DESULFURIZATION OF HYDROCARBONS
[0001] A process for the desulfurization of sulfur-containing hydrocarbon feedstocks, especially
reformer feedstocks. In particular, it relates to a process for the removal of sulfur
from hydrofined reformer feedstocks, without reduction in the temperature of the feedstock
as received from the hydrofiner, via the use of an adsorbent, or sorbent.
[0002] It is known to use sorbents for the removal of sulfur from process streams, including
particularly hydrocarbon process streams. The nature and quality of such sorbents
varies widely, particularly as relates to this capacity to remove a wide variety of
sulfur species, viz., mercaptans, thiophenes, disulfides, thioethers, hydrogen sulfide,
carbonyl sulfide, and the like. Such sorbents, in particular, are not especially suitable
for the essentially complete removal of sulfur from process streams, as required in
some operations, e.g., catalytic reforming, or hydroforming, a well-known and important
process employed in the petroleum refining industry for improving the octane quality
of naphthas and straight run gasolines.
[0003] The presence of sulfur even in a small and virtually infinitesmal concentrations
can have a detrimental effect in reforming. In a typical reforming process, a series
of reactors of the reforming unit are each provided with fixed beds of sulfided catalyst
which are sequentially contacted with a naphtha feed, and hydrogen at high severities,
e.g., at high temperatures and low pressures. Each reactor is provided with a preheater,
or interstage heater, because the reactions which take place are endothermic, and
the temperature between the several reactors is progressively increased. In use of
the more recently developed polymetallic platinum catalysts wherein an additional
metal, or metals, hydrogenation-dehydrogenation (hydrogen transfer) component is added
as a promoter to the platinum, it is, in fact, essential to reduce the feed sulfur
to only a few parts, per million parts by weight of feed (wppm), because of the extreme
sulfur sensitivity of these catalysts. For example, in the use of platinum-rhenium
catalysts it is generally necessary to reduce the sulfur concentration of the feed
well below about 2 wppm, and preferably below about 0.5 wppm, or even less than about
0.1 wppm to avoid excessive loss of catalyst activity and C₅⁺ liquid yield.
[0004] In most, if not all, commercial reforming operations, a sulfur-containing straight
run gasoline, or naphtha, is first hydrofined (or hydrodesufurized) to remove a preponderance
of the sulfur, and the desulfurized feed then reformed. In the hydrofiner a sulfur-containing
straight-run gasoline, or naphtha, is contacted with hydrogen, over a Group VIB and/or
Group VIII metal catalyst, e.g., cobalt molybdate or nickel molybdate supported on
alumina, at conditioners sufficient to remove a preponderance of the sulfur as hydrogen
sulfide, and the liquid product recovered for use as feed to the reformer. The efficiency
of such units are limited by equilibrium or kinetic considerations and unfortunately
the hydrofiner cannot reduce the sulfur levels to the amounts that are desired, or
required; which may be of the order of 2 wppm, 0.5 wppm, or even 0.1 wppm, or less.
Moreover, even if hydrofiners were capable of such effective operation, they are not
capable of such operation 100 percent of the time. Upsets can and do occur. Typically,
the naphtha feed will contain as much as 5 wppm to about 50 wppm, or more, of sulfur;
and, if upsets occur, the feed during some portions of an operating cycle will contain
even higher amounts of sulfur. These relatively high levels of fed sulfur will not
only seriously adversely affect the level of C₅⁺ liquid yield production and decrease
the activity of the catalyst when sulfur-sensitive polymetallic platinum catalysts
are used, but may also poison the catalyst such that regeneration of the catalyst
may become necessary prior to its further, continued use.
[0005] Sorbent or catalyst packed guard chambers, or vessels filled with sorbents or catalysts,
consequently have been used to remove additional sulfur from hydrofined products
prior to their use as reformer feeds. Massive nickel catalysts, e.g., nickel on a
silica-alumina support, have been particularly effective in removing sulfur from hydrofined
products, or naphthas at temperatures ranging below about 350°F. Higher temperatures
than about 350°F cannot be used for the removal of sulfur from naphthas with massive
nickel catalysts, however, because the production of fused multi-ring aromatics or
polynuclear aromatic compounds (PNA's) in the naphtha becomes excessive. The presence
of PNA's are undesirable, not only in that they cause deactivation of reformer catalysts,
but they are also primarily responsible for the octane requirement increase (ORI)
known to occur in automobile engines. In brief, ORI is caused by the build-up of carbonaceous
deposits in internal combustion engines (particularly old engines) which, by limiting
heat transfer from the combustion chamber, leads to preignition. Preignition causes
the phenomenon known as engine knock or ping which is "cured" by burning higher octane
gasolines. The PNA's are major contributors to the build-up of carbon deposits over
the lifetime of an engine, which leads to ORI. Dependent on gasoline composition,
the ORI can be as small as 1-2 octane numbers or as great as 10-12 octane numbers.
