[0001] The invention relates to a sheet transport system comprising at least one perforated
belt that defines a sheet transport path and runs over at least one suction box, the
suction box having a belt support structure that has suction openings distributed
in a regular raster in a transverse direction of the belt.
[0002] An example of a sheet transport system of this type has been described in
US 2017/136787 A1.
[0003] Sheet transport systems are used for example in printers in order to convey the media
sheets through various processing stages of the apparatus. Frequently, it is desired
to attract media sheets to the perforated conveyer belt with a suction pressure so
that the sheets are safely held in position and are prevented from bending or cockling.
The suction pressure results in local airflows across the conveyer belt. In some processing
stages, however, it may be necessary to adjust the suction pressure to reduce or control
the airflows. For example, if the processing stage includes an ink jet printhead,
then a too high suction pressure may create relatively strong air currents that flow
in parallel with the plane of the sheets and may change the trajectories of the ink
droplets and thereby compromise the print quality.
[0004] In principle, it is possible to provide separate suction boxes for the different
processing stages and to control the suction pressures individually for each suction
box. In addition, each suction box can be provided with its specific vacuum source,
such a pump. Generally, commonly applied suction sources have a pre-determined pressure
- flow rate ratio over a limited range. All in all, this, however, leads to a complicated
vacuum system and vacuum control system.
[0005] It is an object of the invention to provide a sheet transport system in which the
suction pressure and/or flow rate can easily be adjusted, specifically varied across
different regions.
[0006] It is the insight of the inventor that a high flow rate per unit area through the
conveyor belt is beneficial for attracting a sheet onto the conveyor belt, while a
smaller flow rate is preferred where droplets are jetted to minimize their displacement
due to air flows. It is the further insight of the inventor that different flow rate
- negative pressure ratios and/or combinations can be achieved by varying the combined
open area of the conveyor belt and its underlying support structure. In addition,
the inventor devised that by varying the combined open area these different flow rate
- negative pressure ratios can be achieved using only a single suction box and/or
suction source.
[0007] According to the invention, in order to achieve this object, perforations in the
at least one perforated belt are arranged in the same regular raster as the suction
openings, and an amount of overlap between the suction openings and the perforations
varies along the sheet transport path.
[0008] Thus, all suction boxes can be connected to a common vacuum source or a common suction
box may be provided for several processing stages, and the suction pressure is adapted
to the local demand simply by changing the amount of overlap between the suction openings
in the belt support structure and the perforations in the conveyor belt. This may
be achieved very easily by slightly varying the relative transverse positions of the
belt and the belt support structure. In processing stages, where a high flow rate
per unit area and/or high suction pressure would be problematic, a reduction of the
flow rate and/or suction pressure can be achieved for example by slightly shifting
the belt support structure laterally into a position where the overlap between the
suction openings and the belt perforations is smaller and the flow resistance for
the air being sucked-in is increased accordingly. In one example, the pressure in
the common suction box is substantially constant along the conveyor belt, and the
different amounts of overlaps are applied to create different flow rates per unit
area. For example, at the ink jet printhead(s), the overlap may be smaller to reduce
the flow rate affecting the trajectories of ink droplets there as compared to upstream
of the printhead where the sheet is to be drawn against the conveyor by greater flow
rates.
[0009] More specific optional features of the invention are indicated in the dependent claims.
[0010] Preferably, the lateral position of the perforated belt is controlled to ensure reliable
positioning of the sheet with respect to the printhead(s). This may for example be
achieved by controllably titling one or more rollers supporting the belt to adjust
the lateral position of the belt. Alternatively, one could shift the belt support
structure in the suction box or to shift the suction box as a whole. Preferably, movement
of the belt with respect to the support structure is limited.
[0011] In an embodiment, the amount of overlap changes to define at least two separate areas
on the support surface of the belt in its transport direction. Preferably that is
achieved by two differently arranged belt support structures (which includes differently
configured portions of one support structure assembly). Therein, one belt support
structure is provided downstream of another belt support structure. Each belt support
structure defines an array of suction openings, so that one array of suction openings
is non-overlapping with the other array of openings when viewed along a transport
direction of the sheet transport system;
- the perforations on the belt are dimensioned and/or arranged in at least two subsets,
so that one subset of the perforations overlaps with the one array of suction openings
but not with the other array, while the other subset of perforations overlaps with
the other array of suction openings but not with the one array at the respective belt
support structure. Each support structure is arranged to close off or seal one of
the arrays of suction openings, but not the other. Each array has a different total
open area per unit area, so the flow rate resistance per unit area is different over
each of the support structures. In consequence, areas with different flow rates are
defined can be defined over a single suction box.
