[0001] A subject of the invention is a ship, particularly of ro-ro type. The invention is
applicable in ship-building, particularly of those ships having no transverse watertight
bullheads in cargo spaces and meeting the requirements concerning ship survivability
in the damage conditions. There are known cargo ships having no transverse watertight
bullheads, intended primarily for the cariage of roll-on/roll off cargo. They have
usually the following watertight compartments: double bottom, forepeak, after-peak,
engine room and wing tanks. The fore and aft collision bullheads and wing tanks are
terminated as a rule at the first deck above the deepest load line.
[0002] There have been so far no subdivision requirements for cargo ro-ro ships. That is
why wing tanks on such ships were applied in view of ballasting and frequently due
to psychological reasons rather than due to subdivision considerations. They could
save the ship only in cases of shallow damages in way of those tanks.
[0003] There are known car-passenger ferries /of ro-ro type/ subject to subdivision and
damage stability requirements contained in the 1974 SOLAS Convention. Space below
the bullhead deck on such ferries as usually densely subdivided by transverse bullheads,
extending from side to side. In such a case wing tanks are not applied and many of
the compartments below the bullhead deck is rather used for cargo nor other purposes.
On the remaining passenger ro-ro ships, below the bullhead deck, wing compartments
of breadth B/5 are applied which are relatively short and cross-connected to avoid
asymmetrical flooding.
[0004] The above solutions do not provide sufficient safety for passenger ro-ro ships in
case of collision. On the centrary, these solutions appear to be extremely dangerous
as they do not secure a ferry against the rapid capsize in case of sea water entering
onto the bullhead deck. A good evidence for this was the capsizing of the "European
Gateway" in 1982 and the "Herald of Free Enterprise" in 1987, to mention only the
two recent most famous disasters.
[0005] In the light of the new requirements concerning the ship subdivision based on the
probabilistic approach, an index of subdivision is an objective measure of ship safety
in the damage condition. The rules are to enter into force as early as in 1992 and
all dry cargo ships, including ro-ro ships, will have to meet these requirements.
Similar rules will also be in force for passenger ships.
[0006] The new probablistic rules require the same level of safety irrespective of dry cargo
ship type. Thus new ro-ro ships will have to be equally safe /have the same indices
of subdivision/ as the remaining dry cargo ships. For present ro-ro ships in service,
values of the indices of subdivision are very low, if not marginal, frequently not
exceeding a value of 0.1 whilst for other cargo ships this index is above 0.5.
[0007] There is no possibilities whatsoever to increase so markedly the indices of subdivision
for ro-ro ships within the presently applied concept of their watertight subdivision,
that is through a considerable increase in freeboard or by the application of removable
transverse bullheads in holds intended for ro-ro cargo. Such solutions are clearly
contradictory with their basic operational features.
[0008] A ship according to the invention embodies the characteristics of having double sides
at least on part of its length, terminated at least at the first continuous deck above
the bullhead deck and of having double decks; at least a bullhead deck, whereas the
double sides and decks are sufficiently densely subdivided by water-tight bullheads
into watertight compartments, whilst cargo spaces are provided with efficient air-escapes
/deaerators/ placed at side tops of these cargo spaces.
[0009] The breadth of the double sides is preferably not greater than 8/10, the double sides
are subdivided into wing tanks by transverse bullheads, and cargo spaces are of constant
breadth.
[0010] The height of the double decks is preferably not greater than the height of deck
stiffeners for adequate single decks; the double decks are transversely and longitudinally
subdivided by watertight bullheads. The double bottom is preferably of minimum height
required by the rules.
[0011] The benefits of the invention are twofold:
I. from design and operation standpoints: the invention makes it possible to obtain
high indices of subdivision, required by the new subdivision regulations, thus it
makes it possible building of safe ro-ro ships without impairing their successful
operational features based on non-subdivided horizontal cargo spaces.
II. from technical standpoint:
a/ the invention does not decrease the cargo space. The double decks make use of the
space on underside of the decks, contained between the huge deck stiffeners, useless
for cargo. Confinement of this space by relatively thin watertight shell plating,
replacing the thick flanges of deck stiffeners, changes this useless space into a
double buoyant deck of considerable volume. Due to this reason, hitherto broad wing
compartments below the bullhead deck can be replaced by relatively narrow double sides
terminated at least at the first deck above the bullhead deck thus improving functionality
of cargo spaces;
b/ the invention does not increase the weight of the ship thus keeping the same deadweight;
c/ the invention improves overall ship strength;
d/ smooth sides make cargo handling and insulation easier.
[0012] The invention as shown in Fig.1 and 2. Fig.1 presents cross-section of a ro-ro ship
with two double buoyant decks.
[0013] The ship in Fig.1 has double bottom
1 of minimum height described by the rules, double sides
2 throughout the whole length of the ship, terminated at the main deck
3. The ship has double bullhead deck
4 of height corresponding to the height of deck stiffeners of an adequate single deck.
[0014] Double sides
2 are horizontally subdivided by the shell of the bullhead deck and are transversely
subdivided by watertight bullheads. The double bullhead deck
4 has two longitudinal bullheads and is transversely subdivided at the same places
as the double sides. Holds
6 and
7 have efficient air -escapes
8 and
9 distributed along the ship sides. Corresponding opposite tanks in the double bottom
2 are cross-connected or flooded by use of the ballast system.
[0015] The ship in Fig.2 has - in addition to the ship shown in Fig.1 - double main deck
10. The double sides
2 in this case are of lesser breadth, keeping the same breadth of holds
6 and
7 as in the case of the ship in Fig. 1. As a result, the breadth of the ship is now
slightly lesser than before.
1. A ship, particularly of a ro-ro type, having inside watertight compartments like double
bottom forepeak, after-peak and engine room, characterized in that at least on part
of its length it has double sides (2) terminated at least at the first continuous
deck above the bullhead deck and has double decks, at least the bullhead deck (4),
the double sides and double decks are sufficiently densely subdivided into watertight
compartments and cargo spaces (6 and 7) have efficient air-escapes (8 and 9) located
at side tops of these spaces.
2. The ship according to claim 1, characterized in that that the double sides (2) have
the preferable breadth not greater than B/10 and are subdivided by bullheads into
smaller compartments whilst cargo spaces (6, 7) have constant breadth.
3. The ship according to claim 1, characterized in that double decks (4, 10) have the
preferable height not greater than the height of deck stiffeners of adequate single
decks and are subdivided longitudinally (5) and transversely into watertight compartments.
4. The ship according to claim 1, characterized in that double bottom (1) has the preferable
height corresponding to a minimum height according to the rules.