[0001] The present invention relates to an electrochemical cell comprising a composite proton
exchange membranes with interlayer structure.
[0002] Proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis is an anticipated core technology
to produce hydrogen from renewable energy sources for power-to-X processes. Performance,
cost and durability are widely considered as the three main challenges to the advancement
of this technology. Enhancing the durability of PEM water electrolysis cells is crucial
for reducing system costs and improving the economic competitiveness of the produced
hydrogen. In the literature, stack lifetimes ranging from 60,000 to 100,000 hours
have been reported, with projections anticipating an increase to over 125,000 hours
by 2050. Among the factors influencing cell durability, chemical degradation of the
membrane plays an important role, and is of particular relevance when thin membranes
of ~50 µm thickness or less are employed.
[0003] The irreversible chemical membrane degradation is typically driven by reactive oxygen
species (ROS) that are generated on catalytic surfaces due to gas crossover. These
ROS include hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2) and its associated radicals, such as hydroxyl (HO˙) and hydroperoxyl (HOO˙) radicals.
The radicals attack the polymer structure, leading to chain scission, and loss of
ion-exchange groups and other structural constituents, resulting in membrane thinning
and reduced ionic conductivity. In the case of perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA)-based
membranes, such as Nafion, the release of fluoride is detected in the cell effluent
water, serving as an indicator of the polymer degradation.
[0004] It is generally accepted that this degradation primarily occurs near the cathode
side, although a comprehensive understanding remains to be elucidated. Chandesris
et al. developed a one-dimensional model addressing the degradation mechanism, involving
the formation of H
2O
2 at the cathode as a result of oxygen crossover, followed by the generation of radicals
via Fenton reactions. Experimental measurements of the fluoride release rate (FRR)
supported the model, demonstrating higher FRR values at the cathode compared to the
anode. This conclusion aligns with the observations made by Fouda-Onana et al. and
Frensch et al.
[0005] It is thought that H
2O
2 is produced both chemically via the reaction of crossover hydrogen and oxygen gases
on platinum (Pt) surfaces accompanied by radical formation, and electrochemically
through a two-electron pathway at the cathode under low-potential conditions. H
2O
2 possesses a diffusion length on the order of millimeters to centimeters, allowing
it to traverse the membrane. During its diffusion, H
2O
2 can decompose to form radicals, either uncatalyzed or catalyzed by certain metal
ions.
[0006] An effective strategy for mitigating membrane chemical degradation is to incorporate
a radical scavenger, such as a cerium (Ce)-based catalyst. It reacts with ROS while
maintaining a dynamic equilibrium of the Ce
4+/Ce
3+ redox couple. Although Ce-based radical scavengers have been extensively studied
in PEM fuel cell research, their application in PEM water electrolysis remains relatively
limited to date. Current reports mainly describe the homogenous incorporation of the
catalyst inside the membrane. However, since the membrane degradation predominantly
takes place near the cathode, such a homogenous distribution may not represent the
most efficient or optimal placement of the radical scavenger.
[0007] Furthermore, another obstacle in the development of PEM water electrolysis cells
with thinner membranes is the increased hydrogen crossover. Recombination catalysts,
such as Pt, have been employed to reduce the rate of crossover hydrogen reaching the
anode side. Klose et al. proposed an ideal placement of the recombination catalyst
layer within the membrane, taking into account the partial pressures and effective
diffusion coefficients of hydrogen and oxygen in water under a set of given conditions.
Specifically, in a typical PEM water electrolysis cell operating at 80 C - where the
cathode H
2 chamber is usually pressurized while the anode O
2 chamber is maintained at ambient pressure - the optimal location for the recombination
layer is near the anode side. Nevertheless, incorporating Pt as a recombination catalyst
was found to exacerbate ionomer degradation, likely due to its role in catalyzing
additional radical formation.
[0008] Summarizing the objective of the present invention, it was the goal to provide an
electrochemical cell, in particular a water electrolysis cell, having a high capability
of an effective radical scavenger and of reducing the hydrogen cross-over when using
thin membranes.
[0009] According to the present invention, the positioning of the antioxidant, such as a
Ce-based radical scavenger, as an interlayer near the cathode side is considered to
ensure effectiveness of the radical scavenger by targeting the region close to the
highest ROS concentration. The impact of radical scavenger positioning on mitigating
membrane degradation has been largely overlooked in the literature so far, and thus,
the present invention clearly advances the edge of the technology known so far.
[0010] Further, according to the present invention, the challenge of hydrogen cross-over
is now tackled by a gas recombination catalyst, such as a Pt/Ce
xZr
1-xO
2 bi-functional catalyst as a replacement for pure Pt, thereby achieving to concurrently
mitigate hydrogen crossover and ionomer degradation. Building on the novel application
of this bi-functional catalyst and informed by the optimal placement, the present
invention preferably positions a gas recombination catalyst layer, such as a Pt/Ce
xZr
1-xO
2 interlayer, near the anode side of the membrane, representing an unexplored approach
in addressing the problem.
