Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a steel pipe for a line pipe with high hydrogen
embrittlement resistance, a method for producing the steel pipe, a steel material
for a line pipe, and a method for producing the steel material, suitable for applications,
such as a line pipe for transporting hydrogen gas.
Background Art
[0002] There is a line pipe for transporting natural gas as an existing energy infrastructure.
Such a steel material has been required to suppress the occurrence of hydrogen-induced
cracking in a sour environment. On the other hand, in recent years, hydrogen has attracted
a great deal of attention worldwide as a clean energy source for the construction
of a decarbonizing society. Thus, for the purpose of transporting a large amount of
hydrogen gas, construction of a hydrogen gas transportation network that pressure-feeds
natural gas partially mixed with hydrogen or hydrogen gas as an alternative through
a natural gas line pipe has been studied. The transport pressure in such a pipeline
operation is assumed to be a high pressure of 1 to 40 MPa, and line pipes are placed
in a high-pressure hydrogen gas exposure environment. A steel material used in such
an environment has a concern about the occurrence of "hydrogen embrittlement" in which
hydrogen enters the steel and degrades its characteristics. Thus, it is necessary
to have not only high toughness and sour resistance required for conventional line
pipes but also hydrogen embrittlement resistance required in a hydrogen gas environment.
[0003] An austenite stainless steel, such as SUS 316L, which is more resistant to hydrogen
embrittlement than low-alloy steels, has been used for a steel structure used in a
high-pressure hydrogen gas environment. However, an austenite stainless steel, such
as SUS 316L, is high in steel material cost and has low strength, and when designed
to withstand a high hydrogen pressure, has a large wall thickness and results in an
increased price of a structure for hydrogen itself. Thus, there has been a strong
demand for a low-alloy steel material that can withstand a high-pressure hydrogen
gas environment at a lower cost for a steel structure for hydrogen.
[0004] In response to such a demand, for example, a steel for a high-pressure hydrogen
environment described in Patent Literature 1 is a steel used in a high-pressure hydrogen
environment, in which Ca/S is less than 1.5 or 11 or more to reduce a relative concentration
of diffusible hydrogen and suppress embrittlement due to diffusible hydrogen.
[0005] Patent Literature 2 discloses a technique of finding that a low-alloy high-strength
steel adjusted to have a specific chemical composition has, within the tensile strength
range of 900 to 950 MPa in the atmosphere, increased drawing and elongation as compared
with JIS G 3128 SHY685NS in a 45-MPa hydrogen atmosphere and improve high-pressure
hydrogen environment embrittlement resistance.
[0006] A Cr-Mo high-strength low-alloy steel described in Patent Literature 3 is a low-alloy
high-strength steel with good elongation and drawing characteristics even in a 45-MPa
hydrogen atmosphere and with high high-pressure hydrogen environment embrittlement
resistance provided by tempering at a relatively high temperature of 560°C to 580°C
to adjust the grain size number after tempering to 8.4 or more and the tensile strength
in a very narrow range of 900 to 950 MPa.
[0007] In a low-alloy steel for a high-pressure hydrogen gas environment proposed in Patent
Literature
4, adding
V, increasing the Mo content as compared with existing steels, increasing the tempering
temperature, and utilizing a V-Mo carbide improve the carbide form at a grain boundary
and greatly improve hydrogen environment embrittlement resistance.
[0008] Patent Literature 5 proposes a steel for a high-pressure hydrogen gas storage container
with high hydrogen resistance. According to the technique described in Patent Literature
5, stress relief annealing for an extended period after normalizing treatment in the
production of a steel sheet finely and densely disperses and precipitates an MC carbide
(Mo, V)C and improves the hydrogen resistance, such as hydrogen embrittlement resistance,
of the steel.
[0009] Patent Literature 6 proposes a steel material with a metallic microstructure composed
of 90% or more by area of a bainite-based microstructure in which cementite with an
average grain size of 50 nm or less and an average aspect ratio of 3 or less is dispersedly
precipitated in the bainite.
Citation List
Patent Literature
Non Patent Literature
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0012] Because the pressure in a line pipe fluctuates during operation or periodical shutdowns,
a repeated stress is applied to the structure. Thus, when designing a steel structure,
such as a line pipe, it is essential to consider fatigue fracture. However, as described
in Non Patent Literature 1, it is known that the fatigue life of a material decreases
in a high-pressure hydrogen environment. This means that the service life of a line
pipe material decreases when the line pipe material is designed on the basis of a
conventional natural gas line pipe. The related art described above can suppress the
occurrence of hydrogen-induced cracking in a sour environment but cannot sufficiently
increase the fatigue strength in hydrogen gas. Therefore, there is a problem in that
it is difficult to achieve both the suppression of the occurrence of hydrogen-induced
cracking in a sour environment and high fatigue strength in hydrogen gas.
[0013] In view of the problems of the related art, it is an object of the present invention
to provide a steel pipe for a line pipe with high strength and high hydrogen embrittlement
resistance in a high-pressure hydrogen gas environment, a method for producing the
steel pipe, a steel material for a line pipe, and a method for producing the steel
material, suitable for a steel structure used in a high-pressure hydrogen gas environment,
such as a line pipe for 100% hydrogen gas or a natural gas containing hydrogen at
a hydrogen partial pressure of 1 MPa or more (natural gas is a gas containing hydrocarbons,
such as methane and ethane, as main components).
[0014] The phrase "high hydrogen embrittlement resistance in a high-pressure hydrogen gas
environment", as used herein, means that the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen at which
no fracture occurs at a number of repetitions of 2,000,000 is 200 MPa or more and
the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress in an inert gas environment
is 0.90 or more, as determined by a fatigue test in accordance with ASTM E466, Fatigue
Testing, at a frequency of 1 Hz, a repetitive waveform of a sine wave, a control method
of load control, a load condition of uniaxial tension and compression, and a stress
ratio of R = -1.0, at room temperature (20°C ± 10°C) in both environments of hydrogen
gas with a pressure of 1 MPa or more and a natural gas (the main components are hydrocarbons,
such as methane and ethane) mixed atmosphere containing hydrogen at a hydrogen partial
pressure of 1 MPa or more. The natural gas containing hydrogen at a hydrogen partial
pressure of 1 MPa or more, for example, has a hydrogen concentration of 30% or less
by volume and a pressure of the entire gas of 30 MPa or less.
[0015] When the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen in the above environment is 200 MPa or
more and the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen of a steel material in the above environment/fatigue
limit stress in an inert gas environment is 0.90 or more, it is possible to design
a steel structure for hydrogen, such as a long-life line pipe, within a thickness
range that is available by a process of producing a steel pipe, such as a seamless
steel pipe or UOE.
[0016] The term "steel material", as used herein, includes a steel sheet, a steel plate,
a seamless steel pipe, an electric-resistance-welded steel pipe, a shaped steel, a
steel bar, and the like.
Solution to Problem
[0017] The present inventors have extensively studied conditions to be satisfied by a steel
material for producing a steel pipe for a line pipe and a steel material for a line
pipe with high hydrogen embrittlement resistance and have invented a new steel pipe
for a line pipe and a new steel material for a line pipe. A steel pipe and a steel
material according to the present invention have high strength. The term "high strength",
as used herein, refers to a tensile strength of 520 MPa or more.
[0018] The gist of the present invention is as follows:
[1] A steel pipe for a line pipe with high hydrogen embrittlement resistance, the
steel pipe having a chemical composition containing:
on a mass percent basis,
C: 0.10% to 0.45%,
Si: 0.01% to 2.0%,
Mn: 0.5% to 1.5%,
P: 0.0001% to 0.015%,
S: 0.0002% to 0.0015%,
Al: 0.005% to 0.15%,
O: 0.01% or less,
N: 0.010% or less, and
H: 0.0010% or less, and
optionally at least one selected from Nb: 0% to 0.10%,
Ti: 0% to 0.1%,
Ca: 0% to 0.005%,
Ni: 0% to 2.0%,
Cu: 0% to 1.0%,
Cr: 0% to 1.0%,
Mo: 0% to 0.60%,
W: 0% to 1.0%,
V: 0% to 0.10%,
Zr: 0% to 0.050%,
REM: 0% to 0.050%,
Mg: 0% to 0.050%,
B: 0% to 0.0020%,
Hf: 0% to 0.2%,
Ta: 0% to 0.2%,
Re: 0% to 0.005%,
Sn: 0% to 0.3%, and
Sb: 0% to 0.3%,
the remainder being Fe and an incidental impurity element,
wherein an area fraction of retained austenite in the steel pipe is 0% to 3%, bainite
or martensite presents at a quarter thickness position from an inner surface of the
steel pipe with an area fraction of the bainite of 90% or more or an area fraction
of the martensite of 90% or more, fatigue limit stress of the steel pipe in hydrogen
at 1 MPa or more is 200 MPa or more, and the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen at 1
MPa or more/fatigue limit stress in an inert gas environment is 0.90 or more. [2]
The steel pipe for a line pipe with high hydrogen embrittlement resistance according
to [1], wherein the chemical composition contains, on a mass percent basis,
Nb: 0.001% to 0.10%,
Ti: 0.005% to 0.1%,
Ca: 0.0001% to 0.005%,
Ni: 0.01% to 2.0%,
Cu: 0.01% to 1.0%,
Cr: 0.01% to 1.0%,
Mo: 0.01% to 0.60%,
W: 0.01% to 1.0%,
V: 0.01% to 0.10%,
Zr: 0.0001% to 0.050%,
REM: 0.0001% to 0.050%,
Mg: 0.0001% to 0.050%,
B: 0.0001% to 0.0020%,
Hf: 0.0001% to 0.2%,
Ta: 0.0001% to 0.2%,
Re: 0.0001% to 0.005%,
Sn: 0.0001% to 0.3%, and
Sb: 0.0001% to 0.3%.
[3] A method for producing a steel pipe for a line pipe, the method including:
a casting step of casting a steel raw material having the chemical composition according
to [1] or [2] at a casting speed of 1.8 m/min or less;
a heating step of heating the steel raw material at 1350°C or less;
a hot rolling step of rolling the steel raw material heated in the heating step with
a finish rolling temperature of 820°C or more to form a steel pipe shape;
a cooling step of, after holding a steel pipe produced in the hot rolling step at
a temperature of an Ac3 point or higher and 1000°C or less, cooling the steel pipe wherein a cooling condition
is the following Group A or Group B; and
a tempering step of tempering the steel pipe produced in the cooling step at 400°C
or more and an Ac1 point or lower,
Group A:
cooling the steel pipe to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or more
from 800°C to 550°C in terms of a temperatuer at a quarter thickness position from
an inner surface of the steel pipe and at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or less
from 550°C to 50°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position from
the inner surface of the steel pipe, and
Group B:
cooling the steel pipe to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 10°C/s or more
from 800°C to 300°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position from
the inner surface of the steel pipe and at an average cooling rate of 5°C/s or less
from 300°C to 50°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position from
the inner surface of the steel pipe.
[4] The method for producing a steel pipe for a line pipe according to [3], including,
before the tempering step, a quenching step of reheating the steel pipe to an Ac3 point or higher and 1000°C or less, and cooling the steel pipe wherein a cooling
condition is the following Group A or Group B,
Group A:
cooling the steel pipe to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or more
from 800°C to 550°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position from
the inner surface of the steel pipe and at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or less
from 550°C to 50°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position from
the inner surface of the steel pipe, and
Group B:
cooling the steel pipe to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 10°C/s or more
from 800°C to 300°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position from
the inner surface of the steel pipe and at an average cooling rate of 5°C/s or less
from 300°C to 50°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position from
the inner surface of the steel pipe.
