TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] The present disclosure belongs to the technical field of aluminum alloys and the
preparation and processing thereof, especially to Al-Mg-Zn-Si-based aluminum alloys.
More specifically, the present disclosure relates to light-weight, high-strength,
corrosion-resistant Al-Mg-Zn-Si-based aluminum alloy materials and methods for producing
the same.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Aluminum alloys have characteristics of light specific weight, high specific strength,
easy processing and low cost, etc., which are widely used in the fields of aerospace,
transportation, and other fields. To better support the lightweighting design of aluminum
alloy structural parts, there is a need of to further develop novel aluminum alloys
with low density, high strength, corrosion resistance and damage resistance.
[0004] Existing commercial deformed aluminum alloys mainly include 2xxx series (Al-Cu-Mg),
3xxx series (Al-Mn), 4xxx series (Al-Si), 5xxx series (Al-Mg), 6xxx series (Al-Mg-Si),
and 7xxx series (Al-Zn-Mg-Cu) aluminum alloys. Among them, 5xxx series aluminum alloys
(Al-Mg-based aluminum alloys) taking Mg as the main alloying element have medium strength,
excellent corrosion resistance, and welding performance, which are the second largest
aluminum alloy variety after the 6xxx series in terms of usage. Commonly used Al-Mg-based
aluminum alloys at home and abroad include mainly 5052, 5056, 5083, 5182, 5A02, and
5A06 in which the Mg content is generally between 2.5-5.5 wt.%. Those alloys have
the highest Mg content and the lowest density among all the commercial deformed aluminum
alloys, and the density decreases by nearly 0.4% with an increase of 1 wt% in the
content of Mg.
[0005] The difference in atomic radius between Mg and Al is 13%. Within the normal Mg content
range (2.5-5.5 wt.%), it is the main strengthening mechanisms of Al-Mg-based aluminum
alloys to cause a lattice distortion by the solid solution of Mg atoms in the Al matrix
to achieve a solid solution strengthening of alloys, and to achieve a work hardening
of the alloys during deformation. When the Mg content further increases beyond the
normal range, a large number of β-Al
3Mg
2 phase distributed in a network will be precipitated along the grain boundary in the
alloy matrix, which is not coherent with the matrix and cannot produce a dispersion
strengthening effect. Moreover, the β-phase has a more negative self-corrosion potential
of -1.085V than the self-corrosion potential of the α-Al matrix of -0.812V, and may
be corroded before the matrix, causing serious peeling corrosion and intergranular
corrosion. Therefore, with regard to the Al-Mg-based aluminum alloys, simply increasing
the Mg content to improve the alloy strength will generally lead to serious deterioration
in the overall performance of the alloy. If the Mg content in the Al-Mg-based aluminum
alloys increases and appropriate alloying element(s) are simultaneously added to form
a precipitation strengthening phase together with excess of Mg element which effectively
inhibits the formation of network-distributed β phase along the grain boundaries,
it is likely to significantly improve the strength of the Al-Mg-based aluminum alloys
and avoid serious deterioration in corrosion resistance while maintaining their low-density
characteristic.
[0006] In order to enable the Al-Mg aluminum alloys to achieve an aging precipitation strengthening,
current researches show that adding two alloying elements, Ag and Zn, can lead to
the formation of T-Mg
32(Al,Ag)
49 and T-Mg
32(Al,Zn)
49 precipitation strengthening phase, respectively. Since the 1960s, it has been discovered
and confirmed that adding trace amount of Ag element to the Al-Mg alloys will result
in the precipitation of T-Mg
32(Al,Ag)
49 precipitation strengthening phase, wherein the T phase and the α-Al matrix are in
an orientation relationship of (010)
T//(112)
α and (001)
T//(11 0)
α, and the lattice parameter a=1.41 nm. Although adding Ag can effectively improve
the precipitation strengthening reaction of the Al-Mg alloys, and a reasonable combination
of pretreatment and aging treatment enables the Al-Mg-Ag alloys to obtain good strength
and plasticity matching, Ag elements cannot be used in industrial production on large
scale due to their expensiveness. Since the beginning of this century, it has been
found that if Zn elements are added into conventional Al-Mg-based aluminum alloys,
a T-Mg
32(Al,Zn)
49 precipitation phase can be formed in the grains and at the grain boundaries by toughening
heat treatment to inhibit the formation of β phase so as to effectively improve the
strength of Al-Mg-based aluminum alloys and avoid serious deterioration of its corrosion
resistance performance, showing an important application value. For example, Patent
document
CN104694800A discloses a high-strength, light-weight Al-Mg-Zn alloy with a basic composition of
Mg: 6.0-10.0 wt%, Zn: 3.0-5.0 wt%, Cu < 2.0 wt%, Mn < 1.2 wt%, Fe < 0.3 wt%, Si <
0.3 wt%, and at least one element selected from Cr, Ti, Zr, Sc, Hf, La, Ce, Pr and
Nd in an amount of less than 0.5 wt% of each element, wherein the alloy has a tensile
strength of more than 530 MPa in the T6 state. Patent document
CN104862551A discloses Al-Mg-Cu-Zn-based aluminum alloys and methods for preparing aluminum alloy
sheets, wherein the alloy has a basic composition of: Mg: 4.0-6.0 wt%, Cu: 0.30-1.0
wt%, Zn: 1.0-3.5 wt%, Mn ≤ 0.4 wt%, Fe ≤ 0.4 wt%, Si ≤ 0.4 wt%, Cr ≤ 0.2 wt%, Ti ≤
0.1 wt%, and the balance of Al and inevitable impurities. This alloy has increased
Cu content on the basis of AA5182 and AA5023 alloys, and further has Zn added. It
fully utilizes the precipitation strengthening of the transition phase of the S phase
in the Al-Mg-Cu-based alloys and the transition phase of the T phase in the Al-Mg-Zn-based
alloy, and can be used to achieve significant improvement of the strength of automobile
inner panels during at 180°C for30 min baking process. Patent document
CN110541096A discloses an easily weldable Al-Mg-Zn-Cu alloy with high strength and a method for
preparing the same, wherein the alloy has a basic composition of Mg: 4.3-7.0 wt%,
Zn: 2.5-5.0 wt%, Cu: 0.4-1.2 wt%, Mn ≤ 0.3 wt%, Cr ≤ 0.1 wt%, Ti ≤ 0.2 wt%, Zr ≤ 0.3
wt%, and the balance of Al and inevitable impurities, wherein a mass ratio of Zn/Mg
is ≤ 1.0, and the strength of the alloy is substantially comparable to that of conventional
7xxx series aluminum alloys. Patent document
CN103866167A discloses an aluminum alloy and alloy sheets thereof, and a method for preparing
the alloy sheets, wherein the alloy has a basic composition of Mg: 5.5-6.0 wt%, Zn:
0.6-1.2 wt%, Cu: 0.1-0.2 wt%, Mn: 0.6-1.0 wt%, Zr: 0.05-0.25 wt%, Cr ≤ 0.1 wt%, Ti
≤ 0.15 wt%, Fe ≤ 0.25 wt%, Si ≤ 0.2 wt%, and the balance of Al. By adding Zn, the
ability of Al
3Mg
2 to continuously precipitate at grain boundaries is greatly reduced, and the alloy
exhibits relatively high strength and corrosion resistance performance compared with
conventional AA5059-H321 and AA5059-H131 sheets. Patent document
CN104152759A discloses a high-strength, corrosion-resistant Al-Mg alloy and its preparation process,
wherein the alloy has a basic composition of Mg: 5.0-6.5 wt%, Zn: 1.2-2.5 wt%, Mn:
0.4-1.2 wt%, Zr: 0.05-0.25 wt%, Cu ≤ 0.4 wt%, Cr ≤ 0.1 wt%, Ti ≤ 0.15 wt%, Fe ≤ 0.4
wt%, Si ≤ 0.4 wt%, and the balance of Al and inevitable impurities. This alloy has
a significantly improved intergranular corrosion resistance on the premise of maintaining
certain mechanical properties and spalling corrosion properties unchanged, as compared
with conventional AA5083, AA5059 alloys for marine, etc. Patent document
CN114438356A discloses a high-strength, corrosion-resistant, high-toughness Al-Mg-Zn-Ag(-Cu) aluminum
alloy with a basic composition of Mg: 4.0-6.5 wt%, Zn: 3.0-5.5 wt%, Ag: 0.05-0.8 wt%,
Cu ≤ 1.0 wt%, Mn ≤ 0.15 wt%, Ti ≤ 0.15 wt%, Zr ≤ 0.20 wt%, and the balance of Al and
inevitable impurities. This alloy has an improved strength and an intergranular corrosion
level of 3.
