[Technical Field]
[0001] The present invention relates to a smoking article filter, which includes a filter
portion including lyocell tow in which a phenol reducing material is dispersed and
a filter portion wrapper wrapped around the filter portion and formed of wrapping
paper having a basis weight in a predetermined range and treated to be grease-resistant
(that is, grease-resistant hard wrapping paper), and a smoking article including the
smoking article filter.
[Background Art]
[0002] Typical cigarette filters include cellulose acetate tow formed by extracting cellulose
from wood pulp and acetylating the extracted cellulose. Also, cigarette filters are
assembled into cigarette products, distributed to consumers, provided for smoking,
and then finally discarded after smoking is completed. Also, some cigarette filters
are directly discarded as manufacturing residue from a cigarette filter manufacturing
plant. This cigarette filter waste is collected as refuse and landfilled for disposal.
In addition, in some cases, smoked cigarettes are left in the natural environment
without being collected as refuse.
[0003] Accordingly, in recent years, research for replacing cellulose acetate tow with an
eco-friendly material to protect the natural environment and reduce costs has been
carried out. For example, the development of tow using lyocell fibers in which the
cellulose itself is fiberized, unlike cellulose acetate, is in progress.
[0004] In manufacturing a smoking article filter, a phenol reducing material that can specifically
reduce phenols generated during smoking is added to reduce phenols in mainstream smoke.
Conventionally, it is known that polyethylene glycol (hereinafter referred to as "PEG"),
triethyl citrate (hereinafter referred to as "TEC"), triacetin (hereinafter referred
to as "TA"), and the like are added as a phenol reducing material to cellulose acetate
tow. In a case where a phenol reducing material composed of PEG, TEC, and TA is added
to cellulose acetate which is hydrophobic, there is a problem in that the phenol reducing
material also serves as a plasticizer for cellulose acetate fibers and causes the
cellulose acetate fibers, which are hydrophobic, to bond to each other, thus reducing
biodegradability.
[0005] Meanwhile, in a case where a phenol reducing material such as PEG, TEC, and TA is
added to lyocell fibers, the lyocell fibers are not plasticized. Accordingly, adding
a phenol reducing material such as PEG, TEC, and TA to lyocell fibers has been found
to reduce phenols in mainstream smoke while not degrading biodegradability.
[0006] Meanwhile, in the case where a phenol reducing material such as PEG, TEC, and TA
is added to lyocell fibers to reduce phenols in mainstream smoke, since plasticization
does not occur in lyocell tow including lyocell fibers, there is a problem in that
the hardness of the lyocell tow is decreased, which may cause the filter to collapse.
In order to address the problem of reduced hardness, a solution has been presented
in which, when manufacturing a smoking article filter, wrapping paper having a high
basis weight, which is referred to as "hard wrapping paper," is used as a filter portion
wrapper surrounding lyocell tow in order to impart a predetermined hardness to the
smoking article filter.
[0007] Meanwhile, although hard wrapping paper has a higher basis weight compared to general
wrapping paper and imparts a predetermined hardness to a smoking article filter, there
is a problem in that a phenol reducing material dispersed in lyocell tow spreads from
a filter portion including lyocell tow to the filter wrapping paper (hereinafter,
"filter portion wrapper") and is absorbed thereinto such that phenol reducing performance
of the smoking article filter is decreased.
[Disclosure]
[Technical Problem]
[0008] One object of the present invention is to provide a smoking article filter in which
a filter portion wrapper is made of wrapping paper having a basis weight of a predetermined
value or more and a surface treated to be grease-resistant (that is, grease-resistant
hard wrapping paper), thereby addressing a fundamental hardness problem that lyocell
tow has.
[0009] Another object of the present invention is to provide a smoking article filter in
which a filter portion wrapper is made of wrapping paper having a basis weight of
a predetermined value or more and a surface treated to be grease-resistant (that is,
grease-resistant hard wrapping paper), thereby minimizing a delivered amount of a
phenol reducing material that spreads from a filter portion, which includes lyocell
tow and the phenol reducing material dispersed in the lyocell tow, to the filter portion
wrapper, thus more effectively removing components such as phenols present in cigarette
smoke during smoking and having excellent biodegradability.
[0010] Still another object of the present invention is to provide a smoking article in
which a filter portion wrapper wrapped around a filter portion including lyocell tow
is made of wrapping paper having a basis weight of a predetermined value or more and
a surface treated to be grease-resistant (that is, grease-resistant hard wrapping
paper), thereby addressing a hardness problem that lyocell tow has and minimizing
a delivered amount of a phenol reducing material that spreads from the lyocell tow
to the filter portion wrapper, thus more effectively removing components such as phenols
present in cigarette smoke during smoking and having excellent biodegradability.
[0011] The objects of the present invention are not limited to those mentioned above, and
other unmentioned objects can be clearly understood by those of ordinary skill in
the art to which the present invention pertains from the description below.
[Technical Solution]
[0012] One embodiment for achieving one object provides a smoking article filter including:
a filter portion including lyocell tow including lyocell fibers and a phenol reducing
material dispersed in the lyocell tow; and a filter portion wrapper wrapped around
the filter portion and treated to be grease-resistant, wherein the filter portion
wrapper has a basis weight ranging from 30 gsm to 180 gsm.