[0011] These objectives have been achieved according to the present invention by an electrochemical
cell comprising a catalyst coated membrane, i.e. for use in water electrolysis, wherein:
- i) the membrane is a cation exchange membrane (CEM), in particular a proton exchange
membrane (PEM), or an anion exchange membrane (AEM), in particular a hydroxide exchange
membrane (HEM);
- ii) said membrane having a thickness below 100 µm, preferably below 75 mm, more preferably
below 50 mm; and
- iii) said membrane comprises an antioxidant (AO) and a gas recombination catalyst
(GRC) in the form of micro and/or nanoparticles, preferably in form of a layer of
antioxidant particles and a layer of gas recombination catalyst particles that are
placed within the membrane close to the cathode side and the anode side respectively.
[0012] Advantageous embodiment of the present invention can be realized, when:
- i) the antioxidant is an oxide of the type Ce1-x-y-zM1xM2yM3zO2-d comprising cerium
as a redox-active transition metal, wherein M1 is one or more transition metals, M2
is one or more lanthanide metals, M3 is one of more noble or heavy metal, with 0 <
x, y, z < 1 and 2-d expresses the oxygen stoichiometry with -0.5 < d < 0.5.;
- ii) the oxide is of the type cerium oxide (CeO2-d), cerium-zirconium oxide (CexZr1-xO2-d),
cerium-gadolinium oxide (CexGd1-xO2-d), preferably: CexZr1-xO2-d with 0.1≤x≤0.75 and
more preferably 0.2≤x≤0.5, or the oxide is a metal organic framework (MOF) with Ce(III)/Ce(IV)
as metal center, such as Ce-MOF-808;
- iii) the gas recombination catalyst is:
- a) a noble metal black, preferably Pt or Pd or an alloy of Pt and Pd, and/or
- b) a noble metal, as described in a), supported on the antioxidant, preferably supported
on CexZr1-xO2-d, such as Pt supported on CexZr1-xO2-d (Pt-CexZr1-xO2-d) with a Pt
content with respect to the oxide of preferably 1 to 20 wt-% and more preferably 2
to 10 wt-%, and/or
- c) a noble metal, as described in a), inserted into the cavity of a MOF type antioxidant;
- iv) said membrane is a proton exchange membrane of the perfluoroalkylsulfonic acid
(PFSA) type, for example Nafion™ (Chemours), Fumapem® and Fumasep® (Fumatech) or Aquivion® (Syensqo) or a proton exchange membrane of the hydrocarbon type, for example Pemion™ (Ionomr) or an AEM, for example PiperION® (Versogen), Aemion™ (Ionomr), Aemion+™ (Ionomr), Duraion® (Creavis), Durion™ (Xergy), Fumasep® (Fumatech), Sustainion® (Dioxide Materials);
- v) the antioxidant particles are mixed with the same type of ionomer, optionally with
a different equivalent weight, in dispersed form, that the membrane is made of and
the resulting slurry is deposited onto the cathode side of the membrane by one or
more of:
- a) coating
- b) printing
- c) spraying
- d) decal transfer,
wherein an antioxidant (AO) loading ranges from 0.01 to 2 mgAO/cm2, more preferably
0.05 to 0.2 mgAO/cm2, with a layer thickness of <10 µm, and wherein a further layer
of the pure ionomer is added by one of the afore-mentioned methods with a thickness
of less than 10 µm; or
the antioxidant particles are incorporated into a cathode catalyst layer comprising
an electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), for example Pt/carbon,
with a preferable load of the antioxidant (AO) in the range from 0.01 to 2 mgAO/cm2,
more preferably 0.05 to 0.2 mgAO/cm2, and wherein the HER catalyst is a Pt/carbon
catalyst, and the Pt loading of the cathode catalyst layer is preferably between 0.010
and 0.40 mgPt/cm2, more preferably between 0.025 and 0.10 mgPt/cm2;
- vi) the gas recombination catalyst particles are mixed with the same type of ionomer,
in dispersed form, that the membrane is made of, and the resulting slurry is deposited
onto the anode side of the membrane, by one or more of a) coating, b) printing, c)
spraying and/or d) decal transfer, wherein a load of the gas recombination catalyst
in terms of its noble metal content ranges from 0.001 to 0.1 mg(noble metal)/cm2,
more preferably 0.02 to 0.05 mg(noble metal)/cm2, with a layer thickness below 10
µm and wherein a further layer of the pure ionomer is added by one of afore-mentioned
methods with a thickness of less than 10 µm;
- vii) the catalyst coated membrane (CCM) is prepared by coating an anode and cathode
catalyst layer onto the composite membrane comprising a layer of the gas recombination
catalyst particles near the anode side of the membrane and a layer of the antioxidant
particles near the cathode side of the membrane, unless the antioxidant particles
are incorporated into the cathode catalyst layer;
- viii) the composition of the anode catalyst layer comprises a catalyst for the oxygen
evolution reaction (OER), such as IrOx, IrOx supported on TiO2, IrOx supported on
another oxide; or IrRuOx, IrRuOx supported on oxide; or, in the case of AEMWE, any
oxide containing transition metals, such as NiFe layered double hydroxide (LDH)-based
electrocatalyst, and an ionomer, which optionally is of the same type as the ionomer
constituting the membrane, or of a different class of ionomer;
- ix) the composition of the cathode catalyst layer comprises a catalyst for the hydrogen
evolution reaction (HER), such as Pt black or Pt supported on carbon (Pt/C), or Pd
black or Pd supported on carbon (Pd/C), or an alloy black containing Pt or Pd or both,
or a carbon supported catalyst containing Pt or Pd or both, and an ionomer, which
optionally is of the same type as the ionomer constituting the membrane, or of a different
class of ionomer;
- x) for the deposition process, an ink is formed from the respective catalyst and the
respective ionomer using a solvent to obtain a slurry or paste, wherein the solvent
is an organic solvent, water, or a mixture thereof;
- xi) the anode and the cathode catalyst layer are deposited by one of more of a) coating,
b) printing, c) spraying and/or d) decal transfer; and/or
- xii) the catalyst coated membrane CCM is assembled into a water electrolyzer cell
with the addition of the following components:
- a) a carbon-based gas diffusion layer (GDL) on the cathode side
- b) a titanium based porous transport layer (PTL) on the anode side
- c) optionally a sub-gasket for edge protection; and
- d) suitable seals and gaskets.