[5] The method for producing a steel pipe for a line pipe according to [3] or [4],
wherein the casting speed is 1.0 m/min or less.
[6] A steel material for a line pipe with high hydrogen embrittlement resistance,
the steel material having a chemical composition containing:
on a mass percent basis,
C: 0.10% to 0.45%,
Si: 0.01% to 2.0%,
Mn: 0.5% to 1.5%,
P: 0.0001% to 0.015%,
S: 0.0002% to 0.0015%,
Al: 0.005% to 0.15%,
O: 0.01% or less,
N: 0.010% or less, and
H: 0.0010% or less, and
optionally at least one selected from Nb: 0% to 0.10%,
Ti: 0% to 0.1%,
Ca: 0% to 0.005%,
Ni: 0% to 2.0%,
Cu: 0% to 1.0%,
Cr: 0% to 1.0%,
Mo: 0% to 0.60%,
W: 0% to 1.0%,
V: 0% to 0.10%,
Zr: 0% to 0.050%,
REM: 0% to 0.050%,
Mg: 0% to 0.050%,
B: 0% to 0.0020%,
Hf: 0% to 0.2%,
Ta: 0% to 0.2%,
Re: 0% to 0.005%,
Sn: 0% to 0.3%, and
Sb: 0% to 0.3%,
the remainder being Fe and an incidental impurity element,
wherein an area fraction of retained austenite in the steel material is 0% to 3%,
bainite or martensite presents at a quarter thickness position of the steel material
with an area fraction of the bainite of 90% or more or an area fraction of the martensite
of 90% or more, fatigue limit stress of the steel material in hydrogen at 1 MPa or
more is 200 MPa or more, and the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen at 1 MPa or more/fatigue
limit stress in an inert gas environment is 0.90 or more.
[7] The steel material for a line pipe with high hydrogen embrittlement resistance
according to [6], wherein the chemical composition contains, on a mass percent basis,
Nb: 0.001% to 0.10%,
Ti: 0.005% to 0.1%,
Ca: 0.0001% to 0.005%,
Ni: 0.01% to 2.0%,
Cu: 0.01% to 1.0%,
Cr: 0.01% to 1.0%,
Mo: 0.01% to 0.60%,
W: 0.01% to 1.0%,
V: 0.01% to 0.10%,
Zr: 0.0001% to 0.050%,
REM: 0.0001% to 0.050%,
Mg: 0.0001% to 0.050%,
B: 0.0001% to 0.0020%,
Hf: 0.0001% to 0.2%,
Ta: 0.0001% to 0.2%,
Re: 0.0001% to 0.005%,
Sn: 0.0001% to 0.3%, and
Sb: 0.0001% to 0.3%.
[8] A method for producing a steel material for a line pipe, the method including:
a casting step of casting a steel raw material having the chemical composition according
to [6] or [7] at a casting speed of 1.8 m/min or less;
a heating step of heating the steel raw material at 1350°C or less;
a hot rolling step of rolling the steel raw material heated in the heating step with
a finish rolling temperature of 820°C or more;
a cooling step of, after holding a steel material produced in the hot rolling step
at a temperature of an Ac3 point or higher and 1000°C or less, cooling the steel material wherein a cooling
condition is the following Group A or Group B; and
a tempering step of tempering the steel material produced in the cooling step at 400°C
or more and an Ac1 point or lower,
Group A:
cooling the steel material to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or
more from 800°C to 550°C in terms of a temperature at a quarter thickness position
from a surface of the steel material and at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or less
from 550°C to 50°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position from
the surface of the steel material, and
Group B:
cooling the steel material to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 10°C/s or
more from 800°C to 300°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position
from the surface of the steel material and at an average cooling rate of 5°C/s or
less from 300°C to 50°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position
from the surface of the steel material.
[9] The method for producing a steel material for a line pip according to [8], including,
before the tempering step, a quenching step of reheating the steel material to an
Ac3 point or higher and 1000°C or less, and cooling the steel material wherein a cooling
condition is the following Group A or Group B,
Group A:
cooling the steel material to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or
more from 800°C to 550°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position
from the surface of the steel material and at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or
less from 550°C to 50°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position
from the surface of the steel material, and
Group B:
cooling the steel material to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 10°C/s or
more from 800°C to 300°C in terms of a temperatre at the quarter thickness position
from the surface of the steel material and at an average cooling rate of 5°C/s or
less from 300°C to 50°C in terms of a temperature at the quarter thickness position
from the surface of the steel material.
[10] The method for producing a steel material for a line pipe according to [8] or
[9], wherein the casting speed is 1.0 m/min or less.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0019] The present invention can easily and simply produce a steel pipe and a steel material
with considerably improved hydrogen embrittlement resistance in a high-pressure hydrogen
gas environment and exhibits industrially significant effects. The present invention
can considerably improve the hydrogen embrittlement resistance of a steel structure,
such as a high-pressure hydrogen gas line pipe, improve the fatigue resistance, and
greatly contributes to the extension of the life of the steel structure. Description
of Embodiments
[0020] Next, a method for implementing the present invention is more specifically described.
The following description shows preferred embodiments of the present invention, and
the present invention is not limited by the following description.
[0021] An implementation method for a steel pipe is more specifically described as a first
embodiment, and then an implementation method for a steel material is more specifically
described as a second embodiment.
First Embodiment
[Chemical Composition]
[0022] The reasons for limiting the component composition (chemical composition) of a steel
pipe (including a steel material) according to the present invention are described
below. Unless otherwise specified, "%" in the following description refers to "% by
mass".
C: 0.10% to 0.45%
[0023] C is an element necessary to increase strength. Thus, the C content is 0.10% or more.
The C content is preferably 0.13% or more. On the other hand, a C content of more
than 0.45% may result in quenching crack during quenching, and the C content is therefore
0.45% or less. The C content is preferably 0.25% or less, more preferably 0.20% or
less, still more preferably 0.17% or less.
Si: 0.01% to 2.0%
[0024] Si is added for deoxidization, but the deoxidization effect is not sufficient at
a Si content of less than 0.01%. Thus, the Si content is 0.01% or more. The Si content
is preferably 0.08% or more, more preferably 0.1% or more. On the other hand, the
effect becomes saturated at a Si content of more than 2.0%, and the Si content is
therefore 2.0% or less. The Si content is preferably 1.8% or less, more preferably
1.0% or less. Furthermore, more than 0.5% results in lower toughness or weldability,
and the Si content is still more preferably 0.5% or less.
Mn: 0.5% to 1.5%
[0025] Mn effectively contributes to the improvement of strength and toughness, but the
effect of addition is insufficient at a content of less than 0.5%. Thus, the Mn content
is 0.5% or more. The Mn content is preferably 0.6% or more, more preferably 0.7% or
more, still more preferably 0.8% or more. On the other hand, more than 1.5% results
in a decrease in SSCC resistance (resistance to sulfide stress corrosion cracking)
and HIC (hydrogen-induced cracking) resistance due to an increase in the hardness
of a surface layer portion or a center segregation zone during controlled cooling.
Furthermore, weldability also deteriorates. Thus, the Mn content is limited to 1.5%
or less. The Mn content is preferably 1.4% or less, more preferably 1.3% or less.
P: 0.0001% to 0.015%
[0026] P is an incidental impurity element, reduces weldability, and reduces the HIC resistance
due to an increase in the hardness of a center segregation zone. This tendency becomes
remarkable at more than 0.015%, so that the upper limit of the P content is 0.015%.
The P content is preferably 0.010% or less, more preferably 0.008% or less. Although
a lower P content is better, from the perspective of refining costs, the P content
is 0.0001% or more.
S: 0.0002% to 0.0015%
[0027] S is an incidental impurity element, forms a MnS inclusion in steel, and reduces
the HIC resistance, so that a lower S content is preferred, but 0.0015% or less is
allowable. Thus, the S content is 0.0015% or less. The S content is preferably 0.0010%
or less, more preferably 0.0008% or less. Although a lower S content is better, from
the perspective of refining costs, the S content is 0.0002% or more.
Al: 0.005% to 0.15%
[0028] Al is added as a deoxidizing agent, but there is no effect of addition at less than
0.005%. Thus, the Al content is 0.005% or more. The Al content is preferably 0.01%
or more, more preferably 0.03% or more. On the other hand, more than 0.15% results
in steel with lower cleanliness and toughness, so that the Al content is limited to
0.15% or less. The Al content is preferably 0.10% or less, more preferably 0.08% or
less, still more preferably 0.05% or less.
O: 0.01% or less
[0029] O can form an oxide inclusion, and a lower O content is more preferred, but an O
content of 0.01% or less causes no problem. Thus, the O content is 0.01% or less.
The O content is preferably 0.005% or less. The O content is more preferably less
than 0.003%. Although the lower limit is not particularly limited, the O content is
preferably 0.001% or more because reducing the oxygen content to 0% increases the
cost.
N: 0.010% or less
[0030] N has a small influence on the fatigue property of a steel pipe, and the advantages
of the present invention are not impaired at a N content of 0.010% or less from the
perspective of toughness. Thus, the N content is 0.010% or less. The N content is
preferably 0.008% or less, more preferably 0.006% or less. The N content is still
more preferably 0.004% or less. On the other hand, from the perspective of improving
the toughness, a lower N content is desirable, but excessive reduction increases the
steelmaking cost, so that the N content is preferably 0.00001% or more. The N content
is preferably 0.001% or more.
H: 0.0010% or less
[0031] H may be introduced into a steel material in various steps during production, and
a large amount of H introduced increases the risk of cracking after solidification
and accelerates fatigue crack growth. A large amount of H introduced also reduces
the fatigue limit stress, and it is therefore important to decrease the amount of
hydrogen in the steel pipe. Since these effects are not problematic at a H content
of 0.0010% or less, the H content is 0.0010% or less. The H content is preferably
0.0005% or less, more preferably 0.0003% or less, still more preferably 0.0001% or
less. On the other hand, a H content of less than 0.00001% causes an increase in cost,
and the H content is therefore preferably 0.00001% or more. The amount of hydrogen
is the amount of residual hydrogen after forming of a steel material, a steel pipe,
UOE, or the like.
[0032] To further improve the strength and toughness of a steel pipe, the chemical composition
in the present disclosure may optionally contain at least one selected from Nb, Ti,
Ca, Ni, Cu, Cr, Mo, W, V, Zr, REM, Mg, B, Hf, Ta, Re, Sn, and Sb in the following
ranges.
Nb: 0% to 0.10% and Ti: 0% to 0.1%
[0033] Nb is an element effective in increasing the strength and toughness of a steel material,
but more than 0.10% results in a weld with lower toughness, so that when Nb is contained
the Nb content is 0.10% or less. The Nb content is preferably 0.08% or less. The Nb
content is more preferably 0.06% or less. Although the Nb content may be 0% or more,
the effects of containing Nb are difficult to obtain at a Nb content of less than
0.001%, so that when Nb is contained the Nb content is preferably 0.001% or more.
The Nb content is more preferably 0.01% or more.
[0034] Ti is an element effective in increasing the strength and toughness of a steel material,
but more than 0.1% results in a weld with lower toughness, so that when Ti is contained
the Ti content is 0.1% or less. The Ti content is preferably 0.05% or less. The Ti
content is more preferably 0.03% or less, still more preferably 0.02% or less. Although
the Ti content may be 0% or more, the effects of containing Ti are difficult to obtain
at a Ti content of less than 0.005%, so that when Ti is contained the Ti content is
preferably 0.005% or more. The Ti content is more preferably 0.008% or more.
