Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to a method for corrosion-prevention treatment of metal
surfaces.
Background of the Invention
[0002] There are known several methods for corrosion-prevention treatment of metal surfaces.
A well-known method comprises coating a metal surface with zinc by hot dip plating
or electroplating followed by chromating. Another one is blast zinc plating. There
has further recently been developed a new coating method which consists of projecting
a shot material onto the surface of iron or an iron alloy, said shot material comprising
an aggregate of particles each consisting of a core of iron or an iron alloy and an
undercoat of an iron-zinc alloy and a top coat of zinc or a zinc alloy. (See Japanese
Patent Publication No. 59-9312.) This method is referred to as the improved blast
zinc coating method in this specification.
[0003] This method has several advantages including low equipment cost, less energy consumption,
and least environmental pollution. However, this method does not provide a zinc coating
having sufficient corrosion resistance. For example, a zinc coating with a coating
weight of 100 mg/dm² permits red rust formation within 24 hours in the salt spray
test. Presumably, this is due to the fact that the coating formed by this method is
an iron-zinc alloy.
[0004] Generally speaking, high corrosion resistance is not achieved by the conventional
metal surface treatments such as zinc plating method, zinc-alloy plating method and
the improved blast zinc coating method. In the case where high corrosion resistance
is required, therefore, the treated object must be subjected to an aftertreatment.
[0005] A comparatively simple method of aftertreatment is chromating. If adequate chromating
is effected after the improved blast zinc coating, neither red rust nor white rust
form within 240-1000 hours. (See Japanese Laid open Patent Publication Nos.61-67773
and 2-19477.) Therefore, it is considered that employment of chromating as an aftertreatment
is essential when the improved blast zinc coating method is applied to a metal surface
for corrosion prevention.
[0006] A disadvantage of chromating as an aftertreatment is that a solution containing a
hexavalent chromium compound has to be used, which is detrimental from the viewpoint
of safety and hygiene and a cause of environmental pollution. Hexavalent chromium
compounds have to be handled with great care when used industrially.
[0007] Although considerable research has been conducted in search of an aftertreatment
that provides excellent corrosion resistance, no method has been developed that surpasses
chromating treatment.
[0008] In search of a satisfactory aftertreatment for the improved blast zinc plating, we
conducted intensive studies. As a result, we found a new aftertreatment method which
is comparable to chromating treatment in corrosion prevention effect. Specifically,
it was discovered that it is possible to produce the same effect as chromating by
treating a metallic material to which the improved blast zinc coating has been applied
with an aqueous suspension of silica and an aqueous solution containing ions of at
least one metal selected from Ti, Zr, Mg, Ba, Sr, W, Ni, Co, Sn, Mo, and Mn.
Summary of the Invention
[0009] The present invention provides a method for treating a metal surface which comprises
projecting onto the metal surface a shot-blast particulate material consisting of
a core of iron or an iron alloy, an undercoat of an iron-zinc alloy and a top coat
of zinc or a zinc alloy, thereby forming a coating film of zinc or the zinc alloy
on the metal surface, and contacting the thus coated metal surface with an aqueous
suspension of silica and an aqueous solution of ions of at least one metal selected
among Ti, Zr, Mg, Ba, Sr, W, Ni, Co, Sn, Mo, and Mn.
[0010] The first step of the present invention is the method disclosed in Japanese Patent
Publication No.59-9312 but including improvements thereof.
[0011] The silica used in the present invention may be either precipitated silica or vapor-phase-hydrolyzed
silica. Any silica will do insofar as it forms an aqueous suspension. The aqueous
suspension contains 0.1-20 parts by weight of silica per 100 parts by weight of water.
With an amount of less than 0.1 part by weight, the silica does not form a satisfactory
corrosion prevention film on the surface of the treated object. With an amount in
excess of 20 parts by weight, the silica forms an undesirable thick gelled film on
the surface of the treated object.
[0012] When the object is treated with a neat silica suspension, the suspension is preferably
kept at 5-40C°. With a temperature lower than 5°C, an unpractically long time is required
for drying after the treatment. With a temperature higher than 40°C, the suspension
is liable to cause early gelation of silica.