[0007] Although the research and development of Al-Mg-Zn-based alloys has achieved some
achievements in recent years, there is still a large improvement space in the excellent
match of the key alloy properties such as low density, high strength, corrosion resistance,
and damage resistance. For example, most of the research work is still focused on
adding Zn elements to the Al-Mg-based aluminum alloys with normal (or slightly higher)
Mg content range, resulting in that while the Al-Mg-based aluminum alloys have an
improved (strength) performance, the alloys loss their inherent low-density advantage
due to the addition of high-density Zn elements and other elements, and the specific
strength performances of such alloys is not as competitive as that of conventional
2xxx and 7xxx-based aluminum alloys. In some research work on high-Mg content Al-Mg-based
aluminum alloys, due to unreasonable types and amounts of added alloying elements,
a relatively high amount of β-Al
3Mg
2 phase is still precipitated in the alloy, which is distributed in a network along
the grain boundaries, thus deteriorating the corrosion resistance properties of the
alloy.
[0008] Therefore, there is a need to further research and develop novel Al-Mg-based aluminum
alloy materials with excellent match of key properties such as low density, high strength,
corrosion resistance, and damage resistance.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] The present inventor conducted a lot of research and industrial practice, and found
that existing Al-Mg-Zn-based aluminum alloys mainly take Mg and Zn as the main strengthening
components and Mg
32(Al,Zn)
49 as the main strengthening phase; the precipitation sequence and main strengthening
phases thereof are relatively single in type, and difficult to give a desirable comprehensive
property match of light weight, high strength, corrosion resistance, and damage resistance.
If the Mg content is significantly increased and appropriate amount of Si is added
as main alloying element based on the existing Al-Mg-Zn-based aluminum alloys, then
a new aging precipitation sequence is added while the alloys can be further lightweight,
which can remarkably enhance the aging strengthening response ability of the alloys,
and at the same time further inhibit the generation of β-Al
3Mg
2 upon when the Mg content is greatly increased, thereby effectively avoiding the deterioration
of the corrosion resistance of alloys; further auxiliarily utilizing Zr, Mn, Sc, Cu,
and other elements for microalloying is beneficial to the refinement of the material
tissues, strengthening of precipitated phase, and improvement of material properties.
The premise optimization and design of the component ranges and ratios of various
elements of the alloys is an important safeguard to ensure the superior property matching
of the alloys. By reasonable designs, the alloys can maintain the light weight, while
synergistically precipitating strengthening phase with Mg
32(Al,Zn)
49 and Mg
2Si during the aging process, and reducing the precipitation of β-Al
3Mg
2 phase in the case of high Mg content, so that the Al-Mg-Zn-Si-based alloys of the
present invention can maintaining good corrosion property while obtaining a high strength
and toughness.
[0010] The present invention overcomes the shortcomings of the comprehensive property matching
of existing Al-Mg-Zn-based aluminum alloy materials, and further improve the comprehensive
performance matching by optimizing the design of composition and preparation and processing
technology on the basis of existing alloys, so that a desirable light-weight Al-Mg-Zn-Si-based
aluminum alloy materials with strength and toughness and corrosion resistance can
be provided for the advanced manufacturing industry.
[0011] A first technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a light-weight,
high-strength, corrosion-resistant, and damage-resistant aluminum alloy material;
a second technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a method
for preparing the aluminum alloy materials; a third technical problem to be solved
by the present invention is to provide a new product formed by welding the aluminum
alloy material with the same alloy or another alloy; a fourth technical problem to
be solved by the present invention is to provide a final component produced by processing
the aluminum alloy material via various surface treatments, stamping and forming,
and machining methods; and a fifth technical problem to be solved by the present invention
is to provide use of the final components.
[0012] The present invention relates to a light-weight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant
aluminum alloy material including: Mg 6.0-10.0 wt%, Zn 1.0-3.5 wt%, Si 0.1-1.3 wt%,
at least one of Mn, Cu, Zr, Sc and Ti elements with a total content of less than 0.8
wt%, and the balance of Al and inevitable impurities.
[0013] In a first preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aluminum alloy includes:
Mg 6.3-9.9 wt%, Zn 1.1-2.9 wt%, Si 0.15-1.0 wt%, at least one of Mn, Cu, Zr, Sc, and
Ti elements with a total content of less than 0.6 wt%, and the balance of Al and inevitable
impurities.
[0014] In a second preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aluminum alloy includes:
Mg 6.6-9.0 wt%, Zn 1.3-2.9 wt%, and Si 0.15-0.8 wt%.
[0015] In a third preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aluminum alloy includes:
Mg 7.1-8.8 wt%, Zn 1.5-2.8 wt%, and Si 0.25-0.7 wt%.
[0016] In a fourth preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aluminum alloy includes:
Mg 7.3-8.5 wt%, Zn 1.5-2.7 wt%, and Si 0.4-0.6 wt%.
[0017] In a fifth preferred embodiment of the present invention, the contents of Mg, Zn
and Si in the aluminum alloy satisfy a relationship of: 2.5 ≤ (9 × Mg) / [(1 × Si)
+ (8 × Zn)] ≤ 6.
[0018] In a sixth preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aluminum alloy comprises:
Mn 0.10 ~ 0.50 wt%.
[0019] In a seventh preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aluminum alloy includes:
Cu 0.10-0.50 wt%.
[0020] In an eighth preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aluminum alloy includes:
Ti 0.01-0.15 wt%.
[0021] In a ninth preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aluminum alloy includes:
Zr 0.05-0.25 wt%.
