TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present disclosure relates to a cold rolling method, a method of producing a
steel sheet, a cold rolling line, and a steel sheet production line.
BACKGROUND
[0002] In general, it is desirable that cold rolling of rolled material such as cold-rolled
thin steel sheets (hereinafter also referred to simply as "rolled material") be carried
out with a sheet passing property of the rolled material stabilized. The sheet passing
property of rolled material is stabilized by maintaining good shape (or flatness)
of the rolled material while maintaining good thickness precision in the rolling direction
and the transverse direction of the rolled material. On the other hand, there is a
growing need for difficult-to-roll material such as thin hard material having a high
load capacity and a thin pre-rolled thickness for purposes such as improving fuel
efficiency by reducing weight. In order to decrease the rolling load during cold rolling,
such difficult-to-roll material is sent to the cold rolling process after being thinned
in a hot rolling process prior to cold rolling.
[0003] Difficult-to-roll material is sometimes joined to the next coil with bends remaining
at the leading and trailing ends of the coil caused by shape defects during hot rolling.
When cold rolling such joined portions, changes in cold mill roll gap, leveling, bender,
intermediate roll shift, and the like cannot be accommodated by automatic control.
As a result, there is a possibility of poor shape of the rolled material after cold
rolling or sheet fracture during cold rolling.
[0004] In recent years, many of the control factors of cold mills are automatically controlled
by actuators mounted on the cold mills. For example, as indicated in Patent Literature
(PTL) 1, a shape meter is disposed at rolling mill delivery, symmetric and asymmetric
components of shape data (elongation difference rate distribution) from the shape
meter are calculated, and shape feedback (FB) control is used to automatically control
rolling mill leveling with the asymmetric component and bending with the symmetric
component.
CITATION LIST
Patent Literature
SUMMARY
(Technical Problem)
[0006] To suppress the occurrence of fractures, unit tension in the vicinity of transverse
direction ends needs to be small and asymmetry in the vicinity of transverse direction
ends needs to be small. However, the index of an asymmetric component expressed by
the correlation of a first-order power function as in PTL 1 is affected by elongation
difference rate at the center in the transverse direction and the asymmetric component
in the vicinity of transverse direction ends cannot be well controlled.
[0007] It would be helpful to provide a cold rolling method, a method of producing a steel
sheet, a cold rolling line, and a steel sheet production line that can suppress the
occurrence of fracture.
(Solution to Problem)
[0008]
- (1) A cold rolling method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure comprises:
a process of calculating a leveling target value for a cold mill that carries out
cold rolling on rolled material, the calculation being based on an index of an asymmetric
component of an elongation difference rate distribution of the rolled material after
cold rolling at delivery of the cold mill; and
a process of executing leveling control of the cold mill based on the leveling target
value, wherein
the index of the asymmetric component of the elongation difference rate distribution
is calculated based on a correlation between the elongation difference rate distribution
and an odd function, where the odd function is obtained by multiplying a first-order
power function by an absolute value power function that is greater than zero-order.
- (2) The cold rolling method according to (1), as an embodiment of the present disclosure,
wherein
the odd function is a third-order power function.
- (3) The cold rolling method according to (1) or (2), as an embodiment of the present
disclosure, wherein
the cold mill comprises a plurality of stands, and
the leveling control based on third-order or higher-order correlation is executed
for all stands of the plurality of stands except the last stand.
- (4) The cold rolling method according to any one of (1) to (3), as an embodiment of
the present disclosure, wherein
in the index of the asymmetric component, the leveling target value is calculated
so that the shape difference between an OP side and a DR side of the rolled material
is 20 I-units or less.
- (5) A method of producing a steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present
disclosure, the method comprising
a cold rolling process of cold rolling a steel sheet as the rolled material by the
cold rolling method according to any one of (1) to (4).
- (6) A cold rolling line according to an embodiment of the present disclosure comprises:
a cold mill that carries out cold rolling on rolled material; and
a controller that calculates a leveling target value of the cold mill based on an
index of an asymmetric component of an elongation difference rate distribution of
the rolled material after cold rolling at delivery of the cold mill, and executes
leveling control of the cold mill based on the leveling target value, wherein
the index of the asymmetric component of the elongation difference rate distribution
is calculated based on a correlation between the elongation difference rate distribution
and an odd function, where the odd function is obtained by multiplying a first-order
power function by an absolute value power function that is greater than zero-order.