[0013] The object for treatment should be immersed in the aqueous suspension of silica for
10-25 seconds. Immersion for less than 10 seconds is too short for the suspension
to form a perfect film on the surface of the object. Immersion for longer than 250
seconds is not practical.
[0014] The aqueous solution contains ions of one or more metals selected from among Ti,
Zr, Mg, Ba, Sr, W, Ni, Co, Sn, Mo, and Mn.
[0015] These metal ions may be of any water-soluble metal salt. There is no restriction
on pH of the aqueous solution. Any solution may be used insofar as it is aqueous.
[0016] The aqueous solution should contain 0.01-20 parts by weight of ions per 100 parts
by weight of water. With an amount of less than 0.01 part of ions, an unduly long
time is required for treatment because the reaction is slow. With an amount in excess
of 20 parts by weight, is formed on the surface of the treated object.
[0017] Treatment with the aqueous solution should be conducted at a temperature between
5°C and the boiling point. With a temperature lower than 5°C an unpractically long
time is required for drying after the treatment.
[0018] The object to be treated should be immersed in the aqueous solution for 3-250 seconds.
Immersion for shorter than 3 seconds or longer than 250 seconds is not practical for
the treatment.
[0019] According to the present invention, after the object to be treated has been subjected
to the improved blast zinc coating, it is dipped in the aqueous suspension of silica
and the aqueous solution of metal ions.
[0020] The treatment with the aqueous suspension of silica and the treatment with the aqueous
solution containing metal ions can be conducted simultaneously by using a single medium
containing the two materials. In this case, the treating liquid should be at 5-40°C.
With a temperature lower than 5°C, an unpractically long time is required for drying
after the treatment. With a temperature higher than 40°C, the treating liquid is liable
to cause early gelation of silica.
[0021] The adequate immersion time ranges from 10 to 250 seconds. With an immersion time
shorter than 10 seconds, the treating liquid does not form a perfect film on the surface
of the treated object. Immersion longer than 250 seconds is not practical for the
treatment.
[0022] The treatment may be accomplished by dipping, brushing, or spraying, with dipping
being most practical.
[0023] The method of the present invention, in which the improved blast zinc coating is
combined with the wet surface treatment, is as effective as the chromating treatment,
and yet it does not cause environmental pollution unlike the chromating treatment.
[0024] It is assumed that the effect of the present invention is brought about by the fact
that silica adsorbed on the zinc coating film seals the pores thereof and subsequently
forms an amorphous coating film by combination with the metal ions.
Specific Disclosure of the Invention
[0025] The invention will be described in detail by way of working examples and comparative
examples, which do not restrict the scope of the invention.
[0026] For testing, 100 x 5 x 20 mm mild steel test panels were used. The panels were degreased
with trichloroethane vapor and, thereafter, coated with a zinc-iron alloy by the improved
blast zinc coating method as disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No. 59-9312.
The thus treated test pieces were then subjected to the aftertreatment as described
in the following Examples and Comparative Examples. The resulting test pieces were
subjected to salt spray test as stipulated in JIS Z-23711. The corrosion resistance
of the test pieces were rated by the time until white rust formed.
[0027] For comparison, the aftertreatment was also carried out on a mild steel test piece
measuring 100 x 50 x 2.0 mm, which had been coated with (8 µm thick) zinc by electroplating.
In the following examples, "parts" means "parts by weight".
Example 1
[0028] An aqueous treating suspension was prepared by uniformly dispersing 0.5 part of silica
in 100 parts of deionized water with stirring. An aqueous treating solution was prepared
by dissolving 0.5 part of K₂ZrF₆ (in terms of Zr ions) in 100 parts of deionized water.
The test piece, which had been subjected to the improved blast zinc coating, was immersed
in the aqueous suspension for 30 seconds, followed by drying with warm air. Thereafter,
it was immersed in the aqueous solution for 60 seconds at room temperature, followed
by drying with warm air. The treated test piece was tested for corrosion resistance.
The results are shown in Table 1.