[0022] In a tenth preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aluminum alloy includes:
Sc 0.05-0.30 wt%; preferably, it further includes Zr 0.05-0.20 wt%; and further preferably,
the contents of Sc and Zr satisfy: 0.15 wt% ≤ (Sc + Zr) wt% ≤ 0.35 wt%.
[0023] In an eleventh preferred embodiment of the present invention, the inevitable impurities
contained in the aluminum alloy include elements unintentionally introduced as impurities
during the process of manufacturing the alloy ingots. The impurities meet: Fe ≤ 0.40
wt%, each of other impurity elements ≤ 0.20 wt%, and the total ≤ 0.50 wt%; preferably,
Fe ≤ 0.20 wt%, each of other impurity elements ≤ 0.10 wt%, and the total ≤ 0.25 wt%;
and further preferably, Fe ≤ 0.10 wt%.
[0024] The present invention also relates to a process for producing the aluminum alloy
material. The process of producing the aluminum alloy deformed material can be described
as "alloy formulation and melting - semi-continuous casting for preparing ingots -
homogenizing heat treatment of ingots - hot deformation - (intermediate annealing)
- (cold deformation) - solid solution treatment - (pre-deforming or straightening)
- aging treatment - product supply"; and the basic manufacturing process of the aluminum
alloy casting can be described as "alloy formulation and melting - casting molding
of castings - solid solution treatment - aging treatment - product supply".
[0025] Among them, the method for producing the aluminum alloy deformed material includes
the steps of:
- (1) producing the semi-continuous casting ingot according to the present disclosure;
- (2) homogenizing and/or pre-heating the produced ingot;
- (3) thermally deforming the ingot to a desired processed material or a pre-processed
material by one or more thermal deformation process selected from the group consisting
of extrusion, rolling and forging;
- (4) optionally processing the pre-processed material to the desired processed material
by reheating and cold deformation;
- (5) solution heat treating the processed material;
- (6) rapidly cooling the treated processed material to room temperature; and
- (7) naturally or artificially aging the cooled processed materials to give an aged
processed alloy material.
[0026] Among them, in step (1), the ingots are produced by the steps of smelting, degasification,
removal of inclusion, and semi-continuous casting; during the smelting process, the
concentrations of elements are accurately controlled by taking Mg and Cu as core elements;
and the ratios among alloying elements are rapidly supplemented and adjusted by on-line
detection and analysis of components so as to complete the production of casting ingots.
In a preferred aspect, 0.0002-0.005 wt% of Be is added in the form of Al-Be intermediate
during the smelting process to change the properties of the oxide film and reduce
oxidation burning loss and inclusions. In another preferred aspect, step (1) further
includes applying electromagnetic field, ultrasonic field or mechanical stirring at
or near the crystallizer site.
[0027] In step (2), the homogenization treatment is carried out by means selected from the
group consisting of: (i)a single-stage homogenization treatment in a temperature range
of from 360-490°C for 12 to 60 h; and (ii) a two- or multi-stage homogenization treatment
in a temperature range of from 360-500°C for total 12 to 60 h.
[0028] In steps (3) and (4), the pre-heating temperature and reheating temperature before
each thermal deformation process are 370-460°C, and the processing time is 1-8 h.
In a preferred aspect, an intermediate annealing treatment at 350-450°C/0.5-6 h is
further comprised between the cold deformation passes.
[0029] In step (5), the solid solution treatment requires to further adjust the sub-grain
size and the recrystallized structure ratio in the material according to the performance
requirements, and is carried out by means selecting from the group consisting of:
(i) a single-, two-, or multi-stage solid solution treatment in a range of 440-500°C
for total 0.5-8 h; and (ii) a progressive heating solid solution treatment in a range
of 440-500°C for total 0.5-5 h. In a preferred aspect, a progressive heating solid
solution treatment is used with a heating rate of ≤ 60°C/min.
[0030] In step (6), the processed material is rapidly cooled to room temperature using a
method selected from the group consisting of cooling medium spray quenching, immersion
quenching, strong air cooling and combinations thereof.
[0031] In step (7), the artificially aging treatment is carried out by means selected from
the group consisting of: (i) after completion of quenching and cooling, natural aging
treatment at room temperature for ≥ 48 h; (ii) within 2 h after completion of quenching
and cooling, artificial aging treatment in a range of 70-240°C for total 6-60 h; and
) (iii) after completing of quenching and cooling, a combination of natural aging
treatment and artificial aging treatment, wherein the artificial aging temperature
is carried out at 70-240°C for 6-60 h.
[0032] Between steps (6) and (7), the method can further include a step of straightening
and/or pre-deforming the cooled processed material, wherein the straightening can
be carried out by means of roller straightening, stretch straightening, stretch bending
straightening and any combination thereof to improve the straightness of the processed
materials, and the pre-deformation can be carried out by means of stretching, compression
and any combination thereof to reduce the residual stress formed by quenching and
cooling, so as to facilitate subsequent processing and application.
[0033] According to the method of the present disclosure, the processed material may be
wires, rods, pipes, sheets, plates, or forging products.
[0034] Among them, the lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material
of the present disclosure may have a density of ≤ 2.68 g/cm
3, a tensile strength of ≥ 400MPa, and an exfoliation corrosion performance of not
lower than EA level. Preferably, the aluminum alloy material may have a density of
≤ 2.66g/cm
3, a tensile strength of ≥ 410MPa, and the exfoliation corrosion performance of not
lower than EA level. Further preferably, the aluminum alloy material may have a density
of ≤ 2.64g/cm
3, a tensile strength of ≥ 420MPa, and the exfoliation corrosion performance of not
lower than PC level.
[0035] The invention further relates to a method for producing the aluminum alloy casting
including the steps of:
- (1) preparing an aluminum alloy ingot using smelting, degasification, removal of inclusion,
sand- or metal-mold casting, or die casting, wherein during the smelting process,
the concentrations of elements are accurately controlled by taking Mg and Cu as core
elements; and the ratios among alloying elements are rapidly supplemented and adjusted
by on-line detection and analysis of components so as to complete the casting production;
- (2) solid solution heat treating the produced aluminum casting, comprising: allowing
the aluminum alloy casting to undergo a single-, two-, or multi-stage solid solution
treatment in a range of 440-500°C for total 0.5-8h, or a progressive heating solid
solution treatment in a range of 440-500°C for total 0.5-5 h.
- (3) naturally or artificially aging the aluminum alloy casting; wherein the natural
aging treatment is carried out at room temperature for ≥ 48 h; the artificial aging
treatment is carried out in a range of 70-240°C for total 6-60 h; and a combination
of natural aging treatment and artificial aging treatment is carried out with the
artificial aging temperature of 70-240°C and the artificial aging time of 6-60 h.
[0036] The aluminum alloy material of the present disclosure may be welded with the same
alloy or another alloy to form a new product with welding methods of friction stir
welding, fusion welding, brazing, electron beam welding, or laser welding. It can
also be processed into a final component through various surface treatments, stamping
forming, or machining; and the final component may be load-bearing structural components.
