyethylene glycol (PEG) and triethyl citrate (TEC) may be added by being injected
together with the hydrophobic emulsion onto the lyocell fibers during the process
of manufacturing lyocell tow, and in this case, the total content of polyethylene
glycol (PEG) and triethyl citrate (TEC) relative to the weight of the lyocell tow
may range from 16 wt% to 20 wt%, 17 wt% to 19 wt%, or 18.5 wt% to 19 wt%.
[0062] In one embodiment, the hydrophobic emulsion may be an emulsion applied to lyocell
fibers and developed exclusively for lyocell, unlike emulsions used in general fibers.
The hydrophobic emulsion may include a hydrophobic component for the phenol reducing
material to uniformly and stably settle on the hydrophilic lyocell fibers or lyocell
tow. The hydrophobic emulsion is a component harmless to the human body and may also
be used in food.
[0063] Since the phenol reducing material is mixed with the hydrophobic emulsion and added
to the lyocell tow constituting the smoking article filter according to the present
invention, compatibility between the phenol reducing material and the hydrophilic
lyocell surface is improved, and thus the phenol reducing material may stably settle
on the lyocell surface due to the hydrophobic emulsion. Accordingly, it is possible
to prevent a decrease in content of the phenol reducing material that settles and
stays on surfaces of the lyocell fibers or a surface of the lyocell tow, and as a
result, it is possible to provide a smoking article filter with excellent phenol reducing
performance.
[0064] Also, since the surfaces of the lyocell fibers or surface of the lyocell tow may
become hydrophobic by mixing the hydrophobic emulsion and the phenol reducing material
and adding the mixture to the hydrophilic lyocell tow, the saliva of the smoker may
be delayed from penetrating into the filter during smoking to prevent a phenomenon
in which the shape of the smoking article filter including lyocell tow is changed
due to the saliva of the smoker and the hardness of the smoking article filter is
lowered, and the ability to preserve the smoking article filter may be improved.
[0065] In some embodiments, the hydrophobic emulsion may further include a compound which
may serve as a type of lubricant or oil. The hydrophobic emulsion may include a component
that imparts lubricity to lyocell fibers added to a crimper in a crimping process
during the process of manufacturing lyocell tow, but the present invention is not
limited thereto.
[0066] In some embodiments, a smoking article filter including lyocell tow in which the
phenol functional additive is dispersed has a hardness of 70% or more. In an exemplary
embodiment, the hardness of the smoking article filter may range from 70% to 90%,
75% to 90%, 80% to 90%, or 85% to 90%. The hardness of the smoking article filter
is a numerical value of a degree to which a diameter of the smoking article filter
is maintained when the smoking article filter is pressed with a force of a certain
level in a direction perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of the smoking article
filter and may be a percentage value of a ratio of a diameter of the smoking article
filter after the force is applied to a diameter of the smoking article filter before
the force is applied.
[0067] Hereinafter, a method of manufacturing the above-described smoking article filter
will be described.
<First manufacturing method> Manufacturing lyocell tow by injecting mixed solution
of phenol reducing material and hydrophobic emulsion onto lyocell fibers
[0068] A method of manufacturing the smoking article filter according to one embodiment
includes preparing a plurality of lyocell fibers, preparing a mixed solution by mixing
a phenol reducing material and a hydrophobic emulsion, manufacturing lyocell tow in
which a phenol functional additive including the phenol reducing material and the
hydrophobic emulsion is dispersed by injecting the mixed solution onto the plurality
of lyocell fibers and drying the mixed solution, and wrapping the lyocell tow in which
the phenol functional additive is dispersed with wrapping paper, wherein the phenol
reducing material includes one or more of triethyl citrate (TEC) and polyethylene
glycol (PEG).
[0069] Since the above manufacturing method basically relates to a method of manufacturing
the above-described smoking article filter, description of parts that have been described
in detail above will be omitted, and hereinafter, features of the manufacturing method
will be described in more detail.
[0070] First, a plurality of lyocell fibers are prepared.
[0071] Then, a phenol reducing material and a hydrophobic emulsion are mixed to prepare
a mixed solution. The phenol reducing material may include one or more of triethyl
citrate (TEC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG).
