[0001] The present invention relates to the refining of crude vegetable oils. In particular,
the present invention relates to the refining of such crude oils containing impurities
to produce an essentially additive free product having good oxidative, flavor and
cold-test stabilities.
[0002] In the past, edible fats and oils derived from animal sources were refined for use
by physical refining methods. Vegetable oils however could not be satisfactorily refined
by these methods. The many and varied impurities vegetable oils might contain would
cause undesirable characteristics, such as dark colors or off-flavors or the like,
in the finished oils.
[0003] At present, the most common method of refining vegetable oils is the treatment of
crude oils with an alkali. Alkali refining removes free fatty acids and other acidic
materials, some phosphatides, proteinaceous matter, pigments and trace metals. Until
recently, most oils could not be deodorized satisfactorily unless they had been alkali
refined. However, although alkali refining is suitable for preparation of oils for
further processing steps, such as bleaching and deodorization, it has some serious
disadvantages also.
[0004] Alkali refining typically results in a high loss of the neutral oil components of
the crude oil, reducing the amount of yield of the refined oil product. In addition,
the removal of free fatty acids by alkali refining results in the production of soapstock
which has to be further processed in order to recover the fatty acids as a by-product.
Further, alkali refining typically results in a large amount of waste water, often
causing a serious water pollution problem. Alkali refined oils are additionally disadvantageous
in that the finished oils require stabilizers, typically antioxidants or citric acid,
or the like, to maintain acceptable flavor characteristics and prevent harmful oxidation
on storage.
[0005] Alkali refining also involves a dewaxing step which increases the cost of the refined
oil. This additional step removes such low temperature insoluble compounds, which
are generally referred to as waxes although these compounds are not limited to compounds
which are classed as waxes in a strict chemical sense. Without this processing step
of chilling the oil and removing the solids formed, the finished oil would not have
acceptable cold-test stability, i.e. it would not retain good clarity during storage
at 0°C for 24 hours.
[0006] Various processes for the physical refining of vegetable oils have been proposed
over the last few decades. Some of these have been successful with certain crude oils
containing limited amounts and types of impurities. For example, U.S. Patent No. 1,744,843
to Taylor, et al, relates to the process of bleaching animal and vegetable oils and
fats and comprises adding bleaching earth and sulfuric acid. The bleaching earth is
added at least as early in the process as the acid so that the fat or oil is exposed
to the acid only in the presence of the bleaching earth. The mixture is agitated and
the supernatant oil is drawn off and filtered through a layer of diatomaceous earth.
[0007] U.S. Patent No. 1,964,875 to Freiberg relates to an alkali-refining process, and
discloses a method of removing impurities from oils and fats in which the oils or
fats are mixed with a small quantity of concentrated phosphoric acid. The mixture
is then heated slowly to about 70°C and stirred, and a small quantity of cellulose
is added. When the action of the phosphoric acid and the cellulose is complete, the
oil is separated by filtration.
[0008] U.S. Patent No. 1,973,790 to Appleton relates to the method of purifying non-edible
vegetable oils to increase their heat stability for use in paints. The oil is purified
by thoroughly mixing it with an amount of phosphoric acid which is sufficient to react
with the impurities in the oil. This will cause such impurities to be precipitated
and settle out of the oil in the form of a sludge. The purified oil is then segregated
from the sludge.
[0009] U.S. Patent No. 2,441,923 to Sullivan, although itself not relating to physical refining,
does disclose that acid-activated adsorptive material such as Fuller's earth can be
used to remove residual color from alkali refined oil.
[0010] U.S. Patent No. 2,510,379 to Christenson relates to a method of removing lecithin,
other phosphatides and coloring matter. After the treatment of the oil with an alkali,
the oil is further treated with an equivalent amount of a strong acid, and resultant
salt produced by the alkali and the acid is removed. Phosphoric acid and other strong
acids are used to neutralize the oil (column 2 lines 35-42). The reference also shows
the use of acid activated bleaching clay (column 4 lines 10-15).
[0011] U.S. Patent No. 2,587,254 to Babayan relates to a method for reclaiming contaminated
refuse palm oil used in steel fabrication. According to this method the refuse palm
oil is treated with from 1% to 5% (by weight) of either phosphoric acid, sulfuric
acid or hydrochloric acid in at least 50% water (by weight of oil) at some temperature
from 0°C to 100°C. The mixture is allowed to stratify and the oil layer is separated
from the aqueous layer and bleached.
[0012] U.S. Patent No. 2,903,434 to Gloss et al relates not to the refining of oils, but
to the preparation of activated bleaching clay. Montmorillonite clay is treated with
an aqueous solution of a fluorine compound and either hydrochloric, phosphoric or
sulfuric acid.
[0013] U.S. Patent No. 2,981,697 to Mickelson et al shows a process for the preparation
of an acid-activated decolorizing clay. An acid-activatable subbentonite clay is treated
with hydrogen chloride in aqueous solution and then washed with water until substantially
free of chlorides. Then the washed clay is treated with either sulfuric acid or phosphoric
acid at a temperature below about 50°C to remove the residual chlorides. Excess acid
is removed from the clay, and the clay is flash-dryed at temperatures below 100°C.
[0014] U.S. Patent No. 3,284,213 to VanAkkeren discloses a process for treating triglyceride
cooking oils to inhibit breakdown during heating and to prevent foaming. About 0.05
to 3.5% of concentrated phosphoric acid is added to the oil, and the oil is heated
slowly to a temperature of about 100°C and stirred slowly to prevent the formation
of free acid in the oil. Bleaching clay is added to the oil when the temperature has
reached about 100°C and the mixture is then heated to about 120°C for about 15-30
minutes. The oil is first cooled and filtered to remove the clay and phosphoric acid
material, and then heated to about 220-225°C under reduced pressure. The reference
teaches that it is important to remove all of the phosphoric acid with the bleaching
clay prior to the final heat treatment. A ratio of phosphoric acid to clay up to 1:10
can be calculated from the examples.
