TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present disclosure relates to a sliding member.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] The term "sliding member" is a generic name for a member that is to come into contact
with another member at least in one portion of the member, and the contacting portion
slides. Examples of sliding members include the rails and wheels of a train, an engine
cylinder and a piston, a crankshaft and a connecting rod, a tool in a drilling process,
a saw blade, a pulley, a gear, an industrial screw, a nut, a bearing, a guide member,
and a die. A sliding member repeatedly slides with another member.
[0004] In the sliding member described in Patent Literature 1, a tin-zinc alloy layer consisting
of tin and zinc is formed on a sliding surface. The thickness of the alloy plating
layer is 10 to 25 µm. The sliding member described in Patent Literature 1 is characterized
in that, in the alloy plating layer, a weight ratio of zinc to the total of tin and
zinc is within a range of 20 to 80%. It is described in Patent Literature 1 that by
this sliding member, even in a state in which there is severe sliding at a sliding
portion, it is possible to suppress the amount of wear, and the sliding member can
thus contribute to achieving a longer life for various machines.
[0005] In the sliding member described in Patent Literature 2, a sliding layer is formed
of an alloy plating layer consisting of, by weight, Zn: 10 to 35%, Pb: 2 to 20%, Ni:
1 to 10%, B (boron): 0.1 to 1%, and the balance: Cu and unavoidable impurities. It
is described in Patent Literature 2 that it provides a sliding member that exhibits
excellent resistance to galling, wear, and corrosion, even when used under severe
conditions such as an elevated operation speed and elevated temperature.
[0006] Patent Literature 3 discloses a sliding member characterized by including a base
material having a metallic surface, and a zinc alloy plating layer provided on the
base material. The zinc alloy plating layer has a chemical composition containing,
by mass, Ni: 2 to 8%, and Mo: 0.1 to 3%, with the balance being Zn and impurities.
The hardness of the zinc alloy plating film is within a range of 150 Hv to 350 Hv,
and the thickness of the zinc alloy plating layer is within a range of 0.1 to 30 µm.
It is described in Patent Literature 3 that by this means a zinc alloy plating member
which not only imparts excellent corrosion resistance to a base material, but can
also be used as a sliding member is obtained.
CITATION LIST
PATENT LITERATURE
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
TECHNICAL PROBLEM
[0008] By the way, among sliding members, there are some sliding members which slide under
a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure.
Such sliding members are, for example, rails and wheels of a train, and industrial
screws. On the other hand, a plating layer formed on a sliding member tends to peel
off during sliding under a high interfacial pressure. Further, if a plating layer
peels off, the galling resistance and corrosion resistance of the sliding member may
decrease. Therefore, it is preferable that an anti-peeling property of the plating
layer is excellent even during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than
1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure.
[0009] On the other hand, in Patent Literature 1 to 3, the anti-peeling property of a plating
layer under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian
contact pressure is not discussed. For example, in paragraph [0029] of Patent Literature
1, it is described that a sliding test is performed under an interfacial pressure
of 224 MPa. For example, in paragraph [0009] of Patent Literature 2, galling resistance
at a maximum load of 500 kgf/cm
2 is evaluated. This is equivalent to 0.049 GPa when converted to Pa units. In Patent
Literature 3, a sliding test is not performed. Therefore, even if the techniques disclosed
in Patent Literature 1 to 3 are used, there is a possibility that the anti-peeling
property of a plating layer during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more
than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure cannot be enhanced.
[0010] An objective of the present disclosure is to provide a sliding member that is excellent
in an anti-peeling property of a plating layer even during sliding under a high interfacial
pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure.
SOLUTION TO PROBLEM
[0011] A sliding member according to the present disclosure includes:
a base material including a sliding surface that slides with another member, and
a plating layer disposed on at least the sliding surface,
wherein:
the plating layer contains a parent phase and polytetrafluoroethylene;
the parent phase is a Zn-Ni alloy consisting of 10.0 to 17.0% by mass Ni, and the
balance being Zn and impurities; and
a content of the polytetrafluoroethylene in the plating layer is 6.5 to 21.0% by mass.
ADVANTAGEOUS EFFECTS OF INVENTION
[0012] The sliding member according to the present disclosure is excellent in an anti-peeling
property of a plating layer, even during sliding under a high interfacial pressure
of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0013]
[FIG. 1] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional diagram illustrating a sliding member according
to the present embodiment.
[FIG. 2] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating the relationship between a content of Ni
in a Zn-Ni alloy plating layer, a content of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in the
Zn-Ni alloy plating layer, and an anti-peeling property of the Zn-Ni alloy plating
layer during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms
of a Hertzian contact pressure.
[FIG. 3] FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the relation between a PTFE/Ni ratio and
an anti-peeling property of a Zn-Ni alloy plating layer during sliding under a high
interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure.
[FIG. 4] FIG. 4 is a photograph of a plating layer of Test No. 10 of the present example.
[FIG. 5] FIG. 5 is an image obtained by subjecting the photograph in FIG. 4 to black-
and-white binarization.
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[0014] The present embodiment is described in detail below with reference to the accompanying
drawings. The same reference symbols are used throughout the drawings to refer to
the same or like parts, and description thereof is not repeated.
[0015] The present inventors conducted studies regarding a sliding member that is excellent
in an anti-peeling property of a plating layer even during sliding under a high interfacial
pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure. As a result,
the present inventors obtained the following findings.
[0016] If a plating layer is damaged during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of
more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure, the plating layer will
peel off from the surface of the base material. On the other hand, if the hardness
of the plating layer is increased, the plating layer is not susceptible to damage
during sliding. Therefore, the present inventors considered that peeling of a plating
layer during sliding even under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in
terms of a Hertzian contact pressure can be suppressed by increasing the hardness
of the plating layer.