[0072] In some embodiments, in a case where the phenol reducing material includes both polyethylene
glycol (PEG) and triethyl citrate (TEC), a ratio of the content of triethyl citrate
(TEC) added to the mixed solution to the content of polyethylene glycol (PEG) added
to the mixed solution may range from 0.2 to 5.0.
[0073] Then, the mixed solution of the phenol reducing material and the hydrophobic emulsion
is injected onto surfaces of the lyocell fibers. In one embodiment, the mixed solution
may be directly injected onto the surfaces of the lyocell fibers by a spray type method.
The spray type method is a method in which a liquid is injected through a spray nozzle.
[0074] In some embodiments, the amount of the mixed solution injected onto the lyocell fibers
may be 15 wt% or less relative to the weight of the lyocell tow, but the present invention
is not limited thereto.
[0075] Meanwhile, in this operation, since the phenol reducing material made of triethyl
citrate (TEC) or polyethylene glycol (PEG) is mixed with the hydrophobic emulsion
and the mixed solution is injected onto the lyocell fibers, hydrophobicity is imparted
to the hydrophilic surfaces of the lyocell fibers by the hydrophobic emulsion, and
thus the phenol reducing material may uniformly and stably settle on the surfaces
of the lyocell fibers.
[0076] Then, the lyocell fibers onto which the mixed solution is injected are dried to manufacture
lyocell tow in which the phenol functional additive including the phenol reducing
material and the hydrophobic emulsion is dispersed on the surfaces of the lyocell
fibers. The drying process may be performed at room temperature or a high temperature
using a general method known in the art
[0077] Then, the manufactured lyocell tow in which the phenol functional additive is dispersed
is wrapped with wrapping paper to manufacture a smoking article filter. When needed,
the lyocell tow may be cut into sizes suitable for application to a smoking article
filter using a mechanical roll, a cutter, or the like.
<Second manufacturing method> Manufacturing filter by injecting mixed solution of
phenol reducing material and hydrophobic emulsion onto lyocell tow manufactured using
lyocell fibers
[0078] A method of manufacturing the smoking article filter according to another embodiment
includes preparing lyocell tow including a plurality of lyocell fibers, preparing
a mixed solution by mixing a phenol reducing material and a hydrophobic emulsion,
dispersing a phenol functional additive including the phenol reducing material and
the hydrophobic emulsion in the lyocell tow by injecting the mixed solution onto the
lyocell tow and drying the mixed solution, and wrapping the lyocell tow in which the
phenol functional additive is dispersed with wrapping paper, wherein the phenol reducing
material includes one or more of triethyl citrate (TEC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG).
[0079] That is, the method of manufacturing the smoking article filter according to another
embodiment is different from the previously described manufacturing method in that
the mixed solution of the phenol reducing material and the hydrophobic emulsion is
injected onto the lyocell tow manufactured using lyocell fibers. Hereinafter, for
convenience of description, differences from the previously-described method of manufacturing
the smoking article filter according to one embodiment will be mainly described.
[0080] First, lyocell tow is manufactured using lyocell fibers. A process of manufacturing
lyocell tow using lyocell fibers may be performed using a general method known in
the art. For example, a process such as treating lyocell fibers with an emulsion or
imparting crimps to lyocell fibers may be performed to manufacture lyocell tow using
lyocell fibers.
[0081] Then, a phenol reducing material and a hydrophobic emulsion are mixed to prepare
a mixed solution.
[0082] Then, the prepared mixed solution is injected onto a surface of the lyocell tow manufactured
using lyocell fibers. In one embodiment, the mixed solution may be indirectly injected
onto the surface of the lyocell tow using a brush type method. The brush type method
is a method in which a liquid is injected by splashing the liquid through the rotation
of a brush roller.
[0083] Meanwhile, in this operation, since the phenol reducing material made of triethyl
citrate (TEC) or polyethylene glycol (PEG) is mixed with the hydrophobic emulsion
and the mixed solution is injected onto the lyocell tow, hydrophobicity is imparted
to the hydrophilic surface of the lyocell tow by the hydrophobic emulsion, and thus
the phenol reducing material may uniformly and stably settle on the surface of the
lyocell tow.
