[Technical Field]
[0001] The present invention primarily relates to a technology for manufacturing a high-carbon
steel product, such as cutting tools, such as saw blades.
[0002] More specifically, the present invention relates to a high-carbon hot-rolled steel
sheet suitable for manufacturing a high-carbon steel product with excellent weldability
and impact toughness, and a high-carbon steel sheet product using the same.
[0003] In addition, the present invention relates to a method of manufacturing a high-carbon
hot-rolled steel sheet and a method of manufacturing a high-carbon steel product.
[Background Art]
[0004] Demand for saw blade materials, necessary for cutting wood, stone, metal, and other
materials used in civil engineering, construction, and other fields, is increasing.
Saw blades need to rotate at high speeds to cut materials and withstand axial and
radial stresses during cutting, and thus materials suitable for the saw blades require
high levels of hardness, rigidity, fatigue strength, and impact toughness.
[0005] In addition, since a cemented carbide is locally welded to the tooth portion of a
saw blade in order to maximize hardness and wear resistance, weldability is required.
[0006] In the manufacture of high-carbon steel products for cutting, techniques for refining
tempered martensite grains are known to satisfy both hardness and impact toughness.
To this end, a prior austenite grain size needs to be refined during the quenching.
Grain refinement is known to improve impact toughness by effectively impeding crack
propagation along grain boundaries.
[0007] Methods of refining an austenite grain size are generally classified into a method
using precipitates and a method of lowering a quenching temperature. The method using
a large amount of precipitates refines the grain size using a phenomenon in which
the precipitates are pinned at grain boundaries, and the method of lowering the heat
treatment temperature suppresses the growth of austenite grains.
[0008] However, since precipitates formed along the grain boundaries have significantly
higher hardness than a base metal, cracks caused by differences in mechanical properties
may easily propagate, thereby posing a risk of reduced impact toughness. In addition,
when the austenite grain size is reduced, it is difficult to secure sufficient hardness
during quenching, and this is because pearlite transformation occurs at the grain
boundaries during the quenching, such that not all austenite is transformed into martensite
and a portion of pearlite remains formed.
[Disclosure]
[Technical Problem]
[0009] The present invention is directed to providing a high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet
suitable for manufacturing a high-carbon steel product with superior weldability and
impact toughness through alloy composition and microstructure control, and a method
of manufacturing the same.
[0010] In addition, the present invention is directed to providing a high-carbon steel product
with excellent weldability and impact toughness through heat treatment process control
along with alloy composition and microstructure control, and a method of manufacturing
the same.
[Technical Solution]
[0011] A high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention
includes 0.70 to 0.90 wt% of C; 0.2 to 0.6 wt% of Mn; 0.1 to 0.5 wt% of Si; 0.1 to
0.5 wt% of Cr; 0.007 to 0.015 wt% of Al; 0.4 to 2.0 wt% of Ni; 0.1 wt% or less (including
0 wt%) of V; and the balance of Fe and inevitable impurities and has a microstructure
including 90 area% or more of pearlite.
[0012] The high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet may preferably satisfy Expression 1 below.
([ ] denotes wt% of corresponding component), and
AlN precipitates may be present and precipitates containing at least one of V, Nb,
and Ti may not be present.
[0013] A method of manufacturing a high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet according to an embodiment
of the present invention includes reheating a steel material including 0.70 to 0.90
wt% of C; 0.2 to 0.6 wt% of Mn; 0.1 to 0.5 wt% of Si; 0.1 to 0.5 wt% of Cr; 0.007
to 0.015 wt% of Al; 0.4 to 2.0 wt% of Ni; 0.1 wt% or less (including 0 wt%) of V;
and the balance of Fe and inevitable impurities at 1050 to 1300 °C, hot-rolling the
steel material at a finishing rolling temperature of 800 to 1150 °C, and cooling the
steel material to 550 to 750°C and coiling the cooled steel material.
[0014] The steel material may preferably satisfy Expression 1 below.

([ ] denotes wt% of corresponding component), and
a precipitate containing at least one of V, Nb, and Ti may not be generated during
the cooling.
[0015] A high-carbon steel product according to an embodiment of the present invention includes
0.70 to 0.90 wt% of C; 0.2 to 0.6 wt% of Mn; 0.1 to 0.5 wt% of Si; 0.1 to 0.5 wt%
of Cr; 0.007 to 0.015 wt% of Al; 0.4 to 2.0 wt% of Ni; 0.1 wt% or less (including
0 wt%) of V; and the balance of Fe and inevitable impurities and having a microstructure
including tempered martensite, wherein the tempered martensite has an average grain
size of 17 µm or more.
[0016] The tempered martensite may have an average grain size of 30 to 40 µm.
[0017] The microstructure may consist of a single phase of tempered martensite.
[0018] The high-carbon steel product may satisfy Expression 1 below.

([ ] denotes wt% of corresponding component), and
AlN precipitates may be present and precipitates containing at least one of V, Nb,
and Ti may not be present.
