[0001] This invention relates to arrays of lenses for focusing thermal infrared radiation,
that is, radiation in the wavelength range 8 to 13 microns. More particularly, it
relates to an array of lenses for directing and concentrating radiation from a plurality
of arcuately displaced directions onto a detector, said lenses being formed as planar
radiation concentrators in a sheet of radiation transmissive material. The lenses
can be moulded in a thin sheet of plastics material, for example, polyethylene. Although
such a material has a relatively poor transmission, absorption loss is low since the
sheet is thin. The planar radiation concentrators would most commonly be fresnel lenses.
However, the focusing action can be obtained from planar diffracting elements such
as zone plates. Such elements can also be moulded in sheet form from a master.
[0002] In European Patent Application 0,197,583 A1 (PHB33155) an array of fresnel lenses,
moulded in planar form, is described for use in an infrared intruder alarm. The passage
of an intruder across any one of the arcuately displaced directions generates a signal
in a detector placed to receive the image of the intruder focused by the associated
lens. Each direction is defined by the line joining the detector to the pole of the
associated lens.
[0003] It is desirable in such an intruder alarm that a single detector should cover directions
over as wide a range of angles as possible for economy in the number of alarms systems
needed to cover any given volume. As the range of angles of the directions becomes
larger, the angle between the normal to the sheet surface and the extreme directions
becomes larger. Consequently there is an increase in radiation lost by reflection
before it can reach the detector, by lens aberrations enlarging the focused image,
deflecting radiation away from the detector, and by off-axis lens aperture reduction.
Typically, when the angle of incidence of radiation on the sheet is 17 degrees, the
lost radiation is half the total. At 33 degrees incidence, the lost radiation is 90
per cent of the total, only 10 per cent reaching the detector.
[0004] In a typical installation, the alarm is mounted high upon a wall to look out into
a volume in directions roughly parallel to the floor. But an intruder may enter the
volume by creeping along close to the wall under the alarm. In this case the direction
to the intruder will be roughly 70 to 80 degrees to the directions looking out into
the protected volume. With a single flat sheet of lenses set at a compromise angle,
the radiation loss from the "creep" zone and from distant sources would both be unacceptably
large.
[0005] However, it is important that the lens array should be a straightforward production
proposition in the interest of cheapness. The making of a steel mould to produce the
plastic sheet lens array will be greatly simplified and cheapened if the array is
composed of a substantially flat sheet.
[0006] In US-A- 4321594 there is described an intruder detection system including a sheet
of plastics material having Fresnel lenses formed therein which direct radiation onto
a detector. In one embodiment the sheet is bent such that two planar portions each
comprising a single lens meet at an oblique angle. In another embodiment, the sheet
comprises three lenses arranged in a line and is curved about an axis perpendicular
to that line. Whilst such bending or curving of the sheet enables the detector to
detect radiation from different directions the range of detection angles possible
is restricted. The detection system in operation could be used to detect radiation
from a plurality of arcuately displaced directions for example generally horizontally
outwards in a plane parallel to the floor but would not be capable of detecting reliably
radiation from other directions especially for example from the creep zone beneath
the detector.
[0007] It is an object of the invention to produce an array of lenses offering a wide range
of detection angles at low radiation loss and yet which is cheap to produce. The invention
provides an array of lenses for directing and concentrating radiation from a plurality
of arcuately displaced directions onto a single detector, said lenses being formed
as planar radiation concentrators in a sheet of radiation transmissive material, characterised
in that the sheet comprises two planar leaves transverse to one another, the planes
of the leaves intersecting at an edge, and in that each leaf comprises a plurality
of planar radiation concentrators. The array of lenses may be characterised in that
the planar radiation concentrators are fresnel lenses.
[0008] In a typical intruder alarm, the two leaves in the intruder alarm would be arranged
so that one leaf is horizontal and the other vertical. By directing the detector typically
some 15 degrees downward, there will then be directions of focused radiation detection
nearly vertically downwards which are nearly normal to the horizontal leaf and other
directions horizontally outwards normal to the vertical leaf. Thus in these two mutually
transverse directions, radiation loss at the associated lenses in the leaves will
be a considerably better compromise. The volumetric coverage of the intruder alarm
with high sensitivity is thereby markedly improved over an alarm having a single flat
sheet of lenses.
