[0001] In order to build superior taste into edible oil products, they must undergo certain
processing steps. The most important, from a finished flavor standpoint, is deodorization.
Since the senses of taste and smell are closely linked, deodorization also improves
the flavor of the product. The finished product is ideally a bland oil.
[0002] About the middle of the last century, deodorization of fats was practiced in Europe
by blowing steam through the heated oils. Prior to the turn of the century, steam
blowing was used in connection with evacuation for the improvement of fats used in
margarine products. About 1900 David Wesson, in the United States, designed a greatly
improved steam-vacuum deodorizer. The system successfully avoided air contamination,
which is one of the important prerequisites of this high-temperature treatment. The
process was never patented, but its secrecy was so effectively guarded that for a
great many years competitive efforts failed to match the quality of the products that
were treated in the Wesson system.
[0003] In addition to improved batch processes, semi-continuous and continuous deodorizers
were later developed. The theoretical aspects of steam stripping are governed by Raoult's
law and Dalton's law.
[0004] Vernon Young in an article published in Chemistry and Industry Sept. 16, 1978, pp.
692-703, provides an excellent review of processing currently in use for refining
and modifying oils and fats.
[0005] High temperature deodorization systems require large amounts of energy, but they
can be designed for heat recovery to save energy. For example, a deodorizing system
modification for heat recovery and steam refining of palm oil is reported by Gavin
et al in J. Am. Oil Chemists Soc., November 1973 (Vol. 50), pp. 466A-472A. Also, U.S.
Patent 3,607,670, King, Sept. 12, 1971, relates to a deodorization process in which
the heat exchange between incoming cold oil and outgoing hot oil takes place within
an enclosed vessel.
[0006] The problem of bland oil regression (degradation), however, is a drawback to energy
efficient deodorization systems, and particular prior art modified systems where hot,
freshly deodorized oil is held dormant, dwells or is pumped out of the deodorizer
at too high of a temperature. Such oil degrade from a bland taste to a scorched or
rubbery taste, or degrade to various other flavors which are less than bland.
[0007] U.S. Patent 2,621,196, Thurman, December 9, 1952, describes a rapid, step-wise deodorization
process at progressively increasing temperatures, followed by a rapid cooling step,
without addressing specifically the problem of energy efficiency.
[0008] Thus, there was a need to invent a process whereby optimum heat is utilized and the
bland taste of deodorized oil is maintained in energy efficient systems.
[0009] It is an object of the present invention to prevent degradation of bland flavor in
hot, freshly deodorized oil in high temperature deodorization systems where said oil
is held dormant for further processing.
[0010] It is another object of the present invention to provide a method to maintain optimum
good taste and bland flavor in freshly deodorized oil.
[0011] Another object of the present invention is to maximize heat recovery in high temperature
deodorization systems while maintaining bland deodorized oil flavor.
[0012] Other objects will become apparent in the light of the disclosure.
Brief Description of the Drawing
[0013] The Figure is a pictorial schematic of a continuous deodorizer unit in which this
invention is illustrated.
Summary of the Invention
[0014] In view of the above-stated need, the present invention provides an oil deodorization
process involving a high temperature, deodorization step followed by a rapid quenching
step, characterized by:
(a) deodorizing edible oil at a temperature in the range from 520°F (271°C) to 425°F
(218°C) and a pressure of from 0.1 mm of mercury (13.3 Pa) to 30 mm of mercury (4000
Pa), and
(b) quenching the deodorized oil of step (a) to a flavor stable temperature in the
range from 480°F (249°C) to 340°C (171 °C) within about 50 seconds, by mixing said
oil with deodorized quenching, said quenching oil having a temperature substantially
below said flavor stable temperature.
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0015] Preferably, the oil is deodorized at a high oil temperature of from about 238°C (460°F)
to about 254°C (490°F), and the outgoing oil is quenched to a pumpable temperature
below about 230°C (446°F) within a quench time of about a fraction of a second to
about 50 seconds.
[0016] The preferred cooling means for quenching the oil is previously deodorized cooled
quenching oil brought in contact with said hot, freshly deodorized oil. Preferably,
the quenching oil is directly mixed with said hot outgoing oil as the hot outgoing
oil passes into said lower, oil-sealed reservoir. Furthermore, the preferred hot,
freshly deodorized outgoing oil has a temperature of from about 238°C (460°F) to about
254°C (490°F) when it passes into the lower, oil-sealed reservoir, and said quenching
oil has a maximum temperature of about 60°C (140°F). In another preferred embodiment,
a pool of outgoing oil in said oil-sealed reservoir is agitated with stripping steam.