[0015] U.S. Patent No. 3,354,188 to Rock et al shows a method of refining oil in which a
refining agent substantially insoluble in the oil is first combined with an emulsifying
agent, and then mixed with the oil to form an emulsion. A particulate solid, such
as Fuller's earth, activated clay or charcoal is then added to adsorb the refining
agent and the oil is separated from the solid. Phosphoric acid is listed among the
refining agents.
[0016] U.S. Patent No. 3,590,059 to Velan discloses a process for the purification of vegetable
and animal oils containing fatty acids and other impurities. The crude or degummed
oil is first washed with about 1 to 5% by weight of water and the aqueous phase is
separated from the resultant mixture. The washed oil is then treated with less than
0.3% by weight of organic acid, sueh as formic, acetic, oxalic, lactic, citric, tartaric
or succinic acids or the anhydrides of any of these acids or mixtures of these acids.
The moisture level of the oil is adjusted and the oil is bleached with a bleaching
earth. Following this, the bleached oil is steam distilled under vacuum to remove
fatty acids. The use of mineral acids, rather than organic acids, is also suggested.
[0017] Great Britan Patent No. 1,359,186 and U.S. Patent No. 4,113,752 to Watanabe et al
disclose a method of refining palm-type oils. Essentially, 0.01 to 2.0% by weight
of phosphoric acid is added to the crude palm-type oil, which is substantially phosphatide-free
and in which any carotinoids remain substantially in a heat sensitive condition. After
mixing, activated clay is added and the temperature is increased to and maintained
at about 100°C for about 5 to 30 minutes. Then the clay is separated from the oil
and the oil is refined-deodorized by steam distillation at a temperature of 200°-270°C,
with superheated steam. The calculated ratio of phosphoric acid to bleaching clay
ranges from about 1:0.1 to 1:60.
[0018] U.S. Patent No. 3,895,042 to Taylor relates to a process for refining crude vegetable
oils as well as other fatty substances. The crude fatty substances are heated to a
temperature of from about 325°F to 500°F under vacuum or inert atmosphere in the presence
of phosphoric acid and acid activated clay. The resulting product is then filtered.
[0019] GB Patent No. 1 580 664 relates to improvements in refining crude fatty oils, which
contain substantially no phospholipids. Therefore the degumming step is not an object
of the citation. Although the steps of the process according to said'reference are
similar to the process according to the invention, the ratio of the bleaching agent
to phosphoric acid does not correspond with the claimed ratio, for oils other than
palm oil.
Objects of the present invention
[0020] It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for the refining of
crude vegetable oils.
[0021] It is a further object of the present invention to provide a process for the refining
of crude vegetable oils containing such impurities as phospholipids, waxes and trace
metals.
[0022] It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a process for the
refining of crude vegetable oils in which the economically valuable by-products may
be more easily recovered.
[0023] It is another object of the present invention to provide a refined oil product having
increased stability of flavor characteristics.
[0024] It is another object of the present invention to provide a refined oil product having
increased stability against oxidation.
[0025] It is another object of the present invention to provide a refined oil product having
satisfactory cold-test stability without the necessity for a separate winterizing
step.
[0026] The objects features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent
in light of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment thereof.
[0027] According to the present invention, there is provided a process for the refining
of crude vegetable oils with the exception of palm oil to provide a product having
good oxidative, flavor and cold-test stabilities, by treatment with phosphoric acid
and a bleaching agent and subsequent deodorization characterized in that it comprises
the following steps:
(a) degumming the crude oil by
i) combining said crude oil with a small amount of water to form a mixture with said
oil,
ii) agitating said mixture,
iii) separating the oil from the water and precipitating impurities;
(b) bleaching the oil obtained in step (a)(iii) by
i) combining said oil with an amount of phosphoric acid in aqueous solution so as
to form a mixture with at least two one-hundredths of a percent (0.02%) phosphoric
acid by weight,
ii) maintaining the mixture at a suitable temperature while agitating intensely to
allow reaction,
iii) combining the mixture thus treated in step (b)(ii) with a bleaching agent in
proportions of 29:1 to 39:1 to said phosphoric acid to allow in the final product
a level of up to three parts per million (3 ppm) residual phosphorus derived from
the phosphoric acid added in (b)(i),
iv) raising the temperature of the mixture of step (b)(iii) under vacuum to a temperature
suitable for the action of the chosen bleaching agent and maintaining said temperature
while agitating said mixture,
v) cooling the mixture of step (b)(iv) to a temperature at which the vacuum can be
broken, and vi) filtering the bleached oil; then
(c) steam refining-deodorizing the bleached oil obtained in step (b)(vi).
[0028] According to another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a process
for the refining of crude vegetable oils, wherein previous to the bleaching step the
following step (3 is performed:
(13) degumming/demetalizing the degummed oil obtained in step (a)(iii) by
i) combining said oil with a small amount of suitable degumming reagent known to the
art to form a mixture,
ii) agitating said mixture,
iii) combining the mixture with a small amount of water,
iv) agitating the mixture, and
v) separating the oil from the residual impurities.
[0029] According to the present invention it has now been determined that an edible oil
having good flavor, oxidative and cold-test stability characteristics can be obtained
from a physical-type refining process. The present invention provides an oil as a
final product with a level of up to three parts per million (3 ppm) residual phosphoric
derived from phosphoric acid used in the process.