[0009] In some embodiments of the invention, portions of a leaf adjacent to the intersecting
edge may be inclined at a substantial angle to the detection directions of those portions.
An alternative array of lenses may be characterised in that a portion of a leaf adjacent
to the edge has zero focusing power and comprises a grating having alternate clear
and opaque strips. The lens loss at the portions near the intersecting edge of the
two leaves may be so large that it may be equally effective to discard the focusing
action of the lens and rely on the interruption of radiation at the detector produced
when the source moves transverse to the grating strips.
[0010] The array of lenses may be characterised in that the focal length of the lenses in
one leaf is substantially less than the focal length of the lenses in the other leaf.
Usually, the vertical distance to the floor under the intruder alarm will be materially
less than the horizontal distance to possible sources out in the room. A more powerful
focusing action is hence desirable for lenses in the horizontal leaf to get an adequate
field of view for each lens. The field of view of a lens is given by the ratio of
the detector size to the lens focal length, that is, the sensitive area of the detector
as projected by the lens into the protected volume.
[0011] So far, lenses providing the function of simple positive lenses have been implied
as the lenses used in the two leaves of the sheet. However, one form of detector which
may be used with the lens array has a separated pair of pyroelectric detector elements
connected to provide a signal related to the difference in radiation incident upon
the two elements. A choice now has to be made as to the direction of separation of
the elements in relation to the expected direction of source movement. Looking out
into the volume, it will usually be desirable to have a horizontal separation of the
elements so that horizontal source movement across the line of sight will produce
a large difference in signal as the source image passes off one element and onto the
other. However, in the case of an intruder entering the volume by a door (or window)
vertically beneath the intruder alarm, the focused image will then move at right angles
to the line of separation of the detectors and there will be little change in the
radiation falling on the elements. To cope with this situation the array of lenses
may be characterised in that the lenses in a leaf comprise cylindrical lenses having
focusing power in one direction only, the cylinder axes of these lenses being inclined
at an angle to the edge. The image of a source is now a concentrated line of radiation,
parallel to the cylinder axis of the lens, which falls across the pair of detector
elements at an angle. Movement of the source in any direction, except parallel to
the cylinder axis, now produces some change in the difference radiation falling on
the element pair.
[0012] To make it more difficult for an intruder to find a movement direction which does
not produce a change in radiation on the detector, the array of lenses may be characterised
in that the lenses in a leaf are arranged in rows parallel to the edge, and in that
each lens in one row is adjacent the junction between a pair of adjacent lenses in
an adjacent row. The arcuately displaced directions are now more interleaved and difficult
to penetrate.
[0013] To further reduce the angle of incidence of the incoming radiation on the lenses,
the array of lenses may be characterised in that a leaf is formed with facets lying
in the plane of the leaf, in that each facet is set at an angle to the plane of the
leaf and in that each facet comprises a lens. With a facet directed at the intended
location of the detector, even though not normal to the associated direction, the
angle of incidence can be materially reduced with consequent improvement in the amount
of radiation reaching the detector.
[0014] According to another aspect the invention comprises a radiation source detection
apparatus comprising a radiation detector set between the two leaves of an array of
lenses as disclosed above, to receive focused radiation from the two leaves.
[0015] Furthermore, the apparatus may be characterised in that the radiation detector comprises
two separated detector elements connected to provide an output signal related to the
difference in radiation incident upon the two elements.
[0016] Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference
to the accompanying drawings in which,
Figure 1 shows a typical infrared intruder alarm installed over a window of a room,
Figure 2 shows the external view of the alarm of Figure 1 in more detail,
Figure 3 shows an inside view of the Figure 2 alarm with the detector in its designed
location,
Figure 4 shows the total effective radiation received by the detector as a function
of the off-axis angle of a fresnel lens,
Figure 5 shows a cross-section of one possible arrangement of lenses in the leaves
of the sheet,
Figure 6 shows the radiation sensitive directions obtained using the Figure 3 sheet
of lenses,
Figure 7 shows an array of lenses having angled facets in the leaves,
Figure 8 shows two rows of alternated lenses in a leaf of the array,
Figure 9 shows the formation of a line image by a cylindrical lens angled to the line
of separation of the pair of elements,
Figure 10 shows a horizontal leaf of a lens array having cylindrical lenses, and
Figure 11 shows an alternative array of two rows of cylindrical lenses.
