Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a method for producing an Fe-Co-based alloy rod
and an Fe-Co-based alloy rod.
Related Art
[0002] Fe-Co-based alloy rods, represented by Permendur, are known as alloys to have excellent
magnetic properties are used in various products such as sensors, cylindrical magnetic
shields, electromagnetic valves, and magnetic cores. As a method for producing the
Fe-Co-based alloy rods, for example, Patent Document 1 describes that an ingot is
heated to 1000°C to 1100°C, hot-worked into a billet of about φ90mm, removing surface
defects by lathe, then heated again to 1000°C to 1100°C, and hot-rolled to produce
a material (rod) of about φ6 to φ9mm.
[0003] Moreover, in Patent Document 2, the applicant of the present invention proposes an
Fe-Co-based alloy rod, which can stably obtain excellent magnetic properties and has
20% or more crystal grains having a GOS (Grain Orientation Spread) value of 0.5° or
more in area ratio; and a method for producing the Fe-Co-based alloy rod, which includes
a heating and straightening step that applies tensile stress while heating the hot-rolled
material to a temperature of 500 to 900°C.
Citation List
Patent Literature
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
Technical Problem
[0005] The Fe-Co-based alloy rod described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication
No. 2 possesses excellent magnetic properties and is a highly useful invention. On
the other hand, according to the investigation by the applicant of the present invention,
it was confirmed that in the case of long rods of 2m or more, there are instances
where magnetic properties vary along the length direction of the rod. Obtaining stable
magnetic properties throughout such long rods is not described in Patent Document
1 or Patent Document 2, leaving room for further investigation.
[0006] Therefore, the purpose of the present invention is to provide an Fe-Co-based alloy
rod and the method for producing the same capable of suppressing variations in magnetic
properties in long rods.
Solution to Problem
[0007] The present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned problems.
[0008] In other words, one aspect of the present invention is a method for producing Fe-Co-based
alloy rod, which includes a hot-rolling step of performing hot-rolling on an Fe-Co-based
alloy billet to obtain a hot-rolled rod with a length of 2m or more; and a heating
and straightening step of applying tensile stress while heating the hot-rolled rod
to 500 to 900°C such that an area reduction ratio of the rod becomes 2.0 to 8.0%,
in which no solution treatment is performed between the hot-rolling step and the heating
and straightening step.
[0009] Another aspect of the present invention is an Fe-Co-based alloy rod having an average
GOS (Grain Orientation Spread) of 0.3° or more and 1.5° or less, an average grain
size number measured on an axial cross-section of the rod of 8.0 or more and 12.0
or less, and a length of 2m or more.
Effects of Invention
[0010] According to the present invention, it is possible to obtain an Fe-Co-based alloy
rod in which variations in magnetic properties are suppressed in long rods.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0011]
[FIG. 1] A diagram showing the area reduction ratio of samples in example of the present
invention.
[FIG. 2] A diagram showing the area reduction ratio of samples in the comparative
example.
[FIG. 3] A diagram showing the coercivity distribution of samples in example of the
present invention.
[FIG. 4] A diagram showing the coercivity distribution of samples in the comparative
example.
[FIG. 5] A diagram showing the relationship between the area reduction ratio and coercivity
in samples of example of the present invention and the comparative example.
DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
[0012] The following describes embodiments of the present invention. First, the method for
producing the Fe-Co-based alloy rod of the present invention is described. The Fe-Co-based
alloy rod of the present invention is a straight rod including those with circular
(including elliptical) or rectangular cross-sectional shapes. Unless otherwise specified,
the rod in this embodiment is a round rod with a circular cross-sectional shape.
<Hot-rolled material composition>
[0013] First, in this embodiment, a hot-rolled material of Fe-Co-based alloy is prepared.
In the present invention, Fe-Co-based alloy refers to an alloy material containing
95% or more of Fe+Co in mass%, and containing 25 to 60% of Co. This enables the achievement
of high magnetic flux density.
[0014] Next, elements that may be contained in the Fe-Co-based alloy of the present invention
are described. To improve workability and magnetic properties, the Fe-Co-based alloy
of the present invention may contain one or two or more elements from V, Si, Mn, Al,
Zr, B, Ni, Ta, Nb, W, Ti, Mo, and Cr, up to a total of 5.0% in mass%. In addition,
impurity elements that are inevitably contained, such as C, S, P, and O, may be mentioned,
and it is preferable to set the upper limit of each of these to 0.1%.