[0019] A method of manufacturing a high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet according to an embodiment
of the present invention includes cold-working a high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet
including 0.70 to 0.90 wt% of C; 0.2 to 0.6 wt% of Mn; 0.1 to 0.5 wt% of Si; 0.1 to
0.5 wt% of Cr; 0.007 to 0.015 wt% of Al; 0.4 to 2.0 wt% of Ni; 0.1 wt% or less (including
0 wt%) of V; and the balance of Fe and inevitable impurities, heating and maintaining
the cold-worked product at a temperature of 850 to 950 °C for 1 to 90 minutes and
then cooling the product at an average cooling rate of 7 °C/sec or more, and tempering
the quenched product.
[0020] The method may further include, prior to the cold working, spheroidizing annealing
the high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet.
[0021] The high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet may satisfy Expression 1 below.

([ ] denotes wt% of corresponding component).
[0022] The average grain size of the austenite produced by the heating and maintaining process
may be 17 µm or more. The average grain size of the austenite produced by the heating
and maintaining process may range from 30 to 40 µm.
[Advantageous Effects]
[0023] According to the present invention, the steel product with excellent weldability
and impact toughness can be manufactured by controlling alloying elements such as
C, Al, and Ni, preventing refinement of austenite grain size by precipitates, and
controlling a quenching temperature.
[0024] Specifically, according to the present invention, the steel product manufactured
through the alloy composition, microstructure, and heat treatment control can exhibit
high hardness of 650 Hv or more together with excellent impact toughness, and thus
is suitable for use as a cutting material such as a saw blade.
[0025] Specific effects together with the above effects are described together with a description
of the following detailed matters for carrying out the invention.
[Mode for Invention]
[0026] Advantages and features of the present invention and methods for achieving them will
become clear with reference to various embodiments, which will be described in detail
below. However, the present disclosure is not limited to the embodiments disclosed
below but can be implemented in various different forms, the embodiments are merely
provided to make the disclosure of the present disclosure complete and fully inform
those skilled in the art to which the present disclosure pertains of the scope of
the present disclosure, and the present disclosure is only defined by the scope of
the appended claims.
[0027] Hereinafter, a high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet, a high-carbon steel product using
the same, and a method of manufacturing the same according to a preferred embodiment
of the present invention will be described in detail.
[0028] The present invention primarily relates to a high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet suitable
for manufacturing steel products such as saw blades for wood cutting, stone cutting,
and circular saws, a high-carbon steel product using the same, and a method of manufacturing
the same.
[0029] For example, saw blades need to rotate at high speeds to cut materials and withstand
axial and radial stresses during cutting, and thus materials suitable for the saw
blades require high levels of hardness, rigidity, fatigue strength, and impact toughness.
In addition, since a cemented carbide is locally welded to the tooth portion of a
saw blade in order to maximize hardness and wear resistance, weldability is required.
In summary, cutting materials such as saw blades need to satisfy high hardness, excellent
impact toughness, and weldability.
[0030] Hardness and weldability are largely determined by the alloy composition of the material.
As the content of alloying elements, such as carbon (C), silicon (Si), nickel (Ni),
etc., increases, hardness improves due to the solid solution strengthening effect,
and adding vanadium (V) also enhances hardness by forming hard carbides. On the other
hand, these elements affect the structure of a heat-affected zone when exposed to
high temperatures, promoting property differences between a melt zone and a base metal,
resulting in poor weldability.
[0031] In manufacturing materials with superior hardness and impact toughness, not only
the alloy composition but also the microstructure significantly influences these properties.
It is known that refining a prior austenite grain size and increasing the grain boundary
area effectively impedes crack propagation, thereby improving impact toughness.
[0032] The most representative method is to use a large amount of precipitates. However,
this method can actually reduce impact toughness. Generally, since precipitates formed
along the grain boundaries have significantly higher hardness than a base metal, cracks
caused by differences in mechanical properties may easily propagate, thereby posing
a risk of reduced impact toughness.
[0033] In addition, when the austenite grain size is reduced, it is difficult to secure
sufficient hardness during quenching, and this is because pearlite transformation
occurs at the grain boundaries during the quenching, such that not all austenite is
transformed into martensite and a portion of pearlite remains formed. During the cooling
process, the number of grain boundaries capable of forming pearlite, rather than martensite,
increases, reducing hardenability, which increases a critical cooling rate required
to secure martensite by cooling within an austenite single-phase temperature range
during the quenching, thereby deteriorating heat treatment characteristics.
[0034] Accordingly, a high alloying element content is required to secure high hardness
characteristics, and weldability requires a low alloying element content. While fine
austenite grain size is essential for improving impact toughness, excessive use of
precipitates to refine grain size can actually reduce impact toughness. In addition,
small grain sizes can prevent uniform martensite formation during the quenching.
[0035] The present invention provides a high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet that simultaneously
considers alloying elements and microstructure to secure both weldability and impact
toughness, a high-carbon steel product using the same, and a method of manufacturing
the same.