[0017] Referring to Figure 1, an infrared intruder alarm 1 is shown installed over a window
2 so as to look out into the volume of a room 3 and also to look downwards across
the plane of the window to a region 5 immediately in front of the skirting board 4.
Figure 2 shows an underneath perspective view of the alarm 1 of Figure 1 and Figure
3 shows an inside view of an alarm having an alternative arrangement of lenses with
a detector 6 in the designed location. Radiation is received by the detector 6 from
a plurality of arcuately displaced directions, such as directions 7, 8, 9, 10 and
11. Each direction is defined by the line joining the pole 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 of
an associated fresnel lens to the detector 6. The lenses are formed in a sheet 17
of radiation transmissive material. The sheet 17 comprises two planar leaves, 18 and
19, transverse to one another, the planes of the leaves intersecting at an edge 20.
Each lens may occupy an arbitrarily shaped area and the pole of each lens may be located
anywhere in the sheet. Normally the pole of a lens will be located within the area
of that lens, but may be outside the lens area if it is desired to have a prismatic
deflecting effect on the incoming radiation for a particular direction. In Figures
2 and 3 only a few of the annular zones of each lens are shown for clarity. Figure
3 shows a lip 32 used for mounting the sheet 17 in the alarm. An important property
of the flat leaves transverse to one another is that the moulding tool can be made
adapted to produce a range of lens arrays having various sizes of the two leaves.
Further, the sheet folded in this way has much improved mechanical rigidity, allowing
simple mounting by the lip 32 to the alarm housing to obtain a rigid window with a
good seal against dust, etc.
[0018] Each of the two leaves comprises a plurality of fresnel lenses, in this embodiment
arranged in parallel rows to provide corresponding rows of arcuately displaced directions.
In the centre of the top row 21 of the vertical leaf 18, the directions defined by
the detector 6 and poles of the lenses are nearly normal to the plane of the lenses.
In successively lower rows 22 and 23 the angles between the directions and the normal
to the sheet become progressively greater, the more so towards the ends of each row.
The amount of radiation reaching the limited sensitive area of the detector falls
off with increasing angle between a lens normal and the defined direction due to three
separate factors. The total reduction in detected radiation is given by the product
of these three factors.
[0019] The first factor is the geometrical reduction in effective collecting area, that
is the effective area within the rim of the lens. This reduction factor is given by
cos x where x is the angle in degrees between the lens normal and the defined direction
for that lens. The second factor is the loss of radiation by reflection at the front
and back surfaces of the sheet which also increases with increasing x. The third factor
is the degradation of the quality of the image produced by a tilted lens due to the
aberrations of a lens working off-axis. The effect is always to enlarge the image
with increasing off-axis angles, throwing radiation off the sensitive area of the
detector. It must be presumed that the source image on axis just fills the detector
sensitive area.
[0020] Figure 4 shows the total effective radiation received R at the detector due to the
product of the above three factors as a function of the off-axis angle in degrees.
It will be seen that the radiation is halved at 17 degrees off axis, but is reduced
to only 10 per cent at twice this angle.
[0021] Thus, an attempt to provide vertical directions in the region 5 of Figure 1 as well
as the horizontal directions with a single vertical sheet would be difficult without
incurring prohibitive radiation loss. But by providing a second, horizontal leaf of
the sheet in accordance with the invention, the directions from the detector into
region 5 can be much more nearly normal to the sheet, greatly enhancing the amount
of radiation detected in the near vertical directions by reducing the amount of radiation
lost by reason of the three factors mentioned above.
[0022] It must be noted that another factor which reduces the radiation received by the
detector is the effective collection area of the detector as a function of the angle
between the normal to the detector and the chief ray of the incident cone of focused
radiation. However, the reduction factor is the cosine of the above angle so that
even when this angle is 45 degrees, the apparent area is still 70 per cent. Thus the
fact that the detector normal may be inclined at as much as 45 degrees to a leaf of
fresnel lenses only incurs a small penalty.