[0017] The deodorization steam temperature is not critical, and can range from about the
boiling point of water at the inlet pressure of about 316°C (600°F). Water can even
be introduced in lieu of steam, since the water would be immediately vaporized and
heated to the deodorization temperature by contact with the hot deodorized oil in
the lower portion of the deodorization column 1 and any other hot materials which
the water contacts. It cools the apparatus and makes deodorization less efficient.
On the other hand, steam at a temperature in excess of about 316°C (600°F) can scorch
the oil, and it is unnecessary to use such high temperature steam. It is preferred
that the steam temperature be within about -7°C (20°F) of the oil temperature; cooler
steam cools the oil, and hotter steam is unnecessary. Thus the preferred temperature
of steam is broadly from about 210°C (410°C) to about 282°C (540°F); when the oil
is within the preferred temperature range of from 238°C (460°F) to about 254°C (490°F),
the preferred steam temperature ranges from about 227°C (440°F) to about 266°C (510°F).
[0018] Throughout this specification reference is made to steam as the deodorization agent.
Steam is highly preferred for this purpose as it is readily available in high purity
and because it does not injure the oils being deodorized. Other deodorization agents
can be used, however, for example, gases which are inert under the conditions of the
process, such as nitrogen or hydrogen. Oxygen and air are unsuitable, however, as
they would cause oxidation and degradation of the oils being deodorized.
[0019] The deodorization chamber per se and its components can be any type of packed vapor-
liquid contacting chamber, such as those which are well known in the chemical engineering
art. See, for example, R. H. Perry et al, eds., Chemical Engineers' Handbook (McGraw-Hill,
4th ed., 1963), pp. 18-25 to 18-53; J. S Eckert et al, Chemical Engineering Progress
54, No. 1, 79-75 (January 1958), 57, No. 9, 54-58 (September 1961), 59, No. 5, 76-82
(May 1963), and 62, No. 1, 59-67 (January 1966); and K. E. Porter, Chemistry and Industry
182-89 (Feb. 4, 1967). These references also describe various kinds of packing materials
which can be used.
[0020] The edible oils which can be deodorized by the process of this invention include
various substances of plant or animal origin which consists predominantly of glyceryl
esters of fatty acids, e.g. triglycerides, including both those commonly called "oils"
which are liquid at atmospheric pressure and room temperature, and those commonly
called "fats" which are solid or semi-solid under these conditions, but liquid at
the temperature of heat-bleaching and deodorization (i.e. about 177°C (250°F) to 271
°C (520°F)). Preferred oils are tallow, lard, and the common edible vegetable oils
used for the production of said oil and shortenings, e.g. cottonseed, peanut, safflower,
palm, soybean, rapeseed, sunflower, corn, and coconut oils. The invention is particularly
applicable to the heat efficient deodorization of sunflower seed oil.
[0021] The selection of a pumpable bland flavor-stable processing temperature within the
range of about 249°C (480°F) to about 171 °C (340°F) is interdependent on the type
of edible oil being processed and the dormant oil times of the deodorization system
being used.
[0022] Preferably, the bland flavor-stable outgoing oil is pumped at a temperature above
about 171 °C (340°F) for heat recovery via heat interchanger means.
[0023] The improved process of this invention isde- signed for utilizing heat and recovering
energy in hot, freshly deodorized outgoing oil in a deodorization system wherein the
hot deodorized outgoing oil is utilized to warm up cold undeodorized incoming oil
via a heat interchanger means.
[0024] The method of this invention is useful in all types of deodorization processes which
can be modified to; (1) quench the temperature of the hot, freshly deodorized oil
to a bland oil flavor-stable temperature before pumping the hot oil through a heat
interchanger to warm up cold incoming oil. Thus, it will be clear to those skilled
in the art that an important principle of this invention is that hot, freshly deodorized
oil must be quenched to its bland flavor-stable temperature before it can be held
dormant for further processing.
[0025] The term "dormant oil" is defined herein as hot deodorized oil, held in a tray or
reservoir as a pool without sparging or significant steam stripping or simply oil
that is being pumped. Dormant oil can be oil that dwells in an oil-sealed reservoir.