Example 2
[0029] The test piece was coated by brushing with the aqueous suspension of silica prepared
in Example 1, followed by drying with warm air. The test piece was further coated
by brushing with the aqueous solution containing K₂ZrF₆ prepared in Example 1, followed
by drying with warm air. The treated test piece was tested for corrosion resistance.
The results are shown in Table 1.
Example 3
[0030] In 100 parts of deionized water was suspended 5 parts of silica and further 1 part
of Ni(SO₃)₂.4H₂O (in terms of Ni ions) was dissolved therein with stirring. The test
piece, which had been subjected to the improved blast zinc coating, was immersed in
the thus prepared treating liquid for 60 seconds, followed by drying with warm air.
The treated test piece was tested for corrosion resistance. The results are shown
in Table 1.
Example 4
[0031] The test piece was coated by brushing with the treating liquid containing silica
and Ni(SO₃)₂.4H₂O prepared in Example 3, followed by drying with warm air. The treated
test piece was tested for corrosion resistance. The results are shown in Table 1.
Example 5
[0032] In 100 parts of deionized water was suspended 10 parts of silica and also 1 part
of MnCl₂.4H₂O (in terms of Mn ions) was dissolved therein with stirring. The test
piece, which had been subjected to the improved blast zinc coating, was immersed in
the thus prepared treating liquid for 60 seconds, followed by drying with warm air.
The treated test piece was tested for corrosion resistance. The results are shown
in Table 1.
Example 6
[0033] The test piece was coated by brushing with the treating liquid containing silica
and MnCl₂.H₂O prepared in Example 5, followed by drying with warm air. The treated
test piece was tested for corrosion resistance. The results are shown in Table 1.
Example 7
[0034] An aqueous treating suspension was prepared by uniformly dispersing 5 parts of silica
in 100 parts of deionized water with stirring. An aqueous treating solution was prepared
by dissolving 0.5 part of K₂ZrF₆ (in terms of Zr ions) and 5 parts of CoSO₄.8H₂ (in
terms of Co ions) in 100 parts of deionized water. The test piece (which had been
subjected to the improved blast zinc coating, was immersed in the aqueous suspension
for 30 seconds, followed by drying with warm air, and then in the aqueous solution
for 60 seconds at room temperature, followed by drying with warm air. The treated
test piece was tested for corrosion resistance test. The results are shown in Table
1.
Example 8
[0036] The test piece was coated by brushing with the aqueous suspension of silica prepared
in Example 7, followed by drying with warm air. The test piece was further coated
by brushing with the aqueous solution containing K₂ZrF₆ and CoSO₄.8H₂O prepared in
Example 7, followed by drying with warm air. The treated test piece was tested for
corrosion resistance test. The results are shown in Table 1.
Example 9
[0037] An aqueous treating suspension was prepared by uniformly dispersing 15 parts of silica
into 100 parts of deionized water with stirring. An aqueous treating solution was
prepared by dissolving 0.5 part of K₂TiF₆ (in terms of Ti ions) in 100 parts of deionized
water. The test piece, which had been subjected to the improved blast zinc coating,
was dipped in the aqueous suspension for 30 seconds, followed by drying with warm
air, and then in the aqueous solution for 60 seconds at room temperature, followed
by drying with warm air. The treated test piece was tested for corrosion resistance
test. The results are shown in Table 1.
Example 10
[0038] An aqueous treating suspension was prepared by uniformly dispersing 15 parts of silica
in 100 parts of deionized water with stirring. An aqueous treating solution was prepared
by dissolving 0.5 part of MgSO₄.H₂O (in terms of Mg ions), 0.5 part of (NH₄)₆Mo₇O₂₄
(in terms of Mo), and 0.7 part of SrCl₂.6H₂O (in terms of Sr ions) in 100 parts of
deionized water. The test piece, which had been subjected to the improved blast zinc
coating, was immersed in the aqueous suspension for 30 seconds, followed by drying
with warm air, and then immersed in the aqueous solution for 60 seconds at room temperature,
followed by drying with warm air. The treated test piece was tested for corrosion
resistance test. The results are shown in Table 1.