[0013] Preferred embodiments of the present invention are hereinafter described in more
detail with reference to the attached drawings which depict in:
- Figure 1
- schematically a representation of composite membrane configurations Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (an) and Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca) (a), fluoride release rates determined during 100-hour constant current tests (b),
polarization curves and iR-free potentials (c), and the corresponding high-frequency
resistances (d) for these two composite membrane configurations;
- Figure 2
- a cross-sectional SEM image of the catalyst coated membrane (CCM) containing Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca);
- Figure 3
- PXRD patterns of the synthesized CexZr1-xO2 (x = 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75) (a), N2 physisorption isotherms and surface areas calculated using the BET method (b), schematic
illustration of the ex-situ Fenton test setup48 (c), and fluoride concentrations monitored during the ex-situ Fenton tests (d) for
these synthesized cerium-zirconium oxides;
- Figure 4
- Schematic representation of composite membrane configurations Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (ca), Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (an) and Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt/Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (an) (a), fluoride release rates determined during 100-hour constant current tests (b),
measured H2 in O2% in the current density range of 0.5-3 A/cm2 (c), polarization curves and iR-free potentials (d) and the corresponding high-frequency
resistances (e) for these composite membrane configurations;
- Figure 5
- HAADF-STEM images of the synthesized Pt/Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (a,b), with the EDX spectrum (c) acquired from the selected area in the image (Cu
signals originate from the Cu grid used). The PXRD pattern with Rietveld refinement
is presented in (d); and
- Figure 6
- schematically the principle of an electrochemical cell comprising a composite proton
exchange membranes with interlayer structures.
[0014] The electrochemical cell, for example designed as water electrolysis cell, is usually
operated at a slightly increased temperature, typically between 50 and 120°C, by feeding
water to the electrochemical cell on the anode side or the cathode side, or both,
and a voltage of typically 1.4 V - 2.5 V per cell or a current of 0.1 A/cm2 - 5 A/cm2
is applied. The gas pressure on the cathode (H2 side) is typically between ambient
and 30 bar, the gas pressure on the anode (O2 side) between ambient and 5 bar.
[0015] In the present application, the work for the creation of an advantageous catalyst
coated membrane (CCM) having a high capability of an effective radical scavenger and
of reducing the hydrogen cross-over when using thin membranes began with the effective
positioning of a model radical scavenger, Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2, placing a spray-coated Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayer near either the anode or cathode within the membrane. The FRRs of the
two composite membranes were monitored and compared over 100 hours of constant current
measurements at 2 A/cm
2. The Ce content in Ce
xZr
1-xO
2 was further optimized for the highest radical scavenging capability using an ex-situ
Fenton test, identifying Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 as the optimal composition. This material was therefore placed near the cathode side,
which had been determined as the more effective location for radical scavenger within
the composite membrane. The positioning of a gas recombination catalyst interlayer,
with Pt as a model material, was additionally evaluated for its role in reducing hydrogen
crossover. Consistent with the literature, the Pt interlayer was found to be more
effective near the anode under the experimental conditions. To address the additional
ionomer degradation induced by the Pt interlayer, a bi-functional catalyst Pt/Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 interlayer has been introduced as a substitute. Building on these findings, a composite
membrane configuration featuring Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 near the cathode and Pt/Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 near the anode was exemplarily developed and examined, achieving concurrently an
enhanced mitigation of ionomer degradation and hydrogen crossover.
Effective Positioning of Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 Radical Scavenging Interlayer
[0016] Two configurations of composite membranes were prepared, each incorporating a Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayer positioned either near the anode or near the cathode of a Nafion NR 212
membrane, as illustrated in Figure 1a. An ionomer layer was deposited over the Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayer to provide electrical insulation from the catalyst layer. The SEM cross-sectional
image (Figure 2a), using
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca) as an example, shows a well-defined composite membrane structure, comprising a 47.6
± 0.6 µm thick Nafion NR 212 membrane, a 7 ± 1 µm thick Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayer and a 5 ± 1 µm thick ionomer layer.
[0017] The radical scavenging effectiveness of the Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayer was evaluated in 100-hour constant current measurements at 2 A/cm
2, conducted at 90 C under differential pressures (
pc = 11 bar and
pa = 1 bar). The fluoride release rates, calculated based on electro-osmotic drag water
rates and fluoride concentrations in the cathode effluent water, are shown in Figure
1b. Blank measurements were performed using three membranes without any Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayers . Their averaged FRR, 0.17 ± 0.01 (µg·cm
-2·h
-1), is represented by a solid horizontal line, with the error bar indicated by a grey-shaded
region.