[0017] Meanwhile, among a plating layer, if a plating layer containing zinc (Zn) is formed,
the corrosion resistance of the sliding member increases because of sacrificial protection.
Therefore, conventionally, plating layers containing Zn have been used in sliding
members. However, the hardness of Zn is comparatively low. It is thought that, for
this reason, even if a Zn plating layer is formed, the anti-peeling property of the
plating layer during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa
in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure cannot be enhanced.
[0018] Here, among a Zn plating layer, a Zn-Ni alloy that consists of nickel (Ni) and the
balance being Zn and impurities has high hardness. Accordingly, the present inventors
considered that if a plating layer is formed by a Zn-Ni alloy consisting of Ni and
the balance being Zn and impurities, the anti-peeling property of the plating layer
will be enhanced even during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than
1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure. In the present description, a plating
layer that consists of Ni and the balance being Zn and impurities is referred to as
a "Zn-Ni alloy plating layer" or simply a "plating layer".
[0019] It is known that the alloy phase of a Zn-Ni alloy has eta phase, gamma phase and/or
alpha phase depending on the content of Ni. The eta phase is a Zn phase in which Ni
is dissolved. The gamma phase is a phase of an intermetallic compound of Ni
5Zn
21. The alpha phase is a Ni phase in which Zn is dissolved. It is known that when the
content of Ni is 10.0% by mass or less, the Zn-Ni alloy becomes a multi-phase alloy
including eta phase and gamma phase. It is known that when the content of Ni is 10.0
to 17.0% by mass, the Zn-Ni alloy mainly includes gamma phase. It is known that when
the content of Ni is more than 17.0% by mass, the Zn-Ni alloy becomes a multi-phase
alloy including gamma phase and alpha phase. Gamma phase is the phase with the highest
hardness among eta phase, gamma phase, and alpha phase. Therefore, it is conceivable
that if the content of Ni in the parent phase of a Zn-Ni alloy plating layer is within
the range of 10.0 to 17.0% by mass, the hardness of the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer
will increase.
[0020] The present inventors conducted further studies. As a result, the present inventors
found that when a Zn-Ni alloy plating layer contains Ni in an amount within a range
of 10.0 to 17.0% by mass, by containing polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in an amount
within a range of 6.5 to 21.0% by mass, an anti-peeling property is enhanced even
under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact
pressure.
[0021] The present inventors conducted the following experiment. A steel sheet having a
length of 150 mm, a width of 100 mm, and a thickness of 0.8 mm was prepared. A Zn-Ni
alloy plating layer was formed on the surface of the steel sheet. The Zn-Ni alloy
plating layer contained a parent phase and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). The parent
phase of the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer was a Zn-Ni alloy consisting of Ni and the
balance being Zn and impurities. The anti-peeling property of the Zn-Ni alloy plating
layer was evaluated while varying the content of Ni and the content of PTFE in the
Zn-Ni alloy plating layer. The anti-peeling property evaluation test was performed
under the following conditions. Apparatus: Stick-Slip Tester No. 7, manufactured by
Kobelco Machinery Engineering Co., Ltd.; sliding indenter: SUJ2 steel ball with diameter
of 4.763 mm; load: 3 kgf (Hertzian contact pressure (average interfacial pressure):
1.56 GPa; sliding width: 10 mm; sliding speed: 4 mm/s; temperature: 1 to 30°C; lubrication:
none. The sliding indenter was caused to slide under the above conditions. If the
Zn-Ni alloy plating layer does not peel off, because the sliding indenter and the
Zn-Ni alloy plating layer slide over each other, the sliding resistance is low. If
the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer peels off, because the sliding indenter and the steel
sheet slide over each other, the sliding resistance rapidly increases. Therefore,
the number of sliding times at the time when the sliding resistance increased to three
times or more the sliding resistance of the previous sliding was defined as "number
of sliding times at which the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer peeled off". The results of
the anti-peeling property evaluation test are shown in FIG. 2.
[0022] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating the relationship between the content of Ni in the
Zn-Ni alloy plating layer, the content of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in the Zn-Ni
alloy plating layer, and the anti-peeling property of the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer
during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of
a Hertzian contact pressure. The abscissa in FIG. 2 represents the content of Ni in
the parent phase of the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer in percent by mass. The ordinate
in FIG. 2 represents the content of PTFE in the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer in percent
by mass. In FIG. 2, a white circle indicates that the number of sliding times at which
the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer peeled off was 600 times or more. In FIG. 2, a black
circle indicates that the number of sliding times at which the Zn-Ni alloy plating
layer peeled off was less than 600 times.
[0023] Referring to FIG. 2, within a range in which a condition that the content of Ni was
10.0 to 17.0% by mass and a condition that the content of PTFE was 6.5 to 21.0% by
mass were both satisfied, the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer did not peel off even when
sliding was performed 600 times under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5
GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure. In other words, it was found that if
a condition that the content of Ni is 10.0 to 17.0% by mass and a condition that the
content of PTFE is 6.5 to 21.0% by mass are both satisfied, the anti-peeling property
of the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer during sliding under a high interfacial pressure
of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure is enhanced.
[0024] The present inventors investigated the Vickers hardness of a Zn-Ni alloy plating
layer in a case where PTFE is contained in the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer. As a result,
the present inventors obtained the following finding.
[Table 1]
[0025]
TABLE 1
Test No. |
Ni Content (mass%) |
PTFE Content (mass%) |
Number of Sliding Times at Which Plating Layer Peeled Off (times) |
Hardness of Plating Layer (Hv) |
3 |
10.1 |
13.0 |
830 |
101 |
4 |
12.1 |
15.5 |
699 |
189 |
5 |
12.6 |
7.2 |
865 |
195 |
15 |
10.3 |
- |
5 |
279 |
[0026] Table 1 is a partial extract of results obtained in Examples to be described later.