[0030] While the patentee does not wish to be bound to one particular mechanism, it is presently
supposed that the phosphoric acid added as a processing aid reacts with minor components
of the oil, such as chlorophyll, phospholipids and prooxidant metals during processing
and may prevent some deleterious effect the bleaching earth would otherwise have on
the oil if the phosphoric acid were not present. It is believed that the phosphorus
has no further beneficial effect after the bleaching step and its removal after action
of the bleaching earth would not alter the beneficial characteristics of the oil of
the present invention. However, since the residual level of up to three parts per
million (3 ppm) phosphorus obtained in this manner is substantially lower than the
level permitted and often employed as an additive in alkali-refined oils, it is believed
that complete removal of the processing aid is unnecessary. A residual level of up
to three parts per million (3 ppm) phosphorus in the finished oil is undetectable
as phosphoric acid by normal acidity measurements and below the detectable level for
phosphorus using the approved test AOCS Official Method No. Ca 12-55.
[0031] Phosphorus present at the time of bleaching in the form of phospholipids does not
produce an oil having the superior properties of the present invention. It is believed
that such phosphorus compounds have no ability to bind heavy metals, such as iron
and copper which promote oxidation.
[0032] To obtain a finished oil with these superior properties, the process must be carefully
controlled to satisfactorily remove essentially all of the phosphoric acid without
permitting the oil to be exposed to the action of the bleaching agent alone. The parameters
for such a controlled removal of phosphoric acid were determined experimentally. Treatment
of the oil with an excess of bleaching agent would remove all of the phosphoric acid.
It is believed that this would have the same effect as treatment of the oil with bleaching
agent alone, which would impair the oxidative stability of the oil. At residual phosphorus
levels above three parts per million (3 ppm) some acidity becomes detectable and,
although refined oils having a phosphorus level this high may have acceptable initial
properties, such oils do not retain these superior properties on storage.
[0033] In the present invention, a process is shown in which an unrefined vegetable oil
is first pre-treated to remove impurities, then steam-refined to produce a finished
oil having good oxidative, flavor and cold-test stabilities.
[0034] Vegetable oils are known to contain many different types of impurities which must
be removed prior to steam refining. Crude oils may contain any or all of the following:
free fatty acids, hydratable phospholipids, non-hydratable phospholipids, low-temperature
insolubles (generally referred to as "waxes"), trace metals, pigments, proteinaceous
matter, mucilagenous matter, mycotoxins, pesticides and oxidation products. With the
exception of cottonseed oil, which contains a dark red pigment generally referred
to as "gossipol" which is considered to be removable only by treatment with alkali,
the process of the present invention can be applied to any of the commercially available
oils: corn, soybean, peanut, safflower, sunflower, rapeseed, rice bran, coconut and
babassu oils.
[0035] These commercially known oils contain at least some of the impurities listed above.
Some, such as soybean oil and rapeseed oil, typically contain relatively high concentrations
of hydratable and non-hydratable phospholipids whereas the concentration of other
impurities, such as low temperature insolubles (waxes) may not present a removal problem.
Other oils, such as corn oil and sunflower oil, may contain relatively high concentrations
of waxes, or trace metals, whereas phospholipids may not normally present a removal
problem.
[0036] Since other oils, such as palm oil may not have concentrations of impurities which
require removal prior to bleaching and steam refining. Physical refining methods have
previously been applied to such oils with some success, as described for example in
the GB-PS 1 580 664.
[0037] Most of the impurities referred to above do not represent useful by-products and
no attempt is generally made to recover them. Free fatty acids and phospholipids can
be useful, however, and it is not unusual to attempt to recover these. In an alkali
refining process, the free fatty acids removed are only recoverable from the soapstock
produced and are of generally low quality. In the present invention, phospholipids
as removed are of better quality and can be utilized for animal feed or the like,
or further processed to recover commercial quality lecithin. Free fatty acids, of
a high quality than the acid oil obtained from soapstock, can be obtained directly
from the steam distillate in a much purer form.
[0038] It should be noted that the process described herein is effective to remove mycotoxins,
such as aflatoxin, from the crude oil. However, where such toxins are present it is
possible that by-products may contain these contaminants.
[0039] Assuming, for the moment, that a certain crude oil contained relatively high concentrations-of
low temperature insolubles (waxes) as well as trace metals and both hydratable and
non-hydratable phospholipids. As a first processing step the crude oil would be degummed
with water. A small amount of water, typically 1 to 5 percent by weight, would be
added and agitated with the oil. The amount of water should be sufficient to remove
the significant portion of the hydratable compounds. Afterwards the oil is separated
by any practical means, and centrifuging or settling are common.
[0040] This step may be carried out at any convenient temperature and room temperature is
often suitable. However, lower temperatures are useful in order to provide the most
efficient removal of compounds which are not soluble in the oil at low temperatures,
referred to generally as "waxes". It is advantageous therefore where such waxes are
present to complete this step at a slightly lower temperature, and temperatures in
the range of about 5°C to about 20°C are most suitable.
[0041] In order to remove non-hydratable phospholipids and trace metals such as iron, copper,
calcium, magnesium or the like, an additional pretreatment step is necessary. A small
amount of a suitable degumming reagent, typically less than one percent (1%) by weight,
and water are added to the oil and agitated. The reagent may be chosen from many which
are known to the art, such as organic or inorganic acids or their anhydrides. Emulsifiers
and surfactants are also known to be useful for this purpose. At present, the preferred
reagents are maleic, fumaric, citric and phosphoric acid. The degummed/ demetalized
oil is then separated from the heavy phase containing any residual phospholipids and
trace metals.
[0042] Oil prepared for bleaching, through the steps set out above, or by any other method
known to the art, is combined with a small amount of phosphoric acid in aqueous solution.
It is preferred to use a concentrated solution to reduce the need for later water
removal. The amount of phosphoric acid should be enough to form a mixture with at
least two one-hundredths of a percent (0.02%) phosphoric acid by weight in the oil.
Although larger amounts could be used, any concentration higher than about two-tenths
of a percent (0.2%) phosphoric acid would cause a removal problem and this level therefore
represents an upper limit as a practical matter. The preferred range is from about
five one-hundredths of a percent (0.05%) to about one tenth of a percent (0.1%) phosphoric
acid by weight.