[0012] In an embodiment, an average total open area per unit area of perforations overlapping
with suction openings is different between the belt support structures. The cross-section
and/or density of the suction openings in one array is different from the other. The
flow rate resistance per unit area of one array is thus different from the other.
Thereby, the flow rate as expressed in e.g. m/s is different over each support structure.
Preferably, one of the belt support structures is positioned facing a print station,
and wherein the average total open area per unit area of perforations overlapping
with suction openings at that one belt support structure is smaller than at the other
the belt support structure. The flow rate resistance through the combined belt and
support structure at the print station is greater than upstream thereof. Air displacement
is on average less below the print station, resulting in locally reduced air current
velocities and reduced droplet displacement as a consequence thereof. Where the sheet
is received in the belt, the flow rates are greater, as thereby a local negative static
pressure due to the Bernoulli effect can be created to draw the sheet onto the belt.
[0013] The suction holes in the belt support structure may for example be shaped as slots
or may arranged in rows that extend in sheet transport direction and are regularly
interspaced in the transverse direction. The "regular raster" may then be considered
to be the spacing between two adjacent rows of suction holes or any integer multiple
of that spacing. Correspondingly, the perforations in the belt will be arranged in
rows that extend in longitudinal direction of the belt and are regularly interspaced
in the transverse direction, and the raster may be considered to be given by the spacing
between two adjacent rows of perforations or any integer multiple of that spacing.
The perforations may be provided in subsets with different open areas per unit area,
for example by varying the perforation cross-section, shape, density, etc. Thus, the
feature that the suction openings and the perforations are arranged in the same regular
raster does not necessarily mean that the spacings between the rows of suction openings
and the rows of perforations are equal. It is sufficient to require that one spacing
is an integer multiple of the other.
[0014] According to another aspect, the invention discloses a sheet transport system comprising
a perforated belt running over a suction box, the suction box having a belt support
structure that has suction openings distributed in a regular raster in a transverse
direction of the belt, wherein perforations in the perforated belt are arranged in
the same regular raster as the suction openings, and an adjustment mechanism is provided
for adjusting the relative position of the belt support structure and the belt in
said transverse direction, thereby to vary the amount of overlap between the suction
openings and the perforations.
[0015] In this case, the sheet transport systems in the various processing stages may have
an identical design, and in each processing stage the adjustment mechanism may be
used for adapting the suction pressure to the local demand. This embodiment has the
further advantage that the adjustment mechanism can also be used for optimizing the
flow rate and/or suction pressure in view of, for example, the physical properties
of the media sheets that are currently being processed.
[0016] According to yet another aspect, the invention discloses a method of adjusting a
suction pressure in a sheet transport system that comprises a perforated belt running
over a suction box, the suction box having a belt support structure that has suction
openings distributed according to a regular raster in a transverse direction of the
belt, perforations in the perforated belt being arranged in the same regular raster
as the suction openings, characterized by a step of adjusting the relative position
of the belt support structure and the belt in said transverse direction, thereby to
vary the amount of overlap between the suction openings and the perforations.
[0017] Embodiment examples will now be described in conjunction with the drawing, wherein:
- Fig. 1
- is a schematic side view of a sheet transport system having a suction box;
- Fig. 2
- is a plan view of a belt support structure and a perforated belt as seen from the
inside of the suction box;
- Fig. 3
- is a top plan view of the belt support structure and the suction box shown in Figs.
1 and 2; and
- Fig. 4
- is a side view of a sheet transport system according to a modified embodiment.
[0018] As is shown in Fig. 1, a sheet transport system 10 comprises an endless perforated
belt 12 trained around two deflection rollers 14 at least one of which is driven to
rotate in anti-clockwise direction in Fig. 1 so as to move media sheets (not shown)
past a print station 16 and a drying station 18. By way of example, it may be assumed
that the print station 16 includes an ink jet printhead adapted to print images on
the media sheets by jetting water-soluble ink onto the media sheets. The sheets leaving
the print station 16 will then be dried in the drying station 18 by blowing hot air
against the media sheets.