Referring to Table 1, in comparison to the Vickers hardness of the Zn-Ni alloy plating
layer of Test No. 15 which did not contain PTFE, the Vickers hardness of the Zn-Ni
alloy plating layer of each of Test Nos. 3 to 5 that contained PTFE was low. In addition,
comparing Test No. 4 and Test No. 5 in which the contents of Ni were nearly equal,
it was found that when the content of PTFE is increased, the Vickers hardness of the
Zn-Ni alloy plating layer decreases. The Zn-Ni alloy plating layer of Test No. 15
which did not contain PTFE peeled off the fifth time that sliding was performed. In
contrast, the Zn-Ni alloy plating layers of Test Nos. 3 to 5 which contained PTFE
peeled off after sliding was performed 600 times or more. Based on the above results,
the finding that, by containing PTFE, even though the hardness of the Zn-Ni alloy
plating layer decreases, the anti-peeling property is enhanced was obtained, which
is a completely different finding to the conventional idea.
[0027] The reason why, when a Zn-Ni alloy plating layer contains the aforementioned content
of Ni and content of PTFE, even though the hardness of the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer
decreases, the anti-peeling property of the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer during sliding
under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact
pressure is enhanced is not certain. However, when a Zn-Ni alloy plating layer does
not contain PTFE, the anti-peeling property during sliding under a high interfacial
pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure is low. Therefore,
it can be considered that PTFE contributes to improving the anti-peeling property
during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of
a Hertzian contact pressure. The present inventors consider that the reason is as
follows. During formation of a Zn-Ni alloy plating layer, internal stress occurs in
the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer. If the internal stress is high, when an external force
is imparted, the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer easily peels off at the interface between
the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer and the base material.
[0028] On the other hand, there is a possibility that in the initial stage of Zn-Ni alloy
plating layer formation, PTFE affects the adsorption of Zn ions to the steel sheet
surface, and therefore the internal stress of the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer will decrease.
Consequently, the present inventors consider that if PTFE is contained in the Zn-Ni
alloy plating layer, the internal stress that occurs during formation of the Zn-Ni
alloy plating layer decreases, and peeling of the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer can be
suppressed.
[0029] The sliding member of the present embodiment, which has been completed based on the
above findings, is as follows.
[0030]
- [1] A sliding member, including:
a base material including a sliding surface that slides with another member, and
a plating layer disposed at least on the sliding surface,
wherein:
the plating layer contains a parent phase and polytetrafluoroethylene,
the parent phase is a Zn-Ni alloy consisting of 10.0 to 17.0% by mass Ni, and the
balance being Zn and impurities, and
a content of the polytetrafluoroethylene in the plating layer is 6.5 to 21.0% by mass.
- [2] The sliding member according to [1], wherein the plating layer satisfies Formula
(1).

Where, in Formula (1), a content in percent by mass of the polytetrafluoroethylene
in the plating layer is substituted for [PTFE], and a content in percent by mass of
Ni in the parent phase is substituted for [Ni].
- [3] The sliding member according to [1] or [2], wherein:
a blackened area ratio of the plating layer surface is 30% or less.
[Sliding member]
[0031] FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional diagram illustrating a sliding member 1 according to
the present embodiment. Referring to FIG. 1, the sliding member 1 includes a base
material 2 and a plating layer 3.
[Base material]
[0032] The base material 2 includes a sliding surface 20 that slides with another member.
The term "another member" refers to another sliding member. The sliding member 1 slides
with the other sliding member at the sliding surface 20. Note that, as described below,
the sliding surface 20 is formed at the base material 2, and the plating layer 3 is
disposed on the sliding surface 20. Accordingly, when the sliding member 1 slides
with the other sliding member, the plating layer 3 is disposed between the sliding
surface 20 and the other sliding member.
[0033] The base material 2 is not particularly limited as long as the base material 2 is
a member that can be utilized as the sliding member 1 and can be subjected to plating.
Examples of the base material 2 include the rail and wheels of a train, an engine
cylinder and a piston, a crankshaft and a connecting rod, a tool in a drilling process,
a saw blade, a pulley, a gear, an industrial screw, a nut, a bearing, a guide member,
and a die. The composition of the base material 2 is not particularly limited. In
other words, the base material 2 may be made of single metal, may be made of an alloy,
or may form a plating layer on the surface. The base material 2 is, for example, carbon
steel, stainless steel, alloy steel, carbon steel with a plating layer, stainless
steel with a plating layer, alloy steel with a plating layer or the like.
[Plating layer]
[0034] The plating layer 3 is disposed on at least the sliding surface 20. In a case where
the base material 2 includes another surface other than the sliding surface 20, the
plating layer 3 may be disposed only on the sliding surface 20, or may be disposed
on the other surface in addition to the sliding surface 20.
[0035] The plating layer 3 contains a parent phase 30 and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)
31.
[Chemical composition of parent phase]
[0036] The parent phase 30 of the plating layer 3 is a Zn-Ni alloy consisting of 10.0 to
17.0% by mass nickel (Ni), and the balance being zinc (Zn) and impurities. In other
words, the parent phase 30 is a Zn-Ni alloy consisting of 10.0 to 17.0% by mass Ni,
83.0 to 90.0% by mass Zn, and impurities. It is known that a Zn-Ni alloy having this
composition mainly includes a gamma phase. In this case, the hardness of the Zn-Ni
alloy plating layer increases, and an anti-peeling property of the plating layer 3
is enhanced even during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5
GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure. A preferable lower limit of the content
of Ni in the parent phase 30 of the plating layer 3 is 10.3% by mass, more preferably
is 10.5% by mass, further preferably is 10.8% by mass, and further preferably is 11.0%
by mass. A preferable upper limit of the content of Ni in the parent phase 30 of the
plating layer 3 is 16.5% by mass, more preferably is 16.0% by mass, further preferably
is 15.0% by mass, and further preferably is 14.0% by mass. Examples of the impurities
include hydrogen (H), oxygen (O), and iron (Fe). In some cases, the parent phase 30
of the plating layer 3 may contain impurities in a total amount of 1.0% by mass or
less. Note that, the term "content of Ni" refers to the content of Ni in the parent
phase 30.