[0036] A high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention
contains 0.70 to 0.90 wt% of carbon (C), 0.2 to 0.6 wt% of manganese (Mn), 0.1 to
0.5 wt% of silicon (Si), 0.1 to 0.5 wt% of chromium (Cr), 0.007 to 0.015 wt% of aluminum
(Al), 0.4 to 2.0 wt% of nickel (Ni), 0.1 wt% or less (including 0 wt%) of vanadium
(V), the balance of Fe, and inevitable impurities.
[0037] Hereinafter, the roles and contents of each component included in a high-carbon hot-rolled
steel sheet according to the present invention will be described.
Carbon (C): 0.7 to 0.9 wt%
[0038] Carbon stably forms austenite and is an alloying element that most significantly
influences the enhancement of the strength and hardness of steel. Carbon is also the
most important element that enhances hardenability and determines the hardness of
martensite after quenching.
[0039] As the carbon content increases, brittleness increases and toughness decreases, and
thus, it is preferable to adjust the carbon content according to the application and
required level.
[0040] From the perspective of manufacturing high-hardness steel products suitable for cutting
materials such as saw blades, when the carbon content is less than 0.7 wt%, it is
difficult to form hard carbides in addition to the martensitic matrix after quenching
or quenching and tempering, which can reduce wear resistance.
[0041] When the carbon content exceeds 0.9 wt%, a large amount of carbides precipitate at
grain boundaries, drastically reducing toughness, making it difficult to maintain
the required level of impact toughness even after heat treatment.
[0042] From this perspective, the appropriate carbon content ranges from 0.7 to 0.9 wt%,
more preferably from 0.75 to 0.85 wt%.
Manganese (Mn): 0.2 to 0.6 wt%
[0043] Manganese combines with the impurity sulfur to improve the cleanliness of steel.
In addition, manganese has an effect of slightly increasing strength and hardness
through solid solution strengthening and improve the hardenability of steel to facilitate
the formation of martensite even at a slow cooling rate. For this effect, manganese
needs to be added in an amount of 0.2 wt% or more. On the other hand, when the manganese
content exceeds 0.6 wt%, segregation layers may be formed, which may deteriorate the
workability of the steel.
[0044] From this perspective, the appropriate manganese content ranges from 0.2 to 0.6 wt%,
more preferably from 0.3 to 0.5 wt%.
Silicon (Si): 0.1 to 0.5 wt%
[0045] Silicon has a high affinity for oxygen and is used for deoxidation. Silicon is an
element that stably forms ferrite and, when dissolved in ferrite, can improve strength.
For this effect, silicon needs to be added in an amount of 0.1 wt% or more. On the
other hand, excessive silicon additions exceeding 0.5 wt% can deteriorate hot workability
and toughness and hinder scale exfoliation at high temperatures, deteriorating the
surface quality of hot-rolled steel.
[0046] From this perspective, the appropriate silicon content ranges from 0.1 to 0.5 wt%,
more preferably from 0.2 to 0.4 wt%.
Chromium (Cr): 0.1 to 0.5 wt%
[0047] Chromium is a ferrite-stabilizing element that secures hardenability. For this effect,
chromium needs to be added in an amount of 0.1 wt% or more.
[0048] Conversely, excessive chromium content exceeding 0.5 wt% can lead to the formation
of chromium oxide during the welding process, leading to weld embrittlement.
[0049] From this perspective, the appropriate chromium content ranges from 0.1 to 0.5 wt%,
more preferably from 0.2 to 0.4 wt%.
Aluminum (Al): 0.007 to 0.015 wt%
[0050] Aluminum has a high affinity for oxygen and is used for deoxidation. In addition,
when precipitate-forming elements such as Nb, Ti, and V are not substantially included,
nitrogen may combine with aluminum to form AlN during a hot-rolled steel sheet manufacturing
process, thereby suppressing excessive grain growth, and to this end, aluminum needs
to be added in an amount of 0.007 wt% or more.
[0051] On the other hand, when the aluminum content exceeds 0.015 wt%, the amount of alumina-based
inclusions increases, which may cause undesirable grain refinement and consequently
deterioration of toughness.
[0052] From this perspective, the appropriate aluminum content ranges from 0.007 to 0.015
wt%, more preferably from 0.008 to 0.012 wt%.
Nickel (Ni): 0.4 to 2.0 wt%
[0053] Nickel is an element that stably forms austenite. Although nickel does not significantly
affect the strength and hardness of steel, it does not form high-hardness precipitates,
and thus even with large additions, toughness is not significantly reduced. In particular,
nickel enhances hardenability, ensuring the stable formation of martensite even at
slow cooling rates after quenching. For this effect, nickel needs to be added in an
amount of 0.4 wt% or more.
[0054] On the other hand, adding nickel in excess of 2.0 wt% can increase the fraction of
retained austenite after heat treatment, thereby reducing hardness.
[0055] From this perspective, the appropriate nickel content ranges from 0.4 to 2.0 wt%,
more preferably from 0.8 to 1.85 wt%.
