(19)
(11) EP 0 155 011 B1

(12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

(45) Mention of the grant of the patent:
18.07.1990 Bulletin 1990/29

(21) Application number: 85103129.4

(22) Date of filing: 18.03.1985
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC)5C22C 38/42, C22C 38/44

(54)

High-strength alloy for industrial vessels

Hochfeste Legierung für Behälter für industrielle Anwendung

Alliage à résistance élevée pour récipients industriels


(84) Designated Contracting States:
BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

(30) Priority: 16.03.1984 US 590393

(43) Date of publication of application:
18.09.1985 Bulletin 1985/38

(73) Proprietor: Inco Alloys International, Inc.
Huntington West Virginia 25720 (US)

(72) Inventors:
  • Bassford, Thomas Harvey
    Huntington West Virginia 25705 (US)
  • Crum, James Roy
    Ona West Virginia 25545 (US)

(74) Representative: Greenstreet, Cyril Henry 
Haseltine Lake & Co. Hazlitt House 28 Southampton Buildings Chancery Lane
London WC2A 1AT
London WC2A 1AT (GB)


(56) References cited: : 
DE-A- 2 528 610
FR-A- 2 330 776
GB-A- 812 582
DE-B- 2 135 180
GB-A- 708 820
   
  • METAL PROGRESS, vol. 122, no. 1, June 1982, pages 66,67, Ohio, US: "Superalloys, special-duty materials"
  • D. Peckner, I.M.Bernstein:"Handbook of Stainless Steels", McGraw-Hill Book Co. (1977), p. A1/51, A1/22, A1/35
  • C.W. Wegst: "Stahlschlüssel", 13th ed. (1983); p.232/233 and 381/382
  • H. Schmitz "Stahl-Eisen Liste" 5th ed. (1975), p. 1024 to 1027
   
Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent Convention).


Description


[0001] The instant invention relates to nickel-iron-chromium alloys in general and more particularly to a high strength, corrosion resistant alloy having a low work hardenability rate with variable age hardenable characteristics. The alloy reduces copper pick-up in fluid streams.

[0002] Power plant operators and boiler manufacturers recognized early on that to improve the efficiency of stream generators (both fossil and nuclear), it was useful to adopt regenerative feedwater heating. Essentially, steam is extracted from the steam turbines to preheat the boiler/reactor feedwater before it is introduced into the economizer of a boiler or directly into a steam generator/reactor. The heating of the feedwater occurs in, naturally enough, feedwater heaters. Steam is used to heat the feedwater inside the feedwater heater tubing to impart a portion of the steam's latent heat to the water. Water temperatures from about 100-650°F (37-343°C) and pressures up to 5200 psi (36 MPa) are not uncommon. Moroever, advanced designs are now contemplating pressures up to 7200 psi (49.6 MPa) and 700°F (371°C).

[0003] Currently, steels (carbon and stainless) and sometimes nickel-copper alloys (MONEL* nickel-copper alloys) are utilized in feedwater heaters. Although the feedwater is treated to remove chemicals and other impurities, corrosion of the tubing may still occur.

[0004] Free oxygen will attack the steels. Superalloys are often difficult to form into tubes due to their high work hardening rates. High copper-containing materials are generally frowned upon since copper and corrosion products are believed to deposit on boiler tubes and may be carried over into the steam. These undesirable entrained products may enter into the turbines resulting in lower efficiencies. Indeed, operators wish to eliminate all possible copper pick-up in the steam because of fouling and the resulting loss of efficiency of the turbine blades when the copper plates out of the steam. It is also believed that the copper deposits may set up local galvanic cells with the ferrous alloys thereby causing additional corrosion. Operators wish to stay away from nickel-copper alloys which otherwise display better chemical and physical properties than the other alloys. However, the substitution of low carbon or stainless steels for the nickel-copper alloys currently available is not always satisfactory since these materials do not have the requisite corrosion resistance, stress corrosion cracking resistance or strength. This leads to high maintenance costs. Moreover, in the case of carbon steels, undesirably short lifetimes of three to eight years have been reported. Contrast this state of affairs with an expected service life in excess of twenty years. Accordingly, power plant operators are in a quandry: steels corrode; high alloys are costly; and the nickel-copper alloys contain high quantities of copper.