[Polytetrafluoroethylene]
[0037] The polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) 31 is a resin having repeating units of (C
2F
4)
n. In the present description, PTFE 31 means particles which contains polytetrafluoroethylene
as a main component. Specifically, PTFE 31 consists of 98% by mass or more of polytetrafluoroethylene,
and the balance being impurities. That is, PTFE 31 contained in the plating layer
3 corresponds to particles of polytetrafluoroethylene. The PTFE 31 according to the
present embodiment is not particularly limited, and well-known particles of polytetrafluoroethylene
can be used. Note that, the size of PTFE 31 is not particularly limited, for example,
the particle size of PTFE 31 may be within a range of 0.1 to 2.0 µm, or may be within
a range of 0.4 to 1.0 µm. Also, the particle size of PTFE 31 means the average particle
size of PTFE 31.
[0038] In the present embodiment, the content of the PTFE 31 in the plating layer 3 is 6.5
to 21.0% by mass. If the plating layer 3 contains the parent phase 30 that is a Zn-Ni
alloy consisting of 10.0 to 17.0% by mass Ni and the balance being Zn and impurities,
and 6.5 to 21.0% by mass the PTFE 31, an anti-peeling property will be enhanced even
during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of
a Hertzian contact pressure. A preferable lower limit of the content of the PTFE 31
is 6.7% by mass, more preferably is 6.9% by mass, further preferably is 7.0% by mass,
further preferably is 7.5% by mass, and further preferably is 8.0% by mass. A preferable
upper limit of the content of the PTFE 31 is 20.5% by mass, more preferably is 20.0%
by mass, further preferably is 19.5% by mass, further preferably is 19.0% by mass,
further preferably is 18.5% by mass, further preferably is 18.0% by mass, further
preferably is 17.5% by mass, and further preferably is 17.0% by mass. Note that, the
term "content of PTFE" refers to the content of PTFE in the plating layer 3.
[Ratio between content of PTFE and content of Ni]
[0039] A ratio between the content of PTFE in the plating layer 3 and the content of Ni
in the parent phase 30 is not particularly limited. However, preferably the ratio
satisfies Formula (1).

[0040] Where, in Formula (1), the content in percent by mass of the PTFE 31 in the plating
layer 3 is substituted for [PTFE], and the content in percent by mass of Ni in the
parent phase 30 is substituted for [Ni].
[0041] Hereunder, the ratio of the content in percent by mass of the PTFE 31 in the plating
layer 3 to the content in percent by mass of Ni in the parent phase 30 is referred
to as "PTFE/Ni ratio". FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the relation between the PTFE/Ni
ratio and the anti-peeling property of the Zn-Ni alloy plating layer 3 during sliding
under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact
pressure. FIG. 3 was obtained based on Examples that are described later. The ordinate
in FIG. 3 represents the number of sliding times at which the plating layer 3 peeled
off in an anti-peeling property evaluation test. The abscissa in FIG. 3 represents
the PTFE/Ni ratio of the plating layer 3. Referring to FIG. 3, if the PTFE/Ni ratio
is within a range of 0.85 or more to 1.05 or less, the anti-peeling property of the
plating layer 3 during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5
GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure is further enhanced. A more preferable
lower limit of the PTFE/Ni ratio is 0.88, and further preferably is 0.90. A more preferable
upper limit of the PTFE/Ni ratio is 1.03, and further preferably is 1.00.
[Method for measuring composition of plating layer]
[0042] The composition of the plating layer 3 is measured by the following method. The surface
of the plating layer 3 is analyzed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) using
a field emission-electron probe micro analyzer (FE-EPMA). Specifically, the analysis
conditions are as follows: measurement magnification of ×1000, irradiation with an
electron beam, which acceleration voltage is 15 kV and a maximum of irradiation current
is 1 nA, and measurement of Kα radiation intensity, and the count of nickel (Ni),
the count of zinc (Zn), and the count of fluorine (F) in the visual field are measured.
The obtained count of F is converted to the content in percent by mass of F. The content
in percent by mass of F is divided by the atomic weight of F to convert to the molar
amount of F. The content in mass percent of CF
2 is determined from the molar amount of F, and the determined value is defined as
the content in mass percent of the PTFE 31. By this means, the content of the PTFE
31 in the plating layer 3 is determined. The obtained count of Ni is converted to
the content in percent by mass of Ni. The obtained content of Ni is the content of
Ni with respect to the entire plating layer 3. Therefore, this content of Ni is converted
to the content of Ni with respect to the parent phase 30 of the plating layer 3 which
does not contain the PTFE 31. By this means, the content of Ni in the parent phase
30 of the plating layer 3 is determined.
[0043] In some cases the plating layer 3 contains impurities. The impurities are selected,
for example, from the group consisting of hydrogen (H), oxygen (O), and Fe. The total
of impurities contained in the plating layer 3 is, for example, less than 1.0% by
mass, and more preferably is less than 0.5% by mass. Accordingly, the plating layer
3 may be a plating layer 3 that consists of the parent phase 30, the PTFE 31, and
one or more impurities selected from the group consisting of hydrogen (H), oxygen
(O), and Fe. The content of impurities may be 0% by mass. Accordingly, the plating
layer 3 may be a plating layer 3 consisting of the parent phase 30 and the PTFE 31.