[0084] Then, the lyocell tow onto which the mixed solution is injected is dried to disperse
the phenol functional additive including the phenol reducing material and the hydrophobic
emulsion in the lyocell tow. Then, the lyocell tow in which the phenol functional
additive is dispersed is wrapped with wrapping paper.
[0085] Hereinafter, the configurations of the present invention and the advantageous effects
according thereto will be described in more detail using examples and comparative
examples. However, the examples are merely for describing the present invention in
more detail, and the scope of the present invention is not limited to these examples.
Comparative Example 1
[0086] Using filter manufacturing equipment manufactured by TYM Co., Ltd. (whose operational
mechanism is the same as cellulose acetate (CA) tow filter manufacturing equipment),
lyocell tow including a plurality of lyocell fibers was wrapped with wrapping paper
to manufacture a smoking article filter having a weight of about 865 mg and a circumference
of about 24.58 mm.
Example 1
[0087] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Comparative Example
1 except that a mixed solution of a hydrophobic emulsion and TEC was added (injected).
Specifically, a mixed solution was prepared by mixing a hydrophobic emulsion and 11.3
wt% of TEC relative to the weight of lyocell tow. The mixed solution was injected
onto the same lyocell tow as the lyocell tow of Comparative Example 1 and dried to
manufacture a smoking article filter.
Example 2
[0088] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Comparative Example
1 except that a mixed solution of a hydrophobic emulsion and PEG was added (injected).
Specifically, a mixed solution was prepared by mixing a hydrophobic emulsion and 2.8
wt% of PEG relative to the weight of lyocell tow. The mixed solution was injected
onto the same lyocell tow as the lyocell tow of Comparative Example 1 and dried to
manufacture a smoking article filter.
Example 3
[0089] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Comparative Example
1 except that a mixed solution of a hydrophobic emulsion, PEG, and TEC was added (injected).
Specifically, a mixed solution was prepared by mixing a hydrophobic emulsion, 11.3
wt% of TEC relative to the weight of lyocell tow, and 2.8 wt% of PEG relative to the
weight of the lyocell tow. The mixed solution was injected onto the same lyocell tow
as the lyocell tow of Comparative Example 1 and dried to manufacture a smoking article
filter.
[Experimental Example 1]: Physical evaluation comparison of smoking article filters
according to addition of mixed solution
[0090] Physical properties of the smoking article filters according to Comparative Example
1 and Examples 1 to 3 were evaluated, and results thereof are shown in Table 1 below.
[Table 1]
| Information |
Weight (mg) |
Circumference (mm) |
Resistance to draw (mmWG) |
| Comparative Example 1 |
865 |
24.58 |
148 |
| Example 1 (11.3% TEC) |
871 |
24.57 |
146.6 |
| Example 2 (2.8% PEG) |
866 |
24.59 |
148 |
| Example 3 (11.3% TEC+2.8% PEG) |
877 |
24.6 |
147.1 |
[0091] As shown in Table 1 above, it can be seen that the smoking article filters according
to Examples 1 to 3 manufactured by injecting the mixed solution of a phenol reducing
material and the hydrophobic emulsion onto the lyocell tow have similar values in
terms of all of resistance to draw, weight, and circumference compared to the smoking
article filter according to Comparative Example 1 in which an additive was not added
to the lyocell tow. Accordingly, it can be seen that physical properties of the smoking
article filters to which lyocell tow, in which a phenol functional additive including
a phenol reducing material and a hydrophobic emulsion is dispersed, is applied are
maintained.
[Experimental Example 2]: Evaluation of phenol reducing performance of smoking article
filters according to addition of mixed solution
[0092] Smoking articles were manufactured using the smoking article filters of Comparative
Example 1 and Examples 1 to 3, smoke components emitted during smoking using the cigarette
smoking machine HAUNI LX20 manual (linear type) as a smoking device were collected
using a Cambridge filter pad (CFP), and in order to extract substances from the smoke
components collected on the CFP, 30 mL of 1% acetic acid was added and then stirred,
and the substances were filtered using a 0.45 µm PVDF syringe filter and analyzed
using an Alliance HPLC-FLD analysis device of Waters Corporation, and results thereof
are shown in Table 2 below.