- (7) The cold rolling line according to (6), as an embodiment of the present disclosure,
wherein
the odd function is a third-order power function.
- (8) The cold rolling line according to (6) or (7), as an embodiment of the present
disclosure, wherein
the cold mill comprises a plurality of stands, and
the leveling control based on third-order or higher-order correlation is executed
for all stands of the plurality of stands except the last stand.
- (9) The cold rolling line according to any one of (6) to (8), as an embodiment of
the present disclosure, wherein,
in the index of the asymmetric component, the leveling target value is calculated
so that the shape difference between an OP side and a DR side of the rolled material
is 20 I-units or less.
- (10) A steel sheet production line according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
comprises
the cold rolling line according to any one of (6) to (9), wherein the cold rolling
line cold rolls a steel sheet as the rolled material.
(Advantageous Effect)
[0009] According to the present disclosure, a cold rolling method, a method of producing
a steel sheet, a cold rolling line, and a steel sheet production line that can suppress
the occurrence of fracture can be provided. Further, the suppression of fracture occurrence
makes it possible to produce steel sheets with excellent stability and productivity.
Even when applying cold rolling to rolled material (in particular material having
a high load and thin pre-rolled thickness), cold rolling can be carried out with good
yield while securing cold rolling stability.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] In the accompanying drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example configuration of a cold rolling
line that carries out a cold rolling method according to an embodiment of the present
disclosure;
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of elongation difference rate distribution
of delivery shape;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of leveling control;
FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating changes in shape Λ1;
FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating changes in leveling control output;
FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating std-1 leveling change amounts;
FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating elongation difference rate distribution at std-1
delivery;
FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating std-1 leveling change amounts; and
FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a relationship between error frequency and leveling
update amount.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0011] A cold rolling method, a method of producing a steel sheet, a cold rolling line,
and a steel sheet production line according to an embodiment of the present disclosure
are described below with reference to the drawings. In each drawing, identical or
equivalent parts are marked with the same reference sign. In description of the present
embodiment, description of identical or equivalent parts is omitted or simplified
as appropriate.
[0012] FIG. 1 illustrates an example configuration of a cold rolling line that carries out
the cold rolling method according to the present embodiment. According to the present
embodiment, the cold rolling line is part of a steel sheet production line and cold
rolls steel material (a steel sheet) that is rolled material. In other words, the
cold rolling method according to the present embodiment is used as a cold rolling
process to cold roll the rolled material in the method of producing a steel sheet.
[0013] In FIG. 1, the right hand side is the upstream side in the conveyance direction of
the rolled material, and the left hand side is the downstream side in the conveyance
direction of the rolled material. The continuous cold mill (cold mill 10) illustrated
in FIG. 1 is a machine that applies cold rolling to target material and comprises
N stands (std-1 to std-N). N is an integer greater than or equal to 1, for example
5. That is, the cold mill 10 includes a plurality of stands. On the delivery side
(downstream side) of each stand is disposed a shape meter 30 (30-1 to 30-N in FIG.
1). The shape meter 30 is a load meter divided in the transverse direction. The load
meter measures normal force received from the steel sheet and calculates elongation
difference rate distribution in the transverse direction from the normal force. FIG.
2 illustrates an example of the elongation difference rate distribution of delivery
shape. The elongation difference rate distribution is illustrated in I-units, with
positive values representing elongation and negative values representing tension.
The elongation difference rate is defined as the difference between the length along
the steel sheet curve surface of a certain rolling direction section and average value
of same in the transverse direction, divided by the difference of the average value.
I-units are the elongation difference rate multiplied by 10
5. Further, in the horizontal axis of FIG. 2, the left side is the operator (OP) side
and the right side is the drive (DR) side.