[Crystal structure of Zn-Ni alloy]
[0044] The parent phase 30 of the plating layer 3 is a Zn-Ni alloy consisting of 10.0 to
17.0% by mass nickel (Ni), and the balance being zinc (Zn) and impurities. In this
case, the parent phase 30 of the plating layer 3 includes a gamma phase. The gamma
phase is a phase having a cubic crystal structure with a lattice constant α = 0.890
nm that has the chemical formula Ni
5Zn
21. The parent phase 30 of the plating layer 3 may contain an eta phase. The eta phase
is a phase having a hexagonal crystal structure with lattice constants a = 0.267 nm
and c = 0.495 nm that has the chemical formula Zn. The parent phase 30 of the plating
layer 3 may contain an alpha phase. The alpha phase is a phase having a face-centered
cubic crystal structure with a lattice constant a = 0.352 nm that has the chemical
formula Ni. The gamma phase has the highest hardness among eta phase, gamma phase,
and alpha phase. Therefore, preferably the parent phase 30 of the plating layer 3
is a single-phase gamma phase.
[Method for identifying crystal structure of parent phase of plating layer]
[0045] The crystal structure of the parent phase 30 of the plating layer 3 is identified
by the following method. X-ray diffraction measurement is performed under the following
measurement conditions with respect to the surface of the plating layer 3. The measured
profiles that are obtained and values described in the ICDD (International Center
for Diffraction Data) cards are compared to identify the phases.
- Apparatus: X-ray diffractometer
- X-ray tube: Co-Kα radiation
- Scan range: 2θ = 10 to 110°
- Scan step: 0.02°
[Thickness of plating layer]
[0046] The thickness of the plating layer 3 is not particularly limited. If the thickness
of the plating layer 3 is 1.0 µm or more, durability can be consistently obtained.
If the thickness of the plating layer 3 is 60.0 µm or less, the occurrence of excessive
production costs can be suppressed. Therefore, the thickness of the plating layer
3 is preferably 1.0 to 60.0 µm. The lower limit of the thickness of the plating layer
3 is more preferably 2.0 µm, further preferably is 3.0 µm, further preferably is 5.0
µm, further preferably is 7.0 µm, and further preferably is 10.0 µm. The upper limit
of the thickness of the plating layer 3 is more preferably 55.0 µm, further preferably
is 50.0 µm, further preferably is 45.0 µm, further preferably is 40.0 µm, further
preferably is 35.0 µm, further preferably is 30.0 µm, further preferably is 25.0 µm,
and further preferably is 20.0 µm.
[Method for measuring thickness of plating layer]
[0047] The thickness of the plating layer 3 is measured by the following method. The thickness
of the plating layer 3 is measured at an arbitrary four locations on the surface of
the plating layer 3 using an eddy current phase-type coating thickness gauge. The
measurement of the plating layer 3 is performed by a method in accordance with ISO
(International Organization for Standardization) 21968 (2005). The arithmetic mean
of the measurement results obtained at the four locations is defined as the thickness
of the plating layer 3.
[Blackened area ratio of plating layer]
[0048] As a result of studies conducted by the present inventors it was found that when
PTFE 31 is contained in a large amount of 6.5% by mass or more in the plating layer
3 that is a Zn-Ni alloy, a black irregular appearance occurs on the surface of the
plating layer 3. In the present description, "black irregular appearance" means that
a part or all of the surface of the plating layer 3 has turned black. The present
inventors considered that if the occurrence of such a black irregular appearance on
the surface of the plating layer 3 can be suppressed, the appearance of the sliding
member 1 will be enhanced. In the sliding member 1 of the present embodiment, preferably
a blackened area ratio of the surface of the plating layer 3 is 30% or less. In this
case, in the sliding member 1, even if the content of PTFE 31 in the plating layer
3 is a high content of 6.5% by mass or more, the plating layer 3 will be excellent
in appearance. The upper limit of the blackened area ratio at the surface of the plating
layer 3 is more preferably 20%, and further preferably is 15%. The blackened area
ratio at the surface of the plating layer 3 may be 0%.
[0049] In the present embodiment, the blackened area ratio can be measured by the following
method. Specifically, a photograph is taken that included a region of 100 mm in length
× 100 mm in width in which the plating layer 3 of the sliding member 1 is formed.
The blackened area is identified from the obtained photograph and then the area ratio
of the blackened area is measured. Note that, for those skilled in the art, it is
possible to identify the blackened area. Also, by performing the image processing
, the obtained photograph may be binarized and the blackened area ratio may be determined.
[Other components]
[0050] As described above, the sliding member 1 according to the present embodiment includes
the base material 2 and the plating layer 3 disposed on the sliding surface 20 of
the base material 2. Here, the sliding member 1 may include other components than
the base material 2 and the plating layer 3. For example, as an upper layer of the
plating layer 3 of the sliding member 1, another plating layer may be formed, a chemical
conversion treatment layer may be formed, or a lubricant coating layer may be formed.
[0051] The sliding member 1 of the present embodiment can be favorably used during sliding
under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact
pressure. However, application of the sliding member 1 of the present embodiment is
not limited to sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms
of a Hertzian contact pressure. The sliding member 1 of the present embodiment can
also be favorably used during sliding under an interfacial pressure of 1.5 GPa or
less in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure.
[Production method]
[0052] A method for producing the sliding member 1 of the present embodiment includes a
preparation process and a plating layer formation process.
[Preparation process]
[0053] In the preparation process, the base material 2 and a plating solution are prepared.
As mentioned above, the base material 2 is not particularly limited as long as the
base material 2 is a material that can be utilized as the sliding member 1 and can
be subjected to plating. The plating solution contains zinc ions, nickel ions, PTFE
31, and a solvent. The plating solution preferably contains zinc ions: 1 to 100 g/L,
nickel ions: 1 to 100 g/L, and PTFE 31: 1 to 50 g/L. The solvent is, for example,
water. The plating solution may contain other components. The other components, for
example, are selected from the group consisting of a conductive auxiliary agent (supporting
electrolyte) and a surface active agent. The conductive auxiliary agent, for example,
is selected from the group consisting of sodium sulfate, ammonium sulfate, and ammonium
chloride. The surface active agent, for example, is selected from the group consisting
of cationic, anionic, and nonionic surface active agents.
