[0001] The present invention relates to a cushioning device for use in an impact tool, specifically
an impact tool adapted to be mounted on the tip of an arm of a mobile carriage such
as a power shovel.
[0002] As shown in Fig. 5, a large-sized hydraulic or pneumatic impact tool 1 (what is called
a breaker) is mounted on the tip of an arm 3 of a carriage 2 such as a power shovel
by means of brackets 4. It is used for a wide range of applications including crushing
and demolishing work at a quarry or a construction site.
[0003] The impact tool 1 vibrates up and down violently during operation. If it were rigidly
coupled to the arm 3, its vibration would be transmitted to the carriage, thus causing
bad effects on the operator and carriage.
[0004] One effective measure to solve this problem is to interpose cushioning rubber members
5 between the impact tool 1 and the brackets 4 as shown in Fig. 6 (hereinafter referred
to as the first prior art). The cushioning rubber members 5 are column-shaped and
fixedly mounted between the impact tool 1 and the brackets 4 by screwing washers 6
and 7 fixed to both ends thereof into the tool 1 and the brackets 4, respectively.
[0005] Fig. 7 shows another prior art (second prior art) in which annular cushioning rubber
members 8 are employed. The cushioning arrangement in the second prior art comprises
plates 10 received in grooves 9 formed in both sides of the impact tool 1 and fixed
to mounting seats fixed to the impact tool, column-shaped protrusions 11 fixed to
the plates 10, and the annular cushioning rubber members 8 held between cylindrical
members 13 and 14 and mounted on the brackets 4 through rings 15.
[0006] The cylindrical cushioning rubber members 5 in the first prior art can absorb and
dampen the vertical vibrations of the tool 1. But if external forces act on the chisel
16 in a back-and-forth direction (direction of arrow X in Fig. 5) owing to oblique
striking or scratch work, the rubber members 5 will be subjected to torsional stress.
This will prompt aging of the rubber. Another problem with the first prior art is
that the rubber members tend to be deformed markedly, thus making difficult the operation
of the impact tool 1.
[0007] If external forces act on the chisel 1 in the side-to-side direction (direction
of arrow Y in Fig. 6) owing to wrenching work, the brackets 4 will be subjected to
such a force as to widen the distance therebetween. Thus the cushioning rubber members
5 interposed therebetween will be subjected to a large tensile force, which is another
cause of premature aging of the rubber member.
[0008] Each cushioning rubber member 5 is required to have a thickness
a larger than a predetermined value to obtain a predetermined dampening effect. On
the other hand, the distance
b between the brackets 4 should be as small as possible, for the case where the tool
1 is used in a limited working space. Since the distance
b is determined by the thickness
a in this arrangement, the above two requirements contradict each other.
[0009] Further, since the washers 6 and 7 fixed to the rubber members 5 are screwed to the
impact tool 1 and the brackets 4, respectively, it would be difficult to replace or
repair the rubber members 5.
[0010] In the second prior art, the cushioning action is carried out by the forces which
act on the annular cushioning rubber members 8 in the direction of compression. But
since the deformation of each rubber member 8 is limited by its thickness, it cannot
deform sufficiently. Thus its cushioning effect is small compared with the column-shaped
cushioning rubber members 5 in the first prior art which are subjected to such a force
as to act in the direction of shear. Also, since the cushioning rubber members 8 are
fitted between the column-shaped protrusion 11 and the rings 15, the heat generated
in the rubber member is difficult to dissipate. This will cause premature aging of
the rubber. Further, the assembly of the cushioning device of the second prior art
is very difficult and troublesome, because it includes bolting the plates 10 to the
seats provided on the impact tool 1 and then fitting the brackets 4 having cushioning
rubber members 8 received therein through the rings 15 on the protrusions 11 on the
plates 10. If any annular cushioning rubber member 8 is broken, all the rubber members
8 have to be removed from the column-shaped protrusions 11 together with the brackets
4, and then they have to be mounted back in position after replacing the broken one.
[0011] It is an object of the present invention to provide a cushioning device which obviates
the abovesaid shortcomings, which increases the durability of its cushioning rubber
members, which allows a smaller distance between brackets, and which facilitates mounting
of an impact tool and replacement of cushioning rubber members.
[0012] Other features and objects of the present invention will become apparent from the
following description taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a partially cutaway side view of the embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a partially cutaway front view of the same;
Fig. 3 is an enlarged vertical sectional view of a portion of the same;
Fig. 4 is a similar view of the second embodiment;
Fig. 5 is a side view showing how an impact tool is used;
Fig. 6 is a front view of a prior art arrangement; and
Fig. 7 is an enlarged sectional view of another prior art arrangement.
[0013] The cushioning device embodying the present invention shown in Figs. 1 to 3 supports
an impact tool 1 in the shape of a square pole between the end portions of an opposed
pair of brackets 4. It has rectangular cushioning rubber members 21 interposed between
the tool 1 and the brackets 4. Restricting members 23 for restricting the backward
motion of the tool 1 are welded to the opposed inner surfaces of the brackets 4. The
tool 1 is inserted into between the brackets 4 from their front end until it abuts
the restricting members 23 through resilient sheets 28 such as plastic plates.
[0014] The tool 1 is formed in each side at two different levels with grooves 24. Each bracket
4 is formed with mounting holes 25 at locations opposite to the respective grooves
24.
[0015] Each cushioning rubber member 21 has a rectangular sectional shape with its top and
bottom surfaces concaved in the middle and has plates 26 and 27 secured as by baking
to both side faces thereof. The plate 26 is complementary in shape to each groove
24, whereas the plate 27 has a surface larger in area than each mounting hole 25.