Vanadium (V): 0.1 wt% or less (including 0 wt%)
[0056] Vanadium combines with carbon to form hard carbides, thereby improving strength,
hardness, and wear resistance and in particular, compensates for the hardness loss
caused by precipitates formed during tempering.
[0057] However, when vanadium is added excessively, precipitates can significantly promote
austenite grain refinement, thereby degrading impact toughness.
[0058] From this perspective, vanadium is omitted, or, if added, its content is preferably
0.1 wt% or less.
[0059] In addition to the above composition, the steel of the present invention may contain
the balance of iron (Fe) and inevitable impurities. The inevitable impurities may
be unintentionally incorporated during typical manufacturing processes and thus cannot
be excluded.
[0060] The high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention preferably
satisfies Expression 1 below:

([ ] denotes wt% of corresponding component)
[0061] Expression 1 represents a type of carbon equivalent (Ceq), and a lower value thereof
indicates improved weldability. When the value of Equation 1 exceeds 0.94, the carbon
equivalent may be impaired due to excessive alloying elements. That is, when the elements
included in Expression 1 are excessive, it affects the structure of a heat-affected
zone when exposed to high temperatures during welding and promotes property differences
between a melt zone and a base metal, thereby deteriorating welding characteristics.
[0062] To easily achieve Expression 1, the C content is more preferably added in an amount
of 0.85 wt% or less.
[0063] Meanwhile, the lower limit of Expression 1 is preferably 0.80 or more, more preferably
0.84 or more, to secure sufficient hardness.
[0064] The high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention may have
a microstructure containing 90 area% or more of pearlite through the hot rolling process
to be described below, in addition to the alloying composition. In addition to pearlite,
cementite, austenite, bainite, etc. may be added in an amount of 10 area% or less.
Meanwhile, the high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention
may contain AlN precipitates, but may not contain precipitates containing at least
one of the representative precipitate-forming elements, Nb and Ti. Furthermore, in
some embodiments in which V is not included, precipitates containing V may also be
absent.
[0065] The high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention may be
manufactured by a method including the following operations of reheating, hot rolling,
and coiling a steel material having the above alloy composition.
Reheating and hot rolling
[0066] A steel material, such as a slab, having the above alloy composition is manufactured
using a converter or electric furnace, and then reheated at a temperature of 1050
°C or higher and 1300 °C or lower for 270 minutes or less. Reheating can promote homogenization
of the steel.
[0067] The homogenized steel slab is hot-rolled at 800 °C or higher. The finishing rolling
temperature preferably ranges from 800 to 1150 °C, preferably from 800 to 1000 °C,
and more preferably from 820 to 920 °C. When the finishing rolling temperature is
800 °C or lower, hot rolling may be performed in an austenite-ferrite coexistence
region or an austenite-cementite coexistence region, which may lead to plate fracture
due to deformation imbalance at a phase interface. On the other hand, when the finishing
rolling temperature is 1150 °C or higher, excessive scale formation may deteriorate
surface quality.
Coiling
[0068] Coiling within an appropriate temperature range determines the shape of a material.
Immediately after hot rolling, a hot-rolled steel sheet is preferably cooled to a
temperature of 550 to 750 °C, preferably 600 to 700 °C, and then coiled. When coiling
is performed at a temperature lower than 550 °C, low-temperature microstructures such
as bainite, martensite, etc. may be locally formed in a width or length direction,
distorting the shape of the material, thereby leading to property differences or edge
cracking. When coiling is performed at a temperature higher than 750 °C, excessive
scale formation may deteriorate surface quality.
[0069] In the present invention, since the alloy composition does not include Nb and Ti,
precipitates containing at least one of Nb and Ti are not formed during cooling. Furthermore,
when V is not included, precipitates containing V may not be formed either.
[0070] Through the above process, a microstructure containing pearlite of 90 area% or more
can be obtained, and other elements such as cementite, austenite, bainite, etc. may
be added in an amount of 10 area% or less.
[0071] Hereinafter, a high-carbon steel product using the high-carbon hot-rolled steel sheet
and a method of manufacturing the same according to the present invention will be
described.
Spheroidizing annealing
[0072] Materials having a microstructure primarily composed of pearlite cannot be easily
processed due to high strength and hardness thereof. Spheroidizing annealing softens
the material into a ferrite and spherical cementite microstructure, significantly
reducing strength and hardness, making room-temperature processing, such as rolling,
forging, pressing, punching, etc., much easier.
[0073] The spheroidizing annealing may be performed within a temperature range of 650 to
750 °C. When maintained at a temperature lower than 650 °C, spheroidization becomes
difficult, requiring a prolonged time and resulting in a very low spheroidization
ratio. At temperatures of 750 °C or higher, a portion of the austenite phase may be
stably formed, which may cause pearlite transformation.
[0074] Depending on the circumstances, the spheroidizing annealing may be omitted.
Cold working
[0075] Cold working may be performed at room temperature using known methods, such as rolling,
forging, pressing, punching, etc. to obtain the desired shape of a product.