[0043] This mixture of oil and phosphoric acid is then agitated and it is advantageous to
raise the temperature slightly. Temperatures between about 35°C and 40°C are typically
employed advantageously, although at higher temperatures, usually above 40°C, it is
considered necessary to introduce vacuum to prevent the harmful effects of oxidation
on the oil quality.
[0044] At this stage a bleaching agent, such as activated bleaching earth, Fuller's earth
or the like is added in a suitable amount in order to remove most, but not all, of
the phosphoric acid previously added. The amount of bleaching agent should be calculated
to provide an oil as a final product with a level of up to three parts per million
(3 ppm) residual phosphorus derived from the phosphoric acid. The preferred bleaching
agent is an activated bleaching clay commercially available under the Tradename Filtrol
105(8) from Filtrol Corporation, which has been used advantageously in the Examples
which follow. If vacuum has not previously been introduced, the system should be evacuated
prior to heating the mixture to a temperature suitable for the action of the chosen
bleaching agent and agitating. Following the action of the bleaching agent, the bleached
oil should be filtered. To prevent oxidation of the oil, the vacuum should not be
broken until the oil has been cooled sufficiently. Alternatively, the oil could be
blanketed with an inert gas such as nitrogen or carbon dioxide.
[0045] The oil bleached in this manner is then steam refined/deodorized in a manner known
to the art to complete the processing.
[0046] The present invention is shown more clearly in the following illustrative examples.
Example 1
[0047] A high quality corn oil was extracted from corn germ by the process disclosed in
Application No. 8012909 filed in Great Britain on April 18,1980, published on October
28,1981 as UK Patent Application No. 2,074,183. The same disclosure recently issued
as United States Patent 4,341,713 claiming priority of the British Application. The
corn oil, which has already been degummed, obtained in this manner was uncharacteristically
free of phospholipids and waxes, and was refined by the process of this invention
and by the alkali refining process of the conventional art for comparison. Certain
physical and chemical properties of this crude oil are listed in Table 1.
[0048] A six kilogram (6.0 kg) quantity of the crude corn oil maintained under a vacuum
of two millimeters mercury (2 mm Hg) absolute pressure at 40°C was treated with four
one-hundredths of a percent (0.04%) by weight phosphoric acid in an eighty-five percent
(85%) concentration in aqueous solution and agitated intensely for 15 minutes. Then,
one percent (1.0%) bleaching earth by weight of the oil, commercially available from
Filtrol Corporation under the Trademark Filtrol 105@ and two-tenths of a percent (0.2%)
filter aid by weight of the oil, available from the Johns-Manville Corporation under
the trademark Filtercel@ were added to this evacuated system. The system was heated
to 120°C and intense agitation continued for an additional 20 minutes, after which
the mixture was cooled to 80°C and the vacuum was broken with nitrogen. The bleached
oil was filtered off in a Buechner funnel and two portions of two and three-tenths
kilogram (2.3 kg) each were measured out.
[0049] The first such portion was designated Sample A and was steam refined-deodorized for
90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter mercury,
0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using two percent (2.0%) sparging steam. A small amount
of citric acid, known to be a useful additive in alkali refined oils, was added to
the second portion, designated Sample B, in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution
in order to yield a feedstock for deodorization having one hundred parts per million
(100 ppm) citric acid. The sample was then steam refined/deodorized under the same
conditions as Sample A. Physical and chemical properties of Sample A and B are also
shown in Table 1.
[0050] Comparative samples were prepared by conventional alkali refining methods in the
following manner. A six and one-tenth kilogram (6.1 kg) quantity of the same crude
corn oil maintained at 40°C was treated with a two and eight-tenths of a percent (2.8%)
of 16° Baume sodium hydroxide solution and agitated intensely for 15 minutes. The
oil was then heated to 65°C and stirred for an additional 15 minutes. Following this
the oil was centrifuged at fourteen hundred and thirty-three (1433) times the gravitational
constant (9.81 m/sec
2) at a rate of nine kilograms per hour (9 kg/hr) to separate the precipitated soaps.
All centrifugations in this and the following examples were carried out under these
conditions unless specifically noted. The oil was then washed by twice adding and
mixing hot distilled water in the amount of ten percent (10%) by weight and centrifuging
each time. Subsequently, the oil was dried at a temperature of 100°C under a vacuum
of 266 Pa (two millimeters mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure for 30 minutes.
[0051] The oil was bleached by adding one percent (1.0%) bleaching earth by weight of the
oil, commercially available from Filtrol Corporation under the Trademark Filtrol@
105, together with two-tenths of a percent (0.2%) filter aid by weight of the oil,
commercially available from the Johns-Manville Corporation under the Trademark Filtercel@,
heating the mixture to 120°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters mercury, 2
mm Hg) absolute pressure and agitating for 20 minutes. After cooling to 80°C, the
oil was filtered off in a Buechner funnel and two portions of two and three-tenths
kilogram (2.3 kg) each were measured out. Sample C was deodorized for 90 minutes at
240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg)
absolute pressure using one and one-half percent (1.5%) sparging steam. A small amount
of citric acid was added to Sample D in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution in
order to yield a feedstock for deodorization having one hundred parts per million
(100 ppm) citric acid. The sample was. then deodorized under the same conditions as
Sample C. Physical and chemical properties of Samples C and D are also given in Table
1.

[0052] To assess the stability of the samples produced, the oils were subjected to color
reversion and flavor stability tests.
[0053] The color reversion test consisted of storage in the dark at ambient temperature
with unlimited air space for eight weeks. Color measurements were performed according
to AOCS Official Method Cd 13b-45. The color reversion data for each sample are given
in Table 2. Since the reversion of color is believed to be a result of oxidative changes
in the oil, peroxide values were also measured according to the AOCS Official Method
Cd 8-53 at the time of each color determination. This data is also given in Table
2.