[0013] Also, the phenol reducing material may include at least one or more of triethyl citrate
(TEC), polyethylene glycol (PEG), and triacetin (TA).
[0014] Also, the filter portion wrapper may have a basis weight ranging from 40 gsm to 160
gsm.
[0015] Also, the filter portion wrapper may have a basis weight ranging from 70 gsm to 150
gsm.
[0016] Also, a hardness of the filter portion may range from 93% to 99%.
[0017] Also, the filter portion wrapper may have a grease resistance of 8 or more based
on a 3M Kit Test.
[0018] Also, a rate at which the phenol reducing material is delivered to the filter portion
wrapper may range from 1% to 13%, the rate at which the phenol reducing material is
delivered to the filter portion wrapper may be defined as a percentage value of a
weight of the phenol reducing material included in the filter portion wrapper to the
overall weight of the phenol reducing material included in the smoking article filter,
and the overall weight of the phenol reducing material included in the smoking article
filter may be a sum of a weight of the phenol reducing material included in the filter
portion and the weight of the phenol reducing material included in the filter portion
wrapper.
[0019] Also, the rate at which the phenol reducing material is delivered to the filter portion
wrapper may range from 2% to 5%.
[0020] One embodiment for achieving another object provides a smoking article including:
a smoking material portion; and a smoking article filter disposed downstream of the
smoking material portion, wherein the smoking article filter includes a filter portion
including lyocell tow including lyocell fibers and a phenol reducing material dispersed
in the lyocell tow and a filter portion wrapper wrapped around the filter portion
and treated to be grease-resistant, and the filter portion wrapper has a basis weight
ranging from 30 gsm to 180 gsm.
[Advantageous Effects]
[0021] According to a smoking article filter and a smoking article including the same according
to one embodiment, since a filter portion wrapper wrapped around a filter portion
including lyocell tow in which a phenol reducing material is dispersed is made of
wrapping paper having a basis weight of a predetermined value or more and a surface
treated to be grease-resistant (that is, grease-resistant hard wrapping paper), it
is possible to address a fundamental hardness problem that lyocell tow has.
[0022] Also, according to a smoking article filter and a smoking article including the same
according to one embodiment, since a filter portion wrapper wrapped around lyocell
tow in which a phenol reducing material is dispersed is made of wrapping paper having
a basis weight of a predetermined value or more and a surface treated to be grease-resistant
(that is, grease-resistant hard wrapping paper), a delivered amount of the phenol
reducing material that spreads from a filter portion to the filter portion wrapper
is minimized, and thus the content of the phenol reducing material remaining in the
filter portion can be optimized, and components such as phenols present in cigarette
smoke can be more effectively removed during smoking.
[0023] In addition, according to a smoking article filter and a smoking article including
the same according to one embodiment, since a phenol reducing material such as PEG,
TEC, and TA does not act as a plasticizer for lyocell tow despite being added to the
lyocell tow, it is possible to provide a smoking article filter having excellent biodegradability
while having phenol reducing performance and a smoking article including the same.
[0024] Advantageous effects according to the technical spirit of the present disclosure
are not limited to those mentioned above, and other unmentioned advantageous effects
can be clearly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art from the description
above.
[Description of Drawings]
[0025] FIG. 1 is a view illustrating a schematic configuration of a smoking article according
to one embodiment of the present invention.
[Modes of the Invention]
[0026] Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in
detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Advantages and features of the
present disclosure and methods of achieving the same should become clear with embodiments
described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, the
technical spirit of the present disclosure is not limited to the following embodiments
and may be implemented in various different forms. The following embodiments are only
provided to make the technical spirit of the present disclosure complete and completely
inform those of ordinary skill in the art to which the present disclosure pertains
of the scope of the present disclosure. The technical spirit of the present disclosure
is defined only by the scope of the claims.
[0027] In assigning reference numerals to components of each drawing, it should be noted
that the same reference numerals are assigned to the same components wherever possible
even when the components are illustrated in different drawings. Also, in describing
the present disclosure, when it is determined that the detailed description of a known
related configuration or function may obscure the gist of the present disclosure,
the detailed description thereof will be omitted.
[0028] Unless otherwise defined, all terms including technical or scientific terms used
herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in
the art to which the present disclosure pertains. Terms defined in commonly used dictionaries
should not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly
so defined herein. Terms used herein are for describing the embodiments and are not
intended to limit the present disclosure. In the specification, a singular expression
includes a plural expression unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
[0029] Also, in describing components of the present disclosure, terms such as first, second,
A, B, (a), and (b) may be used. Such terms are only used for distinguishing one component
from another component, and the essence, order, sequence, or the like of the corresponding
component is not limited by the terms. In a case in which a certain component is described
as being "connected," "coupled," or "linked" to another component, it should be understood
that, although the component may be directly connected or linked to the other component,
still another component may also be "connected," "coupled," or "linked" between the
two components.
[0030] The terms "comprises" and/or "comprising" used herein do not preclude the presence
or addition of one or more components, steps, operations, and/or devices other than
those mentioned.
[0031] First, some terms used herein will be clarified.