Ca: 0% to 0.005%
[0035] Although Ca is an element effective in improving the HIC resistance by the shape
control of a sulfide inclusion, not only the effect is saturated but also the HIC
resistance decreases due to a decrease in the cleanliness of steel, so that when Ca
is contained the Ca content is limited to 0.005% or less. The Ca content is preferably
0.003% or less. The Ca content is more preferably 0.002% or less. Although the Ca
content may be 0% or more, the effect of addition is difficult to obtain at less than
0.0001%, so that when Ca is contained the Ca content is preferably 0.0001% or more.
The Ca content is more preferably 0.001% or more.
Ni: 0% to 2.0%
[0036] Ni is an element effective in improving the toughness and increasing the strength,
but, for cost reduction, when Ni is contained the Ni content is 2.0% or less. The
Ni content is preferably 1.5% or less. The Ni content is more preferably 1.2% or less,
still more preferably 1.0% or less. The Ni content may be 0% or more and is preferably
0.01% or more to achieve the above effects.
Cu: 0% to 1.0%
[0037] Cu is an element effective in improving the toughness and increasing the strength,
but an excessively high Cu content results in a decrease in weldability, so that when
Cu is contained the Cu content is 1.0% or less. The Cu content is preferably 0.5%
or less. The Cu content is more preferably 0.3% or less, still more preferably 0.2%
or less. The Cu content may be 0% or more and is preferably 0.01% or more to achieve
the above effects.
Cr: 0% to 1.0%
[0038] Like Mn, Cr is an element effective in obtaining sufficient strength even at a low
C content, but an excessively high Cr content results in excessive hardenability and
a decrease in the SSCC resistance. Furthermore, weldability also deteriorates. Thus,
when Cr is contained, the Cr content is 1.0% or less. The Cr content is preferably
0.8% or less. The Cr content is more preferably 0.5% or less, still more preferably
0.1% or less. The Cr content may be 0% or more and is preferably 0.01% or more to
achieve the effect. The Cr content is more preferably 0.02% or more.
Mo: 0% to 0.60%
[0039] Mo is an element effective in improving the toughness and increasing the strength
and effective in improving the SSCC resistance regardless of the hydrogen sulfide
partial pressure, but an excessively high Mo content results in excessive hardenability
and a decrease in the SSCC resistance. Furthermore, weldability also deteriorates.
Thus, when Mo is contained, the Mo content is 0.60% or less, more preferably 0.50%
or less, still more preferably 0.40% or less. Most preferably, the Mo content is 0.03%
or less. The Mo content may be 0% or more and is preferably 0.005% or more to achieve
the above effects. The Mo content is more preferably 0.01% or more.
W: 0% to 1.0%
[0040] W contributes to an increase in the strength of a steel pipe, but a W content of
more than 1.0% results in saturation of the effect and causes an increase in cost,
so that when W is contained the W content is 1.0% or less. The W content is preferably
0.8% or less. To further reduce the cost, the W content is more preferably 0.5% or
less. The W content is still more preferably 0.03% or less. The W content may be 0%
or more and is preferably 0.01% or more to achieve the effect.
V: 0% to 0.10%
[0041] V is an element that can be optionally contained to increase the strength and toughness
of a steel pipe, but a V content of more than 0.10% results in a weld with lower toughness,
so that when V is contained the V content is 0.10% or less. The V content is preferably
0.08% or less. The V content is more preferably 0.06% or less, still more preferably
0.03% or less. The V content may be 0% or more, but the effects of containing V are
difficult to obtain at a content of less than 0.01%, so that the V content is preferably
0.01% or more.
Zr: 0% to 0.050%, REM: 0% to 0.050%, Mg: 0% to 0.050%
[0042] Zr, REM, and Mg are elements that can be optionally contained to increase the toughness
through grain refinement or to increase cracking resistance through the control of
inclusion properties. On the other hand, the effects are saturated at more than 0.050%,
so that when they are contained each content is 0.050% or less. More specifically,
when Zr is contained, the Zr content is 0.050% or less. The Zr content is preferably
0.040% or less. The Zr content is more preferably 0.030% or less. The Zr content is
still more preferably 0.010% or less, most preferably 0.005% or less. When REM is
contained, the REM content is 0.050% or less. The REM content is preferably 0.040%
or less. The REM content is more preferably 0.030% or less. When Mg is contained,
the Mg content is 0.050% or less. The Mg content is preferably 0.040% or less. The
Mg content is more preferably 0.030% or less. Each element content may be 0% or more,
but the effects of containing these elements are difficult to obtain at a content
of less than 0.0001%, so that each content is preferably 0.0001% or more. More specifically,
the Zr content is preferably 0.0001% or more. The Zr content is more preferably 0.0005%
or more. The REM content is preferably 0.0001% or more. The REM content is more preferably
0.0005% or more. The Mg content is preferably 0.0001% or more. The Mg content is more
preferably 0.0005% or more.
B: 0% to 0.0020%
[0043] B is an element that improves hardenability, and contributes to an increase in the
strength of a steel pipe, suppresses coarsening of prior-austenite grains, and improves
various characteristics of the material. On the other hand, a B content of more than
0.0020% results in saturation of the effect and causes an increase in cost, so that
when B is contained the B content is 0.0020% or less. The B content is preferably
0.0015% or less. The B content is more preferably 0.0012% or less. To reduce the cost,
0.0010% or less is still more preferred. The B content may be 0% or more and is preferably
0.0001% or more to achieve the effects. More preferably, the B content is 0.0005%
or more.
Hf: 0% to 0.2%, Ta: 0% to 0.2%
[0044] These elements contribute to an increase in the strength of a steel pipe, but a content
of more than 0.2% results in saturation of the effect and causes an increase in cost,
so that when these elements are contained each content is 0.2% or less. More specifically,
when Hf is contained, the Hf content is 0.2% or less. The Hf content is preferably
0.1% or less. The Hf content is more preferably 0.05% or less. When Ta is contained,
the Ta content is 0.2% or less. The Ta content is preferably 0.1% or less. The Ta
content is more preferably 0.05% or less. The Hf or Ta content may be 0% or more and
is preferably 0.0001% or more to achieve the effect. Thus, the Hf content is preferably
0.0001% or more. More preferably, the Hf content is 0.0010% or more. The Ta content
is preferably 0.0001% or more. More preferably, the Ta content is 0.0010% or more.
Re: 0% to 0.005%
[0045] Re contributes to an increase in the strength of a steel pipe, but a content of more
than 0.005% results in saturation of the effect and causes an increase in cost, so
that when Re is contained the Re content is 0.005% or less. The Re content is preferably
0.003% or less. The Re content is more preferably 0.002% or less. The Re content may
be 0% or more and is preferably 0.0001% or more to achieve the effect. 0.001% or more
is more preferred.
Sn: 0% to 0.3%, Sb: 0% to 0.3%
[0046] These elements contribute to an increase in the strength of a steel pipe and an improvement
in the hardenability, but a content of more than 0.3% results in saturation of the
effect and causes an increase in cost, so that when contained each content is 0.3%
or less. More specifically, the Sn content is 0.3% or less. The Sn content is preferably
0.2% or less. The Sn content is more preferably 0.1% or less. To reduce the cost,
the Sn content is still more preferably 0.01% or less. The Sb content is 0.3% or less.
The Sb content is preferably 0.2% or less. The Sb content is more preferably 0.1%
or less. To reduce the cost, the Sb content is still more preferably 0.01% or less.
The Sn or Sb content may be 0% or more and is preferably 0.0001% or more to achieve
the effects. Thus, the Sn content is preferably 0.0001% or more. More preferably,
the Sn content is 0.0010% or more. The Sb content is preferably 0.0001% or more. More
preferably, the Sb content is 0.0010% or more.
[0047] In the chemical composition of a steel pipe, the remainder other than these components
(elements) is composed of Fe and an incidental impurity element.
[0048] The metallic microstructure of a steel pipe according to the present invention is
described below.
Metallic Microstructure
Area fraction Retained austenite: 0% to 3%
[0049] Austenite remaining in a steel pipe may increase the amount of hydrogen in the steel
and increase hydrogen embrittlement sensitivity. Furthermore, when austenite is transformed
into martensite by stress loading during use, hydrogen cracking is likely to occur
because martensite is very hard, and cracking may occur from the martensite portion.
In the present invention, area fraction of retained austenite is 3% or less to reduce
the fatigue crack growth rate. Retained austenite is preferably 2% or less, more preferably
1% or less. The retained austenite may be 0%.
[0050] Bainite or martensite presents at a quarter thickness position from the inner surface
of a steel pipe (for a steel material, a quarter thickness position from a surface
of the steel material), and area fraction of bainite is 90% or more or area fraction
of martensite is 90% or more
[0051] To increase the tensile strength to 520 MPa or more, the steel microstructure needs
to be a bainite or martensite microstructure. On the other hand, when a steel pipe
has a soft phase and a hard phase, fatigue damage preferentially accumulates in the
soft phase and is likely to cause cracking, thus reducing the fatigue limit stress.
A hydrogen environment promotes local deformation, further accelerates fatigue damage
to the soft phase, and reduces the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen. Consequently,
the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress in an inert gas environment
becomes less than
0.90. To address this, it is necessary to reduce the relative proportion of the soft phase.
Thus, the metallic microstructure needs to be a single microstructure of bainite or
martensite and, therefore, defined to be containing either one of bainite or martensite
with an area fraction of the microstructure of 90% or more. Preferably, the area fraction
of the bainite or martensite microstructure is 92% or more, more preferably 95% or
more, still more preferably 98% or more. The upper limit may be, but is not limited
to, 100%. Furthermore, because a fatigue crack is generated from the inner surface
of a steel pipe, the uniformity of the microstructure of the inner surface of the
steel pipe is important. Thus, the metallic microstructure at the quarter thickness
position from the inner surface of a steel pipe is defined, and for a steel material,
the metallic microstructures at the quarter thickness positions are defined to achieve
the above effects regardless of which surface is the inner surface side of a steel
pipe.
[0052] The bainite microstructure includes bainitic ferrite or granular bainite that transforms
during or after cooling (accelerated cooling or quenching) contributing to transformation
strengthening, and also includes tempered bainite. A different microstructure, such
as ferrite, martensite, pearlite, a martensite-austenite constituent (MA), or retained
austenite, in the bainite microstructure reduces the strength or toughness, and the
volume fraction of a microstructure other than the bainite phase is therefore preferably
as small as possible. The martensite microstructure includes tempered martensite.
[0053] Furthermore, the bainite and martensite microstructures can be tempered to precipitate
a carbide, such as cementite. A fine carbide can be precipitated to inhibit the straightness
of a fatigue crack propagation path in hydrogen and further reduce the fatigue crack
growth rate. Thus, a tempered bainite or tempered martensite microstructure is preferred.
Furthermore, it is preferable to finely disperse and precipitate carbides. Thus, carbides
preferably have an average size of 200 nm or less, more preferably 50 nm or less.
The average size X of carbides is defined by X = √(a
2 + b
2)/2, wherein a denotes the long side, and b denotes the short side.