<Hot-rolling step>
[0015] In this embodiment, as an intermediate material for the Fe-Co-based alloy rod, hot-rolling
is applied to a columnar Fe-Co-based alloy billet of approximately φ90mm obtained
from an Fe-Co-based alloy steel ingot having the aforementioned components, to obtain
a hot-rolled rod. Since an oxide layer is formed on this intermediate material due
to hot-rolling, a grinding step may be introduced to remove the oxide layer mechanically
or chemically. In addition, the present invention targets hot-rolled rods with a length
of 2m or more. The longer the hot-rolled rod, the higher the productivity in the heating
and straightening step, but on the other hand, the longer it is, the more likely variations
in magnetic properties occur along the length direction of the rod. According to the
production method of the present invention, it is possible to suppress variations
in magnetic properties even in such long rods. Considering the workability in subsequent
steps, it is preferable to set the diameter of the hot-rolled rod to 5 to 20mm. For
rods other than round rods, the area-circle equivalent diameter of the cross-section
may be set to 5 to 20mm.
[0016] In this embodiment, solution treatment is not performed during the transition from
the hot-rolling step to the heating and straightening step to be described later.
In the case where solution treatment is performed, crystal grain growth progresses
during the solution treatment, reducing grain boundaries that become recrystallization
nucleation sites, making it difficult to promote recrystallization during magnetic
annealing, and in low area reduction ratio parts with an area reduction ratio of 2.5%
or less, a mixed grain structure containing unrecrystallized grains is formed, causing
extreme deterioration of magnetic properties. Moreover, in the case where solution
treatment is performed, bending may occur in the rod due to thermal contraction. When
correcting the bending with press straightening to be described later, it becomes
difficult to obtain a stable area reduction ratio due to work hardening caused by
local strain. In the case where no solution treatment is performed, by suppressing
crystal grain growth before the heating and straightening step, recrystallization
during magnetic annealing can be promoted. This allows for stable magnetic properties
with less variation in crystal grain diameter during magnetic annealing, even in regions
with an area reduction ratio of 2.0 to 2.5%. Here, solution treatment refers to a
step of heating the hot-rolled rod to a temperature exceeding the order-disorder transformation
point (for example, 750 to 1050°C) followed by rapid cooling, and the area reduction
ratio is the ratio calculated by dividing the difference in area before and after
the heating and straightening step by the area before the heating and straightening
step.
[0017] Before transitioning to the heating and straightening step to be described later,
press straightening may be performed to adjust the shape of the rod within a range
that does not deviate from the area reduction ratio range of the present invention.
Press straightening allows for prompt implementation of the subsequent heating and
straightening step. Moreover, in the case where solution treatment is not performed
as in the present invention, excessive bending tends not to occur, so it is preferable
that press straightening with high processing rate is not performed. By not performing
press straightening, a stable area reduction ratio can be obtained in the heating
and straightening step.
<Heating and straightening step>
[0018] In this embodiment, a heating and straightening step is performed on the aforementioned
hot-rolled material, applying tensile stress while heating. At this time, if the hot-rolled
material is in the shape of a "rod", this tensile stress is applied by pulling the
hot-rolled rod in its length direction. This step allows for obtaining a rod with
excellent magnetic properties and straightness while imparting residual strain to
the hot-rolled material. The heating temperature at this time is set to 500 to 900°C.
In the case where the temperature is lower than 500°C, workability decreases, and
there is a risk of the rod breaking when applying tensile stress. On the other hand,
in the case where the heating temperature exceeds 900°C, it becomes impossible to
impart desirable residual strain to the hot-rolled material. The preferable lower
limit of the heating temperature in the heating and straightening step is 600°C, and
more preferably 700°C. Moreover, the preferable upper limit of the heating temperature
is 850°C, more preferably 830°C, and even more preferably 800°C. Further, in the case
where the aforementioned solution treatment step is omitted, the preferable lower
limit of the heating temperature is 700°C, more preferably 730°C, and even more preferably
740°C.
