BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
[0001] This invention relates to glassy metal alloys with near-zero magnetostriction which
are especially suited for use in high frequency applications.
2. Description of the Prior Art
[0002] Saturation magnetostriction λ
s is related to the fractional change in length of Δℓ/ℓ that occurs in a magnetic material
on going from the demagnetized to the saturated, ferromagnetic state. The value of
magnetostriction, a dimensionless quantity, is often given in units of microstrains
(i.e., a microstrain is a fractional change in length of one part per million).
[0003] Ferromagnetic alloys of low magnetostriction are desirable for several interrelated
reasons:
1. Soft magnetic properties (low coercivity, high permeability) are generally obtained
when both the saturation magnetostriction λs and the magnetocrystalline anisotropy K approach zero. Therefore, given the same
anisotropy, alloys of lower magnetostriction will show lower dc coercivities and higher
permeabilities. Such alloys are suitable for various soft magnetic applications.
2. Magnetic properties of such zero magneto-strictive materials are insensitive to
mechanical strains. When this is the case, there is little need for stress-relief
annealing after winding, punching or other physical handling needed to form a device
from such material. In contrast, magnetic properties of stress-sensitive materials,
such as the crystalline alloys, are seriously degraded by such cold working and such
materials must be carefully annealed.
3. The low dc coercivity of zero magnetostrictive materials carries over to ac operating
conditions where again low coercivity and high permeability are realized (provided
the magneto-crystalline anisotropy is not too large and the resistivity not too small).
Also because energy is not lost to mechanical vibrations when the saturation magnetostriction
is zero, the core loss of zero magnetostrictive materials can be quite low. Thus,
zero magnetostrictive magnetic alloys (of moderate or low magnetocrystalline anisotropy)
are useful where low loss and high ac permeability are required. Such applications
include a variety of tape-wound and laminated core devices, such as power transformers,
signal transformers, magnetic recording heads and the like.
4. Finally, electromagnetic devices containing zero magnetostrictive materials generate
no acoustic noise under AC excitation. while this is the reason for the lower core
loss mentioned above, it is also a desirable characteristic in itself because it eliminates
the hum inherent in many electromagnetic devices.
[0004] There are three well-known crystalline alloys of zero magnetostriction (in atom percent,
unless otherwise indicated):
(1) Nickel-iron alloys containing approximately 80% nickel ("80 nickel permalloys");
(2) Cobalt-iron alloys containing approximately 90% cobalt; and
(3) Iron-silicon alloys containing approximately 6 wt. % silicon.
[0005] Also included in these categories are zero magneto-strictive alloys based on the
binaries but with small additions of other elements such as molybdenum, copper or
aluminum to provide specific property changes. These include, for example, 4% Mo,
79% Ni, 17% Fe (sold under the designation Moly Permalloy) for increased resistivity
and permeability; permalloy plus varying amounts of copper (sold under the designation
Mumetal) for magnetic softness and improved ductility; and 85 wt. % Fe, 9 wt. % Si,
6 wt. % Al (sold under the designation Sendust) for zero anisotropy.
[0006] The alloys included in category (1) are the most widely used of the three classes
listed above because they combine zero magnetostriction with low anisotropy and are,
therefore, extremely soft magnetically; that is they have a low coercivity, a high
permeability and a low core loss. These permalloys are also relatively soft mechanically
and their excellent magnetic properties, achieved by high temperature (above 1000°C)
anneal, tend to be degraded by relatively mild mechanical shock.
[0007] Category (2) alloys such as those based on Co₉₀Fe₁₀ have a much higher saturation
induction (B
s about 1.9 Tesla) than the permalloys. However, they also have a strong negative magnetocrystalline
anisotropy, which prevents them from being good soft magnetic materials. For example,
the initial permeability of Co₉₀Fe₁₀ is only about 100 to 200.
[0008] Category (3) alloys such as Fe/6 wt% Si and the related ternary alloy Sendust (mentioned
above) also show higher saturation inducations (B
s about 1.8 Tesla and 1.1 Tesla, respectively) than the permalloys. However these alloys
are extremely brittle and have, therefore, found limited use in powder form only.