Quenching and tempering
[0076] The method of manufacturing a steel product according to the present invention performs
quenching and tempering to impart hardness and toughness to the steel product. For
example, in the case of steel products for cutting purposes, such as blades and saw
blades, high hardness and high toughness are required, and thus quenching and tempering
are performed to simultaneously satisfy these properties.
[0077] In the present invention, the quenching is performed by heating and maintaining the
material at a temperature of 850 °C or higher to secure an austenite microstructure,
and then cooling the material at a rate of 7 °C/s or more to transform it into a martensite
structure.
[0078] The heating and maintaining process is specifically performed at 850 to 950 °C, preferably
860 to 920 °C, and more preferably 870 to 900 °C, for 1 to 90 minutes, preferably
10 to 60 minutes, and more preferably 20 to 50 minutes. When a heating and maintaining
temperature is lower than 850 °C or a heating and maintaining time is less than 1
minute, sufficient austenite cannot be secured, making it difficult to secure a martensite
microstructure after cooling, and in addition, it is difficult to obtain the desired
coarse austenite grain size. On the other hand, when the heating and maintaining temperature
exceeds 950 °C or the heating and maintaining time exceeds 90 minutes, there is a
risk of excessive austenite grain growth, for example, exceeding 40 µm.
[0079] The average grain size of the austenite produced by the heating and maintaining process
may be 17 µm or more. This contrasts with conventional techniques aimed at minimizing
austenite grain size. In addition, in some embodiments, vanadium (V) may not be included,
and in this case, the average grain size of the austenite formed by the heating and
maintaining process may range from 30 to 40 µm.
[0080] Cooling may be performed using water cooling, oil cooling, etc., more preferably
water cooling. The key to the present invention is to secure the highest possible
fraction of martensite during cooling. Hardenability, which refers to the ability
to secure martensite, is influenced by factors such as microstructure, alloy composition,
etc. In the present invention, cooling is preferably performed at an average cooling
rate of 7 °C/s or more. When the average cooling rate is less than 7 °C/s, structures
such as bainite, pearlite, etc. may be formed. When the average cooling rate is 7
°C/s or more, 100 area% of martensite can be secured. Meanwhile, in the present invention,
the addition of 0.1 to 0.5 wt% of Cr and 0.4 to 2.0 wt% of Ni enhances hardenability
without impairing toughness, enabling complete quenching even at an average cooling
rate of 20 °C/s or less. Accordingly, the quenching applied to the method of manufacturing
a steel product according to the present invention is preferably performed at an average
cooling rate of 7 °C/s or more, more preferably 7 to 20 °C/s, and even more preferably
10 to 20 °C/s.
[0081] Through the quenching, a high-hardness martensitic structure with a hardness of 650
Hv or higher can be obtained. However, materials subjected to the quenching have poor
room-temperature impact toughness of less than 2 J and thus secure impact toughness
through sufficient tempering.
[0082] Tempering may be performed by maintaining the quenched material within a temperature
range of 150 to 600 °C, more preferably 300 to 500 °C, for 1 to 180 minutes, preferably
10 to 90 minutes, and more preferably 20 to 60 minutes and then cooling the quenched
material to secure a tempered martensite microstructure. A temperature region less
than150 °C has little effect on eliminating dislocations, whereas a temperature region
of 600 °C or higher causes excessive reduction in hardness, making it difficult to
secure desired mechanical properties. A heat treatment time of less than 1 minute
is insufficient for even heating of the material, and a heat treatment time exceeding
180 minutes results in convergence and ineffectiveness.
[0083] Cooling after the tempering may be performed, for example, by exposing the material
to air at room temperature.
[0084] The high-carbon steel product according to the embodiment of the present invention
contains 0.70 to 0.90 wt% of C, 0.2 to 0.6 wt% of Mn, 0.1 to 0.5 wt% of Si, 0.1 to
0.5 wt% of Cr, 0.007 to 0.015 wt% of Al, 0.4 to 2.0 wt% of Ni, 0.1 wt% or less (including
0 wt%) of V, the balance of iron (Fe), and inevitable impurities and has a microstructure
containing tempered martensite through quenching and tempering. Preferably, the high-carbon
steel product according to the present invention has a microstructure composed of
a single phase of tempered martensite.
[0085] In the present invention, the average austenite grain size is 17 µm or more during
quenching, which may directly lead to the grain size of tempered martensite. Accordingly,
for the high-carbon steel product according to the present invention, the average
grain size of tempered martensite may be 17 µm or more. In some embodiments in which
V is not included, the average grain size of tempered martensite may range from 30
to 40 µm.
Examples
[0086] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail through an example.
However, it should be noted that the examples to be described below are intended only
to illustrate and describe the present invention in more detail and are not intended
to limit the scope of the present invention.
[0087] Table 1 shows chemical compositions of steel specimens prepared for the present invention,
with the balance of Fe and inevitable impurities.