[0005] It is apparent that there is a need for a reasonable cost alloy that exhibits corrosion resistance, strength and formability properties suitable for feedwater heaters, chemical and petrochemical installations and other similar applications.

[0006] Accordingly, there is provided an austenitic alloy having a low work hardening rate especially suitable for, but not limited to, industrial vessels and particularly for heat exchanger tubing for high temperature, high pressure applications. The instant alloy combines improved corrosion resistance and the requisite high strength in a system that is of lower cost than the more expensive higher alloys. The alloy displays good stress corrosion cracking resistance and good high temperature corrosion resistance.

[0007] According to the invention, a high strength, corrosion resistant nickel-iron-chromium alloy consists, by weight, of from 24 to 32% nickel, from 12 to 19% chromium, from 1 to 3.5% molybdenum, from 2 to 5.5% copper, from 0.8 to 2.5% titanium, from 0 to 1.5% manganese, from 0 to 1.5% silicon, e.g. less than 0.45% silicon, from 0 to 1% niobium plus tantalum, from 0 to 2% aluminum, from 0 to 0.1 % cerium, from 0 to 0.01 % boron and from 0 to 0.2% nitrogen, the balance, apart from impurities, being iron.

[0008] The term impurities used herein includes residual amounts of calcium added as a processing aid.

[0009] The molybdenum content is advantageously from 1 to 3%, and the copper content from 2 to 5%. Preferably the nickel content is from 26 to 29%, the chromium content from 15 to 18%, the molybdenum content not more than 3%, the copper content not more than 5% and the content of niobium plus tantalum not more than 0.4%. In one alloy according to the invention the nickel is about 28%, the chromium about 16%, the molybdenum about 2% and the copper about 4%.

[0010] Owing to its low work hardening rate (caused in part by the nickel-chromium combinations) the instant alloy easily lends itself to tube fabrication and other cold working operations. The presence of titanium in amounts above about 0.8% renders the alloys increasingly age hardenable, and e.g. about 1.8% titanium may be incorporated for this purpose.

[0011] The invention will now be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which yield stress is plotted against perecentage reduction for an alloy according to the invention (Alloy 16) and three comparative alloys.

[0012] In the alloy of the invention, the incorporation of a measured quantity of titanium can impart an age hardening response of at least 60 ksi (413 MPa) yield strength and 120 ksi (825 MPa) tensile strength in the cold worked and annealed conditions. The titanium raises the work hardening rate of the alloy. Copper, chromium and molybdenum improve the corrosion resistance of the alloy. Aluminum, cerium, boron and calcium assist in the deoxidation of the alloy. Nitrogen serves to boost the ability of the alloy to withstand
*A trademark of the Inco family of companies. corrosive attack. The nitrogen raises the strength and increases the work hardening rate of the alloy in the annealed condition.

[0013] Table I below sets forth the compositions of a number of heats (Nos. 1-3 and 7-9) within the above composition ranges and also, for purposes of comparison, one alloy (No 4) that is substantially free from copper and molybdenum, one alloy (No. 5) that is substantially free from copper, one alloy (No. 6) that is substantially free from molybdenum, three alloys (Nos. 10-12) having lower titanium contents, and three alloys (Nos. 13-15) having lower nickel contents.

[0014] Some examples will now be given.

Example 1



[0015] This is an example of a low-titanium, non-age hardenable modification of the alloy (No. 12). In a series of tests, specimens of this composition were evaluated for stress corrosion cracking (SCC) and high temperature water corrosion resistance. It was tested in the as-cold-rolled (CR) condition and after annealing and heat treating at 1400°F (600°C) and compared with annealed MONEL alloy 400 and Type 304 stainless steel.

[0016] Stress corrosion cracking test results are given in Table 2.



[0017] SCC tests were carried out with u-bend specimens at 600°F (316°C). General corrosion tests were conducted in deaerated water with coupons suspended from insulated hooks. Weight change in the water test were determined by weighing uncleaned specimens after 500 hours and 1000 hours. The average corrosion rate was determined on cleaned specimens after 1000 hours.