Recently both Fe/6.5 wt.% Si [IEEE Trans.
MAG-16, 728 (1980)] and Sendust alloys (IEEE Trans.
MAG-15 1149 (1970)] have been made relatively ductile by rapid solidification. However,
compositional dependence of the magnetostriction is very strong in these materials,
difficult precise tayloring of the alloy composition to achieve near-zero magnetostriction.
[0009] It is known that magnetocrystalline anisotropy is effectively eliminated in the glassy
state. It is therefore desirable to seek glassy metal alloys of zero magnetostriction.
Such alloys might be found near the compositions listed above. Because of the presence
of metalloids which tend to quench the magnetization by the transfer of charge to
the transition-metal d-electron states, however, glassy metal alloys based on the
80 nickel permalloys are either non-magnetic at room temperature or have unacceptably
low saturation inductions. For example, the glassy alloy Fe₄₀Ni₄₀P₁₄B₆ (the subscripts
are in atom percent) has a saturation induction of about 0.8 Tesla, while the glassy
alloy Ni₄₉Fe₂₉P₁₄B₆Si₂ has a saturation induction of about 0.46 Tesla and the glassy
alloy Ni₈₀P₂₀ is non-magnetic. No glassy metal alloys having a saturation magnetostriction
approximately equal to zero have yet been found near the iron-rich Sendust composition.
A number of near-zero magnetostrictive glassy metal alloys based on the Co-Fe crystalline
alloy mentioned above in (2) have been reported in the literature. These are, for
example, Co₇₂Fe₃P₁₆B₆AL₃ (AIP Conference Proceedings, No. 24, pp. 745-746 (1975))
Co
70.5Fe
4.5Si₁₅B₁₀ (Vol. 14,
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, pp. 1077-1078 (1975)) Co
31.2Fe
7.8Ni
39.0B₁₄SI₈ [proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Rapidly Quenched metals, p.
183, (1979)] and Co₇₄Fe₆B₂₀ [IEEE Trans.
MAG-12, 942 (1976)]. Table I lists some of the magnetic properties of these materials.
Table I
[0010] Saturation induction (B
s), Curie temperature (
ϑf), the first crystallization temperature (T
cl), ascast dc coercivity (H
C), and dc coercivity and permeability ( µ )in the annealed states of some of the prior
art zero magnetostrictive glassy alloys.

The saturation induction (B
s) of these alloys ranges between 0.6 and 1.2 Tesla. The glassy alloys with B
s close to 0.6 T show low coercivities and high permeabilities comparable to crystalline
supermalloys. However, these alloys tend to be magnetically unstable at relatively
low (150°C) temperatures. On the other hand, the glassy alloys with B
s ∼ 1.2 Tesla tend to have their ferromagnetic Curie temperatures ( ϑ
f ) near or above their first crystallization temperatures (T
cl). This makes heat-treatment of these materials very difficult to achieve desired
soft magnetic properties because such annealing is most effective when carried out
at temperatures near ϑ
f.
[0011] A recent prior art (Journal of Applied Physics
53, 7819 (1983)] discloses near-zero magnetostrictive glassy alloys with excellent soft
magnetic properties and magnetic stability. These glassy alloys were designed with
the idea of a saturation induction as high as possible. Recent trends in the applied
magnetics do not necessarily require high saturation inductions but a high squareness
ratio, a low ac core loss and a high permeability at high frequencies. In view of
this, glassy metal alloys exhibiting these features are desirable.