[0054] The fatigue limit stress in hydrogen at 1 MPa or more is 200 MPa or more, and the
fatigue limit stress in hydrogen at 1 MPa or more/fatigue limit stress in an inert
gas environment is 0.90 or more
[0055] To design a steel structure for hydrogen, such as a long-life line pipe, in a thickness
range that is available by a process within the scope of the present invention, a
steel pipe needs to have a fatigue limit stress of 200 MPa or more in hydrogen at
1 MPa or more. The fatigue limit stress in hydrogen at 1 MPa or more is preferably
220 MPa or more. The fatigue limit stress in hydrogen at 1 MPa or more is more preferably
250 MPa or more, still more preferably 270 MPa or more. Although the upper limit is
not particularly limited, the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen at 1 MPa or more is
preferably 500 MPa or less. Furthermore, the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen at 1
MPa or more/fatigue limit stress in an inert gas environment in a steel pipe needs
to be 0.90 or more. The fatigue limit stress in hydrogen at 1 MPa or more/fatigue
limit stress in an inert gas environment is preferably 0.92 or more. The fatigue limit
stress in hydrogen at 1 MPa or more/fatigue limit stress in an inert gas environment
is more preferably 0.94 or more, still more preferably 0.96 or more. Although the
upper limit is not particularly limited, the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen at 1
MPa or more/fatigue limit stress in an inert gas environment may be 1.10 or less.
The term "inert gas", as used herein, includes six elements of Group 0 of the periodic
table, helium, neon, argon, krypton, xenon, and radon, as well as air, and the term
"inert gas environment" refers to an environment containing any one of these.
[0056] In the present invention, the chemical composition and metallic microstructure described
above can suppress the toughness degradation in a high-pressure hydrogen atmosphere
and can achieve a tensile strength of 520 MPa or more. Thus, the present invention
can be applied to a hydrogen line pipe. The upper limit of the tensile strength is
preferably, but not limited to, 950 MPa or less.
[0057] The sheet thickness is preferably 5 mm or more, preferably 30 mm or less.
[Production Method]
[0058] Next, a method for producing a steel pipe according to the present invention is described
below. Although a production method in the following description is described by taking
a seamless steel pipe as an example of the steel pipe, it is needless to say that
an electric-resistance-welded pipe or a UOE steel pipe can be produced by performing
the treatment so as to have the same thermal history.
[0059] A steel pipe according to the present invention can be produced by sequentially performing
the following steps (1) to (3).
- (1) A step of casting a steel raw material after component adjustment
- (2) A hot rolling step of heating and rolling a cast material into a steel pipe
- (3) A step of cooling (accelerated cooling) and tempering the steel pipe produced
in the hot rolling step (including reheating and quenching before the tempering step)
[0060] Each of the steps is described below. Unless otherwise specified, the temperature
in the following description is the temperature at the middle of the sheet thickness
of a steel raw material or a steel pipe. The average cooling rate means the temperature
at a quarter thickness position from the inner surface of a steel pipe. The temperature
at the middle of the sheet thickness and the temperature at the quarter thickness
position from the inner surface of a steel pipe are estimated from the surface temperature
of the steel pipe measured with a radiation thermometer using heat-transfer calculation
or the like in consideration of the heat transfer coefficient of the steel material.
[Casting Step]
Casting speed: 1.8 m/min or less
[0061] A lower casting speed results in a decrease in the hydrogen concentration and inclusions
in the steel, and the effects are remarkable at 1.8 m/min or less. Thus, the casting
speed is 1.8 m/min or less, preferably 1.5 m/min or less, more preferably 1.0/min
or less, still more preferably 0.5 m/min or less, most preferably 0.1 m/min or less.
Although the lower limit is not particularly limited, the casting speed may be more
than 0 m/min.
[Heating Step]
[0062] To perform hot rolling, a steel raw material with the chemical composition described
above is heated. The steel raw material can be, for example, but is not limited to,
a billet or the like produced by an ordinary continuous casting method.
Heating to temperature of 1350°C or less
[0063] A heating temperature of more than 1350°C in the heating step results in prior austenite
grains with an excessively large average grain size and a degradation of various characteristics.
Thus, the heating temperature is 1350°C or less. The heating temperature is preferably
1300°C or less, more preferably 1250°C or less, most preferably 1200°C or less. On
the other hand, the heating temperature is preferably lowered to reduce the amount
of hydrogen in the steel, but an excessively low heating temperature results in a
decrease in the finish rolling temperature and makes rolling difficult. Thus, the
heating temperature is preferably 950°C or more. The heating temperature is more preferably
1000°C or more. Although the heating time is not particularly specified, an excessively
long heating time increases the risk of increasing the amount of hydrogen introduced
into a steel pipe, so that 180 minutes or less is preferred. The heating time is more
preferably 150 minutes or less, still more preferably 120 minutes or less. Although
the lower limit is not particularly limited, the heating time is preferably 30 minutes
or more, more preferably 60 minutes or more.
[Rolling Step]
[0064] Next, the steel raw material heated in the heating step is rolled into a steel pipe
shape. The rolling can be hot rolling including piercing and rolling of an ordinary
Mannesmann-plug mill process or Mannesmann-mandrel mill process.
Finish rolling temperature: 820°C or more
[0065] A finish rolling temperature of less than 820°C results in excessively large rolling
force and a higher risk of occurrence of rolling trouble. Thus, the finish rolling
temperature is 820°C or more. The finish rolling temperature is preferably 850°C or
more, more preferably 900°C or more. On the other hand, although the upper limit of
the finish rolling temperature is not particularly limited, an excessively high temperature
tends to result in a nonuniform metallic microstructure. Thus, the finish rolling
temperature is preferably 1200°C or less. The finish rolling temperature is more preferably
1150°C or less, still more preferably 1100°C or less.
[Cooling Step (Accelerated Cooling Step)]
[0066] In the cooling step, a steel material with the chemical composition described above
is heated and held at a temperature of the Ac
3 point or higher and 1000°C or less as it is or after being processed into a steel
pipe, and is cooled under the cooling conditions of the following Group A or Group
B. The temperature is preferably held for 10 minutes or more, more preferably 15 minutes
or more, still more preferably 20 minutes or more. Although the upper limit is not
particularly limited, the temperature is preferably held for 60 minutes or less, more
preferably 45 minutes or less.
Heating temperature after processing into steel pipe: Ac3 point or higher and 1000°C or less
[0067] A heating temperature lower than the Ac
3 point in the cooling step results in ferrite remaining in the steel after cooling,
a decrease in the strength of a steel pipe, and a decrease in the fatigue limit stress
in hydrogen. Thus, the heating temperature is the Ac
3 point or higher. The heating temperature is preferably the Ac
3 point + 30°C or more, more preferably the Ac
3 point + 50°C or more. However, the Ac
3 point + 30°C or more or the Ac
3 point + 50°C or more is not applied to a composition system in which the Ac
3 point + 30°C or the Ac
3 point + 50°C exceeds 1000°C. On the other hand, a heating temperature of more than
1000°C may result in coarse austenite grains and a decrease in the impact absorbed
energy and toughness of the material after heat treatment. Thus, the heating temperature
is 1000°C or less. The heating temperature is preferably 950°C or less, more preferably
900°C or less. However, 950°C or less or 900°C or less described above is not applied
to a composition system in which 950°C or 900°C is lower than the Ac
3 point.
[0068] In the cooling process, when the temperature after the completion of rolling satisfies
the heating conditions, cooling may be performed as it is, or the completion of rolling
may be followed by reheating again and cooling. When a steel sheet is cooled by natural
cooling once, the steel sheet may be heated again to a temperature of the Ac
3 point or higher and 1000°C or less and may be cooled under the cooling conditions
of the following Group A or Group B. In the present invention, the Ac
3 point (°C) is calculated using the following formula.
Ac3 (°C) = 910 - 203[C]1/2 - 30[Mn] + 44.7[Si] + 700[P] + 100[Al] + 31.5[Mo] - 11[Cr]
- 15.2[Ni] - 20[Cu] + 104[V]
[0069] In the formula, [M] denotes the element M content (% by mass).
Average Cooling Rate
[0070] Group A: cooling to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or more from
800°C to 550°C and at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or less from 550°C to 50°C
at the quarter thickness position from the inner surface of a steel pipe
[0071] When the average cooling rate from 800°C to 550°C at the quarter thickness position
from the inner surface of a steel pipe is less than 15°C/s, a bainite microstructure
with an area fraction of 90% or more cannot be formed, and the strength decreases.
Thus, the average cooling rate at the quarter thickness position from the inner surface
of a steel pipe is 15°C/s or more. From the perspective of reducing variations in
microstructure, the average cooling rate is preferably 17°C/s or more. The average
cooling rate from 800°C to 550°C is more preferably 20°C/s or more, most preferably
22°C/s or more. On the other hand, to reduce variations in grain size, the average
cooling rate is preferably 50°C/s or less, more preferably 45°C/s or less, still more
preferably 40°C/s or less. Furthermore, cooling to 50°C or less at an average cooling
rate of 15°C/s or less from 550°C to 50°C can decrease retained austenite and reduce
the amount of hydrogen in the steel. Thus, the average cooling rate from 550°C to
50°C is 15°C/s or less. The average cooling rate from 550°C to 50°C is preferably
12°C/s or less, more preferably 10°C/s or less. Although the lower limit is not particularly
limited, the average cooling rate from 550°C to 50°C is preferably 1°C/s or more.
The cooling method is not particularly limited, and an arbitrary method, such as water
cooling, oil cooling, or natural cooling, can be used alone or in combination, but
water cooling or oil cooling is preferred from 800°C to 550°C, and natural cooling
is preferred from 550°C to 50°C.
[0072] Group B: cooling to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 10°C/s or more from
800°C to 300°C and at an average cooling rate of 5°C/s or less from 300°C to 50°C
at the quarter thickness position from the inner surface of a steel pipe
[0073] When the average cooling rate from 800°C to 300°C at the quarter thickness position
from the inner surface of a steel pipe is less than 10°C/s, 90% or more of a martensite
microstructure cannot be formed, mixing with a bainite microstructure occurs, and
the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen decreases. Thus, the average cooling rate at
the quarter thickness position from the inner surface of a steel pipe is 10°C/s or
more. From the perspective of reducing variations in microstructure, the average cooling
rate from 800°C to 300°C is preferably 12°C/s or more, more preferably 15°C/s or more,
still more preferably 17°C/s or more. Although the upper limit is not particularly
limited, the average cooling rate is preferably 60°C/s or less. Furthermore, cooling
to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 5°C/s or less from 300°C to 50°C can
reduce the amount of hydrogen in the steel. Thus, the average cooling rate from 300°C
to 50°C is 5°C/s or less. The average cooling rate from 300°C to 50°C is preferably
1°C/s or less. The lower limit is preferably, but not limited to, 0.1°C/s or more.
The cooling method is not particularly limited, and an arbitrary method, such as water
cooling, oil cooling, or natural cooling, can be used alone or in combination, but
water cooling or oil cooling is preferred from 800°C to 300°C, and natural cooling
is preferred from 300°C to 50°C.
[Reheating and Quenching Step (Suitable Conditions)]
Reheating temperature before tempering: Ac3 point or higher and 1000°C or less
[0074] When the temperature at the middle of the sheet thickness is lower than the Ac
3 point, non-transformed austenite partially remains, and a desired steel microstructure
cannot be formed after hot rolling, quenching, and tempering described later. Thus,
the heating temperature before quenching at the time of reheating is preferably the
Ac
3 point or higher, preferably higher than the Ac
3 point. To suppress an excessive increase in the initial austenite grain size and
improve the production efficiency, the heating temperature before quenching is preferably
1000°C or less, more preferably 980°C or less, still more preferably 960°C or less,
most preferably 950°C or less. A reheating temperature before quenching on the low
temperature side in the range of the Ac
3 point or higher can result in a decrease in the initial austenite grain size and
a decrease in the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen.