[0032] In the present specification, "smoking article" may refer to any product that can
be smoked or any product that can provide a smoking experience, regardless of whether
the product is based on tobacco, tobacco derivatives, expanded tobacco, reconstituted
tobacco, or tobacco substitutes. For example, smoking articles may include products
that can be smoked, such as cigarettes, cigars, and cigarillos.
[0033] In the present specification, "smoking material" may refer to any type of material
that may be used in a smoking article.
[0034] In the present specification, "upstream" or "upstream direction" may refer to a direction
moving away from an oral region of a smoker, and "downstream" or "downstream direction"
may refer to a direction approaching the oral region of the smoker.
[0035] In the present specification, "longitudinal direction" may refer to a direction corresponding
to a longitudinal axis of a smoking article.
[0036] Hereinafter, various embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in detail
with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[0037] FIG. 1 is a view illustrating a schematic configuration of a smoking article according
to one embodiment of the present invention.
[0038] Throughout the specification, "smoking article" may refer to anything capable of
generating an aerosol, such as tobacco (cigarettes) and cigars. The smoking article
may include an aerosol-generating material or an aerosol-forming substrate. Also,
the smoking article may include a solid material based on tobacco raw materials, such
as reconstituted tobacco leaves, shredded tobacco, and reconstituted tobacco. A smoking
material may include volatile compounds.
[0039] Also, throughout the specification, "upstream" or "upstream direction" refers to
a direction moving away from an oral region of a user smoking a smoking article 100,
and "downstream" or "downstream direction" refers to a direction approaching the oral
region of the user smoking the smoking article 100. For example, in the smoking article
100 illustrated in FIG. 1, a smoking material portion 10 is disposed upstream or in
an upstream direction of a filter portion 20 included in a smoking article filter.
[0040] Further, in the specification, a case where the smoking article 100 is a combustion-type
cigarette is described as an example. However, the present invention is not limited
thereto, and the smoking article 100 may also be a heating-type cigarette or the like
that is used together with an aerosol generation device (not illustrated) such as
an electronic cigarette device.
[0041] Referring to FIG. 1, the smoking article 100 includes the smoking material portion
10, the filter portion 20, a smoking material portion wrapper 30a, a filter portion
wrapper 30b, and tipping paper 40. The smoking article filter may include the filter
portion 20 and the filter portion wrapper 30b wrapped around the filter portion 20.
In the smoking article 100, the smoking material portion 10 is positioned upstream
of the filter portion 20.
[0042] The smoking material portion 10 may be filled with a smoking material such as raw
tobacco leaves, reconstituted tobacco leaves, or a mixture of tobacco leaves and reconstituted
tobacco leaves. A processed smoking material may be filled in the smoking material
portion 10 in the form of a sheet or shredded tobacco. The smoking material portion
10 may have the form of a longitudinally extending rod whose length, circumference,
and diameter are not particularly limited, but the length, circumference, and diameter
may be adjusted to sizes generally used in the art in consideration of the amount
of smoking material filled therein, user preferences, or the like.
[0043] The smoking material portion 10 may include at least one aerosol-generating material
among glycerin, propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, diethylene
glycol, triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol, and oleyl alcohol. The smoking material
portion 10 may contain other additives such as a flavoring agent, a wetting agent,
and/or an acetate compound. The aerosol-generating material and the additive may be
contained in the smoking material.
[0044] The smoking material portion 10 may be wrapped with the smoking material portion
wrapper 30a. Some of the cigarette smoke generated in a typical combustion process
of the smoking material portion 10 is released into the atmosphere through the smoking
material portion wrapper 30a before passing through the cigarette filter, and sidestream
smoke gives an unpleasant feeling to people exposed thereto. There have been various
attempts to reduce sidestream smoke such as filling conventional cigarette paper with
a filler such as magnesium oxide, titanium oxide, cerium oxide, aluminum oxide, calcium
carbonate, and zirconium carbonate. However, when sidestream smoke is reduced by simply
applying such a filler, tobacco smoke taste degradation, combustion interruption,
ash integrity degradation, or the like may occur, and it is difficult to address the
above-mentioned problem through suitable combinations of materials contained in the
filler. A filler in which magnesium oxide (MgO and/or Mg(OH)
2) and calcium carbonate (CaCO
3) are mixed is applied to the smoking material portion wrapper 30a according to one
embodiment of the present invention in order to prevent tobacco smoke taste degradation,
ash integrity degradation, and combustion interruption while reducing sidestream smoke.
[0045] The smoking article filter may be disposed downstream of the smoking material portion
10. The filter portion 20 of the smoking article filter is disposed downstream of
the smoking material portion 10 and serves as a filter through which an aerosol material
generated in the smoking material portion 10 passes right before being inhaled by
the user. The filter portion 20 may be manufactured using various materials or manufactured
in various forms. The filter portion 20 according to one embodiment of the present
invention may basically include lyocell tow in which a phenol reducing material is
dispersed in a plurality of lyocell fibers. The smoking article filter including the
lyocell tow may replace all or part of the filter portion 20 of existing smoking articles,
and when the smoking article filter replaces part of the filter portion 20, a filter
material that is used conventionally may be used together. For example, a cellulose
acetate filter, a hollow tube filter, or the like may be used as the conventional
filter material.
