[0001] There exists in the United States a large quantity of coal which cannot be economically
used as a fuel because of its high sulfur content. Environmental laws are such that
it is economically unfeasible to burn a high sulfur content coal because of the expensive
antipollution equipment required.
[0002] High sulfur coal, i.e., about 3%, exists in unmined form and also in the form of
already mined coal that has been discarded, i.e., refuse coal. Refuse coal usually
consists of fines which result from the processing of coal. More particularly, when
coal is mined it is normally crushed and washed and the washings are generally dumped
and used as land fill or dumped into a lake or stream. In the latter case, over a
period of time, the pond or stream becomes almost completely filled with the finely
powdered coal. Not only is this a significant waste of coal but it is injurious to
the lakes and streams. Many lakes have become "dead" lakes due to this disposal of
waste coal. The ash content of such refuse coal, i.e., above 20% by weight, also makes
it economically unattractive to attempt to utilize it.
[0003] There also exist in the United States substantial deposits of unmined or virgin coal
having a high sulfur content-In order to burn such coal in industry it would be necessary
to spend substantial amounts of money for air pollution equipment. Therefore, this
high sulfur content coal is not being mined.
[0004] The need to effectively utilize energy while at the same time protecting our environment
faces many other industries as well, the steel industry being another example. The
disposal of waste'materials from steel making processes in an economically feasible,
environmentally suitable manner is frequently a significant problem. For example,
in the processing of steel an acid solution (pickle liquor) is used to treat the product.
The resultant solution consisting of acid, iron compounds, contaminants, etc. (collectively
referred to hereinafter as spent pickle liquor) must be disposed of.
[0005] The present invention is applicable to high sulfur, high ash refuse or virgin coal.
In one form of the present process, coal, crushed to about 1/4 by 0 size is first
treated with spent pickle liquor. Thereafter it is subjected to a strong acidic oxidizing
agent. More particularly, the acidified coal mixture is treated with a mixture of
chlorine gas dissolved in water. Thereafter coal and ash are separated through the
use of water and gravity. Following this, the acid solution remaining is treated with
lime and the precipitate which contains various sulfur compounds is discarded. These
sulfur compounds exist in such a state that they are not injurious to our environment
when discarded and in fact have a beneficial effect on dead lakes. In an alternative
form of the present invention only a minor amount of water is added to the pulverized
coal, preferably in the form of steam, and the mixture is treated with chlorine gas.
[0006] The process of this invention can be effectively practiced on any high sulfur content
coal. In its most useful application it is practiced on refuse coal that at the present
time has no utility. After treatment the refuse coal contains less than about 1% sulfur,
has about 5-6% ash, has about 14,000-14,500 btu per pound, and is processed into easily
handled pellets. In contrast, before processing the refuse coal typically contains
2-3% sulfur, 25-30% ash and has a btu content of only 7,500.
[0007] Refuse coal is produced as the result of normal coal mining operations and exists
as a result of coal being crushed and washed. Typically it is 1/4 by 0, that is 1/4
inch down tc 325 mesh in size. Typically it is discarded as land fill or thrown into
a pond, lake or stream. In some instances as much as 20% by weight of the mined coal
ends up in.the form of heretofore unusable refuse coal.
[0008] Various areas of the United States contain large deposits of coal which are basically
unusable because of the high sulfur content of the coal. The present process is applicable
also to such coal. The only modification required is to pulverize the coal so that
it is about 1/4 by 0 as in the case of refuse coal.
[0009] In the practice of the process the pulverized coal is first mixed with spent pickle
liquor. In the manufacture of iron or steel it is customary to use a pickling acid
to remove scale.; rust., etc. Most frequently 60° Be' sulfuric acid is employed and
this is the preferred form for use. in the present invention although other acid pickle
liquors may be employed. After use, the spent pickle liquor comprising the acid and
various iron compounds such as Fe2(S04)3, FeSO
4·7H
2O and other contaminants must be disposed of. Obviously, the disposal of such a liquid
poses a significant problem from an environmental standpoint.
[0010] For some unknown reason the use of spent pickle liquor produces superior results
than if the acid itself is used. While it is not completely understood, it is believed
that the iron salts present in the spent pickle liquor have a significant effect on
the reaction rate.
[0011] If only uncontaminated H
2SO
4 is used, the final results in many cases in terms of sulfur removal are inferior
and the speed of the reaction is decreased. Moreover, the ability to convert a material
that poses such an environmental risk to a safe, useful material able to benefit the
environment is an advantage not to be taken lightly. While it is preferred to use
spent pickle liquor the acid in unused form may be utilized recognizing, of course,
that under some conditions inferior results may be obtained.