[0018] As mentioned, Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of composite membrane configurations
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (an) and
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca) (a), fluoride release rates determined during 100-hour constant current tests (b),
polarization curves and iR-free potentials (c), and the corresponding high-frequency
resistances (d) for these two composite membrane configurations.
[0019] Figure 2 shows a cross-sectional SEM image of the catalyst coated membrane (CCM)
containing
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca) (a) and the measured H
2 in O
2% for different membrane configurations at 0.5 A/cm
2 (b).
[0020] The results demonstrate that positioning the Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayer near the cathode effectively reduces the FRR compared to its placement
near the anode - the latter exhibits an FRR similar to the blank level. The average
FRR over the 100 hours for
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (an) is 0.18 ± 0.02 (µg·cm
-2·h
-1), whereas for
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca) it is 0.07 ± 0.01 (µg·cm
-2·h
-1), corresponding to a reduction of 61% ± 7%. Placing the radical scavenger closer
to this region is beneficial in lowering the ROS concentrations, thereby improving
the chemical stability of the membrane. Reactions involving ROS with the Ce
4+/Ce
3+ redox couple in cerium-zirconium oxide commonly include:
HO
• + Ce
3+ + H
+ → Ce
4+ + H
2O (1)
HOO
• + Ce
3+ + H
+ → Ce
4+ + H
2O
2 (2)
H
2O
2 + Ce
4+ → Ce
3+ + HOO
• + H
+ (3)
HOO
• + Ce
4+ → Ce
3+ + O
2 + H
+ (4)
[0021] The oxidative strength of these ROS follows the order: HO˙ > H˙ > HOO˙ > H
2O
2. Notably, as HO˙ has a short diffusion length of ~40 nm in PFSA membranes, direct
scavenging of HO˙ produced in the cathode catalyst layer by Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 is unlikely due to the presence of an ionomer layer with a thickness in the range
of 5 mm. Nevertheless, the relatively stable ROS, H
2O
2 and HOO˙, can diffuse from the cathode into the membrane towards the anode. Depending
on the position of the Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayer, they can be consumed by Ce
4+ along their diffusion pathway, particularly for HOO
• whose diffusion length is ~20 µm, shorter than the distance to the Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayer when positioned near the anode. Scavenging these species closer to the
cathode in a timely manner can, therefore, reduce the extent of membrane degradation.
Furthermore, H
2O
2 and HOO
• participate in reactions that lead to the formation of HO
•, such as the Fenton reaction involving H
2O
2, as follows:
H
2O
2 + H
+ + Fe
2+ → Fe
3+ + HO
• + H
2O (5)
[0022] Here, iron ions could be present from feed water impurities. The decomposition of
H
2O
2 can also be catalyzed by other multivalent metal ions, including Cu
2+ and Ti
3+. These ions may arise from the corrosion of system tubing or cell components. A reduced
H
2O
2 concentration near the cathode side, achieved using Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 in the configuration of
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca), mitigates subsequent HO
• formation as H
2O
2 diffuses through the membrane and interacts with metal ion impurities. Overall, these
combined effects in mitigation of ROS concentrations account for the observed lower
FRR when the Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayer is positioned near the cathode, as opposed to be positioned near the anode.
Polarization curves (Figure 1c) indicate a generally higher cell potential for
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca) than
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (an), mostly due to increased high-frequency resistance (HFR). The iR-free cell potentials
for both configurations are similar, as expected. At 2 A/cm
2, the measured HFR for
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca) is 87 mΩ·cm
2, whereas for
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (an), it is 114 mΩ·cm
2 (Figure 1d). It is worth noting that the HFR varies significantly with current density
in the case of
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca), starting to increase at 0.25 A/cm
2 from 84 mΩ·cm
2 to 114 mΩ·cm
2 at 3 A/cm
2. This may be attributed to interfacial effects resulting from an additional resistance
at the interface of the membrane layers. However, the absence of such an effect for
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (an) is interesting.
[0023] Further investigation using composite membranes containing only an ionomer layer,
without any Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayers, confirms that the interfacial effects on HFR is only observed when the
ionomer layer, and consequently the interface, is located near the cathode, instead
of the anode. This may be related to an inhomogeneous distribution of mechanical stress
across the membrane, as the anode is supported by a rigid Ti-felt whereas the cathode
is supported by a relatively soft carbon paper, making a delamination more likely
to occur near the cathode side. The differential pressure setting of 11 bar at the
cathode and ambient at the anode could further exacerbate this situation. As the current
density increases, the rate of electro-osmotic water drag increases proportionally,
potentially causing water to accumulate inside the delaminated interface and thereby
increasing the ohmic resistance. It is believed that this water can be re-absorbed
into the membrane as conditions change, since the increased HFR was found to be reversible.
At current densities below 0.25 A/cm
2, the HFRs for
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (an) and
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca) are comparable, falling within the CCM-to-CCM variations.
[0024] The measured H
2 in O
2% is the highest for membranes without a Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayer, reaching 7.0% at 0.5 A/cm
2 (Figure 2b). This value decreases to 6.3% for
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca), and is the lowest for
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (an), at 5.4%. The incorporation of the Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 interlayer may contribute to this reduction via the following effects: I) The addition
of the interlayer slightly increases the composite membrane thickness, extending the
hydrogen diffusion length and therefore marginally reducing the rate of hydrogen crossover.