[0018] All test material was in the form of 0.125 inch gauge (0.32 cm) x 2.5 inch (6.35 cm) wide strip. Experimental compositions were tested in as CR 50% and/or CR + 1750°F (954°C)/one half hour, water quenched + 1400°F (760°C/one hour air cooled conditions. Commercial MONEL alloy 400 (nominal composition: 32.56% copper, 2.40% iron, 1.04% manganese, 0.1% silicon, 0.1% carbon, balance essentially nickel) and 304 stainless (nominal composition: 18.09% chromium, 9.18% nickel, 1.77% manganese, 0.73% silicon, 0.24% molybdenum, balance essentially iron) were compared to heat 12.

[0019] In a 600°F 1% NaCl solution, only alloy 304 cracked within the 720 hour test. There was no evidence of SCC cracking in heat 12.

[0020] In boiling 45% MgC12, heat 12 had a greater SCC resistance to crack propagation than 304 stainless.





[0021] In boiling 50% NaOH, heat 12 cracked slightly and experienced light surface attack. Alloy 304 was subject to severe general corrosion and cracking while MONEL alloy 400 was resistant to attack under these circumstances.

[0022] In summary, heat 12 displayed good SCC resistance and is expected to resist caustic and chloride SCC better than alloy 304. The higher nickel provides this improved SCC resistance.

[0023] In the high temperature deaerated water test shown in Table 3 below, general corrosion rates in the alloy 12 were similar to 304 stainless and somewhat better than MONEL alloy 400.


Example 2



[0024] Heats 1-3 and 12 (14 kg melts) were vacuum melted and cast to 4 inch (10 cm) diameter ingots. Forged 9/16 inch (1.43 cm) squares plus forged 3/4 x 2 x 12 inch (1.91 x 5.08 x 20.5 cm) flats were made with frequent reheats at 2150°F (1177°C). After overhauling the flats to a uniform thickness, they were hot rolled to 1/4 inch (0.64 cm) at 2150°F. The hot rolled 1/4 inch strip was annealed at 1950°F (1066°C)/one hour water quench and pickled prior to cold rolling. Hardness and tensile tests were taken at various levels of cold work to establish a work hardening response. A low work hardening rate is very desirable in the manufacture of relatively small diameter thin-walled tubing.

[0025] Of particular importance is the yield strength at high levels of cold reduction such as 60 to 80% reduction. Many tube mills produce a large hot-worked tube shell which must be reduced in size during a number of cold working and annealing stages. Experience has shown that alloys which have lower yield strength after high cold reductions may be cold worked to a greater degree without splitting, requiring less annealing stages and lower manufacturing costs. The Figure shows heat 16 to have a lower yield strength after a high cold reduction than heats 14 and 15 with lower nickel content.

[0026] After a cold reduction of 60 to 80%, the yield strength of heat 16 is also lower than the commercial alloy INCOLOY* alloy 800. INCOLOY alloy 800 is shown in the Figure for comparative purposes only. A general purpose alloy, it has good workability characteristics and is easily processed. The instant invention was developed with these attributes in mind.

[0027] All heats had good malleability. Tensile data on cold rolled strip using increasing amounts of titanium are shown in Tables 4, 5 and 6.







[0028] When titanium was raised to 2.0%, the work hardening rate increased but no change occurred as titanium was raised to 2.3%. The aged tensile test results in Table 6 indicate that 414 MPa yield strength and 827 MPa tensile strength can be accomplished with approximately 1.75% titanium and low level cold working. Indeed, the combination of about 20% cold reduction with a slightly lower titanium content might be optimum for feedwater heaters.

[0029] Table 7 shows the strength and ductility characteristics in the annealed and aged conditions.


Example 3



[0030] Corrosion tests were conducted on heats 4-12. Corrosion test environments relevant to feedwater heater service and other possible applications were examined.

[0031] Table 8 depicts the SCC test results in sodium chloride and sodium hydroxide solutions.



[0032] The tests show that the instant alloy is more resistant to SCC (caused by chlorides and sodium hydroxide) than 304 stainless. The relatively hig nickel content of the instant alloys provides the increased chloride and caustic cracking resistance.

[0033] The test data also indicates very good resistance of the alloys to polythionic acid cracking. This is a common cause of failure of stainless steels and high nickel alloys in petrochemical service. The influence of high titanium content on carbide precipitation is believed to be responsible for good polythionic acid SCC resistance.