Dormant oil can be oil pumped through a line or heat interchanger. Dormant deodorized
oil held beyond its critical dormant time at a temperature above its bland flavor-stable
temperature, will degrade. The term "dormant time" as used herein technically refers
to the time freshly deodorized oil dwells in the deodorization process that is no
longer being sparged or stripped.
[0026] The term "pumpable bland flavor-stable processing temperature of a deodorized oil"
refers herein to a temperature or temperature range at which hot deodorized oil can
be held "dormant" or pumped without loss of its bland flavor. There is a maximum pumpable
bland flavor-stable processing temperature for each particular oil and each oil has
a unique dormant process time-temperature interdependency wherein said dormant process
time increases as the temperature decreases.
[0027] The term "quenched oil" as used herein refers to hot freshly deodorized oil that
has been cooled to its PBFSPT. The term "quench time" is that time required to reduce
the temperature for the deodorization temperature to the PBFSPT. There is a critical
quench time for each particular oil and each oil has a unique critical process quench
time - PBFSP temperature interdependency wherein said critical quench process time
increases as the hot deodorization temperature decreases.
[0028] Therefore, the specific process or system used is also a factor in selecting times
and temperatures since the equipment limitations will determine the requisite time
that the oil is held "dormant" at various processing temperatures. Hot oil selectively
quenched to its maximum bland flavor-stable processing temperature can be safely pumped
through heat interchangers which utilize the heat of the hot outgoing oil to warm
up cold incoming oil.
[0029] The incoming oil of this invention is refined and bleached oil or oil which has been
processed with one or more of the following processes; refined, bleached, hydrogenated
winterized, dewaxed, interesterified, etc.
[0030] For a more detailed disclosure of the types of refined and processed oils useful
as incoming oil for the present invention, U.S. Patent 4,035,402, Levine, July 12,
1977, is cited.
[0031] Steam-vacuum deodorization is preferred. The process consists of steam stripping
or steam distilling of the volatile odoriferous constituents at elevated temperature
and reduced pressure.
[0032] The most common shape of the batch deodorizer is a cylindrical vessel two to four
times as high as it is wide. Provision is made to heat the oil internally or externally
by steam, direct firing, or "Dowtherm"@ vapor. "Dowtherm" is a eutectic mixture of
diphenyl and diphenyl oxide which is reportedly more suitable than steam because of
the high temperature range that is required for deodorization. The vacuum equipment
consists of multistage steam ejectors with barometric condensers. Stripping steam
is introduced at the bottom by means of spiders or orifice plates. Good steam distribution
is essential, as it provides the additional advantage of effective agitation. The
classical batch deodorization cycle usually is from 4 to 8 hours. Batch deodorization
systems can be modified to recover the heat of the hot, deodorized oil by determining
the oil's bland, flavor-stable temperature and quenching the oil to that temperature
with a cooling means. The hot quenched deodorized oil can then be safely pumped to
heat cooler incoming oil. Some sparging of the hot, deodorized oil for agitation is
preferred.
[0033] A semi-continuous system designed by the Girdler Corporation has found large-scale
application. It consists essentially of a large cylindrical vessel containing five
pans. A motor- operated timing device opens and closes valves automatically. They
regulate the flow of product from the higher to the next lower pan. The oil is preheated
and de-aerated in the top pan. In the second pan the temperature of the charge is
increased to about 240°C. Deodorization is mainly carried out in the third and fourth
pans. In the last pan the temperature is reduced by water cooling while the product
continues to be steam stripped under vacuum. The total operating time is about 2-1/2
hours. In a modified system, heat recovery can be accomplished by determining the
bland, flavor-stable processing temperature of the oil and following the guidelines
set out herein.
[0034] Several continuous deodorizers also are widely used. The system manufactured by Foster
Wheeler Corporation consists essentially of a vertical stainless steel column provided
with trays and bubble caps. The oil, cascading from top to bottom, moves countercurrently
to the ascending steam. U.S. Patent 3,542,653, Lowrey et al, Nov. 24, 1970, relates
to an apparatus and process for continuous heat-bleaching and high temperature steam
deodorization of edible oils.