[0023] The loss in radiation when a fresnel lens, in particular, is working at large angles
off-axis, such as 40 to 45 degrees, is so large that it may be as well to discard
the lens and replace it by a simple grating of alternate clear and opaque strips as
is shown at 24 in Figure 2. As a source of radiation moves transverse to the strips,
there will be a fluctuation in radiation incident on the detector as the shadow of
the grating cast by the source passes over the detector. The grating strips are shown
in Figure 2 oriented to best detect motion parallel to the edge 20. But the strips
can be set parallel to or at any angle to the edge to detect source motion in other
directions.
[0024] Figure 5 shows an alternative cross-section of the leaves of the sheet of fresnel
lenses. In Figure 5, the horizontal leaf 19 has only one row of large aperture lenses
25, but the vertical leaf 18 has two rows of lenses 26, 27 and a grating 28 where
the angle of incidence on the leaf is large. In this particular embodiment of the
invention, the focal length of the lenses in the vertical leaf is smaller than that
of the lenses in the horizontal sheet to produce an intruder alarm which is more compact
in the horizontal direction away from the wall.
[0025] Figure 6 shows the angular range of radiation sensitive zones, in the vertical plane,
obtained using the Figure 3 sheet of lenses in an alarm installed 2 metres above the
floor. The three rows of lenses in the horizontal leaf produce the zones 29, 30 and
31. Zone 29, covering region 5 of Figure 1, is about 0.5 metres away from the wall
at floor level. Thus the "creep" zone is at 70 to 80 degrees down from the horizontal.
[0026] Figure 8 shows an alternative layout of the lenses in the horizontal leaf. Three
rows of lenses 47, 48 and 49 are shown parallel to the edge 20. Each lens 50 in one
row is adjacent the junction between a pair of adjacent lenses 51 and 52 in the other
row. The arcuately displaced directions defined by the poles of the lenses and the
detector are now more interleaved and it is more difficult for an intruder to find
a direction of motion which will avoid crossing a direction and generating a signal.
[0027] The high angles of incidence on some lenses of the array can be reduced to a considerable
extent, while preserving the essentially flat form of the leaves of the sheet, as
shown in Figure 7, by forming the leaves with facets 33 to 44 lying in the planes
of the leaves. Each facet is set at an angle to the plane of the leaf so as to direct
the normal to the facet more towards the design position of the detector 45. Each
facet may contain one or more lenses 46, three lenses being shown in this example.
[0028] The infrared detector used in conjunction with the array of lenses to form a radiation
source detection apparatus may be a single element pyroelectric detector, such as
Philips type number RPY 100 (Trade Mark) having a single detector element 2mm by 1mm
in size. Alternatively a dual element detector may be used, such as Philips type number
RPW 100 having two elements 2mm by 1mm side by side with long sides adjacent separated
by a 1mm gap. The elements in this dual type of detector are connected to provide
a signal indicating the difference in radiation incident upon the two elements. Thus
a signal will be produced as the image of a source passes off one element and onto
the other. Motion of a source image along the gap between the elements will not produce
a signal. The lenses in the array can, however, be cylindrical lenses having focusing
power only in planes at right angles to the cylinder axis and Figures 9 and 10 show
how source motion can be detected using such a cylindrical lens in conjunction with
a dual element. Figure 9 shows a cylindrical fresnel lens 53 forming a line image
57 of a small source on a dual element detector 55. Figure 9 shows how the cylinder
axis of the lens can be set at an angle to the detector separation so that the line
image falls at an angle across the detector pair. Motions 58 and 59 across and along
the dual detector 55 produce a change in radiation difference on the two elements
as the line image moves off the end of one element of the pair but remains on the
other element.
[0029] Figure 10 shows a horizontal leaf 19 of an array of lenses having two rows 60, 61
of cylindrical fresnel lenses. The cylinder axes 62, 63 are set at an angle to the
edge 20, adjacent lens axes being at opposite angles. Additionally the lenses in row
60 are each adjacent the junction of a pair of adjacent lenses in row 61. Thus a pattern
of linear zones is provided which makes the monitored volume difficult to penetrate
without generating a signal. In practical embodiments the cylinder axes 62,63 would
be set at angles between 20 and 45 degrees to the edge 64 of the leaf.