[0019] A suction box 20 is disposed below the upper run of the perforated belt 12. When
a vacuum pressure is applied to the interior of the suction box 20, ambient air will
be drawn in through uncovered perforations 22, 24 (Fig. 2) of the perforated belt
12. Media sheets conveyed on this belt are firmly attracted against the upper surface
of the belt by a holding force which proportional to the negative pressure and the
open area of the belt 12 and its support structure 26, 28 that allows the negative
pressure to act on the sheets. In order to prevent the belt 12 from sagging due to
the vacuum pressure in the suction box, the belt is supported by two belt support
structures 26, 28. Each support structure 26, 28 comprises a plurality of longitudinal
support beams extending in the transport direction and spaced apart from one another
in the transverse direction. In Fig. 2, the support beams are formed of a plate or
within a tile, but individual or separate beams may be applied as well to form the
belt support structure. The belt support structure 26 supports the belt in the region
of the print station 16, and the belt support structure 28 supports the belt in the
region of the drying station 18.
[0020] Fig. 2 shows the belt support structures 26, 28 and the perforated belt 12 as seen
from the inside of the suction box 20, so that the belt support structures obscure
certain parts of the belt 12. The two belt support structures 26, 28 have an identical
design and each comprise or define slot-shaped suction openings 30 that extend in
longitudinal direction of the belt 12 and are regularly interspaced in the transverse
direction, thereby defining a regular raster r in the transverse direction.
[0021] The perforations 22, 24 of the belt 12 form alternating rows of small-diameter perforations
22 and large-diameter perforations 22 that fit into the raster r defined by the suction
holes 30.
[0022] The belt support structures 26 and 28 are positioned at different positioned along
the transport direction. The belt support structures 26 and 28 differ slightly in
their lateral positions. In case of the support structure 26, the suction holes 30
are aligned with the small-diameter perforations 22 whereas the large-diameter perforations
24 are blocked by the portions of the belt support structure that separate the suction
holes 30. Consequently, the flow rate of the air being sucked-in in the region of
the print station 16 is limited by the relatively small diameter of the perforations
22. Preferably, this support structure 26 is positioned facing the print station 16,
so that the air flows at the print station are relatively small, thereby reducing
their displacement of the jetted droplets.
[0023] In contrast, the belt support structure 28 is positioned such that the suction openings
30 are aligned with the large-diameter perforations 24 whereas the small-diameter
paws 22 are blocked. Consequently, the suction pressure is determined by the larger
diameter of the perforations 24. This has the effect that, when passing underneath
the blower of the drying station 18, the media sheets are firmly attracted with a
high suction pressure so that they are firmly held in position in spite of the air
current generated by the blower. Preferably, a similar support structure 28 is applied
at the upstream side or end of the belt to create there an area, where the sheet is
reliably drawn onto the belt, when it is received from an upstream conveyor. It will
be appreciated that in this example, the suction pressure inside the suction box 20
is assumed to be substantially constant or the same at both belt support structures
26, 28. Under that assumption, the different hole diameter result in different flow
rates in the different areas. Note that the holding force per unit area is proportional
to product of the suction pressure and the hole diameter, so the holding force can
also be varied in this manner. It may be that the suction pressure is also locally
affected by the different rates of air flows entering the different areas of the suction
box, which could allow for local adjustment of the holding force and/or suction pressure.
[0024] Fig. 3 shows the suction box 20 and the sheet support structures 26, 28 - without
the belt 12 - in a top plan view. Fig. 3 further shows an adjustment mechanism 32
that is provided for controlling the lateral positions of the two belt support structures
26, 28 and, therewith, the amount of overlap between the suction openings 30 and the
perforations 22, 24 of the belt 12. The plate-like belt support structures 26, 28
are slidable in the transverse direction of the belt along guide rails 34 and are
arranged and dimensioned to cover the entire top surface of the suction box 20. In
particular, the belt support structures 26, 28 project beyond walls 36 of the suction
box that extend in the sheet transport direction. The adjustment mechanism 32 has
a frame 38 that is attached to the suction box 20 and accommodates and supports two
linear drives 40, 42 for adjusting the lateral positions of the belt support structures
26, 28.
[0025] In the example shown, the linear drives 40, 42 may be configured to just switch between
the two positions of the belt support structures 26, 28 that have been shown in Figs.
2 and 3. This has the advantage that the flow rate of the air being drawn-in is determined
only by the vacuum pressure in the vacuum box 20 and by the diameters of the perforations
22, 24.
[0026] In a modified embodiment, the linear drives 40, 42 may be configured to move the
support structures 26, 28 into any intermediate position between the two positions
shown in Figs. 2 and 3, so that the amount of overlap between the suction openings
30 and the perforations 22, 24 may be varied continuously, which allows for a fine-adjustment
of the combination or ratio of the flow rate and the vacuum pressure. In that case,
it would not even be required that the perforations 22, 24 have different diameters.