Average cooling rate during quenching: the following Group A or Group B
[0075] Group A: cooling to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or more from
800°C to 550°C and at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or less from 550°C to 50°C
at the quarter thickness position from the inner surface of a steel pipe
[0076] When the average cooling rate from 800°C to 550°C at the quarter thickness position
from the inner surface of a steel pipe is less than 15°C/s, a bainite microstructure
with an area fraction of 90% or more cannot be formed, and the strength decreases.
Thus, the average cooling rate at the quarter thickness position from the inner surface
of a steel pipe is 15°C/s or more. From the perspective of reducing variations in
microstructure, the average cooling rate is preferably 17°C/s or more, more preferably
20°C/s or more, still more preferably 22°C/s or more. On the other hand, to reduce
variations in grain size, the average cooling rate is preferably 50°C/s or less, more
preferably 47°C/s or less, still more preferably 45°C/s or less. Furthermore, cooling
to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or less from 550°C to 50°C can
decrease retained austenite and reduce the amount of hydrogen in the steel. Thus,
the average cooling rate from 550°C to 50°C is 15°C/s or less. The average cooling
rate from 550°C to 50°C is preferably 12°C/s or less, more preferably 10°C/s or less.
Although the lower limit is not particularly limited, the average cooling rate from
550°C to 50°C is preferably 1°C/s or more. The cooling method is not particularly
limited, and an arbitrary method, such as water cooling, oil cooling, or natural cooling,
can be used alone or in combination, but water cooling or oil cooling is preferred
from 800°C to 550°C, and natural cooling is preferred from 550°C to 50°C.
[0077] Group B: cooling to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 10°C/s or more from
800°C to 300°C and at an average cooling rate of 5°C/s or less from 300°C to 50°C
at the quarter thickness position from the inner surface of a steel pipe
[0078] When the average cooling rate from 800°C to 300°C at the quarter thickness position
from the inner surface of a steel pipe is less than 10°C/s, 90% or more of a martensite
microstructure cannot be formed, mixing with a bainite microstructure occurs, and
the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen decreases. Thus, the average cooling rate at
the quarter thickness position from the inner surface of a steel pipe is 10°C/s or
more. From the perspective of reducing variations in microstructure, the average cooling
rate is preferably 17°C/s or more, more preferably 20°C/s or more, still more preferably
25°C/s or more. On the other hand, although the average cooling rate may have any
upper limit, when the average cooling rate is more than 60°C/s, a large amount of
hard microstructure is formed on the surface of a steel sheet, a steel microstructure
with the microstructure intended in the present invention is not formed, and the fatigue
property in hydrogen deteriorates. Thus, the average cooling rate is preferably 60°C/s
or less. Furthermore, cooling to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 5°C/s
or less from 300°C to 50°C can reduce the amount of hydrogen in the steel. Thus, the
average cooling rate from 300°C to 50°C is 5°C/s or less. The average cooling rate
is preferably 3°C/s or less, more preferably 1°C/s or less. The lower limit is preferably,
but not limited to, 0.1°C/s or more. The cooling method is not particularly limited,
and an arbitrary method, such as water cooling, oil cooling, or natural cooling, can
be used alone or in combination, but water cooling or oil cooling is preferred from
800°C to 300°C, and natural cooling is preferred from 300°C to 50°C.
Cooling stop temperature during quenching: 50°C or less
[0079] When the cooling stop temperature is more than 50°C, the transformation is not completed,
and a desired steel microstructure cannot be formed after tempering. Thus, quenching
is performed to a temperature of 50°C or less. The cooling stop temperature is preferably
45°C or less, more preferably 40°C or less. Although the lower limit is not particularly
limited, the cooling stop temperature is preferably 25°C or more.
[Tempering Step]
Heating to 400°C or more and Ac1 point or lower
[0080] A tempering temperature of 400°C or more can result in a decrease in retained austenite
and a decrease in hydrogen in the steel. The tempering temperature is preferably 450°C
or more, more preferably 500°C or more. On the other hand, heating to a temperature
higher than the Ac
1 point may result in an increase in retained austenite and an increase in hydrogen
in the steel. Thus, the tempering temperature is the Ac
1 point or lower, preferably, (Ac
1 - 30)°C or less. The upper limit of the average heating rate during tempering is
preferably, but not limited to, 1°C/s or less. The tempering time is preferably, but
not limited to, 60 minutes or more because retained austenite and hydrogen in a steel
pipe decreases as the tempering time increases. The tempering time is more preferably
80 minutes or more, still more preferably 100 minutes or more. An excessively long
tempering time results in an excessive decrease in the material strength and saturation
of the effects. Thus, the tempering time is preferably 180 minutes or less.
[0081] In the present invention, the Ac
1 point (°C) is calculated using the following formula.

[0082] Each element symbol in the formula represents the element content (% by mass) of
the steel and is 0 for an element not contained.
[Dehydrogenation Treatment Step]
[0083] Hydrogen originally present in a steel material increases the acceleration of fatigue
crack growth and decreases the fatigue life and the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen.
Thus, dehydrogenation treatment may be performed to release hydrogen remaining after
production. In the dehydrogenation treatment, holding a product at a high temperature
for a certain period before use can reduce the amount of hydrogen in the steel, and
a steel sheet with high hydrogen embrittlement resistance in a high-pressure hydrogen
gas environment can be produced. The holding time R (h) is preferably determined from
the sheet thickness or the wall thickness t (mm) of a steel pipe and the hydrogen
diffusion coefficient D (mm·s
-2) in the steel at room temperature using the following formula (A).

[0084] The hydrogen diffusion coefficient varies depending on a component contained and
the metallic microstructure and may range from, for example, 1 x 10
-11 to 5 x 10
-9 m
2/s, more preferably 5 x 10
-10 m
2/s or less.
[0085] The dehydrogenation treatment step is performed before pipe production or welding
for connecting steel pipes. The dehydrogenation treatment is preferably performed
at a high temperature because the hydrogen diffusion coefficient D at a high temperature
is small and hydrogen is released quickly. At a high temperature, the calculation
may be performed using a diffusion coefficient D' (diffusion coefficient at each temperature)
at a temperature at which the value of D in the formula (A) is held. On the other
hand, an excessively high temperature in the dehydrogenation step results in a significant
decrease in the material strength, and the dehydrogenation treatment temperature is
preferably 550°C or less. The dehydrogenation treatment temperature T is more preferably
500°C or less. The dehydrogenation treatment temperature T is still more preferably
400°C or less, most preferably 300°C or less. Furthermore, the dehydrogenation treatment
temperature T is preferably room temperature or higher for the reason that the dehydrogenation
treatment at a temperature lower than room temperature increases the treatment time
and cost. The dehydrogenation treatment temperature T is more preferably 50°C or more.
The dehydrogenation treatment temperature T is still more preferably 100°C or more,
most preferably 150°C or more. The dehydrogenation treatment temperature T herein
is the temperature of the ambient in the dehydrogenation treatment step. The room
temperature refers to 20°C ± 10°C.
[0086] In particular, when heating, it takes time for the temperature Tc at the middle of
the sheet thickness of a steel material or a steel pipe to reach the temperature of
the ambient in the dehydrogenation treatment step (dehydrogenation treatment temperature
T). Therefore, even if the holding time R (s) is satisfied at the ambient temperature,
the dehydrogenation treatment may be insufficient if the dehydrogenation treatment
temperature T (ambient temperature) has not been reached at the middle of the sheet
thickness. Thus, it is preferable to hold for R (s) or more after the temperature
Tc at the middle of the sheet thickness reaches a target dehydrogenation treatment
temperature T. Furthermore, to achieve a predetermined crack growth rate in hydrogen
gas, it is necessary to appropriately adjust the amount of hydrogen in a steel material
in a surface layer portion and at the middle of the sheet thickness. For this purpose,
it is preferable to hold the steel material at the dehydrogenation treatment temperature
T for R (s) or more defined by the formula (A), and it is further preferable to hold
the steel material for the holding time R (s) or more after the temperature Tc at
the middle of the sheet thickness reaches the target dehydrogenation treatment temperature
T. In other words, at least the former can appropriately control the amount of hydrogen
in the steel material in the surface layer portion of the steel material or the steel
pipe, and when the latter is also performed, the amount of hydrogen in the steel material
from the surface layer portion to the middle of the sheet thickness of the steel material
or the steel pipe can be appropriately controlled. The temperature Tc at the middle
of the sheet thickness may be actually measured with a thermocouple or the like or
may be predicted using a finite element method or the like.
[0087] Furthermore, the scale on the steel surface inhibits dehydrogenation and is therefore
preferably removed before the dehydrogenation treatment. The scale removal method
may be, for example, but is not limited to, physical cleaning by high-pressure cleaning
or a chemical method using a scale remover. Although the thickness of scale to be
removed is not particularly limited, the scale removal effect can be obtained when
the scale is removed by approximately 100 µm.
Second Embodiment
[0088] A steel material according to the present invention is more specifically described
below. The chemical composition, metallic microstructure, and fatigue limit stress
of the steel material are the same as those described for the steel pipe, and the
steps other than the rolling step and the cooling step (the casting step, the heating
step, the reheating and quenching step, the tempering step, and the dehydrogenation
treatment step) in the production method are performed in the same manner as described
for the steel pipe. The rolling step and the cooling step are performed as described
below.
[Rolling Step]
Finish rolling temperature: 820°C or more
[0089] A finish rolling temperature of less than 820°C results in excessively large rolling
force and a higher risk of occurrence of rolling trouble. Thus, the finish rolling
temperature is 820°C or more. The finish rolling temperature is preferably 850°C or
more, more preferably 900°C or more. On the other hand, although the upper limit of
the finish rolling temperature is not particularly limited, an excessively high temperature
tends to result in a nonuniform metallic microstructure, so that the finish rolling
temperature is preferably 1200°C or less. The finish rolling temperature is more preferably
1150°C or less, still more preferably 1100°C or less.
[Cooling Step (Accelerated Cooling step)]
[0090] In the cooling step, after the hot-rolling, the hot-rolled steel material with the
chemical composition described above is heated, and held at a temperature of the Ac
3 point or higher and 1000°C or less, and is cooled under the cooling conditions of
the following Group A or Group B. The temperature is preferably held for 10 minutes
or more, more preferably 15 minutes or more, still more preferably 20 minutes or more.
Although the upper limit is not particularly limited, the temperature is preferably
held for 60 minutes or less, more preferably 45 minutes or less.
Heating temperature after hot rolling: Ac3 point or higher and 1000°C or less
[0091] A heating temperature lower than the Ac
3 point in the cooling step results in ferrite remaining in the steel after cooling,
a decrease in the strength of a steel material, and a decrease in the fatigue limit
stress in hydrogen. Thus, the heating temperature is the Ac
3 point or higher. The heating temperature is preferably the Ac
3 point + 30°C or more, more preferably the Ac
3 point + 50°C or more. However, the Ac
3 point + 30°C or more or the Ac
3 point + 50°C or more is not applied to a composition system in which the Ac
3 point + 30°C or the Ac
3 point + 50°C exceeds 1000°C. On the other hand, a heating temperature of more than
1000°C may result in coarse austenite grains and a decrease in the impact absorbed
energy and toughness of the material after heat treatment. Thus, the heating temperature
is 1000°C or less, preferably 950°C or less, more preferably 900°C or less. However,
950°C or less or 900°C or less described above is not applied to a composition system
in which 950°C or 900°C is lower than the Ac
3 point.