[0030] Since in a cylindrical lens there is focusing power in only one direction, the aperture
of the lens in a direction parallel to the cylinder axis need only be large enough
to ensure that all parts of the detector can receive radiation arriving undeviated
from all parts of the typical source. Referring to Figure 9 the largest dimension
of the detector pair is the diagonal, which, for the RPW 100 detector mentioned above,
is 3.6 mm. Allowing for a typical source size, a human head and shoulders, at the
typical detection range of a few metres, the lens need only be some 5 mm. wide in
the axis direction in this example. In the transverse direction having focusing power,
the lens aperture would, for example, be large enough to provide F/1 power. With,
for example, a focal length of 12 mm, the lens aperture would be 12 mm. in the direction
transverse to the cylinder axis. Such a lens forms a line image 5 mm. long of the
source, sufficient to illuminate the detector fully when aligned in the direction
associated with that lens.
[0031] Figure 11 shows an alternative array of two parallel rows 65,66 of cylindrical lenses
in a leaf 67. The apertures of the lenses are rectangles, all of equal width, with
a length to width ratio of typically 12 to 5 in the above example. The cylinder axis
68 of each lens is parallel to the rectangle width. The rectangles in any one row
are of equal length, the long sides 69 of the rectangles in a row abutting one another
at an angle of 45 degrees to the row length defined by the aligned rectangle centres
70. The long sides of the rectangles in row 65 are at right angles to the long sides
of the rectangles in adjacent row 66. The serrated edges of the two rows of lens apertures
nest with one another in the manner of parquet tiles on a floor, making full use of
the leaf area for lens apertures. It should be noted that to achieve nesting of the
serrated edges of adjacent rows, it is only necessary that rectangle widths in all
rows be equal and that the rectangle lengths in any one row be equal. Adjacent rows
can have different rectangle lengths and hence the lens apertures of adjacent rows
can be different.
[0032] Alternatively a single row of rectangular aperture cylindrical lenses may be used
with the long sides of the rectangle abutting one another at an angle other than 45
degrees to the row length. Larger rectangular apertures may then be possible so that,
for example, the length of the line image can be greater, affording a wider detection
zone in the direction parallel to the cylinder axis.
1. An array of lenses for directing and concentrating radiation from a plurality of arcuately
displaced directions onto a single detector (6), said lenses being formed as planar
radiation concentrators (e.g. 12 to 16) in a sheet (17) of radiation transmissive
material, characterised in that the sheet (17) comprises two planar leaves (18,19)
transverse to one another, the planes of the leaves intersecting at an edge (20),
and in that each leaf comprises a plurality of planar radiation concentrators.
2. An array of lenses as claimed in Claim 1 characterised in that the planar radiation
concentrators are fresnel lenses.
3. An array of lenses as claimed in Claim 1 or Claim 2, characterised in that a portion
of a leaf adjacent to the edge (20) has zero focusing power and comprises a grating
(24) having alternate clear and opaque strips.
4. An array of lenses as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, characterised in
that the focal length of the lenses in one leaf is substantially less than the focal
length of the lenses in the other leaf.
5. An array of lenses as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, characterised in
that the lenses in a leaf are arranged in rows (e.g. 21 to 23) parallel to the edge
(20), and in that each lens in one row is adjacent the junction between a pair of
adjacent lenses in an adjacent row.
6. An array of lenses as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, characterised in
that the lenses in a leaf (19) comprise cylindrical lenses having focusing power in
one direction only, the cylinder axes (62,63) of these lenses being inclined at an
angle to the edge (20).
7. An array of lenses as claimed in Claim 6, characterised in that the apertures of the
cylindrical lenses in a leaf (67) are rectangular, in that the cylinder axis (68)
of each lens is parallel to the short side of the rectangle, in that a row of lenses
is formed in the leaf with the long sides (69) of the rectangles abutting one another
at an angle to the row length.
8. An array of lenses as claimed in Claim 7, characterised in that the rectangles are
of equal width, in that parallel rows of lenses are formed in the leaf with the rectangles
in any one row of equal length, in that the rectangle sides are at 45 degrees to the
row length, and in that the long sides of the rectangles of one row are at right angles
to the long sides of the rectangles of an adjacent row, the serrated edges of adjacent
rows nesting with one another.
9. An array of lenses as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, characterised in
that a leaf is formed with facets (33 to 38: 39 to 44) lying in the plane of the leaf,
in that each facet is set at an angle to the plane of the leaf, and in that each facet
comprises a lens.