[Table 1]
| |
C |
Mn |
Si |
Ni |
Cr |
V |
Al |
A |
| Steel in Example 1 |
0.79 |
0.38 |
0.19 |
1.82 |
0.25 |
0 |
0.012 |
0.88 |
| Steel in Example 2 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
1.34 |
0.25 |
0 |
0.01 |
0.88 |
| Steel in Example 3 |
0.82 |
0.4 |
0.21 |
0.9 |
0.25 |
0 |
0.007 |
0.87 |
| Steel in Example 4 |
0.81 |
0.41 |
0.21 |
0.46 |
0.25 |
0 |
0.010 |
0.84 |
| Steel in Example 5 |
0.8 |
0.41 |
0.41 |
1.79 |
0.25 |
0 |
0.010 |
0.90 |
| Steel in Example 6 |
0.79 |
0.41 |
0.42 |
1.35 |
0.25 |
0 |
0.008 |
0.88 |
| Steel in Example 7 |
0.8 |
0.39 |
0.2 |
1.81 |
0.25 |
0.095 |
0.010 |
0.90 |
| Steel in Example 8 |
0.79 |
0.41 |
0.31 |
1.36 |
0.25 |
0.1 |
0.008 |
0.88 |
| Steel in Example 9 |
0.8 |
0.42 |
0.4 |
1.81 |
0.25 |
0.098 |
0.010 |
0.91 |
| Steel in Example 10 |
0.8 |
0.41 |
0.4 |
1.36 |
0.25 |
0.1 |
0.011 |
0.90 |
| Steel in Comparative example 1 |
0.79 |
0.39 |
0.45 |
1.83 |
0.25 |
0.49 |
0.011 |
0.95 |
| Steel in Comparative example 2 |
0.81 |
0.41 |
0.46 |
1.33 |
0.25 |
0.51 |
0.009 |
0.95 |
| Steel in Comparative example 3 |
0.79 |
0.38 |
0.19 |
1.82 |
0.25 |
0 |
0.003 |
0.88 |
| Steel in Comparative example 4 |
0.79 |
0.38 |
0.19 |
1.82 |
0.25 |
0 |
0.020 |
0.88 |

([ ] denotes wt% of corresponding component)
[0088] The steel specimens listed in Table 1 were each reheated at 1250 °C for 2 hours,
hot-rolled to a thickness of 6 mm under finishing rolling conditions at 850 °C, and
then coiled at 620 °C to manufacture hot-rolled steel sheets.
[0089] The hot-rolled steel sheets were quenched at 880 °C for 30 minutes and then cooled
in water at room temperature. After quenching, the steel sheets were tempered at 300
°C, 400 °C, and 500 °C for 40 minutes, and then cooling in air at room temperature.
[0090] The fraction of tempered martensite and the average grain size of the tempered martensite
in the final tempered steel specimens were measured under a microscope, and the average
grain size of the austenite was derived from the observed tempered martensite.
[Table 2]
| Expression 1 (A) |
Hot-rolled steel sheet Microstructure |
Austenite Average grain size (µm) (B) |
B/A |
Tempered martensite |
| Pearlite fraction (%) |
Fraction (%) |
Average grain size (µm) |
| Steel in Example 1 |
0.88 |
97.3 |
30.0 |
34.1 |
100% |
30.0 |
| Steel in Example 2 |
0.88 |
98.7 |
31.7 |
36.0 |
100% |
31.7 |
| Steel in Example 3 |
0.87 |
99.1 |
30.1 |
34.6 |
100% |
30.1 |
| Steel in Example 4 |
0.84 |
99 |
30.0 |
35.7 |
100% |
30.0 |
| Steel in Example 5 |
0.90 |
97.9 |
36.3 |
40.3 |
100% |
36.3 |
| Steel in Example 6 |
0.88 |
98.8 |
32.3 |
36.7 |
100% |
32.3 |
| Steel in Example 7 |
0.90 |
96.9 |
25.2 |
28.0 |
100% |
25.2 |
| Steel in Example 8 |
0.88 |
98.7 |
23.5 |
26.7 |
100% |
23.5 |
| Steel in Example 9 |
0.91 |
97.7 |
19.5 |
21.4 |
100% |
19.5 |
| Steel in Example 10 |
0.90 |
98.3 |
17.0 |
18.9 |
100% |
17.0 |
| Steel in Comparative example 1 |
0.95 |
96.8 |
5.4 |
5.7 |
100% |
5.4 |
| Steel in Comparative example 2 |
0.95 |
96.1 |
6.3 |
6.6 |
100% |
6.3 |
| Steel in Comparative example 3 |
0.88 |
99.3 |
51.7 |
58.8 |
100% |
51.7 |
| Steel in Comparative example 4 |
0.88 |
96.3 |
4.6 |
5.2 |
100% |
4.6 |
| Steel in Comparative example 5 |
0.88 |
97.5 |
21.0 |
23.9 |
99.4 |
21.0 |
| Steel in Comparative example 6 |
0.88 |
97.2 |
25.4 |
28.9 |
99.7 |
25.4 |

([ ] denotes wt% of corresponding component)
[0091] The steel in Comparative example 3 has the same steel composition and manufacturing
process as the steel in Example 1, but the result was obtained from a specimen containing
only 0.005 wt% of Al in the steel composition, and the steel in Comparative example
4 has the same steel composition and manufacturing process as the steel in Example
1, but the result was obtained from a specimen containing an excessive 0.02 wt% of
Al in the steel composition.
