BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a polyester mesh for screen printing or, more particularly,
to a polyester mesh for screen printing having increased cohesiveness to the layer
of photosensitive resin and not accompanied by decrease of strength. The invention
also relates to a method of preparation thereof.
[0002] Polyester meshes for screen printing have generally low cohesiveness to the layer
of the photosensitive resin and some times cause inconvenience in several respects
such as faling off of the photosensitive resin layer, so that the precision in the
printed images and durability of the mesh screen in the prior art are not quite satisfactory.
[0003] A sufficient effect of improving the cohesiveness of polyester meshes to the resin
layer is not obtained by the conventional remedial methods including various chemical
treatments and flame processing because of the accompanying rather adverse effects
of, e.g. decrease of the strength or extensibility which tends to induce bursting
of the mesh in the course of spreading on the frame or printing. At any rate, no methods
of substantial improvement of the polyester meshes for screen printing have been established
heretofore.
[0004] Meshes for screen printing in the prior art are sometimes subjected to a treatment
using a surface active agent to be imparted with antistatic property with an object
of preventing blur of the printing ink due to the static electricity but the treatment
is usually accompanied by another disadvantage of decrease in the cohesiveness to
the layer of the photosensitive resin.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] The present invention provides a polyester mesh for screen printing composed of polyester
fibers having microscopical concavities and protrusions each having a diameter in
the range from 0.01 µm to 0.1 µm on the surface in a density of at least 200 per µm²
of the surface area. The concavities and protrusions should preferably have a depth
or height snot exceeding 0.05 µm with a preferred proviso that the density thereof
is at least 250 per µm².
[0006] The invention also provides a method for the preparation of such a polyester mesh
comprising a step of low-temperature plasma treatment of the base mesh. The low-temperature
plasma treatment is carried out preferably in an atmosphere of an inorganic gas or
gases comprising at least 50% by volume of a non-oxidizing inorganic gas such as
helium, neon, argon, hydrogen and nitrogen under a pressure in the range from 0.005
torr to 5 torr by impressing a high frequency electric power between the electrodes
with a power density not exceeding 150 kW/m² of the surface area of the power electrode,
i.e. non-grounded electrode.
[0007] The polyester mesh of the invention has an advantage of improved cohesiveness to
the photosensitive resin to give greatly upgraded workability and durability in the
printing work and, in particular, prevention of blur of the printing ink due to the
static electricity by adding a surface active agent to the photosensitive resin without
being accompanied by the drawback of decrease in the cohesiveness to the polyester
meshes.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0008] The inventors have completed the present invention as a result of the extensive
studies to solve all of the above described problems in polyester meshes for screen
printing by establishing a method of forming an uneven or roughened surface conforming
with the specific requirement by the treatment of the polyester meshes with low temperature
plasma.
[0009] That is, the present invention provides a polyester mesh for screen printing composed
of polyester fibers having an uneven surface having microscopically fine concavities
and protrusions each having a dimension of the diameter in the range from 0.01 to
0.1 µm in a density of at least 200 per µm² formed by the treatment of the polyester
mesh with low temperature plasma.
[0010] The polyester mesh for screen printing is fabricated by weaving polyester filaments
having a diameter from 20 to 100 µm to gossamers of 50 to 500 meshes per inch and
finished up by means of refining, heat-setting and the like. Then, the mesh is treated,
prior to coating with a photosensitive resin, by exposing to an atmosphere of low
temperature plasma under specified conditions.
[0011] The apparatus for generating low temperature plasma used in the invention is most
preferably of the internal electrode type but in some cases external electrode type
apparatuses may also be suitably used. Furthermore, coil-type apparatuses of both
the capacitive coupling and inductive coupling are also suitable. Besides such a
wide possibility in the selection of the types of the plasma treatment apparatus,
however, care must be taken to avoid thermal deterioration of the surface of the article
under treatment by the heat of electric discharge.
[0012] As is mentioned in the above, the method of plasma treatment in the invention is
preferably carried out using an apparatus of the internal electrode type though with
no particular limitations in the form of the electrodes. For example, the powert
and grounded elctrodes may not be of the same form but these electrodes may be formed
in any different shapes including the forms of plate, ring, rod, cylinder and the
like. Furthermore, an apparatus having a grounded inner wall made of a metal as the
counterelectrode may also be used for the plasma treatment in the invention. The
power electrodes are usually made of a metal such as copper, iron, aluminum and the
like and preferably they should have an insulating coating of glass, porcelain, ceramic
and the like having a high dielectric strength of, e.g., 10,000 volts or higher in
order to ensure stability of the electric discharge. In particular, a rod-formed electrode
having an insulating coating is suitable in order to obtain localized generation of
low temperature plasma effectively.