[0054] Flavor stability tests were conducted as follows: Samples were stored in the dark
at 35°C with ten percent (10%) air head space and flavor determinations were made
by a trained panel after two (2), five (5) and twelve (12) months. Each sample was
scored for flavor strength on a scale from 1 to 9 with 1 being completely flavorless
and 9 extremely strong. The results of these tests are given in Table 3.

Example 2
[0055] Crude, expelled corn oil having appreciable amounts of impurities such as free fatty
acids, phospholipids, waxes, trace metals and proteinaceous matter was prepared by
the common commercial expelling process. In this process crude oil is recovered by
subjecting dry corn germ, typically containing from forty-three percent (43%) to forty-five
percent (45%) oil and moisture in the amount of one and one-half percent (1.5%) to
two percent (2.0%) by weight, to mechanical pressure in a screw press. Physical and
chemical properties for this crude oil are given in Table 4.
[0056] A thirteen and one-tenth kilogram (13.1 kg) quantity of the crude corn oil was mixed
with three percent (3.0%) by weight of distilled water and heated to 60°C. The oil
was held at this temperature and intensely agitated for 15 minutes. Precipitating
gums were separated by centrifugation.
[0057] The degummed oil thus obtained was treated with two-tenths of one-percent (0.2%)
by weight phosphoric acid in an eighty-five percent (85%) concentration in aqueous
solution. The oil was intensely agitated at a temperature of 40°Cfor a period of 15
minutes. Then, three percent (3.0%) by weight distilled water was added and the temperature
was raised to 60°C and agitated for 15 minutes. The oil was then centrifuged to remove
the residual gums and metal complexes.
[0058] The first portion of five and two-tenths kilogram (5.2 kg) of the degummed, demetalized
oil was treated with one-tenth of one percent (0.1%) phosphoric acid in an eighty-five
percent (85%) concentration in aqueous solution. The oil was then stirred for 15 minutes
at 40°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure.
The same bleaching earth and filter aid described in Example 1 were then added in
the amount of three percent (3.0%) bleaching earth by weight of the oil and six-tenths
of one percent (0.6%) filter aid by weight of the oil. This mixture was heated to
120°C and agitated for 20 minutes. The oil was cooled to 90°C, the vacuum was broken
with nitrogen and the oil was filtered off in a Buechner funnel.
[0059] Sample E and Sample F, each containing two and three-tenths kilogram (2.3 kg) were
measured out from the bleached oil obtained in this manner. As in Example 1, citric
acid in twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution was added to Sample F to provide one
hundred parts per million (100 ppm) citric acid in the feedstock for deodorization.
Both samples were then steam refined-deodorized for 90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum
of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using
two percent (2.0%) spargin steam. Physical and chemical properties for these samples
are given in Table 4.
[0060] The second portion of six and two-tenths kilogram (6.2 kg) of the degummed, demetalized
oil was reacted with a five and four-tenths of one percent (5.4%) of 16° Baume sodium
hydroxide solution and agitated intensely at 40°C for 15 minutes. The oil was then
heated to 65°C and stirred for 15 minutes. Soapstock produced was separated from the
oil by centrifugation. The oil was then washed by twice adding and mixing hot distilled
water in the amount of ten percent (10%) by weight and centrifuging each time. Subsequently,
the oil was dried at a temperature of 100°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters
mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure for 30 minutes.
[0061] The oil was bleached by adding two percent (2.0%) bleaching earth by weight of the
oil, and four-tenths of one percent (0.4%) of the filter aid, by weight of the oil,
used in Example 1. The mixture was heated to 120°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters
of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure and agitated for 20 minutes. The mixture was
then cooled to 90°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen and the oil was filtered
off with a Buechner funnel. Sample G and Sample H, each containing two and three-tenths
kilogram (2.3 kg), were measured out from the oil obtained in this manner. As in Example
1, citric acid in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution was added to Sample H to
provide one hundred parts per million (100 ppm) citric acid in the feedstock for deodorization.
Both samples were then deodorized for 90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa
(two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using two percent
(2.0%) sparging steam. Physical and chemical properties for these samples are given
in Table 4.

[0062] Following the methods used in Example 1, the samples produced were subjected to color
reversion and flavor stability tests. The resulting data are shown in Table 5 and
Table 6.

Example 3
[0063] A two thousand two hundred and sixty kilogram (2260 kg) quantity of regular production
crude expelled corn oil was placed into a stainless steel kettle equipped with a two-propeller
stirrer. One hundred and thirteen kilograms (113 kg) water, amounting to five percent
(5.0%) by weight, was added to the oil and the mixture was agitated at two hundred
and fifty revolutions per minute (250 rpm) at ambient temperature (approximately 27°C)
for 30 minutes. The precipitating gums were separated in a Westphalia@ centrifuge
operating at seventy-eight hundred revolutions per minute (7800 rpm), with an oil
flow rate of four and one-half kilograms per minute (4.5 kg/minute). The degummed
oil obtained was deaerated and dried under a vacuum of 10640 Pa (eighty millimeters
of mercury, 80 mm Hg) absolute pressure at a temperature of 40°C with intense agitation
for 70 minutes.