II) The interlayer contains 50 wt% Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 particles and 50 wt% ionomer. The reduced ionomer content within the interlayer limits
the available water channels for the dissolved hydrogen to diffuse through, thereby
decreasing the hydrogen crossover. III) Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 particles may exhibit weak catalytic activity for the recombination of crossover
hydrogen and oxygen under the current conditions, providing adsorption surfaces that
facilitate the reaction.
42,43 Given that the reactant ratio near the anode is closer to the ideal reaction stoichiometry
of 2:1 for hydrogen and oxygen (as will be elaborated in a later section), this leads
to a lower H
2 in O
2% for
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (an) than
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (ca). On the other hand, considering the experimental error bars in Figure 2b, the differences
are only slightly more than the sample variations.
[0025] Ex-Situ Study for an Optimized Ce Content in Ce
xZr
1-xO
2 While the effectiveness of Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 with respect to its positioning has been demonstrated in the previous section, it
is beneficial to further explore the optimal Ce content for radical scavenging in
cerium-zirconium oxide, beyond a Ce/Zr ratio of 1. To address this question, powders
of Ce
xZr
1-xO
2 with three different Ce contents (x = 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75) were synthesized. Phase
characterization using powder X-ray diffraction (Figure 3a) reveals a peak shift towards
lower 2θ angles with increasing Ce content, consistent with increased lattice spacing
due to the substitution of Zr
4+ (0.84 Å) by Ce
4+ (0.97 Å). A gradual peak broadening is observed as the Ce content increases, which
may be attributed to reduced crystallite size and/or increased lattice strain. Nitrogen
physisorption measurements of the powders exhibit a type IV isotherm with a H1 type
hysteresis for Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 and Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2, and a type II isotherm with a H4 type hysteresis for Ce
0.75Zr
0.25O
2 (Figure 3b). The hysteresis feature for Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 and Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 indicates the presence of uniformly distributed spherical or cylindrical mesopores
wider than ~4 nm. This aligns with the pore size distribution results, which show
both micropores (centering at ~1-2 nm) and mesopores (centering at ~3-3.5 nm) for
the two samples. The cumulative pore volumes are 0.146 cm
3/g and 0.121 cm
3/g for Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 and Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2, respectively. Mesopores are generally absent in Ce
0.75Zr
0.25O
2, whose cumulative pore volume is significantly lower, being 0.022 cm
3/g. Its isotherm, with a slight hysteresis feature, indicates the presence of narrow
slit-like pores. Among the three compositions, Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 shows the highest BET surface area of 71 m
2/g. The estimated crystallite sizes for all samples, based on the BET surface areas
and by assuming spherical particles, ranges from 13 to 15 nm.
[0026] Figure 3 shows PXRD patterns of the synthesized Ce
xZr
1-xO
2 (x = 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75) (a), N
2 physisorption isotherms and surface areas calculated using the BET method (b), schematic
illustration of the ex-situ Fenton test setup
48 (c), and fluoride concentrations monitored during the ex-situ Fenton tests (d) for
these synthesized cerium-zirconium oxides.
[0027] To compare the radical scavenging performance of Ce
xZr
1-xO
2 with varying Ce contents, an ex-situ Fenton test was carried out. In this setup,
each sample powder and a piece of Nafion NR 212 membrane were placed in a vial containing
freshly prepared Fenton's reagent, as illustrated in Figure 3c. The amount of Ce
xZr
1-xO
2 was normalized to the same Ce mass across different compositions to ensure consistency.
Fenton's reagent contains a high concentration of free radicals, which can either
be scavenged by Ce
xZr
1-xO
2, or attack the Nafion membrane resulting in the release of fluoride. Consequently,
fluoride concentration in the vial was monitored to assess the extent of the membrane
degradation and, in turn, evaluate the radical scavenging activity of Ce
xZr
1-xO
2. As shown in Figure 3d, the suspension with Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 yields the lowest fluoride concentration over the 70-hour test period, indicating
its most effective radical scavenging activity under the specified conditions. Higher
Ce contents (x = 0.5 and 0.75) sequentially increase the resulting fluoride concentrations,
with Ce
0.75Zr
0.25O
2 demonstrating the lowest radical scavenging activity. Therefore, in the samples studied,
the Ce
3+/total Ce ratio is expected to increase in the order of: Ce
0.75Zr
0.25O
2 < Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2 < Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2. With a higher Ce
3+ concentration, as in Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2, more HO˙ can be effectively scavenged via equation (1), while Ce
3+ itself is regenerated via equation (3), leading to the observed higher radical scavenging
activity. The results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements acquired at
Ce 3d core level confirmed that Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 exhibited a higher Ce
3+ concentration compared to Ce
0.5Zr
0.5O
2. However, a similarly high Ce
3+ concentration was also observed in Ce
0.75Zr
0.25O
2, the cause of which remains unclear at this stage.
[0028] Effective Positioning of Pt Gas Recombination Interlayer and Substitution of Pt with
Bi-Functional Catalyst Pt/Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 Based on the findings from the previous two sections, Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 was positioned as an interlayer near the cathode of the composite membrane. This
configuration was maintained in subsequent experiments.