[Plating layer formation process]
[0054] In the plating layer formation process, the plating layer 3 is formed by a plating
treatment. In the plating layer formation process, at least the sliding surface 20
among the base material 2 is brought into contact with the plating solution. By this
means, the plating layer 3 is formed on at least the sliding surface 20 of the base
material 2. Formation of the plating layer 3 is preferably performed by electroplating.
The electroplating is performed by bringing at least the sliding surface 20 among
the base material 2 into contact with the plating solution, and passing an electric
current through the plating solution. The electroplating conditions can be set as
appropriate. For example, the electroplating conditions are as follows: plating solution
pH: 1 to 10, plating solution temperature: 10 to 70°C, current density: 1 to 100 A/dm
2, and treatment time: 0.1 to 90 minutes.
[0055] In the case of suppressing the occurrence of a black irregular appearance on the
surface of the plating layer 3, for example, plating is performed under the following
conditions. In this case, the blackened area ratio of the surface of the plating layer
3 can be made 30% or less.
- Ni2+/Zn2+ molar ratio in plating solution ≤ 1.5
- metallic salt concentration (total of Ni2+ and Zn2+) in plating solution ≤ 1.5 M
- PTFE concentration in plating solution ≤ 25 g/L
- plating solution temperature: 57 to 65°C
- plating solution pH: 2 to 4
- plating solution flow rate (linear flow rate): 0.1 to 0.4 m/sec
- current density: ≤ 3 A/dm2
[Preconditioning treatment process]
[0056] As necessary, the aforementioned production method may include a preconditioning
treatment process prior to the plating layer formation process. The preconditioning
treatment process includes, for example, pickling and alkaline degreasing. In the
preconditioning treatment process, oil or dirt adhering to the sliding surface 20
of the base material 2 is removed. The preconditioning treatment process may further
include a grinding process such as sandblasting and finishing by mechanical grinding.
Only one kind of these preconditioning treatments may be performed, or a plurality
of the preconditioning treatments may be performed in combination.
[0057] The sliding member 1 of the present embodiment is produced by the processes described
above. However, the production method described above is one example of a method for
producing the sliding member 1 of the present embodiment, and a method for producing
the sliding member 1 is not limited to the production method described above. The
sliding member 1 of the present embodiment may be produced by another method.
EXAMPLES
[0058] Hereunder, advantageous effects of the sliding member of the present embodiment will
be described more specifically by way of examples. The conditions adopted in the following
examples are one example of conditions which are employed for confirming the feasibility
and advantageous effects of the sliding member of the present embodiment. Accordingly,
the sliding member of the present embodiment is not limited to this one example of
the conditions.
[0059] In the Examples, plating layers whose compositions were varied were formed on steel
sheets, and the anti-peeling property of each plating layer during sliding under a
high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure
was evaluated. Specifically, the plating layers were formed and evaluated as follows.
[Preparation process]
[0060] In the present examples, commercially available cold-rolled steel sheets were used
based on the assumption of use as a base material. Each cold-rolled steel sheet had
a length of 150 mm, a width of 100 mm, and a thickness of 0.8 mm. The steel grade
was SPCC (low-carbon steel) defined in Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) G3141 (2021).
A region of 100 mm in length × 100 mm in width on the surface of each cold-rolled
steel sheet was subjected to plating.
[0061] The plating solution was an aqueous solution having a pH of 2 to 4 containing zinc
sulfate heptahydrate: 100 to 250 g/L, nickel sulfate hexahydrate: 150 to 350 g/L,
sodium sulfate: 75 g/L, and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE): 0 to 25 g/L. The metallic
salt concentration (total amount of Ni
2+ and Zn
2+) in the plating solution was 1.5 M or less. The composition of the plating solution
was varied within the ranges described above, and a plating layer was formed on the
steel sheet of each test number. By this means, the compositions of the plating layers
of the respective test numbers were varied. Note that, in Test Nos. 16 to 18, the
plating solution did not contain PTFE, and instead contained 3 to 10 g/L of graphite.
The plating layers were formed by electroplating. The plating conditions were a plating
solution temperature of 50 to 60°C, a current density of 1 to 10 A/dm
2, and the plating anode (counter electrode) of an iridium oxide-coated titanium plate.
As PTFE, particles consisting of 98 % by mass or more of polytetrafluoroethylene and
the balance being impurities, and having an average size within a range of 0.4 to
1.0 µm were used in the present example.
[0062] In addition to the aforementioned conditions, Test Nos. 1 to 5 and 7 to 9 satisfied
the following conditions.
- Ni2+/Zn2+ molar ratio in plating solution ≤ 1.5
- plating solution temperature: 57 to 60°C
- plating solution flow rate (linear flow rate): 0.1 to 0.4 m/sec
- current density: ≤ 3 A/dm2
[0063] In Test No. 6, plating was performed under the following conditions.
- Ni2+/Zn2+ molar ratio in plating solution = 3.0
- plating solution temperature: 50°C
- plating solution flow rate (linear flow rate): 0 m/sec
- current density: ≤ 3 A/dm2
[0064] In Test No. 10, plating was performed under the following conditions.
- Ni2+/Zn2+ molar ratio in plating solution = 3.0
- plating solution temperature: 57 to 60°C
- plating solution flow rate (linear flow rate): 0.5 m/sec
- current density: 6 A/dm2
[Test to measure composition of plating layer]
[0065] The composition of the plating layer of each test number was measured by the following
method. The surface of the plating layer of each test number was analyzed by energy
dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) using a field emission-electron probe micro analyzer
(FE-EPMA) with the model name JXA-8530F manufactured by JEOL Ltd. Specifically, the
analysis conditions were as follows: measurement magnification: ×1000, acceleration
voltage: 15 kV, irradiation current: irradiation with an electron beam reaching a
maximum of 1 nA and measurement of Kα radiation intensity, and the count of nickel
(Ni), the count of zinc (Zn), and the count of fluorine (F) in the visual field were
measured. The obtained count of F was converted to the content in percent by mass
of F. The content in percent by mass of F was divided by the atomic weight of F to
convert to the molar amount of F. The content in mass percent of CF
2 was determined from the molar amount of F, and the determined value was defined as
the content in mass percent of PTFE. By this means, the content of PTFE in the plating
layer was determined. The results are shown in the column "PTFE Content (mass%)" in
Table 2.