[0013] The electric power impressed between the electrodes for discharge should be in a
frequency band in the range of low-frequency waves, microwaves, direct current and
the like in addition to high-frequency waves which are the most preferable. The frequency
of the high-frequency electric power should preferably be in the range from a few
kHz to several hundreds MHz.
[0014] The electric power impressed between the electrodes should preferably be controlled
not to exceed 150 kW/m² of the power density on the surface of the power electrode
in order to avoid decrease in the strength of the mesh by the thermal decomposition
or deterioration due to the heat generated during the plasma treatment by impressing
an excessively large electric power.
[0015] The atmospheric gas in the plasma treatment apparatus is selected from oxidizing
and non-oxiding inorganic gases. Typical examples of the non-oxidizing inorganic gas
are helium, neon, argon, hydrogen and nitrogen, and they are used alone or as a mixture.
The content of an oxidizing inorganic gas such as oxygen and air should preferably
be controlled not to exceed 50% by volume in the plasma atmosphere in consideration
of preventing decrease in the strength of meshes. The low temperature plasma treratment
is carried out by passing the inorganic gas or gaseous mixture through the plasma
chamber suitble for evacuation in which the meshes are held and exposed to low temperature
plasma generated by impressing an electric power between the electrodes. The gaseous
pressure in the plasma treatment chamber should preferably be kept in the range from
0.005 to 5 torr or, more preferably, from 0.01 to 1 torr since the meshes are susceptible
to surface denaturation by the heat or excessive etching by the anomalous discharge
to cause decrease of the mechanical strength thereof when the gaseous pressure in
the plasma chamber is outside the above mentioned preferred range. The exposure time
to the plasma atmosphere should preferably be controlled within 100 seconds since
the meshes tend to undergo an excessive etching or surface denaturation when the exposure
time is extended beyond the above mentioned upper limit.
[0016] The polyester meshes processed with the low temperature plasma under the above-specified
conditions have an uneven or roughened surface with microscopically tiny concavities
and protrusions. The diameter of each of the concavities and protrusions should have
a dimension in the range from 0.01 to 0.1µm. The distribution density of such concavities
and protrusions on the surfaces of polyester fibers should be at least 200 per µm²
or, preferably, at least 250 per µm² of the surface area. The depth or height of
each of the concavities and protrusions is not limitative but usually concavities
and protrusions having a depth or height of 0.05 µm or smaller are preferred. In such
a case, a dense distribution of the concavities and protrusions on the surfaces of
the polyester fibers is not detrimental provided that the density thereof is at least
250 per µm² of the surface area. When a substantial portion of the concavities and
protrusions have a depth or height not smaller than 0.05 µm, the density of them on
the surface of the polyester fibers should not preferably exceed 1000 per µm² or,
more preferably, 700 per µm². Concavities and protrusions having a diameter exceeding
0.1 µm tend to cause decrease of extensibility or strength of the meshes. Similarly,
concavities and protrusions having a depth or height not smaller than 0.05 µm distributed
in a density exceeding 1000 per µm² of the surface area cause the same kinds of disadvantages.
Such polyester meshes would frequently be subject to bursting in the course of handling
such as spreading or printing.
[0017] Polyester meshes having minute concavities and protrusions each having a depth or
height of 0.05 µm or larger distributed in a density of 250 per µm² or higher exhibit
particularly high cohesiveness to the layer of the photosensitive resin and high
wettability without the disadvantage of deterioration in the physical properties
as described before. The wettability characteristic of the polyester meshes of the
invention usually is quite satisfactory as is evidenced by the wettability index of
at least 40 dyne/cm and they exhibit sufficient ink-permeability when they are used
as a printing screen in the work of screen printing. Polyester meshes having a wettability
index lower than 40 dyne/cm would not give such an advantage.