[0092] The steel in Comparative example 5 has the same steel composition and manufacturing
process as the steel in Example 1, but when a quenching temperature is 820 °C, the
steel in Comparative example 6 has the same steel composition and manufacturing process
as the steel in Example 1, but the result was obtained from a specimen having the
quenching temperature of 840 °C.
[0093] Referring to Table 2, all of the steels in Examples 1 to 10 and the steels in Comparative
examples 1 to 6 exhibited 90% or more of pearlite in the hot-rolled material. However,
the steels in Examples 1 to 10 exhibited an average austenite grain size of 17 µm
or more after quenching, whereas the steels in Comparative examples 1 and 2 exhibited
an average austenite grain size of only 5 to 7 µm. In addition, when comparing the
steels in Examples 1 to 10 with the steels in Examples 1 to 6, the specimens according
to the steels in Examples 1 to 6, which do not contain V, exhibited the average austenite
grain size of 30 to 40 µm. Meanwhile, the steel in Comparative example 3 containing
only 0.005 wt% of Al exhibited an average austenite grain size exceeding 50 µm, whereas
the steel in Comparative example having an excessive 0.02 wt% of Al exhibited an average
austenite grain size of less than 5 µm.
[0094] Furthermore, as a result of dividing the average austenite grain size (B) by the
value (A) obtained from Expression 1, the specimens according to the steels in Examples
1 to 10 exhibited a B/A of 18 or more, whereas the steels in Comparative examples
1 and 2 exhibited a B/A of 5 to 7. In addition, when comparing the steels in Examples
1 to 10 with the steels in Examples 1 to 6, which do not contain V, the B/A exceeded
30. This B/A indicates that the austenite grain size may be coarsened to a target
size using alloying compositions, such as aluminum, that do not significantly change
the carbon equivalent.
[0095] In addition, the steels in Examples 1 to 10, which satisfy the alloying compositions
and quenching temperatures proposed in the present invention, exhibited the target
tempered martensite single-phase microstructure. However, for the steels in Comparative
examples 5 and 6, which have the same steel composition and manufacturing process
as the steel in Example 1 but were quenched at 820 °C and 840 °C, respectively, the
target tempered martensite single phase could not be achieved.
[0096] Table 3 shows the room-temperature impact toughness and hardness values of steels
subjected to quenching and tempering.
[0097] The room-temperature impact toughness was measured using V-notched specimens machined
according to ISO 148-1, and the test was repeated three times, and the impact toughness
values were converted into values at 10 mm thickness in consideration of the thickness
of the material.
[0098] The hardness was measured using a Vickers hardness test with a load of 10 kgf, and
the results were obtained from 10 repeated tests.
[Table 3]
| |
Impact toughness (J, cm) |
Vickers hardness (Hv, 10 kgf) |
| |
Quen ching |
Tempe ring at 300 °C |
Tempe ring at 400 °C |
Tempe ring at 500 °C |
Quenc hing |
Tempe ring at 300 °C |
Tempe ring at 400 °C |
Tempe ring at 500 °C |
| Steel in Example 1 |
0.2 |
2.0 |
8.9 |
21.1 |
697.6 |
613.6 |
456.1 |
366.8 |
| Steel in Example 2 |
0.2 |
1.1 |
8.9 |
24.5 |
725.6 |
627.0 |
470.4 |
364.7 |
| Steel in Example 3 |
0.0 |
1.4 |
8.4 |
22.8 |
770.7 |
617.2 |
485.7 |
368.5 |
| Steel in Example 4 |
0.0 |
1.6 |
8.1 |
21.9 |
777.2 |
628.7 |
474.0 |
379.4 |
| Steel in Example 5 |
0.2 |
1.1 |
7.9 |
19.4 |
752.9 |
639.4 |
460.9 |
387.6 |
| Steel in Example 6 |
0.0 |
1.1 |
8.6 |
20.6 |
723.0 |
652.7 |
474.4 |
383.6 |
| Steel in Example 7 |
0.6 |
2.7 |
8.7 |
17.7 |
736.4 |
635.2 |
486.8 |
402.2 |
| Steel in Example 8 |
0.2 |
1.8 |
8.7 |
20.4 |
786.9 |
643.2 |
496.9 |
397.0 |
| Steel in Example 9 |
1.8 |
1.4 |
8.1 |
11.9 |
748.9 |
635.0 |
492.3 |
420.0 |
| Steel in Example 10 |
1.6 |
1.4 |
8.1 |
12.4 |
784.1 |
650.6 |
508.3 |
420.2 |
| Steel in Comparative example 1 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
3.4 |
6.7 |
792.8 |
665.8 |
511.3 |
431.5 |
| Steel in Comparative example 2 |
1.9 |
1.2 |
3.7 |
7.4 |
798.1 |
658.7 |
509.4 |
428.9 |
| Steel in Comparative example 3 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
1.7 |
6.3 |
767.8 |
654.1 |
534.2 |
452.9 |
| Steel in Comparative example 4 |
0.1 |
0.9 |
2.4 |
5.7 |
734.5 |
631.2 |
487.5 |
418.7 |
| Steel in Comparative example 5 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.9 |
2.1 |
657.7 |
572.7 |
424.1 |
354.1 |
| Steel in Comparative example 6 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
1.1 |
3.4 |
674.3 |
589.4 |
413.5 |
364.5 |
[0099] Referring to Table 3, the hardness of specimens according to the steels in Examples
1 to 10 and the steels in Comparative examples 1 to 4, which were subjected to quenching,
were 697 Hv or more. Subsequently, it can be seen that the hardness decreased after
tempering. In particular, it can be seen that hardness gradually decreased as the
tempering temperature increased.