[0037] The beneficial effects of the present disclosure comprise:
- (1) By optimizing the composition of the Al-Mg-Zn-Si aluminum alloy together, and
provide a matching preparation method as supplement, the present disclosure achieves
a high Mg content, and the synergistic strengthening of dual-aging precipitation sequences
of Mg32(Al,Zn)49 and Mg2Si, which greatly improves the strengthening response ability of the alloy, so that
the material obtains high strength and toughness while ensuring the lightweight property,
and has good corrosion resistance. The material shows excellent comprehensive properties,
which is an ideal material for various load-bearing structural parts, and can meet
the stringent requirements of various advanced manufacturing for lightweight and high-performance
aluminum alloy materials.
- (2) By adding the alloying element Si, the present disclosure not only introduces
a new aging sequence of Mg2Si precipitate, but also provides a basis for further increasing the Mg content in
the Al-Mg-based aluminum alloy so that the aging strengthening potential of the alloy
is further explored, which is conducive to promoting the development of lightweighting
in aerospace, transportation, automobiles and ships, and has important social and
economic benefits.
- (3) The material of the present disclosure has superior performance, moderate cost,
simple and practical preparation method, strong operability, easy industrial promotion,
and promising market prospects.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0038] In order to clearly illustrate the technical solution of the embodiments of the invention,
the drawings of the embodiments will be briefly described in the following; it is
obvious that the described drawings are only related to some embodiments of the invention
and thus are not limitative of the invention.
FIG. 1 shows a TEM morphology image of the intra-granular precipitates in the aged
state of Alloy 22# in Example 2 of the present disclosure.
FIG. 2 shows a TEM morphology image of the grain boundary precipitates in the aged
state of Alloy 22# in Example 2 of the present disclosure.
FIG. 3 shows a comparison of the specific strength and fracture toughness of the alloy
of the present disclosure and existing typical alloys.
FIG. 4 is a comparison of the specific strength and corrosion resistance of the alloy
of the present disclosure and existing typical alloys.
DETAILED DISCRIPTION
[0039] Hereinafter the present embodiments of the disclosure will be further illustrated
by reference to the examples.
EXAMPLE 1
[0040] Alloy extruded strips were prepared at laboratory scale to demonstrate the principles
of the disclosure. The compositions of the experimental alloys are shown in Table
1.
[0041] Round ingots with Φ210 mm were prepared by alloy smelting, degassing, removal of
inclusion, and simulated the semi-continuous casting conditions well known in the
art, and the conditions for the homogenization treatment of the ingots were selected
as:(400±5°C/12h) + (475±5°C/24h) and air cooling. After peeling, milling and sawing,
an extrusion billet with size of Φ180 mm was obtained. The billet was pre-heated at
440±10°C for 4h, and extruded for deformation to give a 25 x 100 mm strip with the
extrusion temperature controlled at approximately 400°C. The extruded strip was placed
into an air furnace at 450°C to undergo a progressive heating solid solution treatment
at a temperature of 450-480°C for total 90 min, quenched in water immediately before
a 1.5-2% tensile straightening treatment, followed by a two-stage aging treatment
at 90±5°C/24h + 140±5°C/22-26h according to the characteristics of the alloy.
[0042] The samples were cut according to the relevant methods, and tested in accordance
with the relevant test standards for density (GB/T 1423), tensile properties (GB/T
16865), fracture toughness (GB/T 4161), fatigue properties (GB/T 3075), exfoliation
corrosion (GB/T 22639) and intergranular corrosion of the alloy in accordance with
the relevant testing standards, which were taken as common performance indicators
of alloys for evaluation. The results are shown in Table 2.
Table 1. Compositions of Experimental Alloys
| Alloy No. |
Alloy of the present disclosure |
Mg (wt%) |
Zn (wt%) |
Si (wt%) |
Cu (wt%) |
Mn (wt%) |
Zr (wt%) |
Sc (wt%) |
Content of main impurities (wt%) |
| (Y/N) |
| 1# |
Y |
8.53 |
3.01 |
0.49 |
/ |
/ |
0.11 |
/ |
Fe=0.14, Ti=0.02 |
| 2# |
Y |
8.62 |
2.61 |
0.47 |
/ |
/ |
0.13 |
/ |
Fe=0.12, Ti=0.02 |
| 3# |
Y |
8.82 |
2.27 |
0.51 |
/ |
/ |
0.11 |
/ |
Fe=0.13, Ti=0.02 |
| 4# |
Y |
8.59 |
2.02 |
0.41 |
/ |
/ |
0.12 |
/ |
Fe=0.09, Ti=0.02 |
| 5# |
Y |
8.63 |
1.61 |
0.54 |
/ |
/ |
0.13 |
/ |
Fe=0.11, Ti=0.02 |
| 6# |
Y |
8.04 |
2.94 |
0.50 |
/ |
/ |
0.12 |
/ |
Fe=0.13, Ti=0.02 |
| 7# |
Y |
7.95 |
2.14 |
0.44 |
/ |
/ |
0.13 |
/ |
Fe=0.12, Ti=0.02 |
| 8# |
Y |
8.12 |
1.63 |
0.49 |
/ |
/ |
0.11 |
/ |
Fe=0.09, Ti=0.02 |
| 9# |
Y |
7.22 |
2.97 |
0.47 |
/ |
/ |
0.11 |
/ |
Fe=0.13, Ti=0.02 |
| 10# |
Y |
7.15 |
2.29 |
0.19 |
/ |
/ |
0.11 |
0.17 |
Fe=0.12, Ti=0.02 |
| 11# |
Y |
7.03 |
1.53 |
0.25 |
/ |
/ |
0.10 |
/ |
Fe=0.09, Ti=0.02 |
| 12# |
Y |
8.21 |
2.86 |
0.48 |
/ |
0.45 |
/ |
/ |
Fe=0.12, Ti=0.02 |
| 13# |
Y |
7.87 |
2.72 |
0.33 |
0.3 |
/ |
0.12 |
/ |
Fe=0.13, Ti=0.02 |
| 14# |
Y |
9.18 |
2.97 |
0.61 |
/ |
/ |
0.15 |
/ |