[0018] Printing screens prepared using a polyester mesh provided with minute concavities
and protrusions having a depth or height smaller than 0,05 µm on the surfaces of the
filaments thereof exhibit an excellent workability in printing such as precision
of the printed images and the ink-releasability. The polyester meshes of the invention
are laminated with a layer of a photosensitive resin by way of the direct method,
the direct-indirect method, the indirect method or the like after being spread on
a suitable screen frame. Patterned screens for printing work are prepared using the
resin-coated screen by exposure to light followed by development. The printing screens
are excellent in workability in printing due to the high degree of cohesiveness between
the mesh and the layer of the photosensitive resin and have high durability in printing
works because of the high solvent resistance. The printing screens of the invention
provide printed matters with high precision and clearness in any field of printing
works including the pattern printing, letter printing, nameplate printing, color printing
and the like by virtue of the excellent wettability characteristics of the polyester
meshes of the invention. Furthermore, the inventive polyester meshes for screen printing
can be easily treated with a surface active agent to be rendered anti-static since
the meshes do not suffer the decrease of the cohesiveness to the photosensitive resin
by the treatment with a surface active agent. Therefore the meshes are promising as
a material in other fields of use owing to the upgraded anti-static property.
[0019] In the following, examples are given to illustrate the invention in more detail
but not to limit the scope of the invention in any way.
Example 1.
[0020] A 300 mesh polyester gossamer mesh (Super Strong T300S, a product by Nippon Tokushu
Orimono Co.) was set in a low-temperature plasma generating apparatus and the pressure
inside was reduced to 0.005 torr by evacuation. Plasma treatment of the mesh was carried
out for about one second by the impression of an electric power of 45 kW/m² at a frequency
of 110 kHz between the electrodes while argon gas was passed through the plasma chamber
and the gaseous pressure therein was controlled and kept at 0.06 torr. The surface
of the mesh thus treated had a wettability index of 46 dyne/cm. The presence of 500
to 600 concavities and protrusions per µm² each having a diameter of 0.01 to 0.03
µm was observed in the electron microphotographs of the surface. The thus plasma-treated
mesh was spread on a frame in a conventional manner and subjected to testing for strength
to make a comparison with a mesh without the plasma treatment. The results were as
shown in Table 1. Frames of 56 cm square were used for spreading the meshes and the
tensioning condition for each of the specimens was 1.00 mm as measured using a tension
gage (Model STG-75B, a product by Sun Giken Co.). The wettability index of the mesh
before the plasma treatment was also measured to give the value shown in Table 2.
[0021] Each of the meshes was then coated with a photosensitive resin (Encosol 2, a product
by Naz-Dar Co.) to form a resin layer having a thickness of 12 µm and spread on the
frame. Exposure to ultraviolet light was carried out for each screen using a high-pressure
mercury lamp (a product of Oak Manufacturing Co.) for 3 and a half minutes to form
a checkerboard pattern of 1500 squares of 0.2 mm by 0.2 mm each. A pressure-sensitive
adhesive tape (Pacron Tape Y683, a product by Sumitomo MMM Co.) was applied and pressed
on to the checkerboard pattern by hand and rubbed with a finger tip followed by quick
peeling off. The peeling tests were repeated 3 times for each of the specimens and
the number of the released squares was recorded to evaluate the cohesiveness of the
meshes to the photosensitive resin to give the results shown in Table 2.
[0022] Test printing works were carried out using the thus obtained printing screens to
prepare printed circuit boards in which the printing screen using the polyester mesh
of the invention could withstand 8000 times of repeated printing while the printing
screen without the plasma treatment could withstand only 2000 times of printing due
to falling of the resin layer or other deficiencies.
[0023] Following are the details of the testing conditions.
(A) Strength test of the mesh spread on the frame
[0024] The mesh spread on the frame was pierced along the diagonal line thereof with intervals
of 3.5 cm using a bundle of five needles each having a diameter of 0.56 mm to find
whether or not bursting of the mesh took place.
(B) Testing methods for the tensile strength and extensibility
[0025] Testings were carried out according to the method specified in Japanese Industrial
Standard JIS L 1069-79.
(C) Testing method for wettability characteristics
[0026] The mesh to be tested was coated with a series of mixtures of ethyleneglycol monoethyl
ether and formamide (standard testing solutions for wettiability test, prepared by
Wako Pure Chemicals Co.) with a prescribed value of the surface tension, and the highest
value of the surface tension of the liquid capable of wetting the mesh was recorded
as the wettability index. This method is in conformity with Japanese Industrial Standard
JIS K 6786.
![](https://data.epo.org/publication-server/image?imagePath=1987/39/DOC/EPNWA2/EP87400604NWA2/imgb0001)
Comparative Example 1.