[0012] EP-A-84 138 describes a new series of glassy metal alloys with near-zero magnetostriction
is disclosed. The glassy alloys have the composition CO
aFe
bNi
cMo
dB
eSi
f, where a ranges from about 58 to 70 atom percent, b ranges from about 2 to 7.5 atom
percent, c ranges from about 0 to 8 atom percent, d ranges from about 1 to 2 atom
percent, e ranges from about 11 to 15 atom percent and f ranges from about 9 to 14
atom percent with the proviso that the sum of a, b, c ranges from about 72 to 76 atom
percent and the sum of e and f ranges from about 23 to 26 atom percent. The magnetostriction
of these alloys ranges from about -1 × 10⁻⁶ to +1 × 10⁻⁶ and the saturation induction
is between about 0.6 and 0.8 Tesla. The transition metal content is responsible for
the low magnetostriction in these alloys. The metalloid content strongly affects the
saturation induction. Curies temperature, and magnetic stability. Magnetostriction
is mildly affected by the metalloid composition and a particular range of Si/B ratio
for certain iron, cobalt containing alloys wherein the magnetostriction is near-zerao
and relatively insensitive to the Si/B ratio. The same Si/B ratios also provide high
magnetic stability.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0013] In accordance with the invention, there is provided a magnetic alloy that is at least
70% glassy, and which has a near-zero magnetostriction, high magnetic and thermal
stability and excellent soft magnetic properties at high frequencies. The glassy metal
alloy has the composition Co
aFe
bNi
cM
dB
eSi
f, where subscripts are in atom percents and "a" ranges from 65.5 to 70.5, "b" ranges
from 3.8 to 4.5, "c" ranges from 0 to 3, "d" ranges from 1 to 2, "e" ranges from 10
to 12 and "f" ranges from 14 to 15 when M is selected from a group consisting of vanadium,
chromium, molybdenum, niobium and tungsten; when M is manganese, "a" ranges from 68.0
to 70.0, "b" ranges from 2.5 to 4.0, "c" ranges from 0 to 3, "d" ranges from 1 to
4, "e" ranges from 10 to 12 and "f" ranges from 14 to 15. The glassy alloy has a value
of saturation magnetostriction ranging from -1 x 10⁻⁶ to + 1 x 10⁻⁶, a saturation
induction of at least 0.65 Tesla, a Curie temperature ranging from 245 to 310°C and
the first crystallization temperature ranging from 530 to 575°C.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0014] In accordance with the invention, there is provided a magnetic alloy that is at least
70% glassy and which has an outstanding combination of properties, including a near-zero
magnetostriction, high magnetic and thermal stability and such soft magnetic properties
as high permeability, low ac core loss and low coercivity.
[0015] The purity of the above composition is that found in normal commercial practice.
However, it will be appreciated that up to about 2 atom percent of (Si + B) may be
replaced by carbon, aluminum or germanium without significantly degrading the desirable
magnetic properties of these alloys.
[0016] Examples of essentially zero magnetostrictive glassy metal alloys of the invention
include
Co
65.7Fe
4.4Ni
2.9Mo₂B₁₁Si₁₄ and
Co
68.13Fe
4.0Ni
1.37Mo
1.5B₁₀Si₁₅. These glassy alloys possess saturation induction between about 0.65 and 0.70
Tesla, Curie temperature of about 270°C and the first crystallization temperature
of about 530°C. Some magnetic and thermal properties of other near-zero magnetostrictive
glassy alloys of the present invention are listed in Table II.

[0017] The presence of the metal element M is to increase T
cl and hence the thermal stability of the alloy system. The content of M beyond 2 atom
percent, however, reduces the Curies temperature to a level lower than 245°C, which
is undesirable in conventional magnetic devices.
[0018] For some applications, it may be desirable or acceptable to use a material with a
small positive or a small negative magnetostriction. When this is the case, all of
the glassy alloys of Table II exhibiting the saturation magnetostriction value ranging
from -1 x 10⁻⁶ to + 10⁻⁶ may qualify. The value of the magnetostriction is essentially
determined by the ratio of Fe/(Co+Fe) or (Fe+Mn)/(Co+Fe+Mn). These ratios are about
0.06 and 0.07-0.09 respectively. The small amount of the element Ni and the metal
M excepting Mn which is present in the glassy alloys of the present invention is relatively
ineffective to alter the magnetostriction of these alloys.
[0019] The glassy alloy of the invention are conveniently prepared by techniques readily
available elsewhere; see, e.g., U.S. Patent 3,845,805, issued November 5, 1974 and
3,856,513, issued December 24, 1974. In general, the glassy alloys, in the form of
continuous ribbon, wire, etc., are rapidly quenched from a melt of the desired composition
at a rate of at least about 10⁵K/sec.
