[0001] The invention relates to an apparatus and a process for controlling the shape of
sheet metal produced in a rolling mill. Apparatuses are known which are arranged so
as, in use, to receive a plurality of output signals from a sensor disposed across
the width of said metal sheet, said sensor having a plurality of individual sensing
means disposed at different locations across said width, a different one of said plurality
of signals being associated with a different one of said individual sensing means.
[0002] As is known in this art, shape is defined as the cross sectional profile of a strip
width of sheet metal with reference to a flat plane. A shapemeter is a device for
measuring shape, and examples of such shapemeters are described in British Patent
1,160,112 as well as the brochure of Davy-Loewy Limited, Loewy Robertson Division,
entitled "Vidimon Shapemeter". The shapemeter is capable of detecting and displaying
the degree and location of any out of flatness condition of a strip under tension
which may, visually, appear to be flat.
[0003] At present, the display of the shapemeter is monitored by a mill operator who applies
appropriate control signals to correct the out of flat conditions. As will be appreciated,
the operator can only initiate corrective action after the out of flat condition has
existed for some time. Further, the reflex and speed limitations of human beings prevents
corrective action from being immediately taken so that the out of flat condition will
persist for some time after it is detected and displayed.
[0004] Teachings in the art which relate to controlling the shape of metal sheets produced
in a rolling mill are exemplified by the following United States Patents: 2,696,698:
3,064,509; 3,630,055; 3,686,907; 3,875,776; 3,882,709; 3,332,263; 3,514,984; 3,431,761;
3,475,935; 2,961,901; 3,213,665; 3,499,306 and 3,802,237.
[0005] Although it has been suggested that the output of the shapemeter be fed to a system
for automatically initiating corrective action, applicant is not presently aware of
the existence of a physical system for so doing.
[0006] It is therefore an object of the invention to provide an apparatus and process for
automatically controlling the shape of aluminum sheet produced in a rolling mill.
[0007] Apparatus according to the invention is characterised in that the apparatus comprises:
averaging means arranged to receive predetermined ones of said plurality of signals
whereby the average of said predetermined ones of said plurality of signals is produced
at an output of said averaging-means; comparator means arranged to receive at one
input terminal thereof the output of said averaging means and to receive at a second
input terminal, predetermined other ones of said plurality of signals or other averages
thereof; and control means arranged to receive the output of said comparator means
for controlling a parameter of said rolling mill whereby, when said comparator means
detects greater than a predetermined difference between the inputs thereof, said parameter
will be appropriately controlled.
[0008] Other optional features of the apparatus are defined in the subsidiary claims appended
hereto.
[0009] The process according to the invention is characterised in that the process comprises:
forming a signal representative of the average of predetermined ones of said signals,
comprising said signal with a further signal representative of predetermined other
ones of said signal or of other averages thereof and when the difference between the
compared signals exceeds a predetermined amount, controlling a parameter of the rolling
mill in a manner to reduce said difference.
[0010] The invention will be further described by way of example with reference to the accompanying
drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a block diagram of one embodiment of apparatus in accordance with the
present invention and arranged to carry out the process of the invention;
Figure 2 shows part of the Figure 1 in greater detail;
Figure 3 shows one form of analog averaging circuit; and
Figure 4 shows one form of digital averaging circuit.
[0011] Referring to figure 1, the rolling mill process is somewhat schematically represented
by a roll of sheet metal 1, such as aluminum, drawn in the direction of the arrow
A through shaping rolls 3 by driven roll 5.
[0012] Back up rolls 7 are also provided as well known in the art, and a shapemeter 9, for
example, of the type described in British Patent 1,160,112, the teachings of which
are incorporated herein by reference, disposed across the width of the sheet 10, senses
the shape of the sheet after it has passed through the shaping rolls.
[0013] As described in the above mentioned British Patent, the shape meter consists of a
stationary arbor 11 and a segmented rotor 13 supported in the arbor by an air cushion
and rotatable therein. This assembly produces pneumatic signals which, in the present
application, are converted to electrical signals by converter 15, as well known in
the art, as the apparatus in accordance with the invention comprises electronic circuitry.
[0014] The pneumatic signals are a function of the strip force applied to each rotor segment,
and the pneumatic signals are converted to electrical levels, such as voltage levels
or current levels, proportional to the level of the pneumatic signals.
[0015] The output of 15 is fed to processor 17, which could consist of discrete circuits
as described below, or which could comprise a micro-processor with an appropriately
programmed RAM.
[0016] The processor produces control signals fed to means for controlling the roll bend,
means for controlling coolant distribution, and means for leveling the rolls. Although
such means are illustrated in a single block 19 in figure 1, it will be appreciated
that they are, in practice, separate means which are part of existing rolling mill
systems.
[0017] The coolant distribution means comprise a series of sprays, schematically shown at
21 in figure 1, disposed across the width of the sheet 10. The means for controlling
the roll bend are schematically illustrated by the arrows 23, and the means for leveling
the rolls are schematically illustrated by the arrows 25. As above mentioned, these
means are well known in the art, and it is therefore not necessary to describe them
any further here.