[0029] Meanwhile, the high rate of hydrogen crossover, exemplified by the blank membranes
in Figure 2b, presents a significant challenge to the safe operation of the electrolysis
cell. It is understood that hydrogen crossover occurs mainly through the diffusion
of dissolved hydrogen gas in the aqueous domain of the hydrated membrane. The rate
of hydrogen crossover typically increases with increasing cathode pressure and/or
decreasing membrane thickness. While elevated cathode pressure is preferred for eliminating
or reducing the need of mechanical hydrogen compression, and thin membranes are favored
for reducing ohmic losses during cell operation, one approach to mitigate pronounced
hydrogen crossover is to incorporate a gas recombination catalyst, such as Pt. This
catalyst recombines the crossover hydrogen and oxygen to water, as:

where the ideal reaction stoichiometry for hydrogen and oxygen is 2:1. If the amounts
of reactants do not meet the stoichiometric ratio, the reaction will remain incomplete.
In cases where oxygen is the limiting reactant, excess hydrogen gas will continue
crossing over through the membrane to the anode side, thereby leading to a high hydrogen
content in the anode oxygen stream.
[0030] The ideal position inside the membrane for a gas recombination interlayer, where
the crossover hydrogen and oxygen satisfy the stoichiometric ratio, is:

[0031] Here,

and

are the permeability coefficients of O
2 and H
2 in the membrane, while

and

are the partial pressures of O
2 and H
2, respectively.
δmem is the membrane thickness.
x represents the position of the gas recombination interlayer inside the membrane,
with its direction pointing from the cathode towards the anode. Under the current
testing conditions of 90 °C, 11 bar cathode pressure and ambient anode pressure, an
interlayer position close to the anode side, where
x = 0.98·
δmem, is determined based on extrapolation of available data.
[0032] Figure 4 shows a schematic representation of composite membrane configurations
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (ca), Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (an) and
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt/
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (an) (a), fluoride release rates determined during 100-hour constant current tests (b),
measured H
2 in O
2% in the current density range of 0.5-3 A/cm
2 (c), polarization curves and iR-free potentials (d) and the corresponding high-frequency
resistances (e) for these composite membrane configurations.
[0033] To validate the effective positioning of the gas recombination interlayer, a Pt interlayer
with a loading of 0.04 mg
Pt/cm
2 was incorporated near either the cathode or the anode of the composite membrane,
as illustrated in Figure 4a. An ionomer layer was placed over the Pt interlayer when
positioned near the anode to insulate it from the catalyst layer. In the case of the
Pt interlayer positioned near the cathode, this layer was directly added onto the
membrane for consistency. The anode H
2 in O
2% was measured in a range of current densities from 0.5-3 A/cm
2, followed by a 100-hour constant current measurement at 2 A/cm
2 with periodic monitoring of fluoride release rate (Figure 4b). As shown in Figure
4c, the configuration
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (an) indeed exhibits a generally lower H
2 in O
2% compared to
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (ca). At 0.5 A/cm
2, a reduction from 5.0% to 2.9% is seen when the Pt interlayer is changed from near
the cathode to near the anode side. This observation confirms the influence of the
gas recombination interlayer position, considering the yield of the recombination
reaction.
[0034] On the other hand, a higher fluoride release rate was determined for
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (an) than for
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (ca) (Figure 4b), indicating an increased rate of membrane degradation when the Pt interlayer
is placed near the anode. Since Pt is known to catalyze not only the gas recombination
of hydrogen and oxygen, but also radical formation, a higher radical concentration
is likely to induce more rapid membrane degradation when these radicals are generated
far from the radical scavenger and cannot be timely scavenged, as in the case of
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (an). In contrast, for
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (ca), since the radical scavenger is positioned close to the Pt, the produced radicals
can be scavenged effectively by Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2, resulting in a lower membrane degradation rate.
[0035] Figure 5 shows HAADF-STEM images of the synthesized Pt/Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 (a,b), with the EDX spectrum (c) acquired from the selected area in the image (Cu
signals originate from the Cu grid used). The PXRD pattern with Rietveld refinement
is presented in (d).
[0036] The dilemma in the use of Pt with reduced hydrogen crossover but promoted radical
formation can be addressed by employing a bi-functional catalyst Pt/Ce
xZr
1-xO
2. The substitution of Pt with Pt/Ce
xZr
1-xO
2 concurrently mitigates hydrogen crossover and ionomer degradation. Specifically,
Pt/Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 was synthesized via a one-pot polyol method, with calcination carried out in a reducing
atmosphere. Nano-sized Pt metal particles can be directly formed on the Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 support during the reduction of the Pt(IV)-rich layer in the calcination process
of the as-prepared material. High-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning transmission
electron microscopy (STEM) images of the synthesized catalyst are shown in Figures
5a, b. Pt particles, exhibiting a relatively uniform size distribution, are clearly
identified as brighter regions in the contrast, due to the higher atomic number of
the element. In addition, the spectrum (Figure 5c) obtained from the selected area
(Figure 5b) using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) reveals Pt peaks, including
the Pt Lα peak at ~9.4 keV. The powder X-ray diffraction pattern of the catalyst,
along with Rietveld refinement results, indicates a tetragonal-phase Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 with a quantified Pt phase content of 4.1 wt%. This is consistent with the nominal
Pt loading of 5 wt% to Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 during synthesis (equivalent to a Pt loading of 4.8 wt% in the catalyst).