[0020] A metalloid content of boron and silicon in the range of about 24 to 27 atom percent
of the total alloy composition is sufficient for glass formation, with boron ranging
from about 10 to 12 atom percent and silicon ranging from about 14 to about 15 atom
percent.
[0021] Tables III and IV give ac core loss (L), exciting power (P₈) and permeability ( µ
) at 0.1 Tesla induction and at 50 kHz of the near-zero magnetostrictive glassy alloys
of the present invention annealed at different temperature (T
o). Summarizing, by water quenching subsequent to the heat-treatments given in Table
III, the glassy alloys of the present invention exhibit, on the average, L=4W/kg,P₈=6VA/kg
and µ =28,000. One of them, namely, Co
68.13Fe
4.0Ni
1.37Mo
1.5B₁₀Si₁₅, can attain L=3.0 W/kg,P₈=4.2VA/kg and µ =38,000. Slower cooling after the
heat-treatments generally results in higher value for the loss and the exciting power,
and lower permeabilities. Some of the glassy alloys of the present invention, when
cooled slowly subsequent to the heat-treatments, however, show results comparable
to or better than those exhibited by the materials quenched rapidly after the heat-treatments.
One such example is shown by a glassy Co
68.75Fe
4.25W₂B₁₀Si₁₅, which gives L=2.7W/kg, P₈=4.6VA/kg and µ =34,100 at 50 kHz and 0.1 Tesla
induction when heat-treated at 400°C for 15 min. without a field and cooled slowly
at a rate of about -4°C/min. Compared with these values, a prior art crystalline non-magnetostrictive
supermalloy of the similar thickness (25 µm ) given L=BW/kg, P₈=10VA/kg and µ = 19,000
at 0.1 Tesla and 50 kHz. Examples of glassy alloys outside the scope of the invention
are set forth in Table V. The advantageous combination of properties provided by the
alloys of the present invention cannot be achieved in prior art nonmagnetostrictive
glassy alloys with high saturation induction, such as Co₇₄Fe₆B₂₀, because their Curie
temperatures are higher than the first crystallization temperatures and the heat-treatment
to improve their properties are not so effective as in those with lower saturation
inductions. The above properties, achieved in the glassy alloys of the present invention,
may be obtained in low induction glassy alloys of the prior art. However, these alloys
of the prior art such as Co
31.2Fe
7.8-Ni
39.0-B₁₄Si₈ tend to be magnetically unstable at relatively low temperature of about 150°C
as pointed out earlier. The best combined properties of another glassy alloy of a
prior art were L=4W/kg, P₈=7 VA/kg and µ =23,000 obtained for a glassy Co
67.4Fe
4.1Ni
3.0Mo
1.5-B
12.5Si
11.5 annealed at 380°C for 15 min. and cooled rapidly. It is again clear that the glassy
alloys of the present invention are generally superior to this class of glassy alloys.

[0022] Table V shows the magnetic properties of some of the representative glassy alloys
of the composition Co
aFe
bNi
cM
dB
eSi
f (M is selected from the group consisting of V, Cr, Mn, Mo, Nb and W), in which at
least one of a, b, c, d, e and f is outside the composition range defined in the present
invention. The table indicates that the alloys with at least one of the constituents
outside the defined ranges exhibit either Curie temperature or saturation induction
too low to be practical in many magnetic applications
[0023] The following examples are presented to provide a more complete understanding of
the invention. The specific techniques, conditions, materials, proportions and reported
data set forth to illustrate the principles and practice of the invention are exemplary
and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.
EXAMPLES
1. Sample Preparation
[0024] The glassy alloys listed in Tables II-VII were rapidly quenched (about 10⁶ K/sec)
from the melt following the techniques taught by Chen and Polk in U.S Patent 3,856,513.
The resulting ribbons, typically 25 to 30 µm thick and 0.5 to 2.5 cm wide, were determined
to be free of significant crystallinity by x-ray diffractometry (using CuK radiation)
and scanning calorimetry. Ribbons of the glassy metal alloys were strong, shiny, hard
and ductile.