[0018] The output of the processor is also applied to display means 25, which is preferably
a CRT, as some of the control functions may be manually controlled rather than automatically.
Thus, it is within the scope of the invention to provide an apparatus by which only
roll bending and coolant distribution are automatically controlled, while roll leveling
is operator controlled.
[0019] In accordance with the invention, certain ones of the signals from 9 are averaged,
and the average thus obtained is compared with certain other ones of the signals or
with averages of certain other ones of the signals, the result of the comparison constituting
the control signals. The ones of the signals and the other ones of the signals could
overlap, and, indeed, the ones and the other ones could constitute identical sets
of signals. However, the average would be formed by all of the ones of the signals
at the same time, and the average would then be compared to the other ones of the
signals one at a time, as will be described below.
[0020] Turning now to figure 2, there is illustrated, in block diagram form, an arrangement
which could perform the functions of the block 17 of figure 1. In figure 2, the designations
ALl to AL
7 represent the signals from the rotors on the left hand side of the sheet, and the
designations AR to AR
7 represent the signals from the rotors on the right hand side of the sheet and the
designation AC represents the signal from the central rotor, in a 15 segment shapemeter.
These signals are fed to the averaging circuits which will provide averages as required
and as described below. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate, respectively, an analog and a
digital circuit for averaging. In figure 3, the ratio R
1/R1+R6=1/7, when there are 7 inputs being averaged. The circuits of figures 3 and
4 are exemplary only, and the operation thereof is straight forward so that no further
description thereof is required.
[0021] In considering now the process of operating the apparatus as is known, it is desired
to produce a sheet whose thickness is consistent throughout within stated tolerance
limitations. However, portions having thicknesses above or below tolerance limitations
will develop, and these portions will produce, respectively, greater or lesser pressures
on their adjacent rotors and thereby be detected.
[0022] In order to increase or decrease the thickness of the sheet in such a portion, the
output of its adjacent spray is either increased or decreased. Thus, coolant distribution
is one parameter and controlling the coolant distribution is one function of the process
and apparatus.
[0023] In accordance with the invention, in order to correct such deviations in thickness,
the outputs of all rotors are averaged, and the output of each rotor is then compared
to this average one at a time.
[0024] Referring to figure 2, the signal AVT represents the average of all signals ALl to
AL
7, AC and AR
1 to AR
7. AV
T is applied at one input terminal of each of comparators CL
1 to CL
7, CC and CR
1 to CR7. The other input terminal to these comparators is fed, respectively, ALl to
AL
7, AC and AR to AR
7. If the output of any of the comparators is greater, in the positive or negative
directions, from a preset tolerance limit, then the spray adjacent the rotor from
which the other input terminal to the respective comparator is fed is appropriately
controlled to either increase or decrease its output. The spray will continue at this
changed level until the output of the respective comparator falls within the tolerance
limits, whereupon it will resume its normal level.
[0025] To determine whether it is necessary to level the shaping rolls, two averages are
required - the average of all signals from the rotors on the left hand side of the
sheet, AV
L - and the average of all signals from the rotors on the right hand side of the sheet
AV
R. If the average on the right hand side is greater than the average on the left hand
side, this means that more pressure is being exerted on the right hand rotors than
on the left hand rotors, i.e., the right hand side of the roll is closer to the sheet
than the left hand side of the roll. The roll must thus be releveled to tilt the right
hand side upward (away from the sheet), and the left hand side downward (towards the
roll). AV
L and AV
R are compared in comparator LC, and if the output of this comparator exceeds tolerance
limits, the leveling mechanism is actuated to relevel the roll. As above mentioned,
the function controlling this second parameter can be performed automatically, or
it can be operator controlled.
[0026] The cross-sectional shape of the sheet, or mill roll flexture, is a function of the
material being shaped as well as the requirements of the particular mill, and this
parameter must also be monitored. To perform this monitoring function, an average
is taken of signals from a proportion of the outside segments on the right hand side
of the sheet - AVO
R, a second average is taken of signals from a proportion of the outside segments on
the left hand side of the sheet - AVO
L, and a third average is taken from a proportion of segments at the center of the
sheet - AV
C. In one embodiment, the proportions are 25%, 25% and 50%. Thus, in the illustrated
r embodiment, AV
L is formed from signals ALl to AL
4, AV
R is formed from signals AR
1 to AR4, and AV
C is formed from signals A
C, AL
11 AL
2,
AR
1 and
AR2.
[0027] The averages so formed are fed to the processor PR in figure 2 which has, stored
in its memory, the required averages for the desired shape. Any deviations beyond
tolerance from the required averages will provide a control signal to the roll bending
mechanism to bend the roll so as to produce a sheet of the required shape.