[0035] As stated above, in some processes some steam stripping of the "dormant" hot deodorized
oil is preferred during the quenching step for agitation while the hot oil is dwelling
prior to being pumped. It provides agitation and also assures the maintenance of optimum
bland oil flavor in some systems. Less steam is needed for this agitation than is
required for deodorization.
[0036] This invention is mainly described herein in the context of a continuous deodorization
process. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in the light of
this disclosure, that the principles of this invention are equally applicable to modified
batch and semi-contin- ous deodorization processes which are modified to utilize the
heat of the outgoing oil to save energy. The hot modified oil in a modified system
must be quenched if it is to be momentarily held dormant, e.g. as a pool in a vacuum
oil-sealed reservoir means prior to pumping it to heat interchangers.
[0037] The Figure shows a deodorizing unit 1 having a hot incoming oil feed inlet 2. The
deodorization unit 1 comprises packing 3 supported on a screen means 3a, which are
standard items in the art. The hot incoming oil 2 is treated with super-heated stripping
steam 20 in the upper chamber 22 inside the unit 1 to sparge and strip out odor-forming
matter from the oil. The unit 1 also has a separate lower cooling reservoir 5 containing
a pool of dormant hot deodorized outgoing oil 6. The reservoir 5 receives a steady
stream of hot, freshly deodorized oil 21 falling from the upper chamber 22 of the
unit 1. There the hot, freshly deodorized oil 21 is cooled to a bland flavor-stable
processing temperature by the quenching oil 23 in the lower reservoir 5 before it
is pumped through the heat interchanger means 24 wherein cold incoming oil 25 is warmed
by the hot quenched deodorized oil 6 before said incoming oil 25 is finally heated
with a high temperature heating means 26. The hot quenched deodorized oil is finally
cooled to 120°F-140°F by a cooler means 27 which is preferably a water cooler. The
means 24, 26 and 27 preferably comprise a battery of heaters or heat interchangers.
[0038] The figure illustrates a system whereby heat is recovered and the bland flavor of
the deodorized oil is maintained. The quenched deodorized oil 6 after passing through
the heat interchanger means 24 is further cooled via cooler 27 to a packing (storage)
safe temperature of about 49°C (120°F) to 60°C (140°C, which cooled oil 23 can also
be used as quenching oil 23.
[0039] The continuous deodorization unit quench, "CDU quench" method is a preferred embodiment
of this invention. The preferred method comprises showering recycled cooled deodorized
quenching oil 23 through a quenching means 24 onto a pool of quenched deodorized oil
6 in the cooling reservoir 5 to quench and agitate the hot, freshly deodorized oil
21 as it drops into said oil pool 6. The hot, freshly processed deodorized oil 21
is rapidly quenched to a bland flavor-stable processing temperature oil within a fraction
of a second. Additional agitation of the quenched oil 6 can be provided by stripping
steam 20a or water simply injected into the pool of oil. An alternative quenching
means for cooling the hot, freshly deodorized oil comprises injecting the quenching
oil directly into the oil pool 6.
[0040] As stated earlier, the preferred pumpable bland flavor-stable temperature of a particular
oil varies from oil to oil and from system to system. The maximum temperature at which
hot deodorized oil can be pumped to recover heat in a deodorization process while
the bland flavor of the freshly deodorized oil is maintained, is preferred. The preferred
bland flavor-stable temperature, from an energy efficient standpoint, is the maximum
temperature of the hot deodorized outgoing oil at which the bland oil flavor is maintained
in a heat recovery step. In a preferred embodiment the maximum heat of the hot deodorized
oil is used in a heat interchanger means to save energy.
[0041] An alternative to a direct oil-to-oil quench is submerged internal heat exchanger
coils which are used to quench the hot, freshly processed deodorized oil in reservoirs
like reservoir 5, shown in the Figure. Such types of heat exchangers must cool the
hot oil down to its bland flavor-stable processing temperature fast enough to maintain
optimum good taste and bland flavor in deodorized oil, i.e. within the critical quench
time.
[0042] Alternate methods and equipment for quenching hot, freshly deodorized oil to bland
flavor-stable temperature, other than an oil-sealed lower cooling reservoir like 5
are contemplated as within the scope of this invention. A typical example of such
devices are found in: "Deodorization 1975", C. T. Zehnder, Journal of American Oil
Chemist's Society, June 1976 (Vol. 53), and Gavin et al, J. Am. Oil Chemist's Society
November 1973, pp. 466A--477A (Vol. 50).