10. A radiation source detection apparatus comprising a single radiation detector (6)
set between the two leaves (18,19) of an array of lenses as claimed in any one of
Claims 1 to 8 inclusive, to receive focused radiation from the two leaves.
11. A radiation source detection apparatus comprising a radiation detector set between
the two leaves of an array of lenses as claimed in Claim 9, to receive focused radiation
from the two leaves, and the facets in the leaves being directed at the detector.
12. A radiation source detection apparatus as claimed in Claim 10 or Claim 11, characterised
in that the radiation detector comprises two separated detector elements connected
to provide an output signal related to the difference in radiation incident upon the
two elements.
1. Linsenfeld zur Lenkung und Konzentration von Strahlung aus einer Vielzahl von bogenförmig
versetzten Richtungen auf einen einzelnen Detektor (6), wobei die genannten Linsen
als plane Strahlungskonzentratoren in einer Platte (17) aus strahlungsdurchlässigem
Material gebildet sind (beispielsweise 12 bis 16), dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Platte (17) zwei plane, quer zueinander liegende Folien (18, 19) umfaßt,
wobei die Ebenen der Folien sich in einer Kante (20) schneiden, und daß jede Folie
eine Vielzahl von planen Strahlungskonzentratoren umfaßt.
2. Linsenfeld nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die planen Strahlungskonzentratoren Fresnel-Linsen sind.
3. Linsenfeld nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß ein der Kante (20) benachbarter Teil einer Folie eine Brechkraft von null aufweist
und ein Gitter (24) mit abwechselnd durchlässigen und undurchlässigen Streifen umfaßt.
4. Linsenfeld nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Brennweite der Linsen in der einen Folie wesentlich kleiner ist als die
Brennweite der Linsen in der anderen Folie.
5. Linsenfeld nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Linsen in einer Folie parallel zur Kante (20) in Reihen angeordnet sind
und daß jede Linse in einer der Reihen neben der Verbindung zwischen einem Paar in
einer benachbarten Reihe nebeneinanderliegender Linsen liegt.
6. Linsenfeld nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Linsen in einer Folie (19) Zylinderlinsen mit Brechkraft in nur einer Richtung
umfassen, wobei die Zylinderachsen (62, 63) dieser Linsen zur Kante (20) in einem
Winkel geneigt sind.
7. Linsenfeld nach Anspruch 6, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Öffnungen der Zylinderlinsen in einer Folie (67) rechteckig sind, daß die
Zylinderachse (68) jeder Linse parallel zur kurzen Seite des Rechtecks liegt, daß
eine Reihe von Linsen in der Folie so gebildet ist, daß die langen Seiten (69) der
Rechtecke in einem Winkel zur Reihenlänge aneinanderstoßen.
8. Linsenfeld nach Anspruch 7, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Rechtecke die gleiche Breite haben, daß in der Folie parallele Reihen von
Linsen so gebildet sind, daß die Rechtecke in jeder einzelnen Reihe die gleiche Länge
haben, daß die Rechteckseiten mit der Reihenlänge einen Winkel von 45 Grad bilden
und daß die langen Seiten der Rechtecke einer einzelnen Reihe mit den langen Seiten
der Rechtecke einer danebenliegenden Reihe einen rechten Winkel bilden, wobei die
gezackten Kanten benachbarter Reihen ineinandergreifen.
9. Linsenfeld nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß eine Folie mit in der Ebene der Folie liegenden Facetten (33 bis 38: 39 bis
44) gebildet wird, daß jede Facette auf einen Winkel zur Ebene der Folie eingestellt
ist und daß jede Facette eine Linse umfaßt.
10. Strahlungsquellen-Detektiervorrichtung mit einem einzelnen Strahlungsdetektor (6),
der zwischen den beiden Folien (18, 19) eines Linsenfeldes nach einem der Ansprüche
1 bis 8 angeordnet ist, um fokussierte Strahlung aus den beiden Folien zu empfangen.
11. Strahlungsquellen-Detektiervorrichtung mit einem Strahlungsdetektor, der zwischen
den beiden Folien eines Linsenfeldes nach Anspruch 9 angeordnet ist, um fokussierte
Strahlung aus den beiden Folien zu empfangen, wobei die Facetten in den Folien auf
den Detektor gerichtet sind.