[0028] With automatic detection and control, detection of deviations and controls to correct
them are almost instantaneous. Regardless of the experience of an operator, his speed
of response can never even approximate the speed of electronic response, so that shape
of the sheet will be improved due to automatic control. However, the human element
can never be fully programmed into a machine, so that overrides should be provided
to allow the operator to include the human element and experience in the process.
[0029] In the above description, we have assumed a shapemeter having fifteen rotors. As
is known, the same mill may be used to shape wider or narrower sheets. To accommodate
all widths of sheets, the sheet is centered on the sensor, and any unused rotors on
both ends thereof are turned off, as well known in the art. Of course, shapemeters
with different numbers of rotors can also be used.
[0030] Although several embodiments have been described, this was for the purpose of illustrating,
but not limiting, the invention. Various modifications, which will come readily to
the mind of one skilled in the art, are within the scope of the invention as defined
in the appended claims.
1. Apparatus for controlling the shape of sheet metal produced in a rolling mill,
said apparatus being arranged so as, in use, to receive a plurality of output signals
from a sensor disposed across the width of said metal sheet, said sensor having a
plurality of individual sensing means disposed at different locations across said
width, a different one of said plurality of signals being associated with a different
one of said individual sensing means characterised in that the apparatus comprises:
averaging means arranged to receive predetermined ones of said plurality of signals
whereby the average of said predetermined ones of said plurality of signals is produced
at an output of said averaging means;
comparator means arranged to receive at one input terminal thereof the output of said
averaging means and to receive at a second input terminal, predetermined other ones
of said plurality of signals or other averages thereof; and control means arranged
to receive the output of said comparator means for controlling a parameter of said
rolling mill whereby, when said comparator means detects greater than a predetermined
difference between the inputs thereof, said parameter will be appropriately controlled.
2. Apparatus as defined in claim 1 characterised in that said sensor comprises a shapemeter
having a plurality of segments, a different one of said segments of said shapemeter
being associated with a different one of said plurality of signals and in that said
plurality of signals comprise electrical signal levels, said averaging means comprise
electronic averaging means; and said comparator means comprise electronic comparator
means.
3. Apparatus as defined in claim 2 characterised in that said predetermined ones of
said plurality of signals comprise all of said plurality of signals, whereby the output
of said averaging means is the average of all of said plurality of signals, said comparator
means comprises a plurality of comparators equal in number to the plurality of signals,
the output of said averaging means is fed to one input terminal of each of said plurality
of comparators, a different one of said plurality of signals is fed to a second input
terminal of a respective one of said plurality of comparators, and the output of each
comparator is fed to a spray control means, each spray control means being associated
with a separate spray means and each spray means being disposed in a position across
the width of said roll corresponding, respectively, with the position of the segment
which provides the signal feed to its respective comparator whereby, when a signal
has a difference from the average equal to or greater than a predetermined amount,
the spray associated with the segment from which the signal is provided will be controlled
to operate in a manner to reduce said difference.
4. Apparatus as-defined in claim 2 characterised in that said averaging means comprises
two averagers,the signals from the segments on the right hand side of the sheet being
fed to one of said averagers and the signals from the segments on the left hand side
of the sheet being fed to the other of the averagers; the output of said one averager
being fed to one input terminal of said comparator means: and the output of said comparator
means being fed to a roll level controller whereby when the difference in value between
the inputs to the comparator means equals or exceeds a predetermined amount, the level
controller will control the roll level means to operate to eliminate the difference.
5. Apparatus as defined in claim 2 characterised in that said averaging means comprises
first, second and third averagers and said comparator means comprises a processor,a
first portion of said plurality of signals, derived from a first portion of segments
on the outer right hand side of said sheet being fed to said first averager, a second
portion of said plurality of signals, derived from a second portion of segments on
the outer left hand side of said sheet being fed to said second averager; a third
portion of said plurality of signals, derived from the central segments, being fed
to said third averager and the outputs of said averagers being fed to respective input
terminals of said processor which has, stored in memory, required respective averages
whereby, when the outputs of said averagers differ from said required averages by
an amount equal to or greater than a predetermined amount, the roll bend means are
controlled to bend the roll back to reduce the differences.
6. Apparatus as defined in claim 5 characterised in that said first portion of segments
comprises the 25% of the segments disposed on the outer right hand side of said sheet,
said second portion of segments comprises the 25% of the segments disposed on the
outer left hand side of said sheet and wherein said third portion comprises the 50%
of the segments disposed centrally of said sheet.
7. A process for controlling the shape of sheet metal produced in a rolling mill,
the method comprising obtaining a plurality of output signals from a sensor disposed
across the width of said metal sheet, said sensor having a plurality of individual
sensing means disposed at different locations across said width, a different one of
said plurality of signals being associated with a different one of said individual
sensing means characterised in that the process comprises: forming a signal representative
of the average of predetermined ones of said signals, comparing said signal with a
further signal representative of predetermined other ones of said signal or of other
averages thereof and when the difference between the compared signals exceeds a predetermined
amount, controlling a parameter of the rolling mill in a manner to reduce said difference.