[0019] In this embodiment, it is characteristic to adjust the area reduction ratio of the
rod in this heating and straightening step to 2.0 to 8.0%. This imparts strain to
the rod, which acts as the driving force for obtaining coarse crystal grains, and
makes it possible to obtain a rod with less variation in magnetic properties. This
strain may be represented by the GOS average value to be described later. The preferable
lower limit of the area reduction ratio is 2.2%, more preferably 2.5%, and the preferable
upper limit of the area reduction ratio is 7.5%. The area reduction ratio of the present
invention is calculated by measuring the diameter before the heating and straightening
step and the diameter after the heating and straightening step using a micrometer,
and the diameter is measured at multiple locations at equal intervals along the rod
axial direction. In this embodiment, measurements are taken at 28 locations at equal
intervals along the rod axial direction to obtain the area reduction ratio distribution
within a single rod.
[0020] For this heating and straightening step, heating means such as electric heating or
induction heating may be used. However, it is preferable to apply electric heating
due to its advantages of being able to heat the material rapidly (for example, within
1 minute) and uniformly to a target temperature while obtaining the effect of easily
aligning the easy magnetization axis of crystal grains in the hot-rolled material
in a constant direction. Moreover, it is preferable to adjust the tensile load applied
to the rod during the heating and straightening step to 4 to 90 kN in order to more
reliably obtain the desired residual strain. Moreover, it is preferable to adjust
the elongation to 3 to 10% of the total length before the heating and straightening
step. The Fe-Co-based alloy rod obtained by the production method of the present invention
can have an area reduction ratio of 2.0 to 8.0% by appropriately adjusting these values
while omitting the solution treatment.
[0021] Moreover, in the heating and straightening step using electric heating applied in
the present invention, the chucking part is at an equal voltage and no current flows,
so the temperature does not rise in the chucking part. Moreover, since the rod is
mechanically constrained, almost no elongation occurs in the chucking part, which
is a portion to be cut and removed in a later step. Therefore, in the present invention,
the area reduction ratio within the range of up to 250 mm from the rod end, where
the influence of the chucking part in the heating and straightening step is significant,
is not considered. Alternatively, it may be said that in the method for producing
the Fe-Co-based alloy rod of the present invention, it is sufficient if the area reduction
ratio of 2.0 to 8.0% mentioned above is achieved over at least a continuous length
of 2m of the rod.
[0022] In this embodiment, centerless grinding using, for example, a centerless grinder
may be performed on the rod after completing the heating and straightening step. This
allows for the removal of the black skin on the surface of the rod and further improves
the roundness and tolerance accuracy of the shape. In the present invention, since
the straightness of the rod is improved by the heating and straightening step, centerless
grinding may be performed on long rods with a length of 2m or more without cutting
them.
[0023] Next, the Fe-Co-based alloy rod of the present invention that may be obtained by
production method of the present invention mentioned above will be described. The
Fe-Co-based alloy rod of the present invention has an average Grain Orientation Spread
(GOS) value of 0.3° to 1.5°. The preferable lower limit of the GOS average value is
0.5°, and the preferable upper limit of the GOS average value is 1.2°. The GOS value
may be measured by the conventionally known "SEM-EBSD (scanned electron microscope-electron
backscatter diffraction) method". Specifically, the GOS value of a crystal grain may
be calculated by computing the average orientation difference between one point (pixel)
constituting the crystal grain and all other points within the crystal grain, performing
this operation for all points within the crystal grain, and then calculating the average
value. Since the GOS value is determined for each crystal grain, two types of averages
may be considered: the numerical average and the area average. The GOS average value
referred to in the present invention indicates the area average. The area average
is a value calculated by summing up the GOS of crystal grains present in the measurement
field of view, weighted by the area ratio occupied by each crystal grain in the field
of view. The GOS average value may be used as an indicator of the strain imparted
to the alloy by processing, so by setting the GOS average value to 0.3° to 1.5°, an
appropriate strain that becomes the driving force for recrystallization to obtain
coarse crystal grains is introduced into the rod, resulting in good magnetic properties.