12. Strahlungsquellen-Detektiervorrichtung nach Anspruch 10 oder 11, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der Strahlungsdetektor zwei separate Detektorelemente umfaßt, die so verbunden
sind, daß sie ein mit dem Unterschied der auf die beiden Elemente einfallenden Strahlung
zusammenhängendes Ausgangssignal liefern.
1. Ensemble de lentilles conçu pour orienter et concentrer du rayonnement provenant d'une
pluralité de directions disposées en forme d'arc sur un seul détecteur (6), lesdites
lentilles étant formées comme concentrateurs de rayonnement planaires (par exemple
12 à 16) dans une feuille (17) en matériau transmettant le rayonnement, caractérisé
en ce que la feuille (17) comporte deux feuillets planaires (18, 19), s'étendant transversalement
l'un à l'autre, les plans des feuillets s'entrecoupant à un bord (20), et en ce que
chaque feuillet comporte une pluralité de concentrateurs de rayonnement planaires.
2. Ensemble de lentilles selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les concentrateurs
de rayonnement planaires sont des lentilles Fresnel.
3. Ensemble de lentilles selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce qu'une partie
d'un feuillet contiguë au bord (20) présente une puissance de focalisation de zéro
et comporte un réseau (24) présentant des bandes claires alternant avec des bandes
opaques.
4. Ensemble de lentilles selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé
en ce que la longueur focale des lentilles insérées dans l'un des deux feuillets est
sensiblement inférieure à celle des lentilles présentes dans l'autre feuillet.
5. Ensemble de lentilles selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé
en ce que les lentilles présentes dans un feuillet sont disposées en rangées (par
exemple 21 à 23) s'étendant parallèlement au bord (20), et en ce que chaque lentille
dans une rangée est contiguë à la jonction entre une paire de lentilles voisines située
dans une rangée voisine.
6. Ensemble de lentilles selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé
en ce que les lentilles incorporées dans un feuillet (19) comportent des lentilles
cylindriques ne présentant une puissance de focalisation que dans une seule direction,
les axes cylindriques (62, 63) desdites lentilles étant inclinés sous un certain angle
par rapport au bord (20).
7. Ensemble de lentilles selon la revendication 6, caractérisé en ce que les ouvertures
des lentilles cylindriques insérées dans un feuillet (67) sont rectangulaires, en
ce que l'axe cylindrique (68) de chaque lentille s'étend parallèlement au côté court
du rectangle, et en ce qu'une rangée de lentilles est formée dans le feuillet de façon
que les côtés longs (69) du rectangle appuient les uns contre les autres sous un certain
angle par rapport à la longueur de rangée.
8. Ensemble de lentilles selon la revendication 7, caractérisé en ce que les rectangles
présentent la même taille, en ce que des rangées de lentilles parallèles sont formées
dans le feuillet de façon que les rectangles d'une rangée quelconque présentent la
même longueur, en ce que les côtés de rectangle s'étendent sous un angle de 45° par
rapport à la longueur de rangée et en ce que les côtés longs des rectangles d'une
rangée s'étendent perpendiculairement aux côtés longs des rectangles d'une rangée
voisine, les bords serrés de rangées voisines s'emboîtant mutuellement.
9. Ensemble de lentilles selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé
en ce qu'il est formé un feuillet présentant des facettes (33 à 38 ; 39 à 44) se situant
dans le plan du feuillet, en ce que chaque facette est ajustée sur un angle par rapport
au plan du feuillet et en ce que chaque facette comporte une lentille.
10. Appareil de détection de source de rayonnement comportant un seul détecteur de rayonnement
(6) disposé entre les deux feuillets (18, 19) d'un ensemble de lentilles comme revendiqué
dans l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 8 de manière à recevoir du rayonnement
focalisé provenant des deux feuillets.
11. Appareil de détection de source de rayonnement comportant un détecteur de rayonnement
disposé entre les deux feuillets d'un ensemble de lentilles comme revendiqué dans
la revendication 9 de manière à recevoir du rayonnement focalisé provenant des deux
feuillets, et les facettes des feuillets étant orientées vers le détecteur.
12. Appareil de détection de source de rayonnement selon la revendication 10 ou 11, caractérisé
en ce que le détecteur de rayonnement comporte deux éléments détecteurs individuels
connectés de manière à fournir un signal de sortie représentant la différence en rayonnement
tombant sur les deux éléments.