[0043] It was surprisingly discovered that hot, freshly deodorized oils having too high
of a temperature to be safely pumped could be quenched to a slightly lower but bland
flavor-stable temperature to avoid flavor degradation before pumping. Sunflower seed
oil is a very difficult oil to deodorize. It is preferably deodorized at a high temperature
of about 254°C (490°F) to about 238°C (460°F) in a continuous deodorizer. The freshly
deodorized sun oil must be quenched in a CDU to its flavor process stable temperature
of about 229°C (445°F) to about 210°C (410°F) within a quench time of about a fraction
of a second to within about 50 seconds.
[0044] Again, it has been discovered that hot, freshly processed deodorized oil which has
optimum good taste (a bland flavor) will degrade rapidly if held dormant at too high
of a temperature without sparging (stripping) under vacuum. Hot, freshly deodorized
sunflower seed oil at high deodorization temperatures held dormant for just a few
seconds can show degradation. It was surprisingly discovered that hot quenched deodorized
sunflower seed outgoing oil having a temperature below about 229°C (445°F) in a CDU,
as illustrated, maintains its optimum good taste and bland flavors, but unquenched
freshly deodorized outgoing sunflower seed oil shows degradation when held dormant.
Short dormant (dwell) time, e.g. about 60 seconds and less, in a continuous pool in
a reservoir like reservoir 5 and associated piping to cooler 24 of a CDU at high deodorization
temperatures is enough to significantly degrade, the oil, if not quenched. Similar
degradation would happen in modified batch and semi-continuous processes so designed
to recover the maximum heat of the freshly deodorized oil.
[0045] In a CDU system, as shown in the Figure, sunflower seed oil can be deodorized at
a temperature of from about 230°C (446°F) to about 266°C (510°F), and preferably 238°C
(460°F) to 254°C (490°F). The hot, freshly deodorized outgoing oil 21 dribbles out
of the upper chamber 22 down into the lower reservoir. Thus, hot, freshly deodorized
outgoing oil 21 is quenched in reservoir 5 with quenching oil 23 to a temperature
of below about 229°C (445°F) its bland flavor-stable temperature. It is preferably
quenched to a temperature of about 210°C (410°F) ± 2.5°C (5°F) within a quench time
of about a fraction of a second.
[0046] The hot, freshly deodorized oil is preferably quenched by mixing it with 49°-60°C
(120
0-140
0F) prior deodorized quenching oil 23. This step in a CDU is preferably accomplished
by spraying a shower of the quenching oil 23 into the lower reservoir 5 of a CDU system
whereby the hot and cooled oils are contacted, mixed and agitated.
[0047] The quenched deodorized outgoing oil 6 in the reservoir 5 can then be safely pumped
out for further cooling, e.g. via a heat interchanger cooler 24 and then further cooled
via cooler 27 to a packing or storage stable temperature of about 54°C (130°F) ± 4°C
(10°F). The oil is then pumped to a storage tank, packed or recirculated to the cooling
reservoir 5 as cool quenching oil 23.
[0048] Heat interchanger cooler 24 is preferably designed to also heat up incoming oil 25
and thereby save energy.
[0049] The ratio of quenching oil to hot, freshly deodorized oil, needed to quench to a
bland flavor-stable processing temperature, will vary depen- ing on the respective
oil temperatures, dwell time and the particular deodorization process being applied.
[0050] The bland flavor-stable processing temperature for a particular oil within a particular
dwell time for a particular system can be determined by trial and error. The critical
factor is to determine the pumpable bland flavor-stable processing temperature (PBFSPT)
of the oil being processed. One method of determining the PBFSPT would be to withdraw
a series of samples of hot, freshly deodorized oil from a batch deodorization system
at decreasing temperatures and quenching them to various temperatures at increasing
times. Soybean oil, for example has a maximum PBFSPT of about 249°C (480°F) in a CDU
system as shown in the Figure. Soybean oil can be deodorized at a temperature as high
as 266°C (510°F).
Procedure to Determine the PBFSPT
[0051] The following describes a procedure used to determine the PBFSPT of deodorized oils.