[0006] In many refineries, the naphtha feed from the hydrofiner is available at temperatures
far in excess of 350°F, e.g., 500°F and higher, and whereas expensive heat exchange
processes might be employed to reduce the temperature to 350°F, or less, the naphtha,
after such treatment, would have to be reheated to the temperature required for reforming.
This step is obviously quite burdensome, particularly in these times of increasing
fuel costs. Hence, there is a particular need for a sorbent, or catalyst, useful
for removing sulfur at temperatures above about 350°F, or at temperatures ranging
about above 350°F up to reforming temperatures; temperatures which normally produce
excessive PNA's.
[0007] It is accordingly the primary objective of this invention to fill this need; and,
in particular, it is an objective to provide a sorbent, or catalyst, and process for
the use of such sorbent, or catalyst, to effectively remove sulfur from naphthas at
temperatures above about 350°F without the significant production, if any, of PNA's.
[0008] A particular object is to provide a novel, and improved nickel sorbent, or catalyst,
and process for the use of such sorbent, or catalyst, to effectively remove sulfur
from naphthas at temperatures above about 350°F without the significant production
of PNA's.
[0009] This object and others are achieved in accordance with the present invention, which
embodies
(A) a particulate mass of a sorbent, or catalyst, comprised of nickel in concentration
ranging from about 10 percent to about 70 percent, preferably from about 20 percent
to about 50 percent, calculated as metallic nickel based on the total weight of the
sorbent, iron in concentration ranging from about 1 percent to about 15 percent,
preferably from about 2 percent to about 10 percent, calculated as metallic iron
based on the total weight of the sorbent, or catalyst composition, and a porous, refractory
inorganic oxide such as silica, alumina, clays, or mixture thereof; preferably alumina,
with which the nickel and iron are composited; and
(B) a process wherein a hydrocarbon stream which contains sulfur, sulfur compounds,
and the like, is contacted with a particulate mass of the sorbent, or catalyst composition
characterized in (A), supra, and said sulfur, sulfur compounds and the like, are adsorbed
onto said particulate mass of sorbent or catalytic composition, and the process stream
thereby denuded of said sulfur, sulfur compounds, and the like.
[0010] In a preferred embodiment, a particulate mass of the sulfur sorbent is charged, or
packed into a guard chamber, or plurality of guard chambers and employed downstream
of a hydrofiner for removing sulfur from a naphtha hydrofiner product. Suitably, where
a plurality of guard chambers is used, the guard chambers are employed in series,
one behind the other in tandem relationship, or in parallel downstream of the hydrofiner.
The sulfur-containing naphtha product from the hydrofiner, constituting a reformer
feed, is introduced into the guard chamber, or guard chambers, the sulfur-containing
naphtha product from the hydrofiner being passed therethrough, the naphtha being thereby
denuded of sulfur, and the sulfur-denuded naphtha product then employed as feed to
the reforming, or hydroforming unit. It has been found that sulfur can be effectively
removed from a hydrofined naphtha containing up to about 20 wppm sulfur, or even up
to about 50 wppm sulfur, and higher, to provide a naphtha reformer feed containing
less than about 2 wppm sulfur, or less than about 0.5 wppm sulfur, and even less than
about 0.1 wppm sulfur, by contacting the hydrofined naphtha product with the contact
mass at temperatures ranging above about 350°F, preferably from about 500°F to about
850°F, more preferably from about 700°F to about 800°F. The sulfur is effectively
removed from the hydrofined naphtha, and at the same time there is a minimum of polynuclear
aromatics produced, and transported with the naphtha feed to the catalyst packed reactors
of the reforming unit.
[0011] These features and others will be better understood by reference to the following
more detailed description of the invention, and to the drawing to which reference
is made.
[0013] The FIGURE depicts, by means of a simplified flow diagram, the use of a nickel/iron
sorbent packed guard chamber or "sulfur trap" downstream of a hydrofiner, between
said hydrofiner and reforming unit.