In the case where the GOS average value is less than 0.3°, the driving force for recrystallization
is insufficient in the rod, leaving unrecrystallized grain regions that adversely
affect the magnetic properties, and good magnetic properties cannot be obtained. Further,
in the case where the GOS average value exceeds 1.5°, excessive tensile stress is
applied to the rod, making it easier to reduce the area locally, which may result
in disadvantages such as unstable magnetic properties throughout the rod. In addition,
the cross-section for observing the GOS average value may be either the cross-section
perpendicular to the axis or the axial cross-section; observation is also possible
in the axial cross-section of the rod. It is preferable that the GOS average value
is 0.3° to 1.5° in both cases when observed in the cross-section perpendicular to
the axis and the axial cross-section of the rod.
[0024] The Fe-Co-based alloy rod of the present invention preferably has an average grain
size number of 8.0 or more and 12.0 or less. This increases the grain boundaries or
triple points that become recrystallization nucleation sites during magnetic annealing,
making recrystallization more likely to occur, thus making it easier to exhibit stable
magnetic properties. A more preferable lower limit of the average grain size number
is 8.5, and a more preferable upper limit of the average grain size number is 11.5.
An even more preferable lower limit of the average grain size number is 9.0, and an
even more preferable upper limit of the average grain size number is 11.0. The average
grain size number may be measured based on JIS (Japanese Industrial Standards) G 0551.
Moreover, it may be measured in the axial cross-section of the rod. Alternatively,
it may be measured in the cross-section perpendicular to the axis or the axial cross-section
of the rod.
[0025] Further, in the Fe-Co-based alloy rod of the present invention, it is preferable
that the aforementioned GOS average value and average grain size number are satisfied
throughout the entire length of 2m or more. However, it may also be said that it is
sufficient if these are satisfied in a continuous length range of at least 2m within
the rod.
Implementation Example 1
(Implementation Example 1)
[0026] An Fe-Co-based alloy steel ingot having the composition shown in Table 1 was bloomed,
and then hot-rolling was performed to prepare a hot-rolled rod with a diameter of
φ11.8 mm and a length of 2900 mm.
<Sample No. 1 to 3>
[0027] Without performing solution treatment on the aforementioned hot-rolled rod, a heating
and straightening step was implemented by pulling the hot-rolled rod in its length
direction under a condition of tensile load of 27 kN while heating the rod to a temperature
of about 750°C, thereby producing Fe-Co-based alloy rods of Sample No. 1 to 3, which
are examples of the present invention, with a length of 3050 mm.
<Sample No. 4 to 6>
[0028] After performing a solution treatment on the aforementioned hot-rolled rod by heating
it to 850°C, holding for 30 minutes, and then rapidly cooling, a heating and straightening
step was implemented to produce Fe-Co-based alloy rods of Sample No. 4 to 6, which
are comparative examples, with a length of 3050 mm. The conditions for the heating
and straightening step were set the same as those for Sample No. 1 to 3.
[Table 1]
(mass%) |
C |
Si |
Mn |
Co |
V |
Residue |
0.006 |
0.03 |
0.13 |
49.20 |
1.98 |
Fe and inevitable impurity |
[0029] The area reduction ratio distribution was confirmed for the prepared samples of the
examples of the present invention and comparative examples. The area reduction ratio
was calculated by measuring the diameter before the heating and straightening step
and after the heating and straightening step using a micrometer, and this diameter
measurement was performed at 28 locations at equal intervals along the rod axial direction
to obtain the distribution within a single rod. The distribution of the area reduction
ratio within the rod is shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2. Moreover, in the heating and straightening
step using electric heating, the chucking part is at an equal voltage and no current
flows, so the temperature does not rise in the chucking part. In addition, because
the chucking part is mechanically constrained, almost no elongation occurs in the
chucking part, which is a portion to be cut and removed in a later step. Therefore,
the area reduction ratio in the range up to 250 mm from the rod end, where the influence
of the chucking part in the heating and straightening step is significant, is not
considered. The maximum value, minimum value, average value, and standard deviation
of the area reduction ratio obtained from FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 are shown in Table 2.
Here, the maximum value, minimum value, average value, and standard deviation of the
area reduction ratio for examples of the present invention are derived from Sample
No. 1 to 3, and the maximum value, minimum value, average value, and standard deviation
of the area reduction ratio for the comparative examples are derived from Sample No.
4 to 6. From Table 2, it may be confirmed that although the average value of the area
reduction ratio for examples of the present invention is almost the same as the average
value of the comparative examples, the difference between the maximum value and the
minimum value of the area reduction ratio for examples of the present invention is
smaller, and the standard deviation is also smaller, indicating that the variation
in the area reduction ratio is suppressed in examples of the present invention compared
to the comparative examples.