Fe=0.09, Ti=0.02 |
| 15# |
N |
5.81 |
3.52 |
0.5 |
/ |
/ |
0.11 |
/ |
Fe=0.10, Ti=0.02 |
| 16# |
N |
5.79 |
1.05 |
0.5 |
/ |
/ |
0.11 |
/ |
Fe=0.14, Ti=0.02 |
| 17# |
N |
8.63 |
0.92 |
0.47 |
/ |
/ |
0.12 |
/ |
Fe=0.11, Ti=0.02 |
| 18# |
N |
5.77 |
7.51 |
0.50 |
/ |
/ |
0.11 |
/ |
Fe=0.09, Ti=0.02 |
| 19# |
N |
8.47 |
7.36 |
0.50 |
/ |
/ |
0.13 |
/ |
Fe=0.12, Ti=0.02 |
| 20# |
N |
8.73 |
3.05 |
1.49 |
/ |
/ |
0.13 |
/ |
Fe=0.09, Ti=0.02 |
Table 2. Performance Test Results of Experimental Alloys
| Experimental Alloy |
Tensile Property |
Fracture Toughness |
Fatigue Properties |
Corrosion Property |
Density |
| Alloy No. |
State |
Rm (MPa) |
Rp0.2 (MPa) |
A (%) |
KIC (MPa·m1/2) |
Under conditions of 241 MPa, R=0.1, 120,000 cycles |
Exfoliation Corrosion |
Intergranular Corrosion |
g/cm3 |
| 1# |
TX |
602 |
507 |
11.8 |
32.9 |
Pass |
N |
Level 2 |
2.64 |
| 2# |
TX |
579 |
467 |
11.7 |
33.1 |
Pass |
N |
Level 2 |
2.63 |
| 3# |
TX |
561 |
458 |
12.5 |
34.4 |
Pass |
N |
Level 3 |
2.62 |
| 4# |
TX |
535 |
439 |
13.9 |
36.3 |
Pass |
N |
Level 3 |
2.62 |
| 5# |
TX |
512 |
417 |
14.2 |
36.4 |
Pass |
N |
Level 3 |
2.61 |
| 6# |
TX |
584 |
489 |
13.7 |
34.7 |
Pass |
N |
Level 2 |
2.64 |
| 7# |
TX |
554 |
437 |
12.9 |
35.8 |
Pass |
N |
Level 2 |
2.63 |
| 8# |
TX |
521 |
433 |
12.5 |
34.3 |
Pass |
N |
Level 3 |
2.62 |
| 9# |
TX |
549 |
437 |
11.5 |
36.2 |
Pass |
N |
Level 2 |
2.66 |
| 10# |
TX |
492 |
357 |
19.0 |
37.5 |
Pass |
N |
Pitting corrosion |
2.65 |
| 11# |
TX |
436 |
301 |
25.8 |
40.7 |
Pass |
N |
Pitting corrosion |
2.64 |
| 12# |
TX |
582 |
490 |
11.9 |
32.6 |
Pass |
N |
Level 2 |
2.64 |
| 13# |
TX |
578 |
491 |
12.7 |
35.4 |
Pass |
N |
Level 2 |
2.65 |
| 14# |
TX |
617 |
528 |
11.0 |
31.2 |
Pass |
N |
Level 3 |
2.63 |
| 15# |
TX |
428 |
353 |
14.8 |
33.4 |
Pass |
EB |
Level 4 |
2.68 |
| 16# |
TX |
394 |
276 |
21.4 |
36.2 |
Pass |
N |
Level 2 |
2.64 |
| 17# |
TX |
411 |
286 |
19.8 |
38.6 |
Pass |
EB |
Level 4 |
2.60 |
| 18# |
TX |
599 |
526 |
7.2 |
27.1 |
Pass |
EB |
Level 3 |
2.75 |
| 19# |
TX |
612 |
531 |
6.3 |
22.5 |
Pass |
EC |
Level 4 |
2.71 |
| 20# |
TX |
594 |
489 |
8.8 |
34.3 |
Failed |
PB |
Level 3 |
2.64 |
[0043] As seen from the tables, Alloys 1#, 2#, 3#, 4#, 5#, 6#, 7#, 8#, 9#, 10#, 11#, 12#,
13# and 14# have good match of density-strength-plasticity-fracture toughness-fatigue
performance-corrosion resistance: density does not exceed 2.66 g/cm
3, the tensile strength remains above 430MPa, the percentage elongation after fracture
is higher than 11.0%, the fracture toughness is higher than 31.0MPa·m
1/2level, and the fatigue test of 120,000 cycles passes under the conditions of a constant
stress of 241MPa and a strain ratio of 0.1, the exfoliation corrosion level of the
alloy is N, and the intergranular corrosion level is no less than 3. However, Alloys
15#, 16#, 17#, 18#, 19#, and 20# do not have good match of density-strength-plasticity-fracture
toughness-fatigue performance-corrosion resistance, wherein, Alloy 15# has low Mg
content, relatively low strength, and deteriorated corrosion resistance; Alloy 16#
has low Mg and Zn contents, and relatively lowest strength; Alloy 17# has high Mg
content and low Zn content, and seriously deteriorated corrosion resistance; in contrast,
Alloy 18# has low Mg content and high Zn content, relatively low percentage elongation
after fracture, decreased plasticity, and deteriorated corrosion resistance and increased
density; while Alloy 19# has high Mg and high Zn contents, relatively high strength,
but has seriously deteriorated plasticity and corrosion resistance; and Alloy 20#
has high Si content, decreased plasticity and fatigue property, and slightly decreased
corrosion resistance.
EXAMPLE 2
[0044] Aluminum alloy rolled plates were prepared in the laboratory, and the experimental
alloy compositions are shown in Table 3.
[0045] Slab ingots with 100-mm thickness were prepared by alloy smelting, degassing, removal
of inclusion, and simulated semi-continuous casting conditions well known in the industry,
wherein the ingots underwent a three-stage homogenization treatment of (400±5°C/12h)
+ (475±5°C/24h) + (500±5°C/12h) homogenization heat treatment, followed by air cooling.
After peeling, milling and sawing, a rolled billet with thickness of 80 mm was obtained.
The billet was pre-heated at 450±10°C for 2h, first rolled for 3-4 passes along the
width direction of the slab ingot at a blooming temperature of 440°C, inter-annealed
at 400±5°C for 2h, and then rolled by reverse rolling along the length direction of
the flat ingot to a 20-mm thickness. The plate was placed into an air furnace at 450°C
to undergo a solid solution treatment of 450°C/30min + 480°C/60min, quenched in water
immediately before a 2% tensile straightening treatment, followed by a two-stage aging
treatment at 90±5°C/24h + 140±5°C/24h according to the characteristics of the alloy.
[0046] The samples were cut according to the relevant methods, and tested in accordance
with the relevant test standards for density (GB/T 1423), tensile properties (GB/T
16865), fracture toughness (GB/T 4161), fatigue properties (GB/T 3075), exfoliation
corrosion (GB/T 22639) and intergranular corrosion of the alloy in accordance with
the relevant testing standards, which were taken as common performance indexes of
alloys for evaluation. The results are shown in Table 4.