[0046] The filter portion 20 is illustrated as a mono filter formed of a single filter in
FIG. 1, but the present invention is not limited thereto. For example, the filter
portion 20 may be provided as a dual filter, a triple filter, or the like, which includes
two or more filters, in order to increase filter efficiency.
[0047] In some embodiments, when the filter portion 20 is provided as a dual filter, a triple
filter, or the like, the filter (hereinafter, "lyocell filter") of the present invention
that includes lyocell tow including lyocell fibers and a phenol reducing material
dispersed in the lyocell tow may be applied as any one filter of the plurality of
filters, and a cellulose acetate filter and/or a paper filter may be applied as the
other or another filter of the plurality of filters. In this case, a length of the
lyocell filter of the present invention may be 25% to 50% of the overall length of
the filter portion 20. Also, although not illustrated, a crushable capsule (not illustrated)
having a structure in which a liquid including a flavoring is wrapped with a film
may be further included in the filter portion 20.
[0048] The filter portion wrapper 30b may be wrapped around the filter portion 20 to package
the filter portion 20. The filter portion wrapper 30b may be manufactured using hard
wrapping paper having grease resistance. The filter portion wrapper 30b will be described
in detail below. Although the present invention is not limited thereto, an aluminum
foil may be further included at an inner surface of the filter portion wrapper 30b
that faces the filter portion 20.
[0049] The smoking material portion 10 wrapped with the smoking material portion wrapper
30a and the filter portion 20 wrapped with the filter portion wrapper 30b may be wrapped
together with the tipping paper 40. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the tipping paper 40
may be wrapped around at least a portion (for example, a partial downstream region)
of the smoking material portion wrapper 30a and an outer periphery of the filter portion
wrapper 30b. In other words, at least a portion of the smoking material portion 10
and the filter portion 20 may be further wrapped with the tipping paper 40 and physically
combined.
[0050] According to one embodiment of the present invention, the tipping paper 40 may be
made of nonporous wrapping paper that has not been treated to be grease-resistant,
but the present invention is not limited thereto. Also, the tipping paper 40 may include
an incombustible material to prevent a phenomenon in which the filter portion 20 burns,
but the present invention is not limited thereto.
[0051] Also, although not illustrated in the drawing, the smoking article 100 may further
include a hollow tube structure which is a tubular structure including a hollow formed
therein. The hollow tube structure may be disposed downstream of the lyocell filter.
[0052] In some embodiments, perforations may be formed in the hollow tube structure, but
the present invention is not limited thereto. Perforations may not be formed in the
hollow tube structure. In some embodiments, when perforations are formed in the hollow
tube structure, the perforations may be formed at a position spaced 10 mm to 15 mm
from the downstream end of the smoking article 100 in the upstream direction.
[0053] Hereinafter, the smoking article filter according to one embodiment of the present
invention will be described in detail.
[0054] The present invention relates to the smoking article filter included in the smoking
article 100, and the smoking article filter according to one embodiment of the present
invention includes the filter portion 20 including lyocell tow including lyocell fibers
and a phenol reducing material dispersed in the lyocell tow and the filter portion
wrapper 30b wrapped around the filter portion 20.
[0055] The lyocell fibers are eco-friendly fibers made of cellulose extracted from wood
pulp. The lyocell tow refers to a bundle formed by cross-connecting adjacent lyocell
fibers.
[0056] In some embodiments, the lyocell fibers may have a shaped cross-section. The shaped
cross-section is defined as a cross-section having a shape including a plurality of
protrusions instead of having a circular shape. For example, a cross-section having
a shape in which a plurality of protrusions extend from the center may be referred
to as "shaped cross-section."
[0057] In some embodiments, the lyocell fibers may have a Y-shaped cross-section with three
protrusions branching from the center, a cross-shaped cross-section with four protrusions,
a star-shaped cross-section with five protrusions, or an O-shaped cross-section, but
the present invention is not limited thereto.
[0058] In one embodiment, the phenol reducing material corresponds to a substance that can
specifically reduce phenols generated during smoking, and the phenol reducing material
may include at least one or more of polyethylene glycol (hereinafter referred to as
"PEG"), triethyl citrate (hereinafter referred to as "TEC"), and triacetin (hereinafter
referred to as "TA").
[0059] In some embodiments, the phenol reducing material may include only PEG, include only
TEC, or include both PEG and TEC. However, the phenol reducing material additionally
added to at least one of the PEG, TEC, and TA is not limited thereto and may be any
other substance as long as the substance can reduce phenols generated during smoking.
[0060] In some embodiments, the phenol reducing material may be uniformly dispersed in lyocell
tow and may be distributed throughout the entire region of the lyocell tow constituting
the filter portion 20.
[0061] The phenol reducing material may be applied on surfaces of lyocell fibers constituting
lyocell tow. Meanwhile, at least one of PEG, TEC, and TA, which are examples of the
phenol reducing material according to one embodiment, may also serve as a plasticizer
for cellulose acetate fibers but not act as a plasticizer for lyocell fibers. Accordingly,
in a case where at least one of PEG, TEC, and TA is included as a phenol reducing
material, even when the phenol reducing material is applied on surfaces of lyocell
fibers, the lyocell fibers may not be plasticized by the phenol reducing material.