[0064] To this oil, two and six one-hundredths kilogram (2.06 kg) food grade phosphoric
acid, amounting to one tenth of one percent (0.1%) by weight, in an eighty-five percent
(85%) concentration in aqueous solution was added and the mixture was further agitated
under vacuum for another 30 minutes. A two hundred and fifty liter (250 I) portion
of the oil was pumped into a slurry kettle where it was mixed with sixty two kilograms
(62 kg), representing three percent (3.0%) by weight of the total oil, bleaching earth
(Filtrol@ 105 as described in Example 1) and twelve and one-half kilogram (12.5 kg),
representing six-tenths of a percent (0.6%) by weight of the total oil, filter aid
commercially available from the Johns-Manville Corporation under the Trademark Hyflo
Super-Cel@. The mixture in the slurry kettle was agitated intensely for 5 minutes,
and was then reintroduced into the original kettle, still under vacuum. The mixture
was heated to 120°C and agitated at one hundred revolutions per minute (100 rpm) for
30 minutes. The mixture was then cooled to 60°C and held under reduced pressure of
13300 Pa (one hundred millimeters of mercury, 100 mm Hg) absolute pressure until filtration
was completed. The filter press was then blown with nitrogen to recover excess oil.
[0065] To produce samples which were both citrated and non-citrated, citric acid in the
form of a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution was introduced into a quantity of
the oil, designated as Sample J. Citric acid was added into the final deodorization
stage at the rate of one milliliter per minute (1 ml/min) representing a proportion
of citric acid to the oil of fifty parts per million (50 ppm). The remaining oil was
not treated with citric acid and was designated as Sample K.
[0066] Both samples were steam refined-deodorized in a continuous pilot plant deodorizer
unit at an oil flow rate of two hundred and seventy-four kilograms per hour (274 kg/hr)
at a temperature of 227°C under a vacuum of 133-266 Pa (one to two millimeters of
mercury, 1-2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using three percent (3.0%) sparging steam.
Example 4
[0068] Samples of typical crude soybean oil were refined by the process of this invention
and by the alkali refining process of the conventional art for comparison. Certain
physical and chemical properties of the oil, at each stage of both refining processes
are given in Table 10.
[0069] A fourteen kilogram (14 kg) quantity of crude soybean oil was heated to 40°C in a
glass container, then three percent (3.0%) by weight of distilled water was added
and the oil was agitated intensely for 20 minutes. The temperature was raised to 60°C
and a slower agitation continued for another 20 minutes. The oil was then centrifuged
to separate the hydrated phosphatides.
[0070] The oil thus obtained was treated with two-tenths of a percent (0.2%) phosphoric
acid in an eighty-five percent (85%) concentration in aqueous solution and agitated
intensely for 15 minutes at a temperature 40°C under a nitrogen atmosphere. Distilled
water, in the amount of three percent (3.0%) by weight, was then added to the oil.
The temperature was increased to 60°C and a slower agitation continued for another
20 minutes. The oil was then centrifuged under the same conditions as above to separate
the oil from residual phosphatides and gums.
[0071] A five and three-tenths kilogram (5.3 kg) portion of the twice degummed oil was treated
with three one-hundredths of a percent (0.03%) phosphoric acid in an eighty-five percent
(85%) concentration in aqueous solution and stirred at 40°C under a vacuum of 266
Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure for 15 minutes.
[0072] Then, one percent (1.0%) bleaching earth, by weight of the oil, commercially available
from Filtrol Corporation under the Trademark Filtrol 105@, and two-tenths of a percent
(0.2%) filter aid, by weight of the oil, commercially available from the Johns-Manville
Corporation under the Trademark Filtercel@ were added and the mixture, while still
under vacuum, was heated to 120°C and intensely agitated. After twenty minutes of
such continued treatment, the mixture was cooled to 80°C, the vacuum was broken with
nitrogen and the oil was filtered off in a Buechner funnel.
[0073] A small amount of citric acid in a fifteen percent (15%) aqueous solution was added
to yield one hundred parts per million (100 ppm) citric acid in the bleached oil,
and the oil was then steam refined-deodorized for 90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum
of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using
one and seven-tenths percent (1.7%) sparging steam. The oil obtained in this manner
was designated Sample L.
[0074] A comparative sample was prepared by conventional alkali refining methods in the
following manner. A six and four-tenths kilogram (6.4 kg) quantity of the same twice
degummed oil maintained at 40°C was treated with four and fifty-six one-hundredths
of a percent (4.56%) of 16° Baume sodium hydroxide solution and was agitated intensely
under a nitrogen atmosphere for 15 minutes. The temperature was increased to 65°C
and a slower stirring continued for another 15 minutes. The oil was then centrifuged
to separate the precipitated soaps. Following this, the oil was washed by twice adding
and mixing hot distilled water in the amount of ten percent (10%) by weight and centrifuging
each time. Subsequently, the oil was dried at a temperature of 105°C under a vacuum
of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure for 30 minutes.
[0075] The oil was bleached by adding one percent (1.0%) by weight of the same bleaching
earth and two-tenths of a percent (0.2%) by weight of the same filter aid employed
above, heating the mixture to 120°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury
2 mm Hg) absolute pressure and agitating for 20 minutes. After cooling to 80°C, the
oil was filtered off in a Buechner funnel. A small amount of citric acid in a fifteen
percent (15%) aqueous solution was added to yield one hundred parts per million (100
ppm) citric acid in the bleached oil. The oil was then deodorized for 90 minutes at
250°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg)
absolute pressure using one and one-half percent (1.5%) sparging steam. The oil obtained
in this manner was designated Sample M.

[0076] The samples obtained in the above manner were then tested for flavor stability. The
samples were sealed in clear 236,6 cm
3 (eight ounce, 8 oz) glass bottles with ten percent (10%) air headspace, and aged
under irradiation and dark storage conditions. The samples subjected to irradiation
were stored for three (3) weeks in a light cabinet having a continuous light exposure
equivalent to 700 lux (sixty-five (65) foot candles) at a constant temperature of
35°C. The samples subjected to dark storage were kept in a light-proof cabinet for
six (6) months at a constant temperature of 35°C. Following the method described in
Example 1, flavor evaluations on a scale of 1 to 9 were made by a trained panel. The
results are reported in Table 11.