[0014] Referring to the FIGURE, generally, there is depicted a hydrofiner, H/F, and reforming
unit inclusive of multiple on-stream reactors R₁, R₂, and R₃ each of which is provided
with a fixed bed of a sulfur sensitive polymetallic platinum catalyst. A separate
furnace, or heater F₁, F₂, and F₃, respectively, is connected in series with the reactors,
R₁, R₂, and R₃ so that feed can be passed in seratim through F₁R₁, F₂R₂, and F₃R₃.
Pumps, compressors and other auxiliary equipment are omitted for clarity. A deisomerizer,
debutanizer, and guard chamber, or sulfur trap are located between the hydrofiner
H/F and the reforming unit.
[0015] A hydrofined petroleum or synthetic naphtha feed from hydrofiner H/F is passed serially
through the deisomerizer and debutanizer, and the partiallyd desulfurized feed then
passed through the sulfur trap wherein essentially the balance of the sulfur is removed.
Then, the desulfurized naphtha feed, with hydrogen, is passed through the F₁R₁, F₂R₂,
and F₃R₃ with the products from the reactions being passed to a high pressure separator
HPS. A portion of the hydrogen-rich make gas can be taken from the top of the high
pressure separator HPS and, after passage through a make gas compressor, recycled
to the hydrofiner, H/F, and another portion recycled through gas driers to the lead
furnace and reactor F₁R₁. Substantially all, or a major portion of the moisture and
sulfur can be scrubbed and removed from the recycle gas by the recycle gas drier to
maintain a dry, low-sulfur system. C₅⁺ liquids from the bottom of high pressure separator
HPS are sent to a stabilizer, or to tankage.
[0016] The feed which is hydrofined to provide the reformer feedstock is constituted of
a naphtha, whether a virgin naphtha, straight run gasoline, thermally or catalytically
cracked naphtha or the like, or blends thereof, which boils within a range for about
80°F to about 450°F, preferably from about 150°F to about 430°F. In these complex
hydrocarbon mixture the predominant hydrocarbons have from about 5 to 12 carbon atoms,
more typically from about 6 to about 9 carbon atoms per molecule. Typically, such
a gasoline will contain from about 15 vol. % to about 20 vol. % paraffins, naphthenes,
and branched paraffins, which fall within a range of from about C₅⁺ to about C₁₂,
from about 15 vol. % to about 20 vol. % of olefins which fall within a range of from
about C₆ to about C₁₂, and from about 60 vol. % to about 70 vol. % of aromatics, the
preponderance of which fall within a range of from about C₆ to about C₁₂. Most of
the gasoline that are used for motor vehicles are derived from petroleum, but may
also be derived in whole or in part from hydrocarbons obtained for synthetic sources.
Such feeds, prior to hydrofining generally contain from about 300 wppm to about 10,000
wppm sulfur, or more typically from about 300 wppm to about 2000 wppm sulfur, as organo
sulfur compounds.
[0017] The hydrofining operation is typically conducted at conditions of temperature, pressure,
hydrogen flow rate, and liquid hourly space velocities correlated to provide the desired
amount of conversion to convert the organo sulfur compounds to hydrogen sulfide. The
sulfur-containing naphtha is introduced, with hydrogen, into a reactor provided with
a catalyst comprised of a Group VIB metal, or metals, of the Periodic Table of the
Elements (E. H. Sargent & Co., Copyright 1964 Dyna-Slide Co.), or a Group VIII metal,
or metals, or both; inclusive patricularly of the oxides and/or sulfides of such metals,
and admixtures of Group VIB and Group VIII metals. The metals are preferably supported
on a porous, refractory inorganic oxide base, e.g., alumina, silica, zirconia, titania,
bauxite, or the like. The metal content of a catalyst suitably ranges from between
about 2 to 25 weight percent. Suitable catalysts include cobalt-molybdate, chromic
acid, nickel, iron, etc., which are deposited on carriers, such as alumina, or various
other oxides, or gels. A suitable catalyst for the hydrofining process is, for example,
an alumina-containing support with a minor proportion of molybdenum oxide and cobalt
oxide. Sulfided nickel and tungsten on alumina as well as nickel-molybdenum on alumina
can also be used. The hydrofining runs are conducted by adjusting the hydrogen and
feed rates, and the temperature and pressure to the conditions desired to remove
the desired amount of sulfur from the feed. The run is made by adjustment of the major
process variables within the ranges described below:

[0018] The effluent from the hydrofining zone is treated to remove hydrogen sulfide and
ammonia from the hydrofined naphtha. Removal of hydrogen sulfide and ammonia may be
accomplished, for example, by injecting water or alkylized water into the hydrofiner
effluent and passing the resulting mixture into a separator operating under such conditions
that a water phase containing essentially all the hydrogen sulfide and ammonia present
in the effluent can be removed. Further, purification of the hydrofined feed can be
accomplished by a stripper or a distillation column. Also, the hydrogen sulfide and
ammonia can be removed by passing the hydrofiner effluent to a separator at a temperature
and pressure whereby substantially only hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and hydrogen are
in the gaseous state. The liquid naphtha is thus easily separated from the gases.