[Table 2]
| Information |
Comparative Example 1 |
Example 1 (11.3% TEC) |
Example 2 (2.8% PEG) |
Example 3 (11.3 % TEC+2.8% PEG) |
| Catechol (µg) |
94.6 |
88.30 |
81.5 |
88.8 |
| Hydroquinone (µg) |
105.4 |
103.5 |
99.8 |
106.3 |
| m+p cresols (µg) |
23.5 |
17.1 |
16.6 |
106.3 |
| o-Cresol (µg) |
10.2 |
6.6 |
6.5 |
5.1 |
| Phenol (µg) |
43.4 |
29.0 |
26.5 |
21.9 |
| Resorcinol (µg) |
2.7 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
[0093] As shown in Table 2 above, it can be seen that 43.4 µg of phenol was detected in
the smoke of the smoking article manufactured using the smoking article filter of
Comparative Example 1 in which the mixed solution of a phenol reducing material and
the hydrophobic emulsion was not added to the lyocell tow, and 29 µg of phenol, 26.5
µg of phenol, and 21.9 µg of phenol were detected in the smoke of the smoking articles
manufactured using the smoking article filters of Examples 1 to 3 manufactured by
injecting the mixed solution of a phenol reducing material and the hydrophobic emulsion
onto the lyocell tow. It can be seen that a phenol reducing effect is greater by about
50% or more in Examples 1 to 3 compared to Comparative Example 1.
Comparative Example 2
[0094] A smoking article filter was manufactured by directly injecting a hydrophobic emulsion
onto lyocell fibers using a spray type method and drying the hydrophobic emulsion
to manufacture lyocell tow, and then wrapping the manufactured lyocell tow with wrapping
paper.
Example 4
[0095] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Comparative Example
2 except that a mixed solution of the hydrophobic emulsion and 3 wt% of TEC relative
to the weight of the lyocell tow was injected onto the lyocell fibers and dried to
manufacture the lyocell tow.
Example 5
[0096] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 4 except
that 5 wt% of TEC relative to the weight of the lyocell tow was included in the mixed
solution injected onto the lyocell fibers.
Example 6
[0097] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 4 except
that 3 wt% of PEG relative to the weight of the lyocell tow was included as a phenol
reducing material in the mixed solution injected onto the lyocell fibers.
Example 7
[0098] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 6 except
that 5 wt% of PEG relative to the weight of the lyocell tow was included in the mixed
solution injected onto the lyocell fibers.
Example 8
[0099] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Comparative Example
2 except that the mixed solution injected onto the lyocell fibers included both TEC
and PEG as a phenol reducing material, and 20 wt% of the phenol reducing material
was included relative to the weight of the lyocell tow.
Comparative Example 3
[0100] A smoking article filter was manufactured by indirectly injecting a hydrophobic emulsion
onto lyocell tow manufactured using lyocell fibers using a brush type method and drying
the hydrophobic emulsion, and then wrapping the lyocell tow with wrapping paper.
Example 9
[0101] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Comparative Example
3 except that a mixed solution of the hydrophobic emulsion and 3 wt% of TEC relative
to the weight of the lyocell tow was injected onto the lyocell tow.
Example 10
[0102] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 9 except
that 5 wt% of TEC relative to the weight of the lyocell tow was included in the mixed
solution injected onto the lyocell tow.
Example 11
[0103] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 9 except
that 3 wt% of PEG relative to the weight of the lyocell tow was included as a phenol
reducing material in the mixed solution injected onto the lyocell tow.
Example 12
[0104] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 11 except
that 5 wt% of PEG relative to the weight of the lyocell tow was included in the mixed
solution injected onto the lyocell tow.
Example 13
[0105] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Comparative Example
3 except that the mixed solution injected onto the lyocell tow included both TEC and
PEG as a phenol reducing material, and 20 wt% of the phenol reducing material was
included relative to the weight of the lyocell tow.
[Experimental Example 3]: Analysis of amount of phenol reducing material remaining
in smoking article filters
[0106] In order to measure the amount of a phenol reducing material remaining in the smoking
article filters of Comparative Examples 2 and 3 and Examples 4 to 13, portions of
the smoking article filters were randomly collected and the weights of filter samples
were measured, and in order to measure the weight of wrapping paper, the lyocell tow
portion was removed from the smoking article filters and the weight of the wrapping
paper was measured. Then, 50 mL of an extraction solution included in an internal
standard solution was added to each collected filter sample and stirred for 60 minutes
to analyze the TEC component using GC-FID (DB-WAX column) and analyze the PEG component
using a HPLD device in order to measure remaining amounts of the phenol reducing materials.