[0037] Substitution of Pt with a Pt/Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 interlayer near the anode in the composite membrane leads to the configuration
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt/
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (an), as illustrated in Figure 4a. This configuration exhibits the lowest fluoride release
rate, measured at 0.023 (µg·cm
-2·h
-1) at the end of the 100-hour constant current test (Figure 4b). Its average FRR of
0.028 ± 0.008 (µg·cm
-2·h
-1) represents a 3.6-fold reduction compared to
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (ca) (0.10 ± 0.01 (µg·cm
-2·h
-1)). In the meantime, it also demonstrates the lowest H
2 in O
2% (Figure 4c), recorded at 1.6% at 0.5 A/cm
2, corresponding to a 45% decrease relative to
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (an). Given the same Pt loading, this decrease in the recorded H
2 in O
2% may be attributed to the highly dispersed Pt nanoparticles on the Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 support in the Pt/Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 interlayer, providing more active surface area for efficient gas recombination, whereas
they tend to remain agglomerated in the spray-coated Pt interlayer in
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt (ca). Notably, compared to the 7.0% H
2 in O
2% measured in the blank membranes (Figure 2b) at 0.5 A/cm
2, a 4.4-fold reduction is achieved when using the configuration
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt/
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (an).
[0038] The measured FRR allows to estimate the projected lifetime of the membrane. For this,
it is assumed that membrane end of life is marked by a loss of 10% of its fluoride
inventory. For Nafion NR 212 with a dry thickness of 50 mm, assuming a constant FRR
of 0.023 (µg·cm
-2·h
-1) at a cell temperature of 90°C, which was measured at the end of the 100-hour constant
current test, this yields a membrane lifetime of 29,000 h. Compared to blank measurements
without any functional catalyst particle interlayers, it represents a 7.4 times increase
in the projected membrane lifetime. Using an activation energy for membrane degradation
of 58 kJ/mol, this translates to a lifetime of 50,000 h at 80°C and 89,000 h at 70°C.
[0039] It has to be pointed out that other degradation mechanisms and failure modes were
neglected here, such as catalyst aging and mechanical degradation of the membrane,
for example caused by creep. Moreover, it is assumed that the activity of the ceriazirconia
radical scavenger is maintained over this time period. Thus, these results showcase
the effectiveness of the synthesized Pt/Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 embedded as an interlayer in the composite membrane, in mitigating radical-induced
ionomer degradation and hydrogen crossover. Based on the outcomes of the current experimental
work in view of the present invention, the composite membrane
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (ca) - Pt/
Ce0.25Zr0.75O2 (an) demonstrates promising potential for application as next-generation catalyst coated
membranes in PEM water electrolysis cells.
[0040] As shown in Figure 4d, the substitution with a thicker Pt/Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 interlayer compared to Pt results in an increased cell potential in the polarization
curve, mainly due to a pronounced increase in HFR (Figure 4e). This could result from
both an increased membrane thickness and enhanced interfacial effects. Alternative
composite membrane fabrication methods beyond spray coating should be explored to
improve interfacial properties. Additionally, optimizing the loadings of Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2 and Pt/Ce
0.25Zr
0.75O
2, as well as the interlayer ionomer-to-catalyst ratio could help achieve an optimal
balance between membrane electrical resistance and the functional performance of the
interlayer.
[0041] Figure 6 schematically shows again the principle of an electrochemical cell comprising
a composite proton exchange membranes with interlayer structures having a high capability
of an effective radical scavenger and of reducing the hydrogen cross-over when using
thin membranes.
1. Electrochemical cell comprising a catalyst coated membrane, i.e. for use in water
electrolysis, wherein:
i) the membrane is a cation exchange membrane (CEM), in particular a proton exchange
membrane (PEM) or an anion exchange membrane (AEM), in particular a hydroxide exchange
membrane (HEM);
ii) said membrane having a thickness below 100 µm, preferably below 75 mm, more preferably
below 50 mm; and
iii) said membrane comprises an antioxidant (AO) and a gas recombination catalyst
(GRC) in the form of micro and/or nanoparticles, preferably in form of a layer of
antioxidant particles and a layer of gas recombination catalyst particles that are
placed within the membrane close to the cathode side and the anode side, respectively.
2. Electrochemical cell according to claim 1, wherein
the antioxidant is an oxide of the type Ce1-x-y-zM1xM2yM3zO2-d comprising cerium as
a redox-active transition metal, wherein M1 is one or more transition metals, M2 is
one or more lanthanide metals, M3 is one of more noble or heavy metal, with 0 < x,
y, z < 1 and 2-d expresses the oxygen stoichiometry with -0.5 < d < 0.5.
3. Electrochemical cell according to claim 2, wherein
the oxide is of the type cerium oxide (CeO2-d), cerium-zirconium oxide (CexZr1-xO2-d),
cerium-gadolinium oxide (CexGd1-xO2-d), preferably: CexZr1-xO2-d with 0.1≤x≤0.75 and
more preferably 0.2≤x≤0.5, or the oxide is a metal organic framework (MOF) with Ce(III)/Ce(IV)
as metal center, such as Ce-MOF-808.