[0092] In the cooling process, when the temperature after the completion of rolling satisfies
the heating conditions, cooling may be performed as it is, or the completion of rolling
may be followed by reheating again and cooling. When a steel sheet is cooled by natural
cooling once, the steel sheet may be heated again to a temperature of the Ac
3 point or higher and 1000°C or less and may be cooled under the cooling conditions
of the following Group A or Group B (in this case, referred to as quenching). In the
present invention, the Ac
3 point (°C) is calculated using the following formula.
Ac3 (°C) = 910 - 203[C]1/2 - 30[Mn] + 44.7[Si] + 700[P] + 100[Al] + 31.5[Mo] - 11[Cr]
- 15.2[Ni] - 20[Cu] + 104[V]
[0093] In the formula, [M] denotes the element M content (% by mass).
Average Cooling Rate
[0094] Group A: cooling to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or more from
800°C to 550°C and at an average cooling rate of 15°C/s or less from 550°C to 50°C
at the quarter thickness position from a surface of a steel material
[0095] When the average cooling rate from 800°C to 550°C at the quarter thickness position
from a surface of a steel material is less than 15°C/s, a bainite microstructure with
an area fraction of 90% or more cannot be formed, and the strength decreases. Thus,
the average cooling rate at the quarter thickness position from the surface of a steel
material is 15°C/s or more. From the perspective of reducing variations in microstructure,
the average cooling rate is preferably 17°C/s or more, more preferably 20°C/s or more,
still more preferably 22°C/s or more. On the other hand, to suppress variations in
grain size, the average cooling rate is 50°C/s or less, preferably 47°C/s or less,
more preferably 45°C/s or less. Furthermore, cooling to 50°C or less at an average
cooling rate of 15°C/s or less from 550°C to 50°C can decrease retained austenite
and reduce the amount of hydrogen in the steel. Thus, the average cooling rate from
550°C to 50°C is 15°C/s or less. Although the lower limit is not particularly limited,
the average cooling rate from 550°C to 50°C is preferably 1°C/s or more. The cooling
method is not particularly limited, and an arbitrary method, such as water cooling,
oil cooling, or natural cooling, can be used alone or in combination, but water cooling
or oil cooling is preferred from 800°C to 550°C, and natural cooling is preferred
from 550°C to 50°C.
[0096] Group B: cooling to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 10°C/s or more from
800°C to 300°C and at an average cooling rate of 5°C/s or less from 300°C to 50°C
at the quarter thickness position from a surface of a steel material
[0097] When the average cooling rate from 800°C to 300°C at the quarter thickness position
from a surface of a steel material is less than 10°C/s, 90% or more of a martensite
microstructure cannot be formed, mixing with a bainite microstructure occurs, and
the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen decreases. Thus, the average cooling rate at
the quarter thickness position from a surface of a steel material is 10°C/s or more.
From the perspective of reducing variations in microstructure, 12°C/s or more is more
preferred. The average cooling rate is still more preferably 15°C/s or more, still
more preferably 17°C/s or more. On the other hand, although the average cooling rate
may have any upper limit, when the average cooling rate is more than 60°C/s, a large
amount of hard microstructure is formed on the surface of a steel sheet, a steel microstructure
with the microstructure intended in the present invention is not formed, and the fatigue
property in hydrogen deteriorates. Thus, the average cooling rate is preferably 60°C/s
or less. Furthermore, cooling to 50°C or less at an average cooling rate of 5°C/s
or less from 300°C to 50°C can reduce the amount of hydrogen in the steel. Thus, the
average cooling rate from 300°C to 50°C is 5°C/s or less. The average cooling rate
is preferably 1°C/s or less, more preferably 0.8°C/s or less. The lower limit is preferably,
but not limited to, 0.1°C/s or more. The cooling method is not particularly limited,
and an arbitrary method, such as water cooling, oil cooling, or natural cooling, can
be used alone or in combination, but water cooling or oil cooling is preferred from
800°C to 300°C, and natural cooling is preferred from 300°C to 50°C.
[0098] After the cooling, a steel sheet is preferably coiled, although it is not necessary
for a thick sheet.
EXAMPLE 1
[0099] Next, the present invention is more specifically described in the following examples.
The examples are preferred examples of the present invention, and the present invention
is not limited to these examples.
[0100] Steel pipes made of steel materials with the chemical compositions shown in Tables
1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 2-1, and 2-2 were produced. The production procedure is described below.
First, billets with the chemical compositions shown in Tables 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 2-1,
and 2-2 were produced. The billets shown in Tables 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, and 2-1 were produced
at a casting speed in the range of 0.05 to 0.2 m/min. The billets shown in Table 2-2
were cast at a casting speed in the range of 1.1 to 1.5 m/min. The billets were heated
to 1000°C to 1100°C and were hot-rolled. The product was expanded by a Mannesmann-plug
mill process or a Mannesmann-mandrel mill process to produce a seamless steel pipe
with a finish rolling temperature of 850°C or more. The seamless steel pipe was then
slowly cooled by natural cooling. The steel pipes produced by the above method were
heated and held at 950°C for steel pipes with an Ac
3 point of 950°C or less or at 1000°C for steel pipes with an Ac
3 point of more than 950°C and were then cooled to 50°C or less at an average cooling
rate shown in Tables 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, and 4-2. Tempering was then performed, the
steel pipes Nos. 16, 29, 35, 37, and 39 were subjected to dehydrogenation treatment,
and the metallic microstructure and mechanical properties were evaluated. The tempering
temperature was adjusted in the range of 400°C to 680°C so that the tensile strength
of the material ranged from 520 MPa to 700 MPa. In the dehydrogenation treatment of
Example 1, after it was confirmed that the temperature Tc at the middle of the sheet
thickness reached room temperature as the target temperature, held for R (s) to satisfy
the formula (A). Tables 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, and 4-2 show evaluation results. The evaluation
method is described below. A steel material taken from a central portion in the longitudinal
direction of a steel pipe was treated as a steel material of the present invention.
Retained Austenite Measurement
[0101] A sample for metallic microstructure observation was taken from a central portion
of the sheet width in a central portion in the longitudinal direction of each of the
steel materials and the steel pipes thus produced. A cross section parallel to the
longitudinal direction was buffed as an observation surface. The surface layer was
then removed by chemical polishing using picric acid etching, and X-ray diffractometry
was performed. More specifically, a Co-Kα radiation source was used for an incident
X-ray, and the area fraction of retained austenite was calculated from the intensity
ratios of the (200), (211), and (220) planes of ferrite to the (200), (220), and (311)
planes of austenite.
Measurement of Area Fraction of Bainite and Martensite
[0102] The metallic microstructure at a quarter thickness position on the inner side of
each steel pipe was evaluated as described below. A test specimen was taken from the
steel pipe such that the quarter thickness position on the inner side and the center
position of the wall thickness in the center in the longitudinal direction of the
steel pipe were observation positions. A cross section of the taken test specimen
was etched using a 3% by volume nital solution. A scanning electron microscope photograph
was taken at an appropriate magnification in the range of 1000 to 5000 times, and
tempered martensite, ferrite, bainite, and pearlite were observed. Martensite, ferrite,
bainite, and pearlite were visually identified by comparison with microstructure photographs
of Non Patent Literature 2. The microstructure fractions were determined as area fractions
of respection phases from an image obtained by dividing the SEM photograph into regions
based on the above identification by image analysis (for example, to calculate the
fraction of bainite, the bainite and the other region were binarized to determine
the fraction of bainite).
Tensile Strength (TS)
[0103] JIS No. 14 proportional test pieces (parallel portion diameter: 7 mm, gauge length:
35 mm) were taken in accordance with JIS Z 2201 from the steel pipes and the steel
materials thus produced, and the tensile strength was measured.
Hydrogen Temperature-Programmed Analysis
[0104] The amount of hydrogen remaining in the steel was measured by thermal desorption
spectrometry using a low-temperature programmed hydrogen analyzer <gas chromatograph
type> (JTF-20AL). The thermal desorption spectrometry was performed in the temperature
range of room temperature to 400°C at a heating rate of 200°C/h, and the sum total
thereof was taken as the amount of hydrogen. The specimen has a cylindrical shape
with 30 mm in length and 7Φ in diameter in the longitudinal direction of the steel
pipe at the quarter thickness position of the steel sheet and at the quarter thickness
position from the inner surface of the steel pipe. The amount of hydrogen is the amount
of H shown in Tables 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 2-1, and 2-2 before being subjected to a high-pressure
hydrogen fatigue test as explained in the item described later.
Fatigue Test
[0105] A fatigue test was conducted at room temperature (20°C ± 10°C) in a high-pressure
gas mixture atmosphere in the atmosphere in accordance with ASTM E466, Fatigue Testing,
at a frequency in the range of 1 to 15 Hz, a repetitive waveform of a sine wave, a
control method of load control, a load condition of uniaxial tension and compression,
and a stress ratio of R = -1.0. The stress at which no fracture occurred at a number
of repetitions of 10,000,000 was defined as the fatigue limit strength in the atmosphere.
High-Pressure Hydrogen Fatigue Test
[0106] A fatigue test was conducted at room temperature (20°C ± 10°C) in hydrogen gas (100%
gas) with a pressure of 40 MPa, in hydrogen gas with a pressure of 1 MPa or more,
or in a natural gas (the main components are hydrocarbons, such as methane and ethane)
mixed atmosphere containing hydrogen at a hydrogen partial pressure of 1 MPa or more
in accordance with ASTM E466, Fatigue Testing, at a frequency of 1 Hz, a repetitive
waveform of a sine wave, a control method of load control, a load condition of uniaxial
tension and compression, and a stress ratio of R = -1.0. The stress at which no fracture
occurred at a number of repetitions of 2,000,000 was defined as the fatigue limit
stress in hydrogen. Passing was judged when the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen in
this test was 200 MPa or more, and its ratio to the fatigue limit strength in an inert
gas atmosphere, that is, the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress
in an inert gas environment, was 0.90 or more.
[0107] In all of Inventive examples of the present invention, as shown in Tables 3-1, 3-2,
3-3, 4-1, and 4-2, the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen was 200 MPa or more, its ratio
to the fatigue limit strength in the inert gas atmosphere, that is, the fatigue limit
stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress in the inert gas environment, was 0.90 or
more, the tensile strength was 520 MPa or more, and high hydrogen embrittlement resistance
was satisfied.