[0062] The smoking article filter to which lyocell tow is applied according to the present
invention includes at least one or more phenol reducing materials of PEG, TEC, and
TA dispersed in the lyocell tow and thus may have a greater effect of reducing phenols
generated during smoking, compared to a smoking article filter to which the phenol
reducing material is not added.
[0063] In some embodiments, PEG included in the phenol reducing material may have a weight
average molecular weight (MW) in a range of 50 to 10,000, 50 to 2,500, 200 to 2,000,
500 to 700, or a weight average molecular weight (MW) of 600.
[0064] In some embodiments, in a case where the phenol reducing material includes TEC and
PEG, a ratio between the content of TEC and the content of PEG may range from 7:3
to 9:1, but the present invention is not limited thereto.
[0065] In a case where the phenol reducing material dispersed in the lyocell tow of the
smoking article filter includes PEG, phenol reducing performance may vary according
to the molecular weight of the PEG. Specifically, in a case where PEG dispersed in
the lyocell tow has a weight average molecular weight (MW) in the above-mentioned
range, the phenol reducing performance of the smoking article filter manufactured
using the lyocell tow may be excellent. Preferably, in a case where PEG dispersed
in the lyocell tow has a weight average molecular weight (MW) of 600, the phenol reducing
performance of the smoking article filter manufactured using the lyocell tow may be
the best, but the molecular weight of the PEG is not limited thereto.
[0066] The filter portion wrapper 30b may be disposed to be wrapped around the filter portion
20. The filter portion wrapper 30b may be made of (manufactured using) grease-resistant
hard wrapping paper that has a basis weight of a predetermined value or more and is
treated to be grease-resistant.
[0067] Meanwhile, since the filter portion wrapper 30b is made of hard wrapping paper having
a basis weight of a predetermined value or more, the filter portion wrapper 30b may
not only serve as a packaging material that is wrapped around the filter portion 20
including lyocell tow, but also serve to impart hardness of a predetermined level
or more to the smoking article filter according to the present invention.
[0068] Specifically, in a case where the filter portion 20 is made of lyocell tow in which
at least one or more phenol reducing materials of PEG, TEC, and TA is/are dispersed,
since lyocell fibers are not plasticized by the phenol reducing material, the hardness
of the lyocell tow may be decreased. Accordingly, the filter portion wrapper 30b wrapped
around the filter portion 20 may be made of hard wrapping paper having a basis weight
of a predetermined value or more to supplement the hardness of the smoking article
filter.
[0069] In some embodiments, the filter portion wrapper 30b may include wrapping paper having
a basis weight ranging from 30 gsm to 180 gsm, 35 gsm to 170 gsm, 40 gsm to 160 gsm,
50 gsm to 158 gsm, 60 gsm to 155 gsm, 70 gsm to 150 gsm, or 75 gsm to 150 gsm. Since
the filter portion wrapper 30b is made of wrapping paper having a high basis weight,
the hardness of the filter portion 20 including the lyocell tow in which the phenol
reducing material is dispersed may be supplemented with the filter portion wrapper
30b, and the hardness of the smoking article filter may become a hardness of a predetermined
level or more. In this way, it is possible to address the problem of the hardness
of the smoking article filter being decreased.
[0070] In some embodiments, the filter portion wrapper 30b may be manufactured using grease-resistant
wrapping paper that has been treated to be grease-resistant. A grease-resistant coating
material may be coated on wrapping paper having a basis weight of a predetermined
value or more by a size-press method to impart grease resistance to the filter portion
wrapper 30b. In an exemplary embodiment, the grease-resistant coating material may
include a fluoroacrylate copolymer, but the grease-resistant coating material is not
limited thereto and may be any other substance as long as the substance can impart
grease resistance to hard wrapping paper.
[0071] The filter portion wrapper 30b may include a first surface (or an inner surface)
that faces the filter portion 20 and a second surface (or an outer surface) that is
opposite to the first surface (inner surface), and at least one of the inner surface
and outer surface of the filter portion wrapper 30b may be treated to be grease-resistant.
[0072] In an exemplary embodiment, only the inner surface of the filter portion wrapper
30b may be treated to be grease-resistant such that only the inner surface of the
filter portion wrapper 30b has grease resistance, only the outer surface of the filter
portion wrapper 30b may be treated to be grease-resistant such that only the outer
surface of the filter portion wrapper 30b has grease resistance, or both the inner
surface and the outer surface of the filter portion wrapper 30b may be treated to
be grease-resistant such that both the inner surface and the outer surface have grease
resistance.