4. Electrochemical cell according to any of the preceding claims, wherein
the gas recombination catalyst is:
a) a noble metal black, preferably Pt or Pd or an alloy of Pt and Pd, and/or
b) a noble metal, as described in a), supported on the antioxidant, preferably supported
on CexZr1-xO2-d, such as Pt supported on CexZr1-xO2-d (Pt- CexZr1-xO2-d) with a Pt
content with respect to the oxide of preferably 1 to 20 wt-% and more preferably 2
to 10 wt-%, and/or
c) a noble metal, as described in a), inserted into the cavity of a MOF type antioxidant.
5. Electrochemical cell according to any of the preceding claims, wherein
said membrane is a proton exchange membrane of the perfluoroalkylsulfonic acid (PFSA)
type, for example Nafion™ (Chemours), Fumapem® and Fumasep® (Fumatech) or Aquivion® (Syensqo) or a proton exchange membrane of the hydrocarbon type, for example Pemion™ (Ionomr) or an AEM, for example PiperION® (Versogen), Aemion™ (Ionomr), Aemion+™ (Ionomr), Duraion® (Creavis), Durion™ (Xergy), Fumasep® (Fumatech), Sustainion® (Dioxide Materials).
6. Electrochemical cell according to any of the preceding claims, wherein
the antioxidant particles are mixed with the same type of ionomer, optionally with
a different equivalent weight, in dispersed form, that the membrane is made of and
the resulting slurry is deposited onto the cathode side of the membrane by one or
more of:
a) coating
b) printing
c) spraying
d) decal transfer,
wherein an antioxidant (AO) loading ranges from 0.01 to 2 mgAO/cm2, more preferably
0.05 to 0.2 mgAO/cm2, with a layer thickness of <10 µm, and wherein a further layer
of the pure ionomer is added by one of the afore-mentioned methods with a thickness
of less than 10 µm;
or
the antioxidant particles are incorporated into a cathode catalyst layer comprising
an electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), for example Pt/carbon,
with a preferable load of the antioxidant (AO) in the range from 0.01 to 2 mgAO/cm2,
more preferably 0.05 to 0.2 mgAO/cm2, and wherein the HER catalyst is a Pt/carbon
catalyst, and the Pt loading of the cathode catalyst layer is preferably between 0.010
and 0.40 mgPt/cm2, more preferably between 0.025 and 0.10 mgPt/cm2.
7. Electrochemical cell according to any of the preceding claims, wherein
the gas recombination catalyst particles are mixed with the same type of ionomer,
in dispersed form, that the membrane is made of, and the resulting slurry is deposited
onto the anode side of the membrane, by one or more of
a) coating;
b) printing;
c) spraying;
d) decal transfer;
wherein a load of the gas recombination catalyst in terms of its noble metal content
ranges from 0.001 to 0.1 mg(noble metal /cm2, more preferably 0.02 to 0.05 mg(noble
metal)/cm2, with a layer thickness below 10 µm and wherein a further layer of the
pure ionomer is added by one of afore-mentioned methods with a thickness of less than
10 µm.
8. Electrochemical cell according to any of the preceding claims, wherein
the catalyst coated membrane (CCM) is prepared by coating an anode and cathode catalyst
layer onto the composite membrane comprising a layer of the gas recombination catalyst
particles near the anode side of the membrane and a layer of the antioxidant particles
near the cathode side of the membrane, unless the antioxidant particles are incorporated
into the cathode catalyst layer.
9. Electrochemical cell according to any of the preceding claims, wherein
the composition of the anode catalyst layer comprises a catalyst for the oxygen evolution
reaction (OER), such as IrOx, IrOx supported on TiO2, IrOx supported on another oxide;
or IrRuOx, IrRuOx supported on oxide; or, in the case of AEMWE, any oxide containing
transition metals, such as NiFe layered double hydroxide (LDH)-based electrocatalyst,
and an ionomer, which optionally is of the same type as the ionomer constituting the
membrane, or of a different class of ionomer.
10. Electrochemical cell according to any of the preceding claims, wherein
the composition of the cathode catalyst layer comprises a catalyst for the hydrogen
evolution reaction (HER), such as Pt black or Pt supported on carbon (Pt/C), or Pd
black or Pd supported on carbon (Pd/C), or an alloy black containing Pt or Pd or both,
or a carbon supported catalyst containing Pt or Pd or both, and an ionomer, which
optionally is of the same type as the ionomer constituting the membrane, or of a different
class of ionomer.
11. Electrochemical cell according to any of the preceding claims, wherein
for the deposition process, an ink is formed from the respective catalyst and the
respective ionomer using a solvent to obtain a slurry or paste, wherein the solvent
is an organic solvent, water, or a mixture thereof.
12. Electrochemical cell according to any of the preceding claims, wherein
the anode and the cathode catalyst layer are deposited by one of more of:
a) coating
b) printing
c) spraying
d) decal transfer.
13. Electrochemical cell according to any of the preceding claims, wherein
the catalyst coated membrane CCM is assembled into a water electrolyzer cell with
the addition of the following components:
i) a carbon based gas diffusion layer (GDL) on the cathode side
ii) a titanium based porous transport layer (PTL) on the anode side
iii) optionally a sub-gasket for edge protection; and
iv) suitable seals and gaskets.