[0014] Further, at each stand is disposed a controller 20 (20-1 to 20-N in FIG. 1) that
controls the cold mill 10. According to the present embodiment, the controller 20
inputs the elongation difference rate distribution from the shape meter 30 and outputs
target values for leveling and bender load. Hereinafter, control over the leveling
of the cold mill 10 is referred to as leveling control.
[0015] FIG. 3 is a block diagram of leveling control. Arrows in FIG. 3 indicate data flow.
Further, "i" corresponds to one of 1 to N in FIG. 1. That is, the leveling control
according to the present embodiment is carried out in all of the plurality of stands
(std-1 to std-N).
[0016] As an overview, the controller 20-i calculates a leveling target value of the cold
mill 10 (std-i) based on an index of an asymmetric component of the elongation difference
rate distribution of the rolled material after cold rolling at delivery of the cold
mill 10 (std-i). The controller 20-i then executes leveling control of the cold mill
10 (std-i) based on the leveling target value. The details of processing calculating
the leveling target value are described below. Hereafter, descriptions of processing
that does not depend on the order of the stands does not use suffixes such as "i",
"N", and the like. For example, the controller 20-i is denoted simply as controller
20.
[0017] First, the controller 20 inputs the elongation difference rate distribution from
the shape meter 30 and evaluates with an evaluation function J indicated in the following
Expression (1).
[Math. 1]

[0018] The controller 20 searches for and finds a leveling update amount (Δl) and a bender
update amount (Δb) such that the evaluation function J is minimized. Here x is the
normalized transverse direction position. e
b is a bender influence coefficient. e
l is a leveling influence coefficient. k is shape deviation (difference between delivery
shape and target shape). As illustrated in FIG. 3, the controller 20 integrates the
leveling update amount (PI control) to calculate the leveling target value. The controller
20 then executes leveling control of the cold mill 10 based on the leveling target
value. The purpose of the leveling control is to calculate a leveling target value
that makes the delivery shape in FIG. 2 bilaterally symmetrical.
[0019] From Expression (1), the leveling update amount and bender update amount can be obtained
analytically. The leveling update amount (Δl) is calculated by the following Expression
(2). Further, the bender update amount (Δb) is calculated by the following Expression
(3).

[0020] The numerator on the right-hand side of Expression (2) is the correlation of k and
x, which are functions. Correlation is a metric of similarity; the greater the correlation,
the more similar the functions are to each other. In this example, the function x
is a first-order power function, so is referred to as a first-order correlation of
shape deviation k. The leveling update amount is a first-order correlation of the
shape deviation k and is a metric of an asymmetric component recognized by the control.
The asymmetric component and symmetric component of shape are controlled independently,
and the first-order correlation of the delivery shape is used as an index of asymmetry.
Expression (1) is a standard leveling control law, that is, a conventional method.
[0021] Here, an example of leveling control failure is described. FIG. 4 is a graph of shape
A1, with time on the horizontal axis and shape A1 on the vertical axis. One tick on
the horizontal axis is 10 seconds. Further, the units for the shape Λ1 of the vertical
axis are I-units. The shape A1 is the difference between the OP side and the DR side
obtained based on an approximated function, obtained by approximating the elongation
difference rate distribution with a sixth-order polynomial function using the least
squares method. In other words, the shape A1 is the difference in shape between the
OP side and the DR side of the rolled material.
[0022] Here, as a failure example, it is assumed that the shape A1 of std-1 (the most upstream
stand) does not reach zero and a fracture occurs between std-1 and std-2 (the second
stand from the upstream side). When such a failure occurs, the leveling control output
is, for example, as illustrated in FIG. 5. The vertical axis of leveling in FIG. 5
means the leveling change amount output from the controller 20, which corresponds
to the leveling target value. The unit is µm. The horizontal axis in FIG. 5 is the
same as in FIG. 4. In the example in FIG. 5, the delivery shape of std-1 is OP elongation,
and therefore the leveling control output must move in the DR closing direction. However,
the leveling control output of std-1 is moving in a DR-closing manner, but movement
is slow and does not fully correct the asymmetry of the delivery shape. Here, OP elongation
refers to the state in which the rolled material is elongated on the OP side. DR elongation
means the same for the DR side. Further, DR closing refers to narrowing the work roll
gap on the DR side, resulting in OP elongation. OP closing means the same for the
OP side. Here, in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5, std-3 is the third stand from the upstream side
and std-4 is the fourth stand from the upstream side.