2. Magnetic Measurements
[0025] Continuous ribbons of the glassy metal alloys prepared in accordance with the procedure
described in Example I were wound onto bobbins (3.8 cm O.D.) to form closed-magnet-path
toroidal samples. Each sample contained from 1 to 3 g of ribbon. Insulated primary
and secondary windings (numbering at least 10 each) were applied to the toroids. These
samples were used to obtain hysteresis loops (coercivity and remanence) and initial
permeability with a commercial curve tracer and core loss (IEEE Standard 106-1972).
[0026] The saturation magnetization, M
s, of each sample, was measured with a commercial vibrating sample magnetometer (Princeton
Applied Research). In this case, the ribbon was cut into several small squares (approximately
2 mm x 2 mm). These were randomly oriented about their normal direction, their plane
being parallel to the applied field (0 to 720 kA/m. The saturation induction R
s (=4 π 4M
sD) was then calculated by using the measured mass density D.
[0027] The ferromagnetic Curie temperature ( ϑ
f ) was measured by inductance method and also monitored by differential scanning calorimetry,
which was used primarily to determine the crystallization temperatures. The first
or primary crystallization temperature (T
cl) was used to compare the thermal stability of various glassy alloys of the present
and prior art inventions.
[0028] Magnetic stability was determined from the reorientation kinetics of the magnetization,
in accordance with the method described in Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 49, p.
6510 (1978), which method is incorporated herein by reference thereto.
[0029] Magnetostriction measurements employed metallic strain gauges (BLH Electronics),
which were bonded (Eastman - 910 Cement) between two short lengths of ribbon. The
ribbon axis and gauge axis were parallel. The magnetostriction was determined as a
function of applied field from the longitudinal strain in the parallel ( Δℓ/ℓ ) and
perpendicular ( Δℓ/ℓ) in-plain fields, according to the formula λ =2/3[( Δℓ/ℓ) - Δℓ/ℓ)].
1. A magnetic alloy that is at least 70% glassy, having the formula CoaFebNicMdBeSif where the subscripts are in atom percent and "a" ranges from 65.5 to 70.5, "b" ranges
from 3.8 to 4.5, "c" ranges from 0 to 3, "d" ranges from 1 to 2, "e" ranges from 10
to 12 and "f" ranges from 14 to 15 when M is selected from the group consisting of
vanadium, chromium, molybdenum, niobium and tungsten; when M is manganese, "a" ranges
from 68.0 to 70.0, "b" ranges from 2.5 to 4.0, "c" ranges from 0 to 3, "d" ranges
from 1 to 4, "e" ranges from 10 to 12 and "f" ranges from 14 to 15, said alloy having
a value of the saturation magnetostriction between - 1x10⁻⁶ to +1x10⁻⁶, a Curie temperature
ranging from 245°C to 310°C, a first crystallization temperature ranging from 530°C
to 575°C and a saturation induction of at least 0.65 Tesla.
2. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co65.7Fe4.4Ni2.9Mo₂B₁₁Si₁₄.
3. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co68.13Fe4.0Ni1.37Mo1.5B₁₀Si₁₅.
4. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co69.6Fe4.4Mo₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
5. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co68.75Fe4.25Mo₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
6. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co69.6Fe4.4Cr₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
7. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co68.75Fe4.25Cr₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
8. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co68.2Fe3.8Mn₁B₁₂Si₁₅.
9. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co67.7Fe3.3Mn₂B₁₂Si₁₅.
10. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co70.0Fe4.0Mn₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
11. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co69.5Fe3.5Mn₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
12. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co69.0Fe3.0Mn₃B₁₀Si₁₅.
13. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co68.5Fe2.5Mn₄B₁₀Si₁₅.
14. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co69.6Fe4.4V₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
15. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co68.75Fe4.25V₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
16. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co69.6Fe4.4Nb₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
17. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co68.75Fe4.25Nb₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
18. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co69.6Fe4.4W₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
19. The magnetic alloy of claim 1 having the formula Co68.75Fe4.25W₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
1. Eine zu zumindest 70% glasähnliche magnetische Legierung mit der Formel CoaFebNicMdBeSif, in der die tiefgestellten Indices Atomprozent sind und "a" von 65,5 bis 70,5, "b"
von 3,8 bis 4,5, "c" von 0 bis 3, "d" von 1 bis 2, "e" von 10 bis 12 und "f" von 14
bis 15 reichen, falls M aus der Gruppe bestehend aus Vanadium, Chrom, Molybdän, Niob
und Wolfram ausgewählt ist, wobei, falls M Mangan ist, "a" von 68,0 bis 70,0, "b"
von 2,5 bis 4,0, "c" von 0 bis 3, "d" von 1 bis 4, "e" von 10 bis 12 und "f" von 14
bis 15 reichen, wobei die Legierung einen Sättigungsmagnetostriktionswert zwischen
-1 x 10-⁶ bis +1 x 10-⁶, eine Curietemperatur im Bereich von 245°C bis 310°C, eine
erste Kristallisationstemperatur im Bereich von 530°C bis 575°C und eine Sättigungsinduktion
von zumindest 0,65 Tesla aufweist.
2. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co65,7Fe4,4Ni2,9Mo₂B₁₁Si₁₄.
3. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co68,13Fe4,0Ni1,37Mo1,5B₁₀Si₁₅.
4. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co69,6Fe4,4Mo₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
5. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co68,75Fe4,25Mo₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
6. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co69,6Fe4,4Cr₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
7. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co68,75Fe4,25Cr₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
8. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co68,2Fe3,8Mn₁B₁₂Si₁₅.
9. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co67,7Fe3,3Mn₂B₁₂Si₁₅.
10. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co70,0Fe4,0Mn₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
11. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co69,5Fe3,5Mn₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
12. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co69,0Fe3,0Mn₃B₁₀Si₁₅.
13. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co68,5Fe2,5Mn₄B₁₀Si₁₅.
14. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co69,6Fe4,4V₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
15. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co68,75Fe4,25V₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
16. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co69,6Fe4,4Nb₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
17. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co68,75Fe4,25Nb₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
18. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co69,6Fe4,4W₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
19. Magnetische Legierung nach Anspruch 1 der Formel Co68,75Fe4,25W₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
1. Alliage magnétique qui est au moins vitreux à 70 %, répondant à la formule CoaFebNicMdBeSif dans laquelle les indices sont des pourcentages atomiques et "a" est compris entre
65,5 et 70,5, "b" entre 3,8 et 4,5, "c" entre 0 et 3; "d" entre 1 et 2, "e" entre
10 et 12 et "f" entre 14 et 15 lorsque M est choisi dans le groupe constitué du vanadium,
du chrome, du molybdène, du niobium et du tungstène; lorsque M est le manganèse, "a"
est compris entre 68,0 et 70,0, "b" entre 2,5 et 4,0, "c" entre 0 et 3, "d" entre
1 et 4, "e" entre 10 et 12 et "f" entre 14 et 15, ledit alliage ayant une valeur de
la magnétostriction de saturation comprise entre -1x10-⁶ et +1x10⁻⁶, une température
de Curie comprise entre 245°C et 310°C, une première température de cristallisation
comprise entre 530°C et 575°C et une induction de saturation d'au moins 0,65 Tesla.
2. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co65,7Fe4,4Ni2,9Mo₂B₁₁Si₁₄.
3. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co68,13Fe4,0Ni1,37Mo1,5B₁₀Si₁₅.
4. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co69,6Fe4,4Mo₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
5. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co68,75Fe4,25Mo₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
6. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co69,6Fe4,4Cr₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
7. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co68,75Fe4,25Cr₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
8. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co68,2Fe3,8Mn₁B₁₂Si₁₅.
9. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co67,7Fe3,3Mn₂B₁₂Si₁₅.
10.Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co70,0Fe4,0Mn₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
11. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co69,5Fe3,5Mn₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
12. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co69,0Fe3,0Mn₃B₁₀Si₁₅.
13. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co68,5Fe2,5Mn₄B₁₀Si₁₅.
14. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co69,6Fe4,4V₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
15. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co68,75Fe4,25V₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
16. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co69,6Fe4,4Nb₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
17. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co68,75Fe4,25Nb₂B₁₀Si₁₅.
18. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co69,6Fe4,4W₁B₁₀Si₁₅.
19. Alliage magnétique selon la revendication 1, répondant à la formule Co68,75Fe4,25W₂B₁₀Si₁₅.