[0027] A comparative test was carried out in the same manner as in Example 1 except that
the atmospheric gas in the plasma generating apparatus was oxygen under a pressure
of 2 torr, the electric power was 85 kW/m² and the treatment time was 20 seconds.
The strength data of the plasma-treated mesh are shown in Table 3. The presence of
50 to 80 concanvities and protrusions was observed per µm² by the electron microscopic
examination.
[0028] The printing screen prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 bursted already
after 500 times of printing works for the preparation of printed circuit boards.
![](https://data.epo.org/publication-server/image?imagePath=1987/39/DOC/EPNWA2/EP87400604NWA2/imgb0002)
Example 2.
[0029] A 250 mesh polyester gossamer mesh (Super Strong T250T, a product by Nippon Tokushu
Orimono Co.) was set in a low-temperature plasma generating apparatus and the pressure
inside was reduced to 0.005 torr by evacuation. Plasma treatment of the mesh was carried
out for about 5 seconds by impressing 40 kW/m² of elsctric power at a the frequency
of 110 kHz between the electrodes while argon gas was passed through the plasma chamber
and the gaseous pressure was controlled and kept at 0.05 torr. The surface of the
mesh thus treated had a wettability index of 46 dyne/cm. The presence of 500 to 600
of concavities and protrusions per µm² each having a diameter of 0.01 to 0.05 µm and
a depth or height of 0.01 to 0.02 µm was observed in the electron microphotographs
of the surface.
[0030] The thus treated mesh was spread on a frame in a conventional manner and subjected
to testing of the strength making comparison with a mesh before the plasma treatment.
The results were as shown in Table 4. The conditions in spreading were the same as
in Example 1.
![](https://data.epo.org/publication-server/image?imagePath=1987/39/DOC/EPNWA2/EP87400604NWA2/imgb0003)
[0031] Similar peeling off tests using an adhesive tape were carried out as in Example 1
for the plasma-treated and untreated meshes to give the results shown in Table 5.
![](https://data.epo.org/publication-server/image?imagePath=1987/39/DOC/EPNWA2/EP87400604NWA2/imgb0004)
[0032] Test printing works were carried out using the above obtained printing screens to
prepare printed circuit boards in which the printing screen using the polyester mesh
of the invention could withstand 7000 times of repeated printing in the printing while
the control without the plasma treatment could withstand only 2000 times of printing
due to falling of the resin layer or other deficiencies. The testing methods and conditions
were the same as in Example 1.
Comparative Example 2.
[0033] A comparative test was carried out in a similar manner to Example 2 except that the
atmospheric gas in the plasma generating apparatus was oxygen under a pressure of
0.5 torr, the electric power was 80 kW/m² and the treatment time was 120 seconds.
The strength data of the treated mesh are shown in Table 6. The presence of 10 to
20 concavities and protrusions per µm² each having a diameter of 0.2 to 0.3 µm and
a depth or height of 0.06 to 0.08 µm was observed electron microscopically.
![](https://data.epo.org/publication-server/image?imagePath=1987/39/DOC/EPNWA2/EP87400604NWA2/imgb0005)
[0034] The printing screen prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 bursted already after
300 times of printing works for preparing printed circuit boards.
Example 3.
[0035] An experiment was carried out using a polyester mesh (Super Strong T300S) in the
same manner as in Example 1 except that the atmospheric gas in the plasma treatment
apparatus was helium under a pressure of 0.7 torr, the electric power was 40 kW/m²
and the treatment time was 3 seconds. The surface of the mesh thus treated had a wettability
index of 46 dyne/cm and the presence of 300 to 400 concavities and protrusions per
µm² each having a diameter of 0.03 to 0.07 µm at the surface of the filament members
thereof was observed electron microscopically.
[0036] Testings of the strength and cohesiveness were carried out for the plasma-treated
polyester mesh similarly to Example 1 to give the results shown in Tables 7 and 8.
![](https://data.epo.org/publication-server/image?imagePath=1987/39/DOC/EPNWA2/EP87400604NWA2/imgb0006)
[0037] The printing screen prepared using the plasma-treated polyester mesh had a durability
of 8000 times or more in the printing work to prepare printed circuit boards undertaken
in the same manner as in Example 1.
Example 4.