Results thereof are shown in Table 3 below.
[Table 3]
| |
Added amount of phenol reducing material (wt%) |
Remaining amount of phenol reducing material (wt%) |
| Injecting mixed solution onto lyocell fibers (spray method) |
Comparative Example 2 |
0 |
0 |
| Example 4 |
3 |
2.81 |
| Example 5 |
5 |
4.70 |
| Example 6 |
3 |
2.83 |
| Example 7 |
5 |
4.82 |
| Example 8 |
20 |
18.75 |
| Injecting mixed solution onto lyocell tow (brush method) |
Comparative Example 3 |
0 |
0 |
| Example 9 |
3 |
2.30 |
| Example 10 |
5 |
4.21 |
| Example 11 |
3 |
2.44 |
| Example 12 |
5 |
4.30 |
| Example 13 |
20 |
16.78 |
[0107] As shown in Table 3 above, it can be seen that the amounts of a phenol reducing material
remaining in the smoking article filters are different according to a method of injecting
the mixed solution of the hydrophobic emulsion and the same amount of phenol reducing
material. Specifically, it can be seen that the amount of phenol reducing material
remaining in the lyocell tow was greater in Examples 4 to 8 in which a phenol reducing
material was mixed with the hydrophobic emulsion, and the mixed solution was injected
onto the lyocell fibers using the spray method, compared to Examples 9 to 13 in which
a phenol reducing material was mixed with the hydrophobic emulsion, and the mixed
solution was injected onto the lyocell tow using the brush method. This is considered
to be due to the fact that, by injecting the mixed solution onto the lyocell fibers
using the spray method during the process of manufacturing lyocell tow, the mixed
solution can be more uniformly applied compared to when the brush method is used,
and a surface area of lyocell on which the mixed solution may settle increases in
the case where the mixed solution is injected onto the lyocell fibers, compared to
the case where the mixed solution is injected onto the lyocell tow.
[Experimental Example 4]: Evaluation of phenol reducing performance of smoking article
filters according to type and content of phenol reducing material
[0108] Smoking articles were manufactured using the smoking article filters of Comparative
Examples 2 and 3 and Examples 4 to 13, smoke components emitted during smoking using
the cigarette smoking machine HAUNI LX20 manual (linear type) as a smoking device
were collected using a Cambridge filter pad (CFP), and in order to extract substances
from the smoke components collected on the CFP, 30 mL of 1% acetic acid was added
and then stirred, and the substances were filtered using a 0.45 µm PVDF syringe filter
and analyzed using an Alliance HPLC-FLD analysis device of Waters Corporation, and
results thereof are shown in Table 4 below.
[Table 4]
| |
Phenol (ug/cig) |
| Injecting mixed solution onto lyocell fibers (spray method) |
Comparative Example 2 |
41.87 |
| Example 4 |
23.93 |
| Example 5 |
20.91 |
| Example 6 |
23.10 |
| Example 7 |
19.89 |
| Example 8 |
6.80 |
| Injecting mixed solution onto lyocell tow (brush method) |
Comparative Example 3 |
42.57 |
| Example 9 |
31.46 |
| Example 10 |
30.31 |
| Example 11 |
30.87 |
| Example 12 |
29.87 |
| Example 13 |
10.60 |
[0109] As shown in Table 4 above, it can be seen that the amount of delivered phenol significantly
decreased in Examples 4 to 13 in which the mixed solution of a phenol reducing material
and the hydrophobic emulsion was added to the lyocell tow, compared to Comparative
Examples 2 and 3 in which the mixed solution of a phenol reducing material and the
hydrophobic emulsion was not added to the lyocell tow. Specifically, it can be seen
that a phenol reducing effect is greater by about 49% or more or 50% or more in Examples
4 to 13 compared to Comparative Examples 2 and 3.