Example 5
[0077] Commercial Canadian rapeseed oil is produced from rapeseed varieties which are typically
low in erucic acid and glucosinolate. This oil is commercially available as a water-degummed
crude which contains a maximum of two hundred parts per million (200 ppm) residual
phosphorus and no more than five percent (5.0%) erucic acid. As described below, a
sample of this oil was refined in the laboratory according to the process of the present
invention. An additional sample was prepared by the alkali refining process of the
conventional art for comparison. Certain physical and chemical properties of this
commercially available oil are listed in Table 12.
[0078] A ten kilogram (10 kg) sample of this Canadian commercial grade crude rapeseed oil
was placed in a metal container. With the temperature held constant at 25°C, maleic
acid in aqueous solution in the amount of two-hundredths of a percent (0.02%) by weight
of the oil was added and the mixture was stirred for ten minutes. Distilled water,
in the amount of three percent (3.0%) by weight of the oil, was added and the mixture
was agitated for an additional twenty (20) minutes. The mixture was then centrifuged
to separate the oil from the hydrated phospholipids.
[0079] A three and three-tenths kilogram (3.3 kg) portion of the rapeseed oil degummed in
this manner was bleached according to the further teachings of the present invention.
The oil was maintained under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm
Hg) absolute pressure at 40°C and was treated with one-tenth of one percent (0.1%)
phoshoric acid by weight of the oil in an eighty-five percent (85%) concentration
in aqueous solution and agitated intensely for 10 minutes. Then, three percent (3.0%)
bleaching earth, by weight of the oil, commercially available from Filtrol Corporation
under the Trademark Filtrol105@, and six-tenths of a percent (0.6%) filter aid, by
weight of the oil, commercially available from Johns-Manville Corporation under the
Trademark Filtercel@, were added to this evacuated system. The system was heated to
120°C with intense agitation. After 20 minutes at this temperature, the mixture was
cooled to 80°C, agitation was discontinued and the vacuum was broken with nitrogen.
The bleached oil was then filtered off in a Buechner funnel.
[0080] A two and four-tenths kilogram (2.4 kg) portion of the bleached oil thus obtained
was then steam refined-deodorized. The bleached oil was first treated with fifty parts
per million (50 ppm) citric acid, added in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution.
Subsequently, the oil was steam refined-deodorized in a five liter (5 flask for 90
minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury,
0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure, using two percent (2.0%) sparging steam. The rapeseed
oil physically refined in this manner was designated Sample N. Certain physical and
chemical properties of this oil, at various process stages, are shown in Table 12.
[0081] A comparative sample was processed by the conventional alkali refining method in
the following manner. A five and seven-tenths kilogram quantity (5.7 kg) of the rapeseed
oil degummed with maleic acid as described above was treated with one and three-tenths
percent (1.3%) of 14° Baume sodium hydroxide solution and agitated intensely at 25°C
for 15 minutes. Next, the temperature was raised to 65°C and the oil was stirred slowly
for an additional 15 minutes. Afterwards, the precipitating soaps were separated from
the oil by centrifugation. The oil was then washed twice by adding and mixing hot
water in the amount of ten percent (10%) by weight and separating the water each time
by centrifugation. Following this, the oil was dried at a temperature of 60°C under
a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters mercury (2 mm Hg)) absolute pressure for 15 minutes.
[0082] A three and six-tenths kilogram (3.6 kg) quantity of the oil refined with alkali
in this manner was bleached by adding two percent (2.0%) bleaching earth, by weight
of the oil, commercially available from the Filtrol Corporation under the Trademark
Filtrol®105, together with four-tenths of a percent (0.4%) filter aid, by weight of
the oil, commercially available from Johns-Manville Corporation under-the Trademark
Filtercel@. The mixture was then heated to 120°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters
mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure and agitated for 20 minutes. The mixture was then
cooled to 80°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen and the oil was filtered in a
Buechner funnel.
[0083] A sample of two and four-tenths kilogram (2.4 kg) of this oil was measured out and
fifty parts per million (50 ppm) citric acid in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution
was added. The oil was deodorized for 90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa
(two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using one and
five-tenths percent (1.5%) sparging steam. The finished alkali refined oil produced
in this manner was designated Sample 0. Certain physical and chemical properties and
properties of this oil, at various process stages are also shown in Table 12.

[0084] To assess the stability of the finished rapeseed oils produced, Samples N and 0 were
subjected to flavor stability tests. The oils were sealed in clear 236,6 cm
3 (eight ounce (8 oz)) glass bottles with ten percent (10%) air headspace and aged
under irradiation and dark storage conditions. The irradiated samples were stored
for three (3) weeks in a light cabinet having a continuous light exposure equivalent
to 700 lux (sixty five (65) foot candles) at a constant temperature of 35°C. The samples
subjected to dark storage were kept in a light-proof cabinet for eight (8) weeks at
a constant temperature of 30°C. Flavor evaluations were performed by a trained panel.
Each sample was scored for flavor strength on a scale from one (1) to nine (9) with
one (1) being completely flavorless and nine (9) extremely strong. The results are
shown in Table 13.

Example 6
[0085] A sample of commercially available crude peanut oil was divided into two portions,
one of which was refined by the process of this invention and the other by conventional
alkali refining for comparison. Certain physical and chemical properties of the crude
oil and samples obtained at various stages of each refining process are listed in
Table 14.
[0086] A ten kilogram (10 kg) sample of crude peanut oil was mixed with two percent (2.0%)
distilled water, by weight of the oil, and agitated intensely for 30 minutes at a
temperature of 25°C. The oil was then centrifuged to separate the hydrated phospholipids.