Equipment is a 9 kg (20 lb.) capacity batch deodorizer under which is mounted a small
stainless steel sample vessel connected by two valves. The sample vessel is also vented
up to the top of the deodorizer via a valved vent line. The procedure for its operation
is: inlet oil is charged into the deodorizer and deodorized at desired temperature
and time to achieve a suitably bland flavor. Bland flavor is verified by withdrawing
an oil sample into the sample vessel and immersing the sample vessel into an ice bath
while it is connected to the deodorizer and opening the vent line to the top of the
deodorizer to equalize the pressures. Both valves connecting the sample vessel with
the deodorizer itself are then opened, allowing oil to freely drain from the deodorizer
through the two valves and into the sample vessel. Cooling of the oil draining into
the sample vessel is almost instantaneous, as its walls are essentially held at ice
bath conditions by the external ice bath. The sample of deodorized oil thus withdrawn
is then tasted by expert oil evaluators to determine that it is suitably bland. This
sample is the flavor control. When testing, the sample vessel is not precooled in
an ice bath; but rather, the sample is first withdrawn and, after withdrawal, the
sample vessel is cooled in an ice bath, which cooling is not commenced until a few
seconds after sample withdrawal, e.g. 2, 5, 10, 15 or 30 seconds or more. The temperature
of the deodorized oil is reduced to various temperatures to provide several different
sampling temperatures. This process is repeated for several different quenching times
and several different sampling temperatures to produce a map of flavor grades versus
the control. This map of time and temperature allows one to select the PBFSPT by giving
the artisan an understanding of the time at which the oil can be held at a specified
temperature before it starts to degrade.
Examples 1-9
[0052] The specific conditions of Examples 1-9 are set out in Table I. The equipment used
is illustrated in the Figure. Undeodorized, refined and bleached sunflower seed incoming
(inlet) oil was used for each run. Superheated stripping steam 20 was introduced at
a rate of about 0.5% by weight of the incoming oil 2. The steam is introduced via
steam inlet 20 below the screen 3a level and is drawn through the upper chamber 22
via vacuum source 30.
[0053] As shown in the Figure, some additional sparging steam 20a can be introduced below
the surface of the pool of quenched oil 6 in the reservoir 5 for agitation and good
measure. Column operating pressures of about 5 mm of mercury absolute pressure maximum
operating pressure differential (AP) across the column of about 24 mm of mercury.
Preferably, a AP of about 15 mm of mercury are maintained. A AP of about 30 mm of
mercury is not too high. Results of several runs under various conditions are shown
in Table I. (1 mm of mercury = 133 Pa).
[0054] The temperature of the hot incoming oil 2 approximates the temperature of the hot,
freshly deodorized oil 21 in each run. The residence time of oil in the upper chamber
22 of the unit is about a minute and the residence time of the oil in reservoir 5
plus pumping time to interchanger 24 of the unit is about 1 to 2 minutes. The ratios
of the quenching oil to hot, freshly deodorized oil fed into the system were adjusted
to achieve the desired pool temperature shown in the Table.
[0055] The pool temperatures of Examples 2,3,4, 7, 8 and 9 illustrate some preferred PSFSPTs
of this invention.

[0056] Deodorized oil flavor (DOF) is subjectively evaluated on a 10:1 grading scale with
10 being a bland oil and 1 having a very objectionable or strong off-flavor. A 0.2
flavor differential is significant. As can be seen, oils deodorized without the aid
of the quench system of this invention graded lower in flavor quality than all the
oils deodorized using the quench system of this invention.
[0057] Compare unquenched run 1 with quenched run 4. They respectively had deodorized oil
flavors of 7.1 and 7.6. Both were dormant in the oil pool 6 and were pumped dormant
at temperatures of 249°C (480°F) and 207°C (405°F), respectively. Also compare the
flavors of unquenched sparged pool oil run 6 pumped at 249°C (480°F) with quenched,
sparged pool oil run 7 pumped at 229°C (445°F) which were respectively 7.3 and 7.8.
[0058] The hot, freshly deodorized oils of runs 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 and 9 were quenched to their
PBFSP temperatures within 50 seconds and probably within 10 seconds. The residence
or dwell times in the pool 6 of reservoir 5 were each about 1-2 minutes.
[0059] Comparing run 1, unquenched and dormant oil, with runs 5 and 6, unquenched and steam
sparged oils, give a direct comparison of the effect of steam sparging on oil quality.