[0038] An experiment was carried out using a polyester mesh (Super Strong T250T) in the
same manner as in Example 1 except that the atmospheric gas in the plasma treatment
apparatus was helium under a pressure of 0.7 torr, the electric power was 60 kW/m²
and the treatment time was 5 seconds. The surface of the mesh thus plasma-treated
had a wettability index of 46 dyne/cm and the presence of 500 to 600 concavities and
protrusions per µm² each having a diameter of 0.03 to 0.05 µm and a depth or height
of 0.01 to 0.3 µm at the surface of the filament members thereof was observed electron
microscopically.
[0039] Testings of the strength and cohesiveness were carried out for the plasma-treated
polyester mesh similarly to Example 1 to give the results shown in Tables 9 and 10.
![](https://data.epo.org/publication-server/image?imagePath=1987/39/DOC/EPNWA2/EP87400604NWA2/imgb0007)
[0040] The printing screen prepared using the plasma-treated polyester mesh had a durability
of 8000 times or more in the printing test to prepare printed circuit boards undertaken
in the same manner as in Example 1.
Example 5.
[0041] A low-temperature plasma treatment was carried out using a tanned polyester mesh
(Super Strong T300S) in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the atmospheric
gas in the plasma treatment apparatus was helium under a pressure of 0.1 torr, the
electric power was 40kW/m² and the treatment time was 5 seconds. The surface of the
mesh thus plasma-treated had a wettability index of 46 dyne/cm and the presence of
300 to 350 concavities and protrusions per µm² each having a diameter of 0.01 to
0.03 µm on the surface of the filament members thereof was observed electron microscopically.
[0042] A printing screen was prepared using the plasma-treated mesh in the same manner as
in Example 1 except that a cationic surface active agent of an aliphatic amine quaternary
ammonium salt type (Fcall 70, a product by Matsumoto Yushi Seiyaku Co.) was added
to the photosensitive resin (Encosol 2) in an amount of 1% by weight by kneading.
Formation of a checkerboard pattern of 0.2 mm by 0.2 mm squares was carried out in
the same manner as in Example 1.
[0043] The thus prepared printing screen was compared with two kinds of printing screens
prepared in a similar manner but (a) using a mesh without plasma treatment or (b)
using a mesh without plasma treatment and without the surface active agent added to
the photosensitive resin. The results of the tests were as shown in Table 11.
![](https://data.epo.org/publication-server/image?imagePath=1987/39/DOC/EPNWA2/EP87400604NWA2/imgb0008)
Example 6.
[0044] A low-temperature plasma treatment was carried out using a tanned polyester mesh
(Super Strong T300S) in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the atmospheric
gas in the plasma treatment apparatus was argon under a pressure of 0.1 torr, the
electric power was 50 kW/m² and the treatment time was 5 seconds. The surface of
the polyester mesh thus plasma-treated had a wettability index of 46 dyne/cm and the
presence of 400 to 500 concavities and protrusions per µm² each having a diameter
of 0.03 to 0.07 µm and a depth or height of 0.02 to 0.03 µm was observed electron
microscopically.
[0045] A printing screen was prepared using the plasma-treated mesh similarly to Example
1 but using a different photosensitive resin (One Pot Sol 50M, a product by Murakami
Screen Co.) admixed with 1% by weight of the same cationic surface active agent as
used in Example 5 by kneading. Formation of a checkerboard pattern and comparative
testing were carried out in the same manner as in Example 5 to give the results shown
in Table 12.
![](https://data.epo.org/publication-server/image?imagePath=1987/39/DOC/EPNWA2/EP87400604NWA2/imgb0009)
Example 7
[0046] A low-temperature plasma treatment was carried out using a 180 mesh polyester gossamer
mesh (Super Strong T180S, a product by Nippon Tokushu Orimono Co.) in the same manner
as in Example 1 except that the atmospheric gas in the plasma treatment apparatus
was argon under a pressure of 0.1 torr, the electric power was 20 kW/m² and the treatment
time was one second. The surface of the polyester mesh thus plasma-treated had a wettability
index of 44 dyne/cm and the presence of 400 to 500 concavities and protrusions per
µm² each having a diameter of 0.01 to 0.03 µm was observed electron microscopically.
[0047] Preparation of the printing screen using the plasma-treated mesh and formation of
a checkerboard pattern were carried out similarly to Example 1.
[0048] A comparative test was carried out for the printing screens made of the plasma-treated
and untreated meshes to give the results shown in Table 13.
![](https://data.epo.org/publication-server/image?imagePath=1987/39/DOC/EPNWA2/EP87400604NWA2/imgb0010)
Example 8.