[0016] The cushioning rubber members 21 are inserted into the holes 25 of the brackets 4
with the plates 26 inside so that the plates 26 will engage in the respective grooves
24. Then the plates 27 are secured to the outer surface of the brackets 4 at portions
surrounding the mounting holes 25 by means of bolts 29. Each mounting hole 25 has
an area sufficiently large compared with the cushioning rubber members 21 so as to
prevent the rubber members 21 from touching the inner peripheral wall of the mounting
holes 25 even when the former is deformed.
[0017] Restricting members 22 for restricting the forward motion of the tool 1 are secured
to the brackets 4 by bolts 30 (Fig. 1) so as to be in contact with the front surface
of the tool 1 through resilient sheets 31 at locations opposite to the restricting
members 23.
[0018] The resilient sheets 28 and 31 are provided to prevent the restricting members 23
and 22 from coming into direct contact with the tool 1. Numeral 32 designates a pin
hole for mounting the brackets 4 to a carriage 2.
[0019] To assemble the cushioning device, the restricting members 23 are secured to the
brackets 4 beforehand and the plates 27 on the cushioning rubber members 21 are secured
to the outer surface of the brackets 4 so that their inner ends protrude into the
brackets 4.
[0020] Then the tool 1 is inserted into between the brackets 4 from front thereof so that
the plates 26 on the cushioning rubber members 21 will be received tightly in the
respective grooves 24 formed in the tool 1. The tool 1 is pushed in until its rear
end face abuts the restricting members 23. Finally, the restricting members 22 are
pressed against the front end face of the tool 1 to restrict the back-and-force movement
of the tool 1.
[0021] The cushioning rubber members 21 may be inserted through the mounting holes 25 after
mounting the tool 1 in between the brackets 4 and the restricting members 22 and 23
so that the plates 26 are engaged in the grooves 24 in the tool 1. The plates 27 are
secured to the outer surface of the brackets 4 by the bolts 29 thereafter.
[0022] With this arrangement, when the tool 1 vibrates vertically, a shearing force will
act on the cushioning rubber members 21. Thus the vibration of the tool 1 is damped.
The restricting members 22 and 23 only restrict the back-and-forth movement of the
tool 1 through the resilient sheets 28 and 31. Its up-and-down movement will not be
restricted nor transmitted to the brackets 4 through the restricting members 22 and
23.
[0023] Even if an external force in the direction of X acts on the chisel 16, the relative
movement between the brackets 4 and the tool 1 will be restricted by the restricting
members 22 and 23. Thus no tensile force will act on the cushioning rubber members
21.
[0024] If an external force in the direction of Y acts on the chisel, a compressive load
will act on the cushioning rubber members 21 at one side of the tool 1, because the
distance between the brackets 4 are kept uniform by the restricting members 22 and
23. This will restrain the tool 1 from shaking violently.
[0025] Fig. 4 shows another embodiment in which plates 26′ and 37 are secured to both sides
of the cushioning rubber member 21 as by baking. The inner plate 26′ has its outer
surface 38 bonded to the rubber member 21. The surface 38 is oblique with respect
to the axis of the impact tool 1 because the inner plate 26′ widens toward the bottom.
The outer plate 37 widens toward the top, so that the inner surface 39 of the plate
37, too, is oblique with respect to the axis of the impact tool. The mounting plate
27, integral with the outer plate 37, is secured to the bracket 4 by the bolts 29.
The outer plate 37 is received in the mounting hole 25 formed in the bracket 4 and
the inner plate 26′ is engaged in the grooves 24 formed in the impact tool 1.
[0026] The embodiment of Fig. 4 is the same as the first embodiment in the other points.
In this embodiment, since the cushioning member 21 is mounted so as to have their
surfaces oblique with respect to the axis of the impact tool, the vibrations of the
impact tool 1 in a vertical direction act on the cushioning member 21 as compressive
and shearing loads. This reduces the possibility of the cushioning rubber member peelng
off and increases the durability of the entire cushioning device.
[0027] According to the present invention, the restricting members 22 and 23 abut the front
and rear sides of the tool 1 through the resilient sheets 28 and 31, so that the tool
1 can vibrate in one direction only and the cushioning rubber members 21 will be subjected
not to a torsioning force or a tensile force but to a shearing force only. This will
increase the cushioning effect and the durability of the cushioning rubber members
21 and improve the operability of the tool 1.
[0028] Since the cushioning rubber members 21 have a substantial part of their surface exposed
to the atmosphere, the heat generated in the rubber member can dissipate. This will
retard aging of the rubber owing to increase in the rubber temperature.
[0029] Since the plates 27 on the cushioning rubber members 21 are secured to the outer
surface of the brackets 4, the distance between the brackets 4 can be narrowed by
the length equal to twice the sum of thickness d1 of each bracket 4 and the thickness
d2 of each plate 27, compared with the prior art arrangement shown in Fig. 6 in which
the cushioning rubber members 21 are secured to the inner surfaces of the brackets
4 through the washers. Further, since the cushioning rubber members have a square
sectional shape, they can be bonded to both plates 26 and 27 with increased bond areas.
Thus the cushioning rubber members 21 can be made lower in height than the column-shaped
cushioning rubber members 5 in Fig. 6. This will make it possible to further reduce
the distance between the brackets 4.
[0030] The assemblies each comprising a cushioning rubber member 21 and a pair of plates
26 and 27 are inserted into the brackets 4 from outside and secured to their outer
surface. Thus the cushioning device according to the present invention can be assembled
with extreme ease in regardless of whether the tool 1 is mounted after the assemblies
have been secured to the brackets 4 or the assemblies are secured to the brackets
4 after the tool 1 has been mounted on the brackets 4. If any of the rubber members
21 is broken during use, only the assembly including the broken rubber member 21 can
be replaced with a new one by screwing and unscrewing the bolts. Thus the device is
easy and inexpensive to repair.