[0073] Since the filter portion wrapper 30b is manufactured using wrapping paper that has
been treated to be grease-resistant, a delivery rate of a phenol reducing material
that spreads from lyocell tow, in which the phenol reducing material is dispersed,
to the filter portion wrapper 30b may be minimized, compared to when the filter portion
wrapper 30b is manufactured using wrapping paper that has not been treated to be grease-resistant
(that is, wrapping paper that does not have grease resistance). Specifically, since
the filter portion wrapper 30b is treated to be grease-resistant and thus the filter
portion wrapper 30b has grease resistance, a phenol reducing material moving from
the lyocell tow to the filter portion wrapper 30b of the phenol reducing material
dispersed in the lyocell tow may be prevented from spreading to the filter portion
wrapper 30b. Accordingly, the phenol reducing material in the lyocell tow may be prevented
from being absorbed into the filter portion wrapper 30b. Therefore, it is possible
to address a problem of the filter portion wrapper 30b becoming wet due to the phenol
reducing material and the hardness of the smoking article filter being decreased,
or the amount of the phenol reducing material remaining in the lyocell tow being decreased.
[0074] In some embodiments, the filter portion wrapper 30b may have a grease resistance
of 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, or 11 or more based on a 3M Kit Test. The grease
resistance of the filter portion wrapper 30b may be a value obtained by measuring
the grease resistance of at least one of the outer surface and the inner surface of
the filter portion wrapper 30b. In some embodiments, both the outer surface and the
inner surface of the filter portion wrapper 30b may be treated to be grease-resistant,
and a grease resistance of each of the outer surface and the inner surface of the
filter portion wrapper 30b may be 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, or 11 or more.
Since the filter portion wrapper 30b is made of grease-resistant hard wrapping paper
having the above-mentioned grease resistance, a delivered amount of the phenol reducing
material that spreads from the lyocell tow to the filter portion wrapper 30b may be
decreased.
[0075] Meanwhile, grease resistance measurement by the 3M Kit Test was performed as follows.
Specifically, in order to analyze the grease resistance of wrapping paper, grease
resistance measurement solutions were prepared using a universally used method and
dropped onto a test piece, and after a predetermined amount of time had elapsed, grease
resistance was determined from the highest kit number at which a grease mark was not
left on the test piece. The solutions were prepared by mixing castor oil, toluene,
and heptane in a predetermined ratio for each kit number as shown in Table 1 below.
[Table 1]
Kit number |
Castor oil (mL) |
Toluene (mL) |
Heptane (mL) |
1 |
200 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
180 |
10 |
10 |
3 |
160 |
20 |
20 |
4 |
140 |
30 |
30 |
5 |
120 |
40 |
40 |
6 |
100 |
50 |
50 |
7 |
80 |
60 |
60 |
8 |
60 |
70 |
70 |
9 |
40 |
80 |
80 |
10 |
20 |
90 |
90 |
11 |
0 |
100 |
100 |
12 |
0 |
90 |
110 |
[0076] A reagent of the lowest kit number was tested first on the test piece, one drop of
the prepared reagent was dropped onto the test piece, the dropped reagent was removed
using moisture-absorbing cotton or tissue after 15 seconds, and then whether a grease
mark was formed was observed. When a grease mark was not formed, a reagent of the
next lowest kit number was tested, and the experiment was continued until a grease
mark was formed. The final kit number at which a grease mark was not formed was applied
to evaluate oil resistance. As a result of evaluating the grease resistance of the
aerosol-generating article according to the present disclosure, it was confirmed that
the filter portion wrapper 30b according to an embodiment may have a grease resistance
of 8 or more, 9 or more, 10 or more, or 11 or more based on the 3M Kit Test.
[0077] In some embodiments, the smoking article filter according to the present invention
that incudes the filter portion 20 and the filter portion wrapper 30b wrapped around
the filter portion may have a hardness ranging from 93% to 99%, 93.5% to 98.5%, 94%
to 98%, 94.3% to 97.8%, or 93.4% to 97%. The hardness of the smoking article filter
is a numerical value of a degree to which a diameter of the smoking article filter
is maintained when the smoking article filter is pressed with a force of a certain
level in a direction perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of the smoking article
filter and may be a percentage value of a ratio of a diameter of the smoking article
filter after the force is applied to a diameter of the smoking article filter before
the force is applied.
[0078] Specifically, in the smoking article filter according to the present invention, since
the filter portion wrapper 30b wrapped around the filter portion 20 is made of grease-resistant
hard wrapping paper having a basis weight of a predetermined value or more and having
grease resistance, while the hardness of lyocell tow is supplemented, the phenol reducing
material dispersed in the lyocell tow may be prevented from spreading to the filter
portion wrapper 30b to prevent the filter portion wrapper 30b from becoming wet due
to the phenol reducing material, and in this way, the smoking article filter may have
a hardness in the above-mentioned range.
[0079] In one embodiment, the rate at which the phenol reducing material is delivered to
the filter portion wrapper 30b, which is defined as a percentage value of a weight
of the phenol reducing material included in the filter portion wrapper 30b to the
overall weight of the phenol reducing material included in the smoking article filter,
may range from 1% to 13%, 1.2% to 10%, 1.4% to 8%, 1.6% to 7%, 1.8% to 6%, 2% to 5%,
or 3% to 4.5%. Meanwhile, the overall weight of the phenol reducing material included
in the smoking article filter may be calculated as a sum of the weight of the phenol
reducing material included in the filter portion 20 and the weight of the phenol reducing
material included in the filter portion wrapper 30b.