[Table 2]
Sample |
Area reduction ratio (%) |
Maximum value |
Minimum value |
Average value |
Standard deviation |
Example of the present invention |
7.3 |
2.2 |
4.5 |
1.1 |
Comparative example |
10.1 |
1.3 |
4.3 |
2.0 |
[0030] Subsequently, the average grain size, GOS average value, and DC magnetic properties
were confirmed for Sample No. 3 of example of the present invention and Sample No.
6 of the comparative example. The average grain size was determined using an optical
microscope manufactured by Olympus, according to the comparison method of JIS G 0551.
The GOS value measurement was performed using a field emission scanning electron microscope
manufactured by ZEISS and the EBSD measurement and analysis system OIM (Orientation-Imaging-Micrograph)
manufactured by TSL. The measurement field of view was 600 µm × 600 µm, the step distance
between adjacent pixels was 1.5 µm, and the crystal grain diameter discrimination
condition was observed with an orientation difference of 2° or more between adjacent
pixels. The GOS average value was obtained from the resulting GOS value map. The average
grain size and GOS average value were measured at the center axis position on the
longitudinal cross-section (axial cross-section passing through the center axis).
For the DC magnetic properties, after obtaining samples from the resulting rods, magnetic
annealing was performed at 850°C for 3 hours, and the maximum permeability and coercivity
were measured using a DC magnetization specific test device. These measurement results,
along with the area reduction ratio at the sample collection positions, are shown
in Table 3. The sample collection positions for example of the present invention and
comparative example were 4 locations or 3 locations near the maximum value, the minimum
value, and the center value of the area reduction ratio. From the results in Table
3, it may be confirmed that in example of the present invention, the average grain
size number is larger than in the comparative example (crystal grain diameter is smaller
than in the comparative example), and stable DC magnetic properties are obtained with
respect to the fluctuation of the area reduction ratio and GOS average value (an indicator
of strain), with suppressed variation.
[Table 3]
Sample No. |
Area reduction ratio (%) |
Average Grain size Number |
GOS Average value (°) |
Coercivity (A/m) |
Maximum relative permeability |
Remark |
3 |
2.8 |
10.5 |
0.63 |
44 |
15000 |
Example of the present invention |
4.1 |
9.5 |
0.68 |
42 |
17000 |
5.1 |
10.0 |
0.79 |
41 |
18000 |
7.3 |
9.5 |
0.98 |
41 |
19000 |
6 |
1.3 |
7.0 |
0.56 |
56 |
12000 |
Comparative example |
4.4 |
7.0 |
0.92 |
30 |
26000 |
10.1 |
6.5 |
1.76 |
37 |
23000 |
[0031] Next, the coercivity distribution was measured for Sample No. 2 of the example of
the present invention and Sample No. 5 of the comparative example. The coercivity
was measured using a DC magnetization specific test device after collecting a sample
for magnetic properties from the rod and performing magnetic annealing at 850°C for
3 hours. The distribution of coercivity and the distribution of area reduction ratio
are shown together in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4. However, in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, the measurement
positions in the ranges from 0 to 250 mm and from 2800 mm to 3050 mm (shaded part
in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4) are not considered because of the significant influence of the
chucking. It was confirmed that in the comparative example, the coercivity becomes
extremely large (deteriorates) in the parts with small area reduction ratio, whereas
in the example of the present invention, the deterioration of coercivity in the parts
with small area reduction ratio is suppressed, and stable coercivity is obtained with
suppressed variation.
[0032] Next, FIG. 5 shows the relationship between the area reduction ratio and coercivity
derived from the results in Table 3, FIG. 3, and FIG. 4 for example of the present
invention and the comparative example. In the range where the area reduction ratio
is 2.5% or more, the comparative example exhibits excellent coercivity. Example of
the present invention also shows excellent coercivity, although not as good as the
comparative example. In the range where the area reduction ratio is 2.5% or less,
the comparative example shows a rapid deterioration in coercivity and very unstable
coercivity. In example of the present invention, it can be confirmed that stable coercivity
is obtained and variation is suppressed even in the range where the area reduction
ratio is 2.0 to 2.5%.