[0023] FIG. 6 illustrates the leveling change amount of std-1 in this failure example. "Search"
in FIG. 6 indicates the leveling update amount of std-1 expressed in Expression (2).
Further, "Output" in FIG. 6 indicates the leveling control output of std-1. The leveling
update amount is somewhat biased to OP elongation, but does not indicate OP elongation
as clearly as shape A1.
[0024] Further, FIG. 7 illustrates the elongation difference rate distribution of the delivery
side of std-1 in this failure example. The vertical and horizontal axes are the same
as in FIG. 2. Although clearly recognizable as OP elongation to a human observer,
the leveling update amount represented by the first-order correlation in Expression
(2) does not result in OP elongation even for the elongation difference rate distribution
illustrated in FIG. 7, resulting in almost no elongation. Here, the time to fracture
is illustrated at the top of each graph.
[0025] Here, it is known that the shape A1 calculated by the difference between the OP side
and the DR side of the elongation difference rate approximation curve is relatively
close to the asymmetry recognized by a human observer. Further, the distribution shape
in FIG. 7 illustrates that the information at the transverse direction ends needs
to be emphasized.
[0026] Based on the above considerations, the following evaluation function J in Expression
(4) is used. In this case, the leveling update amount (Δl) is calculated by the following
Expression (5), where the numerator on the right-hand side can be a third-order correlation.

[0027] FIG. 8 illustrates the leveling change amount of std-1 when the leveling update amount
is a third-order correlation. As in FIG. 6, "Search" indicates the leveling update
amount for std-1, and "Output" indicates the leveling control output for std-1. FIG.
8 illustrates that the leveling update amount is OP elongation and is improved. Further,
the leveling control output is in the DR closing direction.
[0028] Here, according to the embodiment described above, third-order correlation was assumed
by multiplying the elongation difference rate distribution by a third-order power
function as an odd function, but may be a higher-order correlation other than third-order.
In general, the evaluation function J can be expressed as the following Expression
(6). In this case, the leveling update amount (Δl) is calculated by the following
Expression (7), where the numerator of the right-hand side can be a p-order correlation.
p is a real number greater than or equal to 1. However, when p is 1, this corresponds
to a conventional method.

[0029] That is, the odd function can be obtained by multiplying a first-order power function
by an absolute value power function that is greater than zero-order to obtain a p-order
correlation. Using higher-order correlations can bring the shape closer to A1 (that
is, closer to the asymmetry observed by humans), but would be more susceptible to
errors in the shape meter 30. Here, in Expression (7), when the shape deviation k
is a measurement error model sin(ωx), the error impact on the leveling update amount
can be expressed as the following Expression (8).
[Math. 5]

[0030] Here, the leveling influence coefficient (e
1) is set to 1 and ω is the frequency of the modeled error. The larger the value of
ω, the shorter the wavelength and the higher the error frequency. Expression (8) can
be transformed into the following Expression (9) by considering the leveling update
amount as a function of ω. Here, F is a hypergeometric function.
[Math. 6]

[0031] FIG. 9 illustrates a relationship between the error frequency (ω) and the leveling
update amount (Δl). The horizontal axis in FIG. 9 is the error frequency ω (no units).
It can be seen in FIG. 9 that the larger the order, the higher the susceptibility
to high-frequency error.
[0032] Leveling control based on third-order correlation is applied to at least the most
upstream stand, preferably to four upstream stands other than the last stand, and
leveling control based on first-order correlation is applied to the last stand. For
the last stand (the most downstream stand), first-order correlation is preferable
because the shape must be created for the downstream line. That is, leveling control
based on third-order or higher order correlation is executed for all stands except
the last stand. Further, third-order or higher order correlation may be applied only
to steel grades that are prone to fracture, for example, those containing at least
1.5 % silicon.