[0012] The amount of spent pickle liquor mixed with the pulverized coal is somewhat dependent
on the sulfur content of the coal. Usually though 2% pickle liquor based on the weight
of the coal is sufficient.
[0013] It is important to allow the pickle liquor to contact the coal for a brief period
of time prior to further processing. In practice 5-10 minutes has been found to be
satisfactory. Thereafter, the mixture is introduced into any suitable type of reactor
mixer and mixed with about 20% by weight of water. Preferably the water temperature
and temperature of the mixture is 80-90° F. This may require suitable heating or cooling
means of conventional design. Into the reactor mixer is introduced chlorine gas. The
amount of chlorine required is an amount sufficient to provide a mixture having a
pH of about 3 or less. When mixed with the water the chlorine gas provides hydrochloric
acid, hypochlorous acid and nascent oxygen.
[0015] After the reaction is essentially complete, the ash and coal that are present can
be mechanically separated from each other and from the acid solution. One convenient
way for doing so consists of introducing the entire mixture into a conically shaped
separator of conventional design, where provision is made at the bottom for introducing
water. At the top a wier is provided such that material at the surface of the mixture
will be transferred out of the separator and into a discharge conduit. The denser,
heavier coal particles fall to the bottom and are discharged through an outlet. The
coal is then dried and preferably pelletized.
[0016] To the liquid and water material overflowing the separation is added a sufficient
amount of lime to precipitate most of the sulfur as calcium salts, i.e., CaS0
3, CaS, CaS0
4 or other salts of calcium containing sulfur. The amount of lime required is that
amount which is required to provide a neutral or nearly neutral pH. Such precipitated
salts are thereafter separated and preferably used as fill in coal slurry ponds. If
the ponds are not totally filled but if a sufficient amount of the precipitate is
added over-a relatively short period of time the pond is once again capable of supporting
life.
[0017] The coal so recovered has less than 6% ash, less than 1% sulfur and a btu content
of about 14,000 per pound. The economics of the process are such that refuse coal
may be economically reclaimed to provide an excellent energy source.
[0018] In the alternative form of the present invention, to the pulverized coal is added
a minor amount of water, preferably in the form of steam. The water added is preferably
an amount equal to about 10-20% by weight of the coal. Thereafter, to the mixture
is added chlorine gas. Unlike the previous embodiment the chlorine gas is not dissolved
in water nor is pickle liquor added to the mixture. Also, the amount of water required
is reduced. As in the previous embodiment, the mixture after treatment with the chlorine
gas is subjected to the separation step and thereafter to the neutralization step.
1. A method of treating pulverised coal to remove sulphur comprising adding pickle
liquor to said coal, adding to said coal a mixture of water with chlorine gas added
thereto, the amount of pickle liquor and chlorine gas being an amount sufficient to
provide a mixture having a pH of less than about 3, and physically separating said
coal from said mixture.
2. A method as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the mixture remaining after the coal has
been removed is neutralised so as to provide a precipitate comprising in substantial
part inorganic sulphates.
3. A method as claimed in Claim 1 or Claim 2 wherein a substantial amount of ash is
physically separated from the mixture simultaneously with the separation of the coal
from the mixture.
4. A method as claimed in Claim 3 wherein the mixture remaining after the removal
of the coal and ash fractions is neutralised so as to provide a precipitate comprising
in substantial part inorganic sulphates.
5. A method as claimed in any of Claims 2 to 4 wherein lime is used as the neutralising
agent.
6. A method as claimed in any of Claims 2 to 5 wherein the precipitate is used to
treat dead bodies of water.
7. A method as claimed in Claim 3 wherein the coal and ash are separated from the
mixture through the use of a water flow.
8. A method as claimed in any of the preceding claims wherein the coal is refuse coal.
9. A process for removing ash and sulphur from coal wherein sulphur is present consisting
essentially of the following steps:-
(a) forming a coal and water mixture,
(b) treating the mixture with an acidic oxidizing agent comprising HCL, HOCL and nascent
oxygen formed through the addition of CL2 to water, the amount of CL2 being an amount sufficient to convert the sulphur to a sulphur containing acid(s),
(c) physically separating any ash from the mixture,
(d) treating the remaining coal mixture containing the sulphur containing acid(s)
with lime whereby the sulphur is precipitated as calcium salts, and
(e) physically separating the calcium salts from the coal.
10. A method as claimed in Claim 9 wherein the coal to be treated is refuse coal and
the coal after treatment has less than 6% ash, less than about 1% sulphur and a BTU
content of about 14,000 per pound.
11. A method as claimed in either Claim 9 or 10 wherein the amount of water is about
10 to 20% by weight of the coal.