[0066] The obtained count of Ni was converted to the content in percent by mass of Ni. The
obtained content of Ni was the content of Ni with respect to the entire plating layer.
Therefore, this content of Ni was converted to the content of Ni with respect to the
parent phase of the plating layer which did not contain PTFE. By this means, the content
of Ni in the parent phase of the plating layer was determined. The results are shown
in the column "Ni Content (mass%)" in Table 2. The parent phase of the plating layer
of each test number was a Zn-Ni alloy consisting of Ni and the balance being Zn and
impurities which is shown in Table 2. In Table 2, the ratio of the content in percent
by mass of PTFE in the plating layer to the content in percent by mass of Ni in the
parent phase is shown in the column "[PTFE]/[Ni]". Note that, in Test No. 15, the
plating layer did not contain PTFE. In Test Nos. 16 to 18, the plating layer did not
contain PTFE, and instead contained graphite. With regard to Test Nos. 16 to 18, the
content of graphite is shown in the column "PTFE Content (mass%)" in Table 2.
[Table 2]
[0067]
TABLE 2
Test No. |
Ni Content (mass%) |
PTFE Content (mass%) |
[PTFE]/[Ni] |
Thickness of Plating Layer (µm) |
1 |
13.9 |
11.3 |
0.81 |
11.2 |
2 |
16.6 |
10.1 |
0.61 |
11.1 |
3 |
10.1 |
13.0 |
1.29 |
10.0 |
4 |
12.1 |
15.5 |
1.28 |
10.0 |
5 |
12.6 |
7.2 |
0.57 |
11.7 |
6 |
14.3 |
16.6 |
1.16 |
10.0 |
7 |
11.8 |
11.2 |
0.95 |
12.1 |
8 |
10.6 |
10.3 |
0.97 |
12.0 |
9 |
11.9 |
11.0 |
0.92 |
12.0 |
10 |
15.8 |
13.1 |
0.83 |
12.0 |
11 |
12.4 |
6.2 |
0.50 |
10.8 |
12 |
7.2 |
4.7 |
0.66 |
11.5 |
13 |
7.5 |
12.4 |
1.65 |
11.8 |
14 |
48.5 |
10.1 |
0.21 |
10.0 |
15 |
10.3 |
- |
- |
10.8 |
16 |
14.8 |
(Graphite) 6.7 |
- |
10.2 |
17 |
10.7 |
(Graphite) 8.9 |
- |
16.4 |
18 |
13.7 |
(Graphite) 9.6 |
- |
10.2 |
[X-ray diffraction measurement test for parent phase of plating layer]
[0068] The crystal structure of the parent phase of the plating layer of each test number
was identified by the following method. X-ray diffraction measurement was performed
under the following measurement conditions with respect to the surface of the plating
layer. The measured profiles that were obtained and values described in the ICDD cards
were compared to identify phases. As a result it was found that in all of the Examples,
the parent phase of the plating layer included a gamma phase. The parent phase of
the plating layer of Test Nos. 1, 4 to 6 and 10 was a single-phase gamma phase.
- Apparatus: X-ray diffractometer RINT-2500 manufactured by Rigaku Corporation
- X-ray tube: Co-Kα radiation
- Scan range: 2θ = 10 to 110°
- Scan step: 0.02°
[Test to measure thickness of plating layer]
[0069] The thickness of the plating layer of each test number was measured by the following
method. The thickness of the plating layer was measured at an arbitrary four locations
on the surface of the plating layer using an eddy current phase-type coating thickness
gauge with the model name PHASCOPE PM910 manufactured by Helmut Fischer GmbH. The
measurement of the plating layer was performed by a method in accordance with ISO
21968 (2005). The arithmetic mean of the measurement results obtained at the four
locations was defined as the thickness of the plating layer. The results are shown
in the column "Thickness of Plating Layer (µm)" in Table 2.
[Anti-peeling property evaluation test]
[0070] The plating layer of the respective steel sheets that included a plating layer of
each test number was subjected to an anti-peeling property evaluation test. The test
to evaluate the anti-peeling property of the plating layer was performed under the
following conditions: apparatus: Stick-Slip Tester No. 7, manufactured by Kobelco
Machinery Engineering Co., Ltd.; sliding indenter: SUJ2 steel ball with diameter of
4.763 mm; load: 3 kgf (Hertzian contact pressure (average interfacial pressure): 1.56
GPa); sliding width: 10 mm; sliding speed: 4 mm/s; temperature: 1 to 30°C; lubrication:
none. The number of sliding times at the time when the sliding resistance increased
to three times or more the sliding resistance of the previous sliding was defined
as the "number of sliding times at which the plating layer peeled off". The results
are shown in the column "Number of Sliding Times at Time Plating Layer Peeled Off
(times)" in Table 3.