[Table 3-1]
| |
Cooling step |
|
| A |
B |
| Steel pipe No. |
Steel material No. |
Steel No. |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-550°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 550°C-50°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-300°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 300°C-50°C °C/s |
Residual r ratio (%) |
B fraction (%) |
M fraction (%) |
TS (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress in hydrogen (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress in inert gas environment |
Notes |
| 1 |
1 |
1 |
48 |
8 |
- |
- |
0.0 |
93 |
- |
689 |
358 |
0.91 |
Inventive example |
| 2 |
2 |
2 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
0.8 |
99 |
- |
603 |
283 |
0.97 |
Inventive example |
| 3 |
3 |
3 |
19 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.4 |
93 |
- |
633 |
323 |
0.92 |
Inventive example |
| 4 |
4 |
4 |
10 |
5 |
- |
- |
0.3 |
70 |
- |
622 |
334 |
0.82 |
Comparative example |
| 5 |
5 |
5 |
30 |
5 |
- |
- |
1.1 |
93 |
- |
594 |
315 |
0.97 |
Inventive example |
| 6 |
6 |
6 |
48 |
6 |
- |
- |
0.2 |
95 |
- |
593 |
314 |
0.90 |
Inventive example |
| 7 |
7 |
7 |
40 |
8 |
- |
- |
1.6 |
98 |
- |
615 |
283 |
0.92 |
Inventive example |
| 8 |
8 |
8 |
15 |
25 |
- |
- |
5.0 |
92 |
- |
622 |
334 |
0.85 |
Comparative example |
| 9 |
9 |
9 |
30 |
7 |
- |
- |
0.2 |
97 |
- |
533 |
267 |
0.97 |
Inventive example |
| 10 |
10 |
10 |
40 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.6 |
95 |
- |
613 |
307 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 11 |
11 |
11 |
35 |
6 |
- |
- |
2.3 |
93 |
- |
657 |
309 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 12 |
12 |
12 |
5 |
7 |
- |
- |
1.7 |
60 |
- |
676 |
338 |
0.75 |
Comparative example |
| 13 |
13 |
13 |
30 |
8 |
- |
- |
2.4 |
93 |
- |
666 |
320 |
0.93 |
Inventive example |
| 14 |
14 |
14 |
40 |
7 |
- |
- |
2.2 |
97 |
- |
580 |
290 |
0.99 |
Inventive example |
| 15 |
15 |
15 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.1 |
95 |
- |
679 |
312 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 16 |
16 |
16 |
48 |
6 |
- |
- |
1.9 |
92 |
- |
630 |
302 |
0.91 |
Inventive example |
| 17 |
17 |
17 |
45 |
8 |
- |
- |
2.0 |
92 |
- |
640 |
288 |
0.93 |
Inventive example |
| 18 |
18 |
18 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
2.5 |
92 |
- |
608 |
322 |
0.90 |
Inventive example |
| 19 |
19 |
19 |
45 |
8 |
- |
- |
1.5 |
90 |
- |
656 |
321 |
0.92 |
Inventive example |
| 20 |
20 |
20 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
0.5 |
93 |
- |
550 |
297 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 21 |
21 |
21 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
1.1 |
95 |
- |
581 |
302 |
0.90 |
Inventive example |
| 22 |
22 |
22 |
45 |
8 |
- |
- |
0.6 |
98 |
- |
557 |
262 |
0.99 |
Inventive example |
| 23 |
23 |
23 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
1.0 |
93 |
- |
582 |
274 |
0.91 |
Inventive example |
| 24 |
24 |
24 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
2.3 |
96 |
- |
573 |
281 |
0.94 |
Inventive example |
| 25 |
25 |
25 |
35 |
8 |
- |
- |
3.0 |
95 |
- |
676 |
338 |
1.00 |
Inventive example |
| 26 |
26 |
26 |
45 |
7 |
- |
- |
2.9 |
96 |
- |
602 |
325 |
0.98 |
Inventive example |
| 27 |
27 |
27 |
48 |
8 |
- |
- |
0.1 |
95 |
- |
561 |
286 |
0.93 |
Inventive example |
| 28 |
28 |
28 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
2.1 |
92 |
- |
592 |
320 |
0.90 |
Inventive example |
| 29 |
29 |
29 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.8 |
95 |
- |
604 |
290 |
1.00 |
Inventive example |
| 30 |
30 |
30 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
1.8 |
92 |
- |
666 |
340 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
Underline: outside the scope of the present invention.
γ: austenite, B: bainite, M: martensite |
[Table 3-2]
| |
Cooling step |
|
| A |
B |
| Steel pipe No. |
Steel material No. |
Steel No. |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-550°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 550°C-50°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-300°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 300°C-50°C °C/s |
Residual r ratio (%) |
B fraction (%) |
M fraction (%) |
TS (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress in hydrogen (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress in inert gas environment |
Notes |
| 31 |
31 |
31 |
35 |
9 |
- |
- |
1.2 |
91 |
- |
644 |
341 |
0.91 |
Inventive example |
| 32 |
32 |
32 |
45 |
8 |
- |
- |
2.8 |
92 |
- |
547 |
301 |
0.99 |
Inventive example |
| 33 |
33 |
33 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
1.6 |
97 |
- |
692 |
374 |
0.99 |
Inventive example |
| 34 |
34 |
34 |
45 |
9 |
- |
- |
2.8 |
94 |
- |
632 |
322 |
0.91 |
Inventive example |
| 35 |
35 |
35 |
48 |
6 |
- |
- |
2.5 |
95 |
- |
694 |
354 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 36 |
36 |
36 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
1.8 |
92 |
- |
535 |
262 |
1.00 |
Inventive example |
| 37 |
37 |
37 |
35 |
8 |
- |
- |
0.9 |
95 |
- |
523 |
262 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 38 |
38 |
38 |
45 |
7 |
- |
- |
1.7 |
96 |
- |
584 |
292 |
0.99 |
Inventive example |
| 39 |
39 |
39 |
48 |
8 |
- |
- |
2.3 |
90 |
- |
548 |
279 |
0.99 |
Inventive example |
| 40 |
40 |
40 |
45 |
7 |
- |
- |
1.5 |
93 |
- |
602 |
313 |
0.94 |
Inventive example |
| 41 |
41 |
41 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
1.4 |
96 |
- |
629 |
296 |
0.93 |
Inventive example |
| 42 |
42 |
42 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
2.4 |
91 |
- |
625 |
281 |
0.94 |
Inventive example |
| 43 |
43 |
43 |
35 |
8 |
- |
- |
1.0 |
91 |
- |
587 |
288 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 44 |
44 |
44 |
45 |
7 |
- |
- |
0.9 |
96 |
- |
671 |
349 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 45 |
45 |
45 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
1.7 |
98 |
- |
587 |
311 |
0.98 |
Inventive example |
| 46 |
46 |
46 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.6 |
90 |
- |
625 |
338 |
0.92 |
Inventive example |
| 47 |
47 |
47 |
48 |
6 |
- |
- |
1.3 |
93 |
- |
624 |
300 |
0.90 |
Inventive example |
| 48 |
48 |
48 |
35 |
8 |
- |
- |
2.1 |
98 |
- |
650 |
338 |
0.91 |
Inventive example |
| 49 |
49 |
49 |
45 |
7 |
- |
- |
2.8 |
92 |
- |
653 |
294 |
0.97 |
Inventive example |
| 50 |
50 |
50 |
48 |
8 |
- |
- |
0.6 |
95 |
- |
564 |
276 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 51 |
51 |
51 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
1.7 |
90 |
- |
621 |
317 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 52 |
52 |
52 |
35 |
9 |
- |
- |
1.0 |
93 |
- |
603 |
302 |
0.93 |
Inventive example |
| 53 |
53 |
53 |
48 |
8 |
- |
- |
1.8 |
96 |
- |
658 |
322 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 54 |
54 |
54 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
0.1 |
91 |
- |
693 |
381 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 55 |
55 |
55 |
35 |
9 |
- |
- |
1.6 |
97 |
- |
584 |
286 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 56 |
56 |
56 |
45 |
8 |
- |
- |
0.8 |
94 |
- |
647 |
330 |
0.99 |
Inventive example |
| 57 |
57 |
57 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
0.3 |
90 |
- |
655 |
301 |
0.92 |
Inventive example |
| 58 |
58 |
58 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.1 |
94 |
- |
608 |
322 |
0.92 |
Inventive example |
| 59 |
59 |
59 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
30 |
90 |
- |
544 |
277 |
0.97 |
Inventive example |
| 60 |
60 |
60 |
35 |
8 |
- |
- |
1.2 |
96 |
- |
584 |
280 |
0.99 |
Inventive example |
Underline: outside the scope of the present invention.
γ: austenite, B: bainite, M: martensite |
[Table 3-3]
| |
Cooling step |
|
| A |
B |
| Steel pipe No. |
Steel material No. |
Steel No. |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-550°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 550°C-50°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-300°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 300°C-50°C °C/s |
Residual r ratio (%) |
B fraction (%) |
M fraction (%) |
TS (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress in hydrogen (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress in inert gas environment |
Notes |
| 61 |
61 |
61 |
45 |
7 |
- |
- |
2.4 |
95 |
- |
644 |
303 |
0.92 |
Inventive example |
| 62 |
62 |
62 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
1.3 |
98 |
- |
598 |
299 |
0.97 |
Inventive example |
| 63 |
63 |
63 |
40 |
8 |
- |
- |
1.8 |
92 |
- |
556 |
278 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 64 |
64 |
64 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
2.2 |
91 |
- |
628 |
333 |
0.99 |
Inventive example |
| 65 |
65 |
65 |
30 |
9 |
- |
- |
2.3 |
96 |
- |
524 |
278 |
0.93 |
Inventive example |
| 66 |
66 |
66 |
35 |
6 |
- |
- |
0.8 |
97 |
- |
582 |
308 |
0.93 |
Inventive example |
| 67 |
67 |
67 |
45 |
8 |
- |
- |
0.5 |
97 |
- |
651 |
326 |
0.90 |
Inventive example |
| 68 |
68 |
68 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
0.7 |
98 |
- |
635 |
324 |
0.93 |
Inventive example |
| 69 |
69 |
69 |
40 |
8 |
- |
- |
0.3 |
94 |
- |
557 |
279 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 70 |
70 |
70 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
1.1 |
92 |
- |
578 |
312 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 71 |
71 |
71 |
30 |
9 |
- |
- |
1.5 |
98 |
- |
582 |
303 |
0.94 |
Inventive example |
| 72 |
72 |
72 |
48 |
8 |
- |
- |
1.5 |
98 |
- |
654 |
314 |
0.98 |
Inventive example |
| 73 |
73 |
73 |
40 |
7 |
- |
- |
2.2 |
90 |
- |
673 |
330 |
0.93 |
Inventive example |
| 74 |
74 |
74 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
2.7 |
92 |
- |
650 |
351 |
0.94 |
Inventive example |
| 75 |
75 |
75 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
2.4 |
93 |
- |
549 |
296 |
1.00 |
Inventive example |
| 76 |
76 |
76 |
40 |
8 |
- |
- |
1.9 |
92 |
- |
536 |
273 |
0.97 |
Inventive example |
| 77 |
77 |
77 |
48 |
7 |
- |
- |
0.8 |
97 |
- |
676 |
345 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 78 |
78 |
78 |
30 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.1 |
90 |
- |
549 |
247 |
1.00 |
Inventive example |
| 79 |
79 |
79 |
48 |
8 |
- |
- |
2.3 |
92 |
- |
543 |
244 |
0.90 |
Inventive example |
| 80 |
80 |
80 |
40 |
7 |
- |
- |
2.3 |
95 |
- |
559 |
268 |
0.99 |
Inventive example |
| 81 |
81 |
81 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.9 |
98 |
- |
648 |
337 |
0.90 |
Inventive example |
| 82 |
82 |
82 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.9 |
91 |
- |
523 |
235 |
0.94 |
Inventive example |
| 83 |
83 |
83 |
40 |
6 |
- |
- |
2.3 |
95 |
- |
650 |
358 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 84 |
84 |
84 |
30 |
8 |
- |
- |
2.9 |
92 |
- |
622 |
292 |
0.93 |
Inventive example |
| 85 |
85 |
85 |
30 |
7 |
- |
- |
2.3 |
91 |
- |
617 |
296 |
0.91 |
Inventive example |
| 86 |
86 |
86 |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.4 |
92 |
- |
626 |
282 |
0.99 |
Inventive example |
| 87 |
87 |
87 |
40 |
9 |
- |
- |
1.4 |
98 |
- |
684 |
356 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 94 |
94 |
94 |
45 |
7 |
- |
- |
0.2 |
96 |
- |
612 |
303 |
0.98 |
Inventive example |
| 95 |
95 |
95 |
35 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.3 |
98 |
- |
623 |
308 |
0.97 |
Inventive example |
| 96 |
96 |
96 |
38 |
8 |
- |
- |
0.4 |
97 |
- |
628 |
320 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 97 |
97 |
97 |
39 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.5 |
96 |
- |
654 |
324 |
0.97 |
Inventive example |
| 98 |
98 |
98 |
42 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.0 |
98 |
- |
606 |
311 |
0.98 |
Inventive example |
Underline: outside the scope of the present invention.