[0080] Hereinafter, the configurations of the present invention and the advantageous effects
according thereto will be described in more detail using examples and comparative
examples. However, the examples are merely for describing the present invention in
more detail, and the scope of the present invention is not limited to these examples.
Example 1
[0081] Using filter manufacturing equipment manufactured by TYM Co., Ltd. (whose operational
mechanism is the same as cellulose acetate (CA) tow filter manufacturing equipment),
a phenol reducing material including TEC was added onto lyocell tow by being injected
50 mg/rod, and then the lyocell tow having TEC dispersed therein was wrapped with
grease-resistant hard wrapping paper having a basis weight of 75 gsm and having an
inner surface and an outer surface whose grease resistance was 11 to manufacture a
smoking article filter having a length of 126 mm. The grease resistance of the grease-resistant
hard wrapping paper may be a value measured using the above-described grease resistance
measuring method.
Example 2
[0082] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except
that PEG 600 was used as the phenol reducing material dispersed in the lyocell tow.
Comparative Example 1
[0083] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except
that general hard wrapping paper having a basis weight of 75 gsm and not treated to
be grease-resistant was used as the wrapping paper wrapped around the lyocell tow.
Comparative Example 2
[0084] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 2 except
that general hard wrapping paper having a basis weight of 75 gsm and not treated to
be grease-resistant was used as the wrapping paper wrapped around the lyocell tow.
Experimental Example 1: Evaluation of amount of phenol reducing material delivered
to filter portion wrapper
[0085] In order to measure the rate at which the phenol reducing material is delivered to
the filter portion wrapper (that is, a characteristic of the phenol reducing material
spreading to the filter portion wrapper) in Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Examples
1 and 2, portions of the smoking article filters were randomly collected and the weights
of filter samples were measured, and in order to measure the weight of the filter
portion wrapper (that is, filter wrapping paper), the lyocell tow portion was removed
from the collected portions of the smoking article filters and the weight of the filter
portion wrapper (that is, filter wrapping paper) was measured. Then, 50 mL of an extraction
solution included in an internal standard solution was added to each collected filter
sample and stirred for 60 minutes to analyze the TEC component using GC-FID (DB-WAX
column) and analyze the PEG component using a HPLD device in order to measure remaining
amounts of the phenol reducing materials.
[0086] Then, a percentage value of the weight of the phenol reducing material included in
the filter portion wrapper relative to the overall weight of the phenol reducing material
included in the smoking article filter was calculated and rounded off to two decimal
places to calculate the rate at which the phenol reducing material is delivered to
the filter portion wrapper, and the measured remaining amount of the phenol reducing
material and the calculated rate at which the phenol reducing material is delivered
to the filter portion wrapper are shown in Table 2 and Table 3 below.
[Table 2]
Classification |
Remaining amount of phenol reducing material (TEC) (mg/rod) |
Rate at which TEC is delivered to filter portion wrapper (%) |
Filter portion wrapper |
Entire filter |
Example 1 |
4.7 |
109.0 |
4.3 |
Comparative Example 1 |
32.8 |
123.8 |
26.5 |
[Table 3]
Classification |
Remaining amount of phenol reducing material (PEG 600) (mg/rod) |
Rate at which PEG 600 is delivered to filter portion wrapper (%) |
Filter portion wrapper |
Entire filter |
Example 2 |
0.8 |
21.3 |
3.8 |
Comparative Example 2 |
3.6 |
25.1 |
14.3 |
[0087] As shown in Table 2 and Table 3 above, it can be seen that, despite the filter portion
wrapper 30b being manufactured using hard wrapping paper having the same basis weight,
the amount of the phenol reducing material delivered from the filter portion 20 to
the filter portion wrapper 30b (that is, the amount of the phenol reducing material
spreading from the filter portion 20 to the filter portion wrapper 30b) decreases
when the filter portion wrapper 30b has grease resistance. Specifically, it can be
seen that, in Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 in which the same phenol reducing
material, TEC, was included, the rate at which TEC was delivered from the filter portion
20 to the filter portion wrapper 30b significantly decreased to 4.3% in Example 1
compared to 26.5% in Comparative Example 1 due to the filter portion wrapper 30b having
grease resistance, and in Example 2 and Comparative Example 2 in which the same phenol
reducing material, PEG 600, was included, the rate at which PEG 600 was delivered
from the filter portion 20 to the filter portion wrapper 30b significantly decreased
to 3.8% in Example 2 compared to 14.3% in Comparative Example 2 due to the filter
portion wrapper 30b having grease resistance. Accordingly, since the remaining amount
of the phenol reducing material included in the filter portion 20 made of lyocell
tow is increased when grease-resistant hard wrapping paper is used compared to when
the general hard wrapping paper is used, the phenol reducing performance of the smoking
article filter may be expected to be improved.
Example 3
[0088] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except
that the phenol reducing material including TEC was added onto lyocell tow by being
injected 70 mg/rod instead of 50 mg/rod.
Comparative Example 3
[0089] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Comparative Example
1 except that the phenol reducing material was not injected into the lyocell tow (that
is, the phenol reducing material was not added to the filter portion 20).