[0034] Table 9 shows general corrosion test results.

[0035] Tables 8 and 9 also demonstrate the resistance of the alloy to environments other than that posed by feedwater heaters. Molybdenum addition of 2-3% greatly improves resistance to hydrochloric acid. Copper additions of 4% or more improved sulfuric acid resistance. The combination of copper and molybdenum appears to improve resistance to phosphoric acid. The instant alloy lends itself to chemical and petrochemical applications.

[0036] The design strength of the alloys destined for tubular applications is usually based on the tensile strength of the alloy comprising the apparatus. In the cold worked plus stress relieved conditions, the instant alloy system will meet the 824 MPa minimum tensile strength usually specified by design engineers. This value, compares favorably with such alloys as Inconel alloy 625 and Incoloy alloy 801. Table 10 compares minimum tubular wall thicknesses between MONEL alloy 400, 304 stainless and the instant alloy for various temperature and pressure conditions. Table 10 was constructed to compare the minimum wall thickness between the listed alloys. The next heavier standard well thickness was used to calculate the weight per meter.



[0037] In order to produce objects and, more particularly, tubes which may seamless or welded, the object or tube, made by methods known to those skilled in the art, may be subjected to a stress relieving heat treatment of about 1100 to 1400°F (593-760°C) for an appropriate period of time. The time period is, of course, a function of the temperature selected and the section size.

[0038] In particular, the non-age hardenable tubes may be drawn to final size, annealed at about 1700-2000°F (767-933°C) for a suitable time, straightened, bent into the appropriate shape (if desired), and stress relieved at about 593-760°C up to about three hours. The age-hardenable tubes may be drawn to final size, annealed at about 767-933°C for a suitable time, straightened, aged for about an hour at 593-760°C, bent into the appropriate shape and stress relieved (which also ages the tube) at about 593-760°C for the appropriate time.



[0039] It should be noted that due to the relatively low chromium content, the pitting resistance of the alloy is about the same as stainless 304 and is not recommended for service where superior resistance to localized attack is required. The low chromium lowers resistance to intergranular attack and limits use in highly oxidizing environments such as nitric acid.

[0040] A preferred composition for overall strength, corrosion resistance and economy for feedwater heaters is heat 8 (28 Ni - 16 Cr - 4 Cu - 1.8 Ti - 2 Mo - Bal Fe). This composition appears to have the mechanical and corrosion properties necessary for a high pressure material. It also has excellent general corrosion resistance in hydrochloric, sulfuric and phosphoric acids. The good resistance of this composition to polythionic acid attack also indicates potential petrochemical applications.


Claims

1. An austenitic, high-strength, corrosion-resistant nickel-iron-chromium alloy that consists, by weight, of from 24 to 32% nickel, from 12 to 19% chromium, from 1 to 3.5% molybdenum, from 2 to 5.5% copper, form 0.8 to 2.5% titanium, from 0 to 1.5% manganese, from 0 to 1.5% silicon, from 0 to 1% niobium plus tantalum, from 0 to 0.2% aluminum, from 0 to 0.1% cerium, from 0 to 0.01% boron, and from 0 to 0.2% nitrogen, the balance, apart from impurities, being iron.
 
2. An alloy according to claim 1 wherein the copper content is at least 4%.
 
3. An alloy according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the molybdenum content is from 2 to 3%.
 
4. An alloy according to any preceding claim wherein the silicon content does not exceed 0.45%.
 
5. An alloy according to any preceding claim wherein the nickel content is from 26 to 29%, the chromium content is from 15 to 18%, the copper content does not exceed 5%, the molybdenum content does not exceed 3%, and the content of niobium plus tantalum does not exceed 0.4%.
 
6. An alloy according to claim 5, wherein the nickel content is about 28%, the chromium content is about 16%, the molybdenum content is about 2%, the copper content is about 4%, and the titanium content is about 1.8%.
 
7. An alloy according to any preceding claim that has been heat-treated at a temperature in the range from 1100 to 1400°F (605 to 760°C) for up to 16 hours.
 