Example 11
[0039] An aqueous treating suspension was prepared by uniformly dispersing 20 parts of silica
in 100 parts of deionized water with stirring. An aqueous treating solution was prepared
by dissolving 0.5 part of SnCl₂ (in terms of Sn ions) and 3 parts of CoSO₄.8H₂O (in
terms of Co ions) in 100 parts of deionized water. The test piece (which had been
subjected to the improved blast zinc coating) was immersed in the aqueous suspension
for 30 seconds, followed by drying with warm air, and then immersed in the aqueous
solution for 60 seconds at room temperature, followed by drying with warm air. The
treated test piece was tested for corrosion resistance. The results are shown in Table
1.
Comparative Example 1
[0040] A treating solution was prepared by uniformly dissolving 1.0 part of chromic anhydride,
0.1 part of sulfuric acid, and 0.1 part of nitric acid in 100 parts of deionized water.
The test piece, which had been subjected to the improved blast zinc coating) was immersed
in the treating solution for 4 seconds, and then allowed to stand in air, washed with
water, and dried with warm air. The treated test piece was tested for corrosion resistance.
The results are shown in Table 1.
Comparative Example 2
[0041] A treating solution was prepared by uniformly dissolving 2.0 parts of chromic anhydride
and 0.1 part of chromium nitrate in 100 parts of deionized water. The test piece which
had been subjected to the improved blast zinc coating, was immersed in the treating
solution for 4 seconds, and then allowed to stand in the air, washed with water, and
dried with warm air. The treated test piece was tested for corrosion resistance. The
results are shown in Table 1.
Comparative Example 3
[0042] A treating solution was prepared by uniformly dissolving 15 parts of t-butanol, 2
parts of chromic anhydride, and 0.01 part of oxalic acid in 100 parts of trichlorofluoroethane.
This solution was boiled under refluxing. The test piece which had been subjected
to the improved blast zinc coating, was immersed in this solution for 60 seconds,
followed by forced drying at 40°C for 3 minutes in fresh air. The treated test piece
was washed with a mixed solvent of trichlorofluoroethane and t-butanol, followed by
drying. The treated test piece was tested for corrosion resistance. The results are
shown in Table 1.
Comparative Example 4
[0043] A treating solution was prepared by uniformly dissolving 1.0 part of tannic acid
in 100 parts of deionized water. The test piece which had been subjected to the improved
blast zinc coating, was immersed in the treating solution at 70°C for 4 seconds, and
allowed to stand in air, washed with water, and dried with warm air. The treated test
piece was tested for corrosion resistance. The results are shown in Table 1.
Comparative Example 5
[0044] The test piece, which had been subjected to the improved blast zinc coating, was
tested for corrosion resistance without chemical conversion being employed. The results
are shown in Table 1.
Comparative Example 6
[0045] The test piece, which had been coated with zinc by electroplating in stead of by
the improved blast zinc coating, was treated with the treating liquid used in Example
1. The treated test piece was tested for corrosion resistance. The results are shown
in Table 1.

1. A method for treating a metal surface which comprises projecting onto a metal surface
a shot-blast particulate material consisting of a core of iron or an iron alloy, an
undercoat of an iron-zinc alloy and a top coat of zinc or a zinc alloy, thereby forming
a coating film of zinc or the zinc alloy on the metal surface, and bringing the thus
coated metal surface into contact with an aqueous suspension of silica and an aqueous
solution containing ions of at least one metal selected among Ti, Zr, Mg, Ba, Sr,
W, Ni, Co, Sn, Mo, and Mn.
2. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the treatment with the aqueous suspension
of silica and the treatment with the aqueous solution containing metal ions are conducted
simultaneously by using a single medium containing both the silica and the metal ions.
3. A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the blast-coated metal surface is treated
sequentially with the aqueous suspension of silica and the aqueous solution containing
metal ions.
4. A method as defined in any of Claims 1 to 3, wherein the aqueous suspension of silica
is consists of 100 parts by weight of water and 0.1-20 parts by weight of silica.
5. A method as defined in any of Claims 1 to 3, wherein the aqueous solution containing
metal ions consists of 100 parts by weight of water and 0.01-20 parts by weight of
metal ions.