While it is essential to free the naphtha of hydrogen sulfide and ammonia, hydrogen
dissolved in the naphtha presents no problem, but is desirable.
[0019] The hydrofined reformer feedstock, in the preferred operation, which generally contains
from about 5 wppm to about 50 wppm of sulfur, of an even greater amount of sulfur
as can occur during a hydrofiner upset, is introduced in the guard chamber, or guard
chambers containing the nickel-iron catalyst of this invention, viz., at temperature
ranging from about 300°F to about 600°F, preferably from about 350°F to about 500°F.
Whereas essentially all hydrofined products contain some PNA's, substantially no
new PNA formation occurs in the desulfurization reaction produced by the nickel-iron
sorbent of this invention. The desulfurization reaction can be conducted with or
without the addition of hydrogen to the nickel-iron sorbent-containing guard chamber,
or guard chambers. The product removed from the guard chamber, or guard chambers,
contains no more than about 2 wppm of sulfur; generally less than about 0.5 wppm of
sulfur, and preferably less than 0.1 wppm (an unmeasurable amount) of sulfur.
[0020] The reforming catalyst is constituted of composite particles which contain, besides
a carrier or support material, a hydrogenation-dehydrogenation component, or components,
and a halide component. The support material is constituted of a porous, refractory
inorganic oxide, particularly alumina. The support can contain, e.g., one or more
of alumina, bentonite, clay, diatomaceous earth, zeolite, silica, activated carbon,
magnesia, zirconia, thoria, an the like; though the most preferred support is alumina
to which, if desired, can be added a suitable amount of other refractory carrier
materials such as silica, zirconia, magnesia, titania, etc., usually in a range of
about 1 to 20 percent, based on the weight of the support. A preferred support is
one having a surface area of more than 50 m²/g, a bulk density of about 0.3 to 1.0
g/ml, preferably about 0.4 to 0.8 g/ml, an average pore volume of about 0.2 to 1.1
ml/g, preferably about 0.3 to 0.8 ml/g, and an average pore diameter of about 30 to
300°A.
[0021] The metal hydrogenation-dehydrogenation component can be composited with or otherwise
intimately associated with the porous inorganic oxide support or carrier by various
techniques known to the art such as ion-exchange, coprecipitation with the alumina
in the sol or gel form, and the like. For example, the catalyst composite can be formed
by adding together suitable reagents such as a salt of platinum and ammonium hydroxide
or carbonate, and a salt of aluminum such as aluminum chloride or aluminum sulfate
to form aluminum hydroxide. The aluminum hydroxide containing the salts or platinum
can then be heated, dried, formed into pellets or extruded, and then calcined in nitrogen
or other non-agglomerating atmosphere. Other metal hydrogenation components can also
be added to the catalyst in similar manner, or by impregnation.
[0022] It is preferred to deposit the platinum, or platinum and rhenium metals, or other
metal or metals used as promoters, if any, on a previously pilled, pelleted, beaded,
extruded, or sieved particulate support material by the impregnation method. Pursuant
to the impregnation method, porous refractory inorganic oxides in dry or solvated
state are contacted, either alone or admixed, or otherwise incorporated with a metal
or metals-containing solution, or solutions, and thereby impregnated by either the
"incipient wetness" technique, or a technique embodying absorption from a dilute or
concentrated solution, or solutions, with subsequent filtration or evaporation to
effect total uptake of the metallic components.