[0049] A low-temperature plasma treatment was carried out using a 200 mesh polyester gossamer
mesh (Super Strong T200S, a product by Nippon Tokushu Orimono Co.) in the same conditions
as in Example 2 except that the atmospheric gas in the plasma treatment apparatus
was argon under a pressure of 0.8 torr, the electric power was 40 kW/m² and the treatment
time was 3 seconds. The surface of the plasma-treated mesh had a wettability index
of 46 dyne/cm and the presence of 500 to 600 concavities and protrusions per µm²
each having a diameter of 0.03 to 0.07 µm and a depth or height of 0.02 to 0.04 µm
was observed electron microscopically.
[0050] The plasma-treated mesh was then soaked with a 1% aqueous solution of a non-ionic
surface active agent of tetraethyleneoxide lauryl ether type (K204, a product by
Nippon Oils and Fats Co.) and dried. Preparation of a printing screen using the thus
treated polyester mesh and formation of a checkerboard pattern were carried out in
the same manner as in Exmple 1. The results of the tape-peeling test and the values
of the surface resistivity obtained in the comparative tests were as shown in Table
14.
![](https://data.epo.org/publication-server/image?imagePath=1987/39/DOC/EPNWA2/EP87400604NWA2/imgb0011)
1. A polyester mesh for screen printing composed of polyester fibers having microscopic
concavities and protrusions each having a diameter in the range from 0.01 µm to 0.1
µm on the surface distributed in a density of at least 200 per µm² of the surface
area.
2. The polyester mesh for screen printing composed of polyester fibers as claimed
in Claim 1, in which the density is not larger than 1000 per µm².
3. The polyester mesh for screen printing composed of polyester fibers as claimed
in Claim 1, in which each of the concavities has a depth not exceeding 0.05 µm.
4. The polyester mesh for screen printing composed of polyester fibers as claimed
in Claim 3, in which density of the concavities is at least 250 per µm².
5. The polyester mesh for screen printing composed of polyester fibers as claimed
in Claim 1, in which each of the protrusions has a height not exceeding 0.05 µm.
6. The polyester mesh for screen printing composed of polyester fibers as claimed
in Claim 5, in which the density of the protrusions is at least 250 per µm².
7. The polyester mesh for screen printing composed of polyester fibers as claimed
in Claim 1, in which the fibers have concavities each having a depth not exceeding
0.05 µm and protrusions each having a height not exceeding 0.05 µm in a density of
at least 250 per µm² as the sum thereof.
8. A method for the preparation of a polyester mesh for screen printing composed of
polyester fibers which comprises a step of low-temperature plasma treatment of the
mesh.
9. The method for the preparatiion of a polyester mesh for screen printing composed
of polyester fibers as claimed in Claim 8, in which the low temperature plasma treatment
is carried out in an atmosphere of a non-oxidizing inorganic gas or an gaseous mixture
containing a non-oxidizing inorganic gas in a concentration of at least 50% by volume.
10. The method for the preparation of a polyester mesh for screen printing composed
of polyester fibers as claimed in Claim 9, in which the non-oxidizing inorganic gas
is selected from the group consisting of helium, neon, argon, hydrogen and nitrogen.
11. The method for the preparation of a polyester mesh for screen printing composed
of polyester fibers as claimed in Claim 8, in which the pressure of the atmosphere
of the low-temperature plasma treatment is in the range from 0.005 torr to 5 torr.
12. The method for the preparation of a polyester mesh for screen printing composed
of polyester fibers as claimed in Claim 11, in which the pressure is in the range
from 0.01 torr to 1 torr.
13. The method for the preparation of a polyester mesh for screen printing composed
of polyester fibers as claimed in Claim 8, in which the low-temperature plasma treatment
is carried out by impressing an electric power in a density not exceeding 150 kW/m²
of the surface area of the power electrode between the electrodes.
14. A printing screen comprising a polyester mesh and a layer of a photosensitive
resin in which the polyester mesh is prepared by a method comprising a step of low-temperature
plasma treatment.
15. The printing screen comprising a polyester mesh and a layer of a photosensitive
resin as claimed in Claim 14, in which the photosensitive resin is further admixed
with a surface active agent.
16. The printing screen comprising a polyester mesh and a layer of a photosensitive
resin as claimed in Claim 15, in which the surface active agent is selected from
the group consisting of cationic surface active agents and non-ionic surface active
agents.