EXAMPLES
[0033] By using the leveling control with the evaluation function J of Expression (4), the
shape A1 of std-1 to std-4 can be suppressed to 20 I-units or less. As indicated in
Table 1 below, the fracture rate was decreased for the Examples using higher-order
correlation. Here, the fracture rate was calculated for approximately 1000 coils for
the Comparative Example and each of the Examples. The columns std-1 to std-5 indicate
the order of correlation, or p-order, in Expression (7), which calculates the leveling
update amount (Δl). Further, the failure ratio was calculated as "shape defective
coils/total coils".
[Table 1]
[0034]
(Table 1)
No. |
std-1 |
std-2 |
std-3 |
std-4 |
std-5 |
Fracture rate |
Failure ratio of std-5 delivery shape |
Remarks |
1 |
1st-order |
1st-order |
1st-order |
1st-order |
1st-order |
2.00% |
1.00% |
Comparative Example |
2 |
3rd-order |
3rd-order |
3rd-order |
3rd-order |
1st-order |
0.40% |
1.00% |
Example |
3 |
5th-order |
5th-order |
5th-order |
5th-order |
1st-order |
1.20% |
1.00% |
Example |
4 |
7th order |
7th order |
7th order |
7th order |
1st-order |
1.50% |
1.00% |
Example |
5 |
3rd-order |
3rd-order |
3rd-order |
3rd-order |
3rd-order |
0.40% |
1.50% |
Example |
[0035] Although embodiments of the present disclosure have been described based on the drawings
and examples, it should be noted that a person skilled in the art may make variations
and modifications based on the present disclosure. Therefore, it should be noted that
such variations and modifications are included within the scope of the present disclosure.
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST
[0036]
- 10
- cold mill
- 20
- controller
- 30
- shape meter
1. A method of cold rolling, the method comprising:
a process of calculating a leveling target value for a cold mill that carries out
cold rolling on rolled material, the calculation being based on an index of an asymmetric
component of an elongation difference rate distribution of the rolled material after
cold rolling at delivery of the cold mill; and
a process of executing leveling control of the cold mill based on the leveling target
value, wherein
the index of the asymmetric component of the elongation difference rate distribution
is calculated based on a correlation between the elongation difference rate distribution
and an odd function, where the odd function is obtained by multiplying a first-order
power function by an absolute value power function that is greater than zero-order.
2. The cold rolling method according to claim 1, wherein the odd function is a third-order
power function.
3. The cold rolling method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the cold mill comprises
a plurality of stands, and
the leveling control based on third-order or higher-order correlation is executed
for all stands of the plurality of stands except the last stand.
4. The cold rolling method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein, in the index
of the asymmetric component, the leveling target value is calculated so that the shape
difference between an OP side and a DR side of the rolled material is 20 I-units or
less.
5. A method of producing a steel sheet, comprising a cold rolling process of cold rolling
a steel sheet as the rolled material by the cold rolling method according to any one
of claims 1 to 4.
6. A cold rolling line comprising:
a cold mill that carries out cold rolling on rolled material; and
a controller that calculates a leveling target value of the cold mill based on an
index of an asymmetric component of an elongation difference rate distribution of
the rolled material after cold rolling at delivery of the cold mill, and executes
leveling control of the cold mill based on the leveling target value, wherein
the index of the asymmetric component of the elongation difference rate distribution
is calculated based on a correlation between the elongation difference rate distribution
and an odd function, where the odd function is obtained by multiplying a first-order
power function by an absolute value power function that is greater than zero-order.
7. The cold rolling line according to claim 6, wherein the odd function is a third-order
power function.
8. The cold rolling line according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the cold mill comprises a
plurality of stands, and
the leveling control based on third-order or higher-order correlation is executed
for all stands of the plurality of stands except the last stand.
9. The cold rolling line according to any one of claims 6 to 8, wherein, in the index
of the asymmetric component, the leveling target value is calculated so that the shape
difference between an OP side and a DR side of the rolled material is 20 I-units or
less.
10. A steel sheet production line comprising the cold rolling line according to any one
of claims 6 to 9, wherein the cold rolling line cold rolls a steel sheet as the rolled
material.