[0027] Fig. 4 shows an embodiment of a sheet transport system that has two consecutive perforated
belts 12', one for moving the sheets through the print station 16 and one for moving
the sheets through the drying station 18. Each belt 12' has its own suction box 20'
covered by a belt support structure 26' that, in this case, may be mounted rigidly
in the suction box. In order to adjust the suction pressure, the suction boxes 20
and their belt support structures 26' may be moved as a unit. Since the suction pressures
in the two processing stages can be controlled independently by the positions of the
suction boxes 20', both suction boxes may be connected to a common vacuum source 44.
1. A sheet transport system comprising at least one perforated belt (12; 12') that defines
a sheet transport path and runs over at least one suction box (20; 20'), the suction
box having a belt support structure (26, 28; 26') that has suction openings (30) distributed
in a regular raster (r) in a transverse direction of the belt, characterized in that perforations (22, 24) in the at least one perforated belt (12) are arranged in the
same regular raster (r) as the suction openings (30), and an amount of overlap between
the suction openings (30) and the perforations (22, 24) varies along the sheet transport
path.
2. The sheet transport system according to claim 1, wherein the perforations (22, 24)
of the belt (12) form a repetitive pattern consisting of a number of rows of perforations
(22, 24) with different sizes, and the spacing between two neighboring suction openings
(30) is equal to the product of the spacing between adjacent rows of perforations
(22, 24) with different sizes and the number of rows in the repetitive pattern.
3. The sheet transport system according to claim 2, wherein the number of rows of the
repetitive pattern is 2.
4. The sheet transport system according to claim 2 or 3, wherein the suction openings
(30) have the shape of slots extending in longitudinal direction of the belt (12;
12').
5. The sheet transport system according to any of preceding claims, wherein:
- one belt support structure (26, 28; 26') is provided downstream of another belt
support structure (26, 28; 26');
- each belt support structure (26, 28; 26') defines an array of suction openings (30),
so that one array of suction openings (30) is non-overlapping with the other array
of openings (30) when viewed along a transport direction of the sheet transport system;
- the perforations (22, 24) on the belt (12) are dimensioned and arranged in at least
two subsets, so that one subset of the perforations (22, 24) overlaps with the one
array of suction openings (30) but not with the other array, while the other subset
of perforations overlaps with the other array of suction openings (30) but not with
the one array at the respective belt support structure (26, 28; 26').
6. The sheet transport system according to claim 5, wherein an average total open area
per unit area of perforations (22, 24) overlapping with suction openings (30) is different
between the belt support structures (26, 28; 26').
7. The sheet transport system according to claim 5, wherein one of the belt support structures
(26, 28; 26') is positioned facing a print station (16), and wherein the average total
open area per unit area of perforations (22, 24) overlapping with suction openings
(30) at that one belt support structure (26, 28; 26') is smaller than at the other
the belt support structure (26, 28; 26').
8. A sheet transport system comprising a perforated belt (12) running over a suction
box (20), the suction box having a belt support structure (26, 28) that has suction
openings (30) distributed in a regular raster (r) in a transverse direction of the
belt, wherein perforations (22, 24) in the perforated belt (12) are arranged in the
same regular raster (r) as the suction openings (30), wherein an adjustment mechanism
(32) is provided for adjusting the relative position of the belt support structure
(26, 28) and the belt (12) in said transverse direction, thereby to vary and an amount
of overlap between the suction openings (30) and the perforations (22, 24).
9. The sheet transport system according to claim 8, wherein the belt support structure
(26, 28) is movable relative to the suction box (20) and the adjustment mechanism
(32) is arranged to adjust the lateral position of the belt support structure (26,
28) in the suction box (20).
10. The sheet transport system according to claim 9, wherein the suction box (20) has
a plurality of independently movable belt support structures (26, 28).
11. A method of adjusting a suction pressure in a sheet transport system (10) that comprises
a perforated belt (12) running over a suction box (20), the suction box having a belt
support structure (26, 28) that has suction openings (30) distributed in a regular
raster (r) in a transverse direction of the belt (12), perforations (22, 24) in the
perforated belt (12) being arranged in the same regular raster (r) as the suction
openings (30), characterized by a step of adjusting the relative position of the belt support structure (26, 28)
and the belt (12) in said transverse direction, thereby to vary an amount of overlap
between the suction openings (30) and the perforations (22, 24).