8. A tube formed from an alloy according to any preceding claim.
 
9. A heat-exchanger or feed-water heater comprising an alloy according to any of claims 1 to 7 or a tube according to claim 8.
 
10. The use of an alloy according to any one of claims 1 to 7 for articles or parts exposed in use to polythionic acid.
 


Ansprüche

1. Austenitische, hochfeste, korrosionsbeständige Nickel-Eisen-Chrom-Legierung aus 24 bis 32% Nickel, 12 bis 19% Chrom, 1 bis 3,5% Molybdän, 2 bis 5,5% Kupfer, 0,8 bis 2,5% Titan, 0 bis 1,5% Mangan, 0 bis 1,5% Silizium, 0 bis 1 % Niob und Tantal, 0 bis 0,2% Aluminium, 0 bis 0,1% Zer, 0 bis 0,01 % Bor und 0 bis 0,2% Stickstoff, Rest ausser Verunreinigungen Eisen.
 
2. Legierung nach Anspruch 1, deren Kupfergehalt jedoch mindestens 4% beträgt.
 
3. Legierung nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, deren Molybdängehalt jedoch 2 bis 3% beträgt.
 
4. Legierung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, deren Siliziumgehalt jedoch höchstens 0,45% beträgt.
 
5. Legierung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, die jedoch 26 bis 29% Nickel, 15 bis 18 Chrom, höchstens 5% Kupfer, höchstens 3% Molybdän und höchstens 0,4% Niob und Tantal enhält.
 
6. Legierung nach Anspruch 5, die jedoch etwa 28% Nickel, etwa 16% Chrom, etwa 2% Molybdän, etwa 4% Kupfer und etwa 1,8% Titan enthält.
 
7. Legierung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 6, die jedoch bis 16 Stunden bei 1.100 bis 1.400°F (605 bis 760°C) wärmebehandelt worden ist.
 
8. Rohr aus einer Legierung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 7.
 
9. Wärmetauscher oder Speisewassererhitzer aus einer Legierung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 7 oder einem Rohr nach Anspruch 8.
 
10. Verwendung einer Legierung nach den Ansprüchen 1 bis 7 als Werkstoff für Gegenstände, die im Gebrauch Polythionsäure ausgesetzt sind.
 


Revendications

1. Alliage austénitique nickel-fer-chrome résistant à la corrosion et à haute résistance mécanique, comprenant, en poids, de 24 à 32% de nickel, de 12 à 19% de chrome, de 1 à 3,5% de molybdène, de 2 à 5,5% de cuivre, de 0,8 à 2,5% de titane, de 0 à 1,5% de manganèse, de 0 à 1,5% de silicium, de 0 à 1% de niobium et de tantale, de 0 à 0,2% d'aluminium, de 0 à 0,1 % de cérium, de 0 à 0,01 % de bore et de 0 à 0,2% d'azote, le reste, à l'exception des impuretés, consistant en fer.
 
2. Alliage selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la teneur en cuivre, est d'au moins 4%.
 
3. Alliage selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans lequel la teneur en molybdène, est de 2 à 3%.
 
4. Alliage selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la teneur en silicium, n'est pas supérieure à 0,45%.
 
5. Alliage selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la teneur en nickel est de 26 à 29%, la teneur en chrome est de 15 à 18%, la teneur en cuivre n'est pas supérieure à 5%, la teneur en molybdène n'est pas supérieure à 3%, et la teneur en niobium et en tantale, n'est pas supérieure à 0,4%.
 
6. Alliage selon la revendication 5, dans lequel la teneur en nickel est d'environ 28%, la teneur en chrome d'environ 16%, la teneur en molybdène d'environ 2%, la teneur en cuivre d'environ 4%, et la teneur en titane d'environ 1,8%.
 
7. Alliage selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, qui a été traité à chaud à une température de 1100 à 1400°F (de 605 à 760°C) pendant jusqu'à 16 heures.
 
8. Tube formé à partir d'un alliage selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes.
 
9. Echangeur de chaleur ou réchauffeur d'eau d'alimentation, comprenant un alliage selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7, ou un tube selon la revendication 8.
 
10. Utilisation d'un alliage selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7, pour des articles ou des pièces exposées, en cours d'utilisation, à l'acide polythionique.
 




Drawing