Table 3. Compositions of Experimental Alloys
| Alloy No. |
Alloy of the present disclosure (Y/N) |
Mg (wt%) |
Zn (wt%) |
Si (wt%) |
Cu (wt%) |
Mn (wt%) |
Zr (wt%) |
Sc (wt%) |
Content of main impurities (wt%) |
| 21# |
Y |
7.19 |
2.26 |
0.28 |
0.13 |
/ |
0.12 |
/ |
Fe=0.11, Ti=0.02 |
| 22# |
Y |
8.02 |
2.71 |
0.43 |
/ |
/ |
0.12 |
/ |
Fe=0.10, Ti=0.02 |
| 23# |
N |
7.97 |
2.74 |
0.05* |
/ |
/ |
0.12 |
/ |
Fe=0.10, Ti=0.02 |
| *Note: Indicates that the element is an impurity element and is not added as an alloying
element. |
Table 4. Performance Test Results of Experimental Alloys
| Experiment al alloy |
Tensile property |
Fracture toughne ss |
Fatigue performan ce |
Corrosion properties |
Densit y |
| Alloy No. |
State |
Rm(MP a) |
Rp0.2(MP a) |
A (%) |
KIC (MPa·m1/ 2) |
Under 241MPa, R = 0.1, 120,000 cycles |
Exfoliatio n Corrosion |
Intergranul ar |
g/cm3 |
| 21# |
TX |
491 |
353 |
17. 4 |
37.5 |
Pass |
N |
Pitting corrosion |
2.64 |
| 22# |
TX |
566 |
468 |
12. 9 |
35.6 |
Pass |
N |
Level 2 |
2.64 |
| 23# |
TX |
484 |
387 |
12. 3 |
32.0 |
Pass |
PC |
Level 3 |
2.64 |
[0047] As seen from Table 4, both Alloys 21# and 22# of the present disclosure show good
match of strength, toughness and corrosion resistance, and are significantly better
than Alloy 23# without added Si. FIGs. 1 and 2 show the TEM morphology images of the
intragranular and grain boundary precipitates of Alloy 22# respectively. It can be
clearly seen that T-Mg
32(Al, Zn)
49 and β'-Mg
2Si phase precipitated in the alloy at the same time, the grain boundary precipitates
distribute discontinuously , which is conducive to the alloy obtaining high strength,
toughness and good corrosion resistance.
EXAMPLE 3
[0048] Small-size aluminum alloy forgings were prepared on a pilot platform, and the alloy
composition is shown in Table 5.
[0049] Round ingots with Φ530mm were prepared by alloy smelting, degassing, removal of inclusion,
and semi-continuous casting conditions well known in the industry, wherein the conditions
for the homogenization treatment of the ingots were selected as: (400±5°C/12h) + (475±5°C/30h)
and air cooling. After peeling, milling and sawing, an extrusion billet with size
of Φ490 mm was obtained. The billet was pre-heated at 440±10°C for 6 h to give a Φ240-mm
extruded bar, and then subject to a multi-direction forging to give a 60 x 500 x 900mm
small-sized forging, wherein the extrusion and forging deformation temperatures were
controlled at 400-420°C. The forging was placed into an air furnace at 450°C to undergo
a solid solution treatment of 450°C/30min + 480°C/90min, quenched in water immediately
before a 1.5-2.5% pre-compression deformation treatment, followed by a two-stage aging
treatment at 90±5°C/24h + 140±5°C/28h according to the characteristics of the alloy.
[0050] The samples were cut according to the relevant methods, and tested in accordance
with the relevant test standards for density (GB/T 1423), tensile properties (GB/T
16865), fracture toughness (GB/T 4161), fatigue properties (GB/T 3075), exfoliation
corrosion (GB/T 22639) and intergranular corrosion of the alloy in accordance with
the relevant testing standards, which were taken as common performance indicators
of alloys for evaluation. The results are shown in Table 6.
Table 5. Compositions of Experimental Alloys
| Alloy No. |
Alloy of the present disclosure |
Mg (wt%) |
Zn (wt%) |
Si (wt%) |
Cu (wt%) |
Mn (wt%) |
Zr (wt%) |
Sc (wt%) |
Content of main impurities (wt%) |
| (Y/N) |
| 24# |
Y |
8.72 |
2.56 |
0.75 |
/ |
/ |
0.11 |
/ |
Fe=0.09, Ti=0.02 |
Table 6. Performance Test Results of Experimental Alloys
| Experiment al alloy |
Tensile property |
Fracture toughnes s |
Fatigue performan ce |
Corrosion properties |
Densit y |
| No. |
State |
Rm(MP a) |
Rp0.2(MP a) |
A (%) |
KIC (MPa·m1/ 2) |
Under 241MPa, R = 0.1, 120,000 cycles |
Exfoliatio n Corrosion |
Intergranul ar |
g/cm3 |
| 24# |
TX |
574 |
453 |
11. 2 |
33.4 |
Pass |
N |
Level 2 |
2.62 |
[0051] As seen from Table 6, Alloy 24# of the present disclosure show good match of strength,
toughness and corrosion resistance.
EXAMPLE 4
[0052] Aluminum alloy castings were prepared in the laboratory, and the compositions of
alloys were shown in Table 7.
[0053] Raw materials (high-purity aluminum, pure magnesium, pure zinc, Al-Si intermediate
alloy, Al-Zr intermediate alloy, Al-Ti-B intermediate alloy refiner were prepared,
and tools and molds were baked. High-purity aluminum was melted at 730°C, and pure
zinc, Al-Si master alloy and Al-Zr master alloy were added in conventional order.
The material was stirred to fully melt, and cooled to 720°C. Al-Ti-B intermediate
alloy was added, stirred and left to stand for 4-6 minutes. The material continued
to cool to 710°C, and aluminum foiled-coated pure magnesium was pressed into the aluminum
alloy liquor, and stirred to fully melt. The material was heated to 720°C, and subject
to degassing and slagging refining and pre-furnace inspection. After standing at a
casting temperature of 690°C for 30 minutes, the aluminum alloy melt was poured into
the baked metal mold at a temperature of about 180-200°C. The produced aluminum alloy
casting was placed into an air furnace at 470°C, and subject to a solid solution treatment
of 470±5°C/12h + 485±5°C/12h, cooled by water, naturally aged for 48h, and then underwent
a two-stage aging treatment of 95±5°C/12h + 150±5°C/24h.
[0054] The samples were cut according to the relevant methods, and tested in accordance
with the relevant test standards for density (GB/T 1423), tensile properties (GB/T
16865), exfoliation corrosion (GB/T 22639) and intergranular corrosion of the alloy
in accordance with the relevant testing standards, which were taken as common performance
indexes of alloys for evaluation. The results are shown in Table 8.
Table 7. Compositions of Experimental Alloys
| Alloy No. |
Alloy of the present disclosure |
Mg (wt%) |
Zn (wt%) |
Si (wt%) |
Cu (wt%) |
Mn (wt%) |
Zr (wt%) |
Sc (wt%) |
Content of main impurities (wt%) |
| (Y/N) |
| 25# |
Y |
8.93 |
2.67 |
1.15 |
0.19 |
0.29 |
0.11 |
/ |
Fe=0.16, Ti=0.02 |
| 26# |
N |
5.34 |
/ |
2.09 |
0.26 |
0.32 |
/ |
/ |
Fe=0.13, Ti=0.02 |
Table 8. Performance Test Results of Experimental Alloys
| Experimental alloy |
Tensile property |
Corrosion properties |
Density |
| Alloy No. |
State |
Rm(MPa) |
Rp0.2(MPa) |
A(%) |
Exfoliation Corrosion |
Intergranular |
g/cm3 |
| 25# |
TX |
467 |
396 |
7.1 |
N |
Level 2 |
2.65 |
| 26# |
TX |
306 |
192 |
9.8 |
N |
Level 2 |
2.60 |
[0055] As seen from Table 8, Alloy 25# of the present disclosure exhibits high strength
level and good match of high plasticity and corrosion resistance, as compared with
Alloy 26# (Al-Mg-Si casting aluminum alloy) castings.