Experimental Example 2: Evaluation of phenol reducing performance of smoking article
filter according to addition of phenol reducing material and grease resistance treatment
of filter portion wrapper
[0090] Smoking articles were manufactured using the smoking article filters of Comparative
Examples 1 and 3 and Examples 1 and 3, smoke components emitted during smoking using
the cigarette smoking machine HAUNI LX20 manual (linear type) as a smoking device
were collected using a Cambridge filter pad (CFP), and in order to extract substances
from the smoke components collected on the CFP, 30 mL of 1% acetic acid was added
and then stirred, the substances were filtered using a 0.45 µm PVDF syringe filter
and analyzed using an Alliance HPLC-FLD analysis device of Waters Corporation, and
results thereof are shown in Table 4 below.
[Table 4]
|
Amount of delivered smoke component (µg/cig) |
Phenol |
m+p, o- cresols |
Comparative Example 3 |
50.5 |
39.4 |
Comparative Example 1 |
27.9 |
22.9 |
Example 1 |
23.6 |
19.7 |
Example 3 |
18.5 |
16.1 |
[0091] As shown in Table 4 above, it can be seen that the amount of delivered phenol significantly
decreased in Comparative Example 1 and Example 1 in which a phenol reducing material
(specifically, TEC) was dispersed in lyocell tow, as compared to Comparative Example
3 in which a phenol reducing material was not added to lyocell tow. Also, it can be
seen that, the amount of delivered phenol further decreased in the case of Example
1 in which the filter portion wrapper 30b was manufactured using grease-resistant
hard wrapping paper, compared to Comparative Example 1 in which the filter portion
wrapper 30b was manufactured using general hard wrapping paper. That is, it can be
seen that a phenol reducing effect increases when a phenol reducing material (specifically,
TEC) is added to the filter portion 20, compared to when the phenol reducing material
is not added, and the phenol reducing effect is greater when the filter portion 20
is wrapped with the filter portion wrapper 30b manufactured using grease-resistant
hard wrapping paper. Also, it can be seen that, compared to Example 1, the phenol
reducing effect is greater in Example 3 in which the amount of added phenol reducing
material (specifically, TEC) is larger.
[0092] From the above, it may be expected that, when the filter portion wrapper 30b is manufactured
using grease-resistant hard wrapping paper, the amount of phenol reducing material
spreading from lyocell two to the hard wrapping paper decreases, and the amount of
the phenol reducing material remaining in the lyocell tow becomes optimal such that
the phenol reducing effect is excellent, compared to when the filter portion wrapper
30b is manufactured using general hard wrapping paper.
Example 4
[0093] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except
that, as a phenol reducing material dispersed in the lyocell tow, TEC and PEG were
included at a ratio of 8:2.
Comparative Example 4
[0094] A smoking article filter was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 4 except
that general hard wrapping paper having a basis weight of 75 gsm and not treated to
be grease-resistant was used as the wrapping paper wrapped around the lyocell tow.
Experimental Example 3: Evaluation of hardness of smoking article filter according
to addition of phenol reducing material and grease resistance treatment of filter
portion wrapper
[0095] Smoking articles were manufactured using the smoking article filters of Comparative
Examples 3 and 4 and Example 4, the hardness of the manufactured smoking article filters
was measured, and results thereof are shown in Table 5 below.

[0096] Here, D represents a filter diameter (mm), and a represents a distance (mm) the filter
moves downward (is pressed) due to a 300-g weight. Measured values necessary to calculate
the hardness of the cigarette filter may be obtained using a device generally used
in the art, and for example, DHT 200
™ of Filtrona Co., Ltd. may be used. In measuring hardness, the applied force takes
into account a force actually applied when a smoker holds a cigarette. A hardness
value of 85% or more obtained through the cigarette filter according to one embodiment
of the present invention is technically significant in that it shows that hardness
can be secured at a level that allows the cigarette filter according to one embodiment
of the present invention, which uses lyocell tow, which is an eco-friendly material,
to replace the conventional cigarette filter made of cellulose acetate.
[Table 5]
|
Comparative Example 3 |
Comparative Example 4 |
Example 4 |
Hardness (%) |
94.2 |
92.5 |
94.5 |
[0097] As shown in Table 5 above, it can be seen that the hardness of the smoking article
filter is higher in the case of Example 4 in which the filter portion wrapper 30b
was manufactured using grease-resistant hard wrapping paper, compared to Comparative
Example 4 in which the filter portion wrapper 30b was manufactured using general hard
wrapping paper. Further, it can be seen that, in the case of Example 4 in which a
phenol reducing material was added to lyocell tow, hardness is maintained at a similar
level compared to Comparative Example 3 in which a phenol reducing material was not
added to lyocell tow.
[0098] Although embodiments of the present disclosure have been described above with reference
to the accompanying drawings, those of ordinary skill in the art to which the present
disclosure pertains should understand that the present disclosure may be embodied
in other specific forms without changing the technical spirit or essential features
thereof. Therefore, the embodiments described above should be understood as being
illustrative, instead of limiting, in all aspects. The protection scope of the present
disclosure should be interpreted by the claims below, and any technical spirit within
the scope equivalent to the claims should be interpreted as falling within the scope
of rights of the technical spirit defined by the present disclosure.