[0110] Also, it can be seen that the phenol reducing effect is improved with an increase
in content of a phenol reducing material when smoking article filters are manufactured
by injecting the mixed solution of the hydrophobic emulsion and the same phenol reducing
material. Specifically, it can be seen that, between Example 4 and Example 5 in which
the same phenol reducing material was injected together with the hydrophobic emulsion
using the same method, the phenol reducing effect was greater in Example 5, between
Example 6 and Example 7, the phenol reducing effect was greater in Example 7, between
Example 9 and Example 10, the phenol reducing effect was greater in Example 10, and
between Example 11 and Example 12, the phenol reducing effect was greater in Example
12.
[0111] Also, in the case where smoking article filters are manufactured by injecting the
mixed solution of the hydrophobic emulsion and the same amount of phenol reducing
material, it can be seen that the phenol reducing effect is greater when PEG is included
as a phenol reducing material, compared to when TEC is included as a phenol reducing
material. Specifically, it can be seen that, between Example 4 and Example 6 in which
the same content of phenol reducing material was injected together with the hydrophobic
emulsion using the same method, the phenol reducing effect was greater in Example
6, between Example 5 and Example 7, the phenol reducing effect was greater in Example
7, between Example 9 and Example 11, the phenol reducing effect was greater in Example
11, and between Example 10 and Example 12, the phenol reducing effect was greater
in Example 12.
[0112] Also, it can be seen that phenol reducing performance is different according to an
operation or method of injecting the mixed solution of the hydrophobic emulsion and
the same amount of phenol reducing material. Specifically, it can be seen that the
phenol reducing effect is greater when the mixed solution is injected onto the lyocell
fibers using the spray method compared to when the mixed solution is injected onto
the lyocell tow using the brush method. Specifically, it can be seen that, between
Example 4 and Example 9 in which the same content of the same type of phenol reducing
material was injected together with the hydrophobic emulsion, the phenol reducing
effect was greater in Example 4, between Example 5 and Example 10, the phenol reducing
effect was greater in Example 5, between Example 6 and Example 11, the phenol reducing
effect was greater in Example 6, between Example 7 and Example 12, the phenol reducing
effect was greater in Example 7, and between Example 8 and Example 13, the phenol
reducing effect was greater in Example 8.
[0113] The above-described smoking article filter may be applied to a smoking article. FIG.
1 is a view illustrating a schematic configuration of a smoking article according
to one embodiment of the present invention. The smoking article 100 includes the smoking
material portion 10 and the filter portion 20, and the above-described smoking article
filter is applied to the filter portion 20 of the smoking article 100. In the smoking
article 100, the smoking material portion 10 is positioned upstream of the filter
portion 20.
[0114] The smoking material portion 10 may be filled with a smoking material such as raw
tobacco leaves, reconstituted tobacco leaves, or a mixture of tobacco leaves and reconstituted
tobacco leaves. A processed smoking material may be filled in the smoking material
portion 10 in the form of a sheet or shredded tobacco. The smoking material portion
10 may have the form of a longitudinally extending rod whose length, circumference,
and diameter are not particularly limited, but the length, circumference, and diameter
may be adjusted to sizes generally used in the art in consideration of the amount
of smoking material filled therein, user preferences, or the like. The smoking material
portion 10 may include at least one aerosol-generating material among glycerin, propylene
glycol, ethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol,
tetraethylene glycol, and oleyl alcohol. The smoking material portion 10 may contain
other additives such as a flavoring agent, a wetting agent, and/or an acetate compound.
The aerosol-generating material and the additive may be contained in the smoking material.
[0115] The filter portion 20 is disposed downstream of the smoking material portion 10 and
serves as a filter through which an aerosol material generated in the smoking material
portion 10 passes right before being inhaled by the user. The filter portion 20 may
be manufactured using various materials or manufactured in various forms. The filter
portion 20 according to one embodiment of the present invention basically includes
the above-described cigarette filter including lyocell tow in which a plurality of
lyocell fibers are bonded using a binder. The cigarette filter including the lyocell
tow may replace all or part of the filter portion 20 of existing smoking articles,
and when the cigarette filter replaces part of the filter portion 20, a filter material
that is used conventionally may be used together. For example, a cellulose acetate
filter, a hollow tube filter, or the like may be used as the conventional filter material.