γ: austenite, B: bainite, M: martensite |
[Table 4-1]
| |
Cooling step |
|
| A |
B |
| Steel pipe No. |
Steel material No. |
Steel No. |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-550°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 550°C-50°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-300°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 300°C-50°C °C/s |
Residual r ratio (%) |
B fraction (%) |
M fraction (%) |
TS (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress (in hydrogen) MPa |
Fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress in inert gas environment |
Notes |
| 88 |
88 |
88 |
- |
- |
20 |
4 |
0.0 |
- |
93 |
689 |
358 |
0.91 |
Inventive example |
| 89 |
89 |
89 |
- |
- |
5 |
5 |
0.8 |
- |
70 |
603 |
271 |
0.85 |
Comparative example |
| 90 |
90 |
90 |
- |
- |
30 |
15 |
0.4 |
- |
93 |
753 |
339 |
0.82 |
Comparative example |
Underline: outside the scope of the present invention.
γ: austenite, B: bainite, M: martensite |
[Table 4-2]
| |
Cooling step |
|
| A |
B |
| Steel pipe No. |
Steel material No. |
Steel No. |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-550°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 550°C-50°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-300°C °C/s |
Average cooling rate of 300°C-50°C °C/s |
Residual γ fraction (%) |
B fraction (%) |
M fraction (%) |
TS (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress (in hydrogen) (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress in inert gas environment |
Notes |
| 91 |
91 |
91 |
- |
- |
22 |
5 |
0.0 |
- |
95 |
689 |
324 |
0.94 |
Inventive example |
| 92 |
92 |
92 |
- |
- |
5 |
4 |
2.1 |
- |
70 |
580 |
261 |
0.85 |
Comparative example |
| 93 |
93 |
93 |
- |
- |
30 |
20 |
0.2 |
- |
90 |
670 |
302 |
0.82 |
Comparative example |
Underline: outside the scope of the present invention.
γ: austenite, B: bainite, M: martensite |
EXAMPLE 2
[0108] Examples that have verified the advantages of the present invention are described
below. In the following Examples, steel pipes were produced under the following production
conditions and were characterized. The steels Nos. 1, 14, 46, and 91 shown in Tables
1-1, 1-2, and 2-2 were used, up to the tempering step was performed under the same
conditions as the steel pipes Nos. 1, 14, and 46 shown in Tables 3-1 and 3-2 and the
steel pipe No. 91 shown in Table 4-1. The characteristics were evaluated while the
dehydrogenation treatment conditions were changed. Table 5 shows the results. In Example
2, for the steel pipes and steel materials Nos. 1A, 14A, 46A, and 91A, the dehydrogenation
treatment temperature T (ambient temperature) is 50°C, and the holding time tc after
the temperature Tc at the middle of the sheet thickness reaches 50°C satisfies the
formula (A). For the steel pipes and steel materials Nos. 14B, 46B, and 91B, the dehydrogenation
treatment temperature T (ambient temperature) is 50°C, and the holding time tc satisfied
the formula (A) at a dehydrogenation treatment temperature T of 50°C, but the holding
time tc after the temperature Tc at the middle of the sheet thickness reaches 50°C
does not satisfy the formula (A). For the steel pipes and steel materials Nos. 14C,
46C, and 91C, the dehydrogenation treatment temperature T (ambient temperature) is
50°C, but neither the holding time t at the ambient temperature nor the holding time
tc after the temperature Tc at the middle of the sheet thickness reaches 50°C satisfy
the formula (A).
[0109] In Table 5, "Y" in "Dehydrogenation holding time t" means that the dehydrogenation
treatment temperature T (ambient temperature) is 50°C and the holding time t satisfies
the formula (A), and "N" in "Dehydrogenation holding time t" means that the dehydrogenation
treatment temperature T (ambient temperature) is 50°C, but the holding time t does
not satisfy the formula (A). Furthermore, "Y" in "Holding time tc at steel material
center temperature Tc" means that the holding time tc after the temperature Tc at
the middle of the sheet thickness reaches 50°C satisfies the formula (A), and "N"
in "Holding time tc at steel material center temperature Tc" means that the temperature
Tc at the middle of the sheet thickness reaches 50°C, but the holding time tc after
Tc reaches 50°C does not satisfy the formula (A).
[0110] The fatigue test, the microstructure, the method for measuring the tensile strength,
and the like are the same as those in Example 1.
[0111] In all of Inventive examples of the present invention, the fatigue limit stress in
hydrogen was 200 MPa or more, its ratio to the fatigue limit strength in an inert
gas atmosphere, that is, the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress
in an inert gas environment, was 0.90 or more, and the tensile strength satisfied
520 MPa or more. Among them, the fatigue property was better when the dehydrogenation
treatment was performed under more suitable conditions. A steel pipe and a steel material
of the same number had the same characteristics.
[Table 5]
| Steel pipe No. |
Steel material No. |
Dehydrogenation holding time t |
Holding time tc at steel material center temperature TC |
Residual r ratio (%) |
B fraction (%) |
M fraction (%) |
TS (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress (in hydrogen) (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/ fatigue limit stress in inert gas environment |
Notes |
| 1A |
1 |
Y |
Y |
0.0 |
93 |
- |
689 |
324 |
0.93 |
Inventive example |
| 14A |
14 |
Y |
Y |
2.2 |
97 |
- |
568 |
273 |
0.99 |
Inventive example |
| 14B |
14 |
Y |
N |
2.2 |
98 |
- |
580 |
278 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 14C |
14 |
N |
N |
2.2 |
99 |
- |
592 |
284 |
0.91 |
Inventive example |
| 46A |
46 |
Y |
Y |
0.6 |
90 |
- |
620 |
340 |
1.00 |
Inventive example |
| 46B |
46 |
Y |
N |
0.6 |
90 |
- |
625 |
338 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 46C |
46 |
N |
N |
0.6 |
90 |
- |
630 |
315 |
0.92 |
Inventive example |
| 91A |
91 |
Y |
Y |
0.0 |
- |
95 |
665 |
319 |
0.97 |
Inventive example |
| 91B |
91 |
Y |
N |
0.0 |
- |
96 |
689 |
331 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 91C |
91 |
N |
N |
0.0 |
- |
97 |
692 |
332 |
0.94 |
Inventive example |
Steel material center temperature: Y indicates holding for time R or more after the
temperature Tc at the middle of the sheet thickness reached the target temperature
Tc of the dehydrogenation treatment temperature, N indicates not holding
γ: austenite, B: bainite, M: martensite |
EXAMPLE 3
[0112] Examples that have verified the advantages of the present invention are described
below. In the following Examples, steel materials and steel pipes were produced under
the following production conditions and were characterized. Steel pipes and steel
materials with the same chemical composition as Nos. 14 and 46 shown in Tables 3-1
and 3-2 and No. 91 shown in Table 4-2 were subjected to up to the cooling step under
predetermined conditions, were reheated after the cooling step (before the tempering
step), were subjected to the quenching step under the conditions shown in Tables 6-1
and 6-2, and were characterized. The results are also shown in Tables 6-1 and 6-2.
The steel pipes and steel materials Nos. 14E, 14F, 46E, and 46F shown in Table 6-1
were produced by subjecting the steel pipes and steel materials Nos. 14 and 46 shown
in Tables 3-1 and 3-2 to the reheating step. The steel pipes and steel materials Nos.
91E and 91F shown in Table 6-2 were produced by subjecting the steel pipe and steel
material No. 91 shown in Table 4-2 to the reheating step.
[0113] The fatigue test, the microstructure, the method for measuring the tensile strength,
and the like are the same as those in Example 1.
[0114] In all of Inventive examples of the present invention, the fatigue limit stress in
hydrogen was 200 MPa or more, its ratio to the fatigue limit strength in an inert
gas atmosphere, that is, the fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress
in an inert gas environment, was 0.90 or more, and the tensile strength satisfied
520 MPa or more. A steel pipe and a steel material of the same number had the same
characteristics.
[Table 6-1]
| Steel pipe No. |
Steel material No. |
Steel No. |
Reheating step |
Cooling step |
Residual r ratio (%) |
B fraction (%) |
M fraction (%) |
TS (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress (in hydrogen) (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress in inert gas environment |
Notes |
| A |
B |
| Reheating temperature (°C) |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-550°C (°C/s) |
Average cooling rate of 550°C-50°C (°C/s) |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-300°C (°C/s) |
Average cooling rate of 300°C-50°C (°C/s) |
| 14-1 |
14-1 |
14 |
- |
- |
- |
13 |
3 |
0.1 |
98 |
- |
596 |
280 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 14-1E |
14-1E |
14 |
900 |
0.0 |
95 |
- |
612 |
288 |
0.97 |
Inventive example |
| 14-1F |
14-1F |
14 |
950 |
0.2 |
95 |
- |
632 |
297 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 46 |
46 |
46 |
- |
48 |
9 |
- |
- |
0.6 |
90 |
- |
625 |
338 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| 46E |
46E |
46 |
920 |
0.0 |
95 |
- |
640 |
349 |
0.97 |
Inventive example |
| 46F |
46F |
46 |
970 |
0.2 |
94 |
- |
630 |
342 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| γ: austenite, B: bainite, M: martensite |
[Table 6-2]
| Steel pipe No. |
Steel material No. |
Steel No. |
Reheating temperature |
Cooling step |
|
|
|
|
|
Fatigue limit stress in hydrogen/fatigue limit stress in inert gas environment |
Notes |
| A |
B |
γ fraction (%) |
B fraction (%) |
M fraction (%) |
TS (MPa) |
Fatigue limit stress (in hydrogen) (MPa) |
| Average cooling rate of 800°C-550°C (°C/s) |
Average cooling rate of 550°C-50°C (°C/s) |
Average cooling rate of 800°C-300°C (°C/s) |
Average cooling rate of 300°C-50°C (°C/s) |
| 91 |
91 |
91 |
- |
- |
- |
22 |
5 |
0.0 |
- |
95 |
689 |
324 |
0.94 |
Inventive example |
| 91E |
91E |
91 |
900 |
0.2 |
- |
95 |
697 |
335 |
0.96 |
Inventive example |
| 91F |
91F |
91 |
950 |
0.2 |
- |
92 |
670 |
322 |
0.95 |
Inventive example |
| γ: austenite, B: bainite, M: martensite |