[0100] Regarding Vickers hardness, the steels in Examples 1 to 10 and the steels in Comparative
examples 1 and 2 exhibited high hardness characteristics of 697 Hv or more after quenching.
As the tempering temperature increased, dislocations disappeared, gradually decreasing
the hardness, and after tempering at 500 °C, the hardness decreased to 360 Hv. The
measured hardness values were similar regardless of the steels in Examples 1 to 11
and the steels in Comparative examples 1 to 4, which can be attributed to the fact
that the carbon content, the most dominant factor affecting the hardness of the tempered
martensite microstructure, was at a similar level.
[0101] The room temperature impact toughness of the quenched materials was significantly
inferior at less than 2 J for all of the steels in Examples 1 to 10 and the steels
in Comparative examples 1 to 6. However, it can be seen that, when tempering was performed,
impact toughness was improved, and it can be seen that the impact toughness gradually
increased as the tempering temperature increased. Specifically, the steels in Examples
1 to 10 exhibited room-temperature impact toughness of 1.8 J or less in the quenched
materials, and as the tempering temperature increased, the impact toughness increased,
and thus an impact toughness of 10 J or more is observed after tempering at 500 °C.
[0102] However, the steels in Comparative examples 1 and 2 exhibited relatively high impact
toughness compared to other steel specimens, with a room-temperature impact toughness
of 1.9 J in the quenched materials. This is attributable to the high retained austenite
phase fraction, and when tempering is performed, the retained austenite decomposes
into tempered martensite and the effect disappears, and thus, after the final tempering,
inferior impact toughness values are observed compared to the steels in Examples 1
to 10.
[0103] Meanwhile, the steels in Comparative examples 1 and 2 contain 0.4 wt% of vanadium
(V), and the steel in Comparative example 4 contains 0.02 wt% of Al. It is generally
known that, as the austenite grain size decreases, the number of grain boundaries
that can hinder crack propagation increases, thereby improving impact toughness. That
is, V precipitates and Al precipitates are highly effective in reducing grain size.
As shown in Table 2, the steels in Comparative examples 1 and 2 containing 0.4 wt%
of V and the steel in Comparative example 4 containing 0.02 wt% of Al exhibited the
smallest average austenite grain sizes of 4 to 6 µm.
[0104] However, in the case of the steels in Comparative examples 1, 2, and 4, in which
V and Al were excessively added, the impact toughness was rather inferior to that
of the steels in Examples 1 to 10, which can be attributed to the excessive vanadium
precipitates, which increased the likelihood of crack initiation due to the mismatch
in mechanical properties between the matrix and the precipitates. In particular, the
material tempered at 500 °C, at which vanadium carbide precipitation readily occurs,
exhibited a significant decrease in impact toughness.
[0105] In the case of the steel in Comparative example 3, the Al content was only 0.005
wt%, and thus the average austenite grain size exceeded 50 µm, and as a result of
the excessively coarse austenite grains, the impact toughness was poor.
[0106] In the steels in Comparative examples 5 and 6, the quenching temperature was relatively
low, and in this case, carbides are not readily redissolved, and thus cementite partially
remains even after quenching. As a result, the steels in Comparative examples 5 and
6 exhibited low impact toughness due to the retained cementite. In addition, in the
steels in Comparative examples 5 and 6, carbon that should have been dissolved in
martensite to contribute to hardness improvement was consumed in forming cementite,
and thus the concentration of dissolved carbon in the martensitic matrix was relatively
reduced, resulting in an overall decrease in hardness.
[0107] Although the present invention has been described above, the present invention is
not limited by the embodiments disclosed herein, and it is apparent that various modifications
can be made by those skilled in the art within the scope of the technical spirit of
the present invention. In addition, even when the operational effects according to
the configuration of the present invention have not been explicitly described in the
description of the embodiments of the present invention, it goes without saying that
the effects predictable by the corresponding configuration should also be recognized.