[0116] The filter portion 20 is illustrated as a mono filter formed of a single filter in
FIG. 1, but the present invention is not limited thereto. For example, the filter
portion 20 may be provided as a dual filter, a triple filter, or the like, which includes
two or more filters, in order to increase filter efficiency.
[0117] In some embodiments, when the filter portion 20 is provided as a dual filter, a triple
filter, or the like, the filter (hereinafter, "lyocell filter") of the present invention
that includes lyocell fibers and a phenol functional additive may be applied as any
one filter of the plurality of filters, and a cellulose acetate filter and/or a paper
filter may be applied as the other or another filter of the plurality of filters.
In this case, a length of the lyocell filter of the present invention may be 25% to
50% of the overall length of the filter portion 20.
[0118] Also, although not illustrated, a crushable capsule (not illustrated) having a structure
in which a liquid including a flavoring is wrapped with a film may be included in
the filter portion 20.
[0119] The exterior of the smoking material portion 10 and the filter portion 20 may be
wrapped with a wrapper 30a or 30b.
[0120] The smoking material portion 10 may be wrapped with a smoking material portion wrapper
30a. Some of the cigarette smoke generated in a typical combustion process of the
smoking material portion 10 is released into the atmosphere through the smoking material
portion wrapper 30a before passing through the cigarette filter, and sidestream smoke
gives an unpleasant feeling to people exposed thereto. There have been various attempts
to reduce sidestream smoke such as filling conventional cigarette paper with a filler
such as magnesium oxide, titanium oxide, cerium oxide, aluminum oxide, calcium carbonate,
and zirconium carbonate. However, when sidestream smoke is reduced by simply applying
such a filler, tobacco smoke taste degradation, combustion interruption, ash integrity
degradation, or the like may occur, and it is difficult to address the above-mentioned
problem through suitable combinations of materials contained in the filler. A filler
in which magnesium oxide (MgO and/or Mg(OH)
2) and calcium carbonate (CaCO
3) are mixed is applied to the smoking material portion wrapper 30a according to one
embodiment of the present invention in order to prevent tobacco smoke taste degradation,
ash integrity degradation, and combustion interruption while reducing sidestream smoke.
[0121] The filter portion 20 may be wrapped with a filter portion wrapper 30b. The filter
portion wrapper 30b may be manufactured using grease-resistant wrapping paper, and
an aluminum foil may be further included at an inner surface of the filter portion
wrapper 30b.
[0122] The smoking material portion 10 wrapped with the smoking material portion wrapper
30a and the filter portion 20 wrapped with the filter portion wrapper 30b may be wrapped
together with tipping paper 40. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the tipping paper 40 may
be wrapped around at least a portion (for example, a partial downstream region) of
the smoking material portion wrapper 30a and an outer periphery of the filter portion
wrapper 30b. In other words, at least a portion of the smoking material portion 10
and the filter portion 20 may be further wrapped with the tipping paper 40 and physically
combined. According to one embodiment of the present invention, the tipping paper
40 may be made of nonporous wrapping paper that has not been treated to be grease-resistant,
but the present invention is not limited thereto. Also, the tipping paper 40 may include
an incombustible material to prevent a phenomenon in which the filter portion 20 burns,
but the present invention is not limited thereto.
[0123] Also, although not illustrated in the drawing, the smoking article 100 may further
include a hollow tube structure which is a tubular structure including a hollow formed
therein. The hollow tube structure may be disposed downstream of the lyocell filter.
[0124] In some embodiments, perforations may be formed in the hollow tube structure, but
the present invention is not limited thereto. Perforations may not be formed in the
hollow tube structure.
[0125] In some embodiments, when perforations are formed in the hollow tube structure, the
perforations may be formed at a position spaced 10 mm to 15 mm from the downstream
end of the smoking article 100 in the upstream direction.
[0126] Although embodiments of the present disclosure have been described above with reference
to the accompanying drawings, those of ordinary skill in the art to which the present
disclosure pertains should understand that the present disclosure may be embodied
in other specific forms without changing the technical spirit or essential features
thereof. Therefore, the embodiments described above should be understood as being
illustrative, instead of limiting, in all aspects. The protection scope of the present
disclosure should be interpreted by the claims below, and any technical spirit within
the scope equivalent to the claims should be interpreted as falling within the scope
of rights of the technical spirit defined by the present disclosure.