These runs had deodorized oil flavors of 7.1, 7.3 and 7.3 respectively. This comparison
shows that steam sparging is directionally preferred and does improve flavor. This
improvement, however, is overshadowed by the greater flavor improvement achieved via
quenching. Steam sparging is directionally better but optional.
[0060] In all of the runs (1-9) pool oil 6 was pumped to heat exchanger 24 whereby the cooler
inlet oil 25 was warmed to save energy. Less energy was required to heat the inlet
oil via high temperature heater means 26 to the desired inlet deodorization temperature.
1. Verfahren zum Desodorieren von Öl, beim dem sich an eine Hochtemperaturdesodorierungsstufe
eine schnelle Abschreckstufe anschließt, gekennzeichnet durch
(a) Desodorieren von Speiseöl bei einer Temperatur im Bereich von 520°F (271 °C) bis
425°F (218°C) und einem Druck von 0,1 mm Quecksilber (13,3 Pa) bis 30 mm Quecksilber
(4000 Pa) und
(b) Abschrecken des desodorierten Öls Stufe (a) auf eine geschmacksstabile Temperatur
im Bereich von 480°F (249°C) bis 340°F (171 °C) binnen etwa 50 Sekunden durch Vermischen
dieses Öls mit desodoriertem Abschrecköl, wobei das Abschrecköl eine Temperatur wesentlich
unter dieser geschmacksstabilen Temperatur aufweist.
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Desodorierungstemperatur
von Stufe (a) im Bereich von 490°F (254°C) bis 460°F (238°C) liegt und worin das desodorierte
Öl von Stufe (b) auf einen geschmacksstabile Temperatur unter etwa 446°F (230°C) abgeschreckt
wird.
3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß das Verfahren kontinuierlich,
halbkontinuierlich oder absatzweise ist.
4. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, gekennzeichnet durch die zusätzliche
Stufe, das abgeschreckte Öl durch einem Wärmeaustauscher zu führen, um das abgeschreckte
Öl weiter zu kühlen und gleichzeitig nicht desodoriertes Öl zu erwärmen und dadurch
Energie zu sparen.
5. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß das
Abschrecköl eine Maximaltemperatur von etwa 140°F (60°C) aufweist.
6. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß in
Stufe (b) außerdem das desodorierte Öl mit Anschwänzdampf des Kühlens gerührt wird.
7. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 6, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß das Öl
ausgewählt ist aus der Gruppe bestehend aus Sonnenblumensamenöl, Sojabohnenöl, Leinsamenöl,
Maisöl, und Safransamenöl.
1. Procédé de désodorisation d'huile mettant en jeu une étape de désodorisation à
haute température suivie d'une étape de refroidissement rapide, caractérisé par:
(a) la désodorisation d'une huile comestible à une température comprise entre 271°C
(520°F) et 218°C (425°F) et sous une pression de 13,3 Pa (0,1 mm de mercure) à 4000
Pa (30 mm de mercure), et
(b) le refroidissement de l'huile désodorisée de l'étape (1) à une température, à
laquelle la flaveur est stable, comprise entre 249°C (480°F) et 171 °C (340°F) en
50 secondes environ, en mélangeant ladite huile à de l'huile de refroidissement désodirisée,
cette huile de refroidissement ayant une température très inférieure à ladite température
à laquelle la flaveur est stable.
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que la température de désodorisation
de l'étape (1) est comprise entre 254°C (490°F) et 238°C (460°F), et en ce que l'huile
désodorisée de l'étape (b) est refroidie à une température à laquelle la flaveur est
stable, inférieure à environ 230°C (446°F).
3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que le procédé est un
procédé continu, semi-continu or discontinu.
4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, caractérisé par l'étape
supplémentaire consistant à faire passer l'huile refroidie à travers un échangeur
de chaleur pour refroidir encore plus l'huile refroidie, et simultanément pour réchauffer
l'huile non désodirisée, et, pour cela, économiser de l'énergie.
5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, caractérisé en ce que
l'huile de refroidissement a une température maximale d'environ 60°C (140°F).
6. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 5, caractérisé en ce que
dans l'étape (b), on agite en outre l'huile désodorisée par introduction de vapeur,
en refroidissant.
7. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6, caractérisé en ce que
ladite huile est choisie dans le groupe composé de l'huile de graine de tournesol,
l'huile de soja, l'huile de lin, l'huile de maïs et l'huile de graine de carthame.