EXAMPLE 5
[0056] Alloys were prepared in industrial scale, and the compositions of the alloys were
as shown in Table 9.
[0057] Round ingots with Φ480mm were prepared by alloy smelting, degassing, removal of inclusion,
and semi-continuous casting conditions well known in the art, wherein the conditions
for the homogenization treatment of the ingots of Alloys 27#, 28#, and 29# were selected
as: (405±5°C/10h) + (475±5°C/18h) + (505±5°C/12h), and the other alloys were subject
to conventional annealing treatment of 470-500°C/36h, and air cooling. After peeling,
milling and sawing, an extrusion billet with size of Φ450 mm was obtained. The billet
was pre-heated at 430±10°C for 4h, and extruded for deformation to give a 35 x 400mm
large-sized strip with the extrusion temperature controlled at approximately 380°C±10°C.
By selecting appropriate process parameters in a range of 475-540°C according to the
characteristics of the alloys themselves, the alloy strip was subject to solid solution
treatment, water quenching immediately before 1.5-2% tensile straightening treatment,
and a typical aging treatment, wherein Alloys 27#, 28# and 29# were subject to two-stage
aging treatment of 90±3°C/24h + 140±3°C/24h, Alloy 30# was subject to an aging treatment
of 121±5°C/6h + 163±5°C/20h, Alloy 31# was subject to an aging treatment of 190±5°C/12h,
and Alloy 32# was subject to an aging treatment of 165±5°C/8h, so that the alloys
obtained better comprehensive performance matching.
[0058] The samples were cut according to the relevant methods, and tested in accordance
with the relevant test standards for density (GB/T 1423), tensile properties (GB/T
16865), fracture toughness (GB/T 4161), fatigue properties (GB/T 3075), exfoliation
corrosion (GB/T 22639) and intergranular corrosion of the alloy in accordance with
the relevant testing standards, which were taken as common performance indexes of
alloys for evaluation. The results are shown in Table 10.
Table 9. Compositions of Experimental Alloys
| Alloy No. |
Alloy of the present disclosure |
Mg (wt%) |
Zn (wt%) |
Si (wt%) |
Cu (wt%) |
Mn (wt%) |
Zr (wt%) |
Content of main impurities (wt%) |
Remark |
| (Y/N) |
| 27# |
Y |
8.55 |
2.97 |
0.47 |
/ |
/ |
0.11 |
Fe=0.15, Ti=0.02 |
|
| 28# |
Y |
8.09 |
2.9 |
0.53 |
/ |
/ |
0.11 |
Fe=0.15, Ti=0.02 |
|
| 29# |
Y |
7.15 |
2.29 |
0.24 |
/ |
/ |
0.11 |
|
|
| 30# |
N |
2.25 |
6.21 |
0.06 |
2.3 |
0.05 |
0.11 |
Fe=0.15, Ti=0.02 |
7050 |
| 31# |
N |
1.5 |
0.12 |
0.25 |
4.35 |
0.6 |
/ |
Fe=0.15, Ti=0.02 |
2024 |
| 32# |
N |
0.55 |
0.1 |
0.7 |
0.15 |
0.25 |
/ |
|
6005A |
| Note: The compositions of Alloys 30#, 31# and 32# are respectively taken from the
medium values of the composition ranges of 7050, 2024 and 6005A aluminum alloys registered
by the International Aluminum Association. |
Table 10. Performance Test Results of Experimental Alloys
| Experimenta l alloy |
Tensile property |
Fracture toughnes s |
Fatigue performanc e |
Corrosion properties |
Densit y |
| Alloy No. |
State |
Rm (MPa ) |
Rp0.2 (MPa ) |
A (%) |
KIC (MPa·m1/2 ) |
Under X stress conditions, R=0.1, cycle 120,000 times |
Exfoliatio n Corrosion |
Intergranula r |
g/cm3 |
| 27# |
TX |
605 |
511 |
11.5 |
33.4 |
Pass (X=241MPa) |
N |
Level 2 |
2.64 |
| 28# |
TX |
589 |
492 |
13. 4 |
35.1 |
Pass (X=241MPa) |
N |
Level 2 |
2.64 |
| 29# |
TX |
476 |
329 |
19 |
37.5 |
Pass (X=241MPa) |
N |
Pitting corrosion |
2.64 |
| 30# |
T74 |
521 |
469 |
12. 1 |
36.6 |
Pass (X=241MPa) |
EB |
Level 4 |
2.83 |
| 31# |
T8 |
494 |
464 |
8.7 |
40.1 |
Pass (X=241MPa) |
EB |
Level 3 |
2.78 |
| 32# |
T6 |
282 |
189 |
14 |
24.5 |
Pass (X=120MPa) |
PA |
Level 3 |
2.71 |
[0059] As seen from Table 10, Alloys 27#, 28# and 29# of the present disclosure have low
density, good toughness and corrosion resistance, which have obvious comprehensive
performance advantages, low density, high strength level, and high fracture toughness,
fatigue resistance and corrosion resistance, as compared with the 7050 alloy (30#
alloy), 2024 alloy (31# alloy) and 6005A alloy (32# alloy) prepared under the same
conditions.
[0060] FIGs. 3 and 4 show the comparison of specific strength, fracture toughness and corrosion
resistance of Alloys 27#, 28#, 29# of the present disclosure, 7050 alloy (30# alloy),
2024 alloy (31# alloy) and 6005A alloy (32# alloy), respectively. It can be seen that
the alloy product of the present disclosure shows a good match between mechanical
properties and corrosion properties.
[0061] The foregoings are the only exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, and
are not used to limit the scope of the present disclosure, which is determined by
the appended claims.
1. A lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material comprising:
Mg 6.0-10.0 wt%, Zn 1.0-3.5 wt%, Si 0.1-1.3 wt%, and at least one of Mn, Cu, Zr, Sc,
and Ti elements in total amount of less than or equal to 0.8%, and a balance of Al
and inevitable impurities.
2. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
1, comprising: Mg 6.3-9.9 wt%, Zn 1.1-2.9 wt%, Si 0.15-1.0 wt%, and at least one of
the elements Mn, Cu, Zr, Sc, and Ti elements in total amount of less than or equal
to 0.6 wt%, and a balance of Al and inevitable impurities.
3. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
2, comprising: Mg 6.6-9.0 wt%, Zn 1.3-2.9 wt%, and Si 0.15-0.8 wt%.
4. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
2, comprising: Mg 7.1-8.8 wt%, Zn 1.5-2.8 wt%, and Si 0.25-0.7 wt%.
5. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
2, comprising: Mg 7.3-8.5 wt%, Zn 1.5-2.7 wt%, and Si 0.4-0.6 wt%.
6. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
2, wherein contents of Mg, Zn, and Si satisfy the relationship of: 2.5 ≤ (9 x Mg)
/ [( 1 x Si) + (8 x Zn)] ≤ 6.
7. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
2, comprising: Mn 0.10-0.50 wt%.
8. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
2, comprising: Cu 0.10-0.50 wt%.
9. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
2, comprising: Ti 0.01-0.15 wt%.
10. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
2, comprising: Zr 0.05-0.25 wt%.
11. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
2, comprising: Sc 0.05-0.30 wt%.
12. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
11, comprising: Sc 0.05-0.20 wt%.
13. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
12, wherein contents of Sc and Zr satisfy: 0.15 wt% ≤ (Sc + Zr) wt% ≤ 0.35 wt%.
14. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
2, wherein the inevitable impurities comprises elements that are unintentionally introduced
as impurities during manufacturing process of alloy ingot, wherein Fe ≤ 0.40 wt%,
each of other impurity elements are ≤ 0.20 wt%, and a total amount is ≤ 0.50 wt%.
15. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
14, wherein the inevitable impurities comprises elements that are unintentionally
introduced as impurities during manufacturing process of alloy ingot, wherein Fe ≤
0.20 wt%, each of other impurity elements are ≤ 0.10 wt%, and a total amount is ≤
0.25 wt%.
16. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
15, wherein Fe ≤ 0.10 wt%.
17. A method for producing deformed aluminum alloy materials, comprising the steps of:
(1) producing an ingot of the aluminum alloy material of any one of claims 1-16;
(2) homogenizing and/or pre-heating the produced ingot;
(3) thermally deforming the ingot to a desired processed material or a pre-processed
material by one or more thermal deformation process selected from the group consisting
of extrusion, rolling and forging;
(4) optionally processing the pre-processed material to the desired processed material
by reheating and cold deformation;
(5) solution heat treating the processed material;
(6) rapidly cooling the treated processed material to room temperature; and
(7) naturally or artificially aging the cooled processed materials to give an aged
processed alloy material.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein, in step (1), the ingot is manufactured by means of
smelting, degassing, removal of inclusion and semi-continuous casting; during the
smelting process, Mg, Zn is used as the core to accurately control the element content,
and through online component detection and analysis, the ratio between alloying elements
can be quickly supplemented and adjusted, and the entire ingot manufacturing process
is completed.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein, in step (1), 0.0002~0.005 wt% Be is added in the
form of Al-Be intermediate alloy during smelting to change the properties of the oxide
film and reduce oxidation burning loss and inclusions.
20. The method of claim 18, wherein, in step (1), it also includes applying electromagnetic
field, ultrasonic field or mechanical stirring at or near the crystallizer site.
21. The method of claim 17, wherein, in step (2), the homogenizing is carried out by means
selected from the group consisting of:
(i) a single-stage homogenization treatment in a range of 360-490°C for a total time
of 12-60 h; and
(ii) a two- or multi-stage homogenization treatment in a range of 360-500°C for a
total time of 12-60 h.
22. The method of claim 17, wherein, in steps (3) and (4), the pre-heating temperature
and reheating temperature before each thermal deformation process are 370-460°C, and
the processing time is 1-8 h.
23. The method of claim 17, wherein step (4) further comprises an intermediate annealing
treatment at 350-450°C for 0.5-6 h between the cold deformation passes.
24. The method of claim 17, wherein, in step (5), the solid solution treatment requires
to further adjust the sub-grain size and the recrystallized microstructure ratio in
the material according to the performance requirements, and is carried out by means
selecting from the group consisting of:
(i) a single-, two-, or multi-stage solid solution treatment in a range of 440-500°C
for total 0.5-8 h; and
(ii) a progressive heating solid solution treatment in a range of 440-500°C for total
0.5-5 h.
25. The method of claim 23, wherein a progressive heating solid solution treatment is
used with a heating rate of ≤ 60°C/min.
26. The method of claim 17, wherein, in step (6), the processed material is rapidly cooled
to room temperature using a method selected from the group consisting of spray quenching,
immersion quenching, strong air cooling and combinations thereof.
27. The method of claim 17, wherein, in step (7), the artificial aging treatment is carried
out by means selected from the group consisting of:
(i) after completion of quenching and cooling, a natural aging at room temperature
for ≥ 48 h;
(ii) within 2 h after completion of quenching and cooling, an artificial aging treatment
in a range of 70-240°C for total 6-60 h; and
(iii)after completion of quenching and cooling, a combination of natural aging and
artificial aging with an artificial aging temperature of 70-240°C and a time of 6-60
h.
28. The method of claim 17, further comprising, between steps (6) and (7), steps of straightening
and/or pre-deforming the cooled processed material, wherein the straightening can
be carried out by means of roller straightening, stretch straightening, stretch bending
straightening and any combination thereof to improve the straightness of the processed
materials, and the pre-deformation can be carried out by means of stretching, compression
and any combination thereof to reduce the residual stress formed by quenching and
cooling, so as to facilitate subsequent processing and application.
29. The method of claim 17, wherein the processed material are wires, rods, pipes, sheets,
plates, or forging products.
30. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of any
one of claims 1 to 16 or the lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum
alloy material produced according to the method of any one of claims 17 to 29, having
a density of ≤ 2.68g/cm3, a tensile strength of ≥ 400MPa, and an exfoliation corrosion resistance of not lower
than EA level.
31. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
30, having a density of ≤ 2.66g/cm3, a tensile strength of ≥ 410MPa, and an exfoliation corrosion performance of not
lower than EA level.
32. The lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material of claim
31, having a density of ≤ 2.64g/cm3, a tensile strength of ≥ 420MPa, and an exfoliation corrosion performance of not
lower than PC level.
33. A method for producing casting aluminum alloy materials, comprising the steps of:
(1) preparing an aluminum alloy ingot of the aluminum alloy material of any one of
claims 1-16 using smelting, degasification, removal of inclusion, sand- or metal-mold
casting, or die casting, wherein during the smelting process, the concentrations of
elements are accurately controlled by taking Mg and Cu as core elements; and the ratios
among alloying elements are rapidly supplemented and adjusted by on-line detection
and analysis of components so as to complete the casting production;
(2) solid solution heat treating the produced aluminum casting, comprising: allowing
the aluminum alloy casting to undergo a single-, two-, or multi-stage solid solution
treatment in a range of 440-500°C for total 0.5-8h, or a progressive heating solid
solution treatment in a range of 440-500°C for total 0.5-5 h; and
(3) naturally or artificially aging the aluminum alloy casting; wherein the natural
aging treatment is carried out at room temperature for ≥ 48 h; the artificial aging
treatment is carried out in a range of 70-240°C for total 6-60 h; and a combination
of natural aging treatment and artificial aging treatment is carried out with the
artificial aging temperature of 70-240°C and the artificial aging time of 6-60 h.
34. A product formed by welding the lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant aluminum
alloy material of any one of claims 1 to 16, 30 to 32 or a lightweight, high-strength,
corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material prepared by the method of any one of claims
17 to 29, 33 with the same alloy or another alloy by means of friction stir welding,
fusion welding, brazing, electron beam welding, or laser welding.
35. A final component obtainable by processing the lightweight, high-strength, corrosion-resistant
aluminum alloy material of any one of claims 1 to 16, 30 to 32 or a lightweight, high-strength,
corrosion-resistant aluminum alloy material prepared by the method of any one of claims
17 to 29, 33 via various surface treatments, stamping forming, and machining.
36. The final component of claim 35, wherein the final component is a load-bearing structural
component.