[0087] Two and eight-tenths kilograms (2.8 kg) of the peanut oil degummed in this manner
was treated with two-hundredths of a percent (0.02%) phosphoric acid, by weight of
the oil, in an eighty-five percent (85%) concentration in aqueous solution and agitated
intensely for 15 minutes at a temperature of 40°C under atmospheric pressure..Then,
five-tenths of a percent (0.5%) Fiitro) 105@ bleaching earth, by weight of the oil,
and one-tenth of a percent (0.1%) Filtercel@ filter aid, by weight of the oil, both
described in previous examples, were added and the mixture was agitated under a vacuum
of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure while the temperature
was raised to 110°C. After 20 minutes of intense agitation under these conditions
the mixture was cooled to 90°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen and the oil was
filtered off in a Buechner funnel.
[0088] A two and four-tenths kilogram (2.4 kg) sample of the bleached oil was treated with
thirty parts per million (30 ppm) citric acid in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution
and the oil was then steam refined-deodorized for 90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum
of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using
two percent (2.0%) sparging steam. The oil obtained in this manner was designated
Sample P.
[0089] A comparative sample was prepared by the conventional alkali refining method in the
following manner. A two and eight-tenths kilogram (2.8 kg) quantity of oil which had
previously been degummed with water was treated with one and two-tenths of a percent
(1.2%) 14° Baume sodium hydroxide solution, by weight of the oil, and agitated intensely
at 25°C for 15 minutes. The temperature was then raised to 65°C and the oil was stirred
slowly for an additional 15 minutes. The oil was centrifuged to separate the precipitated
soaps. This was followed by twice washing the oil with hot distilled water in the
amount of ten percent (10%) by weight and centrifuging each time. Finally, the oil
was dried at a temperature of 60°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury,
2 mm Hg) absolute pressure for 15 minutes.
[0090] Bleaching of the oil was performed by adding five-tenths of a percent (0.5%) of Filtrol
105@ bleaching earth together with one-tenth of a percent (0.1 %) of Filtercel@ type
filter aid, heating the mixture to 110°C under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters
mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure and agitating for 20 minutes. After cooling the
mixture to 90°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen and the oil was filtered in a
Buechner funnel.
[0091] A two and four-tenths kilogram (2.4 kg) sample of the bleached oil was treated with
thirty parts per million (30 ppm) citric acid in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution,
and deodorized for 60 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a
millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using one and one-half percent
(1.5%) sparging steam. The oil obtained in this manner was designated Sample R.

[0092] Both-samples were tested for color reversion and development of peroxides. The color
reversion test consisted of storage in the dark at 25°C with unlimited air headspace
for 6 weeks. Color and peroxide measurements were performed according to AOCS Official
Methods, Cd 13b-45 and Cd 8-53 respectively. The results are given in Table 15.

Example 7
[0093] Crude, "non-break" safflower oil, which is available commercially, typically has
already been degummed with water. The residual level of phospholipids in such oil
is sufficiently low that the oil may be refined by the process of the present invention
without any additional pretreatment. Certain physical and chemical characteristics
of this crude safflower oil and samples obtained at various stages of each refining
process are listed in Table 16. A sample of such commercially available oil was divided
into two portions, one of which was refined by the process of this invention and the
other by conventional alkali refining for comparison.
[0094] A three kilogram (3 kg) sample of crude safflower oil was treated with eight one-hundredths
of a percent (0.08%) phosphoric acid in an eighty-five percent (85%) concentration
in aqueous solution and stirred at 25°C under air for 10 minutes. Then, two percent
(2.0%) Filtrol 105" bleaching earth, by weight of the oil, and four-tenths of a percent
(0.4%) Filtercel@ filter aid, by weight of the oil, both described previously, were
added and the mixture was heated to 110°C with intense agitation under a vacuum of
266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure. After 20 minutes of
such treatment, the mixture was cooled to 80°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen
and the oil was filtered in a Buechner funnel.
[0095] A sample of two and four-tenths kilogram (2.4 kg) of the bleached oil was measured
out and treated with thirty parts per million (30 ppm) of citric acid in a twenty
percent (20%) aqueous solution. Following this, the oil was steam refined-deodorized
for 90 minutes at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury,
0.2 mm Hg) absolute pressure using two percent (2.0%) sparging steam. The oil obtained
in this manner was designated Sample S.
[0096] A comparative sample was prepared by the conventional alkali refining method in the
following manner. A four and seven-tenths kilogram (4.7 kg) quantity of crude safflower
oil was treated with four percent (4.0%) of 14° Baume sodium hydroxide solution and
was agitated intensely at 25°C for 15 minutes. Then, the temperature was increased
to 65°C and a slower stirring was continued for another 15 minutes. The oil was then
centrifuged to remove soaps. This was followed by twice washing the oil with hot distilled
water in the amount of ten percent (10%) by weight and centrifuging each time.
[0097] After the second washing, the oil was dried for 15 minutes at a temperature of 60°C
under a vacuum of 266 Pa (two millimeters of mercury, 2 mm Hg) absolute pressure.
[0098] Bleaching of the oil was performed by adding one and one-half percent (1.5%) Filtrol
105@ bleaching earth, by weight of the oil, and three-tenths of a percent (0.3%) Filtercel®
filter aid, by weight of the oil, and heating the mixture to 110°C under a vacuum
of 20 minutes. After cooling the mixture to 80°C, the vacuum was broken with nitrogen
and the oil was filtered in a Buechner funnel.
[0099] A small amount of citric acid in a twenty percent (20%) aqueous solution was added
to yield thirty parts per million (30 ppm) citric acid in the bleached oil. Next,
a two and four-tenths kilogram (2.4 kg) sample of the oil was deodorized for 60 minutes
at 240°C under a vacuum of 26,6 Pa (two-tenths of a millimeter of mercury, 0.2 mm
Hg) absolute pressure using one and one-half percent (1.5%) sparging steam. The oil
obtained in this manner was designated Sample T.

[0100] Both samples were then subjected to color reversion test and peroxides measurements
by the methods previously described. The results are listed in Table 17.