[0023] Platinum in absolute amount, is usually supported on the carrier within the range
of from about 0.01 to 3 percent, preferably from about 0.2 to 1 percent, based on
the weight of the catalyst (dry basis). Rhenium, in absolute amount, is also usually
supported on the carrier in concentration ranging form about 0.1 to about 3 percent,
preferably from about 0.2 to about 1 percent, based on the weight of the catalyst
(dry basis). The absolute concentration of each for use in reactors is preselected
to provide the desired ration of rhenium:platinum for a respective reactor of the
unit. In compositing the metals with the carrier, essentially any soluble compound
can be used, but a soluble compound which can be easily subjected to thermal decomposition
and reduction is preferred, for example, inorganic salts such as halide, nitrate,
inorganic complex compounds, or organic salts such as the complex salt of acetylacetone,
amine salt, and the like. Where, e.g., platinum is to be deposited on the carrier,
platinum chloride, platinum nitrate, chloroplatinic acid, ammonium chloroplatinate,
potassium chloroplatinate, platinum polyamine, platinum acetylacetonate, and the like,
are preferably used. A promoter metal, is added in concentration ranging from about
0.01 to 3 percent, preferably from about 0.05 to about 1 percent, based on the weight
of the catalyst.
[0024] To enhance catalyst performance in reforming operations, it is also required to add
a halogen component to the catalysts, fluorine and chlorine being preferred halogen
components. The halogen is contained on the catalyst within the range of 0.1 to 3
percent, preferably within the range of about 0.6 to about 1.5 percent, based on the
weight of the catalyst. When using chlorine as a halogen component, it is added to
the catalyst within the range of about 0.2 to 2 percent, preferably within the range
of about 0.6 to 1.5 percent, based on the weight of the catalyst. The introduction
of halogen into the catalyst can be carried out by any method at any time. It can
be added to the catalyst during catalyst preparation, for example, prior to, following
or simultaneously with the incorporation of the metal hydrogenation-dehydrogenation
component, or components. It can also be introduced by contacting a carrier material
with a vapor phase or liquid phase containing a halogen compound such as hydrogen
fluoride, hydrogen chloride, ammonium chloride, or the like.
[0025] The reforming operation is carried out by adjusting the hydrogen and feed rates,
and the temperature and pressure to operating conditions. The run is made at optimum
reforming conditions by adjustment of the major process variables, within the ranges
described below:

EXAMPLES
[0026] To illustrate the usefulness of this invention, several nickel containing catalysts
were prepared by the techniques described above. These are listed as Catalyst A, B,
and C in the table. Nickel to the extent of 50% by weight was supported on a silica/alumina
base (15% SiO₂) and designated as Catalyst A. The same amount of nickel was then impregnated
on a pure alumina base and designated Catalyst B. A portion of this latter catalyst
was then impregnated with iron nitrate to produce an adsorbent containing 5% Fe in
addition to the nickel already impregnated. This is designated as Catalyst C.
[0027] For testing, these materials in the form of 14-42 mesh particles were reduced with
hydrogen at 500°F. The catalyst was then transferred under nitrogen to an autoclave
and about 600 cc of a spiked petroleum naphtha added. This naphtha, originally sulfur
free, was intentionally spiked with n-hepyl mercaptan so that 2850 pm sulfur was present
in this feedstock.
[0028] After closing, the autoclave was flushed with nitrogen, and the gas replaced with
hydrogen for pressure testing. The run was started by heating to 500°F while stirring
at 1500 rpm. The pressure was adjusted to the desired level of 275 psig. After contacting
overnight, the autoclave run was terminated. The naphtha liquid product was analyzed
by UV spectroscopy to determine the relative amounts of polynuclear aromatics formed.
This is shown by the amount of ultraviolet light absorbed at 319 mm in the table.
High values reflect higher contents of PNA's. Also, the nickel catalyst was discharged
and analyzed for sulfur by wet chemical techniques. Results are shown in the following
table.

[0029] Catalysts of existing art are represented by Catalysts A and B. Catalyst A has a
higher adsorption capacity of 14.5% sulfur but also produces a larger amount of PNA's
as shown by the higher UV absorbance. By eliminating the silica, the UV absorbance
is decreased but also a substantial loss in sulfur capacity is incurred as illustrated
by the results with Catalyst B.
[0030] The material of this invention is that shown by Catalyst C. By incorporating iron
to the extent of 5% by weight, the extent of PNA production is greatly inhibited.
However, surprisingly, the ability of the material to adsorb sulfur is substantially
increased to the extent of 18.8% by weight.
[0031] It is apparent that various modifications and changes can be made without departing
from the spirit and scope of the present invention.