[Table 3]
[0071]
TABLE 3
Test No. |
Number of Sliding Times at Which Plating Layer Peeled Off (times) |
Blackened Area Ratio (%) |
Hardness of Plating Layer (Hv) |
1 |
1307 |
5 |
- |
2 |
690 |
10 |
- |
3 |
830 |
3 |
101 |
4 |
699 |
10 |
189 |
5 |
865 |
0 |
195 |
6 |
608 |
80 |
- |
7 |
2583 |
0 |
- |
8 |
2244 |
0 |
- |
9 |
2440 |
0 |
- |
10 |
774 |
90 |
- |
11 |
185 |
50 |
- |
12 |
24 |
0 |
- |
13 |
77 |
5 |
- |
14 |
130 |
75 |
- |
15 |
5 |
0 |
279 |
16 |
<600 |
- |
- |
17 |
<600 |
- |
- |
18 |
<600 |
- |
- |
[Blackened area ratio measurement test]
[0072] The blackened area ratio at the plating layer surface of each of Test Nos. 1 to 15
was measured by the following method. A photograph was taken that included the whole
of a region of 100 mm in length × 100 mm in width in which the plating layer was formed.
FIG. 4 shows the photograph of the plating layer of Test No. 10. The obtained photograph
was binarized to black and white by image processing. FIG. 5 shows an image obtained
by subjecting the photograph in FIG. 4 to black- and-white binarization. Based on
the black and white binarized image, the area ratio of the black portions with respect
to the entire area was determined. The results are shown in the column "Blackened
Area Ratio (%)" in Table 3.
[Test to measure hardness of plating layer]
[0073] The hardness of the plating layer of Test Nos. 3 to 5 and 15 was measured. The test
to measure the hardness of the plating layer was performed under the following conditions.
The Vickers hardness (Hv) of the plating layer surface was measured using a micro
hardness tester with the model name FISCHERSCOPE (registered trademark) HM2000 manufactured
by Helmut Fischer GmbH. The load was 10 to 50 mN. The load was adjusted so that a
multiple of six times the indentation depth (µm) was not more than the plating layer
thickness. The results are shown in the column "Hardness of Plating Layer (Hv)" in
Table 3.
[Evaluation results]
[0074] Referring to Tables 2 and 3, the plating layer of each of Test Nos. 1 to 10 contained
a parent phase that was a Zn-Ni alloy consisting of 10.0 to 17.0% by mass Ni and the
balance being Zn and impurities, and PTFE having a content of 6.5 to 21.0% by mass
in the plating layer. As a result, in the anti-peeling property evaluation test, the
number of sliding times at the time when the plating layer peeled off was 600 times
or more. It was found that the sliding members having the plating layers of Test Nos.
1 to 10 were excellent in an anti-peeling property of the plating layer during sliding
under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact
pressure.
[0075] In addition, in Test Nos. 7 to 9 in which the PTFE/Ni ratio was in the range of 0.85
or more to 1.05 or less, in the anti-peeling property evaluation test, the number
of sliding times at the time when the plating layer peeled off was 2000 times or more.
It was found that in comparison to Test Nos. 1 to 6 and 10, the sliding members having
the plating layers of Test Nos. 7 to 9 were more excellent in an anti-peeling property
of the plating layer during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than
1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure.
[0076] The blackened area ratio at the plating layer surface in Test Nos. 1 to 5 and 7 to
9 was 30% or less. It was found that, in comparison to Test No. 6 and Test No. 10,
the sliding members having the plating layers of Test Nos. 1 to 5 and 7 to 9 were
excellent in an anti-peeling property of the plating layer during sliding under a
high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure,
and were also excellent in the appearance of the plating layer even when the content
of PTFE in the plating layer was a high content of 6.5% or more.
[0077] On the other hand, in the plating layer of Test No. 11, the content of PTFE was too
low. As a result, in the anti-peeling property evaluation test, the number of sliding
times at the time when the plating layer peeled off was less than 600 times. It was
found that in the sliding member having the plating layer of Test No. 11, the anti-peeling
property of the plating layer during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of
more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure was not enhanced.
[0078] In the plating layer of Test No. 12, the content of Ni and content of PTFE were too
low. As a result, in the anti-peeling property evaluation test, the number of sliding
times at the time when the plating layer peeled off was less than 600 times. It was
found that in the sliding member having the plating layer of Test No. 12, the anti-peeling
property of the plating layer during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of
more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure was not enhanced.
[0079] In the plating layer of Test No. 13, the content of Ni was too low. As a result,
in the anti-peeling property evaluation test, the number of sliding times at the time
when the plating layer peeled off was less than 600 times. It was found that in the
sliding member having the plating layer of Test No. 13, the anti-peeling property
of the plating layer during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than
1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure was not enhanced.
[0080] In the plating layer of Test No. 14, the content of Ni was too high. As a result,
in the anti-peeling property evaluation test, the number of sliding times at the time
when the plating layer peeled off was less than 600 times. It was found that in the
sliding member having the plating layer of Test No. 14, the anti-peeling property
of the plating layer during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than
1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure was not enhanced.
[0081] The plating layer of Test No. 15 did not contain PTFE. As a result, in the anti-peeling
property evaluation test, the number of sliding times at the time when the plating
layer peeled off was less than 600 times. It was found that in the sliding member
having the plating layer of Test No. 15, the anti-peeling property of the plating
layer during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of more than 1.5 GPa in terms
of a Hertzian contact pressure was not enhanced.
[0082] The plating layers of Test Nos. 16 to 18 contained graphite instead of PTFE. As a
result, in the anti-peeling property evaluation test, the number of sliding times
at the time when the plating layer peeled off was less than 600 times. It was found
that in the sliding members having the plating layers of Test Nos. 16 to 18, the anti-peeling
property of the plating layers during sliding under a high interfacial pressure of
more than 1.5 GPa in terms of a Hertzian contact pressure was not enhanced.
[0083] An embodiment of the present invention has been described above. However, the embodiment
described above is merely an example for carrying out the present invention. Therefore,
the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and can be
practiced by appropriately modifying the above-described embodiment within a range
not departing from the spirit thereof.
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST
[0084]
- 1
- Sliding Member
- 2
- Base Material
- 3
- Plating Layer
- 20
- Sliding Surface
- 30
- Parent Phase
- 31
- Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)